THE MASSACHUSETTS
A free and responsible press
DAILY COLLEGIAN
Thursday, December 10, 2015
DailyCollegian.com
Serving the UMass community since 1890
News@DailyCollegian.com
Supreme Court hears arguments on affirmative action
Future at public univ. in jeopardy By David G. Savage Tribune Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON — The future of affirmative action at public universities appeared in some doubt Wednesday as the Supreme Court justices debated for a second time whether to strike down a race-based admissions policy at the University of Texas. It was clear that the court’s conservatives, including Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., believe that using affirmative action in admission decisions is unneeded and unconstitutional. When a university lawyer spoke of the importance of
classroom diversity, Roberts asked, “What unique perspective does a minority student bring to a physics class?” In the past, when the high court has upheld affirmative action, it did so with the understanding that it was a “temporary” measure, the chief justice said. “When do you think your program will be done?” he asked. The liberals, led by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, spent much of the hour arguing in defense of the university’s policy. Sotomayor, the court’s first Latina, grew up in the Bronx and said she had benefited from affirmative action when she was admitted to Princeton University. “I fear something. I do
have a worry” that the court is on the verge of shutting down affirmative action at state universities across the nation, she said. By contrast, Justice Antonin Scalia questioned whether affirmative action truly benefits black students. “There are some who contend it does not benefit African-Americans to get them into the University of Texas, where they do not do well, as opposed to having them go to a less advanced school, a slower-track school, where they do well,” he said. Scalia was referring to the so-called “mismatch theory” originally set out by University of California, Los Angeles law professor Richard Sander, which contends that black students
sometimes fare badly if they are admitted to a top-tier law school. The same students would have done better had they enrolled in another law school that was somewhat less demanding, the theory holds. Scalia said he was not convinced the University of Texas needed more black students. “Maybe it ought to have fewer,” he said. “I don’t think it stands to reason that it’s a good thing for the University of Texas to admit as many blacks as possible.” Washington attorney Gregory Garre, the lawyer for the university, who served as solicitor general, the government’s top appellate lawyer, under President George W. Bush, said the court had rejected that thinking when
Furry friends ease finals stress
it upheld limited use of affirmative action in a case from Michigan in 2003. “I think what experience shows, at Texas, California and Michigan, that now is not the time and this is not the case to roll back student body diversity in America,” he said. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who almost surely holds the deciding vote, voiced frustration because university lawyers could not quantify in detail what role race plays in Texas in determining which students are admitted. “We’re just arguing the same case again,” Kennedy said at one point, referring to the fact that the court had heard the same case two years ago and sent it back
By Kristen Leonard Collegian Correspondent The University of Massachusetts Student Government Association passed an election reform in early November that will move senate elections from the fall to spring semester to give student voters more time to learn about the candidates. Under the election reforms, proposed by SGA president Sïonan Barrett, candidates will be elected based on their year of expected graduation rather than the residential area where they reside. Former Chancellor of Elections Divya Kirti JUDITH GIBSON-OKUNIEFF/COLLEGIAN
UM vigil held for Planned Parenthood Vox UMass hosts memorial on Wed. By Stuart Foster Collegian Staff
Vox UMass, a student organization focused on advocating for reproductive rights and sexual health, held a vigil for the victims of the Colorado Springs Planned Parenthood shooting Wednesday night outside of the Student Union. Approximately 20 people attended and lit candles to commemorate the three victims killed during the shooting on Nov. 27. Robert L. Dear Jr. stormed the facility with a semi-automatic rifle and killed an Iraq war veteran, a mother of two and a campus police officer at the University of Colorado, along with wounding nine others. Dear was arraigned in court Wednesday on 179 charges and was quoted by the New York Times as
informally admitting to guilt in multiple disruptions during the hearing. “We are standing in solidarity with Planned Parenthood in Colorado Springs,” said Dianna Bronchuk, the education coordinator of Vox UMass. “Three people lost their lives to this man’s brutal and shocking attack.” Speakers at the vigil expressed concern that events like the Nov. 27 shooting endanger the staff and patients of Planned Parenthood. Others showed their support for Planned Parenthood, saying that the non-profit organization provides extremely valuable services to people in need of health care throughout the United States. “Instances like this should remind us why we’re doing what we’re doing,” said Haley Hewson, a senior board member at Vox. Hewson added that advocating for Planned
Parenthood and raising awareness about what the organization does are ways to prevent violence against the organization from occurring. Sophia Muschell, a member of Vox UMass who said she wants to work for Planned Parenthood later in her life, expressed fear over the future of the organization.
“By the time I get the opportunity to work at Planned Parenthood it may not exist anymore because of attacks like this,” Muschell said.
Other speakers said the attack, in addition to causing loss of life, was a symbolic action against the security of those needing reproductive health treatsee
VIGIL on page 3
JUDITH GIBSON-OKUNIEFF/COLLEGIAN
Members from Vox UMass hosted a vigil honoring the Colorado victims.
see
AFFIRMATIVE on page 2
SGA reforms election rules Senators will be chosen in spring
Therapy dogs from the Paws Program visited campus Wednesday to help students blow off steam before finals week begins.
to a lower court for closer review. The Texas case is complicated because the state has a law guaranteeing admission to the top 10 percent of students in each of its more than 1,000 high schools based on their grades only, with no consideration to race. Under that policy - which now accounts for about 75 percent of all admissions to the Austin campus - about onethird were Latino or AfricanAmerican in recent years. The dispute arose over a supplemental program that currently accounts for the remaining 25 percent of admissions. A decade ago, when the top-10 percent policy was
breakdown of candidates. Instead of each candidate being elected by the residential area they live in, candidates are now elected by their expected graduation year that is listed on Spire. So for example in the spring, freshmen run for sophomore positions, sophomores run for junior positions and juniors run for senior positions. Anyone running with more than four years of college experience would run for senior positions. Barrett believes this change will allow senators to be “more representative and serve a broader mission.” Kirti also expresses that this change is positive because the election is “less about where you live and more about what really brings [students]
The biggest change to the elections, however, is the change of the breakdown of candidates. Instead of each candidate being elected by the residential area they live in, candidates are now elected by their expected graduation year that is listed on SPIRE. found the short period of campaigning leading up to fall elections was “unethical and not effective.” She explained that the elections are supposed to embody having a say in what happens in the SGA, and the previous election format gave students no time to learn about the candidates and sent the message that their voices were not as important as the SGA’s schedule. Barrett agreed that the change to elections is beneficial to students. “Having a longer senate term [promotes] more consistency and action throughout the summer and beginning of the year from the voting body,” Barrett said. The biggest change to the elections, however, is the change of the
together,” which is bonding over running for elections and also possibly bonding over the same experiences being in the same graduation year. Barrett explained that the election reforms were also made to increase voter turnout by having the president, vice president, trustee and senate elections at the same time. The reforms also encourage candidates to run for the speaker and associate speaker positions if they fail to win the position they originally campaigned for. Both Barrett and Kirti said that change is always positive and that the new format seems promising. Barrett said that these rules will make the SGA “stronger and prepared.” see
SGA on page 2