Massachusetts Daily Collegian: April 6, 2016

Page 1

THE MASSACHUSETTS

A free and responsible press

DAILY COLLEGIAN DailyCollegian.com

Wednesday, April 6, 2016

Serving the UMass community since 1890

News@DailyCollegian.com

Professor discusses state of cyber Groups to hold discussion about harassment law Tuesday evening ‘Auspicious time’ to higher ed. racism discuss harassment Day-long event to be held on Friday By BrEndan dEady Collegian Staff

A group of student run organizations, faculty and administration members have collaborated to host a day-long discussion dedicated to grassroots responses to racism within higher education. The Racial Justice Coalition, comprised of more than a dozen organizations, is dedicating Friday at the University of Massachusetts to address anti-racism and anti-white supremacy student activism on college campuses. Participants plan to gather in front of the Student Union at approximately 11:45 a.m. for a “Racial Justice March” that will set the day’s events in motion. Marchers will then proceed to the Commonwealth Honors College Events Hall where the remainder of the day’s programs will take place. A student activism panel that includes members from UMass, Amherst College and the University of Missouri will follow the march to CHC at 1 p.m., according to the group’s Facebook page. The current wave of anti-racist student activism can be traced back to the events that transpired at the University of Missouri in late October 2015. At Missouri, minority

students collaborated with athletes to host a series of protests regarding their university administration’s response to a number of racially charged incidents, according to multiple media reports. The protests led to the subsequent resignation of the university system president, Tim Wolfe. Students at Amherst College also staged their own anti-racism demonstrations in November following the developments at Missouri’s campus. A collection of student groups at Amherst College coined their movement “Amherst Uprising” after students occupied the Robert Frost Library in solidarity with students of color at Missouri, Yale University and other colleges, according to the group’s website. Members of the UMass campus established their own campaign that culminated in a student walkout led by members of the Black Student Union and Student Bridges in late Nov. 2015. The demonstrations resulted in a response from the administration in the form of campus-wide emails, listening and discussion sessions and an expansion of the University’s Strategic Diversity Plan. While University administration members have scheduled a number of public events to explore ways to improve diversification and have participated see

By ElizaBEth WallacE Collegian Correspondent

University of Maryland Professor of Law, Danielle Citron, delivered a lecture titled “Hate Crimes in Cyberspace” as part of the Interdisciplinary Studies Institute (ISI) 2016 Residency in the Campus Center on Tuesday. In the wake of the recent

distribution of anti-Semitic flyers to printers and faxes to campuses across the country, including UMass, Citron discussed the prevalence of cyber harassment in society, current laws regulating it and the steps taken by private companies to combat it. Today, unlike 2007, when Citron began working in the field, there is a greater responsiveness from law enforcement regarding cyber harassment as well as

exciting new developments in the field to discuss, she said. “It’s definitely an auspicious time to talk about cyber harassment, which is the subject of my book,” Citron said. Citron wrote “Hate Crimes in Cyberspace,” which was published by Harvard University Press in 2014, according to the ISI website. Citron identified the difference between hate speech

and cyber harassment to distinguish between what is and is not protected by the first amendment. Specifically, cyber harassment falls outside the confines of the first amendment, which makes it unprotected, she said. “It’s not hate speech. Cyber harassment (is) … a persistent course of conduct that is targeted at a specific person … (and) is designed

see

CYBER on page 2

IslamophobIa not welcome

STAND on page 2

DANIEL MALDONADO/COLLEGIAN

Students covered Islamophobic graffiti painted onto the FAC by replacing it with a different message, “Stop the Hate,” on Tuesday, April 5.

Praise for Garland, but no Senate vote Documentary shows alleged Multiple senators met with Garland By lisa Mascaro Tribune Washington Bureau WASHINGTON — The Republican blockade of President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee shows no signs of cracking, even as senators who have met with Judge Merrick Garland find little not to like in the seasoned jurist. On Tuesday, Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine heaped praise on Garland after an hourlong private session in which they discussed the Second Amendment, executive reach and the role of the court. “The meeting left me more convinced than ever the process should proceed,” Collins said outside her office. “I think if more of my colleagues sit down with Judge Garland, they’re going to be impressed with him.” But neither confirmation hearings nor a Senate vote is expected. It’s a strategy engineered by Republican leaders to deny Obama’s influence on the court, but that also risks dragging the confrontation battle into the election year, when voters

will decide which party controls the Senate. Republican senators are un der enormous pressure from conservative activists to prevent the court’s balance, now split 4-4, from tilting toward a Democratic nominee following the sudden death of Justice Antonin Scalia. But polls show most Americans disapprove of the blockade, which will probably keep the court shorthanded well into 2017. As lawmakers returned to Washington on Tuesday after their spring break, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., noted that all but two GOP senators – referring to Collins and Mark Kirk of Illinois –are backing his strategy to leave the vacancy for the next president to fill. “It is safe to say there will be no hearings or votes,” McConnell said. The political strains of the Senate’s inaction, though, have begun to show on some senators. One other Republican, Sen. Jerry Moran of Kansas, had joined Collins and Kirk in calling for consideration of Garland’s nomination,

see

GARLAND on page 3

Israeli manipulation of media First screening in public shown Tues. By BrEndan dEady Collegian Staff

Approximately 80 people filed into room N251 of the Integrative Learning Center Tuesday night for the first public screening of “The Occupation of the American Mind: Israel’s Public Relations War in the United States,” a documentary film depicting the alleged manipulation of media narratives to garner American support for Israel’s actions in the Palestinian territories. The film was produced by the Media Education Foundation, an organization that produces and distributes documentary films and other educational resources to inspire critical thinking about the social, political and cultural impact of American mass media, according to its website. Sut Jhally, a communications professor at the University of Massachusetts, is the MEF’s founder and executive director, and and also provided testimony throughout the film.

The documentary delivered its core argument by presenting first-hand footage of the violence occurring during the Israeli occupation of Palestine, followed by testimony from a number of academics to support the points made by the clips. The film referenced primary documents generated by the Israeli government’s public relations wing. The underlying narrative pushed throughout the film is that throughout the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Israeli government officials have deliberately tried to influence the framing and consequential reactions to each instance of violent conflict. The film alleges that Israel harnesses the narrative of themselves as victims of history who are only reacting to aggression from Palestinians. The film alleges that Israeli officials employ the tactics generally used by propagandists: Manipulation of perspective, control of language, agenda-setting, repetition of favorable narratives and the eschewing of context when instances of violence occur in order to serve their own purposes.

Israeli favoritism is a phenomena concentrated within the U.S., according to the film. One segment analyzes news coverage of a particular period of fighting and reveals that Israeli standpoints were represented three times as much as Palestinian ones on American network shows. The film argues that not only were supporters of Israel given more air time, but anchors framed the questions in a way where the only logical answer is to support Israel’s justification for bombing Palestinians as an action of defense. After a series of opinions and images were presented to argue that a media bias exists toward Israel, the documentary then traced the history of the establishment of the Jewish state. Contributors to the documentary acknowledged that the crimes endured during the Holocaust were horrific, but said they did not justify the uprooting of an established population. Israel was established in 1948 and immediately entered a war with neighboring Arab nations over the decision to carve a

Jewish settlement over disputed, historically religious land. After its victory, Israel experienced a period of general sympathy and was referred to as a modernday David versus Goliath. In 1967, Israel was attacked once more over border disagreements and had victory, even increasing its land holdings by claiming territory in Egypt and Palestine. Following the war, Israel began transporting its citizens into settlements to territories previously held by Palestinians, violating United Nations security Resolution 242. The resolution bars an occupying power from relocating its citizens to solidify its claim on an area. The film alleges that Israel established martial law, violated the human rights of Palestinians and began its transition from its position as the underdog to a bully. Here the documentary explained that the trend of applying a narrow focus to an issue regarding Israel’s actions emerged. The narrative of human rights violations, the death

see

DOCUMENTARY on page 3


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.