DD_Portfolio

Page 1

Digital Design - Portfolio Semester 1, 2018 Kelly Yutong Jin 91449 Shiqi Tang, Studio 30

1


Content:

Edu

201 201 03

Precedent Study

05

Generating Design Through Digital Processes

Wo

XXX

Aw 21

Queen Victoria Garden Pavilion

201

Ski

Rhi Gra

Un

Pho

Illu

Ind

Fab

add


esses

email: yutjin@student.unimelb.edu.au

Reflection:

Education: 2017 - 2019 2015 - 2017

Bachelor of Design Marryatville High School I was motivaed by the possibilities of different design creating different atmosphere and it shapes how people behave. and through this course, I learned a lot about Parametric design skill was by exploring different idea through grasshopper, and unreal enginer as rendering method.

Work Experience: XXXX

N/A

Awards / Exhibition: 2018

Alpha Exhibtion, MSD X

I hope in the future I can using design to forming a warm world and harmony environment by different groups of people and hope we can shpe the world a bit by architecture. In terms of the improvements,the real life fabrication can be considered more carefully as thinking in my finnal project, the connection part in vertical orientation have lots of potential such as join then at one poit and then spreading out which making the connection more meaning behind the form

Skills: Rhino Grasshopper Unreal Photoshop Illustrator Indesign Fabrication add more ++

2


The pavilion has a main concept of allowing the exhibition contents and the park to be simultaneously experienced. The isometric drawing select the part where can demonstrate this attempt of the connection between plants and place to show. 1. A visual permeability | spaced timber framing and cladding battens.

EN

TR

CE

2. In-between space | ramp area, connected between the natural landscape and the pavilion exhibition.

AN

TR

EN

The threshold ramp| ramp area & three interlocking space.

AN

CE

*From that, I learned how threshold define two spaces in terms of privacy(public to private) or functionality (different functions of rooms) and how they finally become an ensemble.

m

3. Three interlocking garden rooms |varying heights and exhibits ever changing views and orientation.

Structure

*From that, I learned how architecture can control the dynamism of circulation though various size and features of different components. It can be very simple variation, but may achieve great effect.

Glazing

Isometric of precedent study

3

M1-Diagramming Design Precedent

North-East Isometric: Queens park pavillion 2015


Kelly,Yutong Jin - 91449

EN

TR

AN

CE

Isometric 1:50 0

1000

3000mm

Glazing

Structure

Openings

Populous area Attraction(arts & crafts) Gathering(chair & space)

In-Between space

Circulation paths

Circulation 1:100

Thresholds (Permeability) 1:100

4


Task A

M2-Generating Ideas Through Process

Surface1

5


Design Matrix

Lofts

1.1

1.3

1.2

Key

1.4

{90,0,150}

{0,0,0} {75,0,150}

{0,75,150}

{150,0,75} {105,150,150}

{0,0,120}

{105,0,50} {75,105,105}

{0,15,50}

{75,150,150} {150,120,150}

{0,0,105} {150,0,150}

{15,0,150}

{0,0,150}

Attractor / Control Points (X Attractor / Control Curves

{135,0,150}

Grid Points

{120,0,150} {90,150,150}

{0,75,0}

{0,0,15}

{0,0,75}

{105,75,0}

{150,105,0}

{0,150,0}

{135,150,0}

{150,150,0} {75,150,120}

{45,0,0}

{0,150,0}

{50,120,75}

{Index Selection}

{Index Selection}

{Index Selection}

{Index Selection}

Iso Curve

3.1

3.2

3.3

3.4

Paneling Grid & Attractor Point

2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4

{Attractor Point Location}

{Attractor Curve}

{Attractor Point Location}

Lofts

1.1

{90,150,150}

1.2

1.4

{90,0,0}

Key {0,0,0}

Attractor / Control Point

Attractor / Control Curve Grid Points

6


Surface 2

7


d & Attractor Point {Attractor Point Location}

{Attractor Curve}

Lofts

1.1

{Attractor Point Location}

1.2

Key

1.4

{0,0,0}

Attractor / Attractor / Grid Points

Paneling Grid & Attractor Point

{Index Selection}

{Index Selection}

{Index Selection}

{Index Selection}

2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4

{Attractor Point Location}

R:50 S:0.27

{Attractor Curve}

Lofts

1.1

1.2

{Index Selection}

{Index Selection}

R:34 S:0.27

{Attractor Point Location}

R:50 S:0.1

R:34 S:0.1

1.4

{Index Selection}

8

{Index Selection}


Computation Workflow

Surface creation Parametic Shape Generation

t

9

Parametric Control of height and direction


Parametric Control of height and

R:50 direction S:0.27

Parametic Control of Location

R:50 S:0.27

R:34 S:0.27

10

R:50 S:0.27

R:34 S:0.27


Surface and Waffle

In the surface creatoin process, the tension between parametric fabrication and design of manual control was explored. Controlling two different parameters: patterns and location by using different method on two surfaces, a similar effect was tried to be achieved stimutaneously around the concept of light gap. On the surface 1, the patterns are mainly genrated parametricly in a wavy behaviour which the wave amplitute and direction can be controlled in the script (pg5). Adding a few exsited drawn patterns with control of height and moving direction in grashopper to balance . On the surface 2, parametric fabrication was used to controll the location of atterns which were drawn in a similar tension but with ifferent sizes of light gap and 3D shadow extrusion. However, the random split commans was choosed for this allocation, because the patterns themselves already have a strong link between each other. By controlling the ratio of split numbers and level of randomness, the script can create something unexpected. Overall, the idea of two surfaces was to create light gaps with a sense of randomness using ordered manipulation or in a opposite way. Enabling visitors to experience expecting and suprising view at the same time.

11


x0 x0

x1

5 5

x2 x1

x3 x12

x2

x13 x14 x15 x3

When nesting the patterns, putting them in roll are convient for later assemble process, number labelling for waffle structures help as well. In terms of model making, the tolerence must be considered as some of the light gap might be to big and too close to the edge which will be bend. Testing laser cutting allowed me to check the buildability of real model and made any adjustment as it needs.

12


Task B

M2-Generating Ideas Through Process

13


Design Matrix

14


SOLID AND VOID

The iteration was selected for final pavillion design because there is more variation of space formed by substraction of Dypyramid and Prism in different scale and grouping method. The complexity of negative space is emphasised by the sloping edge and fragamented grid on top and bottom. The geometry of prism forms interesting void inside which creates many possibilies as a pavillion, in terms of the way of cutting, the void can be used as sitting area, sloping plane for walk, or the framing view opening. The solid part is characterised with it’s different size of plane, as at every angle, plane makes the strongest view of the pavillion. However, at different angle, the plane size and different intersections increasing the complexity and different possibiloities spatial experience of the pavillion.

15


Design Matrix Celluation Variation

1.1

1.2

1.3

Key

1.4

{0,0,0}

Attractor / Control Points (X,Y,Z) Attractor / Control Curves Grid Points

{Index Selection}

{Index Selection}

{Index Selection}

{Index Selection}

{-183,-138,140}

Celluation Variation

1.1

1.2

1.3

{58,-138,140}

Key

1.4

{0,0,0} {-302,-61,-70}

Attractor / Control Points (X,Y,Z) Attractor / Control Curves Grid Points

{-7,266,131}

{-7,266,131}

{109,397,131}

{Index Selection}

{Index Selection}

{Index Selection}

{Index Selection} {402,375,131}

Attractor points

3.1

3.2

3.3

3.4

Boolean Result

2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4

{Attractor Point Location}

{Attractor Curve}

{Attractor Point Location}

16


Computational Process

17


Computational Process

18


1) Concept as Embrace a. The pavilion itself was generated from the two surfaces on opposite sides, embracing each other at the top and creating multiple flows and circulation.

M3-Pavilion of Embrace

b. The cubes extruded from surface are designed to follow the flow, having smaller size when it goes outwards, embracing the nature. c. (landscpe 3.)The landscape was designed with non-parametric method, embrace the regularity and irregularity (explored in m3), by the link of capturing the feature of pavilion and how it flows to the landscape (diagram on p.24) 2) The landscape was also designed to sit the pavilion, which allow people to walk on or climb up to sit on the pavilion at lunchtime seminar and the evening quartet. The landscape outside can be sit as in between area. Central as the performance space having Led light enhances the atmosphere, depending on performance need. 4) The wood material was selected to enhance the feeling of embrace as warm and welcoming, steel reinforcemnet was applied to connect all the cubes for the structure stability purpose as the pavilion serves the function of sitting and climbing.

21


of Embracing

Flow of pavillion

Threshold

Kelly, Yutong Jin - 991449

In between area

Section 1:25 0

Threshold

Section 1:25 0

500

1500mm

22

500

1500mm


M3 - Pavillion of Embracing

Two side of pavvilion appraching towards each other forming the roof structure.

Showing how structure its on the landscape , meanwhile can be sitting area. Sun shadow diagram

Kelly, Yutong Jin - 991449 Top columns defining the threshold

In-between space where people can sit.

Structure sits on the landscape, forming threshold

Exploded Isometric 1:50 0

1000

3000mm

23


Flow of pavillion

In between area

Threshold

24


Design Iteration

The flow of pavillion is interesting. but lack of futher logic behind it

The light and the circulation was considred carefully through parametric method, but the facade has less connection as an ensemble

25

This iteration is most closed to final project interms of circulation, light, flowness, but the struture itself is too dramatic, needs more consideration of size and connection of ndividual elements


This page is intentionally left blank


26


27


Computational Process

Surface is created from remapped grid to achieve the overhang as roof and ground circulation in contrast with lighting effec

The surface is divided into to strips to scale the lines, as lines approaching more towards inside the pavillion it gets longer

28

Then loft all the lines to recreat the strip surface


Square shapes are mapped on the space and size is also scaled in the same logic as more outside more smaller

Then the square was extruded with further distance as coming inside, forming the cubes gradually difuse to outside.

29

The other side of the pavilion follows the same logic and embraces each other


30


31


Fabrication process

Horizontal connection was joined to 3D as people can climb vertically

Vertically connection was by trimming the hole and using the wire for connection to enhance the visual effect of diffuse.

32

Landscape was fabricated by laser cutting. According to the shape, its more efficient to box the model and then fabricate


33


360 Image Output

Degital Design

Digital2019 Design Semester 1, 2018 34


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.