13-05-01: UK: Cameron & Richards: MILINT Necessity of Sustainable Security Coup d'etat

Radical Honoursty Culture Yshmael Guerrylla Law Party CommonSism: Common Sense Guerrylla Laws for a Sustainable Commons AEquilibriaex: balanced Eco/Anthropocentric law www.guerrylla -law.co.nr

Gen. Sir David Richards Chief of the Defence Staff Gen Nicholas Houghton: VC of Defence; Adm George Zamebellas: Chief Navy; Gen Peter Wall: Chief Gen. Staff; Marshall Stephen Dalton: Air Chief; Gen Richard Barrons: Joint Forces Command.

C/O: JFC HQ: Northwood HQ, Sandy Lane, Northwood, Middlesex, HA6 3HP MoD Dept (DefenceSecretary-Group@mod.uk)

Prime Minister David Cameron 10 Downing Street, London, SW1A 2AA c/o: Secretary of Def: Philip Hammond Parl (hammondp@parliament.uk) CC: UK MP’s, Media, Academics etc Notice to be sent to all Nations

Military Necessity of Intn’l Earth Day Coup d'état; If Eco-Illiterate Voters fail to act for Sustainable Security future, by 22 April 2014 ―We can't muster the force of nations to really begin fundamental changes in their energy systems, their construction, their lifestyle patterns, without a profound understanding of the urgency of the situation. We've got to act now.‖ – Wesley Clark, Supreme Allied Commander of NATO, 1996-1999, Climate Change is a Global Security Threat

On a planet 4C hotter, all we can prepare for is extinction1: UK Citizens are invited to sign the White House Petition (wh.gov/zjyC) to avoid MILINT Earth Day Coup d'état‘s of the World‘s Democracies, on Earth Day 2015; by demanding their government implement Sustainable Security Relocalization, Decentralization, DeIndustrialization & Primitivization measures, by 22 April 2014; & turning off all coal, nuclear & fossil fuel sources to their National Grid on 22 April 2015.

If World citizens fail to demand Sustainable Security policies to prevent ecological collapse; TYGAE call for simultaneous MILINT Earth Day Coup d'état‘ of World‘s Democracies; to replace failed malfunctioning ‗One Person, One Vote‘ policy with a ‗Sustainable Security Licence to Vote‘ policy.

If World‘s Military Officials fail, prepare for extinction, by 2100, if not much sooner, due to the runaway feedback confluence of overpopulation, overconsumption, resource scarcity induced conflict and climate change tipping points.

Failure of citizens/Military to act by (2014/2015); while they still can; will aggravate the runaway feedback confluence, rendering it impossible and futile to act later.

1

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/aug/11/climatechange

PO Box 5042 * George East, 6539 * Cel: (071) 170 1954 * guerrylla-law.co.nr

Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr

WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC

2

Sustainability is Security: ―Climate, Energy together are the type of a crisis that could be described as creeping up on you. You don't see them, until all of a sudden you fall off a cliff.‖ - General Paul Kern (Ret), Former Commander, Second Brigade of the 24th Infantry Division; Powering Americas Defense - Energy and the Risks to National Security2

―There is no security without sustainability‖: In the absence of an international new moral order where World Political, or Military Leaders implement Guerrylla laws to regulate and reduce human procreation and resource utilization behaviour; towards a sustainable, pre-industrial lifestyle paradigm; the runaway feedback confluence of overpopulation, overconsumption, ecological tipping points, resource scarcity and climate change, will generate scarcity induced conflict and war (perhaps nuclear) confronting regions at an accelerated pace, resulting in the ―collapse of the global economic system and every market-oriented national economy‖, by 2050, and extermination of humanity, by 2100.

[I] Sustainable Security Relocalization, Decentralization, De-Industrialization and Primitivization: ―You can pay now, or you can pay a whole whole lot later, it‘s not just about really about paying in American lives.‖ United States Navy (Ret); Climate Perspective on Energy, Climate Change and

lot later. And by pay a paying in dollars, its - Admiral John Natham, Patriots: A Military National Security3

Relocalize, Decentralize, De-Industrialize & Primitivization: This is an urgent warning to the World‘s citizen voters, who value their ‗one person, one vote‘ democracies, to demand their politicians implement Sustainable Security Decentralization, De-Industrialization and Primitivization measures, by 22 April 2014 - 09:11 GMT. Citizens have two years to make their Relocalization and Decentralization Prepping plans to deal with the reality that TYGAE is calling for all nations to simultaneously turn off their coal, nuclear and fossil fuel energy sources to their National Grid; on 22 April 2015. ―In my piece, the last third of it is a joint planning session for an Energy policy for the United States between the ghost of John Muir and the ghost of George Patton. Muir is only worried about carbon and thinks terrorism is something the FBI can deal with if anybody needs to. Patton is only worried about terrorism 2 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfD5D_qzqoM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjS9pU0y_JU

Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr

WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC

3

and thinks global warming is something these birkenstock wearers cooked up somewhere between smoking tokes around the campfire or something. They don't agree at all on the problems they are trying to solve, but they keep finding that there is a very substantial degree of overlap in the things that they want to do.

Because in so far as you move toward distributed generation of electricity, because you are worried about the security of the web, terrorist attacks on the web and the like, in so far as you are putting solar energy on your roof, you are also going green, because you can't put a coal fired power plant on your roof, thank goodness.‖ - James Woolsey, Former CIA Director & Former Undersecretary US Navy

[1]

Economic Relocalisation? Relocalize Economic Power. ―Here are a few of my predictions: Many trends of the last century or more, made possible by cheap and abundant energy sources, are going to be reversed. These trends include population growth, centralization of political and economic power, vastly increased quantity of global trade, and mass tourism. [..] Relocalization may be a new term, but conceptually it has long roots. Some related recent precursors include [Thoreau], E.F. Schumacher, Ted Trainer, Garrett Hardin, and Wendell Berry as well as what are called the ―anti-globalization‖ movement, the ―slow food‖ movement, the ―voluntary simplicity‖ movement, the ―back to the land‖ movement, ―new urbanism,‖ [the ―prepping‖ movement], and the ―environmental movement.‖ In general, common themes include decentralization of political and economic structures, less material consumption and pollution, a focus on the quality of relationships, culture and the environment as sources of fulfillment, and downscaling of infrastructural development.‖ - Jason Bradford, Ph.D, Economic Relocalization: A Strategic Response to Peak Oil and Climate Change4; The Oil Drum

Economic Relocalisation: A Strategic Response to Peak Oil and Climate Change; Jason Bradford, Ph.D, The Oil Drum:

4

A.

Relocalization is based on a systems approach that doesn‘t solve one set of problems only to make another problem worse.

B.

Relocalization is based on an ethic of protecting the Earth System--or Natural Capital-- knowing that despite our cleverness, human well-being is fundamentally derived from the ecological and geological richness of Earth.

C.

Relocalization starts from the premise that the world is a finite place and that humanity is in a state of overshoot. Perpetual growth of the economy

http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2598

Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr

WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC

4

and the population is neither possible nor desirable. It is wise to start planning now for a world with less available energy, not more.

[2]

D.

Relocalization advocates rebuilding more balanced local economies that emphasize securing basic needs. Local food, energy and water systems are perhaps the most critical to build.xxv In the absence of reliable trade partners, whether from peak oil, natural disaster or political instability, a local economy that at least produces its essential goods will have a true comparative advantage.

E.

Relocalization takes a different perspective altogether. Instead of working to keep a system going that has no future, it calls us to develop means of livelihood that pollute as little as possible and that promote local and regional stability. Since much of our pollution results from the distances goods travel, we must shorten distances between production and consumption as much as we can.

Political Decentralization: Nullification, Secession, etc: ―The need for relocalization of the economy in the wake of peak oil and climate change is forcing me to re-examine my views. I am of the belief, however, that should relocalization become a widespread adaptation strategy or simply be forced upon us, the locale where one lives in the United States will become of increasing importance.

It is no surprise, then, that relocalization of economic activity implies relocalization of governmental power. In fact, a kind of precursor to secession, nullification, has already appeared in the form of city councils resolving not to cooperate with federal officials in enforcing the so-called Patriot Act. It has also manifested itself in cities and states proceeding with climate change initiatives when the federal government's official policy was that climate change was not a problem. [..] Instead, secession, recast as political decentralization, is a close cousin of economic relocalization the increasingly urgent need many of us to feel to create our own local currencies, grow more of our own food, harvest our own energy, and the like. [..] What is less apparent to most is the fact that the U.S. has become an Empire teetering on the edge, while it continues to enrich the few at the expense of the many.

Nothing less than a complete structural re-tooling of our financial, commercial and economic life will bring about the significant kinds of transformations we'll need moving forward.

It is not an appealing thought, that economic relocalization ultimately will not succeed without political decentralizationbut we believe it is an honest one.‖ - Political Secession and Economic Relocalisation: Parallel Goals to deal with Climate Change & Peak Oil5; Vermont Commons

5

http://www.vtcommons.org/blog/political-secession-and-economic-relocalization-are-parallel-goals

Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr

WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC

5

[2.1]

The New Nullification6 (Resource Insights, 05/06):

A.

Recently, 132 mayors across America announced they were going ahead with policies to fight global warming7 despite the Bush administration's rejection of such measures. In doing so, they were adding to a series of acts by states and localities that when taken together add up to a new and growing nullification movement. Nullification is a long debated theory that says that states have the right to defy federal law or "nullify" it if they feel a particular law is unconstitutional. While the mayors were not exactly defying a federal law, they were openly snubbing an official federal policy of inaction on greenhouse gas emissions. Their action and many similar ones are beginning to call into question the ability of the federal government to impose its will on the individual states and localities.

B.

Take the lawsuit by eight states and New York City against utilities8 designed to force the utilities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The suit was filed because the EPA refused to take action9 to regulate carbon dioxide emissions, a move that prompted an earlier lawsuit against the agency. Both suits are direct confrontations with a federal government which currently wants to do nothing about greenhouse gas emissions.

C.

In the area of genetically engineered crops, the Food and Drug Administration has long held that such crops are virtually identical to non-biotech crops and therefore require no testing or extraordinary regulation. But, two counties in California have already banned their planting10, and a third has a ban on the ballot this year. (Monsanto, the world's largest producer of genetically engineered crops, is fighting back by trying to pass state laws that pre-empt local control of biotech crops.11)

D.

[..] But, perhaps the best-known acts of nullification are resolutions by states, cities and counties across the nation that call for refusing cooperation with federal authorities trying to enforce the so-called USA Patriot Act. To date some 386 resolutions have been passed 12. The list of cities includes Albuquerque, Atlanta, Austin, Baltimore, Dallas, Des Moines, Detroit, Los Angeles, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, New York City, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Portland (ME), Portland (OR), Providence, Richmond (VA), St. Louis, St. Paul, San Francisco, Seattle, and Washington, D. C. itself! States include Alaska, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Maine, Montana, and Vermont.

http://resourceinsights.blogspot.com/2005/06/new-nullification.html http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1402961/posts 8 http://www.climateark.org/articles/reader.asp?linkid=33783 9 http://www.colorado.edu/Economics/morey/4545/global/7states.html 10 http://www.organicconsumers.org/biod/sonoma010605.cfm 11 http://www.organicconsumers.org/monsanto/laws052005.cfm 12 http://www.bordc.org/list.php 6 7

Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr

WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC

6

[2.2] Pennsylvania Court Deals Blow to Secrecy-Obsessed Fracking Industry: Corporations Not The Same As Persons With Privacy Rights 13 (Alternet; 11/04/2013); A.

―The ruling represents the first crack in the judicial armor that has been so meticulously welded together by major corporations,‖ said Thomas Linzey, executive director of the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund, which has helped 150 communities in eight states adopt Community Bill of Rights to limit corporate powers. ―It affirms what many communities already know, that change only occurs when people begin to openly question and challenge legal doctrines that have been treated as sacred by most lawyers and judges.‖

B.

But where the ruling is likely to make the biggest waves is in the so-called corporate personhood debate. The Judge spent more than a third of her 32-page decision saying why corporations and business entities were not the same as people under Pennsylvania‘s constitution, and why, for the purposes of doing business in the state, that federal court rulings that blur the rights of people and businesses do not apply.

C.

―This court ruling is a significant development for the growing movement to restore democracy to the people,‖ said John Bonifaz, the co-founder and executive director of Free Speech For People, a national campaign launched on the day of the U.S. Supreme Court‘s decision in Citizens United v. FEC. ―The ruling is the newest example of dissent within the judiciary to the fabricated doctrine of corporate constitutional rights. It will be held up for years to come as a powerful defense of the promise of American self-government: of, by, and for the people.‖

[2.3] Appeals court upholds local fracking bans in NY14 (Tri-City Herald, 02/05/2013) A.

New York municipalities can use local zoning laws to ban the practice of hydraulic fracturing to drill for natural gas, a mid-level state appeals court said Thursday.

B.

State mining and drilling law doesn't trump the authority of local governments to control land use, the four-judge appellate division panel ruled unanimously.

[2.4] A.

Hardwick, VT: Relocalized Full Employment Agrarian Economy15: The town of Hardwick, Vt., has been celebrated as the scene of a local food revival. In recent years, lots of small farms have started up nearby. Tom Stearns, president of a local organic seed company called High Mowing Seeds, says there are more organic farms per capita within 10 miles of

http://www.alternet.org/fracking/pennsylvania-court-deals-blow-secrecy-obsessed-fracking-industrycorporations-not-same 14 http://www.tri-cityherald.com/2013/05/02/2379781/appeals-court-upholds-local-fracking.html 15 http://www.hardwickagriculture.org/ 13

Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr

WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC

7

Hardwick than anywhere else in the world. There's also a thriving local grocery co-op; a busy farmer's market; even a classy restaurant — Claire's — where almost anything you eat grew or grazed on land nearby.16 [..]

Hewitt saw what was happening in Hardwick, and it struck him as unusual, even odd. "Here's this town: Unemployment rate 40 percent higher than the Vermont state average; median income 25 percent lower; and then there was this thing happening around so-called sustainable ag and local food!" Hewitt says. So Hewitt wrote a book about Hardwick: The Town That Food Saved.

[3]

De-Industrialization: The End of National Power Grids:

All citizens must immediately begin preparing for the reality that on 22 April 2015, TYGAE is calling for all nations to simultaneously turn off their coal, nuclear powered, etc ‗industrial forms of electricity generation‘. All citizens have two years to make their relocalisation Prepping plans for de-industrialized local food and alternative energy production, including pre-industrial forms of transportation. ―Global climate change will pose serious threats to water supplies and agricultural production, leading to mass migration in some cases. At the same time we will see an increasing demand for a dwindling supply of fossil fuels. These factors mean and intense competition for key and vital resources, around the globe and that leads to conflict. ―This report is different to many other reports, involving military leaders. That is because in it, we make a direct appeal to the American people. We talk in this report about the amazing sacrifices the American people made during World War II, planting victory gardens, cutting down on fuel use, saving scrap metal and old rubber, sacrifices, or maybe just examples of common sense and prudent lifestyle changes. Whatever you call them, the steps taken by the American people then, shortened the war and saved lives.

And I believe the same can be said today about these challenges of energy security and climate security. There are individual steps that every American can take. Using less energy. Being more efficient with the energy that we do use. Supporting new policies to help our country take a new energy path. These are the steps that can help us avoid, or shorten wars in the future. Those wars over competition for vital resources. These are steps that can save lives. They may cost money yes, but if we don't spend the money now, we will still pay, and we will pay much more later. In fact, we'll pay in American lives lost.

American civilians played an important role in World War II because they understood the stakes and because they were asked to 16

http://www.npr.org/2011/07/15/137499585/vermont-towns-food-focus-still-a-growing-concept

Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr

WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC

8

do so. General Wald made the stakes clear, and our report makes the stakes clear. Our current energy posture poses a significant and urgent threat to our national security, militarily, economically and diplomatically.

Hopefully more Americans will understand these stakes, and that these consequences will affect them. Hopefully more Americans will hear the very direct request from our Commander in Chief and from this small group of a dozen retired Admirals and Generals.

The American people, all of us, through our energy choices can contribute directly to the security of our nation. It is a triple win. It makes us energy independent. It reduces our effect on the environment, and it makes our nation very much more secure.‖ – Vice Admiral Dennis McGinn; Energy, Climate Change, and the Military: Implications for National Security17; Woodrow Wilson Center

Primitivism: Ultimate Goal: Voluntary Sustainability for Our Children and Humanity’s Future Generations:

[4]

[4.1] Citizens are advised to (a) Learn primitive skills used prior to industrial revolution from indigenous cultures still living low/no tech sustainable lifestyles, (b) replace AnthroCorpocentric Compulsive Developmentism value system with Gender Balanced Agrarian and Primitivist value system. ―Over the past three decades, snow cover has been reduced by 1718% per decade and sea ice is declining fast because of humaninduced global warming. Consequently, the albedo effect is collapsing in the Arctic. Albedo is the reflection of Sun‘s radiation off the white ice and white snow surfaces.

Unfortunately, when the albedo effect collapses, the dark sea and dark land mass absorb most of the Sun‘s radiation. A collapsing albedo effect is ominously apocalyptic for the Arctic, and for the world. And, disturbingly, Arctic albedo is already in the collapsing stage. This will inevitably lead to ever more methane emissions and a vicious cycle of feedbacks leading to an extinction event, probably unstoppable.‖ - Arctic Methane Emergency Group; Methane Outbreak Alert18

Mosuo: Primitive Ecocentric Gender-Balanced Sustainable Agrarian Culture with no murder, rape, jails, homeless or unemployment: The socio-political problem solving system of the Gender Balanced agrarian Mosuo culture in South West China is plausibly the most credible system of jurisprudence on planet earth. The people of Mosuo have no rape (not even a word in their language for rape, because it does not exist), no murder, no suicide, no prisons, no 17 18

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1FMeVH2AgI Dissident Voice, 27/04/2013 http://dissidentvoice.org/2013/04/methane-outbreak-alert/

Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr

WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC

9

mental illness, no mental institutions, no unemployment and no homelessness; as a result of abiding by (a) the laws of nature and tribal control of population and consumption, and (b) the laws of human nature, in terms of public problem solving, and a socio-political focus on root cause problem solving.19 In Mosuo culture, women are the head of the house, property is passed through the female line, and women tend to make the business decisions. Mosuo women carry on the family name and run the households, which are usually made up of several families, with one woman elected as the head. The head matriarchs of each village govern the region by committee. Political power, however, remains in the hands of males, creating a gender-balanced society. The traditional Mosuo religion worships nature, is called Daba, with Lugu Lake regarded as the Mother Goddess and the mountain overlooking it venerated as the Goddess of Love. Their focus is their close relationship to the land that supports them and with their neighbours, who also support them.

Media Sustainable Security Fines: Responsibility for Citizens Ignorance:

[5]

[5.1] A majority of industrial civilization‘s problems - crime, violence, homelessness, unemployment, poverty, inflation, food shortages, political instability, vanishing species, garbage and pollution urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, energy and non-renewable resources (NNR) depletion and scarcity are symptoms of Ecological Overshoot, resulting from Overpopulation and Overconsumption..

[5.2] Dr. Michael Maher‘s study: How and Why Journalists avoid the Population-Environment Connection20: argues that the American public are largely ignorant about the relationship between Overpopulation and the Environment, as a result of media censorship of the role of population growth, in their stories wherein they report on the societal consequences of overpopulation.

But in Tradeoffs: Imperatives of Choice in a High-Tech World, Wenk (1986) offered a more media-centric view of how the public learns: "Whatever literacy in science and technology the general public has reached is not from formal education. Rather, it is from the mass media. That responsibility of the press has been almost completely ignored" (p. 162).

This study will examine press responsibility for the public's indifference to population growth by exploring two questions: To what extent do press reports about population-driven environmental problems link those problems to population growth?

Tami Blumenfield (May 2009): The Na of Southwest China: Debunking the Myths; Washington Univ http://web.pdx.edu/~tblu2/Na/myths.pdf 20 http://www.mnforsustain.org/maher_michael_t_how_and_why_journalists_avoid_pop.htm 19

Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr

WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC

10

What reasons do reporters give for ignoring population growth in stories about environmental problems?

[5.3] Mainstream media publications should consequently be fined $50.00 per word (of the article‘s length) for every single television, print or online article/report as of 22 April 2013; which deals with any Ecological Tipping Point/Scarcity issue: ―crime, violence, homelessness, unemployment, poverty, inflation, food shortages, political instability, vanishing species, garbage and pollution urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, energy and non-renewable resources (NNR) depletion and scarcity‖; where the journalist fails to include the role of over population and overconsumption, as a direct cause of the Ecological Tipping Points/Scarcity issue the article was reporting upon.

[5.4] If Journalists and Editors consistently inform the public when reporting on any Ecological Tipping Point/Scarcity related social problem; that such problems are a direct consequence of overpopulation and overconsumption; citizen members and investors of corporations, CEO‘s, managers and Boards, shall find it far easier to implement Sustainable Security corporate practices.

[5.5] Consequently: Journalists, Editors and Publications which consistently fail to inform the public about the roles of overpopulation and overconsumption in their articles about Ecological Tipping Point/Scarcity issues; should be publicly recognized as Direct Threats to National and Sustainable Security.

[II] Military Coup d'état Implementation of Sustainable Security Constitutions: Walking the National Security Walk to Support the Troops: ―A yellow ribbon on a car or truck is a wonderful message of symbolic support for our troops. I‘d like to see the American people take it several steps further. If you say a yellow ribbon is the ‗talk,‘ then being energy efficient is the ‗walk‘. A yellow ribbon on a big, gas-guzzling SUV is a mixed message. We need to make better energy choices in our homes, businesses and transportation, as well as to support our leaders in making policies that change the way we develop and use energy. If we Americans truly embrace this idea, it is a triple win: it reduces our dependence on foreign oil, it reduces our impact on the climate and it makes our nation much more secure.‖ - Vice Admiral Dennis V. McGinn, USN (Ret); Former Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfare Requirements and Programs21

If World citizens fail; -- since such failure demonstrates the malfunction and ecological collapse consequences of the ‗one person, one vote‘ political system; and 21

http://www.cna.org/reports/energy

Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr

WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC

11

requires a new system where only Ecoliterate persons are qualified to vote -TYGAE call on the Worlds‘ Military to conduct worldwide simultaneous MILINT Earth Day Coup d'état‘s; to end the ‗One Person, One Vote‘ policy and implement a ‗Sustainable Security Licence to Vote‘ policy; where only Ecoliterate ‗Sustainable Leaver‘ citizens get the licence to vote.

Sustainable Security Constitution: ―A runaway climate change is now clear and beginning to be quantified for the first time… the greatest threat we face as a planet… The rate of change we‘re generating in the current situation is between 200-300 times faster than that experience of any extinction event apart from the asteroidal impact. If you look at the general background change, for instance, it takes about 10,000 years to change the concentration of carbon dioxide by 100 ppm — we‘re doing it in 30 years at this year‘s rate… so, the rate of change in the climate is phenomenal compared to previous extinction events. We‘re already in a mass extinction event. We‘re losing species and losing populations, partly by climate change and partly by habitat change, partly by overexploitation of habitat like fisheries… We‘ve lost about 40% of the phytoplankton in the oceans which is the basis of the food chain.‖ -- David Wasdell, International Coordinator, Meridian Programme; Arctic Methane – Why the Sea Ice Matters22

[6] Sustainable Security Licence to Vote: Only citizens who have been, and continue to demonstrate not only their intellectual theoretical Sustainability consciousness, but who also ‗walk their sustainability talk‘, in terms of maintaining their procreation and consumption choices, below carrying capacity; i.e. Sustainable Leavers; should be the only individuals considered worthy of the ‗Sustainable Security Licence to Vote.‘ [7] All other citizens who were either (a) so eco-illiterate they were not even aware of the reality of the climate change, energy and resource scarcity national security risks facing the country, and/or (b) those who were aware of the reality of these Environmental security risks, but lacked the consciousness and commitment to implement the required ‗sustainable security‘ procreation and consumption behaviour in their own lifestyles, or to use their stolen resources to enable a sustainable security future; should forthwith lose their right to vote, until they demonstrate their capacity to procreate and consume below carrying capacity. Until then they shall be considered ‗Unsustainable Scarcity Combatants‘; and denied voting rights.

[8]

How Does a Citizen verify whether they are a Sustainable Leaver?: [8.1]

A Sustainable Leaver / Eco-Innocent is someone who either has:

Arctic Methane Emergency Group; Envisionation, Producer: Nick Breeze, Spring 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSsPHytEnJM 22

Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr

WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC

12

A.

0 children, with a consumption footprint < 20 gha (Intn'l Biocapacity (1 gha) x 20);

B.

1 child, with consumption footprint < 1 gha.

[8.2]

An Unsustainable Taker / Scarcity-Combatant is someone who has:

A.

0 children, with consumption footprint > 20 gha; or

B.

1 child, consumption footprint > 1 gha; or

C.

2 or more children.

[8.3] For example: The author‘s consumption Footprint23 using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 12.75 global hectares (gha). South Africa's average consumption footprint is 38.59 gha. I have no children, consequently my procreation factor is 0 x 20* = 0. Her Consumption (12.75) x Procreation (0) = Eco Footprint of 12.75/0 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed like her, we would need 0.81 earths.24 Conversely, if everyone consumed and procreated like President Jacob Zuma, we would need 2090 earths25.

[9]

Sustainable (Leaver) v Unsustainable (Taker):

[9.1] An individuals Sustainable (Leaver) or Unsustainable (Taker) Footprint is a result of: (A) Consumption Footprint multiplied by (B) Procreation Factor (Every Child increases EcoFootprint by a factor of 20 - Oregon Univ. Study26) [10]

Consumption Footprint:

[10.1] ―The Ecological Footprint (EF) is a measure of the consumption of renewable natural resources by a human population. A country‘s EF is the total area of productive land or sea required to produce all the crops, meat, seafood, wood and fibre it consumes, to sustain its energy consumption and to give space for its infrastructure. The EF can be compared with the biologically productive capacity of the land and sea available to that country‘s population.‖ [10.2] Guerrylla Laws define the Eco/Ego Footprint27 procreation and consumption behaviour of an individual as a Sustainable Leaver (aka Eco-Innocent) or Unsustainable Taker (aka Scarcity-Combatant), based upon a sustainable

http://myfootprint.org/en/your_results/?id=2559685 http://sqworms.weebly.com/lara-johnstone-eco-081.html 25 President Zuma‘s consumption footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 65.66 global hectares (gha). President Zuma‘s Procreation Factor is 500 [President Zuma has 25 children. His procreation footprint factor is 25 x 20* = 500. (Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20 )]. President Zuma‘s Net Consumption & Procreation Footprint is 33280 gha [Consumption (65.66) x Procreation (500) = Net Footprint of 33280 gha]. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like President Zuma, we would need 2,090 earths. http://sqworms.weebly.com/jacob-zuma-ego-2090.html 26 http://sqswans.weebly.com/child--ecofootprint-x-20.html 27 EcoFootprint: The difference between the biocapacity and Ecological Footprint of a region or country. A biocapacity deficit occurs when the Footprint of a population exceeds the biocapacity of the area available to that population. If there is a regional or national biocapacity deficit, it means that the region is importing biocapacity through trade or liquidating regional ecological assets. Global biocapacity deficit cannot be compensated through trade, and is overshoot.

23 24

Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr

WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC

13

consumption bio-capacity of 1 global hectare (gha)28 (60 % of 1.8 gha)29 in accordance with the proactive conservation policies of Bhutan30; multiplied by an individuals Breeding footprint factor of 20 per child. [(Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20)] [10.3]

[11]

Taking Your Personal Footprint Quiz:

A.

Footprint Network31; or

B.

Center for Sustainable Economy32

Procreation Factor:

[11.1] Every Child increases EcoFootprint by a factor of 20 - Oregon Univ.

Study33: A.

[12]

The carbon legacy and greenhouse gas impact of an extra child is almost 20 times more important than some of the other environmentally sensitive practices people might employ their entire lives – things like driving a high mileage car, recycling, or using energy-efficient appliances and light bulbs.

International Sustainable Security Peace Treaties:

[12.1] All ‗Peace treaties‘ which do not require both parties to maintain their nation citizens‘ procreation and consumption practices below carrying capacity, as a fundamental requirement for the credibility of the peace treaty should be considered ‗War is Peace‘ Whore treaties, ruled null and void, and renegotiated.

[12.2] Any credible ‗Sustainable Security‘ Peace Treaty, must require all parties to the Peace Treaty to maintain their nation‘s citizens and corporations procreation, consumption and production practices below carrying capacity. Any nation which allows their citizens or corporations to engage in a breeding, consumption or Sustainable Footprint Biocapacity: A biocapacity of 1 gha assumes that 40% of land is set aside for other species. 1 gha is 60 % of 1.8 gha, therefore .8 hectares is set aside for other species.

29 International Biocapacity: In 2006, the average biologically productive area (biocapacity) per person worldwide was approximately 1.8 global hectares (gha) per capita. In 2008, there were ~ 12 billion hectares of biologically productive land and water on Earth. Dividing by the number of people alive in that year (6.7 billion) gives 1.79 global hectares per person. This assumes that no land is set aside for other species that consume the same biological material as humans. If for example, there were only 3.5 billion people alive that year, that would have provided everyone with 3.5 gha. If there were only 1 billion people, their would be 12gha biocapacity for each persons needs.

30 Bhutan Proactive Conservation: Bhutan is seen as a model for proactive conservation initiatives. The Kingdom has received international acclaim for its commitment to the maintenance of its biodiversity. This is reflected in the decision to maintain at least sixty percent of the land area under forest cover, to designate more than 40% of its territory as national parks, reserves and other protected areas, and most recently to identify a further nine percent of land area as biodiversity corridors linking the protected areas. Environmental conservation has been placed at the core of the nation's development strategy, the middle path. It is not treated as a sector but rather as a set of concerns that must be mainstreamed in Bhutan's overall approach to development planning and to be buttressed by the force of law. - "Parks of Bhutan". Bhutan Trust Fund for Environmental Conservation online. Bhutan Trust Fund.

31 http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/personal_footprint/ 32 http://www.myfootprint.org/ 33 Paul Murtaugh (7-31-09): Family Planning: A Major Environmental Emphasis, Oregon University http://oregonstate.edu/ua/ncs/archives/2009/jul/family-planning-major-environmental-emphasis 28

Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr

WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC

14

production war, shall be considered to have declared war with all other Sustainable Security nations.

[III] Failure of Citizens and Military to Act: Runaway Feedback Confluence of Tipping Points to Extinction: ―If we don't take action now, every day, every year that goes by, the options for dealing with the effects of climate change and the effects of energy security become much much more expensive, and in fact some of the options completely dissapear over the next ten to twenty years; if we don't start taking some prudent actions now.‖ – Vice Admiral Dennis McGinnis; Climate Patriots: A Military Perspective on Energy, Climate Change and National Security34

If Military Officials fail to enact Sustainable Security Constitutions, by worldwide simultaneous temporary Coup d'état measures in 2015; it shall certainly result in the extermination of humanity, by 2100, if not sooner, due to the runaway feedback confluence of overpopulation, overconsumption, resource scarcity induced conflict and climate change tipping points. ―Even if all man-made greenhouse gas emissions were stopped tomorrow and carbon-dioxide levels stabilized at today's concentration, by the end of this century the global average temperature would increase by about 4.3 degrees Fahrenheit, or about 2.4 degrees centigrade above pre-industrial levels, which is significantly above the level which scientists and policymakers agree is a threshold for dangerous climate change.

Of course, greenhouse gas emissions will not stop tomorrow, so the actual temperature increase will likely be significantly larger, resulting in potentially catastrophic impacts to society unless other steps are taken to reduce the Earth's temperature.‖ Charles Greene, A Very Inconvenient Truth35

Failure of citizens, and/or Military to act now, while they still can; shall aggravate the runaway feedback confluence, rendering it impossible and futile to act later.

The Arctic situation is snowballing: dangerous changes in the Arctic derived from accumulated anthropogenic green house gases lead to more activities conducive to further greenhouse gas emissions. This situation has the momentum of a run-away train. I felt there was little hope that any one nation would take the first step to abandon the greed track. However, a reaction has come, unexpectedly, from the smallest, but perhaps most affected, player. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjS9pU0y_JU Charles H. Greene, D. James Baker, and Daniel H. Miller (March 2010): A Very Inconvenient Truth; Oceanography, Vol.23, No.1 http://www.tos.org/oceanography/archive/23-1_greene.pdf 34 35

Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr

WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC

15

In an election on March 12 2013, Greenlanders elected Aleqa Hammond, from the social-democratic party, as their new leader.

Her program places human rights and environmental conservation, the underpinning of their traditional livelihoods as hunters and fishers, above the financial benefits of the resource rush. She has committed to remove the law that opened the door to the mining boom. The new government have opted to stop the charging juggernaut that other nations seem unable — or unwilling — to contain.

The Greenlandic inüit are few and humble, but have given a lesson to the most powerful nations. Other nations with wealthier citizens should take note and ask themselves if they too would have the courage to walk away from the promises of wealth that fuels the run-away train of climate change.

- Final Frontiers: The Artic36 (Conversation; 04/04/2013)

Briefing Paper: Ind. Civilization Suicide March: Navyjag-humint.co.nr White House Petition: Avoid a Coup d'etat, implement Sustainable Security Relocalization, De-Industrialization & Primitivization. http://wh.gov/zjyC

36

http://theconversation.com/final-frontiers-the-arctic-12911

Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr

WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC

16