Risk awareness and trust in the municipality response

Prior knowledge, experience and risk awareness

15 respondents had prior knowledge of historical disasters in Bakklandet and 30 were aware of risks of disasters in the area. Floods, sea-level rise, permanent higher water levels due to storm surges and wave impact that would put the old wharves at risk were mentioned. One respondent said the river was dammed and could be regulated, and others mentioned the reinforcements along the river. Construction work, and mass transport in the quick clay areas were another concern. One of the respondents became aware of this danger after applying for a building extension, and several mentioned that they hoped people were aware of the risk so that no one starts to build without permission.. The fortress, Port Arthur and the existing shelter were mentioned as possible evacuations on higher ground. One stated that it was difficult to take any measures, because of the proximity to the river, and another said the safest would be to stay at home because it was not located on quick clay.

Trust in the municipality’s preparation and response

If a disastrous event happened the respondents answered that the municipality should prepare a crisis team, evacuation center, provide aid to the community, send out a rescue team and organize a clean-up. Two respondents mentioned the municipality would send out a warning through a new catastrophe warning messaging system (sms). The respondents’ view of the response was mixed, some said it would be quick and effective, 11 stated they didn’t know, and a few answered that the response would be poor, insufficient and improvised.