Always Free
Issue no. 10 // November
El Independiente What Happened While You Were Procrastinating IEU has a elected a new student government, voting in List One with 39.9% of the 558 votes. The team consists of Luka Djordjevic as Head Representative, Jorgen Sten Anderson asVice Representative Madrid and Santiago Menéndez in the same position in Segovia. Beatriz Fritz will be the Treasurer in Madrid and Tomas Knapp likewise in Segovia. The team wanted to “thank the community... for voting us into power” stating that “we wouldn’t be where we are now without your support!” On 31st of October, the Constitutional Court of Ecuador gathered to discuss the amendments proposed by the assembly members of Alianza Pais, President Correa’s party. Among these amendments there is the proposal for an indefinite reelection. This proposal which should need a referendum will be treated by the National Assembly as an amendment and not as a possible constitutional reform. This decision has raised suspision of the government which claims that a referendum is only necessary in 2017 when the people will wisely choose their new president.
Brazilian elections
A turning point in the America’s geopolitics? Brazil experienced a slow-down of its
Emil Papaterra On October 27th, Brazilians re-elected current president Dilma Rousseff to a second term. Rousseff’s election continues the rule of the Workers’ Party (PT), which has been in power since Luiz Inácio “Lula” da Silva’s election to the presidency in 2003. For most Brazilians, this election was the most contentious and heated than any other in recent memory—even the most depoliticized citizens were aware of the importance of this elections. Ultimately, Dilma won by a razor-thin majority with 51.6 percent of the vote while her opponent, Aécio Neves received 48.4 percent. However, Dilma’s second administration will face demands for change in the midst of a polarized country — demands that were evident in last year’s widespread protests. Her greatest challenge will be in unifying a completely divided country, where the north and north-east (the poorest area) voted for Dilma’s cash transfers and social programs, whereas the south (the richer areas) voted for Neves’s economically conservative policies. Even in the midst of the financial crisis, the Brazilian economy was booming in the last decade. Moreover, it has played an important role in geopolitics by leading the BRICS bloc and has positioned itself as the seventh largest world economy. However, during Dilma’s first term,
GDP, a rising cost of living, shabby public services, corruption scandals, and high inflation. In the last economic report by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Brazilian economy has stalled, raising questions about its socialeconomic development model. Now, what will Dilma’s victory mean for Latin America and the United States? In principle, Brazil continues to become a more visible player on the global stage by taking on a leadership role in South America. Thus, Dilma’s approach to the region will be based on prioritizing its closest neighbors over other parts of the world. This means that Mercosur —the free-trade bloc among Brazil and other South American countries — will likely be the primary focus, and it entails becoming increasingly independent from the United States. Doing so separates Brazil from from US politics and defines its role as the leader of Latin America, deepening its ties with the BRICS bloc. Although Brazilian development model has been sustainable for at least a decade, the region has recently shown that social policies in favor of the most vulnerable citizens can create wealth as in Morales’ Bolivia, Correa’s Ecuador and Medina’s Dominican Republic. These social programs, especially Brazil’s Bolsa Familia have fed 36 million people and have lifted millions out of extreme poverty. Nevertheless, Brazil’s new challenges are not to feed people; people are now hungry for education, hungry for health, hungry for infrastructure, and hungry to end corruption.