UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY School of Librarv and Inforn~ationScience Kenton County Public Library Director Award Wayne Onkt Wins ALA Wayne Onkst ('79), Director of the Kenton County Public Library in Northern Kentucky, won the ALA Sullivan Award For Administrators Services To The Award was presented during the anrmal conference in June. The ALA announcement read: CHICAGO - The American Library Association (ALA) is pleased to announce Wayne Onkst as the recipient of the Sullivan Award For Public Library Administrators Supporting Services To Children. The award honors an individual who has shown exceptional understanding and support of public library service to children while having general management/supervisory/administrative responsibility that has included publiclibrary service to children in its scope. During his tenure as director of the Kenton Public Library in Covington, Kentucky, Wayne Onkst has demonstrated outstanding commitment to providing library services for children in his community. As a library administrator, he supplied vision and support for his staff. Upon his appointment in 1999, Wayne Onkst laid out an action plan to reach as many children within the county as possible. "He has the wisdom and judgment to select talented librarians," states Lois Schultz 1'741, Kenton County Public Library Trustee. "He then gives them the freedom and support to implement new programs." With his encouragement and leadership, the children's services staff developed new approaches not only to reach children, but also families. "Under Onkst's guidance, partnerships were established with the schools and multiple groups and agencies in the community resulting in the development of a wide range of innovative programs for children and families as well as the receipt of multiple grants," said chair Penny Markey. In 2001, Wayne Onkst received the Children, Inc. award for "innovative services that imagine a better tomorrow for children". It is an honor to name him as the recipient of the 2005 Sullivan Award for Public Library Administrators to Children Award. Onkst is a member of ALA and Public Library Association (PLA). He received a BA in History and a MSLS from the University of Kentucky.
School Receives Favorable UK Review Review Panel Urges UK to Complete Renovation an. Recommends that School Consider Enrollment Management as High Enrollment Continues University of Kentucb Administrative Regulations provide that academic units undergo periodic program review According to AR 11-1.0-6 REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL UNITS: The purpose of programlunit review is to improve the quality of teaching and learning, research, and public service by systematically reviewing mission, goals, priorities, activities and outcomes. Continuous prograrnlunit improvement requires a planning process which integrates current goals and priorities with the basic mission. Continual improvement also requires a review process which evaluates progress toward goal achievement and provides feedback which assists in refinement of plans and direction for the unit. The planning and review processes used by each unit should be appropriate to that unit, but all such processes will include three basic elements: (I) strategic planning; (11) annual review; and (111) periodic review. The AR continues: The purpose of periodic review is to provide the unit with the opportunity for an in-depth analysis of itself, a review of its strategic plan, and a review by a committee external to the unit, fegarding effectiveness in meeting goals in instruction, research, and public service. The periodic review comprises three elements: "(1) preparation of a self-study report by the unit, (2) evaluation by a review team external to the unit, and (3) revision of the unit's strategic plan as based on recommendations from the self-study process and the periodic review team." In conjunction with program review by the ALA Committee on Accreditation, the School completed an extensive Program Presentation in January 2004, which the UK Office for Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness accepted as the required self-study for the periodic review. At the heart of the periodic review is an analysis of the unit by a committee most of whose members are not in the unit to be reviewed. When it has completed its review, the committee issues a report. Dean Johnson appointed the fivemember review team the first of December of last year; the team issued its report on March 10,2005. In its review the committee looked at quality of six areas: