TALES OF MONTREAL
THE HOOPS OF WHITE
SPECIAL REPORT
AND GREEN
DISCIPLINE IN TRINITY HALLS FEATURES 10
HANGING WITH ROVERS: SPORTS FEATURES 22
KARL MCDONALD FINDS OUT WHAT MAKES THEM TICK
SOMETHING STRANGE IS AFOOT: OPINION 17
UFOS AND THE UN
Two
TRINITY NEWS Est 1953
University Lack of transparency over €1 million of student funds highlighted at DUCAC AGM Times in ffSU claims students have no say in Sports Centre ffLack of transperency in fund allocation ffDirector of Sport accused of ignoring students
libel row
UCD Med Day: Girls on Tour
Caitriona Murphy & Aoife Crowley College News Editor & Editor
THE UNIVERSITY Times Editor Tom Lowe was forced to issue a full apology following the publication of his Trinity Top Twenty supplement. The Trinity Twenty ranks various student figures in the College community in terms of perceived spending power, influence and prestige. Education Officer Jennifer Fox’s entry at number three caused the libel controversy for Communications Officer Lowe. Fox’s entry contained a number of unsubstantiated rumours about her personal life, including an insinuation of a romantic relationship with ViceProvost Patrick Prendergast, which Lowe later declared had no basis in fact. Prendergast responded by threatening to sue the paper and demanded a retraction of all copies of the University Times which were in
Eleni Megoran College Sport Editor
A FIERY exchange broke out at the DUCAC AGM last week when the Students’ Union raised the issue of where over one million euro of students’ money is allocated. The money in question is raised by the annual student sports charge of ¤77 paid by each student as part of their registration fee, a stipulation which was introduced by a student referendum in 2007. The Sports Centre and the Students’ Union started a heated argument on the lack of student representation in the running of the Sports Centre at the AGM. Michelle Tanner, the new head of the Sports Department, has complete control over the allocation of this large sum of student money. Students’ Union President, Nikolai Trigoub-Rotnem, stated in an interview afterwards that “students give the vast majority of the funding [to the Sports Centre] and [they] have no say at all [...] a case of taxation without representation.” He went on to say that the Union has no issue with the sports charge but with the lack of accountability that the Sports Centre has to students. “Students should have a say where their money is going, the sum is massive, and no one has a say.” Tanner said that the only option for students is the open door policy, through email and the suggestion box in the sports centre. However TrigoubRotnem claimed that this informal measure is ineffective, and that it just leads to a talking shop. With such informal approaches in communicating “We’re the hired professionals. Do students go to the health centre and tell the doctor how to treat his patients?” with the students, Tanner, he argues, is a gatekeeper with the ability to cherry pick suggestions. The lack of student Continued on page 2
Lowe stated that it was meant to be “tonguein-cheek”, but that some people “hadn’t taken it that way”. SS In keeping with tradition, Trinity campus was invaded last Monday by UCD Medical students in drag as part of their Med Day celebrations. Security quickly responded by shutting Front Gate to those not in possession of a student card and ejecting the invaders
Costing of greenhouses as teaching space deemed to be “unreasonable” Aoife Crowley Editor
THE BUILDINGS and laboratories of the School of Natural Sciences are “technically unsuitable for some of the research carried out in them”, an external review board has found. The Review of the School of Natural Sciences, which has just been made available, was carried out last spring. It states, “There already seems to be too many students for the available space and resources.” This has led to a large number of Senior Sophister students being denied access to the subject of their choice, though the Review notes that some of their dissatisfaction is ameliorated by good quality attention in Senior Sophister year. The recent reorganization of the school has not
watch out for society events during
alleviated teaching loads, which are seen to be high in comparison with similar European institutions. New Masters courses have imposed extra burdens, with staff in desperate need of increased administrative, technical and financial support. The review goes on to say that teaching facilities and space is so limited, that in some cases parallel classes and lectures have to be carried out all year, as the rooms are too small to accommodate the full class. This obviously puts a further stress on teaching loads. One of the problems facing the School is College’s classification of unusable space as normal teaching or research space. The classification of the Botanical Gardens and some other very low-grade space as teaching space is deemed to be
“unreasonable”. Though this problem occurs in many other universities, the Review believes the problem to be “particularly acute” in Trinity. In response to the review, Professor John Parnell, the Head of the School, agreed that this costing of all space as of equal value was “unhelpful” to schools such as Natural Sciences, where a large proportion of the space is unsuited to class space. “This seems particularly unfair in our case as we have greenhouses which are completely unserviced with no water, light, or heat and which are costed at the same level as our best laboratory space as are our basement areas,” Parnell commented. The report also recognized that the School had raised in excess of ¤26 million in the last five years for research.
circulation. Following negotiations, the paper’s staff agreed to gather all distributed copies, and go through each one with a marker to censor the paragraph in question. An apology was later issued online: “We wish to state unequivocally that this assertion has no basis in fact. We would like to apologise to all parties for this lapse of editorial responsibility and any damage or hurt that it has caused”. The Trinity Twenty supplement was not added to the paper’s online archive. Lowe confirms that he takes editorial responsibility for the article, which was written without credit to any writer. He acknowledges that the incident was an “editorial oversight” and that he had tried to make “too much of a splash” with his first issue. He admits he had learned a lot from the error. He claims that the supplement was supposed to be “tongue-in-cheek”, and that “some people just hadn’t taken it that way”. Lowe acknowledges that the tone was “uneven” across the Trinity Twenty supplement, many articles of which were cut off midContinued on page 2
brought to you by the Central Societies Committee
Fourth Week
www.trinitysocieties.ie Vol 57
Issue 2
19 October, 2010