The University Times Volume 2 Issue 2

Page 1

TRINITY’S “FINANCIAL BREAKING POINT” Barra Roantree interviews the Vice-Provost on p3

The Drugs Survey Half of us take drugs. We talk to users and abusers on p5

FILTHY HIPSTERS SOCIAL NETWORK REVIEW TWO DOOR CINEMA CLUB INTERVIEW

The University Times Irish Student Newspaper of the Year TUESDAY, 19 OCTOBER 2010

facebook.com/universitytimes

www.universitytimes.ie

Unqualified lecturers on the rise

27 promoted academics to get back pay

Rónán Burtenshaw Deputy News Editor

College circumvents HEA moratorium on promotions as friction intensifies between the two bodies over staff reductions Tom Lowe Editor The University Times has learnt that the 27 senior academics controversially promoted during the public sector promotions embargo will receive back-pay at their new higher pay grade. The Employment Control Framework issued by the government in 2008 to reduce staff numbers in the public service prohibits recruitment and promotions except in special approved circumstances. The College claims the promotions process for the relevant staff commenced before the embargo came into force and so are not subject to the government moratorium. The Irish Times reported in July of this year that the promotions would be in name only. However, in a memo obtained

by the University Times, the Vice-Provost Patrick Prendergast wrote that the College “would propose to credit the individuals with the time spent on the higher grade”. When asked if this was in contravention of the Employment Control Framework a Higher Education Authority spokesperson said that their “primary concern was that institutions meet reduction in staff numbers of around 6%” agreed with the Departments of Education and Finance. That the senior academics will receive back-payments for the time spent at the higher pay grade is sure to provoke the ire of the Department of Education, who were reported to be investigating potential breaches of the embargo. The college did not respond to a request for comment.

A member of the Capoeira Society impresses onlookers during Freshers’ Week. Photo: Dargan Crowley-Long

The Promoted: The twenty-seven academics to receive the pay bump Personal Chair Professor S O’Mara (Psychology) Professor C O’Sullivan (Computer Science and Statistics) Professor J Parnell (Natural Sciences) Associate Professor Dr D Coghlan (Business Studies) Dr S Connon (Chemistry) Dr T Connor (Medicine) Dr A Corvin (Medicine) Dr S Duffy (Histories and Humanities) Dr I Rozas (Chemistry) Dr J Wickham (Social Sciences and Philosophy) Senior Lecturer Dr P Carmody (Natural Sciences)

Dr S Frolov (Mathematics) Dr P Gallagher (Physics) Dr P Geoghegan(Histories and Humanities) Dr C Gobl (Linguistic, Speech and Communication Sciences) Dr A Harkin (Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences) Dr E Heffernan (Law) Dr J Lalor (Nursing and Midwifery) Dr L Leeson (Linguistic, Speech and Communication Sciences) Dr A McLysaght (Genetics and Microbiology) Dr B O’Kelly (Engineering) Dr M Ó Siochrú (Histories and Humanities) Dr F O’Toole (Social Sciences and Philosophy) Dr J Stout (Natural Sciences) Dr S Tresize (Drama, Film and Music) Dr V Timonen (Social Work and Social Policy) Dr S Waldren (Natural Sciences)

Lack of student representation causes ire at DUCAC AGM

Registration fee to double - Ó Broin

Leanna Byrne Staff Reporter

Ronan Costello News Editor

Members of Trinity College’s sports clubs voiced their concern over lack of student representation on committees and other decision-making processes in the Sports Department’s annual AGM last Thursday. Trinity’s athletes questioned the decision making process on important issues such as the allocation of funds that the Sports Department currently has in place. Although the Acting Head of the Sports Department, Michelle Tanner, argued that students have a central role in committees this was not acceptable to the members. Eoin Blaney, member of the DU Sailing Club, claimed that the Sports Department “only report on what has been done” and that there should be a formal representation system in place for Club Representatives. Another point that Brady made about the final decision not being consulted with the students was met with a simple retort from Tanner, saying “We’re the hired professionals. Do students go to the health centre and tell the doctor how to treat his patients?” Students’ Union President Nikolai Trigoub-Rotnem also inquired about the level of involvement that students have on these committees, saying that “no concrete decisions” are ever made when students are present or that “decisions have already been made for

them”. Nikolai continued to remind the members of the committee that students’ €77 paid annually to the Sports Department to fund sports facilities should be represented officially. The Students’ Union President has a seat on the Sport Department’s Treasury Committee at present. This is to attempt to ensure that students’ levy which accounts for roughly 60% the Sports Department’s funding is allocated appropriately. It is estimated that the Department has a budget of over €2.3 million a year. “We have an ad hoc say,” Trigoub-Rotnem told The University Times. “There should be a formal committee structure with the ability to provide guidance and to reach a decision where everyone’s happy. The attitude that the Sports Department are taking is: we want your money, not your input.

However, it’s clear that not all the students and sports clubs are happy with this.” Another group to voice their opinion was the Ladies Hockey Club who examined the subject of sports scholarships and how awareness of them could be increased. Sports Department committee members ensured the hockey team that their “intention this year is to draft a plan” that would “improve profile and standard”. There were further concerns in the AGM in relation to the cap standing on the number of clubs that exist in DUCAC. Members were once again displeased with the cap, stating that there was “no formal access for new clubs”. However, chairman of the executive committee Chairman Prof Cyril Smyth claimed that DUCAC “cannot fund any kind of club” and there “are not enough funds to spread around”.

Michelle Tanner, acting head of the Department of Sport

Additional matters that arose in the AGM were the election of the Officers on the DUCAC committe. There was not much movement in regards to the positions on the committee, and athletes seemed to be discouraged with the uncontested re-election of the Chairman to the Committee, Cyril Smyth, as the announcement produced a delayed applause and raised hands in protest. Luke Acheson was elected Secretary of the Committee, Susannah Cass as the Vice Chairman and James Sweeny as the new Treasurer. The Club Representatives this year are Cormac Doherty, Mark Harris, Eoin Kerrigan, Aoife O’Reilly, Sinead Rodger and Elizabeth Shannon. Six other Pavilion Club members were elected through the Executive Committee. James Sweeney of the GAA club was glad to be elected Treasurer, remarking in the club’s weekly newsletter “Thanks to the lads who got me elected - the more people we have on the financial commitee the more sway we making sure money is handed out fairly.” In spite of the students’ protests, DUCAC had good news for students that avail of the Pavilion Bar. Small events are being organised in conjunction with Entertainments Officer Darragh Genockey. Plans for karaoke and a silent disco in the near future were some of the ideas mentioned.

This year’s cohort of class reps was told to expect a significant raise in the student registration fee as well as major cutbacks in student support services in the upcoming Budget, which will be delivered on December 7th. Speaking to the gathering of new class reps at their training weekend in Balbriggan, Union of Students in Ireland Officers outlined the severe blows that students should expect to take in the Budget for 2011. Top of the list was the now almost inevitable raise in the student registration charge, which is expected to be raised from €1500 to €3000. Cónán O’Broin, USI Deputy President said that the scale of the financial crisis and its implications for students had yet to dawn on most of the student body. In an interview with The University Times Ó Broin said that “the government is desperate for money and if students don’t put up a fight the registration fee will definitely

go up. Students are seen as a soft target. A hit on students is perceived to have no great political consequences.” Ó Broin explained that there is a “perception that students don’t vote whereas a significant number of pensioners vote. Government TD’s have told us explicitly that they are afraid of targeting pensioners.” During his presentation to the class reps Ó Broin revealed that Finian Mc Grath, the Independent Dublin TD had told USI that he received 584 phone calls in 48 hours when it was announced that medical cards for over70s would be cut. He said that if students are serious about protecting their interests then a similarly proactive attitude is required. Speaking about the scale of the cuts which students should expect in the Budget, Ó Broin said that he had been told by a Government TD in July that €270 million would need to cut from the Department of Education’s budget. Continued on p3

A University Times investigation into the practice of using research grants to buy out teaching has revealed a worrying trend of devaluing undergraduate education. Academics in Trinity College have always had access to a facility that allows them to use money from research grants to compensate for the teaching portion of their workload. This teaching portion would then be passed on to a contract lecturer, who is paid per module they replace. This practice has been used in the past to give what’s known as “relief” to academics. This would mean that it is used when an academic wishes to engage in a large-scale research project or go on other forms of sabbatical, whether for personal reasons or to improve their ability to carry out their job. The process involved in attaining research grants is as follows. An application is made for a grant to a specified body; these could be private companies, funds or semi-state entities. This could be a company like Pfizer for medico-pharmaceutical grants, or bodies like the Environmental Protection Agency, Economic and Social Research Institute or the Irish Research Council for the Humanities and Social Sciences for their respective fields. If this application is successful, the money is deposited with central College authorities, often with conditions attached to its use. The Principal Investigator (P.I.) is then responsible for the funds. A P.I. is the chief signatory or leader of the team applying for the grant. Some research grants are not for the purposes of buyingout teaching; they are used for smaller, largely overhead purposes such as equipment and travel. However, the majority of the larger grants would necessitate some form of replacement teaching to be paid-for using the grant money, relieving the academic of their teaching duties for a specific duration. Trinity College views this practice as beneficial for the student body and the university as a whole. It believes that the practice expands the knowledge of lecturers who teach students, improves the standing of the College as a research university, brings funds into the institution and helps in our efforts to rise in the league tables. Students are likely to find

some aspects of the practice troubling, however. This is particularly the case in light of its expansion in recent years. Our investigation led us to senior academics who described a “marked increase” in teaching buy-outs from temporary relief to established practice. The question of who is involved in replacement teaching is of central importance. College does not have a system for ensuring that those who leave on sabbatical or because of research grants are replaced by those with comparable qualifications. The University Times’ investigation produced evidence of specific instances where Professors and other senior academics were replaced by contract lecturers who were not in possession of a PhD. This is not necessarily an indication of poorer teaching, but would seem to open the door to lower standards. Any expansion in this area would seem to undermine College’s assertions that esteemed senior academics are appointed at least in part to give undergraduate students the best teaching experience. There are, however, some incentives to hire contract lecturers with postgraduate degrees. Only those with such qualification can be used as module coordinators or appointed examiners. In the course of researching this story, the paper spoke to some of those hired as contract lecturers to do replacement teaching. While their disciplines varied, it was possible to average the cost they were being paid per module to around €3,000. This merits contrast with the yearly salaries of the Professors (€108 – 138k), Associate Professors (€79 - 105k) or Senior Lecturers (€70 – 89k) who they may be asked to replace. Academic contracts in Trinity College are not specifically broken down by task. Older contracts can be as little as three lines long. Newer contracts are more detailed but no division of workload is established. However, a notional division of tasks was articulated by Ned Costello, CEO of the Irish Universities’ Association at a September 23rd, 2010, meeting of the Oireachtas Public Accounts Committee. In a discussion with Roisín Shortall, T.D., about pay for academic staff he outlined a theoretical Continued on p2

The University Times Editor: Tom Lowe Deputy Editor: Tommy Gavin Volume 2, Issue 1 Phone: 01 646 8431 Email: info@universitytimes.ie

This newspaper is produced with the financial support of Trinity College Students’ Union. It is editorially independent and claims no special rights or privileges.

The Editor, The University Times, 6 Trinity College Dublin 2 Website: www.universitytimes.ie


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.