NOVEMBER 2008 www.aseanhrmech.org
High Level Panel, Civil Society Exchange Views on ASEAN Human Rights Body
elements for the ToR of the AHRB which were drawn from the Working Group’s consultations with various stakeholders in ASEAN during the 7th Workshop on the ASEAN Regional Mechanism on Human Rights in Singapore in June (see related story on page two) and discussions with local CSOs. The four National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) in ASEAN (collectively known as the ASEAN NHRI Forum), the Solidarity for Southeast Asian Peoples Advocacy (SAPA), and the Women’s Caucus for an ASEAN Human Rights Mechanism also submitted their recommendations to the HLP. The HLP representatives thanked the Working Group and said that it would consider its submission. For his part, Professor Vitit Muntarbhorn, the HLP alternate member for Thailand, requested for more inputs on the value added by the AHRB, the suggested ways by which ASEAN’s previous human rights commitments in
the Vientiane Action Programme can be linked to the AHRB, the relationship of the AHRB with the NHRIs in the region, and the steps needed for the AHRB to evolve in a credible and doable manner. Phuangk etk eow said that another consultation will be held in Thailand on December 2008 and that this could be another opportunity for more inputs to be given. The HLP has been working on the terms of reference of the AHRB since July 2008. Phuangketkeow reported that a first draft will be ready in time for the ASEAN Summit in December 2008. The HLP is eyeing December 2009 as its deadline to complete the final ToR. The creation of an AHRB is provided by the ASEAN Charter adopted by ASEAN heads of state in January 2008. The Working Group, which has been in dialogue with ASEAN on the creation of a regional human rights mechanism since 1996, supported the Charter process.
a s e a n h r m e ch . o r g
The High Level Panel (front row) and representatives from the Working Group, the ASEAN NHRI Forum, SAPA, and the ASEAN Women’s Caucus (back row) interface on the ASEAN human rights body.
w w w .
AT A CONSULTATION with civil society groups held in Manila in September, Sihasak Phuangketkeow, chairperson of the High-Level Panel on the ASEAN Human Rights Body (HLP) pledged that “the [human rights] body would not only be an empty shell but will have a heart and a soul” and that “meaningful dialogues will continue to take place in the future”. Phuangketkeow also said that the ASEAN human rights body (AHRB) will be guided by the Universal Declaration on Human Rights and not by the current varying human rights conditions in member-states. At the same time, the AHRB will “tackle human rights issues in a realistic manner”. The HLP consultation took place in Manila on September 11, 2008 with the non-government Working Group for an ASEAN Human Rights Mechanism (Working Group). The consultation, which took place during the HLP’s Third Meeting, was an opportunity for the HLP to listen to the views of relevant stakeholders in ASEAN and incorporate these into the first draft of the Terms of Reference of the AHRB. The Working Group recommended to the HLP that the AHRB should be institutionalized as a “Commission”, its members must have solid human rights expertise, and they should regularly consult with civil society organizations. One of the most contentious issues that emerged in consultation was the idea of the AHRB developing through an evolutionary process. For the Working Group, this evolutionary process could involve both the evolution of the Commission’s capacity as an institution and the evolution of the system towards a more comprehensive promotion and protection of human rights. The Working Group’s recommendations were contained in a submission detailing the proposed
1