WIAA Appeal Coverage

Page 1

OPINION

Green Bay Press-Gazette: August 30, 2011 -Page 6a Green Bay, WI

TUESDAY, AUGUST 30, 2011 *

GREEN BAY PRESS-GAZETTE

A-6

GREENBAYPRESSGAZETTE.COM OPINION PAGE EDITOR TONY WALTER » twalter@greenbaypressgazette.com » (920) 431-8360

OUR VIEW

WIAA RULING

WIAA

OK! Oki YOU'RE RIGHT/ INATL7MoARDIN0

court decision disappoints e are disappointed that a federal court has affirmed that the Wisconsin Interscholastic Athletic Association can have exclusive rights to air high school tournament events on the Internet. We disagree respectfully with the decision Wednesday by the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled that the WIAA is within its constitutional rights to sign these exclusive contracts, but also prohibits the news media from using ONLINE its online technolREPORT ogy to give the Click on this story public live access at www.greenbay to postseason pressgazette.com for high school

REALI_y IsN

7ORTURE.9

W

our archive of stories sports events. on the WIAA lawsuit. This decision

has national implications for media organizations that want to produce online broadcasts of high school sporting events free from restrictions placed on it by state athletic associations. It also can have a far-reaching impact for school districts and parents, because it places high school sports in the same business category as private entertainment acts and professional sports. We are concerned about the limits this decision places on news media and average citizens. What message does it send to parents, school officials and state legislators who are being asked to view prep sports in the same way they view professional sports? What possible future ramifications could this decision hold for parents who choose to record their child's athletic event? The decision stems from a 2008 WIAA lawsuit against Gannett Co., publishers of the Green Bay PressGazette and nine other Wisconsin daily newspapers, and the Wisconsin Newspaper Association. It originated after our sister publication, The PostCrescent of Appleton, produced live streaming video coverage of four football playoff games. The Press-Gazette made the video streams available on its website. Gannett is reviewing the decision and contemplating its next steps. The WIAA signed a contract in 2005 with American Hi-Fi, giving it exclusive rights to live stream WIAA tournament games. Under the terms of the contract, the WIAA would permit news agencies to stream tournament events that American Hi-Fi does not stream as long as the media pays a fee. The WIAA asserted that the issue is about its ability to charge fees for access to tournaments that are not public events in the constitutional sense. Gannett has argued that the WIAA is a public institution constitutionally required to give equal access to news organizations under the First Amendment. We believe the First Amendment is intended to provide a level playing field. We see high school tournament sports events as news events and believe the WIAA views it as a business. We hope these issues will plant seeds of concern for anyone who appreciates amateur high school sports. The Court of Appeals ruled that tournament games "are a performance product of WIAA that it has the right to control." We assert that the First Amendment controls the rights of news agencies to do their jobs.

We believe the First Amendment is intended to provide a level playing field. We see high school tournament sports events as news events and believe the WIAA views it as a business.

» See Joe Heller's cartoons at www.greenbaypressgazette.com

Corporate profits shouldn't be primary health care concern e have a cancer drug crisis in the United States. Pharmaceutical companies' profits are dictating our health care options, and that should not happen. It shows an immediate need to reform our health care system. As someone undergoing cancer treatment, I am concerned. But this issue should concern everyone who relies on low-cost generic drugs, because it's a systemic problem that has affected noncancer drugs. According to an article published in June by Reuters, cancer drugs are scarce because there is no incentive for drug makers to manufacture low-cost generics, which have slim profit margins for pharmaceutical companies. "Doctors do not expect that equation to change any time soon, making them scramble to find acceptable alternatives or to ration or delay treatment when they cannot," the article said. Dr. Michael Link, a pediatric oncologist at the Mayo Clinic, was quoted in the same article as saying, "Here we have highly effective drugs, they've been shown they work — and to think we don't have them available is almost unconscionable." In some cases, doctors can substitute another drug. But, Link said, "You can imagine the conversation ... doctors have to tell their patients

W

drugs is only known by the staff and immediate family, and we are alone in this fight. Corporate profits are imporPaul tant to companies, but how do Linzmeyer you weigh that against people's Commentary lives? We need a meaningful dialogue about health care in America, including not just the corpoor their patients' parents that we rations and lobbyists, but pacan't give them the proven drug tients and staff. My cancer jourbecause we don't have it." ney has added much richness to In January 2011, I was diagmy life, and it makes me want to nosed with stage 4 rectal cancer. push for much-needed reform Having never been sick, I had no that will give us the health outidea of the challenges in front of comes we all deserve. If we conme. Now cancer-free and in final tinue to let corporate America chemotherapy treatment predefine our policies to fit within scribed to prevent the return of their profit goals, we will continthis cancer, I may need to switch ue to spiral downward in healthmy treatment. The treatment is care outcomes, including cost. excruciating at best, but it does Big versus small government, work. An oral alternative presor Wall Street versus Main ents concerns not only about efStreet, is irrelevant. The defectiveness and side effects, but sired outcome should be an efalso about cost. Health insurance fective and responsible system, carriers typically cover the inboth within government and jectable chemo, but vary on cov- corporations. A government erage on oral alternatives — beoutcome should be the entween $2,000 and $6,000 a month. hanced health of the American Cancer is a great equalizer; it people. The ultimate customer doesn't discriminate based on in- of pharmaceutical corporations come, race, or religion. The peo- is the patient, not the health ple I met as patients and staff care organization. They speak are absolutely incredible. Toat us, but not to us. But our voicgether, we are trying to cure es will be heard. cancer, which is highly individu- Paul Linzmeyer is president of ISO Internaalized in disease and prescriptional LLC. He is an international strategist tion. The emotional, physical and and speaker on business and government inpsychological challenges are novation and sustainability principles. He can enormous. Thus, the problematic be contacted at ISOIntemationaILLC@ consequence of a change in gmail.com.

COMMUNITY VIEWS Roundabout criticism is baffling GREEN BAY — Replacing roundabouts with signals at Lombardi Avenue and Oneida Street in the upcoming U.S. 41 expansion project is baffling. The facts are: Costs — This change will add an additional $1.6 million to the cost of this project and that doesn't factor in the higher cost of future maintenance required by signaled intersections. Safety — The U.S. Department of Mansportation's data shows that roundabout crashes on average decreased 39 percent, injuries decreased 76 percent, fatalities and incapacitation injuries decreased 90 percent. Efficiency — A roundabout is as efficient as a signalized intersection. These are the reasons the original U.S. 41 expansion project called for 28 roundabouts in Brown County. Ask

the engineers designing this project which option they think is the best design for these two areas. Who is requesting this change? Who will pay the additional $1.6 million? Who will pay for the future higher maintenance costs? Since this is a federal funded project, will the federal DOT will pay their share of this change? Finally, a government agency has come up with a more costeffective, safer way of doing business. How anyone can oppose this, like I said, is baffling. Michael Flynn

Walker's education vows are empty GREEN BAY — I find it ironic that Gov. Scott Walker cut more than $800 million in state school spending and is now concerned about improving Wisconsin student reading to help "re-energize our econ-

omy." I thought he was going to create the 250,000 jobs in our state, not require the teachers he's been demonizing to do it. I find his words at the Lambeau Field Read to Lead Task Force meeting on Thursday even more ironic. He said, "We should want to know: Are our schools succeeding?" These words are coming from a man who threw more of our tax dollars to voucher schools while exempting them from taking any test that compares their success to public schools. He brags about graduation rates at voucher schools, yet there are no uniform benchmarks for receiving a diploma at voucher schools compared to public schools. Maybe, if Walker hadn't snuck into Lambeau Field under the radar, an informed citizen or reporter could have questioned him about this. Debbie Tassoul

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK

The 10th anniversary of the terrorist attacks that resulted in deaths in New York City, Washington, D.C., and a field in Pennsylvania is approaching. We're interested in your views on the impact of the 9/11 attacks on yourself and the country since that day. Letters with a 200-word limit should be sent to: Community Views, Green Bay Press-Gazette, P.O. Box 23430, Green Bay, WI 54305-3430. They can be faxed to (920) 431-8379 or sent by email to forum@greenbaypressgazette.com .

Democrats find a spine in 'Mad Max'

We appreciate the time that it takes to compose a letter to the Community Views and your willingness to share your thoughts with other Press-Gazette readers.

KEVIN CORRADO

and events in Northeastern Wisconsin. Writers are limited to one letter every 30 days. We do not publish poetry; letters that are libelous or attack other writers; third-party, consumer-complaint and thank-you letters; and letters generated by political campaigns or special-interest groups and signed by local people. We do not publish anonymous letters and confirm all letters before publication. We require an address and phone number to call

am pleased to report the sighting of an artifact so rarely seen among Democrats that it has become the stuff of legend and conjecture, like Bigfoot or the Loch Ness monster. It is called a spine. Said spine was briefly glimpsed a little more than a week ago at a "jobs summit" in Inglewood, Calif., in the person of Rep. Maxine Waters. "I'm not afraid of anybody," the California Democrat said. "... And as far as I'm concerned, the 'tea party' can go straight to hell." Her words left the Tea Party Patriots sputtering about the need to play nice. Which is funnier than a Bill Cosby monologue, coming from the folks who turned town hall meetings into verbal brawls and threw rocks through windows because they opposed health care reform. I intend no blanket lionization here of Rep. Waters, who is the object of a protracted ethics probe and whom I have for years privately dubbed "Mad Max," in both consternation and admiration of her feistiness. Moreover, as hypocritical and self-serving as the Tea Party Patriots' statement is, it is also correct: Telling people to go to hell is about as uncivil as it gets. I could never, in ordinary times, applaud such conduct. But no one will ever mistake these for ordinary times. These are, rather, times in which the nation's civic dialogue, the ordinary political business of give and take, has been made hostage to the whims of a loud, incoherent minority that has used its very extremism as a weapon. Seventy percent of us, according to a Gallup poll, think both tax increases and spending cuts ought to be used to reduce the budget deficit. That reasonable, balanced approach was not a part of the debt ceiling deal because the tea party threatened, credibly, to push the nation into default rather than allow it. Republicans have been shamefully complaisant toward this behavior, unable to produce a stateswoman — or man — willing to stand up for the simple idea that one should put national welfare above ideological purity. Democrats have been their usual hapless, communicatively-challenged selves, the congressional equivalent of the kid in school who walks around all day with "Kick Me" taped to his back, then wonders why people keep kicking him. After you have reasoned with the bully, bargained with the bully, tried to appease the bully, sometimes the only remaining option is to punch the bully in the nose. That's what Maxine Waters just did. Good for her. Leonard Pitts Jr, winner of the 2004 Pulitzer Prize for Commentary, is a columnist for the Miami Herald, 1 Herald Plaza, Miami, FL 33132. Email: Ipitts@miamiherald.com.

EDITORIAL BOARD

We have a 200-word limit on all letters and a strong preference for those that are about issues

Commentary

I

LETTERS FOR COMMUNITY VIEWS We decide whether to publish a letter based on the number we receive, the interest a letter has for local readers and the contribution it makes to the public dialogue.

Leonard Pitts Jr.

for verification, but only your name and the community in which you live will appear in Community Views.

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR: www.greenbaypressgazette.com

MAIL TO: Community Views Green Bay Press-Gazette P.O. Box 23430 Green Bay, WI 54305-3430

FAX: (920) 431-8379 EMAIL: forum@greenbaypressgazette.com

President & Publisher

JOHN DYE Executive editor KAREN LINCOLN MICHEL Assistant managing editor

TONY WALTER Opinion Page Editor JOE HELLER Editorial cartoonist

» The "Our View" editorials reflect the opinion of the Green Bay Press-Gazette. All other items — cartoons, columns by syndicated and local writers and Community Views

letters — reflect the author's opinion.

OUR MISSION The Press-Gazette strives, as it has since 1915, to be the primary provider of information in Northeastern Wisconsin, keeping the welfare and development of the Greater Green Bay area at heart. It is our responsibility to provide a forum for free and open expression of diverse opinions while maintaining the public trust necessary to serve our readers, advertisers, employees and stockholders.

THE FIRST AMENDMENT Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

a


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
WIAA Appeal Coverage by Wisconsin Newspaper Association - Issuu