Massachusetts Daily Collegian: Oct. 19, 2015

Page 1

THE MASSACHUSETTS

A free and responsible press

DAILY COLLEGIAN DailyCollegian.com

Monday, October 19, 2015

Serving the UMass community since 1890

News@DailyCollegian.com

Design Building breaks ground

The bird man

Building creation to cost $52 million by colby SearS Collegian Staff

KATHERINE MAYO/COLLEGIAN

Tom Ricardi shows off the first of several birds at the Birds of Prey event in the Lower Level of the W.E.B Du Bois Library on Friday. Ricardi, a wildlife rehabilitator, gave a presentation about the behaviors of different species of birds.

The University of Massachusetts celebrated the planned construction of the $52 million Design Building on Friday at a ceremonial groundbreaking. The ceremony honored the state-ofthe-art academic facility and the innovative wood construction technologies it will incorporate. About 100 people celebrated at the event, which featured remarks from UMass President Marty Meehan. Chancellor Kumble R. Subbaswamy, Provost and Senior Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs Katherine Newman and State Rep. Ellen Story also spoke. “It’s bold, beautiful, and brilliant,” said Subbaswamy of the building, which he said will be “the most advanced wood structure in the United States” once completed, yielding zero carbon emissions.

Construction of the Design Building began in the spring and is expected to be finished in 2017. The structure, which will be 87,200 square feet, will house three areas of academic study from three separate colleges. These include Landscape Architecture & Regional Planning in the College of Social and Behavioral Sciences, the Department of Architecture in the College of Humanities and Fine Arts and the Building Construction Technology program in the College of Natural Sciences. It will occupy parts of parking lot 62, which is next to the Studio Arts Building. “It’s going to be a very exciting new building,” UMass Project Manager Burt Ewart told the Daily Collegian in the spring. “It’s being designed as a modern showcase of timber technology.” The “super sustainable” four-story structure will feature wood frame construcsee

BUILDING on page 2

Nearly Naked Mile As Iranian nuclear deal goes into donates clothes force, some questions still remain Hundreds run in philanthropic event by

Stuart FoSter Collegian Staff

In the brightness of Friday’s late afternoon, hundreds of students huddled together behind a starting line in the Northeast Residential Area Quad. Some were decorated in body paint, while some wore elaborately designed costumes, but most wore the bare minimum: underwear. As the students stretched out and warmed up, a voice counted down the number of minutes remaining until they could start running. The Nearly Naked Mile, a fundraiser designed to donate extra clothing for the needy during Homecoming Weekend, was about to begin. The Nearly Naked Mile was established at the University of Massachusetts by the Student Alumni Association and is in its fourth year. Students who register are required to donate at least one article of cloth-

ing, which is then given to the Amherst Survival Center, before running a mile from the Northeast Quad to the Southwest Residential Area. “We wanted to start a homecoming tradition that had a philanthropic component,” said Dianna Bronchuk, a senior communication and sociology major who is the vice president for traditions in the Student Alumni Association. The Nearly Naked Mile is part of an ongoing relationship between the ASC and UMass, which also consists of people involved with the University volunteering at the Survival Center, donating items such as food and holding a similar event to the Nearly Naked Mile, the Dash and Dine 5K race, in the spring. The organizers of the Nearly Naked Mile contact the Amherst Survival Center in advance to confirm that they can accept the clothes as donations, which the ASC is happy to do. “All the good quality items that get donated are usually on see

MILE on page 2

by Paul richter Tribune Washington Bureau WASHINGTON - The international nuclear agreement with Iran comes into force Sunday with some key questions about implementation still unanswered. The U.S. and five other world powers will begin taking steps that, over the next half a year or so, will remove economic sanctions on Iran as it rolls back nuclear activities to prevent it from obtaining a nuclear bomb. Both the Iranian and U.S. governments appear strongly committed to following through on the deal, reached July 14 in Vienna after a dozen years of negotiations. Yet they still haven’t sorted out all the tricky questions on how Iran’s nuclear program will be monitored, how fully sanctions will be eased, and how harshly violations of the rules will be dealt with by world powers, among

other issues. Disagreements on these could lead to continuing battles and delays in implementation, though they’re not expected to sink the agreement, diplomats and outside experts say. “There are potentially contentious issues in there,” said Gary Samore, a former arms control adviser to President Barack Obama who is now executive director for research at the Harvard Kennedy School’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. The two sides may disagree over:

MONITORING Iran and the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog agency, the International Atomic Energy Agency, have yet to sort out all details of how inspectors will keep an eye on nuclear activities, such as uranium enrichment. The agreement is specific on many points, but some

important details can be settled only as the new restrictions are put in place, experts say. The nuclear agency is likely to push for strict oversight, and Iran may object to some steps as infringement of its sovereignty. Iran is expected to provide a complete inventory of its key nuclear hardware; the world powers may react strongly if they believe Iran is hiding something.

SANCTIONS The United States and the European Union are committed to lifting punishing sanctions on trade, investment and energy after Iran takes steps such as storing its centrifuges and redesigning a heavywater nuclear reactor. But how much sanctions relief is in store remains uncertain. The United States and the European Union are going to maintain sanctions that were imposed

on Iran for human rights and terrorism infractions. It’s not entirely clear how closely they will enforce the rules, experts say. And they may add more sanctions if, for instance, they see Iran using armed proxies aggressively in its region. The two sides are already at odds over sanctions that the agreement continues on Iran’s trade in conventional arms and ballistic missiles systems. Iran is insisting that it will not heed those rules, and last weekend fired an intercontinental ballistic missile to test its technology. The Obama administration said the test was a sanctions violation because the missile was capable of carrying a nuclear weapon, and appealed to the United Nations to enforce the rules. Obama, at a news conference Friday, stopped short of threatening Iran see

IRAN on page 2

Small donors playing a major role in 2016 campaigns by Zachary Mider Bloomberg News

NEW YORK — Thanks to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United, this was supposed to be the era of big money in politics. It’s proving to be the era of small money, too. Establishment candidates for the presidency like Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio and Hillary Clinton, who rely on the traditional dinner-party fundraising circuit to collect stacks of $2,700 checks, are

being upstaged in the money race. Ben Carson, Bernie Sanders and Ted Cruz are turning their popularity with their parties’ grass roots into cash, piled up in smaller increments, often over the Internet. Carson, a retired brain surgeon who has never held public office, led the Republican field in campaign fundraising for the quarter that ended in September. His $21 million take included $12 million in contributions of less than $200. Sanders’ $26

million haul, gathered mostly from under-$200 donors, almost equaled Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton’s total. “There are just more small donors in the action, because they think this time they’re in control,” said Kellyanne Conway, a Republican pollster in New York who runs a super PAC supporting Cruz. “It’s a contest between electability and electricity, and electricity is winning.” Technology is transforming the election, allowing

candidates to turn an attention-grabbing debate performance or a viral sound-bite into millions of dollars in a matter of hours with the help of social media and smartphones. Carson said he raised $1 million within 24 hours of his appearance at a Republican debate in September, and that donations poured in at a similar rate later in the month when he declared that a Muslim shouldn’t be president. Sanders’ campaign said he raised $1.3 million in four

hours after his first debate appearance. To be sure, the avalanche of super PAC money unleashed by Citizens United and subsequent court decisions in 2010 remains a critical factor in the race. Bush, who has gathered only $25 million for his campaign since declaring his candidacy in June, spent much of the first half of the year assembling a $102 million super PAC. These vehicles can raise unlimited sums from individuals and cor-

porations - some individual Bush donors wrote checks of $1 million or more - as long as they don’t coordinate certain types of spending with a campaign. The limitations of unlimited money were brought into focus in September, when the campaigns of Republicans Rick Perry and Scott Walker collapsed. Both had the backing of super PACs with millions of dollars still in the bank, but a see

DONORS on page 2


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Massachusetts Daily Collegian: Oct. 19, 2015 by Massachusetts Daily Collegian - Issuu