Module 3 : Fabrication Name: Tan Yee Ann Student No: 573608
Page 1
Review on Ideation
interconnections within the complex network
Pentagon base pattern Leaf veins From the readings by Poling on analytical drawings. I extrapolated many Clay modelling permutation of 2D designs.
Paper modelling Digitizing
Module 3 : Fabrication Name: Tan Yee Ann Student No: 573608
Page 1
Recap on Recipe
2. Repetition (3 layers) 3. Scaling (at the middle)
1. Base unit
4. Continuous Rotation The points on the 3-D object is skewed to show rotation
5. Complex centre as compared to the peripheral zones
I have incorporated the recipe and embedded into my design process. Considering the base pattern, the physical structure, the illuminated state and the shadow that is cast
This is seen in the individual modules. Shadows as well as physical structure
Module 3 : Fabrication Name: Tan Yee Ann Student No: 573608
Page 2
Panelling options and prototyping Panel 1:
Triangulation of pattern due to unconstructability due to the presence of curved surface. Problems faced lead to the development of this design. The central portion where there is a clear relation to the complex core
Module 3 : Fabrication Name: Tan Yee Ann Student No: 573608
Page 3
Panel 2:
Reconsidering module 1’s paper model.
Panel 3:
Experimenting with directing the angle of light. Panel 2 and 3 i experimented with a thinner material. Which allowed more light to shine on the surface.
Panel 4:
Experimenting with different panelled surfaces
Experimenting with the degree of open and closed surfaces
Module 3 : Fabrication Name: Tan Yee Ann Student No: 573608
Page 4
Prototype 1:1 Prototype 1: Developing from panel 1
Panelled surface with panel option 1
2D inner skin
Creation of tabs such that the inner skin can be attached to the outer skin
3D inner skin The concept of creating a double skin is to bring out the theme of core and peripheral /complexity (based on the recipe) Experimenting with the interference effect.
Module 3 : Fabrication Name: Tan Yee Ann Student No: 573608
Page 5
Prototype 1:1 (1)
Issues faced: The prototype has a intricate shadow which is interesting. However the shadow does not show much differentiation in the complex core.
2nd skin
Tabs on the edge of the surface. This is to connect to the 2nd skin. The second skin was discontinued. After testing our the effects. The second skin poses another issue, the second skin does not differ much from the inner layer hence not emphasizing the goals of the recipe
The 1st prototype has too big offset hence having over exposure and it is unable to conceal the led light source. In the model making experimented with the tabs and realise that when i glue both sides of the tabs together it strengthen the entire lantern structure. The idea of st The failure lead to development of the next model.
Module 3 : Fabrication Name: Tan Yee Ann Student No: 573608
Shadow effect and hand interaction
Prototype 1: the inner layer of the deign Page 6
Prototype 1:1 Prototype 2 Development
Further development such that there is a core and peripheral, complex vs non complex theme applied on the border offset as well, which would influence the shadow’s effects
+
=
This differentiation of the 2 types of skin (2D and 3D) enabled me to show a greater distinction between the 3 distinct layers the components as well as bring out the core and peripheral concept
Module 3 : Fabrication Name: Tan Yee Ann Student No: 573608
Page 7
Prototype 1:1 (2) Prototype 2
The lighting produces a beautiful interference pattern. The shadows also brings out the theme which has a central complex shadow compared to the peripheral regions
The use of black card was used to experiment the effect. In making the prototype the effects was beyond expectation. I experienced first hand how experimentation lead to unexpected designs to show a clearer distinction between the 3 separate layers
I also experimented with the joints of the lantern. I liked how the dashed lines allow the form of the to be accentuated. My experimental process has enable me to develop unexpected success in carrying the theme of my lantern across.
Module 3 : Fabrication Name: Tan Yee Ann Student No: 573608
Page 8
Prototype 1:1 Prototype 3 Development New inner skin -developing on prototype 1 and 2
The centralised core that sits within the structure would carry out the core concept stronger and hence the decision made. The presence of the inner core enables the light to be less intense. Which allows the differential lighting effect of the card to be shown. Although the shadow effect is loss this design does not only have a strong design but also have a intricate lighting effect that is comparable to prototype 2.
Module 3 : Fabrication Name: Tan Yee Ann Student No: 573608
Page 9
Construction phase
Led light 8 AA battery in a plastic case
UHU glue Allow some error as its cohesiveness is not as strong as white glue when dried hence if mistakes are made correcting them is a lot easier.
Double sided tape and glue tape is not strong enough to hold the structure in place. White Glue does not dry as quickly hence would require a longer time to make the model.
To cut I used a scalpel which I broke. Hence I use the a pen knife and scissors to trim the edges. Triangle clips to hold the tabs in place for the glue to set.
Module 3 : Fabrication Name: Tan Yee Ann Student No: 573608
Page 10
Preparation for fablab on Rhino
Module 3 : Fabrication Name: Tan Yee Ann Student No: 573608
Page 11
Hand interactions
Module 3 : Fabrication Name: Tan Yee Ann Student No: 573608
Page 12
Final model (3)
Prototype 3
Photo 1
Photo 2
Photo 3
The model has some minor issues that i would need to resolve. The issue with closing the lantern has to be considered as it has a curve surface. To close the structure I would have to attach the black portion last to join the structure. Photo 4: the complexity of the handler..
Having an opening structure at the back is a interesting concept as it shows clear distinction between the complexities seen in photo 2
Module 3 : Fabrication Name: Tan Yee Ann Student No: 573608
Page 13
Reflection In this weeks reading I learnt how technology has greatly improve the flexibility and ability of our to produce complex structures. In Kolarevic’s reading shows large range of different technology is being used in the fabrication of architecture design as well as in product design. From the lecture I have learnt how customizing is becoming more accessible with the proliferation of the technology. These processes are enabled through the development in software, CNC (computer numerical control) technology and stimulated analysis. Iwamato discusses several concepts that are relevant to the fabrication process. In the reading he discusses how fabrication relates to the materials. The reading shows how materials are pushed to the limits due to the greater understanding of materials due to the advances in technology. Previously impossible designs are now made possible. He also talks about the concept discussed in the lecture on problem solving process and puzzle making process. From the lecture I can see how the topics discussed in the readings helps me realize the direction technology has shaped the design industry both in architecture and in product design. The lecture enabled me to see the examples discussed in the readings and learn the different processes taken to develop the design. The lecture also reinforces how experimentation leads to the development of a design. In the lecture the building by Frank Ghery has struck a chord in me. I see how my lantern relates to the building. It has a separate skin that has a totally different structure, which was able to show the core and complexity that I was trying to achieve. The lecture also has many amazing buildings that were raised in the readings. Chris bosses lava Digital origami feature enable light to shine both way, which created an interesting effect. The play of colored light is something that I could consider in my design.
Module 3 : Fabrication Name: Tan Yee Ann Student No: 573608
Page 14