THE MASSACHUSETTS
A free and responsible press
DAILY COLLEGIAN DailyCollegian.com
Thursday, October 13, 2016
Serving the UMass community since 1890
News@DailyCollegian.com
Former Labor Center director describes decline of resources Program surrouned by budget conflicts By Stuart Foster Collegian Staff
Editor’s Note: This article emerged from a collaboration with WMUA News. Their website can be visited at wmua.org, and their broadcast can be listened to live on 91.1 FM. Editor’s Note: This article emerged from a collaboration with WMUA News. Their website can be visited at wmua.org, and their broadcast can be listened to live on 91.1 FM. Since a letter written by the former University of Massachusetts Labor Center director describing cuts to the program by the University was published on several blogs in early Sept., the program has been surrounded by controversy over whether the University is trying to eliminate the program. Since then a petition asking the University to protect the Labor Center by restoring teaching assistantships, externships and the employment of part-time faculty members has acquired 4,700 signatures on Change.org. Eve Weinbaum, the former director whose letter described
being ousted from her position, said that the Labor Center consistently had to work with declining resources during the decade she worked as the director there. “There have been cuts kind of regularly over time,” she said. Weinbaum’s account of the experiences she saw as director conflict with those of John Hird, the dean of the UMass College of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Hird said that Weinbaum’s email inaccurately described demands by administrators to Weinbaum that the Labor Center function as a revenue generator for other departments in the University. “The University doesn’t require any units to be revenue generators,” Hird said. “The Labor Center has never been used to fund other departments.” Hird also said that the University had not eliminated funding for the Labor Center. “I think that email is full of misrepresentations and errors,” Hird said. “There’s many, many, many.” Weinbaum said that she and other faculty members were explicitly told on multiple occasions that the Labor Center could only accept full paying graduate students. “Our understanding was that
master’s degree programs were to bring in revenue, especially Ph.D. programs,” Weinbaum said. “We were told explicitly we could only bring in full-paying students.” Weinbaum said that when she first became the director, the Labor Center was able to promise first year students that their tuition would be covered by teaching assistantships, fellowships or externships paid by outside organizations. “That’s especially important for us because many of our students are from working class families,” Weinbaum said. Weinbaum added that graduates from the labor studies program at UMass would typically go on to work in jobs with low income, such as in organized labor and with immigrants’ rights groups. Throughout Weinbaum’s tenure as director, the amount of teaching assistantships offered to students was gradually reduced to three by 2016, before being eliminated in the past year, in addition to the externships previously offered being made unavailable. “From our perspective, that was a major cut in graduate student support,” she said. Pat Greenfield, who was the
By Hannah Depin Collegian Staff
Though New England’s drought continues, the town of Amherst is not likely to run out of water anytime soon, according to David Boutt, associate professor of geosciences at the University of Massachusetts. Boutt said that the height of the water deficit lasted from late winter through summer this year, peaking during the growing season. Water shortages become especially apparent at this time as farmers attend to crops and there is less water available for streams and groundwater supplies. In terms of water supply, the current shortage is “nowhere near” as dire as it was during the droughts of the 1960s and 1980s, Boutt said. In 1980, UMass closed during the fall semester in response to an extreme drought in Amherst, but Boutt doubts that the current drought will require campus to shut down. He explained that the ‘80s drought was longer than anticipated, and that the three wells that were available to pump groundwater could not support the large student population after a long, dry summer. “They didn’t have enough straws in the water supply,” he explained. Today, Amherst has five wells with access to the groundwater supply. Boutt believes that, although Amherst’s population has grown, these additional wells will prevent a situation
where the town runs out of water. “Barring any catastrophic malfunction, I don’t think it will,” he said. But Boutt also stressed that droughts are multiyear events, and it takes time for the water system to respond to changes in the weather. The drought as we experience it now actually dates back to 2013. Even if it were to end today, it would take a year for the water system to return to its normal condition, he said. Sporadic rainy days have little effect on the water supply, Boutt explained, because rainfall is immediately taken up by the parched soil and vegetation. Boutt said that most of the drought’s impact has been felt by farmers. Masoud Hashemi, extension professor at the Stockbridge School of Agriculture, said that the drought’s impact depends upon the type of crop that farmers grow. He explained that crops are divided in two categories: vegetable and agronomic. Vegetable crops include tomatoes, squash, and sweet corn. Agronomic crops include soybeans, wheat, and corn silage and are grown on a larger scale. Vegetable crops were less impacted by the drought this year than agronomic crops, Hashemi said. Farmers traditionally grow vegetable crops using drip irrigation systems. The drought required farmers to irrigate more frequently this year, which increased their water and labor expenses. Growing vegetable crops was costlier for farmers this season, but the drought did not affect the production see
DROUGHT on page 2
working class family as a queer woman of color, Ahmad said she relied on a teaching assistantship and diversity fellowship to attend the Labor Center. Ahmad said she was attracted to the Labor Center by the promise of being taught by people with hands-on experience in labor movements, and that the program emphasized labor over management, peaking her interest in it. “I had heard over the years there were pressures placed on the Labor Center,” she said. “By the time I came there were only a few professors. It seemed like there was this general pressure.” Hird explained that the Labor Center currently functions within the sociology department, and that due to a decreased enrollment in sociology this year four teaching assistantship positions were shifted from sociology to economics. The impact of this resulted in the decreased number of teaching assistantships for students in the Labor Center. “We need to shift T.A.s to where increasing enrollment is,” Hird said. Despite disagreeing on the extent of pressure placed on the Labor Center, Hird and Weinbaum both expressed opti-
mism for the Labor Center’s future. “We think there’s a potential to draw students into the master’s program,” said Hird, expressing enthusiasm over a four plus one program, which would allow students to complete a one-year master’s program after obtaining their undergraduate degree. “It’s always been an integral part of the University and it will always continue to be,” he added. Weinbaum, who said she proposed and helped plan the four plus one program, said she thought it is a terrific idea. Weinbaum said the Labor Center faculty are excited to work and described the Labor Center as a place where “students can get the background and analytic skills they need.” “I think our future is actually really bright,” she said. “I think the resources we’re asking the University to restore are really minimal in the scheme of things.”
Stuart Foster can be reached at stuartfoster@umass.edu and followed on Twitter Stuart_C_Foster. Lucy Martirosyan contributed to this report and can be reached at lmartirosyan@ umass.edu and followed on Twitter @ lucymartiros.
Just Ride
UMass profressors discuss the drought Water supplies are likely to not run out
Labor Center’s director from 1990 to 1997, said that while the term revenue generator was not used during that time period, administrators did view the program as not bringing in enough tuition to justify its costs. Greenfield said that people at UMass often looked at the Labor Center as a part of the budget that could be cut. “What constantly was missed is the outsized impact this program had in the state and nationally,” said Greenfield. Greenfield said the Labor Center remained attractive because of its attraction to young people who were interested in working with social justice issues, its number of assistantships available and its 100 percent placement rate for graduates. “The Labor Center has a significant reputation within the labor field,” Greenfield said. “As these folks make it into significant positions, they would reach back and recruit into the center.” Sameerah Ahmad, a current graduate student at DePaul University who graduated from the Labor Center four years ago, said that she was disappointed to read Weinbaum’s letter, saying that someone like her would not be able to attend the Labor Center now. Coming from a
JUDITH GIBSON-OKUNIEFF/COLLEGIAN
Kris Badertscher, sustainability science (MS), test drives a BMW i3 during the electric vehicle ride and drive event in the electric yard on Wednesday.
Pa. court rejects Cosby’s latest appeal By Laura McCrystal and Jeremy Roebuck The Philadelphia Inquirer
The Pennsylvania Superior Court on Wednesday rejected Bill Cosby’s latest bid to halt or delay his sex assault case, clearing the path to a trial in Montgomery County. The one-sentence order shot down the only pending appeal in Cosby’s case. The Superior Court and state Supreme Court have turned down other requests this year by Cosby’s defense lawyers to consider dropping the charges against him. But Cosby’s lawyers vowed Wednesday to take their latest appeal to the Supreme
Court, arguing the entertainer’s accuser should have been forced to testify and face cross-examination at a pretrial hearing in May. Instead of using direct testimony from Andrea Constand that day, prosecutors relied on statements Constand gave to police a decade ago. A magisterial district judge found the evidence sufficient to hold Cosby for trial. Cosby’s lawyers appealed first to Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, arguing that Cosby was denied the right to confront his accuser in court before trial.
After Judge Steven T. O’Neill ruled that it was “perfectly proper” to hold the hearing without her direct testimony, Cosby’s legal team appealed to Superior Court. They asked that the charges be dropped or for the justices to order a new hearing at which Constand had to testify. Prosecutors asked the court to reject that argument, which it did. District Attorney Kevin R. Steele was pleased with the ruling, said his spokeswoman, Kate Delano. Brian J. McMonagle, Cosby’s lead defense lawyer, said he is planning to appeal
to the state Supreme Court. Earlier this year, the court agreed take up the same issue in a separate case: The review of a Superior Court ruling that approved the use of police statements from accusers as prosecutors’ only evidence at preliminary hearings. “The right to confront one’s accusers is a right worth fighting for and they have taken that right away from us,” McMonagle said. Cosby, 79, is charged with aggravated indecent assault for allegedly drugging Constand at his Cheltenham home in 2004. His trial is scheduled for June.