stakeholders mission updating by Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval

January 2015

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval

January 2015

Contributors Areas 1 and 2 Steering Committee # 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

Name Prof. Abdullah Hussein Alkadi Prof. Mahmoud Ahmed Abdellatif Dr. Omer Osman Aga Dr. Amera Al Jafary Dr. Dalal Al Shangite Dr. Eman Mohammed Saleh Dr. Yousry Mohammed Mahmoud Othman Dr. Monerah Badr Almahasheer Mr. Somasundaram

Position Chairman Co-Chairman Member Member Member Member Member Member Secretary

Deanship of Quality and Academic Accreditation: # 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17.

Name Dr. Ahmed Alkuwaiti Dr. Mahmoud Fisal Al-Quraan Mr. Somasundaram Mr. Bala Murugan Mr. Ajayan Eng. Mohammad Imtaar Mr. Royce Mr. Gopa Raju

Position Supervisor General Statistical Analyst Quality Officer Quality Officer Lecturer Programmer Statistician Statistician

Report Editor: Prof. Mahmoud Ahmed Abdellatif

Updating UODâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholdersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Preface by H.E. the President of UOD Dr. Abdullah M. Al-Rubaish

‫ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻋﺒﺪﷲ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻴﺶ‬

This report contains the outcome of office and field efforts extended for more than eight months and ended, with the praise of Allah, with the updated vision, mission and values of the University to suite new circumstances and meet new demands and aspirations of the University.

‫ﻳﺗﺿﻣﻥ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﺗﻘﺭﻳﺭ ﺣﺻﻳﻠﺔ ﺟﻬﺩ ﻭﻋﻣﻝ ﻣﻛﺗﺑﻲ‬ ‫ﻭﻣﻳﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﻣﺗﺩ ﻷﻛﺛﺭ ﻣﻥ ﺛﻣﺎﻧﻳﺔ ﺃﺷﻬﺭ ﻭﺍﻧﺗﻬﻲ ﺑﺣﻣﺩ ﷲ‬ ‫ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺻﻳﺎﻏﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﺣﺩﺛﺔ ﻟﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﻗﻳﻡ ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬ ‫ﺣﺗﻰ ﺗﺗﻼءﻡ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﺟﺩﺓ ﻭﺗﻠﺑﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﻁﺎﻟﺏ‬ .‫ﻭﺍﻟﺗﻁﻠﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺟﺩﻳﺩﺓ ﻟﻠﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬

The study followed scientific procedures to reach the final wording of the statements, based on surveys of the opinions of internal and external stakeholders. Then the study analyzed, discussed and scrutinizes the results by focus groups of specialists and decision-makers from the UOD. The process ended with the getting approval of the final versions from the University Council. These approved versions were officially inaugurated in front of a public gathering representing UOD affiliates.

‫ﻟﻘﺩ ﺍﺗﺑﻌﺕ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻷﺻﻭﻝ ﻭﺍﻹﺟﺭﺍءﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻣﻳﺔ‬ ،‫ﺍﻟﺩﻗﻳﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﻭﺻﻭﻝ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺻﻳﺎﻏﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻧﻬﺎﺋﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﺷﻭﺩﺓ‬ ‫ﺣﻳﺙ ﺍﻋﺗﻣﺩﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺗﻁﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻵﺭﺍء ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻔﻳﺩﻳﻥ ﻣﻥ‬ ‫ ﻭﻣﻥ ﺛﻡ ﺗﺣﻠﻳﻝ ﻭﻣﻧﺎﻗﺷﺔ‬،‫ﺩﺍﺧﻝ ﻭﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬ ‫ﻭﺗﻣﺣﻳﺹ ﺍﻟﻧﺗﺎﺋﺞ ﻓﻲ ﺣﻠﻘﺎﺕ ﺗﺭﻛﻳﺯ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺗﺧﺻﺻﻳﻥ‬ ‫ﻭﻣﺗﺧﺫﻱ ﺍﻟﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﻧﺗﻬﺕ ﺑﻣﻭﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﻣﺟﻠﺱ‬ ‫ ﻭﺗﻡ ﺍﻹﻋﻼﻥ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﺻﻳﻎ ﺍﻟﻧﻬﺎﺋﻳﺔ‬،‫ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻣﺎﻡ‬ ‫ﻭﺗﺩﺷﻳﻧﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺣﺗﻔﺎﻟﻳﺔ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﺣﺿﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻣﺛﻠﻳﻥ ﻋﻥ ﻛﺎﻓﺔ‬ .‫ﻭﺣﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺩﻳﻣﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻳﺔ‬

I do appreciate the great interest, positive interaction and support from both internal and external stakeholders of UOD who contributed their thoughts and ideas in this important study. Thanks are extended to the teamwork for producing this study. The University appreciates the findings, which are expected to have great impact on the future development of the University Dammam for many years to come. I congratulate internal and external UOD affiliates for updating the vision, mission and values. I pray to Allah (SWT) to support and guide them to work in accordance with these statements. I ask Allah to bless all efforts spent towards fulfilling the role of the University as one of the effective institutional actors charged with shaping the future of this blessed Nation and building its civilization and prosperity, with the help and support of Allah.

‫ﻧﻘﺩﺭ ﺍﻻﻫﺗﻣﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺩﻋﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺗﻔﺎﻋﻝ ﺍﻹﻳﺟﺎﺑﻲ ﻟﻛﻝ ﻣﻥ‬ ‫ﺳﺎﻫﻡ ﺑﻔﻛﺭﻩ ﻭﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻣﻥ ﻣﺳﺗﻔﻳﺩﻳﻥ‬ ‫ ﻭﻧﺗﻭﺟﻪ ﺑﺧﺎﻟﺹ ﺍﻟﺷﻛﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺗﺣﻳﺔ‬،‫ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻳﻳﻥ ﻭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻳﻳﻥ‬ ‫ﻟﻔﺭﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﻣﻝ ﺍﻟﺗﻲ ﻗﺎﻣﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺭﺍﺣﻝ ﺇﻧﺗﺎﺝ ﻫﺫﻩ‬ ‫ ﻭﻧﺛﻣﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻭﺻﻠﺕ ﺇﻟﻳﻪ ﻣﻥ ﻧﺗﺎﺋﺞ‬،‫ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻣﺔ‬ ‫ﺳﻳﻛﻭﻥ ﻟﻬﺎ ﺃﻛﺑﺭ ﺍﻷﺛﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺭﺳﻡ ﻭﺗﻁﻭﻳﺭ ﻣﺳﺗﻘﺑﻝ‬ .‫ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻟﺳﻧﻭﺍﺕ ﻣﻣﺗﺩﺓ ﻗﺎﺩﻣﺔ‬ ‫ﺃﻫﻧﻲ ﺃﻓﺭﺍﺩ ﻭﻣﺅﺳﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺗﻣﻊ ﻣﻥ ﺩﺍﺧﻝ ﻭﺧﺎﺭﺝ‬ ،‫ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺣﺩﻳﺙ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻭﺭﺳﺎﻟﺗﻬﺎ ﻭﻗﻳﻣﻬﺎ‬ ‫ﻭﺃﺩﻋﻭ ﷲ ﻋﺯ ﻭﺟﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻭﻓﻕ ﺍﻟﺟﻣﻳﻊ ﻟﻠﻌﻣﻝ‬ ‫ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﺑﺎﺭﻙ ﻓﻲ ﺟﻬﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﺟﻣﻳﻊ ﻟﻣﺳﺎﻋﺩﺓ‬،‫ﺑﻣﻘﺗﺿﺎﻫﺎ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺩﺍء ﺩﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﺈﻳﺟﺎﺑﻳﺔ ﻛﺄﺣﺩ ﺍﻟﻣﺅﺳﺳﺎﺕ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻋﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻭﻁ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺭﺳﻡ ﻣﺳﺗﻘﺑﻝ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻭﻁﻥ ﻭﺑﻧﺎء‬ .‫ﺣﺿﺎﺭﺗﻪ ﻭﺍﺯﺩﻫﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﷲ‬

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

III

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Preface by the Vice President for Studies, Development & Community Services Dr. Abdullah H. Alkadi

‫ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻋﺒﺪﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ‬

The University have passed, since separated from the KFU in Ramadan 1430 (September 2009), demographic and geographic changes. The UOD grew to 28 Colleges, 189 disciplines, 41705 students, 2067 faculty members and 4917 staff. The University has branches covering the City of Dammam and six other Mohafazat along the Eastern Province (Qatif, Al Jubail, Noayriyah, Qarya Olia, Khafji, and Hafulbatin. On 2/6/1435 (2/4/2014) Royal Decree was declared separating four branches from the University (Qarya Olia, Noayriyah, Khafji, and Hafr Al Baten) to form a new University named University of Hafr Al Baten. The UOD now has 21 Colleges, 165 specializations, 28698 students,1644 faculty members and 4735 staffs.

‫ﻟﻘﺩ ﻣﺭﺕ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻣﺎﻡ ﻣﻧﺫ ﺍﺳﺗﻘﻠﺕ ﻋﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﻠﻙ‬ ‫( ﺑﺗﻐﻳﻳﺭﺍﺕ‬٢٠٠٩ ‫ﻫـ )ﺳﺑﺗﻣﺑﺭ‬١٤٣٠ ‫ﻓﻳﺻﻝ ﻓﻲ ﺭﻣﺿﺎﻥ‬ ‫ﺩﻳﻣﻭﻏﺭﺍﻓﻳﺔ ﻭﺟﻐﺭﺍﻓﻳﺔ ﻛﺑﻳﺭﺓ ﺗﻣﺛﻠﺕ ﻓﻲ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﺩﺩ ﺍﻟﻛﻠﻳﺎﺕ‬ ‫ ﻭﺯﺍﺩ‬،ً‫ ﺗﺧﺻﺻﺎ‬١٨٩ ‫ ﻛﻠﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺗﺧﺻﺻﺎﺕ ﺇﻟﻰ‬٢٨ ‫ﺇﻟﻰ‬ ‫ ﻋﺿﻭ ﻫﻳﺋﺔ‬٢٠٦٧‫ ﻁﺎﻟﺑﺎ ً ﻭ‬٤١٧٠٥ ‫ﻋﺩﺩ ﻣﻧﺳﻭﺑﻳﻬﺎ ﻓﺑﻠﻎ‬ ‫ ﻭﺍﻣﺗﺩﺕ ﻓﺭﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻟﺗﻐﻁﻲ‬،ً‫ ﻣﻭﻅﻔﺎ‬٤٩١٧ ‫ﺗﺩﺭﻳﺱ ﻭ‬ ‫ﻣﺩﻳﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻣﺎﻡ ﻭﺳﺕ ﻣﺣﺎﻓﻅﺎﺕ ﺃﺧﺭﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻣﺗﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻁﻘﺔ‬ ،‫ ﺍﻟﻧﻌﻳﺭﻳﺔ‬،‫ ﻗﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻳﺎ‬،‫ ﺍﻟﺟﺑﻳﻝ‬،‫ﺍﻟﺷﺭﻗﻳﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻁﻳﻑ‬ (٢٠١٤/٤/ ٢) ١٤٣٥/٦/٢ ‫ ﻭﻓﻲ‬.‫ ﻭﺣﻔﺭ ﺍﻟﺑﺎﻁﻥ‬،‫ﺍﻟﺧﻔﺟﻲ‬ ‫ﺻﺩﺭ ﻣﺭﺳﻭﻡ ﻣﻠﻛﻲ ﺑﻔﺻﻝ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻓﺭﻭﻉ ﻋﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻣﺎﻡ‬ (‫ ﻭﺣﻔﺭ ﺍﻟﺑﺎﻁﻥ‬،‫ ﺍﻟﺧﻔﺟﻲ‬،‫ ﺍﻟﻧﻌﻳﺭﻳﺔ‬،‫)ﻭﻫﻲ ﻗﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻳﺎ‬ ‫ ﻓﺄﺻﺑﺣﺕ‬،‫ﻟﺗﺷﻛﻝ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺟﺩﻳﺩﺓ ﺗﺳﻣﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺣﻔﺭ ﺍﻟﺑﺎﻁﻥ‬ ٢٨٦٩٨‫ ﺗﺧﺻﺻﺎ ً ﻭ‬١٦٥‫ ﻛﻠﻳﺔ ﻭ‬٢١ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻣﺎﻡ ﺗﺿﻡ‬ .ً ‫ ﻣﻭﻅﻔﺎ‬٤٧٣٥‫ ﻋﺿﻭ ﻫﻳﺋﺔ ﺗﺩﺭﻳﺱ ﻭ‬١٦٤٤ ‫ﻁﺎﻟﺑﺎ ً ﻭ‬

These changes necessitated that UOD updates its vision, mission, values, strategic goals and operational objectives to fit new circumstances and to meet the new demands and aspirations of the University. This study was launched to achieve such a goal. The study followed a scientific approach which relied on soliciting the views of various segments of beneficiaries within the University (students, faculty and staff) and outside it (components of the community surrounding the University: students' parents, representatives of institutions, public and private industrial, commercial and service sectors interacting with the University). After analyzing the views of stakeholders, the results were presented to recipients’ focus groups of decision makers from the University where discussed formulas learned, adjusted and improved. They were presented, discussed and approved by the University Council.

‫ﺣﺗﻣﺕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺗﻐﻳﺭﺍﺕ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﻭﻡ ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺑﺗﺣﺩﻳﺙ ﺻﻳﺎﻏﺔ‬ ‫ﺭﺅﻳﺗﻬﺎ ﻭﺭﺳﺎﻟﺗﻬﺎ ﻭﺃﻫﺩﺍﻓﻬﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﺭﺍﺗﻳﺟﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺗﺷﻐﻳﻠﻳﺔ ﺣﺗﻰ‬ ‫ﺗﺗﻼءﻡ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﺟﺩﺓ ﻭﺗﻠﺑﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﻁﺎﻟﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺗﻁﻠﻌﺎﺕ‬ ،‫ ﻓﺎﻧﻁﻠﻘﺕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻟﺗﺣﻘﻳﻕ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻬﺩﻑ‬،‫ﺍﻟﺟﺩﻳﺩﺓ ﻟﻠﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬ ‫ﻭﻗﺩ ﺍﺗﺑﻌﺕ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻣﻧﻬﺟﺎ ً ﻋﻠﻣﻳﺎ ً ﺣﻳﺙ ﺍﻋﺗﻣﺩﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ‬ ‫ﺍﺳﺗﻁﻼﻉ ﺁﺭﺍء ﺷﺭﺍﺋﺢ ﻣﺗﻧﻭﻋﺔ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻔﻳﺩﻳﻥ ﻣﻥ ﺩﺍﺧﻝ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ )ﺍﻟﻁﻼﺏ ﻭﺃﻋﺿﺎء ﻫﻳﺋﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﺩﺭﻳﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﻣﻭﻅﻔﻳﻥ( ﻭﻣﻥ‬ ‫ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻬﺎ )ﻣﻛﻭﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺗﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻣﺣﻳﻁ ﺑﺎﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻷﻓﺭﺍﺩ‬ ‫ﻭﺃﻭﻟﻳﺎء ﺃﻣﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﻁﻼﺏ ﻭﻣﻣﺛﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﺅﺳﺳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻬﻳﺋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻁﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺻﻧﺎﻋﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺗﺟﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺧﺩﻣﻳﺔ ﻭﻛﺎﻓﺔ‬ .(‫ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻔﻳﺩﻳﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺗﻌﺎﻣﻠﻳﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺑﺎﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬ ‫ﻭﺑﻌﺩ ﺗﺣﻠﻳﻝ ﺁﺭﺍء ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻔﻳﺩﻳﻥ ﻋﺭﺿﺕ ﺍﻟﻧﺗﺎﺋﺞ ﻋﻠﻰ‬ ‫ﻣﺟﻣﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺗﺭﻛﻳﺯ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺅﻭﻟﻳﻥ ﻭﻣﺗﺧﺫﻱ ﺍﻟﻘﺭﺍﺭ‬ ‫ﺑﺎﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺣﻳﺙ ﻧﻭﻗﺷﺕ ﺍﻟﺻﻳﻎ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﺧﻠﺻﺔ ﻭﻋﺩﻟﺕ‬ ‫ﻭﻁﻭﺭﺕ ﺛﻡ ﻋﺭﺿﺕ ﻭﻧﻭﻗﺷﺕ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺟﻠﺱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻣﺎﻡ‬ .‫ﻭﺍﻋﺗﻣﺩﺕ ﻭﻭﻓﻕ ﻋﻠﻳﻬﺎ‬

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

On Wednesday 15/4/1436H. ( 4/2/2015G.), an official ceremony was held for the inauguration of the new vision, mission and values of the University under the patronage of H.E. the Rector of UOD with the attendance of Vice Rectors, Deans of faculties and support deanships, department chairmen, directors of administrative departments, and representatives of teaching staff, employees and students. I extend sincere gratitude to H.E. the Rector for his support and embrace of this work. I thank all the team members who participated in the preparation of the Vision, Mission and Values Updating Study and produced it in this decent scientific level. I pray to Allah to grant success to all university employees to work under the vision, mission and values of the new University to achieve the hopes and aspirations of the country's leadership to move the University to new heights Prosperity and progress.

‫ﻡ‬٢٠١٥/٢/٤ ‫ﻫـ ﺍﻟﻣﻭﺍﻓﻕ‬١٤٣٦/٤/١٥ ‫ﻭﻓﻲ ﻳﻭﻡ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺎء‬ ‫ﺃﺟﺭﻳﺕ ﻣﺭﺍﺳﻡ ﺗﺩﺷﻳﻥ ﺍﻟﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻳﻡ ﺍﻟﺟﺩﻳﺩﺓ‬ ‫ﻟﻠﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺑﺭﻋﺎﻳﺔ ﻛﺭﻳﻣﺔ ﻣﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﺩﻳﺭ ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻭﺑﺣﺿﻭﺭ‬ ‫ﺃﺻﺣﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺳﻌﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﻛﻼء ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻭﻋﻣﺩﺍء ﺍﻟﻛﻠﻳﺎﺕ‬ ‫ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻣﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺎﻧﺩﺓ ﻭﻣﺩﻳﺭﻱ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺭﺅﺳﺎء ﺍﻷﻗﺳﺎﻡ‬ ‫ﻭﻧﺧﺑﺔ ﻣﻥ ﺃﻋﺿﺎء ﻭﻋﺿﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺗﺩﺭﻳﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﻣﻭﻅﻔﻳﻥ‬ .‫ﻭﺍﻟﻁﻼﺏ‬ ‫ﺃﺗﻘﺩﻡ ﺑﺧﺎﻟﺹ ﺍﻻﻣﺗﻧﺎﻥ ﻟﻣﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﺩﻳﺭ ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻟﺩﻋﻣﻪ‬ ‫ ﻭﺃﺷﻛﺭ ﺟﻣﻳﻊ ﺃﻓﺭﺍﺩ ﻓﺭﻳﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﻣﻝ‬،‫ﻭﺍﺣﺗﺿﺎﻧﻪ ﻟﻬﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻣﻝ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺫﻳﻥ ﺷﺎﺭﻛﻭﺍ ﻓﻲ ﺇﻋﺩﺍﺩ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻭﺃﺧﺭﺟﻭﻫﺎ ﺑﻬﺫﺍ‬ ‫ ﺭﺍﺟﻳﺎ ً ﻣﻥ ﷲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻭﻓﻕ ﺟﻣﻳﻊ‬،‫ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻭﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﺷﺭﻑ‬ ‫ﻣﻧﺳﻭﺑﻲ ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﻣﻝ ﺑﻣﻘﺗﺿﻰ ﺍﻟﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻳﻡ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺟﺩﻳﺩﺓ ﻟﻠﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻟﺗﺣﻘﻳﻕ ﺃﻣﺎﻝ ﻭﻁﻣﻭﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺭﺷﻳﺩﺓ‬ ‫ﻟﻠﺑﻼﺩ ﻭﻟﻼﻧﻁﻼﻕ ﺑﺎﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺁﻓﺎﻕ ﺟﺩﻳﺩﺓ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻻﺯﺩﻫﺎﺭ‬ .‫ﻭﺍﻟﺗﻘﺩﻡ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﷲ‬

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

‫ﻣﻠﺨﺺ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ‪Arabic Summary‬‬ ‫ﺗﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ‪ :‬ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺼﺎء ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﻠﺤﺔ‬ ‫ﻭﻣﻼﺣﻈﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺰ ﻭﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬ ‫ﺧﻠﻔﻴﺔ‪:‬‬ ‫ﺿﻤﻦ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﺎﺗﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺗﻮﺻﻲ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﻁﻨﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﻢ ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺩﻳﻤﻲ ﺑﺸﺪﺓ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﺆﺳﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻓﺔ ﻭﻣﻌﺘﻤﺪﺓ ﻭﻣﺪﻋﻮﻣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﻅﻔﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﺨﺪﻣﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﺛﻢ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﺗﻮﻟﻲ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﺎ ً ﻛﺒﻴﺮﺍً ﺑﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺠﻬﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﻠﺤﺔ )ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻴﺎ‪:‬‬ ‫ﺃﻋﻀﺎء ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻮﻅﻔﻴﻦ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻄﻼﺏ؛ ﻭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴﺎ ً‪ :‬ﻭﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﺠﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻴﻂ‬ ‫ﺑﺎﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺠﻬﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﺎﻋﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﺎﺹ(؛ ﻭﻳﺘﺠﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻢ ﺑﺄﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﺗﻌﻜﺲ‬ ‫ﺻﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﻗﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﻤﻮﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻘﺒﻠﻴﺔ ﻷﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﻠﺤﺔ‪ .‬ﻟﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﺷﺮﻋﺖ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣ ﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺇﺟﺮﺍء ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺢ ﺍﻟﻤﻴﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﻟﻠﺘﺄﻛﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻋﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻷﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﻭﻧﻮﺍﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻨﻌﻜﺲ‬ ‫ﻓﻲ ﺭﺅﻳﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﻗﻴﻤﻬﺎ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪:‬‬ ‫ﺃﺗﺨﺬ "ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺎﺭﻛﻲ" ﻛﺂﻟﻴﺔ ﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﺪﻯ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﻗﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻭﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ‬ ‫ﺗﺤﺼﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺘﻤﻊ‪ .‬ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺳﻤﺢ ﻟﺠﻤﻴﻊ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﻠﺤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻭﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬ ‫ﺑﺎﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﻄﻼﻉ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺇﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻲ ﻁﺮﺡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺒﻜﺔ ﺍﻹﻧﺘﺮﻧﺖ )ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﻓﻖ )‪((a‬؛‬ ‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﻁﻠﺐ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺗﻘﻴﻴﻢ ﺻﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﺑﺤﺮﻳﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺁﺭﺍﺋﻬﻢ ﺗﺠﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻏﺎﺕ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﺬﺕ ﺁﺭﺍء ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﻠﺤﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺗﺄﻣﻞ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺇﺻﺪﺍﺭ ﻭﺻﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﻣﺤﺪﺛﺔ ﻟﺮﺅﻳﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﻗﻴﻤﻬﺎ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺗﻢ ﺑﺮﻣﺠﺘﻪ ﻭﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻪ ﻛﺎﺳﺘﻄﻼﻉ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺇﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻲ‬ ‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﻧﺘﺮﻧﺖ؛ ﺛﻢ ﺃﻁﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﻧﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﻓﻲ ‪ ٢٠‬ﺃﻛﺘﻮﺑﺮ ‪ ،٢٠١٤‬ﻭﺗﻢ ﺇﺑﻼﻍ ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﻠﺤﺔ‬ ‫ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻹﻋﻼﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻹﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻲ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﻳﺪ‬ ‫ﺍﻹﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻲ ﻟﺠﻤﻴﻊ ﻓﺌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪﻳﻦ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻋﻄﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﻟﻺﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺑﺤﺮﻳﺔ ﺗﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺃﻱ‬ ‫ﺿﻐﻮﻁ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ‪ .‬ﺛﻢ ﺃﺭﺳﻠﺖ ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﻋﺪﺓ ﻟﺘﺬﻛﻴﺮ ﻭﻟﺘﺸﺠﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﺰﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ‪ .‬ﺃﻗﻔﻠﺖ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻳﻮﻡ ‪ ٥‬ﺩﻳﺴﻤﺒﺮ ‪) ٢٠١٤‬ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺘﺮﺓ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻭﻧﺼﻒ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ً ﻣﻦ ﺇﻁﻼﻗﻬﺎ( ﻭﺗﻢ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﻮﻗﻊ ﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ‪ .‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺛﺒﺘﺖ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﺑﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ‬ ‫ﺗﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﻋﺎﻟﻲ ﻟﺤﺠﻢ ﻭﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ‪.‬‬

‫‪Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014‬‬

‫‪VII‬‬

‫ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ‪:‬‬ ‫ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﺗﻠﺨﻴﺺ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻲ‪:‬‬ ‫‪x‬‬ ‫‪x‬‬ ‫‪x‬‬ ‫‪x‬‬ ‫‪x‬‬

‫ﺑﻠﻎ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻹﺟﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ‪ ٤٧٩١‬ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻙ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻣﻦ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﺑﻠﻎ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﻮﺭ ‪ (%٣٦) ١٧٠١‬ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻹﻧﺎﺙ ‪ ٦٤) ٣٠٩٠‬ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺋﺔ(‪.‬‬ ‫ﺗﺮﺍﻭﺣﺖ ﺍﻟﻔﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﺑ ﻴﻦ ‪ ١٥‬ﻭ ≤ ‪ ٦٦‬ﻋﺎﻣ ﺎً‪ ،‬ﻭﺗ ﻮﺯﻉ ﺍﻟﻤﺸ ﺎﺭﻛﻮﻥ ﺑﺸ ﻜﻞ ﺟﻴ ﺪ ﺑ ﻴﻦ ﺟﻤﻴ ﻊ‬ ‫ﻓﺌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻛﺎﻥ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻲ ‪ (%٨٨) ٤٢٣٧‬ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻴﻴﻦ )ﻁﻠﺒﺔ ﻭﻗﻴﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻴﺔ ﻭﺃﻋﻀ ﺎء ﻫﻴﺌ ﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺲ ﻭﻣﻮﻅﻔﻴﻦ(‬ ‫ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻲ ‪ ١٢) ٣٠٧‬ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺋﺔ( ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻣﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴﻴﻦ )ﺃﻭﻟﻴ ﺎء ﺃﻣ ﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻄ ﻼﺏ ﻭﺧﺮﻳﺠ ﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌ ﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻟ ﺪﻣﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻨﺴ ﻮﺑﻲ ﻣﺆﺳﺴ ﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﻄ ﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺨ ﺎﺹ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺠﻬ ﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻧﺤ ﺔ ﻭﺍﻟ ﺪﺍﻋﻤﻴﻦ ﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌ ﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺪﻣﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻤﺜﻠ ﻲ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻮﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻮﻅﻒ ﺧﺮﻳﺠﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ(‪.‬‬

‫ﻣﻠﺨﺺ ﻷﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻮﺻﻠﺖ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪:‬‬ ‫ﻭﺿﻌﺖ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﻟﺠﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺛﻼﺛﻲ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ؛ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻫﻲ‪") :‬ﻧﻌﻢ" ﻭ"ﺇﻟﻰ ﺣﺪ ﻣﺎ"‬ ‫ﻭ"ﻻ"(‪ .‬ﻟﻘﺪ ﺍﺗﻔﻖ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺁﺭﺍء ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﺗﺠﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﻄﺮﻭﺣﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﻴﺎﺭﻳﻦ‬ ‫)"ﻧﻌﻢ" ﻭ"ﺇﻟﻰ ﺣﺪ ﻣﺎ"( ﻣﻌﺎ ً ﻭﺿﻤﻬﻤﺎ ﻛﻔﺌﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ "ﺫﺍﺕ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺇﻳﺠﺎﺑﻲ" ﺗﺠﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻄﺮﻭﺣﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﺎ ً‬ ‫ﻟﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﻗﻒ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻤﺎﺭﺳﺔ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻟﺔ ﻭﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﺗﻠﺨﻴﺺ ﺍﻵﺭﺍء ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﺑﺸﺄﻥ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ‬ ‫ﻭﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﻗﻴﻢ ﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻲ‪:‬‬ ‫‪ -١‬ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ‪:‬‬ ‫‪ x‬ﺃﻛﺪﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺼﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺻﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ‪ :‬ﻣﻮﺟﺰﺓ ﻭﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺔ )‪ ،(%٨٨‬ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺔ ﻭﻁﻤﻮﺣ ﺔ )‪،(%٦٦‬‬ ‫ﻣﻤﻴ ﺰﺓ ﻭﺳ ﻬﻠﺔ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻨﺴ ﻰ )‪ ،(%٨٨‬ﺗ ﺬﻫﻞ ﻭﺗ ﺮﻭﻕ ﻟﻠﻤﺴ ﺘﻔﻴﺪﻳﻦ )‪ ،(%٧٨‬ﻭﺷ ﺎﻣﻠﺔ )‪ .(%٧٧‬ﻭﺃﻛ ﺪﺕ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺻﺎﻟﺤﺔ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ )‪.(%٨٥‬‬ ‫‪ -٢‬ﺑﺸﺄﻥ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ‪:‬‬ ‫‪ x‬ﺃﻛ ﺪﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳ ﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺼ ﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺻ ﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺳ ﺎﻟﺔ‪ :‬ﻣﺨﺘﺼ ﺮﺓ )‪ ،(%٧٩‬ﻭﻣﻜﺘﻤﻠ ﺔ )‪ ،(%٩١‬ﻭﻣﺤ ﺪﺩﺓ‬ ‫)‪ ،(%٨٨‬ﻭﻳﻤﻜ ﻦ ﺗ ﺬﻛﺮﻫﺎ )‪ ،(%٧٦‬ﻭﺗﺘﻤﺎﺷ ﻰ ﻣ ﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳ ﺔ )‪ .(%٩٤‬ﻭﺃﻛ ﺪﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳ ﺔ ﻛ ﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﻴ ﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺻﺎﻟﺤﺔ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ )‪.(%٨٧‬‬ ‫‪ -٣‬ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻘﻴﻢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ‪:‬‬ ‫‪ x‬ﺃﻛ ﺪﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳ ﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺼ ﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺻ ﻴﺎﻏﺔ "ﺍﻟﻘ ﻴﻢ" ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣ ﺔ‪ :‬ﺇﻳﺠﺎﺑﻴ ﺔ ﻭﻣﻠﻬﻤ ﺔ )‪ ،(%٩٤‬ﻭﺗﻐﻄ ﻲ ﺟﻤﻴ ﻊ‬ ‫ﻣﺠﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ )‪ ،(%٩٧‬ﻭﻋﺎﻣﺔ )‪ ،(%٨٦‬ﻭﺗﻠﺒ ﻲ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﺟ ﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻓ ﺮﺍﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺆﺳﺴ ﺎﺕ )‪ .(%٩١‬ﻭﺃﻛ ﺪﺕ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ ﺻﺎﻟﺤﺔ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ )‪.(%٩٣‬‬ ‫‪Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014‬‬

‫‪VIII‬‬

‫‪ -٤‬ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻲ ﻋﺒﺮ ﺃﺻﻨﺎﻑ ﻭﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ‬ ‫‪ x‬ﺃﻛﺪﺕ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻲ ﻋﺒﺮ ﺃﺻﻨﺎﻑ ﻭﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺸ ﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨ ﺎﻙ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋ ﺎ ً ﺇﻳﺠﺎﺑﻴ ﺎ ً ﻭﻗﺒ ﻮﻻً‬ ‫ﻭﺩﻋﻤ ﺎ ً ﻣ ﻦ ﺃﺻ ﻨﺎﻑ ﻭﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋ ﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺸ ﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﻟﺮﺅﻳ ﺔ ﻭﺭﺳ ﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﻗ ﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌ ﺔ‪ .‬ﺣﻴ ﺚ ﺗ ﻢ ﺗﺼ ﻨﻴﻒ ﺃﺭﺍء‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﺸ ﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﻭﻓﻘ ﺎ ﻟﻠﺠ ﻨﺲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟ ﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﻴ ﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤ ﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨ ﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺠ ﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼ ﺺ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻜ ﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﻗﺎﻣ ﺔ‪،‬‬ ‫ﻭﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﺼﺐ ﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ‪.‬‬ ‫‪ x‬ﻭﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻋﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺧﻤﺎﺳﻲ‪ ،‬ﺗﺮﺍﻭﺣﺖ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺗﻮﺍ ﺇﻳﺠﺎﺑﻴﺎ ً ﺑﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺳ ﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘ ﻴﻢ‬ ‫ﻟﺠﻤﻴﻊ ﻓﺌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﻦ ‪ ٣٫٦‬ﺇﻟﻰ ‪ ٤٫٥‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﻞ ‪ ٥‬ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﻓﻲ ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﺌﺎﺕ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺑﺎﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﻟﻘﺪ ﺃﻅﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺢ ﺍﻟﻤﻴﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﻵﺭﺍء ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﻠﺤﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﻴﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺟﻴﻴﻦ ﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﻗﺪ ﻋﺒﺮﻭﺍ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻴﺎﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺛﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻢ ﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﻗﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬ ‫ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ ﺗﻌﻜﺲ ﺟﻴﺪﺍ ﺃﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬ ‫ﻭﻧﻮﺍﻳﺎﻫﺎ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻭﻗﺪ ﺳﺎﻫﻢ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻓﻲ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻼﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻏﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺒﺪﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ‬ ‫ﻓﻲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ )ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻣﻦ‪" :‬ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻘﺘﺮﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ"(‪ ،‬ﻣﺎﻟﺖ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺎﺕ ﺇﻟﻰ‬ ‫ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﻝ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻟﻜﻲ ﺗﻌﺒﺮ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ‬ ‫ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻭﺍﻓﻀﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺍﺩ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻹﻧﺠﻠﻴﺰﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﻨﺎ ًء ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﺟﺮﻱ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻁﻔﻴﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻏﺎﺕ ﻭﺗﻢ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺻﻴﺎﻏﺎﺕ ﻧﺄﻣﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﻴﺎ ً ﻣﻊ ﺁﺭﺍء ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮﺍً ﻋﻦ ﻁﻤﻮﺣﺎﺗﻬﻢ ﻭﺁﻣﺎﻟﻬﻢ‬ ‫)ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺳﻊ "ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﺧﺬ ﻣﻘﺘﺮﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ"(‪.‬‬ ‫ﻋﺮﺽ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺤﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺰ‪:‬‬ ‫ﺑﺘﻮﺟﻴﻬﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻋﺮﺿﺖ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺢ ﺍﻟﻤﻴﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﻵﺭﺍء ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺘﻲ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺰ‬ ‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‪ ،‬ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻠﻬﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻵﺗﻲ‪:‬‬ ‫‪-‬‬

‫ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺰ )‪:(١‬‬

‫ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺰ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻲ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻠﺠﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﻟﻠﺠﻮﺩﺓ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺑﺮﺋﺎﺳﺔ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻭﻋﻀﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﻛﻼء ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬ ‫ﻭﻋﻤﺪﺍء ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﻋﻤﺪﺍء ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎﻧﺪﺓ ﻭﻣﺪﺭﺍء ﺍﻟﻤﺮﻛﺰ )‪ ١٣‬ﻋﻀﻮﺍً(‪ .‬ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻻﻧﻌﻘﺎﺩ ﻫﻮ‪:‬‬ ‫‪١٤٣٦/٣/١٧‬ﻫـ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺍﻓﻖ ‪.٢٠١٥/١/٨‬‬ ‫‪-‬‬

‫ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺰ )‪:(٢‬‬

‫ﺍﻟﻠﺠﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﻴﺬﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺋﻤﺔ ﻟﻠﺠﻮﺩﺓ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺑﺮﺋﺎﺳﺔ ﻭﻛﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻄﻮﻳﺮ ﻭﺧﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺘﻤﻊ‬ ‫ﻭﻋﻀﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﻛﻼء ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ ﻭﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﻭﺣﺪﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ ﺑﻜﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎﻧﺪﺓ ﻟﻠﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ )‪ ١٤‬ﻋﻀﻮﺍً(‪ .‬ﻭﻛﺎﻥ‬ ‫ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻻﻧﻌﻘﺎﺩ ﻫﻮ‪١٤٣٦/٣/٢٤ :‬ﻫـ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺍﻓﻖ ‪.٢٠١٥/١/١٥‬‬

‫‪Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014‬‬

‫‪IX‬‬

‫‪-‬‬

‫ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﻭﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﻣﺔ‪:‬‬

‫ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺘﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺰ‪ ،‬ﺃﻋﻄﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻟﻤﺠﻠﺲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﺃﺳﻪ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻲ"‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺎﺋﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ؛ ﻭﻳﻀﻢ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻀﻮﻳﺘﻪ ﻧﻮﺍﺏ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺨﻤﺴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻤﺪﺍء ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎﻧﺪﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﻘﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﺛﻨﻴﻦ ‪ ٦‬ﺭﺑﻴﻊ ﺛﺎﻧﻲ ‪١٤٣٦‬ﻫـ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺍﻓﻖ ‪ ٢٦‬ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ ‪ .٢٠١٥‬ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺮﺍﺽ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻠﺲ ﻟﻠﺼﻴﻎ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ‪ ،‬ﺗﻤﺖ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺘﻌﺪﻳﻼﺕ ﻁﻔﻴﻔﺔ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺻﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺋﻴﺔ‪:‬‬ ‫ﺑﻌﺪ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﻟﻤﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻭﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﺎﻟﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﺮﺿﻬﺎ‬ ‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺟﻠﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﻲ ‪١٤٣٦-١٤٣٥‬ﻫـ ﻳﻮﻡ‬ ‫ﺍﻻﺛﻨﻴﻦ ‪ ٦‬ﺭﺑﻴﻊ ﺛﺎﻧﻲ ‪١٤٣٦‬ﻫـ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺍﻓﻖ ‪ ٢٦‬ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ ‪ ،٢٠١٥‬ﺗﻮﺻﻲ ﺍﻟﻠﺠﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺪﺓ ﻟﻠﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﺘﺨﺬ ﻛﺎﻓﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻹﺟﺮﺍءﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻣﺔ ﻟﻺﻋﻼﻥ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﻌﻤﻴﻤﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﻤﻘﺘﻀﺎﻫﺎ ﺑﻜﺎﻓﺔ ﻗﻄﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻭﻭﺣﺪﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻳﺔ‬ ‫ﻭﺍﻷﻛﺎﺩﻳﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺠﺘﻤﻌﺔ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺪﻟﺔ‪:‬‬

‫ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ‪:‬‬

‫"ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺭﺍﺋﺩﺓ ﺗﺣﻘﻕ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﻳﺯ ﻣﺣﻠﻳﺎ ً ﻭﺇﻗﻠﻳﻣﻳﺎ ً ﻭﻋﺎﻟﻣﻳﺎ ً"‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ‪:‬‬

‫"ﺗﻘﺩﻳﻡ ﺧﺩﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﻌﺭﻓﻳﺔ ﻭﺑﺣﺛﻳﺔ ﻭﻣﻬﻧﻳﺔ ﺇﺑﺩﺍﻋﻳﺔ ﺑﺷﺭﺍﻛﺔ ﻣﺟﺗﻣﻌﻳﺔ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ"‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ‪:‬‬

‫"ﺍﻻﻧﺗﻣﺎء؛ ﺍﻹﺗﻘﺎﻥ؛ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﻳﻕ؛ ﺍﻟﺷﻔﺎﻓﻳﺔ؛ ﺍﻟﺗﻧﻭﻉ؛ ﺍﻹﺑﺩﺍﻉ؛ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺅﻭﻟﻳﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻻﺟﺗﻣﺎﻋﻳﺔ"‬

‫‪Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014‬‬

‫‪X‬‬

Executive Summary Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval Background: The National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment (NCAAA) strongly recommends that an institution’s mission is supported, known and accepted by its employees and the community that it serves. Therefore, the University of Dammam has focused on getting the support of its stakeholders (internally: faculty, students and staff and externally: private and public individuals and other beneficiaries). This support is obvious when the Vision, Mission and Values statement of the University truly express and reflect the existing and future ambitions of the stakeholders. In order to achieve this goal, UD has conducted stakeholders’ survey with the intention of substantiating the beneficiaries’ support of the University’s purpose and intentions as reflected in its Vision, Mission and Values statement. Survey Methodology: A “Participatory Approach” has been adopted as the mechanism to test the usefulness of the Mission, Vision and Values statement and the support they receive from the community. By using this approach, all internal and external stakeholders of the University have been involved in an online survey (see the questionnaire form: Appendix a). They have been asked to assess the wording of the University’s Vision, Mission and Values statement and freely express their opinions towards these statements. The opinions of all the stakeholders have been taken into consideration. As a result of this survey, UD hopes to develop an updated version of its Mission, Vision and Values statement UD. After the approval of the final version of the questionnaire, it was uploaded online using a survey software tool. The survey was launched online on October 20, 2014 and was communicated to all the stakeholders of the University through announcement on the UD website, as well as through email notifications. The stakeholders were given enough time to respond without undue pressure. Several reminders were sent to encourage more participation. The survey was closed on December 5, 2014, a month and a half after it was launched and the raw data was downloaded in order to conduct a detailed analysis. Various statistical tests proved that the sample was highly representative of the University’s beneficiaries.

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Characteristics of the respondents: The basic characteristics of the respondents can be summarized as follows: x

The total number of respondents to the survey was 4,791 respondents.

Among the total respondents, 1701 (36%) were males and 3,090 (64%) were females.

The age group of the participants varied from 15 to ≥ 66 years. Participants are fairly distributed among all age cohorts.

4237 (88%) of respondents were internal beneficiaries (students, administrators, faculty members and staff).

307 (12%) were external beneficiaries (parents of students, UD graduates, private enterprises, donors and supporters of UD and official government entities that hire UD graduates).

Summary of Findings: The respondents had a three level scale of measurement to express their ratings of various statements of the University’s Vision, Mission and Values; these levels are: (“Yes”, “to some extent” and “No”). In interpreting the views of the respondents toward certain issues, it has been a widely accepted practice and one more close to reality, to add the two choices (“Yes” and “to some extent”) to include the moderate group of respondents who have a positive opinion toward a certain issue. The final views of respondents concerning the Vision, Mission and Values of UD, may be summarized as follows: 1. UD’s Vision: x

The survey has ascertained that the vision statement is: brief and comprehensible (88%), realistic and ambitious (66%), distinctive, easy and memorable (88%), astonishes and pleases to clients (78%), and comprehensive (77%). The majority of respondents see the mission to be suitable (85%).

2. UD’s Mission: x

The survey has ascertained that the mission statement is: brief (79%), complete (91%), articulate (88%), memorable (76%) and aligned with the vision (94%). The majority of respondents see the mission to be suitable (87%).

3. UD’s Values: x

The survey has ascertained that the proposed “values” are: positive and inspiring (94 %), covering all areas of interest (97%), general (86%) and satisfy the needs of individuals and the institution (91%). The majority of respondents consider the proposed values suitable (93%).

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

XII

4. Cross Tabulation Statistics: x

The results of cross tabulation statistics have ascertained the positive support of respondents to UD’s Vision, Mission and Values. Respondents were categorized according to gender, marital status, age, primary work, field of specialization, place of residence, place of work, relationship to UD, the position of the respondent and UD and faculty rank. In general and for all categories, the mean score of accepting the Vision, Mission and Values ranges between 3.6 to 4.5 out of 5 points in all categories.

In summation, the stakeholders’ survey showed that UD’s internal and external beneficiaries have expressed high levels of support and satisfaction towards the proposed Vision, Mission, and Values of UD and that the statements in fact represent the purpose and intention of the University. Some of the participants in the questionnaire have effectively contributed in providing amendments to the wording initially proposed in the questionnaire (see Chapter 8: "Analyzing the Suggestions from Respondents"). Most of these suggestions have suggested that the statements should be shorter and more concise; while others suggested replacing some Arabic words to reflect stronger and better meanings in their English counterparts. Therefore, the team decided to make a few slight modifications to align the statement with the views of participants and make them more reflective of the aspirations and hopes of the University (see Chapter 9 "The final statements after incorporating the respondents’ suggestions"). Reviewing the Survey Results by focus groups: Upon the request of HE the President, the results of the stakeholders’ survey were discussed in order to get feedback from two focus groups from University officials. These groups are structured as follows: -

Focus Group (1)

The first focus group is the Higher Committee for Quality, chaired by the HE, the President and various University Vice Presidents, Deans of Colleges and Support Deanships and Directors of University Centers (13 members). This meeting was held on January 8, 2015. -

Focus Group (2)

The second focus group is the Permanente Executive Committee for Quality, chaired by the University Vice President for Studies, Development and Community Services; and various Vice Deans of Colleges for Quality, chairs of the quality departments in colleges and supporting Deanships (13 members). This meeting was held on January 15, 2015.

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

XIII

University Council Review and Approval

After the two focus groups, the final say was given to the Governing Body of UOD (the University Council), chaired by H.H. The Minister of Higher Education, Deputy Chaired by the University President; membered with various University’s Vice Presidents, Deans of Colleges and supporting Deanships. This meeting was held on Monday January 26, 2015. The Council has reviewed and approved the three statements.

Final Recommendations: Following the adjournment of the report and the proposed wording for the vision, mission and values to H.E. the Rector of the University and the University Council discussion and approval of the statements, the Committee recommends that the UOD takes all necessary actions to post, disseminate and act upon these statements by all academic and administrative units of the University.

The Final Statements as Approved by the University Council:

VISION:

A leading University achieving distinction locally, regionally and internationally MISSION: ON:

Providing creative knowledge, research and professional services with effective community partnerships VALUES:

Loyalty, Excellence, Teamwork, Transparency, Diversity, Creativity and Social Responsibility

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

XIV

TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTRIBUTORS............................................................................................................................ I PREFACE BY H.E. THE PRESIDENT OF UOD ....................................................................................III PREFACE BY THE VICE PRESIDENT FOR STUDIES, DEVELOPMENT & COMMUNITY SERVICES ........... V ARABIC SUMMARY‫ ﻣﻠﺨﺺ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ‬....................................................................................... VII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ XI TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. XV TABLE OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................... XVI TABLE OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................... XVI 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 2. MECHANISM ADOPTED FOR THE STAKEHOLDERS’ SURVEY...................................................5 2.1 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................6 2.2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE.......................................................................................6 2.3 THE VISION PROPOSED FOR UD .................................................................................................7 2.4 THE MISSION PROPOSED FOR THE UD .........................................................................................7 2.5 VALUE PROPOSED FOR THE UD ..................................................................................................8 2.6 ONLINE SURVEY .....................................................................................................................9 3. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RESPONDENTS .......................................................................... 11 3.1 BENEFICIARIES FROM WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE UNIVERSITY.......................................................... 12 3.2 OVERALL SUMMARY OF RESPONDENT CHARACTERISTICS................................................................ 13 4. ANALYSIS OF RESPONDENTS’ VIEWS ABOUT UD’S VISION, MISSION AND VALUES .............. 17 4.1 VISION PROPOSED FOR UD (ITEMS 3.1 – 3.7) ............................................................................ 18 4.2 MISSION PROPOSED FOR UD (ITEMS 3.9 – 3.14) ................................................................. 19 4.3 VALUES PROPOSED FOR UD (ITEMS 3.16 – 3.20) ........................................................................ 21 5. RESULTS OF CROSS TABULATION STATISTICS ..................................................................... 23 5.1 MEAN SCORE OF VISION, MISSION AND VALUES BY GENDER........................................................... 24 5.2 MEAN SCORE OF VISION, MISSION AND VALUES BY MARITAL STATUS ............................................... 24 5.3 MEAN SCORE OF VISION, MISSION AND VALUES BY AGE ................................................................ 25 5.4 MEAN SCORE OF VISION, MISSION AND VALUES BY LEVEL OF EDUCATION .......................................... 26 5.5 MEAN SCORE OF VISION, MISSION AND VALUES BY PRIMARY WORK ................................................ 27 5.6 MEAN SCORE OF VISION, MISSION AND VALUES BY FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION ..................................... 28 5.7 MEAN SCORE OF VISION, MISSION AND VALUES BY PLACE OF RESIDENCE .......................................... 29 5.8 MEAN SCORE OF VISION, MISSION AND VALUES BY PLACE OF WORK................................................ 30 5.9 MEAN SCORE OF VISION, MISSION AND VALUES BY THE BENEFICIARIES’ RELATIONSHIP TO UD ............... 31 5.10 MEAN SCORE OF VISION, MISSION AND VALUES BY THE RESPONDENT’S ROLE IN UD ............................ 32 5.11 MEAN SCORE OF VISION, MISSION AND VALUES BY FACULTY RANK.................................................. 33 6. CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 35 7. APPENDICES ..................................................................................................................... 39 APPENDIX A: THE SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE (ENGLISH VERSION)................................................. 41 APPENDIX B: THE SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE ................................................................................ 45 ( ARABIC VERSION) ..................................................................................................................... 45 8. ANALYZING THE SUGGESTIONS FROM THE RESPONDENTS ................................................. 49 9. COMPARISON TABLES: ORIGINAL STATEMENTS, STAKEHOLDERS’ RESULTS, FOCUS GROUP (1) AND FOCUS GROUP (2) .......................................................................................................... 57 10. THE FINAL STATEMENTS AFTER INCORPORATING THE RESPONDENTS’ SUGGESTIONS ......... 63 Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 4-1 Stakeholders’ responses to the Vision Assessment Criteria ................................... 19 Figure 4-2 Stakeholders’ responses to Mission Assessment Criteria ...................................... 20 Figure 4-3 Stakeholders’ responses to Values Assessment Criteria ........................................ 21 Figure 4-4 Stakeholders’ responses to Values Assessment Criteria ........................................ 22 Figure 5-1 Mean score of Vision, Mission and Values by Gender .......................................... 24 Figure 5-2 Mean score of Vision, Mission & Values by Marital status................................... 25 Figure 5-3 Mean score of Vision, Mission and Values by Age ............................................... 26 Figure 5-4 Mean score of Vision, Mission and Values by level of Education ........................ 27 Figure 5-5 Mean Score of Vision, Mission and Values by Primary Work .............................. 28 Figure 5-6 Mean Score of Vision, Mission and Values by Field ............................................. 29 Figure 5-7 Mean Score of Vision, Mission and Values by Place of Residence ....................... 30 Figure 5-8 Mean Score of Vision, Mission and Values by Place of work ............................... 31 Figure 5-9 Mean Score of Vision, Mission and Values by Beneficiaries ................................ 32 Figure 5-10 Mean Score of Vision, Mission and Values by Role ............................................ 33 Figure 5-11 Mean Score of Vision, Mission and Values by Faculty Position ......................... 34

TABLE OF TABLES Table 3-1 Beneficiaries from Within the University ................................................................ 12 Table 3-2 Beneficiaries from outside the University ............................................................... 13 Table 3-3 Categorizing the Respondents by Gender ................................................................ 13 Table 3-4 Categorizing the Respondents by Marital Status ..................................................... 14 Table 3-5 Categorizing the Respondents by Age Distribution ................................................ 14 Table 3-6 Categorizing the Respondents by Education Level ................................................. 15 Table 3-7 Categorizing the Respondents by Primary Work .................................................... 15 Table 3-8 Categorizing the Respondents by Field of Study..................................................... 16 Table 3-9 Categorizing the Respondents by Nationality ......................................................... 16 Table 3-10 Categorizing the Respondents by Work Place ....................................................... 16 Table 4-1 Stakeholders’ responses to the Vision Assessment Criteria .................................... 18 Table 4-2 Stakeholders’ responses to Mission Assessment Criteria ........................................ 20

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

XVI

1. Introduction

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

The University of Dammam (UD) was established as a stand-alone entity, which began the journey almost 40 years earlier as a branch of King Fisal University (KFUDammam). The preparation of UD’s Mission Statement goes back to the 1st Institutional Self-Study (SS-1) carried out in 2007, before the separation of UD from KFU. The separation took place in September 2009 according to the approval of the Higher Education Council in its meeting No. 4/1430 reported to HE the President of KFU with a letter from HE, the Minister of Higher Education No. 1811/a dated 15/9/1430H (Evidence No. 1). After the emergence as a new entity, the University has gone through significant geographic, demographic and physical growth to reach its current stage. The organizational chart depicted in the Strategic Plan 2009 was created based on the identity of UD as KFU-Dammam Campus. Thereafter, the identity has changed and UD has emerged as a separate entity. The University is no longer part of a larger university system, but it is now the head of its own university system with numerous branches. In addition, UD is experiencing rapid growth with four professional clusters, specifically: Health, Engineering, Science and Management and Humanities. The health cluster and its associated new Medical Center continue to be the leading cluster. In this new environment the entire university plan needs to be reconsidered and conceived around this change.

In addition, the new comprehensive nature of the

university must be geared to support a new way of thinking that is required to align the plan with the UD of today and tomorrow. Hence, the administrators at UD have come to the conclusion that the mission and vision have to be revisited because of the dramatic changes in the University’s structure. Since 2009 the review of the UD’s Strategic Plan began. A special task force was established and a variety of actions have been initiated towards this end. Several workshops and meetings were held during the 2013-1024 academic year were just some of the actions that took place in the reviewing UD’s strategic plan.

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

The UD Strategic Plan Updating Task Force Workshop (1) was held on January 9, 2013.

The UD Strategic Plan Updating Task Force Follow up Meeting was held on March 6, 2013.

The UD Strategic Plan Updating Task Force Workshop (2) was held on April 3, 2013.

HE the President signed a Decision, No. 42/585 dated 2/7/1434H (11/5/2013) to that established a new Vice Deanship for Strategic Planning under the Deanship of Academic Development.

The last UD Strategic Plan Updating Workshop was held from September 4 – 8, 2014 with the attendance of the George Kaludis Consultants.

The goal of this report is to assess UD’s (www.uod.edu.sa) stakeholders’ opinions about the statements of the proposed vision, mission and values of the University.

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

2. Mechanism Adopted for the Stakeholders’ Survey

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

2.1

Background

The University developed a “Participatory Management Approach” where all the UD stakeholders were involved in process of updating the Mission, Vision and Values statement of UD. The opinions of all the stakeholders have been taken into consideration while updating the Mission, Vision and Values statement of UD. 2.2

Development of the Questionnaire

A unique questionnaire tool was developed and customized for all the stakeholders of UD. Two versions were prepared, both in Arabic and English. The responsibility was given to the Steering Committee on Areas 1 and 2, the input of its chairman, Prof. Abdullah Alkadi, the members of the Committee and several experts of UD were consulted while designing and finalizing the tool. The aim of the questionnaire was to survey the opinions of UD’s beneficiaries regarding the stated elements in the proposed Vision, Mission and Values statement of the University. The stakeholders included segments within the University (students, faculty and staff) and from the outside community surrounding the University (individuals, parents of students, representatives of public bodies, private enterprises, the industrial, commercial and service sectors dealing with UD). The questionnaire consists of four parts: 5. 6. 7. 8.

Explaining the aim of the questionnaire Demonstrating a background about UD The survey part of the questionnaire: updating UD’s Vision, Mission and Values Characteristics of the respondents.

The questionnaire was posted on the UD website and invitations were sent to all staff, employees, students and external beneficiaries (institutions and community individuals). The link to the questionnaire is: http://www.ud.edu.sa/en/news/just-10-minutes-of-your-time-can-change-uds-future

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

2.3

The Vision Proposed for UD (‫)ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻗﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ‬

“A leading creative university at the Eastern Province, the Kingdom, the Gulf Region and the World levels” The vision of UD was evaluated with the following criteria, evaluating whether it is achieved, achieved to some extent or not achieved. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

Brief and comprehensible Realistic and Ambitious (Balanced) Distinctive (Creative) Easy and memorable Astonishes and pleases Comprehensive

If the stakeholder is not satisfied or if he/she felt that the proposed vision for UD is not suitable, then they were requested to suggest their proposed modifications in writing. 2.4

The Mission proposed for the UD

‫)ﺗﻠﺘﺰﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﺤﺜﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻭﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻭﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ ﺑﺸﺮﺍﻛﺔ‬ (‫ﻭﻣﺴﺎﻫﻤﺔ ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻗﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ‬ “The University of Dammam is committed to providing distinct, creative and high quality educational, research, and professional services with effective community partnerships and involvement at the Eastern Province, the Kingdom, the Gulf Region and World Levels” The mission of UD was evaluated with the following criteria, evaluating whether it is achieved, achieved to some extent or not achieved. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Brief Complete (Who are we?, What do we do?, How we do it? and Why do we do it?) Articulate Memorable Aligned with the Vision

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

If the stakeholder is not satisfied or if he/she felt that the proposed mission of UD is not suitable they were requested to suggest their proposed modification in writing. 2.5

Value proposed for the UD

، ‫ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ‬،‫ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻓﺴﻴﺔ‬،‫ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻮﻉ‬،‫ ﺍﻹﺑﺪﺍﻉ‬،‫ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ‬،‫ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎءﻟﺔ‬،‫ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ‬،‫ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺗﻘﺎﻥ‬:‫)ﻗﻴﻤﻨﺎ‬ (‫ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‬،‫ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺗﻴﺔ‬ “Quality, Trust, Accountability, Team spirit, Creativity, Respect for Diversity, Competitiveness, Professionalism, Self-Establishment, Social Responsibility.” The proposed value of UD was evaluated with the following criteria, evaluating whether it is achieved, achieved to some extent or not achieved. 1. 2. 3. 4.

Positive and inspiring Covers all areas of interest General (Global) Satisfies the needs of individuals and the institution

If the stakeholder is not satisfied or if he/she felt that the value proposed for UD is not suitable, then they were requested to put their proposed modification in writing: The last part of the questionnaire dealt with the respondent’s characteristics. This part was again subdivided into three groups namely: beneficiaries from outside University, beneficiaries from inside University and some additional data, which was common to all the stakeholders. The students, people holding leadership positions, faculty members and staff were considered as stakeholders from the University. They were asked to mention their position or rank that they hold in the University. An open question was put forward to the beneficiaries from outside the University to describe their relationship with the University. The common question dealt with age, gender, marital status, educational level, primary work, field of work or study, nationality, place of residence and place of work. The questionnaire is provided in the appendix [Appendix 1].

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

2.6

Online Survey

After the approval of the final version of the questionnaire, it was uploaded in an online in-house survey software tool. This tool is professionally programed, which can quickly create online surveys. This was launched online on October 20, 2014 and was communicated to all the stakeholders of the University through the UD website as well as through official E-mails. The stakeholders were given enough time to respond without undue pressure. With the proper intimation, the survey was closed on December 2, 2014 and the raw data was downloaded from the Question Pro website for detailed analysis. The raw data was coded and subjected to further analysis using the SPSS analytical tool. The total numbers of respondents for the survey were 4,791. Among the total respondents, 1,701 were males and 3,090 were females. The age group of the participants varied from 15 to ≥ 66 years. The majority of the participants belong to the age group 15-25 (N=1750; 36.5%) and a very few of them belonged to the age group ≥ 66 (N=11; 0.2%).

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

3. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RESPONDENTS -

Beneficiaries from within and outside the University

Overall summary of characteristics

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

3.1

Beneficiaries from Within and Outside the University

In terms of categories, the participants fall into two main categories; 1. Internal Beneficiaries (students, administrators, faculty and staff) 2. External beneficiaries (parents, graduates of UD, donors and supporters, private enterprises, officials from other government institutions) Table 3-1 shows the major categories of beneficiaries from within the University as follows: x

2,023 students (32% males and 68% females), 1,166 faculty members (36% males and 64% females) and 735 staff (47% males and 53% females) have responded.

It was observed through the statistical inference:

For students: A 95% confidence level has been achieved, which is significant with a margin of error of 2.1%, which is acceptable with a total student population of 28,698.

For leadership: A 95% confidence level has been achieved, which is significant with a 2.7% margin of error is acceptable with a leadership population of 388.

For faculty members: A 95% confidence level was found, which is significant with a margin of error of 1.5%, which is acceptable with a total population of 1,644.

For staff: A 90% confidence level was achieved with a margin of error of 2.8% which is acceptable with the total population of 4,735. Table 3-1 Beneficiaries from Within the University Internal Student Leadership Faculty Staff

Male No’s % 648 32 78 25 424 36 355 48 Total

Female No’s % 1375 68 238 75 742 64 377 52

Total No’s % 2023 100 316 100 1166 100 732 100 4237 100

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Table 3-2.

Beneficiaries from Outside the University reflects that, 73 Parents of

students enrolled in UD [58% males and 42% females], 126 Graduates of UD [49% males and 51% females], 43 private enterprises that employ UD graduates [43% females], 42 donors and supporters of the UD [11% males and 31% females], 23 Presidents of official or government institutions that employ UD graduates [23% females] have responded. Table 3-2 Beneficiaries from outside the University External

3.2

Male No’s %

Female No’s %

Total No’s %

Parent of student enrolled in UD

100

Graduate of UD Private enterprises employing University graduates Donor and Supporter of the university President of/official of government institution employing University graduates Total

126

100

307

100

Overall Summary of Respondent Characteristics

Table 3-3 shows that the overall characteristics of respondents as mentioned below; the table shows that 4,791 have responded [36% males and 64% females] Table 3-3 Categorizing the Respondents by Gender 1. Gender

No’s

Male

1701

Female

3090

Total

4791

100

Table 3-4 shows that 2,309 bachelors (27% males and 73% females), 2388 married (45% males and 55% females), 52 divorced (4%males and 96% females), 42 widow (42% females) have responded. Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Table 3-4 Categorizing the Respondents by Marital Status 2. Marital Status Bachelor Married Divorced Widow

Male No’s 619 1080 2 0 Total

Female No’s 1690 1308 50 42

% 27 45 4 0

% 73 55 96 100

Total No’s % 2309 100 2388 100 52 100 42 100 4791 100

Table 3-5 demonstrates that in the 15-25 age group of 1,750 respondents (31% males and 69% females), 1,054 respondents (30% males and 70% females) in the age distribution of 26-35, 1,206 respondents in the age group of 35-36 (42% males and 58% females), 623 respondents in the age of 46-55 (39% males and 61% females), 147 respondents (58% males and 42% females) in the age group of 56-65, only 11 respondents (100% males) fall in the age category of 66 or more have responded. Table 3-5 Categorizing the Respondents by Age Distribution 3. Age Distribution 15-25 26-35 35-36 46-55 56-65 66 or more

Male No’s % 540 31 313 30 510 42 242 39 58 85 100 11 Total

Female No’s 1210 741 696 381 62 0

% 69 70 58 61 42 0

Total No’s % 1750 100 1054 100 1206 100 623 100 147 100 11 100 4791 100

Table 3-6 shows that 844 respondents have a secondary education level (50% males and 50% females), 215 diplomas (78% males and 22 females), 1,664 Bachelors (22% males and 78% females), 575 Masters (35% males and 65% females), 1,493 PhD (36% males and 64% females) have responded.

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Table 3-6 Categorizing the Respondents by Education Level 4. Education Level Secondary Diploma Bachelor Master PhD

Male No’s 420 167 371 203 540 Total

Female No’s 424 48 1293 372 953

% 50 78 22 35 36

% 50 22 78 65 64

Total No’s % 844 100 215 100 1664 100 575 100 1493 100 4791 100

Table 3-7 shows that 2,778 Government employees (38% males and 62% females), 214 private sector (40% males and 60% females), 1,521 student (33% males and 67% females), 43 job seekers (95% males and 5% females), 75 jobless persons (75% females) and 160 others (100% females) have answered this questionnaire. Table 3-7 Categorizing the Respondents by Primary Work

5. Primary Work Government Employees Private sector Student Job Seeking Jobless others

Male No’s %

Female No’s

Total No’s %

1069

1709

2778

100

85 506 41 0 0

40 33 95 0 0

129 1015 2 75 160

60 67 5 100 100

214 1521 43 75 160 4791

100 100 100 100 100 100

Total

Table 3-8 shows that 2,756 respondents worked in the education sector (25% males and 75% females), 743 health professionals (53% males and 47% females), 264 engineering and construction professionals (62% males and 38% females), 418 tradesman (70% males and 30% females), 8 judiciary and legal professionals (100% males), 322 information technology professionals (34% males and 66% females), 9 industrialists (22% males and 78% females), 87 media and press professionals (10% males and 90% females) have responded.

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Table 3-8 Categorizing the Respondents by Field of Study 6. Field of work or study Education Health Engineering and Construction Trade Judiciary and legal Profession Information technology Industry Media and press

Male No’s % 678 25 391 53

Female No’s 2078 352

% 75 47

Total No’s % 2756 100 743 100

163

101

264

100

292

126

418

100

8 110 2 9

212

322

100

22 10

7 78

78 90

9 87 4607

100 100 100

Total

Table 3-9 demonstrates that 3,455 respondents have Saudi residency (35% males and 65% females) and 1,336 chose non-Saudi residency (38% males and 62% females). Table 3-9 Categorizing the Respondents by Nationality

7. Nationality Saudi Non-Saudi

Male No’s % 1198 35 503 38 Total

Female No’s 2257 833

% 65 62

Total No’s % 3455 100 1336 100 4791 100

Table 3-10 shows that 2,473 respondents work in Dammam (29% males and 71% females) and 1,217 people work in Khobar (54% males and 46% females) and only 345 people work at Dhahran (34% males and 66% females). Table 3-10 Categorizing the Respondents by Work Place

8. Place of work Dammam Khobar Dhahran

Male No’s 726 663 117 Total

Female No’s 1747 554 228

% 29 54 34

% 71 46 66

Total No’s % 2473 100 1217 100 345 100 4035 100

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

4. ANALYSIS OF RESPONDENTS’ VIEWS ABOUT UD’S VISION, MISSION AND VALUES

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

4.1

Vision Proposed for UD (Items 3.1 – 3.7)

Vision is brief & comprehensible: 54 % (2,594 out of 4,791) of the responses feel “Yes”, 34 % (1,634) felt the same “to some extent” and 12% (563) indicated “No”.

Vision is realistic and ambitious: 42% (2,015) indicated, “Yes”, followed by 44 % (2,131) responses “to some extent” and 13% (645) towards “No”.

Vision is distinctive: Only 31% (1,474) indicated “Yes”, 46% (2,216) feel it is only “to some extent” and 23% (1101) responded to “No”.

Vision is easy and memorable: About 50% (2,380) stated “Yes”, nearly 38% (1,869) consider it “to some extent” and only 12 % (542) indicated “No”.

Vision astonishes and pleases clients: 34% (1,641) indicated “Yes”, 44% (2,112) feel it only “to some extent” and 22% (1,038) feel it doe not

Vision is comprehensive: 40% (1937) stated “Yes”, 37% (1759) feel it “to some extent” and 23% (1095) responded to “No”.

Opinion on the proposed Vision: 37% (1,760) indicated as “suitable”, 48% (2,313) feel “to some extent” it is suitable and 15% (718) responded to “no”.

Table 4-1 summarizes the stakeholders’ responses to the Vision Assessment Criteria Table 4-1 Stakeholders’ responses to the Vision Assessment Criteria Participants Responses (n) Criterion

Percent of Participants Responses

To some extent

YES

To some extent

YES

563

1634

2594

12%

34%

54%

Vision is Brief and comprehensible Vision is Realistic and Ambitious (Balanced) Vision is Distinctive (Creative) Vision is Easy and memorable Vision is Astonishes and pleases clients

645

2131

2015

13%

44%

42%

1101

2216

1474

23%

46%

31%

542

1869

2380

12%

38%

50%

1038

2112

1641

22%

44%

34%

Vision is Comprehensive

1095

1759

1937

23%

37%

40%

Your opinion of the proposed Vision

718

2313

1760

15%

48%

37%

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Figure 4-1 Stakeholders’ responses to the Vision Assessment Criteria

4.2

MISSION PROPOSED FOR UD (ITEMS 3.9 – 3.14)

Mission is Brief: 47% (2,255) of the responses feel “Yes”, 32% (1,550) felt the same “to some extent” and 21% (986) indicated “No”.

Mission is complete: 52% (2,489) indicated “Yes”, followed by 39% (1,876) responses “to some extent” and 9% (426) towards “No”.

Mission is Articulate: 51% (2451) indicated “Yes”, 37% (1774) feel it is only “to some extent” and 12% (566) responded to “No”.

Mission is memorable: About 40% (1929) stated “Yes”, nearly 36% (1739) consider it “to some extent” and 23 % (1123) indicated “No”.

Mission is aligned with the Vision: 58% (2802) indicated “Yes”, 36% (1717) feel it only “to some extent” and only 6% (272) feel it doesn’t.

Opinion on the proposed Mission: 45% (2143) indicated as “suitable”, 42% (2010) feel “to some extent” it is suitable and 13% (638) responded to “no”.

Table 4-2 summarizes the stakeholders’ responses to Vision Assessment Criteria

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Table 4-2 Stakeholders’ responses to Mission Assessment Criteria Participants Responses (n)

Percent of Participants Responses (%)

Criterion

To some extent

YES

To some extent

YES

Mission is Brief

986

1550

2255

0.21

0.32

0.47

Mission is Complete

426

1876

2489

0.09

0.39

0.52

566

1774

2451

0.12

0.37

0.51

1123

1739

1929

0.23

0.36

0.40

272

1717

2802

0.06

0.36

0.58

638

2010

2143

0.13

0.42

0.45

Mission is Articulate Mission is Memorable Mission is Aligned with the Vision Your opinion on the proposed Mission

Figure 4-2 Stakeholders’ responses to Mission Assessment Criteria

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

4.3

Values proposed for UD (Items 3.16 – 3.20)

Values are positive and inspiring: 74% (3,558) of the responses felt “Yes”, 20 % (955) felt the same “to some extent” and only 6% (278) indicated “No”.

Values are covering all areas of interest: 61% (2,939) indicated “Yes”, followed by 27 % (1,307) responses “to some extent” and 11% (545) towards “No”.

Values are general: 55% (2,633) indicated “Yes”, 31% (1,507) feel it is only “to some extent” and 14% (651) responded to “No”.

Values satisfy the needs of individuals and the institution: About 55% (2,650) stated “Yes”, nearly 36% (1739) consider it “to some extent” and 23 % (1,123) indicated “No”.

Opinion on the proposed Values: 56% (2,697) indicated as “suitable”, 38% (1,841) feel “to some extent” it is suitable and only 5% (253) responded to “no”.

Figure 4-3 Stakeholders’ responses to Values Assessment Criteria Participants Responses (n) Criterion Values are Positive and inspiring Values are Covering all areas of interest Values are General (Global) Values Satisfy the needs of individuals and the institution Your opinion on the proposed Values

Percent of Participants Responses (%)

To some extent

YES

To some extent

YES

278

955

3558

0.06

0.20

0.74

545

1307

2939

0.11

0.27

0.61

651

1507

2633

0.14

0.31

0.55

473

1668

2650

0.10

0.35

0.55

253

1841

2697

0.05

0.38

0.56

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Figure 4-4 Stakeholders’ responses to Values Assessment Criteria

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

5. RESULTS OF CROSS TABULATION STATISTICS

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

5.1

Mean score of Vision, Mission and Values by Gender

Male: The mean score of Vision was 3.7 out of 5, Mission 3.8 out of 5 and 4 for Values, which falls under “high quality performance”.

Female: The mean score of Vision was 3.7 out of 5, Mission 3.9 out of 5 and 4 for Values, which falls under “high quality performance”.

Overall female stakeholders gave high scores to the Mission, Vision and Values of UD when compared with male stakeholders. Also, both female and male stakeholders registered a higher satisfaction level for the Values of UD compared with the Mission and Vision.

Figure 5-1 Mean score of Vision, Mission and Values by Gender

5.2

Mean score of Vision, Mission and Values by Marital Status

Bachelor: The mean score of Vision was 3.4 out of 5, Mission 3.6 out of 5 and 3.8 for Values.

Married: The mean score of Vision was 4 out of 5, Mission 4.2 out of 5 and 4.5 for Values.

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Divorced: The mean score of Vision was 4.2 out of 5, Mission 4.3 out of 5 and 4.6 for Values.

Widowed: The mean score of Vision was 4 out of 5, Mission 4.3 out of 5 and 4.6 for Values.

Overall stakeholders from different marital statuses have almost the same level of satisfaction for the Vision, Mission, and Values of UD. Also, there is higher satisfaction for the Values of UD compared with the Mission and Vision.

Figure 5-2 Mean score of Vision, Mission & Values by Marital status

5.3

Mean score of Vision, Mission and Values by Age

Age group 15 – 25: The mean score of Vision was 3.3 out of 5, Mission 3.5 out of 5 and 3.8 out of 5 for Values.

Age group 26 – 35: The mean score of Vision was 3.9 out of 5, Mission 4 out of 5 and 4.3 out of 5 for Values.

Age group 36 – 45: The mean score of Vision was 4.2 out of 5, Mission 4.3 out of 5 and 4.6 out of 5 for Values.

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Age group 46 – 55: The mean score of Vision was 3.9 out of 5, Mission 4.3 out of 5 and 4.4 out of 5 for Values.

Age group 56 – 65: The mean score of Vision was 3.8 out of 5, Mission 4 out of 5 and 4.4 out of 5 for Values.

Age group 66 or more: The mean score of Vision was 3.4 out of 5, Mission 4.2 out of 5 and 5 out of 5 for Values.

Overall stakeholders in the higher age group have higher satisfaction with the Mission, Vision and Values of UD when compared with the lower age group. Also, stakeholders from different age groups have higher satisfaction for the Values compared with the Mission and Vision of UD.

Figure 5-3 Mean score of Vision, Mission and Values by Age 5.4

Mean score of Vision, Mission and Values by Level of Education

Secondary: The mean score of Vision was 3.5 out of 5, Mission 3.6 out of 5 and 4

out of 5 for Values. x

Diploma: The mean score of Vision was 3.8 out of 5, Mission 3.8 out of 5 and 4.4

out of 5 for Values. x

Bachelor: The mean score of Vision was 3.5 out of 5, Mission 3.7 out of 5 and 4 out

of 5 for Values. x

Master: The mean score of Vision was 4 out of 5, Mission 4 out of 5 and 4.3 out of 5

for Values. Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

PhD: The mean score of Vision was 4 out of 5, Mission 4.3 out of 5 and 4.6 out of 5

for Values. x

Overall stakeholders from different educational levels have almost the same level of satisfaction for the Vision, Mission, and Values of UD. Also there is higher satisfaction for the Values of UD when compared with the Mission and Vision statements.

Figure 5-4 Mean score of Vision, Mission and Values by level of Education 5.5

Mean score of Vision, Mission and Values by Primary Work

Government: The mean score of Vision was 4 out of 5, Mission 4.1 out of 5 and 4.4 out of 5 for Values.

Private sector: The mean score of Vision was 3.5 out of 5, Mission 3.6 out of 5 and 4 out of 5 for Values.

Student: The mean score of Vision was 3.3 out of 5, Mission 3.5 out of 5 & 3.8 out of 5 for Values.

Job seeking: The mean score of Vision was 3 out of 5, Mission 3.1 out of 5 and 4.3 out of 5 for Values.

Updating UODâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholdersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Jobless: The mean score of Vision was 4.1 out of 5, Mission 4.2 out of 5 and 4.2 out of 5 for Values.

Others: The mean score of Vision was 3.3 out of 5, Mission 3.6 out of 5 and 4.1 out of 5 for Values.

Overall stakeholders from different types of primary work have almost the same level of satisfaction for the Vision, Mission and Values of UD. Also there is a higher satisfaction for the Values of UD compared with the Mission and Vision statements.

Figure 5-5 Mean Score of Vision, Mission and Values by Primary Work 5.6

Mean score of Vision, Mission and Values by Field of Specialization

Education: The mean score of Vision was 4 out of 5, Mission 4.2 out of 5 and 4.4 out of 5 for Values.

Health: The mean score of Vision was 3.7 out of 5, Mission 3.6 out of 5 and 4.3 out of 5 for Values.

Engineering and Construction: The mean score of Vision was 3.4 out of 5, Mission 3.5 out of 5 and 3.8 out of 5 for Values.

Business: The mean score of Vision was 3.3 out of 5, Mission 3.5 out of 5 and 3.7 out of 5 for Values.

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Judiciary and the Legal Profession: The mean score of Vision was 3.3 out of 5, Mission 3.6 out of 5 and 3 out of 5 for Values.

Information Technology: The mean score of Vision was 3.3 out of 5, Mission 3.4 out of 5 and 3.7 out of 5 for Values.

Industry: The mean score of Vision was 4.6 out of 5, Mission 4.8 out of 5 and 4.8 out of 5 for Values.

Media and Press: The mean score of Vision was 3.1 out of 5, Mission 3.8 out of 5 & 3.9 out of 5 for Values.

Overall stakeholders from the Industry field have a high level of satisfaction for the Vision, Mission, and Values of UD when compared with other fields. Also there is higher satisfaction for the Values of UD compared with the Mission and Vision statements.

Figure 5-6 Mean Score of Vision, Mission and Values by Field

5.7

Mean score of Vision, Mission and Values by Place of Residence

Dammam: The mean score of Vision was 3.6 out of 5, Mission 3.7 out of 5 and 4.1 out of 5 for Values.

Khobar: The mean score of Vision was 4.2 out of 5, Mission 4.4 out of 5 and 4.5 out of 5 for Values.

Overall stakeholders from Khobar have a higher level of satisfaction for the Vision, Mission and Values of UD when compared to Dammam residents. Also

Updating UODâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholdersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

stakeholders from both places have higher satisfaction with regards to the Values of UD compared with the Mission and Vision statements.

Figure 5-7 Mean Score of Vision, Mission and Values by Place of Residence

5.8

Mean Score of Vision, Mission and Values by Place of Work

Dammam: The mean score of Vision was 3.8 out of 5, Mission 4 out of 5 and 4.4 out of 5 for Values.

Khobar: The mean score of Vision was 3.5 out of 5, Mission 3.7 out of 5 and 3.9 out of 5 for Values.

Dhahran: The mean score of Vision was 3.1 out of 5, Mission 3.3 out of 5 and 4 out of 5 for Values.

Overall stakeholders from Dammam have a higher level of satisfaction for the Vision, Mission and Values of UD when compared with those in Khobar and

Updating UODâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholdersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Dhahran. Also stakeholders from different Places of Work have a higher satisfaction for the Values when compared with the Mission and Vision statements.

Figure 5-8 Mean Score of Vision, Mission and Values by Place of work

5.9

Mean Score of Vision, Mission and Values by the Beneficiaries’ Relationship to UD

Within the University: The mean score of Vision was 3.7 out of 5, Mission 4 out of 5 and 4.2 out of 5 for Values.

Outside the University: The mean score of Vision was 4 out of 5, Mission 3.7 out of 5 and 3.9 out of 5 for Values.

Overall stakeholders within the University have a higher level of satisfaction for the Mission and Values of UD when compared with outside stakeholders.

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Figure 5-9 Mean Score of Vision, Mission and Values by Beneficiaries

5.10 Mean score of Vision, Mission and Values by the Respondent’s Role in

Leadership Position: The mean score of Vision was 4 out of 5, Mission 4.2 out of 5 and 4.5 out of 5 for Values.

Faculty member: The mean score of Vision was 4.1 out of 5, Mission 4.4 out of 5 and 4.6 out of 5 for Values.

Staff: The mean score of Vision was 3.7 out of 5, Mission 3.9 out of 5 and 4.3 out of 5 for Values.

Student: The mean score of Vision was 3.4 out of 5, Mission 3.6 out of 5 & 3.9 out of 5 for Values.

Overall stakeholders under Leadership position and Faculty member categories have higher levels of satisfaction for the Vision, Mission and Values of UD when

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

compared with staff and students. Also stakeholders have a higher satisfaction for the Values when compared with the Mission and Vision statements.

Figure 5-10 Mean Score of Vision, Mission and Values by Role

5.11 Mean Score of Vision, Mission and Values by Faculty Rank

Professor: The mean score of Vision was 4.8 out of 5, Mission 4.7 out of 5 and 5 out of 5 for Values.

Assistant Professor: The mean score of Vision was 4.4 out of 5, Mission 4.3 out of 5 and 4.4 out of 5 for Values.

Lecturer: The mean score of Vision was 4 out of 5, Mission 4.3 out of 5 & 4.5 out of 5 for Values.

Teaching Assistant: The mean score of Vision was 3.7 out of 5, Mission 4.1 out of 5 and 4.5 out of 5 for Values.

Overall stakeholders under the Professor category have higher levels of satisfaction for the Vision, Mission and Values of UD when compared with other faculty positions. Also stakeholders have a higher satisfaction for the Values when compared with the Mission and Vision statements.

Updating UODâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholdersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Figure 5-11 Mean Score of Vision, Mission and Values by Faculty Position

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

6. CONCLUSION

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

1. The basic characteristics of the respondents may be summarized as follows:

The total number of respondents to the survey was 4,791.

Among the total respondents, 1,701 (36%) were males and 3,090 (64%) were females.

The age group of the participants varied from 15 to ≥ 66 years. Participants are fairly distributed among all age cohorts.

4,237 (88%) of respondents were internal beneficiaries (students, leaderships, faculty members, staff)

307 (12%) were external beneficiaries (parents of students, UD graduates, private enterprises, donors and supporters of UD, official government entities that hire UD graduates).

2. Concerning the UD’s Vision:

The survey has ascertained that the vision statement is:

brief and

comprehensible (88%), realistic and ambitious (66%), distinctive, easy and memorable (88%), astonishes and pleases clients (78%) and comprehensive (77%). The majority of respondents see the mission to be suitable (85%). 3. Concerning the UD’s Mission:

The survey has ascertained that the mission statement is:

brief (79 %),

complete (91%), articulate (88%), memorable (76%) and aligned with the Vision (94%). The majority of respondents see the mission to be suitable (87%). 4. Concerning the UD’s Values:

The survey has ascertained that the proposed Values are: positive and inspiring (94 %), covering all areas of interest (97%), general (86%) and satisfy the needs of individuals and the institution (91%). The majority of respondents consider the proposed values suitable (93%).

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

5. Cross Tabulation Statistics

The results of cross tabulation statistics have ascertained the positive support of respondents to UD’s Vision, Mission and Values. Respondents were categorized according to gender, marital status, age, primary work, field of specialization, place of residence, place of work, relationship to UD, position of the respondent at UD and faculty rank. In general and for all categories, the mean score of accepting the Vision, Mission and Values statement ranges between 3.6 to 4.5 out of 5 points in all categories.

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

meeting was held on Monday January 15, 2015. The Council has reviewed and approved the three statements. Final Recommendations: Following the adjournment of the report and the proposed wording for the vision, mission and values to H.E. the Rector of the University and the University Council discussion and approval of the statements, the Committee recommends that the UOD takes all necessary actions to post, disseminate and act upon these statements by all academic and administrative units of the University.

Updating UODâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholdersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

7. APPENDICES

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Appendix A: The Survey Questionnaire (English Version)

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Updating UD Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey Welcome Dear Participant; The University of Dammam values your interest, support and participation in this important study, which will have the greatest impact in developing the University's future and help it to fulfill its positive role as institution charged with shaping the future of the Nation and build its progress and prosperity. We appreciate your effort, participation and spending the time in filling this questionnaire which will not take more than 10 minutes First: The Aim of the Questionnaire: The aim of this questionnaire is to survey the opinions of UD beneficiaries about the statements of the proposed vision, mission and values of the University. The stakeholders include segments of sectors from within the University (students, faculty and staff) and from the outside community surrounding the University (individuals, parents of students, representatives of public bodies, private enterprises, the industrial, commercial and service sectors dealing with the UD). Second: General Background about UD: (You can skip this and go to "Third" directly if you are familiar with the history of the University of Dammam)

The preparation of UD’s Mission Statement goes back to the 1st institutional Self-Study (SS-1) carried out in 2007, before the separation of the University of Dammam from King Faisal University. The separation took place in September 2009 according to the approval of the Higher Education Council in its meeting No. 4/1430 reported to HE the President of KFU with the letter of HH the Minister of Higher Education No. 1811/a dated 15/9/1430H (Evidence No.1). During the 2007 SS1, the Mission Statement of KFU-Dammam branch was developed by the Steering Committee of Area 1. The statement was based on the goals and objectives found in the 1975’s establishment Charter of KFU. After various interviews with members of the KFU Governing Body and other stakeholders such as faculty members, staff, students and other beneficiaries, the mission statement was initiated. In 2008 HE the University President initiated a process which concluded with a Strategic Plan for KFUDammam Branch (now UD) all the while keeping in mind the necessity of having a Strategic Plan for the institution based on the recommendations of SS-1 External Reviewers’ team. The Strategic Plan included the mission statement, main strategic goals, objectives, proposed tasks and input metrics and calendars for proposed projects. In 2009, UD established a Strategic Planning Unit, which followed the Deanship of Quality Assurance and Academic Accreditation (DQAA). Since September 2009, UD has experienced dramatic growth. In September 2013, the numbers of UD affiliates has jumped. UD has geographically covers Dammam City and six other Mohafazat (counties) along the Eastern Province, namely, Qatif, Jubail, Quaryah Oliya, Nairiyah, Khafji, and Hafr Al Batin. The University has a new campus in the Dammam location, which includes separate sections for males and females. New colleges and programs have been introduced; in September 2013 UD had 28 Colleges and 189 Majors, with 41,705 students (14% males and 86% females); 2,067 faculty members (39% males and 61% females); and 4,917 staff (45% males and 55% females). In April 2014, a Royal Decree was issued establishing a new University named Hafr Al Batin University, which would take four branches from UD, namely (Quaryah Oliya, Nairiyah, Khafji, and Hafr Al Batin). Now UD has 28,698 students (20% boys and 80% girls), 1,644 faculty members (44% males and 56% females) and 4735 staff (47% males and 53% females). UD currently has 21 Colleges and 165 Majors. The above mentioned changes have necessitated that the Mission Statement, the strategic goals as well as the operational objectives of UD be reviewed and possibly modified to cope with the emerging conditions and meet the new demands and prospects. Since 2009 the review of UD’s Strategic Plan began. A special task force was established and initiated a variety of actions towards this end. Among these actions were several workshops and meetings that were held during the 2013 – 2014 academic year, namely: The UD Strategic Plan Updating Task Force Workshop (1) held on January 9, 2013. The UD Strategic Plan Updating Task Force Follow up Meeting held on March 6, 2013. The UD Strategic Plan Updating Task Force Workshop (2) held on April 3, 2013. The UD Strategic Plan Updating Workshop with the attendance of George Kaludis Consultants from September 4-8, 2014.

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Third: Update of UD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey 3-1 Vision proposed for UD: A leading creative university at the Eastern Province, the Kingdom, the Gulf Region and the World levels. - Evaluating the proposed Vision (through the following Criteria): No. 1 2 3 4 5 6

Criterion

Achieved

- Your opinion of the proposed Vision:

Not Achieved

Brief and comprehensible Realistic and Ambitious (Balanced) Distinctive (Creative) Easy and memorable Astonishes and pleases the Comprehensive

Suitable

Not Suitable

In case you think that it is (Not Suitable) Please write your proposed modification:

3-2 Mission proposed for the UD: The University of Dammam is committed to providing distinct, creative and high quality educational, research, and professional services with effective community partnerships and involvement at the Eastern Province, the Kingdom, the Gulf Region and World Levels. - Evaluating the proposed Mission (through the following Criteria): No. 1

Criterion

3 4

Brief Complete (Who are we? What do we do? How we do it? Why we do it?) Articulate Memorable

Aligned with the Vision

Achieved

- Your opinion on the proposed Mission:

Not Achieved

Suitable

Not Suitable

In case you think that it is (Not Suitable) Please write your proposed modification:

3-3 Value proposed for the UD: Quality, Trust, Accountability, Team spirit, Creativity, Respect for Diversity, Competitiveness, Professionalism, Self-Establishment, Social Responsibility. - Evaluating the proposed Values (through the following Criteria): No.

Criterion

Achieved

- Your opinion on the proposed Values:

Not Achieved

Suitable

Not Suitable

Positive and inspiring

Covers all areas of interest

In case you think that it is (Not Suitable)

General (Global)

Please write your proposed modification:

Satisfies the needs of individuals and the institution

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Forth: Respondents’ Characteristics: (please put the appropriate choice) 4-1 Beneficiaries from within the University: 4-1-1 Students: 1. Level

o Preparatory

2. College

o Multiple-choice with names of all UD faculties/Colleges

o Second

o Third

o Fourth

o Fifth

4.1.2 Leadership position: o The President of the University

o Vice President of the University

4-1-3 faculty member: o Professor o Associate Professor

o Dean of a College

o Assistant Professor

o Vice Dean of a College

o Lecturer

o Head of a Department

o Other

o Teaching assistant

4-1-4: Staff: 1.

Sector

o Administrative Staff

o Technical Staff

Department Name

o Multiple-choice with names of all UD administrative Units

o Financial Staff

(Others)....................... (Others).............

4-2 Beneficiaries from outside the University: 4-2-1 Describe your relationship with the University of Dammam: o Parent of student enrolled in the University

o A private enterprise employing University graduates

o A graduate of the University

o Donor and supporter of the University

o President of/official of government institution employing University graduates

.........................................

o Other (complete)

4.3 Additional data: (please complete the following data from all the participants of various Groups): 1. Sex: 3. Age:

o Male

o 15. less than 25 years o 55. less than 65 years

4. Education level:

5. Primary work:

6. Field of work or study:

2. Marital status:

o Female

o Bachelor

o 25. less than 35 years o 65 years and over

o Reads and writes o Diploma o Government employee

o Married

o Divorced

o 35-45 years old

o Elementary o Bachelor

o Widow

o 45. less than 55 years old

o preparatory o Master

o Secondary o PhD

o Private sector employee

o Business

o Student

o Retired

o Seeking a job

o Jobless

o Education

o Health

o Engineering and construction

o Trade

o Judiciary and legal profession

o Military

o Information technology

o Industry

o Media and press

o Other....................

7. Nationality:

o Saudi

o Non-Saudi

8. Place of residence:

o Dammam

o Khobar

o Dhahran

o Other.............

9. Place of work:

o Dammam

o Khobar

o Dhahran

o other.............

…………………………. Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

Appendix B: The Survey Questionnaire ( Arabic Version)

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

‫ﺗﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﺻﻴﺎﻏﺔ اﻟﺮؤﻳﺔ واﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ واﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ اﻟﺪﻣﺎم‪ :‬اﺳﺘﻄﻼع رأي اﻟﻤﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪﻳﻦ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺳﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻳﻛﻡ ﻭﺭﺣﻣﺔ ﷲ ﻭﺑﺭﻛﺎﺗﻪ ‪ :‬ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻣﺎﻡ ﺗﻘﺩﺭ ﺍﻫﺗﻣﺎﻣﻛﻡ ﻭﺩﻋﻣﻛﻡ ﻭﻣﺷﺎﺭﻛﺗﻛﻡ ﺍﻟﻛﺭﻳﻣﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻣﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺗﻲ‬ ‫ﺳﻳﻛﻭﻥ ﻟﻬﺎ ﺃﻛﺑﺭ ﺍﻷﺛﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺭﺳﻡ ﻭﺗﻁﻭﻳﺭ ﻣﺳﺗﻘﺑﻝ ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻭﻣﺳﺎﻋﺩﺗﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺩﺍء ﺩﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﺈﻳﺟﺎﺑﻳﺔ ﻛﺄﺣﺩ ﺍﻟﻣﺅﺳﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻋﻠﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻭﻁ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺭﺳﻡ ﻣﺳﺗﻘﺑﻝ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻭﻁﻥ ﻭﺑﻧﺎء ﺣﺿﺎﺭﺗﻪ ﻭﺍﺯﺩﻫﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﷲ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻭﺇﺫ ﻧﺷﻛﺭ ﺟﻬﺩﻛﻡ ﻭﻣﺷﺎﺭﻛﺗﻛﻡ ﺍﻟﻛﺭﻳﻣﺔ‪ ،‬ﻧﺛﻣﻥ ﻭﻗﺗﻛﻡ ﻭﻧﻌﺩﻛﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻠﻲء ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﺑﺎﻧﺔ ﻟﻥ ﻳﺳﺗﻐﺭﻕ ﺃﻛﺛﺭ ﻣﻥ ‪ ١٠‬ﺩﻗﺎﺋﻕ‬ ‫ﺃﻭﻻً‪ -‬ﺍﻟﻬﺩﻑ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﺑﻳﺎﻥ‪:‬‬ ‫ﻳﻬﺩﻑ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﺑﻳﺎﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺗﻁﻼﻉ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻔﻳﺩﻳﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺻﻳﺎﻏﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺗﺭﺣﺔ ﻟﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﻗﻳﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻣﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﺷﻣﻝ ﺷﺭﺍﺋﺢ ﻗﻁﺎﻋﺎﺕ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻔﻳﺩﻳﻥ ﻣﻥ ﺩﺍﺧﻝ ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ )ﺍﻟﻁﻼﺏ ﻭﺃﻋﺿﺎء ﻫﻳﺋﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﺩﺭﻳﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﻣﻭﻅﻔﻳﻥ( ﻭﻣﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻬﺎ )ﻣﻛﻭﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺗﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻣﺣﻳﻁ ﺑﺎﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﻥ‬ ‫ﺍﻷﻓﺭﺍﺩ ﻭﺃﻭﻟﻳﺎء ﺃﻣﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﻁﻼﺏ ﻭﻣﻣﺛﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﺅﺳﺳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻬﻳﺋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻁﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺻﻧﺎﻋﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺗﺟﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺧﺩﻣﻳﺔ ﻭﻛﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻔﻳﺩﻳﻥ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻣﺗﻌﺎﻣﻠﻳﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺑﺎﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ(‪.‬‬

‫ﺛﺎﻧﻳﺎ ً‪ -‬ﺧﻠﻔﻳﺔ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ‪) :‬ﻳﻣﻛﻧﻙ ﺗﺧﻁﻲ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺧﻠﻔﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺫﻫﺎﺏ ﺇﻟﻰ "ﺛﺎﻟﺛﺎ ً" ﻣﺑﺎﺷﺭﺓ ﺇﻥ ﻛﻧﺕ ﻣﻁﻠﻌﺎ ً ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣﻭﺍﻝ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻣﺎﻡ(‬ ‫‪-‬‬

‫‪-‬‬

‫‬‫‪-‬‬

‫‪-‬‬

‫‬‫‬‫‬‫‬‫‬‫‪-‬‬

‫ﺗﺭﺟﻊ ﺻﻳﺎﻏﺔ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺫﺍﺗﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﺅﺳﺳﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻟﺗﻲ ﻧﻔﺫﺕ ﻓﻲ ﻋﺎﻡ ‪ ،٢٠٠٧‬ﻗﺑﻝ ﻓﺻﻝ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﻥ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﻠﻙ ﻓﻳﺻﻝ ﻓﻲ ﺳﺑﺗﻣﺑﺭ ‪ ٢٠٠٩‬ﻭﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﻟﻣﻭﺍﻓﻘﺔ "ﻣﺟﻠﺱ ﺍﻟﺗﻌﻠﻳﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻲ" ﻓﻲ ﺍﻻﺟﺗﻣﺎﻉ ﺭﻗﻡ ‪ ١٤٣٠/٤‬ﺣﻳﺙ ﺃﺑﻠﻎ ﻣﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﺭﺋﻳﺱ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﻠﻙ ﻓﻳﺻﻝ ﺑﺫﻟﻙ ﺑﺧﻁﺎﺏ ﻣﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﻭﺯﻳﺭ ﺍﻟﺗﻌﻠﻳﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﺭﻗﻡ ‪/١٨١١‬ﺃ ﺍﻟﻣﺅﺭﺥ ‪١٤٣٠/٩/١٥‬ﻫـ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺫﺍﺗﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﺅﺳﺳﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻲ ‪٢٠٠٧‬ﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﺿﻌﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﺟﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺅﻭﻟﺔ ﺻﻳﺎﻏﺔ ﻟﺭﺅﻳﺔ "ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﻠﻙ ﻓﻳﺻﻝ‪-‬ﻓﺭﻉ ﺍﻟﺩﻣﺎﻡ"‪.‬‬ ‫ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺕ ﺍﻟﺻﻳﺎﻏﺔ ﺍﺳﺗﻧﺎﺩﺍً ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻷﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺗﻲ ﻭﺟﺩﺕ ﻓﻲ ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺗﺄﺳﻳﺱ ﻟﻌﺎﻡ ‪" ١٩٧٥‬ﺑﻣﻳﺛﺎﻕ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﻠﻙ ﻓﻳﺻﻝ"‪ .‬ﻭﻛﺎﻥ‬ ‫ﺫﻟﻙ ﺑﻌﺩ ﻋﺩﺓ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻼﺕ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻋﺿﺎء ﻣﻥ ﻣﺟﻠﺱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﻠﻙ ﻓﻳﺻﻝ ﻭﺃﻋﺿﺎء ﻫﻳﺋﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﺩﺭﻳﺱ ﻭﺷﺭﺍﺋﺢ ﻣﻥ ﺃﺻﺣﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻣﺻﻠﺣﺔ‪،‬‬ ‫ﻭﺍﻟﻣﻭﻅﻔﻳﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻁﻼﺏ ﻭﻏﻳﺭﻫﻡ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻔﻳﺩﻳﻥ‪ ،‬ﻛﻣﺎ ﺗﻡ ﺻﻳﺎﻏﺔ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ‪.‬‬ ‫ً‬ ‫ﻓﻲ ﻋﺎﻡ ‪ ،٢٠٠٨‬ﻭﻣﻊ ﻣﺭﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﺿﺭﻭﺭﺓ ﻭﺟﻭﺩ "ﺧﻁﺔ ﺍﺳﺗﺭﺍﺗﻳﺟﻳﺔ" ﻟﻠﻣﺅﺳﺳﺔ ﻭﺍﺳﺗﻧﺎﺩﺍ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺗﻭﺻﻳﺎﺕ ﻓﺭﻳﻕ "ﺍﻟﻣﺭﺍﺟﻌﻳﻥ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺧﺎﺭﺟﻳﻳﻥ"‪ ،‬ﺑﺩﺃ ﻣﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﺩﻳﺭ ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻣﻠﻳﺔ ﺍﻧﺗﻬﺕ ﺑﻭﺿﻊ ﺧﻁﺔ ﺍﺳﺗﺭﺍﺗﻳﺟﻳﺔ ﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﻠﻙ ﻓﻳﺻﻝ‪-‬ﻓﺭﻉ ﺍﻟﺩﻣﺎﻡ‪ .‬ﻭﺷﻣﻠﺕ‬ ‫"ﺍﻟﺧﻁﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﺭﺍﺗﻳﺟﻳﺔ" ﺑﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﺭﺍﺗﻳﺟﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﺋﻳﺳﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻷﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﻣﻬﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺗﺭﺣﺔ ﻭﻣﺅﺷﺭﺍﺕ ﻗﻳﺎﺱ‬ ‫ﺍﻷﺩﺍء‪ ،‬ﻭﺧﻁﺔ ﺯﻣﻧﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻣﺷﺎﺭﻳﻊ ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺗﺭﺣﺔ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻓﻲ ﻋﺎﻡ ‪ ،٢٠٠٩‬ﺃﻧﺷﺄﺕ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻣﺎﻡ ﻭﺣﺩﺓ ﻟﻠﺗﺧﻁﻳﻁ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﺭﺍﺗﻳﺟﻲ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﻟﻌﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺟﻭﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻻﻋﺗﻣﺎﺩ ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺩﻳﻣﻲ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻓﻲ ﺳﺑﺗﻣﺑﺭ ‪ ،٢٠٠٩‬ﻣﺭﺕ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﻧﻣﻭ ﻭﺗﻁﻭﺭ ﻛﺑﻳﺭ‪ .‬ﻭﻓﻲ ﺳﺑﺗﻣﺑﺭ ‪ ،٢٠١٣‬ﻗﻔﺯﺕ ﺃﺭﻗﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﻭﻉ ﺑﺷﻛﻝ ﻛﺑﻳﺭ‪ .‬ﻭﺗﻭﺳﻌﺕ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻣﺎﻡ ﺟﻐﺭﺍﻓﻳﺎ ﻟﺗﻐﻁﻲ ﻣﺩﻳﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻣﺎﻡ ﻭﺳﺕ ﻣﺣﺎﻓﻅﺎﺕ ﺃﺧﺭﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻣﺗﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻁﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺷﺭﻗﻳﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻁﻳﻑ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺟﺑﻳﻝ‪ ،‬ﻗﺭﻳﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻳﺎ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻧﻌﻳﺭﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺧﻔﺟﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺣﻔﺭ ﺍﻟﺑﺎﻁﻥ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻠﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺣﺭﻡ ﺑﺣﻲ ﻟﺑﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﻭﺣﺭﻡ ﺁﺧﺭ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻭﻗﻊ ﻣﻣﻳﺯ ﺑﻣﺩﻳﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻣﺎﻡ ﻳﺗﺿﻣﻥ ﺃﻗﺳﺎﻡ‬ ‫ﻣﻧﻔﺻﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﺑﻧﻳﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺑﻧﺎﺕ‪ .‬ﻭﻗﺩ ﺍﺳﺗﺣﺩﺛﺕ ﻛﻠﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺑﺭﺍﻣﺞ ﺟﺩﻳﺩﺓ؛ ﻓﻲ ﺳﺑﺗﻣﺑﺭ ‪ ٢٠١٣‬ﺃﺻﺑﺢ ﺑﺎﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ‪ ٢٨‬ﻛﻠﻳﺔ ﻭ‪ ١٨٩‬ﺗﺧﺻﺹ‪،‬‬ ‫ﻭﻭﺻﻠﺕ ﺇﻋﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻁﻼﺏ ﺇﻟﻰ ‪ ٤١٧٠٥‬ﻁﺎﻟﺏ )‪ %١٤‬ﻁﻼﺏ ‪ %٨٦‬ﻁﺎﻟﺑﺎﺕ(؛ ﻭﺑﻠﻎ ﺃﻋﺿﺎء ﻫﻳﺋﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﺩﺭﻳﺱ ‪ ٢٠٦٧‬ﻋﺿﻭ )‪%٣٩‬‬ ‫ﺫﻛﻭﺭ ﻭ‪ %٦١‬ﺇﻧﺎﺙ(؛ ﻭﺑﻠﻎ ﺍﻟﻣﻭﻅﻔﻭﻥ ‪ ٤٩١٧‬ﻣﻭﻅﻑ )‪ %٤٥‬ﺫﻛﻭﺭ ‪ %٥٥‬ﺇﻧﺎﺙ(‪.‬‬ ‫ﻓﻲ ‪ ٢‬ﺇﺑﺭﻳﻝ ‪ ،(١٤٣٥/٦/٢) ٢٠١٤‬ﺻﺩﺭ ﻣﺭﺳﻭﻡ ﻣﻠﻛﻲ ﺑﻔﺻﻝ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻓﺭﻭﻉ ﻋﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻣﺎﻡ )ﻭﻫﻲ ﻗﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻳﺎ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻧﻌﻳﺭﻳﺔ‪،‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺧﻔﺟﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺣﻔﺭ ﺍﻟﺑﺎﻁﻥ( ﻟﺗﺷﻛﻝ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺟﺩﻳﺩﺓ ﺗﺳﻣﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺣﻔﺭ ﺍﻟﺑﺎﻁﻥ‪ ،‬ﻓﺄﺻﺑﺣﺕ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻣﺎﻡ ﺗﺿﻡ ‪ ٢٨٦٩٨‬ﻁﺎﻟﺑﺎ ً )‪%٢٠‬‬ ‫ﻁﻼﺏ ‪ %٨٠‬ﻁﺎﻟﺑﺎﺕ( ﻭ ‪ ١٦٤٤‬ﻋﺿﻭ ﻫﻳﺋﺔ ﺗﺩﺭﻳﺱ )‪ %٤٤‬ﺫﻛﻭﺭ ﻭ‪ %٥٦‬ﺇﻧﺎﺙ(‪ ،‬ﻭ‪ ٤٧٣٥‬ﻣﻭﻅﻔﺎ ً )‪ %٤٧‬ﺫﻛﻭﺭ ‪%٥٣‬‬ ‫ﺇﻧﺎﺙ(‪ ،‬ﻓﺿﻼً ﻋﻥ ‪ ٢١‬ﻛﻠﻳﺔ ﻭ‪ ١٦٥‬ﺗﺧﺻﺻﺎ ً‪.‬‬ ‫ﻭﻗﺩ ﺍﻗﺗﺿﺕ ﺍﻟﺗﻐﻳﻳﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻣﺫﻛﻭﺭﺓ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺿﺭﻭﺭﺓ ﺗﺣﺩﻳﺙ ﺻﻳﺎﻏﺔ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﺃﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﺭﺍﺗﻳﺟﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺿﻼ ﻋﻥ‬ ‫ﺍﻷﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺗﺷﻐﻳﻠﻳﺔ ﺣﺗﻰ ﺗﺗﻼءﻡ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﺟﺩﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﻠﺑﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﻁﺎﻟﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺗﻁﻠﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺟﺩﻳﺩﺓ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻭﻗﺩ ﺍﺗﺧﺫﺕ ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﺟﻣﻭﻋﺔ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻹﺟﺭﺍءﺍﺕ ﻟﺗﺣﻘﻳﻕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻥ ﺑﻳﻧﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺑﻳﻝ ﺍﻟﻣﺛﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﻭﺭﺵ ﻋﻣﻝ ﻭﺍﺟﺗﻣﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻋﻘﺩﺕ‬ ‫ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺳﻲ ‪:٢٠١٣-٢٠١٢‬‬ ‫ﺣﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻣﻝ )‪ (١‬ﻟﺗﺣﺩﻳﺙ ﺍﻟﺧﻁﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﺭﺍﺗﻳﺟﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﻲ ﻋﻘﺩﺕ ﻓﻲ ‪ ٩‬ﻳﻧﺎﻳﺭ ‪.٢٠١٣‬‬ ‫ﻣﺟﻣﻭﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻣﻝ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻳﺔ ﺑﻣﺗﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﺗﺣﺩﻳﺙ ﺍﻟﺧﻁﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﺭﺍﺗﻳﺟﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻻﺟﺗﻣﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﻋﻘﺩ ﻓﻲ ‪ ٦‬ﻣﺎﺭﺱ ‪.٢٠١٣‬‬ ‫ﺣﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻣﻝ )‪ (٢‬ﻟﺗﺣﺩﻳﺙ ﺍﻟﺧﻁﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﺭﺍﺗﻳﺟﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﻲ ﻋﻘﺩﺕ ﻓﻲ ‪ ٣‬ﺃﺑﺭﻳﻝ ‪.٢٠١٣‬‬ ‫ﻭﺭﺷﺔ ﻋﻣﻝ ﺗﺣﺩﻳﺙ ﺍﻟﺧﻁﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﺭﺍﺗﻳﺟﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺑﺣﺿﻭﺭ ﻓﺭﻳﻕ ﺟﻭﺭﺝ ﻛﺎﻟﻭﺩﺱ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﺷﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﺗﻲ ﻋﻘﺩﺕ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﺗﺭﺓ ‪٨-٤‬‬ ‫ﺳﺑﺗﻣﺑﺭ ‪.٢٠١٤‬‬

‫‪Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014‬‬

‫‪46‬‬

‫ﺛﺎﻟﺛﺎ ً‪ -‬ﺍﺳﺗﻁﻼﻉ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻔﻳﺩﻳﻥ‪:‬‬ ‫‪ ١-٣‬اﻟﺮؤﻳﺔ )اﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ( ﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ اﻟﺪﻣﺎم‪) :‬ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ اﻟﺮﻳﺎدة ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮى اﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ اﻟﺸﺮﻗﻴﺔ واﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ واﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ اﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ واﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ( ‪.‬‬ ‫ ﻣﻌﺎﻳﻴﺮ ﺗﻘﻴﻴﻢ اﻟﺮؤﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼل‪:‬‬‫اﻟﻤﻌﻴﺎر‬

‫م‬ ‫‪١‬‬

‫ﻣﺨﺘﺼﺮة وﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺔ‬

‫‪٢‬‬

‫واﻗﻌﻴﺔ وﻃﻤﻮﺣﺔ ) ﻣﺘﻮازﻧﺔ (‬

‫‪٣‬‬

‫ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰة )إﺑﺪاﻋﻴﺔ(‬

‫‪٤‬‬

‫ﺳﻬﻠﺔ وﺟﺪﻳﺮة ﺑﺎﻟﺤﻔﻆ‬

‫‪٥‬‬

‫ﺗﺤﻘﻖ إﺑﻬﺎر اﻟﻤﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪ وإﺳﻌﺎدﻩ‬

‫‪٦‬‬

‫ﺷﺎﻣﻠﺔ‬

‫ ﻣﻠﺨﺺ رأﻳﻜﻢ ﻓﻲ اﻟﺮؤﻳﺔ )اﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ(‪:‬‬‫ﻣﺘﺤﻘﻖ‬

‫ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ‬

‫ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﺘﺤﻘﻖ‬

‫ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ‬

‫اﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ اﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮح )ﻓﻲ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ اﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﺑﻐﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ اﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ اﻟﺬي ﺗﻘﺘﺮﺣﻪ(‬

‫‪ ٢-٣‬اﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ )اﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ( ﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ اﻟﺪﻣﺎم‪) :‬ﺗﻠﺘﺰم ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ اﻟﺪﻣﺎم ﺑﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎت ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ وﺑﺤﺜﻴﺔ وﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰة وﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ وﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ اﻟﺠﻮدة ﺑﺸﺮاﻛﺔ‬ ‫وﻣﺴﺎﻫﻤﺔ ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮى اﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ اﻟﺸﺮﻗﻴﺔ واﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ واﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ اﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ واﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ(‪.‬‬

‫‪-‬‬

‫ﻧﻤﻮذج ﺗﻘﻴﻴﻢ اﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼل‪:‬‬

‫م‬

‫اﻟﻤﻌﻴﺎر‬

‫‪١‬‬

‫ﻣﺨﺘﺼﺮة‬

‫ ﻣﻠﺨﺺ رأﻳﻜﻢ ﻓﻲ اﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ )اﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ(‪:‬‬‫ﻣﺘﺤﻘﻖ‬

‫ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ‬

‫ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﺘﺤﻘﻖ‬

‫ﻣﻜﺘﻤﻠﺔ اﻷرﻛﺎن اﻟﺨﻤﺴﺔ‬ ‫‪٢‬‬

‫ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ‬

‫اﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ اﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮح )ﻓﻲ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ اﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﺑﻐﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ اﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ اﻟﺬي ﺗﻘﺘﺮﺣﻪ(‬

‫)ﻣﻦ ﻧﺤﻦ ؟ ﻣﺎذا ﻧﻌﻤﻞ ؟ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻧﻌﻤﻞ‬ ‫؟ ﻟﻤﻦ ﻧﻌﻤﻞ ؟ﻟﻤﺎذا ﻧﻌﻤﻞ؟(‬

‫‪٣‬‬

‫ﻣﺤﺪدة‬

‫‪٤‬‬

‫ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺣﻔﻈﻬﺎ‬

‫‪٥‬‬

‫ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻤﺔ ﻣﻊ اﻟﺮؤﻳﺔ‬

‫‪ ٣-٣‬اﻟﻘﻴﻢ )اﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ( ﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ اﻟﺪﻣﺎم ‪) :‬ﻗﻴﻤﻨﺎ‪ :‬اﻟﺠﻮدة واﻹﺗﻘﺎن‪ ،‬اﻟﺜﻘﺔ‪ ،‬اﻟﻤﺴﺎءﻟﺔ‪ ،‬روح اﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ‪ ،‬اﻹﺑﺪاع‪ ،‬اﺣﺘﺮام اﻟﺘﻨﻮع‪ ،‬اﻟﺘﻨﺎﻓﺴﻴﺔ‪ ،‬اﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ‪،‬‬ ‫اﻟﺘﻨﻤﻴﺔ اﻟﺬاﺗﻴﺔ‪ ،‬اﻟﻤﺴﺆوﻟﻴﺔ اﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ(‪.‬‬

‫ ﻧﻤﻮذج ﺗﻘﻴﻴﻢ اﻟﺮؤﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼل‪:‬‬‫م‬

‫اﻟﻤﻌﻴﺎر‬

‫‪١‬‬

‫ﻣﺤﻔﺰة وإﻳﺠﺎﺑﻴﺔ‬

‫‪٤‬‬

‫ﺗﻐﻄﻲ ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﻣﺠﺎﻻت اﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎم‬

‫‪٣‬‬

‫ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ) ﻋﺎﻟﻤﻴﺔ (‬

‫‪٤‬‬

‫ﻣﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﻟﺤﺎﺟﺎت اﻟﻌﻤﻞ واﻟﻔﺮد‬

‫ ﻣﻠﺨﺺ رأﻳﻜﻢ ﻓﻲ اﻟﻘﻴﻢ )اﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ(‪:‬‬‫ﻣﺘﺤﻘﻖ‬

‫ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ‬

‫ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﺘﺤﻘﻖ‬

‫ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ‬

‫اﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ اﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮح )ﻓﻲ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ اﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﺑﻐﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ اﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ اﻟﺬي ﺗﻘﺘﺮﺣﻪ(‬

‫‪Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014‬‬

‫‪47‬‬

‫راﺑﻌﺎً‪ :‬ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ اﻟﻤﺸﺎرﻛﻴﻦ ﻓﻲ اﻟﺪراﺳﺔ )رﺟﺎء وﺿﻊ اﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎر اﻟﻤﻨﺎﺳﺐ(‪:‬‬

‫‪ ١-٤‬ﺷﺮاﺋﺢ اﻟﻤﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ داﺧﻞ اﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‪:‬‬

‫‪ ١-١-٤‬ﺷﺮﻳﺤﺔ اﻟﻄﻼب‪:‬‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫‪ .١‬ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ‬

‫ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻀﻴﺮﻳﺔ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫‪ .٢‬اﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ‬ ‫‪ ٢-١-٤‬ﻣﻨﺼﺐ ﻗﻴﺎﺩﻱ‪:‬‬ ‫‪ o‬ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬ ‫‪ ٢-١-٤‬ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺲ‪:‬‬ ‫‪ o‬ﺃﺳﺘﺎﺫ‬ ‫‪ ٢-١-٤‬ﻣﻮﻅﻒ‪:‬‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺛﺎﻟﺜﺔ‬

‫ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺃﺳﻤﺎء ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﻛﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﻭﻛﻴﻞ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﻋﻤﻴﺪ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻙ‬

‫‪ .١‬ﺍﻟﻘﻄﺎﻉ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﻗﻄﺎﻉ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﻱ‬

‫‪ .٢‬ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺃﺳﻤﺎء ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬

‫ﺃﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﻗﻄﺎﻉ ﻓﻨﻲ‬

‫ﺃﺧﺮﻯ )ﺃﻛﻤﻞ( ‪....................‬‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﻭﻛﻴﻞ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﻣﺤﺎﺿﺮ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺭﺍﺑﻌﺔ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺧﺎﻣﺴﺔ‬

‫ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻗﺴﻢ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﻣﻌﻴﺪ‬

‫ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‬

‫ﺃﺧﺮﻯ )ﺃﻛﻤﻞ( ‪....................‬‬

‫ﻗﻄﺎﻉ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ‬

‫ﺃﺧﺮﻯ )ﺃﻛﻤﻞ( ‪....................‬‬

‫‪ ٢-٤‬ﺷﺮاﺋﺢ اﻟﻤﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎرج اﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‪:‬‬ ‫‪ ١-٢-٤‬ﺑﺮﺟﺎء ﺗﺤﺪﻳﺪ ﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻋﻼﻗﺘﻚ ﻣﻊ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ‪:‬‬

‫‪ o‬ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻣﺆﺳﺴﺔ‬ ‫ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ‬ ‫‪ o‬ﺧﺮﻳﺞ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﻣﻦ‬ ‫‪ o‬ﻭﻟﻲ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻁﺎﻟﺐ‬ ‫ﻣﻠﺘﺤﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬ ‫ﺑﺘﻮﻅﻴﻒ ﺧﺮﻳﺠﻲ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬ ‫‪.........................................‬‬ ‫‪ o‬ﺃﺧﺮﻯ )ﺃﻛﻤﻞ(‬ ‫‪ ٣-٤‬ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺇﺿﺎﻓﻴﺔ‪) :‬ﺭﺟﺎء ﺍﺳﺘﻜﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺎﺳﺒﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻟﺠﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﺋﺢ(‪:‬‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫‪ .١‬ﺍﻟﺠﻨﺲ‪:‬‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺫﻛﺮ‬

‫‪o‬‬ ‫‪o‬‬

‫‪ .٣‬ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮ‪:‬‬

‫‪ .٦‬ﻣﺠﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺃﻭ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ‪:‬‬

‫‪o‬‬ ‫‪o‬‬

‫‪ -٥٥‬ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ‪٦٥‬ﺳﻨﺔ‬

‫‪o‬‬ ‫‪o‬‬

‫‪ .٥‬ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻲ‪:‬‬

‫‪ .٢‬ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪:‬‬

‫‪ -١٥‬ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ‪٢٥‬ﺳﻨﺔ‬

‫‪o‬‬ ‫‪o‬‬

‫‪ .٤‬ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻲ‪:‬‬

‫ﺃﻧﺜﻰ‬

‫ﺩﺑﻠﻮﻡ‬

‫ﺍﻟﻌﺴﻜﺮﻳﺔ‬

‫‪o‬‬ ‫‪o‬‬

‫ﻣﺘﺰﻭﺝ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﻣﻄﻠﻖ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫‪ -٣٥‬ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ‪٤٥‬ﺳﻨﺔ‬

‫ﺃﺭﻣﻞ‬

‫‪ -٤٥‬ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ‪٥٥‬ﺳﻨﺔ‬

‫‪٦٥‬ﺳﻨﺔ ﻓﺄﻛﺜﺮ‬

‫‪o‬‬ ‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺍﻻﺑﺘﺪﺍﺋﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺑﻜﺎﻟﻮﺭﻳﻮﺱ‬

‫‪o‬‬ ‫‪o‬‬

‫ﻣﻮﻅﻒ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﻲ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫‪ -٢٥‬ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ‪٣٥‬ﺳﻨﺔ‬

‫‪o‬‬ ‫‪o‬‬

‫ﻳﻘﺮﺃ ﻭﻳﻜﺘﺐ‬

‫ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻢ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﻣﺎﻧﺢ ﻭﺩﺍﻋﻢ‬ ‫ﻟﻠﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺃﻋﺰﺏ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺭﺋﻴﺲ‪/‬ﻣﺴﺆﻭﻝ‬ ‫ﺑﻤﺆﺳﺴﺔ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺗﻮﻅﻒ ﺧﺮﻳﺠﻲ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬

‫‪o‬‬ ‫‪o‬‬

‫ﻣﻮﻅﻒ ﻗﻄﺎﻉ ﺧﺎﺹ‬ ‫ﻣﺘﻘﺎﻋﺪ‬

‫ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺔ‬ ‫ﺗﻘﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ‬

‫‪o‬‬ ‫‪o‬‬

‫‪ .٧‬ﺍﻟﺠﻨﺴﻴﺔ‪:‬‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺳﻌﻮﺩﻱ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﻏﻴﺮ ﺳﻌﻮﺩﻱ‬

‫ﺍﻟﻬﻨﺪﺳﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﻧﺸﺎء‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ‬

‫‪o‬‬ ‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻮﺳﻄﺔ‬ ‫ﻣﺎﺟﺴﺘﻴﺮ‬

‫‪o‬‬ ‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺭﺭﺟﻞ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻝ‬ ‫ﻳﺒﺤﺚ ﻋﻦ ﻋﻤﻞ‬

‫‪o‬‬ ‫‪o‬‬

‫‪o‬‬ ‫‪ o‬ﺍﻹﻋﻼﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﻓﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ‬

‫ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻮﻳﺔ‬ ‫ﺩﻛﺘﻮﺭﺍﻩ‬ ‫ﻁﺎﻟﺐ‬ ‫ﻻ ﻳﻌﻤﻞ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎء ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺤﺎﻣﺎﺓ‬ ‫ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‪....................‬‬

‫‪ .٨‬ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﻦ‪:‬‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺍﻟﺨﺒﺮ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮﺍﻥ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‪....................‬‬

‫‪ .٩‬ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ‪:‬‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺍﻟﺨﺒﺮ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮﺍﻥ‬

‫‪o‬‬

‫ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‪....................‬‬

‫‪Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014‬‬

‫‪48‬‬

8. ANALYZING THE SUGGESTIONS FROM THE RESPONDENTS

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

On the questionnaire, respondents were asked to provide written suggestions or modifications to the posted statements. x

55 respondents out of the total 4,791 (about 1%) commented or gave suggested modifications.

Most suggestions included minor refinements and corrections of the posted statements.

Basically, the suggestions advised that the statements be shortened and to make them more concise.

For the sake of documentation, the following tables have included all the written suggestions that were provided by the respondents.

Updating UODâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholdersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

UD Vision: proposed modifications by participants ‫ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﺣﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺤﻴﺔ‬:‫ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ‬ .( ‫ ﻧﺨﻂ ﺑﻌﺪﺍ ) ﺃﻭ ﻧﺮﺳﻢ ﻁﺮﻳﻘﺎ ) ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﻧﺤﻦ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻌﺒﺮﻩ ) ﺃﻭ ﻳﺴﻠﻜﻪ‬-١ .‫ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺛﺮﻳﺔ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﻣﺒﺪﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺻﻌﺪﺓ ﺟﻤﻴﻌﻬﺎ‬-٢ A governmental creative teaching university that produces state of the art leaders who will produce change in knowledge and practice in the whole world. A leading creative university for a better society A leading creative university Nationally, regionally and internationally. A Leading creative university serving the local community, Saudi Arabia, the Middle East, and North Africa (MENA) Region ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺭﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻟﺨﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﻮﺩﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮﻕ ﺍﻷﻭﺳﻂ ﻭﺷﻤﺎﻝ ﺃﻓﺮﻳﻘﻴﺎ‬ A leading university at the Eastern Province and the Gulf Grammer is poor. It should be more clear of what UoD wishes to become and achieve in the future Note: This statement does not serve as a clear guide for choosing current and future courses of action Option 1: A leading university for intellectual and creative accomplishments of its faculty, staff, and students at the Eastern Province, the Gulf Region and World levels. Option 2: Leading university with a culture of excellence recognized for innovation and quality at Eastern Province, the Gulf Region and World levels. Option 3: National and international distinction for innovation and excellence in education, research and healthcare. Option 4: Leaders in world-class university education and healthcare. Pursue national and global distinction for innovation, excellence and creativity Sorry I have to choose Not Suitable just to open this box: The phrase is excellent but I suggest checking in the English translation about the effect of huge separation between "at" and "levels". I am afraid it is weakening the phrase. The English translated statement needs some review. To be a worlwide leading creative university in education, clinical, and research. To be one of the leading creative universities regionally and globally To be one of the leading universities in the Middle East region and an internationally recognized university via providing creative, innovative and first-rate teaching and research services. UoD is a fast growing university moving to higher levels in the field of education and aiming to reach greater heights .The vision is not self-explanatory and comprehensive. UoD, The center of leadership and creativity nationally and internationally ً ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻭ ﺍﻹﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﻣﺤﻠﻴﺎ ً ﻭ ﻋﺎﻟﻤﻴﺎ‬ ‫ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺎﻁﻖ‬ ً‫ﺑﻴﺌﺔ ﺇﺑﺪﺍﻋﻴﺔ ﺗﺴﻌﻰ ﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﺎﻟﻤﻴﺎ‬ ‫ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﻹﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺠﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻲ‬ ‫ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﺮ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ‬.‫ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺭﺃﻳﻲ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﻭﻣﺒﻬﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺭﺍﺋﺪﺓ‬،‫ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﻧﺠﻠﻴﺰﻳﺔ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ‬ ‫ ﻻ ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﺒﺢ ﺭﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻓﻲ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻲء ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻌﻜﺴﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ‬.‫ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻢ ﺗﺤﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼﺺ‬،‫ﻫﻮ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺎﺫﺍ؟ ﺭﻛﺰﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬ .‫ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ ﻟﺬﺍ ﻫﻲ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﺯﻧﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺔ‬ Valuable education for better life ‫ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﻟﺤﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻓﻀﻞ‬ ( ‫ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ) ﻣﺒﺪﻋﻪ‬ ‫ ﻭﺍﻹﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻗﻴﺔ‬,‫ ﺍﻟﻄﻤﻮﺡ‬,‫ َﺟﺎ ِﻣﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﻠﻢ‬,‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺘﻤﻊ ﻭﺗﺨﺪﻣﻪ ﻭﺗﻨﺎﻓﺲ ﻣﺜﻴﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﻜﻞ ﺛﻘﺔ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺗﺴﻌﻰ ﻟﻠﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻗﻲ ﺑﻄﻼﺑﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﻄﻮﻳﺮ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺑﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻧﻔﻊ ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻌﻬﺎ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺗﺴﻌﻰ ﻟﻨﻬﻀﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺘﻤﻊ‬

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺗﻄﻤﺢ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ ﺑﺈﻧﺠﺎﺯﺍﺗﻬﺎ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺭﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺗﻮﻓﺮ ﺑﻴﺌﺔ ﺧﺼﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺒﺪﻋﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ ﻣﺒﻬﻤﺔ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻋﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻗﻴﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻋﺎﻟﻤﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﻋﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻋﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎءﺓ ﺗﺴﻌﻰ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﻹﻗﻠﻴﻤﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻤﻲ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻤﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﻹﻗﻠﻴﻤﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻤﻲ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻮﻁﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺗﺤﺴﻴﻦ ﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻗﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﺤﻠﻴﺎ ﻭﺇﻗﻠﻴﻤﻴﺎ ﻭﻋﺎﻟﻤﻴﺎ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ‪ ،‬ﻏﺎﻳﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ‪ ،‬ﺗﺘﺒﻨﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﻌﺪ ﺍﻷﺟﻴﺎﻝ ﻟﻠﺤﻴﺎﺓ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻭﻣﺘﻄﻮﺭﺓ ﺗﻮﺍﻛﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﻰ ﺷﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺎﻻﺕ ﺑﻤﺎ ﻳﺨﺪﻡ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺭﻳﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻁﻤﻮﺣﺔ ﺗﺴﻌﻰ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺎ ﻭﺇﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴﺎ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻤﻌﺎﻳﻴﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻬﺎ ﺭﻳﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺠﺘﻤﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻁﻦ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺔ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻓﻀﻞ ﻭﻟﻢ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻗﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻁﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﺤﻠﻴﺎ ﻭﻋﺎﻟﻤﻴﺎ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺟﻲ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﺭﻛﻴﻜﺔ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻘﺒﻞ ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻹﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﻻ ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺎﺫﺍ؟؟ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﺍﻹﻧﺠﻠﻴﺰﻳﺔ ﺭﻛﻴﻜﺔ‬ ‫ﺟﺪﺍ‪ -٢ . - .‬ﻧﺼﻒ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﻣﺖ ﻓﻲ " ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻗﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ " ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ ﺑﺴﻴﻄﺔ ﻟﻠﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺤﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﺍﻹﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﻁﻤﻮﺣﻪ‬ ‫ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺩﺍﻋﻲ ﺫﻛﺮ "ﺍﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ" ﻭﻳﻜﺘﻔﻰ ﺑﻌﺎﻟﻤﻴﺎً‬ ‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻌﺐ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻫﻨﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺤﺘﻞ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﺍ ﺭﻳﺎﺩﻳﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﻗﺼﺮﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻗﻴﺔ ﺟﺰﺍء ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻫﻲ ﺟﺰء ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻫﻮ ﺟﺰء ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ ‪ ..‬ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﻻﻛﺘﻔﺎء ﺑﺠﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ‬ ‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ‬ ‫ﻧﺤﻮ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﺴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ‬ ‫ﻧﺴﺘﺒﻌﺪ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻗﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﻴﻖ ﺑﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺭﺅﻳﺘﻲ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻛﻔﺮﺩ ﻫﻲ‪" :‬ﺇﺭﺿﺎء ﷲ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺈﺳﻌﺎﺩ ﻧﻔﺴﻲ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺗﻨﻮﻳﺮ‬ ‫ﻋﻘﻮﻟﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻠﻢ"‪...‬ﻓﺮﺅﻳﺘﻲ ﺍﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻏﺮﺿﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺎﻓﺴﺔ!!!‪...‬ﺃﻳﻦ ﺍﻹﺛﺮﺍء ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺗﻲ ‪..‬ﺗﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﺳﺎﺗﺬﺓ‬ ‫ﻛﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻵﺩﺍﺏ‬ ‫ﻧﻄﻤﺢ ﻟﻺﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﻭﻧﺴﻌﻰ ﻟﻠﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﻹﻗﻠﻴﻤﻲ‬ ‫ﻳﺮﻛﺰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻭﺍﻻﺣﺘﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻔﻈﺔ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻷﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻬﻠﻜﺔ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬

‫‪Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014‬‬

‫‪52‬‬

UD Mission: proposed modifications by participants ‫ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﺣﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺤﻴﺔ‬:‫ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ‬ .ً ‫ ﺻﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﺍﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺎ ﻭﻣﻬﻨﻴﺎ ﻟﺘﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﻭﺗﺒﺪﻉ ﻣﺤﻠﻴﺎ ﻭﻋﺎﻟﻤﻴﺎ‬-١ .ً‫ ﺗﻤﻜﻴﻦ ﺳﻔﺮﺍء ﻟﻠﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﻴﻦ ﺑﺤﺜﻴﺎ ﻭﻣﻬﻨﻴﺎ ﻣﺤﻠﻴﺎ ﻭﻋﺎﻟﻤﻴﺎ‬-٢ Again the English translation needs some modification especially the last part . ‫ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ "ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ‬ Sorry I have to choose Not Suitable just to open this box: 1- Please watch for the translation. 2- The end could better be "...with effective community partnerships and involvement in the Eastern Province, the Kingdom, the Gulf Region, and the World." The University of Dammam is committed to positively inspire society by providing distinct, creative and high quality educational, research, and professional services. The University of Dammam is committed to providing distinct, creative and high quality educational, research, and professional services with effective community partnerships and involvement at the Eastern Province, the Kingdom, the Gulf Region Levels and the World at large. The University of Dammam is committed to the highest international standards in educational programs, ethical research, professional services and partnership for sustainable development and the welfare of our community To contribute to society through the pursuit of education, professional training, and research at the highest international levels of excellence. UoD is committed to contribute to the national and international society, through creating and disseminating knowledge and pursuit of integrated research that is based on society needs, and applied with the highest scales of excellence. ‫ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻌﻲ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ‬،‫ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻭﻧﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺮﻓﺔ‬،‫ﺗﺴﻌﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﺎﻫﻤﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺑﻨﺎء ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻮﻁﻨﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﻲ‬ .‫ﺣﺎﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺘﻤﻊ ﻭ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﺰ‬ University of Dammam is committed to providing creative, community-responsive, and high-quality education and research with effective community and industry partnerships in the local community, Saudi Arabia, the Middle East, and North Africa regions. ‫ﺗﻠﺘﺰﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﺘﻮﻓﻴﺮ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﻭﺃﺑﺤﺎﺙ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻭﻣﺘﺠﺎﻭﺑﺔ ﻻﺣﺘﻴﺎﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺘﻤﻊ ﻭﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺘﻤﻊ‬ ‫ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﺤﻠﻴﺎ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮﻕ ﺍﻷﻭﺳﻂ ﻭﺷﻤﺎﻝ ﺃﻓﺮﻳﻘﻴﺎ‬ we have to be more specific. what exactly UoD want to be recognized in. for example if we want to be recognized in quality of education so let us concentrate on that and so on. The University of Dammam is committed to providing distinct, creative and high quality of teaching and learning national, regional and international. or The University of Dammam is committed to providing distinct, creative and high quality in research and evidenced based practice national, regional and international. or The University of Dammam is committed to providing distinct, creative and high quality in professional services with effective community partnerships and involvement national, regional and international Well writen but a minor suggestion (You may like to think on similar lines ): -to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and work wisely, creatively, and effectively for the betterment of humankind. .‫ ﻓﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ "ﻣﻠﺘﺰﻣﺔ" ﻳﻌﻜﺲ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﻧﺠﻠﻴﺰﻳﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ "ﺗﻠﺘﺰﻡ" ﻻ ﺗﻌﻜﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ‬،‫ﺃﺭﺟﻮ ﺃﻭﻻً ﺍﻟﺘﺪﻗﻴﻖ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ‬ ‫ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﻰ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﺓ؟ ﺛﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ‬.‫ ﻫﻲ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﻻ ﻣﻌﻨﻰ ﻟﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻕ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ‬،‫ ﺃﺭﺟﻮ ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﻓﻲ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ‬،‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﺣﺎﻝ‬ ‫ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺴﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻌﻜﺲ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﻴﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ً ﻓﺎﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺗﺮﻳﺪ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻞ‬،‫ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ؟ ﺃﻋﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺗﺒﺪﺃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﻷﻧﻬﺎ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺔ‬ ‫ ﺃﻋﺮﻑ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﺤﺜﻴﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﻋﻤﻠﻬﺎ ﺑﺪﻻً ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺑﻌﻤﻞ ﻛﻞ‬، ‫ﺷﻲء ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﻭﺑﺤﺚ‬ .‫ﺷﻲء ﻭﺑﻤﻌﺎﻳﻴﺮ ﻓﻀﻔﺎﺿﺔ ﻛﺎﻹﺑﺪﺍﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﺰ‬ ‫ ﻭﺍﻥ ﺗﺼﺒﺢ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺇﻧﺘﺎﺟﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻘﻲ ﻭﺧﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺘﻤﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ‬،‫ﺍﻥ ﺗﺼﺒﺢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﻟﻄﻠﺒﺘﻬﺎ‬ ‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻗﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ‬ ‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﻟﻠﻌﺮﺑﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ ﻭﻳﺤﺬﻑ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺍﺭ‬.. ‫ﺍﻳﻀﺎ ﻟﻼﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ‬ ‫ﺗﺤﺮﺹ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺜﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﺇﺑﺪﺍﻋﻴﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺑﺸﺮﺍﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺘﻤﻊ ﻟﻠﺮﻗﻲ ﺑﻤﻨﻈﻮﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﻲ‬ Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

‫ﻣﺤﻠﻴﺎ ﻭﺇﻗﻠﻴﻤﻴﺎ ﻭﻋﺎﻟﻤﻴﺎ‬ ‫ﺗﺴﻌﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺎ ﻭﺇﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﻷﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺘﻤﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﻋﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ‬ ‫ﺗﺴﻌﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﺤﺜﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻭﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻭﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ ﺑﺸﺮﺍﻛﺔ ﻭﻣﺴﺎﻫﻤﺔ ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ ﺃﺟﻤﻊ‬ ‫ﺗﻠﺘﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺑﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﻪ ﻭﺑﺤﺜﻴﻪ ﻭﻣﻬﻨﻴﻪ ﺑﺠﻮﺩﻩ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺷﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﻪ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﻪ ‪...........‬‬ ‫ﺗﻠﺘﺰﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﺤﺜﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ ﺑﺸﺮﺍﻛﺔ ﻭﻣﺴﺎﻫﻤﺔ ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻠﻲ‬ ‫ﻭﺍﻹﻗﻠﻴﻤﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﻲ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺗﻠﺘﺰﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﺤﺜﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻭﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ ﺑﺸﺮﺍﻛﺔ ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻤﻲ‬ ‫ﺗﻠﺘﺰﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﺤﺜﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻭﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ ﺑﺸﺮﺍﻛﺔ ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻳﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻠﻲ‬ ‫ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻤﻲ‬ ‫ﺗﻠﺘﺰﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﺤﺜﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻭﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻭﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ ﻋﻦ ﻁﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎءﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺴﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻠﻴﻦ ﻭﺑﺸﺮﺍﻛﺔ ﻭﻣﺴﺎﻫﻤﺔ ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻌﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﺳﻌﺔ ﻭﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻤﻲ‬ ‫ﺗﻠﺘﺰﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﺤﺜﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻭﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻭﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ ﺑﺸﺮﺍﻛﺔ ﻭﻣﺴﺎﻫﻤﺔ ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ‬ ‫ﺗﻠﺘﺰﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﺤﺜﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻭﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻭﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ ﺑﺸﺮﺍﻛﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺎﺕ ﺇﻗﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﻋﺎﻟﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﺴﺎﻫﻤﺔ ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻌﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺗﻠﺘﺰﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﺤﺜﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻭﻣﻮﺍﻛﺒﺔ ﻟﺘﺤﺪﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻮﻟﻤﺔ ﺑﻘﻴﻢ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺇﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺗﺨﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺘﻤﻊ‬ ‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻗﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ‬ ‫ﺗﻠﺘﺰﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ)‪-١‬ﻣﻦ ﻧﺤﻦ؟( ﺑﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻭﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺤﺜﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ )‪-٢‬ﻣﺎﺫﺍ ﻧﻌﻤﻞ؟(‬ ‫ﺑﺸﺮﺍﻛﺔ ﻭﻣﺴﺎﻫﻤﺔ ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ)‪-٣‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﻧﻌﻤﻞ؟( ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﻹﻗﻠﻴﻤﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻤﻲ )‪-٤‬ﻟﻤﻦ ﻧﻌﻤﻞ؟(‬ ‫ﺗﻢ ﺇﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺒﺎﻟﻐﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻡ‪ :‬ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﺓ‪ ,‬ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ‪ ،‬ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ‪ .‬ﻣﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ؟؟ ﻳﻤﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ" ﻋﻠﻰ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﻹﻗﻠﻴﻤﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﻲ"‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﺗﺨﺪﻡ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﺨﺺ ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻗﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺑﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺃﻛﺎﺩﻳﻤﻴﺔ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ ﻣﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ‬ ‫ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻮﺍﻁﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻘﻴﻢ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ ﻣﺆﺳﺴﺔ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﻴﺔ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﺤﺜﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻭﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻭﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ ﺑﺸﺮﺍﻛﺔ ﻭﻣﺴﺎﻫﻤﺔ ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ‬ ‫ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺃﻧﺸﻄﺔ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﺤﺜﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﺑﻤﺴﺎﻫﻤﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ ﻣﺤﻠﻴﺎ ﻭﺇﻗﻠﻴﻤﻴﺎ ﻭﻋﺎﻟﻤﻴﺎ‬ ‫ﺣﺬﻑ )ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺠﻴﺔ(‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺨﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﻮ ﻛﺜﻴﺮﻩ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺠﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ ﻣﻌﻨﻰ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺣﺪﻫﻤﺎ‬ ‫ﺫﻛﺮﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ ﻣﺮﺗﻴﻦ‬ ‫ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ ؟ّ‬ ‫ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺩﺍﻋﻲ ﻟﺬﻛﺮ "ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺛﻢ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ ﺛﻢ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ" ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﻌﻄﻲ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻉ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺟﻴﺪ‪ ،‬ﺍﻷﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﻟﻬﺎ‬ ‫ﺑــ" ﻣﺤﻠﻴﺎ ً ﻭﻋﺎﻟﻤﻴﺎ ً" ﻓﻘﻂ‬ ‫ﻣﻜﺮﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ ﻭﺍﻷﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﻌﺎﺩﻫﻤﺎ ﻭﻧﻘﺘﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ‬ ‫ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻮﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻭﺍﺿﺤﺔ ﻣﺤﻠﻴﺎ ﻭﻋﺮﺑﻴﺎ ﻭﻋﺎﻟﻤﻴﺎ‬ ‫ﻳﺤﺬﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ‬

‫‪Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014‬‬

‫‪54‬‬

‫‪UD Mission: proposed modifications by participants‬‬

‫ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻡ‪ :‬ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﺣﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺤﻴﺔ‬ ‫‪exchange Self Establishment with Self Development Add: Integrity‬‬ ‫‪Quality, Honesty, Team spirit, Creativity, Respect for Diversity, Professionalism, Self-Establishment,‬‬ ‫‪Social Responsibility.‬‬ ‫‪Self-Establishment & Social Responsibility may not qualify as quality traits for an organization‬‬ ‫‪Sorry I have to choose Not Suitable just to open this box: 1- The word accountability is to be translated‬‬ ‫‪into‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﺔ‪ .‬ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎءﻟﺔ ﻣﺤﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﻌﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺛﻘﺎﻓﺘﻨﺎ ﻭ ﻻ ﺗﺼﻠﺢ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻕ‪ .‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﺳﺘﻔﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺠﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﻋﻦ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺼﺪ ﻓﻬﻞ ﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺗﺸﺠﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻟﺨﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﺜﻼً؟‬ ‫‪The ordering seems arbitrary .‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺗﻘﺎﻥ ‪ ،‬ﺍﻹﺑﺪﺍﻉ ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺗﻴﺔ ‪ ،‬ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ‪ ،‬ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻮﻉ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻓﺴﻴﺔ ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎءﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪.‬‬ ‫‪too many qualities stuffed in. keep it concise‬‬ ‫‪You may add "Collaboration" if appropriate‬‬ ‫ﺍﻹﺧﻼﺹ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻹﻳﻤﺎﻥ‬ ‫ﺍﻗﺘﺮﺡ ﺇﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﻗﻴﻢ ﻫﺎﻣﺔ ﺗﺤﺘﺎﺡ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﻠﻨﺔ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮ ﻭﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺓ ﺿﻤﻨﻴﺎ ) ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ( ﻣﺜﻞ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻤﺎء‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ‪،‬‬ ‫ﻭﺍﻟﺤﻮﺍﺭ ﻭﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ‬ ‫ﺍﻗﺘﺮﺡ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﺸﻔﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﺍﻗﺘﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻓﺴﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺑﻨﺎء ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻟﺢ ﻟﻠﻮﻁﻦ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻤﺮ ﻟﻠﻬﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺩﻳﻤﻴﺔ ﺑﻤﺎ ﻳﺤﺎﻓﻆ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﺍﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻤﻴﺰ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺭﺍﺣﺔ ﻭﺭﺿﺎء ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻠﻴﻦ ﻭﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﻫﺪﻓﻨﺎ‪ .‬ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺒﺪﻋﻴﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻼﺏ ﻭﺍﻻﻛﺎﺩﻳﻤﻴﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻠﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﺟﺰء ﺃﺻﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ‬ ‫ﻋﻤﻠﻨﺎ‬ ‫ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎءﻟﺔ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ‪ .‬ﺍﻹﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺪ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ‪ .‬ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻕ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺎﻧﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻟﻢ ﺗﺮﺩ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎءﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﺗﻀﺎﻑ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺠﻴﻊ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ ‪ ،‬ﺍﻹﺧﻼﺹ‪ ،‬ﺍﻷﻣﺎﻧﺔ‪ ،‬ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺸﻔﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺼﺪﺍﻗﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻹﺑﺪﺍﻉ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺗﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﺪﺍﻣﺔ‪، ،‬ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺎ‬ ‫ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺘﻜﺮﺭﺓ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻅ ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎءﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻮﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻓﺲ‪...‬ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎءﻟﺔ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ً ﻷﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺗﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺍﻷﺧﻄﺎء ﻟﻴﺘﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺏ‬ ‫ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎءﻟﺔ!!!‬ ‫ﻗﻴﻤﻨﺎ‪ :‬ﺍﻹﺗﻘﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎءﻟﺔ‪ ،‬ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ‪ ،‬ﺍﻹﺑﺪﺍﻉ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺣﻢ‪ ، ،‬ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ‪ ،‬ﺗﺰﻛﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﻗﻴﻤﻨﺎ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ ‪ ،‬ﺍﻹﺗﻘﺎﻥ ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻮﻉ ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺗﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺠﺘﻤﻌﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﻛﺜﻴﺮ ‪ ١١‬ﻗﻴﻤﻪ ﻳﻔﻀﻞ ﺍﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻗﺐ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺣﻔﻈﻬﺎ ﺍﻥ ﺗﺪﻣﺞ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ ﺍﻹﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﺍﻟﺠﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎءﻟﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻟﻬﺎ ﺩﺍﻋﻲ‬ ‫ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺘﻴﻦ‪ :‬ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻰ‪ :‬ﻳﺮﺟﻰ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﺔ ﻣﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎءﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ‪ Accountability‬ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻓﺴﻴﺔ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﺗﺮﻏﺐ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬ ‫ﺑﺘﻌﺰﻳﺰﻫﺎ؟ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻳﻤﻴﻞ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻛﺔ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻓﺲ‪ .‬ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺇﻟﻰ ‪ ٥‬ﻗﻴﻢ ﻛﺤﺪ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ‪ .‬ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ‬ ‫ﻭﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺭﺑﺘﻴﻦ‬ ‫ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎءﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺠﻮﺩﺓ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺑﻤﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻹﺗﻘﺎﻥ‪ .‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﺇﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻕ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎﻧﺪﺓ ﻭ‬ ‫ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﺒﺮﺯ ﻓﻲ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻳﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﻔﺮﺩ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ‪ .‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺭﻯ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻮﻉ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻗﻴﻢ ﺟﻤﻴﻠﺔ‬ ‫ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﺜﻞ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎء ﺑﺈﺧﻼﺹ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺔ ﷲ‪ .‬ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻋﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﻏﻴﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺗﻜﺰﺍﺕ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻻ ﺃﺩﺭﻱ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻴﻤﺎ ﺃﻡ ﻻ؟؟؟ ﻭﺷﻜﺮﺍ‬ ‫ﻧﺴﺘﺒﻌﺪ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎءﻟﺔ‬

‫‪Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014‬‬

‫‪55‬‬

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

9. Comparison Tables: Original Statements, Stakeholders’ Results, Focus Group (1) and Focus Group (2)

The following tables show comparisons of three versions of the statements: (1) as posted on the survey and (2) after modification according to suggestions from respondents, (3) after modifications from focus group 1, and (4) after modifications from focus group 2:

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

VISION (1)

(2)

As initially Posted

As modified by Stakeholders

(3)

(4)

As modified by Focus Group 1

As modified by Focus Group 2

(5)

A leading g creative

A leading g

Version modified by University Council A leading g

university y at the

university y

University y

Eastern Province,

achieving g

Accepted p

achieving g

the Kingdom, g the

distinction locally, y

as in (2)

distinction locally, y

Gulf Region g and

regionally g y and

the World levels

internationally

MISSION (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

As initially Posted

Version modified by Stakeholders

Version modified by Focus Group 1

Version modified by Focus Group 2

Version modified by University Council

The University y of Dammam is committed to

The University y of

p providing g creative

Dammam Strives

and high g quality q y

for providing p g

Providing g creative

educational,

creative and high g

and high g quality q y

research, and

quality y knowledge, g

knowledge, g

p professional

research, and

services with

p professional

effective

services with

services locally, y

services with

community y

effective

regionally g y and

effective

partnerships p p and

community y

internationally y with

community y

involvement at the

p partnerships p

effective

partnerships

Eastern Province,

locally, y regionally g y

community y

the Kingdom, g the

and internationally

partnerships

Providing g creative knowledge, g research, and p professional services with effective y community partnerships

Gulf Region g and World Levels

Updating UODâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholdersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

VALUES (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

As initially Posted

As modified by Stakeholders

As modified by Focus Group 1

As modified by Focus Group 2

Version modified by University Counci

Quality, y Trust, Accountability, y Team Spirit, p Creativity, y Respect p for Diversity, y Competitiveness, p Professionalism, Self-Establishment, Social Responsibility

Quality; ty y; Creativity; y y Self-Establishment; Team Spirit; p Respect p

Loyalty; y y Quality; ty; y

for Diversity; y

Team Spirit; p

Competitiveness; p Transparency, p y Trust

Accepted p as in (2)

and Accountability; y

Transparency; p y Diversity; y Creativity; y Social Responsibility

Professionalism;

Loyalty; y y Excellence; ce; Teamwork; Transparency; p y Diversity; y Creativity; y Social Responsibility

Social Responsibility

Updating UODâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholdersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

‫ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﻟﺼﻴﺎﻏﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ‪ (١) :‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻋﻠﻨﺖ ﻟﻠﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺤﻴﺔ‪ (٢) ،‬ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻏﺎﺕ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻠﻬﺎ ﻁﺒﻘﺎ ً‬ ‫ﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻛﻴﻦ‪ (٣) ،‬ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻏﺎﺕ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻠﻬﺎ ﻁﺒﻘﺎً ﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴ ﺰ ‪ ،١‬ﻭ)‪ (٤‬ﺍﻟﺼ ﻴﺎﻏﺎﺕ ﺑﻌ ﺪ ﺗﻌ ﺪﻳﻠﻬﺎ ﻁﺒﻘ ﺎً‬ ‫ﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺰ ‪:٢‬‬

‫اﻟﺮؤﻳﺔ‬ ‫)‪(١‬‬ ‫)‪١‬‬

‫)‪(٢‬‬

‫)‪(٣‬‬ ‫)‪٣‬‬

‫)‪(٤‬‬

‫)‪(٥‬‬

‫ﻥ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺻﻳﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﻁﺭﻭﺣﺔ ﻟﻠﻣﺳﺗﻔﻳﺩﻳﻥ‬

‫ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺗﺭﺡ‬ ‫ﺭ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺻﻳﻐﺔ ﺑﻌﺩ ﺍﻟﺗﻌﺩﻳﻝ‬ ‫ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻔﻳﺩﻳﻥ‬

‫ﺍﻟﺗﻌﺩﻳﻝ‬ ‫ﻳ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺻﻳﻐﺔ ﺑﻌﺩ‬ ‫ﻳ‬ ‫ﻣﺟﻣﻭﻋﺔ‬ ‫ﻭ‬ ‫ﻣﻥ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺗﺭﺡ ﻥ‬ ‫ﺭﺡ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺗﺭﻛﻳﺯ )‪(١‬‬

‫ﺍﻟﺗﻌﺩﻳﻝ‬ ‫ﻳ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺻﻳﻐﺔ ﺑﻌﺩ‬ ‫ﻳ‬ ‫ﻣﺟﻣﻭﻋﺔ‬ ‫ﻭ‬ ‫ﻣﻥ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺗﺭﺡ ﻥ‬ ‫ﺭﺡ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺗﺭﻛﻳﺯ )‪(٢‬‬

‫ﺍﻟﺗﻌﺩﻳﻝ‬ ‫ﻳ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺻﻳﻐﺔ ﺑﻌﺩ‬ ‫ﻳ‬ ‫ﺱ‬ ‫ﻥ ﻣﺟﻠﺱ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺗﺭﺡ ﻣﻥ‬ ‫ﺭﺡ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬

‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ‬ ‫اﻟﺮﻳﺎدة ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮى‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ اﻟﺸﺮﻗﻴﺔ‬ ‫واﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ واﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ‬ ‫اﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ واﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ‬

‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ راﺋﺪة‬ ‫ﺗﺤﻘﻖ اﻟﺘﻤﻴﺰ‬ ‫ﻣﺤﻠﻴًﺎ وإﻗﻠﻴﻤﻴًﺎ‬ ‫وﻋﺎﻟﻤﻴًﺎ‬

‫ﻗﺒﻮل اﻟﺼﻴﻐﺔ‬ ‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﻓﻲ )‪(٢‬‬ ‫ﺑﻼ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ‬

‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ راﺋﺪة‬ ‫ﺗﺤﻘﻖ اﻟﺘﻤﻴﺰ‬ ‫ﻣﺤﻠﻴًﺎ وإﻗﻠﻴﻤﻴًﺎ‬ ‫وﻋﺎﻟﻤﻴًﺎ‬

‫اﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ‬ ‫)‪(١‬‬ ‫)‪١‬‬

‫)‪(٢‬‬

‫)‪(٣‬‬ ‫)‪٣‬‬

‫)‪(٤‬‬ ‫)‪٤‬‬

‫)‪(٥‬‬

‫ﺍﻟﺻﻳﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﻁﺭﻭﺣﺔ ﻟﻠﻣﺳﺗﻔﻳﺩﻳﻥ‬

‫ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺗﺭﺡ‬ ‫ﺭ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺗﻌﺩﻳﻝ‬ ‫ﻳ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺻﻳﻐﺔ ﺑﻌﺩ‬ ‫ﻳ‬ ‫ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻔﻳﺩﻳﻥ‬

‫ﻋﺭﺿﻬﺎ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺻﻳﻐﺔ ﺑﻌﺩ ﺭ ﻬ‬ ‫ﻳ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺗﺭﻛﻳﺯ‬ ‫ﻣﺟﻣﻭﻋﺔ ﺭ‬ ‫ﻭ‬ ‫ﻋﻠﻰ‬ ‫)‪(١‬‬

‫ﻋﺭﺿﻬﺎ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺻﻳﻐﺔ ﺑﻌﺩ ﺭ ﻬ‬ ‫ﻳ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺗﺭﻛﻳﺯ‬ ‫ﻣﺟﻣﻭﻋﺔ ﺭ‬ ‫ﻭ‬ ‫ﻋﻠﻰ‬ ‫)‪(٢‬‬

‫ﺍﻟﺗﻌﺩﻳﻝ‬ ‫ﻳ‬ ‫ﻟﺻﻳﻐﺔ ﺑﻌﺩ‬ ‫ﻳ‬ ‫ﺱ‬ ‫ﻥ ﻣﺟﻠﺱ‬ ‫ﺭﺡ ﻣﻥ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺗﺭﺡ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬

‫ﺗﻠﺘﺰم ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ اﻟﺪﻣﺎم‬ ‫ﺑﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎت‬ ‫ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ وﺑﺤﺜﻴﺔ‬ ‫وﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰة‬ ‫وﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ وﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ‬ ‫اﻟﺠﻮدة ﺑﺸﺮاﻛﺔ‬ ‫وﻣﺴﺎﻫﻤﺔ ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻌﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮى‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ اﻟﺸﺮﻗﻴﺔ‬ ‫واﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ واﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ‬ ‫اﻟﻌﺮﺑﻲ واﻟﻌﺎﻟﻢ‬

‫ﺗﺴﻌﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬ ‫اﻟﺪﻣﺎم ﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ‬ ‫ﺧﺪﻣﺎت ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻴﺔ‬ ‫وﺑﺤﺜﻴﺔ وﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ‬ ‫إﺑﺪاﻋﻴﺔ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ‬ ‫اﻟﺠﻮدة ﺑﺸﺮاﻛﺔ‬ ‫ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ‬ ‫ﻣﺤﻠﻴًﺎ وإﻗﻠﻴﻤﻴًﺎ‬ ‫وﻋﺎﻟﻤﻴًﺎ‬

‫ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎت‬ ‫ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎت‬ ‫ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎت‬ ‫ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻴﺔ‬ ‫وﺑﺤﺜﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻴﺔ‬ ‫وﺑﺤﺜﻴﺔ‬ ‫وﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ إﺑﺪاﻋﻴﺔ‬ ‫وﺑﺤﺜﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ اﻟﺠﻮدة وﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ إﺑﺪاﻋﻴﺔ‬ ‫وﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ إﺑﺪاﻋﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﻣﺤﻠﻴًﺎ وإﻗﻠﻴﻤﻴًﺎ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ اﻟﺠﻮدة‬ ‫ﺑﺸﺮاﻛﺔ‬ ‫ﺑﺸﺮاﻛﺔ‬ ‫وﻋﺎﻟﻤﻴًﺎ‬ ‫ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ‬ ‫ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ‬ ‫ﺑﺸﺮاﻛﺔ‬ ‫ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ‬

‫‪Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014‬‬

‫‪61‬‬

‫اﻟﻘﻴﻢ‬ ‫)‪(١‬‬ ‫)‪١‬‬

‫)‪(٢‬‬

‫ﻥ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺻﻳﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﻁﺭﻭﺣﺔ ﻟﻠﻣﺳﺗﻔﻳﺩﻳﻥ‬

‫ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺗﺭﺡ‬ ‫ﺭ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺗﻌﺩﻳﻝ‬ ‫ﻳ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺻﻳﻐﺔ ﺑﻌﺩ‬ ‫ﻳ‬ ‫ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻔﻳﺩﻳﻥ‬

‫اﻟﺠﻮدة واﻹﺗﻘﺎن‪،‬‬ ‫اﻟﺜﻘﺔ‪ ،‬اﻟﻤﺴﺎءﻟﺔ‪،‬‬ ‫روح اﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ‪،‬‬ ‫اﻹﺑﺪاع‪ ،‬اﺣﺘﺮام‬ ‫اﻟﺘﻨﻮع‪ ،‬اﻟﺘﻨﺎﻓﺴﻴﺔ‪،‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ‪ ،‬اﻟﺘﻨﻤﻴﺔ‬ ‫اﻟﺬاﺗﻴﺔ‪ ،‬اﻟﻤﺴﺆوﻟﻴﺔ‬ ‫اﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‬

‫اﻟﺠﻮدة واﻹﺗﻘﺎن؛‬ ‫اﻹﺑﺪاع؛ اﻟﺘﻨﻤﻴﺔ‬ ‫اﻟﺬاﺗﻴﺔ؛ روح‬ ‫اﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ؛ اﺣﺘﺮام‬ ‫اﻟﺘﻨﻮع؛ اﻟﺘﻨﺎﻓﺴﻴﺔ؛‬ ‫اﻟﺸﻔﺎﻓﻴﺔ واﻟﺜﻘﺔ‬ ‫واﻟﻤﺤﺎﺳﺒﺔ؛‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ؛ اﻟﻤﺴﺆوﻟﻴﺔ‬ ‫اﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‬

‫)‪(٣‬‬ ‫)‪٣‬‬

‫)‪(٤‬‬ ‫)‪٤‬‬

‫)‪(٥‬‬

‫ﻰ‬ ‫ﻋﺭﺿﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺻﻳﻐﺔ ﺑﻌﺩ ﺭ ﻬ‬ ‫ﻳ‬ ‫ﻣﺟﻣﻭﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﺭﻛﻳﺯ )‪(١‬‬

‫ﻋﺭﺿﻬﺎ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺻﻳﻐﺔ ﺑﻌﺩ ﺭ ﻬ‬ ‫ﻳ‬ ‫ﻣﺟﻣﻭﻋﺔ‬ ‫ﻭ‬ ‫ﻰ‬ ‫ﻋﻠﻰ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺗﺭﻛﻳﺯ )‪(٢‬‬

‫ﺍﻟﺗﻌﺩﻳﻝ‬ ‫ﻳ‬ ‫ﻟﺻﻳﻐﺔ ﺑﻌﺩ‬ ‫ﻳ‬ ‫ﻥ ﻣﺟﻠﺱ‬ ‫ﺭﺡ ﻣﻥ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺗﺭﺡ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ‬ ‫ﻌﺔ‬

‫اﻻﻧﺘﻤﺎء؛‬ ‫اﻹﺗﻘﺎن؛ روح‬ ‫اﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ؛‬ ‫اﻟﺸﻔﺎﻓﻴﺔ؛‬ ‫اﻟﺘﻨﻮع؛‬ ‫اﻹﺑﺪاع؛‬ ‫اﻟﻤﺴﺆوﻟﻴﺔ‬ ‫اﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‬

‫ﻗﺒﻮل اﻟﺼﻴﻐﺔ‬ ‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﻓﻲ )‪(٢‬‬ ‫ﺑﻼ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ‬

‫‪Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014‬‬

‫‪62‬‬

10. THE FINAL STATEMENTS AFTER INCORPORATING THE RESPONDENTS’ SUGGESTIONS

Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014

‫اﻟﺮؤﻳﺔ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ راﺋﺪة ﺗﺤﻘﻖ اﻟﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﻣﺤﻠﻴًﺎ وإﻗﻠﻴﻤﻴًﺎ وﻋﺎﻟﻤﻴﺎً‬

‫اﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ‬ ‫ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎت ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻴﺔ وﺑﺤﺜﻴﺔ وﻣﻬﻨﻴﺔ إﺑﺪاﻋﻴﺔ ﺑﺸﺮاﻛﺔ‬ ‫ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ‬

‫اﻟﻘﻴﻢ‬ ‫اﻻﻧﺘﻤﺎء؛ اﻹﺗﻘﺎن؛ روح اﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ؛ اﻟﺸﻔﺎﻓﻴﺔ؛ اﻟﺘﻨﻮع؛ اﻹﺑﺪاع؛‬ ‫اﻟﻤﺴﺆوﻟﻴﺔ اﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‬

‫‪Updating UOD’s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholders’ Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014‬‬

‫‪64‬‬

VISION A leading University achieving distinction locally, regionally and internationally

MISSION Providing creative knowledge, research and professional services with effective community partnerships

VALUES Loyalty, Excellence, Teamwork, Transparency, Diversity, Creativity and Social Responsibility

Updating UODâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Vision, Mission and Values: Stakeholdersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Survey, Focus Groups Reviews and University Council Approval, January 2014