References

Birkmann, J. (2015). Chapter 1: “Theoretical and Conceptual Framework for the Assessment of Vulnerability to Natural Hazards and Climate Change in Europe”. Retrieved 26.05.2023. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780124105287/assessment-of-vulnerability-to-natural-hazards?via=ihub=)

Choularton, R. (2007). Contingency planning and humanitarian action A review of practice. Humanitarian Practice Network

Christensen, K. (2007). Journal of the American Planning Association. Coping with Uncertainty in Planning

Norges geologiske undersøkelse. (2023) Interactive map. Innsynking https://insar.ngu.no/ [retrieved 12.05.23]

Koteng. (2023) Grilstad Marina https://koteng.no/koteng-bolig/boligprosjekter/grilstad-marina/ [retrieved 21.05.23]

Trondheim kommune. (2018) Planbeskrivelse. Detaljeregulering av Grilstadfjæra felt B3 og N7, sluttbehandling. https://www.trondheim.kommune. no/globalassets/10-bilder-og-filer/10-byutvikling/byplankontoret/1c vedtatt-plan/2018/grillstadfjara-felt-b3-og-n7-vedtatt-reguleringsplan-r20160011/1planbeksrivelse.pdf [retrieved 21.05.23]

Jha, A. (2010). The World Bank. Safer Homes, Stronger Communities: A Handbook for Reconstructing after Natural Disasters. Retrieved 25.05.2023. Koshy, M. An adaptive and contextual framework. Sourced from the lecture “Introduction to urban contingency practice and planning”. Retrieved 25.05.2023. Koshy, M (2022). Handling Compounded Uncertainty in Spatial Planning and Humanitarian Action in Unexpected Floods in Wayanad, Kerala: Towards a Contextualised Contingency Planning Approach. Retrieved 25.05.2023. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ epdf/10.1080/14649357.2022.2143548?needAccess=true&role=button

Singh, 2014, International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies, “The Concept of Social Vulnerability: A Review from Disasters Perspectives”

United Nations ISDR. (2004). Living with Risk A global review of disaster reduction initiatives

Wisner et al. 2012, “Framing disaster: theories and stories seeking to understand hazards, vulnerability and risk”

World Road Association. (2022). Disaster management coordination. https://disaster-management.piarc.org/en/preparedness/preparedness-measures [retrieved 25.05.23]

The International Consortium of Organizational Resilience. (2023) Community Resilience Framework https://www.build-resilience.org/resilienceframeworks.php [retrieved 26.05.23]

List of figures

Figure 1: Most likely relative sea level change (meter) over the period 1986-2005 to 2081-2100. Source: www.kartverket.no

Figure 2: Graph showing the scope of contingency planning approach is used for dealing with event having low degree of predictability and low means of management. Source: Authors

Figure 3: Hypothetical scenario. Source: NTNU UEP

Figure 4: A flexible and incremental approach to contingency planning is the principles on which this proposal is based. Source: Authors

Figure 5: Locating the site in Trondheim. Source: Authors

Figure 6: Site Area. Source: Authors

Figure 7: Community Resilience Framework. Source: The International Consortiuum of Organisational Resilience

Figure 8: Methodologies used in formulating the contingency plan. Source: Authors

Figure 9: Photo documentation during one of the site visits. Source: Authors

Figure 10: Visualization sketches for emergency response measures. Source: Grilstad Marina AS edited by authors

Figure 11: Site Sections to understand the topography of the Grilstad Marina. Source: Authors

Figure 12: Site Sections to understand the topography of the Grilstad Marina. Source: Authors

Figure 13: Identifying aspects that need intervention for flood protection. Source: Authors

Figure 14: NGU statistics of sinking areas in the Grilstad area. Source: NGU, 2023.

Figure 15: Power-Interest diagram to show all the different stakeholders with levels of power in decision making processes. Source: Authors

Figure 16: What the stakeholders said. Source: Authors

Figure 17: Stakeholder- Issue Interrelationship diagram. Source: Authors

Figure 18: Predictability- Probability Matrix. Source: Authors

Figure 19: Copenhagen’s Lynetteholm island plan. Source: Bloomberg, By and Havn, The Daily Scandinavian

Figure 20: Elevated walkways of Venice. Source: Wikicommons

Figure 21: Map of elevated walkway network in Venice. Source: Authors

Figure 22: Water Squares of Rotterdam in dry season. Source: OMA Architects

Figure 23: Water Squares of Rotterdam during monsoons. Source: OMA Architects

Figure 24: Spatial strategy ideation. Source: Authors

Figure 25: Spatial strategy ideation. Source: Authors

Figure 26: Spatial strategy ideation. Source: Authors

Figure 27: Hypothetical scenario. Source: Authors

Figure 28: Short term measures for evacuation during flooding. Source: Grilstad Marina AS edited by Authors

Figure 29: Community building and awareness mechanisms facilitated by expert groups. Source: Authors

Figure 31: Visualization of floating walkways that can be used for emergency rescue. Source: Authors

Figure 30: Plastic buoys used in sea for water sports. Source: Wikkicommons

Figure 32: Building a network of public and community use open spaces as valleys and ridges that can channel water into ‘water squares’. Source: Authors

Figure 33a: Section AA’ visualized as public space in the valleys. Source: Authors

Figure 33b: Section AA’ visualized during storm surge and with sea level rise. The ridges become ‘elevated walkways’ that remain functional during flooding and storm surge. Source: Authors

Figure 34: Building a network of public and community use open spaces as valleys, the ‘Water Squares’, and ridges, the ‘Elevated Walkways’. Source: Authors

Figure 35a: Section BB’ visualizes valleys as a play park for children. Source: Authors

Figure 35b: Section BB’ visualizes the play park becoming a ‘Water Square’ during flooding and storm surge. Source: Authors

Figure 36: Long term vision showing a network of flood protection on the perimeter of Grilstad Marina AS, floating island infrastructure along the coast. Source: Authors

Figure 37: (Top) Institutional Framework for flood management in Norway. Source: Global Environment Change, 2005

Figure 38: (Right) Operational Support Plan showing contribution of different stakeholders in the different stages of flooding. Source: Authors

Figure 39a: Rescue areas for risk zones. Source: Authors

Figure 39b: Preparedness measures. Source: Disaster Management Manual, www.piarc.com

Figure 40 : Timeline of implementation of different measures. Source: Authors

Figure 41: Cost-Benefit analysis of proposed measures in the contingency plan. Source: Authors

Figure 42: Continuum in contingency planning. Source: Choularton, 2007