Trinity News Vol. 63, Issue 1

Page 1

TRINITY NEWS

Trinity News | Tuesday 20th September

Volume 63, Issue 1

trinitynews.ie

EST. 1953

Stacey Wrenn vists a Direct Provision Centre and describes the conditions

Features p.9

Read our Freshers’ week supplement for all your info on food, night out and more!

Trinity Life p.11

Michael Foley discusses the growing commercialisation of universities

Comment p.15

Students considering legal action over SU pro-choice mandate Niamh Lynch Cathal Kavanagh

A

group of Trinity students have consulted with solicitors about taking legal action against the pro-choice mandate of Trinity College Dublin Students’ Union (TCDSU). Speaking to Trinity News, Gavin Rothwell, one of the students concerned, said: “A number of students are currently exploring our legal options regarding how the Students’ Union operates (regarding) the automatic membership of every college student of the SU, and how there seems

to be an obligation to pay a levy of 8 annually. This raises genuine legal and constitutional issues of all students’ right to freedom of expression, association (and) disassociation, freedom of conscience and property rights”. Represented by Cormac O’Ceallaigh & Co. solicitors, the group has not commenced legal proceedings but “have begun to engage with relevant parties to receive clarification on the issues”. The move follows threats from other students to leave the SU last year. In emails seen by Trinity News, junior sophister Classics student Will Dillon requested in January that then SU President Lynn Ruane allow him resign from the SU, of which all students are compulsory members. In the correspondence with Ruane,

CSC introduces later start time for Freshers’ Week Societies will not be permitted to set up their stands before 10am from Tuesday onwards Sinéad Harrington Assistant News Editor

F

reshers’ Week will be marked by a later start time this year than in previous years, in line with new regulations introduced by the Central Societies Committee (CSC). From Tuesday onwards, the start time for Freshers’ Week will be 10am, with no society permitted to set up their stand before then. However, on Monday the start time will remain at 8am with stand set-ups commencing from 8.30am onwards. As in previous years, each society is permitted to borrow one table and two chairs from College for use at Freshers’ Week stands. However, as per the new regulations, no queuing will be allowed before 8am at any point during the week. Freshers’ Week has previously seen societies queuing from as early as 6am in an effort to procure the most prominent spots in Front Square, primarily those nearest to Front Gate. CSC continues to enforce the rule that there are to be no stands, obstructions or promotions under Front Arch, or on the central path to Front Arch. The change is being welcomed by society chairs who feel that the later start time will take unnecessary

pressure off societies to be in college hours before other students arrive. Speaking to Trinity News, Law Soc Auditor Hilary Hogan expressed her support for the changes, saying she was “very relieved that the Law Soc committee can have some rest which will help them to enjoy their week more, and do a better job with all the events we’re running”. These sentiments were echoed by Hist Auditor Ronan Mac Giolla Rua, who said the changes were “certainly a step toward alleviating the pressure on society committee members”. He did express some reservations, however, saying: “I am slightly concerned as to how this will play out, as in the absence of allocated stands. It is unclear whether now people will simply queue outside Front Arch or somewhere similar, in the hopes of dashing in to claim the best spots at 8am. We’ll have to wait and see how that goes I guess”. Notwithstanding the change in start time, the regulations remain largely unchanged from previous years. These include a blanket ban on amplification systems, a 4ft limit on the maximum width of gazebos, and a ban on the preparation and distribution of any food that does not come from an approved provider.

Dillon attributed his request to “the lack of effectiveness from part of the Union in representing all views, including mine, on campus”. At the time, Ruane said that she was not in a position to remove Dillon from the SU. Remarking on this matter, current SU President Kieran McNulty said: “No students have expressed their dissatisfaction to me”. In February 2014, 73% of Trinity students voted in favour of the SU’s proposal to adopt a pro-choice mandate on the issue of abortion. This resulted in the SU calling for a “full repeal” of the Eighth Amendment, which equates the life of the mother to that of the unborn child. The SU campaigned to Repeal the Eighth Amendment during Ruane’s

This raises geniune legal and constitutional issues of all students’ right to freedom of expression

presidency, while McNulty confirmed that supporting the Repeal campaign will be a priority during his presidency. During Freshers’ Week, the SU are organising a ‘Rallying Call for Repeal’ on the Dining Hall steps. McNulty commented on the situation: “I’m always happy to talk to students with other views or who are unsure of their stance. I realise not all students are in favour but we have to take action on the mandate, which passed profoundly. We are creating conversation on something that there is going to be a convention on and eventually a referendum on”.

Trinity among most efficient Irish colleges, finds new study of Irish third level education

What is the real cost of the Olympics?

InDepth p.20

Panda’s are removed from the endangered species list

SciTech p.21

Trinity News guide to all the sports clubs in college

Sport p. 23

Related findings include benefits of gender diversity and short-term effects of funding cuts Cathal Kavanagh Investigations A new report into the efficiency of Irish universities and Institutes of Technology has shown Trinity to be “at or near the frontier in all areas”, according to an academic involved in the study. Professor Brian Lucey said that Trinity is “pretty much a class leader” in an Irish context, on the back of the study which shows it ahead of the national average when it comes to efficiency in teaching, research, and knowledge transfer activities like patenting and commercialisation. The report, carried out by three academics from the Trinity Business School, analysed the efficiency of Irish Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) relative to one another with regard to the three areas of activity. Professor Lucey, who authored the study with Dr Charles Larkin and Dr Qiantao Zhang, said that the research was important as it “provides a look into the three domains that universities are dealing with nowadays”. The work was carried out as part of the ongoing TIONCHAR project, which looks at the economic impact of Irish education more broadly. The report also found that an institution having a higher share of female academic staff was beneficial to efficiency. A demonstrable hit to efficiency in 2010-11 is evident

from the report as funding cuts took hold - though the year was an exception in the context of an ongoing trend of increasing efficiency. Professor Lucey said that similar research has been carried out on institutions elsewhere, but that no international comparisons could correctly be drawn from this study, which only looked at Irish institutions to assess who was “best in their own field”. “We can’t say anything from this study” about the comparative efficiency of Irish as opposed to UK, US or European institutions, although similar research has indeed been carried out elsewhere. He added that on the metrics that are comparable with the UK, “we come out pretty well”. The report also looks at the correlation between the different efficiency estimates. One of the main conclusions being drawn from the research is that it is extremely hard for an institution to improve its efficiency in all three domains, with two being the best that can be hoped for. “Put differently, an institution cannot improve its efficiency in research or knowledge transfer by improving its efficiency in teaching, as teaching seems to be irrelevant to the other two types of activities”, the report states. Professor Lucey said that though the efficiency scores are “to some extent independent of the funding

issue”, there are lessons to be inferred for education policy more generally. Research suggests that “trying to push institutions to be best in class at all aspects of the mission will be difficult, that you might actually be better off allowing for specialisation”. The study used a number of inputs and outputs to assess the overall efficiency of the country’s universities and ITs between the 200910 and 2013-14 academic years. The results sets published accounted for both ‘unadjusted’ and ‘quality-adjusted’ inputs and outputs respectively. “In particular, the qualityadjusted measures take into account the reliance of an institution on state funding and the strength of research capacity”, which may impact on the efficiency score. For example, when looking at the field of teaching, inputs included the institution’s total income, academic and non-academic staff and fixed assets, while outputs in the different activity areas included the numbers of different types of graduates, the income derived from research and the number of patents and spin-out firms generated. In both the ‘unadjusted’ and ‘quality-adjusted’ models, Trinity scored above the national average on all counts. CONTINUED INSIDE

Tn2 visits the Dublin Fashion Festival, gets portraits painted by a robot named Paul, talks to composer Jane Deasy about her Fringe show, Kaperlak

>> >> >>


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.