Massachusetts Daily Collegian: Apr. 9, 2014

Page 1

WHERE ARE THE HORSE COPS AND PEPPER SPRAY?

PAGE 5

PAGE 4

THE MASSACHUSETTS

A free and responsible press

DAILY COLLEGIAN DailyCollegian.com

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

News@DailyCollegian.com

Administration, SGA, GSS sign new agreement

farewell to a film star

Chancellor creates 3 advisory boards By Marie Maccune Collegian Staff

MCT

Cheryl Standard takes a picture of flowers that were put on the star of Mickey Rooney in Hollywood on Monday. Rooney, as a celebrated child actor in films of the 1930s and 40s era and one of the era’s top box-office draws, has died at 93.

Rethinking the ‘language gap’ Department holds open discussion By Julia Mclaughlin Collegian Correspondent

The Department of Languages, Literatures and Cultures at the University of Massachusetts held an open discussion on the “language gap,” the linguistic separation between underprivileged children and wealthy children, Tuesday evening in Herter Hall. Also known as the “word gap,” this disparity is often seen as the result of parents from lower socioeconomic backgrounds not speaking enough to their children during development. After reading recent articles from The New York Times on the so-called “word

gap,” UMass Professor of Anthropology Jonathan Rosa said he found these works to be limiting and one-dimensional, and recognized that this controversial topic needs more analysis in order to be understood fairly and accurately. With the help of Meghan Armstrong of the Hispanic Linguistics Department, and led by Rosa, this open discussion served as an opportunity for faculty and students to share their perspectives on, and stories of, the “language gap.” Rosa initiated the discussion by referencing past research on the subject by linguists and anthropologists. Anne Fernald, an American psychologist and specialist in children’s language development, has conducted recent studies within

this field. Her research concluded that by 18 months, a language-gap can be recognized in children. In the 1980s, Shirley Brice Heath, an American linguistic anthropologist, analyzed three communities in the Carolinas – one wealthy, middle-class white community, a working-class white community and a workingclass African American community – as part of a 10-year ethnography to study language and linguistic differences. “She shows us how only particular home practices are picked up on in school so that the practices that kids are learning in the working class African American communities, the particular kind of verbal routines, are not viewed as valuable in school,” Rosa said.

In this way, family practices valued in the white, middle-class communities control the way that language is defined. The school that Heath observed, therefore, particularizes certain skills in mainstream society that some children have rooted in their family, which others do not share. “What Shirley Brice Heath showed us is how systematically, over the course of the school year, the children’s responses that didn’t fit the presumed-upon normative routines that the teacher was seeking to enact in that situation positioned them as cognitively inferior and as incapable, or academically unsuccessful,” Rosa said. Stressing these cultural see

Serving the UMass community since 1890

WORD GAP on page 3

The Student Government Association, Graduate Student Senate and University of Massachusetts administration signed a shared governance agreement earlier this semester that establishes new advisory boards to the Chancellor and aims to improve communication with student government. According to the agreement, which was signed on Jan. 22 by UMass Chancellor Kumble Subbaswamy, SGA President Zac Broughton and GSS President Robin Anderson, the Chancellor is required to establish three new advisory boards. These boards include Academic Affairs, Administration and Finance and Student Affairs. Six undergraduate students appointed by the SGA and two graduate students appointed by the GSS will sit on each of the boards. The agreement also requires the Chancellor to meet with members of the SGA and GSS at least twice a semester to discuss relevant University policies and initiatives. “I think this is reflective of the Chancellor’s commitment to being very studentfocused. He really wants to have the input of the students,” campus spokesperson Ed Blaguszewski said. “He goes to many campus events in a variety of contexts, but this really formalizes the interactions. … We can all get busy, so unless we anchor our calendar to specific meetings, like the agreement does, we can fail to address certain issues. This is a way to say we are really getting the input that we want and need from students.”

Broughton, a senior studying political science and legal studies, said he was excited about the agreement. “More student voice means a better future for the University,” he said. According to Broughton, before the agreement, the Chancellor and Vice Chancellor of Student Affairs would meet directly with only the SGA president multiple times a month. Broughton said he sees the new advisory boards as a way of creating new opportunities for more student voices to be heard, including voices outside of the SGA. “The cancellation of EDM shows on campus really acted as a catalyst for getting the agreement into writing,” he said. “The SGA leadership had doubts about the administration’s authority to do so and wanted to be a bigger part of the decision process.” When asked about reception by the administration, Broughton was positive. “The great thing about this Chancellor and Vice Chancellor is that they really do care about student input,” he said. “They have been really receptive to the new boards and student ideas.” In terms of the future, Broughton hopes to see this agreement used as a model to create even more advisory boards, saying that “the best part about the language is that it doesn’t put limitations on what boards we can and can’t have.” Robin Anderson, president of the GSS, was also a co-signer. “The advisory boards, I believe, were a reaction to the ongoing voices of the student body who were calling for more participation in University governance over the past couple of see

AGREEMENT on page 2

Nuclear deal brings Iran Democrats hope equal pay issue will boost voter turnout little economic relief Citizens say they see minimal change By raMin MostaghiM and Paul richter Los Angeles Times

TEHRAN, Iran — When Iran’s leaders signed a preliminary nuclear deal with world powers in November, they promised that the sixmonth agreement would quickly start “melting the iceberg” of Western sanctions, lead to new trade ties and improve the lives of ordinary Iranians. Opponents of the deal in the United States and the Middle East said much the same thing, warning that

it would rapidly erode the international sanctions that have crippled Iran’s economy. It hasn’t worked out that way. More than four months into the deal, many Iranians think the interim accord has done little to help them. “The deal has not brought any economic breakthrough for the common people,” said Mohammed Hydari, editor of Khandani, a political and economic journal. The “meager” funds released by world powers each month under the deal, he said, “are not helping the people, but the government.” Dwindling popular support in Iran for the preliminary accord, coupled with

continuous resistance to any nuclear compromise from hard-liners, raises doubt about how long Iranian President Hassan Rouhani can push ahead with his effort to reach a final deal. It also builds pressure on negotiators for Iran and six world powers to complete the complex diplomacy before the July 20 deadline. Under the Nov. 24 agreement, which took effect Jan. 20, Iran and the six world powers - the United States, Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China - must all consent to a six-month extension of talks. But diplomats fear that see

IRAN on page 2

The party aims to mobilize women By lindsay Wise and david lightMan McClatchy Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON — A Democratic blitz this week for new orders and laws promising equal pay for women is a key agenda item the party hopes will boost turnout this fall among its most loyal voters - a crucial strategy in a midterm election, when turnout tends to drop. President Barack Obama signed two executive actions, which will bar federal contractors from retaliating against employ-

ees for comparing salaries and require contractors to report compensation data to the government by gender and race. At the same time, Democratic lawmakers launched an assault on Republicans in Congress for opposing legislation that would expand measures to prevent gender-based pay discrimination nationwide. That bill, the Paycheck Fairness Act, is expected to fail a procedural vote Wednesday in the Senate. “Republicans in Congress have been gumming up the works,” Obama said Tuesday. “They’ve been blocking progress.” By reviving a familiar line of attack from the 2012 cam-

paign - that Republicans are waging a “war on women” - the president and fellow Democrats aim to capitalize on the party’s longstanding edge among women voters in this fall’s elections for control of Congress. They also hope to force Republicans to oppose popular measures and thus alienate women voters. One senior Obama administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss internal strategy, said it was unclear if the push for equal pay would help Democrats but said it was likely that “opposition will hurt the GOP.” Motivating women see

EQUAL PAY on page 3


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.