Global Productivity

Page 325

GLOBAL PRODUCTIVITY

CHAPTER 5

299

FIGURE 5.19 Drivers of productivity growth in LAC A sustained period of contracting investment growth in LAC has held back productivity gains in recent years. Lower R&D spending relative to other regions, weak trade linkages in several large economies, and inadequately educated workers also hinder productivity growth. A. Investment growth

B. Research and development spending

2020Q1

2019Q1

2017Q1

Percent Argentina 12 Peru 8 4 0 -4 -8 -12

2017Q1

2016Q1

2015Q1

2014Q1

2013Q1

2012Q1

2011Q1

Percentage points Brazil Mexico 12 Colombia Chile 8 Growth (RHS) 4 0 -4 -8 -12

C. Trade, 2015-17 Percent of GDP 100

Percent of GDP 0.8 Interquartile range

Median

0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 2006-12

2013-17 LAC

2006-12

2013-17

EMDEs

D. Firms indicating inadequately educated workers as their biggest obstacle EMDE average

Percent 15 12

60

9

40

6

20

3

0

0

BRA ARG COL URY DOM ECU PAN PER GTM JAM CRI CHL BOL PRY SLV HND MEX NIC

80

Interquartile range Median

2006-12

2013-18 LAC

2006-12

2013-18

EMDEs

Sources: Haver Analytics; World Integrated Trade Solution; World Bank (Doing Business, Enterprise Surveys, and Global Financial Development Database). Note: EMDEs = emerging market and developing economies; LAC = Latin America and the Caribbean; R&D = research and development. A. Bars show investment-weighted averages. Last observation is 2020Q1. Investment growth is year-on-year. B. Sample includes 16 economies for LAC and 94 for EMDEs. C. Bars show 2015-17 average of exports plus imports as a share of GDP. Sample includes 96 EMDEs. BRA = Brazil; ARG = Argentina; COL = Colombia; URY = Uruguay; DOM = the Dominican Republic; ECU = Ecuador; PAN = Panama; PER = Peru; GTM = Guatemala; JAM = Jamaica; CRI = Costa Rica; CHL = Chile; BOL = Bolivia; PRY = Paraguay; SLV = El Salvador; HND = Honduras; MEX = Mexico; NIC = Nicaragua. D. Sample includes 30 LAC economies and 113 EMDEs.

than in the EAP and ECA regions. Even the LAC countries most integrated in GVCs (Chile, Costa Rica, and Mexico) are not among the most integrated EMDEs and may suffer the economic consequences of GVC disruptions as a result of COVID-19 (OECD 2018b; World Bank 2020a). The opportunity for regional productivity gains through trade is further hindered by the structure of intra- and extraregional trade relationships. Although LAC countries are party to numerous trade agreements, there is little harmonization of rules of origin and nontariff measures across agreements, and there is no region-wide agreement. These characteristics result in fragmentation of trading priorities and, together with weak diversification of traded goods in many countries, limit the development of intraregional GVCs. Rules of origin imposed under preferential trade agreements in the region are estimated to negate more than 15 percent


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Annex 7B Marginal productivity gap

4min
pages 452-453

References

14min
pages 456-463

Annex 7A Data and methodology

6min
pages 448-451

References

13min
pages 421-428

Sectoral productivity gaps

2min
page 432

Annex 7C Firm TFP data, estimates, and methodology

5min
pages 454-455

Annex 6C Commodity-driven productivity developments: Methodology

2min
page 420

Conclusion and policy implications

2min
page 412

Drivers of productivity: Technology vs. demand shocks

2min
page 391

Annex 6A SVAR identification of technology drivers of productivity

8min
pages 413-416

PART III Technological Change and Sectoral Shifts

0
pages 383-386

Effects of demand shocks

2min
page 397

Figure 6.1 Global labor productivity surges and declines

7min
pages 388-390

Sub-Saharan Africa

2min
page 350

Figure 5.22 Factors supporting productivity growth in MNA

7min
pages 333-335

Figure 5.19 Drivers of productivity growth in LAC

9min
pages 325-328

South Asia

4min
pages 337-338

Conclusion

2min
page 363

Figure 5.13 Drivers of productivity growth in ECA

10min
pages 314-317

Middle East and North Africa

2min
page 329

Latin America and the Caribbean

2min
page 318

Figure 5.12 Drivers of productivity growth in ECA in regional comparison

5min
pages 312-313

Europe and Central Asia

2min
page 305

Figure 5.7 Drivers of productivity growth in EAP

3min
page 301

PART II Regional Dimensions of Productivity

0
pages 281-284

Sources of, and bottlenecks to, regional productivity growth

4min
pages 290-291

Figure 5.1 Evolution of regional productivity in EMDE regions

4min
pages 288-289

East Asia and Pacific

2min
page 295

References

12min
pages 274-280

Evolution of productivity across regions

2min
page 287

Annex 4F Productivity measurement: PPP vs. market exchange rates

4min
pages 268-269

Annex 4C Beta-convergence testing

2min
page 257

Figure 4.4 Convergence club memberships

2min
page 242

Annex 4D Estimating convergence clubs: Commonalities in productivity levels

7min
pages 258-260

Testing for convergence and its pace

4min
pages 236-237

Conclusion and policy implications

7min
pages 253-255

Convergence clubs

7min
pages 239-241

Annex 3B Robustness

2min
page 213

Conclusion

2min
page 204

Figure 3.8 Episodes across different types of events

4min
pages 193-194

Annex 3A Data, sources, and definitions

2min
page 206

How has productivity convergence evolved?

2min
page 231

Figure 3.4 Episodes of war

2min
page 187

What policies can mitigate the effects of adverse events?

2min
page 203

Figure 3.5 Correlations between war frequency and productivity growth

7min
pages 188-190

Figure B3.1.1 Severity of pandemics, epidemics, and climate disasters

6min
pages 179-181

Figure B3.1.3 Impact of epidemics

6min
pages 184-186

Annex 2A Partial correlations

2min
page 146

Figure 3.2 Episodes of natural disaster

4min
pages 175-176

Box 3.1 How do epidemics affect productivity?

1min
page 178

Adverse events: Literature and stylized facts

2min
page 171

Conclusion

2min
page 145

Figure 2.13 Developments in financial and government technology

2min
page 143

Figure 2.12 EMDE infrastructure and education gaps

2min
page 142

Policy priorities

4min
pages 140-141

Figure 2.11 Post-GFC slowdown of the drivers of productivity growth

10min
pages 136-139

References

12min
pages 101-108

Analyzing the effects of drivers

1min
page 128

Developments in drivers of productivity

2min
page 134

Figure 2.1 Innovation

5min
pages 114-115

Box 2.1 Review of recent firm-level total factor productivity literature

8min
pages 130-133

Summary of stylized facts

2min
page 126

Long-run drivers

4min
pages 112-113

Box 1.1 Productivity: Conceptual considerations and measurement challenges

9min
pages 85-88

Conclusion

2min
page 96

Annex 1A Cyclical and technology-driven labor productivity developments

1min
page 100

Figure B1.1.1 Labor productivity decomposition and natural capital in EMDEs

7min
pages 89-91

References

13min
pages 65-70

Key findings and policy messages

4min
pages 32-33

Future research directions

2min
page 64

Synopsis

2min
page 39

PART I Productivity: Trends and Explanations

0
pages 71-74

Evolution of productivity

2min
page 78

Sources of the slowdown in labor productivity growth after the GFC

2min
page 83

Implications of COVID-19 for productivity

11min
pages 34-38
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.