FALL 2019 TONY VANNOY JORDAN ZANIER INTEGRATIVE
LEARN + CREATE CENTRE (LCC)
A CENTER FOR OPPORTUNITY, CREATIVITY, AND LEARNING IN DETROIT’S EASTERN MARKET.
TABLE OF CONTENTS TOPIC PROJECT BRIEF NARRATIVE PROJECT PROGRAM PROJECT - SITE - Climate Analysis - Legal Description + Zoning - Urban Scale - Site Photos - Immediate Context - Ecology + Natural Systems OCCUPANCY - Occupancy Classification /Occupant Loads, Construction Type, Building Height + Area SUCCESS CRITERIA MASSING SCHEMES - Development Version 1, 2, 3 - Final FAB CITY GLOBAL INITIATIVE - The Problem - The Solution - Our Impact - Example of what the Fab Lab could Produce STRUCTURAL SYSTEM - Structural System Selection - Structural Layout MECHANICAL SYSTEM - Mechanical System Selection - Mechanical System Diagram + Floor-to-Floor PLUMBING SIZING AND ACCESSIBLE LAYOUT PROJECT WATER PLANNING - The Importance of Stormwater Management - Relationship to Local Issues - Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) Pipeline Proposal PASSIVE STRATEGIES DIAGRAM - Passive Strategies Diagram - Passive Strategies Specifics WALL SECTION - Wall Section: Opaque - Wall Section: Transparent/Translucent EXTERIOR MATERIAL PALETTE 360 DEGREE PANORAMAS
PAGE NUMBER 03. 04. 05.
12. 17. 18. 22.
33. 35. 43. 44.
54. 56. 58. 59.
PROJECT BRIEF + NARRATIVE PROJECT DRIVERS:
PROJECT LOCATION: 1825 Division St, Detroit MI
GROSS SQ FOOTAGE: 30,000 sq ft
CLIMATE ZONE: ASHRAE Climate Zone 5
This project seeks to serve its community by being a space for creativity, learning, and experimentation, while strictly reflecting the future needs of Detroit. Doing so will result in not only a profound positive impact on the city, but one that will easily endure 50+ years into the future. Detroit is currently undergoing a massive evolution with the project known as the Detroit Future City Plan. Also known as the DFC Strategic Framework, it is a “50-year vision for the City of Detroit developed with input from more than 100,000 Detroiters” (DFC). With this plan, the city is being massively redefined with a variety of developments already in planning. It is our hope that with this project, it will be identified as an additional but vital constituent of the overall framework.
EDUCATE
INTEGRATE
BUILDING TYPE: Non-Traditional Library combined with Fabrication Labratory
UTILIZE
With studies of DFC zoning, the project site and neighboring context will be converted to a LIVE+MAKE zoning classification in the future, while preserving the currently existing Eastern Market and Dequindre Cut. This is where our program derives from. Partnering with the Fab City Global Initiative, this project seeks to be Detroit’s central hub for the movement through the implementation of a Fabrication Laboratory (Fab Lab) in the program. This stems from the eventual goal of making the city locally productive and globally connected, by providing a centralized space for making/ creating with locally-harvested resources/materials. As stated by the Fab City Global Initiative Website, the current industrial economy, “operates on a linear model of importing products and producing waste”. This needs to be remodeled to a “spiral innovation ecosystem in which materials flow inside cities and information on how things are made circulates globally”. In turn the Fab City Global Initiative seeks to build a, “new economy based on distributed data and manufacturing infrastructure”. Historically Detroit is known as once being a central source of manufacturing, as well as a hub for innovation, and product distribution in the form of the automobile. This resulted in its other name being the Motor City. With technology developing, Detroit should evolve its heritage with a data-driven focus and through incorporating Fabrication Laboratories. This in turn will cut down carbon emissions being released into the atmosphere through transportation, factories, and harvesting while also promoting the city of Detroit to produce its own resources. By implementing a “Fab-Lab” creator space, it can be geared towards educating the youth, job training for young adults, and a collaborative work space for the community to use and enjoy. It will also, as previously mentioned, align and promote the Eastern Market’s/ neighboring context’s Live+Make DFC zoning classification in 2050. Denoting the Eastern Market as a breeding ground for makers and entrepreneurs will give an edge to this neighborhood in the coming years. By having our program promote making and material independence via digital fabrication such as CNC, Laser/Water Jet Cutting, and 3D printing, we will be helping the district flourish as a Live+Make Hub in the city in the coming years. This will also help to create digital fabrication jobs that the city will be relying on in the decades to come. Additionally the project is taking advantage of another development in the DFC Strategic Framework, being the Joe Louis Greenway. The greenway will be a massive bike/pedestrian connection spanning a large chunk of Detroit, a portion of it being the Dequindre Cut located beside the project site. Thus the project intends to emphasize its connection between the Eastern Market and the Joe Louis Greenway, by treating its main entry as an active central hub and anchor point. This will hopefully promote connections between the Live+Make zone and the much larger Greenway.
GREEN STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE PIPELINE
Lastly the project seeks to benefit its immediate context by addressing a prevalent issue in Detroit, that shall be partially tackled by the Future City Plan. One of the major environmental issues in the city, especially for the Eastern Market, is the inadequacy of its storm water management and resulting sewage overflow. As described by the City of Detroit Website: “the sewer system in Detroit is a combined sewer system -- it carries both storm-water runoff and sanitary sewage. During wet weather, too much storm-water can overload the combined system. This might cause basement backups, street flooding, and polluted wastewater to flow into the Rouge River, the Detroit River, and eventually, Lake Erie”. As part of the DFC Framework includes implementing shared Green Storm-water Infrastructure (GSI’s). The project plans to focus on storm-water collection of both itself and its immediate context to aid with the sewage overflow issue, to lower run-off tax costs of the neighboring context, and to utilize it for water fixtures and rain gardens.
PROJECT PROGRAM SPACE-FUNCTION
AREA
ADDITIONAL PROGRAM = FABRICATION LABORATORY
Adult Print Collection Youth Print Collection Periodicals Non-print Media
5,000SF 2,500SF 500SF 500SF 8,500SF
GROSS SQ FOOTAGE - 5545 SF
Approximately 150 seats See below. Work / Study Carrels 2- and 4-seat tables Lounge Seating CPU Workstations Café Tables / Bar Seating Children’s Seating Main Service Desk and Check-out Book Drop Reference Desk / Tech. Services Youth Service Desk Stand-up CPUs
Youth Programs Space Tutoring Rooms Small Meeting Rooms Conference-Style Room Community Meeting Room Kitchenette Storage
30SF/occ. 25SF/occ. 35SF/occ. 45SF/occ. 20SF/occ. 20SF/occ. 5,000SF 200SF 50SF 100SF 100SF 20SF/occ. (200SF) 650SF 350SF 50SF/ea. (100SF) 100SF/ea. (200SF) 250SF 750SF 50SF 100SF 1,800SF
Director Office Staff Work Room Receiving, Waste, Bulk Storage Staff Lounge + Kitchenette Staff Restroom
150SF 500SF 200SF 150 SF 50SF 1,050SF
Main Entry Vestibule Public Restrooms Family Restroom Elevator Stairs Mechanical Equipment Room Electrical Equipment Room Data-Comms. Closet Corridors, Wall Thicknesses, etc.
100SF TBD TBD 200SF TBD TBD TBD 25SF NA 20-30% Building Area
DIVISION ST LEVEL
THE FAB-FAB COMPRISES OF THE FOLLOWING PROGRAMS: Maker Shop/Loading Bay Fab-Lab 3D Print Stations Classroom 1 Classroom 2 Classroom 3 Technician Office Open Collab. Space Material Storage
8
1 G-021
2836 SF 240 SF 370 SF 254 SF 882 SF 186 SF 425 SF 352 SF
7 1 6
5 1 G-022
4 3 2
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Maker Shop/Loading Bay -Main area for loading materials. -Production using hand tools, standard shop tools, table saw, CNC Mill, and Laser Cutter. -Tables situated for small groups or individual use. Fab-Lab 3D Print Stations: Computer Stations and 3D printers available for individual use or technician use. Classroom 1, 2: -Smaller classrooms intended for small group, children, and young teens. -Classrooms have “tech carts” with IPads and laptops for technical classes and digital learning. Classroom 3: -Larger Classroom intended for larger groups, teens, and adults. - Classroom is outfitted with a projector. - Classroom has ‘tech carts” with iPads and laptops for technical classes, seminars, digital learning, and certification training. Technician Office: -Personal desk space for the 2 shop technicians and a digital fabrication technician. Open Collab. Space: -Open collaboration space designed to house medium size groups of children, young adults, and teens. -Space allows for hands-on learning which includes small tools for model making and other design exercises. -Open to the main hall and engaging with those passing by. Material Storage: -Space designed for the storage of large sheet material, lumber, and other building and making materials.
1
A.1 D
C
B
OUTLINE OF BUILDING ABOVE
1 A
G-030
G-029
PROJECT SITE - CLIMATE ANALYSIS True south facing facades allow for maximum solar heat gain in the winter while being shaded by light shelves which not only protect from over lighting in the summer but allow for light to penetrate deep into the space during the high sun of summer.
Average Monthly Temperatures in Detroit
Average Monthly Precipitation in Detroit
4.0
LEGEND
100
RECORDED HIGH DESIGN HIGH AVERAGE HIGH MEAN AVERAGE LOW DESIGN LOW RECORDED LOW -
90
3.5
80
3.0
70
2.5
COMFORT ZONE SUMMER WINTER
60
(At 50% Relative Humidity) 50
2.0
40
1.5
30
1.0
20 10
0.5
0
0.0
N
W
March Equinox
c
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Annual
De
No v
t
Jan
N
E
S
Oc
Se p
g Au
l Ju
n Ju
ay M
r Ap
ar M
Fe b
n
-10
Ja
Inches
One of the major environmental issues we are going to solve with out design is the problem Detroit as a city, especially Eastern Market, has with storm water management. Our design proposes to collect, use, and manage all the storm water on our site through passive systems such as planting native grasses as well as taking a more active approach and using it for plumbing fixtures and irrigation. We also propose to collect and harvest the rain water from the surrounding buildings to not only help with the issue with sewage overflow but also help alleviate business owners of the rain water run off tax.
SITE PLANNING, BUILDING PLANNING AND CODES
W
N
E
S
June Sols�ce
W
N
E
S
Sepetember Equinox
W
E
S
December Sols�ce
5
PROJECT SITE - LEGAL DESCRIPTION + ZONING
SITE PLANNING, BUILDING PLANNING AND CODES
PROJECT ZONING PER CITY ZONING CODE - M3 – GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
QU DE RE
IND
PARCEL SIZE - 13 662 SQ FT (138’-0” X 99’-0”) - NO MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONS/COVERAGE - MAX AREA PER SINGLE FLOOR = 45 000 sqft
EN
RE
TG
CU
PARCEL SETBACKS - 20 FT OFF NORTH SECTION OF PARCEL -> FIRE CODE -SIDEWALK TO SOUTH = 10 FT - OFF-STREET PARKING -PROHIBITED B/W STREET AND FRONT
ARTICLE XIII DIVISION I SUB-DIVISION E SEC. 61-1^3-44
Y WA
HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS: - 80’- 0” [AS PER M3 ZONING] - 85’ - 0” [AS PER TYPE IV - HT, Spr.] STUDIO COMPANION Pg. 399 OCCUPANCY: A3
FAÇADE CONDITIONAL ZONING OR OVERLAYS -Not specified EASEMENTS - Telephone Poles - South-West Corner - North-West Corner - Two Fire Hydrants - [Both across Division St.] - Centre of Site - South West Corner SHARED FEATURES - Alley on shared West side - Dequindre Cut sharing East Side beside bank with height of 15’-0” - Abandoned meat packing building sharing North Facade - will be converted to Retail - Parking (except Handicap) to be relocated to lot across Division St overpass
T. S N
IO
S DIV
6
PROJECT SITE ANALYSIS - URBAN SCALE
SITE PLANNING, BUILDING PLANNING AND CODES
PROPOSED JOE LOUIS GREENWAY PROJECT SITE
77
80
68
The Eastern Market, and immediate context has been dealing with severe rain and thunder storms for the past few years. Much of this water flows into the city’s combined sewer system which frequently leads to sewage overflow into the city’s clean potable water. Being that the Eastern Market Neighborhood is nearly 80% impervious surface, it is crucial that this design addresses these needs of the community. It should also be noted how the zoning of the region is going to change with the development of the Detroit Future City Plan. The result will be that larger clusters of zoning will be formed, with the Eastern Market and Project Site converted to a LIVE+MAKE zoning classification. The design seeks to implement itself in this future development, to better integrate itself with Detroit as a necessary installation long into the future.
45 N CURRENT ZONING STRATEGY
FUTURE CITY ZONING STRATEGY
M3: General Industrial
Live + Make
B4: General Business
Green Mixed Rise
B6: General Services
Innovation Production
PD: Planned Development
District Center
SD2: Special Development
City Center
The Project Site has the unique opportunity to be located next to the Dequindre Cut which is a community pedestrian/bicycle route. As part of the Detroit Future City Initiative, this will connect to a much larger proposed pathway that will be called the Joe Louis Greenway, which will span a large chunk of Detroit. 7
PROJECT SITE ANALYSIS - SITE PHOTOS
SITE PLANNING, BUILDING PLANNING AND CODES
8
PROJECT SITE ANALYSIS - IMMEDIATE CONTEXT
SITE PLANNING, BUILDING PLANNING AND CODES
MAJOR SITE ASSETS
MAJOR OPPORTUNITIES
MAJOR SITE CHALLENGES
Dequindre Cut - The Dequindre Cut is a por�on of the much larger Joe Louis Greenway Ini�a�ve
Detroit Future City Strategic Framework - Means many notable changes will be coming to the City of Detroit which includes the Eastern Market region
- The strategic placement of it next to the project allows us to be connected to the en�re greenway
These Include:
20 � Offset - [STUDIO RULE]: As set by the Integra�ve Studio, the project must be offset from the neighbouring building by a minimum of 20 feet - Brings about the poten�al issue of an addi�onal unac�vated alley condi�on
- Emphasis is placed on the ac�va�on of the Dequindre Cut as a Central Hub
1. LIVE+MAKE ZONING CLASSIFICATION - Eastern Market Region will be delineated as a LIVE+MAKE zoning
Site Terrain - Rela�vely Flat Base Site with Western bank followed by a bowl condi�on.
- The additonal program of the project shall reflect on this future zoning change by integra�ng a Fabrica�on Library and parternering with the Fab City Global Ini�a�ve
- The Bowl Condi�on has an eleva�on of -16 feet with reference to the Division St level, and houses the above men�oned Dequindre Cut
- This is in the hopes the project through its func�on will fit in its future loca�on and evolve alongside the Detroit City Future Plan
- To further establish the Dequindre Cut connec�on as a central hub, building is brought down to the lower eleva�on, as one solid gesture
Eastern Market - Well established market-place located in near vicinity to the project site - Building serves to create a dis�nguished circula�ve connec�on between the Eastern Market and Dequindre Cut users
2. Green Stormwater Infrastructure - As part of the DFC Strategic Framework Green Stormwater Infrastructure or GSI pipelines will be implemented to reduce sewage overflow. - They shall also reduce stormwater run off tax costs - The design will integrate with these to bring the lines to the Eastern Market Region while also harves�ng the neighbouring context’s rainwater to lower their costs
N
Resolu�on: - As part of the main concept associated to rainwater collec�on, the design seeks to repurpose the 20 foot offset as a rain garden Inac�ve Western Alley - Western Alley currently is inac�ve/in bad condi�on - It is the boundary between the project site and neighbouring context along Division St N
Resolu�on: - Alley way is approx. 20 feet wide which means it can be u�lized as a transport route -Using it as the main access for the Fabrica�on Labratory’s drop off zone will ins�gate repair and reuse of the alley Context Limi�ng Views’ Poten�al - Poten�al Views to the Downtown and Dequindre Cut are Somewhat Limited by the Neighbouring Context Resolu�on: - The building raises above context buildings to increase vision areas, while the building form orients towards specific sightlines while coalgining with passive strategies
9
PROJECT SITE ANALYSIS - IMMEDIATE CONTEXT
SITE PLANNING, BUILDING PLANNING AND CODES
N
10
PROJECT SITE ANALYSIS - ECOLOGY + NATURAL SYSTEMS
Including native plantings around the building will help manage rain water as well as biodiversity which is a prominent driver of the Dequindre Cut Greenway’s vegetation. Using plants that survive well in medium to dry soil mixtures, this allows for the plants to go without much water but also allows them to soak up the rain when we do have those severe storms and spring rainy days.
Indian Grass
NATIVE PLANT APPENDIX RECOMMENDED NATIVE PLANTS Common Name
Little Blustern
Yellow Coneflower
Wild Strawberry
Black Eyed Susan
Mountain Mint
SOUTH OF BUILDING
By xeriscaping the site and including a wide array of natural flora to the site allows for the site to embrace it’s place in the ecosystem of the Dequindre Cut. With the Dequindre Cut consisting of natural grasses and bushes, the proposed design also includes those natural grasses as well as plenty of naturally occurring flowers to attract, maintain, and help grow the number of pollinators such as bees, birds, and butterflies in and around the Dequindre Cut. The proposed design allows for native plants to be located both to the north and south of the site as well as on the east side of the Dequindre Cut where the proposed surface lot is located.
Grey Goldenrod
Wild Lupine
Latin Name
Light
Soil Moisture
Bloom Time
Butter˜y Weed
Asclepias tuberosa
Full Sun
Dry-Medium Dry
Summer
Grey Goldenrod
Solidago nemoralis
Full Sun
Medium Dry
Fall
Indian Grass
Sorghastrum nutans
Full Sun
Medium to Med. Dry
N/A
Schizachyrium scoparius
Full Sun
Medium Dry to Dry
N/A
Pycnanthemum virginianum
Full Sun
Medium to Med. Wet
Summer
New England Aster
Aster novae-angliae
Full Sun
Medium to Med. Wet
Fall
Rough Blazing Star
Liatris aspera
Full Sun
Medium to Dry
Late Summer
Showy Goldenrod
Solidago speciosa
Full Sun
Medium to Med. Dry
Fall
Little Bluestem Grass Mountain Mint
Aster laevis
Full Sun
Medium to Med. Dry
Fall
Swamp Milkweed
Asclepias incarnata
Full Sun
Wet to Medium
Summer
Yellow Cone˜ ower
Ratibida pinnata
Full Sun
Medium to Med. Dry
Late Summer
Wild Lupine
Lupinus perennis
Full Sun to Pt. Sun
Medium Dry to Dry
Spring
Wild Strawberry
Fragraria virginiana
Full Sun to Pt. Sun
Medium to Med. Dry
Spring
Smooth Aster
Great Blue Lobella
Wild Bergamot
Common Cinquefoil
Purple Coneflower
Wild Columbine
Short’s Aster
NORTH OF BUILDING
Measure 3: DESIGN FOR ECOLOGY
SITE PLANNING, BUILDING PLANNING AND CODES
Hairy Beardtongue
Penstemon hirsutus
Full Sun to Lt. Shade
Medium Dry
Spring
Purple Cone˜ ower
Echinacea purpurea
Full Sun to Lt. Shade
Medium Dry
Mid to Late Sum.
Sand Coreopsis
Coreopsis lanceolata
Full Sun to Lt. Shade
Medium to Med. Dry
Early Summer
Yarrow
Achillea millefolium
Full Sun to Lt. Shade
Dry Medium
Early Summer
Great Blue Lobelia
Lobelia siphilitica
Full Sun to Full Shade
Medium to Med. Wet
Late Sum. to Fall
Black Eyed Susan
Rudbeckia hirta
Part Sun to Full Sun
Medium Wet to Med. Dry
Summer
Wild Bergamot/Beebalm
Monarda ÿstulosa
Part Sun to Full Sun
Medium
Summer
Common Cinquefoil
Potentilla simplex
Light Shade to Full Sun
Medium to Med. Dry
Spring
Wild Columbine
Aquilegia canadensis
Light Shade to Full Sun
Medium to Dry Med.
Spring
Cardinal Flower
Lobelia cardinalis
Light Shade to Pt. Sun
Medium Wet
Late Summer
Aster shortii
Full Shade to Pt. Sun
Medium
Fall
Geranium maculatum
Full Shade to Pt. Sun
Medium to Dry Med.
Spring
Asarum canadense
Full Shade
Medium
Spring
Short’s Aster Wild Geranium Wild Ginger
11
OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION/OCCUPANT LOADS, CONSTRUCTION TYPE, BUILDING HEIGHT + AREA USE GROUP/OCCUPANCY
A-3
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
IV -HT; HEAVY TIMBER
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE AREA
135,000 SQ. FT.
CALCULATED FLOOR AREA
34,370 SQ. FT.
SPRINKLED
YES
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT
85'
SITE PLANNING, BUILDING PLANNING AND CODES
FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS OF STRUCTURE ELEMENTS - STRUCTURAL FRAME
2 HOURS SUPPORTING FLOORS 2 HOURS SUPPORTING ROOF
- FLOOR CONSTRUCTION
2 HOURS
- BEARING WALLS
2 HOUR
- ROOF CONSTRUCTION
1 1/2 HOUR 8
FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS OF EGRESS COMPONENTS - VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURES
2 HOUR
- HORIZONTAL EXITS
2 HOUR
7 6 5
FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS OF FIRE SEPARATIONS - SHAFTS AND ELEVATOR HOISTWAYS
2 HOUR
- EXTERIOR WALL OPENINGS
NO LIMIT
- EXTERIOR WALL CONTINUITY
NOT APPLICABLE
- EXTERIOR WALL (NON
NOT APPLICABLE
-STRUCTUAL)
Function of Space
Staff Work Area Assembly, w/o fixed seating Unconcentrated Directors Office Business Areas Library Office 1 Business Areas Libray Office 2 Business Areas S ta ff K itc he n K itc he n Mechanical Mechanical Equipment Room S tora ge S tora ge G ra nd tota l
Area Per Occ, SF 15 100 100 100 200 300 300
Area Per Occ, Type net gross gross gross gros s gross gros s
C
B
A E
OUTLINE OF BUILDING ABOVE
F
G A.1
D
C
Code Summary - Level -1 Name
D
Square Feet
Occupant Load Lable
357.40 SF
24
A
166.82 SF 76.50 SF 84.60 SF 153.25 S F 1616.43 SF 329.20 S F
2 1 1 1 5 1 34
B C D E F G
B
N Level -1 - Dequindre Cut Life Safety Plan SCALE:
1/32" = 1'-0"
12
OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION/OCCUPANT LOADS, CONSTRUCTION TYPE, BUILDING HEIGHT + AREA
EGRESS, EXIT, AND EXIT ACCESS LIMITATIONS: MAXIMUM LENGTH OF EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL
250' W/FPS
MAXIMUM COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL
75'
MINIMUM LENGTH OF DEAD
< 20' OR 2.5 X WIDTH OF CORRIDOR
44" 67"
MINIMUM STAIR WIDTH MINIMUM STIAR WIDTH PROVIDED
44" 44"
6" 10"
MINIMUM CORRIDOR WIDTH MINIMUM CORRIDOR WIDTH PROVIDED
6"
2"
48"
6"
7'-0"
MAXIMUM DOOR WIDTH
4'-0"
1'-0"
36" 36"
3'-0"
2"
MINIMUM DOOR WIDTH MINIMUM DOOR WIDTH PROVIDED
Egress Doors
7'-0"
-END CORRIDOR
SITE PLANNING, BUILDING PLANNING AND CODES
8 Code Summary - Level 1: Division Street Name
Function of Space
Fab Lab Assembly, w/o fixed seating Reception Unconcentrated Community Assembly, w/o fixed seating Meeting Room Unconcentrated Open Assembly, w/o fixed seating Collaboration Unconcentrated Space Fab Lab Assembly, w/o fixed seating Reception Desk Unconcentrated Fab Lab 3D Assembly, w/o fixed seating Print Spaces Unconcentrated Book Drop Off Assembly,w/o fixed seating Standing Fab Lab Offices Business Areas Fabrication Educationa, shops and Space vocational areas Classroom 1 Educational, classroom areas Classroom 2 Educational, classroom areas Classroom 3 Educational, classroom areas Community K itc he n Kitchenette Small Printed Libraries, stack areas Resources C los e t S tora ge Material S tora ge Storage G ra nd tota l
Area Per Occ, SF
Area Per Occ, Type
7 Square Feet
Occupant Load Lable
15
net
610.44 SF
41
A
15
net
738.02 SF
49
B
15
net
424.89 SF
28
net
161.85 SF
11
D
15
net
239.63 SF
16
E
5
net
53.82 SF
11
F
100 50
gross net
185.19 SF 2836.05 SF
2 57
G H
20 20 20 200
net net net gros s
370.86 SF 253.42 SF 881.26 SF 187.36 S F
19 13 44 1
I J K L
100
gross
40.90 SF
01
M
gros s gros s
95. 22 S F 351.87 S F
01 1 2294 92
N O
B
5 3
2
C
15
300 300
6
4
K
1
C
N D
M
A
E
G
I H
L
D
A.1
F
J
O
C
B
A
N
OUTLINE OF BUILDING ABOVE
Level 1 - Division Street Life Safety SCALE:
1/32" = 1'-0"
13
OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION/OCCUPANT LOADS, CONSTRUCTION TYPE, BUILDING HEIGHT + AREA
SITE PLANNING, BUILDING PLANNING AND CODES
ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE CRITERA FOR GLULAM MINIMUM DEPTH AT WHICH 6 -3/4" AND 8 -3/4" WIDE BEAMS CAN BE ADAPTED FOR ONE -HOUR FIRE RATINGS DEPTH 3 SIDES EXPOSED (IN.)
BEAM WIDTH (IN.)
DEPTH 4 SIDES EXPOSED (IN.)
6-3/4
13-3/8
27
8-3/4
7-1/2
13-1/2
MINIMUM DEPTHS AT WHICH 8 -3/4" AND 10 -3/4" COLUMN WIDTHS QUALIFY FOR ONE -HOUR RATING. DEPTH 3 SIDES EXPOSED (IN.)
COLUMN WIDTH (IN.)
8
DEPTH 4 SIDES EXPOSED (IN.)
10-3/4
10-1/2
13-1/2
8-3/4
9
12
10-3/4
7-1/2
10-1/2
7 6
D
5
2
3
C
4
1
Name Youth CPU Stations / Printing Youth Reception Desk Lounge Youth Program Space Child Seating Child Seating Youth Print Collection C los e t G ra nd tota l
Function of Space
Area Per Occ, SF
Area Per Occ, Type
A
H
Code Summary - Level 2
A.1 Square Feet
D
Occupant Load Lable
Assembly, w/o fixed seating Unconcentrated
15
net
407.98 SF
27
A
Assembly, w/o fixed seating Unconcentrated Assembly, w/o fixed seating Unconcentrated Educational Occupancy, classroom areas Libraries, reading rooms Libraries, reading rooms Libraries, stack areas
15
net
145.17 SF
10
B
15
net
334.83 SF
22
C
20
net
360.21 SF
18
D
50 50 100
net net gross
776.90 SF 1041.35 SF 2741.01 SF
16 21 27
E F G
S tora ge
300
gros s
86.46 S F
10 1142 41
H
E
F
B
C
B
A
N
Level 2 - Life Safety Plan SCALE:
1/32" = 1'-0"
14
OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION/OCCUPANT LOADS, CONSTRUCTION TYPE, BUILDING HEIGHT + AREA
SITE PLANNING, BUILDING PLANNING AND CODES
8 7 6
E D
5 Code Summary - Level 3 Name
Function of Space
Area Per Occ, SF
Area Per Occ, Type
Square Feet
Occupant Load Lable
3
2
15
net
185.14 SF
12
A
15
net
323.87 SF
22
B
15
net
92.86 SF
6
C
15
net
54.51 SF
4
D
J
15
net
58.12 SF
4
E
50
net
808.37 SF
16
F
50 50 100
net net gross
460.43 SF 502.01 SF 2940.45 SF
9 10 29
G H I
100 100 300
gross gross gros s
393.71 SF 119.50 SF 92. 00 S F
4 1 10 118 119
J K L
L F D
A.1
K
A C
H
4
1 Meeting Room Assembly, w/o fixed seating 1 Unconcentrated Meeting Room Assembly, w/o fixed seating 2 Unconcentrated Conference Assembly, w/o fixed seating Room Unconcentrated Tutor Room 1 Assembly, w/o fixed seating Unconcentrated Tutor Room 2 Assembly, w/o fixed seating Unconcentrated CPU Work Libraries, reading rooms Stations / Printing 2-4 Seat Tables Libraries, reading rooms 2-4 Seat Tables Libraries, reading rooms Adult Print Libraries, stack areas Collection Peridocals Libraries, stack areas Peridocals Libraries, stack areas C los e t S tora ge G ra nd tota l
B
C
G I
B
A
N
Level 3 - Life Safety Plan SCALE:
1/32" = 1'-0"
15
OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION/OCCUPANT LOADS, CONSTRUCTION TYPE, BUILDING HEIGHT + AREA
SITE PLANNING, BUILDING PLANNING AND CODES
TYPICAL EGRESS STAIR
MONUMENTAL STAIR
7
8
3'-8"
1
D
1'-6"
3'-4"
2'-6"
4'-0"
7'-6"
C
4'-10"
3'-8"
7'-6"
9'-0"
9'-6"
8
9'-6"
7 6
6'-0"
A
5
B
2
3
4
1
C B
D
D
C
Code Summary - Level 4 Area Per Occ, SF
A.1
Area Per Occ, Type
Square Feet
A.1 Occupant Load Lable
Name
Function of Space
Work/Study Carrels Adult Print Collection Non-print Collection Non-print Collection G ra nd tota l
Libraries, reading rooms
50
net
717.57 SF
14
A
Libraries, stack areas
100
gross
1417.24 SF
14
B
Libraries, stack areas
100
gross
397.06 SF
4
C
Libraries, stack areas
100
gross
154.41 SF
2
D
B
34
A
N
Level 4 - Life Safety Plan SCALE:
1/32" = 1'-0"
16
SUCCESS CRITERIA
CONCEPT GENERATION + SUCCESS CRITERIA
SUCCESS CRITERIA: - A Project that demonstrates extreme and careful consideration of the context - To integrate itself as a means to benefit its immediate context, regional context, and if possible align itself with much larger contexts - Therefore the project must seek strong strategic advantage in it is integration with the Detroit Future City Framework Plan that concerns the entirety of Detroit for the next 50 years - The project must anticipate the cultural shifts, and zoning developments of the next fifty years to root its strategic development - Fabrication Laboratory being a derivative of zoning developments of the Eastern Market and a way to connect to a Global Initiative ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA: WILL IT USE ALL OF THE STORM WATER ON-SITE? - It will try to manage all of it, since the amounts of water generated in mere neighboring context are vastly more than the building needs - Doing so is extremely important in the fight against sewage overflow issues in Detroit - The Project acting as an example of how to be leaders (in building form) for this department WILL IT BE NET-ZERO ENERGY? - The design seeks to be Net Zero and if possible Net Positive WILL IT BE LOW CARBON, MEETING THE 2030 CHALLENGE GOALS? - The design seeks to have low carbon demand/emissions in hopes of meeting the 2030 Challenge Goals - The Fabrication Lab will aid to reduce carbon costs/emissions related to its practices and methodologies WILL IT BE EDUCATIONAL AND INTUITIVE? - Program will be educational with its integration of the learning environments of a Library and a Fabrication Library - To have people invested in new technologies that are becoming more relevant in the Digital Fabrication industry, requires education - Provide opportunities for jobs in the field, as well as certification - Interest the younger generation in the field with principles of sustainability, future technology, and green practices - The building will educate its users on some of its methods of passive strategies - Rain gardens - Seeing rainwater flow WILL IT ANTICIPATE CLIMATE CHANGE IN OUR CITY? - The project seeks to anticipate climate change by studying its reaction to figurative data based on global warming predicted future trends 17
MASSING SCHEMES - DEVELOPMENT VERSION 1
CONCEPT GENERATION + SUCCESS CRITERIA
WHAT DOES THIS SCHEME PROVIDE? - Form derived from a fanning of spaces between Division Street and the Dequindre Cut - General Simplicity of form
99%
ASE
WHERE DOES IT CREATE A PROBLEM? - Tight pointed corners
55
75
90 100
43%
sDA
the Dequindre Cut
10
ARE THERE WAYS TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEMS? also to unify as a single gesture
PROJECT DRIVERS:
TOTAL ENERGY 444 248
Fanning Out of Programs
kWh per year
Diagonal Axis between Dequindre Cut and Eastern Market
dEQ DRE
UIN CUT N ST
ISIO dIV
EAS TER
TOTAL ENERGY 444 248
ARK
NM ET
kWh per year
Pulling In Division St Level to Delineate Program and Provide Shading
ANNUAL ELECTRICITY DEMAND
RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATED
191 502 kWh
185 375 kWh
ENERGY USAGE INDEX (EUI) 2
ANNUAL NET ELECTRICITY USE 65 371 kWh
18
MASSING SCHEMES - DEVELOPMENT VERSION 2
CONCEPT GENERATION + SUCCESS CRITERIA
WHAT DOES THIS SCHEME PROVIDE? - Dynamic Form derived from three angular forms that protrude from a linear axis 99%
High-Angle Summer Sun - Angular Protrusions angled directly south to maximize harness
sDA
55
75
90 100
43%
WHERE DOES IT CREATE A PROBLEM? - Lot of corners = does this mean a great loss of energy + worse
ASE
10
ARE THERE WAYS TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEMS?
PROJECT DRIVERS:
TOTAL ENERGY 384 072 kWh per year
Diagonal Axis between Dequindre Cut and Eastern Market
dEQ DRE
UIN CUT N ST
ISIO
dIV
EAS ARK
NM
TER
TOTAL ENERGY 384 072
ET
kWh per year
to Radically Change Spaces
ANNUAL ELECTRICITY DEMAND
RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATED
242 372 kWh
202 452 kWh
ENERGY USAGE INDEX (EUI) 2
ANNUAL NET ELECTRICITY USE 39 920 kWh
19
MASSING SCHEMES - DEVELOPMENT VERSION 3
CONCEPT GENERATION + SUCCESS CRITERIA
WHAT DOES THIS SCHEME PROVIDE? -
- Removed Angles, Rectangular Form 85%
sDA
- South facade faces True South to maximize solar gains WHERE DOES IT CREATE A PROBLEM?
55
75
90 100
14%
ASE - Strong Entry on far side of Division St
10
ARE THERE WAYS TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEMS? - Place Programs such as Mechanical Room and Egress in Underlit Spaces PROJECT DRIVERS:
TOTAL ENERGY 236 113
FAB LAB
kWh per year
EDUCATE
INTEGRATE
UTILIZE
Diagonal Axis between Dequindre Cut and Eastern Market
dEQ DRE
UIN CUT N ST ISIO dIV
EAS ARK
NM
TER
TOTAL ENERGY 236 113
ET
kWh per year
to Radically Change Spaces
ANNUAL ELECTRICITY DEMAND
RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATED
127 504 kWh
253 065 kWh
ENERGY USAGE INDEX (EUI) 2
ANNUAL NET ELECTRICITY USE -125 561 kWh
20
MASSING SCHEMES - FINAL SCHEME
CONCEPT GENERATION + SUCCESS CRITERIA
WHAT DOES THIS SCHEME PROVIDE?
85%
-
sDA
- South facade faces True South to maximize solar gains
55
75
90 100
14%
ASE OTHER IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT DRIVERS:
10
TOTAL ENERGY 308 912 kWh per year
EDUCATE
INTEGRATE
UTILIZE
TOTAL ENERGY 308 912 kWh per year
ANNUAL ELECTRICITY DEMAND
RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATED
178 155 kWh
375 921 kWh
ENERGY USAGE INDEX (EUI) 2
ANNUAL NET ELECTRICITY USE -197 776 kWh
GREEN STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE PIPELINE
21
FAB CITY GLOBAL INITIATIVE - SUMMARY
CONCEPT GENERATION + SUCCESS CRITERIA
LOCALLY PRODUCTIVE, GLOBALLY CONNECTED CITIES For more than 10 years Fab labs have provided widespread access to modern means for invention and production. Fab labs have spread from inner-city Boston to rural India, from South Africa to the North of Norway. Activities in Fab labs range from technological empowerment to peer-to-peer project-based technical training to local problem-solving to small-scale high-tech business incubation to grassroots research. Projects being developed and produced in fab labs include solar and wind-powered turbines, thinclient computers and wireless data networks, analytical instrumentation for agriculture and healthcare, custom housing, and rapid-prototyping of rapid-prototyping machines. To become a FAB City requires having a more precise knowledge of the way that cities work. The evolution of the project will make it possible to create better systems of capturing and analyzing data, developing knowledge about a city, and it will also require the implementation of an evaluation system and detailed monitoring. The Fab City strategy is unique in that it addresses a range of environmental, social and economic objectives (carbon reduction, waste minimization, localization of manufacturing and work) in a systems approach by harnessing new technology and production approaches. All of this is brought to a practical level, by connecting with the existing Fab Lab Network, a vast source for urban innovations being shared already globally by makers in more than 70 countries and 600 labs. The first city to become self-sufficient - simultaneously increasing employment by creating opportunities through open innovation, and radically reducing carbon emissions by re-localizing production - will lead the future of urban development globally.
www.fab.city
Barcelona Zagreb Shenzhen Georgia Curitiba Occitanie Region
Puebla Mexico City Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes Amsterdam Cambridge Kerala
Sacramento Plymouth Hamburg Yucatan Region Belo-Horizonte Ekurhuleni
Brest Boston Toulouse Paris Santiago Velsen
Seoul Oakland Somerville Detroit Kamkura Rennes
Sao Paolo Recife
22
FAB CITY GLOBAL INITIATIVE - THE PROBLEM
CONCEPT GENERATION + SUCCESS CRITERIA
CARBON REDUCTION One main problem that the Fab City Global Initiative (FCGI) is trying to combat is carbon in the atmosphere. Goods extracted, shipped, manufactured, sold, and ultimately thrown away all over the world. The FCGI gears its mentality towards cities and one day countries being able to be self sustainable and not have to rely on imported goods but will instead utilize locally sourced, extracted, manufactured, and sold goods. This not only helps reduce carbon in terms of production but also in transportation as well.
TRANSPORT
6
+CO 2
WASTE MINIMIZATION America alone generates 30% of the worldâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s garbage, with about 1 million pounds of waste per person every year. A goal of the FCGI is to reduce waste created and also promote the recycling of plastics, metals, woods, and other materials which can then be used in post consumer recycled content such as furniture from reclaimed wood, plates and bowls from recycled papers and woods, and reusable bottles from recycled plastics.
CONSUMPTION CAPITAL
5
TRANSPORT
RE-LOCALIZATION OF MANUFACTURING AND WORK This problem revolves around manufacturing and factory jobs being outsourced to other countries with cheaper labor costs. This problem hurts both the local families of these workers as well as it promotes a worse and low quality work environment for those over seas. The FCGI aims to bring those manufacturing jobs back to the home city. While boosting the use of natural and local resources, it also boosts the local job grown in the manufacturing sector, more specifically in digital fabrication, digital technology jobs. This is great for cities such as Detroit who have a history of manufacturing and so much of our local economy depends on it.
5
RAW MATERIALS
3
PRODUCTION
+CO 2
6
+CO 2
EXTRACTION
CONSUMPTION
7
DISTRUBUTION
7
4
WASTE
1
2
TRANSPORT +CO 2
www.fab.city
23
FAB CITY GLOBAL INITIATIVE - THE SOLUTION
CONCEPT GENERATION + SUCCESS CRITERIA
Educating for the Future: Incorporating a stronger emphasis on learning-by-doing in education systems and curricula, and engaging all levels of education in finding solutions for local needs through digital fabrication technologies, and sharing them with global networks. Distributed Energy Production: With the advent of domestic batteries and efficiency improvements in solar and other means of clean power generation, energy distribution itself will face enormous changes. Distributed grids will change the role of households and businesses in power, water and resources distribution. Advanced Manufacturing Ecosystem: Being part of a global network of cities that share knowledge and best practices on urban solutions emerging from citizens, companies, educational institutions, and governments. Local networks of Fab Labs and mid-scale production centers connected to the larger global network of supply chains, sharing knowledge, best practices and projects. Building the Spiral Economy: Reduce the amount of imported goods, food and resources like water or energy. Increase the use of recycled raw materials for the production of objects in cities. Create added value in every iteration of a new product.
DATA EXC HA NG E
CIRCULAR FABRICATION
CIRCULAR FABRICATION
CIRCULAR FABRICATION
D AT
CIRCULAR FABRICATION
A EXC HA N G E
Collaboration Between Governments and the Civil Society: Local government and civic organizations, start-ups, universities, and other organizations must work together in order to make a cultural shift that promotes the empowerment of cities and their citizens.
D AT
www.fab.city
A EXC HA N G E
24
FAB CITY GLOBAL INITIATIVE - OUR IMPACT circular fabrication (advanced and clean industry)
supply chains for batch production (traditional industry)
global supply chain (traditional industry)
UTILIZE
r
data in
10 mi
500 mi
5000 mi
Wh at t ravl es gl ob
a ll y i s d a t a , n o t
H RT EA
RO ET
N A OR M T ER H IC A
ls
IT
= r a w m a t e ria
D
sh
E M AS A TE RK R ET N
C
tra
LC
UTILIZE the natural resources within the Metro-Detroit area including the several hundred abandoned houses from which reclaimed wood can be harvested and reused as well as other house hold materials. Utilize the manufacturing history of the city to help build and promote Detroit as the city of not only manufacturing but self sustainability in terms of digital fabrication in the 21st century.
1 mi
data out
INTEGRATE into a neighborhood with a rich history of manufacturing and processing of food. Integrate and create a program and narrative that will help transition into the future and towards the path of a net carbon, self sustainable, and resourceful building, neighborhood, and city.
aw
ls stay loc teria al a m
data in
EDUCATE the youth of Detroit as well as young adults to prepare them for the future of digital fabrication in the city of Detroit and more specifically Eastern Market. Host workshops, seminars, and skilled labor certification programs to benefit the majority of the community both present and future.
data out
INTEGRATE
social fabrication (Fab Lab, maker space)
domestic production (3d printing, CNC, laser cuting)
EDUCATE
CONCEPT GENERATION + SUCCESS CRITERIA
p
u ro d
cts
25
EXAMPLE OF WHAT THE FAB LAB COULD PRODUCE
CONCEPT GENERATION + SUCCESS CRITERIA
MULTI FUNCTIONAL DESK The Module seeks to radically change work spaces with a fully developed system that allows users to modify their working conditions. It features swing up work planes as well as pull-out privacy barriers with different options for variated privacy levels. Additionally behind a sliding door can be found a custom designed folding chair, and drop panel that reveals sets of electrical outlets. In conjunction with Module 1, Module 2 can be converted into a standard wall with two height options.
CLOSED POSITION
WORK CARREL
The system uses a series of hinges, magnets and a track system to achieve these above mentioned task. The Module creates different opportunities and variations for how users can not only utilize but perceive of workspaces. With options of standard desk layout with option to covert to work carrel, desk with large display board or simply extended wall, these can be used to change the work dynamic of spaces.
mAGNET hinge
track SLiding door latch door
WALL/PRESENTATION BOARD
MECHANICAL ELEMENTS 26
SITE PLAN
PLANS
Scale: N.T.S.
27
8
LEVEL -1 - DEQUINDRE CUT Scale: 1’=1/16”
PLANS
7
6
5
D
C
A.1
B
OUTLINE OF BUILDING ABOVE
28
LEVEL 1 - DIVISION STREET
PLANS
Scale: 1’=1/16” 8
1 G-021 7
1
G-029
6
5 1 G-022
4 3 2
1
A.1 D
C
B
OUTLINE OF BUILDING ABOVE
1 A
G-030
29
LEVEL 2
PLANS
Scale: 1’=1/16” 8
7
6
5
4 3 2
1
A.1 D
C
B
A
30
LEVEL 3
PLANS
Scale: 1’=1/16” 8
7
6
5
4 3 2
1
A.1 D
C
B
A
31
LEVEL 4
PLANS
Scale: 1’=1/16” 8
7
6
5 OUTLINE OF BUILDING ABOVE
4 3 2
1
A.1 D
C
B
A
32
STRUCTURAL SYSTEM SELECTION
STRUCTURAL SYSTEM
Mass Timber Construction:
FINAL CHOICE:
Pros: - High Fire Resistance - Quick Erection Time - Utilize Off-site Prefabrication - Renewable - Allow Construction Under Adverse Weather Conditions - Self Insulating
HEAVY TIMBER: CROSS LAMINATED TIMBER FLOORS, GLU-LAM COLUMNS AND BEAMS
Cons: Lack of Expertise in the Region
Masonry Construction: Pros: - Readily Available Material in Region - Cheap - Easy to find Skilled Labor
Reasons for Selection: - Working with a regular form with non-intense geometric shapes. - Most of it will be reconstructed off site and moved to the site and put together. - May have a higher cost in our region compared to the readily available steel and masonry. - Low embodied energy and carbon if the timber is sources from a renewable and sustainable forest. - Building size is at a decent size for heavy timber. - The timber can easily be recycled into other construction projects. - Timber is renewable if sources from a sustainable forest - Erection time is quick with this type of construction Main Drawback: - May have a higher cost in our region compared to the readily available steel and masonry.
Cons: - Heavy - Carbon-Pig - Timely to Construct
Steel Construction: Pros: - Off-site Fabrication - Easy to Construct - Cheap Cons: - Carbon-Pig - Non-renewable - Fireproofing Needed
33
STRUCTURAL LAYOUT
STRUCTURAL SYSTEM
Typical Spans and Loads: Glue-Laminated Beams: Cross- Laminated Timbers: Cross-Laminated Timber Decking: Heavy Trusses:
10’ - 100’ 10’ - 40’ 10’ - 40’ 30’ - 200’
We Will be Utilizing a Ridged Frame System. Glue-Laminated Timber Columns: 16” wide X 16” deep Glue-Laminated Timber Girders: 6 3/4” wide X 18” deep Glue-Laminated Timber Beams: 5 1/8” wide X 12” deep Cross-Laminated Timber Decking w/ Integrated Radiant Floor Heating: 9” thick Heavy Timber Belgian Truss System: 16” deep Emergency Egress Stairs: Standard CMU 8”tall x 8” wide x 16” deep Isolated Spread Footing Foundation: 24”tall x 48”wide x 48” deep
34
th
Loop
MECHANICAL SYSTEM SELECTION
MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEM
Constant Air Volume (CAV): Pros: Cheap Low Maintenance Low Operating Cost
Reheat Terminal A
Schematic Diagram of a Typical Constant Air Volume (CAV) System ZONE A
Supply Air ~55 F
Outside Air
Reheat Terminal B Supply Fan
Cons: Large Non-Flexible Low Control of Air Velocity
Cooling Coil
Filter
ZONE A Preheat Coil Reheat Terminal C Return Air ~75 F
ZONE A
Exhaust Air Return Fan
FINAL CHOICE: HYDRONIC RADIANT HEATING/COOLING WITH VAV AIR SYSTEM FOR FRESH AIR INTAKE FRESH AIR INTAKE LINKED TO SENSOR-CONNECTED OPERABLE FENESTRATION Reasons for Selection: - Can be heated with PVT (Hybrid Thermal) Panels, to boost efficiency of Photovoltaic Panels will providing efficient heating generated from Solar Radiation - Means having a boost boiler as opposed to regular boiler usage - Less Carbon Emissions
Building Boundry
- Can be combined with Fresh Air VAV intake system in an integrated floor system Variable Air Volume (VAV): Pros: Cheap Low Maintenance Low Operating Cost
VAV Box A
- Fresh Air/Cooling and hot air exit routes provided by Fresh Air VAV intake system, as well as sensor connected operable glazing
Schematic Diagram of a Typical Variable Air Volume (VAV) System ZONE A
Supply Air ~55 F
Outside Air
VAV Box B
Cons: Large Non-Flexible Low Control of Air Velocity
Variable Speed Supply Fan
Filter
Cooling Coil
ZONE A
Preheat Coil VAV Box C Return Air ~75 F
ZONE A
Exhaust Air Variable Speed Return Fan
Building Boundry
Hydronic Radiant Heating: Pros: Low Noise Flexible Space Arrangement Low Maintenance Integration with PVT Cons: Large Initial Cost Little Control and Customization Slows Construction Speed
Solar Supplement
Solar Collectors PVT Pump
Radiant Heating System with Hot Water Heater Hot Water to Fixtures
Cold Water From Tank
Tempering Valve Plumbing Mechanical Package
Pump
Heating Loop
One-way Valve Back-up Tank
Storage Hot Water Heater with Integral Heat Exchanger
35
MECHANICAL SYSTEM DIAGRAM + FLOOR-TO-FLOOR MECHANICAL SYSTEM SELECTED:
MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEM
Space for electrical, data, ÿre suppresion, and ability to include larger ducts in the future if needed.
Base 9” CLT Spab with 8” CLT Slabs or openings ontop to allow for mechanical. with integrated radiant heat CLT slab ontop of that.
HYDRONIC SYSTEM - Radiant Floor Heating and Cooling - Coupled with VAV Air Distribution System for Fresh Air Intake and Return Main Vertical Supply Duct: 24” x 60” Primary Branch Ducts: 24” x 60” Secondary Branch Ducts: 24” x 8” Tertiary Flex Ducts: 12” x 12” Air Diffuser: 12” x 12”
Example of Integrated CLT Floor
Example of Laminated Wood Ceiling
36
MECHANICAL SYSTEM DIAGRAM + FLOOR-TO-FLOOR
MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEM
MECHANICAL SYSTEM SELECTED: HYDRONIC SYSTEM - Radiant Floor Heating - Coupled with VAV Air Distribution System for Fresh Air Intake and Return Main Vertical Supply Duct: 24” x 60” Primary Branch Ducts: 24” x 60” Secondary Branch Ducts: 24” x 8” Tertiary Flex Ducts: 12” x 12” Air Diffuser: 12” x 12”
Example of Lowered Ceiling Around Main Duct
Example of Drop Ceiling
37
LEVEL -1 - MECHANICAL ZONING PLAN
MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEM
Scale: 1’=1/16” 8
7
6
5
D
C A.1
B
STAIRS LINE OF BUILDING ABOVE
PERIMETER ZONE RADIANT FLOOR 38
LEVEL 1 - MECHANICAL ZONING PLAN Scale: 1’=1/16”
MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEM
MECHANICAL SECTION 1
8
7
6
5
MECHANICAL SECTION 2
4 3 2
1
A.1 D
C
B
STAIRS LINE OF BUILDING ABOVE
A
PERIMETER ZONE RADIANT FLOOR
39
LEVEL 2 - MECHANICAL ZONING PLAN
MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEM
Scale: 1’=1/16” 8
7
6
5
4 3 2
1
A.1 D
C
B
STAIRS PERIMETER ZONE A
RADIANT FLOOR 40
LEVEL 3 - MECHANICAL ZONING PLAN
MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEM
Scale: 1’=1/16”
8
7
6
5
4 3 2
1
A.1 D
C
B
STAIRS PERIMETER ZONE A
RADIANT FLOOR 41
LEVEL 4 - MECHANICAL ZONING PLAN
MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEM
Scale: 1’=1/16”
8
7
6
5
4 3 2
1
A.1 D
C
B
STAIRS PERIMETER ZONE A
RADIANT FLOOR 42
PLUMBING SIZING AND ACCESSIBLE LAYOUT
MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEM
7
D
BATHROOM CALCULATIONS
Bathroom Plan - Level -1 SCALE:
LEVEL -1 - DEQUINDRE CUT
R E Q U IR E D R A T I O REQUIRED # OF FIXTURES P R O V ID E D # O F F I X T U R E S
OCCUPANTS 34
WC - M 1 /1 25 P 1
WC - F LAV - M LAV - F DF 1/6 5 P 1 /2 0 0 P 1 /20 0 P 1 1 1 2 U nis e x P rov ide d
6
7
1 /5 0 0 P 1
LEVEL 1 - DIVISION STREET
R E Q U IR E D R A T I O REQUIRED # OF FIXTURES PROVIDED # OF FIXTURES
1/4" = 1'-0"
D OCCUPANTS 294
WC - M 1/1 2 5 P 2 2
WC - F 1 /6 5 P 4 4
LAV - M 1 /20 0 P 1 2
LAV - F 1/2 0 0 P 1 2
DF 1 /5 0 0 P 1 2
WC - M 1/1 2 5 P 1 2
WC - F 1 /6 5 P 4 4
LAV - M 1 /20 0 P 1 2
LAV - F 1/2 0 0 P 1 2
DF 1 /5 0 0 P 1 2
WC - M 1/1 2 5 P 1 2
WC - F 1 /6 5 P 4 4
LAV - M 1 /20 0 P 1 2
LAV - F 1/2 0 0 P 1 2
DF 1 /5 0 0 P 1 2
WC - M 1/1 2 5 P 1 2
WC - F 1 /6 5 P 1 4
LAV - M 1 /20 0 P 1 2
LAV - F 1 /2 0 0 P 1 2
DF 1 /5 0 0 P 1 2
5'-0 1/2"
LEVEL 2
R E Q U IR E D R A T I O REQUIRED # OF FIXTURES PROVIDED # OF FIXTURES
OCCUPANTS 142
4'-11 1/2"
LEVEL 3 4'-0"
LEVEL 4
R E Q U IR E D R A T I O REQUIRED # OF FIXTURES PROVIDED # OF FIXTURES
3'-11"
3'-0"
R E Q U IR E D R A T I O REQUIRED # OF FIXTURES PROVIDED # OF FIXTURES
OCCUPANTS 119
OCCUPANTS 34
Bathroom Plan - Typical SCALE:
1/4" = 1'-0"
43
PROJECT WATER PLANNING - THE IMPORTANCE OF STORMWATER MANAGMENT
Great Lakes Water Levels (1918−2019) Monthly Mean Level
MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEM
Long Term Average Annual
Lake Superior 183.40 183.20 183.00 182.80
603.02
GREAT LAKES WATER LEVELS (1918 - 2019)
meters
601.71 601.05
MONTHLY MEAN LEVEL LONG TERM AVERAGE ANNUAL 1918
177.50
602.36
1921
1924
1927
1930
1933
1936
600.39 599.74 1939
1942
1945
1948
1951
1954
1957
1960
1963
1966
1969
1972
1975
1978
1981
1984
1987
1990
1993
1996
1999
2002
2005
2008
2011
2014
2017
Lake Michigan−Huron
582.35
177.00
580.71
176.50
579.07
176.00
577.43
175.50
575.79 1918
1921
1924
1927
1930
1933
1936
1939
1942
1945
1948
1951
1954
1957
1960
1963
1966
1969
1972
1975
1978
1981
1984
1987
1990
1993
1996
1999
2002
2005
2008
2011
2014
2017
176.00
577.43
175.50
575.79
175.00
574.15
174.50
572.51
174.00
feet
Lake St. Clair meters
Flooding and Sewage Overflow have been massive issues in Detroit and with Climate Change, these issues are only going to get worse.
feet
183.60
feet
meters
183.80
570.87 1918
1921
1924
1927
1930
1933
1936
1939
1942
1945
1948
1951
1954
1957
1960
1963
1966
1969
1972
1975
1978
1981
1984
1987
1990
1993
1996
1999
2002
2005
2008
2011
2014
2017
Global Warming
572.51
174.00
570.87
173.50
569.23
Detroit’s Urban Condition With Detroit’s historical developments the city has become highly urbanized, resulting in many paved surfaces being impermeable to water.
1921
1924
1927
1930
1933
1936
1939
1942
1945
1948
1951
1954
1957
1960
1963
1966
1969
1972
1975
1978
1981
1984
1987
1990
1993
1996
1999
2002
2005
2008
2011
2014
2017
Lake Ontario Sourced from the US Army Corps of Engineers - Detroit District meters
The Climate is rapidly changing due to Global Warming, and this means that storms and overall precipitation are increasing.
1918
75.50
247.7
75.00
246.06
74.50
244.42
74.00
242.78 1918
1921
1924
1927
1930
1933
1936
1939
1942
1945
1948
1951
1954
1957
The monthly average levels are based on a network of water level gages located around the lakes. Elevations are referenced to the International Great Lakes Datum (1985).
1960
1963
1966
1969
1972
1975
1978
1981
1984
1987
1990
1993
1996
1999
2002
2005
2008
2011
2014
feet
CAUSES
574.15
174.50
feet
meters
Lake Erie 175.00
2017
Water levels have been coordinated through 2018. Values highlighted in gray are provisional.
EFFECTS Lake Water Levels Rising
Stormwater Runoff
With the increase in precipitation the levels of the various bodies of waters such as the Great Lakes (which neighbor Detroit) are becoming increasingly full
Detroit’s high amount of impervious surfaces means a great amount of stormwater has to be directed to drainage
HISTORIC FLOODING FLOODINGAREA AREA HISTORIC PREDICTED FLOODING FLOODING AREA AREA PREDICTED 2019 2019 REPORTED REPORTED OCCURRENCES OCCOURANCES SITE SITE Locations sources from local new and weather outlets.
RESULTS Flooding
The Lakes end up having more water than they can hold resulting in overflow to the nearby cities such as Detroit
Sewage Overflow
The large amount of stormwater that has to be managed overflows Detroit’s combined sewer system. - This system controls storm-water runoff and sanitary sewage. - Causes basement backups, street flooding, and polluted wastewater.
THUS THE DESIGN SEEKS TO DEVELOP A HIGHLY COMPREHENSIVE WATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 44
PROJECT SITE ANALYSIS - RELATIONSHIP TO LOCAL ISSUES
MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEM
2: COMMUNITY. Due to climate change, the City of Detroit has dealt with issues concerning flooding which leads to property damage and health concerns such as available fresh water. With about 80% of the Eastern Market Neighborhood being surface lots and impervious pavement, it has proven to be a hot spot for sewage overflows and flooding concerns. During severe storms, much of this water flows into the city’s combined sewer system and the sewage and waste water overflows into the City’s drinking water, contaminating it and calling for a boiled water advisory or even the lack of clean water all together. In 2015 the Detroit Collaborate Design Center along with partners came up with a stormwater management strategy to be fully implemented by 2025. One of the 12 alleys that the DCDC has targeted is the alley that is adjacent to the project’s site. Having the site adjacent to a planned GSI system allows for our design to be further intertwined with the events already happening in the market.
GRAPHICS COURTESY OF THE DETROIT COLLABORATIVE DESIGN CENTER (DCDC)
45
PROJECT SITE ANALYSIS - RELATIONSHIP TO LOCAL ISSUES
MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEM
Some of the benefits of implementing this GSI system into Eastern Market are as followed: District-wide solutions: Eastern Market can be a library for green infrastructure and a model for solving stormwater concerns at the district scale, setting a precedent for a high-capacity nonprofit supporting the management of district stormwater management facilities. Development Incentive: A district-wide stormwater management service is an enticement for businesses locating in the Eastern Market area, as are the cost savings associated with a district GSI approach, which would reduce drainage charges for property owners. Property values: Property values will increase as green infrastructure improves the districtâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s aesthetic appearance, enhances the quality of life, and reduces drainage charges for property owners. Place-making & Public Education: Green stormwater interventions will further enhance the public market experience with high-performance green spaces that are intended for education as well as recreation. Environment: Property owners and public entities investing in green stormwater infrastructure contribute to improved water quality for all. Having a key part of the projectâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s design having to do with stormwater management allows us to integrate our project with the strategic framework that the DCDC has been working on for the past few years.
GRAPHICS COURTESY OF THE DETROIT COLLABORATIVE DESIGN CENTER (DCDC)
46
PROJECT WATER PLANNING How building and site design strategies manage site water and drainage: - Site Water and Drainage are tackled by four systems: 1. South System 2. North + West System 3. East System 4. Green Stormwater Infrastructure - (GSIâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s) *These systems are mentioned in greater detail on Pg 43 & 44.
MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEM
1 - Predicted Water Use Step 1) Indoor Water Use
2 - Measured Water use per occupant / Percent of rainwater used / Percent of Grey+Blackwater used
Commercial
Step 1) Indoor Water use Uses / day / Occupant Total uses / day
Occupants Male Occupant 37.5 Female Occupant 37.5 Male Occupant Female Occupant
Toilet
Shower
Lavatory
2 0 3 0 0 3 75 0 112.5 0 0 112.5 75 0 225 * if no urinal, use toilet value 1.1 0.2 0 0.5 0 0.5 165 15 56 60,225 5,475 20,531
Total uses / Day
Gallons used / day Gallons used / year Total indoor water use - Gallons / Day
Urinal 1 3 37.5 112.5 150
Fixture Flow Rates (GPF / GPM)
Water and Drainage for Parking Lot: - An Additional System was specifically designed as part of the project in terms of water treatment of the new parking to be implemented across the Dequindre
Predicted
75 365
Daily Ave. Occupancy
Total indoor water use - Gallons / Year
236
Kitchen Faucet 0 0 0 0 0 2.2 0.25 -
86,231
Month January February March April May June July August September October November December Total (Gal)
Design strategies that capitalize on renewable water sources (i.e. precipitation) on site: - Utilization of existing Downspouts of Neighboring context to connect their stormwater runoff to our systems - For management of stormwater - To decrease Stormwater run off taxes for neighboring context - Seeking Integrated Water management Systems to be appreciated and help educate on how the building performs - Integrated Leaders - Rain Gardens with French Drain and Xeriscaping system Reuse strategies for water including use of rainwater, graywater, and wastewater: - Rain Garden usage - Reused for Water Fixture Demand
gallons/month
7,186 7,186 7,186 7,186 7,186 7,186 7,186 7,186 7,186 7,186 7,186 7,186 86,231
Potable
Rainwater
-8,313 -8,615 -10,958 -15,419 -19,578 -14,209 -14,209 -14,512 -11,261 -12,773 -9,446 -8,615 -147,909
15,499 15,801 18,144 22,605 26,764 21,395 21,395 21,698 18,447 19,959 16,632 15,801 234,140
gallons/month
gallons/month
Reclaimed grey/black
1
Potable2
Rainwater
Reclaimed grey/black3
10,575 10,575 10,575 10,575 10,575 10,575 10,575 10,575 10,575 10,575 10,575 10,575 126,900
1,000 500 2,000 3,000 8,000 500 500 500 1,000 6,000 500 500 24,000
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
gallons/month gallons/month
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Annual Gallons Predicted -147,909 Measured 102,900
No
- Features, Bioswales as well as Drainage Routes that connect to the GSI
Demand1
Measured
Potable 100% 81%
gallons/month
gallons/month
Rainfall Grey/Black 272% 0% 23% 0%
Water Use Summary Proposed Design Irrigated Area (potable or non-potable)
1,000 sf
Warm Humid Plant Quality Factor (Qf) Baseline Xeriscape Sprinklers
3.3 0.8 0 0.75 0
Month January February March April May June July August September October November December
Gallons 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Step 3) Cooling tower Percent of the buidling cooled by a water-cooled chiller Cooling tower water use
Does the cooling tower use potable water? No Where strategies taken to conserve cooling tower water? n/a Total cooling tower water use
31% 38% 60% 77% 88% 99% 100% 100% 77% 60% 38% 30%
Baseline #1: Baseline #2: All Turf 1,000 1,000 3.3 3.3 0.8 0.8 1 0.2 0.75 0.9 365 2,193 Proposed Design Comparison 100% 100%
100% 7 171,500
Gallons/sf/yr Gallons/yr
Total Annual Water Use Total Annual Water Use / Occupant Total Annual Water Use / sf
Total Annual Water Use - Benchmark Total Annual Water Use / Occupant - Benchmark Improvement
Total Potable Demand Predicted Measured -147,909 126,900 Gallons/yr -2,276 1,952 Gallons/Occupant/yr -6.0 5.2 Gallons/sf/yr Benchmarks 357,700 5,503
Gallons/yr Gallons/Occupant/yr
141%
65%
3 - Stormwater managed on-site 24H 2Yr Event (in) Rainwater Storage (cf)
2.35 0.195833333 3500
Surface Roof Impervious Turf
0.9 0.9 0.2 0.05 0.5
Semi-Pervious Sub Total Total Percent Managed Onsite
Cubic Feet Stormwate Total Area (sf) r 24,500 4,798 4,318 1,400 274 247 0 1,362 267 13 0 27,262 5,339 4,578 1,078
79.8%
Assume: 0 water for non-potable use, 0 1 0 Gallons / yr strategies.* 4
47
PROJECT WATER PLANNING
MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEM
FIG 20.7 MEEB A2
40” annual
FIG 20.7 MEEB A2 A1
From Context
40” annual
A1
A1
A2 From Context
50’
A1 A1a
40’
A1b
38’
A1cA1a
228’
A1a = 85 000 gallons
A1c A1e
228’
A2b A1a = 85 000 gallons
50’
54’40’
A1dA1b
38’ 46’
A1d 94’
A1d = l x w = 54’ x 94’ = 5076 SF
A2a 24.5’ 50.5’ 16’ 22’
43’
A1c = l x w = 38’ x 94’ = 3572 SF
A1e = l x w = 46’ x 94’ = 4324 SF
A1 = l x w = 228’ x 94’ = 21 432 SF
FIG 20.5 MEEB
A1b = 67 000 gallons
A1c = 65 000 gallons
A1c = 65 000 gallons
A1d = 90 000 gallons
63.5’
A2d
16’
63.5’
69’A2b = l x w = 24.5’ x 16’ = 392 SF A2d = lA2b xw =lxw 24.5’ x 16’ = 63.5’ =x 16’ = 1016 =SF392 SF
A2c = l x w A2d = l x w = 43’ x 69’ = 63.5’ x 16’ A2 = = 2967 A2a SF + A2b + A2c + A2d = 1016 SF = 1111 SF + 392 SF + 2967SF + 1016 SF = 5486 SF A2 =
FIG 20.5 MEEB
A1d = 90 000 gallons
16’
16’
A2d
A2c 43’
A2c = l A2a xw =lxw = 50.5’ x 22’ = 43’ x 69’ SF = 2967 =1111 SF
Conclusions following can be said:
Conclusions
- From the COTE Stormwater Calculators the project has an Annual Water Fixture Usage of 86 231 gallons A2a + A2b + A2c + A2d The roof can provide for 170 000 gallons = 1111 SF + 392 SF + 2967SF + 1016 SF following can be said: = 5486 SF - From the COTE Stormwater Calculators the project has an Annual Water Fixture Usage of 86 231 gallons The rooftocan provide for 170 000 gallons - The project will propse implement:
FIG 20.5 MEEB
1. Rain Gardens, Bioswales, Extensive Green Roofs, and a Cistern unit - The project will propse to implement: 2. Green Stormwater Infrastructure Pipeline (GSI) into the project site 1.-The Rainrest Gardens, Extensive Greenfeatures Roofs, and unitto a GSI of theBioswales, water not used for water will abeCistern rerouted The Western Context Buildings will also be able to connect to this GSI to lower their stormwater
A1e = 75 000 gallons
A1e = 75 000 gallons
Total Catchment Area = 482 000 gallons
24.5’
A2a = l x w = 50.5’ x 22’ =1111 SF
Total = A1a + A1b + A1c + A1d + A1e = 85 000 + 67 000 + 65 000 + 90 000 + 75 000 =382 000 gallons Total = A1a + A1b + A1c + A1d + A1e = 85 000 + 67 000 + 65 000 + 90 000 + 75 000 =382 000 gallons
A2a
69’
46’
A1 = l x w = 228’ x 94’ = 21 432 SF
FIG 20.5 MEEB
22’
A2c
A1b = 67 000 gallons
A1b = l x w A1c = l x w 94’ = 40’ x 94’ = 38’ x 94’ = 3760 SF = 3572 SF
A1d = l x w A1e = l x w A1a = l x w A1b = l x w = 54’ x 94’ = 46’ x 94’ = 50’ x 94’ = 40’ x 94’ = 5076 SF = 4324 SF = 4700 SF = 3760 SF
50.5’
A2b
54’
A1e A1a = l x w = 50’ x 94’ = 4700 SF
A2
100 000 gallons
2. Green Stormwater Infrastructure Pipeline (GSI) into the project site -The rest theSF water not used for water features will be rerouted to a GSI Area Total for Project = 12of129 The Western Context Buildings will also be able to connect to this GSI to lower their stormwater
100 000 gallons Area Total for Project = 12 129 SF
49
PROJECT WATER PLANNING
Month
Rainfall (in)
MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEM
Catchment Yield (gal)
Usage (gal)
Net Gallons
Adjusted Capacity (gal)
Rainfall/12 x 12,129 SF
Taken from
Catchment Yield
Net Gallons (Month 1
x 7.48 gal per cu. Ft
COTE Calculators
minus Usage
plus Month 2 â&#x20AC;Ś.
May
3.54
26763.85
7186
19577.85
19577.85
Jun
2.83
21395.96
7186
14209.96
33787.81
Jul
2.83
21395.96
7186
14209.96
47997.77
Aug
2.87
21698.38
7186
14512.38
62510.15
Sep
2.44
18447.40
7186
11261.40
73771.55
Oct
2.64
19959.48
7186
12773.48
86545.03
Nov
2.2
16632.90
7186
9446.90
95991.93
Dec
2.09
15801.26
7186
8615.26
104607.19
Jan
2.05
15498.84
7186
8312.84
112920.03
Feb
2.09
15801.26
7186
8615.26
121535.29
Mar
2.4
18144.98
7186
10958.98
132494.27
Apr
2.99
22605.63
7186
15419.63
147913.90
Lowest Net Gallon Values
Values Added
x1.5 Drought Factor
/7.48 per cu. Ft
Minimum Cistern Sizing Nov
2.2
9446.90
Dec
2.09
8615.26
Doesn't take into account:
Chosen Cistern Capacity = approx. 30 000 gallons
1. Extensive green roof
34990.26 Jan
2.05
8312.84
Feb
2.09
8615.26
Suggested Cistern Capacity = approx. 70 000 gallons Notes
52485.38445
7016.762627
Reasons: - Cistern is to be designed with Overflow piping so that when it reaches a certain level of capacity it will slowly drain into the Rain Garden North of the Project (That feeds Northern RG) - This to be done after the process of the water to fill the cistern is slowed down through Extensive Green Roofs and Constructed Wetlands - Easier Accomodation into Basement Mechanical Room 50
PROJECT WATER PLANNING
MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEM
PROJECT BUILDING Target Speed of System Progression
Sloped Green Roofs
Integrated Leaders
Waterfall Ripple Panel
Constructed Wetland
NEIGHBOURING PERIMETER Target Speed of System Progression
Existing Downspouts
Permeable Green Alley
Overflow Cistern
Terraced Rain Garden
Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI)
51 NEIGHBOURING PERIMETER
GREEN STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE (GSI) PIPELINE PROPOSAL
MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEM
The Project wishes to propose the implementation of a Green Stormwater Infrastructure Pipeline (GSI) in the project site or close vicinity (such as in the Dequindre Cut). GSI’s are part of an initiative led by the Detroit Collaborative Design Center (DCDC) to install new green pipelines to deal with the Sewage Overflow problem in Detroit. As part of the project’s ability to manage its own stormwater as well as the neighboring context, implementing a GSI will have the following benefits:
CENTRAL HUB
KEY FIGURES:
- Establish the project as a central hub for stormwater management using some stormwater for its own needs, while additional overflow can be directed to the GSI.
Approx 1.23 acres of impervious surface in surrounding block. .83 are from the surrounding buildings.
- Implementing the GSI will promote new networks of water connections for the entire Eastern Market region. STORMWATER TAXES - Lower Stormwater Runoff Taxes for Neighboring Context - The more connected buildings the more benefit from the tax reduction -Less taxes allow property owners to redirect their funds to invest in other needs - This may promote healthy investment into the development of the Eastern Market Region
Photo courtesy of City of Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, from Stormwater Management Design Manual 2018
Combined property owners pay on average about $740 in drainage charge fee per month, close to $9000 a year. Palencia Mobley, chief engineer and deputy director for Detroit Water and Sewage Department describes the new way stormwater runoff tax is calculated. “Everybody now is charged based on their impervious area,” says Mobley, referring to spaces that do not absorb water such as asphalt parking lots or building roofs. But business owners can earn credits against their charge — a reduction of up to 80% — by planting rain gardens or installing pervious pavement to reduce the volume of stormwater running off their property”. https://ensia.com/features/flooding-increase-cities-live-with-water-green-stormwaterinfrastructure/
By utilizing our Rain Garden/Constructed Wetland, we can drop their annual costs to $0.
CONSTRUCTED WETLAND /RAIN GARDEN
GREEN ALLEY
POTENTIAL LOCATIONS FOR GSI
STORMWATER RUNOFF PATH
52
GREEN STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE (GSI) PIPELINE PROPOSAL
MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEM
Scale: N.T.S.
53
PASSIVE STRATEGIES DIAGRAM
PASSIVE AND RENEWABLES
DAYLIGHTING
SHADING
Benefits:
Benefits:
- Allows the space to gain heat in the winter months and lower heating costs. - Users prefer Daylighting to Artificial Lightning = Better quality of life - Reduces Energy Usage by reducing the need for Artificial Lighting
- Allows for cooler spaces - Especially useful for outside spaces -Small reduction of the buildings exterior heat - Translates to small reduction in Mechanical Systemâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s demand to maintain a regulated interior climate
Implementation in Project:
Implementation in Project:
- Orienting towards the South - Light Shelves - Bounce Daylighting further into the space - Light Monitors Facing West - Facade facing true North/South allowing for improved winter heat gains - Areas receiving less light programmed with Service Cores
- Division St Level recedes - Provides shading to entry and immediate perimeter - Light Shelves - Provides shading from High Summer Sun and diffuses its light when bounced further into the space
PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY
RAIN COLLECTION
Benefits:
Benefits:
- Production of Renewable Energy - Offset with Non Renewable Energy Demand = Net Zero or Net Positive - Can be Grid Connected - Sell back excess energy = Decrease Electrical Bills
- If managed properly, can reduce the sewage overflow problem in Detroit - Can be reused for water fixtures
Implementation in Project:
- Integrated Water systems to manage the Projectâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s own stormwater as well as the Immediate Context - Techniques extended to Division St Parking - Rain Gardens as partial management solutions with great spatial quality - Storage System to hold onto a sizable amount of rainwater - Reused for Water Fixtures - Proposal for the installation of a Green Stormwater Infrastructure Pipeline (GSI)
- PV Array installed on Roof = 12 220 SF - PV Array installed as SUDI shades over re-developed parking = 8 754 SF - Facade facing true North/South allowing for maximum PV efficiency
Implementation in Project:
54
PASSIVE STRATEGIES - SPECIFICS
PASSIVE AND RENEWABLES
FINAL SEFAIRA RESULTS ANNUAL ELECTRICITY DEMAND
RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATED
ENERGY USAGE INDEX (EUI)
PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY There are Different Options Worth Considering:
ANNUAL NET ELECTRICITY USE
NOTE: Values Obtained as Applied to Current Design with FIXED Amount of PV Panels installed
178 155 kWh
375 921 kWh
2
-197 776 kWh
85%
sDA
55
14%
ASE
HOW WERE THESE RESULTS ACHIEVED? SPACE USE
10
75
90 100
PV TYPE
ELECTRICAL EFFICIENCY
WATER HEATING EFFICIENCY
RESULTING ENERGY USAGE INDEX (EUI)
CURRENT GEN. PV
20%
N/A
2
HYBRID THERMAL PVT
25%
55%
2
NEXT GEN. PV
35%
N/A
2
COST GRADING
S SS SSS
After considering possible selections we suggest an investment in the HYBRID THERMAL PVT System for the following reasons: - Provides Electrical Energy as well as Thermal Energy to to the chosen Mechanical System HYDRONIC RADIANT FLOOR HEATING - Requires a Boost Boiler as opposed to a full-time regular boiler operating 24/7 - Reduces Harmful Chemical Released into the Atmosphere - Makes the Building Net Positive (Good Amount of Extra Renewable Energy that can be sold back to Electrical Companies with a Grid-Connected System)
CONTROLLED FRESH AIR INTAKE - Utilizing a Hydronic Radiant Floor system requires a ventilation unit for fresh air intake purposes - The Building is outfitted with sensors to indicate optimal times for operable glazing to be opened as well as automatic sensor variants for the inaccessible, glazing on the North Facade - When all Operable Glazing is opened, the Mechanical Ventilation Unit Shuts off which saves energy
Manually Operated with Indicator Sensor
Automatically Operated with Sensor + Hydraulics
55
WALL SECTION - OPAQUE
WALL SECTIONS SOURCED FROM MONARCH METAL
1
A.
Parapet Detail
1
SCALE:
1/2" = 1'-0"
1
1
Parapet Detail
1
SCALE:
1/2" = 1'-0"
Parapet Detail
1
SCALE:
B.
1/2" = 1'-0"
2
1
Curtain Wall to Awning Detail
2
SCALE:
1/2" = 1'-0"
2
Parapet Detail
1
SCALE:
2
1/2" = 1'-0"
Curtain Wall to Awning Detail
2
SCALE:
1/2" = 1'-0"
Curtain Wall to Awning Detail
2
SCALE:
1/2" = 1'-0"
3 2
Control Layers Water Air/Vapor
3
Ground Connec�on Detail SCALE:
Thermal 3
2
1/2" = 1'-0"
GFCR to Window Rain Garden Curtain Wall to to Awning Detail SCALE:
1/2" = 1'-0"
Assembly Composition:
Roof System - R-Volt Photovoltaic Panels - Urbanscape Green Roof System: 1 1/2” Sedum-mix Blanket, 1” Green Roll, 1 1/2” Drainage System with buffer, Root Membrane, Waterproof Membrane, Roof Membrane, Air/Vapor Membrane, 3/4” Plywood, 10” Rigid Insula�on, 8” CLT Slab, CLT Structure. Wall System - Trespa Exterior Wood Panels - Country Wood; Sa�n - with Monarch Metal Fastener. OR Trespa Exterior Wall Panels - Metropolic Black; Oblique - with Monarch Metal MESTR-SSCLAD Concealed Fasteners, Waterproof Membrane, 3/4” Plywood, 5” Rigid Insula�on, Air/Vapor Membrane, 6” Steel Stud, 3/4” Gypsum Board OR Automated/Manual Top Hinged Window System, Fixed Window. Floor System - 1/8” Armstrong Flooring - Roan Oak; Natural, Roan Oak; Warm, Alder Mid, Handcra�ed Honey - , 1/2” Di. PEX Radiant Piping, Heat Reflec�ve Membrane, Acous�c Membrane, 4” CLT Slab, 8” Air Gap with Integrated Plumbing/Drainage/Fire Suppression/Electrical/Data/Ductwork, 9” CLT Slab, 6” Glulam Joist, 18” Glulam Beam, Fresh Air Supply Ven�la�on, 1/4” Armstrong Ceiling - Natural Varia�ons Beech -, Sprinkler Heads, Ligh�ng. French Drain System - 1 1/2” Raised Plank Walkway, 4’ Water Reten�on Area, Gravel - Course, Gravel - Fine, Sand, Filtra�on Layer, Piping.
56
WALL SECTION - TRANSPARENT
WALL SECTIONS
SEPTEMBER, 2017
SOURCED FROM KAWNEER
7500 Wall™ Curtain Wall System
5
EC 97911-135
3
Parapet Detail 3
3
SCALE:
1/2" = 1'-0"
Parapet Detail SCALE:
1/2" = 1'-0"
Laws and building and safety codes governing the design and use of glazed entrance, window, and curtain wall products vary widely. Kawneer does not control
7500 WALLTM
TM
2
Curtain Wall Vertical Fin Connection
2 Vertical Curtain Wall SCALE: Fin 1/2" =Connection 1'-0"
2
SCALE:
1/2" = 1'-0"
Assembly Composition: Roof System
Wall Systems Floor System
1
1
kawneer.com
ADMD110EN
- Hybrid Photovoltaic - Thermal Panel (PVT) - Extensive Vegetation, 3” Soil Substrate, Filter Fabric (typ.), Drainage System, Waterproof Membrane (typ.) 1.6” OPTIM - R Insulation (R Value - 46), Protection Layer (typ.), Root Barrier (typ.), Roof Deck with Vapor Barrier and Roof Structure - Kaweer 7500 Wall™ Curtain Wall System - 4” (Finish Floor, 3/4” Di. PEX Radiant Piping, Acoustic Layer, Thermal Mass), 4” Raised Floor, 8” Air Gap with Integrated Plumbing/Drainage/Electric & IT, 9” Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) Slab, 6” Glulam Joists, 18” Glulam Beam, Return and Supply Fresh Air Ventilation, Drop Ceiling, Fire Supression/Sprinkler Head, Lighting
Curtainwall Ground Termination SCALE:
1/2" = 1'-0"
57 1
Curtainwall Ground Termination SCALE:
1/2" = 1'-0"
EXTERIOR MATERIAL PALETTE
MATERIALS + EMBODIED ENERGY
MATERIALS FOR SELECTION R-Volt solar panels
HPL PLANKBOARD - Used in between Windows for Floors 2 and up - Tightly spaced Wood Texture - Accentuates Horizontality - Soft Brown acts as an Earth-tone PRECAST CONCRETE - Used for Members vertically bordering the windows of Floors 2 and above - Light Beige - Mild Texture - Harmonizes with Warm Browns of the HPL Plankboard to give a light but warm composition Stone Veneer -Used for Cantilever Ridge
kawneer 1600 curtainwall
precast concrete panels
little blustern
kawneer Versoleil sunshades
Trespa Wall Plank
wild lupine
kawneer Versoleil sunshades
Trespa Wall Panel
Grey Goldenrod
kawneer GLASSvent Windows
Shortâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s aster
SOUTH ELEVATION
- Smooth Texture - Lighter shade of black - Accentuates the Ridge which delineates entry - Forms an eyebrow that holds up the visual characteristics of Floors 2 and up while remaining being related to Division St. Level EXTENSIVE GREEN ROOFS - Used for Main and Cantilever Ridge Roofs - Excellent tool for rainwater absorption - Provides Texture and a pop of green color - Following along the Cantilever Ridge emphasizes its gesture to delineate Entry GFRC PANELS - Used for Division Street Level - Soft Dark Colour Contrasts with Lighter Upward Portion - Material Change + Form Recession Delineates Fabrication Lab Program from Library Functions MULLION TRIM -Used for Windows -Accentuate the geometric proportions of the glazing
DIVISION ST RENDERING
EAST ELEVATION
58
360 DEGREE PANORAMAS Rendering of the Front Entrance Showing Entry Procession.
Key Plan: Level 1 Division St.
360 Panorama QR Code:
59
360 DEGREE PANORAMAS Rendering of the Fab-Lab
Key Plan: Level 1 Division St.
360 Panorama QR Code:
60
360 DEGREE PANORAMAS Rendering of the Childâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Story-time Space and Activity Center.
Key plan: Level 2
360 Panorama QR Code:
61
360 DEGREE PANORAMAS Rendering of the Childâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Collections as well as Child Reading Area.
Key plan: Level 2
360 Panorama QR Code:
62
360 DEGREE PANORAMAS Rendering Overlooking the Atrium and Adult Collection.
Key plan: Level 3
360 Panorama QR Code:
63
360 DEGREE PANORAMAS Rendering at the Top of the Monumental Stairs
Key plan: Level 4
360 Panorama QR Code:
64