SANTA CLARA DOWNTOWN PRECISE PLAN CIT Y OF SANTA CLARA | ADOPTED DECEMBER 5, 2023
SANTA CLARA DOWNTOWN PRECISE PLAN CIT Y OF SANTA CLARA | ADOPTED DECEMBER 5, 2023
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS City of Santa Clara Downtown Community Task Force Butch Coyne Rob Mayer Dan Ondrasek Matthew Reed Chan Thai Adam Thompson Ana Vargas-Smith Atisha Varshney Debra von Huene WRT / Planning, Urban Design, Team Leader Kimley-Horn / Mobility CSW|ST2 / Civil Engineering Sargent Town Planning / Place-Making & Form-Based Code EPS / Economics Greensfelder Real Estate Strategy / Retail Strategy David J. Power & Associates / CEQA
FACING PAGE: FARMERS’ MARKET AT FRANKLIN SQUARE
CONTENTS 1.
Introduction ................................................................................................ 01 The Opportunity Engaging the Community Developing Market Considerations Our Foundation What is a Precise Plan?
2.
Downtown Framework .................................................................. 27 Downtown Today Downtown Precise Plan Framework
3.
Streets + Public Spaces .............................................................. 43 Strategic Statement Goals and Policies Implementing Measures
4.
Retail, Culture + the Ground Floor.................................... 73 Strategic Statement Goals and Policies Implementing Measures
5.
Building Up .................................................................................................. 91 Strategic Statement Goals and Policies Implementing Measures
6.
Implementation ................................................................................... 107 Strategic Statement: Actions to Make and Sustain Downtown Implementation Measures Phasing Concept
7.
Appendix A: Community Engagement Summary
8.
Appendix B: Form-Based Code . Separate Document
LIST OF FIGURES 1.
Introduction
2. Downtown Framework
Figure 1-1 Regional Setting
Figure 2-1 Downtown Zoning
Figure 1-2 Nearby Downtowns
Figure 2-2 Downtown Property Ownership
Figure 1-3 Downtown and its Context
Figure 2-3 Downtown Programming
Figure 1-4 Downtown Santa Clara Planning Area Opportunities and Constraints
Figure 2-4 Street and Transit Network
Figure 1-5 Views of Santa Clara Valley History
Figure 2-5 Bike Network and Pedestrian Access
Figure 1-6 Old Downtown Santa Clara (Early Days)
Figure 2-6 Existing Parking
Figure 1-7 Old Downtown Santa Clara (Early 1060s)
Figure 2-7 Existing Utilities
Figure 1-8 Urban Renewal
Figure 2-8 Streets and Public Spaces Framework
Figure 1-9 Precise Plan Schedule and Community Engagement
Figure 2-9 Essential Ground Floor Land Use Framework
Figure 1-10 Meeting in a Box
Figure 2-10 Urban Form Framework (Maximum Building Heights)
Figure 1-11 SCU Workshop
Figure 2-11 Urban Form Framework (Maximum Bonus Building Heights)
Figure 1-12 Survey Summary of Land Use Framework Options
Figure 2-12 Phase 1 Ownership
Figure 1-13 Preliminary Land Use Variations
Figure 2-13 Phase 1 Urban Form
Figure 1-14 Preliminary Public Space Sketches Figure 1-15 Support for Placemaking Elements Figure 1-16 Market/Project Value and Development Cost Figure 1-17 Preliminary Benchmarking for Density Figure 1-18 Vision for Downtown Figure 1-19 Franklin Street on Campus
3. Streets + Public Spaces Figure 3-1 Concept vision for the “Arts Commons” looking East Figure 3-2 Downtown Streets & Public Spaces Figure 3-3 Lafayette Street Cross-section Figure 3-4 Monroe, Benton & Homestead Cross-section Figure 3-5 Franklin Street Cross-section Figure 3-6 Main Street (South) Cross-section Figure 3-7 Washington & Main Street Cross-section
Figure 3-8 Alley Cross-section Figure 3-9 Downtown Bicycle Network and Micromobility
Figure 4-7 Galleries, Trees and Utility Placement along Franklin Street (Conceptual)
Figure 3-10 Downtown Transit Network
Figure 4-8 Active Building Fronts
Figure 3-11 Downtown Parks & Plazas
Figure 4-9 On-site Parking Illustrated
Figure 3-12 Arts Commons Illustrated
Figure 4-10 Historic Downtown Blocks
Figure 3-13 Central Green Illustrated
Figure 4-11 Arts Commons Design Relationships
Figure 3-14 Franklin Plaza Illustrated
Figure 4-12: Arts Commons Activation
Figure 3-15 Paseos & Courtyards Illustrated
Figure 4-13 Activating Events & Programs
Figure 3-16 Public Realm Design Features Illustrated
Figure 4-14 Typical Retail-ready Frontages
Figure 3-17 Street Tree Concept Figure 3-18 Wayfinding, Interpretation and Public Art Illustrated
5. Building Up
Figure 3-19 Green Infrastructure Illustrated
Figure 5-1 Downtown Urban Form Illustrated
Figure 3-20 Green Infrastructure Concept
Figure 5-2 Urban Form Qualities
Figure 3-21 Franklin Street Interim Through-connection
Figure 5-3 Building Height Transitions
Figure 3-22 Existing Parcels Interim Access And Proposed Public Land Dedication At Franklin and Main
Figure 5-4 Maximum Building Heights Figure 5-5 Maximum Bonus Building Heights Figure 5-6 Historic Resources And Areas Of Historic Sensitivity (2022)
4. Retail, Culture + the Ground Floor Figure 4-1 Active Ground-floor Frontage Illustrated
Figure 5-7 Building Heights Adjacent To Historic Buildings And Areas Of Historic Sensitivity
Figure 4-2 Historic Downtown Santa Clara
Figure 5-8 Old Downtown Santa Clara Buildings
Figure 4-3 Typical Primary Retail Frontage
Figure 5-9 Elements for Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
Figure 4-4 Typical Flexible Frontage Figure 4-5 Frontage Types & Locations Figure 4-6 Building Projections
6. Implementation Figure 6-1 Potential Phasing
01.
INTRODUCTION
SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY SCROLL Santa Clara University students present a scroll to the Downtown Community Task Force. The scroll is filled with ideas for things students want to see in Downtown.
2
| C i t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
INTRODUCTION A. THE OPPORTUNITY
Station and about three miles northwest
Homestead and Lafayette, the Park Central
of downtown San Jose. Every other
Apartments facing Benton, University
downtown along the Peninsula and the
Plaza at the corner of Homestead and
Valley, from San Mateo to Sunnyvale, has
Jackson, a few other small commercial
Santa Clara is growing and changing,
become a thriving center of community
enterprises, and large parking areas.
attracting people from all over the world
life for residents, workers and visitors
These elements do not feel connected
with its desirable climate, beautiful tree-
alike. BART, high-speed rail, and planned
to one another or to the surrounding
lined neighborhoods and central position
development will transform nearby Diridon
neighborhood.
in the heart of the Silicon Valley. But since
Station into a major hub for the region.
The City of Santa Clara owns the land on
1965, when eight city blocks were razed in the name of urban renewal, Santa Clara has been missing an important ingredient: a true downtown.
THE SITE
the eastern end of downtown. The City also has an easement that could hold a
The planning area covers what would
future segment of Franklin Street.
be ten standard blocks at the center of
We now have an opportunity to rebuild the
The western two blocks of the planning
the Old Quad neighborhood, between
downtown fabric in a way that can achieve
area include one block of Franklin Street
Lafayette Street on the east and Madison
our goals for an authentic, affordable and
with a mix of businesses, older houses
Street on the west and between Benton
adaptable downtown. The Santa Clara
along Benton, Homestead and Madison,
Street on the north and Homestead Road
Downtown Precise Plan envisions a place
and new multifamily development along
on the south. Today, most of Downtown
that is rooted in its cultural and historical
Monroe Street.
is absorbed in two “super-blocks” that
context while featuring infrastructure and
were created as part of the urban renewal
amenities to support a vibrant, urban
project that never came to fruition.
community hub that will develop over the
The Old Quad neighborhood that surrounds Downtown has old (many historic) houses and mature trees on
Downtown currently includes a nucleus
a traditional street grid. Santa Clara
composed of the old post office, a plaza
University, just to the east, has a formal
with fountain and mature trees, and the
and often beautiful campus character
Franklin Square shopping center. The
surrounding the historic Mission de Santa
Downtown Santa Clara is located
site also includes the County Courthouse
Clara de Asis.
directly west of Santa Clara University,
facing Homestead, the 7-story Commerce
about a half-mile walk from the Caltrain
Plaza office building at the corner of
years to come.
THE SETTING
3
Figure 1-1
REGIONAL SETTING
Santa Clara’s underutilized Downtown is a missing link between the region’s other thriving Downtowns.
Figure 1-2
NEARBY DOWNTOWNS
Top row: Downtown Palo Alto Middle row: Downtown Mountain View, Downtown Campbell Bottom row: Downtown Sunnyvale
| Cha p te r 1: Intro d u c ti on
4
| C i t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
3
1 2 4
Figure 1-3
DOWNTOWN AND ITS CONTEXT
Downtown Santa Clara is situated in the center of the Old Quad (1) neighborhood. Santa Clara University (2) is directly to the northeast across Lafayette Street. Santa Clara Station (3) is about a half mile to the northeast along Franklin Street, much of which is now a pedestrian mall as it passes through the University. From the southeastern edge of the University to I-880, the Alameda features a local business district. The El Camino Real (4) commercial corridor is about a quarter mile northwest of Downtown, and extends all the way up the Peninsula. The Santa Clara City Hall is on the north side of El Camino Real.
Downtown Santa Clara Public Parks Major Retail Important Destinations Historic Properties Other Planning Project Areas Santa Clara University
5
| Cha p te r 1: Intro d u c ti on
*
Parks Figure 1-4
DOWNTOWN SANTA CLARA OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS
The planning area covers what would be ten standard blocks between Lafayette Street, Madison Street, Benton Street, and Homestead Road. Today, most of Downtown is absorbed in two “super-blocks” that were created as part of the urban renewal project that never came to fruition.
* The City of Santa Clara has secured easements across private property for what could become extensions of Franklin and Washington streets.
6
| C i t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
UNDERSTANDING HISTORY
Valley to take up farming. The high costs
name of urban renewal to build a new
Santa Clara has a rich past that
and scarcity of flour, fruit and vegetables
mall. That vision was never realized.
during the Gold Rush made agricultural
What was downtown Santa Clara like
exemplifies the early history and development of California.
Railroad Company constructed the Santa
by the Tamyen (also known as Tamien)
Clara Depot as one of two “way stations’’
group of Ohlone people. They lived in
built between the two cities. When the
concentrations of small villages that
Transcontinental railroad was completed
were related to each other by kinship
in 1869, the first shipment of fresh pears
ties, established their settlements near a
from Santa Clara was shipped to Eastern
dependable water source and other easily
States in October of that year.
available subsistence needs, and set up
Through the 1940s, Santa Clara was
and materials.
agricultural valley specializing in a rich variety of fruit orchards including prunes,
1777 and was discontinued by the Mexican
peaches, apricots, pears, cherries and
government in 1834. During the era of
apples. Santa Clara itself had a multi-
Spanish missions, most Tamyen people
ethnic population, with people of German,
moved or were moved into one of the
Portuguese, Italian and Spanish descent
missions, and many died from disease.
living and operating businesses in what
from around the world to California. Santa Clara College (1851) and the City of Santa Clara (1852) were established shortly after California became part of the United States. San Jose was the first
Top row: Tamyen people of the Ohlone in Santa Clara Valley. Middle row: Santa Clara Mission. Bottom row: Santa Clara Valley orchards
a small town in the heart of a thriving
The Mission Santa Clara de Asis dates to
The Gold Rush brought immigration
VIEWS OF SANTA CLARA VALLEY HISTORY
1863, the San Francisco and San Jose
The Santa Clara Valley was occupied
temporary camps to collect seasonal foods
Figure 1-5
pursuits more profitable than mining. By
is now the downtown area. Reminders of Santa Clara’s history remain, including the Mission, the Railroad Depot, the Santa Clara Downtown Post Office, and the vintage houses of the Old Quad neighborhood.
State Capital and a main supply center for
Rapid growth began in the 1950s, with
hopeful miners as they passed through
postwar suburbanization and then the
the area. Large numbers of these miners
emergence of the semiconductor industry.
were farmers from Eastern United States
The City made a pivotal turn in 1963, when
and Europe and recognized the potential
the City Council voted to demolish eight
of Santa Clara Valley. After the Mother
city blocks in the downtown core in the
Lode, many of the miners returned to the
between the 1850s and the 1950s? How did it evolve? Santa Clara had what was in many ways a typical American small-town main street, with storefronts lining the sidewalks and a mix of 1- to 3-story buildings. There were some notable landmarks. These included the Santa Clara Theater on the south side of Franklin between Washington and Lafayette, and the old City Hall on the northeast corner of Franklin and Washington. The intersection of Franklin and Main Streets was known as “Bank Corners.” Franklin Street, unpaved and lined with horses and carts in its early days, came to have a streetcar line. It was the heart of town, and the site of community events and parades. By the early 1960s, downtown appears to have been struggling with competition from shopping centers and the rise of a caroriented lifestyle.
7
1
2
3
Franklin Street, 1870s 5
4
Franklin and Jackson Streets, 1888
Figure 1-6
OLD DOWNTOWN SANTA CLARA (EARLY DAYS) 1.
View east on Franklin Street from Washington showing the Cameron Hotel (1870s.)
2. View east on Liberty Street (now Homestead) toward Methodist Church and Plaza Park. 1873. 3. Businesses on Franklin Street near Jackson Street, 1888. 4. Widney Mercantile, northwest corner of Franklin and Main Streets, 1892. 5. View west of Franklin Street from Main, 1899.
| Cha p te r 1: Intro d u c ti on
8
| C i t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
1.
6.
2.
5.
Figure 1-7
OLD DOWNTOWN SANTA CLARA (EARLY 1960S) 1.
Bondi’s Electronics; Santa Clara Drug Co., Franklin and Main, 1960.
2. Safeway, Franklin and Monroe Streets, early 1960s.
3.
4.
3. Jewelry and Loans, Franklin Street, early 1960s. 4. View west on Franklin Street from Lafayette, 1963. 5. Acapulco Restaurant, Franklin Street, 1961. 6. Bank of America, Franklin and Main Streets, 1962.
9
1.
2.
3.
4.
Figure 1-8
URBAN RENEWAL
In 1963, Santa Clara City Council voted for the University Urban Renewal Project, to clear eight blocks of downtown to make way for what was hoped would become a modern shopping and business center. Demolition occurred in 1965.
1.
Downtown Santa Clara from above, early 1960s.
2. Downtown after demolition, 1970s. 3. One early vision for redevelopment. 4. Downtown today.
| Cha p te r 1: Intro d u c ti on
10 10
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
B. ENGAGING THE COMMUNITY
Recreation of two to three of the original
In recent years, there has been great
Committee, which held seven workshops
interest among Santa Clara residents
between 2015 and 2017, in which members
in the idea of bringing downtown back.
shared research findings, came together
In Reclaiming Our Downtown Member
around principles and objectives, explored
Mary Grizzle’s own words, “A major
alternatives, and identified a preferred
reason for the return of the Downtown
concept for future development.”
has been a grass roots citizen-lead group
Beginning in the fall of 2019, the
named Reclaiming Our Downtown. The group led by Rod Dunham and Dan Ondrasek began with 5 citizens and grew quickly to 4000. This group of citizen volunteers have spent the last seven years educating and surveying the public on the Downtown. They researched the best practices of other American cities and their Downtowns, which led to their advocacy for a strong urban planner, a Downtown Task Force, Form-Based Code, and this very Precise Plan. Based on their own surveys of the public, they focused on 5 key visions: 1) return of the original street grid, 2) Connecting the new Downtown with the transit station through a historical trolly, 3) Protection of existing retailer rents, 4) Mixed-use architecture, 5)
•
The University community was directly engaged with a lunchtime forum and a student-led workshop.
•
A “meeting in a box” format allowing community members to report their vision and priorities; and “meeting out of the box” and “placemaking forum”, both conducted virtually using Zoom.
Downtown facades including the iconic Santa Clara Theatre. The City formed a Downtown Santa Clara Revitalization
Downtown Precise Plan process brought in the diverse voices of stakeholders, downtown advocates, neighbors, and members of the broader community. The engagement strategy included the following elements: • The Downtown Community Task Force (DCTF), a Steering Committee composed of representatives from stakeholder organizations and the community met some 25 times over the 2 1/2-year planning process, providing valuable ongoing guidance. •
The planning team met individually or in small groups with community advocates, property owners, developers, and technical advisors.
•
Two online surveys were conducted, to get feedback on (1) land use
alternatives and (2) placemaking strategies. These are summarized below.
PHASE 1: OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS In the first phase, the City and Consultant team heard vision ideas and priorities
SANTA CLARA DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY TASK FORCE MEETING
11
Figure 1-9
PRECISE PLAN SCHEDULE AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
| Cha p te r 1: Intro d u c ti on
1 22
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
for downtown from a broad array of
community members were asked to take
stakeholders and community members.
a walk downtown and identify assets
DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY TASK FORCE
and opportunities for change on a map. Assets commonly identified by community
The Precise Plan process was initiated
members were the Post Office, Plaza
with the Downtown Community Task
Park, and the historic context of the
Force in October 2019. The Task Force
neighborhood. Opportunities included: • Restoring the original street grid and making Franklin and Main Streets like promenades.
and members of the public shared their vision and priorities for Downtown. These included: • Restore the grid; conserve and recreate the historical street grid; provide open space for relaxation, events and gathering; a transit connection to the Caltrain station; and create a highquality, memorable place. •
Create a unique character and experience of place, a downtown with a “heart and soul” that is connected to its historic roots. Look to arts as an anchor, with the University as partner.
•
Recognize the challenging environment for retail, underlining the need for highquality placemaking
•
Present an ambitious vision for longterm change, but create a clear path for near-term action
MEETING IN A BOX In December 2019, the City and Consultant
•
Enabling higher-density buildings to help make new development financially feasible.
•
Stepping back future buildings from Franklin and Main Streets.
•
Concentrating taller buildings away from the surrounding neighborhood.
•
Recreating key street frontages that were lost when downtown was demolished.
•
Creating a public parking garage with access from Homestead Road.
ENGAGING THE SCU COMMUNITY A lunchtime meeting was held at the de Saisset Museum at Santa Clara University on January 29, 2020. Students, faculty and staff were encouraged to provide feedback on the future Downtown. SCU community
Team gave the Santa Clara community “homework” for the holidays. Interested Figure 1-10
MEETING IN A BOX
A sampling of assets and opportunities for change developed by community participants.
13
members showed a desire for inexpensive eateries and cafes; outdoor restaurant seating; independent businesses; a Cultural Arts Center; and parks and plazas that can host farmers’ markets and events. Public spaces should have water features, things for children to do, public art, expression of Ohlone history, and sustainable plantings. In spring 2020, four SCU students under the guidance of Professor C.J. Gabbe conducted a Walk Audit for Downtown, a Public Perception Survey, and a Downtown Comparison study which included Sunnyvale, Redwood City and Palo Alto. Their key recommendations were as follows: • Increase Downtown’s business density to levels more comparable with the peer cities.
| Cha p te r 1: Intro d u c ti on
STAKEHOLDERS AND TECHNICAL ADVISORS In early 2020, the planning team held informal interviews with individuals or small groups to get the perspectives of City officials, transit agencies, University administrators, neighborhood residents, and developers. The planning team learned important information about City and property owner objectives, and the priorities of local residents and Downtown advocates.
DEVELOPER ROUNDTABLE A developer panel was held In February 2020 to discuss the Downtown Precise Plan, with representatives from Republic Urban Properties, Prometheus, Related, and Summer Hill Homes. The focus was to understand what will make
•
Include more community events to attract the broader community.
•
Expand opportunities for outdoor seating and dining.
construction they believed to be financially
Add pedestrian-oriented lighting to improve safety.
to create a successful retail environment,
Add flashing lights at crosswalks to improve visibility for pedestrians.
zoning.
• •
Downtown Santa Clara attractive for investment. Developers stated the types of feasible, described what would be needed and advocated for appropriate flexibility in
Figure 1-11
SCU WORKSHOP
Participants received a summary of the process and were able to leave post-its with their input and indicate preferred precedents with green dots.
1 44
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
PHASE 2: LAND USE FRAMEWORK
connectivity to Santa Clara Station, and in spurring the relocation of the Courthouse.
During the second phase, the planning
ONLINE SURVEY
team developed an initial set of
In May 2020, an Online Survey was
“land use frameworks,” and received
published to gather community feedback
feedback from community members
on three land use frameworks. The survey
and stakeholders. The planning team
was promoted by Task Force members,
made major adjustments to our outreach
on the City’s website and social media,
and engagement activities during the
through Santa Clara Unified School
pandemic, shifting to virtual formats. We
District and with a poster at the Downtown
believe these efforts - in spite of COVID
Farmer’s Market. A total of 485 responses
restrictions - were successful in reaching
were received.
a broad spectrum of the community as
Survey respondents favored Option 1:
well as providing substantive, valuable feedback.
DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY TASK FORCE The March 2020 Task Force meeting was focused on reviewing the three land use frameworks, with an eye toward balancing community desires with development realities. Most DCTF members preferred Option 1: Central Square, and wanted the planning team to put special emphasis on creating a successful development
to the desire for a walkable Downtown with open gathering spaces, small local businesses and food options with outdoor seating. There was a range of opinions on taller buildings downtown, with the greatest support for stepping buildings down toward the edges to respect the scale of existing neighborhoods and sculpting building heights to ensure adequate sunlight.
placemaking through arts and history to make Downtown Santa Clara unique. The Task Force expressed continued interest in
farmers’ market, cafes and restaurants
gathering place for the whole community,
with outdoor dining.
with a good pedestrian environment, open
Residential and office buildings were seen
spaces, restaurants, a diversity of people, and inviting atmosphere. Buildings should have variety in scale and character, and should convey a Santa Clara identity.
as appropriate components in a mixeduse downtown, with a preference for a variety of housing types, including those that first-time homebuyers could afford. People preferred that taller buildings be
framework concepts that would include
situated on the eastern blocks towards the
In June 2020, the City and Consultant
a central open space, modified to ensure
University. Buildings should step down in
Team conducted six virtual workshop
that the plan can be realized successfully.
height towards the surrounding residential
sessions with some 34 Santa Clara
Franklin Street should prioritize
neighborhood.
residents who signed up.
pedestrians, with wide sidewalks, lots of
parcels, which can catalyze the further
along Franklin Street, and to focus on
We heard that downtown should be a
Participants favored a hybrid of the
MEETING OUT OF THE BOX
expressed the desire to maximize retail
SURVEY SUMMARY OF LAND USE FRAMEWORK OPTIONS
Central Square. Many comments referred
and placemaking on the City-owned development of Downtown. Members
Figure 1-12
activity, limited traffic, and potentially a trolley connection to Santa Clara Station. Downtown should create space for local businesses and for outdoor activities: a
15
| Cha p te r 1: Intro d u c ti on
Figure 1-13
PRELIMINARY LAND USE VARIATIONS
Land use mix and intensity were explored for each of the three framework alternatives.
CENTRAL SQUARE
LAFAYETTE GATEWAY
CONTEXTUAL
PHASE 3: URBAN DESIGN AND PLACEMAKING
City-owned land, were the subject of more
for three potential future public spaces.
cultural and historic context could be
detailed consideration, with conceptual
The team considered existing downtown
represented in the future Downtown as
design development for the proposed Arts
programs like the farmers’ market and
part of art and interpretive elements.
During the third phase of the process,
Commons plaza and potential activating
the opportunity to bring programming
the planning team focused on the details
uses around it: a theater, a community/
throughout the district in the future, even
Further Refinement. The “Framework
of Downtown “placemaking:” elements
performing arts space, a food hall, a
before development begins.
that would make Downtown Santa Clara
hotel with conference center, and a
vibrant, unique and authentic.
concentration of housing.
Building Design. The key characteristics
as the placement of the proposed cultural
of buildings at the ground level and above
anchors and public parking, the extent
DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY TASK FORCE
Street Cross-Sections. Alternative
were presented and discussed, including
of required retail, and the way building
conceptual designs for Benton, Lafayette,
the importance of entrances, transparency,
massing could better respond to sun and
and the future extensions of Franklin and
ground-floor height, indoor/outdoor
wind conditions and address smaller-scale
Main Streets were presented and explored,
spaces, the width or rhythm of building
and historic buildings particularly on the
including variations of the allocation
frontage, building height variety, façade
west end.
of street right-of-way and in building
projections, and landmarks.
frontages.
Art and Interpretation. The Task Force
Public Spaces and Programming. The
considered how Santa Clara’s ecological,
The planning team developed placemaking concepts with the Task Force between November 2020 and June 2021, with concept development along the following paths. Blocks A and B. The eastern two blocks of Downtown, with a concentration of
land use concepts included concepts
Plan” was refined to respond to detailed Task Force comments on such aspects
ONLINE SURVEY In October 2021, a second online survey was conducted to gather community
16 6
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
Figure 1-14
PRELIMINARY PUBLIC SPACE SKETCHES
CENTRAL GROVE
FRANKLIN SQUARE
LAFAYETTE GATEWAY
17
feedback on Downtown placemaking. The survey asked for input on placemaking concepts in the categories of streets and public spaces; businesses, attractions and activities; building design; and art and interpretation. A total of 204 responses were received. Survey respondents were broadly supportive of the proposed street crosssections, though there were also several comments about the potential to restrict car access on Franklin Street. Using a visual preference format, the survey revealed strong support for a plaza with festivals and farmers’ markets; wide sidewalks with trees and pedestrian amenities; cafes and restaurants with outdoor dining; local businesses; a food hall with local vendors; and outdoor concerts and movies. Buildings that include indoor/outdoor environments, façade projections, and generous ground-floor heights were favored. So were landscape and planting, public art expressed through lighting and paving,
VIRTUAL WORKSHOP A virtual Community Workshop was also held in October 2021, providing another opportunity to get feedback on Downtown placemaking. Approximately 40 community members participated. In breakout room discussions on streets, public spaces, activation, building articulation, and art, interpretation and wayfinding, community members reinforced many of the preferences and values expressed elsewhere. This included support for bringing back the street grid, a desire for streets to prioritize pedestrians, a desire for a movie theater and a performance space for arts and events, a mix of anchor and mom-and-pop retail, and for existing downtown programs to continue. Community members wanted buildings to take inspiration from historical styles in a way that is authentic to this place. Community members showed great interest in integrating art into the downtown fabric.
and murals.
Figure 1-15
SUPPORT FOR PLACEMAKING ELEMENTS
Survey participants were able to prioritize placemaking strategies on a virtual platform.
| Cha p te r 1: Intro d u c ti on
18 18
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
C. DEVELOPMENT MARKET CONSIDERATIONS A plan for downtown will remain just that – a plan – unless individual property owners decide to develop. An understanding of development realities and the market is an important part of creating a plan that will be realized. This section provides a brief
development a competitive investment,
based on the cash flow of existing uses.
hall, theater, or robust public programming
then we can say that the project “pencils”
We assumed parking would be provided
may help retail potential expand. The team
in the context of the market (See Figure
at lower ratios than is typical today (taking
came to the following conclusions.
1-16).
advantage of transit proximity), but within
The Downtown Precise Plan process
a range that is market-acceptable. We
included analysis of all of these factors. We had to make certain assumptions. For simplicity, the analysis assumes development would take place on a site with an existing low-density retail use. In fact, feasibility will differ parcel by parcel
assumed that residential development
The statewide housing shortage has had
will be required to include 15% affordable
magnified effects in Silicon Valley. While
housing, per City policy. (On City-owned
Santa Clara has increasingly offered high-
land, that will be higher.) And we assumed
density housing, the ongoing economic
that while demand for retail Downtown
activity in Silicon Valley and additional
is limited today, a catalyst such as a food
jobs in Santa Clara have intensified the
overview of development considerations for Downtown Santa Clara. Conditions will continue to evolve with time. Development feasibility is affected by the costs of land acquisition, design and permitting, infrastructure development, and building construction; by regulatory limits on height and density and requirements for parking and community benefits; by technical issues of life and safety requirements in the Building Code and the capacity of utilities; and by market demand: the rent per square foot that can be achieved. When all of these factors are accounted for and residual value remains that makes
Figure 1-16
Residential
MARKET/PROJECT VALUE AND DEVELOPMENT COST
19
| Cha p te r 1: Intro d u c ti on
Figure 1-17
PRELIMINARY BENCHMARKS FOR DENSITY
These summary diagrams illustrate the density threshold at which certain building types become feasible based on market conditions at the time of writing.
2 00
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
need for housing at a local and regional
city’s office market is well-supplied in the
contained within residential and office
scale. Between 2010 and 2019, Santa
near term. Investor demand continues to
projects is likely to be revenue-neutral,
Clara added over 3,000 units, almost all
remain strong for office development that
with a negligible effect on financial
in multifamily rental developments. High
is well-designed, strategically located, and
feasibility.
rental rates and consistently low vacancy
has a long-term tenant in place.
suggest the market can accommodate
Mid-rise and high-rise office development
additional high-density residential uses downtown. Analysis conducted for the Precise Plan indicates that townhomes and mid-rise housing prototypes (up to eight stories) maximize residential real estate feasibility. Current market rent levels in Santa Clara do not appear to support high rise residential development.
Office
likely is financially feasible, though office demand downtown is not well established.
Retail Despite national shopping trends, retail inventory in Santa Clara and neighboring cities has been fairly stable. To stay competitive, the nature of new retail offerings is evolving from the traditional indoor mall and strip mall formats to lifestyle shopping centers that are more
Silicon Valley is one of the premier
experiential. Retail success hinges
innovation economies of the world.
on precise location characteristics.
However, there is concern over the
Retail downtown would require unique
mismatch between housing growth and
positioning that complements rather
job growth, with costly and undersupplied
than competes with regional and local
housing posing a threat to the continued
retailers or positions retail in a mixed-use
expansion of high-tech sectors in the
development that may fulfill local demand
South Bay. Santa Clara added over 5
while providing convenience to other on-
million square feet of office space between
site uses.
2010 and 2019. Given the significant new
Analysis done for the Precise Plan
inventory, vacancy rates above 10 percent, and additional projects in the pipeline, the
concluded that ground-floor retail
D. OUR FOUNDATION
Parking
The Precise Plan seeks to integrate two
Subterranean parking adds significant
vision for a future Downtown, and the need
cost to development and is not a realistic option in many cases. With below-grade parking construction costs that are roughly 50 percent greater than an above-grade
essential ingredients: the community’s to make that vision financially achievable, given the capacity of the City to lead and the constraints of the market.
residual land values. The densest mid-rise
COMMUNITY DESIGN PRINCIPLES
residential and highest-intensity office
Downtown Santa Clara, following the
or hotel projects may be able to rely on
direction of this Plan, will be authentic,
limited subterranean parking (likely limited
adaptable and affordable. It will reflect its
to one level below grade), assuming a
history, but not in a way that simplifies
low land cost basis. Cost-effective, above
the past or applies superficial styles.
ground parking solutions and measures
Downtown will also have an eye to
that reduce parking demand will improve
the future. It should be resilient to the
real estate development economics.
changes in culture, technology, and
structure, subterranean parking solutions are financially challenging and reduce
environment that are sure to come, and serve future generations. And Downtown should be a place where people of all types feel welcome and can afford to visit or live.
21
| Cha p te r 1: Intro d u c ti on
The Precise Plan seeks to achieve the following community priorities for streets and public spaces: • A restored street grid; •
Multi-modal streets;
•
Active and pedestrian-scaled Franklin Street;
•
Parks and plazas for community gathering and community programs;
•
Outdoor seating.
The urban form of Downtown should be characterized by: • Human scale and pedestrian comfort; •
Building height variation and diversity;
•
Buildings massing that supports urban life and steps down to the neighborhood context;
•
Integration of traditional and contemporary building forms sensitive to nearby historic homes;
•
A mix of building uses, including retail, cultural catalysts, housing and offices.
AU T HEN T IC
ADAP TABLE
AF F O R DABLE
Timeless and of its Time Hodge Podge Something Old Something New
Sustainable Over Time Retail Ready Parking Strategy
Mix of Uses Resource Sharing Affordable Retail Community Benefits Public Programming
Figure 1-18
VISION FOR DOWNTOWN
2 22
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
FEASIBLE IMPLEMENTATION
users from surrounding areas, design attention, curation and flexibility. Retail is necessarily focused where it is most desired, along Franklin Street.
Financial Feasibility. The Downtown Precise Plan’s land use pattern and urban
•
form reflect community priorities as well as the planning team’s best understanding of market economics for downtown development. Aspects of financial feasibility that have informed the Plan, in particular, include the following: • Today, there is a relatively limited demand for retail space at this location. Retail success will require attracting
•
Residential development is likely to be feasible as Type III construction, and may be most feasible in the range of 5 to 7 stories. Townhomes are also feasible and may be ideally suited for liner uses facing adjacent neighborhood edges. Small-floor plate urban office buildings may be successful downtown, but this
•
is not yet proven in the current market environment.
generous in recent years in response to
Lower than typical required parking ratios will lower the cost of construction and can work in the market while supporting City goals to shift travel patterns and leverage
of the time the Precise Plan was written,
transit.
the level of subsidy provided. Second, the
State Regulations. There are also some important State-level regulatory conditions which the Plan needed to take into account. First, the State’s density bonus program has grown more
the ongoing housing affordability crisis. As the State density bonus allows housing developments up to 80% more floor area than allowed by local code, depending on the extent of deed-restricted units and Surplus Land Act (as amended) requires that jurisdictions that wish to dispose of property first offer the property to other public agencies and to affordable housing developers. Since the City owns key parcels in the Downtown area, this requirement will likely apply. City and Property Owner Objectives. Downtown development, from the creation of streets and public spaces to the building of retail, cultural venues, housing and offices, will only occur if and when downtown property owners, including the City, want to develop. The City has stated its interest in making its downtown property available for development, but (as of this writing) expects that development to pay for public improvements. Santa Clara University (also a downtown parcel owner) has also expressed interest in being a partner in creating a new downtown; one possible partnership could involve co-development
SANTANA ROW The Downtown Precise Plan reflects both community priorities and our best understanding of market economics. Source: Visit San Jose
of cultural arts spaces. Relocation of the County courthouse may be achievable, but will require a financial strategy and willing participants. Some private property
23
owners in the district are openly interested
for a long-term collaborative partnership
in development while others have not
with the City of San José and Valley Transit
indicated an interest. This Plan aims to
Authority (VTA) to capitalize on the new
clearly enable a first phase on City-owned
Santa Clara BART Station.
land, which may become a catalyst for future development. The Plan also aims to
| Cha p te r 1: Intro d u c ti on
Santa Clara University Master Plan
provide a satisfying downtown experience
Santa Clara University adopted a 5-year
at each stage.
capital improvement Master Plan in July 2016 to sustain a physical environment
BUILDING ON OTHER PLANS
that supports the University’s initiatives
General Plan
The Master Plan reinforces an arts focus
The Santa Clara General Plan provides a long-range blueprint for the city’s evolution through 2035. In its Downtown Focus Area, the General Plan envisions a compact and walkable district with boutique shopping, restaurants, public gathering spaces and civic venues, and multifamily housing. The Precise Plan is consistent with this vision at a high level, but provides much more detail, and provides new direction on public streets and spaces, land use, urban form, and development capacity. Both the General Plan and zoning will be updated to reflect this Downtown Precise Plan.
VTA Playbook The VTA Playbook (2019) focuses on regional transit connectivity, and would refocus growth in Santa Clara around the station. While the City has not adopted the Playbook, it presents a starting point
for a community of scholars, integrated education and effective use of resources. at the campus’ northwest corner adjacent to Downtown. The University segment of Franklin Street, reimagined as an Arts Paseo, is a critical linkage between Santa Clara Station, the University, and Downtown.
FRANKLIN ARTS PASEO Franklin Street has been converted to a pedestrian mall between Lafayette Street and the Alameda to better integrate the main campus with buildings north of Franklin.
244 2
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
WHAT IS A PRECISE PLAN? A Precise Plan provides detailed guidance on how a small district should develop. It allows us to evaluate a place more deeply, do tailored community engagement, and provide more precise direction compared to a general plan whose subject is the city as a whole. Unlike a Specific Plan, a Precise Plan does not replace the General Plan and may not include detailed implementation components. Here, the Precise Plan will be accompanied by a form-based zoning code as well as a financing plan. A Precise Plan is subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Because it is done at a finer grain of detail than a general plan, the CEQA analysis can allow more streamlining of subsequent development projects.
E. GUIDE TO THIS DOCUMENT
IF YOU ARE A COMMUNITY MEMBER
The Santa Clara Downtown Precise Plan
interested in learning about this
has six chapters. The first two chapters provide important background on the process, the place, and the plan framework. Chapters 3 through 5 feature policies for streets and public spaces (Chapter 3); street-level activation and groundfloor design (Chapter 4); and the form of buildings (Chapter 5).
For community members who are Plan, Chapters 1 and 2 are essential to understanding how the Plan was developed, and what the Plan is trying to achieve for a future Downtown Santa Clara. Chapters 3 through 5 describe in more detail how Downtown would look and feel, starting with its streets and public spaces (Chapter 3), and moving on to ground-floor activity (Chapter 4) and the size and shape of buildings (Chapter
Chapter 6 is a summary of key aspects of
5). Support from community members—
implementation, including creation of a
as champions of the Plan and as future
form-based development code, a financing
Downtown customers, business owners,
strategy, and a downtown management
workers and residents of Downtown—is
plan.
the most essential ingredient for the Plan’s
A form-based code has also been developed as part of this planning process and will be a companion document to the Precise Plan.
success.
25
IF YOU ARE A PROPERTY OWNER OR DEVELOPER
IF YOU WORK FOR THE CITY
Downtown property owners who are
The City will use this Plan to evaluate
interested in developing should become
applications and guide public
familiar with the Plan’s overall planning
improvements to ensure new development
framework, as described in Chapter 2.
is consistent with the overall vision and
Development applications and project
policies. Future public infrastructure,
designs will need to be consistent with
mobility, and public realm investments
Policies describe the approach to specific
the Plan’s direction for dedicating and
should be consistent with the Downtown
elements of Downtown (streets, public
improving streets and public spaces;
Precise Plan. The City should regularly
spaces, catalytic cultural uses, active
attracting catalyst uses and designing
monitor the progress being made on
ground-floor uses, upper-level building
for successful ground-floor experience;
public projects in the planning area.
elements) to achieve those goals.
and establishing height and massing
As the owner of significant Downtown
envelopes for future buildings (Chapters
property, the City will also play a critical
Implementation measures include
3, 4 and 5). Chapter 6’s summary of
role in enabling project development. All
implementation measures, including the
parts of the Plan are important for City
developer role, is also important. A form-
Staff to understand, with an emphasis on
based code has also been developed as
the implementation measures described
part of this planning process and will be a
in Chapters 3 through 5 and summarized
companion document to the Precise Plan.
in Chapter 6. City Staff will administer
Future development will need to follow the
the Downtown Form-based Code, and
standards of the form-based code.
will need to become familiar with its provisions.
WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A GOAL, A POLICY, AND AN IMPLEMENTING MEASURE? Goals express distinct characteristics of the high-level vision for Downtown.
programs and physical improvements. These are actions that must be taken by the City, private developers, other agencies, and others to fully achieve the vision of the Precise Plan.
| Cha p te r 1: Intro d u c ti on
02.
DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK
FRANKLIN SQUARE TODAY AT MONROE STREET
2 88
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
DOWNTOWN FRAMEWORK A. DOWNTOWN TODAY
developed residential mixed-use building
The Downtown planning area comprises
and 228 residential units.
approximately 27.4 acres or what would
About six acres on the east end of the
be 10 standard Old Quad blocks, between Lafayette Street on the east and Madison Street on the west and between Benton Street on the north and Homestead Road on the south. Today, most of the Downtown study area is in two “superblocks” that were created as part of the failed urban renewal project of the 1960s.
LAND USE AND OWNERSHIP
along Monroe Street. Today, the Planning Area includes approximately 302,500 square feet of commercial and office space
planning area are owned by the City of Santa Clara, as are the parking areas at Franklin Square and behind the Courthouse. The Courthouse is owned by the State of California, and the post office is owned by the US Postal Service. One property at the corner of Benton and Lafayette streets is owned by Santa Clara University. The remaining properties,
Mission Library
comprising about half the district’s land, are in private ownership.
Downtown includes the old post office, the County Courthouse, the Franklin Square and University Plaza commercial centers, the Commerce Plaza office building, the Park Central Apartments, a few other small
Figure 2-1
DOWNTOWN ZONING
commercial buildings, large parking areas,
Single Family
Community Commercial
General Office
and a small plaza with mature trees and a
Duplex
Downtown Commercial
Low Density Multiple Dwelling
Neighborhood Commercial
Professional and Administrative Office
Medium Density Multiple Dwelling
Planned Development
Heavy Industrial
Public/ Quasi Public
Historical Combination
fountain at Franklin Square. The western two blocks of the planning area include small-scale commercial buildings, older and historic homes, and one recently-
Moderate Density Multiple Dwelling
Light Industrial
29
Santa Clara University
Mission Library
Figure 2-2
DOWNTOWN PROPERTY OWNERSHIP Privately Owned City of Santa Clara Santa Clara University State of California United States Postal Services
| Cha p te r 2 : Downtown Fra me work
30 3 0
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
PROGRAMMING AND EVENTS Downtown is activated with a number of events. The Farmers Market occurs every Saturday morning around the year at Franklin Square. There is live music, locally grown food and flowers, food vendors, local craftsmen and bakers. The Annual Street Dance is a City-sponsored festival hosted at Franklin Square every August, with live performances, food vendors, beer and wine, and art and activities for all ages. The Santa Clara Parade of Champions was a time-honored legacy in Santa Clara between 1945 to 1995 and has been recently revived. These events have been essential in bringing people Downtown. Just beyond Downtown’s boundaries, a Historical Home Tour at Old Quad takes place the first week of December. The Easter Egg Hunt is hosted by Santa Clara City Library Foundation and Friends at Mission Library. The Festival of Lights at Santa Clara Mission is hosted each December by Santa Clara University’s Music Department.
Figure 2-3
DOWNTOWN PROGRAMMING
Current events provide a program foundation to build upon.
31
ACCESS AND MOBILITY Street Configurations and Vehicular Travel All streets in the planning area are threelane configurations with left-turn lanes or continuous center left-turn lanes and on-street parking. Monroe Street, Benton Street and Homestead Road also feature Class II bike lanes. Traffic signals exist at the four corners of Monroe, Lafayette, Benton, and Homestead. Lafayette Street carries substantially more traffic than the other streets. The intersection of Lafayette and Benton accommodates substantial right-turn movement from eastbound Benton Street to southbound Lafayette. Benton Street today is a critical access link, connecting Downtown with Santa Clara Station and major arteries. A traffic analysis was performed in 2019 to measure existing level of service (LOS) at eight Downtown-area intersections during the morning and afternoon peak hours. LOS is a measure of vehicle delay ranging from A (very little delay) to F (long delays and congestion). The analysis shows that all eight
Figure 2-4
STREET AND TRANSIT NETWORK
intersections currently operate above a
Site Boundary
22
Rapid Bus
Level of Service of D.
CalTrains
60
Frequent Bus
Stations
21
Local Bus
Transit
BART Phase 2
Downtown Santa Clara is situated within
1/4 mile (5 min walk)
a rich transit environment. The eastern
1/2 mile (10 min walk)
| Cha p te r 2 : Downtown Fra me work
322 3
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
portion of the planning area is within a ten-minute walk (1/2 -mile) of Santa Clara Station, served by Caltrain and, in the future, Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART). Downtown is located with a five-minute walk (1/4-mile) of the Valley Transit Authority’s (VTA) Rapid 522, which provides 10-15-minute service frequencies along El Camino Real. In addition, downtown Santa Clara is served by three local VTA routes, Route 32, Route 60, and Route 81. Route 60 is a frequent bus route, having frequencies of 15-20 minutes throughout the day, while the others have 30-minute service frequencies. The transit hub connecting local VTA routes to regional transit and the larger Bay Area is located adjacent to Santa Clara Station.
Bicycles Santa Clara’s Bicycle Plan identifies three bicycle levels of traffic stress. Level 1 indicates the bicycling experience is comfortable for bicyclists of all ages and ability levels. Level 2 indicates an experience that is comfortable to an average or better adult bicyclist. The final category indicates a comfort level appropriate only to a confident adult bicyclist. The assessment shows the bicycling environment in Downtown Santa Clara largely comprises streets that
Figure 2-5
BIKE NETWORK Site Boundary
Recommended Bikeways
Bicycling Level of Traffic Stress
CalTrain
Class II Bicycle Lane
Level 1 - All Ages and Abilities
Stations
Class III Bicycle Route
Level 2 - Average Adult
BART Phase 2
Class IIIB Bicycle Boulevard
Level 3 - Confident Adult
Existing Bikeways
Class IV Separated Bikeway
Class II Bicycle Lane Class III Bicycle Route
Source: City of Santa Clara, 2022 and Bicycle Master Plan, 2018.
Source: Kimley Horn, 2019, study for Precise Plan.
33
are comfortable for Level 2 bicyclists. Lafayette and Benton Streets showed a higher level of bike stress (this may have changed on Benton Street with the more recent addition of bike lanes). The plan also identified the intersection of Monroe Street and Homestead Road as a common crash site for bicyclists. This intersection could be improved for bicyclists by eliminating the shared vehicular right-turn lane with the bike lane.
On-street parking exists along each street in the planning area, at no cost. However, the on-street parking is restricted by time limitations, primarily of 1, 2, and 4 hours on weekdays and Saturdays, giving Downtown visitors convenience while encouraging turnover. Downtown also has “green curb” spaces for loading, pick-up and drop-off, and “blue curb” spaces for accessible parking. Public off-street parking consists of
While all Downtown streets have
surface lots and a garage available for
sidewalks and all intersections have
general public or customer parking.
crosswalks, there are notable constraints
Private parking consists of off-street lots
to pedestrian access in and around
where certain visitors can access the
Downtown. First, Downtown itself lacks
parking. This is regulated via a permit for
an internal street network, limiting options
the facility. Signs are posted at the facility
for walkable access between places.
entrances to indicate that a permit is
Second, the current configurations of
required to park in the lot.
Lafayette Street and El Camino Real act
The number of required off-street parking
Downtown, separating it from Santa Clara University and from Santa Clara Station. The Pedestrian Master Plan from 2019 identified four high priority
EXISTING PARKING
Parking
The Pedestrian Experience
as barriers for good pedestrian access
Figure 2-6
| Cha p te r 2 : Downtown Fra me work
spot improvement projects within the Downtown area. These are located on the Monroe St/Homestead Rd, Lafayette St/ Homestead Rd, Monroe St/Franklin St and Homestead Rd/Jackson St intersections.
spaces is determined by the type and size of the building the parking will serve, as required by the City’s zoning code. Required parking in Santa Clara generally ranges from 1 space per 200 square feet to 1 space per 300 square feet of commercial space, depending on use. One space is required per apartment unit Downtown.
3 44
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
INFRASTRUCTURE The City of Santa Clara owns and operates potable and non-potable water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, and electrical services to the precise plan area. Public utilities provide natural gas and communications services. A summary of
zone generally comes from groundwater
Based upon the current land use at the
Based upon the current land use at the
delivered through wells.
site, average potable water demand
site, average sanitary sewer flows range
The pipelines within the study area include
ranges from about 11,000 to 17,000 gallons
from about 10,000 to 16,000 gallons per
the following: • Madison Street – Water line of unknown size and type
per day (GPD).
day (GPD). Assuming a peaking factor of
Sanitary Sewer
•
the infrastructure and its condition follows.
Potable and Non-Potable Water
•
The City of Santa Clara provides potable and fire water service to the area. The water sources include an extensive local underground aquifer supply delivered to
Homestead Road - 12-inch cast iron pipe installed in 1965
•
Franklin Street - 8-inch cast iron pipe installed in 1927 – an abandoned 10inch pipeline remains in the segment between Jackson and Monroe
water agencies including the Valley Water and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) Hetch Hetchy system.
•
Monroe Street - 12-inch cast iron pipe installed in 1972
•
Jackson Street - 8-inch ductile iron pipe installed in 1987
According to the City of Santa Clara’s 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, the City will have adequate water supply assuming projections for water demand of 8.9% average annual growth for the next 5 years and slower 1% growth thereafter. The study area is within the City of Santa Clara’s pressure zone 1. The normal pressure ranges within the zone are maintained between 45 and 85 psi. The pressure remains fairly constant with demand generally not varying by more than 15 psi. The water supply within this
Lafayette Street – A 6-inch cast iron pipe installed in 1927 and 12-inch cast iron pipe installed in 1962 which are not continuous along the segment
•
the system by well as well as imported water supplies provided by two wholesale
Benton Street – 24-inch ductile iron pipe installed in 1973 and 8-inch cast iron pipe installed in 1927
South Bay Water Recycling provides
Wastewater is collected by the City of
Storm Water
to the San Jose/Santa Clara Regional
Storm runoff is collected by the City of
Wastewater Facility.. The plant has the
Santa Clara and transported to the San
capacity to treat up to 167 million gallons
Francisco Bay. The study area is within
per day. The treated effluent is sent to the
the Southern Guadalupe River Drainage
South Bay Water Recycling project for re-
Area as defined by the City of Santa
use as non-potable water.
Clara Storm Drain Master Plan dated
All pipelines adjacent to the study area are
December 2015. The study area does not
vitrified clay pipes and range from five to twelve feet in depth. The wastewater from the study area discharges to the collector
Streets respectively. This recycled water can be used for irrigation as well as non-potable building uses such as toilet flushing and/or mechanical processes.
contain areas designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency as subject to the inundation from a 100-year
pipeline in Lafayette Street or Franklin
storm.
Street where it flows to the south or east,
All pipelines are reinforced concrete
receptively. The following summarizes the
pipe, unless noted otherwise, and range
pipelines adjacent to the study area: • Madison Street – 6 and 8 inches in diameter
from three to four feet in depth. The
•
Benton Street - 6, 8 and 12 inch in diameter
where it flows to the east. The following
•
Lafayette Street - 6 and 12 inches in diameter
study area: • Madison Street – 36 inches in diameter
•
Homestead Road - 12 inches in diameter
•
Benton Street - 36 inch in diameter
•
Lafayette Street - 21 inches in diameter
•
Franklin Street – 10 inch in diameter
•
•
Monroe Street - 12 inches in diameter
Homestead Road – 14, 15 and 18 inches in diameter
•
Jackson Street - 8 inches in diameter
pipelines located to the north and west of the study area in Fremont and Madison
0.65 cubic feet per second.
Santa Clara and transported for treatment
non-potable water service near the site. Currently, the utility has transmission
2.5, the peak daily demand could be about
stormwater from the study area discharges to the collector pipeline in Benton Street summarizes the pipelines adjacent to the
35
•
Franklin Street – 8 inch in diameter noted as vitrified clay pipe
•
Monroe Street - 12 inches in diameter
•
Jackson Street - 20 inches in diameter
Electricity Silicon Valley Power serves the site through overhead lines and underground infrastructure operating at 12KV. The site includes a series of transformers providing electrical services at voltages necessary to serve commercial and residential uses.
Natural Gas and Communications Pacific Gas and Electricity (PG&E) has natural gas pipelines within the roadways surrounding the study area. Silicon Valley Power, Comcast, and AT&T provides communication services within the area among others. To meet greenhouse gas reduction goals, the development will not install natural gas. Telecommunications services are typically installed with new developments. Santa Clara is rich with broadband providers.
Figure 2-7
EXISTING UTILITIES Existing Electric
Existing Storm Drain
Existing Gas
Existing Water
Existing Sewer
| Cha p te r 2 : Downtown Fra me work
36 6
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
B. DOWNTOWN PRECISE PLAN FRAMEWORK
Downtown, each with its own typical
The framework plan also identifies three
encouraged; where retail uses should be
width, mobility emphasis, and frontage
public spaces. These are to be Arts
required; and where retail uses should
characteristics. Lafayette Street is
Commons, at the east end; Franklin
be enabled by design, but not required
recognized as a major street. Benton,
Square, in the west; and a Central Green
(“retail-ready”). Arts Commons, at
Homestead, and Monroe are multi-modal
around the future intersection of Franklin
Downtown’s east end, is seen as the likely
The Precise Plan integrates the
streets that balance vehicle, transit,
and Main Streets. Each of these public
first stage of downtown development,
bicycle and pedestrian travel. Franklin
spaces will have a distinct character,
the seam between the University and the
Street and one new block of Main Street
formed by the design of the space and by
community, and a lively place. A theater
are pedestrian-oriented streets with active
the contributing activities around it.
would be located nearly in the same
community’s vision for a future Downtown and the need to make that vision achievable. The Plan starts with a simple framework. The framework, which developed over the course of months with the Downtown Community Task Force (DCTF), community members, stakeholders, and finally City Council, has
retail and cultural uses and a rich public realm. Washington, Jackson, and Madison Streets are local downtown streets that include a mix of uses and should provide both a quality pedestrian experience and
three parts: streets and public spaces;
service function.
essential land use; and urban form. The
The Plan envisions midblock alleys that
framework clearly identifies what is most
can be service alleys as well as places that
important about the Precise Plan, and
add interest and flavor to the downtown
also what can be flexible in the interest
walking experience. While alleys are to
of implementation and adaptability to
be required in each block with future
change.
development, their precise locations
STREETS AND PUBLIC SPACES The framework for streets and public spaces starts with re-establishing the street grid, creating ten city blocks. The Plan envisions four types of streets
are left flexible. Alleys are anticipated to have private ownership with dedicated public access and utility easements. They should be constructed such that they can handle the weight of solid waste collection vehicles.
ESSENTIAL LAND USE The Downtown Precise Plan’s approach to land use is based on a few key ideas. First, Downtown should be a mixed-use environment, with places to live, work, and enjoy community life. Second, retail, restaurants, and cultural uses are the most valued by community members as the heart and soul of Downtown. However (and third), retail success is likely to be challenging, especially in the near term, so over-prescribing it could lead simply to vacant spaces. Fourth, Franklin Street was widely seen as the place where active retail and cultural uses should be focused. The Essential Land Use component of the Plan identifies ground floor spaces where cultural catalysts should be required or
location where the old Santa Clara Theater once was – but now centered prominently on the new plaza, and a community/ performance space, a food hall, and retail would surround the plaza and activate Franklin Street. Similarly, retail would surround the future Central Green, and would also be clustered where Franklin Street meets Monroe Street. Along remaining frontages of Franklin Street as well as some others, retail-ready spaces would be required, but these would not be required to have retail uses at the outset but could transition to retail uses later, as the market for retail matures.
37
| Cha p te r 2 : Downtown Fra me work
Figure 2-8
STREETS AND PUBLIC SPACES FRAMEWORK FRANKLIN SQUARE CENTRAL GREEN
Major Arterial Street Multi-modal Street ARTS COMMONS
Pedestrian Oriented Street Service Oriented Street Alleys* Public Spaces *Private ownership with dedicated public access and the option to place utilities in a public access easement if needed.
Figure 2-9
ESSENTIAL GROUND FLOOR LAND USE FRAMEWORK
Retail Uses Retail Ready Uses Entertainment/Cultural Anchors Public Spaces
38 3 8
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
URBAN FORM The urban form component of the Precise Plan is in one way the most flexible, and in another the most sensitively and specifically designed. In terms of land use, the Precise Plan is “agnostic”: buildings may be housing, offices, hotels, civic or cultural uses, or a mix of these uses. Thus the framework plan does not show color (typically associated with land use in plans), but only shows building form. The building massing has been crafted through several iterations working with the DCTF and City staff to respond to multiple conditions. These include stepping down in the north, west and south edges to transition to neighborhood scale; solar access to public spaces and to the neighborhood north of Benton; concentrating density – and mass – at the central civic axes – Main and Franklin – and at the east end around the Arts Commons; and finally, stepping down to respond to the scale of historic structures at the west end including the old post office and historic homes in the blocks between Monroe and Madison.
Figure 2-10
URBAN FORM FRAMEWORK (MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHTS)
39
| Cha p te r 2 : Downtown Fra me work
Building form, as shown in the model, represents general building “envelopes” that the Precise Plan and its implementing form-based code will seek to maintain. Actual buildings will have varied massing and façades, providing human scale, visual interest, and design features that the Plan should guide but leave room for creative response. The diagrams shown here represent building form that could occur “as of right” under the Plan—the base maximum building envelopes—and the building form that could occur with the provision of additional community benefits (bonus), including affordable housing, cultural catalyst uses, and enhanced public realm features.
Figure 2-11
URBAN FORM FRAMEWORK (MAXIMUM BONUS BUILDING HEIGHTS)
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
POTENTIAL PHASE 1
EVOLUTION + CONTINUITY
Santa Clara has a unique opportunity
The Precise Plan paints a vision for a
to catalyze the development of a new
completely reshaped Downtown Santa
downtown because of existence of a
Clara, and creates a regulatory framework
significant aggregation of City-owned
to allow this to be created by individual
parcels at the east end of the study area.
property owners over time.
The majority of the easternmost two blocks is owned by the City as well as a significant portion of a third block (as proposed) south of the Franklin Street alignment between Washington and Main. Here, the City has the opportunity to
BENTON
However, it is important to state that the Plan only sets terms for future development. Existing land uses, businesses and activities can be carried
LAFAYETTE
4 00
on--and can contribute to an evolving place.
orchestrate a development project that sets the tone for the new downtown in terms of urban form, land use mix, cultural attractions, ground floor activating uses and public space function and character. With this as an example, subsequent phases of the Downtown Precise Plan are far more likely to be initiated and follow the qualitative lead of the earlier phase. Phasing and implementation strategy as
HOMESTEAD
well as more details about the qualitative aspects of making the early phases successful, will be discussed in later chapters.
Figure 2-12
PHASE 1 OWNERSHIP City of Santa Clara Santa Clara University Privately Owned
41
Figure 2-13
PHASE 1 URBAN FORM
The two easternmost blocks have strong potential as a catalytic first phase for the Downtown leveraging City-owned parcels.
| Cha p te r 2 : Downtown Fra me work
03.
STREETS + PUBLIC SPACES
FRANKLIN SQUARE LOOKING WEST ALONG THE FRANKLIN STREET AXIS
4 44
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
STRATEGIC STATEMENT The public realm sets a stage on which the choreography of community life unfolds. The design of streets, parks and other public spaces will determine much of what our Downtown experience will be: how we might move, where we might pause, who we might meet, and what we might see. The public realm should create a Downtown that’s a great place to live, work, play or visit. With thoughtful design and careful programming, streets and open space can address complex challenges relating to mobility, economic vitality, greening strategies, and community activities. From the perspective of community identity, an enhanced public realm provides a way to establish Downtown as the heart of Santa Clara and to differentiate it from other places.
Figure 3-1
CONCEPT VISION FOR THE “ARTS COMMONS” LOOKING EAST
45
| Cha p te r 3 : Stre e t s + Pu b l i c Sp a c e s
4 66
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
The following over-arching principles describe how Downtown’s public realm is envisioned:
DOWNTOWN’S PUBLIC REALM SHOULD OFFER MEMORABLE EXPERIENCES AND A SENSE OF HISTORY AND PLACE.
activities, in the public realm itself and
The quality of its environment should help make Downtown Santa Clara a noteworthy
of buildings abutting the public realm.
DOWNTOWN SHOULD BE FLEXIBLE.
Recognize that community life occurs in
Public settings should provide a frame
different ways, ranging from just one or
within which a wide variety of activities
two people to large gatherings, and at
can occur. Simple features, like wide
different times of the day or different times
sidewalks with movable seating, are
of the year.
preferred to elaborate but inflexible design
as a complement to the ground-floor
pedestrian environment, and by creating
DOWNTOWN SHOULD BE SAFE AND FACILITATE HEALTH.
a beautiful Downtown with an appealing
Studies show that communities with
and economically successful destination. Enjoyment of community life should be promoted by tending to the quality of
urban forest, harmonious street elements, historic interpretation, and exemplary public art.
DOWNTOWN SHOULD BE WELCOMING. The public realm should offer ways to engage in social, cultural, and business
inviting sidewalks and walk-to amenities improve physical health, reduce mental stress, and increase social interaction. Calm traffic minimizes injuries and makes Downtown more enjoyable. Pleasant settings should be provided that balance sunshine and shade.
solutions. Flexibility also comes in the form of uninterrupted plazas and lawns, raised platforms available for performances, and flexible use of curbside lanes.
DOWNTOWN SHOULD BE GREEN. By creating pedestrian-oriented streets and a balanced street grid, Downtown can promote alternatives to the car and reduce reliance on single-occupancy vehicles, while distributing traffic across a network. Green infrastructure will raise awareness of the stormwater networks to which Downtown connects, as well as providing a host of other environmental benefits.
47
| Cha p te r 3 : Stre e t s + Pu b l i c Sp a c e s
GOALS + POLICIES The following goals and policies will ensure that the plan’s vision for a vibrant public realm will be achieved.
GOAL 3.1: COMPLETE STREETS & MULTIMODAL ACCESS Recognize that streets provide ways to get around and a setting for community life. Encourage walking, bicycling, and transit use, while maintaining access by cars and trucks. Leverage Downtown’s access to regional transit. Create an interconnected network of streets and paths to provide direct routes and distribute traffic. Tailor the character of each street to complement adjacent land uses and desired activities. Design streets to help
POLICY 3.1A: CONNECTED STREET GRID
POLICY 3.1B: COMPLETE STREETS
Re-establish Downtown’s street grid,
Design multimodal streets for safe,
as described in Figure 3-2: Downtown
comfortable walking, bicycling, and shared
Streets & Public Spaces. Extend streets
mobility; for convenient access to transit
through the Downtown area to establish
and local destinations; and to support
an interconnected network. Locate streets
public realm activity. Establish ample
to align with existing intersections and
sidewalks that provide continuous path of
maintain sufficient dimension for future
pedestrian travel, and provide space for
buildings. Pursue interim pedestrian
trees, outdoor dining, bicycle parking, and
connections using existing easements
landscape, as appropriate. Set the width
extend or sweep the sides of the building.
where full street right-of-way land
of traffic lanes to acceptable dimensions
More detailed recommendations for each
dedication is currently not available. Spark
to accommodate yet slow traffic flows,
Downtown street, as well as proposed
redevelopment by extending Franklin
reduce pedestrian crossing distances,
future private alleys, are provided on the
Street on City-owned land, where it will
and create human-scaled environments,
following pages.
intersect Lafayette Street. Provide a safe,
maintaining ease of flow for all modes and
comfortable crossing of Lafayette Street,
functions.
ensuring continuity between the Franklin Arts Paseo and Franklin Street Downtown.
Streets must also be designed to provide aerial access for fire equipment.
establish a unique sense of Downtown
Alleys are required in each block to
Currently, the City of Santa Clara requires
identity.
facilitate parking and service access but
that buildings over 30 feet in height require
are flexible as to their precise location.
roadways to be located so aerial apparatus
Alleys should connect at least two different
will have clear access to the “entire” face/
adjoining streets for each block. Alleys
sides of the buildings. The minimum
are anticipated to have private ownership
number of sides is project and building
with public access and the option to place
specific but generally includes a minimum
utilities in a public access easement if
of two and up to four sides depending on
needed.
the building configuration, building design, occupancy, and construction type. Aerial access roadways must be located not less than 15 feet and not greater than 30 feet from the building and shall be positioned parallel to the entire face/side of the building. Trees at full development must not exceed 30 feet in height and canopies must not impair an aerial apparatus’ ability to
4 88
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
Figure 3-2
DOWNTOWN STREETS & PUBLIC SPACES
Major Thoroughfare Community Connectors Pedestrian Oriented Downtown Street Service Oriented Downtown Street Suggested Alley Locations* Park or Plaza Potential Relocation of Franklin Square to the block to the North, as Part of Potential Future Development Building Setback Line *Private ownership with dedicated public access and the option to place utilities in a public access easement if needed
49
Lafayette Street. Design Lafayette Street to serve the needs of Downtown, while
| Cha p te r 3 : Stre e t s + Pu b l i c Sp a c e s
Figure 3-3
LAFAYETTE STREET CROSS-SECTION
recognizing Lafayette’s importance as a city-serving major street. At the edge of Downtown, increase sidewalk width
DOWNTOWN SIDE
SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY SIDE
to extend beyond the right-of-way and within building setbacks, as illustrated in Figure 3-3: Lafayette Street Cross-Section. Where possible, extend curb “bulb-outs” to reduce pedestrian crossing distances at crosswalks at Benton, Franklin, and Homestead, and plant street trees near the curb. Announce the edge of Downtown with street trees and pedestrian-scale lighting and banners. Enable sidewalk cafe seating by allowing up to 6’ from building edge to be used for private purposes like outdoor dining. The remaining sidewalk is required to be publicly accessible. The Downtown Precise Plan does not make recommendations for Lafayette Street between the curbs. However, the length of Lafayette Street should be studied as a corridor for potential redesign, balancing traffic flows with pedestrian and bike functions. Because Lafayette needs to be understood as an important cross-town connector, this study was not conducted for the Downtown Precise Plan.
Sidewalk Existing Extension Sidewalk Furniture & Green Infrastructure Zone
(no proposed change, out of study area)
Existing
Sidewalk
5 00
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
Monroe & Benton Streets and Homestead Road. These streets have
Figure 3-4
MONROE, BENTON & HOMESTEAD CROSS-SECTION
traffic and bicycle lanes in each direction separated by a center turn lane, as shown in Figure 3-4: Monroe, Benton &
DOWNTOWN SIDE
NEIGHBORHOOD SIDE
Homestead Cross Section. These streets require only modest improvements, such as to extend curbs at intersections to reduce crosswalk distances, plant street trees, and add green infrastructure. Franklin Street. Give priority to pedestrians along Franklin Street , while allowing one continuous traffic lane in each direction which is shared by cars and bikes, as described in Figure 3-5: Franklin Street Cross Section. Give pedestrians priority by providing sidewalks wide enough for outdoor dining, carts with merchandise, public art, and other amenities. Allow up to 6’ from building edge to be used for private purposes like outdoor dining. The remaining setback and sidewalk is required to be publicly accessible. Design to accommodate a potential shuttle connection within the travel lanes that would connect Downtown to Santa Clara Station.
Green Infrastructure
Sidewalk Multi-use Bike Curb Lane Lane
Bike Multi-use Sidewalk Lane Curb Lane Existing streets; widths vary
51
| Cha p te r 3 : Stre e t s + Pu b l i c Sp a c e s
f.o.c.
Sidewalk
WRT | S anta C l ara Dow n to wn Prec i s e P l an
Provide a multi-use curb lane, while extending the curb at intersections to
Figure 3-5
Franklin StSTREET with galleries FRANKLIN CROSS-SECTION
reduce pedestrian crossing distances. The multi-use curb lane can be used for a variety of uses that are likely to change over time as demands shift. These uses include drop-off zones, service and delivery zones, bike share stations and onstreet parking. “Rain gardens” and permeable paving for stormwater management may also occur in this zone in prescribed locations (Refer to Policy 3.4: Stormwater Management and Green Infrastructure). Permeable pavers in the ROW will be subject to an encroachment agreement where the private property owner maintains the pavers in perpetuity. Establish a distinctive canopy of street trees with seasonal color and street lights scaled appropriately to be compatible with Franklin Street design Design the street so it can be closed to traffic during special events, especially near public spaces. Use historic light standards and other design features to provide a clear connection with the historic downtown. Emphasize continuity between Franklin Street downtown and the Franklin Arts Paseo to the east.
12.5’–15’ (setback)
10’
Sidewalk
f.o.c.
character and elements like banners.
7’
26’
60’ ROW
7’
10’
12.5’–15’ (setback)
52 52
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
The timing of development by different property owners may require phased
Figure 3-6
MAIN STREET (SOUTH) CROSS-SECTION
Franklin Street improvements. As an early interim measure, provide a Franklin Street through-connection between Washington and Jackson that utilizes the right-of-way easement obtained along the south edge of the existing Park Central Apartments. See diagram Figure 3-21 showing interim condition. Main Street (South). Make Main Street a grand connection between the Central Green (described under Goal 3.2) and City Plaza Park. Between Franklin Street and Homestead Road, create a memorable allée with four lines of trees, so that both roadway and continuous sidewalks are framed on each side by a line of trees, as illustrated in Figure 3-6: Main Street (South) Cross Section. Between the outside trees and edge of right-ofway, provide a flexible zone adjacent to building fronts that complement ground-
Sidewalk
Sidewalk
Multi-use Curb Lane
Multi-use Curb Lane
floor use and can change in character over time. Allow up to 6’ from building edge to be used for private purposes like outdoor dining. The remaining setback
Green Infrastructure Zone
Green Infrastructure Zone
Tree Planting Zone
53
Figure 3-7
WASHINGTON & MAIN STREET (NORTH) CROSS-SECTION
Sidewalk
Furniture & Green Infrastructure Zone
Multi-use Curb Lane
Multi-use Curb Lane
Furniture & Green Infrastructure Zone
| Cha p te r 3 : Stre e t s + Pu b l i c Sp a c e s
Figure 3-8
ALLEY CROSS-SECTION
Sidewalk
Alleys are anticipated to have private ownership with dedicated public access and the option to place utilities in a public access easement if needed.
5 44
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
and sidewalk is required to be publicly
to have private ownership with public
accessible. Maintain the same palette of
access and the option to place utilities
tree species and materials as the Central
in a public access easement, if needed.
Green.
Alleys should be designed for shared
The City should also explore streetscape
pedestrian use, and may include active
enhancements for Main Street between Homestead Road and City Plaza Park, to provide a sense of continuity linking City Plaza Park with the Central Green. Washington & Main Street (North). These streets are not expected to have high levels of pedestrian or vehicular activity, as the edge of right-of-way is
retail and restaurant uses, public art and interpretation. They may incorporate permeable paving for stormwater management which will be maintained by the private property owners. Their alignment in each block is flexible. See Figure 3-8: Alley Cross Section.
office buildings, as seen in Figure 3-7:
POLICY 3.1C: PEDESTRIAN COMFORT & SAFETY
Washington & Main Street (North) Cross
Provide safe, direct, and continuous
expected to be lined with residential or
Section. Both streets should also serve as marked bicycle routes where bikes and vehicles share lanes.
pedestrian paths throughout Downtown, to and from surrounding areas, and to Santa Clara Station. Maintain an uninterrupted
•
landscaped medians where turn lanes exist but are not needed.
If high volumes of cut-through traffic are observed, consider controls at intersections or the elimination of turn lanes. Where high vehicle speeds are observed, consider speed bumps or speed tables.
POLICY 3.1D: PUBLIC PARKING & CURB MANAGEMENT Direct motorists to parking garages and moderate on-street parking demand with available supply, such as with wayfinding to parking garages, sensors and “smart parking” apps communicating parking availability, and adjusting the price of
Jackson & Madison Streets. No changes
path for pedestrian travel at least 8 feet
parking.
are proposed to these 2-lane, 2-way
in width. Minimize curb cuts where motor
Optimize curbside lanes through
streets, which have favorable features such
vehicles cross pedestrian sidewalks, by
integrated planning and by managing
as street trees between curb and sidewalk.
consolidating access and using alleys.
their use for multiple functions including
Calm traffic, including with: • curb extensions to reduce pedestrian crossing distances at crosswalks;
passenger pick-up and drop-off (e.g. for
•
pedestrian-activated rapid flashing beacon at longer crosswalks;
and shared mobility stations. Consider
traffic lane width reduction to acceptable minimums;
when on-street parking demand is low.
Alleys. Alleys are required for off-street access to parking, loading and service areas, except for where a parcel may abut a Secondary Frontage, as described in Chapter 4, or if a parcel is otherwise undevelopable. Alleys are anticipated
•
ride-hailing apps), loading and delivery for businesses, vehicle and bike parking, allowing curbside loading for businesses
MOBILITY HUB The Downtown Precise Plan recommends mobility hubs that cluster combinations of bikeshare, scootershare, carshare, on-demand rideshare, and microtransit.
55
Figure 3-9
DOWNTOWN BICYCLE NETWORK AND MICROMOBILITY
| Cha p te r 3 : Stre e t s + Pu b l i c Sp a c e s
POLICY 3.1E: BIKES & MICROMOBILITY Prioritize bike-friendly designs for new or modified Downtown streets in this Plan. Maintain bike lanes on Monroe Street, Benton Streets, and Homestead Road, as indicated on Figure 3-9: Downtown Bicycle Network and Micromobility. Create a new continuous bicycle route on Washington Street, where bikes and slowmoving vehicles can share lanes. Amend the City’s Bicycle Master Plan to show this new bicycle route made possible by extending Washington Street through Downtown. Incorporate street design elements like on-street parking, curb bulb-outs, and lane markings (e.g. bike boxes at intersections, “sharrows”) to encourage safe, mixed vehicle and bike movement. Encourage bicycle use and other forms of mobility by creating mobility hubs
Class II Bike Lanes Class III Bike Routes (Sharrows) Micromobility Stations
that cluster combinations of bikeshare, scootershare, carshare, on-demand rideshare, and microtransit. Mobility hubs can be implemented incrementally as
Parking Garage (Potential)
development projects make needs and
*Amendments to the 2018 Bicycle Master Plan
opportunities evident, while remaining geographically distributed as illustrated in Figure 3-9.
56 56
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
Figure 3-10
DOWNTOWN TRANSIT NETWORK
POLICY 3.1F: TRANSIT ACCESS Encourage transit use by Downtown workers, residents and visitors. In coordination with VTA, provide highquality transit shelters with waste receptacles maintained by VTA, where buses stop adjacent to Downtown, as indicated in Figure 3-10: Downtown Transit Network. Enhance transit connections from Downtown to regional destinations, such as to emphasize proximity to the Santa Clara Transit Center, which offers Caltrain service, VTA rapid bus service, and future BART service, through pedestrian connections, integration of design features, and wayfinding. Fund a study to understand the feasibility of a frequent convenient trolley, shuttle or autonomous micro bus between Downtown, Santa Clara University, and the Santa Clara Transit Center. Ensure that good transit functionality
Existing Bus Routes Existing Bus Stops Potential Shuttle
is a criterion for evaluating design at the project scale in any case where development would affect transit service.
57
GOAL 3.2: GREAT PUBLIC SPACES Make Downtown a vibrant place and attractive destination by providing
Figure 3-11
DOWNTOWN PARKS & PLAZAS
outstanding parks, plazas, paseos, and other public spaces. Address the needs and interests of Downtown residents, workers, and visitors. Design open spaces to be flexible, while also providing amenities and public art.
POLICY 3.2A: PUBLIC SPACE CREATION Establish active recognizable parks, plazas and paseos for public use, as described in Figure 3-11: Downtown Parks & Plazas. Actively engage in open space creation through public sector and private sector actions. Locate parks, plazas, and street amenities such as benches, lighting, trash receptacles, etc., to take advantage of and generate pedestrian activity, such as where pedestrians will naturally converge because of adjacent use and/ or intersecting paths. Required plaza and park locations are shown on Figure 3-11; Downtown Parks and Plazas. Public open space should be visible from streets and well-lighted. Address utilitarian demands while attending to placemaking. Provide space and infrastructure for events
ARTS COMMONS
| Cha p te r 3 : Stre e t s + Pu b l i c Sp a c e s
5 88
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
and programs, as is further described in
•
use harmonious pedestrian-scaled street and plaza elements, consistent with Policy3.3A: Public Realm Design Features;
POLICY 3.2C: CENTRAL GREEN
•
complement ground-floor commercial and/or community activity in buildings that edge the Central Green;
Create a common open area at the
“uplight” the trees to accentuate the Arts Commons at night, and consider dynamic and other artistic lighting;
intersection of Franklin and Main
•
•
require arcades for building frontages facing the greens (See Chapter 4: Retail, Culture & the Ground Floor)
display public art in prominent locations;
3-13: Central Green Illustrated. Design
•
•
allow active civic uses to have pavilion space that projects into the Green; and
•
•
incorporate historic interpretation, recognizing that this location was the heart of downtown, including where City Hall was once located;
provide locations and infrastructure (e.g., electrical outlets) for food trucks and food carts, along curbs or in the
Policy 4.1F: Events & Programs. In Santa Clara, parks under 1 acre in area are considered “mini parks.” The expectations for mini parks should be adjusted to create places described in policies 3.2B, 3.2C and 3.2D.
POLICY 3.2B: ARTS COMMONS Create a “town square” for Santa Clara near where Franklin Street and Lafayette Street will intersect, and where Cityowned land can be leveraged. Create a
•
flexible yet amenity-rich plaza framed by active building frontages and communityserving uses, as illustrated in Figure 3-12:
•
Arts Commons Illustrated and further described in Policy 4.1E: Commercial & Cultural Destinations. Design
•
considerations include: • accommodate public gatherings and events with flexible plaza areas, such as to view outdoor films, •
•
provide flexible hardscape with movable seating, especially in locations that support adjacent food-service establishments; include infrastructure for intensive yet flexible use, such as by providing electrical hookups for food trucks and music events, speakers, programmable lighting, display monitors, hose bibs, etc.;
•
•
communicate the presence of the Arts Commons with framed views of the plaza from Lafayette Street; create a seamless connection to Santa Clara University Historic Franklin Street Arts Paseo; through the use of paving materials, low curbs and bollards, extend the plaza across Franklin Street so as to create a larger plaza presence while ensuring pedestrian safety and street functionality; along Franklin Street, maintain visibility into the plaza and provide curb space for drop-off and delivery; provide loading and service to the plaza and adjacent buildings in locations that won’t diminish plaza activity and active building edges, such as from Washington Street.
Streets, to activate and visually unify its four corners, as illustrated in Figure considerations include: • maintain visibility into each corner open space from Franklin and Main Streets; •
•
•
public spaces on the north side of Franklin are larger and will be dominated by multi-use lawns; public spaces on the south side of Franklin are smaller multi-functional plazas paved with textured paving or decomposed granite. on all four corners and along the south block of Main Street, maintain consistent tree species and same palette of landscape and hardscape materials;
•
select a visually distinct tree species with recognizable branch pattern and seasonal color;
•
“uplight” the trees to accentuate the Central Green at night, and consider dynamic and other artistic lighting;
•
display public art near the intersection of Franklin and Main Streets to further unify the four corners;
open space.
POLICY 3.2D: FRANKLIN PLAZA Create a small Franklin Plaza in front of and north of the historic Post Office, as suggested by Figure 3-14: Franklin Plaza Illustrated. Provide sufficient size to host Downtown’s weekly farmers market, when combined with adjacent streets that can be temporarily closed. Design considerations include: • determine alignment of Franklin Street and whether it should run north of the existing fountain or will require the fountain and it’s surrounding plaza’s relocation; •
if the Fountain is relocated, to move and incorporate it prominently within the Plaza;
59
Figure 3-12
ARTS COMMONS ILLUSTRATED (LOOKING WEST)
| Cha p te r 3 : Stre e t s + Pu b l i c Sp a c e s
6 00
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
Figure 3-13
CENTRAL GREEN ILLUSTRATED (LOOKING SOUTH)
61
Figure 3-14
FRANKLIN PLAZA ILLUSTRATED (LOOKING SOUTH)
| Cha p te r 3 : Stre e t s + Pu b l i c Sp a c e s
62 62
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
•
adjust property lines to accommodate Franklin Street and the Plaza, and work with property owners to provide for and encourage new development that activates and frames the Plaza spatially;
•
design and program the Plaza to complement adjacent ground-floor uses;
•
design the Plaza for flexibility, such as with hardscape that can be used for movable seating or as event space; Franklin Street, 1870s
•
determine what parts of the Plaza can be used for the farmers market.
POLICY 3.2E: PASEOS & COURTYARDS Courtyards and paseos (narrow passageways that are part of private development) are acceptable ways to extend pedestrian access and amenities from streets into the middle of blocks. As illustrated in Figure 3-15: Paseo & Courtyards Illustrated, paseos and courtyards should be spatially framed by building edges with entrances and windows, and without blank walls. Paseos and courtyards are optional features and may be used to meet privately-owned public open space (POPOS) requirements and qualify for POPOS bonus provisions described in Chapter 4.
Figure 3-15
PASEOS & COURTYARDS ILLUSTRATED
63
| Cha p te r 3 : Stre e t s + Pu b l i c Sp a c e s
GOAL 3.3: PUBLIC REALM POLICY 3.3A: PUBLIC REALM DESIGN FEATURES Establish a recognizable, memorable Downtown identity through consistent use of attractive high-quality human-scale street and open space design features, such as: • a coordinated palette of trees (one species for Franklin, another for Main and a third for all other side streets), other plants, tree grates, and green infrastructure elements, in coordination with the City Arborist; •
•
•
consistent hardscape treatments (such as concrete color, texture, and expansion joint spacing) and specifications for preferred pavers; specifications for light standards (such as pole height, color, base, and style of light fixtures), light bollards, and other lights, in consultation with Silicon Valley Power. Limit light poles to 18 feet to maintain pedestrian scale, except at intersections and along the perimeter of Downtown. Consider a custom base for light poles using the base of Downtown’s historic lights, which might be recast; specifications for movable and fixed furnishings;
Franklin St. Species Main St. Species Other Streets Species Tree species selection will be in accordance with City’s recommended tree list.
Figure 3-16
STREET TREE CONCEPT
6 44
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
•
signage (such as wayfinding signs and interpretive exhibits);
•
transit shelters and mobility hubs.
Public realm features should draw from design elements present in the historic downtown. Light standards, especially, provide an opportunity to use historic features that also create continuity with the Franklin Arts Paseo.
POLICY 3.3B: ADEQUATE INFRASTRUCTURE Ensure adeqaute water, sewer, stormwater, electric, gas and communications infrastructure to serve the growing Downtown.
POLICY 3.3C: GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE Use green infrastructure to retain stormwater runoff and filter pollutants that wash off roadways and other impermeable areas in the public realm. All public facilities including sidewalks, streets and open spaces will feature bioretention facilities consistent with City and County requirements. These will be installed as part of right-of-way or frontage improvements with private development. Green infrastructure may be distributed geographically, as illustrated in Figure 3-18: Green Infrastructure Concept.
Figure 3-17
PUBLIC REALM DESIGN FEATURES ILLUSTRATED
65
Facilities may include vegetated swales, rain gardens, and permeable pavers,
Figure 3-18
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE CONCEPT
as suggested in Figure 3-19: Green Infrastructure Illustrated. A district-wide stormwater capture system may also be created. Stormwater associated with private land will be managed separately by facilities created on-site as part of future development.
POLICY 3.3D: WAYFINDING & INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE Spark Downtown discovery by establishing a system of wayfinding and interpretive signage. Help people navigate within Downtown and to nearby cultural and historic destinations, public parking, mobility hubs, Santa Clara University, and Santa Clara Station. Develop street signs in line with historic street signs in coordination with public works. Involve the Santa Clara Arts Commission in the development of a wayfinding and interpretive program. Interpretive elements
Figure 3-19
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE ILLUSTRATED
| Cha p te r 3 : Stre e t s + Pu b l i c Sp a c e s
Green infrastructure features, typical
6 66
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
may address multiple themes, including the Santa Clara Valley ecological context, Tamyen Ohlone people and culture, and Downtown’s history. Use the format and style of public signage to cultivate a distinct recognizable Downtown identity.
POLICY 3.3E: PUBLIC ART Promote public art along streets and in public parks and plazas as well as murals on blank building facades. Public art should include installations as well as integrated elements such as paving, lighting, and seating. Require public art element as part of all new development as defined in the Form Based Code. Opportunities for public art, including temporary and low-cost installations, should be sought as part of early downtown activation.
Figure 3-20
WAYFINDING, INTERPRETATION AND PUBLIC ART ILLUSTRATED
67
| Cha p te r 3 : Stre e t s + Pu b l i c Sp a c e s
IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES MEASURE 3.1: FINANCING PLAN
hearing. The fee levels must be based
to pay an annual special tax to cover
on a “rational nexus” or a demonstrated
these costs. A CFD may be initiated by
relationship between the amount and
the legislative body or by property owner
Public improvement costs will be funded
impact or demand attributable to the
petition, but establishment requires
through a variety of funding mechanisms
development paying the fee.
an election process (i.e., a vote of the
and resources. Appropriate funding
and other factors. A financing strategy
MEASURE 3.2: ONGOING FUNDING FOR PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES
will be established, with current thinking
The primary source of ongoing funding
sources will reflect the specific nature of the public improvement required as well as funding availability, timing, beneficiaries,
favoring the use of land dedications and an “area development impact fee” for downtown. If this strategy is pursued, a Nexus Study will be prepared to support adoption of the fee. During the buildout of the Plan, new funding sources may be identified. The purpose of the Impact Fee is to equitably distribute area-wide and common infrastructure costs among developers within the Plan area. Infrastructure that provides benefits to development within the Plan will be analyzed and calculated for probable
for the City’s public services and facilities is tax revenue that accrues to the City’s General Fund. This revenue comes from property taxes, sales taxes, and transient
landowners or registered voters). CFD funds may be used to cover the cost of certain public services as well as infrastructure. The City and property owners may seek to evaluate whether a CFD is appropriate to cover maintenance of new streetscape features, plazas, and other public services and facilities within the plan area.
standard features such as plazas,
MEASURE 3.3: LAND DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC REALM
stormwater treatment facilities,
The creation of public streets and open
pedestrian-oriented lighting, special
spaces will rely on the dedication of land
paving, wayfinding signage, and others,
by property owners, typically as part of
these features should be privately-funded
development.
occupancy taxes, among others. If the City determines that additional funding is required to support non-
and maintained through a maintenance agreement as a condition of approval.
construction costs. The fee program would
A Mello-Roos Community Facilities District
be enacted by the City Council through
(CFD) could be studied and potentially
adoption of an ordinance in a public
established to require new development
Property Owner Coordination a. The City should work diligently with Downtown property owners and developers for orderly creation of street rights-of-way and public space, while
maintaining development feasibility on adjacent parcels. During Design & Engineering, contact affected property owners to discuss land dedication expectations and potential for land development on the remaining parcel. b. The City should work with property owners/developers to adjust property lines or assemble land, where the location of public streets and public spaces might result in parcel remnants that are too small to develop effectively, such as to extend Main Street through the County Courthouse and other properties (see Figure 3-23). c. Alleys are also required on each block for access to parking, loading, and service areas, and to add interest and enhanced connectivity for Downtown pedestrians. The location of alleys is flexible, and should meet the needs of development as well as contribute to the larger Downtown experience. Precise alley locations should be part of individual development proposals for each block.
Timing of Dedication a. Land for future streets and public space shall be dedicated as a
6 88
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
condition for development approval, as determined above OR as provided on Figure 3-2: Downtown Streets & Public Spaces. b. The location of private alleys with public access and the option to place utilities in a public access easement if needed shall also be established. c. Interim improvements should be provided within established easements for public access such as the existing easement along the proposed Franklin Street alignment between the future Washington and Jackson. The City may purchase additional easements, where such an access or utility easement is not already present and where the City finds that an interim improvement is essential to Downtown’s circulation network. The phasing of the roadway network may also require interim roadway measures to be constructed to ensure viable emergency vehicle access.
Figure 3-21
FRANKLIN STREET INTERIM THROUGH-CONNECTION
MEASURE 3.4: STREET AND PUBLIC SPACE DESIGN The following actions provide for the creation of new public right-of-way and open space Downtown.
Design & Engineering a. Create a detailed street & public space map based on a survey of existing conditions (building, curbs,
Figure 3-22
EXISTING PARCELS, INTERIM ACCESS AND PROPOSED LAND DEDICATION
69
| Cha p te r 3 : Stre e t s + Pu b l i c Sp a c e s
Figure 3-23
GALLERIES, TREES, AND UTILITY PLACEMENT ALONG FRANKLIN STREET (CONCEPTUAL)
Building Facade
12'-6" to 15'-0" setback to Facade
9'-0" min. from Façade to utility trench
22'-6" to 25'-0" from Facade to face of curb
22'-6" to 25'-0" from Facade to face of curb
4'-0" utility trench 3'-0" utility trench to R.O.W. 4'-0" dry utility trench
+
10'-0" curb face to R.O.W. line
3'-0" curb face to utility trench
3'-0" clearance to trench 5'-0" structural soil
+
+
+
7'-0" parking/flex curbside lane
Face of Gallery at R.O.W. line where allowed by Code
Face of 6" Curb
20'-0" curb face to centerline of R.O.W.
Streetlight, typ.
1'-6" curb face to structural soil
Tree planter and street tree in street segments where Galleries are not permitted
Notes:and street cross sections and utilities) access considerations into design and in Figure 3-22: Street Utility Placement be accessed from the alley; in To accommodate 4-foot wide dry utility trench in all Franklin Street sidewalks, theor two Franklin Street is intended to strongly define theengineering. pedestrian space of the very wide sidewalks and (Figures 3-3 through 3-8). Determine with exceptions anoted. underground vaults; in utility identified pedestrian shelter techniques require different alignments of that Trench in order to active shopfronts. To provide spatial definition, shade for pedestrians and the distinctive historic the exact location of future street rooms/closets within buildings— c. of Develop a detailedare design for the f. Where projections aretoprovided providegallery the required clearances street tree planters and structures. These alignments are as character of Downtown Santa Clara, two types “spatial enclosure” proposed. These are rights-of-way, public space features, subject to the requirements and shown in the drawing above, and described here. intended to alternate from block to block and inFranklin some cases within a block, as discussed at Street through-connection along Franklin Street, locate utilities lengthimprovements, and in detail by the Downtown Community Task Force over the past 3 years. and utility consistent of SVP. 1. In the stretches where Galleries located 3'-0" behind face of curb, referred to in Policy 3.1B: Franklin following the alternative Utility are allowed, the trench isapproval and with 3 feet minimum clear from the back of Trench to the face of Gallery. Gallery footings Galleries: are “covered sidewalks” with posts in the sidewalk as were present in the with Figure 3-2:These Downtown Streets Street, as an interim measure before Placement shown in Figure 3-23. ii. If such locations are infeasible, must be deep enough and designed as required by the City engineer, to avoid subjecting the historic downtown was demolished in the 1960s. The development standards in the Form& Public Spaces. Alignthat streets with full Franklin widthwith andGalleries north these services shallthe beutility in lines trench to excessive structural loads that would conflict with the ability to access Based Code require that many of the shopfrontsthe on Franklin StreetStreet be provided g. Electrical infrastructure including existing intersections for reasonably for replacement or maintenance. within specified portions of selected blocks, andCentral prohibit Green the construction Galleries in other block areofdeveloped inconspicuous locations along the Silicon Valley Power (SVP) straight paths of travel. Adjust the exact segments. 2. In stretches where Galleries are not allowed, the Trench sides is located 3 feet of clear of the sites back of (see Figure 3-21). or rears project and requirements shall adhere to the location of streets to account for the without Galleries will be provided with street trees planted structural soil for tree plantings, per City standard. The 9 foot minimum distance to the building Street Trees: Frontages in segments shall be thoroughly screened from d. Locate and design green infrastructure following will ensurestandards: that no unacceptable structural loading is imparted to the Trench. in structural soil, per Cityasstandards. Franklin Square Fountain, described public view. features based on Downtown The from back-of-curb Trench alignment to back-of-structural soil alignment will be To accommodate vehicular and pedestrian traffic and public utilities, a consistent 60-foot street in Policy 3.2D, and other potential i. transition Utility access and equipment made with a 45 degree angle transition. (R.O.W.) is provided, plus an additional 3'-6" Public Services Access and Utility topography, the location of stormwater iii. Such utility equipment shall not be designright-of-way constraints. such as back-flow preventers, Easement where the utility trench extends outside the public right-of-way, as shown above. infrastructure and available public land, located above grade in the street, transformer boxes, b. Develop detailed design of street and opportunities presented by new sidewalk, sidewalk planters/ telecommunications pedestals, and public space improvements for construction and retrofits. planting strip, or within the front gas and electric meters, and other incremental yet orderly construction building setback area. Dry Utility Trench Alignment Diagram e. Street utilities shall conform as closely utilities shall be placed either: Integrate future maintenance and fire 1":20' 25 August 2023 as possible to City standards as shown within or adjacent to alleys and Typical block, Franklin Street ONLY. This is to scale, but is a diagram. Galleries are allowed where shown (to be documented in Form-Based Code) not continuous, but covering most of the sidewalk. Street trees and ground plantings required where shown, with breaks.
7 00
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
NOTES: a. Storm drain and sanitary sewer pipelines that have diameters or are deeper/shallower in elevation may require greater separation from other utilities. b. Extend geotextile root barrier 6” below chemical barrier.
Figure 3-24
STREET UTILITY PLACEMENT
c. Utility installations must comply with SVP required clearances at the time of installation. This Figure represents SVP’s required clearances as of the date of adoption of this Precise Plan. Refer to Table 1 of SD-1235, “Tree Planing Requirements Near Underground Facilities.”
71
iv. Utilities such as transformers, service equipment and trenches/ manholes should comply with the current SVP standard.
Design Features including Wayfinding and Public Art a. Develop a palette of features described in Policy 3.3A: Public Realm Design Features using product specifications and design vignettes, and with involvement from the City Arborist in developing a downtown tree palette; b. Adopt practices to successfully establish and provide for the continued health of trees and other plant materials. Maintain a continuous soil trench along street tree alignments where feasible. c. Engage a qualified professional to develop a system of wayfinding signage that determines the location, content, and format of wayfinding information. Consider arrival and navigation by all transportation modes. d. Develop a program for public art and interpretation along streets and in public open space, in cooperation with the City’s Arts Commission, Historic Landmarks Commission, as part of the City’s Arts Master Plan, and in consultation with experts on local history. e. Require at least one public art element as part of all new development.
MEASURE 3.5: INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS Development following the Precise Plan will create additional demand for water, sewer, electricity, gas and communications services. Demand studies conducted for this Precise Plan indicate the potential for needed improvements. These may include but may not be limited to a district stormwater capture system; an additional transformer at an existing SVP substation; extension of the recycled water system; and underground piping and ducting. Following the approach defined by the
development increases ridership in the area.
transportation demand management, and to optimize use of curbside lanes.
b. Study the possibility of a trolley, shuttle or autonomous micro-bus connecting Downtown with the Caltrain Station and Santa Clara University (SCU), such as to develop a pilot shuttle project, in collaboration with VTA and SCU.
c. Initiate flexible use of curb lanes, such as to setting time-of-day priorities for alternating activities, such as parking versus loading, drop-off zones, outdoor dining parklets, bike-share stations, etc.
c. Engage a transportation planning professional to develop a plan for mobility hubs, with detail regarding programmatic features, preferred locations, possible sponsors, capital program, on-going activities, and financing.
infrastructure improvements in a way
MEASURE 3.7: PARKING & CURBSIDE MANAGEMENT
that is timed to correspond with need.
Provide for the effective management of
Financing Plan, fund and implement
Underground utilities should be included as part of street development where feasible.
MEASURE 3.6: TRANSIT SERVICE & MOBILITY HUB COORDINATION Encourage high-quality transit service and mobility with the following activities. The City should: a. Work with Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) to provide more frequent transit service as Downtown
| Cha p te r 3 : Stre e t s + Pu b l i c Sp a c e s
on-street parking and parking garages, to optimize use of available parking spaces. a. Manage demand for public parking through variable pricing and information sharing regarding availability, with a target utilization rate of 85% for each block face. b. Consider establishment of a Parking Management District to manage use of on-street and public parking garages through price and information, to promote alternatives to driving through
MEASURE 3.8: PROGRAMS & OPERATIONS The City should work in partnership with Downtown merchants and other stakeholders to activate Downtown streets and open spaces, and provide other supportive activities such as Downtown events, festivals, fairs and markets, as discussed in Chapter 4, Measure 4.3: Downtown Activation.
04.
RETAIL, CULTURE + THE GROUND FLOOR
FARMERS’ MARKET AT FRANKLIN SQUARE
74 74
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
STRATEGIC STATEMENT To be the heart of Santa Clara, Downtown must become an exceptional place – distinguished by its community-focused destinations and an active pedestrian-friendly experience that is itself an attraction. To create a vibrant Downtown, streets and open spaces need to be energized by the way the base of buildings spatially frame and activate the public space they abut. Urban vitality generated by ground floor uses, building design and infrastructure are critical to Downtown’s success and will distinguish Downtown Santa Clara from auto-oriented destinations as well as other downtowns on the Peninsula and in the South Bay. The sense of place created as a result of this synergy will invite people from Santa Clara as well as the Bay Area to Downtown and encourage them to linger longer. High levels of street activity depend on ground-floor uses that serve the public, such as retail and cultural uses, and ground-floor architecture that provides direct entry and visual connection into the building, such as provided by traditional shopfronts. America’s traditional “main streets” do this well. Along the most active streets, a continuous line of buildings activate wide sidewalks with shopfronts and enliven the experience of pedestrians. Generous shopfront windows give a glimpse of what’s happening inside and of goods on display. Along traditional main streets, conditions are set for social activities, frequent comings and goings, things to do and to look at, and – per chance – bumping into a neighbor or your child’s soccer coach. Public space also benefits from programmed uses, such as outdoor dining and places for socializing, performance, and play.
75
*Parklet subject to Council approval
Figure 4-1
ACTIVE GROUND-FLOOR FRONTAGE ILLUSTRATED
| Cha p te r 4 : Re t a i l , Cu l tu re + th e G rou n d Fl o or
7 66
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
Franklin Street once was and will again
For members of the public, parking lots
creation of a great urban environment will
become Santa Clara’s centerpiece with
and blank walls should not be part of the
also require the commitment of developers
activating uses and shopfront architecture
Downtown experience and, at the same
in partnership with the City.
as illustrated in Figure 4-1: Active Ground-
time, midblock alleys and secondary
Floor Frontage Illustrated. Building
streets like Washington and Jackson may
Above all, Downtown should feel like it
edges along Lafayette, Main and Monroe
need to accommodate certain utilitarian
Streets will have main-street character,
functions, like access to loading areas and
as well. Recognizing that there may
parking garage entrances.
not be sufficient market support to line these streets continuously with publicserving uses, the Precise Plan identifies “retail-ready” locations where shopfront architecture and appropriate building infrastructure is required but the interior ground-floor use need not be publicserving at the outset, so long as these retail-ready spaces can be converted to public-serving retail uses as market demand allows. Downtown’s streetlevel experience will also include streets that need not be edged by continuous active public-serving uses and can be lined by residential and office buildings that provide “eyes on the street.” Every street should feel safe and welcoming, by containing ground-floor entrances and windows along with an active sidewalk.
is an extension of Santa Clara and what makes it unique. Downtown should reflect the community’s values, history and character, with a vibrant public life
Downtown’s success as a city and regional
supported by human-scaled streets,
destination also depends on attracting
sidewalks, amenities and buildings.
commercial and cultural venues. These
We can take cues from Santa Clara’s
“anchors” will not only serve and enrich the community, but they will also increase Downtown foot traffic that supports small shops. Implementation measures stress the importance of attracting such permanent anchors, as well as encouraging the programming of weekly and seasonal events to bring people Downtown. Stakeholder partnerships will play a vital role. Ongoing activities and promotions will require collaboration on the part of the City, merchants, Santa Clara University, cultural institutions, community-based organizations, and other stakeholders. The
historic Downtown, now lost and shown in Figure 4-2: Historic Downtown Santa Clara, which had a human-scale rhythm of shopfronts that corresponded with the width of structural bays. We can learn from the past while embracing Santa Clara’s future.
77
PROMINENT CORNERS
STRONG HORIZONTAL BANDING
Figure 4-2
OLD DOWNTOWN SANTA CLARA AT STREET LEVEL
TRANSPARENCY AND DETAIL
DISTINCTIVE SIGNAGE
| Cha p te r 4 : Re t a i l , Cu l tu re + th e G rou n d Fl o or
VERTICAL ARTICULATION
DISTINCTIVE SIGNAGE
7 88
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
GOALS + POLICIES GOAL 4.1: A VIBRANT WELCOMING DOWNTOWN Cultivate and create a thriving Downtown destination that is both an activity center for the City and region and a livable urban residential neighborhood. Downtown Santa Clara will offer a unique, appealing concentration of history and art, cultural destinations, local shopping, services, and amenities, and pedestrian-friendly building fronts. Create Franklin Street as a continuous active and welcoming centerpiece for Downtown and all of Santa
Figure 4-3
TYPICAL PRIMARY RETAIL FRONTAGE
Where high levels of activity are desired, maintain ground-floor retail, restaurant, and cultural uses, and “retail-ready” frontage where near-term retail demand may be limited but should be designed for in the long-term. High levels of activity are desired along Franklin, Lafayette, Main, and Monroe Streets, and along the edge of public spaces, as shown on Figure 4-5: Frontage Types & Locations and Figures
16’
Sidewalk
4-3 and 4-4 illustrating each general frontage condition. Flexible frontages are also indicated, and include Jackson, Madison and Benton
6’6”
Planting Multi-use Zone Curb Lane
Figure 4-4
TYPICAL FLEXIBLE FRONTAGE
Streets and Homestead Road. On flexible street frontages, allow uses that generate less activity including residential and office uses and allow access to parking
Clara.
and building service. Grade separation
POLICY 4.1A: ACTIVE GROUND-FLOOR USES
private entry stoops are encouraged to
The ground-floor frontages of buildings
building lobbies as these are valuable
can provide a mutually beneficial
contributors to successful retail.
for ground floor residential units and provide a level of privacy. Corners should be reserved for retail spaces rather than
relationship between public and private realms. Each frontage should be tailored to its specific context.
Sidewalk Planting Multi-use Zone Curb Lane
*Parklet subject to Council approval
79
| Cha p te r 4 : Re t a i l , Cu l tu re + th e G rou n d Fl o or
Retail Frontage Retail-Ready Frontage Flexible Frontage Parking and Loading Entrances Allowed Interim Connection Easement Major Thoroughfare Community Connectors Pedestrian Oriented Downtown Street Service Oriented Downtown Street Suggested Alley Locations*
Figure 4-5
FRONTAGE TYPES & LOCATIONS
*Private ownership with public access and the option to place utilities in a public access easement if needed.
8 00
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
GALLERY
ARCADE Gallery Required (50% minimum block frontage) Gallery Allowed Arcade Required Arcade Allowed Interim Connection Easement Major Thoroughfare Community Connectors Pedestrian Oriented Downtown Street Service Oriented Downtown Street Suggested Alley Locations* Galleries at Franklin Square.
Figure 4-6
BUILDING PROJECTIONS
*Private ownership with public access and the option to place utilities in a public access easement if needed.
If Franklin Square is relocated to this block per Precise Plan Figure 3–2, Galleries lining Franklin Square are optional. Galleries near the Theater. Any Gallery lining block B shall stop at least 20' away from any Theatre Marquee.
81
| Cha p te r 4 : Re t a i l , Cu l tu re + th e G rou n d Fl o or
POLICY 4.1B: PEDESTRIANORIENTED BUILDING DESIGN Line the edge of wide sidewalks and public spaces with building entrances and windows, to place foot traffic on public sidewalks and create visual connections to building interiors for passersby. Where retail, restaurants and cultural uses are desired, maintain shopfront architecture with frequent entrances and generous windows to maximize transparency, as indicated in
RESIDENTIAL STOOPS
Figure 4-7: Active Building Fronts. Shopfronts may be set within covered galleries or arcades of sufficient height and width. See Figure 4-6 for allowed and required galleries and arcades. Along secondary street frontages, also
INDOOR/OUTDOOR CONNECTIONS
allow residential and office ground-floor architecture that maintains windows and entrances. For privacy and urban character, ground-floor residential should be raised above sidewalk level with residential FLEXIBLE PUBLIC SPACE
entrances punctuated by stoops. Recognize that a building’s base is the most prominent façade as seen by pedestrians and helps maintain a human-scale rhythm in facades while avoiding monotony. Ground-floor design and signage should draw from historically relevant details, including recessed storefronts, awnings, blade signs, window lettering and other
CANOPIES
Figure 4-7
ACTIVE BUILDING FRONTS
elements. POCKET RETAIL IN GARAGE FRONTAGE
8 22
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
Figure 4-9
ARTS COMMONS DESIGN RELATIONSHIPS Figure 4-10
ARTS COMMONS ACTIVATION
*Parklet subject to Council approval
The Arts Commons, as envisioned, would include a cultural arts center, a theater, and a market hall, arrayed around an active public space. Other retail, office, residential, hotel, and conference activities would also contribute to a vibrant place.
83
| Cha p te r 4 : Re t a i l , Cu l tu re + th e G rou n d Fl o or
POLICY 4.1C: CULTURAL & COMMERCIAL DESTINATIONS
Figure 4-11
HISTORIC DOWNTOWN BLOCKS
The Market Hall will be a distinctive architectural presence on the Plaza with high, open beam ceiling and transparency on the plaza as well as on Franklin Street and Lafayette Street frontages. The Hall is meant to provide a welcoming gateway use to attract people to the plaza at all times of day and also to serve as a buffer from Lafayette traffic making the plaza experience more hospitable.
Attract and sustain cultural and commercial destinations in Downtown, especially to establish Franklin Street as Santa Clara’s premier pedestrianoriented cultural, historic, shopping and dining experience. Capitalize on existing local consumer demand and increase consumer demand through residential
•
Santa Clara Theater was a muchbeloved historic and cultural icon of the old downtown before it was demolished in the 1960s. The Theater and its distinctive marquee an vertical should be brought back and provided with a prominent location that is centered on the plaza and activates Franklin Street.
•
A Cultural Arts Center is envisioned as a multi-purpose community center and cultural arts venue featuring a variety of community-serving, performing and visual art spaces of various sizes with the potential to accommodate both Santa Clara University and community-based events. Its proposed location faces the plaza and Franklin Street, where it will be visually prominent and bring activity and vitality to the area. A corner café space as part of the Cultural Arts Center program, further activates the Commons.
and employment growth and by creating a great place. Encourage complementary uses that reinforce one another and create a destination. Work to create the anchor destinations described below. (Design intentions for public space elements also appear in Chapter 3.) Cultural destinations in the Arts Commons include the following and are shown in Figure 3-12: Arts Commons Illustrated (see Chapter 3). Design relationships between building and Arts Commons Plaza are vital for establishing a A proposed theater would be located almost exactly where the Santa Clara Theater once anchored this block of Franklin Street in old downtown Santa Clara, as shown on this historic fire insurance map.
strong sense of history and place and are illustrated in Figure 4-8: Arts Commons Design Relationships and Figure 4-9: Arts Commons Activation. • Market Hall will anchor the Plaza and provide a food and beverage destination featuring local purveyors and small specialty shops and providing take-out opportunities for outdoor dining on the Plaza.
8 44
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
The Central Green will provide a green respite within the Downtown. The Central
Figure 4-12
ACTIVATING EVENTS & PROGRAMS
Green is envisioned to be activated by cafés and other appropriate ground-floor uses within adjacent buildings. The Central Green is made up of four parts, one on each corner of the Franklin and Main intersection. The northern two spaces are larger and dominated by green space as multi-purpose lawns. The southern two spaces are smaller multi-functional plazas. See Policy 3.2c in Chapter 3 for further detail. Franklin Square will be an active open space enlivened by proximity to the historic Post Office and fountain and the Franklin Square shopping center. Franklin Square will also be activated by adjacent ground-floor uses.
Restaurants
Theatre
Public Art
Fountain
Farmers Market
Kids Play Area
Cultural Arts
Note: bonus heights would be provided for proposed cultural uses and food hall.
85
| Cha p te r 4 : Re t a i l , Cu l tu re + th e G rou n d Fl o or
POLICY 4.1D: DIVERSE, LOCAL & EVERYDAY BUSINESSES Encourage a diverse mix of retail, restaurants, personal service, and other businesses. Encourage the attraction and retention of small businesses and locallyowned businesses, by creating a mix of retail space sizes, through recruitment and other means.
Figure 4-13
ON-SITE PARKING ILLUSTRATED
Subterranean Parking Podium Parking Structured Parking
8 66
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
POLICY 4.1E: EVENTS & PROGRAMS Work with local stakeholders to maintain
readings, yoga classes; and meeting spaces; •
ongoing ground-floor and public space activities that sustain an active Downtown. Complement ground-floor activity with pedestrian-oriented amenity-rich public realm improvements and programming. See Figure 4-11: Activating Events & Programs.
•
weekly and seasonal events, such as the farmers market, off-the-grid, outdoor movies, theatrical events, street fairs, art festivals, music festivals, holiday markets, swap meets, winter skating and parades. community group meetings; things that bring people to the Downtown District as a destination.
Early activation of Downtown, even
pedestrian-friendly community-oriented sense of place.
POLICY 4.1G: PARKING LOCATION In order to maintain a strong pedestrianoriented environment at street level, place parking below buildings, behind buildings, or behind appropriate ground-floor space in the form of podium parking. See Figure 4-12: On-Site Parking Illustrated. Build a strong district-wide signage
on collaboration with community
POLICY 4.1F: PROMOTIONS AND BRANDING
organizations. Near-term programming
Increase awareness through promotions
directional signage to parking areas for
that precedes development will begin to
and marketing. Develop an effective
those arriving by car.
create a sense of place and develop the
coordinated media presence locally and
Downtown as a destination. Events can
in the South Bay. Emphasize Downtown
be indoor (in vacant spaces) or outdoor.
as a destination that offers shops,
Pop-ups can help activate underutilized
restaurants, urban amenities, history,
spaces while the district matures, and
art, and cultural venues. Communicate
to add something new and varied at any
Downtown destinations and events
time. Downtown programs and events may
by using traditional media and online
include: • temporary outdoor uses, such as food trucks, sidewalk florists, and concession-cart merchandising;
platforms, including a robust Search
•
Downtown Santa Clara’s unique story
before new development occurs, should be pursued, with an emphasis
temporary ground-floor (indoor) uses, such as art installations, poetry
Engine Optimization (SEO) strategy to take advantage of ‘go-to’ resources such as Google, Yelp, and Eater. Leverage of downtown regeneration and its
program including directories and wayfinding for pedestrians, and clear
87
GOAL 4.2: AN ADAPTABLE DOWNTOWN POLICY 4.2A: RETAILREADY SHOPFRONTS Along frontage locations where retail, restaurants or cultural activity are desired in the long term but where market conditions do not support retail in the present, require that ground-floor space is designed in a way that can easily accommodate future retail, restaurants, or
| Cha p te r 4 : Re t a i l , Cu l tu re + th e G rou n d Fl o or
Figure 4-14 Allowed uses in retail-ready spaces
TYPICAL RETAIL-READY FRONTAGES
include residential, live-work, community, and office. See Figure 403: Frontage Types & Locations, and Figure 4-13: Typical RetailReady Frontages.
POLICY 4.2B: ACTIVATIONREADY PLACES Consider ways that the ground-floor of buildings can support public realm activity and flexibility, such as buildings with food service windows, digital information
BEFORE RETAIL
WITH RETAIL
BEFORE RETAIL
WITH RETAIL
displays, and outside faucets to spraywash sidewalks.
cultural uses. Retail-ready design includes attention to width and depth, clear height, venting (or chases for future venting), location for remote refrigeration equipment, grease traps, loading zones and back of house (BOH) access, trash areas, availability of adequate utilities, retail sign bands, delivery zones, etc. The adjoining sidewalk/frontage area should be of adequate width to accommodate outdoor displays and dining, amenities, etc.
8 88
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES MEASURE 4.1: FORMBASED CODE
is consistent with the vision expressed
this association would include events and
in this Precise Plan and that promotes
activation, marketing and promotion, and
Downtown’s emergence as a dynamic
the convening and coordination of key
Adopt a Form-Based Code to regulate
activity center with a mix of uses including
stakeholders.
ground-floor frontage along streets and
cultural catalysts, retail, hotel, and housing
publicly-accessible open space to address
uses.
When larger-scale development starts
the following. • Frontage Standards. To ensure that buildings line Downtown streets and open spaces in way that benefits both the public and private realms. •
•
Ground Floor uses. To concentrate active ground floors in the heart of Downtown while providing flexibility to adapt to community needs and economic realities over time. Signage Standards. To ensure that private signs contribute to a beautiful public realm while providing visibility and branding opportunities for businesses and organizations.
MEASURE 4.2: DEVELOPER SOLICITATION & COLLABORATION For City-owned land Downtown, issue a request for proposals from developerled teams to support development that
to take physical form, the voluntary
To conform to California’s Surplus
association should consider consulting
Land Act (Assembly Bill 1486), mixed-
a specialist about the possibility of and
use development on City-owned land
process for creating a property-based
must include not less than 300 housing
business improvement district (PBID).
units and restrict at least 25 percent of
A PBID for Downtown Santa Clara would
these residential units to lower-income households.
MEASURE 4.3: DOWNTOWN MANAGEMENT ENTITY In the near term, the City, the University, and the master developer of City-owned property at the east end of Downtown should form a voluntary association, with commitment and resources from each. The voluntary association should also strive to include existing business and property owners. This association would focus on generating initial vitality and momentum, “putting Downtown on the map” as a place worth exploring. The work plan for
concentrate on activation and marketing, with the goal of establishing Downtown as a destination for a broad catchment area. The PBID would be responsible for channeling the interests and perspectives of the district’s business community, and could also play a sourcing and vetting function with respect to project and business-specific municipal initiatives. Specific roles for the Downtown Management Entity should include: • Creating a brand statement for Downtown, and hiring a marketing firm to focus efforts on social media and influencers that highlight and direct people toward Downtown Santa Clara.
89
•
•
Creating a regular program of activities Downtown, building on existing events and adding new seasonal events such as street fairs or holiday markets, Off the Grid-type events, and outdoor concerts or movies. Activating vacant storefronts with displays, and pop-ups, banners promoting the Downtown as a whole, and offering spaces to community groups at no or minimal cost for meetings and events.
MEASURE 4.4: DOWNTOWN ACTIVATION A Downtown Activation Strategy should consider events and programming, promotions and branding, and funding for ongoing activation. This should be a core responsibility of a downtown management entity (see Measure 4.2) and should be supported by the City. Public space activation should include existing Downtown programs (e.g., the farmers’ market) and events (e.g. Parade of Champions) as well as new and enriched programming such as food trucks, sidewalk vendors, outdoor
movies, wellness classes, and art walks, as described in Policy 4.1f: Events and Programs.
MEASURE 4.5: CULTURAL CATALYSTS a. Work in partnership to establish cultural destinations Downtown. Provide development incentives for cultural destinations, such as bonus provisions described in Measure 5.1. Consider use of public-private partnership forms of financing.
b. Engage Downtown partners in the formation of a Downtown Cultural Arts District or “Downtown Arts District.” Specifically, work with Santa Clara University to understand University plans and aspirations for cultural facilities and to create a City Cultural District that ties the Downtown Arts District to the Santa Clara University Historic Franklin Street Arts Paseo. c. Engage the Historic Landmarks Commission, Cultural Arts Commission, and associated experts to create programs & promote downtown as a heritage and cultural destination.
| Cha p te r 4 : Re t a i l , Cu l tu re + th e G rou n d Fl o or
MEASURE 4.6: BUSINESS RECRUITMENT Work with the Downtown management entity to identify and recruit promising retail, restaurant, and office tenants. Build on retail demand analysis and recommendations developed as part of the Precise Plan. Capitalize on and promote as part of Downtown’s brand Downtown’s competitive advantages including pedestrian-oriented amenity-rich environments, proximity to Santa Clara University and Santa Clara Transit Center, drive-by visibility along Lafayette Street, and growing patronage from the future downtown residents and workers. Work to attract and support small, local businesses in concert with City and County programs. Consider a new low-interest loan program to encourage new and support existing Downtown businesses, such as to help fund façade improvements. Encourage gourmet and ethnically-focused Peninsula & South Bay restaurants to move to or open a second location in Downtown. Encourage farm-totable local restaurants that take advantage of nearby locally-grown produce.
05.
BUILDING UP
NEW DEVELOPMENT AT FRANKLIN AND MONROE
92 92
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
STRATEGIC STATEMENT Live. Work. Play. Engage. Thriving downtowns are activity centers that concentrate a rich mix of complementary uses at urban intensities that can support walk-to destinations, amenities & activities, regional transit, and a mix of uses and activities that complement each other. This intensification or “Building Up”, is inseparable from Santa Clara’s desire to create a thriving city center, as upper floors of multifamily and office buildings put people Downtown on a continuous basis. In turn, residents and workers generate foot traffic and around-the-clock activity. Residents and workers will also patronize – and thereby help attract - Downtown’s retail shops, restaurants, and cultural venues and in turn create destinations for outside visitors. “Building Up” will also intensify the area to better fit today’s Bay Area. Parcelby-parcel, low-intensity land uses will be replaced by development projects that deliver housing and office space that is sorely needed in the South Bay and will be in a location where residents and workers can walk and use transit and reduce the need for private automobile use.
93
| Cha p te r 5: Bu i l d i n g Up
Figure 5-1
DOWNTOWN URBAN FORM ILLUSTRATED Allowable heights of buildings.
Note: Allowable building heights and number of stories are regulated by Figure 5-4 and 5-5
9 44
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
Downtown is to become a great urban
buildings stepping down around it. Historic
neighborhood with diverse housing
preservation consistent with the Secretary
options. Simultaneously, Downtown is
of the Interior Standards for preservation
to become an employment center that
and treatment of historic properties will
confers a noteworthy business address in
be followed. And the character of new
light of adjacent land uses and amenities.
construction is to be compatible with
As illustrated in Figure 5-1: Downtown
designated historic resources, when old
Urban Form Illustrated, the Precise Plan proposes context-appropriate building
and new buildings are adjacent or across the street, particularly in the western
heights and massing. Building heights
blocks.
will step down in height where Downtown
“Building Up” will also reduce the
abuts existing residential neighborhoods,
community’s environmental footprint, as
while stepping up in height along the east
mixed-use walkable districts generate
end of Downtown’s central spine, Franklin
less traffic and greenhouse gas per capita
Street, where amenities and transit will
than more car-reliant districts. The cost
be most abundant, and at the Main and
burden of infrastructure improvements
Franklin Street crossing, marking the
and operations is also reduced per capita,
Downtown’s “civic axis” leading to City
thereby contributing to Santa Clara’s
Plaza Park.
fiscal health. The Precise Plan encourages
City values around historic preservation
green building and green infrastructure in
are also reflected in the Plan. The historic Post office will be celebrated with adjacent
support of the City’s climate adaptation goals.
95
GOALS + POLICIES GOAL 5.1: VITALITY THROUGH DIVERSITY, INTENSIFICATION & FIT
•
Housing opportunities for persons of different ages, incomes, helping to meet Santa Clara’s continuing need for additional housing.
POLICY 5.1B: URBAN INTENSITY
•
An employment district comprised of high-intensity office buildings, and supported by retail, services, hospitality, and cultural uses. Downtown’s office mix could include civic uses and public offices, potentially relocated from the Civic Center.
attracting urban development with
Attract high-intensity employment and residential development, creating a pedestrian-oriented, transit-accessible and amenity-rich Downtown Santa Clara. Use growth to increase patrons, foot traffic, and market support for Downtown retail, restaurants, and services. Avoid uses that
•
A hotel with conference center to bring visitors Downtown and take advantage of Downtown’s cultural uses, proximity to SCU, and car-free access to regional transit and future high-speed rail.
Activate and populate Downtown by sufficient height and intensity to be financially feasible and bring new residents and employees to Downtown in substantial numbers. Leverage Downtown’s potential by prohibiting autooriented and other low-intensity uses. Development shall achieve a minimum density of 35 units per acre cumulatively within the Precise Plan area. This minimum density will be monitored; new development will not be approved when
are unlikely to generate population and
Maintain flexibility about where this mix of
it would cause the cumulative density
pedestrian activity. Create a “complete
uses is provided Downtown. At the same
or intensity of development approved
Downtown” that is a great place to live,
time, avoid the long-term possibility of a
following adoption of this Plan below the
work and play, and can adapt over time.
Downtown with only one type of upper-
density and intensity thresholds.
story use by maintaining balance at all
POLICY 5.1A: LAND USE DIVERSITY & FLEXIBILITY
phases of development. If only one upper-
Create a thoroughly mixed-use Downtown
approved on over 25% of Downtown’s
with residential, office and hotel uses
developable acreage, limit the dominant
on upper stories to take advantage of
use until sufficient balance has been
market trends and foster 24/7 activation.
reached. Continue to monitor after each
Downtown should mature to include:
subsequent increment of development.
story use dominates (over 75% of floor area) after new development has been
| Cha p te r 5: Bu i l d i n g Up
96 96
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
POLICY 5.1C: DOWNTOWN FORM
Figure 5-2
URBAN FORM QUALITIES
Locate taller buildings at the eastern end of Downtown, within a half-mile walk of Santa Clara Station, and near the geographic center of Downtown (Main & Franklin Streets). Transition building heights to shorter buildings in the direction of residential neighborhoods to the north, south and west to respond to scale and shade, and shape allowable building height to reduce shading on public open space. These strategies are depicted in Figure 5-1: Downtown Urban Form Illustrated, which models a potential
Strong horizontal banding and vertical articulation items create scale and break up monotony.
Stepped massing helps respond to lower scale neighborhood edges.
future Downtown buildout, and Figure 5-3: Building Height Transitions, which shows critical relationships between Downtown building heights, Downtown public spaces, and the adjacent neighborhood. Maintain street wall continuity, while providing visual interest through building modulation, such as bay windows, and building articulation, such as to express structural bays. See Figure 5-2: Urban Form Qualities.
SCU
Figure 5-3
LAFAYETTE
BUILDING HEIGHT TRANSITIONS
WASHINGTON
MAIN
97
| Cha p te r 5: Bu i l d i n g Up
Massing variation coupled with horizontal and vertical articulation help add human scale to the Downtown.
JACKSON
POST OFFICE
MONROE
MADISON
98 98
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
POLICY 5.1E: MAXIMUM POLICY 5.1D: REQUIRED BUILDING HEIGHTS CONTRIBUTIONS TO INFRASTRUCTURE AND THE In keeping with the conceptual urban form framework for Downtown, allow buildings PUBLIC REALM New development will be required to make contributions that improve public infrastructure and the public realm in ways that promote alternative transportation modes (walking, biking & transit),
to achieve maximum heights as shown on Figure 5-4: Maximum Building Heights. Height is regulated by the number of stories as well as the maximum number metric.
(green infrastructure and green building
Two levels of parking may correspond with
performance), and provide for the
one level of tall ground-floor retail space,
orderly and attractive transformation of
counting as one floor. Within each height
Downtown.
district, maximum building heights in feet
New development is expected to improve
are intended to allow for tall ground-floor
creation of new streets and public spaces, make fair-share contributions, or possibly
spaces and typical office floor-to-floor heights. For typical residential buildings, maximum height would not be expected to
pay an Infrastructure Impact Fee for
be achieved.
Downtown improvements to create and
Floor area is not directly governed, but is
improve streets and public spaces, as
limited based on what can be achieved
indicated in Figure 3-2: Downtown Streets
within a building envelope described in
and Public Spaces.
more detail in the Form-based Code.
New development is expected to make fair-share contributions to infrastructure needed to support Downtown development. See Measure 3.5: Infrastructure Improvements.
Bonuses may be granted to Downtown
adoption of this study, grant additional
buildings for community benefits provided
floor area and building height for
off-site but within Downtown.
community benefits that may include: • Arts Commons cultural destinations that include Santa Clara Theater, the Cultural Arts Center and the Market Hall; •
of feet. Buildings must not exceed either
promote environmental sustainability
adjacent streets, dedicate land for the
height and floor area allowance. Following
POLICY 5.1F: MAXIMUM BONUS HEIGHTS AND COMMUNITY BENEFITS The City will undertake a study that will lead to a formal bonus heights program,
A public parking garage that can support these venues; visual and performing art venues or movie theaters in locations other than the Arts Commons (but Downtown);
POLICY 5.1G: COMPATIBILITY WITH SAN JOSÉ INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN When measuring development height for consistency with the San José
Conservation of historic resources or contributing buildings to historic districts;
International Airport (SJC) Comprehensive
•
Land dedication for public realm that exceeds the District average;
level (MSL) to the top of the highest point
•
Enhanced contributions to public realm improvements above fairshare development impact fee, including infrastructure, paving, planting, furnishings, public art and interpretation elements;
•
•
Enhanced contributions to district transit infrastructure and operations.
Floor area bonuses will be calculated based on the amount of floor area that could be achieved with maximum (base) building heights and massing limits established in the Form-based Code.
establishing a specific relationship
Bonuses may be combined but not beyond
between a developer’s contribution to
maximum height indicated in Figure 5-5:
desired benefits and additional building
Maximum Bonus Building Heights.
Land Use Plans (CLUP) Part 77 Surfaces, height is to be measured from mean sea of any proposed structure. Height of any proposed structure is subject to height policies set forth in the SJC and Reid Hillview (RHV) CLUPs and may not exceed the Part 77 Surface immediately above that proposed structure. All proposed development within the SJC CLUP Traffic Pattern Zone shall comply with the applicable open space requirements of the SJC CLUP (SJC CLUP policy S-5 and Table 4-2). Where legally allowed, dedication of an aviation easement to the City of San José shall be required to be offered as a condition of approval on all projects located within the Airport Influence Area.
99
Figure 5-4
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHTS
| Cha p te r 5: Bu i l d i n g Up
Figure 5-5
MAXIMUM BONUS BUILDING HEIGHTS
Notes: Height is regulated by the number of stories as well as the maximum number of feet; buildings shall not exceed either metric.
1 0 00 | Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan 10
GOAL 5.2: HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND CHARACTER
Figure 5-6
HISTORIC RESOURCES AND AREAS OF HISTORIC SENSITIVITY (2022)
POST OFFICE
Conserve Downtown’s historic resources and sense of history, while allowing use of buildings to change over time. The old Post Office is a building of notable character and the blocks west of Monroe have properties designated as historic, as indicated in Figure 5-6: Historic Resources
Architecturally Significant & Historic Sites
and Areas of Historic Sensitivity (2022).
100ft buffer around Historic Sites Historic Combining District (HT)
POLICY 5.2A: HISTORIC PRESERVATION
Further study needed
Preserve Downtown’s historic buildings and sites as described by the City’s Historic Preservation and Resources Inventory and consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Preservation and Treatment of
Figure 5-7 POST OFFICE
BUILDING HEIGHTS ADJACENT TO HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND AREAS OF HISTORIC SENSITIVITY
Historic Properties and with the City’s regulations for Historic Combining Districts (see Chapter 18.58 of the Santa Clara City Code). Encourage the continued assessment of buildings and sites with potential but undetermined
Architecturally Significant & Historic Sites
historic significance. In particular, the City
Historic Combining District (HT)
should study the potential eligibility of
100ft Buffer around Historic Sites Further study needed
10 1
the downtown post office for the Historic
the height of new development should
Preservation and Resources Inventory.
not distract from the historic building.
POLICY 5.2B: FLEXIBILITY FOR HISTORIC BUILDING REUSE
Accordingly, height limits have been set in the western area of the Downtown Plan in response to adjacencies of sensitive buildings and historic resources.
Recognize that reasonable use of historic buildings may necessitate adaptive reuse and encourage such reuse by allowing flexibility around parking requirements, change-in-use thresholds, and other standards, while remaining consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards
UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CLARA THEATRE
for the Preservation and Treatment of Historic Properties and with the City’s regulations for Historic Combining Districts (see Chapter 18.58 of the Santa Clara City Code).
POLICY 5.2C: COMPATIBLE NEW DEVELOPMENT Where it will be adjacent to a historic building or within areas of historic sensitivity, new development should be designed to be compatible with historic resources, consistent with the Secretary of the Interior standards and City regulations, such as by using similar proportion, scale, facade modulation, and stepdowns. For new buildings on the same parcel as a historic building or within a buffer area
FRANKLIN STREET 1898
defined by Figure 5-6: Historic Resources
Figure 5-8
and Areas of Historic Sensitivity (2022),
GLENWOOD HOTEL
OLD DOWNTOWN SANTA CLARA BUILDINGS
CITY HALL
| Cha p te r 5: Bu i l d i n g Up
1 0 22 | Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan 10
GOAL 5.3: REDUCING AUTO DEPENDENCE
Shared Parking. Parking shared among uses is encouraged, and up to twenty percent (20%) of parking spaces provided may be shared between two uses. For the purposes of this title, those parking spaces shared between two uses count towards the parking requirement of both. Shared
Leverage Downtown as a place where
parking is justified when reduced parking
car use and ownership can be reduced.
reflect different uses have different time-
Optimize on-site parking in recognition
of-day parking demand profiles, based on
of reduced reliance on personal vehicles
evaluation by a qualified transportation
because of the availability of walk-to
planner and the City.
destinations and exceptional transit access. Encourage shared-use and construction of public parking.
Unbundled Parking. A maximum of one parking space shall be rented or sold
Table 5-2
REQUIRED PARKING USE
MINIMUM VEHICLE PARKING REQUIRED
Office, civic, cultural and conference uses
1 space per 500 sq. ft. of building area
Grocery stores
1 space per 500 sq. ft. of building area
All other commercial uses, including restaurants and bars
1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of building area
Hotels
0.5 spaces per room 1 space per unit for units greater than or equal to 550 sq. ft.
with each unit. Additional parking spaces
POLICY 5.3A: TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT: PARKING REQUIREMENTS
shall be rented or sold separately. As an
For new development Downtown,
a separate waiting list from renters with
establish transportation demand
cars, and renters being chosen alternately
management (TDM) requirements that
from the two lists. Require employers
reflect the vision for a pedestrian-oriented
who provide free employee parking to
district that is accessible by all modes
offer a cash payment in lieu of the parking
of travel and not dominated by wide
benefit.
alternative to renting or selling parking spaces separately from residential units,
Residential units
prospective renters without cars put on
Residential units for seniors, with onsite staff
In the Downtown Precise Plan Area,
parking may be provided off-site but
POLICY 5.3B: TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT: CONTRIBUTIONS TO BICYCLING & TRANSIT
parking requirements shall be as
within Downtown. Directly adjacent on-
summarized in Table 5-2. These
Development will contribute financially
street parking may count toward parking
requirements reflect a strong transit
to Downtown’s bicycle and transit
requirements for commercial uses.
infrastructure, as noted in Policy 5.1d.
roadways and traffic.
orientation for downtown.
Off-Site and On-Street Parking. Required
1 space per 20 units for guest parking Required parking may be provided anywhere in the district, including in shared-use garages.
property managers may implement a parking preference program, with
0.5 spaces per unit for units less than 550 sq. ft.
Require new development to provide secure indoor bicycle parking, consistent
1 space per employee plus 0.1 spaces per unit
with zoning.
allow parking requirement reductions for
The City’s Climate Action Plan currently requires all multifamily residential development to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) through transportation demand management measures. Within the Downtown Precise Plan area, non-residential development, based on evaluation by a qualified transportation planner and the City:
10 3
•
•
•
•
Transit Passes for Commercial Uses – when commercial developers commit to a monthly transit pass benefit, paired with a “guaranteed ride home” benefit for when employees have family or medical emergencies;
integrated with office, residential and
Bike Commuter Facilities – when commercial projects make locker room(s) with shower(s) available to employees;
parking for residential projects. On-site
Carsharing Spaces – when developers of large projects dedicate one or more on-site parking spaces to a carsharing operator for carsharing by residents and/or employees, with further reduction when on-site carsharing is available to the public;
POLICY 5.3D: PARKING GARAGE ADAPTABILITY
Vanpool Spaces – when larger commercial projects reserve one or more parking spaces for an established
demand. Require all standalone garages to
employer-run vanpool program.
have a minimum of 10’ floor-to-floor height
| Cha p te r 5: Bu i l d i n g Up
hotel development. Efficient parking design can be achieved by minimizing drive aisle dimensions whole addressing vehicle needs and operations and allowing mechanical parking lifts and tandem charging stations for electric vehicles should be provided.
Provide for long-term conversion of large parking garages, as the reduction of auto use and the rise of autonomous vehicles may lead to a reduction in parking have flat floors as well as external ramps for easier adaptability. These should also for future reuse.
POLICY 5.3C: ON-SITE PARKING DESIGN On-site parking will be provided in future development such that it does not dominate the pedestrian experience. This includes placing garage entrances on streets designated to handle service functions; lining the public, street-level edges of parking with other uses; and using decorative screening elements. Parking will be provided efficiently, in subterranean garages and podiums
Figure 5-9
ELEMENTS FOR TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM)
1 0 44 | Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan 10
IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES MEASURE 5.1: FORMBASED CODE AND PERMITTING
d. Standards for Parking Design that minimize the influence of parking on the public realm, ensure efficient use of space, and enable adaptive reuse.
Adopt a Form-Based Code to regulate
The Form-Based Code will be used to
building form, upper-story land use and development generally to address the following. a. Building Placement & Site Planning. To ensure that new buildings contribute to the urban streetwall and are appropriately set back or brought forward depending on use. Parking within blocks is to provide convenient access to Downtown without threatening the desired character and nature of an active, beautiful Downtown environment. b. Building Height & Massing. To create buildings which define comfortable and beautiful urban space while transitioning sensitively to existing buildings and providing adequate solar access. c. Facade Design & Articulation. To ensure that buildings create a human scale and rhythm characteristic of active Downtown environments.
evaluate and approve future development projects Downtown. Project review will also address all building code and fire safety requirements, including the need to provide aerial apparatus access roadways, emergency escape and rescue openings, fire-flow requirements, and fire hydrant spacing.
MEASURE 5.2: DEVELOPER SOLICITATION & COLLABORATION For City-owned land Downtown, issue a request for proposals from developer-led teams to support Downtown’s emergence
than 300 housing units and restrict at least
lines, proportion of windows & entrances,
25 percent of these residential units to
and other distinguishing design attributes.
lower-income households.
MEASURE 5.3: PARKING SUPPLY & TDM PROGRAMS
Protect Downtown historic resources
For Downtown Santa Clara, formalize
by applying Santa Clara City Code
transportation demand measures (TDM)
Chapter 18.106 Historic Preservation to
that evaluate the ratio between benefits
proposed alterations and demolitions.
offered and parking ratio reductions
Changes to historic structures must
offered. Set parking ratios, and allow
be consistent with the Secretary of the
parking requirement reductions with TDM,
Interior’s Standards for the Preservation
as described in policies 5.3A and 5.3B.
and Treatment of Historic Properties and
MEASURE 5.4: HISTORIC RESOURCES Height & Massing Establish height and massing limits that ensure complementary scale, as described
as a dynamic activity center with a mix
in Policy 5.2C.
of uses including cultural catalysts, hotel,
Historic Context
office, and housing uses. To be part of a mixed-use development that conforms to California’s Surplus Land Act (Assembly Bill 1486), development on City-owned land must include not less
Designated & Potential Resources described by the City’s “Historic Preservation and Resources Inventory”
with the City’s regulations for Historic Combining Districts (see Chapter 18.58 of the Santa Clara City Code). See Figure 5-6: Historic Buildings Downtown. Note that State streamlined development review requirements for proposed affordable housing projects do not apply if demolition of a historic resource is proposed. Provide for protection of cultural resources that have not been formally designated.
Through the form-based code,
Continue proactive assessments of
establish design standards that address
potential cultural resources to recommend
compatibility with character-defining
qualifying resources as historic inventory
features including setback & streetwall,
and to allow streamlined entitlement of
rhythm of entrances and massing, cornice
properties free of designated resources.
10 5
Specifically, study the downtown post office for potential eligibility for inclusion in the City’s Historic Preservation and Resources Inventory. For development applications where potential resources have not been assessed previously, require an assessment by the Historic Landmarks Commission and its historic resources consultants as part of development approval applications and, for projects that qualify for permit streamlining, a process for making timely determinations
Adaptive Reuse Encourage adaptive reuse of historic buildings. Prior to renovations and minor additions that retain a significant part of historic facades and other characterdefining features, the properties must be assessed by a qualified historic resources consultant and reviewed by the City’s Historic Landmarks Commission for consideration of historical significance, consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Preservation and Treatment of Historic Properties and with the City’s regulations for Historic Combining Districts (see Chapter 18.58 of the Santa Clara City Code). Exempt adaptive reuse from parking and open space standards. Consider reductions in development fees.
MEASURE 5.5: FINANCING PLAN Develop and rely on a Nexus Fee Study and Financing Plan to anticipate costs associated with public improvements and propose how to address those costs. A financing strategy will be established, with current thinking favoring the use of land dedications and an “area development impact fee” for downtown. See Measure 3.1 in Chapter 3.
MEASURE 5.6: BONUS HEIGHTS PROGRAM Conduct a cost benefit analysis of monetary value of community benefit offered in relation to bonus height allowance. Adopt the recommendations of this study into a bonus heights program to guide the City in the approval process of new projects in the Downtown.
MEASURE 5.7: FUNDING FOR PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES The primary source of ongoing funding for the City’s public services and facilities is tax revenue that accrues to the City’s
Downtown, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) could be studied and potentially established. See Measure 3.2 in Chapter 3.
MEASURE 5.8: AFFORDABLE HOUSING MECHANISMS Implement State laws for the production of affordable housing, such as to increase the allowed size of affordable housing projects consistent with State “density bonus law,” and to make public land available
| Cha p te r 5: Bu i l d i n g Up
Attainment of Land Use Balance If anytime after one-quarter (25%) of Downtown’s total developable acreage has been developed or entitled, over threequarters (75%) of the total cumulative developed & entitled upper-floor area is residential or office, the Planning Commission and City Council shall consider a temporary moratorium so as not to accept new project applications that propose the dominant upper-story use.
Attainment of Minimum Density and Intensity
consistent with California’s Surplus Land
The City shall maintain a record of all
Act. Apply citywide inclusionary housing
development approved within the Precise
and development fees for the creation of
Plan area following adoption of the Plan.
affordable housing.
The City shall ensure that at no time shall the cumulative density of future
MEASURE 5.9: LAND USE BALANCE AND MINIMUM DENSITY AND INTENSITY Monitoring Upper-Story Use For Downtown, the City shall monitor total cumulative upper-floor floor area by use, inclusive of developed and entitled projects. Development progress should be updated regularly and available to the public.
development projects be less than 35 units per acre, for primarily residential projects, or less than 0.75 FAR for primarily non-residential projects.
MEASURE 5.10: SIGNS AND BUILDING PROJECTIONS Allow signs, awnings and marquees to project into public rights-of-way, while ensuring adequate clearance for comfortable pedestrian movement, as
General Fund. If the City determines
detailed in the Downtown Santa Clara
that additional funding may be required
Form-based Code.
to support public facilities and services
06.
IMPLEMENTATION
UPTOWN OAKLAND STREET SCENE
1 0 88 | Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan 10
STRATEGIC STATEMENT ACTIONS TO CREATE AND SUSTAIN DOWNTOWN The vision for Downtown Santa Clara presented in this Plan will require actions by the City, other property owners in the District, arts and cultural organizations, business owners and residents over many years. Actions will be needed to build the Downtown vision piece by piece, and to sustain its success over time. In Chapter 1 we provided the historic context and the process of developing this Plan with the community. Chapter 2 described Downtown as it is today, and the Plan’s framework for change, starting with a critical first phase at the eastern end. Chapters 3, 4, and 5 provided goals, policies and implementation measures for streets and public spaces; ground-floor building use and design; and building form. Here, we summarize the implementation measures needed to achieve the outcomes described in those chapters, indicating roles and timeframes for each. The chapter then considers phasing. The Plan recognizes that Downtown will not come into being all at once, and strives to enable development that adds pieces of the puzzle that are selfsustaining in their own right, while contributing to a greater whole over time.
10 9
POP-UP ACTIVATION
Temproary interventions can activate spaces at an early stage before permanent development takes hold, as here in Hayes Valley, San Francisco.
| Cha p te r 6 : Imp l e me nt ati on
11 0 110
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra Downtown Pre c is e Plan
IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES Table 6-1 lists all of the implementation measures identified in the Santa Clara Downtown Precise Plan. For each measure, the table indicates potential roles for the City of Santa Clara; other agencies and organizations; a potential downtown management entity; property owners and developers; and community members and organizations. Finally, it suggests short-, medium- and long-term actions.
Table 6-1
IMPLEMENTATION MEASURE MATRIX IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
CITY
OTHER AGENCIES & ORGANIZATIONS
DOWNTOWN MANAGEMENT ENTITY
PROPERTY OWNERS/ DEVELOPERS
COMMUNITY MEMBERS & GROUPS
TIMING
STREETS AND PUBLIC SPACES Measure 3.1: Financing Plan
Near-term.
Measure 3.2: Funding for Public Services and Facilities
Near-term.
Measure 3.3: Land Dedication for Public Realm
Ongoing, coordinated with development. City may take lead in negotiating property line adjustments.
Measure 3.4: Street and Public Space Design
Near-term interim improvements on public access easement. Ongoing, coordinated with development and with developer contributions as appropriate.
Measure 3.5: Infrastructure Improvements Measure 3.6: Transit Service & Mobility Hub Coordination
Near-term: identify improvement needs. Ongoing: provide infrastructure as it becomes needed to support development. VTA
Near-term: study transit shuttle and develop plan for mobility hubs.
SCU
Mid- to long-term: implement mobility hubs and potential shuttle. Ongoing: coordinate with VTA.
Measure 3.7: Parking & Curbside Management
Coordinated with Phase 1 development of eastern blocks, and ongoing.
Measure 3.8: Programs & Operations
Ongoing.
RETAIL, CULTURE & THE GROUND FLOOR Measure 4.1: Form-based Code
Near-term.
Measure 4.2: Developer Solicitation & Collaboration
Near-term and ongoing.
Measure 4.3: Downtown Management Entity
Ongoing, coordinated with development.
111
| Cha p te r 6 : Imp l e me nt ati on
Table 6-1
IMPLEMENTATION MEASURE MATRIX IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
CITY
OTHER AGENCIES & ORGANIZATIONS
Measure 4.4: Downtown Activation
DOWNTOWN MANAGEMENT ENTITY
PROPERTY OWNERS/ DEVELOPERS
COMMUNITY MEMBERS & GROUPS
TIMING Near-term, City-led activation. Ongoing.
Measure 4.5: Cultural Catalysts
Santa Clara Cultural Commission
Measure 4.6: Business Recruitment
SCU
Near-term.
Arts organizations
Developers build and dedicate space as bonus-able measure. Ongoing.
BUILDING UP Measure 5.1: Form-based Code and Permitting
Near-term.
Measure 5.2: Developer Solicitation & Collaboration
Near-term and ongoing.
Measure 5.3: Parking Supply & TDM Programs Measure 5.4: Historic Resources
Near-term. Historic Preservation Commission
Near-term and ongoing.
Measure 5.5: Financing Plan
Near-term.
Measure 5.6: Bonus Heights Program
Near-term.
Measure 5.7: Funding for Public Services and Facilities
Near-term.
Measure 5.8: Affordable Housing Mechanisms
Ongoing.
Measure 5.9: Land Use Balance and Minimum Density and Intensity
Ongoing.
Measure 5.10: Signs and Building Projections
Ongoing.
1122
| Ci t y o f S a nt a Cla ra D owntown Pre c is e Plan
POTENTIAL PHASING Figure 6-1
POTENTIAL PHASING
B A
EXISTING CONDITION
POTENTIAL PHASE 1
Santa Clara has a unique opportunity
terms of urban form, land use mix, cultural
to catalyze the development of a new
attractions, ground floor activating uses
downtown because of existence of a
and public space function and character,
significant aggregation of city-owned
and can create momentum. Success will
parcels at the east end of the study area.
breed success. Phase 1 can also include
The majority of the easternmost two
interim development of the Franklin Street
blocks is owned by the city as well as
right-of-way, to provide a connection
a significant portion of a third block (as
between new Downtown development and
proposed) south of the Franklin Street
the Franklin Square area.
alignment between Washington and Main.
A potential Phase 2 may involve Blocks
Phase 1 development on City-owned
D and F, where the County Courthouse
land can set the tone for Downtown in
and University Plaza shopping center
113
| Cha p te r 6 : Imp l e me nt ati on
J I
H
F
F
D
C
B A
A
POTENTIAL PHASE 2
LONG-TERM POTENTIAL BUILDOUT
are located. This phase would require
development on these sites is complicated
negotiation between the City of Santa
by multiple property ownerships and
Clara and the State, which owns the
by the existence of a stable, revenue-
Courthouse building. Other property
producing housing development.
owners and developers could also be
Development on the westernmost blocks
involved. The potential of this phase grows out of consolidated property ownership and potentially interested parties. Later phases may involve development at the Franklin Square shopping center (Blocks G and H) and the Park Central Apartments (Blocks C and E). New
E
D
B
(Blocks I and J) will take the form of smaller infill projects that may take place over time at all phases.
G
APPENDIX A. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY
NEW DEVELOPMENT AT FRANKLIN AND MONROE