THE HR REPORTER
INSIDE THIS ISSUE Employee Engagement . . . . . . . . . . 1 2020 Health Goals!. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Supervisory Foundations. . . . . . . . . 2 Optum Course Series. . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Internship Program.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
JANUARY – MARCH 2020
HOW CAN WE HAVE MORE
HIGHLY ENGAGED EMPLOYEES AT UTHSC? Dr. Alston. Associate Vice Chancellor
Performance Review. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 New Employee Spotlight. . . . . . . . . 4
According to Gallup, a global analytics and advice firm, engaged employees perform better and create a better customer experience.
HUMAN RESOURCES
Are you providing an environment where employees are engaged?
Chandra Alston, EdD
Associate Vice Chancellor
Damon Davis
Compensation Director
Debbie Jackson Benefits Director
Brittney Murray
Senior Administrative Services Assistant
Alisha Boone
Recruitment Manager
Anesha Jones
Compliance Manager
Debbie Long HR Specialist Gina Curry
Insurance Coordinator
Brandi Martin
Employee Relations Specialist
Tarlesha Gales
Compensation Analyst
Chastity Pegues
HR Support Technician
Barica Horner
Human Resources Specialist
Cierra Richmond
Recruiting Assistant
Rebekka Freeman
Employee Relations Manager
Phuong Nguyen
Employee Relations Counselor
Tracy Horton
Employee Relations Counselor
Gabrielle Marshall
Recruiting Assistant
Cheressa Lyles HR Assistant
Melissa Rabalais HR Assistant
Brandi Green
HR Temporary Support Assistant
Chandra Alston, EdD
The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) defines employee engagement as the lifecycle employees experience physically, emotionally, psychologically and behaviorally with their organization. Highly engaged employees feel safe and supported in these different states and as a result, behave in ways that are more productive for the organization.
Forbes reported that 89 percent of HR leaders agree that ongoing peer feedback and check-ins are key for successful outcomes. What opportunities do your employees have to give feedback to peer team members regarding their contributions, ability to work well with others, and general team performance standards? It’s critical that we allow employees on a work team the opportunity to share positive and negative feedback regarding their peers. When I interview potential HR employees, I make it a point to tell them, the person we hire must work well with the entire HR team. The team decides who stays or who goes. For me, giving this power to the team has been freeing because it causes me to check-in regularly with everyone and keep a pulse on whether there are problems. This strategy has been welcomed by the team because they feel empowered and they quickly identify weak links and challenge them to straighten up! In addition to ongoing peer feedback, I do regular employee check-ins. These include short 2-3-minute conversations where I am verifying how a new implementation or project is working to a 1-2-hour meeting on progress, goal setting, and expected outcomes. When I started in the role of Associate Vice Chancellor six years ago, I met with my direct reports weekly. After 2-3 years, we changed that to monthly meetings and then just met as needed. What I found is that when we don’t have regularly scheduled check-ins, we are not as productive or accountable. This year I have reverted back to weekly meetings and I am going to stick with it. The team appreciates the regular contact and I see that we are more productive and effective! While ongoing peer feedback and regular check-ins aren’t the only ways to engage employees, I have found them easy to implement and highly effective. How do you provide feedback or what do check-ins look like for your team? Send me an email (calston@uthsc.edu) and I’ll share some of your thoughts in a later edition of the HR Reporter this year.