Missoula International Ap,MT,USA WMO#727730; NREL TMY Data
120
100
Outdoor Temperature (oF)
80
ASHRAE Design Temperature Cooling 0.4% 92.5 OF Cooling 1% 89.3 OF Cooling 2% 85.7 OF
60
40
PORTFOLIO
20
0
Heating 99% 1.8 OF Heating 99.6% ‐6 OF ASHRAE Design Temperature
‐20
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep RH>60%
RH 40%‐60%
RH 20%‐40%
Oct Nov Dec
RH<20%
Frenchtown Mill 2014042.00 6/23/2014
1
Analysis
Exterior View from 12th Ave NE
Capitol Hill EcoDistrict TOD Angle Lake Station Link Extension Parking Garage Frenchtown Mill 2.0 Urban Design, MT Sentul Site Masterplan,Indonesia WSU Visitor Center Pike Market Place I&II
Project 7TH at Gilman Housing
LEED Admin THA Community Center THA Bay Terrace Housing UW Childrens Housing Avalon Bay University District Housing AMLI South Lake Union Phase I&II AMLI Ballard Housing AMLI Wallingford Housing
WEI YAN GGLO work 2013-2014
CONCE PT
CON C E PT & BASELI NE
SHADOW STUDY: POINTS KEY PLAN
SHADOW STUDY: POINTS 1-2-3
"Master Dev 02" Model (08/15/2013)
"Master Dev 02" Model (08/15/2013)
"Max FAR" Model (06/27/2013)
Baseline (Max FAR) Pt1 gains an extra 15min-30min of solar access in the morning around 9am while having a bit more afternoon shading in summer months.
Pt1 Pt2 Pt3
Light Rail Bldg A-N Station
Shadow by
Bldg B-N
Pt1
Bldg A Bldg B Bldg C
Bldg A-C
Bldg B-C
Station
30' 30' 60'
Bldg A-S 60'
Other
Baseline (Max FAR)
Pt1 Pt2 Pt3
Pt2 gains an extra 15min-30min of solar access in the morning around 11am (Oct-Mar) while having more afternoon solar access over the year.
Bldg B-S Pt4 Pt5 Pt6
Northern Points (1-3): Slight gains in solar/ daylight access in the morning and afternoon
Pt7 Pt8 Pt9
Pt2
Bldg C Baseline (Max FAR)
Note: The hours shown on sun path diagrams are solar hours. Local hours are about 1hr ahead due to daylight saving time and time zone adjustment. (noon on diagram= approx.1pm)
Capitol Hill TOD Analysis August 16, 2013
12
Pt3 has a loss of 15min solar access in the morning around 11am over the year while having more solar access in the afternoon throughout the year.
Pt3
Capitol Hill TOD Analysis Capitol Hill TOD 1 August 16, 2013
Site/Daylight/Shading Analysis 2013.08-2014.09
13
E N ER GY C APAC I T Y CONCEPT SCHEME "Master Dev 02" Model (08/15/2013)
DEMAND
30%
EUI EUI (kBTU/SF/Year) (kBTU/SF/Year)
90
80
80
30%
EUI
100
60
Reduction
Reduction
60
63
90 EUI
EUI
63
20
27
20
27
20
DEMAND
10
EUI
0
18%
Reduction
45 EUI
45
Bldg B-S
16 EUI
70%
EUI (kBTU/SF/Year)
BLDG A-NORTH
MASTER DEV.02 BLDG A-CENTRAL & A-SOUTH
20 60 10 50
REC.
36%
EUI (kBTU/SF/Year)
OTHER
18% 10%
RECREATION OTHER
20
40
EUI
36%
76% RENEWABLES 18% Reduction
RENEWABLES
80
0
20
40
provides
70% 17
100
60
10
REC.
OTHER
BLDG
provides
9% 9% 20 9% 0 REC.
REC. OTHER
RECREATION
40
RENEWABLES
SITE B
~25,000 GAL
261,000 GAL/YR 176,000 GAL/YR
SITE B
392,000 GAL/YR
Bldg A-C
Bldg B-C
Bldg A-S
Bldg B-S
176,000 GAL/YR
1000000
2000000
3000000C
0
1000000
DEMAND 2000000 2.0 MILLION 3000000 GAL/YR
4000000
RESIDENTIAL
4000000
RESIDENTIAL DEMAND
OFFICE + RETAIL DEMAND
2.0 MILLION GAL/YR
0.25 MILLION GAL/YR
~50,000 GAL
IRRIGATION DEMAND OFFICE RETAIL 0.02 MILLION+GAL/YR DEMAND
RAINWATER CISTERN
OPTION 2
0.25 MILLION GAL/YR
~50,000 GAL
IRRIGATION DEMAND
RAINWATER CISTERN
0.02 MILLION GAL/YR
RESIDENTIAL DEMAND 3.8 MILLION GAL/YR
OPTION 2
EUI
provides
~25,000 GAL
Solar Hot Water or
4.3% 11.8% 112%
provides
Solar Hot Water or
2.7% 7.5%
IRRIGATION DEMAND 0.02 MILLION GAL/YR
RAINWATER CISTERN
Electricity 2030 Bldg
RENEWABLES
SITE C
Electricity 2030 Bldg
80
Bldg
0
OPTION 1
390%
73%
73% 60
2.7% 7.3%
15,000 GAL OPTION 1
GREYWATER CISTERN
100
LEED-SILVER RENEWABLES 2030 CHALLENGE COMPLIANT BLDG BLDG
OTHER
~10,000RAINWATER CISTERN
RAINWATER CISTERN
MASTER DEV.02
GREEN ROOF
Solar Hot Water or
Electricity 2030 Bldg
SUPPLY POTENTIAL (LEED 10% SILVER BLDG) BLDG B-CENTRAL 20%- SITE C 31% 39% & B-SOUTH
4.4% 10.2% 129%
EUI
13%REGION-TYPICAL 11%
~25,000 GAL
EUI
36% 80
GREYWATER CISTERN
Solar Hot Water or
Electricity 2030 Bldg
2030 CHALLENGE RENEWABLES COMPLIANT BLDG
SUPPLY POTENTIAL - SITE B (LEED SILVER BLDG) % OF ROOF AREA 17 MASTER DEV.02 BLDG B-NORTH 0
SITE A SITE C
Bldg B-N
SITE A
2169%
129% Reduction Solar Hot Water or provides 2.7% 7.3% EUIElectricity 2030 Bldg
% OF ROOF AREA LEED-SILVER REGION-TYPICAL EUI GREEN ROOF RECREATION OTHER BLDG BLDG
30
4.4% 10.2% Electricity 2030 Bldg
18% 45 10%
60
RAINWATER HARVESTING POTENTIAL 392,000 GAL/YR
Bldg A-N
SITE A
~10,00015,000 GAL
Solar Hot Water or
provides
36%
55
GREEN ROOF
20
RENEWABLES
11% 11%
MASTER DEV.02 0 0 BLDG A-CENTRAL40 & A-SOUTH
EUI
76%
OTHER
261,000 GAL/YR
EUI
55 50 EUI GOLD/SILVER BLDG) SUPPLY POTENTIAL - SITE A (LEED SUPPLY POTENTIAL SITE A (LEED 45 GOLD/SILVER BLDG) 40 MASTER DEV.02 2169% REC.
SITE B
SITE C
Bldg C
16
18%
BLDG A-NORTH
"Master Dev 02" Model (08/15/2013)
70%
2030 CHALLENGE LEED-GOLD 2030 CHALLENGE REGION-TYPICAL LEED-SILVER REGION-TYPICAL LEED-SILVER 2030 CHALLENGE LEED-GOLD 2030 CHALLENGE REGION-TYPICAL REGION-TYPICAL 60 BLDG COMPLIANT COMPLIANT BLDG BLDG MIXED-USE BLDG BLDG OFFICE BLDG BLDG COMPLIANT BLDG COMPLIANT BLDG MIXED-USE BLDG Reduction Reduction BLDG BLDG OFFICE
11% 11% DEMAND MASTER DEV.0230
CONCEPT SCHEME
Reduction
EUI
0
0
Bldg A-S
SITE A
EUI Reduction
10
EUI
Bldg B-C
WATE R C APACI T Y
5570%
30 20
EUI 30
EUI
40
EUIEUI
40
Bldg A-C
18%
40
55
50
Bldg B-N
Reduction
60 50
70%
Reduction
6040
0
70%
Reduction
100 DEMAND
Bldg A-N
RESIDENTIAL DEMAND 1.8 MILLION GAL/YR
100
% OF ROOF AREA MASTER DEV.02 BLDG C
9% 9% 9% GR
0
REC
73%
OTHER
20
provides
RENEWABLES
40
60
RETAIL DEMAND
405%
0.02 MILLION GAL/YR
Solar Hot Water or
4.9% 13.4% Electricity 2030 Bldg
80
~3,000 GAL
100
IRRIGATION DEMAND 0.003 MILLION GAL/YR
RAINWATER CISTERN
% OF ROOF AREA
Capitol Hill TOD Analysis August 21, 2013
13
*POTABLE WATER CAPACITY EVALUATION DOES NOT INCLUDE POSSIBLE STORMWATER DETENTION NEEDS
Capitol Hill TOD Analysis Capitol Hill TOD 2 August 21, 2013
Site/Daylight/Shading Analysis 2013.08-2014.09
18
BldgA(v3)_Daylight
B A CORRIDOR
C D
Analysis Objectives:
1. To understand how the units perform under the new LEEDv4 daylight metrics. 2. To test how much the interior space daylight will be improved by opening windows to the light wells. L3,5,7 were selected. 3. To understand how the lightwells are performing for corridors at Level 3-8. Three levels were selected (L3,5,7) to represent the daylight conditions in lower, middle and upper building section. Note: 1.No blinds/shades are installed or operated. 2.Ambient bounces is set to 2 instead of 6 to save time while yielding reasonably accurate results. 3. Building A rhino model created at 9/15/2014 is used as base model.
Results & Recommendations:
N
1.All four units showed high level of illumination near the east or west facing window. Unit A&B performed better than Unit C&D due to the horizontal shading provided by the deck. Shading is recommened for all units. 2. Window facing the light wells are more effective for the west units (A&B) than east untis(C&D). For A&B, indoor space will see improvement at L5-8, while L7-8 for C&D. Additional shading is recommened for L7-8 west units facing elongated light wells. Glazed doors or windows near entrances are recommened especially for west units at L5-8 to reduce visual discomfort casued by high contrast between the corridor and the unit entrance area. 3. Level 5-8 corridor benefit significantly from the light wells. Properly zoned dimming devices will furthur reduce the electric lighting energy use.
GGLO #2013065.00 09/22/2014
Capitol Hill TOD
Site/Daylight/Shading Analysis 2013.08-2014.09
3
BldgA(v3)_Unit A vs B_Level 7_useful daylight illuminance (UDI) B A Deck
Living Room
Bathroom
Bedroom
Deck
Living Room
Bathroom
Kitchen
LEVEL 7
UDI <100 lux
unit A
Living Room
Unit A: sDA 300/50% =25% (LEED v4 not met) UDI 100-2000 lux/50%=58% of floor area ASE 1000,250 =14% (LEED v4 not met)
unit B
Bathroom
Bedroom
Deck
Living Room
Bathroom
Kitchen
Bathroom
UDI 100- 2000 lux unit A
GGLO #2013065.00 09/22/2014
•
Windows facing the light well greatly improves the bedroom daylight by providing 100-2000lux illumination to about half of the bedroom over the year.
•
Unit A bedroom may require glare control devices as area near window has approx.25% chance of light level over 2000 lux. Potential glare issue near west facing window similar as Level 3/5.
•
High contrast issue similar as Level 5.
unit B
Bedroom
Deck
Living Room
Kitchen N
Unit B: sDA 300/50% =22% (LEED v4 not met) UDI 100-2000 lux/50%=55% of floor area
UDI >2000 lux
unit A
Living Room
Bedroom
Kitchen
UDI >2000 lux
Deck
N
Kitchen
UDI <100 lux
Deck
Bedroom
Bathroom Kitchen
UDI 100- 2000 lux unit B
Bedroom
LEED v4 Daylight credit (op1) sDA 300/50%≥55% of floor area and ASE 1000, 250≤10% of floor area (%) 0
25
50
75
100
Capitol Hill TOD
Site/Daylight/Shading Analysis 2013.08-2014.09
4
BldgA(v3)_Corridor_Level 5_useful daylight illuminance (UDI) CORRIDOR
N
LEVEL 5
Daylit Area (sDA 300/50%) =44% of floor area UDI 100-2000 lux/50%=58% of floor area •
The corridor daylight on level 5 is improved along the edges of the light wells, not so much in the lobbies on the north and south end. The corrdior area along the unit wall will need electric light for about 75% of the time ir order to provide enough lighting.
•
The illuminnance level of the corridor in general stays under 2000 lux (200fc) with relatively low glare potentials.
Areas require electric lighting most of the year.
N
UDI 100-2000 lux GGLO #2013065.00 09/22/2014
UDI >2000 lux
UDI <100 lux
LEED v4 Daylight credit (op1) sDA 300/50%≥55% of floor area and ASE 1000, 250≤10% of floor area (%) 0
25
50
75
100
Capitol Hill TOD
Site/Daylight/Shading Analysis 2013.08-2014.09
5
a, Montana
rth ; Long 114.09o West
Missoula, Montana
F = 7484/294 o
Missoula International Ap,MT,USA 1 TEMPERATURE
WMO#727730; NREL TMY Data Missoula International Ap,MT,USA
120
WMO#727730; NREL TMY Data
120
100
80
60
40
20
100
ASHRAE Design Temperature ASHRAE Design Temperature OF0.4% 92.5 OF Cooling Cooling 0.4% 92.5 Cooling OF 1% 89.3 OF Cooling 1% 89.3 O Cooling OF 2% 85.7 F Cooling 2% 85.7 80
Outdoor Temperature (oF)
TURE
Lat 46.92 North ; Long 114.09o West Elev 3189 ft HDD/CDD 65 oF = 7484/294
Outdoor Temperature (oF)
o
60
40
20
0
Heating 99% 1.8 OF Heating 99.6% ‐6 OF ASHRAE Design Temperature
0
‐20
OF Heating 99% 1.8 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Heating 99.6% ‐6 OF ASHRAE Design Temperature
RH>60%
RH 40%‐60%
RH 20%‐40%
Oct Nov Dec
RH<20%
‐20
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep RH>60%
RH 40%‐60%
RH 20%‐40%
1
Frenchtown Mill 2014042.00 6/23/2014
Oct Nov Dec
RH<20%
Frenchtown Mill, Missoula MT
Climate Analysis 2014.07
6
Frenchtow
Missoula, Montana Lat 46.92o North ; Long 114.09o West Elev 3189 ft HDD/CDD 65 oF = 7484/294 4 WIND ROSE_Summer
4 WIND ROSE_Winter
Missoula International Ap,MT,USA
Missoula International Ap,MT,USA
Latitude/Longitute: 46.92, ‐114.1
Latitude/Longitute: 46.92, ‐114.1
WMO#727730; NREL TMY Data Set (2008)
NNW
Data Period: Summer Jun‐Aug 0:00‐24:00
WMO#727730; NREL TMY Data Set (2008)
N 14%
Wind Speed Data Period: Winter (mph) Dec‐Feb 25 + 0:00‐24:00 18 ‐ 24
NNE
12%
NW
NE
10%
NNW
ENE
6%
8 ‐ 12 4 ‐ 7
18 ‐ 24 13 ‐ 17
8%
WNW
ENE
6%
8 ‐ 12 4 ‐ 7 0 ‐ 3
4%
2%
W
25 +
NE
10%
0 ‐ 3
4%
Wind Speed (mph)
NNE
12%
NW
13 ‐ 17
8%
WNW
N 14%
2%
E
0%
WSW
ESE
SE
SW SSE
SSW S
W
E
0%
WSW
ESE
SW calm: 8.33%
SE SSW
SSE
calm: 29.07%
S
3
Frenchtown Mill 2014042.00 6/23/2014
Frenchtown Mill, Missoula MT
Climate Analysis 2014.07
7
Missoula, Montana Lat 46.92o North ; Long 114.09o West Elev 3189 ft HDD/CDD 65 oF = 7484/294 5 SKY COVER
6 DAYLIGHT AVAILABIITY
Average Hourly Statistics for Total Sky Cover %
Average Hourly Statistics for Global Horizontal Illuminance, fc
1 am 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 am 12 noon 1 pm 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 pm 12 mid
Jan 71 72 68 69 70 71 75 80 83 83 80 82 82 80 85 88 82 84 80 77 79 77 75 74 0‐20% clear
Feb 59 60 61 63 64 67 69 71 73 76 78 77 76 74 75 74 75 71 69 65 63 58 55 55
Mar 76 76 79 78 77 72 79 79 80 81 79 80 80 82 84 83 83 80 73 65 66 78 76 73
Apr 55 54 54 54 52 59 63 60 66 71 71 73 69 74 74 70 75 76 80 70 62 59 52 49
20‐50% 50‐80% 80‐100% scattered broken
May 56 49 50 56 63 63 61 68 70 67 71 75 73 72 71 68 71 68 67 66 62 59 59 52
Jun 36 38 38 48 56 60 56 53 53 62 61 61 63 66 62 66 62 58 59 56 53 50 41 36
Jul 34 33 35 38 40 40 41 40 40 41 41 45 47 50 51 50 51 47 43 39 39 40 40 38
Aug 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 36 37 39 44 49 54 56 59 61 58 55 53 48 43 39 38
Sep 38 31 34 41 37 38 41 39 38 36 31 27 35 35 37 36 46 43 45 48 40 41 39 40
Oct 48 45 45 51 52 52 55 53 54 46 44 44 44 49 50 49 48 48 46 43 42 44 44 45
Nov 68 68 71 75 78 81 85 88 88 88 88 85 78 75 74 76 75 73 70 68 68 68 68 68
Dec 85 87 85 90 91 88 84 91 90 93 91 88 88 88 86 87 78 84 87 81 81 84 81 84
1 am 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 am 12 noon 1 pm 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 pm 12 mid
Jan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 171 823 1625 2126 2429 2377 1939 1296 473 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 <250
Feb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 585 1504 2379 3011 3395 3394 2960 2155 1257 336 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mar 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 516 1521 2467 3722 4077 4413 4248 3931 3236 2144 1041 207 0 0 0 0 0
Apr 0 0 0 0 0 16 504 1748 2946 4099 4990 5643 6012 5751 5131 4422 3200 1849 696 55 0 0 0 0
251‐1000 1001‐2000
May 0 0 0 0 0 293 1206 2399 3677 4732 5681 6204 6310 6313 5874 4980 3943 2573 1402 359 0 0 0 0
Jun 0 0 0 0 0 454 1537 3089 4436 5468 6285 6881 7009 6673 6398 5592 4381 3090 1886 678 0 0 0 0
Jul 0 0 0 0 0 306 1342 2700 4227 5591 6508 7338 7492 7148 6763 5824 4586 3336 1839 672 0 0 0 0
Aug 0 0 0 0 0 51 790 2215 3721 5093 5857 6670 6803 6352 6037 4972 3723 2550 1129 221 0 0 0 0
Sep 0 0 0 0 0 0 137 1238 2763 4301 4813 5719 5796 5379 4717 3545 2657 1550 76 0 0 0 0 0
Oct 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 349 1486 2772 3637 4188 4421 3282 2990 2368 1405 140 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nov 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 491 1302 1823 2418 2564 2365 1875 1136 354 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dec 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 180 787 1373 1851 2056 1893 1535 892 245 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
>2000
overcast
4
Frenchtown Mill 2014042.00 6/23/2014
Frenchtown Mill, Missoula MT
Climate Analysis 2014.07
8
Missoula, Montana Lat 46.92o North ; Long 114.09o West Elev 3189 ft HDD/CDD 65 oF = 7484/294 7 SHADING CALENDAR
8 AVERAGE GLOBAL HORIZONTAL SOLAR RADIATION, Btu/h ft2
Average Hourly Statistics for Dry Bulb temperatures (F)
1 am 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 am 12 noon 1 pm 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 pm 12 mid
Jan 24 24 23 23 23 22 22 22 22 23 25 27 29 30 31 31 30 29 28 28 27 27 26 25
Feb 28 28 27 26 25 25 24 23 26 29 31 34 37 39 40 40 41 38 35 32 31 30 29 29
Mar 34 33 33 32 32 31 31 32 35 37 39 42 44 45 46 46 45 43 40 38 37 36 35 34
Apr 38 37 36 35 34 34 35 39 42 45 48 51 53 55 55 56 56 55 52 48 45 43 41 39
Cold Cool Comfort Hot <32 32‐54 55‐69 >70 Shading for Balance Point = 55 oF
May 46 44 43 42 42 41 44 48 50 53 55 59 60 62 63 64 64 62 60 57 53 50 48 47
Average Hourly Statistics for Global Horizontal Solar Radiation Btu/hr ft² Jun 53 52 51 49 49 50 53 56 60 64 66 70 72 73 74 74 74 73 71 68 64 61 58 56
Jul 58 56 55 53 52 55 58 61 64 68 71 74 76 79 80 80 81 78 76 73 69 66 62 60
Aug 61 59 58 56 54 56 58 60 64 67 71 74 77 80 80 79 79 77 74 72 69 66 63 62
Sep 51 49 48 47 46 44 44 48 52 56 60 64 67 70 71 71 70 68 64 59 57 55 53 52
Oct 38 36 36 35 34 33 33 35 38 41 45 49 51 54 55 55 53 49 46 44 42 40 39 38
Nov 31 31 30 30 30 30 30 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 41 40 39 37 35 33 33 32 32 31
Dec 22 22 23 23 23 22 22 22 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 29 27 26 25 24 24 24 23 22
1 am 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 am 12 noon 1 pm 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 pm 12 mid
Jan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 26 52 68 77 75 62 41 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Feb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 48 75 95 107 107 94 68 40 11 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mar 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 16 48 77 117 127 139 133 123 102 68 33 8 0 0 0 0 0
Apr 0 0 0 0 0 2 16 55 93 129 158 178 191 181 162 140 101 58 22 3 0 0 0 0
0
1‐100
101‐250
>250
May 0 0 0 0 0 10 38 76 116 149 180 196 199 199 186 158 125 81 45 12 1 0 0 0
Jun 0 0 0 0 1 15 49 99 141 175 200 220 223 211 204 178 139 98 61 22 3 0 0 0
Jul 0 0 0 0 0 10 43 87 135 180 208 236 240 229 216 186 147 107 59 22 3 0 0 0
Aug 0 0 0 0 0 4 26 72 120 164 189 215 219 203 194 159 119 83 37 9 0 0 0 0
Sep 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 41 89 139 154 184 186 173 151 113 86 51 2 0 0 0 0 0
Oct 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 48 90 117 135 142 104 96 77 47 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nov 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 16 41 57 77 81 75 60 36 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dec 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 25 44 59 65 60 49 29 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5
Frenchtown Mill 2014042.00 6/23/2014
Frenchtown Mill, Missoula MT
Climate Analysis 2014.07
9
Missoula, Montana Lat 46.92o North ; Long 114.09o West Elev 3189 ft HDD/CDD 65 oF = 7484/294 9 PSYCHROMETRIC CHART
7
Frenchtown Mill 2014042.00 6/23/2014
Frenchtown Mill, Missoula MT
Climate Analysis 2014.07
10
SUSTAINABLE SUSTAINABLE DESIGN DESIGN CASE CASE STUDY STUDY
SUSTAINABLE SUSTAINABLE DESIGN DESIGN CASE CASE STUDY STUDY
36%
16
32%
54
95%
24%
Lowrise Lowrisehomes homes LEED LEEDfor forHomes HomesGold Gold
of oftotal totalsite sitearea area vegetated vegetatedto topromote promote biodiversity biodiversity
Midrise Midrisehomes homespursuing pursuing LEED LEEDfor forNew NewConstruction Construction
potential potentialutility utilitycost cost savings savings
potential potentialutility utilitycost costsavings savings for formidrise midrisebuilding building
of ofproject projectwaste wastediverted diverted from fromlandfill landfill
THA THABay Bay Terrace Terrace Community Community && Education Education Center Center Tacoma, Tacoma,Washington Washington Completion: Completion:
Spring Spring2014 2014
Project ProjectSize: Size:
0.4 0.4acres; acres;7,227 7,227GSF GSF
Owner: Owner:
THA THABay Bay Terrace Terrace Phase Phase II Housing Housing
Tacoma TacomaHousing HousingAuthority Authority
Architecture: Architecture:
GGLO GGLO
Interior InteriorDesign: Design:
GGLO GGLO
Landscape LandscapeArchitecture: Architecture:
GGLO GGLO
Completion: Completion:
under underconstruction construction
Absher AbsherConstruction Construction
Project ProjectSize: Size:
4.6 4.6acres; acres;174,306 174,306GSF GSF
Contractor: Contractor: Civil CivilEngineer: Engineer:
KPFF KPFF
Structural StructuralEngineer: Engineer:
PCS PCS
Tacoma, Tacoma,Washington Washington
Unit UnitCount: Count:
70 70Units Units
Owner: Owner:
Tacoma TacomaHousing HousingAuthority Authority
Commissioning: Commissioning:
Glumac Glumac
Architecture: Architecture:
GGLO GGLO
MEP MEPEngineer: Engineer:
Glumac Glumac
Interior InteriorDesign: Design:
GGLO GGLO
Landscape LandscapeArchitecture: Architecture:
LEED LEED速速 Gold Gold
Contractor: Contractor:
GGLO GGLO Absher AbsherConstruction Construction
Civil CivilEngineer: Engineer:
KPFF KPFF
Structural StructuralEngineer: Engineer:
New NewConstruction Construction
Certification Certificationawarded awardedJuly July2014 2014
LEED LEEDPoints Points
65 65
Sustainable SustainableSites Sites
23 23of of26 26
Water WaterEfficiency Efficiency
04 04of of10 10
Energy Energy&&Atmosphere Atmosphere
12 12of of35 35
Materials Materials&&Resources Resources
06 06of of14 14
Indoor IndoorEnvironmental EnvironmentalQuality Quality
13 13of of15 15
Innovation Innovation&&Design Design
05 05of of06 06
Regional RegionalPriority Priority
02 02of of04 04
PCS PCS
Commissioning: Commissioning:
Glumac Glumac
MEP MEPEngineer: Engineer:
Glumac Glumac
Lowrise LowriseHousing Housing
Midrise MidriseHousing Housing
LEED LEED速速 Gold Gold
Pursuing Pursuing LEED LEED
Homes Homes
New NewConstruction Construction
certification certificationawarded awarded Aug Aug2014 2014
certification certificationanticipated anticipated 2014 2014
Project
LEED Admin/production 2013-2014
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
F
AVB U District Housing
7TH at Gilman Housing
Seattle ,WA LEED NC v2009 306,736 SF/283 Units Multifamily Midrise
Issaquah ,WA
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 377,823 SF/346 Units JUNE 9, 2014 Multifamily Midrise
E
Exterior View from 12th Ave NE UW Childrens Housing
AMLI Wallingford
Seattle ,WA LEED NC v2009 187,874 SF/184 Units Multifamily Midrise
Seattle ,WA LEED H Midrise v2010 239,155 SF/239 Units Multifamily Midrise
D
C
B
PLOT DATE/TIME: 6/6/2014 2:22:43 PM
A
1
2
3
4
5
Project
LEED Admin/production 2013-2014
6
12