Safety on the River Calder The Problem Boats heading downriver may • come upon an 'amber' river level warning. • be unaware whether the next canal section has an operable flood lock or flood gates • (in either case) be unaware whether the next canal section's flood gates are open or closed • even when arriving, find it difficult to see the current state of the gates • and particularly in the case of closed flood gates, be unaware whether it is possible, desirable or permitted to open them to pass into the next canal section • … and if it is not possible to pass into the next canal section, whether the boat can safely turn, and even if it can, whether it can make progress upriver against the stream to regain the safety of the canal section it has just left. Background The River Calder forms the river sections of two historic navigations, the Calder and Hebble (Brighouse to Wakefield) and the Aire and Calder (Wakefield Branch) (Wakefield to Castleford). There is no prominent signage to demarcate the two navigations, so considered here in their context as one river. By this analysis, there are ten separate river sections, each with their own separate navigational risks and challenges, particularly during higher water levels. In terms of navigation downriver, the main differences are approaching flood locks compared with flood gates. As an example of the difficulties, the quoted name of the structure is not an infallible guide to whether it is now operated as a gate or a lock. For example, Thornhill Flood Lock has had its inner gates permanently removed and is now operated as only flood Gates. Information for management of the system We are not aware of any published information on: • Number of boat passages in each direction in Spring Summer Autumn Winter • How often, in each season, navigation is restricted by river levels • How many boat passages are inconvenienced by such restrictions, … • … and how often such inconvenience extends to a problem of safety on the river and danger to boats and their crews… • … and of those incidents, any which have lead to actual damage to boats, personal injury to boat crews, or a need to call out the emergency services. • … and what proportion of closures could have been avoided with no adverse consequences, for example when the levels never actually leave the green zone? Similarly we are not aware of any published information for boaters about how the closure and reopening of flood gates and flood locks is intended to work. In particular there is nothing on any of the following in the BW boaters' Guides (appended hereto) downloadable from the Waterscape website. • What is the trigger that causes the flood gates and flood locks to be closed? • Are there separate triggers for each flood gate and flood lock (guess this to be most likely, but it is conceivable that a single state applies to the whole river)? … • … and is there a separate (lesser) trigger that causes the flood locks to be brought into use as locks instead of having both sets of gates open? • And what are the triggers to allow the flood gates and flood locks to be reopened to navigation? • … and how is the balance achieved between the flood protection requirements for closure and the navigation requirements for reopening? • … and what safety margin is incorporated into these calculations? • Is it intended that only British Waterways people secure and reopen the flood gates ? … • … in which case whether it is intended that the flood gates are always chained back when not in use? … • … and are these arrangements consistent down the whole of the river, and across the whole year? ... • … and is there a role for boat crews in operating flood gates, and what would be the rules for leaving gates in a state other than that in which they were found? Operation of the Flood Warning System