12 By the Numbers2_Layout 1 12/6/12 4:07 PM Page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here as either an actual check for money or, in the Preliminaries, the earning of a Shoot-Out spot. With Shoot-Out entries paid, I consider earning a Shoot-Out money in your pocket.) It shows that no matter where you are coming from, you have a good shot at winning some money at the Finals. The state showing the greatest dollar increase from 2011 to 2012 was Texas with a $351,250. Second was Oklahoma with a $188,050 gain. Louisiana was third and Nebraska was fourth in this category with $174,800 and $167,950 gains, respectively. Now let’s look at the category I think is most representative of the states that did the best at the Finals. It measures “per capita” income or how well each state did in proportion to the number of ropers they sent to the Finals. Because they send so many more ropers to the Finals than any other state, Texas will probably always be the state taking home the most amount of money. Let’s face it, South Carolina, Montana or Connecticut will never have a chance at unseating Texas in the most money won department. But the real measure of how well a state does is proportionally, that is, how does each state do in relation to the number of ropers that state sent to the Finals. To determine the “per capita” income of each state’s contestants, I simply divided the amount of money each state earned by the number )$ *))$ !))$ '))$ %))$ !" !"#$"%&'()" #$"%&'()" #))$ ())$ of ropers that came from each state. That figure you will find in the table labeled “Top Ten States at USTRC Finals by Money Won per Roper”. So with that in mind, here is my Top Ten for the Finals determined by their “per capita” income. The three states that Top Ten States at USTRC Finals fared the best at this by Money Won per Roper year’s Cinch NFTR were South Carolina, Nevada Rank State Per Capita and Washington, in that order. South Carolina $7,557 SC 1 sent 7 ropers to the $5,258 NV 2 Finals and they took $3,767 WA 3 home $52,900, which $2,499 NE 4 meant an average of $7,557 per roper. Nevada $2,479 LA 5 was second in this $2,326 AL 6 category with $5,258 per $2,163 CA 7 ropers. Nevada has the $2,119 UT 8 distinction of being in $2,113 GA 9 the Top Five of Money $1,828 NM 10 Won per Roper for three years running. They were SUPERLOOPER MAGAZINE / 13