UNDP support to energy access and transition

Page 65

4.5 LEVERAGING INVESTMENT Finding 14. De-risking renewable energy investment. The DREI framework has provided UNDP with an analytical tool for demonstrating the financial benefits of renewable energy to government stakeholders and investors. It expanded the UNDP offer beyond its core policy and capacity-building work and has delivered to government partners an important tool to help achieve market readiness. UNDP developed the DREI methodology in response to the observation that in many developing countries, financing costs for renewable energy remain high even as hardware costs fall, because of the higher risks of investing in these contexts. Prior to DREI, UNDP worked primarily on policy de-risking, supporting Governments to adopt regulations that encourage financial investment. This remains the most common practice where UNDP seeks to encourage a market for renewable technology. As described in chapter 4.3, the reviewed projects set the right targets for their policy work and planned the right activities. However, in many cases the project duration is too short to develop a market for the technology. In some cases, these projects have already been the subject of initial discussions with potential financiers, which were broken off with the termination of the projects. Typically, the market will not yet be self-supporting or provide large-scale opportunities ready for investment. There is scope for the projects to accelerate their preparatory activities, but longer time frames are often required because policy approvals depend on political will, approval processes and pilot project development. The DREI framework provides clear financial analysis to supplement this process. Ideally, the analytical results show that the clean energy technology is financially competitive, thus reducing the economic uncertainties surrounding policy adoption and investment. Where the analysis shows that further subsidies are still necessary to achieve competitiveness, or to yield sufficient return for the investor, the subsidies may still be lower than those applied to non-renewables options. The analysis is particularly useful in situations where fundamental political persuasion for the creation of an enabling environment is still needed, i.e., where there is no market uptake yet and there is a lack of clarity regarding the financial options. However, even in contexts where initial steps have been taken to de-risk investments the tool can highlight further measures to reduce barriers and improve the regulatory environment.

FIGURE 15. Example of the visual outputs of the DREI analysis USD/kWh USD/kWh Financing Costs

Cost of Equity Cost of Debt Operational Costs Investment Costs/ Depreciation

Technology Costs

Renewable Energy Pre-Derisking Life-cycle

Renewable Energy Post-Derisking Life-cycle Costs

Note: LCOE= Levelized Cost of Electricity Source: Adapted from UNDP Bureau for Policy and Programme Support, 2021

Chapter 4. FINDINGS

47


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

5.2 Recommendations and management response

19min
pages 77-92

5.1 Conclusions

5min
pages 75-76

Box 6. Emerging initiatives for common intervention approaches in UNDP

1min
pages 73-74

Table 3. Comparison of the share of regular (core) versus other resources (non-core) funding for UNDP signature solutions, 2018-2021

8min
pages 70-72

Box 4. The evidence base for energy’s contribution to the SDgs

10min
pages 61-63

4.6 Management and resources

1min
page 68

Box 5. The DREI process in kazakhstan

6min
pages 66-67

Figure 14. Number of UNDP country offices that supported energy connections, 2017-2021, and types of usage

5min
pages 59-60

Figure 15. Example of the visual outputs of the DREI analysis

1min
page 65

4.3 Energy transition

8min
pages 53-55

4.5 leveraging investment

2min
page 64

Figure 12. UNDP achievements in improving access to electricity and clean cooking fuels and the impact pathway for households, services and income-generating activities

8min
pages 50-52

Box 3. Transformational shifts through UNDP support. Improving the energy efficiency of lighting and other building appliances, Egypt

5min
pages 56-57

4.2 Access to electricity and clean fuels and technology for cooking

2min
page 49

2.3 The urgency of climate change makes energy initiatives central to institutional arrangements and economic planning

2min
page 31

Box 2. Energy transitions in Sudan

2min
page 48

3.1 Strategic direction

2min
page 35

2.1 Technological breakthroughs have shifted the challenge of expanding energy access and decarbonizing production to policy and investment considerations

2min
page 28

1.4 Evaluation methodology

1min
page 22

Table 1. Objectives of the evaluation of UNDP support to energy access and transition and services assessed

1min
page 20

1.3 Evaluation questions

1min
page 21

Figure 2. IEO gender results effectiveness scale

1min
page 25
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.