INTERIOR DESIGN PORTFOLIO

PORTFOLIO

INTRO TO INTERIOR DESIGN ARCH/ 4541

DR. NAGWA EL SHERIF AND DR ALY KANDIL FALL 2O21

BY;YOUSSEF HASSABO ID: 900170261

THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIRO The Department of Architecture Bachelor of Science Degree in

Architectural Engineering Five Year Plan- Fall Enrollment - Starting Fall 2019

ENGR 212/2102

Cultural exploration (3Cr)

CORE PHIL 220/2100

Con. Material (4 Cr.)

CORE Secondry level

CENG 302/3112

Strct.

Analysis & Design

CENG 305/3151

Hum/Social Sci (3 Cr.)

ARCH 326/2231

Env. Control (3 Cr.)

CENG

Strc. Design1 for Arch (3 Cr.)

423/4252 Con.Methods (3 Cr.)

CENG 306/3152

ARCH 428/3311

Strc. Design 2 (3 Cr.)

Bldg finishes (3 Cr.)

ENGR 345/3222

Eng. Economy (3 Cr.)

CORE

CORE

Global Studies (3 Cr.)

PRIMARY CORE SECONDARY CORE CAPSTONE CORE

ARCH 429/4312

Tech.

Drawing (3 Cr.)

CENG 441/4410

Arab Studies 2 (3 Cr.)

Capstone II (3 Cr.)

Housing/GIS (3 Cr.)

ARCH 441/4421

Design Mngmt (2 Cr.)

Hist & Phil Modern Arch.

(3 Cr.)

Urban/Lndsc p (3 Cr.)

Des Studio Form (4 Cr.)

ARIC 205/2205

Des Studio Sust.

(4 Cr.)

ARCH 426/3321

Bldg Services (3 Cr.)

ARCH 4561

Vertical Stud A (5 cr)

ARCH 473/3522

Advc. CAD (3 Cr.)

4

18

5

16

6

Intro to Egpt Arch. (3 Cr.)

17

7

17

8

13

9

12

10

ARCH 4801-2-3

TH & DISS (2 Cr.)

Sen. Project 2 (5 Cr.)

ENGINEERING CORE CONCENTRATION REQUIREMENTS CONCENTRATION ELECTIVE

18

EGPT 203/2030

Vertical Stud B (5 cr)

ARCH 491/4981

Intern.

Design (1 Cr.)

3

1

Islamic Arch1 (3 Cr.)

ARCH 4562

ELECTIVE (3 Cr.)

18

ARCH 352/3553

ARCH 453/3554

ARCH 468/4532

2

ARCH 314/2211

Des Studio Hum. (4 Cr.)

Senior Studio (5Cr.)

ARCH 497/4951

Found 3D Des (3 Cr.)

ARCH 351/2552

Surveying (1 Cr.)

ARCH 368/3531

ARCH 250/2512

Intro.Arch.De s (3 Cr.)

ARCH 268/2411

18

YEAR

ARCH 251/2551

ARCH 4570

Intro.

Mngmnt (3 Cr.)

CORE

ARCH 234/2221

Digital Rep (2 Cr.)

Physics Lab. (1 Cr.)

Interior Desgn (3 Cr.)

Intern. Const.

(0 Cr.)

CORE

ARCH 273/1521

ARCH 420/4541

ARCH 496/3950

Arab Studies 1 (3 Cr.)

PHYS 123L/1012

Hum Asp Arch (3 Cr.)

Eng. Mech. 1 (3 Cr.)

ARCH 323/3331

Philosophic (3 Cr.)

Calculus 2 (3 Cr.)

Classic.

Mech.

(3 Cr.)

2

Scientific Thinking (3 Cr.)

Chemistry (3 Cr.)

PHYS 111/1011

YEAR

CORE Pathways 2:

Libraries (0 Cr.)

MACT 132 /1122

1

3

CORE SCI 120/1020

Research writing (3 Cr.)

CHEM 105/1005

15

YEAR

CORE LALT101/1020

Free-Hand Rep (3 Cr.)

Eng. Drawing (2 Cr.)

4

CORE RHET120/1020

Computer Sc. (3 Cr.)

Intro. Engr.

(1 cr.)

YEAR

Freshman Seminar (3 Cr.)

ARCH 221/1511

ENGR 115/1005

CSCI 106/1001

ENGR 101/1001

5

Freshman Writing (3 Cr.)

CORE 110/1010

YEAR

CORE RHET110/1010

PRE-REQUISITE CONCURRENT COURSES OFFERED ONCE A YEAR

5/21/202012:32 AM

2

14/9

3

21/9

4

28/9

5

5/10

6

12/10

7

19/10

8

26/10

9

2/11

10

9/11

11

16/11

12

23/11

13

30/11

14

7/12

15

14/12 21/12

Interior Design Scheme

7/9

Final Project

1

Pre-Design Work

COURSE OUTLINE:

Definitions/field/course outline/briefing

CW: professional practical field research and presentation

Survey(meter)/standard/ergonomics/ Anthropometrics/proxemics ….

CW: surveying a space (group) HW: surveying final drawing

Design (style) board: concept/inspiration

CW: moodboard exercise HW: animation clip presentation

Principles of design: axiality, symmetry, rhythm, repetition, echo, focal point, vista Practical planning: plan and section

CW: campus photo shoot HW: floor pattern design

Classical styles (louis 14, 15, 16, empire, regency, Victorian)

CW: styles mini boards, project 1 intro: café HW: classic modern contemporary boards

Pre-modern styles (arts & crafts, art nouveau, art deco) + Modernism

CW: project 1 café – cross regional style HW: project 1 café style board

Sourcing & colours: lighting, fabrics, finishes, accessories, …

Sample board

CW: sourcing list and suppliers research HW: project 1 color & sample board (café au lait)

FF&E (furniture fixture and equipment), Details and accessories, kitchen & bathroom Interior design scheme

CW: project 2 dorm room schematic design HW: dorm room design

Final Project: Feedback 1

CW: project 2 final submission

Feedback 2 Pre-Final submission Final submission Portfolio Final submission

CW: plan and section morphology (photos) HW: plan and section vs typology

CW: project 1 final sub., project 2 intro: dorm room HW: project 2 vision and concept

CW: project 2 pre-final - Final Project introduction HW: dorm room final submission

T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S

1- ASSIGNMENTS 2-CLASSWORK 3-PROJECT 1 4-PROJECT 2

A S S I G N M E N T S

ASSIGHMENENT 1: SPATIAL SURVEYING

PURPOSE: LEARN HOW TO EFFICIENTLY DRAW A SPACE WITH DETAILING TO SCALE.

OBJECTIVE: TRANSLATE SITE SURVEY INTO PROPER ARCHITECTURAL RECORDS.

REFLECTION: ISSUES IN ORGANIZATION, AND SCALE OF FONTS COMPARED TO DRAWING, REQUIRED MORE ACCURACY.

GRADE: 14

ASSIGHMENENT 2: 1: INTERIOR SPATIAL SURVEYING CONCEPT FILM

PURPOSE: TRANSLATION LEARN HOW TOOF EFFICIENTLY IDEAS INTODRAW A CONCEPTUAL A SPACE WITH FILM DETAILING AND USE OF TO VARIETY SCALE. OF MEDIA.

OBJECTIVE: TRANSLATING TRANSLATE SITE CONCEPTUAL SURVEY INTO IDEAS PROPER INTO ARCHITECCONCRETE TURAL RECORDS. VISUALS

REFLECTION: THE MOVIE ISSUES IN ORGANIZATION, ITSELF WAS HARD AND TOSCALE MAKEOF IT TOOK FONTS TIME COMPARED AND EFFORT TO TO DRAWING, FIND THE REQUIRED RIGHT PROGREAM, MORE AS ACCURACY. WELL AS THE RIGHT KEYWORDS THAT DESCRIBE THE MOVIE.

GRADE: 82

ASSIGHMENENT 3: FLOOR PATTERN DESIGN

PURPOSE: USAGE OF LEARNT DESIGN CONCEPTS AND INTIATIVES.

OBJECTIVE: CREATING A FLOOR PATTERN USING 2 OF THE DESIGN TECHNIQUES LEARNT IN CLASS

REFLECTION: FORMS WERE CORRECT BUT VERY SIMPLE COULD HAVE BEEN MORE BRAVE WHEN IT CAME TO DESIGN

GRADE : 85

ASSIGNMENT 4: CHANGING TYPOLOGIES

PURPOSE: UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENT NEEDS FOR EACH SPACE AND DESIGNING DIFFERENT SOLUTIONS

OBJECTIVE: DESIGN 3 DIFFERENT TYPOLOGIES WITH APPROPRIATE FURNISHING

REFLECTION: IT WAS DIFFICULT TO DESIGN 3 DIFFERENT TYPOLOGIES WHILE UNDERSTANDING THE NEEDS AND WANTS OF EACH TYPOLOGY.

GRADE : 72

ASSIGHMENENT ASSIGNMEN T 5: MINI 1: SPATIAL CONCEPT SURVEYING BOARD

PURPOSE: UNDERSTANDING HOW CONCEPT BOARD WORKS, LEARN HOW TO EFFICIENTLY DRAW A SPACE WITH WHILE KNOWING THE RIGHT KEY WORDS TO USE. DETAILING TO SCALE.

OBJECTIVE: OBJECTIVE: TRANSLATING ONE OF THE FRENCH STYLES INTO A TRANSLATE SITE SURVEY INTO PROPER ARCHITECMINI CONCEPT BOARD THAT TELLS THE CONCEPT TURAL RECORDS. OF THE ERA

REFLECTION: REFLECTION: ISSUES IN ORGANIZATION, AND SCALE OF FONTS THE CONCEPT BOARD ITSELF WAS WELL THOUGHT COMPARED TO DRAWING, REQUIRED MORE OF AND EXPRESSES THE STORY OF THE NAPOLEONIC ACCURACY. STYLE OF DESIGN.

GRADE: 91

ASSIGHMENENT ASSIGNMEN T 6: ART 1: SPATIAL DECO X SURVEYING PRESSO

PURPOSE: UNDERSTANDING HOW TO TAKE TWO STYLESWITH AND LEARN HOW TO EFFICIENTLY DRAW A SPACE BLEND TOGETHER TO CREATE ONE COHERENT DETAILING TO SCALE. STYLE.

OBJECTIVE: OBJECTIVE: TRANSLATE SITE SURVEY INTO PROPER ARCHITECBLENDING THE ART DECO ERA WITH ANOTHER TURAL RECORDS. COUNTRY TO CREATE A NEW STYLE MERGED BY BOTH. REFLECTION:

REFLECTION: ISSUES IN ORGANIZATION, AND SCALE OF FONTS

COMPARED TO DRAWING, REQUIRED MORE IT WAS CHALLENGING TO PICK THE RIGHT BLEND ACCURACY. AND THEN CHOOSE HOW THEY COULD BEST GO TOGETHER AND THEN DESIGINING A SPACE WHILE MAINTAINING BOTH CONCEPTS.

GRADE: 85

C L A S S W O R K

ASSIGHMENENT CLASSWORK 3: MOOD 1: SPATIAL BOARD SURVEYING

PURPOSE: UNDERSTANDING THE BASIC CONCEPT OF DESIGNLEARN HOW TO EFFICIENTLY DRAW A SPACE WITH ING MOOD TO BOARDS DETAILING SCALE.

OBJECTIVE: OBJECTIVE: TRANSLATING A CONCEPT FROM THE MET GALA TO TRANSLATE SITE SURVEY INTO PROPER ARCHITECAN ACTUAL CONCEPT BOARD TURAL RECORDS.

REFLECTION: REFLECTION: THE CONCEPT BOARD LACKED WORDS, AND ISSUES IN ORGANIZATION, AND KEY SCALE OF FONTS WAS MISSING OF THE BASIC IDEAS OF A MOOD COMPARED TOSOME DRAWING, REQUIRED MORE BOARD. ACCURACY.

GRADE: 7

ASSIGHMENENT CLASSWORK 4: DESIGN 1: SPATIAL PRINCIPLES SURVEYING ON CAMPUS

PURPOSE: UNDERSTANDING THE BASIC CONCEPTS OF DESIGN LEARN HOW TO EFFICIENTLY DRAW A SPACE WITH PRINCIPLES. DETAILING TO SCALE.

OBJECTIVE: OBJECTIVE: SEARCHING FOR BASIC DESIGN PRINICTRANSLATE THE SITE CAMPUS SURVEY INTO PROPER ARCHITECPLES EXPRESSED TURAL RECORDS.IN LECTURE.

REFLECTION: REFLECTION: SOME CHOSEN ELEMENTS WEREOF INCORRECT ISSUESOF INTHE ORGANIZATION, AND SCALE FONTS AND NOT RELATED TO THEREQUIRED KEYWORDS CHOSEN. COMPARED TO DRAWING, MORE ACCURACY.

GRADE: 5

ASSIGHMENE5T CLASSWORK 5: FROM 1: SPATIAL PICTURE SURVEYING TO SCHEMATICS

PURPOSE:

HOW TO SKETCH A SCHEMATIC FROM A PICTURE LEARN HOW TO EFFICIENTLY DRAW A SPACE WITH DETAILING TO SCALE. OBJECTIVE: UNDERSTANDING SCALE AND PORPORTION OBJECTIVE: THROUGH PICTURES. TRANSLATE SITE SURVEY INTO PROPER ARCHITECREFLECTION: TURAL RECORDS. THE SKETCHES COULD HAVE BEEN NEATER AND REFLECTION: MORE ACCURATE IN TERMS OF SCALE AND PORPORTION. ISSUES IN ORGANIZATION, AND SCALE OF FONTS COMPARED TO DRAWING, REQUIRED MORE ACCURACY.

GRADE: 6

P R O J E C T S

ASSIGHMENE5T PROJECT 1: DORM 1: ROOM SPATIAL DESIGN SURVEYING

PURPOSE:

HOW TO DESIGN A DORM ROOM WHILE USING THE BASIC PRINCIPLES FROM THE COURSE. LEARNLEARNED HOW TO EFFICIENTLY DRAW A SPACE WITH DETAILING TO SCALE.

OBJECTIVE: OBJECTIVE:

DESIGNING A DORM ROOM FOR A SELECTED UNIVERSITY. TRANSLATE SITE SURVEY INTO PROPER ARCHITECTURAL RECORDS.

REFLECTION: REFLECTION:

COULD HAVE FOCUSED MORE ON SELECTED COLOR PATTERNS AND IDEAS, COULD HAVEOF USED MORE ISSUES IN ORGANIZATION, AND SCALE FONTS POWERFUL DESIGN IDEAS.REQUIRED MORE COMPARED TO DRAWING, ACCURACY.

GRADE: 90

ASSIGHMENE5T PROJECT 2: SPACE 1: X SPATIAL SURVEYING

PURPOSE:

USING LEARNT CONCEPTS TO MERGE 3 DIFFERENT BRANDS TOGETHER LEARN HOW TO EFFICIENTLY DRAW A SPACE WITH DETAILING TO SCALE.

OBJECTIVE: OBJECTIVE:

DESIGNING A PAVILION THAT COMBINES 3 DIFFERENT BRANDSSITE TOGETHER TRANSLATE SURVEYFLUENTLY. INTO PROPER ARCHITECTURAL RECORDS.

REFLECTION: REFLECTION:

THE PROJECT WAS VERY DIFFICILT AS THE BRANDS WERE DIFFERENT ANDAND ALMOST NOT ISSUESVERY IN ORGANIZATION, SCALE OF RELATED FONTS IN ANYWAYTO TO DRAWING, EACH OTHER; HOWEVER WITH RECOMPARED REQUIRED MORE SEARCH AND WORK THE FOLLOWING OUTPUT WAS ACCURACY. MADE

GRADE: 90