THE MASSACHUSETTS
A free and responsible press
DAILY COLLEGIAN
Thursday, November 3, 2016
DailyCollegian.com
Serving the UMass community since 1890
News@DailyCollegian.com
Fire guts home on Tamarack Drive The homeowners were not harmed Devyn Giannetti Collegian Staff
JESSICA PICARD/COLLEGIAN
The Amherst Fire Department cleans up after a fire that caused serious damage and killed two dogs at 29 Tamarack Drive on Wednesday, Nov. 2.
A house on Tamarack Drive in Amherst was gutted by a fire Wednesday afternoon. Two dogs were killed in the incident, according to a press release from the Amherst Fire Department. The owners, Anthony and Anna Bond, were not in the house at the time of the fire. According to the release, a preliminary investigation determined that the fire likely began in a bedroom on the second floor and was coming out of the roof once fire officials arrived, but is not believed to be suspicious. A passer-by reported the incident shortly after noon via a 9-1-1 call, and an
alarm box was then pulled to summon on-duty and offduty personnel. The cause of the fire is still unknown and investigators will return later this week. Because of the size of the fire, a second alarm was called for back-up as the Northampton Fire Department had one truck on site and the Belchertown Fire Department had one ambulance standing by with dozens of police and firefighters on the scene. Crews put out a significant amount of the fire in order for them to search the house for any occupants. After no person was found, the crew exited the house because the roof started to cave in. Fire crews remained at the see
FIRE on page 3
Mother of Eric Sinacori sues UMass Obama chides FBI Accuses school of a for Clinton probe breach of contract By Stuart Foster Collegian Staff
The mother of Eric Sinacori, a University of Massachusetts student who died of a heroin overdose three years ago, filed a civil lawsuit against the University for an alleged breach of conduct. Francesca Sinacori, of Whitehouse Station, N.J., is seeking $5 million from UMass, alleging that the police program which used her son as a confidential informant violated her right to be informed about her son’s disciplinary record and drug use, according to a MassLive article. The lawsuit also seeks $1 million from Jesse Carillo, a 27-year old graduate student charged of distributing heroin and involuntary manslaughter, for “willful, wanton or reckless conduct”
which led to Eric Sinacori’s death. A police officer identified as “John Doe” is also listed as a defendant in the lawsuit. Eric Sinacori was arrested after selling LSD and MDMA to an undercover police officer. The University of Massachusetts Police Department later recovered a hypodermic needle from his room. The breach of conduct alleged by Francesca Sinacori refers to, according to MassLive, the UMass Student Code of Conduct, which stated that violations of UMass alcohol and drug policies by a student under the age of 21 would result in a notification of the student’s legal guardians. However, Sinacori’s involvement in the UMPD’s confidential informant program prevented his parents from being notified of his record, keeping them in the dark. The complaint against
the University says that UMPD were not trained to recognize drug addicts and did not make an effort to help Sinacori, according to Masslive. The complaint also alleged that the actions of UMPD put Sinacori at further risk, by immediately arresting a drug dealer after Sinacori had bought drugs from him. The complaint said this made it clear to people in the “UMass drug scene” that Sinacori was cooperating with law enforcement, according to Masslive. The complaint also says that an undercover police officer returned $700 to Sinacori after confiscating it from his room during his initial arrest, and alleged that Sinacori used the money to buy drugs. UMass Executive Director of Strategic Communications Ed Blaguszewski said UMass does not comment on pending legal matters and that the confidential informant
program was suspended by the University after learning about Sinacori’s involvement. “Subsquently, the Un iversity permanently ended the confidential informant program in January 2015, following a comprehensive, three-month review by an 11-member campus working group,” he added. While the UMPD had previously referred to the confidential informant program as a “core component” of their drug enforcement strategy, the ending of the confidential informant program appears to have had little impact on drug arrests at UMass, which did not see an uptick in drug arrests after that point. Francesca Sinacori is being legally represented by Northampton attorneys David Hoose and Luke Ryan. Stuart Foster can be reached at stuartfoster@umass.edu or followed on Twitter @Stuart_C_Foster.
SGA introduces compost pilot program Tests out six new bins around campus By Stefan Geller Collegian Staff
In an effort to encourage more students at the University of Massachusetts to stop throwing away their compostable material, the Student Government Association’s Secretary of Sustainability, Ainsley Brosnan-Smith, launched a compost pilot program earlier this month to expand outdoor composting on campus. The temporary program will test out six new compost containers in highly trafficked areas on campus. Brosnan-Smith, along with four others in the SGA, use bikes with attached trailers to sort through the bins and transport the compost to a
compactor in the Campus Center, which is then taken to Martin’s Farm in Greenfield. “I just kept taking pictures of all these trash cans overflowing with compostable containers, and I was like this doesn’t make sense,” said Brosnan-Smith, a junior with a dual major in natural resource conservation and sustainable food and farming. Brosnan-Smith plans to present the program’s results to advisory committees on campus in an effort to either receive funding for what would become a student business or for the program to be incorporated with waste management. The bins are located outside of W.E.B. Du Bois Library, outside of Thompson Hall, outside of the Whitmore Administration Building, in
front of the Student Union entrance, on the west side of the Student Union facing the pond and between the Integrative Learning Center and Blue Wall. “Why throw away these compostable materials? Why are we investing more of our money in something that’s just getting thrown away?” said Brosnan-Smith. According to the UMass website, the University composts over 1,400 tons of food waste each year in the dining commons and cafes, making composting the largest recycling stream on campus. Earlier this month, UMass was ranked 41st on the Princeton Review’s Top 50 Green Colleges. However, Brosnan-Smith doesn’t believe that students on campus are embracing sustainability enough. “We’re just throwing away money to say that our cam-
pus is sustainable but we’re not actually practicing it.” Still, Brosnan-Smith believes that thus far the program is working well and is optimistic about its future. “I was like I know this is something I could improve, and it’s been working and I’ve kind of done it. It’s not permanent yet but it seems on the way to permanence, which is great.” When compostable materials are thrown in the trash they are transported to a landfill where they decompose and release methane into the atmosphere, a greenhouse gas that can trap up to 25 times more radiation in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide over a 100 year period, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. Stefan Geller can be reached at stefangeller@umass.edu or on Twitter @StefanGeller.
By Christi Parsons and Sarah D. Wire Tribune Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama faulted the FBI on Wednesday over its handling of the investigation into whether newfound emails are related to Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s private server, condemning the bureau for falling short of standards. “There is a norm that when there are investigations, we don’t operate on innuendo and we don’t operate on incomplete information and we don’t operate on leaks,” Obama told NowThis in an interview. “We operate based on concrete decisions that are made.” The remarks were Obama’s first public reaction to FBI Director James B. Comey’s decision last week to make the review public just days before the election. He did not mention Comey by name and cautioned that he wasn’t trying to interfere with the investigation. Nonetheless, his comments constituted an extraordinary departure for a president who has held his fire on the FBI’s actions in a variety of cases, citing a longstanding precedent of presidents trying not to influence federal investigations. Clinton’s campaign, most Democrats and even some Republicans excoriated Comey for re-injecting the emails into the forefront of the presidential race. More than three months earlier, Comey said his agents had completed their investigation into whether Clinton mishandled sensitive government information and concluded that they did not have enough evidence to recommend charges. “When this was investi-
gated thoroughly the last time, the conclusion of the FBI, the conclusion of the Justice Department, the conclusion of repeated congressional investigations was that she had made some mistakes but that there wasn’t anything there that was prosecutable,” Obama said. Others said Comey, who notified lawmakers of the new review in a brief letter Friday, should have released more information about it once he decided to go public. Sen. Charles E. Grassley, R-Iowa, the head of the Senate Judiciary Committee, demanded that the director release more about the probe and complained that much of what was publicly known came from media reports. Comey has agreed not to seek subpoenas or take other investigative steps in probes related to either Clinton or Donald Trump so close to the presidential election, a federal law enforcement official confirmed. That applies to an investigation involving the Clinton Foundation charitable organization and another into whether Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, had improper business dealings with Ukraine. Justice Department officials worried that taking public investigative steps could affect the outcome of the November elections, and Comey agreed with that determination in both cases, as first reported by The New York Times. Such actions would also have violated longstanding agency guidelines prohibiting law enforcement action or public statements about investigations within weeks of an election. The new FBI probe comes at a critical moment not only for Clinton but see
FBI on page 3