Sabine Pöller - Diagnostic and evaluation of the core strenght in triathletees

Page 1

14.02.2013

Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

S ABINE P ÖLLER1, T HOMAS M OELLER2 & M AREN W ITT1,2 1 2

FACULTY OF SPORT SCIENCE, UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG, GERMANY INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED TRAINING SCIENCE, LEIPZIG, GERMANY

Science & Triathlon - Magglingen - February 2013

Introduction  Functions of the trunk musculature:  

stable base force transmission

 Impact on athletic performance?  Prevention of injuries?

Santana (2005)

 Content C t t and d amountt off strength t th ttraining? i i ?  “Gold standard” for the measurement of

Tittel (1994)

core strength? Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pöller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

1


14.02.2013

Core Strength Testing • Measurement results of core strength differ strongly  possible causes:  isometric or isokinetic movements  endurance strength or 1 RM  different groups of subjects,  different measuring systems,  different measuring positions  movement speeds,  reps and  evaluation software (Verdonck et al., 1997) Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pöller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

Objectives What is the performance level of triathletes in an isometric trunk maximum strength test  in the cross-section of the total sample?  depending on age and gender?  depending on the training base?  compared over a preparation period and over a year?  gender-differentiated compared to the other sports: rowing, canoeing, swimming and throwing (athletics)?  In which amount and content is strength trained at

German triathlon bases?

Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pöller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

2


14.02.2013

Instrument and Measurement  Isometric maximum strength test using

the CTT Pegasus g (BfMC,, Leipzig, p g, Germany) at the Institute for Applied Training Science (Leipzig) within the complex performance diagnostics  Maximum force measured in the

sagittal, frontal & transversal plane  3 trials in the strength test (~15 min)

Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pöller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

Instrument and Measurement  Each subject has its own individual anthropometric

profile p  Necessary to determine:   

body mass body height upper body length

 Reference = upper body torque

Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pöller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

3


14.02.2013

Subjects  49 athletes (21 female and 28 male, regional and

national squad)  19.2 ± 3.0 years old Comparative Test A (after 2-4 months); n=16

1. Test (n=49)

Comparative Test B (after 1 year); n=11

Sex

Body height in cm

Body mass in kg

female

168.8 ± 6.3

58.1 ± 7.6

male

183.3 ± 6.3

70.5 ± 8.3

Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pöller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

Cross-Section Results (n=49) [Percent] 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Extension

Flexion

Lateral left

Lateral right

Rotation left

Rotation right

Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pöller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

4


14.02.2013

Gender Differences [Percent]

120

* *

110

* *

*

100 90 80 70 60 Extension

Flexion

Lateral left

male

Lateral right Rotation left Rotation right

female

Lateral Lateral Extension Flexion Signifikanztabelle left right p

.002

.084

.011

.015

Rotation Rotation left right .000

.007

Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pรถller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

Age Group Differences [Percent]

120 110 100 90 80 70 60 Extension

Flexion

Lateral left Lateral right Rotation left Juniors

Rotation right

U23/Elite

โ ข Juniors (n=28), U23/Elite (n=21) Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pรถller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

5


14.02.2013

Strength Training at the National Centers  Saarbrücken (n=8), Potsdam (n=22),

Neubrandenburg (n (n=9), 9), others (n (n=10) 10) Saarbrücken Potsdam

Neubrandenburg

strength training in h/year

~ 200

100-150

100-150

units per week

4

3-5

2-3

a) athletic training b) with i h gym equipement i c) with free weights

50 % 15 % 35 %

65 % 0% 35 %

66.6 % 33.3 % 0%

alternative strength training

none

Skikes, rowing, canoeing

xc-skiing

Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pöller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

Training Base Differences [Percent]

130

120 110 100 90 80 70 6 60 Extension

Flexion

Saarbrücken

Lateral_li Potsdam

Lateral_re Rotation_li Rotation_re Neubrandenburg

others

• Problems with inconsistent recording and group composition Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pöller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

6


14.02.2013

Development over one preparation period [Percent]

*

130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60

Extension

Flexion

Lateral left Lateral right Rotation left Rotation right 1. Test T t

2. Test T t

.787

Lateral left .095

Lateral right .956

Rotation left .072

Rotation right .054

.07

.38

.01

.27

.32

Extension

Flexion

p

.000

d

.77

Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pรถller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

Comparison of Sports Men

[Percent]

110 100 90 80 70 60 Extension Canoeing Swimming (Elite)

Flexion Rowing Triathlon

Lateral

Rotation

Swimming (Youth) Throwing

Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pรถller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

7


14.02.2013

Comparison of Sports Women

[Percent]

105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 Extension Canoeing Swimming (Elite)

Flexion

Lateral

Rowing Triathlon

Rotation

Swimming (Youth) Throwing

Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pรถller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

Single Cases

Male (17), Regional Squad

Male (20), Regional Squad

Female (22), National Squad

Female (27), National Squad

Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pรถller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

8


14.02.2013

Summary  Men have a good performance level, women have

significant deficits - explanation?  No significant differences by age and training  Trunk strength training with complex, alternative training methods  Good analysis of the trunk strength possible with this test

Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pöller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

Future Research  With ongoing testing, clarification of the trend in the      

longitudinal section Training intervention studies Benchmarks for triathletes Correlation of dysbalances and laterality Correlation of flexibility and strength performance I Impact t on the th competition titi result lt Standardized recording of strength training

Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pöller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

9


14.02.2013

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!

contact: sabine.poeller@gmail.com

Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pöller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

References Bourban, P., Hübner, K., Tschopp, M. & Marti, B. (2001). Grundkraftanforderungen im Spitzensport: Ergebnisse eines 3-teiligen Rumpfkrafttests. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin und Sporttraumatologie, 49 (2), 73-78. Cowley, P. M., Fitzgerald, S., Sottung, K., & Swensen, T. (2009). Age, Weight, and the Front Abdominal Power Test as g and Work in Young g Men and Women. Journal off Strength g and Predictors of Isokinetic Trunk Strength Conditioning Research, 23, 915-925. Denner, A. (1995). Muskuläre Profile der Wirbelsäule. Band 1: Grundlagen. Köln: Sport und Buch Strauß. Fröhlich, M. & Pieter, A. (2009). Cohen’s Effektstärken als Mass der Bewertung von praktischer Relevanz – Implikationen für die Praxis. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin und Sporttraumatologie, 57, 139-142. Nikolenko, M., Brown, L. E., Coburn, J. W., Spiering, B.A. & Tran, T. T. (2011). Relationship between Core Power and Mesures of Sport Performance. Kinesiology, 43 (2), 163-168. Prochnow, C. (2011). Entwicklung eines Trainingskonzepts zum spezifischen Krafttraining in der Sportart Triathlon im Hochleistungstraining. Studienarbeit, Trainerakademie Köln. Santana, J. (2005). Strength Training for Swimmers: Training the Core. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 27 (2), 40-42. Sato, K. & Mokha, M. (2009). Does Core Strength Training Influence Running Kinetics, Lower-Extremity Stability, and 5000-m Performance in Runners? Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 23, 133-140. Tittel, K. (2003). Beschreibende und funktionelle Anatomie des Menschen (14., völlig überarb. und erw. Aufl.). München, Jena: Urban und Fischer. Tschopp, M. (2003). Leistungsdiagnostik Kraft. Magglingen: Swiss Olympic. Verdonck, A. J., Höltke, V. & Theek, C. (1997). Isokinetische Kraftleistungsdiagnostik der Rumpfextensoren und – flexoren. Eine Untersuchung bei Hochleistungsschwimmern und Eistänzern/Eiskunstläufern der nationalen Spitzenklasse. Leistungssport, 27 (4), 39-44. Vincent, W. (1995). Statistics in kinesiology. Champaign: Human Kinetics. Weineck, J. (2000). Optimales Training : leistungsphysiologische Trainingslehre unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Kinder- und Jugendtrainings (11. Aufl.). Balingen: Spitta-Verlag. Witt, M. (2009, Oktober). Biomechanische Diagnostik selbstständig durchführen: Rumpfkraft. Vorlesung Masterstudiengang Sportwissenschaft an der Universität Leipzig. Zatsiorsky, V. M. & Kraemer, W. J. (2008). Krafttraining, Praxis und Wissenschaft. Aachen: Meyer & Meyer.

10


14.02.2013

Development over one year [Percent]

130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60

*

Extension

*

Flexion

Lateral left Lateral right Rotation left 1 Test 1.

Extension

Flexion

p

.024

.888

d

.70

.03

*

Lateral left .000 1.29

Rotation right

2 Test 2. Lateral right .000

Rotation left .155

.80

Rotation right .064

.28

.44

Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pöller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

Upper Body Torque  by Zatsiorsky (1984, in Witt, 2009)  needed: body mass (BM), body height (BH) and upper body

length (UBL). (UBL)

Women upper body mass (UBM) = -21.084 + 0.326 BM + 0.2155 BH Men upper body mass (UBM) = 10.0974 + 0.62064 BM - 0.06562 BH individual upper body torque = 0.45 UBL/100 * 9.81 UBM  Expected: Extension : Flexion – 2:1, Flexion : Lateral – 1:1,

Flexion : Rotation – 1:0,7

11


14.02.2013

Training Examples

(Prochnow, 2011; Eggert, 2011) Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pรถller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

Instrument and Measurement

12


14.02.2013

Kraftformen  Motorische Kraft=Maximalkraft, Schnellkraft und

Kraftausdauer (Letzelter & Letzelter, 1986)  Maximalkraft lk f =Basisfähigkeit, f h k Anteill an d der Absolutkraft, b l k f der willkürlich aktiviert werden kann (Bührle, 1985) Tab. : Erscheinungsformen und leistungsbestimmende Faktoren der Muskelkraft (nach Schmidtbleicher) Maximalkraft

Schnellkraft

Kraftausdauer

Reaktives Kraftverhalten

Muskelquerschnitt

Maximalkraft f

Maximalkraft f

Elastische Eigenschaften

Muskelfaserspektrum

Explosivkraft

Ermüdungswiderstandsfähigkeit

Reflexverhalten

willkürliche Aktivierungsfähigkeit

Startkraft

Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pöller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

13


14.02.2013

Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pรถller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

Science & Triathlon - Sabine Pรถller: Diagnostic and Evaluation of the Core Strength of Triathletes

14


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.