Element Design to Shape a Structure I

Page 1

ELEMENT DESIGN TO SHAPE A STRUCTURE SABAH SHAWKAT

I


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

Reviewer: Cover Design: Software Support: Printing/ Binding:

Prof. Dipl. Ing. Ján Hudák, PhD. Richard Schlesinger asc. Applied Software Consultants, s.r.o., Bratislava, Slovakia Tribun EU, s.r.o., Brno, Czech Republic

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted, or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, including photocopying, without permission in writing from the author.

Element Design to Shape a Structure I. ©

Assoc. Prof. Dipl. Ing. Sabah Shawkat, MSc, PhD. 1. Edition, Tribun EU, s.r.o. Brno 2017 ISBN 978-80-263-1190-4


Sabah Shawkat Zahawi is the Head of Engineering Room at the Academy of Fine Arts and Design in Bratislava, Slovakia. He teach students of architecture several structural engineering subjects. Moreover, he regularly organize workshops for students and exhibitions of their projects and construction models. He also actively practise in projecting and building constructions as well as reconstructions and modernizations of buildings. Sabah Shawkat is also a passionate expert in reinforced concrete, prestressed concrete structures and structural design. He has published numerous articles in professional journals and wrote several books.

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture About the Author


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

Example 3.1-5 Determine the required tension

Introduction 1. Materials

1 1

Example 3.1-6 Determine the required tension

1.3 The behaviour of hardened concrete

6

Example 3.1-7 Determine the required tension

1.4 High-strength concrete

7

1.1 Concrete mix design

2. Limit states

Example 3.1-8 Determine the required tension

9

13

2.3 Stress-strain Diagram for Reinforcing Steel

14

2.4 Basic Values for the Design Resistance to Moments and Axial Forces

16

Example 3.1-9 Determine the required tension Example 3.1-10 Determine the required tension

17

Example 2.1

17

3.2.1 Flat Slabs

Example 2.2

20

3.2.1-1 Analysis and Design of Flat Plate

21

properties of concrete and steel 23

perform load test of reinforced concrete beam. 2.6 Shrinkage

69 71 72

Example 3.2-2 Assessment of the punching according to EC 2

80

Example 3.2-3 Assessment of the punching according to EC 2

84

Example 3.2-4 The calculation of the maximum bending

88

moment of reinforced concrete rectangular slab Table D 3 Coefficients for calculating bending moments

30

2.7-1 The investigation of the effects of shrinkage of

68

Example: 3.2-1 Design and calculation of Flat Plate

29

2.7 Creep

59

reinforcement to the section

2.5 Verification at the Serviceability Limit States

Example 2.4 The beam has a theoretical span 2.50 m,

57

reinforcement to the section.

3.2 Reinforced Concrete Slabs

Example 2.3 The determination of actual and statistical

55

reinforcement to the section

10

2.2 Stress - strain Diagram for Concrete

53

reinforcement to the section

10

2.1 Strain Diagrams in the Ultimate Limit State

52

reinforcement to the section

1.2 Steel fibre reinforced concrete (SFRC).

1.4-1 Components of cement-based matrices

50

reinforcement to the section

88

over between the supports

30

Table E3 Calculation of deflection and moments circular plates

a composite concrete structure

90

depending the method of support and load 3. Structural system

37

3.1 Reinforced Concrete Beams Example 3.1-1

37

3.3 Staircases

93 Example 3.3-1 Design a straight flight staircase in a residential building

39

3.1-1 Continuous beams Example 3.1-2 Determine the required tension

41

3.4 Reinforced concrete column 48

reinforcement to the section

98 100

Example 3.4-1 Design reinforced concrete columns

110

rectangular cross section

reinforcement to the section Example 3.1-4 Determine the required tension

Example 3.3-2 Circular-staircase

46

reinforcement to the section Example 3.1-3 Determine the required tension

96

49

Example 3.4-2 Determine the carrying capacity of a rectangular column

111


118

Example 3.5-2 The Assessment of the cross section for the

121

interaction of torsion moment and shear force Example 3.5-3 Spreading of box girders beams

of reinforced concrete rectangular column

113

Example 3.5-1 Failure due to torsion

122

Example 3.7-8 Determination of the tension reinforcement

128 Example 3.6-1: Reinforced concrete wall subjected

Example 3.7-9 Ultimate limit state of the cross-section

169

Example 3.7-10 Determination of the ultimate bending moment

169

and stresses at the upper and lower of cross-section Example 3.7-11 Determine the ultimate bending moment Example 3.7-12 Determine the ultimate bending moment

173

and concrete stresses

134

3.8 Calculation of stiffness of concrete members

with openings subjected to vertical load

171

and concrete stresses.

132

to horizontal load Example 3.6-2: Solution of reinforcing concrete walls

167

of reinforced concrete rectangular column

Example 3.5-4 Dual-chamber section or 2 box girder cross-section 125 3.6 Shear walls

166

175

139

Example 3.8-1 Calculation of bending and shear stiffness

175

3.7.1 Pre-tensioning

139

Example 3.8-2 Calculation of bending and shear stiffness

177

3.7.2 Pre-tensioning

139

Example 3.8-3 Cross section with cracks

181

3.7.3 Partial prestressing

141

Example 3.8-4 Calculation of initial bending and axial stiffness

189

3.7.4 In post-tensioned

141

Example 3.8-5: Calculation of curvature of rectangular cross-section

198

3.7 Pre-tensioned Prestress Concrete Beam

Example 3.7-1: Pre-tensioned Prestress Reinforce Concrete I Beam

3.7.5 Loss of Prestress Due to Creep and Shrinkage

142 148

3.9 Concrete Foundations

203

3.9.1 Shallow Foundations

205

3.7.6 Ultimate limit state of failure due to bending moment

152

3.9.2 Strap Footing

206

3.7.7 Limit state stress limitation

154

3.9.3 Combined Footing

207

3.7.8 Cracking limit state

155

3.9.4 Strip/continuous footings

207

3.7.9 Deflection

157

3.9.5 Mat or Raft footings

208

157

3.9.6 Pile foundations

208

Example 3.7-2 Determination of required tension reinforcement to the cross-section Example 3.7-3 Partial prestressed beams

160

Example 3.7-4 Determination of required tension reinforcement

163

to the section.

Example 3.9-1 Assessment of slab foundation to punching

211

Example 3.9-2 Determination of the design bearing capacity

213

of the soil at depth Example 3.9-3 Endless beam

213

Example 3.7-5 Determination of the tension reinforcement to the section

164

Example 3.9-4 Design of reinforcement in footing

217

Example 3.7-6 Determination of the tension reinforcement

165

Example 3.9-5 Static calculation of extreme square isolated footings

223

of reinforced concrete rectangular column Realization Projects

227

References

257

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

3.5 Mode of failure of reinforced concrete members subjected to torsion

Example 3.7-7 Determination of the tension reinforcement

Department of Architecture

Example 3.4.3 Determine the carrying capacity of circular columns 112


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

Introduction

The visual expression of efficient structural function is thus a fundamental criterion of

This textbook is designed to teach students but it can serve as a reference for practising

elegance in structure design. It is one of the primary distinguishing factors between structural

engineering or researchers as well and accessible to a larger number of engineers. The text

engineering art and architecture. All design examples given in this book are produced in the

offers a simple, comprehensive, and methodical presentation of the basic concepts in the

form of worksheet. The examples are fully self-explanatory and well annotated and the authors

analysis of members subjected to axial loads, and bending. Many practical worked examples

are confident that the readers, whether practising design engineers, course instructors or

are included and design aids in the form of tables are presented.

students, will find them extremely useful to produce design solutions or prepare course

Primary considerations in structural design are safety and serviceability. Design rules of this textbook are based on the concept of Concrete Structures Euro-Design. For greater clearness, the survey follows the sequence of practical concrete members design process by dividing itself into three main parts, namely, Design, structural analysis, and dimensioning and structural detailing, each section with its individual numbering examples. The major quantities which are considered in the design calculations, namely the loads,

handouts. In particular, the worksheets will allow design engineers to undertake sensitivity analyses to arrive at the most suitable/economic solution(s) very quickly. I kindly ask readers of this textbook who have questions, suggestions for improvements, or who find errors, to write to me. I thank you in advance for taking the time and interest to do so. Finally, I am grateful to my colleague Richard Schlesinger for his help, constructive criticism, patience and encouragement that have made this project possible.

dimensions, and material properties, are subject to varying degrees of uncertainty and randomness. Further, there are idealizations and simplifying assumptions used in the theories of structural analysis and design. There are also several other variable and often unforeseen factors that influence the prediction of ultimate strength and performance of a structure, such as construction methods, workmanship and quality control, probable service life of the structure, possible future change of use, frequency of loadings, etc. This textbook contains design aides such as tables and diagrams which enable very simple and rapid determination of reinforcement in a given rectangular concrete cross-section subjected to bending moment or bending moment with axial force. The elements of a structure are normally classified, by consideration of their nature and function, as beams, columns, slabs, walls, foundation etc. Rules are provided for the analysis of the commoner of these elements and of structures consisting of combinations of these elements. The purpose of analysis is to establish the distribution of either internal forces and moments, or stresses, strains and displacements, over the whole or part of a structure. Linear analysis of elements based on the theory of elasticity may be used for both the serviceability and ultimate limit states. Reinforced concrete structures and structural components are designed to have sufficient strength and stability to withstand the effects of factored loads, thereby satisfying the safety requirements. The design for serviceability limits is made at specified (service) loads (generally, the design is first made for strength and the serviceability limits are checked).

Bratislava 2017

Sabah Shawkat


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

1

The choice of a structural detail can significantly influence the performance of a structure, bond, anchorage, bearing, fire, corrosion and other properties of concrete have to be taken into consideration individually or in combination in the design and detailing of concrete structures.

1. Materials 1.1 Concrete mix design The mechanical properties of the concrete are given by the properties of the aggregates and cement matrix and by the proportions between them, and by the interfacial physical and

Since concrete is weak in tension, it is important that where bond is most important,

chemical bond.

structural details must ensure the force transfer between steel and concrete. In the case of

The cement paste is the continuous matrix in the material. Its contribution to the

bearings, structural details must be adequate to transfer forces from one member to another with

properties of the concrete depends on the progress of the hydratation process, the nature of the

a limited area of high local stresses. Structural details must cater for thermal expansion and

hydratation products and their microstructural arrangement. These characteristics are functions

creep where they are expected. The fire endurance of concrete structures is an essential part of

of the composition of the cement and the water/cement ratio.

a good design. The endurance period is generally taken as one hour plus. For high seismic risk,

The - curve for concrete is highly non-linear. This non-linearity is due, in part, to the

a certain minimum number of bars must be provided as continuous longitudinal steel for beams.

composite action of the concrete, since there is a highly imperfect bond between the aggregate

For beams framing into both sides of a column, these bars must extend through the column for

and the hcp.

at least twice the beam depth without splices. The structural engineer must indicate quantities

The - curve for concrete in compression may be divided into the four regions. Below

of reinforcement, cut-off points and length and location of splices to satisfy code requirements.

about 30% of the ultimate stress (ult) there is very little extension of these cracks for normal

Where concrete structures are subject to impact, reinforcement details must take into account potential ones of spalling, scabbing and cracking. The bars must span these areas. Verification of stress on reinforced concrete cross - section subjected to bending and bending moment with axial load in serviceability limit state can easily be performed. Three different diagrams, bi-linear ( ´  0), bi-linear ( ´

0)

, and parabola-rectangle stress -

strain for reinforcing steel and two diagrams, bi-linear ( ´  0 ), parabola-rectangle

rates of loading, and the - curve essentially linear. Beyond this point, the - curve becomes increasingly non-linear as the interfacial cracks begin to grow under load, partly due to differences in the elastic constants for hcp and aggregate, and partly due to the high stress concentrations which occur in these regions.

for

concrete stress distribution are used for the determination of reinforcement to concrete crosssection for any concrete strength. Calculations are demonstrated by examples in order to check the sufficient bearing capacity of reinforced concrete rectangular column in centric compression for axial force taking into account the existing reinforcement.

Figure 1.1-1 : Stress vs strain curve for concrete in compression

Materials


At about 0.5ult, in addition to further growth of the interfacial cracks, cracks begin to

paste, but also affects the quality of the hydration products. Low w/c ratios can lead to stronger

extend through the cement matrix, bridging between the coarse aggregate particles,

bonds and thus improve the strength of the concrete.

approximately parallel to the axis of loading, but still in a stable fashion.

The strength is consequently not only a function of the porosity.

Finally beyond about 0.75ult, the matrix cracks begin to form a much more extensive network, though there is still enough reductancy in the system for it to remain relatively stable under short-term loads. Eventually, this network becomes so extensive that failure occurs. Static fatigue in concrete is generally associated with loading within this region. It should be noted that, even at ult, the crack pattern still leaves a structure that has some load-carrying capacity. The aggregates are traditionally considered as the more inert component of the concrete, with respect to the development of the properties of the hardened material. Yet, the choice of aggregate and their grading is of prime importance in controlling the properties of the fresh and hardened concrete. Hardened cement paste is a porous, inhomogeneous material. The degree of porosity and heterogeneity of the material is a decisive factor controlling its properties. According to Professor S.Mindess, the strength of cement paste depends on:

Based on the strength controlling parameters given by S. Mindess three corresponding paths might be taken to increase the strength of cement paste and cement-based materials: a) decrease of total porosity b) improved pore size distribution, i.e. reduction of maximum and average pore size, and also elimination of large Griffith flaws c) improved quality of CS Hydration products As a consequence, the pillars of practical mix design for HSC are:  reduced w/c ratio  extensive use of plasticizers  application of cement with a high strength potential  application of silica fume (SF) 1.2 Steel fibre reinforced concrete (SFRC).

a) total porosity

The use of fibres to strengthen materials which are much weaker in tension than in

b) pore size distribution

compression goes back to ancient times. when probably the oldest written account of such a

c) the nature of the solid phase

composite material, clay bricks reinforced with straw occurred.

The porosity is mainly a function of the w/c ratio and the degree of hydration. This forms

The concept of using fibers to improve the characteristics of construction materials is

the basis for the well known empirical relation between strength and w/c ratio as formulated

very old. Addition of fibers to concrete makes it more homogeneous and isotropic and

by R. Feret and D. Abrams. Several investigators such as J. Jambor and Zaitsev have also established relations between the pore size distribution and the strength of the concrete, showing that reduced average pore size and reduced maximum pore size lead to increased compressive strength. According to classical fracture mechanics, i.e. Griffith theory, the maximum pore size might be considered as controlling the strength of brittle materials. The solid phase of cement paste is a very complex system of amorphous hydration products (CSH), crystals of calcium hydroxide, Ca(OH)2, un hydrated cement and minor quantities of other components. The CSH-products amount to about 70 % of the paste. The

transforms it from a brittle to a more ductile material. Historically, reinforcement has been in the form of continuous reinforcing bars, which could be placed in the structure at the appropriate locations to withstand the imposed tensile and shear stresses. Fibres, on the other hand, are discontinuous, and are most commonly randomly distributed throughout the cementitious matrix. Due to these differences, there are certain applications in which fibre reinforcement is better than conventional reinforcing bars. These include: 1.

structure and chemical composition of the CSH vary locally, and the different forms have only partly been resolved.

Thin sheet materials, in which conventional reinforcing bars cannot be used, and in which the fibres therefore constitute the primary reinforcement. In thin sheet materials, fibre concentration are relatively high, typically exceeding 5 % by volume.

Materials

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

J. Jambor has pointed out that the w/c ratio controls not only the porosity of the cement

Department of Architecture

2


2.

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

3 Components which must withstand locally high loads or deformations, such as tunnel linings, blast resistant structures, or precast piles which must be

1

hammered into the ground. 3.

h

z(  ) 

Components in which fibres are added primarily to control cracking induced by

1

humidity or temperature variations, as in slabs and pavements. In these applications, fibres are often referred to as secondary reinforcement.

2.04 fc

2  o  3  3    

b (  )



The strength of the fiber reinforced concrete can be measured in terms of its maximum resistance when subjected to either compressive, tensile, flexural and shear loads.

4 h 

  

h 2.04 fc

 lf

 3  3    2

 o

   1 2   o  3  3      h

2.04 fc

There are a number of factors that influence the behavior and strength of FRC in flexure.

Fibres do little to enhance the static compressive strength of concrete, with increases in

These include: type of fiber, fiber length (L), aspect ratio (L/df) where df is the diameter of the

strength ranging from essentially nil to perhaps 25%. Even in members, which contain

fiber, the volume fraction of the fiber (Vf), fiber orientation and fiber shape, fiber bond

conventional reinforcement in addition to the steel fibres, the fibres have little effect on

characteristics (fiber deformation).

compressive strength. However, the fibres do substantially increase the post-cracking ductility, or energy absorption of the material.

When concrete cracks, the randomly oriented fibers arrest a microcracking mechanism and limit crack propagation, thus improving strength and ductility.

In the simplest case concrete may be modeled as a composite material consisting of

The addition of fibers to such matrices, whether in continuous or discontinuous form,

two phases : hardened cement paste and aggregates. It is evident that the aggregate as well

leads to a substantial improvement in the tensile properties of the FRC in comparison with the

as the hardened cement paste exhibit a brittle behaviour. The - curve of concrete, on the

properties of the unreinforced matrix. The enhancement of the properties is particularly

other hand, deviates from linearity even at low loads and has a decresing slope after

noticeable.

maximum load.

The stress–strain or load–elongation response of fiber composites in tension depends mainly on the volume fraction of fibers. The addition of fibers generally improves the shear strength and ductility of concrete. It has been reported that the stirrups as shear reinforcement in concrete members can be partially or totally replaced by the use of steel fibers [Lim et al. 1987; Mansur et al. 1986]. Most of the work has been limited to concretes of normal strength. The influence of fibres on the composite behaviour of elements subjected to loadings is complex. In the limits of elastic deformation the fibres are not active and their role may be derived from the law of mixtures. When the micro-cracks are open, the fibres act as crack-

Figure 1.2-1: Fracture energy

arrestors and control their propagation. The load corresponding to the first crack appearance is 2 3

b

 fc   Gf   MPa 

 0.6 

the same or is increased when a specially high volume of fibres is added. The main fibre effect  f lf

2

 b MPa

12 df 7850

o



 f lf  b MPa

2 df 7850

 ( u)

u    o  1  2   l f  

2

is a considerable increase in deformability and in the amount of energy of the external load which may be accumulated before the rupture occurs. The load-displacement diagram is completely different and quasi-ductility of the material behaviour is observed.

Materials


Experimental studies [Fanella and Naaman 1985; Shah et al. 1978] have shown that the addition of fibers have only a slight effect on the ascending branch (modulus of elasticity) of the stress–strain curve of the composite The same factors that influence the shrinkage strain in plain concrete influence also the shrinkage strain in fiber reinforced concrete; namely, temperature and relative humidity, material properties, the duration of curing and the size of the structure. The addition

Figure 1.2-2: A loaded concrete beam with a crack and a fracture zone

of fibers, particularly steel, to concrete has been shown to have beneficial effects in

The fibre-reinforced concretes and mortars offer increased toughness and that advantage is decisive for their applications The modulus of elasticity of a material, whether in tension, compression, or shear, is a fundamental property that is needed for modeling mechanical behavior in various structural applications. The role of fibres depends also on their form, i.e. whether they are used as short chopped fibres, continuous single fibres, distributed at random in the matrix or arranged in a more regular way. The fibre-matrix bond is assured by different process: by adhesion, mechanical anchorage and by friction, depending on the chemical and mechanical properties of both phases. The quality of bond may vary with the intensity of load and its duration.

counterbalancing the movements arising from volume changes taking place in concrete, and tends to stabilise the movements earlier when compared to plain concrete. The primary advantage of fibers in relation to shrinkage is their effect in reducing the adverse width of shrinkage cracks [Swamy 1985; Lim et al. 1987; Shah and Grzybowski 1989]. Shrinkage cracks arise when the concrete is restrained from shrinkage movements. The presence of steel fibers delays the formation of first crack, enables the concrete to accommodate more than one crack and reduces the crack width substantially [Swamy 1985 The ability to withstand relatively large strains before failure, the superior resistance to crack propagation and the ability to withstand large deformations and ductility are characteristics that distinguish fiber-reinforced concrete from plain concrete. These characteristics are generally described by "toughness" which is the main reason for using fiberreinforced concrete in most of its applications.

Materials

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Figure 1.2-3: Effect of hooked-steel fibre content on compressive stress-strain curves

Department of Architecture

4


Cementitious matrices such as mortar and concrete have low tensile strength relative to

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

5 applications such as pavement (highways, roads, parking areas, runways, and bridge desks),

their compressive strength, and fail in a brittle manner. One way to improve their fracture

industrial floors, shear failure zones in structures, shotcrete, repair of concrete structures and

properties is to reinforce them with randomly distributed fibers.

lining of tunnels.

Toughness is a measure of the capacity of a material to absorb energy and resist fracture when subjected to static or dynamic loads. Flexural toughness is defined as the total energy absorbed

However, Bentur and Mindess showed that, with a 1.5% fibre volume, partial fibre

prior to complete separation of the specimen.

reinforcement (to 1/2 of the beam depth) increased the ultimate load by 32%, while full depth

In many applications, particularly in pavements, bridge deck overlays, and offshore structures,

fibre reinforcement increased the ultimate load by about 55%. Thus, there are benefits to having

the flexural fatigue strength and endurance limit are important design parameters because these

fibres even in the top (compression) half of a beam.

structures must be designed for fatigue load cycles.

With increasing crack opening, more and more fibers are fully out and , for u = lf / 2, the

Ramakrishnan et al. [1989b] observed that the fatigue strength and endurance limit (to achieve two million cycles) increased with the addition of fibers and increasing volume fraction of fibers.

stress drops to zero. Because the number of bounded fibers decreases linearly with increasing u, for 0<u<lf/2.

One of the major advantages of SFRC is that SFRC will not support the classic galvanic corrosion cells which are often the cause of corrosion and deterioration in reinforced concrete. The fibres, being non-continuous and discrete and protected by an alkaline matrix, provide no mechanism for propagation of corrosion activity. This phenomenon is well established from examination of numerous SFRC structures subjected to aggressive exposure environments. Since the role of the steel fibres is primarily to provide tensile capacity in the bottom portion (tension side) of the elements, it has been suggested that it may not be necessary to provide steel fibres throughout the full depth of a reinforced concrete elements. For reasons of economy, it may be sufficient simply to use SFRC in the bottom half of the elements. Figure: 1.2-5

(u)

 o   1 

2 u lf

  

2

f  lf   b

o

2 d f

Figure 1.2-4: Stress vs strain curve, Distribution of stresses, when the ultimate load is reached When fibres are wisely used, they can help us to produce concrete with increased tensile

( u)

strength and strain capacities, failure and impact resistance, energy absorption, crack resistance and durability. However, fibre give us the opportunity to utilize the concrete for a variety of

Materials

 b  La ( u )   f ( u )  2

 b  La   f  2

df

df

  1  2

  lf  u

2

 o   1  2

  lf  u

2


Properties of hardened concrete 1. Short term properties

Strength in compression, strength in tension, strength in bond, modulus of elasticity The strength of concrete depends on a number of factors including the properties and proportions of the constituent materials, degree of hydration, rate of loading, method of testing and specimen geometry. The properties of the constituent materials, which affect the strength are the quality of fine and coarse aggregate, the cement paste and paste-aggregate bond characteristics (properties of the interfacial, or transition zone). These, in turn depend on the macro- and microscopic structural features including total porosity, pore size and shape, pore distribution and Figure: 1.2-6

morphology of the hydration products, plus the bond between individual solid components. 2. Long-term properties

Creep, shrinkage, behaviour under fatigue, durability (porosity, permeability, abrasion La ( u )

La  1  2

u

lf 

f

f   1  2

resistance)

u

Two dominant constituent materials that are considered to control maximum concrete

lf 

strength are coarse aggregate and paste characteristics. The important parameters of coarse aggregate are its shape, texture and the maximum size. Since the aggregate is generally stronger than the paste, its strength is not a major factor for normal strength concrete. However, the aggregate strength becomes important in the case of higher-strength concrete. Surface texture and mineralogy affect the bond between the aggregates and the paste as well as the stress level at which microcracking begins. The use of larger maximum size of aggregate affects the strength in several ways. First, since larger aggregates have less specific surface area and the aggregate–paste bond strength is less, the compressive strength of concrete is reduced. It is generally accepted that the most important parameter affecting concrete strength is the Figure 1.2-7: Behavior of the concrete in compression and tension before the formation of the crack, Stress-crack opening diagram used in service, and Characteristic stress-crack opening diagram used in ultimate limit state calculation.

w/c ratio, sometimes referred to as the W/B (binder) ratio. Even though the strength of concrete is dependent largely on the capillary porosity or gel/space ratio, these are not easy quantities to measure or predict. The capillary porosity of a properly compacted concrete is determined by the w/c ratio and degree of hydration. Most high performance concrete are produced with a w/c ratio of 0.40 or less. The practical use of very low w/c ratio concretes has been made possible by use of both conventional and high-range water reducers, which permit production of workable concrete with very low water contents [Fiorato 1989; Zia et al. 1991; Burg and Ost 1992].

Materials

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

1.3 The behaviour of hardened concrete

Department of Architecture

6


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

7 Fly ash, slag and silica fume have been used widely as supplementary cementitious

High-strength concrete is a brittle material, and as the concrete strength increases the

materials in high performance concrete. Although fly ash is probably the most common mineral

post-peak portion of the stress-strain diagram almost vanishes or descends steeply. The increase

admixture, on a volume basis, silica fume (ultra–fine amorphous silica, derived from the

in concrete strength reduces its ductility - the higher the strength of concrete, the lower is its

production of silicon or ferro silica alloys) in particular, used in combination with high-range

ductility. This inverse relation between strength and ductility is a serious drawback for the use

water reducers, has increased achievable strength levels dramatically [Ezeldin et al. 1989;

of high-strength concrete and a compromise between these two characteristics of concrete can

Baalbaki et al. 1993; Zia et al.1993a, 1993b; Farny and Panarese 1994].

be obtained by adding discontinuous fibers.

Collepardi et al. [1990] studied the effect of combined addition of silica fume and

Addition of fibre to concrete makes it more homogeneous and isotropic and transforms it from

superplasticizer on concrete compressive strength by taking into account such parameters as:

a brittle to a more ductile material. When concrete cracks, the randomly oriented fibres arrest a

(a) type and dosage rate of superplasticizer, (b) type and content of portland cement, and (c)

microcracking mechanism and limit crack propagation, thus improving strength and ductility.

way of silica fume utilization (as additional component or as cement replacement). They

The addition of fibres has a minor effect on the improvement of the compressive strength

concluded that in the presence of silica fume, for both type I and type III portland cement, the

values.

melamine sulphonated polymer superplasticizer performs better than the naphthalene

Strength development and strength potential in HSC depend on the choice of cement.

sulphonated polymer, particularly when a high dosage such as 4% is used. A change from 2 to

The clinker composition and the fineness are factors that influence both early and final strength.

4% superplasticizer dosage rate in general does not modify or reduce compressive strength in

The clinker minerals C3S, C2S and C3A have the greatest influence on the strength development

the absence of silica fume, whereas significantly increases compressive strength in the present

in cement paste. C3S contributes both to a rapid early age strength development and a high final

of silica fume.

strength. C2S hydrates somewhat slower, but can contribute significantly to the final strength. C3A has particular influence on the early strength.

1.4 High-strength concrete

The hydratation of the clinker minerals may be influenced by the fineness of the cement.

The influence of fibre content on the compressive strength, modulus of rupture,

A high specific surface leads to a rapid reaction. A high degree of grinding fineness may, however, reduce the strength development after 28 days of curing.

toughness and splitting tensile strength is presented. The increased sensitivity of HPC compared to normal concrete relates to the mixing,

Other components in the cement may also influence the development of strength and

transport, placing, compaction and curing processes. HPC requires an experienced and

heat. Especially, a high content of alkalis will result in an increased early strength and reduced

competent workforce and high quality workmanship to achieve the potential benefits, but this

final strength potential.

is not always available on site. HPC concrete in the better" end of the above scale can be very difficult to place and compact, and the risk of honeycombs, particularly in the cover concrete, increases. In addition, the quality and efficiency of compaction is extremely dependent on the individual person handling the vibrator. Hence, the better the concrete mix, from a durability point of view, the greater the risk of having inferior or bad execution leading to reduced quality in the final structure. This fact is seldomly respected on site. This inconsistency is due to the dominating influence of the execution process on the final quality and performance of the structure

Figure 1.3-1: Cement paste in NSC and in HPC

regardless of the good quality of the initial concrete mix.

The amount of aggregate or filler is usually between 60 and 85 % of volume fraction in all kinds of concrete. Therefore their influence on mechanical and other properties is important. In concrete natural stone aggregate is used in the form of gravel or crushed rock and sand.

Materials


tension-stiffening effect, for the control of crack width, and, thus, the necessary minimum

1. shape and texture

amount of reinforcement.

2. compressive strength

It is generally agreed that the elastic modulus of concrete increases with its compressive

3. other mechanical properties

strength. The modulus is greatly affected by the properties of the coarse aggregate, the larger

4. distribution of grain size

the amount of coarse aggregate with a high elastic modulus, the higher would be the modulus

According to their shape, rounded grains of natural gravel and sand are distinguished from

of elasticity of concrete. The modulus also increases with concrete age.

angular grains obtained from crushed rocks.

Generally speaking, the measurement of dynamic modulus corresponds to a very small instantaneous strain. Therefore the dynamic modulus is approximately equal to the initial tangent modulus which is appreciably higher than the static (secant) modulus. The difference between the two moduli is due in part to the fact that heterogeneity of concrete affects the two moduli in different ways. For low, medium, and high strength concretes, the dynamic modulus is generally 40%, 30% and 20% respectively higher than the static modulus of elasticity [Mehta 1986]. These changes in the load-response are a consequence of improved aggregate-paste bond for HSC. The more linear stress-strain relationship reflects the reduced amount of

Figure 1.3-2: The effect of aggregate and cement on the concrete

microcracking at lower levels of loading for these concretes.

Although the tensile strength of concrete is neglected for the strength of reinforced and prestressed concrete structures, in general, it is an important characteristic for the development of cracking and therefore, for the prediction of deformations and the durability of concrete. Other characteristics such as bond and development length of reinforcement and the concrete contribution to the shear and torsion capacity are closely related to the tensile strength of concrete. The tensile strength is determined either by direct tensile tests or by indirect tensile tests such as flexural or split cylinder tests. The direct tensile strength is difficult to obtain. Due to the difficulty in test, only limited and often conflicting data is available. It is often assumed that direct tensile strength of concrete is about 10% of its compressive strength. The most commonly used tests for estimating the indirect tensile strength of concrete are the

Figure 1.3-3: CEB/FIB MC 90 - The examples of the stress-strain curve in compression

splitting tension test and the third-point flexural loading test. The bond behaviour of a reinforcing bar and the surrounding concrete has a decisive importance regarding the bearing capacity and the serviceability of reinforced concrete members. This knowledge is an indispensable requirement to give design rules for anchorage and lap lengths of reinforcing bars, for the calculation of deflections taking into account the

Materials

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Important characteristics of aggregate grains are:

Department of Architecture

8


1.4-1 Components of cement-based matrices

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

9 High alumina cement is used in mortars for refractory brick walls and in refractory

The main groups of inorganic binders:

concretes when mixed with special aggregate, like corundum.

1./ hydraulic cements (pozzolans, slag cement, naturel cements, high alumina cement and

Portland Cements are by far the most important binder for concrete. They are obtained by

Portland cement)

grinding and mixing raw material which contain argils and lime: clays, shales and slates

2./ non-hydraulic cements (gypsum, lime, magnesium cement)

together with limestones and marls. The ground materials are fused in temperature of about

3./ hydrothermal cements

1400 oC into clinker which is ground again into powder of particles below 100 ď ­m and gypsum

4./ sulphur cement

is added.

The adjective hydraulic means that the product when hardened is water-resistant. Non-

Not only composition but also fineness of cement has a considerable influence on the

hydraulic materials are those that decompose when subjected to water and cannot harden under

hydration process and properties of the hardened product. The fine cements offer a higher

water.

hydration rate and higher final strength. On the other hand, the higher water requirement of fine

Pozzolans were obtained initially from volcanic rocks and ashes. After grinding, a kind of

cement increases its shrinkage.

cement was produced. In present times ‘pozzolanic’ admixtures are obtained also from fly ash or burnt clays and shales. These admixtures are added to Portland cements as a les active binder

Expansive cements are special kinds of PC which contain particular constituents that increase

which partly plays the role of a fine aggregate of low cast.

their volume during hydration and hardening. By appropriate composition, the shrinkage of PC may be entirely compensated for, or even a final increase of total volume may be obtained.

Slag cements are obtained from rapidly cooled blast furnace slag which is then subjected to

processes of grinding and mixing with lime and Portland cement in different proportions.

Gypsum is a kind of non-hydraulic cement obtained from mineral of the same name. The

Besides being at a lower cost than Portland cement, the addition of slag cement improves

production is based on crushing the raw material and heating it to temperatures between +130

resistance against sulphate corrosion of mortars and concretes.

and +170 C for dehydration. If burnt is higher temperatures, a gypsum of higher strength is obtained. The last stage of production is the grinding into a fine powder and mixing with

High alumina cements are obtained from bauxite Al2O3 fused together with limestone at a

additives which delay and control the setting time to enable effective mixing with water and

temperature of 1600 oC to form clinker which is then ground into powder.

easy placing in forms.

High alumina cement is about three times more expensive than PC, mainly because of

the high energy consumption involved in grinding the hard clinkers.

Lime is obtained from natural limestone or dolomite burnt at temperatures between 950 and

1100 oC. The hardening of the lime is a slow process called carbonation, which is based on the

Hydratation of high alumina cement requires more water and mixes of better workability are obtained. The hydratation process starts later, after mixing with workability are obtained.

absorption of CO2 from the atmosphere. The lime is then transformed again into limestone CaCO3 and free water is evaporated.

The hydratation process starts later, after mixing with water, but occurs more quickly with high rates of liberated heat. Also, hardening is quick and usually within 24 hours about 80% of final

Magnesium oxychloride is produced by burning of magnesite MgCO3 at temperature between

resistance is obtained. The hardened cement has both lower porosity and permeability.

600 and 800 oC. The hardening process is quick and already after 28 days a compressive strength of about 100 MPa may be reached. The application is limited to the interiors of

Mortars and concretes made with high alumina cement are resistant against sulphate

buildings because its durability when exposed to moisture is insufficient.

attack and also resist better CO2 from ordinary water. In comparison, the resistance against alkalis is lower than of PC.

Materials


The purpose of structural analysis is the establishment of the distribution of either

internal forces and moments, or stresses, strains and displacements over the structure as a whole or a part of it. It is the aim of each design procedure - on condition that the structure or member is actually constructed according to the design - to minimize the probability of failure without unreasonable expenditure. Further more serviceability during the lifetime of the structure should be guaranteed with adequate probability.

- failure by excessive deformation, transformation of the structure or any part of it into a mechanism, rupture, loss of stability of the structure or any part of it, including supports and foundations, - failure caused by fatigue or other time-dependent effects. When considering an ultimate limit state of rupture or excessive deformation of a section, member or connection (fatigue excluded), it should be verified that Sd  Rd

Where Sd is the design value of internal forces or moments (e.g. M, N, V, T for

Therefore two limit states are defined:

bending moment, axial force, shear force, torsional moment) produced by the actions F (loads, prestressing forces and so called indirect actions such as imposed deformations from the

a) Serviceability Limit State (SLS) b) Ultimate Limit State (ULS)

settlement of supports or from temperature and shrinkage effects) and Rd is the corresponding

a) Serviceability Limit State (SLS)

design resistance, associating all structural properties with the respective design values. The index d makes clear that we have to calculate the corresponding design values of S and R

Analyses carried out in connection with serviceability limit states will normally be based on the linear elastic theory. In this case it will be satisfactory to assume the stiffness for members based on the stiffness of the uncracked cross-section, when cracking of the concrete has a significant unfavourable effect on the performance of the structure or member considered,

. In cases where the ultimate state is characterised by the loss of statical equilibrium, the condition is given in the form: Ed dst  Ed stb

it shall be taken into account in the analysis.

Where Ed dst stands for the destabilising influences and Ed stb for the stabilising influences.

The serviceability requirements concern:

Examples for such cases are piers during the construction phase of symmetrical free cantilever

- the functioning of the construction works or parts of them,

beam or the buckling of slender columns.

- the comfort of people, - the appearance.

2.1 Strain Diagrams in the Ultimate Limit State The allowable strain diagrams which are possible in accordance to the stress - strain

b) Ultimate Limit State (ULS)

diagrams are shown in figure 2.1-1.

Depending on the specific nature of the structure, the limit state are considered and on the specific conditions of design or execution, analysis for the ultimate limit states may be linear elastic with or without redistribution, non-linear or plastic. Ultimate limit states concern: - the safety of the structure and its contents - the safety of people. Ultimate limit states which may require consideration include:

The strain diagrams are based on the assumption of Bernoulli s hypothesis. The strain limits of the stress-strain diagrams for concrete and steel result in different domains for the strain diagrams in the design of cross sections. The stress state in a cross section is defined by the chosen strain diagram of the materials. With the assumption of an ideal bond the strain diagram in figure 2.1-2 governs not only the concrete compression stresses but also the steel stress for reinforcement in the cross-section. The compressive strain of reinforcing steel caused by creep and shrinkage of concrete are normally negligible in the ultimate limit state.

- loss of equilibrium of the structure or any part of it, considered as a rigid body,

Limit states

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

2. Limit states

Department of Architecture

10


In the following a short explanation of the five domains shown in figure 2.1-2 is given:

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

11

Figure 2.1-2 Strain distributions of reinforced concrete cross - section with respect to the limitation of the steel strains Assumption:  s2 ( A)

0.01

Zone 1: The entire section is in tension, the neutral axis lies outside the section, normally reinforcement yields. Zone 2: The neutral axis lies within the section, there exists thus a compression and a tension zone. The maximum strain in the concrete is less than the limiting value of 0.0035, thus the strength of the concrete is not exhausted. The boundary between zone 2 and 3 is defined by a strain diagram where both the maximum concrete strain (  c strain  s

0.01

0.0035)

and reinforcement

are present.

Zone 3: The concrete compression strain at the upper fibre is 0.0035 (point B). The steel strain lies between 0.01 and  yd, the strain corresponds to the design strength of the steel f yd.

This means that the stress of reinforcing steel is fully exhausted in tension. The boundary

between 3 and 4 is called the balanced condition. Zone 4: The strain in the steel at failure lies between  yd and 0.00 that means the steel Figure 2.1-1: Bending – Axial – Load Interaction

stress at the ultimate limit state is thus less than f yd. Zone 4a: All the steel (except prestressing steel) is in compression. Some small part of the section remains in tension. Zone 5: The entire section (with exception of possibly existing prestressing steel) is in compression.

Limit states


is between 0.0035 - with  c

0

Department of Architecture

All strain profiles pass through point C. The maximum compressive strain of concrete at the lower line and 0.002 for centric axial compressive

load. Point C is the point where the line BO (which defines the boundary between the sections partially in tension and sections in compression only) intersects the line characterized by c

0.002

const. The distance of this point from the upper compressive fibre is equal to 3 / 7

of the total depth of the section. Both assumption a and b for the steel strain limitation (point A) (in figure 2.1-2) result in slightly different strain diagrams. Zone 4 and parts of zone 3 characterize the transition from dominant bending moments to dominant axial compression force. These areas cover the cases in which strong pure bending and moments with compression force require a deep situation of the neutral axis. In cases of pure bending or dominant bending with compression force this uneconomic area can be avoided by placing compression reinforcement which leads to a higher neutral axis and thus to full exhaustion of the tension reinforcement. Zone 3 with relatively low neutral axis cannot be used for dominant bending if the rules for the limitation of the relative depth of the compression zone (x / d) depending on the chosen redistribution of moments are obeyed. Thus the necessity of additional compression reinforcement depends also on the limits for (x / d).

Figure 2.1-3: Bending – Axial – Load Interaction

Limit states

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

12


2.2 Stress - strain Diagram for Concrete

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

13

Studies on the development of strength show that after 24 hours 70% of the compressive strength can be reached. The cement used is an important factor. These material properties offer new possibilities in the production of structural members. The stress - strain diagram for concrete (the conventional stress distribution in the compression zone) is presented normally by the parabola - rectangle curve. According to the design concept with partial safety factors the maximum stress value is   f cd figure 2.2-1. The factor  0.85 Figure 2.2-2: Bilinear stress-strain diagram for concrete

takes account of the concrete strength under sustained load which is smaller than the strength under short term loading. The non-proportional interdependence between stress and strain of the concrete in the compression zone according to figure 2.2-1 represents an approximation to

The design concrete strength is defined by f cd

the real stress distribution in the ultimate limit state. For simplification reasons this distribution can also be used in cases

f ck c

.

The design diagram is derived from the chosen idealized diagram by means of a

- with the strain diagrams acc. to figure 2.1-2 for the neutral axis in high positions.

reduction of the stress ordinate of the idealized diagram by a factor (  /  c ), in which  c is

In these cases only a part of the parabola - rectangular diagram gives the stress distribution in

the partial safety factors for concrete  c 1.5

the compression zone which is limited by the relevant strain at the upper fibre.

is a coefficient taking account of long term effects on the compressive strength and of

unfavourable effects resulting from the way the load is applied. The additional reduction factor 

for sustained compression may generally be assumed to be |0.85|.

A rectangular stress distribution as given in figure 2.2-2 may be assumed. The  - factors as given for idealized diagram are valid, except that it should be reduced to |0.80|, when the compression zone decreases in width in the direction of the extreme compression fibre. The behaviour of hardened concrete can be characterized in terms of its short-term (essentially instantaneous) and long-term properties. Short-term properties include strength in compression, tension, bond and modulus of elasticity. The long-term properties include creep, shrinkage, behaviour under fatigue and durability characteristics such porosity, permeability, Figure 2.2-1: Parabola - rectangular diagram for concrete stress distribution

freeze-thaw resistance and abrasion resistance.

Other idealized stress-diagrams may be used, provided they are effectively equivalent

The strength of concrete depends on a number of factors including the properties and

to the parabola-rectangular diagram, e.g. the bi-linear diagram figure 2.2.-2 or the rectangular

proportions of the constituent materials, degree of hydration, rate of loading, method of testing

stress block figure 2.2.-2. The following design aids are based exclusively on the parabola-

and specimen geometry. The properties of the constituent materials, which affect the strength

rectangular diagram because of its universal applicability and its good approximation to test

are the quality of fine and coarse aggregate, the cement paste and paste-aggregate bond

results. For quick calculation and for predesign of members the rectangular stress block is a

characteristics (properties of the interfacial, or transition zone). These, in turn depend on the

useful tool.

macro- and microscopic structural features including total porosity, pore size and shape, pore

In this diagram  cu max is taken as 0.0035

Limit states


-reduced ultimate strain may be observed for medium HSC

components. The most linear stress-strain relationship reflects the reduced amount of microcracking at lower levels of loading for these concretes. These aggregate-paste bond failures first started to propagate at cca.90% of the ultimate load resulting in a linear stress-strain relationship up to this level. A less developed microcrack pattern also results in a more sudden failure, because the ability of redistributing stress is reduced. 2.3 Stress-strain Diagram for Reinforcing Steel The characteristic value f yk for the yield stress is defined as 5% - fractal of the yield stress ( f y). The design values f yd and f td for ultimate limit state result from the characteristic values, divided by the safety factors  s:

f yd

f yk s

f td

f tk s

According to EC 2 the safety factor  s

1.15

in case of basic combinations and  s

1.0

in

case of accidental combinations.

Figure 2.2-3: Bending – Axial – Load Interaction For HSC the long-term sustained strength of concrete is less than that determined by short-term loading. This is of fundamental importance in the design since it means a reduction in the safety factor with regard to strength, which is usually based on short-term test. In MC-90

Figure 2.3-1: Stress-strain diagrams for reinforcing steel

we find the relation 0.85. The stress-strain behaviour of HSC in uniaxial compression is reported by many research centres. The main differences between the stress-strain curves of normal and HSC are: -a more linear stress-strain relationship to a higher % of the maximum stress -a slightly higher strain at maximum stress -a steeper shape of the descending part of the curve

Three different stress-strain diagrams for reinforcing steel are used figure 2.3-2. a) Assumption of a horizontal ideal-plastic branch ( ´ b) Assumption of a branch ascending from

f yk s

to

f tk s

0) with a steel strain limitation to  uk

but with a steel strain limitation to  uk

c) Assumption of parabolic-rectangle with a steel strain limitation  uk

Limit states

0.01

0.01 0.01

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

distribution and morphology of the hydration products, plus the bond between individual solid

Department of Architecture

14


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

15

Figure 2.3-2: Three different stress-strain diagrams for reinforcing steel

Figure 2.3-4: Bi-linear diagram for steel and bi-linear diagram for concrete stress distribution for pure bending or bending moment with axial forces.

Figure 2.3-3: Bi-linear diagram for steel and bi-linear diagram for concrete stress distribution for pure bending or bending moment with axial forces.

Figure 2.3-5: Parabolic-rectangular diagram for steel and bi-linear diagram for concrete stress distribution for pure bending or bending moment with axial forces.

Limit states


For clearly under-reinforced beams the flexural strength is determined by the tensile

2.4.1 Basic Assumptions figure 2.4.-1

steel ratio, and the influence from the compressive stress distribution is of less importance.

a) Plane sections remain plane (hypothesis of Bernoulli), that means strain distributions in the

The flexural strength of over-reinforced beams is more dependent on the stress-strain curves.

section are linear.

The position of the concrete compression resultant becomes more important as the compression

b) Perfect bond between concrete and (reinforcing and bonded prestressing) steel. In each fibre

zone in beams increases. Flexural capacities under different steel ratios and different steel ratios

is valid  cs  s with  cs as "smeared" concrete strain (including crack opening) and  s as steel

and different assumptions of compressive stress distributions are outlined by Nielsen

strain.

Comparison between test results from flexural strength of beams (fc=100 N/mm2) and

c) The tensile strength of concrete including the tension stiffening effect is neglected (so called

calculations with triangular stress block assumption referred by Bernhardt, show improved

"naked" state II).

agreement for over-reinforced beams compared to the parabola curve usually assumed in

d) Simplified design stress - strain diagrams for concrete and steel which take account of the

standards and codes.

elastic - plastic behaviour of the materials approximately. In EC 2 different diagrams for concrete and steel are given.

Flexural rotation capacity

The ultimate compressive strain in concrete (3.5 Promile) for bending and for normal force with

For reasons of safety a ductile behaviour of the structural elements is necessary.

great eccentricity must be reduced to (2 Promile) for centric normal force.

Cracking and visible deformations give obvious warnings and announce the imminent failure.

The strain diagram is to be turned around point C in figure 2.1-2, which distance from the most

Besides a sufficient ductility enables an economical design by allowing moment redistribution

compressed fibre is 3 / 7 of the total height of the concrete section.

and by taking into account the energy dissipation as a result of the plastic deformations in the case of cyclic excitations, e.g. earthquakes. The ductility of beams is characterised by its rotational capacity, which is usually defined as the plastic hinge rotation at maximum bending moment. For small reinforcement percentages, leading to tension failures, the rotational capacity is controlled by the stress-strain behaviour of the steel and increases with smaller amount of reinforcement. In the case of a concrete failure for over-reinforced beams the curvature and by that the rotational capacity and by that the rotational capacity decrease due to the reduced strain of the reinforcement. Concerning the behaviour of the compression zone, the shape of the curve is of a higher importance than the magnitude of the ultimate shortening. therefore, the steep descending part of the  -curve for HSC leads to a decrease of the rotation capacity.

Figure 2.4-1 The compression stress distribution for HSC is different from normal strength concrete. The steep and linear ascending part of the curve, and the sudden drop after the ultimate stress peak is reached, influence both the position and the magnitude of the concrete stress resultant in beams subjected to flexure.

Limit states

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

2.4 Basic Values for the Design Resistance to Moments and Axial Forces

Department of Architecture

16


Example 2.1:

2.5 Verification at the Serviceability Limit States

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

17

Limitation of Stress under Serviceability Conditions The provisions at the ultimate limit states in Eurocode 2 may lead to excessive stresses in concrete, reinforcing steel. These stresses may, as a consequence, adversely affected the appearance and performance in service conditions and the durability of concrete structures. Key-words in this context are:

Maximum stress fc_  103 MPa

Initial slope Ec of the stress-strain Ec  3320

Factors

- non-linear creep of concrete due to excessive compressive stresses, - increased permeability of the concrete surface due to micro - cracking of concrete around the reinforcing bars,

fc_ MPa

 6900

n  6.858824

k  2.33129

Strain when fc reaches fc_

 c_  0.00297

- yielding of steel in service condition leading to cracks with unacceptable width, - cracks parallel to the reinforcing bars, - excessive deflection of concrete members caused by high stresses, cracking and creep of the

Expression, which describes the shape of a concrete cylinder stress-strain curve fc   c 

c

 c_

 fc_ 

Members. In reinforced concrete structures, longitudinal cracks parallel to the reinforcing bars may

1.210

occur if the stress level in the concrete under the rare combination of actions exceeds a critical

1.0810

value. Such cracking may lead to a reduction in durability.

9.610

In detail EC 2 requires the verification of stresses, associated with the following permissible

8.410

values, for the following reasons:

 

7.210

fc  c

610 4.810

  

1.13  c_ fc_

7 7 7 7 7 7

under rare combinations of actions are limited to 0.6  f ck in absence of other methods (for

2.410

7 7

0 0

c  0.6  f ck

 c  0 0.0001 0.007

n k

8

1) For preventing the development of longitudinal cracks, the concrete compressive stresses example, increasing the concrete cover of confinement of the compression zone).

 c     c_ 

8

3.610 1.210

n

 n  1  

710

4

1.410

3

2.110

3

3) for reinforcing steel subjected to loads and restraints, s  0.8  f yk 4) for reinforcing steel subjected to restraints only, s  f yk

3

3.510

3

3

4.210

4.910

3

5.610

3

6.310

3

710

3

c

2) For preventing excessive creep, the concrete compressive stresses under quasi - permanent combinations of actions G k j  Pk   2 i  Qk i are limited to 0.45  f ck, c  0.45  f ck

2.810

Figure 2.1-1 The axial force Pmax that can by resisted by a rectangular section with the linearly varying strain the max. force is 0,6 .fc_.b.h   

1.13  c_

0

fc   c d c  0.451661fc_   c_  1.513

fc  1.13  c_  fc_

Limit states

 0.600001

fc  1.13  c_   61.800061MPa


The characteristic cube strength of concrete (MPa): fc  20

fc_  21 MPa

The stress of the concrete at the end of the diagram:

Initial slope Ec of the stress-strain fc_

Ec  3320

Department of Architecture

Maximun stress

MPa

bcu  0.73 fc  MPa

- corresponding strain:

 6900

 bcu  0.0035

Maximum stress of the concrete (strength of prism)

Factors

n  2.035294

bc1  0.85 fc  MPa

k  1.00871

corresponding strain:

Strain, when fc reaches fc_

 bc1  0.002

 c_  0.001867

Limit quasi-linear stress concrete: bco  0.5 fc  MPa

corresponding strain

Expression, which describes the shape of a concrete cylinder stress-strain curve c

fc   c 

 c_

2.510 2.2510 210 1.7510

 

fc  c

1.510 1.2510 110 7.510 510 2.510

 fc_ 

4

n n k    c   n 1        c_  

Instant (secant) modulus: Eij 

7

1.99  c_

7

fc_

Eij  3.257  10 MPa

Tangent module for short-term stress:

7

  1.65

7

Eijo28 4

1     3    12000 fc  MPa

Eijo28  5.375  10 MPa

6 6

Region 1 (quasi-linear region) supposition

6

710

4

1.410

3

2.110

3

the max. force is 0,8. fc_.b.h fc   c d c  0.800103fc_   c_  1.99

fc  1.99  c_ 

4

3

7

2.810

3

3.510

3

4.210

3

3

4.910

5.610

c

0

4

Eij  3.257  10 MPa

 bco

Eij  12000 fc  MPa

7

0

  

bco 1

fc_

7

0

1.99  c_

 bco  3.07  10

 c  0 0.0001 0.007

 0.787593

Figure 2.1-2 fc  1.99  c_   16.539453MPa

3

6.310

3

710

3

  1.65

Calculation of the coefficient: n  1.435

Tangent module for short-term stress:  

1 3

 

Eijo28    12000f  c  MPa

60000 psi  413.685438MPa

Limit states

4

Eijo28  5.375  10 MPa

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

18


Tangent modulus = 0: 4

4

for comparison

E( 0)  5.375  10 MPa

Eijo28  5.375  10 MPa

The proof assuming= 1.65: _  1.65

Terms for bc () can only be managed more complicated: n   n     n  2       n   bco bco    1   bco    bco   bc(  )   bco 2 ( n  1)   bco

Region 2:

Figure 2.1-3 Equation an up curve (quasi-linear) for the region 1:

4

  0 0.00001  bco

 bc   bco 3.1 10

        ( n  2)   bc(  )  bco   n      2 ( n  1)  bco bco     n

1

bc_ (  ) 

bco  bco

  bc1

n 1  1.215

An up curve equation (linear) for the region1:

bc2  bc 



bco b

bc1  bco b

210

 

5

1.510

 bco

6

Stress of concrete

6

n1      bc   bco    bc   bco   n 1     n 1  1    bc1   bco    bc1   bco 

1

Region 1 and 2

7

7.5  bc(  )  10

 bc_ (  )  10

Region 1

10

Stress of concrete

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

19

2.5

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

 bc1

7

 

 bc2  bc  bc(  )

110

7

510

6

 bco

3

  10

Strain of concrete

0

510

110

3

Strain of concrete

Figure 2.1-4

Region 2 Region 1

The equation of tangent modulus-in:

Figure 2.1-5

  1     d bco  ( n  2)    n     2 ( n  1)  d    bco    bco  n

Limit states

3

1.510

 bc 

for a = 1.65 for a = 1

E(  ) 

4

210

3


 c1  0.002

2     c   c        c1       c1  

fcs   c  bc1 2 

 c  0 0.0001  c1

 

Stress

 bc2  bc

210

7

1.510

7

110

7

510

6

 bc(  )

 

fcs  c

The values of n for different strain of the concrete:

 bco

no

 n o

   bc1 c

bc3  c 

bc1 b

  no  c   c    n o   bc1 n o  1    bc1  1

 

 bc1

for

510

4

110

3

1.510

3

210

3

n  2.092

 c  0.0005

 bco

0

  c  1 d  bc1      d c   b n o  1    bc1 

Eb   c 

Diagram of concrete

for

 c  0.001

n  2.092

for

 c  0.0015

n  2.092

 bc   c Strain

Example 2.2: The determination of actual and statistical properties of concrete

Sh 2 Sh 1 HOGNESTAD

Testing of cube compressive strength of concrete Cubes dimensions:

Figure 2.1-6   0.5

Stress of concrete

  fcs  c

1.510

7

110

7

510

6

 bc3  c

v  150.7 mm

b  149.6 mm

v  150.5 mm

a  156.4 mm

b  150.2 mm

v  151.8 mm

1

2

2

3

3

Weight: mbet  7.92 kg 1

 bco

 bc1

 bet  i

4

510

110

3

1.510

3

210

mbet  7.98 kg

mbet

i

a b v

i i i

3

Strain of concrete

 bet  i

2323.36 m 3 kg 2355.04

Average bulk density:



 bet 

Figure 2.1-7

3

2327.55

c Diagram of concrete HOGNESTAD

mbet  8.3 kg

2

Density:

 bco

0

1

3

Diagram of Concrete

7

b  150.3 mm

2

  no  bc1 c   c  1     n o bc3  c    b n o  1    bc1   bc1 210

a  150.5 mm a  150.5 mm

1

n o  2.092

i

bet i

3

3

Limit states

 bet  2335.32m 

 kg

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Hognestad:

Department of Architecture

20


Compressive surface of the test cube:

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

21

A  a  b i

Example 2.3: The determination of actual and statistical properties of concrete and steel:

A  i

i i

0.02262 m2 0.02251

Test cube compressive strength of concrete Cubes dimensions:

0.02349

Maximum compressive force in press F  639 kN

F  753 kN

1

Cube strength for each cube:

fcub

F

i

fcub 

A

i

F  714 kN

2

MPa

i

he true characteristics of concrete:

fcub.p 

i1

v2  150.5  mm

a 3  156.4  mm

b3  150.2  mm

v3  151.8  mm

1

   30.394

mbet  7.98  kg

 bet  i

mbet

i

a i  bi  vi

i

2323.36 m 3  kg 2355.04

fcub.p  30.696MPa 

2327.55

Prismatic compressive strength:

 

fccyl  fcub.p   0.855  0.005 fccyl fcub.p

Average Density:

fcub.p 

 MPa 

fccyl  21.534MPa 

  beti  bet 

 0.702

fct  0.274

2

3

 kg

Ai 

0.02349

fct  2.686 MPa

Max. compressive force in the jack: F1  639  kN

3   fcub.p   12710   10610   MPa MPa  

F2  753  kN

4

Eco  2.919 10  MPa

Cube strength for each cube:

Classification of concrete: 1

 bet  2335.32 m

0.02262 m2 0.02251

 fcub.p     MPa  MPa 

fcub  28.249MPa 

3

Ai  a i bi

Modulus of elasticity: Eco

i

Compression area of the test cube:

Tensile strength of concrete: 3

3

 bet 

i

3

mbet  8.3  kg

2

Density:

3

fcub

v1  150.7  mm

b2  149.6  mm

mbet  7.92  kg

 28.249

  33.445

Average cube strength

b1  150.3  mm

a 2  150.5  mm

Weight:

3

i

a 1  150.5  mm

Rbk  i

fcub  33.445 MPa 2

fcub  30.394 MPa 3

Fi

Rbk

Ai

MPa

i

28.249 33.445 30.394

fcubm  25 MPa

Limit states

F3  714  kN


Safety factor of the concrete:

Average cube strength:

 mb  1.3

3

Rbk.p 

Rbk

i1

Nominal diameter of reinforcement:

i

Rbk.p  30.696  MPa

3

D  14  mm

Specific initial length: Lo  5  D

Prismatic- cylinder compressive strength:

 

Rbh  Rbk.p   0.855  0.005  Rbh Rbk.p

 mbt  1.5

Test of tendon by means of tensile

Rbk.p 

MPa 

Lo  70  mm

Density of reinforcement: Rbh  21.534  MPa

 o  7850  kg  m

3

Modulus of elasticity of steel:

 0.702

Es  210000  MPa

length samples:

or

L1  354  mm

fccub_    f fccyl   0.855  0.005  MPa  ccub_ 

fccyl  21.53  MPa

fccyl fcd  0.85  1.5

fcd  12.2025 MPa

L2  358  mm

Sample weight: M1  0.435  kg

Tensile strength of concrete:

Breaking force:

3

Fm  110  kN

2

 Rbk.p  Rbt  0.274    MPa  MPa 

Rbt  2.686  MPa

L3  360  mm

or

1

M2  0.435  kg

M3  0.440  kg

Fm  110.5  kN

Fm  106.5  kN

2

3

force obtained yield strength when deformed. 0.2%:  fccub_ fctm  0.274    MPa

  

0.66

 MPa

fctm  2.63  MPa

Fe.0.2  74.25  kN 1

Fe.0.2  76.83  kN

Fe.0.2  76.89  kN

Lu  91.5  mm

Lu  92.8  mm

2

3

Final measured length: Ebt  32000 MPa

Lu  93.4  mm 1

Modulus of elasticity: E bo

3   R bk.p   12710   10610   MPa MPa  

The actual cross-sectional area: 4

Ebo  2.919  10  MPa

Ao  i

Mi

Ao

 o  Li

mm

CLASSIFICATION OF CONCRETE Rbk  28.249  MPa

>

Rbk  33.445  MPa

>

Rbg  25  MPa

=> C25

1 2

2

i

2

156.537 154.788 155.697

Rbk  30.394  MPa 3

Limit states

3

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

The true characteristics of concrete:

Department of Architecture

22


Example 2.4: The beam has a theoretical span 2.50 m, perform load test of reinforced concrete beam.

Elongation:

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

23

As 

Lu  Lo i

As

Lo

%

i

i

1. Determine the real and statistical properties of concrete and steel at the time of testing

33.429

2. Theoretical calculation with the actual properties of materials

30.714

3. Proposal test load and load process

32.571

4. Realization of load test

Tensile strength of reinforcement: Rm  i

Fm

Rm

Ao

MPa

i

5. Evaluation of load test

i

i

1. Determine the real and statistical properties of concrete and steel at the time of testing

702.71 713.881

Real properties:

684.02

The agreed yield strength in permanent deformation of 0.2% Fe.0.2

Re.0.2

Ao

MPa

i

Re.0.2  i

i

i

fccub_  30.696 MPa

average cube strength short prismatic strength:

fccub_    f fccyl   0.855  0.005  MPa  ccub_ 

474.329 496.357 493.844

tensile strength of concrete:

The average value of the measured characteristics:

 Re.0.2i i

Re.0.2.p 

3

 fccub_ fctm  0.274    MPa

Re.0.2.p  488.177  MPa

i

3

  

0.66

 MPa

fctm  2.63  MPa

modulus of elasticity:

 Rmi Rm.p 

fccyl  21.53  MPa

Ect  32000 MPa

Rm.p  700.204  MPa

statistical properties

 Asi As.p 

i

3

fyk  488.177 MPa

As.p  32.238  %

fyk fyd  1.15

fyd  424.5017 MPa

Figure 2.4-1: View of tested beam

Limit states


fccyl fcd  0.85  1.5

The lower area of reinforcement:

fcd  12.2025 MPa

Ast  3   

modulus of elasticity:

( 0.014  m)

2

Ast  4.62  cm

4

2

Force at the bottom reinforcement:

Ec  30000 MPa

Nst  Ast  fyd

Steel:

real properties

Nst  196.04 kN

The depth of compression zone of concrete:

yield stress of bars 14 fyk

fyk  488.177 MPa

fyd  1.15

yield stress of bars 6

x u  fyd  424.5017 MPa

Nst

x u  0.134  m

b  fcd

Ultimate bending moment: Re6

Re6  191.0  MPa

fyst  1.15

modulus of elasticity:

fyst  166.087MPa

xu    Mut  Nst   d  2  

Mut  21.77  kN  m

Shear resistance

E s  210000 MPa

Coefficients:

2. Theoretical calculation with the actual properties of materials

 q  1

 n  1

Force which bearing by concrete: The actual section width of the beam:

Vcu 

b  12.0  cm

The actual amount of the cross-section of the beam: h  20.0  cm

Real Densities:  bet  23.31  kN  m

 b  h   q  fctm

Vcu  21.00  kN

Area of stirrups: ( 0.006 m)

2

4

A ss  0.57  cm

Force in the stirrups:

a  1  m

Nss  Ass  fyst

Nss  9.39  kN

3

Distance between the stirrups:

The actual resistance of the beam

s s  0.160  m

Equivalent section height d  h  0.015  m 

3

Ass  2   

The actual length of the beam: l  2.5  m

1

0.014  m 2

Force per meter in the stirrups d  0.178  m

Nss fss  ss

Limit states

fss  58.70  kN  m

1

2

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Design of compressive strength

Department of Architecture

24


Length the inclined cracks:

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

25

c  d 

Deflection at the time of cracking

1.2   n  b  fctm

c  0.452  m

fss

x r 

Force which transferred by stirrups: Vssu  c  fss

Shear resistance load capacity Vut  Vcu  Vssu

n  As1  As2

 1 

 

b

Vssu  26.52  kN

Ac  b  x r  2  n  As2 

Vut  47.52  kN

z r 

Moment of cracking

  

2

x r  as2

x r  0.069  m

Ac  0.0095 m

xr

  2  As2  n  2

2  b  As1  d  As2  as2 n  As1  As2

xr 

b  xr   d 

1

x r  as2 xr

 d  as2

2

 z r  0.144  m

Ac

Area of reinforcement: As1  3  As2  2 

  ( 0.014  m)

2

As1  4.62  cm

4   ( 0.010  m)

2

As2  1.57  cm

4

2

2

as1  0.015  m  as2  0.025  m 

0.014  m 2 0.01  m 2

 r 

as1  0.022  m as2  0.030  m

Brb 

modulus ratio of steel and concrete: n 

Es

Br 

n  6.56

Ect

ideal cross-sectional characteristics:

Ai  b  h  n  As1  As2

bh x i 

h 2

Ai  0.0281 m

 n  As1  d  As2  as2

Ai 2

3

 5 

M rt M rt

 

 1

r  1

d  zr

Brb  1477.7 kN  m

2   1  E A  E A  c c s s1  1

Br  2788.8 kN  m

1  r   r    Bra Brb  

q0  b  h   bet

q0  0.559  kN  m

Bending moment by self-weight:

x i  0.106  m 4

Ii  1.025  10

m

M0 

4

1 8

 q0  l

2

M0  0.44  kN  m

Applied force which cause cracking

Moment of cracking: Ii Mrt  fctm  h  xi

Bra  0.85  Ect  Ii

Frt 

Mrt  2.86  kN  m

Limit states

Mrt  M0 a

Frt  2.42  kN

2

2

Self-weight:

2

h  2 2  b  h  b  h   x i    n  As1   d  x i  n  As2   x i  as2 Ii  2 12  1

 4   1

1

Bra  2788.8 kN  m

2


5 q0  l frt   384 Br

4

Frt  a 24  Br

2

2

 3l  4a

Department of Architecture

Proposal test load and load process

Deflection in cracking:

frt  0.64  mm

Deflection and crack width at base load Base load: Ms  0.5  Mut

1

Br 

Mrt 1  r    5  4   Ms

Ms  10.89 kN m

B  1534.2 kN  m

r 1  r   r    Bra Brb   Force which produce the base load:

 

 1

r  0.0783

2

Figure 2.4-2 Limit value of arm forces:

Fs 

Ms  M0

Mut ahr  Vut

Fs  10.45  kN

a

Deflection for base load: frt 

 st 

5 384

q0 l Br

As1

4

Selected value of lever arm: Fs a

24  B r

 3 l

2

 4 a

2

a

frt  4.37  mm

Ms

sr  fyd  M

 st  1.92  %

bh

ahr  0.458  m

ut

0.458m

1m  ahr

failure occurs of the moment

Self-weight of devices: Dynamometer sr  212.25 MPa

Fz1  0.170  kN

Hydraulic press

Fz2  0.350  kN

tb  6 

as1



tb  max 1 tb

h



tb  1

  1.2

k  2500

Piece for bearing load Fz3  0.600  kN

Crack width for base load:

Steel plate 1

sr 3 wa      k  tb  0.039   st   ( 1.2)  mm Es

  1

wa  0.0637 mm

Fz4  2  ( 10  mm  150 mm  100 mm)  78.5  kN  m

3

Fz4  0.024  kN

Rollers Fz5  2 

  ( 2  cm )

Limit states

4

2

 14  cm  78.5  kN  m

3

Fz5  0.007  kN

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

26


Together

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

27

Fz  Fz1  Fz2  Fz3  Fz4  Fz5

Fz  1.150  kN

Mi kN  m

Bending moment of self-weight equipment and beams: M0 

1

Fz

2

 q0  l 

8

2

M0  1.012  kN  m

a

the initial stage of loading: k 0 

M0

k 0  0.09

Ms

the degree of load at crack formation: k rt 

Mrt

k rt  0.26

Ms

Load levels:

k  k 0 0.15 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 k rt 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.5 3.0 n  18

T

i  1  n

Fl

i

pl i

kN

MPa

i

mm

ki 

1.0123

0

0

0

1.6329

1.2413

0.1951

0.0248

2.1772

2.3299

0.3663

0.0466

3.2658

4.5071

0.7086

0.0901

4.3545

6.6843

1.0508

0.1337

5.4431

8.8616

1.3931

0.1772

6.5317

11.0388

1.7354

0.2208

2.8593

3.694

0.5807

0.0739

7.6203

13.216

2.0777

0.2643

8.7089

15.3933

2.4199

0.3079

10.8861

19.7477

3.1045

0.395

13.0634

24.1022

3.7891

0.482

15.2406

28.4566

4.4736

0.5691

17.4178

32.8111

5.1582

0.6562

19.5951

37.1656

5.8427

0.7433

21.7723

41.52

6.5273

0.8304

27.2154

52.4062

8.2387

1.0481

32.6584

63.2923

9.9501

1.2658

0.093 0.15 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.2627 0.7 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.5 3

load moment: Mi  k i  Ms

Applied force produce by press: Fl  2 

Mi  M0 a

i

area of the press: Al  63.61  cm

2

4. Realization of load test test took place according to the specified scheme, measured by the rotation of all, deflection, rotation at mid-span and development of cracks 5. Evaluation of load test Graf deflection in the center of the beam on the degree of load:

pressure in the press:

n  15

Fl i pl  i Al

constant force measuring device: k s  50  kN  mm

i  1  n

Reading the deformometer:

1

T

P  ( 6.20 6.29 6.351 6.485 6.591 6.711 6.936 7.052 7.24 7.61 8.083 8.589 9.6 10.44 11.52) mm

Read on force measuring device:  i 

Fl

i

The resulting deflection:

ks

wi  Pi  P1

Limit states


deflection at the mid span of the beam

0

0.093 0.15

0.151

0.2

1.6

0.285

0.3

1.4

0.391

0.4

1.2

0.511

0.5

1

0.736

0.6

0.852

0.2627

1.6 1.4

0.8

1.04

0.6

1.41

0.4

1.883

0.2 0

2.389 0

1

2

3

4

deflection [mm]

5

6

3.4 4.24 5.32

1.8

Loading level [-]

1.8

Rotation on the end of the beam

2

ki 

0.09

2

Loading leve [-]

0.7

1.2 1 0.8 0.6

0.8

0.4

1 1.2

0.2

1.4

0

1.6

0

1

2

1.8

3

4

5

6

Rotation [mm/m]

Figure 2.4-4 Figure 2.4-3

L1 i

Graf rotation supporting cross-sectional view of the degree of load:

mm  m

Reading on the left side of the beam: T

1

L1.  ( 11.24 10.81 10.76 10.62 10.48 10.33 10.12 9.99 9.78 9.41 8.91 8.34 7.24 6.31 5.11 ) mm m

reading to the right side of the beam: T

L2.  ( 6.60 6.69 6.75 6.875 7.01 7.16 7.385 7.52 7.71 8.02 8.53 9.05 10.18 11.09 12.26 )  mm  m

the resulting rotation of the left end: L1  L1.  L1. i i 1

the resulting rotation to the right end: L2  L2.  L2. i i 1

1

L2 i 1

mm  m

1

0

0

0.43

0.09

0.48

0.15

0.62

0.275

0.76

0.41

0.91

0.56

1.12

0.785

1.25

0.92

1.46

1.11

1.83

1.42

2.33

1.93

2.9

2.45

4

3.58

4.93

4.49

6.13

5.66

ki  0.093 0.15 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.2627 0.7 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8

Graf of strain in the center of the beam for moment 0.5 Mrt Mrt 0.5 Mut: n  4

i  1  n

The original length of the measuring elements: l  20  cm

Limit states

7

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

wi mm

Department of Architecture

28


2.6 Shrinkage

height each measuring elements from the top of the beam

Shrinkage is the decrease of concrete volume with time. This decrease is due to changes in the

T

h  ( 1.4 8.2 14.9 22.5 )  cm

moisture content of the concrete and physicochemical changes, which occur without stress attributable

Reading the individual measuring elements:

to actions external to the concrete. Swelling is the increase of concrete volume with time. Shrinkage and

T

D1  ( 0.338 0.408 0.929 0.948 )  mm

swelling are usually expressed as a dimensionless strain (in./in. or mm/mm) under given conditions of

T

D2  ( 0.345 0.4081 0.9252 0.9398 )  mm

relative humidity and temperature. Concrete immersed in water does not shrink but may swell.

T

D3  ( 0.3765 0.4129 0.901 0.8785 )  mm

Shrinkage of high performance concrete may be expected to differ from conventional concrete

T

D4  ( 0.388 0.4129 0.8792 0.8425 )  mm

in three broad areas: plastic shrinkage, drying shrinkage, and autogenous shrinkage. Plastic shrinkage

resulting Strain:  1 

D1  D1 i i l

i

occurs during the first few hours after fresh concrete is placed. During this period, moisture may  3  i

D1  D3 i i l

 2  i

D1  D2 i i l

 4  i

D1  D4 i i l

evaporate faster from the concrete surface than it is replaced by bleed water from lower layers of the concrete mass. Paste-rich mixes, such as high performance concretes, will be more susceptible to plastic shrinkage than conventional concretes. Drying shrinkage occurs after the concrete has already attained

Average strain in the middle of the beam 1.4

its final set and a good portion of the chemical hydration process in the cement gel has been accomplished. Drying shrinkage of high strength concretes, although perhaps potentially larger due to higher paste volumes, do not, in fact, appear to be appreciably larger than conventional concretes. This

3.51

Depth [cm]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

29

is probably due to the increase in stiffness of the stronger mixes. Data for VES and HES mixes is limited.

5.62

Autogenous shrinkage due to self-desiccation is perhaps more likely in concretes with very low W/CM

7.73

ratio, although there is little data outside indirect evidence with certain high strength concrete research [Aitcin et al. 1990]. Shrinkage should not be confused with thermal contraction which occurs as concrete

9.84

loses the heat of hydration.

11.95

Shrinkage is a function of the paste, but is significantly influenced by the stiffness of the coarse

14.06

aggregate. The interdependence of many factors creates difficulty in isolating causes and effectively

16.17

predicting shrinkage without extensive testing. The key factors affecting the magnitude of shrinkage are:

18.28

20.39

Aggregate. The aggregate acts to restrain the shrinkage of cement paste; hence concrete with higher aggregate

22.5 Average strain [-]

Figure 2.4-5

content exhibits smaller shrinkage. In addition, concrete with aggregates of higher modulus of elasticity or of rougher surfaces is more resistant to the shrinkage process. 

Water-cementitious material ratio. The higher the W/C ratio is, the higher the shrinkage. This occurs due to two interrelated effects. As

W/C increases, paste strength and stiffness decrease; and as water content increases, shrinkage potential increases.

Limit states


Member size.

shrinkage varies according to the sequence of occurrence of carbonation and drying process. If both

Both the rate and the total magnitude of shrinkage decrease with an increase in the volume of the

phenomena take place simultaneously, less shrinkage develops. The process of carbonation, however,

concrete member. However, the duration of shrinkage is longer for larger members since more time is needed for shrinkage effects to reach the interior regions. 

2.7 Creep

Medium ambient conditions.

Creep is the time-dependent increase in strain of hardened concrete subjected to sustained stress. It is

The relative humidity greatly affects the magnitude of shrinkage; the rate of shrinkage is lower at

usually determined by subtracting, from the total measured strain in a loaded specimen, the sum of the initial instantaneous strain (usually considered elastic) due to sustained stress, the shrinkage, and any

higher values of relative humidity. Shrinkage becomes stabilized at low temperatures. 

is dramatically reduced at relative humidities below 50 percent.

thermal strain in an identical load-free specimen, subjected to the same history of relative humidity and

Admixtures. Admixture effect varies from admixture to admixture. Any material which substantially changes the

pore structure of the paste will affect the shrinkage characteristics of the concrete. In general, as pore

temperature conditions. Tests indicate a reduction in the creep coefficient for HPC. At the same time, the creep coefficient is constant up to a higher stress ratio for high strength than for low strength concrete.

refinement is enhanced, shrinkage is increased. Pozzolans typically increase the drying shrinkage, due to several factors. With adequate curing,

Experimental results reported in by Ngab indicate an even higher reduction of the creep

pozzolans generally increase pore refinement. Use of a pozzolan results in an increase in the relative

coefficient. Testing of Specimens of concrete strength of 60-70 MPa under unsealed conditions showed

paste volume due to two mechanisms; pozzolans have a lower specific gravity than portland cement

that the creep coefficient was about 50 to 75% of that of normal strength concrete. Under sealed

and, in practice, more slowly reacting pozzolans (such as Class F fly ash) are frequently added at better

conditions the creep coefficient of HPC increased to 75 to 90% of that of normal strength concrete. The

than one-to-one volume replacement factor, in order to attain specified strength at 28 days. Additionally,

stress-creep relation for HPC was found to be approximately linear over a range from 0 to about 70% of

since pozzolans such as fly ash and slag do not contribute significantly to early strength, pastes

the ultimate strength, while normal strength concrete has a linear stress-creep relation only up to about

containing pozzolans generally have a lower stiffness at earlier ages as well, making them more

30 to 50%.

susceptible to increased shrinkage under standard testing conditions. Silica fume will contribute to strength at an earlier age than other pozzolans but may still increase shrinkage due to pore refinement. Chemical admixtures will tend to increase shrinkage unless they are used in such a way as to reduce

2.7-1 The investigation of the effects of shrinkage of a composite concrete structure

the evaporable water content of the mix, in which case the shrinkage will be reduced. Calcium chloride,

Time - dependent analysis of prestressed and partially prestressed concrete composite beams is

used to accelerate the hardening and setting of concrete, increases the shrinkage. Air-entraining agents,

difficult and complicated, because the cross-section can be cracked or without cracks,

however, seem to have little effect.

depending on the degree and level of load. Solving methods that are available are not

Cement.

sufficiently simple that they can be commonly used in practice.

Type the effects of cement type are generally negligible except as rate-of-strength-gain changes.

If there is no available a good building model, it is virtually impossible to perform any useful

Even here the interdependence of several factors make it difficult to isolate causes. Rapid hardening cement gains strength more rapidly than ordinary cement but shrinks somewhat more than other types, primarily due to an increase in the water demand with increasing fineness. Shrinkage compensating cements can be used to minimize shrinkage cracking if they are used with appropriate restraining reinforcement. 

time - dependent analysis of structures. It is also necessary to understand the basic facts and physical mechanism of creep and shrinkage. Examine the cross section of two coupled concrete varying quality ( Ec) And also of different ages, which will be reflected on the effect of stress such cross-section.

Carbonation. Carbonation shrinkage is caused by the reaction between carbon dioxide (CO2) present in the

atmosphere and calcium hydroxide (CaOH2) present in the cement paste. The amount of combined

Limit states

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

30


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

31

Figure: 2.7.1-2 Figure: 2.7.1-1 A) Because the cross-section of external forces do not act, we can write the following

E

equilibrium conditions:

E

or when the external forces do not act on the cross-section, we can write the following

1

0

N

1

i

N

2

M

2

equilibrium conditions: V

E J m

M M

1

2

M

M

0

1

i

1 1

E J

E J

M

2 2

Because

2

E J

E J

Nr

N

1 1

1

Nr 

2 2

1 1

E J

M

2 2

E J

1

E J

M 1 

1

M

Nr  M

2

1 1 

will be

1

 E1  J 1    E J   2 2

Nr 

 2 2

then

E J

1 1

B) When Composite member should have two of the same curvature (the difference  and 1  Is

2

M

negligible at large values of the radius of curvature R)

1

2 2

Nr 

1

M

dx

(   z )  d    d

z

dx

  d

    

z 

 z  E dF

z

 E

 E     

M

E

M

2

M

z dF

   

E 

1

E E

J

1 1

thus

1 2

1 1

We gate  zm

E J  E J

1 1

2 2

E J

2 2

E Nr 

Nr 

E J

E

  z dF M

E J

E J

1

J

2

1

E J 

1

E

m J M

2 2

J

2

1

Nr 

J

1

m J  J

1

M

2

2

Nr 

2

m J  J

1

2

C) Beam curvature and avoiding the displacement of joint offset in part 1 and 2 can be provided

1

M

1

M

E J

E J

1

1 1

M

to merge continuity cross- sections before and after deformation (for simplicity we introduced 2

E J

2 2

an element of length L = 1 m, then the deformation l will soon be relative deformation) The equation for curvature dx

Limit states

  d

1 

 dx

d

also

1 

 

M

1

E J

1 1

M

2

E J

2 2


M r

    r

M r

1

2

E J

Deformation  and  flow from Hook's law 1 2

E J

1 1

2 2

N

1

M

N F

1

J

1

z

1

1

 N M2    z  2  F J 2 2  

2

E F

When investigating continuous structures will be advantageous to calculate the support bending moments and use them to construct a diagram of additional bending moments for continuous beam. Values of moments can be determined using the equation of the force method, where the outer deformation io is obtained by the relationship derived here:

Figure: 2.7.1-3

Then the total relative deformation as shown we can write (beware of the forces only affects

Figure: 2.7.1-4

deformation by shrinkage of the balance shrinkage Parts 1 and 2):

 

1  

 zm

 1zm   2zm

   

1

2

M´  r N  N1 2 1     E F E J E F 2 2 1 1  1 1

N

1

E F

N 

1 1

2

E F

2 2

Nr

2

   2 2

E J  E J

1 1

 1zm   2zm

N

l

1 E F

1 1

then

1 E F

2 2

r

1

Nr 

2

1 F

E J  E J

1 1

m J M

 N

1

m F



2

and

2

M

2

Nr 

 m  r 2

m J  J

1

 III

M

1

1 1

2

E J

2 2

2

  II

3  

2

  III

l

M  2  1  

2  E1  J 1    II l

M  3  1  

2  E1  J 1    III

l

M  2  2  

2  E2  J 2    II l

l I

1  

2

  I

M  3  2  

2  E2  J2    III

2

Then

2

m J  J

2  

l

2zm

1

m J

1

m J  J

1

2 2

1zm

E J

 II

thus

M

On this basis, we can determine the rotation of the numbers of individual parts as follows:

Then we can express the unknown force N:

1

M  l  M  1  1  2  1     2  E1  J 1  2  E1  J 1   I   II

l

2

10

From these results, we can calculate the stress level of each section, and therefore the entire

the investigation of the fiber after the neutral axis of the respective cross section - Part 1 and 2:

l  M  M  2  1  3  1     2  E1  J 1  2  E1  J 1  II III

l

cross-section of the eccentric patterns for strain pressure, where z and z are the distance from 1 2

20

Limit states

M  l  M  1  2  2  2     2  E2  J 2  2  E2  J 2   I   II

l

l  M  M  2  2  3  2     2  E2  J2  2  E2  J2  II III

l

l

M  1  1  

2  E1  J 1   I

l

M  1  2  

2  E2  J2   I

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

then the strain will be

Department of Architecture

32


From the equations of the force method:

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

33

X



1( t ) 11

X



2( t ) 12



10

0

X



1( t ) 21

X



2( t ) 22



20

Differential equations

0

= d . When the concrete of the two beams is the same age, then=1, ´ =  , ´ 11 11 10( t ) 10( t )

at any time . The finale effect of shrinkage We can calculate the unknown moments X , X 1( t ) 2( t )

because, go = constant. then d = Const. and further will be: 10( t )

is determined by summing together the two effects. Then we can determined the stresses in different cross sections due to moments X , X , as in the classic cross-section composed 1( t ) 2( t ) of two materials with different modulus of elasticity. In our case, when we introduced

E E

1

10( t )

dx

1( t )

d



11

X



1( t ) 11



10

dx

0

1( t )

d

X

1( t )

 10        11 

M

then stresses at the interface of Parts 1 and 2, intended for the same deformation (from Hook's

Where M is the bending moment above the support in a monolithic beam

law).

the equation has solution as follows. 

1

2

1

E

1

E

2

E

2

1

E

1 2



2

 

2

X

transformed cross-section (introduction

E E

1 2

 ) Ji W i z the

M ( t)

1( t )

M

stress will be  2

M

1  e  

where

Wi

 0 

   ( t)   t

0

Stress in cross-section we find, by means of the calculation of section Properties of

0

d

,

2

d

B). simplified procedure Is based on the following equation:

Creep of concrete in the calculation of structures X

A) Solution using differential equations

11( t ) 1( t )



10( t )

0

X

1( t )

10( t )

10

 

Where

Ec( t )

 10( t )        11( t ) 

then

 1  e   Ec          

11( t )

 

    

M M

1

 

0 0

We use the L'Hospital's rule (derivative by  numerators, denominators fraction) 

 

Figure: 2.7.1-5

Limit states

lim  0

          1      (  )   1         (    )   e   2     1       

ds

            1      1  e  

If we neglect the reinforcement, then   

1

Ec( t )  J c


 

lim  0

           1      e   lim ( )    2   0  1      

 if =0, then  = then next

Ec( t )

Ec 

1  e(   ) 

Then (see Bending moment diagrams):

1

11( t ) Ec 

11( t )

1  e(   ) 

 Jc

   

M  M ds

1

1

1 2  2  l  (   )   J c 2 3 Ec  1  e

2   l (   )   J c 3 Ec  1  e

Figure: 2.7.1-6

10( t )

10( t )

10

10





  Ec  J c   

1. Span M  M ds

1

1

t1 

3    go  l     Ec  Jc 12   

  2 1 2 1  2   l   go  l    E  J 2  c c 3 8

1

   ( )  

0

1

t1  0.083

12

t4 

1month

t2 

2 12

t4  8.333 

12

t2  0.167

t3 

305

3 12

t3  0.25

10

And  X

1( t )

M ( t)

Ec  J c

go  l

3

12

   Ec  J c  1  e 

 o 

 2  l   3

X

1( t )

M ( t)

1 8

2

 go  l  1  e

(   )

M  1  e

(   )

t 3 

5

3 12

k

or

4

Ec 

1  MPa

l 

1m

J 

1  m4

go 

1  kN  m

t 3  0.25

Rocsh  1mes 

1e

 1mes  0.501

Limit states

t1

 2mes 

1e

 2mes  0.579

t2

 3mes 

1e

 3mes  0.627

t3

1

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

 

c) The simplified procedure in the construction of two unknown moments

          1         2     2     e   2   1      

Department of Architecture

34


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

35

t4

1e

 nekone 

 nekone 

11t  1.706

1

i=1.3

     1  e 2 

2

t4

1 e

     1  e 1

t2    o

 2.105

     1  e 3

1 e

Ec 

  o

1e



3

 2.496

1

Ect  Ec  1

i

1 e

 1.864

3

   1

1e

   1 e 3

Ect  Ec  3

22t 

t3 

   i

Ecti

t4

t4

1

   2

1 e

   1 e 1

3

12t 

t1    o

Ect  Ec  2

1

1 e

   1 e 2

0.368

2

2

0.417

d

10( t )

10

2( t ) 12( t )

0



10( t )

X 

1 21( t )

X



2( t ) 22( t )

0



20( t )

We Calculate the coefficient ij as in elastic state, but we consider a change of modulus of elasticity of concrete (see figure) 1

11( t ) Ec 

11t 

1e 



1

   

1

 Jc

   

then

M M d

1

1

 E c  J c

s

1

M  M ds 

1

1

Ec 

1e 



2

   

10t 

 1 2 1   1 2 1  2 1 2 1   l   go  l         l   go  l      1000   1 2 E  J E  J 3 8 2 3 8 2 c c    

10t  0.192

20t 

 1 2 1   1 2 1  2 1 2 1   l   go  l         l   go  l      1000   2 3 E  J E  J 3 8 2 3 8 2 c c    

20t  0.165

2

We substitute calculated values (all applicable to Part t = ) mentioned in Condition

M  M ds

1

  1 2 1   1 2 1 2 1 2 1   l   go  l          l   go  l      2 1  Ec  Jc 3 8 2 2  Ec  J c 3 8

101  1  102  2

System of conditional equations: 1 11( t )



 e 

10t



d

e

1.86364327

0.4533558

X

1.534

2.10523659

0.41714226

X 

22t 

0.4

2.49628063

 MPa

0.36759053

 1 1  1 2     l  1    103  kN  m       2 3    2 3 1 e  E  1  e  J Ec   J c      2 3   

21t 

we know that:

i 

i

21t  12t

We get them by multiplying the respective values of elastic coefficients of creep, because

Ect 

12t  0.4

Coefficients i0 ( t ) represent creep deformation caused by external loading (self-weight go).

 0.453

3

 1 1 1 3    l  1    10  kN  m   2 3   2 E  1  e   J  c   2  

1

Equation system of conditional equations:

 Jc

X1t 

 1 1 2 1 1 2 3   l 1     1  l    10  kN  m       2 3 2 3      1 2  J 1  e  J  E  1  e  Ec  c     1 2  

Limit states

5  kN  m

X2t 

10  kN  m

Given X1t  11t  X2t  12t  10t  kN  m

0

X1t  21t  X2t  22t  20t  kN  m

0


If

Ec 

11t 

X1t  0.093 m  kN

32000  MPa

go 

30  kN  m 1

l 

X2t  0.084 m  kN

27  m

I 

2.57  m

4

 1 1 2 1 1 2 3   l     l    10  kN  m        2 3 2 3     1 2  J 1  e  J  E  1  e  E  c  c    1 2  

11t  0.00143935

12t 

22t 

 1 1 1 3    l  1    10  kN  m     2 2 3 E  1  e  J c    2  

12t  0.00034

21t  12t

21t  0

 1 1  1 2     l  1    103  kN  m 22t  0.001       2 3    2 3 1 e  E  1  e  J Ec   J c      2 3   

10t 

 1 2 1   1 2 1  2 1 2 1   l   go  l         l   go  l      1000   1 2 E  J E  J 3 8 2 3 8 2 c c    

10t  3.538

20t 

  1 2 1   1 2 1 2 1 2 1   l   go  l         l   go  l      1000   2 3 E  J E  J 3 8 2 3 8 2 c c    

20t  3.052

The system of conditional equations: X1t 

5  kN  m

X2t 

10  kN  m

Given X1t  11t  X2t  12t  10t  kN  m

 X1t     Find  X1t X2t   X2t 

0 X1t  2029.749 m  kN

X1t  21t  X2t  22t  20t  kN  m

0

X2t  1828.576 m  kN

Limit states

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

 X1t     Find  X1t X2t   X2t 

Department of Architecture

36


3. Structural system consists of the primary load-bearing structure, including its members and

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

37

connections. An analysis of a structural system consists of determining the reactions, deflections, and sectional forces and corresponding stresses caused by external loads. Methods for determining these depend on both the external loading and the type of structural system that is assumed to resist these loads.

Figure 3.2: Structural system of reinforced concrete members 3.1 Reinforced Concrete Beams Beams are structural elements carrying external loads that cause bending moments. Shear forces and torsional moments along their length. The beams can be singly or doubly reinforced and can be simply supported, fixed or continuous. The structural details of such beams must resist bending, diagonal tension, shear and torsion and must be such as to transmit forces through a bond without causing internal cracking. The details must be able to optimize the behaviour of the beams under load. The shapes of the beams can be square, rectangular, flanged or tee (T). Although it is more economical to use concrete in compression, it is not always possible to obtain an adequate sectional area of concrete owing to restrictions imposed on the size of the beam (such as restrictive head room). The flexural capacity of the beam is increased by providing compression reinforcement in the compression zone of the beam which acts with tensile reinforcement. It is

Figure 3.1: Perspective view of RC frames

then called a doubly reinforced concrete beam. As beams usually support slabs, it is possible to

Loads are forces that act or may act on a structure. For the purpose of predicting the

make use of the slab as part of a T-beam. In this case the slab is generally not doubly reinforced.

resulting behaviour of the structure, the loads, or external influences, including forces, consequent displacements, and support settlements, are presumed to be known. Loads are typically divided into two general classes: dead load, which is the weight of a structure including all of its permanent components, and live load, which is comprised of all loads other than dead loads. In a statically determinate system, all reactions and internal member forces can be calculated solely from equations of equilibrium. However, if equations of equilibrium alone do not provide enough information to calculate these forces, the system is statically indeterminate. In this case, adequate information for analyzing the system will only be gained

Where beams are carried over a series of supports, they are called continuous beams. A simple beam bends under a load and a maximum positive bending moment exists at the centre of the beam. The bottom of the beam which is in tension is reinforced. The bars are cut off where bending moments and shear forces allow it. In a continuous beam the sag (deflection) of the centre of the beam is coupled with the hog at the support. An adequate structural detailing is required to cater for these changes. The reinforcement bars and their cut-off must follow the final shape of the final bending moment diagram. Where beams, either straight or curved, are subjected to in-plane loading, they are subjected to torsional moments in addition to flexural bending and shear. The shape of such

by also considering the resulting structural deformations. A member subjected to pure compression, such as a column, can fail under axial load in either of two modes. One is characterized by excessive axial deformation and the second by

a moment must be carefully studied prior to detailing of reinforcement. The structural detailing of reinforcing bars must prevent relative movement or slip between them and the concrete.

flexural buckling or excessive lateral deformation.

Structural system


Figure 3.1-1 Figure 3.1-2

Structural system STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

38


Example 3.1-1: The cross - section dimensions of a beam shown on figure 3.1.1-1 are

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

39

subjected to bending moment Msd. Determine the required tension reinforcement to the crosssection.

Msd

 

Material data:

  0.09368

2

b  d  fcd

Characteristic value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa): fck  40  MPa

1) To apply the design, the bending moment Msd has to be brought into a dimensionless form:

From the design diagram B3-B3.3, for fyk = 300 MPa we obtain the reinforcement ratio:   0.03833

fckcyl  0.8  fck

2

The required tension reinforcement A2 ( cm ) is as follows:

Design value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa): 2

fcd  0.85 

fckcyl 1.5

3

fcd  18.13333 MPa

 fckcyl    MPa fctm  3.04015 MPa  10  MPa 

fctm  1.4  

Characteristic yield stress of reinforcement (MPa):

fyk  300 MPa

fyd 

Ecm  35  GPa

e 

fyk 1.15 Es Ecm

MN

Ast  6 

e  5.71429

( 1.8  cm )

2

Ast  0.00141m

2

Ast  0.00153m



4

  0.12

2

we provide

2

x    d

x  0.0696m

x u  0.8  x

L  6  m

The required compression reinforcement Asc ( cm ) is as follows:

Asc 

dst  0.02  m

Ast  fyd  x u  b  fcd

Asc  4 

d  0.58 m

Msd  0.200  MN  m

Asc  0.00017m

fyd ( 1.2  cm )

Design maximum bending moment ( MN  m):

4

2

2

Asc  0.00045m



we provide

2

w 

Ast  Asc bh

w  0.00942

Compression forces acting in the reinforcement resp. in concrete and tension force in tension reinforcement are calculated as follows:

Fsc  Asc  fyd

Fst  Ast  fyd

Fc  x u  b  fcd

Fsc  118.01461kN

Fst  398.29931kN

Fc  353.3824kN

Fsc  Fc  471.39701kN 2

Area of the transformed uncracked cross-section ( m )

x u  0.05568m

2

h  0.60  m

Effective depth of a cross-section (m): d  h  dst

 100 cm

Es  200 GPa

Cover of reinforcement (m): dsc  0.02  m

  b  d  fcd 

The depth of compression zone: fyd  260.87 MPa

Cross-section ( m): b  0.35  m

Ast 

Figure: 3.1.1-1

Ai  b  h  e  Ast  Asc

Structural system

Ai  0.22131m

2


further determine the stiffness of the beam with the complete exclusion of tension in concrete, then the depth of the compression zone x r we determined from the conditions of the balance

agi 

forces in cross section, which after the treatment can be written in the form:

b  h  0.5  h  e  Asc  dsc  Ast  h  dst 

agi  0.30777m

Ai

2

Moment of inertia of the transformed uncracked cross-section ( m ) 2

3 1

Ii  b  h 

x r 

12

 h  a     A  a  d 2  A  h  d  a 2 gi  e  sc  gi sc st  st gi   2 

 bh

Ii  0.00717m

c1  8.58089 MPa

e  Ast  Asc

2



x r  0.14163m

 

fcd  c1

Ac  b  x r  2  e  Asc 

x r  dsc

Ac  0.05401m

xr

2

Arm of internal forces:

Msd

c2  8.14774 MPa

 Ii     h  agi 

 2

b xr

 4   e  A sc  d sc 

z r  d 

x r  d sc xr

z r  0.51336m

2 A c

 

b

2  b  Ast  d  Asc  dsc

1

where b   xr  2 the static moment of area A c based to the upper compression edge of the crosssection, bending stiffness of the beam with total exclusion of tension in concrete will:

fctm  c2

 1 

first, we determine:

Msd

 Ii     agi  Stress in tension (MPa): c2 

4

Stress in compression (MPa): c1  

e  Ast  Asc

 

Fsc  agi  dsc  Fc   agi 

xu  2

  Fst  d  agi  

Brb 

Msd

The ultimate bending moment is found using the following equation:

d  zr

2

Brb  68720.14187m  kN

2  1    E A  E  A s st cm c  

The resulting bending stiffness:

xu   Mu  Fc   d    Fsc   d  dsc 2 

Mu  261.21181m  kN

Mu  Msd

ok

r 

Mcr 

Ii h  agi

 fctm

Mcr  74.62552m  kN

Ms 

Msd 1.12

Ms  178.57143m  kN

Br 

b) Determine the bending stiffness

1 4

 Mcr

5

Ms

 1

1 1  r   r    Brb   Bra

- element has no cracks the bending stiffness we determine using the following equation: Br  0.85  Ecm  Ii

2

Br  213406.5593m  kN

- the element with the expected cracks first determine the stiffness of the beam without crack:

Structural system

r  0.27238

r  0

2

Br  84284.9175m  kN

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

The distance of the extreme fibre from the neutral axis (m):

Department of Architecture

40


Excessive deflections are unacceptable in building construction, as they can cause

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

41

cracking of plaster in ceilings and can result in jamming of doors and windows. Most building codes limit the amount of allowable deflection as a proportion of the member’s length, i.e. 1/180, 1/240 or 1/500 of the length. It can be seen that deflection is greatly influenced by the span L, and that the best resistance is provided by beams which have the most depth (d), resulting in a large moment of inertia.

flim 

L 500

Every building, whether it is large or small, must have a structural system capable of carrying all kinds of loads - vertical, horizontal, temperature, etc. In principle, the entire resisting system of the building should be equally active under all types of loading. In other words, the structure resisting horizontal loads should be able to resist vertical loads as well, and many individual elements should be common to both types of systems. A beam may be determinate or indeterminate

Deflection: 5 Ms 2 f   L 48 Br

3.1-1 Continuous beams

Statically determinate beams are those beams in which the reactions of the supports may be determined by the use of the equations of static equilibrium.

f  7.9449904 mm

If the number of reactions exerted upon a beam exceeds the number of equations in static flim  0.012 m

equilibrium, the beam is said to be statically indeterminate. In order to solve the reactions of

f  flim

the beam, the static equations must be supplemented by equations based upon the elastic deformations of the beam. The degree of indeterminacy is taken as the difference between the number of reactions to the number of equations in static equilibrium that can be applied. The degree of indeterminacy is taken as the difference between the number of reactions to the number of equations in static equilibrium that can be applied. Continuous beams are those that rest over three or more supports, thereby having one or more redundant support reactions. According to figure 3.1.1-1, we determine the reactions and sketch the shear diagrams. Then we compute the values of maximum vertical shear V and maximum positive bending moment M. Sufficient reinforcement should be provided at all sections to resist the envelope of the acting tensile force, including the effect of inclined cracks in webs and flanges. The area of steel provided over supports with little or no end fixity assumed in design, should be at least 25% of the area of steel provided in the span. Where a beam is supported by a beam instead of a wall or column, reinforcement should be provided and designed to resist the mutual reaction. This reinforcement is in addition to that required for other reasons. This rule also applies to a slab not supported at the Figure: 3.1.1-2

top of a beam.

Structural system


Figure 3.1.1-3: equal spans of continuous beam A uniform load is carried over the more than 3 equal spans with different shapes of crosssection as shown in figure 3.1.1-4, figure 3.1.1-5.

Figure 3.1.1-1 A continuous beam carries a uniform load over two equal spans as shown in figure 3.1.1-1. A beam carrying the loads shown in figure 3.1.1-2 is composed of four spans. It is supported

Figure 3.1.1-4: four spans continuous beam

by five vertical reactions. We determine the values of the bending moments over supports as follows.

Figure 3.1.1-5

Figure 3.1.1-2

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

A uniform load is carried over three equal spans as shown in figure 3.1.1-3.

Department of Architecture

42


symmetrical T-beams shall not exceed 0.40 of the span length of a simply supported beam or

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

43

0.25 of the span length of a continuous beam, and its overhanging width on either side of the web shall not exceed 12 times the slab thickness, nor one-half of the clear distance of the next web.

Figure 3.1.1-8

Figure 3.1.1-6: Floor T-Beam Reinforcing Elevation According to figure 3.1.1-7 a simple beam shown of length L that carries a uniform load of gd (kN/m) throughout its length and is held in equilibrium by reactions Ra and Rb. Assume that the beam is cut at a distance of Sm from the left support and the portion of the beam to the right of Sm be removed. The portion removed must then be replaced by vertical shearing force V together with a couple M to hold the left portion of the bar in equilibrium under the action of Ra and gd Sm.

Figure 3.1.1-9: cross-section of T-beam Without shear reinforcement the beam would have a catastrophic failure due to shearweb and flexure-shear cracks. These cracks would form due to the shear forces in the beam and cause equivalent tension stresses that would cause failure in the beam since concrete is very weak in tension. There-fore stirrups at a determined spacing are used to provide a source of tensile strength against these shear forces (and equivalent tensile stresses). figure 3.1.1-8 shows Figure 3.1.1-7: Simple supported rectangular reinforced concrete beam

a sample factored shear diagram for the floor load of reinforced concrete beam.

In T-beam construction, the flange and web shall be built integrally or otherwise effectively bonded together. The effectively flange width to be used in the design of

Structural system


connections in perfect fixed. This frame becomes very strong, and must resist the various loads that act on a structure during service load figure 3.1.1-11 and figure 3.1.1-12.

Figure 3.1.1-11: Internal column beam multi-storey frame

Figure 3.1.1-10: The shear diagram of reinforced concrete beam Concrete frame structures are very common – or perhaps the most common – type of modern building. This type of building consists of a frame or skeleton of concrete. Horizontal members of this frame are called beams and slabs, and vertical members are called columns.

Figure 3.1.1-12: corner column – beam connection

The column is the most important, as it is the primary load-carrying element of the building. The structural system of a building is a complex three-dimensional assembly of interconnected discrete or continuous structural elements. The primary function of the structural system is to carry all the loads acting on the building effectively and safely to the foundation. The structural system is therefore expected to: 1.

Carry dynamic and static vertical loads.

2.

Carry horizontal loads due to wind and earthquake effects.

3.

Resist stresses caused by temperature and shrinkage effects.

4.

Resist external or internal blast and impact loads.

5.

Resist, and help damp vibrations and fatigue effects.

Figure 3.1.1-13

The design principle of Strong Beam-Column Joints is essential for building structure to resist horizontal load such as wind or earthquakes figure 3.1.1-11. So the structure is actually a connected frame of members, each of which are firmly connected to each other. These connections are called moment connections, which means that

Figure 3.1.1-14 Redistribution procedures for frames

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

the two members are firmly connected to each other. In concrete frame structures have moment

Department of Architecture

44


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

45 Structural floor systems are, of course, influenced by the material used, but in all cases

consider throughout the design process, but especially during the initial planning stages. In

they are a combination of slabs and joists or secondary beams (floor beams in the case of larger

general, span lengths, floor loads, and geometry of a floor panel all play a key role in the

spacing). The characteristic element, for the whole floor structure, is the floor slab whose

selection process The section fails if the design moment exceeds the resistance moment

thickness and reinforcement is dependent upon the span, the loading and the support conditions.

Figure 3.1.1-16: Continuous reinforced concrete slabs Additional parameters must be considered when selecting an economical floor system. The corners of the slab lift, if they are not loaded by vertical forces of constructions above, resulting in torsional moments.

Figure 3.1.1-15: Diagram of reinforcement in RC frame They are structural elements with a small thickness comparable to their dimensions in the other two directions. Used for floor, roofs and bridge decks. Maybe supported by edge beams or walls, or they may be supported directly by columns, flat slab. When two-way slab

Figure 3.1.1-17

systems are supported directly on columns, shear around the columns is critically important,

The most efficient floor plan is rectangular, not square, in which main beams span the

especially at exterior slab-column connections where the total exterior slab moment must be

shorter distance between columns and closely spaced floor beams span the longer distance

transferred directly to the column.

between main beams. The spacing of the floor beams is controlled by the spanning capability

For a typical continuous RC slab as shown in figure 3.1.1-16, is a flexural member that

of the concrete floor construction.

requires flexural reinforcement in addition to the concrete strength. Concrete, reinforcement,

The structure rests on foundations, which transfer the forces – from the building and on the

and formwork are the three primary expenses in cast-in-place concrete floor construction to

building – to the ground.

Structural system


Example 3.1-2: The cross - section dimensions of a beam shown on figure 3.1.2-2 are subjected

connections, which are used in steel structures figure 3.1.1-18 and figure 3.1.1-19.

to bending moment Msd and Nsd Determine the required tension reinforcement to the section. Msd  0.2198 MN  m

Nsd  0.120  MN

fck  20  MPa

Characteristic value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa): fckcyl  0.8  fck

Design value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa): fcd  0.85 

fckcyl

fcd  9.06667 MPa

1.5

Es  200 GPa

Ecm  29  GPa

e 

Es Ecm

e  6.89655

Characteristic yield stress of reinforcement (MPa): fyk  412 MPa

fyd 

. Figure 3.1.1-18

fyk 1.15

fyd  358.26 MPa

Cross sectional dimensions: b  0.30  m

h  0.55  m

Cover of reinforcement (m): dst  0.03  m

dsc  0.03  m

Effective depth of a cross-section (m): d  h  dst

d  0.52 m

Design maximum bending moment ( MN  m): Msd  0.2198 MN  m

Figure 3.1.1-19

1) To apply the design diagram B3-B3.3 the bending moment Msd has to be brought into a dimensionless form: h  Mtot  Msd  Nsd    dst Mtot  190.4 m  kN 2 

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

There are other types of connections, including hinged connections, respectively fixed

Department of Architecture

46


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

47

Mtot

 

Stress in compression (MPa)

  0.25888

2

b  d  fcd

c1 

c2 

2

The required tension reinforcement A2 ( cm ) is as follows: MN

2

 100 cm 

c1  10.49229 MPa

Ii

Stress in tension (MPa)

  0.083

  b  d  fcd 

Mtot 

Ai

agi

From the Design Table we obtain the reinforcement ratio:

Ast 

Nsd

Nsd Ai

Mtot

c2  10.95  MPa

Ii h  a gi

Nsd

Ast  0.00151m

fyd

2

The depth of compression zone:   0.3829

x    d

x u  0.8  x

x  0.19911m

x u  0.15929m

2

The required compression reinforcement Asc ( cm ) is as follows: fyd  Asc  x u  b  fyd

Asc 

Ast  fyd

Ast  fyd  x u  b  fcd

Asc  0.0003m

fyd

2

Figure: 3.1.2-1

Compression forces acting in the reinforcement resp. in concrete and tension force in tension reinforcement are calculated as follows: Fst  Ast  fyd

Fc  x u  b  fcd

Fsc  107.32206kN

Fst  540.58106kN

Fc  433.25901kN

Fsc  Fc  540.58106kN

 

Mu  Fc   d 

 xu

2

Area of the transformed uncracked cross-section ( m )

Mu1  Fc  

Ai  0.17747m

xu  2

  Fst  d  agi  

Msd

The ultimate bending moment is found using the following equation:

Fsc  Asc  fyd

Ai  b  h  e  Ast  Asc

 

Fsc  agi  dsc  Fc   agi 

2

2

xu  2

  Fsc   d  dsc  

 dsc  Ast  fyd  d  dsc

Mu  243.37636m  kN

Mu  Msd

Mu1  243.37636 m  kN

Mu1  Msd

ok

The distance of the extreme fibre from the neutral axis (m) agi 

b  h  0.5  h  e  Asc  dsc  Ast  h  dst  Ai

agi  0.28651m

2

Moment of inertia of the transformed uncracked cross-section ( m ) 3 1

Ii  b  h 

12

2

 h  a     A  a  d 2  A  h  d  a 2 gi  e  sc  gi sc st  st gi   2 

 bh

Ii  0.00488m

4

Structural system

Figure: 3.1.2-2


1) To apply the design diagram B 3 – B 3-3 the bending moment Msd has to be brought into a

to bending moment Msd. Determine the required tension reinforcement to the section.

dimensionless form:

Characteristic value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa): fck  20  MPa

Msd

 

  0.33094

2

b  d  fcd

fckcyl  0.8  fck

From the Design table, we obtain the reinforcement ratio:

Design value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa): fcd  0.85 

fckcyl 1.5

Es  200 GPa

  0.11637 fcd  9.067  MPa Ecm  29  GPa

e 

Es Ecm

Characteristic yield stress of reinforcement (MPa): fyk  412 MPa

fyd 

fyk

fyd  358.26 MPa

1.15

e  6.89655

The depth of compression zone:   0.52113

x    d

x u  0.8  x

x  0.24441m

2

The required tension reinforcement A2 ( cm ) is as follows: Ast 

  b  d  fcd  MN

 100 cm

2

Ast  0.00148m

2

Cross sectional dimensions:

b  0.30  m

2

The required compression reinforcement Asc ( cm ) is as follows:

h  0.5  m

fyd  Asc  x u  b  fyd

Cover of reinforcement (m): dst  0.031  m

Ast  fyd

Asc 

Ast  fyd  x u  b  fcd fyd

Asc  0.0001486 cm

2

dsc  0.031  m

Effective depth of a cross-section (m): d  h  dst

x u  0.19553m

d  0.469 m

Design maximum bending moment ( MN  m):

Compression forces acting in the reinforcement resp. in concrete and tension force in tension reinforcement are calculated as follows: Fsc  Asc  fyd

Fst  Ast  fyd

Fc  x u  b  fcd

Fsc  0.00532kN

Fst  531.84142kN

Fc  531.83609kN

Fsc  Fc  531.84142kN

Msd  0.198  MN  m 2

Area of the transformed uncracked cross-section ( m ):

Ai  b  h  e  Ast  Asc

Ai  0.16024m

2

The distance of the extreme fibre from the neutral axis (m):

Figure: 3.1.3-1

agi 

b  h  0.5  h  e  Asc  dsc  Ast  h  dst 

Structural system

Ai

agi  0.26399m

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Example 3.1-3: The cross - section dimensions of a beam shown on figure 3.1.3-1 are subjected

Department of Architecture

48


Example 3.1-4: The cross - section dimensions of a beam shown on figure 3.1.4.-1 are subjected to bending moment Msd and compression force Nsd . Determine the required tension

2

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

49

Moment of inertia of the transformed uncracked cross-section ( m ): 3 1

Ii  b  h 

12

2

 h  a     A  a  d 2  A  h  d  a 2 gi  e  sc  gi sc st  st gi   2 

 bh

Ii  0.00358m

4

reinforcement to the section. Characteristic value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa): fck  20  MPa

Stress in compression MPa: c1  

Msd

c1  14.58172 MPa

 Ii     agi  Stress in tension MPa: c2 

Msd

 Ii     h  agi 

fckcyl  0.8  fck

Design value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa):

fcd  c1

fcd  0.85 

fckcyl 1.5

fcd  9.06667 MPa

Characteristic yield stress of reinforcement (MPa): c2  13.03598 MPa

fctm  c2

fyk  412 MPa

fyd 

fyk

fyd  358.26 MPa

1.15

Figure: 3.1.3-2

Cross-Section dimensions (m): b  0.45 m xu   Fsc   agi  dsc  Fc   agi    Fst  d  agi  2 

Msd

h  0.45  m

Cover of reinforcement (m): dsc  0.03  m

The ultimate bending moment is found using the following equation:

dst  0.03  m

Effective depth of a cross-section (m): xu   Mu  Fc   d    Fsc   d  dsc 2 

ok

 xu   dsc  Ast  fyd   d  dsc 2 

Mu1  Fc  

Mu  197.43904m  kN

Mu  Msd

Mu1  197.43904 m  kN

Mu1  Msd

d  h  dst

d  0.42 m

Design maximum bending moment ( MN  m): Msd  0.05  MN  m

Nsd  2.8  MN compression force

L  4  m

To apply the design table the bending moment Msd has to be brought into a dimensionless form:

h  d  st 2 

Mext  Msd  Nsd 

 

Mext 2

b  d  fcd

Figure: 3.1.3-3

Structural system

  0.82811

Mext  596m  kN

entire section is subjected in compression


w 

Next  0.8  b  d  fcd 

Ast bd

Ast  0.00399m

fyd

2

w  2.11061

 100

Figure: 3.1.4-1 Eccentricity due to action effects: e 

Msd

h

e  0.01786m

Nsd

6

h

 0.075 m

6

e

Centric compression force or compression force with small eccentricity: The minimum amount or longitudinal reinforcement is given by:  Nsd   f  yk   1.15  Stress of concrete (MPa):

Nsd  2.8  MN

Asmin  0.15  

c 

Asmin  0.00117m

2

Figure: 3.1.4-2 Example 3.1-5: The cross - section dimensions of a beam shown on figure 3.1.5-1 are subjected

Nsd

to bending moment Msd a Normal force Nsd (compression). Determine the required tension

c  18.40894 MPa

h  2dst  b  2  dsc

reinforcement to the section. Characteristic value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa):

Slenderness ratio:  

fck  20  MPa

0.7  L

  21.60494

0.288  b

Design value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa):

From the design diagram B3-B3.3 we obtain the following dimensionless parameters:   2.5



2

2

Ast     h  2dst  b  2  dsc   10

Ast  0.0038m

Ns  Ast  fyd

Next  2800 kN

2

The required tension reinforcement A2 ( cm ) is as follows: Ns

Next  Nc

fckcyl  0.8  fck

Ast  fyd

Next  0.8  b  d  fcd

fcd  0.85 

fckcyl

Nc  0.8  b  d  fcd

1.5

fcd  9.06667 MPa

Characteristic yield stress of reinforcement (MPa): fyk  410 MPa

fyd 

fyk 1.15

fyd  356.52 MPa

Cross-section dimensions: b  0.40  m

Structural system

h  0.45  m

L  4  m

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Ast 

Department of Architecture

50


Cover of reinforcement (m):

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

51

dsc  0.03  m

Eccentricity due to action effects:

dst  0.03  m

e 

e  0.1 m

Nsd

h 6

h

 0.075 m

6

e

Effective depth of a cross-section (m): d  h  dst

Msd

Centric compression force or compression force with small eccentricity:

d  0.42 m

Design maximum bending moment ( MN  m):

The minimum amount or longitudinal reinforcement is given by:

Msd  0.150  MN  m

Nsd  1.5  MN

compression

To apply the design table 3.1-1 the bending moment Msd has to be brought into a dimensionless form: h  d  st 2 

Mext  Msd  Nsd  

 

Mext 2

 Nsd   f  yk   1.15 

Asmin  0.15  

Asmin  0.00063m

2

Stress of concrete (MPa): Mext  442.5 m  kN

  0.69168

Nsd

c 

entire section is subjected to compression

b  d  fcd

h  2dst  b  2  dsc

c  11.31222 MPa

Slenderness ratio:

 

0.7  L

  24.30556

0.288 b

From the design diagram B3-B3.3 we obtain the following dimensionless parameters:

  0.1 2

2

A    ( h  b)  10

A  0.00018m

Ns  Nsd  0.8  b  d  fcd

Ns  281.44kN

Nc  0.8  b  d  fcd

2

The required tension reinforcement A2 ( cm ) is as follows: Ns

Nsd  Nc

Ast 

Figure: 3.1.5-1

w 

Ast  fyd

Nsd  0.8  b  d  fcd 

Ast bd

fyd  100

Structural system

Nsd  0.8  b  d  fcd

Ast  0.00079m

w  0.46988

2

Nc  1218.56kN


to bending moment Msd and normal force Nsd (tension) Determine the required tension reinforcement to the section. Characteristic value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa): fck  20  MPa

fckcyl  0.8  fck

Design value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa): fcd  0.85 

fckcyl

fcd  9.06667 MPa

1.5

Characteristic yield stress of reinforcement (MPa): fyk  410 MPa

fyd 

fyk

fyd  356.52 MPa

1.15

Cross sectional dimensions (m): b  0.20 m

h  0.35  m

dsc  0.03  m

dst  0.03  m

Figure: 3.1.6-1 Forces in kN in tension, compression reinforcement and concrete in compression zone (kN):

Cover of reinforcement (m):

Effective depth of a cross-section (m): d  h  dst

Nsc  Asc  fyd

Nst  Ast  fyd

Nc    d  0.8  b  fcd

Nst  490.36924kN

Nc  108.85803kN

Nsc  381.51122kN

w  3.4936

w  wmax

Nsc  Nc  490.36924kN

d  0.32 m

Design maximum bending moment ( MN  m): w 

Msd  0.087  MN  m

Tension force

Nsd  0.380  MN

if

To apply the design diagram B3-B3.3 the bending moment Msd has to be brought into a dimensionless form: h   dst 2 

Mext  Msd  Nsd  

Mext  31.9 kN  m

  0.05335

 

Mext 2

Ast  Asc

  0.1718

fyd 

 100

fyk  190 MPa

 

Mext

  0.1718

2

  0.17728

b  d  fcd

fyk

fyd  165.22 MPa

1.15

2

The required tension reinforcement Ast ( cm ) is as follows:

b  d  fcd Ast 

  0.2345

bh

  b  d  fcd  MN

2

 100 cm 

Nsd fyd

Ast  0.00333m

2

2

The required tension reinforcement Ast ( cm ) is as follows: Ast 

  b  d  fcd  MN

2

 100 cm 

Nsd fyd

2

Ast  0.00138m

2

The required compression reinforcement Asc ( cm ) is as follows:

2

The required compression reinforcement Asc ( cm ) is as follows: Asc 

Ast  fyd  0.8  d  b  fcd fyd

Asc  Asc  0.00107m

2

Ast  fyd  0.8  d  b  fcd fyd

w  wmax

Structural system

Asc  0.00267m

2

w 

Ast  Asc bh

 100

w  8.56931

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Example 3.1-6: The cross - section dimensions of a beam shown on figure 3.1.6-1 are subjected

Department of Architecture

52


Example 3.1-7: The cross - section dimensions of a beam shown on figure 3.1.7-1 are

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

53

subjected to bending moment Msd . Determine the required tension reinforcement to the section. Characteristic value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa):

Design maximum bending moment ( MN  m): Msd  0.192  MN  m

Nsd  0.125  MN

compression

1) To apply the design diagram B3-B3.3 the bending moment Msd has to be brought into a dimensionless form:

h  d  st 2 

Mext  Msd  Nsd  Mext

 

  0.10568

2

e 

Mext  226.375m  kN

Es Ec

  0.03103

b  d  fcd

Figure: 3.1.7-1 fckcyl  35  MPa

Ec  35  GPa

Es  200 GPa

fck  42  MPa

2

The required tension reinforcement A2 ( cm ) is as follows:

Design value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa): fcd  0.85 

fckcyl 1.5

Ast 

  b  d  fcd  MN

fcd  19.833 MPa Ast  4 

( 1.6  cm )

fyd 

fyk 1.15

fyd  358.26 MPa

b  0.30  m

h  0.65  m

Cover of reinforcement (m): dsc  0.05  m

2

we provide

Ast  0.000804m



2

Msd

e  1.536 m

Nsd

h 6

h

 0.10833m

6

e

Centric compression force or compression force with small eccentricity: 2

The required compression reinforcement Asc ( cm ) is as follows:

dst  0.05  m

Effective depth of a cross-section (m): d  h  dst

L  4  m

Ast  0.00076m

fyd

Eccentricity due to action effects (m): e 

Cross-section dimensions (m):

Nsd

2

4

Characteristic yield stress of reinforcement (MPa): fyk  412 MPa

2

 100 cm 

d  0.6 m

Asc 

Ast  fyd  0.8e  d  b  fcd

Asc  2 

fyd ( 1.2  cm )

Structural system

4

Asc  0.04475 m

2

2



Asc  0.000226m

2

we provide

e  5.71429


 h2

Ii  b  h  

3

c 

Nsd

c  1.04167 MPa

b  2  dsc  h  dst

c  0.45  fck

b  2  dsc  h  dst

2

 10

2  Asc  xi  dsc2

Ii  0.00731m

4

2 3

    MPa  10  MPa 

fctm  1.4  

0.45  fck  18.9  MPa

Ast

or

c  fcd

The reinforcement ratio ρ is given by:  

 x i  x i  h   e  Ast  d  x i

Ms 

  0.67021

fckcyl

Msd

Mcr  fctm 

fctm  3.22731 MPa

Ii h  xi

Mcr  73.58168m  kN

Ms  171.42857m  kN

1.12

b) Determine the bending stiffness 2

Br  0.85  Ec  Ii

Br  217377.77269m  kN

Slenderness ratio:  

0.7  L

- element has no cracks and have bending stiffness:

  32.40741

0.288  b

From the table VI.4

2

Bra  0.85  Ec  Ii

Bra  217377.77269m  kN

- the element of expected cracks, first determine stiffness of the beam without crack:

c  20.61  MPa

further we determine the stiffness of the beam with total eliminate of the tension in concrete, Design ultimate capacity of a cross-section may be determined:

where the depth of concrete zone x r of the cross-section determined from the conditions of the balance of forces in cross section, which after adjustment we can be written in the form:



Nud  c   b  2  dsc  h  dst 

Nud  2473.2kN

Nsd  125kN

Nud  Nsd

x r 

The minimum amount of longitudinal reinforcement is given by:

Asmin  0.15 

Nsd

Asmin  0.00005m

fyk

2

e 

1.15

x i 

 

0.5  b  h  e  Ast  d  Asc  dst b  h  e  Ast  Asc

Ec

e  5.71429

b

 1 

 

1

2  b  Ast  d  Asc  dsc

e  Ast  Asc

2

  

bending stiffness of the beam with total eliminate of the tension in concrete will: compression area of the cross section

x i  0.32952m

x r  0.11893m

where b   xr  2 the static moment of area A c , based to the upper compression edge, the first, we determine:

We decide whether the expected cracking 2

Es

e  Ast  Asc

Ac  b  x r  2  e  Asc 

x r  dsc

Structural system

xr

Ac  0.03718m

2

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Stress of concrete (MPa):

Department of Architecture

54


Example 3.1-8: The cross - section dimensions of a beam shown figure 3.1.8-1 are subjected

Arm of internal forces

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

55

 2  4  e  Asc  dsc 

b  xr z r  d 

Brb 

to bending moment

x r  dsc xr

2  Ac

The material properties are assumed as follows:

d  zr

2

Brb  41855.73425m  kN

 1  2   E A   s st Ec  Ac 

1 4

Br 

 Mcr

5

Ms

 1

Characteristic value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa): fck  31.25 MPa

r  0.28653

1

    Brb   Bra

c1  

Mext Ii

fcd  0.85 

r  0

Br  54454.38842m  kN

c1  10.20903 MPa

f 

5 Ms 2  L 48 Br

Mext Ii

f  5.24686 mm

fckcyl 1.5

fctm  3.22731 MPa

0.45  fck  18.9  MPa

fcd  14.16667 MPa

Characteristic yield stress of reinforcement (MPa): fyk  325 MPa

fyd 

fyk 1.15

fyd  282.61 MPa

Cross-sectional dimensions:

xi

c2 

fckcyl  0.8  fck

Design value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa):

2

1  r 

r

Determine the required tension reinforcement to the

section.

z r  0.54092m

The resulting bending stiffness: r 

Msd.

c2  9.92885 MPa

fctm  3.22731 MPa

h  xi

bd  0.4  m

hd  0.4  m

hs  0.8  m

Ac  bd  hd  bs hs  bh  hh

bh  0.3  m

hh  0.3  m Ac  0.45 m

H  1.5 m

Cover of reinforcement (m):

dsc  0.03  m

dst  0.03  m

Effective depth of a cross-section (m): d  H  dst

d  1.47 m

Msd  410 kN  m

Figure: 3.1.7-2

Structural system

Ms  365 kN  m

Msd Ms

 1.12329

bs  0.25  m 2

H  hd  hs  hh


agi 

Ac  agc  e  Ast  d  Asc  dsc

agi  0.80862m

Ai

Modulus of elasticity of cross-section (without any reinforcement): Ic 

1

 bs H  bh  bs  hh  bd  bs  hd 3

12

Figure: 3.1.8-1 Tension reinforcement:

 st  25  mm nst

 2

4

Ast1  0.00196m

 sc  16  mm

 2

Ast2   sc 



2

3

2   bs H   0.5  H  agc  

hh 

Ii  Ic  Ac  agi  agc

nsc  4 nsc 4

Ast2  0.0008m

Ii  0.11245m



2

Ast  Ast1  Ast2

Ast  0.00277m

2

2 

Asc  0.00188496m

4

Es  200 GPa

Ecm  30.5  GPa

2

Atot  Asc  Ast

e 

Atot  0.00465m

4

2  e  Ast  agi  dsc2  Ast  H  dst  agi 2

Determination of μ from diagram B3‐B3.3

Compression reinforcement: Asc  6  ( 20mm) 

Modulus of inertia of transformed cross-section (with reinforcement):

nst  4

Ast1   st 

4

2 2 hd      bd  bs  hd   H   agc  2 2  

 bh  bs  hh   agc  Ic  0.0935m

3

Msd   b  Ab  fcd

Ast

  Ab  fcd

 

Atot Ac  fcd

 MN   100 2 m 



  0.07298

2

Design ultimate capacity of a cross-section may be determined:

Es

e  6.55738

Ecm

Mu    Ac  d  fcd

Mu  1733.68125m  kN

Mu  Msd

Stress in concrete - compression zone;

Area of concrete net cross-section: Ac  bs H 

 bh  bs  hh   bd  bs  hd

Ac  0.45 m

2

c1  

Ai  0.48051m

2

 c2 

Distance of the neutral axis (centroid) of the net section: 0.5  bs H  bh  bs  hh 2

agc 

hd      bd  bs  hd   H  2 

2

Ac

Msd

c1  2.9483 MPa

 Ii     agi  Stress in concrete - tension zone:

Area of concrete transformed cross-section: Ai  Ac  e  Ast  Asc

  0.185

agc  0.80333m

M sd

c2  2.52083 MPa

Ii      H  a gi 

 0.8fck    10  MPa 

c2  fctm

0.666

fctm  1.4  

fcd  c1

Structural system

 MPa

fctm  2.57725 MPa

Msd  410m  kN

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Distance of the neutral axis (centroid) of the transformed section:

Department of Architecture

56


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

57 Example 3.1-9: The cross - section dimensions of a beam shown on figure 3.1-9 are subjected to bending moment Msd . Determine the required tension reinforcement to the section. Characteristic value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa): fck  45  MPa

fckcyl  0.8  fck

fckcyl  36  MPa

Design value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa): fcd  0.85 

fckcyl 1.5

fcd  20.4  MPa

fctm  3.2  MPa

Characteristic yield stress of reinforcement (MPa): fyk  325 MPa

fyd 

fyk 1.15

fyd  282.61 MPa

Cross-section dimensions (m):

Figure: 3.1.8-2

b  0.4  m

h  1.0  m

Ac  b  h

Ac  0.4 m

ap  0.15  m

e  15

Cover of reinforcement (m):

dsc  0.05  m

dst  0.05  m

Effective depth of a cross-section (m):

d  h  dst

d  0.95 m

H  ap  1.35 m

Figure: 3.1.8-3

Structural system

Figure: 3.1.9-1

2


Np  2.8  MN

Stress in concrete - tension zone:

compression

2 

Ast  4  ( 1.6cm ) 

Ast  0.000804m

4

Np

c1 

c1  fctm

Tension reinforcement:

Ai

or

2

Np

c1 

c1  fctm

Ai

agi

Ii

 1 

Asc  0.001257m

4

c1  3.25598 MPa

Ii

Stress in concrete - compression zone:

2

c2 

Prestress tendon:  2  2  Ap  1  ( 0.55cm )   6  ( 0.5cm )    4.5  4 4 4 

Np Ai

h  agi

Ii

 1 

 Ai  eext 

c2  14.41501 MPa

Ai  b  h  e  Asc  Ast  Ap

c2  fctm

or Ap  0.002548m

2

c2 

c2  fctm

Np Ai

Msd  Np   h  ap  agi 

c2  14.41501 MPa

Ii h  agi

Area of concrete transformed cross-section:

c1  3.25598 MPa

agi

2 

LA 15.5 (1 fi 5.5+6 fi 5)

Msd  Np   h  ap  agi 

Compression reinforcement: Asc  4  ( 2cm ) 

 Ai  eext 

Ai  0.46914m

2

Distance of the neutral axis (centroid) of the transformed cross - section:

agi 

b  h  0.5  h  e  Asc  dsc  Ast  h  dst  Ap  h  ap  Ai

agi  0.52201m

Modulus of inertia of transformed cross-section (with reinforcement):

Method of verification see B3-B3.3: For

2

 h 2 2 2 Ii  b  h   b  h    agi   e  Asc   agi  dsc  Ast   h  dst  agi   Ap  agi   h  ap   12 2  3 1

Ii  0.04405m

 

4

Figure: 3.1.9-2

fyk  325 MPa

Ast  Ap b  d  fcd

 MN   100  2 m 

  0.04325

  0.115

Np  2800 kN

dp 

Mext  Msd  Np  h  ap  agi

 h  ap  agi

2

Mu    b  d  fcd

dp  0.32799m

Mext Np

eext  0.27799m

Mext  778.37885 m  kN

For

Mext  778.37885 m  kN

eext 

Mu  846.906m  kN

fyk  520 MPa

  0.18

Mext  778.37885 m  kN

Mext  Mu

Structural system

2

Mu    b  d  fcd

Mu  1325.592m  kN

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Msd  140 kN  m

Department of Architecture

58


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

59 Example 3.1-10: The cross - section dimensions of a beam are subjected to bending moment

To apply the design diagram B3-B3.3 the bending moment Msd has to be brought into a

Msd.

dimensionless form:

Determine the required tension reinforcement to the section.

Msd

 

Characteristic value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa): fck  30  MPa

From the Design Table, for fyk= 325 MPa we obtain the reinforcement ratio:

fckcyl  0.8  fck

  0.09382 2

The required tension reinforcement A2 ( cm ) is as follows:

Design value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa): fcd  0.85 

  0.22812

2

b  d  fcd

Material data:

fckcyl

Ast 

fcd  13.6  MPa

1.5

  b  d  fcd  MN

Ast  0.0019m

 100 cm

2

Ast  0.00182m

2

we provide

Ast  5 

( 2.2  cm ) 4

2



2

2 3  fckcyl    MPa  10  MPa 

fctm  1.4  

The depth of compression zone (m):

fctm  2.51  MPa

  0.3314

Characteristic yield stress of reinforcement (MPa): fyk  325 MPa e 

Es Ecm

fyd 

fyk

fyd  282.61 MPa

1.15

h  0.50  m

dst  0.025  m

Effective depth of a cross-section (m): d  h  dst

d  0.475 m

Design maximum bending moment ( MN  m): Msd  0.210  MN  m

Es  200 GPa

Ecm  35  GPa

we provide ( 1.2  cm )

Ast  fyd

Asc 

Ast  fyd  x u  b  fcd

2

4

Asc  0.00023m



Asc  0.00008m

fyd 2

w 

Ast  Asc bh

2

w  0.01418

Compression forces acting in the reinforcement resp. in concrete and tension force in tension reinforcement are calculated as follows:

Cover of reinforcement (m): dsc  0.025  m

x u  0.12593m

2

Asc  2 

Cross-section ( m):

x u  0.8  x

x  0.15741m

The required compression reinforcement Asc ( cm ) is as follows: fyd  Asc  x u  b  fyd

e  5.71429

b  0.30  m

x    d

Fsc  Asc  fyd

Fst  Ast  fyd

Fc  x u  b  fcd

Fsc  63.92458kN

Fst  537.14405kN

Fc  513.80256kN

Fsc  Fc  577.7271kN

2

Area of the transformed uncracked cross-section ( m )

Ai  b  h  e  Ast  Asc

Structural system

Ai  0.16215m

2


b  h  0.5  h  e  Asc  dsc  Ast  h  dst 

agi 

Department of Architecture

A 3 Design of reinforced concrete members (c = 0,0035, s = 0,01)

The distance of the extreme fibre from the neutral axis (m):

agi  0.26328m

Ai

2

Moment of inertia of the transformed uncracked cross-section ( m ):

2

 h  a     A  a  d 2  A  h  d  a 2 gi  e  sc  gi sc st  st gi   2 

3 1

Ii  b  h 

 bh

12

Ii  0.00371m

4

Stress in compression (MPa):

c1  

Msd

c1  14.89569 MPa

 Ii     agi 

fcd  c1

1. Bending moment and tension axial force h  M sds M sd  N sd    d 2  2 

Stress in tension (MPa): c2 

Msd

c2  13.39334 MPa

 Ii     h  agi 

 

Fsc  agi  dsc  Fc   agi 

fctm  c2

xu  2

  Fst  d  agi  

The required reinforcement [cm2]:  N sd  A2   A c  f cd  100    104   f yd  req  

Msd

s 

Ast  d

x d

1

x

s  115.29396 MPa

The required reinforcement [cm2]:  N sd  A2   A c  f cd  100    104   f yd  req  

where coefficient  obtained from the graph according to coefficient obtained from M.sd ...... in MNm h, d2,d....... in m M sds  Nsd ........ in MN Ac ............. in m2 A c  d  f cd fyd .........in MPa fcd ..............in MPa

Stress in tension reinforcement (MPa): Msd

2. Bending moment and compression axial force h  M sds M sd  N sd    d 2  2 

s  fyd

Determination of the concrete cross-section area Ac :

d

The ultimate bending moment is found using the following equation:

 

Mu  Fc   d 

xu 

  Fsc   d  dsc 2

2

Mu  240.47019m  kN

Mu  Msd

ok

Ac = b . d

Ac



D

4

Ac



D 1 D 2 4

3. Pure bending In case of pure bending can be used previous relations, where Nsd is equal zero.

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

60


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

61 A 3.1 Design of reinforced concrete members (c = 0,0035, s = 0,01)

1. Bending moment and tension axial force h  M sds M sd  N sd    d 2  2 

A 3.2 Design of reinforced concrete members (c = 0,0035, s = 0,01)

2. Bending moment and compression axial force h  M sds M sd  N sd    d 2  2 

The required reinforcement [cm2]:  N sd  A2   A c  f cd  100    104   f yd  req  

The required reinforcement [cm2]:  N sd  A2   A c  f cd  100    104   f yd  req  

1. Bending moment and tension axial force h  M sds M sd  N sd    d 2  2 

2. Bending moment and compression axial force h  M sds M sd  N sd    d 2  2 

The required reinforcement [cm2]:  N sd  A2   A c  f cd  100    104   f yd  req  

The required reinforcement [cm2]:  N sd  A2   A c  f cd  100    104   f yd  req  

where coefficient  obtained from the graph according to coefficient obtained from M.sd ...... in MNm h, d2,d....... in m M sds  Nsd ........ in MN Ac ............. in m2 A c  d  f cd fyd .........in MPa fcd ..............in MPa

where coefficient  obtained from the graph according to coefficient obtained from M.sd ...... in MNm h, d2,d....... in m M sds  Nsd ........ in MN Ac ............. in m2 A c  d  f cd fyd .........in MPa fcd ..............in MPa

Determination of the concrete cross-section area Ac :

Determination of the concrete cross-section area Ac :

2

Ac = b . d

Ac



D

4

Ac



2

D 1 D 2 4

3. Pure bending In case of pure bending can be used previous relations, where Nsd is equal zero.

Ac = b . d

Ac



D

4

Ac



D 1 D 2 4

3. Pure bending In case of pure bending can be used previous relations, where Nsd is equal zero.

Structural system


1. Bending moment and tension axial force h  M sds M sd  N sd    d 2  2 

2. Bending moment and compression axial force h  M sds M sd  N sd    d 2  2 

The required reinforcement [cm2]: A2 req

1

f yd

4

Department of Architecture

A 3.3 Design of reinforced concrete members (c = 0,0035, s = 0,01)

4

   A c  f cd  10  N sd  10

The required reinforcement [cm2]: A2 req

1

f yd

   A c  f cd  104  N sd  104

where coefficient  obtained from the graph according to coefficient obtained from M.sd ...... in MNm h, d2,d....... in m M sds  N Ac ............. in m2 sd ........ in MN A c  d  f cd fyd .........in MPa fcd ..............in MPa Determination of the concrete cross-section area Ac :

2

Ac = b. d

Ac



D

4

Ac



D 1 D 2 4

3. Pure bending In case of pure bending can be used previous relations, where Nsd is equal zero.

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

62


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

63

Design of reinforced concrete members

0,50

fyk

0,48

520 MPa

0,45

490 MPa

0,43

450 MPa

0,40

412 MPa

0,38

410 MPa 392 MPa

0,35

375 MPa

0,33

325 MPa

0,30

300 MPa

0,28

245 MPa

0,25

235 MPa

0,23 Stress-strain curve of steel

0,20

206 MPa

Stress-strain curve of concrete

190 MPa

0,18 0,15 0,13 0,10 0,08 0,05 0,03 0,00 0

0,03

0,06

0,09

0,12

0,15

0,18

0,21

0,24

0,27

0,3

0,33

0,36

0,39

0,42

0,45

0,48

Figure B 3: Sections without compression reinforcement for pure bending or bending moment with axial force, based on the bi-linear diagram for steel and bi-linear diagram for concrete

Structural system


Design of reinforced concrete members

fyk

0,50 0,48

190 MPa

0,45

206 MPa

0,43

235 MPa

0,40

245 MPa 300 MPa

0,38

325 MPa

0,35

375 MPa

0,33

392 MPa

0,30

410 MPa

0,28

412 MPa

0,25

450 MPa 490 MPa

0,23

Stress-strain curve of steel

0,20

520 MPa

Stress-strain curve of concrete

0,18 0,15 0,13 0,10 0,08 0,05 0,03

0,00 0,00

0,03

0,06

0,09

0,12

0,15

0,18

0,21

0,24

0,27

0,30

0,33

0,36

0,39

0,42

0,45

0,48

Figure B 3.1: Sections without compression reinforcement for pure bending or bending moment with axial force, based on the bi-linear diagram for steel and bi-linear diagram for concrete

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

64


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

65

m

Design of reinforced concrete members

fyk

0,50

190 MPa 206 MPa

0,45

235 MPa 245 MPa 300 MPa

0,40

325 MPa 375 MPa

0,35

392 MPa 410 MPa 412 MPa

0,30

441 MPa 450 MPa

0,25

490 MPa Stress-strain curve of steel

0,20

520 MPa

Stress-strain curve of concrete

0,15

0,10

0,05

0,00 0,00

0,03

0,05

0,08

0,10

0,13

0,15

0,18

0,20

0,23

0,25

0,28

0,30

0,33

0,35

0,38

0,40

0,43

0,45

0,48

r

Figure B 3.2: Sections without compression reinforcement for pure bending or bending moment with axial force, based on the parabolic-rectangular diagram for steel and a bi-linear diagram for concrete

Structural system


h

2

 d 2 

2

b  d f cd

M sd  N sd  

h

2

 d 2 

2

b  d f cd

0,43 0,40

M sd 2

b  d  f cd

0,38

Design of reinforced concrete members Bending w ith tension

Bending w ith compression

Pure bending

0,35

h

0,30 0,28

req d2

0,25

d

0,33

0,23 0,20 0,18 0,15

 N sd

  b  d  f cd  100  

Bending w ith compression

A req

Pure bending

 N sd 4   b  d  f cd  100    10  f  yk 

A req

  b  d  f cd  100

 f yk

0,10 0,08 0,05 0,03

4

A req

Bending w ith tension

0,13

 10 

h, d, b, d2 fcd, fy d Nsd

in MN

Msd

in MNm

Areq

in cm2

0,00 0,00

0,04

0,08

0,12

0,16

0,20

0,24

0,28

0,32

0,36

0,40

0,44

0,48

0,52

0,56

0,60

0,64

in m in MPa

0,68

0,72

r

Figure B 3.3: Sections without compression reinforcement for pure bending or bending moment with axial force, based on the bi-linear diagram for steel and parabolicrectangular diagram for concre

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

M sd  N sd  

Department of Architecture

66


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

67

C 3: Preliminary design cross-sectional thickness of reinforced concrete slabs structures uniform loading (dimensions rounded to 10 mm) One way reinforced slab

C 3.1: Preliminary design cross-sectional dimension of reinforced concrete beams and frames structures uniform loading (dimensions rounded to 50 mm)

- freely supported hs

T - beam

1 L 25

- freely supported ht

bt

1 L t 20

 1  2 h    2 3 t

- perfectly cantilevered 1 1  h s    L  30 35 

- perfectly cantilevered ht

- cantilevered landings hs

Two way reinforced slab

1 L t 25

1 L 10

- freely supported hs

1  L x L y 75

- cantilevered landings ht

1 L t 5

hp

 1  1  L    10 15  p

- perfectly cantilevered hs

1   L x  L y 105

Beams bp

 1  2 h    2 3 p

Structural system


Slabs are divided into suspended slabs. Suspended slabs may be divided into two groups:

D-3 Positioning the neutral axis of reinforced concrete The moment of inertia of ideal cross-section: hs

d1

bc

v1 h d

M sd

2 A 2 ˜ d v 1 2º¼

bw

¬ 12

§ ©

¨v 2

2º ¸ » 2 ¹ ¼

hs·

2 º ¸» ¹¼

ht· 2

M sd

Nsd

(2)

slabs supported directly on columns without beams and known as flat slabs. Supported

directions). In one-way slabs the main reinforcement is provided along the shorter span. In order to distribute the load, a distribution steel is necessary and it is placed on the longer side. Oneway slabs generally consist of a series of shallow beams of unit width and depth equal to the slab thickness, placed side by side. Such simple slabs can be supported on brick walls and can

3

slabs supported on edges of beams and walls

direction only) and two-way slabs (slabs supported on four sides and reinforced in two

2 ª h s2 § hs· º I gg´ ˜ v 1 v 2 b c b w ˜ h s ˜ « ¨v ¸ » 3 ¬ 12 © 1 2 ¹ ¼ 2 2 n ˜ ª A 1 ˜ v 1 d 1 A 2 ˜ d v 1 º ¬ ¼

bw

(1)

slabs may be one-way slabs (slabs supported on two sides and with main reinforcement in one

The moment of inertia of ideal cross-section:

A1

A2

ª h t2

§ ©

¨v 1

2 º» ª« b w ˜ h 2 hs ht· § v1 ˜ b t b w ˜ h t ˜ ¨ h ¸ b c b w ˜ » 2 2 A « 2 ¹ © « n ˜ A 1 ˜ d 1 A 2 ˜ d

» ¬ ¼ v2 = h – v1 A = bw. h + (bc - bw). hs + (bt - bw). ht + n. (A1+ A2) area:

d1 v1

2

1

bc

v2

ªh

b c b w ˜ h s ˜ «¬ 12s

3

bt bw ˜ht˜«

Nsd ht

v2 d2

3

¬

bw

d2

˜ v1 v2

n ˜ ªA 1 ˜ v 1 d 1

bt

hs

3

A1

A2

h d

bw

I gg´

3

be supported on reinforced concrete beams in which case laced bars are used to connect slabs to beams.

where

ª b w ˜ h2

1

v1

˜«

b c b w ˜ h s 2

n˜ A ˜d

A 2˜ d

1 1 2 ¬ 2 v2 = h – v1 A = bw. h + (bc - bw). hs + n. (A1+ A2) area: A

º

»¼

If M sd N sd

I gg´

M sd

A˜v2

N sd

I gg´ A˜v2

Mt = bc. h.s2. (d – hs /3). 0,8. fyk / 30 .( d – hs )

The entire section is in compression

If Mt < Msd

A1

Mt > Msd A1

A1

A2

M sd

Nsd

A1

A2

M sd

Nsd A2

A1

A2

M sd

A2

M sd

Nsd

A1

Nsd

M1 = (bc-bw).hs.fcd.(d-0,5.hs) Md = Msd – M1 As = U . bw . d . fcd . 100 b c b w ˜ h s ˜ f cd A 2req As f yd

!

P

M sd

Nsd A2

Md 2

b w ˜ d ˜ f cd

P

M sd

Nsd

Figure 3.2-1: One –way slab, two-way slab, ribbed slab, flat slab, solid flat slab with drop panel, waffle slab

M sd 2

b c ˜ d ˜ f cd

according to the graph of Figure B-3 until B-3-3 we obtaine U A2req = U . bc . d . fcd .100

In R.C. Building construction, every floor generally has a beam/slab arrangement and consists of fixed or continuous one-way slabs supported by main and secondary beams.

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

3.2 Reinforced Concrete Slabs

Department of Architecture

68


3.2.1 Flat Slabs

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

69

Flat plate is defined as a two-way slab of uniform thickness supported by any combination of columns, without any beams, drop panels, and column capitals. Flat plates are most economical for spans from 4,5 to 7,5m, for relatively light loads, as experienced in apartments or similar building. -A flat slab is a reinforced concrete slab supported directly on and built monolithically with the columns, the flat slab is divided into middle strips and column strips. The size of each strip is Figure 3.2-2: Solid flat slab, solid flat slab with drop panels The usual arrangement of a slab and beam floor consists of slabs supported on crossbeams or secondary beams parallel to the longer side and with main reinforcement parallel to the shorter side. The secondary beams in turn are supported on main beams or girders extending from column to column. Part of the reinforcement in the continuous is bent up over the support, or straight bars with bond lengths are placed over the support to give negative bending moments.

defined using specific rules. The slab may be in uniform thickness supported on simple columns. These flat slabs may be designed as continuous frames. However, they are normally designed using an empirical method governed by specified coefficients for bending moments and other requirements which include the following: 1. There should be not less than three rectangular bays in both longitudinal and transverse directions. 2. The length of the adjacent bays should not vary by more than 10 %.

Figure 3.2.1-1: Post punching behaviour of slab- critical section The general layout of the reinforcement is based on the both bending moments (in spans) and bending moments in addition to direct loads (on columns).

Figure 3.2-3: Types of the reinforced concrete slab systems Figure 3.2.1-2: Combined punching shear and transfer of moments

Structural system


Figure 3.2.1-4

Figure 3.2.1-3

Structural system STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

70


3.2.1-1 Analysis and Design of Flat Plate

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

71 Uniform. The procedure generally adopted is to divide the slab into column strips (along the

To obtain the load effects on the elements of the floor system and its supporting members using an elastic analysis, the structure may be considered as a series of equivalent

column lines) and middle strips and then apportion the moment between these strips and the distribution of the moment within the width of each strip being assumed uniform.

plane frames, each consisting of vertical members – columns, horizontal members - slab. Such plane frames must be taken both longitudinally (in x-direction) and transversely (in y direction) in the building, to assure load transfer in both directions. For gravity load effects, these equivalent plane frames can be further simplified into continuous beams or partial frames consisting of each floor may be analysed separately together with the columns immediately above and below, the columns being assumed fixed at their far ends. Such a procedure is described in the “Equivalent Frame Method”. When frame geometry and loadings meet certain limitations, the positive and negative factored moments at critical sections of the slab may be calculated using moment coefficients, termed “Direct Design Method”. These two methods differ essentially in the manner of determining the longitudinal distribution of bending moments in the horizontal member between the negative and positive moment sections. However, the procedure for the lateral distribution of the moments is the same for both design methods.

Figure 3.2.1.1-2: Moments and frames

Figure 3.2.1.1-1: Steel shear –heads, steel plats joined by welding

Since the outer portions of horizontal members (slab) are less stiff than the part along the support lines, the lateral distribution of the moment along the width of the member is not

Structural system

Figure: 3.2.1.1-3


Live load (apartments):

Geometric Shapes

vd  2.0

hd  300mm The geometry of the building floor plans:

1.5

qd  qdo  q1d  vd

l2  3.6m

ly  7.7m

kv  2.850m Dimensions columns:

vd  3

kN m

2

qd  17.325

kN 2

m Force load Peripheral masonry thickness of 400 mm YTONG: F1  10

kN

kv ly 400mm1.35 3 m Total load acting on the console:

bs  400mm hs  bs The peripheral dimensions of the beam: ho  0.5m

2

m Total load on 1 m 2 of slab:

Slab thickness

l1  7.7m lk  2.3m Construction height of object:

kN

F1  118.503kN

F1d  118.503kN F1d  F1 Investigation replacement frame in the X-axis Frame 1:

bo  0.30m

Calculation model

Figure: 3.2.1-1 Load calculation Load per area Reinforced concrete slab thickness of 300 mm qdo  hd 25

floor layer: q1d  3

kN m

2

kN m

3

1.4

qdo  10.125

1.35

q 1d

 4.2 

kN m

kN m

2

Figure: 3.2.1-2 load calculation Load width in a direction perpendicular to the x:

zsx  ly 2

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Example: 3.2-1 Design and calculation of Flat Plate

Department of Architecture

72


Load in the x-direction:

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

73

qdx  qd zsx

qdx  133.403

Calculation of internal forces

kN m

Moment on a console:

 lk  Mk   F1d lk  qdx  2

Mk  625.407kN m

2

Moment of inertia:

Figure: 3.2.1-3

Transverse replacement frame:

Ip 

ly hd

3

Ip  0.017m

12

9

Central girders replacement of frame:

1 12

3

Is  5.208  10 3 m

Primary moments in node 10:

4

M109o 

Bending stiffness:

Ip l1

1000

kN

Kp  2.25kN 

2

rad m Central girders replacement frame: Kst 

Ist

 l2

1000

Column

Ks 

Is kv

1000

1 12

M1010ò  

Transverse replacement frame:

Kp 

M910o  

M97o  0kN m bs hs

kN rad m kN

rad m

2

2

M108  1 M911  1

M109  1 M97  1

M1012  1

Primary moments in node 9:

Ist  Ip column: Is 

M910  1 M10'10  1

 1  10  1 M1010'  1

4

m rad

Kst  4.813kN 

Ks  1.827kN 

m rad

qdxl1 1 12

2

qdxl2

1 12

qdxl1

2

M108o  0kN m 2

M911o  0kN m

M1012o  0kN m

M10'10o  M1010ò

Given M97kN m M97o  Ks  3 9rad  M911kN m M911o  Ks  2 9rad  M910kN m M910o  Kp  2 9rad   10rad  M108kN m M108o  Ks  3 10rad  M109kN m M109o  Kp  2 10rad   9rad  M1012kN m M1012o  Ks  2 10rad  M1010'kN m M1010ò  Kst   10rad  M10'10kN m M10'10o  Kst   10rad 

m

Equilibrium conditions:

rad

Node 9

Mk  M97kN m  M910kN m  M911kN m Node 10:

0 kN m

M109kN m  M1012kN m  M1010'kN m  M108kN m

Structural system

0 kN m


The calculated moments of individual members of equilibrium conditions: M910  v ( 1.0) kN m M10'10  v ( 9 0) kN m M1010'  v ( 5.0) kN m M911  v ( 2.0) kN m M109  v ( 3.0) kN m

M910  691.408kN m M10'10  282.659kN m M1010'  282.659kN m M911  26.401kN m M109  545.787kN m

The computation of shear forces in the individual members: V910o  qdx

l1

0

2

V109o  V910o V910  V910o 

M910  M109

0

39.601

1

-691.408

2

26.401

3

l1

V910  532.511kN M910  M109 V109  V109o  l1 V109  494.688kN  l1  V1010ò  qdx 

545.787

v  4

-105.251

5

-282.659

6

-157.877

7

7.223

8

-28.797

9

282.659

 4

V1010'  V1010ò V1010'  256.8kN

Transformation moments for the part columned strip and between the columns Ma  M910 Mb  M109 Ma  691.408m kN Mb  545.787m kN Mc'  Mmax1.25 Mc  Mstr 1.25 Mc'  464.278kN m Mc  5.539kN m Moments over support:  0.75 M1a   p Ma M2a  172.852kN m M2b   1   p Mb p

M1a  518.556kN m M1b   p Mb M2b  136.447kN m

 m  0.60 M3c  Mc'  m

l1

M3c  278.567kN m

M4c  Mc'  1   m

a  3.992m

V910  V109 2

a Mmax   V910a  M910  qdx 2

Mmax  371.423kN m

Maximum moment between 10-10 Mstr

Mstr

 l2    l1  2  V1010'  M1010'  qdx 4

M2a   1   p  Ma M1b  409.34kN m

Positively support moments:

Maximum moment between 9-10 Mmax a  V910

Figure: 3.2.1-4

2

2

Mstr  4.431kN m

Figure: 3.2.1-5

Structural system

M4c  185.711kN m

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

v  Find M97 M910M911M109M1012M1010'M108 9  10 M10'10

Department of Architecture

74


Column strip M 1b:

Dimensioning of the reinforcement:

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

75

M1b  409.34kN m

Material characteristic of concrete f ckcyl and steel fyk fyd  375MPa



effective height:

M1b

Ast 

width, which act the moment

  b d fcd  MN

2

M1a  518.556kN m

M1a  0.518MN m fcd  12MPa

d  0.27m

M1a

2

b d fcd

Ast   b d fcd

Ast 

b  3.85m

 0.0475

  b d fcd  MN

2

 0.154

Ast

2

100cm

Ast  59.252cm

Ast  44.857cm

3.85

M2a  0.172MN m fcd  12MPa



M2a

2

b d fcd

Ast 

  b d fcd  MN

2

100cm

 0.121

Ast

2

 11.651cm

3.85

M2b  0.136MN m

2

 15.39cm

b  3.85m

M2b

2

b d fcd

  b d fcd  MN

2

100cm

d  0.27m

 0.01145

2

Ast  14.283cm

 0.04

Ast 3.85

2

 3.71cm

The lower reinforcement for moments: Column strip M 3c:

M2a  172.852kN m d  0.27m



Ast 

Among the columned strip M 2a:

2

100cm

fcd  12MPa



 0.03596

M2b  136.447kN m

Column strip M 1a:

b  3.85m

Among the columned strip M 2b:

b  3.85m

2

2

b d fcd

d  hd  3cm

ly

fcd  12MPa

d  0.27m

fcd  12MPa

The top reinforcement for moments:

b 

M1b  0.409MN m

2

Ast  17.95cm

 0.051

Ast 3.85

M3c  0.278MN m

b  3.85m

b  3.85m

 0.01439

M3c  278.567kN m

2

 4.662cm



M3c

2

b d fcd

Ast 

  b d fcd 

Structural system

fcd  12MPa

d  0.27m

MN

2

100cm

 0.0249

2

Ast  31.06cm

 0.083

Ast 3.85

2

 8.068cm


a magnification between support:

M4c  185.711kN m

M4c  0.185MN m fcd  12MPa

d  0.27m 



Mc  453.412kN m

b  3.85m

Transformation moments for the part columned strip and among columned

M4c

2

b d fcd

Ast 

Mc  Mc' 1.25

 0.055

 0.01588

support t of Ma2 p

  b d fcd 

2

100cm

2

Ast  19.809cm

MN Investigation replacement frame in y Frame 2 Calculation Model

Ma1   p Ma

 0.75

Ma1  362.73kN m

Ma2   1   p  Ma

Ma2  120.91kN m

Between the support of M c m

Mc1   mMc

 0.6

Mc2   1   m Mc

Mc1  272.047kN m

Mc2  181.365kN m

Dimensioning of reinforcement Upper reinforcement of moment: Effective depth: d  hd  3cm Column strip M 1a:

The width on which acting the moment:

b  Figure: 3.2.1-6

q2d  qd   l1  l2 1 2

Calculation internal forces

q2d  97.886

kN m

Support part: 1

2

Ma  483.64kN m

Among the supports: Mc' 

16

q2d ly

l2

b  2.825m

4

M1a  0.518MN m 

 q l  12  2d y

1

4

Column strip M 1a:

Load calculation

Ma  

l1

2



M1a

2

b d fcd

Ast  Mc'  362.73kN m

d  0.27m

  b d fcd  MN

2

100cm

Structural system

 0.06687

fcd  12MPa 

b  2.825m

 0.21

2

Ast  61.206cm

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Among the columned strip M 4c:

Department of Architecture

76


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

77 Between the column strip M 2a:

Investigation extreme frame replacement

Calculation Model: M2a  0.172MN m 



d  0.27m

M2a

2

b d fcd

Ast 

  b d fcd  MN

 0.02037

fcd  12MPa

b  2.825m

 0.07

2

Ast  18.645cm

2

d  0.27m

fcd  12MPa

100cm

Column strip M 1a:

Mc1  0.272MN m



Mc1 2

b d fcd

Ast 

  b d fcd  MN

 0.03277

b  2.825m

 0.11

Figure: 3.2.1-7 Calculation of load:

2

2

100cm

Ast  29.994cm

From the slab: l1   q3do  qd  lk   2 

Between column strip M 2a:

Mc2  0.181MN m



Mc2 2

d  0.27m

b d fcd

Ast 

  b d fcd  MN

2

100cm

 0.0216

fcd  12MPa

b  2.825m

 0.073

2

kN m

Peripheral masonry thickness of 400 mm YTONG:

F1  10

Ast  19.77cm

q3do  106.549

kN m

3

kv 400mm1.4

F1  15.96

kN m

Total load replacement frame: qkd  q3do  F1

Structural system

q kd  122.509 

kN m


Design the reinforcement to the reinforced concrete slab

Moment of the end strip:

The top reinforcement for moments:

Support bending moment:

effective height: d  d  3cm

Mka  

1 12

qkd ly

2

Mka  605.295kN m

Column extreme strip Mexta:

width which act moment

Between the column bending moment:

b  lk Mkc 

1 16

qkd ly

2

Mkc  453.971kN m

b  2.3 m

Column extreme strip Mexta: see diagram B3-B3.3

Transformation moments for the part columned bands and among columned

Mexta  0.265MN m

d  0.24m

fcd  12MPa

b  2.3 m

columned strip width: bp3  lk 

l1 2

bp3  6.15m



Mexta

Moments over support: Ast  Mexta 

Mka  lk   1  2  4 b p3  

MN

2

 0.166

2

100cm

Ast  33.716cm

Column strip inside M k4a:

Mk4a   p Minta

Mk3a   1   p  Minta

Mk3a  85.197kN m

Mk4a  255.59kN m

width, which acts moment, see diagram B3-B3.3 b 

Between the column moments:

Mkc  lk   1  2   4 b p3  

  b d fcd 

 0.0509

Mexta  264.509kN m

Minta  Mka  Mexta

Mextc 

2

b d fcd

l1

b  1.925m

4

Mk4a  0.256MN m Mextc  198.382kN m

Mintc  Mkc  Mextc

Mk4c   mMintc

Mk3c   1   m Mintc

Mk3c  102.236kN m

Mk4c  153.354kN m



d  0.24m

Mk4a

2

b d fcd

Ast 

  b d fcd  MN

2

100cm

Structural system

 0.05965

fcd  12MPa

b  1.925m

 0.192

2

Ast  33.07cm

Ast 1.925

2

 17.179cm

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Calculation of internal forces

Department of Architecture

78


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

79 Among the columned strip M k3a:

Mk4c  0.153MN m

width, which acts moment b 

l1

b  1.925m

4

Mk3a  0.085MN m



2

b d fcd

  b d fcd  MN

fcd  12MPa

d  0.24m

Mk3a

Ast 

 0.01739

b  1.925m

2

2

100cm

b  lk

Ast  9.641cm

Ast 1.925

b  2

 5.008cm

Mextc  0.198MN m

d  0.24m

l1

2

b d fcd



4

Ast  19.049cm

 0.03758

2

100cm

  b d fcd 

b  2.3 m

 0.125

2

Ast  24.893cm

Ast 2.3

2

b d fcd

Ast  fcd  12MPa

d  0.24m

Mk3c

2

 10.823cm

width, which acts moment l1

Ast

2

100cm

Mk3c  0.102MN m

Column strip inside M k4c:

b 

2

 0.115

1.925

2

 9.896cm

b  1.925m

4

Mextc

MN

MN

See diagram B3-B3.3

b  2.3 m

  b d fcd 

  b d fcd 

 0.03436

width, which acts moment

width, which acts moment, see diagram B3-B3.3

Ast 

2

b d fcd

b  1.925m

Among the columned strip M k3c:

 0.064

Column extreme strip Mextc:



Mk4c

Ast 

The lower reinforcement for moments:



fcd  12MPa

d  0.24m

b  1.925m

Structural system

MN

2

100cm

 0.02189

fcd  12MPa

b  1.925m

 0.077

2

Ast  12.136cm

Ast 1.925

2

 6.304cm


Carrying capacity of the concrete section

thickness is hd = 0.3m, Column diameter (round column) d =0.50 m, the maximum force applied one column at Nd= 1800 kN. d 

0.5  m

hd 

0.3  m

b 

1 m

Nd 

17  MPa

0.42  hd   g   b  fctm

1.2 MPa

fyd 

1

 kN

Maximum force per columns Vcd  1800 kN

Vcd  Nd

fctm 

qbu  262.86 m

Assess the resistance of the concrete section

1800  kN

Material characteristics: fcd 

qbu 

Department of Architecture

Example 3.2-2: In the example we are considering reinforced concrete slab flat, floor slab

375  MPa

Basic critical perimeter

ucr  2.51 m

Shear force on the critical perimeter qd 

Vcd

qd  716.2 m

ucr

1

 kN

Shear resistance of concrete qbu 

1

qd  2  qbu

 stw 

Ast

As1   

1

4

n 

5

Ast  n  As1

Ast  0.00127 m

 h 

1.4 

correct proposal

Proposal of hidden head

Maximum critical perimeter with hidden head

1 fctm  3 fyd

1

qd  qbu

2  qbu  525.72 m 1  kN

qd  2  qbu

On 1m plate

 b 

 kN

2

in both directions

 stmin 

1

Incorrect design, head to be designed so that they apply condition:

2

 stw  0.004241 m

b  hd

716.2 m

Coefficient of shear strength

18  mm

qd 

 1 

 kN

We suggest shear reinforcement

Figure: 2.3.2‐1

262.86 m

 stmin   s 

2 hd  3 m

 g   s  n   h   f

0.001067

1.159

 h  1.2 g 

1.74

Ucrmax 

 n 

1.0

 f 

1.25

 b 

1

1.9  ucr

Ucrmax  4.78 m

qda 

Vcd Ucrmax

qda  qbu

qda  376.95 m

1

2  qbu  525.72 m

Structural system

qbu  262.86 m

 kN 1

 kN

1

 kN

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

80


If we want to make a proposal without head, subject to the following parameters:

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

81

d 

1.0  m

fctm40 

1.40  MPa

ucr40     d 

Carrying capacity of the concrete section qbu40 

0.42  hd   g   b  fctm40  ucr40

qbu40 

2  qbu40  2504.94 kN

2

hd 

 2

ucr40 

4.08 m

hh 

2qbu40  Vcd

qd2 

dh 

Vcd

2.0  m

qd2 

Ucr2

8  mm

diameter of one profile

1

2

Asssku  Ass

design value of shear resistance of plate without shear reinforcement (per unit length of critical perimeter)

sin ( )  0.71

0.6  m

 1 

2 Asssku  0.00025133 m 4 Assessment of the punching according to EC 2

Geometry head

45  deg

number of bars in one bin / m 'ss = 0.25m

Asssku  n1   

Proposal visible head

 

5

Vcd  1800 kN

1252.47 kN

n1 

286.48 m

v Rd1

cos ( )  0.71

1

 kN

qbu 

262.86 m

1.2  40  1  d

shear resistance

Ucr2  6.28 m

Ucr2    dh

 Rd  k 

1

 kN

qd2  qbu

 Rd 

0.3 

MN m

hd 

2

0.3  m

k 

1.6 

hd m

k  1.3

average width tension section

bt 

1 m

fyk 

410 

m

min2 

min 

Figure: 2.3.2‐2

Proposal shear reinforcement - reinforced by bins q

bu

fyd 

 qsu

190  MPa

qsu  ss 

n  A ss   ss   s  fyd

1

0.0015  bt 

 min1     min2 

 s 

1

m

0.6  bt 

hd kN  4 m

fyk

min2  0.00045

2

min  0.00045

Ac  0.3 m

2

The maximum degree of reinforcement

q su  q d2  q bu A ss 

hd

min  max min

Ac  hd  bt

qd2  2  qbu

d2

min1 

2

concrete area

We suggest shear reinforcement

q

MN

1 m

2

n 

q su 

23.62 m

1

 kN

max 

0.04 

m

1

Ac

2

max  0.01

The average degree of reinforcement

n is the number of bins reinforced, Ass area of reinforcement to a bin

Given

qsu

n  Ass  ss  s fyd  m

1

 

Ass  Find Ass

1  Ass  0.000124 m

2

min  max

2

vRd1   Rd  k 

Structural system

1.2  40  1  hd

1  0.01 vRd1  169.53 m

1

 kN

min1  0.00000044


The load effects Vsd 

length of critical perimeter) vRd2 

1.6  vRd1

vRd2  271.25 m

1

Computing shear force

1800  kN

 

1.15

internal columns

 kN

Design value of shear resistance of plate with shear reinforcement (per unit length of critical perimeter)

 A f

s yd  sin ( )

vRd1 

vRd3

i

u

Column diameter Ps 

Diameter of critical perimeter Pu 

2  1.5  hd  Ps

vsd 

Pu  1.4 m

Critical perimeter

Acw   

2

4

2

 

Ps

lh 

Acw  1.34 m

4

2

concrete shear area

0.9  m

incorrect design, design head

vsd  vRd3

As  0 m

2

As  fyd  sin ( ) u

 

2

hh 

0.6  m

d2crit 

3.11  m

ucrit  9.77 m

fyd 

vRd3  255.28 m

360 

1

MN m

 kN

d2crit

2

2

Ps

2 Acwh  7.4 m 4 4 The expected level of reinforcement by shear reinforcement Acwh   

 

2

Ash  0.01 m

Ash   ´w Acwh

carrying capacity

vRd3  vRd1 

Ash  fyd  sin ( ) ucrit

2

vsd 

 A w

sw  sin ( )

i

Ax

Structural system

Vsd  

vsd  211.87 m

ucrit

vRd3  382.21 m

Slab with shear reinforcement to a void punching.

vsd  vRd3

Concrete shear area

0.0013  0.6

vRd3  vRd1 

 kN

Critical perimeter with head

As  ´w Acw

1

ucrit    d2crit

Assumption degree of shear reinforcement

´w 

vsd  470.64 m

u

Geometry head u  4.4 m

u    Pu Pu

Vsd  

as being applicable condition

Figure: 2.3.2‐3

0.5  m

1

 kN

vsd  vRd3

1

 kN

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

The maximum design value of shear resistance of plate with shear reinforcement (per unit

Department of Architecture

82


Space inside the critical perimeter less the contact surface

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

83

Ax   

d2crit

2

4

2

 

Ps

Ax  7.4 m

4

w 

Asw  sin ( ) Ax

wtab 

w  0.00001528

0.0013

wmin  0.6 wtab

wmin  0.00078

2

Necessary degree of reinforcement EC2:

For dimensioning elements requiring shear reinforcement

0.5    fcd   bw  0.9 d  1  cotg ()

VRd2

 

fck

0.7 

 

200  MPa

fck 

  if   

0.58

25  MPa

0.5 0.5  

fcd 

 

0.58

13.3  MPa

 

0.5

w  if w  wmin wmin w

w  0.00078

Minimum design values of moments on columns in contact with the plate at the eccentric load

x  0.125

Internal Column, top moment

Smallest section width in the range of effective height bw 

y  0.125

1.0  m

Internal Column, top moment

Vsd  1800 kN

acting shear

Height of the floor slab hd 

force msdx  x  Vsd

msdx  225 kN

msdy  y  Vsd

msdy  225 kN

0.3  m

cot ( ) 

0

VRd2 

0.5    fcd   bw  0.9  hd  1  cot ()

VRd2  1032.41 kN

Maximum distance of stirrups

s max 

0.3  hd

s max  0.09 m

s max  if s max 

0.2  m smax 0.2  m

s max 

0.09 m

2  VRd2  688.27 kN 3 Maximum diameter of reinforcement stirrups with a smooth surface Vsd  1800 kN

s 

0.012  m Figure: 2.3.2‐4

Sectional area of shear reinforcement in the length range Asw   

s

4

2

Asw  0.00011 m

2

 

2

Structural system


of thickness hs at a critical cross-section carries a full load slab, shear force Vcd = 400 kN,

Bending moment and shearing forces: Vcd1  400  kN

Vcd  325  kN

Mcd  20  kN m

shear force from accidental load Vcd = 325 kN and the bending moment Mcd = 20 kNm (moment transmitted from slab to reinforced column).

hs

Uc1  as 

2

Ucr  2   Uc1  Uc2 Vcd1 qdmax  Ucr

Ucr  2.4 m

Mkontr  0.2  Vcd  hs

Mkontr  13 m  kN

Material characteristics:

fckcyl  0.8  fckcub

fckcyl

fcd  0.85 

1.5

1

qdmax  166.667 m

hs 2

2

Uc2  0.6 m

 kN

fckcyl  16  MPa

Icr 

U c1

3

6

U c2  U c1

2

Icr  0.144 m

2

3

fcd  9.067  MPa 2 3

 fckcyl    MPa  10  MPa 

fctm  1.4  

Uc2  bs 

If Mkontr less than the Mcd, should be respected Mcd

Figure: 2.3.3-1

fckcub  20  MPa

Uc1  0.6 m

2

fyk  345  MPa

fctm  1.915 MPa

fyd 

fyk 1.15

fyd  300  MPa

Figure: 2.3.3-2

where fctk is the characteristic tensile strength of concrete (5-percent fractile), fctm is the mean tensile strength and fck is the characteristic compressive strength of concrete measured on cylinders.

1

n  1 

The depth of reinforced concrete slabs hs  0.2  m

 dmax

2

V cd U cr

n  0.4

 U c2     U c1 

M cd  n  0.5  U c1

 dmax

Icr

1

 152.08m

 kN

Calculation of Qbu

Dimension columns: as  0.40  m



3

bs  0.40  m

2

d

 18  mm

Structural system

As1   

d

4

2

As1  0.00025447 m

n  6

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Example 3.2-3: In the middle columns of dimensions as x bs from adjacent reinforced flat slab

Department of Architecture

84


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

85

c1  as \



 stmin



 sty

Perimeter displaced the critical cross section

2

Astd  n As1

Astd  0.00152681 m

c2  bs



 stx

1 fctm  3 fyd

 stmin

Ucrp  2   c1  hs  2  ss   c2  hs  2  ss

Astd

 stx

 c2  4  hs  hs

 0.00636173 qdmaxp 

Vcd1

1

qdmaxp  77.04451232 m

Ucrp

It is less than qbu, that is, the cross section satisfies without shear reinforcement. Alternative we suggest shear reinforcement consisting of a flexible conduit at an angle

Astd

 0.00636173

 sty

 c2  4  hs  hs

s



  stx   sty 

 stm

 1  50   b    stm   stmin 

qbu  0.42   s   h   n  fctm  1

qbu  246.91096132 m

 =60.deg.

hs m

 kN

s

qbu  246.911 m

 0.00636173

 1.212

h

 1.4  m  2 

qbur  0.42  fctm 

hs

hs 3

h

 1.267 m

Asb 

1

qbur  160.87453706 m

 oh

2

qbur  160.87453706 m

1

qbu  246.911 m  kN

 qdmax  0.5  qbu  Ucr

 kN

Asoh   

 oh

4

 2.59304223

 kN 2

qbueur  160.87453706 m

 kN

I suggest shear reinforcement in the form of welded of mesh

ss 

s

 8  mm

 ss  Ass1   s  fyd

qdmax  0.5  qbu

Ass1   

s

2

4

2

The cross-section without shear reinforcement does not comply

 1

 kN

Asb  0.00039917 m

sin (  )   s  fyd

 14  mm

Asoh

 kN

qdmax  166.667 m

2

2

Asb

qdmax  166.667 m

1

 kN

The proposal

m

The reliability condition

 ss

 kN

 0.00212797

1

 stm

Ucrp  5.19180391 m

2

Ass1  0.00005027 m

ss  0.34897549 m

Figure: 2.3.3-3

Structural system

2

Asoh  0.00015394 m

 60  deg


Column of 400x 500 extreme

hd  25  cm

fctm  1.2  MPa

fyd  375  MPa

P1  856  kN

bs  50  cm

hs  50  cm

hd  25  cm

fctm  1.2  MPa

bs  40  cm

hs  50  cm

fyd  375  MPa

Qbu1  0.42  hd  fctm  ucr1

Qbu1  226.8 kN

Step 1: step 1:

ucr1   bs  hd   hs  hd  2

Qbu1  0.42  hd  fctm  ucr1

P  P1  0.5  Qbu1

P  667 kN

Asb 

As1 

P 0.86  fyd

2

Asb  0.00206822 m

2

 4

0.5  Qbu1  113.4 kN

When applied to the plate even bending moment, then we take 0.5 qbu

 25  mm

2

V1  0.42  hd  fctm  ucr1

ucr1   bs  0.5  hd  2   hs  hd

Qbu1  378 kN

P1  577  kN

Asb

As1  0.00049087 m

n 

V1  378 kN

P  667 kN

As1

n  4.21333718

As1 

ucr2   bs  3  hd   hs  3  hd  2

ucr2  5 m

Qbu2  0.42  hd  fctm  ucr2

Qbu2  630 kN

P  P1  0.5  Qbu2

n 

Asb As1

n  3.42

P  541 kN

 25  mm

As1 

P 0.42  hd  fctm

ucr  4.2937 m

Asb  0.00143752m

 4

As1  0.00031416m

2

2

2

2

 4

V1  226.8 kN

 20  mm n 

Asb

n  4.575766

As1

P  463.6 kN V1  P does not comply

Step 2

2

Asb  0.00167752 m

2

As1  0.00049087 m

ucr2   hs  3  hd   bs  1.5  hd  2

ucr2  2.8 m

Qbu2  0.42  hd  fctm  ucr2

Qbu2  352.8 kN

We expand the circumference in order to prevent the creation of a new shear crack

V2  0.42  hd  fctm  ucr2 V2  630 kN

ucr 

P 0.86 fyd

V1  0.42  hd  fctm  ucr1

P Asb  0.86  fyd

P  463.6 kN

For P we calculate the required shear reinforcement.

Asb 

Step 2

P  P1  0.5  Qbu1

ucr

4

 1.0734 m

P  P1  0.5  Qbu2 

 20  mm

Structural system

P  400.6 kN

As1 

2

 4

Asb 

P 0.86  fyd

2

Asb  0.00124217 m 2

As1  0.00031416 m

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Internal column of 500 x 500

Department of Architecture

86


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

87

n 

Asb As1

V2  0.42  hd  fctm  ucr2

n  3.95395164 V2  P

P  400.6 kN

V2  352.8 kN

The bending moment calculation of rectangular slabs loaded due to distributed load

does not comply

When calculating the maximum bending moments are used coefficients C, in the tables D-3. The choice of table depends on the method of support of rectangular slab. Kind of support:

- simple supported - cantilevered or fixed

The following tables also shown ways of reinforcing various kinds of slabs 

Figure 2.3.3-4: Shear reinforcement at slab-column connection Step 3:

:

ucr3   hs  5  hd   bs  2.5  hd  2 Qbu3  0.42  hd  fctm  ucr3

Asb 

Qbu3  478.8 kN

P 0.86  fyd

 25  mm

2

 4

Ma

C aq  q  a

2

2 - In direction b M b C bq  q  b

where q = g + v = dead load + variable loads

P  P1  0.5  Qbu3

 P  337.6 kN

2

- In direction a

ucr3  3.8 m

Asb  0.00104682 m

As1 

Calculation of the maximum bending moments over the supports

Calculation of maximum bending moments between the supports

- the effects of the dead load g - In direction a

2

As1  0.00049087 m

n 

Asb As1

n  2.13

Ma

C ag  q  a

2

-In direction b

Mb

C bg  q  b

2

where q = g = dead load - from the variable load v

V3  0.42  hd  fctm  ucr3

V3  478.8 kN

P  337.6 kN V3  P OK

V3 is greater than P, thus the determination of the reinforcement to avoid the punching in

2 - In direction a : M a C av  q  a

where q = v = variable loads

reinforced concrete slab flat over the column is o

Structural system

2 - In direction b M b C bv  q  b


Table: D 3

Loads on slab: - dead load

g = 9 kN/m2

-variable loads

v = 3 kN/m2

- total load

q = g + v = 12 kN/m2

a/b Caq Cbq a/b Caq Cbq a/b Coefficients for Cag calculating bending moments Cbg between the a/b supports where Cag q=g Cbg a/b Coefficients for Cav calculating bending moments Cbv between the a/b supports where Cav q=v Cbv

1,00 0,70 1,00 0,036 0,036 0,70 0,068 0,016 1,00 0,036 0,036 0,70 0,068 0,016

0,95 0,65 0,95 0,040 0,033 0,65 0,074 0,013 0,95 0,040 0,033 0,65 0,074 0,013

0,90 0,60 0,90 0,045 0,029 0,60 0,081 0,010 0,90 0,045 0,029 0,60 0,081 0,010

0,85 0,55 0,85 0,050 0,026 0,55 0,088 0,008 0,85 0,050 0,026 0,55 0,088 0,008

0,80 0,50 0,80 0,056 0,023 0,50 0,095 0,006 0,80 0,056 0,023 0,50 0,095 0,006

a/b Caq Cbq a/b Caq Cbq a/b Coefficients for Cag calculating bending moments Cbg between the a/b supports where Cag q=g Cbg a/b Coefficients for Cav calculating bending moments Cbv a/b between the supports where Cav q=v Cbv

1,00 0,045 0,045 0,70 0,074 0,017 1,00 0,018 0,018 0,70 0,030 0,007 1,00 0,027 0,027 0,70 0,049 0,012

0,95 0,050 0,041 0,65 0,077 0,014 0,95 0,020 0,016 0,65 0,032 0,006 0,95 0,030 0,025 0,65 0,053 0,010

0,90 0,055 0,037 0,60 0,081 0,010 0,90 0,022 0,014 0,60 0,034 0,004 0,90 0,034 0,022 0,60 0,058 0,007

0,85 0,060 0,031 0,55 0,084 0,007 0,85 0,024 0,012 0,55 0,035 0,003 0,85 0,037 0,019 0,55 0,062 0,006

0,80 0,065 0,027 0,50 0,086 0,006 0,80 0,026 0,011 0,50 0,037 0,002 0,80 0,041 0,017 0,50 0,066 0,004

0,75 0,069 0,022

a/b Caq Cbq a/b Caq Cbq a/b Coefficients for Cag calculating bending moments Cbg between the a/b supports where Cag q=g Cbg a/b Coefficients for Cav calculating bending moments Cbv between the a/b supports where Cav q=v Cbv

1,00 0,076 0,70 0,050 1,00 0,018 0,027 0,70 0,046 0,016 1,00 0,027 0,032 0,70 0,057 0,016

0,95 0,072 0,65 0,043 0,95 0,021 0,025 0,65 0,054 0,014 0,95 0,031 0,029 0,65 0,064 0,014

0,90 0,070 0,60 0,035 0,90 0,025 0,024 0,60 0,062 0,011 0,90 0,035 0,027 0,60 0,071 0,011

0,85 0,065 0,55 0,028 0,85 0,029 0,022 0,55 0,071 0,009 0,85 0,040 0,024 0,55 0,080 0,009

0,80 0,061 0,50 0,022 0,80 0,034 0,020 0,50 0,080 0,007 0,80 0,045 0,022 0,50 0,088 0,007

0,75 0,056

Coefficients for calculating _ bending moments over the supports where q=g+v

rectangular slab subjected to uniform load at two directions.

span of the slab: - In the direction a: a = 5,4 m - In the direction b: b = 7,2 m

Coefficients for calculating _ bending moments over the supports where q=g+v

Figure 3.2.4-1: Slab acting in two directions When calculating the maximum bending moments are used coefficients C, in Table D-3.

0,75 -

0,75 0,061 0,019

0,75 0,061 0,019

0,75 0,028 0,009

0,75 0,045 0,014

Maximum moment over the supports: Mac- a MbcMac- = Caq. q a2 = 0,076 .12. 5,4 2 = 26,59 kNm/m

Mbc- = Cbq q b2 = 0,024 .12. 7,2 2 = 14,92 kNm/m

The maximum bending moment between supports Mac+ a Mbc+ - the effects of the dead load g Mag+ = Cag g a2 = 0,043 .9

5,4 2 = 11,28 kNm/m

Mbg+ = Cbg g b2 = 0,013 .9 .7,2 2 = 6,06 kNm/m

- the effects of variable loads v Mav+ = Cav v .a2 = 0,052 .3

5,4 2 = 4,55 kNm/m

Mbv+ = Cbv. v b2 = 0,016 .3 .7,2 2 = 2,49 kNm/m

- total maximum bending moments between supports Mac+ a Mbc+ Mac+ = Mag+ + Mav+ = 15,83 kNm/m

Mbc+ = Mbg+ + Mbv+ = 8,55 kNm/m

Structural system

Coefficients for calculating _ bending moments over the supports where q=g+v

0,75 0,040 0,018

0,75 0,051 0,019

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Example 3.2-4: The calculation of the maximum bending moment of reinforced concrete

Department of Architecture

88


Table: D 3

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

89

Coefficients for calculating _ bending moments over the supports where q=g+v Coefficients for calculating bending moments between the supports where q=g Coefficients for calculating bending moments between the supports where q=v

Coefficients for calculating _ bending moments over the supports where q=g+v Coefficients for calculating bending moments between the supports where q=g Coefficients for calculating bending moments between the supports where q=v

Coefficients for calculating _ bending moments over the supports where q=g+v Coefficients for calculating bending moments between the supports where q=g Coefficients for calculating bending moments between the supports where q=v

a/b Caq Cbq a/b Caq Cbq a/b Cag Cbg a/b Cag Cbg a/b Cav Cbv a/b Cav Cbv

1,00 0,050 0,050 0,70 0,081 0,019 1,00 0,027 0,027 0,70 0,046 0,011 1,00 0,032 0,032 0,70 0,057 0,014

0,95 0,055 0,045 0,65 0,085 0,015 0,95 0,030 0,024 0,65 0,050 0,009 0,95 0,035 0,029 0,65 0,062 0,011

0,90 0,060 0,040 0,60 0,089 0,011 0,90 0,033 0,022 0,60 0,053 0,007 0,90 0,039 0,026 0,60 0,067 0,009

0,85 0,066 0,034 0,55 0,092 0,008 0,85 0,036 0,019 0,55 0,056 0,005 0,85 0,043 0,023 0,55 0,072 0,007

0,80 0,071 0,029 0,50 0,094 0,006 0,80 0,039 0,016 0,50 0,059 0,004 0,80 0,048 0,020 0,50 0,077 0,005

0,75 0,076 0,024

a/b Caq Cbq a/b Caq Cbq a/b Cag Cbg a/b Cag Cbg a/b Cav Cbv a/b Cav Cbv

1,00 0,075 0,70 0,086 1,00 0,027 0,018 0,70 0,035 0,005 1,00 0,032 0,027 0,70 0,051

0,95 0,079 0,65 0,087 0,95 0,028 0,015 0,65 0,036 0,004 0,95 0,034 0,024 0,65 0,055

0,90 0,080 0,60 0,088 0,90 0,029 0,013 0,60 0,037 0,003 0,90 0,037 0,021 0,60 0,059

0,85 0,082 0,55 0,089 0,85 0,031 0,011 0,55 0,038 0,002 0,85 0,041 0,019 0,55 0,063

0,80 0,083 0,50 0,090 0,80 0,032 0,009 0,50 0,039 0,001 0,80 0,044 0,016 0,50 0,067

0,75 0,085 -

0,011

0,009

0,007

0,005

0,004

a/b Caq Cbq a/b Caq Cbq a/b Cag Cbg a/b Cag Cbg a/b Cav Cbv a/b Cav Cbv

1,00 0,071 0,70 0,091 1,00 0,033 0,027 0,70 0,051 0,009 1,00 0,035 0,032 0,70 0,060 0,013

0,95 0,075 0,65 0,093 0,95 0,036 0,024 0,65 0,054 0,007 0,95 0,038 0,029 0,65 0,064 0,010

0,90 0,079 0,60 0,095 0,90 0,039 0,021 0,60 0,056 0,006 0,90 0,042 0,025 0,60 0,068 0,008

0,85 0,083 0,55 0,096 0,85 0,042 0,017 0,55 0,058 0,004 0,85 0,046 0,022 0,55 0,073 0,006

0,80 0,086 0,50 0,097 0,80 0,045 0,015 0,50 0,061 0,003 0,80 0,051 0,019 0,50 0,078 0,005

Table: D 3

0,75 0,043 0,013

0,75 0,052 0,016

0,75 0,033 0,007

0,75 0,047 0,013

0,75 0,088 -

0,75 0,048 0,012

0,75 0,055 0,016

Structural system

a/b Caq Cbq a/b Caq Cbq a/b Coefficients for Cag calculating bending moments Cbg between the a/b supports where Cag q=g Cbg a/b Coefficients for Cav calculating bending moments Cbv between the a/b supports where Cav q=v Cbv

1,00 0,071 0,70 0,038 1,00 0,027 0,033 0,70 0,058 0,017 1,00 0,032 0,035 0,70 0,063 0,017

0,95 0,067 0,65 0,031 0,95 0,031 0,031 0,65 0,065 0,014 0,95 0,036 0,032 0,65 0,070 0,014

0,90 0,062 0,60 0,024 0,90 0,035 0,028 0,60 0,073 0,012 0,90 0,040 0,029 0,60 0,077 0,011

0,85 0,057 0,55 0,019 0,85 0,040 0,025 0,55 0,081 0,009 0,85 0,045 0,026 0,55 0,085 0,009

0,80 0,051 0,50 0,014 0,80 0,045 0,022 0,50 0,089 0,007 0,80 0,051 0,023 0,50 0,092 0,007

0,75 0,044

a/b Caq Cbq a/b Caq Cbq a/b Coefficients for Cag calculating bending moments Cbg between the a/b supports where Cag q=g Cbg a/b Coefficients for Cav calculating bending moments Cbv a/b between the supports where Cav q=v Cbv

1,00 0,033 0,061 0,70 0,068 0,029 1,00 0,020 0,023 0,70 0,040 0,011 1,00 0,028 0,030 0,70 0,054 0,014

0,95 0,038 0,056 0,65 0,074 0,024 0,95 0,022 0,021 0,65 0,044 0,009 0,95 0,031 0,027 0,65 0,059 0,011

0,90 0,043 0,052 0,60 0,080 0,018 0,90 0,025 0,019 0,60 0,048 0,007 0,90 0,035 0,024 0,60 0,065 0,009

0,85 0,049 0,046 0,55 0,085 0,014 0,85 0,029 0,017 0,55 0,052 0,005 0,85 0,040 0,022 0,55 0,070 0,007

0,80 0,055 0,041 0,50 0,089 0,010 0,80 0,032 0,015 0,50 0,056 0,004 0,80 0,044 0,019 0,50 0,076 0,005

0,75 0,061 0,036

a/b Caq Cbq a/b Caq Cbq a/b Coefficients for Cag calculating bending moments Cbg between the a/b supports where Cag q=g Cbg a/b Coefficients for Cav calculating bending moments Cbv a/b between the supports where Cav q=v Cbv

1,00 0,061 0,033 0,70 0,081 0,011 1,00 0,023 0,020 0,70 0,033 0,006 1,00 0,030 0,028 0,70 0,050 0,011

0,95 0,065 0,029 0,65 0,083 0,008 0,95 0,024 0,017 0,65 0,034 0,005 0,95 0,032 0,025 0,65 0,054 0,009

0,90 0,068 0,025 0,60 0,085 0,006 0,90 0,026 0,015 0,60 0,036 0,004 0,90 0,036 0,022 0,60 0,059 0,007

0,85 0,072 0,021 0,55 0,086 0,005 0,85 0,028 0,013 0,55 0,037 0,003 0,85 0,039 0,020 0,55 0,063 0,006

0,80 0,075 0,017 0,50 0,088 0,003 0,80 0,029 0,010 0,50 0,038 0,002 0,80 0,042 0,017 0,50 0,067 0,004

0,75 0,078 0,014

Coefficients for calculating _ bending moments over the supports where q=g+v

Coefficients for calculating _ bending moments over the supports where q=g+v

Coefficients for calculating _ bending moments over the supports where q=g+v

0,75 0,051 0,020

0,75 0,056 0,020

0,75 0,036 0,013

0,75 0,049 0,016

0,75 0,031 0,007

0,75 0,046 0,013


Mr

-Radial

moment

Mt -tangential moment

slab stiffness: D

h -slab thickness

E h

The deflection at any distance r from

3

12  1  

2

where E - modulus

the center of plate

of elasticity

z -deflection plates

- Poisson ratio

z( r)

g 64  D

2

2

2

 a r

Table E3: Plate simply supported, loaded by uniform load g [kN/m2] The deflection at any distance r from the center of plate

z( r)

2 2 g   a  r 

64  D

The radial moment at any distance r from the center of plate  5    a2  r2   1  



M r( r)

g 16

  a   1     r   3     2

2

The radial moment at any distance r from the center of plate

M r( r)

g 16

2

 3     a  r

2

Tangential moment at any distance r from the center of plate

Tangential moment at any distance r from

M t( r)

the center of plate

M t( r)

g 16

  a   3     r   1  3     2

2

Radial moment in the middle of plate

M r( r

0)

M t( r

0)

ga 16

2

3 

Structural system

g 16

  a   1     r   1  3     2

2

Radial moment in the middle of plate

M r( r

0)

M t( r

0)

ga 16

2

 1   

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Table E3: Cantilevered circular plate subjected to uniform load g [kN/m2]

Calculation of deflection and moments circular plates depending the method of support and load

Department of Architecture

90


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

91 Table E3: Simply supported circular slab loaded due to two concentrated loads P [kN / m]

Table E3: Plate around the perimeter of cantilevered, loaded with continuous circular load P

acting at a distance ro

[kN / m] acting at a distance ro

Deflection at any distance r > ro from the center of plate

z r  ro

z r  ro

P



2

   

  a  r  1  2

1

1

2

a  ro

2

   



2   2 1  a   r 2 2      r o  r  ln    a  The deflection at any distance r < ro from the center of plate

8  D

 ro  2 2    r o  r  ln   8    D   a   3     a2   1     r2  2 2  a  r o  2 2  1     a 

P

Deflection at the middle of plate

 

      Radial and tangential moment at any distance

z( r

P

0)

8  D

Mt r  ro

Cantilevered radial moment

r < ro from the center of plate

Mr r  ro

1 2  r o  2 2    a  r o  r o  ln  2  a 

1     a

2

8  a

 ro 2

M r( r

  P  1     P  ln r o 

2

4 

a

a)

P 4 

a

2

 ro a

2

2

Cantilevered tangential moment

M t( r

Structural system

a)

 

P 4 

a

2

 ro a

2

2


acting on the plate of the center distance C

The radial moment at any distance r> c of the center of plate a  1     P  c  1 1     2 2 16    r r a  Tangential moment at any distance r> c of the center of plate M r( r  c)

M t ( r  c)

1     P 4 

P 4 

2

 ln

2  1     P  c   1    16    

  1     ln

a

r

 

1

1

2

r

a

2

2

  

  

Deflection plate at the edge of the load (in the distance c)

z( r

c)

 3   

P 16    D



 1   

2

 a c

  c2   3  ln c   1  1  

2

a

2

1 

2

a c a

2

Radial moment on the edge of the load (In the distance c)

M r( r

c)

1     P 4 

 ln

a

 c

 1     P   a 2  c 2 16    a

2

Tangential moment on the edge of the load (In the distance c) M t( r

c)

P 4 

  1     ln

2 2  1     P  a  c    1    2  16    a

a

c

Deflection in the middle of plate   3     a2  c2  ln c    7  3     c2     a  4  1      1  Radial moment in the middle of plate   1     c2  P a M r( r 0) M t( r 0)    1     ln   1   2 4   c 4 a  z( r

0)

P

16    D



Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Table E3: Simple supported circular slab loaded due to two partial uniform load W [kN / m2]

Department of Architecture

92


3.3 Staircases

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

93 Minimum number of risers except for stairs within a dwelling unit, at least 3 risers shall be

Staircases provide means of movement from one floor to another in a structure.

provided in interior flights.

The effective span of a simply supported slab should normally be taken as the clear distance between the faces of supports plus one-third of their widths. However, where a bearing pad is provided between the slab and the support, the effective span should be taken as the distance between the centres of the bearing pads. The span/effective depth should not exceed the appropriate value from table C3. There is normally no need to calculate shear stresses in staircases supported on beams or walls. The effective span is the distance between centre-lines of supporting beams or walls. The initial design should be checked, to obtain the final sizes of the stair slab and to calculate the amount and dimensions of the reinforcement. Types of staircases 1. Straight stairs – simplest form of stair layout and consists of one straight two levels. The

Figure 3.3-1: Continuous supported stairs, Reinforcement details for flight

width and the length of the landings should be equal = width of flight +10cm. 2. L Shaped stair (or sometimes called quarter turn stairs) – L shaped stair may have either

A straight staircases can be defined as one having a single, straight flight of stairs that connects two levels or floors in a building a straight staircase can be simple but quite elegant. Because a straight staircase offers a clear view of the stairs, there is a lower chance of falls or

equal or unequal flights. 3. U shaped stairs (or sometimes called half turn stairs or switchback stairs) 4. Winder stairs – stairs refer to stairways that make a turn without including an

misplaced steps. In contrast, curved staircases often require a lot of attention when you are going up or down one. Straight staircases require more space as compared to curved or platform staircases.

intermediate landing or platform to provide a flat rectangular turning space. 5. Spiral stairs – have tread which turn and rise around a central column. 6. Curved stairs – as winder stairs. Some of the functional requirement of staircases are, stability, protection from fire, suitable dimensions, and appearance. Staircases consist of components, flight, landing, tread, riser. In a flight of stairs all steps should have the same riser and same tread. Relationship between riser and tread can be shown as 2h+b = 63cm. Figure 3.3-2: Simply supported stairs, design of reinforcement, Reinforcement details

The vertical height between any landings shall not exceed 3.7m.

Structural system


in the longitudinal direction, while shrinkage reinforcement runs in the transverse direction. Special attention has to be paid to reinforcement detail at opening joints, as shown in

Loading: Dead Load: The dead load, which can be calculated on horizontal plan, includes: 1. Own weight of the steps.

figure 3.3-2.

2. Own weight of the slab. For flight load calculations, this load is to be increased by dividing it by cos  to get it on horizontal projection, where a is the angle of slope of the flight. 3. Surface finishes on the flight and on the landings. For flight load calculations, the part of load acting on slope is to be increased by dividing it by cos  to get it on horizontal projection.

Live Load: Live load is always given on horizontal projection. Longitudinally supported stairs may be supported in any of the following manners: 1. Beams or walls at the outside edges of the landings. 2. Internal beams at the ends of the flight in addition to beams or walls at the outside edges of

Figure 3.3-3: Steps cantilevering from a wall or a beam

the landings.

Figure 3.3-3 shows a stairs cantilevered from a reinforced concrete beam. The effective length of a cantilever reinforced concrete stairs and beams where this forms the end of a

3. Landings which are supported by beams or walls running in the longitudinal direction figure 3.3-5, figure 3.3-6, figure 3.3-7, figure 3.3-8.

continuous slab is the length of the cantilever from the centre of the support. Where the slab is an isolated cantilever the effective length is the length of the cantilever from the face of the support.

Figure 3.3-5: Longitudinally supported stairs due to walls, beams

Figure 3.3-4: Longitudinally supported stairs, bending moment and shear forces diagram

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

The stairs slab is designed for maximum shear and flexure. Main reinforcement runs

Department of Architecture

94


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

95

Figure 3.3-6

Figure 3.3-7

Figure 3.3-8: Simply supported steps supported by two walls, beams and a combination of both

Structural system

Figure 3.3-9


reinforced concrete walls (center-to-center) on both sides and carries a live load of 3kN/m2. The risers are 163 mcm and goings are 300 cm. Stair thickness required to satisfy deflection requirements is given by h = 220mm The depth of landing slab is hp = 220 mm  = 29 deg Calculation model: Load calculation The section b-c: Calculation of replacement shoulder height: v  0.143m

v  cos ( )  h v

h 1 

v

h 1  0.071m

2

h  h 1  h d h  0.321m

Thickness staircase shoulders h = 0.321 m q1s  h  25

kN

1

q1d  q1s 1.35

3 cos ( )

m

q1 s  9.183 kN  m

 2

2

q1d  12.398kN m

floor layer shoulders 2

q2s  2.106 kN m

2

q2d  q2s 1.4

Section a-b, c-d:

q2d  2.948kN m

Thickness staircase landings h p  0.02m

q3s  h p 25

Layer floor landing: 2

q4s  1.504 kN m

kN 3

m  cos ( )

2

q3d  q3s 1.35

q3s  0.572kN m

2

q3d  0.772kN m

2

q4d  q4s 1.35

q4d  2.03kN m

Imposed loads Circulation areas v 1s  3

kN

v 1d  v 1s 1.5

2

m

2

v 1d  4.5kN m

The total surface load on board: q bcs  q1s  q2s  v 1s 2

Figure 3.3-10

q bcd  19.846kN m

2

q cds  5.076kN m

Structural system

2

q bcd  q1d  q2d  v 1d

q bcs  14.289kN m

q cds  q3s  q4s  v 1s

q cdd  q3d  q4d  v 1d

2

q cdd  7.302kN m

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Example 3.3-1: Design a straight flight staircase in a residential building that is supported on

Department of Architecture

96


Sectional forces:

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

97

L  6200 mm

Dimensioning: L2  2550 mm

L1  2100 mm

L3  1550 mm

M a  68.573kN

The calculation of bending moments: 2

M a 

q cdd L 12

2

q cdd L

L2   q bcd  q cdd    L3   2  2  L2

  q bcd  q cdd 

L2

  L1 

M a  68.573kN

L2

 12 2  2   L3  L2  2  q cdd L 2  L2  M ad    q bcd  q cdd  L2    0.5  L1  2  L2 24    L1   2   M d 

Bending moment over the support:

m m

M d  77.369kN

M ad  56.877kN

m

m

b  1m h  0.22m See diagram B3-B3.3 



m m

m

fcd  11.5MPa

Ma

2

b d fcd

fyd  375MPa

 0.0475

fyk  410MPa

 0.154

2

Astd  b d fcd 100

Astd  12.01cm

m

We provide 7 16 

 0.21167

 0.91533

z   d

xu  0.033m

Ast = 14.07 cm2

 16mm

n  7 2

Ast  14.074cm

x   d

xu  0.8x

x  0.042m

z  0.18m

As1   

2

2

As1  2.011cm

4

Mu  Ast fyd z

Ast  n As1

Mu  95.171kN m

Mu  Ma

b. Cross section between the supports Mad = 56.877 kN m  

Figure 3.3.1-1

The calculation of reactions A, B A 

B 

q cdd L 2

q cdd L 2

 L3     q bcd  q cdd  L2   L1    

  q bcd  q cdd  L2 1 

 

 16mm 

ast  20mm

Mad

m

2

b d fcd

 0.134

   0.5 L2  2  2

A  36.024

kN m

B  41.237

kN m

2

2

4

Mu  Ast fyd z

Structural system

d  h  ast 

 2

h  0.22

 0.03679

 0.182

 0.9272

Astm   b d fcd

z  0.178m

8.3cm

As1   

L2 

  L3   2      0.5 L2  L1    2   

Astm

b  1 m 

z   d

L2 

d  0.197m

we provide

2

As1  2.011cm

Mu  67.113kN m

 16mm

Ast  n As1

n  5 2

Ast  10.053cm Mu  Mad


Example 3.3-2: The supporting structure of this type is a spiral reinforced concrete slab anchored at both ends in thick reinforced concrete slab or wall. Diagram of bending moments and forces in such reinforced concrete slab is plotted in figure 3.3.2-2. Structural height

Angle o

H

o

Number widths

ns

Width of stairs

b

Step height

vs

Plaster thickness

ho

3.9 m

2  270 360

4.712

 b1

25

3

22 kN m

nv

nv

25 kN m

26

thickness of staircase boards

1.2 m H

 b2

3

hd

g4

13.486kNm

g1  g2  g3  g4  p

r

- inside radius stairs

r1

1.2 m

- external radius of stairs

r2

2.4 m

 o  r1

- density

0.015 m

o

3

O1

s1

5.655m

O2

1 -1

1.8 m

 o r

 0.03 m   

0.015 m 0.15 m 

1

  b  b1 0.967kNm 

0.339 m

g1

-1

0.967kNm

0.5 v s  b   b1 h d  b   b2 0.914

1

1.98kNm

1

g2

1.98kNm

g3

6.565kNm

ho  o b 0.914

g4

vs

tan   

8.482m

O3

1

b

cos   

 o  r2

 o  cos    2  

2  2 

o  2 2 r  k  tan   3 sin  o  1 

 

0.339m

11.31m

s3

 

0.915

sin     cos   

0.196 6

hd

ns

23.86 deg

0.405

2

O2

s2

0.442

s2

 11

1

0.374kNm

0.226m

ns

19 kN m

 11

- Plaster

q

q

- combination of loading - radius of the axis of stairway

k

g3

3.6kNm

3 kN m  b

1

- calculation step width

- Steps

- Self - weight of reinforced concrete slab

p

p

sin   

g2

2

variable load

tan

g1

3.6kNm

3 kN m  b

0.15m

Permanent load - Surface treatment

p

p

O1

0.2 m

2

variable load

0.452m

 

1

cos  o

sin   

0.164

cos   

2

3

0.354

2

 o  sin    2 

0 0.836 2

0.5

0.707 

3  o cos  o 

          3  2   1  tan   2 sin   2   o  3 sin    o  o  2  2  k    3  cos    o o      6 cos   2    sin     o o  

  2   o  7 2  k sin     3 sin   o   5  2 12     9  cos    o o  2     o    2  o   3   4    2  6 sin      o cos  o  sin   o       

3  o 

2 

    1     

2

 11

445.165m

   

r



       



 

           

137.397

2

  

ns

sin  o

 o  cos    2 

0.37

O3

  

   

 12

r tan  3 k sin  o   o  cos  o  1.75 k cos     3 sin  o   o  cos  o  2  o       3 1   sin    2  o cos  o  sin  o  2 cos    2  o  sin  o     k  

 12

68.769m

2

 

 12 r

Structural system

38.205

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Circular-staircase

Department of Architecture

98


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

99

   3.5 k cos  2  o  sin  o  6 1k  sin  2  o  sin  o

 22

6 k  o  sin  o

 22

234.913

3    o o o o 3  10 q  r  tan      3 k  5  o  cos    8 sin    2  o cos    cos    sin   o     2   2   2   2    o o o  2 2   1.75 k cos      24 sin  2   2  o  sin  2   15  o  cos  2              2   o o o    sin    3 cos    sin   o    2  o cos     2   2   2       o  1 2  2    3   sin     2  o  sin         2   k  2     o o o    9   cos     2  o  cos    sin      o   2   2   2       o o     sin     cos    16  sin    o  2         2       o o o 2     cos      6  o  cos    8 sin    2 cos    sin   o      2   2   2    

 10

Calculation of moments, shearing force and longitudinal forces

                  

 10 3

19060.183kNm 2

q r

Calculation A, A, A2 A

2

 11  22   12

1

4 5 4

5

    



2



6

A2

 10  12   20  11

7002102.731kN m

Mx

i

2 6 4



3



7

3 4 7 4



4

i

My

Tx

i

Ty Ni

i

i

0

Rc

q  r

o 2

57.196kN

1 r tan     sin     cos   i      i  cos     sin   i  2 sin     sin   i    o   2  q  r   i     cos    sin   i   sin    2      1 cos   i 1 sin     sin   i  q  r   i    cos    1 cos     sin   i  q  r   i    sin   

Figure 3.3.2-1: Moment diagrams

A

Rb

37.603kN



436.215

A2

1

1 r sin     cos   i    i    sin   i  2 cos     sin   i   o   2  q  r    i    cos    sin   i  cos      2  

2

2

Ra

    o  2 1 r tan       i    sin   i  2 cos   i  q  r  1   cos    cos   i     2  

Calculation 1,2

A

1

148.421kNm

2

3754528.482kN m

37.603kN

 sin 

2

 20  12   10  22

A1

2

99845.761m

A1

1

o

Moments and forces in any cross-section (according to ) the axis of the spiral are calculated as follow:

274.156

 o o   o  2  20 q  r   6 k   o  cos    4 sin    sin   o   cos        2   2   2        o   o  1 o 2 2   4 sin    sin   o  cos      3.5 k cos     6  sin       3  o cos  k 2 2         2   20

q  r 

1

Mt

2

21562.414kN m

q r

 20

 o    2 2.669kNm  2  o   o o    o  2 M b q  r  sin      cos    1 r tan      2 2 2 2         o M c 1 r sin   47.861kNm  2  2

Ma

70.129kN m

Structural system


Design of reinforcement in reinforced concrete elements loaded concentric and eccentric compression with a small eccentricity Although the column is essentially a compression member, the manner in which it tends to fail and the amount of load that causes failure depend on: 1. The material of which the column is made. 2. The shape of cross-section of the column. 3. The end conditions of the column. As the loads on columns are never perfectly axial and the columns are not perfectly straight, there will always be small bending moments induced in the column when it is compressed.

Determining the buckling length of the column lo

Figure 3.3.2-2: Dimensioned drawing of reinforcement spiral staircase

Table: 3.3.2-1  0,785 1,571 2,356 3,142 3,927 4,712 5,498

Mx 21,557 -3,332 -0,673 4,462 -0,673 -3,332 21,557

cos() 0,707 0,000 -0,707 -1,000 -0,707 0,000 0,707

My -54,018 -73,795 -53,156 0,000 53,156 73,795 54,018

sin() 0,707 1,000 0,707 0,000 -0,707 -1,000 -0,707

Mt 3,807 -0,489 1,859 0,000 -1,859 0,489 -3,807





-2,356 -1,571 -0,785 0,000 0,785 1,571 2,356

2,356 1,571 0,785 0,000 -0,785 -1,571 -2,356

Tx 26,590 0,000 -26,590 -37,603 -26,590 0,000 26,590

Ty -41,552 -19,661 -6,680 0,000 6,680 19,661 41,552

Figure: 3.4-1 1. One end fixed in direction and position, the other free k = 2 N -47,453 -49,814 -32,029 0,000 32,029 49,814 47,453

2. Both ends pinned k = 1 3. One end pinned, the other fixed in direction and position k = 0.707 4. Both ends fixed in direction and position k = 0.5 The consideration of the two end conditions together results in the following theoretical values for the effective length factor (the factor usually used in practice). Columns and struts with both ends fixed in position and effectively restrained in direction would theoretically have an effective length of half the actual length.

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

3.4 Reinforced concrete column

Department of Architecture

100


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

101

However, in practice this type of end condition is almost never perfect and therefore

Design of reinforcement in reinforced concrete columns

somewhat higher values for k are used and can be found in building codes. In fact,

Stress in concrete [MPa] :

in order to avoid unpleasant surprises, the ends are often considered to be pinned (k = 1.0) even when, in reality, the ends are restrained or partially restrained in

c = Nsd / Ac’

direction.

Total required area of reinforcement v [cm2] :

In this case, the end conditions for buckling about the x-x axis are not the same as about the y-y axis. There-fore both directions must be designed for buckling (Where

Arequired = c‘ .10 2

the end conditions are the same, it is sufficient to check for buckling in the direction

where  can be obtained from the following graph:

that has the least radius of gyration). Although the buckling of a column can be compared with the bending of a beam, there is an important difference in that the designer can choose the axis about which a beam bends, but normally the column will take the line of least resistance and buckle in the direction where the column has the least lateral unsupported dimension 

=5

=7,5

12.84472 13.14803

12.76732 13.06879

13.75465

13.67173

0.3 0.4

Determination of basic characteristics

slenderness:

i

radius of gyration: Ac‘= b‘ . h‘

lo i I A c´

Minimum amount of reinforcement:

=10

13.28918

=c

13.5888

• Determination of the maximum carrying capacity of cross-section The maximum capacity of the cross section can be determined using the following graph:

- rectangle:

Aprovided . 10 2 / (Ac‘)

- where I is the moment of inertia of

I = 1/12.b.h3

the cross section 

 0.1 0.2

determine the minimum cross-sectional dimension columns in terms of

=5

=7,5

0.1 0.2

12.84472 13.14803

12.76732 13.06879

13.75465

13.67173

0.3 0.4

buckling

=10

13.28918

=b < 0,6 . fck

13.5888

sdv Ac‘ v lo  v i  v Areq, Aprovided v

MN m2 m m cm2

When the load on a column is not axial but eccentric, a bending stress is induced in the column as well as a direct compressive stress. This bending stress will need to be considered when designing the column with respect to buckling. Figure 3.4-2

The relationship between the length of the column, its lateral dimensions and the end fixity conditions will strongly affect the column’s resistance to buckling.

Structural system


and to the column above will vary with manufacturer. Foundation connection may be via a

documents which perform a similar function. It is necessary for a designer to become familiar

base plate connected to the column or by reinforcing bars projecting from the end of the

with local requirements or recommendations in regard to correct practice.

column passing into sleeves that are subsequently filled with grout. Alternatively, a column may be set into a preformed hole in a foundation block and grouted into position. Column-column connections may be by threaded rods joined with an appropriate connector; with concrete subsequently cast round to the dimensions of the cross-section of the column. Alternatively, bars in grouted sleeves, as described above, may be used. This results in a thin stitch between columns while the previous approach requires a deeper stitch. Connections may be located between floors, at a point of contra-flexure, or at floor level. Columns are provided with necessary supports for the ends of the precast beams (corbels or cast-in steel sections). There will also be some form of connection to provide beam-column moment connection and continuity. For interior columns this may be by holes through which reinforcing bars pass from one beam to another. For edge columns, some form of bracket or socket is required. During erection columns must be braced until stability is achieved by making the necessary connections to the beams and slabs.

Figure 3.4-3 In low and normal strength concrete, significant non-linearities in the stress-strain behaviour start to develop at about 0.001 strain and the slope of the curve is close to zero at about 0.002 strain. The steel is therefore still in the elastic range, and is able to carry an increasing part of the load, when the non-linearities in the concrete start to develop. The usual range of the yield strength of ordinary reinforcement is 400 to 500 N/mm2. The reinforcement thus starts to yield at about the same strain level as the concrete reaches its maximum strength. In high strength concrete the stress-strain curve is more linear, and the strain at maximum stress is higher compared to lower strength concrete. The reinforcement in HSC columns will therefore yield before the concrete reaches its maximum strength and will continue to yield at about the same stress level until the concrete reaches its ultimate strain level.

Precast Concrete Columns can be circular, square or rectangular. For structures of five storeys or less, each column will normally be continuous to the full height of the building. For structures greater than five storeys two or more columns are spliced together. Precast concrete columns may be single or double storey height. The method of connection to the foundation

Structural system

Figure 3.4-4

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Many countries have their own structural design codes, codes of practice or technical

Department of Architecture

102


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture 103

Figure 3.4-5 Figure 3.4-6

Structural system


Figure 3.4-7

Structural system

Department of Architecture STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Figure 3.4-7 104


Figure 3.4-8

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture 105

Figure 3.4-8

Structural system


Figure 3.4-9

Structural system

Department of Architecture STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Figure 3.4-9

106


Figure 3.4-10

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture 107

Figure 3.4-10

Structural system


Figure 3.4-11

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

Figure 3.4-11

108


Figure 3.4-12

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture 109

Figure 3.4-12

Structural system


part of a statically indeterminate structures. Extreme loads induces normal force Nd and bending moment Mf. The actual length of the column is l and the effective length le. 2800 kN

Nd

Mf

50 kN  m

l

le

4.0 m

0.7 l

le

2.8m

Asd

11.5 MPa

0.9 MPa

fctm

Ec

1

 lim 1.25 

0.96

 Nd  1  b  h  0.8 fcd     u  fyd

Asd

2

0.00281m

 1 

1

22 mm

As1

As

n  As1

As

0.00304m

Ast

4  As1

Ast

15.2cm

Asc

4  As1

Asc

15.2cm

2

As1

4 2

2

0.00038m

n

8

As  Asd

2

0.467

 lim

fyd

u

 50

2

210 MPa

Es

20 h

Suggestion:

27 GPa

Steel: 375 MPa

1

The necessary amount of reinforcement:

Concrete:

fyd

u

mm

Material characteristics:

fcd

Geometry factor:

Department of Architecture

Example 3.4-1: Design reinforced concrete columns rectangular cross section. The column is

420 MPa

Design cross-sectional dimension: M f

ef

Acd

N d

Nd 0.8 fcd   vystu  fyd

Abd

2

0.16766m

Abd

0.40947m

Design the cross-section: b

0.45 m

0.45 m

h

Design the bearing reinforcement to the cross-section: Determining the influence of slenderness: 

12

le  h

21.55

ef

ed

  ee

Assessment: Determination of slenderness:

  35

The calculation of eccentricities - statically indeterminate structures: ee

Figure: 3.4.1-1

ed

0.018m

h

le  12

h

h

21.55

 h  35

The calculation of eccentricities ed: ee

ef

ef

Structural system

M f N d

ef

0.018m

ed

  ee

ed

0.018m

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

110


Example 3.4-2: Determine the carrying capacity of a rectangular column shown in

Percentage reinforcement:

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

111

Asc

 sc

 stmin

0.00563

 sc

bh

0.03

 scmax

scmin  sc  scmax

1 fctm  3 fyd le

 scmin

h

4

 10

 stmin

0.0008

 scmin

0.00062

Extreme normal force which influence collapse of the cross section Neu: Neu

 u  0.8 b  h  fcd  As  fyd

2883.26kN

Neu

Nd

2800kN

Nd  Neu

satisfies section

The design of reinforcement to cross-section will be

c

0.02 m

fck

20 MPa

c

b  2 c

0.41m

Nd

16.65 MPa

c

b´  h´

21.55

Design of reinforcement: Areq

  b´  h´  100

Areq

2

28.577cm

2

As1

 1 

As1

4

Aprovided

n  As1

As

2

0.00038m

2

0.00304m

1

n

22 mm

8

Aprovided  Areq

h´ 

0.41m 1.7

figure 3.4.2-1. Cross-section and material characteristics of the column: concrete cover: Section height:

h

0.60 m

h  2 c

h´ = 0,56.m

Section width:

b

0.30 m

b  2 c

b´ = 0,26.m

c

0.02 m

Characteristic cylinder compressive strength of concrete:

f ck.cyl

Characteristic strength of steel:

f yk

The extreme value of the compressive forces acting on the column:

N sd

Overall height of column:

l

Buckling length of the

lo

0.7 l

25 MPa

410 MPa 3250 kN

3.70 m

2.59 m

column: radius of gyration:

i

slenderness column:

Stress in concrete:

c

From diagram the value  at a

0.288 b lo i

0.0864m 

30

N sd b´  h´

22.32  MPa

we obtaine given

3.23846

stress in steel s:

Minimum area of reinforcement can be calculated as follows A smin :

A smin

0.15

N sd

4

 f yk     1.15 

 10

2

13.67378cm 

The necessary amount of longitudinal see reinforcement in the column A

Figure: 3.4.1-2

Structural system

  b´  h´  100

2

47.151 cm


Number profiles:

2.5  cm

The actual amount of reinforcement designed to column:

of

n

Cross-cutting and material characteristics of the column: 2

As

n  

Example 3.4.3: Determine the carrying capacity of circular columns, shown in figure 3.4.3-1

10

2

49.08739cm 

4

The real amount of reinforcement must be greater than the value of A:

As A

reinforcement ratio  is calculated as follows:

As 100  b´  h´

concrete cover:

c

0.03  m

column diameter:

D

0.5  m

Characteristic cylinder compressive strength of concrete:

f ck.cyl

Characteristic strength of steel:

f yk

The extreme value of the compressive forces acting on the column:

3.37139

again, from the graph of can be obtained c

Buckling length of the column:

22.67275MPa 

radius of gyration: Multiplying the amount of stress in concrete c with net area

Nud = c . b´.h´=3,3 MN

lo

i

 D 64

D 4

2

 D

25 MPa

410 MPa 3200 kN

3.5 m

2.45 m

0.125 m

4

ultimate capacity of column:

Nsd:

0.7 l

0.44 m

4

of concrete cross-section (b´. h´) then we Obtained the

which must be greater than the force exerted on the column

N sd l

Overall height of column:

in reverses way the stress in concrete:

D  2 c

N ud  N sd

3.25 MN

slenderness column:

Stress in concrete:

lo

of

c

i

N sd 

2

D

19.6

21.045 MPa

4

From the graph we obtain the value of  at stress

2.2

in steel s: Minimum area of reinforcement A smin can be

A smin

0.15

calculated as follows: Figure: 3.4.2-1

N sd

 f yk     1.15 

2

13.46341cm 

The necessary amount of longitudinal reinforcement in the column can be determined by using the obtained coefficients :

Structural system

A

  

2

D´ 4

 100

2

33.452 cm

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

- diameter:

Department of Architecture

112


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

113

- diameter reinforcing

25 mm

profiles:

- Number profiles:

of

n

The real amount of reinforcement designed to

n  

Torsion: twisting of a structural member, when it is loaded by couples that produce rotation about its longitudinal axis. Under twisting deformation, it is assumed

2

As

3.5 Mode of failure of reinforced concrete members subjected to torsion

8

2

39.26991cm 

4

1. plane section remains plane 2. radii remaining straight and the cross sections remaining plane

column:

The task of the design engineer is to avoid torsional stresses, either to eliminate them

The real amount of reinforcement must be greater than the value of A:

As A

reinforcing coefficient  calculated as follows: 

Again, from the graph we can be obtained

torsion of concrete is a problem of less importance than its bending or compression, there are many structural members in which twisting forces occur and such forces must not be ignored.

As

reverses the stress in concrete:

entirely, or to greatly reduce them by suitably arranging the layout of the structure. Although

c

2

D´ 4

2.5826

 100

22.2 MPa

Multiplying the amount of stress in concrete c with a net area of the concrete section of the column is obtained by

N ud

 D´2    4 

 c  

3.376 MN

carrying capacity:

which must be greater than the force exerted on the column Nsd :

N ud  N sd

3.20 MN

Figure 3.5-1: The notation of balanced and unbalanced stability Experiments with plain and reinforced concrete were recorded as early as 1903 at Stuttgart, Germany. Professor Morsh tested to failure eight cylindrical specimens, 26 cm in diameter of plain concrete, and some cylinders reinforced with spirals. He noted that the fracture was on helical surface, approximately at 45 degrees with surface elements parallel to the axis and that the torsional moment at initial cracking was higher than that for unreinforced specimens. The Stuttgart experiments by Prof. Bach (1911) of thirty-seven test –pieces (circular 40 cm in diameter, square 30cm by 30cm, and rectangular 42cm by 21cm) of plain concrete and

Figure: 3.4.3-1

Structural system


In practice, torsion usually occurs as a secondary effect of bending. Such torques occur when a

longitudinal bars and spirals, constituted the first thorough investigation of the problem.

beam is loaded in a plane which does not pass through the shear centre of the cross-section, or

The ratio of the torsional shear strength to compressive strength varied from 0.07 to

the beam is curved in a plane at right angles to the applied loads.

0.13. the ratio of the torsional shear strength to the tensile strength varied from 0.92 to 1.75. the

Longitudinal balcony a girders that support cantilever beams, frame beams are also subject to

highest values obtained for the rectangular sections and the lowest for the hollow circular

torsion because of eccentricity of the load.

sections.

For Reinforced concrete frame if we used it in vertical position, be subject to combined bending

Cowan (sydney) 1960, presented formulas for determining the torsional shear stresses,

and compression, used in horizontal position as balcony beam, would be subject to combined

diagonal tensile stresses and angle of rotation for several section. Most of these formulas form

bending, shear and torsion.

a part of the new Australian concrete beams subject to torsion with due consideration to both

In the rigid space frame, the end moments of a loaded beam give rise to bending in the column

safety and economy.

and torsion in the beams which frame in the same joint at right angles to the loaded beam.

Cowan proposed a dual criterion of failure for the behaviour of concrete under stresses,

The problem of combined bending and shear with torsion arises essentially out of the monolithic

particularly combined bending and torsion. Although Cowan has contributed a great deal to the

character of reinforced concrete structures. In a beam and slab floor, any asymmetry of the

subject by extending his theoretical and practical investigations to rectangular reinforced and

loading from the slab produces torsion in the supporting beams, the extreme case being a

prestressed concrete sections, the number of tests performed by him in each case was limited.

continuous beam with alternate spans loaded.

The distribution of lateral loads to several shear walls depends on the rigidity of the floor and the rigidity of the shear wall. A rigid floor with flexible shear walls is one extreme

In seismic region where earthquakes are frequent and severe, torsional stresses occur in all parts of the framed structure as secondary stresses during the earthquake tremors.

case and a flexible floor with rigid shear walls is another extreme case. In the first case, the lateral force is distributed to the shear walls depending on their relative levels of rigidity. In a case where the floor is supported by three shear walls of equal rigidity, each of these walls carries a third of the lateral load. However, if the inner wall is not located at the centre, a torsion component is also developed figure 3.5-2.

Figure 3.5-2: The notation of balanced and unbalanced stability Figure 3.5-3

Many structural elements in building and bridge construction are subjected to significant torsional moments that affect the design. Spandrel beams in buildings, beams in eccentrically

For the box-girder beam the webs of a box girder must not only handle shear but also

loaded frames of multi-deck bridges, and box girder bridges are examples of such elements.

torsion and transverse bending. If as in the case of bridges constructed with the cantilever

The effects of the torsional moment are accounted for by superimposing the amount of

method, the compression chord is inclined, smaller tensile forces are produced for the

transverse and longitudinal steel and the intensity of the shearing stresses required for torsion

determination of the stirrups, but larger forces occur in the tension chord. The design of the web

resistance to those required for shear resistance.

for transverse bending has up until now normally been carried out separately for shear and torsion, and the reinforcement for each has been fully superimposed.

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

concrete reinforced with (a) longitudinal bars, (b) longitudinal bars and rings and (c)

Department of Architecture

114


This force is equal to the shear flow cross-section, it is shear force per unit length corresponding

Torsion the closure of one or more cell-type cross-sections

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

115

to perimeter of the cross section. Then the average shear stress is inversely perimeter ofsectional thickness it is. T

t On the center line lengths ds account for then torque.

dMk

 Tds

 t 

ds

The entire torque integration we get all around Figure 3.5-4

Mk t    ds Because

Basic relations theory of torsion: From Hook's law 

G

 

 

1

 the relative angle of twist per unit length attributable Because dF 

dMk

1

dFs

2

2 TFs

 ds

t   ds

t G  ds

T

 ds

2 dFs

a   ds

Tds

t  ds

t

t ds

T

Mk

 2   dF  

t G  ds

Mk

Mk

2 F s 2 TFs

2 

2 t Fs

F s

2 

ds

G  ds

 

1

G 

s

2 F s

t Fs

Then for a moment torsional stiffness we get

then will 

Mk GJk

G 

Mk Jk

Jk

Mk

Jk

G

2  1 2 Fs

 Fs  2

t Fs

4

  ds

Hollow-chamber section Twisting a thin straight bar that corresponds to the relative angle of twist , formed by

And further

longitudinal shear force. Let us define the size of the force attributable to unit length of tendon T.

 2 dFs

will be

2

G  dF

  2d dMk G   F G Jk   Where we have identified

Jk

T ds Tds

 distance is investigated location of the center of torsion

2 F s

G 

Where G is the shear modulus

dMk

  ds

T  ds

Mk Jk G

Structural system

Mk

ds

t  G 4  F  2 s

ds t

Jk

 Fs  2

4

ds t

ds

2 G 

  ds

F s

2 F s


If the cross-section of more chambers, the individual shear flows uncertain variables. We use them to determine the hydrodynamic analogy. If the node know two outlet quantities we can determine the amount of the third (shear force). For bypass (shear rate) of each chamber has use Derivatives of Formulas, wherein the relative twist each well the same as the ratio of the pitch of the entire cross section. So we obtain cross-section, from which we can calculate the individual shear flows T, torsional stiffness momentJ or relative twist angle . For each chamber will apply these relationships:

 i 

ds

2 G 

F i

2 G 

Mk GJk

Fi

2

Mk Jk

F i

Diameter Jk moment torsional stiffness of the entire cross-section. The picture drawing more pre-chamber cross section, and there are marked the shear flow A. Let's pick as the third chamber (i = 3) to the surface F i = F 3, we can write: D

A

   ds  D

B

   ds  A

C

   ds B

2 G 

D

A

B

C

 1  1  1  1 ds   T3  T2  ds  T3  ds   T3  T4  ds T3   t 3h  t 23  t 3d  t 34 C D A B 2 G 

F 3

F 3

2

Mk Jk

2 G 

F3

Mk

F 3 Jk After writing and receive treatment (removal of brackets) 2

      1  1  1  ds  T2   ds  T4   ds T3    t   t   t       

In this formula mean Mk torque applied to the cross section, Fi area closed chamber.

   ds  C

If we substitute for  relationship = (T/t) then will be

2 G 

F3

2

Mk Jk

F 3

The relationship can be generalized and such. for i - th chamber will be:

   1  ds  Ti 1   Ti    t     

   1  ds   T( i 1)   ds t   t     1

2 G 

Fi

2

Mk Jk

F i

What we express in short hand as follows: F 3

 Ti     Where

1

t

ds  

 

 k

   Tk   1 ds    t    

2 G 

Fi

2

Mk Jk

Fi

The box girder i = 1,2 ..... n k = The cells adjacent to the box girder and, i.e. (I-1), (i + 1) i, k = considered, the walls of the chamber, and the chambers adjacent to the (i k = -1, k = i + 1) For n of cells, we can write n equations of type

    1  1  ds  T2   ds T1    t   t      Figure 3.5-5 D

   ds  C

A

   ds  D

B

   ds  A

C

   ds B

2 G 

F3

2

Mk Jk

F 3

2 G 

F1

2

      1  1  1  ds  T1   ds  T3   ds T2    t   t   t       

Structural system

Mk Jk

F 1

2 G 

F2

2

Mk Jk

F 2

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

More cell-type hollow section

Department of Architecture

116


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

117     1  1  ds  T( n 1)   ds Tn    t   t     

2 G 

Fn

2

Mk Jk

The condition is composed of the cross-section shape F n

n

Mk  2

 Ti Fi

i1

n

Jk

If the label clarity integrals, which are dimensionless coefficients  such as:  ii

    1 ds   t   

i = 1,2.......n

 ik

    1 ds   t   

4

i1 k = i -1, i+1

i i k

Then, 

2 Mk

Jk

A quantity 2 G 

2

Mk

Jk We can write this (modified, the order due to the unknown shear flows Ti)  11 T1

  12 T2

(  ) ( n n 1) Tn 1   n n Tn

G

 F n

section, or the relative angle of twist  unknown. We see that when we get chambers n + 1 unknowns. Because all equations contain a common factor 2 G = 2 (Mk / Jk) = of these equations we can determine the ratio of shear flows

Ti 2 G 

Ti 

 Ti 

 Ti 2 G

 ( 1   )

2 G

E

E 2 ( 1   )

The reactions at the supports of box-girder bridges cannot be directly introduced into the webs in most cases and can also not be carried by means of transverse bending of the bottom flange. In addition, often room between the bridge bearings must be provided for hydraulic jacks needed to replace the bearing at a later time. The transverse diaphragm, which is favourable in stabilizing the cross-section under torsion anyway, can be used in solving this problem as well.

Jk

The forces in the diaphragm can be simply determined with the truss analogy, whereby the

2 Mk

transition between the truss of the diaphragm and that of the web must be maintained without

After solving the equations of them multiplying factor  determine the actual shear flows, thus Ti

Where we took shear modulus

 F 2

On the right side of the set of equations the torque stiffness to torsion Jk the whole cross-

 Ti Ti

A relative angle of twist

 F1

(  ) 21 T1   22 T2   23 T3

   Ti Fi

a break. With sufficient frame stiffness the torsional moment can be handled without a diaphragm.

2Mk Ti  Jk

If 2 or more box girders are placed next to each other it is advantageous to connect their top and bottom flanges in order to achieve a better transverse load distribution. If only the top

Quantities T´i we obtain the equations where the place Ti on the left we write T´i and on the

flanges are connected, they will be highly stressed due to bending moments in the transverse

right side will act only known value Fi (we actually shared factor )

direction without being able to effectively distribute the stresses in this direction. It is then better to separate the two box girder.

Structural system


fctm  1.92  MPa

Example 3.5-1: A simple example for predicting the ultimate strength and mode of failure of reinforced concrete beams subjected to pure torsion. Where the torsional strength is related to the amounts of transverse and longitudinal reinforcement and to the concrete strength. Torsional moments in reinforced concrete are typically accompanied by bending moments and shearing forces. An example of the design and assessment of reinforcement for the torsion sided cantilevered beam with a cross-section b(m), h(m) see figure 3.5.1-1. Extreme load causes in face of support bending moment M(kN.m) shearing force V (kN) and torsion moment T(kN m).

fcd  9.07  MPa

Department of Architecture

Failure due to torsion

Cross-sectional dimension: b  0.35  m

h  0.45  m

Beam span: l  4.35  m

Concrete cover: ast  0.03  m

Effective section height: d  h  ast

d  0.42 m

Torsion moment: Td  9  kN  m

Uniform load: qd  73  kN  m

Figure 3.5.1-1: Reinforced concrete beam subjected to torsion

1

Bending moment: Md  115 kN  m

 q  1

Shearing force: Vd  159 kN

 

Figure: 3.5.1-2

Md

  0.205439319

2

  0.07111

b  d  fcd

material characteristics fctkom  1.40  MPa

fcko  10  MPa

fck  16  MPa

fyk  375MPa

2

fctm

 fck   fctkom     fcko 

3

fcd  0.85 

fck 1.5

fyd 

fyk 1.15

Required reinforcement: Astd    b  d  fcd 

fyd  326.09 MPa

1 1  100 MPa

Structural system

Astd  9.478 cm

2

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

118


Torsional moments acting on a cross section of a beam cause shearing stresses, which circulate

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

119

near the periphery. For this reason, torsion design has typically been linked to shear design. Design of reinforcement: As1 

Ast  n  As1

 1 

As1  0.000314159m

4

Ast  0.001256637m

 stmax  0.03  b  h

2

Vd

n  4

Vc

2

 stmax  0.004725m

2

 stmin

1 fctm   bh 3 fyd

1 3

 b  h   q  fctm

Vumax 

1 3

 stmin  0.000308343m

c max  0.18 

fcd  q  fctm

h

assd  0.00115311m

choose stirrups with area Ass s s  1  m

2

ass1d 

4

Tc  8.933177419m  kN

3  Td W t  fcd

is less than 1, that is, the concrete cross section satisfies

 0.568127251

Tc  8.933177419m  kN

Td  Tc

Abt  0.1131m

bt  b  2  ast 2

ut  2  bt  ht

ht  0.39 m

bt  0.29 m

Abt  bt  ht

ut  1.36 m

assd n

n4

longitudinally inserts As1d

Td

ut

2  Abt  fyd

as1d 

Td 2  Abt  fyd

1m

as1d  0.000122016m

2

Design of cross-sectional area - additional reinforcement at the top (bottom) surface

ass1d  0.000576555m

2

 ss  

3  Vd

as1d

To one side of the beam (stirrups n = 2)

Ass1 

 W t  k n  fctm

It is greater than 1

 2.588836802

ht  h  2  ast

c max  0.383464041m

fcd  c

n  2

3

Vd1  125.925kN

 Vd  Vc   s s

assd 

1

Proposal reinforcement for torsion

Vumax  476kN

Vd1  ( 0.5  l  h)  qd

Tc

Td  9 m  kN

greater than 2.5 and Vc less than Qumax -To propose shear reinforcement

Vd  159kN

Td

b  h  fcd

Vc  100.55kN

 b  h  fcd

Tc 

Verification of the cross-sectional dimension 2

shear reinforcement, shearing force Carrying by concrete: Vc 

k n  1.1

The reliability condition is not satisfied it is necessary to determine torsion reinforcement

2

 1  20  mm

2 h  3 m

k n  1.4 

Ass1  0.000628319m

2

2

 

as1d   bt  2  s s  0.25  m Ass1  assd

 ss  10  mm

satisfies

  0.000059178m3

4

on the side of the beam as1d 

Collapse due to torsion

ht 

ht 2

 0.000023793m

3

remains at the top surface W t 

1 3  2

2

h

h b

W t  0.012721154m

3

Ast  Astd   0.000308883m2

b

Structural system

is greater than

0.000064324 m

2


Ast  Astd bt 

ht

m

as1  6.37  cm

2

0.2   stmin  bt  s s  0.00000244m

4

2

  10  mm

Ass1 

  4

is less than Ass1  0.79  cm 2

2

Checking conditions of reliability Stirrups on the side of the beam is designed 10 2

  10 mm

As 

 

A s  0.79  cm

4

2

as1 

At the bottom side of the cross-section

asst  ass  ass1d

As

as1  0.000402768m

 ht    2

asst  1.63  cm

2

from the longitudinal reinforcement we can determine the balance:

Ast  Astd   3.09  cm 2

2

2   

n  2

As 

  20  mm

4

That the condition

As  0.002166616m

bt

asst fyd

b) Stirrups for torsion

as1  fyd

Because inequality must be satisfied 0.5 

Asst fyd ut   2.0 As1  fyd s st

asstd 

Td 2  Abt  fyd  2

m

then will be asstd  0.86  cm

asstd

Asst

Td

s st

2  Abt  fyd  2

0.5

2  bt  ht 

2

Tu 

Td   Ast  Astd m   m  fyd   ass  ass1d  fyd ht 2  Abt  fyd    bt  2   

Is greater than

m

Td  9 m  kN

reinforcement as1  2  asstd

as1  1.73  cm

2

is less than

0.000187561  0.000332637

Stirrups for shear and torsion ass1d  asstd  0.000662833m

2

  10  mm

Stirrups a  1  m

at distances 0,19 m 2

ass 

s s  0.19  m

  a  4 ss

ass  4.13  cm

2

Assessment of the reinforcement for torsion s s  0.19  m

bt  0.29 m

 stmin 

1 fctm   bt  ht 3 fyd

 stmin  0.00022142m

2

Structural system

Tu  21.38i m  kN

The proposed reinforcement satisfies.

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

as1 

Department of Architecture

120


Example 3.5-2: The reinforced concrete section is rectangular in shape with dimensions bt, ht

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

121

We want to assess the cross section for the interaction of torsion moment Td and shear force

Vd Vcu

Td

3.36

Tcu

Vd. It is greater than 1, that is, the tensile reinforcement is needed.

Material characteristics, concrete and steel: fcd

11.5  MPa

fctm

0.9  MPa

fyd

Verification of the cross-sectional size:

300 MPa

Cross-sectional dimension:

Vd

Section width: b

1 3

0.30  m

ast 0.025 m bt b  2  ast

1

Tcu

Concrete cover: bt

0.25m

ht

h  2  ast

Torsion moment: 1.4  kN  m

ht

0.35m

3

2.4 kN m

Td

Ttq

0.5  Vd  bt

Ttq

3

 b  h  fctm

Vcu

36kN

Section modulus in torsion (rectangular section): 2

Wt

b h 3  2

b

Wt

0.008m

T cu

3

Td  Tcu

12.5kN m

Td  Ttq

Tcu

Td



Vtd

Ttq  

116.8kN

The greatest shearing force of long-acting service load does not exceed 80% of the shear force from overall service load Vcu

Vcu

d

h

 W t  fctm

1.4kN m

Vcu

0.8

45kN

Vss

Vtd  Vcu

3

Calculation torsion moment transmitted by concrete: 1

  

Vd   1  1.5 

Vtd

Shear force transmitted by concrete: Vcu

 W t  fctm

Both conditions are fulfilled, then effect of torsion of the increased value of shear forces will be:

100 kN

1

3

0.26

 W t  fcd

Tcu

Shear force: Vd

1

Calculation torsion moment transmitted to the violation of concrete:

0.40  m

Td

 b  h  fcd

Td

It is less than 1, the size of the cross section satisfies.

Section height: h

2.4kN m

h  ast

d

c

0.375m

1.2 

b  fctm Vd  Vcu

Vss

2

d

c

71.8kN

0.828m

Maximum distance double shear stirrups  str

8  mm

Structural system

n

2

Ass

n     str 4

2

Ass

0.000100m

2


Vss

s smax

 Ass  fyd  c

0.347m

ss

Example 3.5-3: Spreading of box girders beams

0.30  m

The procedure for constructing lines to the influence of spreading of the cross-section:

Verification of the distribution and size of the stirrups: Ass

0.000050m

2

Ass 2

1 fctm 0.5   b s 3 fyd t s

2

a) calculate the deflection of structure from concentric acting unit force P = 1 - ordinates 0.0000375m

2

sagging w b) establishes the deflection lines ordinates of the applied bending moment M = P.y (where y is the distance from the center of the cross-section of torsion to the end of beam see

1 fctm  0.5   b s 3 fyd t s

figure 3.5.3-1, for that we want to construct a line to the influence of spreading of the cross-section) so that we find first relative angle of twist  (torsional rigidity of closed

The longitudinal reinforcement at 1m:

cross-section) and through that we obtain ordinates w c) determine the resulting deflection lines of force P = 1 acting over respective beams

as1min

1 fctm b m 0.5   3 fyd t

as1min

0.000125m

which will be the sum of ordinate w´ and w´´ therefore w = w´ + w´´

2

d) by means of deflection lines we get the influence of spreading line (condition qi=1, where qi=1, are ordinates of the influence lines of spreading under each beam)

Perimeter ut

2  bt  ht

ut

1.2m

q i

1

k  w i

k

1 w i

a

q i

k  w i

The longitudinal reinforcement: as1min

As1min

m

 ut

As1min

0.00015m

Beam of one box girder of length L and cross-section dimensions shown in figure 3.5.3-1 is

2

given. The girder is torsionally fixed at both ends.

Proposal longitudinal reinforcement in cross-section: l

8  mm

A sl

 

 l

Calculation of cross-sectional characteristics:

2

4

Asl

0.0000502m

2

Span: L = 25m

For the symmetric load, Vw is obtained by dividing the total shear by V/2. The web bending

The number of required longitudinal profile in cross-section: n

A s1min A sl

n

Modulus of elasticity of concrete: Ec = 32000GPa

moment Mw is obtained from the total bending moment M.

2.98

Suggestion 4 J 8 (one in each corner profile).

Figure: 3.5.2-1

Structural system

Figure 3.5.3-1: Cross-section of one-box girder

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

1

s smax

Department of Architecture

122


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

123 Fbi 

Width of individual parts of the cross-section:

Sbi 

1.95

b 1  13.00m

b 2  2.8m

b 6  6.40m

b 3  1.75m

h 1  0.15m

h 5  0.15m

h 2  0.2m

h1

r 1 

r 1  0.075m

r 2  0.21667m

r 5  h 1 

2

h 3  0.2m

b 5  0.4m

h 4  1.35m

h 6  0.15m

Fbi  b i h i

h5

b 4  1.0m

0.56

r 2  h 1 

2

h2

r 3  h 1 

3

r 4  h 1 

r 3  0.21667m

  h 4  h 5  h 6

r 6  h 1  h 4 

r 5  1.275m

h6

h3 3

h4 2

m

2

0.07583

0.21667

1.35

1.11375

0.825

0.06

0.0765

1.275

0.96

1.368

1.425

SBi 

Jboi 

0.01097 0.02629

m

4

0.01721 1.12388

0.09754

0.00008

0.09761

1.9494

0.0018

1.9512

2

6

Fb 

6

Jbo1  0.00366m

4

Jbo3  0.00078m

1

 b 1   h 1

Jbo4  0.20503m

1 3 Jbo5   b 5  h 5  2

 36

Sb 

Fbi

i1

4

Jbxi  Jboi  Fbi  r i

Jbo6 

4

 36

4

1 12

 b 6   h 6

Jbo6  0.0018m

1 3 Jbo3   b 3  h 3  2

Jbo5  0.00008m 2

3

m

4

3

3

4

SBi

4

Fb  5.23m

2

6

Jbx 

Jbxi

i1 4

Jbx  3.23205m

4

Position of the neutral axis from the equation:

1 3 Jbo2   b 2  h 2  2

Jbo2  0.00124m

Sbr 

i1

Sbr  3.01947m

Jboi

Jbo  0.21258m

4

 36

6

Sbi

i1

6

12

0.02753

0.20503

i1

Jbo1 

0.01462

0.00078

Moment of inertia: 3

4

0.91884

SBi  Sbi r i

 b 4   h 4

m

0.01643

Jbo  1

m

Jbxi 

0.00366 0.00124

Sb  2.90167m

12

0.075 0.21667

0.35

Static moment of individual parts of the cross-section:

Jbo4 

m

0.12133

3

r 4  0.825m

r 6  1.425m

Sbi  Fbi r i

ri 

0.14625

Fb t

Sb

t 

Sb Fb

t  0.55481m

The resulting inertia we get from the relationship: Jbx

Jbt  Fb t

Jb  Jbt

Structural system

2

Jbt  Jbx  Fb t Jb  1.62217m

4

2

Jbt  1.62217m

4


Jk 

span axis of symmetry of the cross section:

4 Fs

2

Jk  3.56342 m

 hs bs  2     b4 h1 

4

Considering

Mk  1 Jk

Gc 

P  1 MN

3

Ec

4

Gc  15652173.91304 m

2 ( 1   )

2

 0.15

kN

Figure: 3.5.3-2

P L f   48 Ec Jb 1

Mk  3.56342 m

f  0.00557m

Figure 3.5.3-4: Cross-section and loads, girder and equivalent torque Mk, torsional moments T Both ends of the girder are torsionally fixed. The torsional moments will be resisted by a combination of St.Venant and Warping torsion. Torsional moment T in a single-cell box girder are normally considered to be equilibrated by a state of pure shear. This phenomenon is called St.Venant torsion. The torsional shear stresses in the deck slab cantilevers are small relative to those in the walls of the box and are therefore neglected. Because the webs and slabs are thin relative to the overall box dimensions, the shear stresses can be assumed constant across the wall thickness. The torsional stresses can thus be expressed as a constant closed shear flow

Figure: 3.5.3-3

around the box, (kN/m). The value of  is obtained from the equation of moment equilibrium about one of the corners of the box

Calculation ordinates deflection lines: Moment stiffness in torsion: bs  b 6  0.5 b 4

hs  h 4

Fs  bs hs

bs  6.9 m

hs  1.35 m

h1  

y 

h1  0.15 m

b4  0.5 m

y  3.45 m

b4 

b4 2

 h1 h6    2   2

Fs  9.315 m

bs

2

= (T/2Ao )

Ao = b h

Relative angle of twist will be:

2 



Mk Gc Jk

Structural system

2

 0 m kN

1

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Calculate the deflection of a simple beam from force P = 1 MN acting at the middle of the

Department of Architecture

124


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

125 Torsion in box girder bridges is rarely equilibrated by shear stresses alone.

Dual-chamber section or 2 box girder cross-section

and the angle of twist at mid-span

Example 3.5-4: Calculation of cross-sectional characteristics:

L

3

   10 kN m 2

3

Span L = 35m 

Modulus of elasticity of concrete: Ec = 36000GPa

 0.0008 rad

Ordinates deflection lines from this rotation under the beam will be: 

  y

 0.00276 m

The resulting ordinates we get by counting: l

 f  

l

 0.00282 m

p

 f  

p

 0.00833 m

Line cross to the influence of spreading of the affine with crease lines coefficient of affinity: ql  l k

ql  0.25286 m

qp  p k

Figure: 3.5.4-1

qp  0.74714 m

Width of individual parts of the cross-section:

check: ql  qp  1 m We were based on the assumption that the cross-section is perfectly rigid and therefore also to the influence of spreading of cross-line has a linear course.

b 1  18.0 m

b 2  2.9 m

b 3  3.6 m

b 4  0.50 3 m

b 5  0.6 m

b 6  10.7 m

h 1  0.15 m

h 2  0.2 m

h 3  0.2 m

h 4  1.35 m

h 5  0.15 m

h 6  0.15 m

ah 

b 1  2 b 2  2 b 3  b 4 2

ah  1.75 m

r 3  h 1 

Figure: 3.5.3-5

Fbi  b i h i

r 5  h 1 

h3 3 h5 2

r 1 

h1 2

r 3  0.21667 m

  h 4  h 5  h 6

r 1  0.075 m r 4  h 1 

r 2  h 1 

h4 h6

Static moment of individual parts of the cross-section: Sbi  Fbi r i

Structural system

SBi  Sbi r i

3

r 2  0.21667 m

r 4  0.825 m

2

r 6  h 1  h 4 

h2

2

r 6  1.425 m

r 5  1.275 m


Jbo6 

1 12

Position of the neutral axis from the equation:

b 6  h 6 

Jbo1  0.00506 m

3

4

 1 b  h 3 2 2  2   36  4

Jbxi  Jboi  Fbi  r i Sbi  0.2025 0.12567

m

12

b 4  h 4 

Jbo4  0.30755 m

Jbo2  

Jbo2  0.00129 m

1

Jbo4 

3

4

 1 b  h 3 2 3  3   36 

Jbo3  

Jbo3  0.0016 m

4

1

Jbo1 

12

b 1  h 1 

Jbo6  0.00301 m

 1 b  h 3 2 5  5   36 

Jbo5  0.00011 m

Fbi 

3

2.7 0.58

m

ri 

2

0.075

0.825

0.11475

0.09

1.275

2.28712

1.605

1.425

SBi  0.01519

m

0.02723

4

0.00506 0.00129

0.0354

0.0338

0.0016

1.37827

0.30755

0.14642

0.14631

0.00011

3.26216

3.25915

0.00301

6

6

Fbi

Sb 

i1

Fb  7.72 m

Sb  4.55667 m

Jboi

Jbx 

Sbr 

3

6

Jbo  0.31862 m

Jbxi

2

Jbt  Jbx  Fb t

2

Fb t

Sb

Jc  Jbt

Jc  2.48903 m

4

Determine the deflection of a simple beam from force P = 1 MN acting in the middle of the

f 

3

1 P L  48 Ec Jc

f  0.00997 m

finally: Moment stiffness in torsion:

m

4

SBi

Figure 3.5.4-2

Jbx  5.17856 m

bs  5.075 m

hs  1.35 m

Fs  bs hs 1 1 1

Fs  6.85125 m

1

Sbr  4.85994 m

4

b4 

i1 4

Jbt  Fb t

for the calculation of shear flow, as the resulting stiffness and torsional twist angle proportional

i1

2

i1

Jbx

6

Sbi

i1

6

Jbo 

The resulting inertia we get from the relationship:

m

Jboi 

1.68581

Fb 

4

Because this case is a two-chamber section, we have to write two equations with two unknowns

2.025

4

Jbt  1.62217 m

t  0.59024 m

axis of symmetry of the cross section:

0.21667

1.67063

m

Sb Fb

P  1 MN

0.21667

0.02852

4

2

0.72

0.02025

4

t 

Jbo5  

0.156

Jbxi 

3

4

b4 3

b4  0.5 m

Structural system

b 4  1.5 m

1

1

y 

2 bs

1

2

y  5.075 m

2

Fs  Fs 2 1

Fs  6.85125 m

2

2

 h1 h6    2   2

h1  

 2

h1  0.15 m

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Moment of inertia:

Department of Architecture

126


To quantify factors

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

127

 hs 1

 11

 2 

 12

 

 b4

bs  1

h1 

 hs 1    b4 

 11

 73.06667

 22

  11

 12

 2.7

 21

  12

 22

 21

 73.06667

 2.7 Figure: 3.5.4-3

Write conditional equation:  11T1

  12T2

Proportional twist angle is:

  11   12 T

 Fs1

 F

 22T2

  21T1

 Fs2

Mk

 rad     m 

  0.00006 m Gc Jk A twist angle in the middle span: 

After partitioning the equations factor  and after the introduction of marking:



L 2   0.00106 ( rad )    m 2 Ordinates deflection lines from the rotation under the beams: 

T´1

T1

 11T1´m

T2

T´2

2

  12T2´m

2

Fs

2

Jk

4

 T

i1

Mk  yP

 0.15

2

Fs

T1´  0.09736

1´ Fs i i

l

T2´  0.09736

Jk  4  T1´Fs  T2´Fs 1

 f    f  

Jk  5.33658 m

l p

 0.00457 m  0.01536 m

s

 f

 0.0054 m

Line cross to the influence of spreading of the extreme beam: k 

2

 0.0054 m

Ordinates the resulting lateral deflection in the center span from the force P = 1 MN:

2

p

 T1´     Find T1´ T2´  T2´  n

 21T1´m   22T2´m

1

  y

2

1 m l

ps

k  33.43857

Ordinates to the influence of spreading of transversal lines: Mk  5075 m kN

Gc 

Ec 2 ( 1   )



2 Mk Jk

 1901.96887 m

Gc  15652173.91304 m

2

kN

1

kN

ql   l k qp   p k check:

ql  0.1529 m qp  0.51377 m

qp   p k ql  qp  qs  1 m For middle beam

qp  0.51377 m

ql qp qs 0.3333 The result is correct.

Structural system

qs   s k

qs  0.33333 m


Department of Architecture

3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

the same manner as columns, but there are a few differences. A wall is distinguished from a column by having a length that is more than five times the thickness. Plain concrete walls should have a minimum thickness of 120 mm. Where the load on the wall is eccentric, the wall must have centrally placed reinforcement of at least 0.2 percent of the cross-section area if the eccentricity ratio exceeds 0.20. This reinforcement may not be included in the load-carrying capacity of the wall. Shear walls should be designed as vertical cantilevers, and the reinforcement arrangement should be checked as for a beam. Where the shear walls have returns at the compression end, they should be treated as flanged beams.

If the walls contains openings, the assumption for beams that plane sections remain plane is no longer valid. Shear walls connected by beams or floor slabs. The stability of shearwall structure is often provided by several walls connected together by beams or floors. Where the walls are of uniform section throughout the height and are connected by regularly spaced uniform beams. Many shear walls contain one or more rows of openings.

Figure 3.6-2: Shear walls subjected to bending moment and vertical load If a tall building has an asymmetrical structural plan and is subjected to horizontal loading, torsional as well as bending displacements will occur, and hence a full three-dimensional analysis is required. In many tall building shear wall provide most, if not all, of the required strength for lateral loading resulting from gravity, wind, and earthquake effects.

Figure 3.6-1: Building with shear walls When walls are used to brace a framed structure, it may be acceptable to disregard the lateral stiffness of the frame and assume the horizontal load carried entirely by the walls. The equilibrium and compatibility equations at each level produces a set of simultaneous equations which are solved to give the lateral deflection and rotation at each level.

Structural system

Figure 3.6-3

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

128


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

129 The system (Hull - Core Structures) has been used for very tall buildings in both steel and

greatest degree of protection against non-structural damage in moderate earthquakes, while

concrete. Lateral loads are resisted by both the hull and the core, their mode of interaction

assuring survival in case of catastrophic seismic disturbances, on account of their ductility.

depending on the design of the floor system.

Yielding of the flexural bars will also affect the width of diagonal cracks. The shear strength of tall shear walls may also be controlled by combined moment and shear failure at the base of the wall. Door and service openings in shear walls introduce weaknesses that are not confined merely to the consequential reduction in cross-section. Stress concentrations are developed at the corners, and adequate reinforcement needs to be provided to cater for these concentrations. This reinforcement should take the form of diagonal bars positioned at the corners of the openings. The reinforcement will generally be adequate if it is designed to resist a tensile force equal to twice the shear force in the vertical components of the wall as shown, but should not be less than two 16mm diameter bars across each corner of the opening.

Figure 3.6-4: Shear walls subjected to horizontal load and vertical load

A floor slabs of multi-story buildings, when effectively connected to the wall, acting as stiffeners, provide adequate lateral strength. As essential prerequisites, adequate foundations and sufficient connection to all floors, to transmit horizontal loads, must be assured.

Figure 3.6-6: Diagonal reinforcement in coupling beams, beam cross-section and possible mechanisms involving openings A single cantilever shear wall, such as the one shown in figure 3.6-7, can be expected to behave in the same way as a reinforced concrete beam. The shear walls will be subjected to bending moments and shear forces originating from lateral loads, and to axial compression induced by Figure 3.6-5: side view of shearing wall shows the thickness of bearing wall in accordance with boundary conditions of the members

gravity.

Normally, for wind loading, the governing design criterion or limit state will be

At the base of the wall, where yielding of the flexural reinforcement in both faces of the

deflection. Shear walls, when carefully designed and detailed, hold the promise of giving the

section can occur, the contribution of the concrete towards shear strength should be disregarded where the axial compression on the gross section is less than 12% of the cylinder crushing

Structural system


the two faces of the wall. The maximum area of vertical reinforcement should not exceed 4% of the gross cross-sectional area of the concrete. Horizontal reinforcement equal to not less than half the area of vertical reinforcement should be provided between the vertical reinforcement and the wall surface on both faces. The spacing of the vertical bars should not exceed the lesser of 300mm or twice the wall thickness. The spacing of horizontal bars should not exceed 300mm and the diameter should not be less than one-quarter of the vertical bars.

Figure 3.6-9: Precast reinforced concrete walls

Figure 3.6-10: Shear subjected to lateral load Figure 3.6-7: Geometry and reinforcement of typical shear wall

The prime function of the vertical reinforcement, passing across a construction joint, is to supply the necessary clamping force and to enable friction forces to be transferred.

Figure 3.6-8: Geometry and reinforcement of shear wall in tall building

Figure 3.6-11: Shear walls with flexible coupling beams

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

strength of the concrete. Sectional area of the concrete and should be equally divided between

Department of Architecture

130


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture 131

Figure 3.6-12 Figure 3.6-13

Structural system


Example 3.6-1: Reinforced concrete wall subjected to horizontal load Ho or Wo Construction height

H = 27.5 m

Storey height

l = 2.75 m

Sectional area of the first pillar 1

and A1 or 1 = 2 m2

Sectional area of the second pillar 2 and A2 or 2 = 1.6 m2 Moment of inertia of the first pillar I1 = 4 m4 Moment of inertia of the first pillar I2 = 2 m4 Moment of inertia of the cross-sectional area Structures weakened openings I = 39 M4 Moment of inertia of girders IPR = 0.006 m4 Modulus of elasticity of pillars E = 10 GPa Modulus of elasticity of girder E´ = 20 GPa

Figure 3.6.1-2: Geometry calculated reinforcing walls subjected to horizontal loading Ho Data: E  10000  MPa 3

S  5.42  m

Walls weakened with openings S = 5.42 m3

 1  1 S    1 2  c 

I1  4  m 4

I  39  m

i  0.006  m

2

2  1.6  m

4

I2  2  m

l  2.75  m

c  3.049m

2

The distance between the center of gravity of the pillars 2c = 6.10 m

4

1  2  m

4

Static moment of sectional area

Shear force applied in base Construction Ho = 354 kN

2

E´  20000  MPa

Width of the window type openings 2a = 2m Z  10  l

 

3  E´  i

E  I1  I2

    Z

I S

Ho  l  S

a  1  m

Ho  354  kN c

2

2

 135.292kN

1

  0.048m

3

I   0.219m

a l

  6.016

Determination the value of    6.016

d

2

d

2

2

T(  )    T(  )

Figure 3.6.1-1: Shear walls contains openings

Structural system

2

  ( 1   )

T( 0)

0

T'( 1)

0

  Odesolve (  1)

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Calculation of sectional forces and moments of structures

Department of Architecture

132


Diagram () vs 

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

133

J 

0.6

S I

I1  I2

2 c

 v 2   e2 

1 2

I1  I2   1     v 1   e1   1 2 c   

3 1

J  1.893  10 m

0.54 0.48

i  2  12

j  1  11

  0

  

1

0.42

i

i 1

 0.1

(  ) 

Ho  l  S I

 kg

 (  )

0.36

Determination the values of M1 and M2

( ) 0.3 0.24

M 1(  ) 

0.18 0.12 0.06 0

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

M 2(  ) 

1

I1 I1  I2

 Ho  Z 

I2

 Ho  Z  I1  I2

  (1   )2 S  2 c   (  ) I  2    (1   )2 S  2 c   (  ) I  2 

where the value of the function  can read from the graf, based on the coefficient for paying the relationship  H   (  )   

 j2 



 1

2

j

 



 1 kN

j





(1   ) 

 1

j

0

21.828

0

1

0.161

5·10-3

25.068

0.017

0.9

0.185

0.02

32.611

0.038

0.8

0.241

0.045

42.226

0.066

0.7

0.312

0.08

52.451

0.101

0.6

0.388

0.4

0.125

62.055

0.143

0.5

0.459

0.36

0.18

69.575

0.192

0.4

0.514

0.32

0.245

72.767

0.245

0.3

0.538

0.28

0.32

67.778

0.297

0.2

0.501

0.405

47.701

0.341

0.1

0.353

0.5

7.526·10-14

0.361

0

0

1

  0 0.01 1

 (  ) d 

Diagram () vs 

0.24  ( ) 0.2 0.16 0.12 0.08 0.04 0

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

2 c

1

v 1  30 

tonne l

v 2  20 

Solving the values of K and J

tonne l

e1  0.5  m

I1  I2 I1  I2    1  1  K   v 2   e2     v1   e1  2  c    I 2 c 2 1      S

e2  1  m

3 1

K  1.893  10 m

 kg

S I



 1

j



 j2  2  c  S   2

I

1   j 

 j 

q 

0

0

21.828

0.014

-9.383·10-3

25.068

0.032

-0.012

32.611

0.056

-0.011

42.226

0.085

-5.313·10-3

52.451

0.121

3.761·10-3

62.055

0.163

0.017

69.575

0.208

0.037

72.767

0.252

0.068

67.778

0.289

0.116

47.701

0.306

0.194

7.526·10-14

Structural system

kN

j




2

2

2 c m

I



(  ) 

Ho  l  S I

2 c m

q (  )  ( ( 1   ) )

 (  )

I

Example 3.6-2: Solution of reinforcing concrete walls with openings subjected to vertical load



The reinforcing walls, as mentioned in the introduction, other than the horizontal load and the 1.5 10 110 M 1  j 

510

6

810 610

6

M 2  j 

5

0  510

410 210

vertical load are transmitted as well.

5 5

This chapter is about solving the stiffening of reinforced walls in terms of a vertical load defined

5

the basic assumptions that in dealing with all three types of reinforcing walls.

5

0

5

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

 210

1

j

5

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

j

1

L - floor height H - total height of the wall A1A2 - cross-sectional area of each pillar

External load w acting on the structure induces in the individual pillars bending moments.

2c - distance between pillars 2 - width of openings



M1 1  

 j 0



M2 1   kN  m

 j

0

kN  m

N - normal force acting in the pillar

shear force applied in the girders E - modulus of elasticity of the walls

-60.893

-30.447

-79.765

-39.883

-69.196

-34.598

-34.479

-17.239

24.407

12.204

112.802

56.401

243.358

121.679

E1 - eccentricity at which the load acts v1

440.758

220.379

750.922

375.461

e2 - eccentricity at which the load applied v2

1.258·103

629.068

E'- modulus of girders V1 - vertical loads on pillar 1 at level each floor v2 - vertical loads on the Pillar 2 at the level of each floor

Figure: 3.6.2-1

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

(1  )

Department of Architecture

134


Data:

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

135 Diagram () vs  2

E  10000  MPa E´  20000  MPa 3

S  5.42  m

4

4

I  39  m

 1  1 S    1 2  c 

i  0.006  m

c  3.049m

2

4

2

I1  4  m

1  2  m

l  2.75  m

v 1  300  kN

4

2  1.6  m

Z  10  l

I2  2  m

a  1  m

Ho  354  kN

v 2  200  kN

e1  0.5  m

e2  1  m

  (  )   

1

 (  ) d 

  0 0.01 1

0.4 0.36 0.32

Ho  l  S

 135.292kN

I  

I1  I2 I1  I2    1  1  K   v 2   e2      v 1   e1   I 2 c 2 1 2 c     

3  E´  i

E  I1  I2

I S

0.28

S

c

2

2

  0.048m

3

0.24  ( ) 0.2 0.16

1

K  52.06kN

  0.219m

0.12

a l

0.08 0.04

    Z

  6.016

i  2  12

j  1  11

  0

  

1

i

i 1

0

 0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

Figure: 3.6.2-3

(  )  K   (  ) M 1(  ) 

Diagram () vs 

d

  6.016   Odesolve (  1)

2

d

2

2

T(  )    T(  )

2

  ( 1   )

T( 0)

0

T'( 1)

M 2(  ) 

0

I1 I1  I2 I2 I1  I2

Z l

Z l

 ( 1   )  v 1  e1  v 2  e2  2  c  K  (  )  

 ( 1   )  v 1  e1  v 2  e2  2  c  K  (  )

Z N1 (  )   v  ( 1   )  K  (  )  l  1

0.6 0.54

Z N2 (  )   v  ( 1   )  K  (  )  l  2

0.48 0.42 0.36

Diagram () vs 

( ) 0.3

1

0.24 0.18

 (  )    (  ) d 

0.12

  0 0.01 1

0.06 0

0.3

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Figure: 3.6.2-2

Structural system

0.8

0.9

1


j

 



 1  

0

0.81

j

 

39.606

(1   ) 



j

kN

1   j

1

-0.995

-0.099

39.57

0.9

-0.994

-0.199

39.447

0.8

-0.991

-0.298

39.194

0.7

-0.985

-0.396

38.714

0.6

-0.973

-0.492

37.829

0.5

-0.95

0.36

-0.585

36.21

0.4

-0.91

0.27

-0.673

33.251

0.3

-0.835

0.72 0.63 0.54  ( ) 0.45

0.18 0.09 0

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

-0.75

27.85

0.2

-0.7

-0.809

17.992

0.1

-0.452

-0.834

2.654·10-14

0

0

Department of Architecture



 1

0.9

1

Figure: 3.6.2-4

6

510

5

5

410

5

310

110

5

810 M 1  j 

Diagram () vs 

610

M 2  j 

5

410

5

2

d

K  1

2

0

110 0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

 T(  )

K

T( 0)

0

T'( 1)

0

j

0

 

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1



M2 1  

kN  m

72.384

0.6

j

0

  kN  m



N1 1   j

  0



N2 1   j kN

0.8

  0

36.192

260.406

239.594

145.081

72.54

520.889

479.111

218.519

109.259

781.554

718.446

293.404

146.702

1.043·103

957.424

370.982

185.491

1.304·103

1.196·103

453.501

226.75

1.567·103

1.433·103

545.055

272.527

1.832·103

1.668·103

653.105

326.553

2.101·103

1.899·103

791.268

395.634

2.378·103

2.122·103

984.388

492.194

2.668·103

2.332·103

Figure: 3.6.2-5  ( 0.4)  0.91

0.4

Figure 3.6.2-6



0.1

0.2

  Odesolve (  1)

M1 1  

0

0

j

1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6  ( )0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0

0

1

j

T(  ) 2

5 5

210

d

5

210

 ( 0.5)  0.95

Structural system

kN

1

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

136


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

137

Diagram vs  Diagram vs 

Figure: 3.6.2-8 Figure: 3.6.2-7

Structural system


Diagram vs   1

0,9

0,8

0,7  

0,6

  

0,5

 

0,4

  

0,3



0,2

0,1

0

0

0,1

0,2

0,3

Figure: 3.6.2-10 Figure: 3.6.2-9

Structural system

0,4

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Diagram vs 

Department of Architecture

138


Designs must ensure adequate behaviour at ultimate limit state and under service conditions,

3.7 Pre-tensioned Prestress Concrete Beam

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

139

Prestressing is a special state of stress and deformations which is induced to improve structural behaviour. Structures can be prestressed either by artificial displacements of the supports or by steel reinforcement that has been pre-strained before load is applied. The forces induced by the former method are sharply reduced by creep and shrinkage and are generally ineffective at ultimate limit state. Due to these inherent disadvantages, support displacements are rarely used for prestressing. The forces induced by pre-strained reinforcement can, however, survive the effects of shrinkage and creep, provided the initial steel strain is sufficiently larger than the anticipated shortening in the concrete. The required pre-strains are best achieved using

both of which must be verified directly. Structures can be prestressed either by pre-tensioning or post-tensioning. 3.7.1 Pre-tensioning is used primarily for the prefabrication of concrete components. The prestressing steel is stressed between fixed abutments, forms are installed around the steel, and the concrete is cast. After the concrete has hardened, the prestressing steel is detached from the abutments. Anchorage of the steel, and hence the transfer of prestressing force from steel to concrete, is achieved entirely through bond stresses at the ends of the member.

high-strength steel. High-strength steel that has been pre-strained can normally be stressed to its full yield strength at ultimate limit state.

Figure:3.7-2 3.7.2 Pre-tensioning is usually more economical for large-volume precasting operations, since the costs of anchors and grouting can be eliminated. it is quite common,

Figure: 3.7-1

however, to combine both methods of prestressing in a given structures.

Prestressing can be full, limited, or partial. Full prestressing is designed to eliminate concrete tensile stresses in the direction of the prestressing under the action of design service loads, prestressing, and restrained deformations. In structures with limited prestressing, the calculated tensile stresses in the concrete must not exceed a specified permissible value. Behaviour at ultimate limit state must nevertheless be checked in both cases. Partial prestressing places no restrictions on concrete tensile stresses under service conditions. Concrete stresses need not, therefore, be calculated. Partial prestressing encompasses the entire range of possibilities from conventionally reinforced to fully prestressed concrete.

Prestressing with pre-strained steel reinforcement induces a self-equilibrating state of stress in the cross-section. The tensile force in the steel and the compressive force in the concrete, obtained from integration of the concrete stresses, are equal and opposite. In statically determinate structures, the two forces act at the same location in the cross-section. The sectional forces in the concrete due to prestressing can thus be easily determined from equilibrium. The following expressions are based on the assumption that the direction of the prestressing force deviates only slightly from a vector normal to the cross-section.

Structural system


The maximum tensile force in the tendons at tensioning should generally not exceed the

Figure:3.7-4

lower of the following values after transfer or prestressing to the concrete.

Losses occurring before prestressing (pretensioning)

ď łpo,max=0.75 fptk

The following losses should be considered in design

ď łpo,max = 0.85 fpo,1k The minimum concrete strength required at the time when tensioning takes place is given in the approval documents for the prestressing system concerned.

Where particular rules are not given, the time when prestressing takes place should be fixed

2. safety with respect to the compressive strength of the concrete 3. safety with respect to local stresses 4. early application of a part of the prestress, to reduce shrinkage effects.

c- Loss due to relaxation of the pretension tendons during the period which elapses between the tensioning of the tendons and prestressing of the concrete.

the permanent actions presents at tensioning.

1. deformation conditions of the component

b- Losses due to drive-in of the anchoring devices (at the abutments) when anchoring on a prestressing bed.

The initial prestress (at time t = 0) is calculated taking into account the prestressing force and

with due regard to:

a- Loss due to friction at the bends (in the case of curved wires or strands)

d- The prestressing force at a given time t is obtained by subtracting from the initial prestressing force the value of the time dependent losses at this time t. e- These losses are due to creep and shrinkage of concrete and relaxation of steel. f- The finale value of the prestressing force is obtained by subtracting from the initial prestressing force the maximum expected value of the time-dependent losses. g- The strength of the anchorage zones should exceed the characteristic strength of the tendon, both under static load and under slow-cycle load. h- Possible formation of small cracks in the anchorage zone may not impair the permanent efficiency of the anchorage if sufficient transverse reinforcement is provided. i- This condition is considered to be satisfied if stabilization of strains and cracks widths is obtained during testing.

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Figure:3.7-3

Department of Architecture

140


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

141

Figure:3.7-5 3.7.3 Partial prestressing is generally more economical than full or limited prestressing. Although structures that are partially prestressed require a significant portion of mild reinforcement for crack control and distribution, this steel contributes to the ultimate resistance of the section. Whatever mild steel is added to improve bahaviour under service conditions thus reduces the amount of prestressing steel necessary for safety at ultimate limit state. The prestressing force must always be carefully monitored during construction, since deviations from the prescribed prestressing force can led to cracking, deformations, and fatigue. 3.7.4 In post-tensioned construction, the prestressing steel is only stressed after the concrete has been cast and hardened. The steel must therefore be enclosed in ducts and anchored using special devices. The ducts are most commonly embedded in the concrete and filled with grout after stressing to bond steel to concrete and to provide protection against corrosion. The

Figure:3.7-7

ducts can also be located outside of the concrete section and left unbonded for the entire life of the structure. In the such cases, grout is only a means of protecting the steel.

Figure:3.7-8

Figure:3.7-6

Structural system


Department of Architecture

Tension and compression reinforcement in cross-section:

Example 3.7-1: Pre-tensioned Prestress Reinforce Concrete I Beam

Compression reinforcement:

asc  0.05 m

ast  0.05 m

Asc  0.001571 m

2

c

  c 2     4 

nc  5 Asc  nc 

 20 mm

Tension reinforcement: t

 16 mm

nt  6

  t 2     4 

Ast  nt 

Ast  0.001206 m

2

Figure 3.7.1-1: Static scheme Total span of the prestress reinforced concrete I beam: L =30 m

The space between the prestress beams:

Lx = 5 m

Cross-section near the support: hd1  0.15 m

hh1  0.15 m

Hp  1.1 m

hh  0.20 m

hd  0.20 m

app  Hp  Cp

app  0.9 m

dp  Hp  ast

dp  1.05 m

Hpk  1.1 m

hsp  Hp   hh  hh1  hd  hd1 

hsp  0.4 m

Figure: 3.7.1-2

Hpk  hh  hh1  hd  hd1  hsp

hs  Hp  hh  hh1  hd  hd1

Hpp  hh  hh1  hs  hd1  hd

Hpp  1.1 m

Cross-section at mid span of the beam:

Cp  0.2 m

H  1.8 m

bs  0.20 m

bh  0.50 m

bd  0.50 m

aps  H  Cp

aps  1.6 m

ds  H  ast

ds  1.75 m

Hk  1.8 m

hs  1.1 m

Hk  hs   hh  hh1  hd  hd1 

hs  H   hh  hh1  hd  hd1 

hs  0.4 m

hsm  H  hh  hh1  hd  hd1 Area of prestress tendons: np  20 Ap  np Ap1

Structural system

Ap1 

hsm  1.1 m 

4

2

2

2

 5.5  6  5 mm 2

Ap  28.314 cm

2

Ap1  1.416 cm

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

142


Design value of concrete strength (MPa):

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

143

Concrete:

fck  50 MPa  bmax 

0.0035

Ecm  35 GPa

fckcyl

fckcyl  0.8 fck

fcm  fck  8 MPa

fcd  0.85 

fckcyl  40 MPa

fcm  58 MPa

fcd  22.667 MPa

0.45 fckcyl  18 MPa

c

 25 kN m

1.5

3

2 3

 fckcyl   MPa  10 MPa 

fctm  1.4 

fctm  3.528 MPa

Ecm

Ecd 

1.5

Ecd  23.3333 GPa

Characteristic stress of reinforcement (MPa): fyk  510 MPa n 

Es

s

 1.15

Es  200 GPa

fyd 

fyk s

fyd  443.478 MPa

n  5.714

Ecm

Characteristic stress in prestress tendon: fpk  1720 MPa

fpd 

fpk s

fpd  1495.652 MPa

Ep  200 GPa

 0.9

The maximum stress in prestress tendon at time = 0 at tensioning: fpd 

fpk

fpd  1495.652 MPa

s

The maximum stress in concrete, hence the transfer of prestressing force from steel to concrete:  pmax  

fpk

 pmax

1.15

 1346.087 MPa

Load due to roof covering: Figure: 3.7.1-3

gstrs  0.5 

Structural system

kN m

2

Lx

gstrs  2.5 m

1

kN

gstrd  gstrs 1.5 gstrd  3.75 m

1

kN


hpanel  0.30 m

The distance of the extreme fibre from the neutral axis (m):

bpanel  1.2 m

gpanels   hpanel bpanel 

  5   c 4 

2

2

n  5

gpanels  8.961 m

1

gpaneld  12.097 m

gpaneld  gpanels 1.35

 bd  hs  2 ch1     hd1  2 

 20 mm

hd   2 2 0.5 bs Hp   bh  bs  hh    bd  bs  hd  Hp    2   1 2    0.5  bh  bs  hh1  hh1  hh    bd  bs  hd1  hd1  hs  hh  0.5 3 3     agcp  Acp

kN

1

kN

agcp  0.541 m

2

 bh  hs  2 cd1     hh1  2 

ch1  0.158 m

cd1  0.158 m

Perimeter cross sections - section in the middle and section near the support beam: u1  bd  2 hd  2 cd1  2 hs  2 ch1  2 hh  bh

u1  3.232 m

u2  bd  2 hd  2 cd1  2 hsm  2 ch1  2 hh  bh

u2  4.632 m

Cross-section at the support:

Area of cross-section near the support: Acp  bs Hp   bh  bs  hh   bd  bs  hd   0.5  bh  bs  hh1  0.5  bd  bs  hd1 Acp  0.385 m

2

Area of the transformed uncracked cross-section:

Aip  Acp  n  Ast  Asc  Ap 

Aip  0.417 m

2

Figure: 3.7.1-4

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

self -weight of the panels SIPOREX:

Department of Architecture

144


The distance of the extreme fibre transformed cross-section from the neutral axis (m):

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

145

Acp agcp  n  Ast dp  Asc asc  Ap app 

agip 

Section modulus at the lower chord of cross-section:

Wdp 

agip  0.553 m

Aip

Iip Hp  agip

Wdp  0.113 m

3

Moment of inertia of uncracked cross-section: Cross-section at the mid span of I beam: Icp 

1

bs Hp   bh  bs  hh   bh  bs   3

12

3

hh1

3

3

  bd  bs  hd   bd  bs  

 

 bs Hp  0.5 Hp  agcp    bh  bs  hh  agcp  2

 

  bd  bs  hd  Hp 

2

hh 

2

Acs  bs H   bh  bs  hh   bd  bs  hd   0.5  bh  bs  hh1  0.5  bd  bs  hd1 2

2

2

Area of transformed cross-section (at mid span of beam): Ais  Acs  n  Ast  Asc  Ap 

Ais  0.557 m

2

Area of cross-section:

2

 Ap  app  agip 2 

4

epp  Hp  agip  Cp

epp  0.347 m

Section modulus at the upper chord of cross-section: agip



4

2

Iip

Area of concrete cross-section (at mid span of I beam)

3

Acs  0.525 m

Ac 

Iip  Icp  Acp  agip  agcp   n Asc  agip  ast   Ast  Hp  ast  agip 

Whp 

3

 

2 

Moment of inertia of the transformed uncracked cross-section:

Iip  0.062 m

hd1

 1  1   agcp    bh  bs  hh1   agcp  hh  hh1   2 2  3  

hd

1  1    bd  bs  hd1   Hp  hd  hd1  agcp  2  3  Icp  0.056 m

3

Whp  0.112 m

3

2

 

Ais  Aip 2

Ac  0.487 m

2

The center of gravity of the concrete section from the upper edge (at mid-span):

hd   2 2 0.5 bs H   bh  bs  hh    bd  bs  hd  H    2     1 2  0.5  bh  bs  hh1  hh1  hh    bd  bs  hd1  hd1  hs  hh  0.5 3 3     agcs  Acs agcs  0.864 m

The center of gravity of the transformed cross-section from the upper edge:

agis 

Acs agcs  n  Ast ds  Asc asc  Ap aps 

Structural system

Ais

agis  0.883 m


3

3

hh1 hd1 1 3 3 3 Ics  bs H   bh  bs  hh   bh  bs     bd  bs  hd   bd  bs    12 3 3

2 2 hd hh      agcs      bd  bs  hd  H  2  2    2 2 1 1  1    hh  hh1    bd  bs  hd1   H  hd  hd1  agcs  3 2  3  

 bs H 0.5 H  agcs    bh  bs  hh  agcs  2

1    bh  bs  hh1   agcs 2 

Ics  0.199 m

Iis  Ics  Acs  agis  agcs   n Asc  agip  asc   Ast  H  ast  agip 

 Ap  aps  agip 2 

Iis  0.229 m

2

Whs  0.26 m

agis

Iis H  agis

Acp  Acs 2

g0d  g0s 1.35

 c

kN

sd  sk 1.5 1

gd  gstrd  gpaneld  g0d  sd

gd  44.703 m

sd  13.5 m

1

g0d  15.356 m

1

kN

kN

1

kN

The bending moment from the total load: Mk 

1 8 1

8

2

Mk  3581.52 m kN

gs L

2

gd L

Md  5029.114 m kN

Mk1  2771.52 m kN Md1  3814.114 m kN

Shear force at the supports from total load: 1  gs  L Vs  477.536 kN 2 1 Vd   gd  L Vd  670.549 kN 2 We calculate the value of initial prestress force ppo (kN) near the support at the lower side of the beam: Vs 

kN

1

kN

The bending moment from the action of self-weight at the mid span of the I beam

1 2 g0s L 8

1

gs  31.836 m

 hIp

Mg0k 

sk  9 m

1 2  gstrs  gpanels  g0s  0.2 sk L 8  1 2 Md1   gstrd  gpaneld  g0d   0.2 sd L 8

3

g0s  11.375 m

Lx

Mk1 

Self-weight of the prestress concrete beam:

g0s 

m

2

The bending moment due to Combinations load

3

Wds  0.25 m

kN

gs  gstrs  gpanels  g0s  sk

eps  0.717 m

Section modulus at the lower edge of the cross section: Wds 

 

Section modulus at the top edge cross-section: Whs 

sk  1.8

Md 

Iis

Mg0d  1727.578 m kN

Load due to snow:

4

eps  H  agis  Cp

2

g0d L

The moment of inertia of the transformed concrete cross-section: 2

8

4

2

1

Mg0d 

Mg0k  1279.688 m kN

c

 pm0k Aip

 pm0k epi

 18 MPa

Structural system

Wdp

 0.45 fckcyl

Ppo  100 kN

c

 0.45 fckcyl

eps  0.537 m

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

The moment of inertia of the concrete cross-section:

Department of Architecture

146


The loss of prestress due to relaxation, is a function of the properties of the steel and the

Given

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

147

1.333  Ppo 

c

Acp

1.333  Ppo  epp Wdp

P1  fpd Ap1 P1  211.74 kN

 po



Ppo Ap

 po

Ppo  Find Ppo 

ratio of initial stress to tensile strength po/fpi. Relaxation progresses more rapidly than creep

Ppo  2386.451 kN

28 days. This same percentage of the final creep and shrinkage strain is achieved only after 90 days. In spite of this fundamental difference, a detailed calculation of the interaction between

Ppo

 11.27 we suppose number of cables will be 14

P1

relaxation, creep, and shrinkage is usually not necessary. The interaction between relaxation, creep, and shrinkage can then be considered by calculating the loss of prestress due to creep and shrinkage using the following reduced initial prestress:

 842.864 MPa

p = p0 – 0.5  p,rel,∞

We calculate the value of initial prestress force at the mid span of the beam in state of decompression at lower chord of the beam where the stress in lower part of the beam is σos = 0 kN:

Where  p,rel,∞ denotes the long – term loss to relaxation.

Relaxation loss of prestressing tendons: tendon with a limit 0.2.....  =0.9

 dIs

and shrinkage in concrete. Whereas 50 percent of the final relaxation strain is reached at roughly

 pm0k  pm0k epi Mk 1   Ais  Wds   Wds 

Pso  100 kN

eps  0.537 m

pd  0.266

 0

 decompression

Wds  0.25 m

3

 0 MPa

Acs  0.525 m

2

Pso  Find Pso 

relative relaxation losses arising between tensioning and inserts by introducing pre-stressing in concrete:  1r

 p   p  fpd

Relaxation loss of prestressing tendons:

Given  decompression

pe  0.5

1.333  Pso  Acs

1.333  Pso  eps

Pso  2052.225 kN

Wds

 so



Pso Ap

tendon with a limit 0.2.....  =0.9

Mk1

 pd

Wds

 so

 724.819 MPa

 0.266

 pe

 0.5

Relative relaxation losses arising between tensioning and inserts by introducing pre-stressing in concrete:  1r

 p  p fpd

Time period 0-3 days: t  3 24 60 p

t  4320

fpk 

fpd 

  pd  1   pe 

Structural system

t0  0 24 60 p

 0.113

t0  0

t1,t2 in minutes


 

  0.18 

 pr2 ( 28 3)

1 7

 

log( t ) 

3.7.5 Loss of Prestress Due to Creep and Shrinkage

 0.699

 p

Time-dependent plastic shortening in the concrete due to creep and shrinkage causes

 p  p  pm0

 1r

  p  p fpd

 1r

 118.249 MPa

shortening in the prestress steel and thus a loss of prestressing force. The reduction in

 1346.087 MPa

and prestressing. Several different cases must therefore be distinguished:

prestressing force due to creep and shrinkage is a function of the state of stress due to dead load  r1

 fpd   1r

 r1

 1377.403 MPa

 pmax

Uncracked Section, Bonded Prestressing Steel. This is the most common case for

0.9 fpd  1346.087 MPa

 pm0

  pm0max

prestressed concrete bridges. The concrete at the level of prestressing steel is precompressed

As the maximum stress introduced into the tendon choose which is more than 1456 MPa: fpdtrans  1456 MPa p

 pr1

transferred directly to the prestressing steel. The loss of prestressing force due to creep and shrinkage can therefore be calculated at a given section based on the compatibility of strain in

  pd  1   pe 

under dead load plus prestressing. It is assumed that any change in concrete strain can be

fpk

 

p

fpdtrans 

  p  p fpdtrans

 pr1

steel and concrete, assuming an appropriate creep law.

 0.109

These concepts can be used to drive an expression for the loss of prestress, P, in a member subjected to initial prestressing force, P0, and external axial compression, N. Both forces act

 110.873 MPa

concentrically the time-varying strain in the concrete, c(t), is computed from the following creep law.

 r1

 fpdtrans   1r

 r1

 1337.751 MPa

 r1

 0.9 fpd

0.9 fpd  1346.087 MPa

c = (co / Ec) (c / Ec) (1+cs Where is the concrete creep coefficient and cs shrinkage strain, the parameter can be taken as 0.8 the initial stress in the concrete, co, and the change in stress, c, are given by the following expression:

b) Time period 3-28 days:

co = ((-P) +N) / Ac

t2  28 24 60 p

t2  40320

fpk 

 r1 

  pd  1   pe 

 p

 

  0.18 

t1,t2 in minutes

p

 0.095

c = (-P) / Ac Where Ac is the area of the concrete section, compatibility requires that p = c . P = p Ep Ap = c Ep Ap

1 1    log t2    0.18  log t1  7 7   

 r328   p  p  r1

t1  3 24 60 t1  4320

 r328

 17.61 MPa

 p

 0.139

Substituting for c and solving for P, the following expression is obtained: P = n  ((co Ac cs Ec Ac) / (1+n ) (1+)) n = Ep / Ec and Ap / Ac.

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

 p

Department of Architecture

148


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

149 where equation for P also gives reliable results for prestressing losses in members subjected

t-ts - the actual duration of untreated shrinkage, respectively. swelling in days shrinkage

to both flaxture and axial load. In such cases, co and c are computed, at the elevation of the

coefficient during the time, we can determine from the relationship:

prestressing tendon and must include the flexural and axial components of stress.  s25

Cracked Section, bonded prestressing steel. When cracks penetrate up to or beyond the

t25



2

 ho  0.035    t25  mm 

level of the tendons, the stress in the prestressing steel will be whatever value is necessary to

 s25

maintain internal equilibrium, regardless of creep and shrinkage. This stress is always greater

than the initial prestress. The effect of creep and shrinkage is thus limited to additional

Strain from the effect of shrinkage:

shortening and deflections in the girder, without reduction in steel stress. The concrete stress-

 cs

free at the level of the tendons and thus does not deform due to creep. The strain in the

 t ts    cso  s25

 cs

prestressing steel is likewise not reduced by shrinkage of the concrete at the level. Although the

 t ts    cs  t ts  Ep

 0.107 ho - replacment element dimension in mm

 cs

 t ts 

 cs

 0.00003375

 t ts 

 6.751 MPa

stress in the prestressing steel is reduced somewhat by shortening of the flexural compression

Loss due to creep of concrete:

zone due to creep and shrinkage, this effect is small and can be neglected.

Time period 28 to ∞ days: Loss due to shrinkage of concrete:

s RH

 cs

 RH    100 

 1  

0

for rapid hardening cement

 8

3 s RH

 0.488

 RH

 1.55 s RH

 RH

 0.756

 RH

fcm   6    sfcm  160   cs  90   10 MPa   

 sfcm

 0.000416

 cso

2 Ac

 u1  u2   

t25  25

2

 0.00031466

 t ts 

 0.1  3 ho 

t  28

ts  3

t25  t  ts

 fcm

16.8 fcm

coefficient which express the effect of age of concrete at the time of load introduction to the theoretical factor: Creep: 

s

100

ho  0.248 m

 

1

RH

Coefficient which express the influence of strength on theoretical creep coefficient:

Replacement element dimension in mm, where Ac is the cross-sectional area: ho 

 fcm   t0

1  RH

Theoretical coefficient of shrinkage:   sfcm  RH

 t  t0

Coefficient which express the influence of relative humidity on the theoretical creep coefficient:

Coefficient which expressed the influence of the strength of concrete on shrinkage:

 cso

 0  c

Theoretical coefficient of creep:

Relative humidity of environment: RH  80

 t t0

 t0

 s25

Structural system

1

 0.1  t00.2


RH 

 RH

 1 

 fcm 

 1   100  

The resulting equation for the creep coefficient:

t0  3

t  28  RH

3  ho   0.1   mm  

16.8

 fcm

fcm

 1.031

c 25

 

t25

  0

p c  s  r

 s ( t t0) Ep

t0

 t0T 

9

 2   t0T

for quick hardening cement with high strength  = 1

1.2

  0.5 

 1

  pr2  n   t t0   28   cp0 

From the above interval we appoint an interval of Investigation:

a) Time Period 3-28 days:

Age of concrete in days at the time of application load: 9   t0   t0T   1 1.2  2   t0T 

 0.407

 Ap   Ac 2  zcp    1  0.8   t t0  1  n   1  Ic  Ac   

Age concrete regulation: t0T  28

t25  25

Stress due to relaxation, shrinkage and creep:

 2.206

   1

c 25

  H  t25 

MPa

t25  t  t0

0.3

t0  32.458

n 

Es Ecm

c 25

n  5.714

Coefficient which express the age of concrete at the time of applying the load on the theoretical creep coefficient:

 0.407

t  28

t0  3

 cs

 t t0

 0.0000338

Stresses in the adjacent concrete from its self-weight, other permanent load and from the

prestress on an ideal cross-section at the middle span of the beam: 

 t0 

1

 0.1  t00.2

 t0

 0.475

Theoretical coefficient of creep: 0

  RH fcm  t0

0

 pm0

 1.08

 1345.75 MPa

Time Coefficient of creep RH v % a ho v (mm)

Pm0k   

During the time factor creep in HR and% h (mm) c

18

  RH  ho  H  1.5 1   0.012   250   100   mm  

H

 621.561

 

fpk 1.15

Pm0k Ais

Ap

Pm0keps

 Iis     eps 

Structural system

fpk 1.15

 1346.087 MPa

Pm0k  3811.257 kN

Mg0k

 Iis     eps 

c

 8.638 MPa

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Coefficient which express the influence of relative humidity on the theoretical creep coefficient:

Department of Architecture

150


Stress by relaxation, shrinkage and creep:

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

151 Strain from shrinkage:

 cs  cs

 t ts 

 0.00003375 c 25

n  5.714 Acs  0.525 m  pcsr

2

Es  200000 MPa

 0.407

c

4

r328 

eps  0.537 m n c 25  c

 Ap   Acs 2  eps    1  0.8 c  1  A I cs  cs   

1  n 

 17.611 MPa

Ap  0.00283 m

 8.638 MPa

Ics  0.199184 m

  cs  t ts   Es  



 r328

 cs

  pm0   pcsr

 p28

 t ts    cs  t ts  Ep

 t ts 

 cs

 0.00031466

 t ts 

g is the self-weight of the panel to be placed on the prestressed beam:

 41.479 MPa

25

Np28  3692.864 kN

Mg0k 

Np28   p28 Ap

Np28  3692.864 kN

Mp28  Np28 eps

Mp28  1983.068 m kN  c28

 1304.272 MPa



Np28 Ais

Mp28

 Iis     eps 

Mg0k  

1 8

 gstrd  gpaneld  L

2

adjacent fibers of the concrete at t = 28 days.

for fast drying cement with high strength  = 1:

t  ( 28) 

 2  28

fpk 

 p28 

  pd  1   pe 

 p

 

 1   0.18 

 pr2nekon

1 7

p

 

log t2 

  p  p  p28

 skon



2

 ho  0.035    (   28)  mm 

 1 1.2

t  32.458

coefficient:

 p

 0.162

 pr2nekon

 19.153 MPa

 t0 

1

0.1  ( t) 0.2

 t0

 0.475

Theoretical creep coefficient: 0

  RH fcm  t0

0

 1.08

t  

(   28)

Coefficient During the time factor creep:  skon

1

 4.101 MPa

Factor express concrete effect of age at the time of applying the load to the theoretical creep

 0.091

Loss due to shrinkage of concrete:

ts  28

9

 c28

 Iis     eps 

p

1 2  gstrd  gpaneld  L 8

Np28  Ap  p28

Loss of prestress tendon due to relaxation, therefore we have to determine the stress of the

t2  40320

 62.932 MPa

It should also be determine the stress of the adjacent fibers to the concrete at t = 28 days

Stress in the tendon at t = 28 days the  p28

 cs

2

0.8 c 25  0.326

 pcsr

 t ts    cso  skon

H

 

 1.5 1   0.012 

Structural system

18 RH   ho  250   100   mm

H

 621.561


 ckon

   28     H    28 

  0

 p

 cs



 pcsr

0.3  ckon

 t ts  Ep   pr2nekon

 1.08

Ac Ec

 n  ckon   c28

 0.75 fpk

0.9  p   1086.06 MPa

 97.541 MPa

 pcsr

 1206.73 MPa

 p

0.75 fpk  1290 MPa 

fpk s

  p   139.356 MPa

The total loss can be calculated from the difference stresses 0.9  

 0.9 

fpk 1.15

 0.9  p 

The total loss of stress in tendon

0.9 

tendon.

1.15

a 0.9  pnekon as 



 0.000326

2

Iip

Ecm

agip

2

 0.0001488  0.0002916  0.0005539  0.00021182

o

  1   2

o

 0.00454

o

 Ep  o

 0.00045422 Ecm

2

o

 0.0003253  907.928 MPa

3.7.6 Ultimate limit state of failure due to bending moment

compressive strain reaches cu, or when the strain in the outer layer of reinforcing steel reaches s,max. These ultimate states of strain define the effective resistance of the cross-section.

fpk

 0.193

19.3 % the total loss of stress in the

1. Plane section remain plane after deformation 2. Strain of tension and compression reinforcement and prestressing of concrete reinforcement,

1.15

fpk

1.15 maximum stress in tendon (see working diagram). thus, deformation will be:

 spmax

Iip

 gstrd  gpaneld  L

Calculation assumptions is based on the following assumption: 

The deformation of the tendon, which will correspond to the stress 0.9 

0.9 

 0.0001463

8

The ultimate resistance of the cross-section is achieved when the extreme fibre

fpk

 260.029 MPa

Mg0k agip

 Ap   Acs 2  eps    1  0.8  ckon  1  n   1  A I cs cs   

  p28   pcsr

 pnekon

1

Ppo

is equal to strain the fiber adjacent concrete interaction with the concrete is assured by bond. It represents the

3. Rectangular stress distribution of concrete in compression 4. The tensile strength of concrete can be neglected 5. Idealized stress-strain diagrams can be used for both steel and concrete, upper strand of the

fpk

diagram of prestress tendon, respectively. concrete reinforcement is horizontal, ie stress in the

1.15

 spmax

Ep

 0.00673 prestressing respectively. Reinforcing steel is limited to

and the deformation of the tendon after the losses will be:

0.9 fpk fyk , resp. , and Strain of steel s s

is not limited.  sp

1



0.9  p 

 spmax

Ep

 Ppo    Ap Ep 

 

1

  sp  0.001

 0.004

 sp

 0.005

Ppo  2386.451 kN

Ec  33500 MPa

Ppo eps Iip agip

 0.0003265

Md  5029.114 m kN

Np    p  Ap

Np  0.9 Np 

Np   3075.02 kN

Ecm

Structural system

Np   3416.689 kN

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

The resulting equation for the creep coefficient:

Department of Architecture

152


The area of compression concrete surface on the carrying capacity of the:

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

153

1

Abc 

Nb

Abc  0.168 m

 fcd

2

hh  0.2 m

hh1  0.15 m

The area of the upper flange: Ahh  bh hh

Ahh  0.1 m

2

or that x > hh1

The entire surface of the flange, including start-up:

Ah  bh hh  bs hh1 

bh  bs 1  hh1 2 2 2

x will be approximately as follows:

x 

hh  hh1

From the figure we determine the height of the compression zone of concrete H  v  1.55 m  spmax  0.007

Hv   pmax   sp    bmax

0.0035

xmax  0.907 m

xu  0.8 xmax

 sp

 0.00425

 bmax 

 

Mb  Abc fcd  agis 

0.0035

( H  v ) 0.0035 xmax    spmax   sp    bmax

M

   Ap eps

MRd  Mb  M

Abc

 0.907

xu  0.309 m

xu 

  Asc fyd  agis  asc 

Mb  3356.501 m kN

2

M

 395.359 m kN

MRd  3751.86 m kN

Mext  3377.828 m kN Mext  MRd

So if x  xmax this means that in all layers of the prestress tendon it should be the limitation 0.9 fpk . stress s

Nb    Ap  Np 

Ah

xu  0.726 m

hh  hh1  0.35 m

Moment on the load-bearing capacity:

Bending moment of the overall load

xmax

2

Abc

Figure 3.7.1-5: Diagram of the prestress tendon

v  0.25 m

area ratio will be

xu  0.8 x

x  0.386 m

Ah

Ah  0.153 m

Nb  3811.257 kN

Structural system

Mext  Md  Np  eps

satisfies


NRd

Acp fcd

Acp 

Force to the load-bearing capacity: NRd  Acp fcd

Nsd fcd

Acp  0.206 m

2

NRd  4658.203 kN

The entire surface of the flange, including start-up Ad  bd hd  bs hd1 

Figure 3.7.1-6: Cross-section of the mid span of the beam

Acp

Cross-section of the support:

 0.742

hd  hd1

x 

Nsd  4658.203 kN

N0max  4234.73 kN

xu  0.8 x

x  0.472 m

Ad

2

xu  0.377 m

Acp

t tr, (the time of the transfer stress):

N0max  Ap fpd

Ad  0.153 m

Ad t

hd  hd1  0.35 m

i.e. that x is less than hd + hd1 and is greater than hd

Acp  Ad

bd  bs 1  hd1 2 2 2

NRd  xbd fcd

Nsd  1.1 N0max

epp  0.347 m

NRd  5345.479 kN NRd  Nsd

vyhovuje

Nsd  4658.203 kN

Cross-section of the middle span of the beam:

We are looking for a part of the entire cross section of I-profile, which has a center of

Nsd  1.1 Ap fpd

gravity at a distance from the epp-sectional center of gravity. Therefore that the force on the

Nsd  4658.203 kN

bearing capacity was on the same line as the force the load, which in this case is the force of

prestress. This requirement is fulfilled part of the cross section of a line in the distance 0.377m

Moment difference will be: M

from the lower chord of the cross-section.

 Mpd  Mg0k

M

Mpd  Nsd eps

Mpd  2501.455 m kN

 1221.77 m kN

The greatest moment in cross‐section can bear it if the force is applied Nsd

M Whs

Nsd Ais

0

M 

Nsd Ais

Whs

M  2171.635 m kN M  M satisfies section

3.7.7 Limit state stress limitation

Excessive compressive stress in the concrete for the any service loads can induce the formation of longitudinal cracks and may lead to the development of microcracks in the Figure 3.7.1-7: Cross-section of the support

concrete, respectively, greater creep. Therefore, it is necessary to adequately limiting this stress. In accordance with EC2 will check stress in element in quasi-permanent load, the value of which is a combination of

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Nbp

Nsd

Department of Architecture

154


a) Service permanent load

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

155

Stress at the top surface

b) Service prestress tendon c) multiple variable load

State prestressing t Mgo

t tr

Npm0  Ap  fpd   pr1

0 kN m

Npm0

 

h

 3.859 MPa

Ais

Npm0eps

h

Whs h

Mg0k

Whs  0.45 fckcyl

Npm0  3920.809 kN Stress in the lower surface

agip  agcp  0.012 m d

Stress at the top surface Npm0

h

 

h

 2.32 MPa

Aip

Npm0epp   agip  agcp 

 fctm

d

 

Npm0 Aip

d

Npm0epp   agip  agcp 

 20.996 MPa

Satisfies

d

Wds

d

 10.342 MPa

 0.45 fckcyl

0.75 fpk  1290 MPa

 p

 1206.731 MPa

 p

 0.75 fpk

Figure: 3.7.1-8

3.7.8 Cracking limit state

The cross-section in the middle of the beam

Cracks must be limited so as not to disrupt the proper function of the structure,

t tr

respectively. unacceptable degradation of their appearance. Durability of prestressed elements

eps  0.537 m

0.45 fck  22.5 MPa

Npm0  Ap  fpd   pr1

Wds

The tension in the tendon and the offsetting of losses does not exceed further value 0.75 fpk

Wdp

 0.45 fck

State prestressing t

Mg0k

Stress in the lower surface d

Ais

Npm0eps

0.45 fck  22.5 MPa Satisfies

Whp h

 

Npm0

Npm0  3920.809 kN

agis  agcs  0.019 m

can be greatly affected cracks. If the requirements are not entered more precisely, it is required for the pretensioned prestress elements placed in an environment of class 2 to 4 fulfill decompression limit, which means that all the liners prestress tendon frequently charged in the combination of at least 25 mm inside the concrete compression. In our case, we can simplistically be required to lower the fiber cross-section was zero stress. Calculation of stress once again showcased the ideal crosssection.

Structural system


Decompression request is granted

a) Service load values

The cross-section of the support

b) any service loads of prestress force

Stress at the top surface:

c) times the value of variable loads = 0.2 for snow load

h

 

Cross-section of the middle span:

Np   p  Ap

d

Bending Moment for frequent load combinations: Mk1 

 gstrs  gpanels  g0s  0.2 sk L

Mk1  2771.52 m kN

1 2  gstrd  gpaneld  g0d   0.2 sd L 8 

Md1  3814.114 m kN

8

Md1 

2

 

Np Ais

Np eps Whs

Np epp Whp

h

 2.38 MPa

h

 fctm

 

Np Aip

Np epp Wdp

d

 18.651 MPa

 d  0.45 fckcyl satisfies 0.45 fckcyl  18 MPa The limit state of decompression is defined as the state where all axial concrete stresses are

below or equal to zero. Compressive stresses in concrete

Stress at the top surface:

h

Np Aip

Stress in the lower surface:

Np  3416.689 kN

1

Excessive compressive stress in the concrete under service load may lead to longitudinal Mk1 Whs

cracks and high and hardly predicable creep, with serious consequences to prestress losses.

 9.741 MPa

h

When such effects are likely to occur, measures should be taken to limit the stresses to an appropriate level.

h

 0.45 fckcyl

If the stress does not exceed 0.6fck

stress in the lower surface:

d

 

Np Ais

Np eps Wds

Mk1 Wds

0.45 fckcyl  18 MPa satisfies

1. Under the rare combination, longitudinal cracking is unlikely to occur 2. Under the quasi-permanent combination, creep and the corresponding prestress losses can be correctly predicted.

d

 2.386 MPa

If under the quasi-permanent combination, the stress exceeds 0.4fck, the non-linear model shall be used for the assessment of creep.

d

 0.45 fckcyl

Steel stresses

Tensile stresses in the steel under serviceability conditions which could lead to inelastic deformation of the steel shall be avoided as this will lead to large, permanently open cracks. Stress verifications should be carried out for partially prestressed members because there may be fatigue problems.

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Frequent load value is a combination of:

Department of Architecture

156


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

157 When prestressed and non-prestressed types of steel are simultaneously used, since the bond

Example 3.7-2: The cross - section dimensions of a beam shown on figure 3.7.2-1

behaviour of prestressing tendons is different from the bond behaviour of deformed reinforcing

are subjected to bending moment Msd . Determine the required tension reinforcement to the

bars, different steel stress will be developed in each type of steel.

cross-section.

Both equilibrium and compatibility should be respected for the calculated stresses in prestressing and reinforcing steel.

Characteristic value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa):

For single cracks, different transmission lengths ls and lp should be calculated for reinforcing

fck  60  MPa

fckcyl  0.8  fck

fckcyl  48  MPa

and prestressing steel respectively. For reinforced or prestressed slabs subjected to bending without significant axial

Design value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa):

tension, no special measures to control cracking are needed, provided that the overall depth of

fcd  0.85 

the slab does not exceed 160mm.

fckcyl

fcd  27.2  MPa

1.5

 fckcyl    10  MPa 

0.66667

fctm  1.4  

 MPa

fctm  3.98374 MPa

Characteristic yield stress of reinforcement (MPa): 3.7.9 Deflection

Stress in any cross-section does not exceed the tensile strength of concrete, some sections remain even in compression, we can therefore count on the entire cross-section,

fyk  325 MPa

Ecm  33.5  GPa

because we do not expect cracking. When constructing buildings generally considered sufficient deformation of quasi-permanent load combinations and consider all load being

e 

persistent. Np eps L 1 5  gstrs  gpanels  g0s  sk   L ftot      8  Ecd 384  Ecd     Ics   Ics 1   ckon    1   ckon  2

4

ftot  0.024 m

L 500

fm  0.06 m

ftot  fm

Es  200 GPa

Ep  200 GPa

e  5.97015

hh  0.20  m hs  0.450  m

hh1  0.10  m

bd  0.60  m

h  hh  hs  hd  hh1  hd1

hd  0.20  m

hd1  0.15  m

h  1.1 m

Cover of reinforcement (m):

Limit state of deformation

dsc  0.05  m

In-service deformations (deformations and rotations) may be harmful to

dst  0.05  m

ap  0.15  m

from lower chord of the beam

Effective depth of a cross-section (m):

2. The integrity of non-structural parts

d  h  dst

3. The proper function of the structure or its equipment.

d  1.05 m

To avoid harmful effects of deformations appropriate limiting values should be respected.

Es

bs  0.30  m

1. The appearance of the structure

fyd  282.61 MPa

fpk  1620 MPa

Ecm

bh  0.6  m

deflection satisfies.

fyk 1.15

Cross-sectional dimensions (m):

Serviceability limit deflection think of as fm 

fyd 

Msd  2350 kN  m

Structural system

Nsd  1200 kN

Tension

Np  4.2  MN

compression


2 

Ast  10  ( 2cm ) 

The center of gravity of ideal cross-section (m):

Ast  0.003142m

4

2

2 

Asc  0.003142m

4

The moment of inertia of the concrete cross section (m4):

2

Prestress tendon (m2):

 2  2  Ap  1  ( 0.55cm )   6  ( 0.5cm )    4.5  7 4 4 

LA 15.5 (1 fi 5.5+6 fi 5)

agi  0.56885m

Ai

Compression reinforcement (m2): Asc  10  ( 2cm ) 

Ac  agc  e  Ast  d  Asc  dsc  Ap  h  ap 

agi 

Ap  0.004459m

Ic 

2

1

3

12

3

 bs h  bh  bs  hh  bh  bs  2

hh1 3

3

3

 bd  bs  hd  bd  bs  2

hd1 3

3

 bs h 0.5 h  agc

2 

2 hd   1  1     bd  bs  hd   h   agc   bh  bs  hh1    agc  hh   hh1  2  3 2 2    2 1  1    bd  bs  hd1    h  hd   hd1  agc 2  3 

 

 bh  bs  hh   agc 

Ic  0.06634m

hh 

4

The moment of inertia of ideal cross-section (m4):

Ii  Ic  Ac  agi  agc Ii  0.07979m

2  e  Asc  agi  dsc2  Ast  h  dst  agi 2  Ap  h  ap  agi 2

4

 

Mtot  Msd  Nsd   agi 

Ntot  Nsd  Np etot 

Figure: 3.7.2-1

Area of concrete net cross-section (m2):

 

 bh  bs  hh   bd  bs  hd  0.5   bh  bs  hh1  0.5   bd  bs  hd1 Area of concrete transformed cross-section (m2): Ac  bs h 

Ai  Ac  e  Asc  Ast  Ap

Ai  0.55163m

Ac  0.4875 m

2

Ac

agc  0.54949m

Mtot  726.55533m  kN

Ntot  3000 kN

Mtot

etot  0.24219 m

Ntot

Ast  Ap  Asc Ac  fcd

 MN   100 2 m 



Mtot  Ntot  etot   0.08101

Mtot  726.55533m  kN   0.21

Mu  2923.83m  kN

for

hd    1    bd  bs  hd   h  2   0.5   bh  bs  hh1   3  hh1  hh  2    bd  bs  hd1    hd1  hs  hh  0.5 3   agc  2

  Np   h  ap  agi 

2

Mu    Ac  d  fcd

2

The center of gravity of the cross section of the concrete from the upper chord (m):

0.5  bs h  bh  bs  hh

2

h

fyk  520 MPa

Mu    Ac  d  fcd

Mu  4316.13m  kN

s2  20.71986 MPa

0.8  fyk  416 MPa

  0.31

Stress in Ast reinforcement (MPa):

s2 

Ntot Ai

Mtot Ii

 e

d  agi

Structural system

Mu  Mtot

ok

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Tension reinforcement (m2):

Department of Architecture

158


Stress in prestress tendon (MPa):

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

159

 Ntot  p     Ai  

p 

Np Ap

c2 

Ii h  ap  a gi

 p  15.28323 MPa

is in tension

c2  0.60156 MPa

Ii

Nsd

  

 

Mtotcomp  Msd  Nsd   agi    p

p  957.11554 MPa

0.75  fpk  1215 MPa

Ntotcomp  Nsd  Np

h

  Np   h  ap  agi 

2

is compression

Np  4200kN

Mtotcomp  771.79959m  kN Ntotcomp  5400 kN

Cracks cannot be excluded even in prestressed concrete structures. Crack width and etotcomp 

alternating stress from fatigue loading have to be limited to obtain adequate durability. Therefore the knowledge of steel stresses under service load is necessary.

c1comp 

means ignoring the tension stresses in concrete between the cracks and at the ends of the cracks. In prestressed concrete beams, especially in case of partial prestressing the bond produced c1comp 

tension stresses in concrete between the cracks cannot be neglected because the bond behaviour of normal reinforcing steel and of prestressing steel is very different.Therefore the stress s at the cracks is normal reinforcing steel is much higher than the increase sp of the stress of

etotcomp  0.14293 m

Ntotcomp

Ntotcomp  Ai

Ntotcomp  Ai

agi

Ii

 1 

 Ai  etotcomp



c1comp  15.29183 MPa

Ntotcomp  etotcomp 

c1comp  15.29183 MPa

Ii a gi

prestressing steel, although the different steel members are in one layer.

c2comp 

Ntotcomp  Ai

h  agi

Ii

 1 

 Ai  etotcomp

 

c2comp 

 Nsd   Np  agi  1   Ai   etot  c1  Ai I i  

c1  10.61855 MPa

Nsd   Np  Mtot  

c1  10.61855 MPa

Ii

or

Ntotcomp  Ai

Ntotcomp  etotcomp  Ii h  a gi

c1  fctm

agi

Nsd  Np Ai

h  agi

Ii

 1 

c2comp  4.65106 MPa

or

Stress in concrete (MPa):

Ai

Mtotcomp

The steel stress in reinforced concrete beams may be calculated for “pure state II”, that

c2 

fctm  c2

If

c1 

Mtot

Ai

h  a gi

  e   

Mtot

Nsd  Np

 

 Ai  etot 

c2  0.60156 MPa

Figure: 3.7.2-2

Structural system

c2comp  4.65106 MPa


concrete C35 / 45 f ck, f ctm , Ecm. Reinforcement As1, As2, Es. prestressing tendon Ap, Ep. The cross-section is subjected for exceptional load combinations Bending Moment:

Msd = 3.55 MNm

Normal force:

Nd (tension) = 1.60 MN.

Value of prestressing force

Np (compression) = 5.2 MN

The initial prestressing force in a tendon is the force existing in this tendon at the end of the prestressing operation. The initial prestressing force on a prestressed element is obtained by considering all the forces existing in the tendons, at the end of the last prestressing operation. Under service load conditions the limitation of stresses may be required for

Figure 3.7.3-2: Cross-sectional dimension

1. Tensile stresses in concrete 2. Compressive stresses in concrete 3. Tensile stresses in steel.

H  1.2 m bs  0.20 m

The limitation of tensile stress in concrete is an adequate measure to reduce the probability of cracking.

ap  0.20 m as1  0.05 m bh  0.50 m bd  0.3 m

hh1  0.10 m hd1  0.10 m hd  0.30 m

as2  0.05 m hh  0.25 m

dp  H  ap dp  1 m hs  0.45 m

d  H  as2

hh  hd  hh1  hd1  hs  1.2 m Material Characteristics: Concrete 40/50: fck  40 MPa

fctm  3.5 MPa

Ecm  35 GPa fcd  0.85 

Ep  200 GPa

fyk  520 MPa

Steel: Es  200 GPa 2

 22 mm

As2  n A2

1

Figure 3.7.3-1: Values of ideal cross-section and stress distribution

 16 mm

As1  n A1

Structural system

A2 

  2

2

  1

fcd  22.667 MPa

fyk 1.15

fyd  452.174 MPa

A2  0.0003801 m

4

As2  0.0019007 m

A1 

fyd 

fck 1.5

2

2

2

4

As1  0.0010053 m

n  5

A1  0.0002011 m 2

2

n  5

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Example 3.7-3: Partial prestressed beams according to figure 3.7.3-1 is proposed as,

Department of Architecture

160


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

161

 1 ( 5.5mm) 2  6 ( 5mm) 2    Ap1    4 4   Ap1  0.0001416 m

The moment of inertia of the concrete cross section (m4): 3

np  25

Ic 

2

 bs H 0.5 H  agc   2

Ap  np Ap1

Ap  0.0035392 m

As  Ap  As2

As  0.0054399 m

2 2 hd    agc      bd  bs  hd  H  2  2   2 1  1    bh  bs  hh1   agc  hh  hh1   2  3  2 1  1    bd  bs  hd1   H  hd  hd1  agc  2  3 

2

2

 

  bh  bs  hh  agc 

e



Es Ecm

e

 5.71

Cross-section area of concrete (m2): Ac  bs H   bh  bs  hh   bd  bs  hd   0.5  bh  bs  hh1  0.5  bd  bs  hd1

Ac  0.365 m

3

hh1 hd1 1 3 3 3  bs H   bh  bs  hh   bh  bs     bd  bs  hd   bd  bs   3 3 12

Ic  0.0594 m

2

hh 

4

The moment of inertia of ideal Cross section (m4):

Ideal cross-section area (m2):

Ai  Ac   e  As1  As2  Ap 

2 2 2 2 Ii  Ic  Ac  agi  agc    e As1  agi  as1  As2  H  as2  agi  Ap  dp  agi 

Ai  0.4018 m

2

Ii  0.0689 m

The center of gravity of the concrete cross section from the upper extremity (m):

4

Calculation the values of Mtot and Ntot .

hd   2 2 1 0.5 bs H   bh  bs  hh    bd  bs  hd  H    0.5  bh  bs  hh1  hh1 2   3 2     bd  bs  hd1  hd1  hs  hh  0.5 3  agc  Ac agc  0.5287 m The center of gravity ideal cross-section (m):

agi 

Ac agc   e  As2 d  As1 as1  Ap dp Ai

agi  0.5623 m

Ntot   Np  Nsd

Ntot  3600 kN

 H  a   N  d  a gi   p  p gi 2 

Mtot  Msd  Nsd  Mu

b d d fcd As



 0.255

Ac fcd

100 MPa

Mu  2109.7 m kN

Structural system

As

Mtot  1334.3774598 m kN

 b d fcd

 0.0657518

Mu   Ac dp fcd Mu  Mtot

ok


and durability of the structure.

 H  a   N  d  a gi   p  p gi 2 

Msd  Nsd  etot 

It should be ensured that, with an adequate probability, cracks will not impair the serviceability

etot  0.3707 m

Nsd   Np

c

 f ctm , Where f ctm, is the mean value of the tensile strength of concrete. The section without

 H  a   N  d  a gi   p  p gi 2 

Mtot  Msd  Nsd 

Mtot  1334.377 m kN

Ntot   Nsd    Np

Ntot  3600 kN

The ultimate resistance of partially prestressed structures is a function of the combined yield force of prestressing and reinforcing steel. The appropriate amount of prestressing to be

crack assumes the full effect of the concrete section and flexible behaviour of concrete reinforcement in tension and compression. There-fore we begin the calculating of the limit state stress limitation by evaluate the values of ideal cross-section. Because EC 2 considers the value of unity modulus for post-tensioning prestress concrete and reinforcement Es

provided, therefore, cannot be directly determined on the basis of behaviour at ultimate limit state. Supplementary criteria for the design of prestressing in partially prestressed structures are therefore required. These criteria, which will be called prestressing concepts, are established to account for aspects of serviceability, economy, and construction in the design of the

The upper edge: The limitation of compressive stresses in concrete should avoid excessive compression,

Es Ecm

term loading components in the calculation according to limit state stress limitation considered only in cases where more than 50% of the stresses induced Quasi-permanent load  2 1 Q k 1 simplifying

value  e

15.

 c1  19.844 MPa fctm  3.5 MPa This competence means cracks do not arise:

Calculation of stress in concrete extreme fibers of Cross section:

 c1

e

Where Ecm the value of the secant modulus of elasticity of concrete. The effects of long

prestressing as they apply to various types of structures.

producing irreversible strains and longitudinal cracks. Nsd   Np   agi   c1   1  Ai etot  I Ai i  

Ep,

 .c1

 fctm

Checking formation of cracks on the lower edge of Cross section  c2

 3.38 MPa

fctm  3.5 MPa

Limitation of concrete compression stress regarding the formation of longitudinal crack:

 19.84 MPa

Using conditions of reliability, we can check this condition.

or

c

 0.6 f ck

Satisfies the compressive stress in absolute value, this condition or not

 c1



Ntot Ai

Mtot

 Ii     agi 

 c1

 19.8436 MPa

fck Is the characteristic compressive strength of concrete. c c

The stress at lower edge:

H  agi Nsd   Np    c2   1  Ai etot  Ai I i  

 c1

 c2

 3.38 MPa



Ntot Ai

Mtot Ii Hagi

 19.8436 MPa

0.6 fck  24 MPa

The reliability condition is satisfied. In prestress beam is assessment should be done

or

 c2

is the greatest compression stress of concrete under exceptional load combinations or  G k j   P  Qk 1 resp. G k j  P  0.9 Q k 1.

especially in the stage of introducing preload into the concrete. It assessed the fulfillment of  c2

the conditions of reliability for compressive stress in the concrete at the quasi-permanent load

 3.38 MPa

combinations.

c

Structural system

 0.45 fck

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Distance resultant of horizontal forces from the center of gravity of ideal Cross section (m):

Department of Architecture

162


Example 3.7-4: The cross - section dimensions of a beam shown on figure 3.7.4-1

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

163 The required tension reinforcement A2 (m2) is as follows:

are subjected to bending moment Msd. Determine the required tension reinforcement to the

Astrequired   b d fcd 

section.

1 2 10 MPa

Material data: Characteristic value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa):

fccyl  0.8 fck fcd  0.85 

fccyl

fcd  11.333 MPa

1.5 Characteristic yield stress of reinforcement (MPa): fyk  412 MPa e



Es

fyd  e

Ec

fyk

2

A1  0.0003142 m

Astprovid  0.0015708 m

Astprovid  n A1

Ec  29 GPa

2

2

n  5

2

Tension force in reinforcement (kN):

fyd  358.261 MPa

1.15

A1   

4 Provided tension reinforcement (m2):

Design value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa): fck  25 MPa

 20 mm

Astrequired  0.001457 m

Es  210 GPa

 7.2413793

Fst  Astprovid fyd

Fst  562.755 kN

x   d Fc  xu b fcd

x  0.193 m Fc  524.852832 kN

xu  0.8 x

xu  0.1544 m

Cross-section (m), cover of reinforcement (cm), effective depth of a cross-section (m): b  0.30 m d  h  ast

h  0.45 m

asc  3 cm

ast  3 cm

d  0.42 m

Figure: 3.7.4-1 Design maximum bending moment Msd (kN.m), to apply the Design figure B3-B3.3 the bending moment Msd has to be brought into a dimensionless, we obtain the reinforcement ratio: Msd  180 kN m 



Msd 2

b d fcd

Figure: 3.7.4-2

 0.30012

 0.10203

 0.45943

Fst  Fc

Ascrequired  0.0001058 m fyd Diameter, number of bars, provided: Ascrequired 

 12 mm

Structural system

A1   

2

4

2

A1  0.0001131 m

2

n  3


Ascprovid  n A1

Ascprovid  0.0003393 m

Fsc  Ascprovid fyd

Fsc  121.555 kN

to bending moment Msd. Determine the required tension reinforcement to the section.

2

Material data: Characteristic value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa):

 

Mu  Fc  d 

Design value of concrete cylinder compressive strength (MPa):

xu 

  Fsc  d  asc  2

Mu  227.3342917 m kN

Mu  Msd fck  20 MPa

Msd  180 m kN

Ai  b h   e  Astprovid  Ascprovid 

Ai  0.1488317 m

2

agi 

b h 0.5 h   e Ascprovid asc  Astprovid  h  ast 

agi  0.2366841 m

Ai

fccyl  0.8 fck

fcd  0.85 

fccyl 1.5

fcd  9.067 MPa

Characteristic yield stress of reinforcement (MPa): fyk  412 MPa

fyd 

fyk 1.15

fyd  358.261 MPa

Cross-section ( m), cover of reinforcement (m), effective depth of a cross-section (m): 4

Moment of inertia of the transformed cross-section about neutral axis ( m ): 3 1

Ii  b h 

12

 h  a    A 2 2 gi  e  scprovid  agi  asc   Astprovid  h  ast  agi  2 

 b h 

Ii  0.0027838 m

b  2.63 m d  h  ast

2

4

asc  3 cm

h  0.50 m d  0.47 m

ast  3 cm

Design maximum bending moment (kN.m), to apply the Design, figure B3-B3.3 the bending moment Msd has to be brought into a dimensionless form, from the Design we obtain the reinforcement ratio:

Compression and tension concrete stress (MPa):

Msd  198 kN m Msd

 Ii     agi 

Msd

 15.3041944 MPa

Ii

 13.7931827 MPa

h agi



Msd 2

b d fcd

 0.03759

 0.0103

2 The required tension reinforcement A2 ( cm ) is as follows:

Astrequired   b d fcd 

Figure: 3.7.4-3

Structural system

1 2 10 MPa

Astrequired  0.0011544 m

2

 0.05104

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Example 3.7-5: The cross - section dimensions of a beam shown on figure 3.7.5-1 are subjected

Provided compression reinforcement:

Department of Architecture

164


Reinforcing steel (MPa):

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

165

fyk  412 MPa

fyd 

fyk

fyd  358.261 MPa

1.15

It is assumed that (m), cover of reinforcement (m), effective depth (m):

b  0.45 m d  h  ast

asc  3 cm

h  0.45 m d  0.42 m

ast  3 cm

Design value of bending moment (kN.m), design value of axial compression force (kN), combined actions have to be transformed in relation to the centre of gravity of the tension reinforcement (kN.m):

Nsd  2800 kN compression

Msd  50 kN m

Figure: 3.7.5-1

h  Mext  Msd  Nsd   ast  2  

Mext  596 m kN

To apply the design diagram figure B3-B3.3 the transformed actions Msds has to be brought into a dimensionless form (-): 



Mext

2

b d fcd

Example 3.7-6: Determine the tension reinforcement of a reinforced concrete rectangular

Use the bi - linear diagram for steel ( ´

0)

and bi - linear diagram for concrete.

entire cross-section is in compression

Figure: 3.7.5-2

column shown on figure 3.7.6-1, subjected to bending moment Msd and compression force Nsd.

 0.82811

Fc  0.8 b d fcd

Fc  1370.88 kN

Fstrequired  Nsd  Fc

Fstrequired  1429.12 kN

2

The required tension reinforcement A2 ( cm ) is as follows:

Material data: Concrete (MPa): fck  20 MPa

fccyl  0.8 fck

fcd  0.85 

fccyl 1.5

Astrequired  fcd  9.067 MPa

Structural system

Fstrequired fyd

Astrequired  0.003989 m

2


location is reduce the possibility of the reinforcement buckling with the resulting inability to take the load for which the column is supposed to be designed. Such buckling is prevented by lateral reinforcement in the form of ties or closely-spaced spirals. The minimum number of longitudinal bars in a tied column should be four and the minimum diameter of bar is 12mm.

Example 3.7-7: Determination of the tension reinforcement of reinforced concrete rectangular column shown on figure 3.7.7-1, subjected to bending moment Msd and compression force, Nsd by

the bi - linear diagram for steel ( ´

0)

and bi - linear diagram for concrete.

Material data: Concrete (MPa): fck  20 MPa

Figure: 3.7.6-1

 22 mm

Astprovid  n A1

A1   

fyk  412 MPa 

2

4

A1  0.0003801 m

Astprovid  0.0045616 m

2

n  12

2



Astprovid b d

 0.0241354

fcd  0.85 

fccyl

Reinforcing steel(MPa):

Provided, diameter, number of bars: 

fccyl  0.8 fck

fyk

fyd 

1.15

It is assumed that (m):

1.5

fcd  9.067 MPa

fyd  358.261 MPa

asc  3 cm ast  3 cm b  0.40 m h  0.45 m d  h  ast d  0.42 m Design value of bending moment (kN.m), design value of axial compression force (kN), Combined actions have to be transformed in relation to the centre of gravity of the tension

  max

reinforcement (kN.m):

Columns are usually under compression and they are classified as short columns or long and slender columns. Long columns are liable to buckle under axial load. The length of the

Msd  150 kN m

h

Mext  Msd  Nsd 

2

 

 ast 

Nsd  1500 kN compression Mext  442.5 m kN

column is the distance between the supports at its end or between any two floors. The effective

To apply the Design figure B3-B3.3 the transformed actions M sds has to be brought into a

length of a column is governed by the condition of fixity at its ends in position and in direction.

dimensionless

Codes give the values of the effective length for a number of cases by multiplying the actual

form (-):

length by a factor. Columns may also loaded eccentrically or there may be a bending moment imposed on them in addition to concentric (axial) and eccentric loads.



Mext 2

Reinforcement in the form of longitudinal bars is provided both in short and long columns.

b d fcd Fc  0.8 b d fcd

These reinforcements are necessary to withstand both tension and compression loads. The most

Fstrequired  Nsd  Fc

Structural system

 0.69168

entire cross-section in compression

Fc  1218.56 kN Fstrequired  281.44 kN

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

efficient location of the longitudinal reinforcement is near the faces of the columns. Such

Department of Architecture

166


Example 3.7-8: Determination of the tension reinforcement of reinforced concrete rectangular

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

167

column shown on figure 3.7.8-1, subjected to bending moment by the bi - linear diagram for steel ( ´

0)

M sd and

compression force

and bi - linear diagram for concrete.

Material data: Concrete (MPa): fck  20 MPa

fccyl  0.8 fck

fcd  0.85 

fccyl

fcd  9.067 MPa

1.5

Reinforcing steel(MPa): fyk  412 MPa

fyd 

fyk

fyd  358.261 MPa

1.15

It is assumed that (m), cover of reinforcement (m), effective depth (m): b  0.20 m d  h  ast

asc  3 cm

h  0.35 m

ast  3 cm

d  0.32 m

Design value of bending moment (kN.m), design value of axial compression force (kN): Combined actions have to be transformed in relation to the centre of gravity of the tension

Figure: 3.7.7-1 The required tension reinforcement Astrequired 

A2

Fstrequired

reinforcement (kN.m):

2

( cm ) is:

Msd  8.7 kN m

Astrequired  0.0007856 m

fyd

2

 16 mm

A1   

Astprovid  n A1

A1  0.0002011 m

4

2

n  4



Mext 2

b d fcd A2

Astprovid  0.0008042 m

 0.34359

The required tension reinforcement

( cm 2) is: 2

Astprovid  Astrequired

Astrequired   b d fcd 

M sds has

to be brought

into a dimensionless form (-), from the design diagram figure B3-B3.3 we obtain:

2

The provided tension reinforcement

Mext  63.8 m kN

To apply the design diagram figure B3-B3.3 the transformed actions

Provided, diameter, number of bars: 

Nsd  380 kN

h  Mext  Msd  Nsd   ast  2 

 16 mm

Structural system

A2

Nsd 1  fyd MPa

A1   

2

4

 0.12579

 0.554403

( cm 2) is: Astrequired  0.0719311 m A1  0.0002011 m

2

n  4

2

Nsd


Astprovid  0.0008042 m

Astprovid  n A1

Ascprovid  0.0002262 m

Ascprovid  n A1

( cm 2) is:

A2

2

Fsc  Ascprovid fyd

2

Fsc  81.0366995 kN

 

Mu  Fc  d 

xu 

  Fsc  d  asc 

Mu  87.593 m kN

2

Ai  b h   e  Astprovid  Ascprovid 

b h 0.5 h   e Ascprovid asc  Astprovid  h  ast  Ai 3 1

Ii  b h 

12

etoti 



Astprovid b d

x   d

Fc  xu b fcd

 12 mm

Fst  Astprovid fyd

xu  0.8 x

x  0.1774 m

Fc  257.3612646 kN

A1   

2

4

4

Mext Nsd

etoti  0.1679 m

Fst  288.1304873 kN

A2

Ascrequired 

Fst  Fc fyd



Nsd  agi   1  Ai etoti  Ai  Ii 

 c2



h  agi Nsd    1  Ai etoti  Ai  Ii 

2

 c1

 8.5532 MPa

 c1

 fctm

( cm 2) is:

A1  0.0001131 m

 c1

xu  0.1419 m

2

The provided compression reinforcement

2

Compression and tension concrete stress (MPa):

 0.0125664

Ascrequired  0.0000859 m

agi  0.1828 m

 h  a    A 2 2 gi  e  scprovid  agi  asc   Astprovid  h  ast  agi  2 

 b h 

Ii  0.0008667 m

The reinforcement ratio is given by (‐):

2

agi 

Figure: 3.7.8-1

Ai  0.0774618 m

Mu  Msd

n  2

Structural system

 c2

 17.2109 MPa

 c2

 fctm

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

The provided tension reinforcement

Department of Architecture

168


Example 3.7-9:

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

169 Example 3.7-10:

Material data:

Concrete (MPa):

fccyl  25 MPa

fcd  0.85 

Reinforcing steel(MPa): fyk  325 MPa 2

 25 mm

A2 

Ast  n2 A2 1

  2

fyd 

2

A1 

Asc  n1 A1

  1

fyk

are subjected to bending moment Msd, Np (compression), Nsd (compression). Determine the

fcd  14.167 MPa

1.5

ultimate bending moment and stresses at the upper and lower of cross-section.

fyd  282.609 MPa

1.15

A2  0.0004909 m

4

2

n2  4

A1  0.0000503 m

Asc  0.0002011 m

2

fyk  520 MPa

n1  4

 20 mm

A2 

Ast  n A2

1

Figure: 3.7.9-1 The provided compression and tension reinforcement

h  110 cm

ast  5 cm

b=0.20m

A2

 16 mm

asc  5 cm

d  h  ast

To apply the design diagram figure B3-B3.3 the transformed actions



Ast Ac fcd

100 MPa

Mu   Ac d fcd

Msd Ac d fcd  0.047793

  1

A1  0.0002011 m

2

2

Asc  0.0008042 m

4

2

M sds has

Ast 

 b d fcd

2

6 ( 5mm)    4  2

Ap1  0.0001416 m

Ap  np Ap1

Ap  0.0033976 m

As  Ap  Ast  Asc

As  0.0054585 m

2

np  24

2

2

Cross-sectional dimension:

Ac  0.29 m

Mu  Msd

n  4

to be brought

2

 0.135

Mu  582.35625 m kN

n  4

2

4

A2  0.0003142 m

d  1.05 m

into a dimensionless form (-), from the design diagram figure B3-B3.3 we obtain: 

2

2

Msd  365 kN m

fyd  452.174 MPa

1.15   2

fcd  19.833 MPa

1.5

4

A1 

 1 ( 5.5mm) 2 

Ap1  

( cm 2) is:

fccyl

fyk

Ast  0.0012566 m

Asc  n A1

As  0.0021646 m

fyd 

2 2

As  Asc  Ast

fcd  0.85 

Steel:

2

4

Material Characteristics: fccyl  35 MPa

2

Ast  0.0019635 m

 8 mm

fccyl

The cross - section dimensions of a beam shown on figure 3.7.10-1

ok

ap  0.15 m

asc  0.05 m

ast  0.05 m

bs  0.40 m

bh  0.60 m

bd  0.4 m

hh  0.30 m

hs  0.90 m

hd  0.30 m

hh1  0.10 m

hd1  0.05 m

H  hh  hd  hh1  hd1  hs

Structural system

H  1.65 m

dp  H  ap

dp  1.5 m


The moment of inertia of ideal cross-section:

d  1.6 m

Gross area of concrete cross-section:

2 2 2 2 Ii  Ic  Ac  agi  agc    e As1  agi  as1  As2  H  as2  agi  Ap  dp  agi 

Ac  bs H   bh  bs  hh   bd  bs  hd   0.5  bh  bs  hh1  0.5  bd  bs  hd1

Ii  0.2027 m

4

2

Ac  0.73 m Area of the transformed uncracked cross-section: Ai  Ac   e  Ast  Asc  Ap 

Msd  4350 kN m

Ai  0.7612 m

Ntot   Np    Nsd 

hd    2 2 1 0.5 bs H   bh  bs  hh    bd  bs  hd  H    0.5  bh  bs  hh1  hh1  hh   2   3   2   bd  bs  hd1  hd1  hs  hh  0.5 3   agc  Ac

 H  a   N  d  a gi   p  p gi 2 

etot 

Distance of the neutral axis (centroid) of the transformed cross-section:

agi  0.7852 m

Ai

3

Mtot

3

2

hd hh       bh  bs  hh  agc   agc      bd  bs  hd  H  2  2    2 1  1    bh  bs  hh1   agc  hh  hh1   2  3  2 1  1    bd  bs  hd1   H  hd  hd1  agc  2  3  Ic  0.1821 m

As

b d d fcd

 b d fcd



As Ac fcd

100 MPa

Mu  5537.962 m kN

 0.0377013   0.255

Mu  Mext

ok

Stress in concrete:

2

2

etot  0.0736969 m

Ntot

hh1 hd1 1 3 3 3  bs H   bh  bs  hh   bh  bs     bd  bs  hd   bd  bs   3 3 12

 bs H 0.5 H  agc  

Mtot  545.357006 m kN

Mtot

Mu   Ac dp fcd

The moment of inertia of the concrete cross-section: Ic 

Ntot  7400 kN

Mtot  Msd   Nsd  

agc  0.7628 m

Ac agc   e  Ast d  Asc as1  Ap dp

Compression Nsd  2200kN Compression

2

Distance of the neutral axis (centroid) of the net cross-section:

agi 

Np  5200 kN

 c1



 Nsd    Np Ai

agi

Ii

 1 

Ai etot 

 c1

 11.83 MPa

or  c1



 Ntot  Ai

Mtot

 Ii     agi 

4

Structural system

 c1

 11.8337 MPa

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

d  H  ast

Department of Architecture

170


Example 3.7-11: The cross - section dimensions of a beam shown on figure 3.7.11-1

The lower edge

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

171

are subjected to bending moment Msd, Np (compression), Nsd (tension). Determine the  c2



 Nsd    Np Ai

H  agi

Ii

 1 

Ai etot 

ultimate bending moment and concrete stresses at the upper and lower of cross-section.  c2

 7.4 MPa

Material Characteristics Concrete:

or  c2



N tot Ai

fccyl  35 MPa

Mtot

 c2

Ii

 7.4 MPa

fcd  0.85 

Steel:

fyk  520 MPa

Hagi

2

 20 mm

fyd 

A2 

Ast  0.0012566 m

1

 16 mm

A1 

Figure: 3.7.10-1

fyd  452.174 MPa

2

A2  0.0003142 m

4

2

n  4

Ast  n A2

  1 4

2

A1  0.0002011 m

2

n  4

Asc  n A1

2

 1 ( 5.5mm) 2  

fyk 1.15

  2

fcd  19.833 MPa

1.5

2

Asc  0.0008042 m Ap1  

fccyl

4

6 ( 5mm)    4  2

Ap1  0.0001416 m

Ap  np Ap1

Ap  0.0033976 m

As  Ap  Ast  Asc

As  0.0054585 m

2

np  24

2

2

Cross-sectional dimension:

ap  0.15 m

asc  0.05 m

ast  0.05 m

bs  0.150 m

bh  0.40 m

bd  0.3 m

hh  0.20 m

hs  0.45 m

hh1  0.10 m

hd1  0.05 m

hd  0.20 m

Structural system


H  hh  hd  hh1  hd1  hs

H  1m

The moment of inertia of ideal cross-section:

dp  0.85 m dp  H  ap Gross area of concrete cross-section:

2 2 2 2 Ii  Ic  Ac  agi  agc    e As1  agi  as1  As2  H  as2  agi  Ap  dp  agi 

Ac  bs H   bh  bs  hh   bd  bs  hd   0.5  bh  bs  hh1  0.5  bd  bs  hd1

Ac  0.24625 m

2

Ii  0.0355 m

Area of the transformed uncracked cross-section: Ai  Ac   e  Ast  Asc  Ap 

4

Ai  0.2774 m

2

Msd  2350 kN m

Distance of the neutral axis (centroid) of the net cross-section:

Np  4200 kN

Compression

Ntot   Np  Nsd

hd   2 2 1  0.5 bs H   bh  bs  hh    bd  bs  hd  H    0.5  bh  bs  hh1  hh1  hh   2   3  2    bd  bs  hd1  hd1  hs  hh  0.5 3   agc  Ac

Nsd  1200kN Tension

Ntot  3000 kN

 H  a   N  d  a gi   p  p gi 2 

Mtot  Msd  Nsd 

Mtot  866.4714747 m kN

agc  0.4568 m etot 

Distance of the neutral axis (centroid) of the transformed cross-section:

Ac agc   e  Ast d  Asc as1  Ap dp Ai The moment of inertia of the concrete cross-section: agi 

3

3

hh1 hd1 1 3 3 3  Ic  bs H   bh  bs  hh   bh  bs     bd  bs  hd   bd  bs   3 3 12  bs H 0.5 H  agc   2

2 2 hd hh       bh  bs  hh  agc   agc      bd  bs  hd  H  2  2    2 1  1    bh  bs  hh1   agc  hh  hh1   2  3  2 1  1    bd  bs  hd1   H  hd  hd1  agc  2  3 

Ic  0.0294 m

4

etot  0.2888238 m see diagram B3-B3.3

Ntot Mtot

agi  0.4955 m

Mtot

b d d fcd

 0.375

As

 b d fcd

Mu   Ac dp fcd



As Ac fcd

100 MPa

 0.1117642

Mu  1556.762 m kN Mu  Mext

Stress in concrete:

 c1



agi Nsd   Np     1  Ai etot  Ai I i  

Structural system

 c1

 22.89 MPa

ok

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

d  H  ast

Department of Architecture

172


Example 3.7-12: The cross - section dimensions of a beam shown on figure 3.7.12-1

or

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

173

 c1



Ntot Ai

Mtot

 c1

 Ii     agi 

 22.8916 MPa

are subjected to bending moment Msd, Np (compression). Determine the ultimate bending moment and concrete stresses at the upper and lower of cross-section. Material Characteristics: Concrete:

The lower edge

fccyl  35 MPa

Nsd   Np  H  agi   c2   1  Ai etot  Ai I i  

Steel:  c2

 1.49 MPa

 c2



Ai

Mtot

fyk  520 MPa

1

 c2

Ii

 20 mm

fcd  19.833 MPa

1.5

fyd  452.174 MPa

1.15   1

2

A1  0.0003142 m

4

 1.49 MPa

Asc  n A1

Hagi

A1 

fccyl

fyk

fyd 

Compression reinforcement:

Or

Ntot

fcd  0.85 

Asc  0.0012566 m

2

e

 15

n  4

2

Tension reinforcement:

2

 22 mm

A2 

Ast  n A2

  2

2

A2  0.0003801 m

4

Ast  0.0015205 m

2

n  4

2

Tendon prestress cables:

 1 ( 5.5mm) 2 

Ap1  

Figure: 3.7.11-1

4

Ap1  0.0001416 m

2

6 ( 5mm)    4  2

np  18

Ap  np Ap1

Ap  0.0025482 m

Cross-section dimensions: h  120 cm

b  45 cm

d  h  ap

d  1.05 m

Structural system

ap  15 cm

asc  5 cm

2


As  0.0053254 m

w 

As b h

h a  p 2 

Mext  Msd   Np 

w  0.0098618

Msd  240 kN m

Np  2500 kN

Msd

As

b d d fcd



Nd = 0 kN

As b d fcd

100 MPa

Mu   b d d fcd

 b d fcd

Mext  885 m kN

 0.0568269

Mu  3542.3325 m kN

Mtot  Msd   Np   h  agi  ap

 c1



 c2



 N p  Ai

 N p  Ai

Mtot

 Ii     agi  Mtot Ii

 c1

 1.992 MPa

 c2

 9.461 MPa

Transformed cross-section area:

Ai  b h   e  Ast  Asc  Ap 

Ai  0.6198809 m

2

The center of gravity of the cross section of the concrete from the top of edge

agi 

b h 0.5 h   e Asc asc  Ast  h  ast   Ap  h  ap  Ai

agi  0.6312603 m

The moment of inertia of ideal cross-section 3 1

Ii  b h 

12

4

Figure: 3.7.12-2

 h  a    A  a  a 2  A  h  a  a 2  A  h  a  a 2 gi  sc  st  st gi p  p gi  e  sc  gi 2 

 b h 

Ii  0.0845359 m

2

Structural system

 0.36

Mu  Mext

Mtot  806.8493483 m kN

h agi

Figure: 3.7.12-1

ok

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

As  Ap  Ast  Asc

2

Department of Architecture

174


3.8 calculation of stiffness of concrete members

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

175

Example 3.8-1: Cross-section in tension Ms  0 N s  0 , we determine input data: b

Ii

rc

rc

A i agi

0.086m

From the diagrams, we determine the reinforcement to the cross-section as follows:

0.40 m

h

0.50 m

d2

ast

d

Bending moment: Ms

fckcube

150 kN m

fcdcyl.

20 MPa

he

fckcube

b

0.8 0.85

  

fcdcyl.

9.07 MPa

Axial force: Ns

fyd

Material properties: fckcube

1.15

s

275 kN

20 MPa

fctm

1.4 MPa

Ec

375 MPa

fycd

375 MPa

c

18 mm

nt

210 GPa

12 mm

nc

A st

2

A sc

n t 

n c  

c

 t

2

4

0.00153m

2

A sc

4

A 2required

2

A st

2

M sds

M sds

89.5kNm

2

0.11172

b  d  fcd

0.03277

6

h M s  Ns    d 2 2

M sds

Tension and compression reinforcement: t

s

We calculate coefficient , and . then we determine the required reinforcement to the section see B3-B3.3

27 GPa

Es

fyk

fyd

410 MPa

356.52MPa 

Area and position of reinforcement: fyd

fyk

1.5

b

A 1required

2

 b  d  fcd  10 

3

Ns  10 fyd

4

 10

A 2required

Ns  A 2provided  fyd

A 1required

fyd

0.00023m

2

13.299cm 

A 2provided

2

0.00076m

A 1provided

Fully ideal acting cross-section asc

2.8 cm

ast

agi

1 b  h  2 n  A st  h e  A sc  asc  2 b  h  n  A st  A sc

2

3 cm

he

h  ast

agi

n

Es

rt

b  h  n  A st  A sc

Ii

Ai

7.77778

r

t

i

ef

Ns

0.545

rt

- has sign of normal force

( I ) - sectional area (moment of inertia) of ideal cross-section i

c

4

0.00481m

a) First, we determine whether the expected cracking

2

0.21363m

0.0938m

f

( r ) -core segment due to tension (compression) edge is determined as follows:

N r1

f ctm

A i 1 

A i h  agi

e

- is characteristic value of the tensile strength of concrete.

ctm

A

Ii

Ms

ef

f

0.2604m

 h 2 2 2 Ii b  h    agi  agi  h   n  A st   h e  agi  A sc   agi  asc     3  Ai

n

Eb

Ns

275kN

Structural system

ef rt

Nr2

0.6 fck 

Ai 1

ef rc

A st

A sc


Nr1

72.48kN

Nr2

361.74kN

cracking is expected

a1

4   n  A st  0.5 h  ef  h e  A sc  0.5 h  ef  asc b 

ao

b

b) Determination of stiffness - unless cracking is not expected: the bending stiffness without cracks Bfla

Bfla

0.85 Ec  Ii

4

a2

2 0.5 h  ef



 n  A st  h e 0.5 h  ef  h e  A sc  asc  0.5 h  ef  asc 



a2

1.59091m

2

a1

0.05215m

ao

0.01854m

3

2

110275.24kNm

The value of x we determine according to Newton numerical methods, i.e. setting it from the r

- axial stiffness of the beam without crack igi

where

0

relationship:

1. iteration

Ii

igi

Ai

0.14997m

xri

xr1

xr

 

xri 

0.5 h

 

 2  xri3

ao  a1 xri  a2 xri

 

xr1

 2

a1  2 a2 xri  3 xri

xr1

0.1314m

xr

0.1314m

using as initial value (i=1) we can be considered x 0.5 h (i is number of iteration) and r i repeat the operation until the condition will be satisfies.

Figure: 3.8.1-1 B axa

B fla

 igi 

2

Baxa

 e f  0.5  h  a gi

6556750.69kN

further we provide stiffness of the beam with total elimination of concrete in tension

eccentricity etbal

etbal

A sc  asc  agi  asc  A st  h e h e  agi A sc  asc  A st  h e

0.2098m

etbal

0.2098m

ef

0.54545m

ef  etbal

Figure 3.8.1-2 2. iteration

if it is ef  et bal, there is a cross-sectional area of compression if it is ef  et bal, first determine the stiffness of the beam without crack

xr2

xr1 

 

 2  xr13

ao  a1 xr1  a2 xr1

 

 2

a1  2 a2 xr1  3 xr1

Structural system

xr2

0.099m

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Ns  Nr1

xr 3  a2xr 2  a1xr  ao

Department of Architecture

176


3. iteration

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

177

xr3

xr2 

Bending:

 

 2  xr23 2 a1  2 a2  xr2  3  xr2

ao  a1 xr2  a2 xr2

xr3

Bfl

0.095m

4. iteration xr4

xr3 

1 1  r   r B  B  flb   fla

2

Bfl

39125.28kNm

Bax

444573.14kN 

- Axial:

 

 

  2 a1  2 a2  xr3  3  xr3  

 2  xr43

ao  a1 xr3  a2 xr3

2

 xr3

3

xr4

Bax

0.095m

1 1  r   r B  B  axb   axa

5. iteration xr5

xr4 

ao  a1 xr4  a2 xr4

 

xr5

 2

a1  2 a2 xr4  3 xr4

0.095m

xr

xr5

xr

0.095m

Example 3.8-2: Eccentrically loaded elements of bending moments and axial force M 0 s

where P is the number of digits that in two consecutive iterations agree further determine    he   asc  P b  xr  2 n  A st    1  A sc    1  ef xr xr      

P

3

0.029m

N 0 s

input data Cross-sectional dimension: b

0.40 m

stiffness of the beam with a fully excluded concrete in tension

Bending moment

Bending stiffness:

Axial force

Eb  P xr

Bflb

Bflb

2

2

37060.57kNm

Eb = Ec

tension , N  0 compression - effects from working load s

When compression cross-sections:

Ms

130 kN m

Ns

460 kN

asc

2.8 cm

h

0.50 m

ast

3 cm

he

h  ast

- Axial stiffness: Eb  P

Baxb

Baxb

 agi  2 ef    1  xr 

Eb = Ec

411453.99kN

The resulting stiffness:

r

1 4

 Nr1

  5

 Ns

 1

r

0.0795

 0 r

Figure: 3.8.2-1

Structural system

he

0.47m


fckcube

20 MPa

fyk

fcdcyl.

0.8  0.85

 

fckcube 1.5

206 MPa

  

d2

fcdcyl.

ast

d

9.06667MPa 

Ec

d

he 27 GPa

Es

h 2

b h 

Ii

0.47m

210 GPa

3

Ai

According to diagrams we calculate the value of , then :

 agi agi  h

b  h  n  A st  A sc

  n Ast  he  agi2  Asc  agi  asc 2

Ai

Ii

4

0.00455m

2

0.2080m

 c ) core segment respectively on the tension, (compression) edges, setting it from the

r  r t

relationship:

h M s  Ns    d 2 2

from the graf we finde out  0.194

0.29

2

rt

b  d  fcd 3

2

A 2required

 b  d  fcd  10 

Ns  10

4

 10

fyk

A 2required

2

f

7.39 cm

1.15

t

c

16 mm

nt

12 mm

nc

r A st

4

A sc

2

nt   

2

t

nc   

A st

4 c

2

0.0008m

2

4

A sc

t

i

ef

ef

Ns

0.28261m

e

f

ef

6 h

 bg  Rbtn 

- has sign of normal force

Ai

Nr1

ef

277.22kN

where bg Rbtn = fctm

rt

axial force provided that decisions driven by compression in concrete

 12 m

1

-1

ef

 

l e

f



6 h

cracks

Nr2

0.6 Rbn 

Ai

6 h

ef

Nr2

436.37kN

Rbn = fck

rc

If it is Nr1  Nr2, then Nr

Nr1 ,

if Ns  Nr cracking is not expected,

The calculation of the ideal characteristics of a fully-acting sectional Distance of center of gravity of ideal cross-section of the upper extremity: 2

0.08589m

axial force provided that decisions driven by tension in concrete

1

Cracks formed

agi

rc

c

1 -1

Ii A i agi

2

not formed  3.53846 m

rc

0.0892m

( r ) -core segment due to tension (compression) edge is determined as follows:

0.00023m

First, we determine whether the expected formation of cracks, (if it is N s  0 ,

1

rt

( Ii) - sectional area (moment of inertia) of ideal cross-section

Nr1 Ms

Ii

- is characteristic value of the tensile strength of concrete.

ctm

A

Area and position of reinforcement:

A i h  agi

1 b  h  2 n  A st  h e  A sc  asc  2 b  h  n  A st  A sc

if Ns  Nr cracking is expected: b) determination of stiffness

agi

0.254m

xi

agi

- If the cracking is not expected: the bending stiffness without cracks

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

The moment of inertia about an axis through the center of gravity of ideal cross-section:

Material properties:

Department of Architecture

178


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

179

Bfl

0.85 Ec  Ii

Bfl

Further we provide stiffness of the beam to the total exclusion of the concrete strength) when

2

104455.92kNm

compression cross-section ( Ms  0Ns  0 ) in cross-section with cracks then occur compression area, the depth of this area x We r

radius of gyration igi

determined from the equation:

Ii

igi

Ai

0.147m

xr 3  a2xr 2  a1xr  ao

where

0

a2

2 0.5 h  ef

a2

0.06522m

- axial stiffness of the beam without crack

 4   n A   0.5 h  e  h   A   0.5 h  e  a   b   st f e sc f sc   

a1 B axa

Baxa

B fl

 igi  2

 e f  0.5  h  a gi

4498629.29kN

If cracking is expected: first determine the stiffness without cracks - Bending Bfla

0.85 Ec  Ii

Bfla

2

b

 n  A st  h e 0.5 h  ef  h e  A sc  asc  0.5 h  ef  asc 



0.03251m

ao

3

0.01481m

The depth x determine the value of numerical methods, ie iterated according to a relationship: r

xri

0.5 h

 

xrii

xri 

104455.92kNm

 

 2  xri3

ao  a1 xri  a2 xri

 

xrii

 2

a1  2 a2 xri  3 xri

0.198m

xr

xrii

xr

0.198m

using as initial value (I = 1) we can be considered xr i 0.5 h (i is number of iteration) and

Axial: Baxa

4

ao

2

a1

Bfla

igi2  ef  0.5 h  agi

repeat the operation until the condition will be satisfies Baxa

4498629.29kN x

r i 1

x

1

P

10

r i

where P is the number of digits to the two subsequent iterations coincide. Next, we determine

P

 he

 asc    1  A sc    1  ef  xr   xr 

b  xr  2 n  A st  

P

3

0.01845m

stiffness of the beam with a fully excluded tension in concrete Figure 3.8.2-2

- bending Bflb

Structural system

Eb  P xr 2

Bflb

2

49431.0kNm

Eb = Ec


The stiffness went out with negative sign, indicating that the sign of the axial deformation not Eb  P

Baxb

Baxb

 agi  2 ef    1  xr 

Eb = Ec

3107654.19kN

conforming the sign axial force.

The resulting stiffness r

1 4

 Nr1

  5

Ns

 1

r

0.50333

r  0

- Bending: Bfl

1

Bfl

1  r   r B   Bflb  fla 

2

67266.17kNm

- axial: B ax

Figure: 3.8.2-4

1

 r  B  axa

1  r B axb

  

Bax

20861377.5

Figure: 3.8.2-5 Figure: 3.8.2-3

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

- axial

Department of Architecture

180


Example 3.8-3: Cross section with cracks

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

181 Force in concrete reinforcement at the bottom of the cross section Ns2

If the condition of formation of cracks is fulfilled at one edge in the plan of bending of the cross-section and the opposite side is at the same time in compression, we determine for

N p

calculation the stresses values of cross section with cracks as shown in figure 3.8.3-1, where the tension zone of concrete does not work (neglected) and the stress in compression zone of the section and in reinforcement is proportional to the plane of deformation of the cross section. For a rectangular cross section of width b and d effective depth of the upper (lower)

horizontal forces and bending requirement of the upper edge of the cross section: Nd  Npd

the cross-sectional area Ap which is subject by bending moment Md, normal force from an

c

x  a s1  p  c x

ap  x x

Ncc  Ns1  Ns2  N p

Nd  Npd  N p  Ns2  Ncc  Ns1 0  Nd  Npd e Ncc  x3  Ns1 a s1  Ns2 d  N p a p

external load Nd and from the prestress Npd (Service value), shall apply according to figure:

d  x  s1  c x

Ap  p Ep

The cross section which is in the picture, we can also write the equilibrium condition of the

with concrete reinforcement cross-sectional area As1 item (AS2) and the prestress tendon with

 s2

As2  s2 Es

.

If we exclude the axial forces due to external load from equations, we get substituting the expressions: d  x  s1  x c

 s2 c

x  a s1  p  x c

ap  x x

And modified cubic equations for calculation the depth of the compression zone in the cross section: 6  e 3  2 As1  e  a s1   As2 ( e  d )  Ap  e  a p x  x  3e x  b  

6  e

b

0

As1 a s1  e  a s1   As2 d ( e  d )  Ap a p  e  a p

Area of transformed cross-section: Ai

Figure: 3.8.3-1 Values of cross-section with cracks in bending or tension and compression with high eccentricity

Distance of center of gravity of ideal cross-section of the upper edge:

For compression area shall valid: Force in compression part of cross-section

Ncc 0.5b x cm Ecm Force in concrete reinforcement on the top edge of the cross section Ns1

As1  s1 Es

Ac   e  As1  As2  Ap

a gi

Ac a c   e  As2 d  As1 a s1  Ap a p Ai

The moment of inertia of ideal cross‐section

Ii

2 2 2 2 Iby  Ac  a gi  a c    e As1  a gi  a s1   As2  a gi  d   Ap  a gi  a p 

Ac - sectional area of the concrete

Structural system


Nd  Npd

As2- sectional area of reinforcement at the lower edge of concrete section

 Nd  Npd e

Ap - sectional area of prestress tendon Iby - moment of inertia of the concrete cross section of the y axis 15, e -is the distance of resultant forces N d  N pd from the top of the cross section. To calculate the cross-sectional values with crack A a g I where instead of the entire surface of

the concrete section Ac is now using its compression part Acc (for rectangular cross-section xb ).

For searching the stress in concrete resp. in reinforcement in cross-section with cracks apply by analogy:

x Ncc   Ns1 a s1  Ns2 d  N p a p 3

Npd a N p = 0 , in equation

where  e

Acc

Ncc  Ns1  Ns2  N p

6  e  3 2 As1  e  a s1   As2 ( e  d )  Ap  e  a p x  x  3e x  b  

6  e

b

As1 a s1  e  a s1   As2 d ( e  d )  Ap a p  e  a p

fall away members of the cross-sectional area Ap,

in members without compression

reinforcement also we omitted the cross-sectional area As1.  c1

Nd  Npd  ag  1  A  a g  e A I  

 s1

Nd  Npd  a g  a s1  1  A  a g  e  e A I  

 s2

 s2

 p

 p

Nd  Npd  ag  d  1  A  a g  e  e A I  

For rectangular cross-section with a crack, subject only to bending moment from the service load Md (without prestress tendon) then the force equilibrium conditions will be Ncc  Ns1  Ns2

where using a relationship and Ncc Ns1 Ns2 N p , we obtained after

adjustments quadratic equation for calculating the depth of compression zone of concrete crosssection x: or

x

 Nd   ag  e    Nd  Npd   Npd   ag  e       e I I A  A   d ag d ag    Nd  Npd  ag  ap  1  A  a g  e  e A I  

0,

b

  

 As1  As2  1 

1

2 b e

As1 a s1  As2 d 

 As1  As2 2

 

The depth of compression part of concrete x, at the same time is the core axis of weakened cross section a g

x , So we can directly determine the moment of inertia of the weakened

cross-section:

or

Nd  ag  e   Nd  Npd   Npd   ag  e       e I I A A   ag ap ag ap  

e

I

1 3

3 2 2 b x   e As1  x  a s1   As2 ( d  x) 

Then the stress of concrete and the stress of reinforcement will be:  c1

M x I

 s1

Structural system

 e M

I

 a s1  x

2

 e M

I

( d  x)

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

For non- prestressed elements will be in relations:

As1- sectional area of reinforcement at the upper edge of concrete section

Department of Architecture

182


The cross-section of the general form, the compression zone should be divided by surface

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

183

portions, respectively. strips and the compression part of cross-section determined by the relationship,  s2 c

d  x  s1  c x

x  a s1  p  c x

ap  x x

,

Ncc Ns1 Ns2 .

and

If the condition  c  f ctm on both edges of the cross section  c1 ,  c2 are fulfilled, then it goes

that the cross-section subjected by eccentric tension with small eccentricity and the ideal cross section for calculating the stress  s1 it consists only reinforced. Figure 3.8.3-2: Values of ideal cross-section and stress distribution

on the upper edge

 c1

The stresses will vary from maximum compression at the top to maximum tension at

Nd  Npd  a gi   1  Ai etot i  Ii Ai  

the bottom. Where the stress changes from compressive to tensile, there will be one layer that remains unstressed and this is called the neutral layer or the neutral axis (NA).

on the lower edge

This is why beams with an I-section are so effective. The main part of the material is

concentrated in the flanges, away from the neutral axis. Hence, the maximum stresses occur  c2

where there is maximum material to resist them. If the material is assumed to be elastic, then

Nd  Npd   h  a gi A e  1  i tot i Ii Ai  

Nd   Npd 

the stress distribution can be represented by two triangular shapes with the line of action of the resultant force of each triangle of stress at its centroid. The couple produced by the compression and tension triangles of stress is the internal-reaction couple of the beam section.

Ntot

Characteristics of T- shaped cross section, and I inverted T cross-section loaded by

 c1

Ntot Ai

 Npd  Ai

Nd

 Ii     agi 

 etot.i 

 Npd   Ii     agi 

bending moments. Dimension an I - beam in the illustration, the following procedures can, of  etot.i

course be used to cross-sections rectangular (appoint the b 2 - shaped cross section or inverted T-shape ( b 1

b 2, h 1

 c2

Nd Ai

 Npd  Ai

Nd

 Ii     h  agi 

 etot.i 

 Npd   Ii     h  agi 

 etot.i

Figure 3.8.3-3

Structural system

0)

b 1, b 3

b 1, h 2

0,

h3

0 )T


3

Ac

area As tot static moment Ss0 . And inertia Is0 (both of the upper edge of the cross section),

 b k h k

if necessary. Distance of the center of gravity of reinforcement a gs from the top edge.

k1

Characteristics of an ideal fully-acting sectional get then the following applies

Static moment of area of the concrete section to the upper edge:

A

  h  hk  b k h k   i 2   i1   k 1

3

Sc0

Sectional area:

k1

a gc

Ic0

k1

I

Where as k = 1 substitutes

Ecm 1 

Sc0  n Ss0 A

Ic0  n Is0  A  a g

2

The rectangular cross section with dimensions b,h is Ac

b h , Sc0

b h 2

2

, Ic0

b h

3

3

The depth of the compression zone xr, and moment of inertia to the neutral axis Ixr cross-

k 1

Ec eff

Moment of inertia of the cross-section to the centre of gravity of cross section:

2 k 1  2   b k h k  h k   h i   h k     2     12  i1   

Es Ec eff

Distance from the centre of gravity of the compression edge of the cross-section:

The moment of inertia to the upper edge

3

n

Ac  n As tot

hi

section is completely excluding concrete in tension. If we mark

0

i1

Acx as a surface of

compression concrete, Scx is static moment of this area to the compression edge, then the These relationships also apply in cross-sections consisting of multiple rectangles (and

summation must be extended to their count). In the following we will limit on I cross-section composed of 3 rectangles.

conditions which shall be counted the depth of compression area xr, will be of the form: Axc xr  Scx  n  As tot xr  Ss0 

0

These relationships will use in calculating the replacement thickness by the relationship h0

Ac up

.. half perimeter

up exposed to the environment can be determined from the

section, however, Acx

relationship

up

k h 1 

In the general case, we need to solve this equation numerically. When a rectangular cross

b1 2

 k h 2 h 1  k h 3 

where coefficients k h k, k

b1  b2 2

 k h 4 h 2  k h 5 

1 ............7 are

not or is exposed to the environment.

b3  b2 2

 k h 6 h 3  k h 7 

b xr, Scx

b  xr 2

2

, leading to quadratic equations with solution:

b3 2

equal 0 or 1 depending on whether given sides is

xr

k s  1 

1  2

Structural system

a gs 

ks 

where k s

n

As tot b1

, a gs

Ss0 As tot

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Reinforcement layers may be more in the cross section. In the calculation applies total

Area of the concrete section is then:

Department of Architecture

184


To calculate the moment of inertia about the neutral axis of the cross-section with excluding

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

185

the tension zone in concrete is valid a general relationship Ixr

Icx  Scx xr  n  Is0  Ss0 xr

where Icx

b 1  h 1  b 2  h 2  2b 1 h 1 h 2  2n As tot  a gs  h 1  h 2 passes through the flange 2

b  xr

3

3

, for rectangular cross-

section

2

2

1

Ec eff Ixr

There, the neutral axis passes through the wall. Conditions the first and the second in the order

b h

n

If it is satisfied b 1  h 1  2n As tot  a gs  h 1 , but the conditions 2

The characteristics of the ideal full acting cross section ( A a g I ) area, the distance of the centre of gravity from the top edge, the moment of inertia about the centre of gravity

A

2

b 1  h 1  b 2  h 2  2b 1 h 1 h 2  2n As tot  a gs  h 1  h 2

Flexibility sectional weakened due to cracks will then be: CII

If is valid:

b h  n As tot

Es Ec eff

2

ag Ec eff

2

 n Ss0 A

Ecm 1 

I

b h 3

3

 n IS0  A  a g

2

as listed. If condition b 1  h 1  2n As tot  a gs  h 1 do not pay, we determine the coefficients k s1 k s2 from the equations: 2

k s1

 creep coefficient

n

As tot

k s2

b1

2 k s1 a gs

a gs

Ss0 As tot

If condition b 1  h 1  2 n As tot  a gs  h 1 is valid, but do not valid condition 2

Full flexibility sectional acting CI will be: CI

1

b 1  h 1  b 2  h 2  2 b 1 h 1 h 2  2 n As tot  a gs  h 1  h 2 then: 2

Ec eff I

Moment of the cracking Mcr is then:

k s1

I  h  a g f ctm is the mean value of the concrete tensile strength Mcr

2

 b 1  b 2 h 1  n As tot b2

f ctm 

k s2

 b 1  b 2  h 1 2  2n Ss0

Where there are two conditions simultaneously, then:

When calculating the characteristics of the cross section with the complete exclusion of

the tension in concrete we must first determine who frequently cross the neutral axis. This can be done according to the following two conditions. If is valid:

k s1

k s2

b 1  h 1  2 n As tot  a gs  h 1 2

 b 1  b 2 h 1   b 3  b 2  h 1  h 2  n As tot b3

 b 1  b 2  h 1 2   b 3  b 2  h 1  h 2 2  2n Ss0

neutral axis is below the top flange. If the condition does not apply the neutral axis passes through the upper flange or right on the edge between the top flange and the wall.

Structural system

b3

b2


- Bending moment Ms the entire service load (considered as a positive value). The calculation of the ideal characteristics of a fully cross-section of the applied bending

xr

k s1 

 k s1 2  k s2

Hcx

b 1 

 xr

3

moment at cracking.

6

The largest of ordinate zbk we mark h, i.e h

maxzbk. sectional area ideal Ai, static moment

t Si0 to the upper edge and the moment of inertia Ii0 the upper edge of the cross section If the neutral axis passes through the upper flange Hcx

b 2 

 xr 3  6

 b 1  b 2  h 1 2 

h1 3

calculated from:

xr  2

 

Ai

If the neutral axis passes through a wall Hcx

b 3 

 xr 3 6

x  h 1 xr  2  h 1  h 2    r     b 3  b 2  h 1  h 2  3 2 3     2

  b 1  b 2  h 1  2

If the neutral axis passes through the lower flange Ixr CII

Icx  Scx xr  n  Is0  Ss0 xr

Icx  Scx xr

Si0

Hcx Ii0

1

Ec eff Ixr

plane load. In the calculation of the initial bending stiffness of the cross-section of a of the multiple layers (see figure) to be introduced the following input data - Dimensions of the cross-section: the cross sections limited by line segments can be introduced

2

n

1 6

Es

k1

Es

k1

b ( k 1) zbk  b k z( bk 1)  zbk 1  zbk   Ec

Modulus of elasticity of steel Es (Populated with the Es The standard tensile strength of concrete f ctm..

210000MPa )

 Asjzsj

1  n  b ( k 1) zbk  b k z( bk 1)  zbk 1 2  z( bk 1) zbk   zbk 2     12 k  1    n E  s  Asj  zsj 2  Ec j1 



    

moment of inertia Ii to the ideal center of gravity of the cross section according to formulas

xi Ii

- Material properties: modulus of elasticity of concrete Ec ,

Based on these cross-section values can be calculated height of compression area xi and

procedure for the award of the coordinates shown by the arrows in figure 3.8.3-4 - Position of a surface of the reinforcement layer ( Asj, Zsj ), j = 1,..m,

m

j1

by the cross-section dimensions of the coordinates of the polygon vertices of the contour ( zb, zbk), K = 1, n ., wherein for a = 0, is given b 0 = 0, zb0 = 0, and for k = n must b n = 0, the

Asj

j1

n

m

b ( k 1) zbk  b k z( bk 1)   Ec

The calculation of the initial bending stiffness of the cross-section of a symmetrical by symmetrical loading of the plane with reinforcement, which may be distributed along the height

1

Si0 Ai Ii0  Ai  xi

2

Moment at cracking is then Mr

fctm 

Ii h  xi

Structural system

If

Ms  Mr

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

The height of compression zone is then:

Department of Architecture

186


Calculation of stiffness, where the cracking is not expected

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

187

If the condition Ms  Mr, The initial flexural stiffness Br is calculated from equation: Br

0.85Ec Ii

Calculation of stiffness, where the cracking expected If the condition Ms  Mr, it is expected that the formation of cracks perpendicular to the axis of the element. In this case, the first identifying the characteristics of the cross section

Figure 3.8.3-4

(depth of compression area xr,. The ideal compression area of the cross section Ac, And the arm of internal forces zr, Provided that the tension concrete does not act drawn. We determine the depth of the compression zone according to numerical solution of equation Where F  xr

F  xr

0

Abc xr  2

Es Ec

m

0

Abc xr  2

Es Ec

m

Asj  zsj  xr

j1 The new value xr i is given by:

Asj  zsj  xr

xr i

j1

In the formula, Abc is a significant compression areas of concrete. When numerical solution of the equation F  xr

F  xr

can be use this procedure by (regula falsi method): In

calculating the surface of the compression area of the cross section Abc at a given xr is first

r x d F  xr h  xr h F  xr d F  xr h  F  r x d

The index i in the formula is a number of iterations, e.g. at the start of the calculation will be i = 1 The value xr i calculated is then calculated the value F  xr i . if then F  xr i

of all determined the coordinates of vertices of the polygon that creates the compression area (see figure). Assume that the coordinates of which are ( b l zbl), l

1 .........n ),where

the b l

xr.

0 is

zbl

and for placed l

n l become b nl

0, zbnl

l

l

0 , and

We substitute to another calculation xr d

Surface of the compression area for a given xr will be: Abc

1 2

nl

 b l 1 zbl  b l zbl 1

xr i , F  xr d

F  xr i (Values xr h, F  xr h

F  xr i

F  xr h

 0 does not comply, the

next calculation shall be substitutes

l1

0.4h , xr h

 0

Are left out previous operating process). If the condition

In numerical solutions are chosen at the beginning of the two values xr that indicate xr d and xr h ( xr d

F  xr h

xr h xr i: F  xr h F  xr i and values xr d, F  xr d leaving unchanged. With the new values thus determined xr d, F  xr d, xr h, F  xr h given by

0.6h ,). For both of these values can be determined from the formula

Abc area Abc d, Abc h and then the function F  xr d, F  xr h from equation.

xr i

r x d F  xr h  xr h F  xr d

Structural system

F  xr h  F  r x d

new value xr i 1 .


Furthermore, we determine the values

subsequent iteration process in value xr i repeat. If then xr i 1

p

 1  10 p

xr i

Abc  zs max  a bc   2

calculated and static moment of compression part of the cross section to the upper

Br

(compression) edge of the cross section of the formula.

6

j1

   zsj  Asj   1  zs max  zsj x   r  

Bending stiffness Br in the case that the expected formation of cracks, is then given by:

1

Ec

n

Iteration is considered as completed and hence are also known values xr, Abc . This can be

Sbc

Es

Ec zs max p

 zs max   2   1  s   b  xr  

Calculating the coefficients  br,  sr ,  b,  s to work around so that the calculated value from

 b l 1 zbl  b l zbl 1  zbl 1  zbl

the relationship p and substituting in  b

l 1

and therefore the distance of the center of gravity of the compression area from the compression

s

1 in

relation to the calculation Br bending

stiffness Brc , i. j.

edge. Sbc

a bc

and therefore the distance zs max of the center of gravity of the compression area of concrete from compression edge, coefficients  br,  sr can then be determined from formulas.

xi

 br

1.7Ii

Es

 

Ec

Abc  zs max  a bc   2 

n

j1

   zsj  Asj   1  zs max  zsj   xr   

2

From the formula for calculation  r we calculate the parameter level load  r and the resulting bending stiffness in the interval 0   r  1 will then ( Br

Calculation of deflection

n xi  zs max  Es    zsj    Abc  zs max  a bc   2   Asj   1  zs max  zsj zs max  Ec 1.7Ii   xr   1 j1   xr 1

 sr

Ec p xr

Brc

Abc

f

5 48

Ms Br

2

L

Furthermore, the calculated parameter  r from the formula: r

1 4

 Mr   1  Ms 

 5 

and coefficients  b,  s from the formula b

1

  r  1   br

s

1

  r  1   sr 

Structural system

1

 r  1  r   Brc  Bra 

)

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

We choose an accuracy further process by calculating the number of digits to be in two

Department of Architecture

188


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

189 Example 3.8-4: Calculation of initial bending and axial stiffness of the cross-section symmetrical about a plane load subjected to bending moments and axial force input data

compression cross-section

Ns  5100 kN

2

Material characteristics: fcyl  22 MPa

fctm  3.15 MPa

Ec  32.5 0.9 GPa

Es  210 GPa

b 3  0.25 m

b 6  0.9 m zb  0 m

b 2  0.8 m b 7  0.0 m zb  0.30 m

zb  1.60 m

zb  1.60 m

h  zb

1 6

2

7

3 4

Cross-sectional dimension: k  1  7 b 1  0.8 m

j  1  8 1

Bending moment with axial force Ms  3900 kN m

Area and location of reinforcement:

zb  0.45 m 3

7

h  1.6 m

b 4  0.25 m zb  1.15 m 4

b 5  0.9 m

5

 28 mm  25 mm  16 mm  16 mm  20 mm

n1  4 n2  2 n3  2 n4  2 n5  2

As  n1  

2 1

4

1

As  n2   2 4 As  n3   3 4

As  n5  

4 4

 20 mm

n6  2

As6  n6  

7

 28 mm

n7  4

As  n7  

zb  1.30 m 5

8

 28 mm

asc  5.0 cm

n8  4

7

As  n8   8

ast  5.0 cm

 0   0.24     0.285  2 b ( k 1) zbk  b k zb( k 1)   0.175  m  0.71     0.27   1.44 

Figure: 3.8.4-1

Structural system

6

2

zs  0.30 m

As  0.0004 m

2

As  0.0004 m

2

2

zs  0.45 m 3

zs  0.80 m 4

As  0.00063 m

2

zs  1.15 m

5

2

4

2 7

4

As6  0.00063 m

As  0.00246 m

5

2

zs  1.25 m 6

2

zs  1.35 m

7

2 8

4

As  0.00098 m

4

2 5

6

1

3

2 4

5

zs  0.05 m

2

2 3

4

2

1

2 2

As  n4  

As  0.00246 m

As  0.00246 m

7

2

zs  1.55 m

8

d  h  ast

 zbk 

1

 zb

8

d  1.55 m

k

 0   0.3     0.75    1.6  m  2.45     2.9   3.2 


 0.00246   0.00098   0.0004   0.0004  2 As   m j  0.00063   0   0.00246     0.00246 

0

 0.00012   0.00029   0.00018   0.00032  3 m As j  zs j     0.00072   0   0.00333     0.00382 

 0.00001   0.00009   0.00008    As  zs 2   0.00026  m4  j j   0.00083   0   0.00449     0.00592 

 

 

b ( k 1) zbk  b k zb( k 1) 

1 Ai   2

1.7 m

8

2

7

k1

Es

b ( k 1) zbk  b k zb( k 1)   Ec

As  0.0098 m

j1

8

As

j1

j

Ai  0.92038 m

j

Si  0

4

Si

0

xi  0.83221 m Ai Moment at cracking: xi 

Mcr  fctm 

Ii

h  xi Bending stiffness:

agi  xi

1

3

ef

1  6

k1

 

Es

b ( k 1) zbk  b k  zbk 1   zbk 1  zbk   Ec 3

8

 A

s

j1

j

zs

j

Ii  Ii  Ai  xi 0

2

Ii  0.28543 m

2

Br  7096429.91035 m kN

Ms

ef  0.76471 m

Ns

 2.15157

 1.30769 m

l 6   cracks h ef

 bg



10.5 ef  h

n 

6 ef  h

Es Ec

n  7.17949 1

ef  0.76471 m

6

h

 3.75 m

1

1

ef

6

h

rt, rc core segment corresponding to tension (compression) edge, setting it from the relationship: rt  rc 

4

Mcr  1171.016 m kN

First, we determine whether the expected formation of cracks, (as Ns  0,

ef 

4.21725 m

 

 

cracks are formed 7

Si  0.76595 m 0

 

b ( k 1) zbk  b k  zbk 1   zbk 1  zbk 

0

 bg

7

k1

2

are formed

2

Static moment:

Ii  0.92286 m

  2 2 b ( k 1) zb  b k zb  zb  zb zb  zb    k k 1 k  ( k 1)  ( k 1) k      As  zs 2  j j   

Br  0.85 Ec Ii

7

k1

Area ideal cross-section:

1  7   12 k  1   8  Es   Ec j1 

Ii  

Ii

Ai  h  agi Ii Ai agi

Structural system

rt  0.40391 m rc  0.37264 m

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

 

2 zb  zb zb  zb ( k 1) k k  ( k 1)

The moment of inertia of the upper edge of the cross section:

 0   0.09     0.4275  2 2  2.0425  m    4.5075     6.33   7.68 

Department of Architecture

190


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

191 axial:

fctm (fcyl) - Is the tensile strength of concrete (compression) Ai, (Ii) - sectional area (moment of inertia) of ideal cross-section

Baxa 

rt, (rc)- core segment due to tension (compression) edge is determined as follows.

Nr1  fctm 

1

rt axial force, provided that the decisions concrete compression zone Ai

Nr2  0.6 fcyl 

1

Nr2  3980.54417 kN

ef

xrd  0.1 h

xrh  0.6 h

0.1 h  0.16 m

0.6 h  0.96 m

xrd  0.16 m b 3  0

xrh  0.96 m

b 1  0.8 m

b 2  0.8 m

zb  0 m

zb  xrd 2

zb  xrd 3

Abcrd 

rc

If Nr1  Nr2, Then Nr

Sbcrd 

Nr1 ,

If Ns  Nr cracking is not expected,

abcrd 

If Ns  Nr cracking is expected:

Abcrh 

Ii

Bfl

 igi 

2

 ef  0.5 h  agi

Sbcrh 

Baxa  21199298.17231 kN abcrh 

If the cracking is expected: first we determine the stiffness without any cracks - Bending: Bfla  0.85 Ec Ii

  bl  z

1 b

l1

 b l zb

l

  bl  z

1 b

l1 Sbcrd

l

Abcrd  0.128 m

l 1

3

 b l zb

  zbl 

l 1

1



 zb  l

2

Sbcrd  0.01024 m

3

abcrd  0.08 m

Abcrd

b 2  0.8 m zb  0.3 m

1

igi  0.55688 m Ai axial stiffness of the beam without crack Baxa 

1  6

3

b 1  0.8 m zb  0 m

2

Bfl  7096429.91035 m kN

Radius of gyration igi 

1  2

1

Calculation Abcrh, Abcrh

Determination of stiffness Bfl  0.85 Ec Ii

Baxa  21199298.17231 kN

 ef  0.5 h  agi

Let's do it using the method regula falsi

Nr1  3245.63928 kN

ef

 igi 

further we provide stiffness of the beam with a full exclusion of concrete strength

axial force provided that decisions tension zone in concrete Ai

Bfla 2

2

1  2 1  6

2

Structural system

3

5

  bl  z

1 b

l1

 b l zb

l

  bl  z

l1 Sbcrh

Abcrh

1 b

l

 b l zb

  zbl 

l 1

b 4  0.25 m zb  xrh 4

b 5  0.0 m zb  xrh 5

Abcrh  0.44625 m

l 1

5

agi  ef  0.0675 m

Bfla  7096429.91035 m kN

b 3  0.25 m zb  0.45 m

1



 zb  l

Sbcrh  0.15439 m abcrh  0.34597 m

2

3


8

   a

gi

 e f  zs

j  1 8

j1

j

As zs  agi  ef  zs j j j

  A s j 

  0.00812 m

As j zs j  agi  ef  zs j   0.01108 m

Fxrd  Abcrd xrd  agi  ef  abcrd   2  Fxrd  0.14014 m

Ec

4

Fxrh  Abcrh xrh  agi  ef  abcrh   2  Fxrh  0.07222 m xr1 

Es

4

xrd Fxrh  xrh Fxrd

Es Ec

j1

j1



As j  zs j  xrd  agi  ef  zs j 



xr2 

b 5  0.0 m

zb  0 m

zb  0.3 m

zb  0.45 m

zb  xr1

zb  xr1

4

Area of compression zone: 1 b

l1

l

 b l zb

  zbl 

l 1

1



 zb  l

Sbc  0.09835 m

Sbc

 b l zb

l 1

3

abc  0.26001 m

Abc

Es Ec

4

 F xr1    F xrh

  0.3977

0

8

j1



As j  zs j  xr1  agi  ef  zs j 

  to the next calculation should be substitute 

5

xrd  0.68794 m

xrd Fxrh  xrh Fxrd

Fxrd  Fxr1

xr2  0.76535 m

Fxrh  Fxrd

Calculation Abc, Abc b 1  0.8 m

b 2  0.8 m

b 3  0.25 m

b 4  0.25 m

b 5  0.0 m

zb  0 m

zb  0.3 m

zb  0.45 m

zb  xr2

zb  xr2

1

2

3

4

Surface compression area:

5

  bl  z

l

xrd  xr1

b 4  0.25 m

1  2

l1

b 3  0.25 m

Abc 

1 b

As j  zs j  xrh  agi  ef  zs j 

b 2  0.8 m

3

  bl  z

Fxr1  0.02872 m

F xrh

b 1  0.8 m

2

5

compression concrete edge

F xr1

Calculation Abc, Abc

1

1  6

Distance of the center of gravity of the compression zone of concrete from

abc 

xr1  0.68794 m

Fxrh  Fxrd

Sbc 

Fxr1  Abc xr1 agi  ef  abc   2 

8

Static moment of compression zone of cross-section on the upper (compression) edge.

3

4

8

 0   0.00007   0.00007   0.00024  4  m  0.00078   0   0.00426     0.00566 

Abc  0.37823 m

2

Abc 

1  2

5

  bl  z

1 b

l1

Structural system

l

 b l zb

l 1

Abc  0.39759 m

2

5

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

 0.00004   0.00023   0.00015   0.00029  3 agi  ef  zs As   m j j  0.00068   0   0.00316     0.00365 

Department of Architecture

192


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

193 Static moment of compression zone of cross-section on the upper (compression) edge crosssection Sbc 

1  6

5

  bl  z

1 b

l1

l

 b l zb

 zb l   l



 zb  1 l

1

Sbc  0.11241 m

3

Distance of the center of gravity compression surface of concrete from compression concrete edge abc 

Sbc

abc  0.28605 m

Abc

Distance of the center of gravity compression surface of concrete from compression concrete edge abc 

Sbc

Fxr3  0.00187 m

abc  0.28272 m

Abc

Fxr2  Abc xr2 agi  ef  abc   2 

Fxr2  0.00429 m xrd  xr2 xr3 

Es Ec

xr4 

8

j1



Fxrd  Fxr2

xrd Fxrh  xrh Fxrd

Fxrd  0.00429 m

4

b 1  0.8 m

b 2  0.8 m

b 3  0.25 m

b 4  0.25 m

b 5  0.0 m

zb  0 m

zb  0.3 m

zb  0.45 m

zb  xr3

zb  xr3

4

5

Surface compression area Abc 

1  2

  bl  z

1 b

l1

 b l zb

l

Abc  0.40032 m

l 1

1  6

1 b

l1

Fxrd  Fxr3 Fxrd  0.00187 m

4

xr4  0.7809 m

b 3  0.25 m

b 4  0.25 m

b 5  0.0 m

zb  0 m

zb  0.3 m

zb  0.45 m

zb  xr4 4

zb  xr4 5

1

2

3

1  2

5

  bl  z

1 b

l1

 b l zb

l

Abc  0.40147 m

l 1

2

Static moment of compression zone of cross-section on the upper (compression) edge crosssection 1  6

5

  bl  z

1 b

l1

l

 b l zb

  zbl 

l 1

1



 zb  l

Sbc  0.11541 m

3

Distance of the center of gravity compression surface of concrete from compression concrete edge

5

  bl  z

xrd  0.77627 m

Fxrh  Fxrd

2

Static moment of compression zone of cross-section on the upper (compression) edge crosssection Sbc 



b 2  0.80 m

Sbc 

5

As j  zs j  xr2  agi  ef  zs j 

Surface compression area

Calculation Abc, Abc

3

j1

b 1  0.80 m

Abc 

2

xrd  xr3

8

Calculation Abc, Abc

xr3  0.77627 m

Fxrh  Fxrd

4

Ec

xrd Fxrh  xrh Fxrd

As j  zs j  xr2  agi  ef  zs j 

4

xrd  0.76535 m

1

Es

Fxr3  Abc xr3 agi  ef  abc   2 

l

 b l zb

 zb l   l 1



 zb  1 l

Sbc  0.11451 m

3

abc 

Sbc

abc  0.28747 m

Abc

Fxr4  Abc xr4 agi  ef  abc   2 

Fxr4  0.00082 m

Structural system

4

xrd  xr4

Es Ec

8

j1



As j  zs j  xr2  agi  ef  zs j 

xrd  0.7809 m

Fxrd  Fxr4

Fxrd  0.00082 m

4


The resulting stiffness

xr5  0.78291 m

Fxrh  Fxrd

r



1 4

Calculation Abc, Abc b 1  0.8 m

b 2  0.8 m

b 3  0.25 m

b 4  0.25 m

b 5  0.0 m

zb  0 m

zb  0.3 m

zb  0.45 m

zb  xr5 4

zb  xr5 5

1

Abc 

Sbc 

abc 

1  2 1  6

2

3

5

  bl  z

1 b

l1

 b l zb

l

  bl  z

1 b

l1

l

 b l zb

  zbl 

l 1

1



 zb  l

Sbc  0.11581 m

Sbc

Fxr5  0.00036 m xrd  xr5

 sr

3

 sr

Ec

4

8

j1



xrd Fxrh  xrh Fxrd

Fxrd  0.00036 m

 1   r  1   br 

4

Bax 

8

j1

xr  0.78379 m

  zs j  As   1    j  xr 

0.00141 m

zsmax  h  ast 2

Abc  0.40198 m

   zs Es 8  As  j  1  ef P  Abc  2   Ec   j  xr  j1  

 br

 0.74474

 0.19219

The calculation is repeated until you achieve the desired accuracy.

xr  xr6

 zs  ef   Es 8  As  j  1   Abc  2   rc   Ec  j  xr  j1  

 0

s

 1   r  1   sr 

Ec zsmaxP

2

 zsmax   2   1   s   b x  r  

Bfl  4701985.94096 m kN

Axial stiffness:

xr6  0.78379 m

Fxrh  Fxrd

r

8    zs j    A  2  Es  As   1   bc  Ec  j  xr    ef  zsmax  agi   1 j1   1    2 1.7 Ai zsmax  i gi   1  xr  

Bfl 

Fxrd  Fxr5

1.7 Ai

 1 

 0.5455

Bending stiffness:

As j  zs j  xr2  agi  ef  zs j 

xrd  0.78291 m

1

r

and coefficients b

Es



 Ns

 1

2

abc  0.28809 m

Abc

Fxr5  Abc xr5 agi  ef  abc   2 

xr6 

Abc  0.40198 m

l 1

5

 br

 Nr1

 5 

zsmax  1.55 m

Bax  53163385.822 kN

agi    zsmax   agi   2 ef   1     s   1    b zsmax    xr   zsmax  

Stiffness Bfl and Bax also can be calculated without calculating the coefficients s, b Bending stiffness

2

P  0.29196 m

Ec P

3

Bflb 

Ec P xr 2

Structural system

2

Bflb  3346675.19031 m kN

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

xrd Fxrh  xrh Fxrd

xr5 

Department of Architecture

194


Axial stiffness

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

195

Baxb 

From the concrete section active part with a height hsh. Which is determined as follows: Ec P

in the section in which we do not expect cracking hsh = h. where h is a whole section height

Baxb  90381434.25457 kN

 agi  2 ef   1  xr 

- In the section in which we expect cracking introduced into the calculation of the smaller of hsh = 2xr, hsh = 0.6h.

Calculation of bending and axial stiffness when cracking expected hsh  2 xr

Bending stiffness 2

Bfl  0.85 Ec Ii

Bfl  7096429.91035 m kN

Axial stiffness Bax  0.85 Ec 

Ii igi  ef  0.5 h  agi 2

Bax  21199298.17231 kN

The resulting stiffness will then

Bf´ 

Bax´ 

1

2

 r   1  r      Bfla   Bflb  1

 r   1  r      Baxa   Baxb 

Bf´  4701985.94096 m kN

Bax´  48301511.12233 kN

hsh  1.56758 m

 0.015 t1 0.15  0.8 e

t1  14

 0.07 t1

 t1

 1  e

 t2

 1  e

 0.07 t2

 t1

 0.23042

 t2

 0.60904

 5.5

dry environment

 bf2

 3.8

normal environment



 bf1   bf2

2

  t2   t1

hsh  0.93 m

t2  180

 bf1

hsh  0.6 d

  t2   t1

 0.37862

 1.76056

Modulus of elasticity of concrete is introduced value Where Ebo it is a basic module of elasticity of concrete Eco  Ec

Ect 

Eco

Ect  14860478.73568 m

1  0.55 

2

kN

So that we can identify Ns,sh. We need to determine: - Acting on concrete section of height hsh: Cross-sectional dimension:

k  1  5 b 1  0.8 m

b 2  0.8 m

b 3  0.25 m

b 4  0.25 m

b 5  0.0 m

zb  0 m

zb  0.3 m

zb  0.45 m

zb  0.6 d

zb  0.6 d

1

Figure: 3.8.4-2

Structural system

2

3

4

5


 

2 zb  zb zb  zb ( k 1) k k  ( k 1)

 zbk 

1

 zb

k

 0     0.3    0.75  m  1.38     1.86 

ab,sh sectional center of gravity distance from the top edge.

absh 

absh  0.33573 m

Absh

Ib,sh sectional moment of inertia of the center of gravity axis

 0.00246   0.00098   0.0004   0.0004  2 As   m j  0.00063   0   0.00246     0.00246 

 0    0.09   2 2  0.4275  m    1.4859     2.5947 

Sbsh

Department of Architecture

 0     0.24  2 b ( k 1) zbk  b k zb( k 1)   0.285  m  0.12     0.2325 

1 Ibsho   

 2 2 b ( k 1) zb  b k zb  zb  zb zb  zb   ( k 1)  ( k 1) k k k 1 k   

5

 12  k1

Ibsho  0.07708 m

 

Ibsh  Ibsho  Absh  absh 

4

2

Ibsh  0.02763 m

4

the cross-section consisting only of reinforcement:

 0.00012   0.00029   0.00018   0.00032  3 m As j  zs j     0.00072   0   0.00333     0.00382 

 0.00001   0.00009   0.00008    As  zs 2   0.00026  m4  j j   0.00083   0   0.00449     0.00592 

 

Total area of reinforcement in cross-section 8

Assh 

 

As

j1

Assh  0.0098 m

j

8

Sssh 

 A

s

j1

j

zs

j

2

Sssh  0.00879 m

3

The distance in the overall reinforcement from the top of the cross section Ab,sh cross-sectional area without reinforcement 5

1 Absh   2 k1

b ( k 1) zbk  b k zb( k 1)

Absh  0.43875 m

assh 

2

Or

Sssh

assh  0.89619 m

Assh

Issh moment of inertia of the reinforcement to the center of gravity axis Static moment:

8

  1   b ( k 1) zb  b k  zb  zb  zb     k k 1   k 1 k 6   k  1  5

Sbsh

 

Sbsh  0.1473 m

3

Issh 

j  1

C1 

 

A s  zs 2  j   j

8

j  1

asc  assh Es  asc  absh   Issh Ect Ibsh

Structural system

A s a ssh j

2

Issh  0.0038 m

C1  368.98722 m

3

4

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

196


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

197

C2 

d1 

d2 

d  assh Es  d  absh   Issh Ect Ibsh

1

Assh 1

Assh

Es Ect Absh Es Ect Absh

C2  793.19651 m

assh  asc  assh  Issh assh  d  assh  Issh

Es absh  asc  absh  Ect Ibsh

Es absh  d  absh 

Ect Ibsh

 sh1

3

 0.00013

 sh2

 0.00019

force or load Ns,sh and the eccentricity from the top edge calculated from: d1  382.99836 m

2  sh1 C2

Nssh  d2  228.59165 m

  sh2 C1

C2d1  C1d2

Nssh  162.50055 kN

Es

2

esh 

 sh2 d1

  sh1 d2

 sh1 C2

  sh2 C1

esh  0.59334 m

Suppose that the shrinkage of the two surfaces is not equal, there is a difference bs (differential shrinkage). The concrete part a section of height hsh subjected by force Nb,sh. Equally great force, but opposite in sign, loaded reinforcement is placed across, then Ns,sh = - Nb,sh.

Curvature of shrinkage: 1

 sh

rsh  sh



The cross-section is exposed on the upper surface of the permeability of the current environment, the lower the surface to a dry environment. If not used for the production of concrete with increased content of mixing water will be the values of free shrinkage at the top surface bsfh = -0.33 10-3. At the bottom surface bsfd = -0.5 10-3. t1  14

Shrinkage - proportional measuring length deformation caused by shrinkage of concrete, is given by:  bsh

 0.00012

 bsd

  bsfd   t2   t1

 bsd

 0.00019



The reduced curvature of shrinkage:

The calculation will introduce bsh = -0.00012   bsh

 bs

 sh1

 bs

   bsd   bsh

  bs   bs 

asc h

 0.00012

 bs

 sh2

 0.00006

  bs   bs 

 sh

 0.00006 m

Nssh  1 esh  assh     agc  assh  Es  Assh Issh 

 shredukovane

 bs

 esh  assh 

1

agc  0.5 h  gsh

  bsfh   t2   t1

Es Issh

And axial deformation (shortening)

t2  180

 bsh

Nssh

d h

Structural system

d

  .bs ( t1)   .bs ( t2) 

 gsh

 0.00008


moment: Reinforced concrete beam:

The consistency of concrete mix: S2

Department of Architecture

Example 3.8-5: Calculation of curvature of rectangular cross section subjected by bending

Relative humidity of: rh

50 100

Input data: b

0.3 m

h

0.5 m

asc

0.038 m

ast

Age of concrete at the beginning of the load:

asc

t0

60 days

Bending moment from service load: Ms

145 kN m

M sd

M s  1.25

M sd

181.25kNm

Environmental influence is exposed to only the bottom surface ms

Span:

1

d

7.0 m

d

h  ast

kh = (0,0,1)

0.462m

Concrete C25/30: Ecm

30500 MPa

fctm

2.6 MPa

Figure: 3.8.5-2

The characteristic yield strength of reinforcement fyk

The duration of humid treatment of fresh concrete:

410 MPa

ttr

Modulus of elasticity of reinforcement: Es

10 days

We propose reinforcing the cross-section of the following:

200000MPa 

b

1.5

fck

30 MPa

s fyk

Figure: 3.8.5-1

fck 

b

fcdcyl.

0.8 0.85

fyd

356.52MPa 

 

fcdcyl.

13.6 MPa

1.15 410 MPa

fyd

fyk s

b  d  fcdcyl.

0.066

A required

 b  d  fcdcyl.  100

Structural system

A required

M sd 2

2

12.44074cm

0.20813

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

198


Reinforcement:

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

199 Bending element is acceptable in terms of serviceability limit state if the condition is satisfied

14 mm

 sc

n sc

14 mm

 st1

n st1

20 mm

 st2 A st

2

A sc

0

n st2

n sc   

A st1

5

Assessment by defining bending slenderness:

A st

2

A sc

4  st1

n st1   

A st2

A st1  A st2

 sc

2

A st1

4

2

2

A st2

4

2

0.00157m

( 1825)

tab 1

18

 tab1

0.00157m

A st b d

 tab2

25

2

A provided

A st

kh1

0

h0

Provided area of reinforcement of cross-section (should assumed that A s prov  A s req ) A provided

b h

ht

Area of reinforcement required to carry over ultimate moment: 12.44 cm

Ac

Ac

2

0.15m

kh2

0

kh3

kh1  kh3 b2  kh2 h

up

1

up

0.15m

Table values replacement cross-sectional thickness:

Ast is area of tension reinforcement, b is the width of cross-section

A required

Calculation of deflection:

Perimeter of the concrete section that is exposed to the environment:

1.13333

 100

15.15

The entire area of the concrete section:

Percentage of reinforcement: 

d

Calculation of creep coefficient

2

Type of construction: 

beam is fits in terms of serviceability limit state. It is not necessary to calculate the

The ratio of span to effective depth of cross-section.

0m

l

 st2

n st2   

l  d d deflection.

2

0.00031m

2

0.00157m

( 0.050.150.60.050.150.6)  m

Ac

h0

up

1m

potom

h 0  0.6

h0

0.6 m

0.05  h 0  0.6

Tabulated values of the age of the concrete at the beginning of a long-term load operation: t0

60

t0

60

t

(days)

( 1 7 2890365)

t

ht

( 0.050.150.60.050.150.6)  m

Determining coefficients:  c1

1

 c2

7 8

 c3

410 MPa

 c3

A required    fyk  A  provided  

d

Defining bending slenderness:

d

 c1  c2  c3  tab1  (   0.5)   tab2  (   1.5)  

1.2627

d

t

22.72 dt

t

t i

t0  tt i1 tt i  tt i1 t0  28 ( 90  28)

Structural system

90

t

d

h

dt

t i  1

h 0  h t j 1 h t j  h t j 1 0.51613

28

0.05  h 0  0.6

dh

h0  0.15 m ( 0.6  0.15)  m

h0

dh

0.6m

1


The characteristics of the ideal full acting cross section (A, ag, I) area, distance from the center of gravity the upper edge, the center of gravity of the moment of inertia

c  

h0

0.6m

cs

 1  d t  d h  d t d h   t i1 j 1  d t d h   t ij 1 1  d h d t   t ij d t d h

t i  1 j  1

t0

60

t

90

ti

4

j

3

t i 1 j  1

2.5

2.0

t i 1 j

ccs

b h

t

3.2 2.5 2.5 2.1 2.5 2.0 1.9 1.7 2.1 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.6 1.2 1.2 1.0

1.6

t i j

2

0.18441m

 e Ss0

agi

Ai

0.2766m

2.1

t i j  1

The moment of inertia of ideal cross-section:

1 2.5 1  d t  d h  d t d h  2.0 1  d t  d h  2.1 1  d h  d t  1.6 d t  d h

Ai

2

2

agi

 1.9  1.5  1.2   1.0 

A c  e A stot

Distance of center of gravity of ideal cross-section of the upper edge:

1

 5.4 4.4 3.6 3.5 3.0 2.6   3.9   3.2  2.6   2.0

Ai

Tabulated values of the coefficient of creep: i

Sectional ideal area:

1.79 b h

I

3

Calculation of bending flexibility of full acting cross-section:

 2

I

 e Is0  A i agi

3

4

0.00454127m

Full flexibility sectional acting C1 will be: A stot

A st  A sc

2

A stot

0.00188m

CI

Effective elastic modulus: Ecm

Eceff

Eceff

1 

18.318

e

Eceff

M cr

Ecm is the initial mean (secant) modulus As

1

j

A si

A sc

( 1  3) 3

Eceff

j 1

2

zs 1

Es

3

Is0

As

j 1

As

j

A   z  2  s j  s j 

A si

-1

0.00002017kN m

I fctm  h  agi

M cr

52.85165kNm

fctm is the mean value of the tensile strength of concrete

A st1

As

asc

zs 2

A st2

3

d

zs 3

The depth of compression area xr , and moment of inertia about the neutral axis Ixr , the cross-

d

section without the action of concrete in tension. If we denote as Acx area of compression

3

2

0.03441m

Ss0

j 1

Is0

CI

At the moment of cracking Mcr is then

Es

e

10918.01MPa 

1 Eceff  I

 A s j  zs j   

Ss0

3

0.00073741m

concrete, Scx static moment of the surface edge, the conditions which shall be counted the depth of compression area of concrete xr will be in the form:

4

0.00033572m

A x  S xc r

cx



   A e

s tot

Structural system

 xr  Ss0

0

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Then we get the creep coefficient from the relationship:

Department of Architecture

200


This equation solve numerically (eg. by method Polen or by regula falsi method). When a

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

201

rectangular cross section, however,

A

cx

ags

b  x , S r

cx

 r 2 resulting in a quadratic

b x 2

Scx

Ss0

ags

A stot

 

b  xr

sr Is the stresses in reinforcement in the same cross section of the load between the crack equation with the solution: The resulting curvature of bending moment:

ags    ks   1  1  2  ks   

xr

xr

0.39252m

0.20655m

2

Scx

2

ks

e

A cx

A stot

ks

b

b  xr

A cx

m

2

0.06197m

3

 3

b  xr

Icx

3

4

0.00088m

Ixr

Icx  Scx xr  e Is0  Ss0  xr

Ixr

4

0.00292m

-1

CII

Eceff  Ixr

t

( 1 7 2890365)

t

1

1.0

Coated bars

2

0.5

long-acting load

t

sr

s

M

cr

M

s

d

h0  0.15 m

h

dh

( 0.6  0.15)  m

cs

2

0.93357

-1

0.00003kN m

ht h0

( 0.050.150.60.050.150.6)  m

t

28

t i

0.6m

h 0  h t j 1 h t j  h t j 1

ttr  7

dt

( 28  7)

dt

0.14286

1

1  d t  d h  d td h   t i1 j1  d td h   t ij 11  d h d t   t ijd td h

t i  1 j 1

Tabulated values of the coefficient of creep: 

t i  1 j 1

When bending elements the stress ratio replaces the ratio of moments: 

(days)

0.05  h 0  0.6

ttr  tt i1 tt i  tt i1

c  

 Mcr  1   1  2    Ms 

C

Creep coefficient we get then from the relationship:

Effects of reducing flexibility of the action of of the tension stiffening between cracks: 

7

t i  1

dh

Partition coefficient 

-1

0.00444168m

Tabulated values for the age of at the beginning of a long-term load action

d

0.00003138kN m

m

m

Calculation of boundary curvature of shrinkage:

t

1

M s  ( 1  )  CI   CII  

m

( 1  )  CI   CII

Flexibility sectional weakened due to cracks will then be: CII

r

The resulting tension stiffening C (considered constant over the length of the beam) C

0.0064m

operations of the tensile concrete is a general relationship:

1

0.11471m

To calculate the moment of inertia about the neutral axis of the cross-section excluding

Icx

s Is the tensile stress in the reinforcement calculated under load effect on the weakened section due to cracks

t

 5.4  3.9   3.2  2.6   2.0

Structural system

3.2

t i  1 j

2.5

ccs

1

4.4 3.6 3.5 3.0 2.6 

  2.5 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.5  2.1 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.2   1.6 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.0  3.2 2.5 2.5 2.1 1.9

t i j  1

2.5

t i j

2.0


1 3.2 1  d t  d h  d t d h  2.5 1  d t  d h  2.5 1  d h  d t  2.0 d t d h

2.428

The final values of the relative shrinkage  cs(%o)

Calculation of boundary bending flexibility of full acting cross-section:  sh1  0.0006 Ecm

Eceff

Eceff

1 

e

8895.83MPa

Es Eceff

e

22.48

 

 sh2  0.0005

ccs   sh1   sh2   sh1 

 cs

h 0  0.15 m 0.45 m

 

 cs

0.0005

The characteristics of the ideal full acting cross section (A, ag, I ) area, distance from the If h  0.15 m, sat in this relationship h 0 0

center of gravity the upper edge, the moment of inertia

Curvature due to shrinkage Area of ideal cross-section: Ai

2

0.19224m

ag

h 2

 e A st  d

2

0.19224m

ag

I

b h

 2

 e Is0  A i agi

3

I

1

shI

xr

Ss0

4

1  2

shI

rshII

ags

A stot

ks   1  

1

shII

rshI

ags

0.27994m

The moment of inertia of ideal cross-section 3

1 rs hII

cross-sectional

Ai

acting in full cross-section and

weakened due to crack then are: Ai

Distance of center of gravity of ideal cross-section of the upper edge: b h 

1 rshI

0.15 m

0.39252m

ags  ks

  

 cs  e A stot 

ags  ag I

shI

A stot

ks

e

xr

0.22025m

ks

b

A cx

b  xr

-1

0.00044513m

0.14079m

A cx

2

0.06607m

0.00534075m

Scx

 2

b  xr

Scx

2

3

0.00728m

Full flexibility sectional acting C1 will be: To calculate the moment of inertia about the neutral axis of the cross-section without the CI

1 Eceff  I

CI

action of the concrete in tension there is a general relationship:

-1 -2

0.00002105kN m

Free shrinkage cs is determined depending on the thickness of the replacement ho and the relative humidity rh

Icx Ixr

rh

50 100

h0

 3

b  xr 3

4

Icx

0.00107m

Hcx

Icx  Scx xr

Ixr

0.00336228m

Icx  Scx xr  e Is0  Ss0  xr

Hcx 4

0.6m shII

 cs  e A stot 

ags  xr

Structural system

Ixr

shII

-1

0.00108203m

4

0.00053418m

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

202


203

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

3.9 Concrete Foundations A foundation is a integral part of the structure which transfer the load of the superstructure

Flexibility sectional weakened due to crack will then be: 1

CIIsh

CIIsh

Eceff  Ixr

to the soil without excessive settlement. A foundation is that member which provides support

-1 -2

0.00003343kN m

for the structure and it's loads.

The resulting curvature of shrinkage: 

sh

1 r

sh

sh

It also provides a means by which forces or movements within the ground can be resisted by

( 1  )  shI   shII

sh

-1

the building. In some cases, foundation elements can perform a number of functions: for

0.00103972m

example, a diaphragm wall forming part of a basement will usually be designed to carry loading from the superstructure.

Deflection in the middle of span due to bending effect (uniform load): fm

5 48

 m l

2

fm

If new foundations are placed close to those of an existing building, the loading on the ground

0.02267m

will increase and movements to the existing building may occur. When an excavation is made, the stability of adjacent buildings may be threatened unless the excavation is adequately

Deflection in the middle of span due to shrinkage: fsh

1

 l 8 sh

2

fsh

supported. This is particularly important with sands and gravels which derive their support from lateral restraint.

0.00637m

The choice of foundation type or the type of foundation selected for a particular structure is influenced by the following factors:

The resulting deflection: f

fm  fsh

f

0.02904m

fmedz

l 250

Does not comply deflection or deflection does not satisfies.

fmedz

0.028m

1. The imposed loads or deformations, the magnitude of the external loads 2. Ground conditions, the strength and compressibility of the various soil data 3. The position of the water table 4. Economics 5. Buildability, and the depth of foundations of adjacent structures 6. Durability.

Figure: 3.9-1 Foundations of tall building

Structural system


204

safely bear. The types of foundation generally adopted for building and structures are spread (pad), strip, balanced and cantilever or combined footings, raft and pile foundations.

Square or rectangular footing supporting a single column. Strip footing Long footing supporting a continuous wall. Combined footing

For example, strip footings are usually chosen for buildings in which relatively small loads

Footing supporting two or more columns.

are carried mainly on walls. When the spread footings occupy more than half the area covered

Balanced footing

by the structure and where differential settlement on poor soil is likely to occur a raft foundation

Footing supporting two columns, one of which lies at or near one end.

is found to be more economical. Pad footings, piles or pile groups are more appropriate when

Raft

the structural loads are carried by columns. If differential settlements must be tightly controlled,

Foundation supporting a number of columns or loadbearing walls so as to transmit

shallow strip or pad footings (except on rock or dense sand) will probably be inadequate so

approximately uniform loading to the soil.

stiffer surface rafts or deeper foundations may have to be considered as alternatives.

Pile cap

This type of foundation viewed as the inverse of a one-storey beam, slab and column system. The slab rests on soil carrying the load from the beam/column system which itself transmits the loads from the superstructure.

Foundation in the form of a pad, strip, combined or balanced footing in which the forces are transmitted to the soil through a system of piles. The plan area of the foundation should be proportioned on the following assumptions: a. All forces are transmitted to the soil without exceeding the allowable bearing pressure b. When the foundation is axially loaded, the reactions to design loads are uniformly

Â

Â

distributed per unit area or per pile. A foundation may be treated as axially loaded if the eccentricity does not exceed 0.02 times the length in that direction

Figure: 3.9-2

c. When the foundation is eccentrically loaded, the reactions vary linearly across the

Types of foundations

footing or across the pile system. Footings should generally be so proportioned that zero

These are generally supporting columns and may be square or rectangular in plan and

pressure occurs only at one edge. It should be noted that eccentricity of load can arise

in section, they may be of the slab, stepped or sloping type. The stepped footing results in

in two ways: the columns being located eccentrically on the foundation; and/or the

a better distribution of load than a slab footing. A sloped footing is more economical although

column transmitting a moment to the foundation. Both should be taken into account and

constructional problems are associated with the sloping surface. The isolated spread footing in plan concrete has the advantage that the column load is transferred to the soil through dispersion in the footing. In reinforced concrete footings, i.e. pads, the slab is treated as an inverted cantilever bearing the soil pressure and supported by the column. Where a two-way footing is provided it must be reinforced in two directions of the bending with bars of steel placed in the

combined to give the maximum eccentricity. d. All parts of a footing in contact with the soil should be included in the assessment of contact pressure e. It is preferable to maintain a reasonably similar pressure under all foundations to avoid significant differential settlement.

bottom of the pad parallel to its sides. Foundations under walls or under closely spaced rows of columns sometimes require a specific type of foundation, such as cantilever and balanced footings and strip footings.

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

An essential requirement in foundations is the evaluation of the load which a structure can

Department of Architecture

Pad footing


205

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

3.9.1 Shallow Foundations A shallow foundation distributes loads from the building into the upper layers of the ground. Shallow foundations are susceptible to any seismic effect that changes the ground contour, such as settlement or lateral movement. Such foundations are suitable when these upper soil layers have sufficient strength (‘bearing capacity’) to carry the load with an acceptable margin of safety and tolerable settlement over the design life. The different types of shallow foundation are: a)

Strip footing

Shallow Foundations

b) Spread or isolated footing c)

Figure: 3.9.1-2

Combined footing Strap or cantilever footing

d) Mat or raft Foundation.

Spread Footing Design of Reinforcement

Punching in Spread Footing Figure: 3.9.1-3 Figure: 3.9.1-1

Structural system


Figure: 3.9.1-4

Figure: 3.9.1-6

3.9.2 Strap Footing It consists of two isolated footings connected with a structural strap or a lever, as shown in figure 3.9.2-1. The strap connects the footing such that they behave as one unit. The strap simply acts as a connecting beam. A strap footing is more economical than a combined footing when the allowable soil pressure is relatively high and distance between the columns is large.

Figure: 3.9.1-5

Figure: 3.9.2-1

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

206


207

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

3.9.3 Combined Footing It supports two columns as shown in fig. 3.9.3-1. It is used when the two columns are so close to each other that their individual footings would overlap. A combine footing may be rectangular or trapezoidal in plan. Trapezoidal footing is provided when the load on one of the columns is larger than the other column.

Figure: 3.9.3-1 Combined Footing 3.9.4 Strip/continuous footings A strip footing is another type of spread footing which is provided for a load bearing Figure: 3.9.2-2

wall. A strip footing can also be provided for a row of columns which are so closely spaced that their spread footings overlap or nearly touch each other. In such a cases, it is more economical to provide a strip footing than to provide a number of spread footings in one line. A strip footing is also known as “continuous footing”.

Figure: 3.9.2-3 Figure: 3.9.4-1

Structural system


208

Figure: 3.9.5-2

Figure: 3.9.4-2 3.9.5 Mat or Raft footings

Â

It is a large slab supporting a number of columns and walls under entire structure or a

3.9.6 Pile foundations

large part of the structure. A mat is required when the allowable soil pressure is low or where

Deep foundations are used when the soil at foundation level is inadequate to support the

the columns and walls are so close that individual footings would overlap or nearly touch each

imposed loads with the required settlement criterion. Where the bearing capacity of the soil is

other. Mat foundations are useful in reducing the differential settlements on non-homogeneous

poor or the imposed load are very heavy, piles, which may be square, circular or other shapes

soils or where there is large variation in the loads on individual columns.

are used for foundations. If no soil layer is available, the pile is driven to a depth such that the load is supported through the surface friction of the pile. The piles can be precast or cast in situ. Deep foundations act by transferring loads down to competent soil at depth and/or by carrying loading by frictional forces acting on the vertical face of the pile. Diaphragm walls, contiguous bored piles and secant piling methods are covered later in this chapter. Short-bored piles have been used on difficult ground for low-rise construction for many years. They can be designed to carry loads with limited settlements, or to reduce total or differential settlements. They can have bases that are flat, pointed or bulbous, and shafts that are vertical or raked. In some circumstances, piles can be constructed of other materials, such as timber or

Figure: 3.9.5-1

plastics. Piled walls or sheet piles are used to resist lateral movements, such as in forming a basement.

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

required to bridge over soft spots at movement joints or changes in founding strata.

Department of Architecture

A traditional strip foundation consists of a minimum thickness of 150 mm of concrete placed in a trench, typically 0.8–1 m wide. Reinforcement can be added if a wider strip is


209

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

The piling technique used to install the piles will be determined by the ground conditions, loading requirements for the final pile as well as other factors such as access or proximity to other buildings and the need for noise reduction. Pile types There are two basic types of piles: â—? cast-in-place (or replacement) piles and â—? driven (or displacement) piles.

Figure: 3.9.6-3 All pile caps should generally be reinforced in two orthogonal directions on the top and bottom faces and the amount of reinforcement should not be less than 0.0015bh in each direction. The bending moments and the reinforcement should be calculated on critical sections at the column faces, assuming that the pile loads are concentrated at the pile centres. This reinforcement should be continued past the piles and bent up vertically to provide full

Figure: 3.9.6-1

anchorage past the centreline of each pile.

Figure: 3.9.6-2 Piles are individual columns, generally constructed of concrete or steel, that support loading through a combination of friction on the pile shaft and end-bearing on the pile toe. The distribution of load carried by each mechanism is a function of soil type, pile type and settlement. They can also be used to resist imposed loading caused by the movement of the surrounding soil, such as vertical movements of shrinking and swelling soils. Piles can be installed vertically or may be raked to support different loading configurations.

Structural system

Figure: 3.9.6-4


Figure: 3.9.6-5

Figure: 3.9.6-6

Figure 3.9.6-4: Main reinforcement in slab foundation Figure 3.9.6-3: collapse of unbearable soil

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

210


211

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

Example 3.9-1: Assessment of slab foundation to punching

P  P1  Qbu

P  1188 kN

Required surface area of reinforcement to punching:

Depth of the reinforced slab foundation: hd  80  cm

Asb 

Tensile strength of concrete:

P 0.86  fyd

2

Asb  0.00368372 m

Reinforcement diameter:

fctm  0.9  MPa Width of column:

bs  50  cm

 25  mm

As1 

2

 4

2

As1  0.00049087 m

Number of profiles:

Height of column: n 

hs  40  cm

Asb

n  7.504

As1

Q  0.42  hd  fctm  ucr

Q  1512 kN

Design strength of reinforcement:

fyd  375  MPa

Figure: 3.9.1-2 Data of rolled I profiles:

Figure: 3.9.1-1

I28

Perimeter of critical cross-section: ucr   bs  hd   hs  hd  2

3

b1  119  mm

Shearing force carrying by concrete:

Qbu  0.42  hd  fctm  ucr

Qbu  1512 kN

2

A1  6.10  10  mm

ucr  5 m

P1  2700  kN

b3  119  mm

Structural system

6

4

J1y  75.8  10  mm b2  119  mm

h1  280  mm


212

2

6

4

J1y  157  10  mm

h1  340  mm b1  137  mm

b2  137  mm

b3  137  mm I38 3

2

6

A1  10.7  10  mm b1  149  mm L  1.45  m

b2  149  mm p1 

P 8

4

h1  380  mm

J1y  240  10  mm

b3  149  mm

p1  148.5 kN

h2  20  mm

M  161.49375 m  kN

M  p1  0.75  L 3

A2  b2  h2

A3  b3  h3

J2 

3

b2  h2

J3 

12

h2    h1  h3     h2    A2    A3    h1  h2  2   2   2 

A1   e2 

12

Section modulus: J e1

3

Wd  0.00227904 m

Wh 

J e2

3

Wh  0.00227904 m

Stress control:

e1  H  e2

H  0.42 m

Figure: 3.9.1-3

Wd 

b3  h3

e2  0.21 m

A1  A2  A 3

H  h1  h2  h3

h3  20  mm

d



M Wd

h



M Wh

d

h

 70.86  MPa  70.8604  MPa

s

 210  MPa

s

 210  MPa

e1  0.21 m a1 

h1 2

 h2  e2

a2  e2 

h2

a3  H 

2

h3 2

a1  0 m

 e2

The total moment of inertia of composite section: 2

2

2

J  J1y  J2  J3  A1  a1  A2  a2  A3  a3

4

J  0.0004786 m

J  1.99416111 J1y

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

3

A1  8.67  10  mm

Department of Architecture

I34


213

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

Example 3.9-2: Determination of the design bearing capacity of the soil at depth

Example 3.9-3: Endless beam

dp =1,5 m

In the case of infinite beams subjected to concentrated loads P, the diagram of the contact stresses in the soil P, shear forces on the beam T and the bending moment on the beam

Soli classification F6:

cef

16 kPa

21 deg

 ef

cef

cd

2

M at any distance x from the point of application P can be expressed as follows:

 ef

d

 m

P( x)

C  Y( x)

 ( x) 

Bearing coefficient of the soil: Nd  m

tan 45 deg 

d 

2

tan  d

 e 2 

 

1.5  Nd  1 tan  d

Nb

 ef

21 

1

 ef  4 deg

Nc

C  15000 

2 

2

3

m

1

Base area of the footing:

Width:

bp = 1 m

1 12

dd

1  0.1 

dp bp

1

sin 2  d

bp lp id

 

sin  d 1

ic

sb

1

1  0.3 

ib

bp lp

dc

1  0.1 

dp

4 E I C B

h  1  m

4

L  22.2  m

Le 

4 E I C B

Le  4.949m

L Le

 (  ) 

1 4

  0 0.05 6

 (cos()  sin())

 e

 

 (  )  

1

2

 e



 ( cos (  ) )

 ( cos (  )  sin (  ) )

0.6 0.4  ( )

0.2

 ( )

 ( )

cd N c sc dc ic   1 dp N d sd dd id   2 

I  0.125m

x

1

Design bearing capacity of the soil:

Rd

4

3

Le 1 

bp

 B h

 ()   e 2

sd

B  1.5  m

Le

E = modulus of elasticity of the base strip

Coefficient of the shape of the footing:

lp

E  27000  MPa

3

( x)  P  Le

Where

bp

M ( x)

The coefficients , ,  are functions of the ratio

1  0.2 

Le  B

4

 ( x) P

I = the moment of inertia of the cross section of the base strip

Length: Lp = 6 m

sc

T( x)

m

I 

kN

kN

P

bp 2

0

2

4

 0.2

N b sb db ib

Rd

243.077 k

 0.4  0.6 

Figure: 3.9.3-1

Structural system

6

 4.486


Q1 ........ Le / 2 from the cross-section A =>  = P / 2 => (P / 2) = -0.052 and  (P / 2) = 0

i  1  n

P  2265  kN

x  2.1  m

P  1821  kN

P  2265  kN

x  20.1  m

L  22.2  m

1 4

1 4

2

x  9.3  m 2

P  1821  kN 3

x  12.9  m 3

=> shear force applied force Q1 in cross section and is equal to 0 Q2 ........ .Le / 4 from the cross section A => = p / 2 => (P / 4) = 0, and (P / 4) = 00:16 =>

Bending moment deduced force Q 2 in cross-section A is equal to 0

Q3 ........ Le / 2 from the cross-section B =>  = P / 2 =>  (P / 2) = -0.052 and  (P / 2) = 0

A signed convention:

=>

Shear

force

applied

force

Q3

in

cross-section

B

is

equal

to

0

- Coefficients ,  apply equally to both positive and negative ratio, ie If the  = 0.140 -> 

Q4 ........ L / 4 the cross section B => = p / 2 =>  (P / 4) = 0, and  (P / 4) = 00:16

= 0.185 as well as the value of the ratio  = - 0.140 -> = 0.185 Coefficients are symmetrical

=> Bending moment deduced force Q4 in cross-section A is equal to 0

- Coefficient is asymmetrical.

On the basis of the simplified, above-mentioned boundary conditions MA = 0, MB = 0, TA = 0, TB = 0 to write the following: and then can be calculated from the sizes of these conditions fictitious forces Q 1, Q 2, Q 3 and Q 4: 1. condition: MA

  Fi  iA

   V  Le  2 1



0

n

2. condition: VA

  Fi   iA

0

 

 V  2 1

n

   V  Le    FSd  i   Le   i A 4 2 n 



 

 V  4 2

3. condition: MB

  Fi  iB

0

   V  Le  2 3



n

4. condition: Figure: 3.9.3-2

VB

  Fi   iB

0

 V  2 3

 

n

  FSd i   iA n

   V  Le    FSd  i   Le   i B 4 4 n 



   V    FSd     4  4   i iB n 

 

B - Final beam The final beams are called real beams. In this case, the final beam computed as part of

(  ) 

the endless, which in the extreme cross-sections A, B satisfies the following boundary

 (  ) 

Assume that the beam is loaded not only real forces P1 ... Pn but fictitious Q1, Q2 Q3, Q4 active outside the actual beam distance and the locus of the edge of the beam is as follows:

4

e



 ( cos (  )  sin (  ) ) if   5.1

0 otherwise

conditions: MA = 0, MB = 0, TA = 0, TB = 0,

1

1    e  ( cos (  ) ) if   5.1 2  0 otherwise

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

n  4

Department of Architecture

214


From 3 Q3 conditions can be calculated. Q4 product. (P / 4) = 0, while (p / 2) = -0052 =>

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

215

n

n

Q3 

i1

 Pi    Bi    

3

Q3  1.03  10  kN

0.052

V

i1

 FSd i    Bi    

4

0.052

From 4 conditions can be calculated Q4, Q3 product.  (p / 2) = 0, while  (p / 4) = -0160 => Traces of bending moments M along the entire beam of length L xL  0  m0.1  m L

 

M xL  Le 

Figure: 3.9.3-3 From 1. Condition the first conditions can be calculated Q1, Q2 product. (P / 4) = 0, while

 (p / 2) = -0052 => n

 xi   A     Le  i

 B  i

Lx

i

Le

i1

Q1 

 Pi    A i    

3

Q1  1.03  10  kN

0.052

      ( Q1)            Q3      

     n  x x    4  Le  xL    P   L i   Q2         i  Le Le Le      i  1       L   L  x     Le   L  xL  L      4 e 2   Q4       Le Le    

2

 Le  xL

 2  794.011  kN  m

M x

n

B 

A 

i 4.061

i 0.424

2.606

1.879

1.879

2.606

0.424

4.061

V

i1

 FSd i    A i    

1

 

d 1 xL 

0.052

 

xL  x if xL  x  0 1 1

d 2 xL 

0 otherwise

 

d 3 xL 

0 otherwise

 

xL  x if xL  x  0 3 3

d 4 xL 

0 otherwise 4

Q2 

i1

i

2.265·103

n

 Pi     A i     0.160

q 

P 

n

3

Q2  3.521  10  kN

V

2

i1

 FSd i     A i     0.160

xL  x if xL  x  0 4 4 0 otherwise

From 2. Condition the second condition can be calculated Q2, Q1 product. (p / 2) = 0, while (p / 4) = -0160 =>

xL  x if xL  x  0 2 2

 kN

P

i1

L

i

xL  0  m0.1  m L

1.821·103 1.821·103 2.265·103

2

xL  P  d 1 xL  P  d 2 xL  P  d 3 xL  P  d 4 xL MA xL  q  1 2 3 4 2

 

Structural system

 

 

 

 

      





    


Beam width = 1.5m L = 22.2m

h=1.0m

6

110

  MA  xL M xL

0

10

20

6

 110

30

1 P. xL   Le  B

 

6

 210

      ( Q1)             Q3       

     L  x  n    4 e L    xL  xi   Q2   P        i  Le Le Le      i  1            Le   L  xL    4  Le   L  xL   2   Q4     Le Le    

2

 Le  xL

      





    

6

 310

P.( 9.3  m)  229.001  kPa

xL

Figure: 3.9.3-4 3

5

MA ( 5.7  m)  2.174  10  kN  m 2

3.210

xL MA xL  q   P  d 1 xL  P  d 2 xL  P  d 3 xL  P  d 4 xL 1 2 3 4 2

 

 

 

 

xL 

5.2 m

 

 

-1.066·103

 kN  m

  

L

0 m

 

M xL 

 

-2.045·103

5.3

-1.022·103

-2.078·103

5.4

-974.464

-2.107·103

5.5

-923.759

-2.133·103

5.6

-869.735

-2.156·103

5.7

-812.388

-2.174·103

5.8

-751.714

-2.189·103

5.9

-687.711

-2.2·103

6

-620.372

-2.208·103

6.1

-549.693

-2.211·103

6.2

-475.668

-2.211·103

6.3

-398.293

-2.208·103

6.4

-317.559

-2.201·103

6.5

-233.462

-2.19·103

6.6

-145.995

-2.175·103

...

...

...

x4

310

 

5

P. xL dxL L

MA xL 

x2

5

P. xL

2.810

5

2.610

5

2.410

 kN  m

5

2.210

0

13.333

26.667

40

xL

Figure: 3.9.3-5

The course of shear forces along the beam of length L

n

i  1

P

i

 

d 1 xL 

 8.172  10

3

 kN

1 if xL  x  0 1

  

L 0m

 

P . xL L

 

d 2 xL 

 

1 if xL  x  0 3 0 otherwise

Structural system

 245.3

 kPa

1 if xL  x  0 2 0 otherwise

0 otherwise d 3 xL 

dx L

 

d 4 xL 

1 if xL  x  0 4 0 otherwise

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

The course of the contact stress in the ground along the entire beam of length L 6

210

Department of Architecture

216


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

217

 

T xL 

      ( Q1)            Q3       

     L  x   n     4 e L   xL  xi   xL  xi       Q2   P        i  Le  xL  x  Le Le      i  1    i       L  L  x   Le   L  xL      L    4 e 2    Q4     Le Le    

2

 Le  xL

 

 

 

 

TA xL  q  xL  P  d 1 xL  P  d 2 xL  P  d 3 xL  P  d 4 xL 1 2 3 4

210

   

110

Example 3.9-4: Design of reinforcement in footing

     

Material characteristics Concrete

fccub_  30 MPa fccub_    f fccyl   0.855  0.005  MPa  ccub_ 

3

T( 13.2  m)  1.095  10  kN

 





6

 fccub_   fctm  0.274   MPa 

x2

x4

0.66

MPa

fctm  2.59MPa

fccyl fcd  0.85  1.5

6

fccyl  21.15MPa

fcd  11.985MPa

T xL

TA xL

0  110  210

10

20

30

6

xL

Figure 3.9.3-6

 

P. xL  B  456.628 454.779 452.928 451.073 449.215 447.352 445.482 443.605 441.718 439.819 437.906 435.975 434.023 432.047 430.044 ...

Steel

6

kN m

 

T xL 

 

-4.22

 kN

TA xL 

0

41.394

36.811

86.829

73.622

132.086

110.432

177.164

147.243

222.064

184.054

266.785

220.865

311.326

257.676

355.688

294.486

403.86

331.297

447.732

368.108

491.411

404.919

534.898

441.73

578.188

478.541

621.28

515.351

...

...

 kN

fyk  410 MPa

fyk fyd  1.15

ly  6 m l1  7.2 m

lk  2.16 m

fyd  356.522 MPa bs  400 mm

Distributed loads Distributed loads of the floor:

qdx  11.75 

kN 2

m Surface roof load: qstr  8.22 

Load area ZS1

kN m

2

l1   zs1  ly  lk   2  

zs1  34.56 m

Load area ZS2

 l2 l1  zs2  ly    2 2

Structural system

zs2  32.4 m

2

2

l2  3.6 m

kv  2.85 m


Force load from the outer walls:

h 

F1d  82 kN

kN

F2d  bs kv 25  1.35 3 m

F2d  15.39 kN

Service force acting on the end column: N1s 

Number of floors: 4 kN  2  N1d  qdxzs1  F1d  F2d n  qstrzs1  bs ( 2.85 m  1.5 m ) 25  1.35 3 m  

3

N1d  2.321  10 kN

d  1.2 m

N1d  2.321  103 kN

Total load on the foundation will be:

h  1.575 m

Extreme force applied at the end column:

Force load of self-weight of the column: 2

H 10

2

N2d  qdxzs2  F2d n  qstrzs2  bs ( 2.85 m  1.5 m ) 25 

kN m

3

1.35

N2d  1.874  103 kN

N1d

N1s  1.857  103 kN

1.25

Extreme force applied in the central column: N2d  1.874  103 kN

Service force acting on central columns: N2s 

N2d

N2s  1.499  103 kN

1.25

Preliminary design of footing dimensions: Max. Distance between columns: l1.  7.2 m Unloading strip: 1

lv  l1 4

lv  2.1 m

The entire length of strip- foundation: L  2 lv  2 l1  l2

L  22.2 m

Figure 3.9.4-1: Calculation model

The depth of the footing:

Design dimensions of reinforced concrete STRIP – footing. Building height:

H  n 2.85 m  ( 2.85 m  1.5 m )

h  1.44 

H  15.75 m

Structural system

N1s 0.6 fcd

 5 cm

h  0.782 m

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

The degree of constraint of building:

Force load

Department of Architecture

218


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

219

h

Ns.max

1.44 

0.6 Rbd

Dimension checking of the foundation:

Nd.max

 5 cm

1.44 

f

0.6 Rbd

 5 cm

The actual weight footing:

0.8 m

 18 

kN m

3

 zs1

 650.849 kN

 zs2

 250.669 kN

kN m

3

Weight of soil below the foundation:

The tabulated carrying capacity of the soil at a depth of footing bottom = 1 m for S4 Rdt  260kPa

 zs2 

(BL) (d  h ) 

Force in footing bottom:

Tabulated load bearing capacity of the soil at a depth of footing bottom = t + h: R

BLh 25 

 zs1 

Earth weight:

dt  Rdt  2.5 ( d  1 m) 

R

dt  269 kPa

The sum of all forces from the columns to the base strip – footing: Vs  2 N1s  2 N2s

3

Vs  6.713  10 kN

Vskut  Vs   zs1   zs2 Maximum tension in footing bottom:  skut



Vskut

 skut

B L

 228.664 kPa

<

R

Overall extreme force (weightlessness strip) n

Vd  8.391  103 kN

Vd

i1

Gzs  0.1 Vs

Preliminary ground plan of the foundation strip L x B = Aef Vs  Gzs Aef  R dt The width of the foundation: B 

Aef

L I suggest: B  1.5 m

B  1.237 m

Aef  27.451 m

2

satisfies

dt  269 kPa

Calculation sectional forces

Vd  2 N1d  2 N2d

Preliminary weight of foundation:

Vskut  7.615  103 kN

Nd

i

The stress in footing bottom:  d1

Vd



 d1

B L

 251.99 kPa

Vd

1

B L

n

  Ndi xi

i1 n

i1

Vd

2

Nd

BL

6 Vd e 2

BL

6 Vd e 2

BL

i

The reaction in footing bottom: fd   d1 B

Structural system

kN fd  377.985 m

E I 

d4

4

dx

s ( x)  BC s ( x)

f ( x)


Q

e

 E I 

x Le x    C1 cos   C2 sin   e Le Le  

x

d3

3

dx

Le

s ( x)

4

 C3 cos 

4 EI

x   C4 sin  Le Le  x

M

BC

EI 

d2

2

dx

s ( x)

The bending moment calculation: lv Ma  fd lv  2

Ma  833.456 kN m

l1  lv   Mab  fd  lv    2  2 

Mb  fd  lv  l1 

lv  l1 2

l1 2

 N1d 

l1

Mab  2.217  103 kN m

2

 N1d l1

l2  lv  l1   Mbb  fd  lv  l1    2  2 

Mb  368.511 kN m

l2 2

 

 N1d  l1 

l2  2

l

  N2d  2 2 

Mbb  980.846 kN m

Figure 3.9.4-2: Bending moments diagram vs Shear forces diagram due to design loads Dimensioning

The computation of shear forces:

Design of reinforcement for the maximum Bending moment between the columns : Design moment:

Vk  fd lv

Vk  793.768 kN

Vka  N1d  Vk

Vka  1.528  103 kN

M  Mab

Cover

Vab  fd  lv  l1  N1d

Vab  1.194  103 kN

Vbb  N2d  Vab

Vbb  680.373 kN

cst  5 cm effective height:

d  h  c st

d  0.732 m

Compression depth of concrete: xu  d 

2

d 

M 0.5 Bfcd

Structural system

xu  0.079 m

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

s ( x)

x Le

Department of Architecture

220


Or we can be calculated according to the design of reinforced concrete beam as follows:

The compression height limit

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

221

 420 d MPa  xulim     525 MPa  fyd 

xulim  0.349 m

Required area of reinforcement: xuBfcd As  fyd

As As1

( 25 mm)

2

As1  4.909 cm

4

Mab



 0.86742

d  h  cst 

2

Bd fcd

x   d

h  0.782 m

 0.23

x  0.243 m

Designed of reinforcement:

2

Amsk  39.27 cm

The depth of compression zone of concrete: xureal  0.078 m

xus  0.194 m

As

97.86 cm

Mult  As zfyd

Mult  2.263 MN m

2

As  100 cm

M

h  0.782 m

d  0.732 m

 0.102

 0.03118



 0.94441

x   d

x  0.102 m

xu  0.081 m

z   d

z  0.691 m

Mult  As zfyd

Mult  1.011 MN m

As   Bd fcd 100

As

2

Bd fcd

Mu  xureal  B  fcd   d  

 0.13898

xu  0.8 x

2

41.03 cm

Design of reinforcement for bending moment between the columns:

Carrying capacity of cross-section:

xus  0.8 x

we provide

As   Bd fcd 100

2

Bfcd

 0.07437

z  0.635 m

M  0.980 MN m

Assessment of the Design:

fyd Amsk

d  0.732 m

Or we can be calculated according to the design of RCB B3-B3.3 as follows:

n  8.094

Amsk  As1 8

 0.33144

z   d

2

I suggest 8 V25 to the entire width of the strip foundation b:

xureal 

fcd  11.985 MPa 2

Number of profiles: n 

B  1.5 m

As  39.733 cm

Area 1 of 25 profile: As1   

Mab  2.217 MN m

xureal  2

 

Mu  970.046 kN m

M  980.846 kN m

M  0.833 MN m

h  0.782 m

fyd  356.522 MPa

Structural system



M 2

Bd fcd

d  0.732 m 

 0.087

fcd  11.985 MPa 

 0.0265


x   d

x  0.086 m

xu  0.8 x

xu  0.069 m

z   d

z  0.697 m

As   Bd fcd 100

As

Mult  As zfyd

Mult

 0.11808

2

34.87 cm

Sectional area of the stirrups: 2

dss Ass    4

0.866 MN m

The force that is transferred by stirrup: Nss  Ass 4 fyd

Design of shear reinforcement

Nss  71.683 kN

Area A

Distance between the stirrups:

Sectional shear resistance:

c ss  Nss  ss  3.79 m Vs Suggestion 4-cutting stirrups profile dss = 8mm at a distance of 400 mm

1

Vcu  1.011  103kN

Vcu  Bh fctm 3

Shear force applied at a given cross-section: Vk  793.768 kN Force transferring by stirrups;

Vs  Vk  Vcu

Vs  217.152 kN Figure 3.9.4-3: Shear forces diagram with side view of foundation

The projection of the cracks: c 

1.2 Bfctm d

2

Vs

c  11.48 m

maximum. the projection of the cracks: Cmax  0.18 

fcd  q fctm

Cmax  0.834

q

 1

min. the projection of the cracks: Cmin  h  0.04 m

Cmin  0.742 m

Suggestion 4-cutting stirrups diameter:

Figure 3.9.4-4: Load calculation areas on plate - load from one floor

dss  8 mm

Structural system

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

 0.95277

Department of Architecture

222


Example 3.9-5: Static calculation of extreme square isolated footings

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

223 The total load on the foot:

Number of floors: n = 4

Nd   qd zs  F1d  F2d  n  qstr zs  bs ( 2.85m  1.5m ) 25 2

kN m

3

1.35

Nd  2.48  103 kN Foundation dimensions: Building height:

H  n 2.85m  ( 2.85m  1.5m )

H  15.75m

Figure: 3.9.5-1 Material properties – design value of concrete cylinder compressive strength: fcd  14.16MPa

fctm  2.01MPa

fyd  443MPa

The span among the columns: ly  6m

l1  7.2m

lk  2.16m Figure: 3.9.5-2

Distributed loads:

The degree of constraint of buildings:

Distributed loads of the ceiling: qd  13kN m

2

h 

Flat roof load: qstr  7.8kN m

H

h  1.575m

10

The force acting in the contact columns and footing foundation (extreme values): 2

Nd  2.48  103 kN Service value applied force:

Load area: l1   zs  ly  lk   2  Force load:

zs  34.56m

2

Ns 

Nd 1.2

Ns  2.066  103 kN

Force load from the peripheral walls:

Tabulated load bearing capacity of the soil in the bed joints of the depth = 1 m:

F1d  82kN Force load of self-weight of columns:

Rdt  400kPa Earth gravity:

2

F 2d  b s k v 25 

kN m

3

1.35

F2d  15.39kN

 18

kN m

Structural system

3


 Ns    5cm  0.6fcd 

d  1.44  I suggest:

Weight footings:

d  0.76m

2

Nzs1  b d 25

N zs1  92.45  kN 3 m Weight of soil under the foundations of structures:

d  0.8m

 Rdt  2.5( h  d  1m ) 

R dt

 461.875kPa

Vs  Ns  0.1Ns Vs  2.273  103 kN

Nzs  Nzs1  Nzs2

Preliminary calculation of the effective surface which is able to transfer force and stress not exceed Rtd: R dt

Nzs2  126.512kN

Vsk  Ns  Nzs

Vsk  2.285  103 kN

The stress in the bed joints and assessed for bearing capacity of foundation soil:

Aef  4.921m

2

Dimensions of square foundation: b  Aef b  2.218m Design dimensions of the foundation: 2

Aef  b b  2.15m Assessment of foot in terms of soil bearing capacity:

Vsk

 z  494.41kPa < R dt  461.875kPa 2 b Dimensioning (of extreme values weightless footing): z

Vs

2

The resulting force applied at the footing bottom (with gravity base):

Preliminary calculation of the force applied in footing bottom (if self-weight Ns = 10%):

Aef 

2

Nzs2  b  bs  ( h )

The tabulated bearing capacity of soil to the depth of the bed joints = d + h: R dt

kN



geometry: a 

b  bs

a  0.875m

2

Length of console Projection: ak  a  0.15bs

ak  0.935m

The stress in footing bottom of extreme load: Nd

 d  536.45kPa Aef Maximum moment acting on the footing: d



M 

ak

2

2

b  d

Vmax  ak b  d

M  504.151kN m Vmax  1.078  103 kN

Arm of internal forces determined approximately: ast  6.5cm deff  d  ast Force in reinforcements: Ns  Figure 3.9.5-3: Determination of bending moment and shear force

M zb

Ns  806.964kN

Structural system

zb  0.85 deff 

zb  0.625m

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Height of the foundation:

Department of Architecture

224


Required area of reinforcement:

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

225

As 

Ns

For square footing and column:

As  1.822  10 3 m

fyd

uc2  uc1 Peripheral length of the critical cross-section:

2

ucr  4.8 m ucr  4 uc1 Stress from acting load-of bearing structure acting on footing bottom (without sel-weight of footing):

Area 1  18: d1  18mm

2 

A1  d1 

4

2

A1  2.545cm

n 

As

n  8.442

A1

we propose 10 V18 the entire width of the footing => distance between the reinforcement will be 200 mm:  smin



1 3

Rbtd Rsd

Ask  s  d b

 smin

s

 8  10 4

 1.479  10 3

Ask  A1 10

2

Ask  25.447cm

>  smin  8  10 4

Nd

 d  0.536MPa 2 b Shear force of the extreme loads acting on the critical cross section: d



2

Nqd   d  b  uc1

2

Nqd  1.704  103 kN

Maximum shear force caused by extreme stress relating to the unit of the critical cross section: Nqd

kN qdmax  355.053 m ucr Computing shear force that carries by means of concrete qcu:

qdmax 

factor of reinforcement:  s  1  50  s   smin factor for height of section (for d > 0.6m):  h  1 normal force coefficient: n

qcu  0.42h  s  h  n fctm

 1

qdmax  355.677

kN m

<

qcu  1.327  103 

kN m

Figure 3.9.5-4: Critical area for punching The reliability condition to avoid punching: Sectional dimensions critical for punching: uc1  d  bs

uc1  1.2 m Figure: 3.9.5-5

Structural system

=> satisfies


STRUCTURAL STRUCTURALENGINEERING ENGINEERINGROOM ROOM

Department of Architecture

226


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture 227


Realisation Projects

Apartment Buildings- Panské in Stupava Author: Assoc. Prof. Dipl. Ing. Sabah Shawkat, MSc, PhD.

STRUCTURAL STRUCTURALENGINEERING ENGINEERINGROOM ROOM

Department of Architecture

228


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

229 Assumptions.

Variables

Concrete simple, non-structural C 16/20 – X0

snow load

Reinforced concrete C 25/30 – XC2, XF1

Height above sea level

175.00 + 15.00 ≈ 190.00, zone 1.

Steel B 500 B - 10 505 – R and welded networks KARI B 490 B – SZ

coefficients zone – a = 0.454; b = 970

Steel flat rolled bars and S 235

Sk = 0.454 + 190/970 = 0.65 KN/m2

Masonry YTONG

coefficients:

μ1 = 0.80; Ce = 1.00; Ct = 1.00

snow load

0.80 x 1.00 x 1.00 x 0.65

0.55 x 1.50 = 0.80 KN/m2

Loading and operating effects. vertical load.

Ceiling interior - typical floor – RC slab 180 mm

A roof over the last floor

Dead load

Dead load 2

The floor

1.80 x 1.35 = 2.45 KN/m²

0.18 x 25.00

gravel embankment

0.05 x 18.00

0.90 x 1.35 = 1.25 KN/m

Self-weight of the RC slab

4.50 x 1.35

6.10

Water insulation

0.25 x 1.35 = 0.35

Plaster, ceiling, wiring professions ≈

0.35 x 1.35

0.45

Thermal insulation with gradients

≈ 0.30 x 1.35

6.65

9.00 KN/m²

Vapor barrier, geotextiles

0.10 x 1.35

0.15

Variables

Self-weight of the RC slab 0.18 x 25.00

4.50 x 1.35

6.10

Utility – Apartments

Plaster, ceiling, wiring professions ≈

0.35 x 1.35

0.45

6.40

8.70 KN/m²

0.40

social and assembly areas utility room - boiler room

Variables

partitions

snow load

I wonder weighing

Height above sea level

175.00 + 15.00 ≈ 190.00, zone 1.

coefficients zone

Sk = 0.454 + coefficients: snow load

970

5.00 x 1.50 = 7.50 1.20 x 1.35 = 1.65 KN/m2

Dead load 2

= 0.65 KN/m

μ1 = 0.80; Ce = 1.00; Ct = 1.00 0.80 x 1.00 x 1.00 x 0.65

3.00 x 1.50 = 4.50

Balconies, balcony

a = 0.454; b = 970 190.00

2.00 x 1.50 = 3.00 KN/m2

0.55 x 1.50 = 0.80 KN/m2

The floor

6.10

Plaster soffit

0.35 x 1.35

0.45

6.35

8.60 KN/m²

Dead load

Variables 0.05 x 18.00

0.90 x 1.35 = 1.25 KN/m2

Water insulation

0.25 x 1.35 = 0.35 0.40

1.50 x 1.35 = 2.05 KN/m² 4.50 x 1.35

Roof above the elevator shaft – RC slab150 mm gravel embankment

Self-weight of the RC slab 0.18 x 25.00 ≈

4.00 x 1.50 = 6.00 KN/m2

Utility - balconies, loggias RC slab interior - the 1 st level- 200 mm slab

Thermal insulation with gradients

≈ 0.30 x 1.35

Vapor barrier, geotextiles

0.10 x 1.35

0.15

Dead

Self-weight of the RC slab

0.15 x 25.00

3.75 x 1.35

5.10

The floor

1.80 x 1.35 = 2.45 KN/m²

Self-weight of the RC slab

0.20 x 25.00

5.00 x 1.35

6.75

Plaster soffit

0.35 x 1.35

0.45

Plaster, ceiling, wiring professions ≈

0.35 x 1.35

0.45

5.65

7.70 KN/m²

Realisation Projects


230 9.65 KN/m²

Horizontal load Wind

2

Utility – Apartments

2.00 x 1.50 = 3.00 KN/m

Wall partitions

I wonder how static load in two directions (X and Y) Basic wind speed - 26 m / s

1.00 x 1.50 = 1.50 KN/m2

I wonder weighing

Terrain category – III I am not dividing the load along the height, then we considering the same, which will have

Arm of the staircase - 240 mm slab depth

mean wind speed and peak wind pressure: Z e = 15.50 m; vm , ze1 = 21.60 m/s; q p, ze, 1 = 0.85 KN/m2

The slope of the staircase ≈ 35º The average thickness of the slab with steps

h priem = 0.181 x cos 35 / 2 + 0.24 = 0.32 m

Dead load on plan view plane Surface treatment

0.03 x 23.00 0.18 x 0.03 x 23.00 / 0.28

RC slab + levels

0.32 x 25.00 / cos 35

Plaster treatment

Wind - Wind actions

0.85 x 1.50 = 1.30 KN/m2

The coefficients of the external pressure, - a suction pressure in vertical: 2

0.70 x 1.35 = 0.95 KN/m

pressure- Cpe,10 = + 0.80

0.45 x 1.35

suction -

0.60

9.80 x 1.35 13.20 0.45 x 1.35 11.40

0.60

Cpe,10 = - 0.70

Horizontal load scheme pressure suncion

15.35 KN/m²

all

Variables Utility - staircase accommodation

3.00 x 1.50 = 4.50 KN/m2

Stair-case – RC slab 240 mm Dead load The floor

0.70 x 1.35 = 0.95 KN/m²

RC slab

0.24 x 25.00

6.00 x 1.35

Plaster ≈

0.35 x 1.35

0.45

7.05

8.10 characteristic

9.50 KN/m²

Variables Utility - staircase accommodation

3.00 x 1.50 = 3.00 KN/m2

Seismic load The area is classified in 7º seismic MSK-64; Category ground B. Source areas of the seismic risk of a seismic acceleration agr = 0.86 m / s 2 coefficient significance class γ = 1:00; subsoil factor B → S = 1:35 Behaviour factor for horizontal seismic load: The compliance structure – DCM Behaviour factor q 0 = 3:00; The effect of the dominant mode of failure to K w = 1.00

Realisation Projects

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

7.15

Variables

Department of Architecture


231

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

Coefficient of behaviour construction q = 3.00 x 1.00 = 3.00 The magnitude of the earthquake: I 0 = 70; the depth of focus h ≈ 8 Km

The epicenter intensity Magnitude Mp spectra

= 00:55 0.95 x 7 = 5:50 → 4.80 ≤ elastic response type 2

- 0.05 s → 2.91 m / s 2

For these loads I am considering the following combinations: Combinations ULS: 1. combination 1.35x1 + 1.35x2 + 1.50x3 + 1.35x4 + 1.50x5 2. combination 1.35x1 + 1.35x2 + 1.35x4 + 1.50x0.70 x (3+5) + 1.5x6 3. combination 1.35x1 + 1.35x2 + 1.35x4 + 1.50x0.70 x (3+5) + 1.5x (-6) 4. combination 1.35x1 + 1.35x2 + 1.35x4 + 1.50x0.70 x (3+5) + 1.5x7 5. combination 1.35x1 + 1.35x2 + 1.35x4 + 1.50x0.70 x (3+5) + 1.5x (-7)

Magnitude earthquake: The epicenter intensity Magnitude

0

I 0 = 7 ; depth of focus h ≈ 8 Km

Ms = 0.55 x 7 + 0.95 = 4.80 ≤ 5.50 → the elastic response of the type 2

spectra – 0.05 s → 2.91 m/s2

6. combination 1.00x1 + 1.00x2 + 0.30x3 + 1.00x4 + 0.30x5 + 1.00x8 + 0.30x9 7. combination 1.00x1 + 1.00x2 + 0.30x3 + 1.00x4 + 0.30x5 + 1.00x8 + 0.30x (-9) 8. combination 1.00x1 + 1.00x2 + 0.30x3 + 1.00x4 + 0.30x5 + 1.00x (-8) + 0.30x9 9. combination 1.00x1 + 1.00x2 + 0.30x3 + 1.00x4 + 0.30x5 + 1.00x (-8) + 0.30x (-9)

0.20

2.91

10. combination 1.00x1 + 1.00x2 + 0.30x3 + 1.00x4 + 0.30x5 + 0.30x8 + 1.00x9

0.50

1.46

11. combination 1.00x1 + 1.00x2 + 0.30x3 + 1.00x4 + 0.30x5 + 0.30x8 + 1.00x (-9)

1.00

0.72

12. combination 1.00x1 + 1.00x2 + 0.30x3 + 1.00x4 + 0.30x5 + 0.30x (-8) + 1.00x9

1.50

0.39

13. combination 1.00x1 + 1.00x2 + 0.30x3 + 1.00x4 + 0.30x5 + 0.30x (-8) + 1.00x (-9)

2.00

0.22

3.50

0.11

combinations SLS:

5.00

0.07

1. combination 1.00x1 + 1.00x2 + 1.00x3 + 1.00x4 + 1.00x5

These values are considered for the calculation of seismic loading. Actions and combinations thereof. In the calculation, we considered these basic load: 1 - self weight parts of the structure 2 – dead load 3 - snow 4- the partition and outer walls 5 – variables load 6- wind load direction Y 7 - wind direction X 8 - seismicity the Y – direction 9- seismicity X – direction

Horizontal bearing structures For the design of horizontal bearing structures based on the results of the spatial 3D model, which are documented internal forces, respectively, directly required reinforcement and deformation on concrete with cracks. Reinforced concrete flat slab Level 6 - roof lift. The reinforced concrete flat slab - 180 mm thick, deformation of the concrete with cracks a necessary minimum reinforcement - see below. Reinforced concrete flat slab Level 5. The reinforced concrete flat slab - 180 mm thick, deformation of the concrete with cracks a necessary minimum reinforcement - see below. Reinforced concrete flat slab Level 4. The reinforced concrete flat slab - 180 mm thick, deformation of the concrete with cracks a necessary minimum reinforcement - see below.

Realisation Projects


232 Reinforced concrete flat slab Level 3.

along the two edges horizontal 0.001 x 20 x 100 = 2.00 cm2 along the two edges

Reinforced concrete flat slab Level 2. The reinforced concrete flat slab - 180 mm thick, deformation of the concrete with cracks a necessary minimum reinforcement - see below.

Graphic attachments are classified according to the numbering of the drawing plans Foundation.

Reinforced concrete flat slab Level 1.

I take the load on the foundation of spatial 3D model basis to consider blanket, base slab

The reinforced concrete flat slab - 180 mm thick, deformation of the concrete with cracks a necessary minimum reinforcement - see below.

foundation with a thickness of 500 mm. In a computational model it considers the infra-structure in interaction with the upper structure. The base gap will be located in a layer of clay sandy F4 to F6-EN-CI. The effects of groundwater

staircase.

on the foundation not considered.

The angle slab stairs thickness of 240 mm. The reinforced concrete slab is supported in the level 1 to the base slab foundation and the upper floors to the ceiling tile. Deformation of the concrete with cracks and required minimal reinforcement - see below.

These soils have the following mechanical properties: E def= 5.00 until 7.00 MPa C ef= 0.05 until 0.01 MPa φ ef= 200

Vertical support structures.

γ = 19.00 KN/m3

The vertical support structures form is reinforced concrete monolithic, reinforced concrete wall thickness of 180 to 200 mm, the wall thickness precision Ytong 300 mm, steel columns Q 150/150/5.

ν = 0.40 β = 0.50

partial coefficients – γ R = 1.40; γ c = 1.00; γ φ = 1.00 C d = 1.00 x 0.01 = 0.01 MPa

Results taken from the spatial model. On the walls and columns they are documented in

φ d = 1.00 x 20.00 = 20.000

graphic form the resulting internal forces for the steel columns and on each wall marked the

depth of slab foundation D min = 0.80 m; width of slab foundation B = 1.00 m; Length of slab foundation

necessary reinforcement in cm2; in the areas of reinforcement is taken into account minimum

L = 10.00 m

percentage of reinforcement under the current guidelines of EC2 Minimum % reinforcement:

The design resistance Subsoil : Coefficients of bearing capacity of foundation soil for φ d = 20.000

- vertical reinforcement A s, vmin = 0.002 x b x h

N q = tg2 (45 + 20.00/2) . e3.14 x tg 20.00 = 6.40

- horizontal reinforcement A s, hmin = 0.001 x b x h, or 0.25 x A s,vmin -

N c = (6.40 – 1) x 1/tg 20.00 = 14.83

- The greater of maximum reinforcement%: A s, vmax = 0.04 x b x h

N γ = 1.50 (6.40 – 1) x tg 20.00 = 2.95 2

Minimum reinforcement for a wall thickness of 180 mm - vertical 0.002 x 18 x 100 = 3.60 cm along the two edges horizontal 0.001 x 18 x 100 = 1.80 cm2

Coefficients of the shape of the base: s c = 1 + 0.20 x 1.00/10.00 = 1.02 s q = 1 + 1.00/10.00 x (sin 20.00) = 1.03

Realisation Projects

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

The reinforced concrete flat slab - 180 mm thick, deformation of the concrete with cracks a necessary minimum reinforcement - see below.

Department of Architecture

along the two edges Minimum reinforcement for a wall thickness of 200 mm - vertical 0.002 x 20 x 100 = 4.00 cm2


233

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

s γ = 1 – 0.30 x 1.00/10.00 = 0.97

Coefficients deep foundation: d c = 1 + 0.10 x √

0.80

1.00

d q = 1 + 0.10 x √

= 1.09

0.80 đ?‘Ľđ?‘Ľ đ?‘ đ?‘ đ?‘ đ?‘ đ?‘ đ?‘ 2 đ?‘Ľđ?‘Ľ 20.00

d Îł = 1.00

1.00

= 1.07

√ (0,8 x sin2 x 20.00/ 1.00)

Coefficients of skewness load: i c = i q = i Îł = 1.00

Coefficients of skewness terrain, slope of terrain β = 0.00 0 : j c = j q = j γ =1.00

Calculation of design resistances Subsoil: R d = (0.01 x 103 x 14.83 x 1.02 x 1.09 x 1.00 x 1.00 + 19.00 x 0.80 x 6.40 x 1.03 x 1.07 x 1.00 x x 1.00 + 19.00 x 1.00/2 x 2.95 x 0.97 x 1.00 x 1.00 x 1.00) / 1.40 = 214.00 KN/m2

For reasons difficult foundation conditions speculating

R d = 200.00 KN/m2

In calculating the spatial subsoil will restore springs type WINKLER For the following base ratios speculating modulus of subsoil reaction C = 9000 KN/m3 Approximate load on subsoil: Ceiling - level 5

8.70 + 0.8

9.50 KN/m2

Ceilings - Level 4; 3; 2

3 (9.00 + 3.00 + 1.65)

41.85 Ceiling

- Level 1

9.65 + 3.00 + 1.50

14.15

The walls

7.00

Base foundation

0.55 x 25.00 x 1.35

18.60 KN/m2

∑

≈

91.10 KN/m2

assessment. Load on subsoil - ≈

Bratislava 04. 2016.

91.10 KN/m2 ≤ 200.00 KN/m2

Sabah Shawkat

Realisation Projects


Realisation Projects STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

234


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture 235

Realisation Projects


Realisation Projects STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

236


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture 237

Realisation Projects


Realisation Projects STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

238


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture 239

Realisation Projects


Realisation Projects STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

240


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture 241

Realisation Projects


Realisation Projects STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

242


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture 243

Realisation Projects


Realisation Projects STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

244


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture 245

STAIRWAY WALL IN AXIS B- ST19

Realisation Projects


ST19

Realisation Projects STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

246


1.2.9

1.3.8

1.3.5

1.3.4

1.3.6

1.3.9

1.2.10

Zsch1

1.3.2

H

1.3.7

1.3.10

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

Realisation Projects

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

18 x 257 x 183

1.3.3

1.3.1

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture 247

PLAN GROUND FLOORBLOCK B


Realisation Projects

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

1.3.1

1.3.3

1.2.1

1.2.3

Department of Architecture

Zsch1

1.3.2

1.3.7

1.3.10

1.2.7

Zsch1

1.2.2

12

13

14

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

1.3.8

1.3.5

1.3.4

1.3.6

1.3.9

1.2.8

1.2.5

1.2.4

1.2.6

15

16

18 x 257 x 183 18 x 257 x 183

17

H

H

1.2.9

248


3,66 m2

2,50 m2

3,66 m2

2,50

m2

2,50 m2

3,66 m2

2.H.4

2.G.6

2.F.6

2.E.4

2.E.3

2.D.3

2.C.3

2.B.3

2.A.4

2.D.2

2.F.4

2.G.5 2.G.4

2.G.1

2.A.5

H

2.1.1

2.C.4

2.B.1

2.A.1

2.G.7

2.F.7

2.C.2

2.B.4

2.G.3

2.F.3

2.F.1

2.E.2

2.E.1

2.D.1

2.C.1

2.B.2

2.A.2

2.G.2

2.F.2

2.F.5

2.A.3

16

15

14

13

12

Realisation Projects

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

2.A.6

16 x 181 x 268

5,89 m2

12,66 m2

PAVLAČ

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture 249

PLAN 1,2,3 FLOOR BLOCK B


Realisation Projects 3,66

m2

3,66 m2

2,50 m2

3,66 m2

3,66 m2

2.K.5

2.N.5

2.M.4

2.M.3

2.L.3

2.L.4

2.J.6

2.I.5

2.I.3

2.H.3

2.N.6

2.N.3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

2.N.2

2.3.1

2.K.7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

2.N.1

5,89 m2

2.J.5

H

H

8,03 m2

Department of Architecture

2.M.2 2.M.5

2.M.1

2.L.1

2.K.6

2.J.2

2.J.1

2.K.1

2.L.2

2.K.3

2.J.3

2.I.4

2.2.1

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

2.N.4

2.K.4

2.K.2

2.J.4

2.I.2

2.I.1

2.H.1

2.H.2

2.G.1

16 x 181 x 268 16 x 181 x 268

2.G.5 2.G.4

250


Realisation Projects

ZS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

18 x 257 x 183

H

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

1.1.3

1.1.1

Zsch1

1.2.1

H

1.A.1

1.A.7

1.1.2

1.1.5

1.B.3

1.C.2

1.C.1

1.D.4

Zsch1

1.A.X

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

1.C.X

1.D.3

1.D.1

1.1.6

1.A.4

1.B.1

1.A.3

1.A.5

1.B.2

1.1.4

1.C.3

1.C.5

1.D.6

1.D.2

1.C.4

1.E.5

1.D.5

1.E.2

1.E.6

1.1.8

1.1.7

1.A.2

1.A.6

1.B.4

1.B.5

1.C.6

1.C.7

1.D.7

1.D.8

1.E.8

1.E.7

1.1.9

4,20 m2

4,20 m2

4,20 m2

4,20 m2

4,20 m2

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

1.E.4

1.E.1

1.E.3

18 x 257 x 183

Department of Architecture 251

PLAN GROUND FLOORBLOCK A


15

2.D.X

2.2.1

16 x 181 x 268

2.A.4

28,95 m2

8,98 m2

2.A.X

2.B.X

2.C.X

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

2.E.3

2.1.1

2.I.4

2.J.4

3,09 m2

3,09 m2

3,09 m2

3,09 m2

3,09 m2

3,09 m2

3,09 m2

Department of Architecture

2.A.8

2.B.5

2.B.4

2.C.3

2.D.4

2.E.5

2.F.5

2.G.5

2.H.5

2.I.5

3,86 m2

PLAN 1,2,3 FLOOR BLOCK A

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

2.A.7

2.A.5

2.A.6

2.B.1

2.B.2

2.D.5

2.C.1

2.C.2

2.D.3

2.E.2

2.E.4

2.F.4

2.F.2

2.G.4

2.G.3

2.H.3

2.H.4

2.I.2

2.B.3

2.A.2

2.A.1

H

2.D.2

2.D.1

2.G.2

2.H.2

2.F.3

2.E.1

2.F.1

2.G.1

2.H.1

2.J.3

2.I.3

2.J.2

2.J.5

2.I.1

2.J.1

16 x 181 x 268

14

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

Realisation Projects 2

H 1

16

252


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

253

PHOTODOCUMENTATION- FOUNDATIONS, GROUND FLOOR

Realisation Projects


PHOTODOCUMENTATION- ROOF REINFORCEMENT

Realisation Projects

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

254


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

255

PHOTODOCUMENTATION- ROOF REINFORCEMENT , 3rd FLOOR IN PROCESS

Realisation Projects


SITE INSPECTION AND STUDENT FIELD TRIP .

Realisation Projects

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

256


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

257 References

[18] CEB - Bull. 124/125 - F: Code modéle CEB - FIP pour les structures en béton. CEB,

[1] ACI: Cracking of concrete members in direct tension. ACI Journal, Vol. 83, January –

Paris, 1980

February, 1986

[19] CEB - Bull. 156 - F: Fissuration et déformations. École Polytechnique Fédérale de

[2] ACI Committee 318 (1995), Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete, ACI

Lausanne,1983.

318-89, and Commentary, ACI 318R-89, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI, USA

[20] CEB - FIP Model Code 1990, Comité Euro - International du Béton, 1991

[3] Aide - mémoire: Composants en béton précontraint. Bordas, Paris, 1979

[21] CEB - Bull. 159: Simplified methods of calculating short term deflections of reinforced

[4] Allen, H. G.: “The strength of thin composites of finite width, with brittle matrices and

concrete slabs. Paris - Lausanne, 1983

random discontinuous reinforcing fibres, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. (1972)

[22] Cholewicki, A. ´Shear Transfer in Longitudinal Joints of Hollow-Core Slabs´ Beton

[5] Aveston, J.; Mercer, R. A. & Sillwood, J. M.: “Fibre reinforced cements – scientific

Fertigteil Technik n. 4, Wiesbaden 1991

foundations for specifications. In Composite – Standards, Testing and Design, Proc. National

[23] Comité Euro-international du Béton, Bull. n. 161, T.P. Tassios, Reporter, Ch. 4: Highly

Physical Laboratory Conference, UK, 1974

Sheared Normally Loaded Linear Elements, Paris 1983

[6] Azizinamini, A.: “Design of Tension Lap Splices in High Strength Concrete.” High

[24] Composite structures, FIP 1994

Strength Conference, First International Conference, Proc. ASCE, 1997, Kona, Hawaii

[25] Cholewicki, A: Shear Transfer in Longitudinal Joints of Hollow-Core Slabs´ Beton

[7] Balaguru, P. & Kendzulak, J.:“ Mechanical properties of Slurry Infiltrated Fiber Concrete

Fertigteil Technik n. 4, Wiesbaden 1991

(SIFCON). American concrete Institute, Detroit, 1987

[26] Composite Dycore Office Structures, Company literature-Finfrock Industries, Inc.,

[8] Balaguru and Shah 1992, Fiber-Reinforced Cement Composites. McGraw-Hill Inc. 1992.

Orlando, FL, 1992.

[9] Bentur, Mindness 1990, Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites. Elsevier Applied

[27] CCBA 68: Régles Techniques de conception et de calcul des ouvrages et constructions

Science, 1990, 449 p

en béton armé. D.T.U. Paris, 1975

[10] Bazant, Z. P. & Oh, B. H.: “Crack band theory for fracture of concrete.”, Materials and

[28] Consenza, E., Greco, C.: Comparison and Optimization of Different Methods of

Structures (RILEM), 1993

Evaluation of Displacements in Cracked Reinforced Concrete Beams. Materials and

[11] Beeby, A. W.: The Prediction of Crack Widths in Hardened Concrete, Cement and

Structures, No. 23, 1990

Concrete Association, London, 1979

[29] Coates, R. C., Coutie, M. G., Kong, F. K.: Structural analysis, Second Edition, Hong

[12] Belgian standard NBN B15-238 (1992)

Kong, 1980

[13] Brandt, A. M.: “Cement – Based Composites”, 1995 E & FN SPON

[30] Cox, H.L:“ The elasticity and strength of fibrous material”, Br. J, Appl. Phys. (1952)

[14] Bjarne, Ch. J.: Lines of Discontinuity for Displacements in the Theory of Plasticity of

[31] Davidovici, V.: Béton armé, aide - mémoire. Bordas, Paris, 1974

Plain and Reinforced Concrete, Magazine of Concrete Research, Vol. 27, No. 92, September,

[32] DBV-Merkblatt ”Bemessungsgrundlagen fur Stahlfaserbeton” (1992)

1975

[33] Design of Concrete Structure, Norwegian Standard NS3473 (1992), Norwegian Council

[15] Boulet, B.: Aide - mémoire du second oeuvre du batiment. Bordas, Paris, 1977

for Building Standardization, Oslo, 1992

[16] Brooks, J. J., Neville, A. M.: A comparison of creep, elasticity, and strength of concrete

[34] Deutscher Ausschuss fur Stahlbeton – DafStb (1994): Richlinie fur Hochfesten Beton,

in tension and in compression. Magazine of Concrete Research, Vol. 29, 1977

Supplement a DIN 1045, DIN 488 and DIN 1055, Berlin, Germany

[17] Chan, S.Y.N.; Anson, M.; Koo, S. L.:” The development of very High Strength

[35] Eibl, J.: Concrete Structures. Euro - Design Handbook. Karlsruhe, 1994 – 96

Concrete” Concrete in the Service of Manking, Radial Concrete Technology – Proceeding of

[36] Edward, G., Nawy, P.E.: Prestressed Concrete A fundamental Approach. Part 1, New

the International Conference, University of Dunde, Scotland, UK, 27-28 June 1996.

Jersey, 1989

References


[53] Hognestad, E., A Study of Combined Bending and Axial Load in Reinforced Concrete

members. ACI Journal, Vol. 67, 1970

Members, University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station, Bulletin Series No. 399,

[38] Elliot, K. S.; Torey, A. K.: Precast concrete frame buildings, Design Guide. British

Bulletin No. 1, 1951.

Cement Association 1992

[54] Hsu, T. T. C.: Torsion of reinforced concrete. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1984

[39] FIP Recommendations ´Design of multi-storey precast concrete structures´. 1986

[55] Ismail, M. A., Jirsa, J. O.: Bond deterioration in reinforced concrete subject to low cycle

[40] Goto, Y.: Cracks Formed in Concrete Around Deformed Tension Bars, Journal of the

loads. ACI Journal, Vol. 69, June, 1972

ACI, No. 68, April, 1971

[56] Klink, S. A.: Actual Elastic Modulus of Concrete. ACI Journal, September - October,

[41] Gregor, J. G.: Reinforced Concrete, New Jersey, 1988

1985

[42] Gvozdev, A. A.: Novoje v projektirovanii betonnych i železobetonnych konstrukcij.

[57] Kelly, J. M., Skinner, R. I., and Heine, A. J., ‘Mechanisms of Energy Absoption in

Moskva, 1978

Special Devices for use in Earthquake Resistant Structures, ‘Bulletin of the New Zealand

[43] Goulet, J.: Résistance des matériaux. aide - mémoire, Bordas, Paris, 1976

Society for Earthquake Engineering. Vol. 5, No. 3, Sept. 1972.

[44] Grandet, J.: „ Durability of High Performance Concrete in Relation to ‚External‘

[58] Laws, V.: “The efficiency of fibrous reinforcement of brittle matrices.” J. Phys. D. Appl.

Chemical Attack“, High Performance Concrete: From material to structure, 1992 E & FN

Phys., (1971)

Spon

[59] Lawrence, P.:” Some theoretical considerations of fibre pull-out from an elastic matrix”,

[45] Grigorian, C. E., Yang, T.-S., and Popov, E. P., ‘Slotted Bolted Connection Energy

Journal of Material Science 7 (1972)

Dissipators,’ Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California,

[60] Leonhardt, F.: Reducting Shear Reinforcement in Reinforced Concrete Beams and Slabs,

Berkeley, Report No. UCB/EERC-92/10, July, 1992.

Magazine of Concrete Research, Vol. 17, No. 53, December, 1965

[46] Gupta, A. K.: Unified Approach to Modelling Postcracking Membrane Behavior of

[61] Leonhardt, F.: Recommendations for the Degree of Prestressing Prestressed Concrete

Reinferced Concrete, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 115, No. 4, April, 1989

Structures. FIP Notes 69, July - August, 1977

[47] Gupta, A. K.: Postcracking Behavior of Membrane Reinforced Concrete Elements

[62] Leonhardt, F.: Crack Control in Concrete Structures. ACI Journal, July - August, 1988

Including Tension-Stiffening. Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol.115, No. 4, April, 1989

[63] Leonhardt, F.: Vorlesungen uber Massivbau. Vol. 4, 1978

[48] Grigorian, C. E., Yang, T.-S., and Popov, E. P., ‘Slotted Bolted Connection Energy

[64] Lenkei, P.: Deformation capacity in reinforced concrete slabs. In: IABSE Colloquium -

Dissipators,’ Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley,

Plasticity in reinforced Concrete, Copenhagen, 1979

Report No. UCB/EERC-92/10, July, 1992.

[65] Leong, T. W., Warner, R. F.: Creep and shrinkage in reinforced concrete beams. Journal

[49] Hanečka, Š., Križma, M., Ravinger, J., Shawkat, S.: Contribution to Limit State of the

of the Structural Division, Vol. 96, March, 1970

Second Group of Beams Subjected to Moving Load. First Slovak Conference on Concrete

[66] Lin, C.S. and Scordelis, A.C., Nonlinear Analysis of RC Shells of General Form,

Structures, Bratislava, September, 1994.

Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, 101(1975) 523-538.

[50] Hassanzadeh, M.; Haghpassand, A.:”Brittleness of Normal and High-Strength Concrete”,

[67] Maidl, B., “Stahlfaserbeton”, Ernst & Sohn, Berlin, 1991

Utilization of High Strength Concrete, Proceedings, Symposium in Lillehammer, Norway,

[68] Mindes, S. & Bentur, A.:”Fibre Reinforced cementitious Composites”, 1990 Elsevier

June 20-23, 1993

Science Publishers Ltd

[51] Hillerborg, P. E., Int. J. Cem. Comp., 1980

[69] Moranville-Rgourd, M.:“Durability of High Performance Concrete : Alkali-Aggregate

[52] Holzmann, P.: “High strength concrete C 105 with increased Fire-resistance due to

Reaction and Carbonation“, High Performance Concrete: From material to structure, 1992 E

polypropylen Fibres”, Utilization of High Strength /High Performance Concrete, Proceedings,

& FN Spon

Symposium in Paris, France, May 29-31 1996

References

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

[37] Elvery, R., Shafi, M.: Analysis of shrinkage effect on reinforced concrete structural

Department of Architecture

258


STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

Department of Architecture

259 [70] Muller, H. S.: “Creep of High Performance Concrete – Characteristics and Code-Type

[85] Schlaich, J., Scheef, H.: Concrete box - girder bridges. Structural Engineering

prediction Model.” Fourth International Symposium on the Utilization of High Strength /

Documents 1e. Stuttgart, January, 1982

High Performance Concrete, 1996, Paris, France

[86] Shah, S.P.: “Material aspects of High Performance Concrete.”

[71] Naaman, A. E.: „Fasern mit verbesserter Haftung.” Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 95, 2000,

Conference, First International Conference, Proc. ASCE, 1997, Kona, Hawaii

Heft 4

[87] Shah, S. P.: “Advanced Cement-Based Composites”, Concrete in the Service of

[72] Ontario Precast Concrete Manufactures Association and PCA, Duotek, Portland Cement

Manking, Radial Concrete Technology – Proceeding of the International Conference,

Association, Skokie, IL.

University of Dunde, Scotland, UK, 27-28 June 1996.

[73] Placas, A., Regan, P.E.: Limit - state design for shear in rectangular and "T" beams.

[88] Shawkat, S.: Deformácie konštrukcie. Medzinárodná vedecká konferencia - 60. Výročie

Magazine of Concrete Research, December, 1970

Stavebnej fakulty STU v Bratislave. Zborník vedeckých prác. Bratislava, 18. - 20. november

[74] Placas, A., Regan, P.E.: Shear Failure of Reinforced Concrete Beams. Journal ACI,

1998.

October, 1971

[89] Shawkat, S.: Deformation of reinforced concrete beams. Proceedings of the RILEM

[75] Pitoňák, A., Nürnbergerová, T., Shawkat, S.: Pretvárne charakteristiky betónových

International Conference Concrete bridges, Štrbské pleso, 22. - 24. september 1997

nosníkov vystužených predpätými tyčami. Stavebné Materiály a Skúšobníctvo, Zborník

[90] Low, S-G., et al.: Minimization of Floor Thickness in Precast Prestressed Concrete

Podbanské, Vysoké Tatry, 27.- 29. máj 1998

Multistory Buildings, PCI Journal, Vol. 36, No. 4, July-August 1991

[76] Prekop, L., Shawkat, S., Králik, J.: Modelovanie experimentálnych priehybov prútových

[91] Shawkat, S., Križma, M., Cesnak, J., Bartók, A.: Moment and Shear Deflection for

betónových prvkov. Vybrané problémy stavebnej mechaniky. Zborník prednášok z vedeckej

Reinforced Concrete Beams. Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering, Volume II, No. 2-3, 1994

konferencie pri príležitosti 70. narodenín Prof. Ing. J. Sobotu, DrSc., Bratislava, September,

[92] Shawkat, S., Cesnak, J.: Crack Development and Strain Energy of Reinforced Concrete

1996

Beams. First Slovak Conference on Concrete Structures, Bratislava, September 1994

[77] PCI Technical Report no. 2. Connections for Precast Prestressed Concrete Buildings

[93] Shawkat, S., Cesnak, J.: Deflection of Reinforced Concrete Beams due to Actions of

including earthquake resistance. March 1992.

Shearing Forces. Proceedings of an International Conference RILEM. Failures of Concrete

[78] Prior, R. C., Pessiki, S., Sause, R., Slaughter, S., van Zyverden, W.: Identification and

Structures, Štrbské pleso, 1993

Preliminary Assessment of Existing Precast Concrete Floor Framing System, ATLSS Report

[94] Shawkat, S., Križma, M, Cesnak, J.: Determination of Strain Energy on Reinforced

93-07, August 1993, 141 pp.

Concrete Beams. Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering, Volume II, 1994

[79] Rehm, G., Eligehausen, R., Mallee, R.: Limitation of Shear Crack Width in Reinforced

[95] Shawkat, S., Cesnak, J.: Deformations of Reinforced Concrete Beams Subjected to

High Strength

Concrete Construction. University of Stuttgart, Heft 6, 1983

Stationary Loading. Inžinierske stavby 43, č. 9 -10, 1995

[80] Rehm, G.: Berechnung der Breite von Schubrissen in Stahlbetonbauteilen. Ausfsatz fur

[96] Shawkat, S., Bolha, Ľ.: Internal Energy of Concrete Elements by Moving Load,

CEB. Stuttgart, 1977

Inžinierske stavby, 43, č. 4, 1995

[81] Recommendations on precast prestressed Hollow-Core Floors Th. Telford Publ., London

[97] Shawkat, S., Nürnbergerová, T., Pitoňák, A.: Ohybová tuhosť prútových betónových

1988

prvkov. Betonárske dni 1996, Zborník prednášok, Bratislava, September, 1996

[82] Russell, H.& Thomas, M. D.:“Durability of Concrete containing Fine Pozzolan“

[98] Shawkat, S., Križma, M.: Šmyková tuhosť betónových prvkov po vzniku trhlín.

Utilization of High Strength / High Performance Concrete, Florida, USA,

Vybrané problémy stavebnej mechaniky. Zborník prednášok z vedeckej konferencie pri

[83] Sargin, M: Stress - strain relationships for concrete and the analysis of structural

príležitosti 70. narodenín Prof. Ing. J. Sobotu, DrSc., Bratislava, September, 1996

concretesections. University of Waterloo, Study No. 4, 1971

[99] Shawkat, S., Križma, M., Šuchtová A.: Deformation of Reinforced Concrete Beams.

[84] Saliger, R.: Der Stahlbetonbau. 8. Auflage. Franz Deuticke, Wien, 1956

Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering, č. 3-4, 1996

References


Bratislava, SvF STU, 1993 [101] Shawkat, S.: Structural design I. - 1. vyd. - Brno : Tribun EU, 2015. - 210 p. - ISBN 978-80-263-0977-2 [102] Shawkat, S.: Structural design II. - 1. vyd. - Brno : Tribun EU, 2015. - 125 p. - ISBN 978-80-263-0978-9 [103] Shawkat, S.: Structural design III. - Brno : Tribun EU, 2016. - 356 p. - ISBN 978-80-263-10113-6 [104] Neville 1995, Properties of Concrete, Fourth Ed., Longman Group, 1995, 844 p. [105] Tadros, M. K., Einea, A., Low, S.-G., Magana, and Schultz, A. E., ‘Seismic Resistance of a Six-Story Totally Precast Office Building, ‘Proceedings, FIP Symposium, 93, Kyoto, Japan, Oct. 17-20, 1993. [106] Vagner, V. W., Erlhof, G.: Praktische Baustatik. Teil 1, 2, 3, Stuttgart, 1977 [107] Vecchio, F. J.: Reinforced Concrete Membrane Element Formulations. Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 116, No. 3, March, 1990 [108] Van Zyverden, W., Pessiki, S., Sause, R., and Slaughter, S., “Proposed Concepts for New Floor Framing Systems for Precast Concrete Office Buildings“ATLSS Report No. 94-05, Center for Advanced Technology for Large Structural System, Lehigh University Bethlehem, PA, March 1994, 49 pp. [109] Wecharatana, M.; Shah, S. P.:”Fracture in Concrete”, Proc. ASCE Session, Hollywood, Florida, Oct. 27-31 1980 [110] Yee, A.A.: Design Considerations for Precast Prestressed Concrete Building Structures in Seismic Areas, PCI Journal, Vol. 36 No. 3, May-June 1991.including earthquake resistance. March 1992. [111] Zhou, F. P.; Barr, B. I. G.:” Effect of coarse aggregate on elastic modulus and compressive strength of High Performance Concrete”, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 25, No. 1, 1995 Elsevier Science Ltd.

References

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM

[100] Shawkat, S.: Vplyv priečnych síl na priehyb prútových nosníkov [Dizertačná práca].

Department of Architecture

260


Department of Architecture

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ROOM Element Design to Shape a Structure I. ©

Assoc. Prof. Dipl. Ing. Sabah Shawkat, MSc, PhD. 1. Edition, Tribun EU, s.r.o. Brno 2017 ISBN 978-80-263-1190-4


9 788026 311904


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.