Bridging the Technological Divide

Page 217

efforts, as Lach, Neeman, and Schankerman (2021) show. However, depending on whether the financial problem regarding information asymmetries centers on screening and identifying good projects from bad ones, or successful upgrading, the preferred policy should be an interest rate that is higher or lower than the market rate. This contrasts with many public programs that finance technology acquisition, which almost always provide a lower-than-market interest rate. Credit guarantees provide a mechanism for lenders to mitigate risk and work as an insurance scheme to cover some portion of the losses to lenders associated with extending credit to firms investing in risky technologies. For instance, the Korea Technology Finance Corporation (KOTEC) provides an innovative policy instrument to finance technology (see box 7.4). It offers credit guarantees based on a technology appraisal to provide clear signaling to banks to finance the development and acquisition of new technologies. While the model has been exported to other countries, the capacities required to appraise the technologies suggest that this type of instrument is more likely to be effective in upper-middle-income and high-income countries. Policy makers should keep in mind some key elements in implementing finance instruments (Cirera et al. 2020): ■■

■■

The need to leverage the broader commercial environment. While government loans are often justified in the context of a weak financial market, policy makers should bear in mind that the ultimate objective is to create a competitive financial market that finances technology. Before launching a loan scheme, policy makers need to consider the alternatives underpinned by commercial initiatives, and work with the financial sector to reduce information asymmetries and ensure future availability of finance from commercial banks for technology upgrading. Complementary policy measures. Firms that face financing problems can also be subject to weaknesses such as low capacity to exploit technology. In such cases,

BOX 7.4 Credit Guarantees for Technology through the Korea Technology Finance Corporation (KOTEC) KOTEC (also known as Kibo), a nonprofit financial institution established in 1989 in the Republic of Korea, facilitates technology financing for innovative small and medium enterprises (SMEs), mainly through provision of technology appraisal services and credit guarantees (figure B7.4.1). Target beneficiaries are technologically viable but collateral-constrained SMEs with limited access to credit from traditional financial institutions. KOTEC’s Kibo Technology Rating System (KTRS) appraises the future values of the technologies retained by SMEs based on competency, marketability, and commercial viability of (Box continues on the following page.)

Policies and Instruments to Accelerate Technology Adoption 191


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

A.1 Number of Establishments Surveyed, by Strata

4min
pages 236-237

7.5 The Difference between Vouchers and Grants

8min
pages 219-222

Notes

5min
pages 224-225

Corporation (KOTEC

2min
page 217

References

7min
pages 226-229

7.3 Agriculture Extension: The Case of Embrapa

6min
pages 214-216

Instruments to Support Technology Upgrading at the Firm Level

2min
page 209

Adoption of Technology

6min
pages 211-213

7.1 Digital Platforms Are Prone to Market Concentration and Dominance

9min
pages 198-201

References

6min
pages 192-194

6.1 Specific Barriers to the Use of Digital Platforms

2min
page 176

Surrounded by Digital Infrastructure

0
page 174

Factual Evidence on Drivers of and Obstacles to Technology Adoption

4min
pages 172-173

References

8min
pages 161-166

Notes

2min
page 160

Technology and Resilience

2min
page 146

Digital Technologies

2min
page 138

Introduction

1min
page 137

References

4min
pages 134-136

4.10 Technology Sophistication Contributes to Wage Inequality within Firms

1min
page 132

Introduction

1min
page 121

References

2min
pages 117-120

Functions Manually

1min
page 100

Technology Differences across and within Sectors

2min
page 96

Introduction

1min
page 95

References

3min
pages 93-94

Summing Up

2min
page 91

Notes

2min
page 92

Other Technology Facts

2min
page 86

Business Functions Varies across Firm Size

1min
page 83

Introduction

1min
page 73

Using the FAT Data to Understand Some of the Limitations of Standard Measures of Technology

4min
pages 63-64

References

4min
pages 70-72

Measuring Adoption and Use of Technology by Firms

2min
page 48

References

3min
pages 42-46

Opening the Black Box: The Firm-level Adoption of Technology (FAT) Survey

4min
pages 50-51

Introduction

1min
page 47

Notes

2min
page 41

Technology (FAT) Survey

1min
page 52
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.