Research Active Vol 07 Issue 3 May 2013 by University of Kent

Fu IN ll L A is SID w t ar of E: ds R p4 ec - 5 en t

Research Active The Newsletter of University of Kent Research Services, Vol 7 Issue 3, May 2013

ON THE HORIZON In 2014 there will be a big change to the way that European funding for research is organised. For the past 25 years the EC has been distributing research funding through the Framework Programme (FP). 2013 is the last year of FP7. In January the EC will launch a new funding framework: Horizon 2020. This will combine elements of the

FP with funding for innovation. The intention is that this will make it easier to access the funds, but will also cover the full lifecycle of research. The budget for H2020 is still being negotiated,: the original proposal was for €80bn, but the latest proposal is for €69bn. This should be resolved shortly. In the meantime,

the EC is intending to publish ‘Work Programmes’ over the summer. These will outline what they intend to fund. To find out more about H2020, talk to your Faculty Funding Officer (details, p2).

HORIZON 2020: AT A GLANCE H2020 will be split into three areas. Some elements of FP7 remain, others are new, and others have been brought in from other areas of the EC: Research Excellence Funding for basic research suggested by the investigators The European Research Council (ERC) has been one of the biggest successes of FP7, and the EC will continue it in H2020. Other ‘basic research’ schemes include the Marie Skłodowska-Curie fellowships and networks, and ‘Future and Emerging Technologies’ (FET). Industrial Leadership Funding for innovation, some of which were outside the Framework Programme The drive here is to ensure that European research leads on to European industrial innovation and growth. The focus will be on key industrial technologies (such as ICT, nanotechnology, biotechnology and space, as well as ‘risk finance’, and funding for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs). Societal Challenges Large, collaborative projects around specific topics This area takes over from FP7’s ‘Cooperation Programme’. Whereas FP7 was very, very prescriptive about what it wanted in each topic area, the intention for H2020 is to be much more open. The EC will provide ‘challenges’, and will then leave it up to investigators to decide how to address them. The challenges include health, demographic change and wellbeing, food security, sustainable agriculture, secure, clean and efficient energy, smart, green and integrated transport, inclusive, innovative and secure societies, and climate action, resource efficiency and raw materials.

INSIDE THIS EDITION Funding Insight Changes in RS Public Engagement Contact Us Overview of Funding New Awards HR Excellence in Research KRIMSOn RDM Policy New Starters New Leverhulme Director Update on Open Access Other External Funding Cuts from the Blog

ResearchActive is edited by Phil Ward. Contact him for more information or clarification on any of the items in this edition. In addition, 1 for the latest from the world of research funding, go to fundermental.blogspot.com, or Twitter @unikentresearch & @frootle

2 2 2 2 3 4 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 8

Funding Insight A new service from Research Professional The University has a subscription to Research Professional, which is the UK’s leading database of research funding opportunities. We have recently extended our subscription to include a new service they are planning to launch, ‘Funding Insight’. This will provide some ‘value added’ information for applicants, such as:  Details from the Research Councils, Wellcome and Leverhulme on previous award winners for specific schemes. This will help you to see whether a particular scheme is right for you;  News about scheme changes, analysis of funding trends and interviews with programme managers, so that you can be ahead of the curve for what’s on the horizon.  ‘Know how’ from a range of experienced investigators, officers and managers about putting together a successful bid.  Four separate disciplinary ‘channels’, which will gather relevant information, statistics and analysis into one place for your area. The new service started on 10 April. If you want an introduction to the new system, do get in touch with your Faculty Funding Officer (see panel, right) who can come over and show you how it works.

Changes in Research Services There have been changes to personnel in Research Services. Whilst we hope that our service is as complete and satisfactory as ever, do please bear with us as the new staff find their feet. Funding Team Dr Helen Leech has taken on a role of Sciences Officer, which she will share with Dr Carolyn Barker. Those at Medway will now be supported by Faculty-specific Funding Officers. See box below for their areas of responsibility and contact details. Contracts Team Juan Vidal has left the University to take up a post at Birkbeck. Dr Andrew Massoura will be joining us from Oxford to replace him. Karen Allart (right) has returned from maternity leave and will now be solely responsible for costings and contracts for the Medway Campus. Accounts Team Alicia Barron has left the University to work for Visit Britain. We are currently recruiting someone to replace her.

PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT The University will be launching its new Public Engagement (Research) Strategy on Wednesday 12 June 11.00 – 2.00. The Strategy has been developed as a joint venture by Research Services, Corporate Communications and representatives of all 3 Faculties and confirms the University’s support for public engagement in the Institutional Plan 2012-15. Speakers at the launch will include the Vice Cnachellor, Professor Dame Julia Goodfellow, and Matthew Dodd, Head of Speech Programming and Presentation, BBC Radio 3. The launch will also include a panel discussion on public eng a g em ent . Members of the panel The Public. Engaged. include Sarah Dance, Project Manager, East Kent Bid for City of Culture and key academics from Kent who are involved in public engagement. The event will be chaired by Tom Andrews, Chief Executive of ‘People United’. If you have any queries about Public Engagement (Research) or would like more information, please contact Lynne Bennett (details below).

Want to talk to us about your research plans, but not sure who to approach? The best place to start is with your Faculty Funding Officer. They will be able either to help you themselves or to put you in touch with the most appropriate person who can, The Officers are:  Humanities: Lynne Bennett (l.bennett-282@kent.ac.uk, xtn 4799)  Social Sciences: Brian Lingley (b.lingley@kent.ac.uk, xtn 4427)  Sciences:  Carolyn Barker (c.m.barker-47@kent.ac.uk, xtn 7957)  Helen Leech (h.leech@kent.ac.uk, xtn 7957/8967)

An Overview of Research Funding, Jan-Mar 2013 This term sees the return of the Sciences Faculty to take the lion’s share of the research funding. Just under three-quarters of all funding was won by the Sciences, with almost a third of the total being awarded by the EPSRC and BBSRC. However, in terms of number of awards it is the British Academy that comes out on top. As the PVC Research, Prof John Baldock, has suggested before (RA, Vol 6; Issue 3) this demonstrates Kent’s ability to win, but our need to submit larger

Humanities 3%

Social Sciences 23%

Sciences 74%

Total Award Value by Faculty

Largest Individual Awards (titles of projects listed overleaf) Humanities: Prof Paul Allain (Arts) & Dr Charlotte Sleigh (History) £20,000 each from AHRC

Sciences: Prof Mark Smales (Biosciences) £342,147 from BBSRC

Natural Lewisham Other <1% England PCT 5% BA 4% Interreg AHRC 2% 2% 3% 2% TEVA Pharma 5% John Spedan Lewis Fdn 5% Arthritic Assoc 6% MRC 6%

EPSRC 10%

Oracle 7%

EC 25%

BBSRC 18%

Award Value

Award Number (>1award) 3

Social Sciences: Prof Peter TaylorGooby (SSPSSR) £188,766 from EC

0 BA

AHRC

EPSRC

London Maths. Soc.

MRC

FULL LIST OF AWARDS: 1 Jan—31 March 2013 Below are awards for more than £1000 made last Term. They do not include extensions or supplements. HUMANITIES Arts Dr Duska Radosvljevic: Porus Dramaturgy: ‘Togetherness’ and Community in the Structure of the Artwork (AHRC, £3,894) Prof Paul Allain: Performing Arts in East Kent: Living Research in Context (AHRC, £20,000) European Culture & Languages (SECL) Dr Luisa Marti: Semantic Properties of Russian Indefinites: Quantifier Scope and Speaker Identifiability (BA, £6,270) Dr Lucy O’Meara (right): Paris-TokyoParis: Responses to Japan in French Art, Culture and Theory since 1945 (Daiwa Anglo-Japanese Foundation, £1,359) Dr Helen Frowe: Themes from ‘The End of Harm: the Moral Foundations of Criminal Law’, Rogoznica, Croatia, 23-24 May 2013 (Society for Applied Philosophy, £1,500) History Dr Charlotte Sleigh: Chain Reaction! (AHRC, £20,000) SCIENCES Centre for Molecular Processing Prof Mark Smales: Tailor-Made Expression Hosts Depleted in Protease Activity for Recombinant Protein Production (BBSRC, £342,147) Medway School of Pharmacy Prof Janet Krska (right): Evaluation of NHS Checks Provided by GP Practices in Sefton PCT (Sefton PCT, £3,100) Prof Janet Krska: Evalua-

tion of Spirometry Testing as an Addition to the NHS Health Check Provided by Community Pharmacists (Lewisham PCT, £29,992) Dr Claire Peppiatt-Wildman: Pericyte-Mediated Intra-Renal Blood Flow Regulation: from Brain to Kidney (MRC, £105,624) Dr Alison Edwards: Targeting of Chemotactic Vasoactive Peptide Receptor Signalings in Neurovascular Diseases: Applications to Clinical Therapeutics (Interreg, £61,198) Dr Ali Nokhodchi: Better Aerosolization Performance with DPI Containing Amorphous Tiotropium Bromide-Amorphous Lactose (TEVA Pharmaceuticals, £90,000)

Dr Huiling Zhu: Development of Energy-Efficient Radio Resource Allocation Algorithms (Royal Society, £13,480) Dr Jim Ang: Creativity Greenhouse: Digital Brain Switch (EPSRC, £162,689)

Biosciences Dr Jeremy Rossman: Mechanisms of Influenza Virus Assembly and Budding (EC, £85,916) Dr Dan Muvihill: Development of a Rapid Temperature Jump System for Live in Vitro Microscopy (Cairn Research Ltd, £16,000)

Physical Sciences (SPS) Dr Donna Arnold: Evoking Multiferroicity in Double Ordered Pervorskites (Royal Society, £15,000)

Computing Dr Erke Boiten: CyptoForma Workshop at Microsoft Research Cambridge, 15-16 April 2013 (Microsoft, £2,000) Prof Michael Kolling: Oracle Fellowship (Oracle, £121,212) Dr Alex Freitas: Predicting the Volume of Distribution of Drugs and Toxicants with Data Mining Methods (EPSRC, £19,073) Engineering and Digital Arts (EDA) Dr Huiling Zhu: Energy-Efficient Radio Resource Allocation for Broadband Wireless Video Transmissions (RAE, £7,600) Dr Richard Guest: Signature Biometrics Systems: Usability Assessment (ESRC, £2,480) 4

Mathematics, Statistics & Actuarial Science (SMSAS) Dr Ian Wood: Spectral Analysis and Differential Equations (London Mathematical Society, £5,410) Dr Stephane Launois: RTQASL: Representation Theory of Quantum Algebras and their Semi-Classical Limits (EC, £199,484) Dr Tristan Pryer: Visit to Berlin (London Mathematical Society, £1,000)

Sport & Exercise Sciences Dr Lex Mauger (below): To Assess the Efficacy of a Self-Paced, Incremental Exercise Protocol to Exhaustion in the Measurement of Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Healthy Men, during Laboratory and Field Based Exercise (Massey University, £1,878) Dr Lex Mauger (right): A Research Study into the Effectiveness of the Nutritional Element of the Arthritic Association’s Programme (Arthritic Association, £109,965) SOCIAL SCIENCES Kent Business School (KBS) Prof Andy Fearne: Sources, Seasonability, Transmission and Control: ‘Campylobacter’ and Human Behaviour in a Changing Environ-

Kent Law School (KLS) Prof Sally Sheldon: Cross Border Provision of Early Medical Abortion Medication (European University Institute, £5,198)

University Gains HR Excellence in Research Award

Anthropology & Conservation (SAC) Dr Patrick Mahoney (left): Childhood Weaning and Health in Medieval Canterbury (BA, £8,533) Dr Noreen Von C r a m o n Taubadel: Testing Alternative Models for the Settlement of the Americas (BA, £8,171) Dr Jim Groombridge: Uncovering the Genes Responsible for Adaptation to Climatic Change (John Speedan Lew is Fou ndat ion, £90,000) Dr Zoe Davies: Costs, Benefits and Tradeoffs in Creating Large Conservation Areas (Natural England, £79,156)

In May the University gained a coveted HR Excellence in Research Award. This award may be unfamiliar to many, but is increasingly important as a prerequisite for anyone seeking European Union funding, and possibly for RCUK in the future. Essentially, the award is a demonstration of the University’s commitment to supporting and developing its researchers. It shows that the University has incorporated the QAA Code of Practice for Research Degree Programmes and the Concordat to Support the Career Development of Researchers. As such, it aligns the Uni-

Economics Dr Yhu Zhu: Sheepskin Effects in the Returns to Education: Evidence from UK Natives and Immigrants (BA, £9,997)

The project to scope, acquire and install a new research administration system is entering a crucial stage. Ranjit Pender, the Project Manager for the Kent Research Information Management System Online (KRIMSOn), has spent the last few months identifying the needs of all those who will be using the system at the University. He has talked

Social Policy, Sociology, and Social Research (SSPSSR) Prof St ephen Peckham (right): Support for Reciprocal UK-Japan Travel by Academics Taking Part in Workshops in Kent (Daiwa Anglo-Japanese Foundation, £12,000) Peter McGill: Research Travel Grant for Rebecca Hardiman (Remedi, £2,600) Prof Peter Taylor-Gooby: Innovation and Policy Learning for Resilient Labour Markets in Europe (INSPIRES) (EC, £188,766) Linda Jenkins: Help the Hospices Patient Survey 2012/13 (Help the Hospices, £15,145)

versity with the European Charter for Researchers and Code of Conduct for their Recruitment. More information about the award is available on the Human Resources website, here: http://bit.ly/16DFOJj If you would like to send any feedback or comments about the project, please email Simon Black (s.black@kent.ac.uk).

KRIMSOn GOES On to potential suppliers, and seen some of the systems in action at other universities. The project will now go out for tender, and it is hoped that suppliers will submit bids by early June. They will be evaluated shortly after and a supplier chosen. Ranjit will then work with them to implement the system from the summer onwards. If anyone has questions about the new system, Ranjit can be contacted at r.s.pender@kent.ac.uk

RDM Policy Develops Information Services (IS) has been working on a Research Data Management (RDM) Policy. The need for such a policy is twofold: to put in place a framework in response to the Research Councils’ data access policy (RA, Vol 7, Issue 2), and also to provide a coherent framework for handling research data at the University. Currently, data created as part of the research process at the Univer5

sity is managed on an ad hoc basis by researchers and staff. Dave Puplett, Head of Academic Liaison in IS, is undertaking a review of current processes, and will be drafting a Data Management Policy in readiness for the new academic year. If you have questions about the current audit or the proposed policy, c o n t a c t D a v e o n d.r.puplett@kent.ac.uk.

WELCOME! 14 academics have joined the University since January. Welcome to them all; here is a summary of their research interests.

Dr Barry Blight (SPS) (right): Molecular recognition and directed self-assembly of functional chemical species; Dr Rachel Cal o g e r o (Psychology): psychological determinants of system justification and social change; problems of (and solutions to) objectification of others and selfobjectification; social psychology of gender, class, and inequality; social psychological underpinnings of (and interventions for) dysfunctional exercise and eating; motivated social cognition; Dr Anna Corrias (SPS): Highly porous nanocomposites with interesting magnetic and catalytic properties Prof Geoff Craig (Journalism): political interviews and leaders' debates, environmental journalism, and

topics relating to journalism, democracy, and the public sphere; Dr Tracy Kivell (SAC) (right): the functional morphology of the wrist and hand in extant and fossil primates. Dr Emma McCabe (SPS): materials chemistry, with a focus on the synthesis, structural characterisation and physical properties of complex transition metal oxides and mixed anion systems; Prof Wendy Parkins (English) (below): William and Jane Morris; Aestheticism and PreRaphaelitism; Victorian sustainability; gender and modernity in Victorian literature and culture. Mr Connal Parsley (KLS): Jurisprudence; Critical Legal Theory; Political Theory; Public Law; Law and Aesthetics; Law and Film; Australian Aboriginal Legal Issues; Legal Ethics Dr Nikolas Rajkovic (KLS): Theories of Public International Law; Critical Approaches to Global Law and Governance; Global Constitutionalism; Post-National Adjudication and Judicialization; Transna-

tional Law and Arbitration; Legalization and Juridification; International Relations Theory; Lawfare and International Criminal Law; European Human Rights Law; Ms Sinéad Ring (KLS): Legitimacy and the process of proof in the criminal trial . Dr Dean Sayle (SPS): Using Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulation to mirror experiment; Dr May Seitanidi (KBS): social partnerships between business and nonprofit organisations; sustainability and corporate social responsibility; social change, multi-level, social good ;

Dr José Silva Becerra (Economics): labour macroeconomics; Prof Veronica Wong (KBS): marketing strategy, marketing of innovations and global/international marketing.

‘The Last Honourable Man Standing’ The new Leverhulme Director sets out his stall

Prof Gordon Marshall, former VC at Reading, took over the helm of the Leverhulme Trust in October 2011. At a talk to the LSE in February he set out his stall. There was a very clear sense that he was enjoying the refuge that the Trust offered from the wild tornadoes and bleak arctic winds of the current funding environment. Leverhulme doesn’t need to chase the latest political fad, or hound award holders to demonstrate social or economic relevance.

Its only concern, said Marshall, ‘is to increase the sum of human knowledge. It may sound corny, but it’s true.’

suasive then we will try to fund the work.’

And, if your experiments don’t work, or your research goes off piste, then Leverhulme will still be on your side. ‘It doesn’t matter,’ said Marshall. You will have still learnt something. The Trust was the only funder ‘to score risk positively’.

‘I can’t dec i d e whether we’re just very old fashioned, or the last honourable man standing’, concluded Marshall.

Marshall tried to encapsulate the Trust’s aims in a simple sentence. ‘Tell us (in plain language) what research you want to do, and why it is compelling, and if that sounds per-

Marshall has accepted an invitation to visit Kent in the Autumn Term. We will keep you posted of the exact date nearer the time.

Update on Open Access Following the Open Access (OA) Forum (reported in last term’s Research Active), an OA Working Group was convened to draft the University’s OA Policy. This has now been approved by Senate, and is available on the Research Services website. In essence, the Policy has four key principles:  that, where possible, all forms of research output should be made available ‘freely and accessibly in ways that allow them be used and re-used for the benefit of the wider society’;  That, where possible, this should be done through either free Gold OA or Green OA route. If this is not possible, Standard Gold OA (which would require payment of Article Processing Charges (APCs)) will be supported ‘where appropriate and within available resources’. If neither is possible, a non-OA route may be pursued.  That the Kent Academic Repository (KAR) should be used for Green OA.  That the University will, where possible, support the establishment of free Open Access Journals (such as feminists@law). Underlying this is the fundamental principle that academics should strive to publish in the best and most appropriate outlet for their research, regardless of OA status. The OA Working Group is now working on an Implementation Strategy that will make clear how these principles will be put into practice., including the distribution of the Research Council’s block grant for OA. Whilst this fund is limited (£60k in the first year), the University wishes it to be distributed through a fair, equitable and light touch process.

The Strategy will go to Board for Research in June, and to Senate for approval. All staff will be updated when it is more widely available.

The Jisc APC System One of the potential problems with implementing OA is the practicalities of administering APCs, and of how individual universities will negotiate with each publisher. The Joint Information Services Committee (Jisc) has recognised this, and is working on a possible solution. It is working with Open Access Key (OAK) to develop a system that provides a simple, unified system to handle APCs. By acting together through the system, universities may also be in a stronger position to negotiate favourably with publishers. In addition, it should help universities to manage their RCUK OA block grants better. Working together makes sense for both Jisc and OAK: Jisc got a ready made system that seemed to be fit for purpose; OAK got the backing of a known and trusted body, a governmentfunded supplier that had had experience of rolling out similar such projects. Last month we had a preview of the system, and it seemed to work well: it appeared to provide a smooth, effortless integration between the needs of the publisher (i.e. to be paid), the academic (i.e. to have their work published) and the institution (i.e. to manage the money and approve the payment). Of course, there is still much practical detail to be resolved, but it is heartening to see Jisc working on a practical solution to the difficulties of making OA work. The major challenge will be getting the publishers on board. More detail on the system is available here: http://www.jisccollections.ac.uk/Jisc-APC-project/ 7

EXTERNAL FUNDING: Alternative Choices Whilst many of you have a good understanding of traditional sources of funding for your work, you may be less aware of ‘alternative’ sources. There’s a confusing funding landscape out there, but Kent has in place a supportive framework of linked services to help you to benefit from it. We are hoping to develop a webbased portal and a ‘triage’ service to help you talk to the right people about your funding needs. In the meantime here is quick guide to who deals with what. Kent Innovation and Enterprise (KIE) Funding from non-traditional sources covering impact from research, consultancy, follow-on funding, knowledge and technology transfer activities, translational funding, collaborative projects and training. Development Office Philanthropic funds from Individuals, Trusts and Corporates for a wide range of research activity, fellowships and infrastructure. International Development International student and staff exchanges, and collaborative partnerships including the EU’s Erasmus and Erasmus Mundus programmes. Support for recruitment activity. Graduate School Doctoral training centre and training of postgraduates Enrolment Management Services (EMS) Scholarships and postgraduate studentships. For more information on any of these, drop Phil Ward a line (p.ward@kent.ac.uk).

CHOICE CUTS FROM THE BLOG For the latest news and rumours from the world of research funding, log on to http://fundermental.blogspot.com/ A Sierra-Fuelled Dawn 28 January 2013 Following the commendable example of Bristol, Bath, Exeter and Cardiff in forming the GW4 collaboration, Fundermental Towers University will be forming an alliance with the research intensive universities of Ebbsfleet White Horse (Unrampant), and Snodhurst, together with Deangate Ridge Golfing Academy, This strategic alliance to explore and identify opportunities where their combined research strength can more effectively address global challenges, as well as getting an impressive discount on stationery costs. Professor Gymslip Plimsole, ViceChancellor of Fundermental Towers University welcomed the news. 'This is an exciting day for the wider Rochester area, and the impact will be felt right the way from The Esplanade in the West to Tinker's Alley in the East.' 'We have already commissioned a 'shuttle service' between the universities', continued Plimsole. 'We have purchased a 1983 Ford Sierra which is ideal for the job. We hope to paint it in the colours of all four institutions. When combined these come out as a rather fetching puce-brown. Fortunately most Sierras of that age came in that colour, so there may be no need for a repaint. See? This collaboration is already saving us money!' ‘There are still a number of details to iron out. The most important of these is the biscuit selection for our meetings. I know Snodhurst have a penchant for jammie dodgers, but we at Fundermental Towers have more refined tastes. For us, it's custard creams or nothing.'

SSC Close the Circle 25 March 2013 One of the long standing gripes for us research administrators is that, whilst we're integral to the submission process for all Research Council applications, we don't directly get to hear the outcome of them unless they're successful. Whilst it's always nice to get good news, we would welcome bad news as well. Why? Well it would help us to help the academics. When they get the dismissive one liner from the Shared Services Centre (SSC), the chances are that they'll be a sobbing wreck on their office floor. If we had the nod from the SSC we could get in touch with them to talk about other alternatives. Or at least rail at the unfairness of it all with the applicant. We could share their pain. So it was great to hear that 'the Research Councils have agreed to provide feedback to Research Organisation administration offices on the outcome of proposals.' Not only that, it sounds like the info they intend to provide will be more thoughtful than just a yes/no outcome. 'This will provide information on the relative ranking or scoring of proposals, as well as written feedback on the decision'. Great news, then. They don't say when this system will be rolled out, but hats off to SSC for recognising a problem and finding a solution.

Is There Something Missing from ROS? 15 April 2013 In November 2011 the Research Councils scrapped End of Award Reports and introduced the 'Research Outcomes System' (ROS) to monitor the outputs of their funded projects. Investigators now need only note what publications (and other outputs) have resulted from a grant. On many levels this makes sense, and potentially saves a huge amount of time and effort. However, the new system seems to miss out any monitoring and assessment, a crucial element of the End of Award Reports. Whilst RCUK checks compliance with ROS, there doesn't appear to be anyone checking the quality of the outputs or the success of the project measured against it's original aims and objectives. This seems to be quite an oversight. In the past the PI on an ’unsatisfactory’ project could be barred from applying again. Equally important, if the project had excelled, it could be labelled 'outstanding', and the PIs could bask in the glow of approbation. OK, so the old system may have smacked of the schoolroom, but I think it is important that investigators are held to account - for better or worse. The new system just seems to be a bit, well, quantitative. As long titles are given and boxes ticked, that’s fine. Or am I misunderstanding this bright new dawn?

Lookalike Corner Game of Thrones, for the uninitiated, 'follows the members of several noble houses in a civil war for the Iron Throne of the Seven Kingdoms.' It makes perfect sense, then, that Thrones actor Clive Russell bears an uncanny resemblance to Rick Rylance, chief of one of the seven noble Research Councils, Rylance the AHRC. 8

Russell