King & Wood Mallesons
Q & A : ‘A c o m b i n at i o n o f e q u a l s ’
p. 4 2
juLY2012
NORTH ASIA EDITION
DARK DAYS A crucial next few months for India
PAGE 20
IPO ACCOUNTABILITY
BEYOND THE GAMING
INSIDE
Tougher rules for sponsors
Macau’s infrastructure boom
n Deals SPOTLIGHT
04
n THE BIG STORY
05
PAGE 26
PAGE 32
n LEAGUE TABLES
10
n SUNDRIES
80
CONTENTS
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
20
“It (social housing) can be very profitable because the government pays for all the variations, all the changes, and all the extra costs that are required to complete these projects in a timely fashion.” Carlos Duque Simoes, DSL Lawyers
34
COVER STORY Next Generation Cities
ALB’s Next-Generation Cities identifies the best full-service law firms in emerging commercial centres across Asia. As Osaka, Guangzhou, Bangalore and Penang become increasingly important to the global economy, the market demands a corresponding growth in superior and sophisticated legal services. ALB has identified and profiled the top full-service law firms in these next generation cities.
1
52
FEATURES Women in law
Almost one out of every two people in the world is female. Yet, women still face myriad issues when it comes to business. How do they make it to the top? What obstacles do they face? How do they juggle their family commitments and professional obligations? Has female participation at senior management levels increased over the last few years in Asia? Seher Hussain investigate.
India’s hour of doubt
It is hard to imagine that India was, until a mere couple of years ago, one of the most attractive of the world’s new economies. The lustre has noticeably faded in the last few months, with growth slowing, the deficit gap widening, and the rupee falling through the floor as a result of stalled reform, government paralysis, and a variety of other factors that have made investors circumspect. There is no question that the fundamentals of India are just as strong as they were half a decade ago, and the country is expected to turn things around in the near future. But the next few months could be crucial, finds Ranajit Dam
Turning the screws
Economic uncertainty has translated into a marked slowdown of IPO activity in global markets. Facebook’s botched listing in May this year did little to restore market confidence. In Hong Kong, investors finally have a reason to smile, following the Security and Futures Commission’s proposals to toughen rules for IPO sponsors,
12
including making them criminally liable for listing prospectuses. Kanishk Verghese reports
Macau: Beyond the gaming
20
The gaming industry may be the core driver of Macau’s economy, but there is a lot more happening apart from the casinos. Construction extends to landmark infrastructure projects, public housing, and various residential and commercial developments. However, the continued boom times are exacerbating a problem that has been plaguing the former Portuguese colony for several years now: a severe labour shortage. Candice Mak explores the other aspects of Macau.
One of a kind
26
When Australian market leader Mallesons Stephen Jaques and Chinese powerhouse King & Wood officially merged on March 1, the new combined firm became a game changer. Global managing partner Stuart Fuller and China managing partner Wang Ling sat down with Candice Mak to discuss the integration of the firms’ cultures, why the King & Wood Mallesons model cannot be replicated, which elements are crucial for success, and the challenges they tackle as leaders.
Best of the best
Allen & Gledhill are among the big winners of the ALB 2012 SE Asia Law Awards, as Stephenson Harwood walks away with the SE Asia Deal of the Year
NEWS 32
DEALS
04
BRIEFS
05
LEAGUE TABLES
10
APPOINTMENTS
11
INDEX SPONSORED Regional Updates 42
— China Paul, Weiss — Singapore Loo & Partners — Malaysia Wong & Partners — Philippines Sycip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan
SPONSORED UPDATES 60
— Emerging Markets Kelvin Chia Partnership — International Tax AzureTax
SUNDRIES
78
72 73 74 74
76 76
80
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012
2
MANAGING DIRECTOR Andrew Goldner andrew.goldner@thomsonreuters.com
ON THE COVER
NORTH ASIA REGIONAL EDITOR Candice Mak candice.mak@thomsonreuters.com SOUTHEAST ASIA REGIONAL EDITOR Ranajit Dam ranajit.dam@thomsonreuters.com MIDDLE EAST REGIONAL EDITOR Shaheen Pasha shaheen.pasha@thomsonreuters.com JOURNALISTS Seher Hussain seher.hussain@thomsonreuters.com Zhen Liu zhen.liu@thomsonreuters.com Kathryn Crossley kathryn.crossley@thomsonreuters.com Kanishk Verghese kanishk.verghese@thomsonreuters.com
REUTERS/Kimimasa Mayama
copy editor Vasundhara Chatterjee vasundhara.chatterjee@thomsonreuters.com Sanchita Ghosh sanchita.ghosh@thomsonreuters.com HEAD OF SALES May Wong may.wong@thomsonreuters.com
THOMSON REUTERS TRUST PRINCIPLES 01
That Thomson Reuters shall at no time pass into the hands of any one interest, group or faction;
02 That the integrity, independence and freedom from bias of Thomson Reuters shall at all times be fully preserved; 03
That Thomson Reuters shall supply unbiased and reliable news services to newspapers, news agencies, broadcasters and other media subscribers and to businesses governments, institutions, individuals and others with whom Thomson Reuters has or may have contracts;
04 That Thomson Reuters shall pay due regard to the many interests which it serves in addition to those of the media; and 05 That no effort shall be spared to expand, develop and adapt the news and other services and products so as to maintain its leading position in the international news and information business. Please contact Andrew Goldner with any questions. andrew.goldner@thomsonreuters.com
DIRECTOR, EVENTS Lucinda Maguire lucinda.maguire@thomsonreuters.com ACCOUNT MANAGERS Yvonne Cheung (Senior Account Manager, China) yvonne.cheung@thomsonreuters.com William Lo (North Asia and Global Business Development Manager, North Asia) william.lo@thomsonreuters.com Rebecca Ng (Account Manager, North Asia) rebecca.ng@thomsonreuters.com Brian Chu (Account Manager, North Asia) brian.chu@thomsonreuters.com Wendy Tan (Account Manager, Southeast Asia) wendy.tan@thomsonreuters.com Alison Towle (Account Manager, Middle East) alison.towle@thomsonreuters.com DESIGNERS John Agra Yvette Chiu TRAFFIC MANAGERs Ivy Tsang (Hong Kong) Rozidah Jambari (Singapore) intern Jacob Michael Wildstein ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS is available by subscription. Please call +852 3762 3269 (Hong Kong), +65 6775 5088 (Singapore) for details or visit www.legalbusinessonline.com Copyright is reserved throughout. No part of this publication can be reproduced in whole or part without the express permission of the editor. Contributions are invited, but copies of work should be kept, as ALB can accept no responsibility for loss. THOMSON REUTERS 10/F, Cityplaza 3, Taikoo Shing, Hong Kong T (852) 3762 3269 | F (852) 2154 6425 www.thomsonreuters.com
EDITORIAL
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
3
Cities to keep an eye on Very often legal publications such as ours tend to focus on the key cities of a country - Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Tokyo, Seoul, Singapore etc. – which makes sense because these are the market hubs where financial, legal and commercial business are centred. However, increasingly investors are casting their gazes a bit further away from these core, saturated cities for new opportunities. This month, our cover story features a handful of “Next Generation Cities”: Guangzhou, Osaka, Penang and Bangalore. As reporters Kanishk Verghese and Seher Hussain note, Guangzhou’s GDP is poised to catch up with that of Hong Kong and Singapore by 2015, and Osaka may be the new production hub of Japan as companies consider shifting operations west in light of the natural disasters that have plagued the east coast. We also bring you a fascinating interview with the managing partners of King & Wood Mallesons. Ever since the two powerhouse firms combined in March, peers on both the international and PRC front have been keeping a close eye on how the merger is proceeding and how clients are responding to this new hybrid player. Has the firm spearheaded a trend where others will try to emulate its success through combinations? Find out the managing team’s views on this and more on page 44. To kick off a regular section about women in law we are planning to incorporate into the magazine, in this issue we are featuring several of Asia’s most prominent female lawyers on page 12. In a ALB_210x87mm_bleed10mm.pdf 1 2011-8-12 11:04:50
cluster of profiles and a Q&A, these ladies share their views with Seher Hussain on their career journeys and how they balance raising a family with their work responsibilities. Akiko Mikumo, the Asia managing partner of Weil, Gotshal & Manges, explains how firms have become more understanding of the female professional: “Now it’s not seen as an accommodation, but seen as something that you need to do in order to keep the talent; it’s more of an economic decision. If you want talent, you need to adjust your work environment. It is very tough to have children in this profession, but it’s more doable now, certainly.” In addition to these interesting reads, we bring you features that explore the state of India’s economy, new proposed IPO sponsor regulations in Hong Kong and what else is driving Macau’s growth beyond casinos. Please enjoy and if you have any comments or feedback, feel free to get in touch with the editorial team.
CANDICE MAK North Asia Regional Editor, Asian Legal Business Thomson Reuters
DEALS spotlight
4
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012 n your month at a glance Deal name
$7.1 billion
Jurisdiction
Value ($ mln)
China/U.S.
7100
M&A
China/Hong Kong
1000
Debt
U.S.
2600
M&A
238
M&A
U.S./Japan
3600
M&A
China/Brazil
1000
M&A
China/Hong Kong
2000
Debt
Deal type
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
M&A ALIBABA’S STAKE REPURCHASE FROM YAHOO! • The largest e-commerce M&A transaction ever, and the largest M&A transaction ever between a U.S. and Chinese company. • The second-largest cross-border M&A transaction involving a Chinese company in history. • Yahoo! will receive a consideration of about $7.1 billion from Alibaba, composed of at least $6.3 billion in cash proceeds and up to $800 million in newly-issued Alibaba preferred stock.
Firm
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Conyers Dill & Pearman Alibaba’s stake repurchase from Yahoo!
Munger, Tolles, & Olson Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer Fenwick & West Maples and Calder Baker & McKenzie Freehills
$2.6 billion
Yanzhou Coal Mining’s notes issuance worth $1 billion
M&A DALIAN WANDA’S ACQUISITION OF AMC ENTERTAINMENT • Dalian Wanda Group to buy out AMC’s current investment group, and additionally invest up to $500 million. • Dalian Wanda is one of China’s largest theatre owners and AMC is the world’s largest IMAX theatre owner. Together, they are expected to create the world’s number one cinema operator.
King & Wood Mallesons Davis Polk & Wardwell Jingtian & Gongcheng
Dalian Wanda Group’s acquisition of AMC Entertainment
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Davis Polk & Wardwell White & Case King & Wood Mallesons
$3 billion financing for the privatisation of Alibaba.com
Walkers Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
Hong Kong/ China
Fangda Partners Maples and Calder
$3.6 billion M&A marubeni corp’s acquisition of gavilon • The acquisition will nearly double Marubeni’s grain trading volumes. • The largest overseas acquisition in agriculture or energy by a Japanese company since 2006.
Marubeni Corp’s acquisition of Gavilon for $3.6 billion
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Jones Day
State Grid Corporation of China acquisition of assets in Brazil from Actividades de Construcción y Servicios
Baker & McKenzie SFME Advogados Davis Polk & Wardwell
CNOOC Finance’s $2 billion bond offering
Linklaters Walkers Commerce & Finance
07.2012
BRIEFS
05
the big story
Banding together
FORUM What does class action mean for Hong Kong? “Because there are no class actions and no significant civil litigation here relating to prospectus disclosure, the enforcement burden falls on the SFC. If investors could band together to effectively impose accountability on various parties, this might have a bearing on what rules the SFC would come out with.”
A call for class action By Kanishk Verghese
I
t has been a tense month for bankers in Hong Kong. On May 9, the Securities and Futures Commission released a consultation paper proposing tightening the code of conduct for IPO sponsors, including holding them civilly and criminally liable for listing prospectuses. Just two weeks later, the city’s banking and finance sector experienced another headache. The territory’s Law Reform Commission recommended legislation to allow class action lawsuits to help investors seek damages through a single representative. The proposed system would only apply to consumer fraud and product liability cases, but not to investments such as securities. The proposal to introduce class action in Hong Kong was first circulated in 2009, after investors of financial instruments issued by the defunct Lehman Brothers sustained substantial losses. Hong Kong currently allows multi-party proceedings, but the existing rules have been criticised as inadequate. Local law stipulates that losing parties must pay for their opponent’s legal cost, which has proved a sizeable disincentive for individual investors seeking damages. “Right now, the incentive for an investor to sue is low. The amount you spend on litigation could easily outstrip any loss you have on your investment,” says Steven Winegar, a partner at Paul Hastings’ Hong Kong office. Lawyers, therefore, agree that the introduction of class action lawsuits will have a positive effect on market behaviour, leading many companies to carefully revisit their corporate governance and due diligence procedures. Although the primary concern for corporate
Steven Winegar Paul Hastings
“In Hong Kong, you don’t really see, with a few exceptions, litigation following on from listing applications. Part of the reason for that is because there is no class action mechanism in Hong Kong. For your typical retail investor, it’s almost worth moving on to the next transaction rather than worrying about bringing claims. But that slightly changes if there is more of a class action framework in Hong Kong.” Matt Emsley Herbert Smith
executives is, not surprisingly, to satisfy its stakeholders, the introduction of class action legislation is likely to push corporations into being more watchful of their risk framework. Banks and financial institutions in Hong Kong will have to face the possibility of a marked rise in lawsuits, as ordinary retail investors will likely band together with renewed vigour to claim damages. Banks will have some time to prepare, however, as legal experts agree that class action may take several years to implement. “I think it would be a seismic event in the market, and for that reason, a class action regime will take years to work through the system. There are no assurances that this will get done,” says Winegar.
“It is not a question of black and white, and it’s not a question of all class action or all individual liability. It is that shade of grey that we have to find. How far should liability extend? I think that’s the question we should be posing.” Bryane Michael
visiting fellow, the University of Hong Kong
6
BRIEFS
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012
GC INTERVIEW
‘See the forest for the trees’
JASON F. COHEN
Vice president and General Counsel – Asia-Pacific Starwood Hotels and Resorts
REUTERS/Jeff Haynes
ALB: How is your legal team structured? JC: The legal team for the AsiaPacific is structured around three regional areas: China, India, and the rest of Asia. Collectively, we cover all countries in the region. The majority of the team sits here in Singapore (which is our AsiaPacific headquarters), but we also have lawyers in Shanghai for our China practice and New Delhi for our India practice. The lawyers cover all practice areas for their regions but the largest share of the work is transactional, with the focus on negotiating and documenting new hotel deals. ALB: How is being an in-house lawyer for a hospitality company different from that of other companies? JC: Starwood is a large global enterprise, but each hotel acts as a separate complex business unit. This means we really become ingrained in the local jurisdictions in which we operate. More specifically, the trend for large hospitality companies is to focus on the management and franchise businesses as opposed to owning hotels outright. The business has become centred on longterm management and franchise
agreements. The role of the lawyer is critical because these contracts are very complex, and the company must be adept at navigating through these legal documents. It gives the lawyers a lot of visibility and opportunity to be very close to the core of the business. ALB: What are the most important qualities someone in your role must possess? JC: Understanding the hospitality industry is critical, as is having a good knowledge of a wide range of practice areas. International experience is also important. In my particular role, one must be able to digest comparative law issues and consider how they relate to the big picture. You have to understand the local law, and also be able to put that up against some of the other legal systems to assess whether a particular issue is material. ALB: How would you describe the strategy for the legal team? JC: Viewing ourselves as business partners is a key strategy. The legal team does not just give advice, it also owns the result. When transitioning from a firm lawyer to an in-house lawyer, there might be a tendency to view the role of the lawyer as dispensing advice and stopping there. However, to be really successful,
the team must take on the role of problem solver, give practical advice and be vested in the decision. ALB: How would you describe your criteria for selecting external counsel? JC: We would initially gravitate towards a hospitality practice if it exists in a particular jurisdiction. If that does not exist, we would look for lawyers who are very interested in our business. We like to partner with firms who view our work as strategic for their practices. ALB: What is the best advice you have ever received? JC: It is more an adage: “Being able to see the forest for the trees” guides me through my work. For lawyers, it is sometimes hard to find the right balance between being very thorough and detail-oriented, which is critical for the legal profession, and keeping your eye on the big picture. Given the wide variety of work that comes across my desk, being able to identify the most important issues quickly and finding ways to resolve them in a fashion that is in line with our overall business objectives is really the key to success. That old adage steers me through times when it is difficult to navigate a lot of complex details.
BRIEFS
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
7
Not losing steam Demand for U.S. Treasuries is still hot, although foreign purchases of long-term treasuries have fluctuated greatly over the past few months, with inflows varying between $10.1 billion and $36.9 billion in February and March respectively. Recently, countries with both young and old economies have been investing in the U.S. Treasuries as a way to insulate their currencies from the plights of the worldwide economic downturn, and to curb inflation. Both Brazil and China regularly buy dollars in currency markets to prevent excessive appreciation of their own currencies, and stash the money in U.S. government bonds. The replication of this trend can be seen across the globe through oil exporting countries, other Asian markets such as Japan, Taiwan, and Hong Kong, and in the Caribbean. Despite last year’s credit rating decrease, the strong reputation of U.S. Treasury bonds continues to precede it worldwide.
FOREIGN HOLDERS OF U.S. TREASURIES Foreigners decreased their purchases of long-dated U.S. securities in February as capital inflows rose to $10.1 billion. China – the largest investor in U.S. Treasuries – grew its holdings to $1.18 trillion, up 2.1 percent from its holdings a year ago. Top foreign holders of U.S. Treasuries – $bln
Percent change from a year ago
China Japan Oil exporters Brazil Caribbean banking centers Taiwan Switzerland Russia Hong Kong Luxembourg Belgium U.K. 0
200
400
600
800
1000 1200
2.1 23.1 20.8 16.1 32.7 14.2 37.5 8.9 13.4 79.1 318.8 -65.3
140
Net long-term capital inflows* – $bln
120 100 80 60 40 20 0
2010
2011
'12
* Excluding swaps Source: U.S. Treasury Department Reuters graphic/Stephen Culp
16/04/12
FOLLOW US ON TWITTER! @ALB_Magazine With its portfolio of leading titles, online services, Law Awards and In-House Legal Summits, ALB provides authoritative and unbiased insights, and unmatched networking and business development opportunities, to legal professionals throughout Asia Pacific and the Middle East.
ALB twitter ad HP_final.indd 1
31/5/12 10:33 AM
8
BRIEFS
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS juLY 2012
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT
THIS MONTH’S TOP HEADLINES FROM WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM
REUTERS/Siu Chiu
Four firms star in CNOOC’s $2 bln bond issuance
Davis Polk & Wardwell, Walkers, Linklaters, and Commerce & Finance recently acted in CNOOC Finance’s $2 billion guaranteed bond offering worth. The two part Reg S/144A notes comprised $1.5 billion tenyear notes at 3.875 percent yield due 2022, and $500 million 30-year notes at 5 percent due 2042. The notes were listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
REUTERS/Tony Gentile
Women urged to consider all options when returning to law A senior legal practitioner has urged women in law to seriously consider what they want in returning to work after a career break and what options are available to them. “Given that women lawyers spend a lot of time getting qualified and working in law, it makes sense for them to return to law at an appropriate time for them and their family,” said Kathryn Kearley, a sole practitioner and lecturer at The College of Law.
REUTERS/Kacper Pempel
China eases restrictions on corporate forex transfers China will allow domestic firms to use foreign currency loans from domestic banks to finance operations overseas in a move to promote overseas expansion by Chinese companies, the country’s foreign exchange regulator told Reuters on Friday. The loosening of foreign exchange restrictions on domestic firms is intended to support China’s “Going Out” policy.
REUTERS/Bobby Yip
Freshfields, CC, S&C advise on Telefónica’s buyback of China Unicom stake
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Sullivan & Cromwell, and Clifford Chance have acted in the China United Network Communications Group’s (CUNCG) share buyback of its subsidiary China Unicom from Spain’s Telefónica SA. In the transaction, CUNCG is expected to acquire 4.56 percent of China Unicom’s stake at 1.1 billion euros ($1.4 billion) through a wholly-owned subsidiary.
REUTERS/Tim Wimborne
Hong Kong auditors battle against criminal liability law
Auditors in Hong Kong are mounting an increasingly vocal campaign against a proposed new law that would make them face criminal sanctions for shoddy audit work. A new Companies Bill is being considered, which includes a clause that would make auditors criminally liable if they knowingly or recklessly omit a required statement from an audit report.
REUTERS/Tim Chong
U.S. lawmakers probe China telecoms for ties, contracts
U.S. lawmakers are pressing two top Chinese technology companies to disclose their inner workings in a probe into security threats to U.S. telecommunications. Closely held Huawei Technologies Co and ZTE Corp were asked by letter to document, among other things, their interactions with the Chinese Communist Party and advice given to them by five consultancies.
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
NEWS
9
REUTERS
Insight: Nomura collides with Japan’s insider trading crackdown By Nathan Layne and Taro Fuse
TOKYOJapanese regulators reached breaking point in March after months of stonewalling by the country’s largest broker, which they suspected of leaking confidential information to clients ahead of share sales. A trail of evidence in a near 2-year probe into pre-sale tip-offs, the most extensive in Japan for years, had taken investigators deep inside Nomura Securities, part of the 87-year-old group at the heart of Japan’s capital markets, but the firm’s top executives kept stalling, say people involved in the investigation. In late March, bankers waiting outside the office of Shozaburo Jimi, then Financial Services Minister overseeing the regulatory agency, were startled to hear him bellow to aides: “I haven’t had one call from Nomura yet. What the hell’s going on?” From interviews with more than a dozen bankers, regulators and lawyers with direct knowledge of the investigation emerges a picture of a reluctant watchdog roused into action in 2010 by whistleblowers with statistical evidence that the Tokyo market was rigged against share issuers and investors. It is also a tale of a ‘too-big-to-punish’ broker - Nomura - skirting around flimsy insider trading laws, and cosy ties with longstanding clients, cemented by a culture of entertaining and gift giving that set the backdrop for sharing corporate secrets. Nomura this month acknowledged for the first time that its employees had leaked confidential information on three separate public share offerings in 2010. On Monday, it was omitted from a list of institutions chosen by the Ministry of Finance to underwrite a government sale of around $6 billion worth of shares in Japan Tobacco. Nomura declined to comment on specific issues for this article, but referred to a June 8 statement it issued after Japan’s Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission (SESC) recommended fining a U.S. company for trading on non-public information about a share offering by Tokyo Electric Power - one of the three cases involving Nomura. “Nomura takes this matter seriously and will implement improvement measures and disciplinary action in accordance with the results of the internal investigation and the Commission’s inspection,” the broker said
then. By the middle of 2011, the SESC had contacted the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and was poring over data that showed Nomura failed to protect sensitive information on companies planning share issues, the sources say. The showdown between the SESC and Nomura developed behind the scenes for months, according to the sources, who could not speak publicly about the matter as the probe is ongoing. Regulators are likely in the weeks ahead to order Nomura to improve its internal controls, sources say, after finding that confidential information leaked from its syndicate desk to its institutional sales team, in breach of basic banking safeguards, and then was passed on to clients. It could even be ordered to close some operations for weeks, and regulators may flex their muscles and push for a leadership shake-up at Nomura. In past insider trading cases, Japanese regulators have tended to slap wrists rather than go for the jugular. Under weaker insider trading rules than most developed markets, the person leaking information is practically immune from prosecution unless they trade on that inside knowledge. But Nomura has lost a third of its market value since a first insider trading case was announced, reflecting investor worries about the impact on its business. In addition to being left off government deals, some investors may stop trading with it for a certain period in line with their own compliance rules. “If Nomura were dropped from deals there would naturally be an impact on its business. Their reputation would take a hit and its market share would fall,” said Azuma Ohno, a brokerage analyst at Barclays in Tokyo. “There’s nothing but risk here.” BORN AGAIN? On April 25, investigators charged into Nomura’s offices and set up base on the 14th floor of the Urbannet Otemachi Building, a high-rise that was once a showpiece of the financial district but had earned the nickname “bubble tower” because it was finished in 1990 right after Japan’s economic bubble collapsed. Yet even in the days after the rare escalation to an on-site investigation, SESC of-
ficials struggled to gain traction with lowerlevel executives who insisted there were no systemic problems. Investigators believed CEO Kenichi Watanabe and Chief Operating Officer Takumi Shibata were getting a censored version of events. “Watanabe and Shibata are not getting straight information from the sales force, who are in their own world,” one of the sources said in early May. “Once senior management understands and reveals the bad practice, Nomura can be born again.” In one case, when investigators identified a junior Nomura equity saleswoman in her 20s as the source of a leak on a $6 billion offering by energy firm Inpex in 2010, they were told by the brokerage she couldn’t answer further questions because the stress of the investigation had become too much. The stonewalling became harder to defend after March when Chuo Mitsui Asset Trust and Banking, now part of Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings, admitted to insider trading on Inpex and privately told regulators Nomura was the source of the leak. That kind of leak had been widespread in Tokyo after 2008, an almost sure-fire way for funds to turn an easy bet by shorting shares and a simple way for brokers to boost commissions in a weak market. A recapitalizing boom in 2009 and 2010 in the wake of the financial crisis lit a fire under such trades. In secondary offerings, existing shareholders can see their stakes diluted as more shares come on the market. A Reuters analysis shows shares of companies in 20 of the top 25 secondary offerings in 2010 underperformed the benchmark TOPIX index finance/markets/ index?symbol=jp%21ixj”>.TOPX by an average of nearly 4 times in the three weeks prior to the deal being announced. The analysis did not account for media reports that sometimes preceded announcements. That stock performance gap nevertheless equated to $16 billion in market value, hurting shareholders and increasing the issuers’ cost of capital.
The rest of this report can be found on reuters.com
LEAGUE TABLES
10
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012
CHINA Announced M&A Legal Rankings
HONG KONG Announced M&A Legal Rankings
Jingtian & Gongcheng
5,109.3
DEALS: 11 RANK
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
11,949.8
VALUE ($mln)
DEALS: 5
MARKET SHARE: 6.5
LEGAL ADVISeR
VALUE ($MLN)
DEALS
MARKET SHARE
RANK
VALUE ($mln)
MARKET SHARE: 31.4
LEGAL ADVISeR
VALUE ($MLN)
DEALS
MARKET SHARE
2
Baker & McKenzie
4,627.4
7
5.9
2*
Fangda Partners
7,100.0
1
18.7
3
Linklaters
4,551.6
7
5.8
2*
Skadden
7,100.0
1
18.7
4*
Stikeman Elliott
4,538.4
2
5.8
2*
Fenwick & West LLP
7,100.0
1
18.7
4*
Weil Gotshal & Manges
4,538.4
3
5.8
2*
Munger Tolles & Olson
7,100.0
1
18.7
6
Tian Yuan Law Firm
3,778.6
5
4.8
2*
O’Melveny & Myers
7,100.0
1
18.7
7
Clifford Chance
3,680.9
8
4.7
2*
Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz
7,100.0
1
18.7
8
Davis Polk & Wardwell
3,093.2
5
3.9
2*
White & Case LLP
7,100.0
1
18.7
9
Sullivan & Cromwell
3,053.6
2
3.9
2*
Weil Gotshal & Manges
7,100.0
2
18.7
10
Grandway Law Offices
2,869.8
2
3.6
10
Allen & Overy
6,248.1
6
16.4
(*tie) Based on Rank Value including Net Debt of announced M&A deals (excluding withdrawn M&A)
(*tie) Based on Rank Value including Net Debt of announced M&A deals (excluding withdrawn M&A)
JAPAN Announced M&A Legal Rankings
SOUTH KOREA Announced M&A Legal Rankings
Lee & Ko
Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu
26,484.3
DEALS: 36 RANK
6,220.0
VALUE ($mln)
MARKET SHARE: 34.8
LEGAL ADVISeR
DEALS: 29
VALUE ($MLN)
DEALS
MARKET SHARE
RANK
VALUE ($mln)
MARKET SHARE: 26.0
LEGAL ADVISeR
VALUE ($MLN)
DEALS
MARKET SHARE
2
Nishimura & Asahi
20,214.2
43
26.6
2
Jipyong Jisung
3,526.1
2
14.7
3
Jones Day
8,306.4
8
10.9
3*
Freehills
3,309.1
1
13.8
4
Skadden
7,753.5
7
10.2
3*
Latham & Watkins
3,309.1
1
13.8
5
Paul, Weiss
6,133.2
2
8.1
5
Kim & Chang
2,778.7
35
11.6
6
Mori Hamada & Matsumoto
5,807.0
58
7.6
6
Bae Kim & Lee
2,383.2
12
10.0
7
Blake Cassels & Graydon
5,600.0
1
7.4
7
Yulchon
1,018.6
6
4.3
8
Hogan Lovells
4,255.2
5
5.6
8
Shin & Kim
1,009.1
10
4.2
9
Sullivan & Cromwell
3,810.8
5
5.0
9
Yoon & Yang
447.2
3
1.9
10
Bennett Jones
3,347.2
3
4.4
10
Allen & Overy
429.9
2
1.8
(*tie) Based on Rank Value including Net Debt of announced M&A deals (excluding withdrawn M&A)
(*tie) Based on Rank Value including Net Debt of announced M&A deals (excluding withdrawn M&A)
160 140 120 100
Series1 94.5
94.0
80
64.0 63.0
60
72.8 54.5
Series2 112.5 103.4
130.3 104.8
99.7
92.2
70.6
61.7
3,000 137.3 126.4 130.2 128.3 127.9 2,500 114.7 112.2 107.5 107.3 101.1 2,000 97.9 83.8 81.8 1,500
143.7
75.4 54.1
1,000 500
40 20
0 1Q 05
3Q 05
1Q 06
3Q 06
1Q 07
3Q 07
1Q 08
3Q 08
1Q 09
3Q 09
1Q 10
3Q 10
1Q 11
3Q 11
1Q 12
NOTES: League tables, quarterly trend, and deal list are based on the nation of either the target, acquiror, target ultimate parent, or acquiror ultimate parent at the time of the transaction. Announced M&A transactions excludes withdrawn deals. Deals with undisclosed dollar values are rank eligible but with no corresponding Rank Value. Non-US dollar denominated transactions are converted to the US dollar equivalent at the time of announcement of terms. North Asia includes China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea, Japan. Data accurate as of June 27, 2012
No. of Transactions
Rank Value US$ Billion
ANY NORTH ASIA INVOLVEMENT ANNOUNCED M&A ACTIVITY - QUARTERLY TREND
APPOINTMENTS
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
LATERAL HIRES NAME
Leaving
GOING TO
PRACTICE
LOCATION
Seung Chong
Proskauer Rose
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
Private equity and M&A
Hong Kong
Jie Huang
Telstra Australia Corp.
Daniel Lee
Shanghai Leaven Attorneys-at-Law (affiliate law firm of Taiwan firm Lee & Li)
Jingtian & Gongcheng
Capital markets & Corporate
Shanghai
Matthew Lewis
Morgan Stanley
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
Capital markets
Beijing
Jun Liu
Morrison & Foerster
Jingtian & Gongcheng
Private equity and M&A
Beijing
Spencer Park
Asia Pacific Land
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison
Private equity and M&A
Hong Kong
Benjamin Qiu
Innovation Works
Cooley
Business & Technology
Shanghai
Phillip Rompotis
Melbourne TEC Chambers
Stephenson Harwood
Construction & Dispute resolution
Hong Kong
Sean Tai
O’Melveny & Myers
Paul Hastings
M&A and Private equity
Shanghai
Dirk Walker
Dewey & LeBoeuf
King & Wood Mallesons
Energy & Resources
Beijing
Paul Weidong Wang
DeHeng Law Offices
Dechert
Venture capital & Private equity
Beijing
Dina Yin
Linklaters
King & Wood Mallesons
Energy & Resources
Beijing
Christina Zhang
Johnston Controls
Cooley
Business & Technology
Shanghai
Ingrid Zhu-Clark
Dewey & LeBoeuf
Morgan Lewis
Energy & Resources
Beijing
Cadwalader, Wickersham, & Taft
Finance and M&A
Beijing
Asia ex-Japan Legal & Compliance Best Headhunting Executive: Rank 1 Asia ex-Japan Legal & Compliance Best Contingency Firm: Rank 2 Asia ex-Japan Legal & Compliance Best Retained Firm: Rank 3
The Recruiters Partners speak to in Asia. Discreet. Professional. Effective. CmlAsia
CareerAsia
Partners • Team Moves • Associates • In House +852 2836 6382
www.cmlrecruitment.com.hk
11
12
WOMEN in women IN law LAW
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS JULY 2012
WOMEN IN LAW ALMOST ONE OUT OF EVERY TWO PEOPLE IN THE WORLD IS FEMALE. YET, WOMEN STILL FACE MYRIAD ISSUES WHEN IT COMES TO BUSINESS. HOW DO THEY MAKE IT TO THE TOP? WHAT OBSTACLES DO THEY FACE? HOW DO THEY JUGGLE THEIR FAMILY COMMITMENTS AND PROFESSIONAL OBLIGATIONS? HAS FEMALE PARTICIPATION AT SENIOR MANAGEMENT LEVELS INCREASED OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS IN ASIA? SEHER HUSSAIN INVESTIGATES.
F
irst, a quick overview of the state of play. A 2012 Grant Thornton report indicated that 32 percent of senior management roles were held by women in Southeast Asia, a significant increase over the EU (24 percent), Latin America (22 percent) and North America (18 percent). From ASEAN, the Philippines and Thailand easily swept the top spots with a resounding 39 percent female participation rate, while India with 14 percent and Japan with 5 percent lagged behind. Several factors play into these statistics, the most notable being that of a built-in support system. The resounding refrain from marketplace sources was that female professionals in Asia have access to affordable childcare and an extended family network, lending them greater freedom than their Western counterparts. However, the problems faced by female
lawyers in Asia are also unique to the region ranging from traditional-minded clients, who may prefer male partners on their accounts, to conservative societal pressure where ambition may be frowned upon. From India to Indonesia, Hong Kong to Singapore, ALB takes a closer look at these pressing issues, presenting a snapshot of powerful and influential female lawyers in Asia; combining a Q&A with Tilleke & Gibbins’ powerhouse duo Darani Vachanavuttivong and Tiziana Sucharitkul and profiles of Indian trailblazer Zia Mody, corporate M&A maven Akiko Mikumo, capital markets pundit Teresa Ko, and Indonesia’s redoubtable Melli Darsa. Alongside is the coverage of ALB’s Singapore Women in Law forum, a recent event that brought together over 60 in-house counsel and private practice lawyers to frankly discuss today’s hot button topics.
WOMEN IN LAW
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
Tending Tilleke A formidable pair, Darani Vachanavuttivong and Tiziana Sucharitkul are co-managing partners of the Southeast Asian firm Tilleke & Gibbins. Focusing on intellectual property and dispute resolution work, here they chat about the challenges of being female lawyers, juggling their roles as mothers and managing partners, and the advantages of living in Asia
Women handle a variety of roles - acting as a mentor, a leader, a mother and a professional - all in one sometimes. How do you balance them all? TS: It’s certainly not easy to balance everything. Both Darani and I have families and young children and our lives are very full, especially with travel schedules to work with our international client base. You have to be organised and you have to prioritise, be systematic, but also flexible because once in a while things go wrong, and you need to be able to adapt quickly. You have to have a good support system, both at work as well as at home. We both find that if everything clicks, the rewards can be great. But it hasn’t been easy. We are also fortunate to live in a place like Thailand where cultural and structural factors come into play to our benefit. We have, and rely on, great family support. It’s not unusual for in-laws or parents to live close by and help take care of the children. There is also affordable child care unlike some countries in the West, so we are very lucky. Technology is also a factor; being able to work remotely gives us the flexibility to leave the office early sometimes or to come in a little later, or just to get work done while sitting in the Bangkok traffic. DV: It’s not easy to balance a working life and personal life, but I’m quite lucky that I receive good support from my husband and my family so I can feel free to work. But I also balance time with my family whenever I have time to give to them. So I don’t feel that I have any problem in balancing my working life and family life. Top tier lawyers are well known for working long hours. Realistically speaking, is this going to change in the future? TS: Providing legal services is a very personal thing. It is often based on the one-on-one relationships that you have developed with clients. So if you have managed to
build your career to become a top-tier lawyer, it’s often you that the clients want. I don’t think this will change; so in fact, the more reputable you become, the busier you will be. DV: I do not think the long hours will change much. You can, however, reduce long hours by having a very strong supporting team. Research continues to show that having women in senior management roles is beneficial for business. Yet the path for many women to the top of the legal industry is difficult. What are some of the main factors that you would pick out as being major hurdles? TS: The major hurdle that I think most women face—especially in this industry—is that the legal profession is
(L-R) Darani Vachanavuttivong and Tiziana Sucharitkul
a male-dominated field with many men in leadership positions. We’ve been very lucky to work at Tilleke & Gibbins as our firm is a very supportive place for women. It’s not easy to balance work and family, but we are in a place that has been as supportive as it could possibly be. The firm has always promoted women to leadership roles at all levels, and being a woman at this firm is not an obstacle to climbing the ladder. Within our firm leadership, 40 percent of our partners are women and 75 percent of non-legal department heads are women. This essentially means that 92 percent of employees in the firm work in
13
14
WOMEN IN LAW
“You have to be organised and you have to prioritise, be systematic, but also flexible because once in a while things go wrong, and you need to be able to adapt quickly. You have to have a good support system, both at work as well as at home.” TIZIANA SUCHARITKUL
departments which are headed by women. So there’s a very strong feeling here that you are not going to be discriminated against for being a woman. We have a strong family support system in place. Quite often, people bring their children to work if somehow their daycare falls through for the day. All our social activities, New Year parties, lawyers’ retreats and firm outings are for families, not just for the lawyers or staff members themselves. So we do have things in place that lead people to believe that this is a very family- and womenfriendly environment. In the market generally, however, it’s difficult to overcome the basic fact that women are primary family caregivers. In this male-dominated industry, some of the male leadership can be unforgiving in that they don’t take that into account and don’t allow flexibility for the way women must manage their work-life balance. DV: This is part of the process and development of a culture changing and evolving. In the past, families would only send their sons to study abroad, so it was men only who rose to become the top management. Now, however, things are changing. Sons and daughters are being given equal educational opportunities, and hopefully this will result in more and more women being represented at the top management levels. One hurdle that remains is that women tend to devote themselves to the family more than men, and that will probably not change any time soon. Do you think those obstacles will still be in place for the next generation of female lawyers, or are things improving? TS: In countries which face greater problems of retention of female lawyers, there is a lot being done to improve the working environment for women. The workplace realises how valuable women are to the industry, and are implementing various schemes and programmes to improve the retention problem; for example, allowing for part-time partners, implementing flexible working hours, organising day care at work, etc. So the situation is improving. However, simply because women are the ones who bear children and are usually the primary family caregivers, it will be very difficult to completely overcome all current obstacles. DV: Thailand has improved a lot, as well as Malaysia, Hong Kong and the Philippines. There have been recent studies that show that Thailand is ranked in the top three in terms of having women in senior management positions, together with the Philippines. We have many
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS JULY 2012
females at the top management level of the law firms and opportunities for female lawyers are open — just look at our female prime minister! How well would you say Thai firms are performing when it comes to female participation? TS: If you try to think of predominant women in other firms in Thailand, there are immediately five or six names that come to mind. To name a few firms, Weerawong C&P, Linklaters, Chandler & Thong-ek and Baker & McKenzie all have very senior women partners. The percentage of women lawyers in Thailand continues to increase every year. We see that in our own recruiting process, when students apply here as new graduates or even in internship programmes. Currently, the numbers reflect that more than half of our applicants are women. This is a positive trend. Do you think there is evidence of any direct discrimination against women in law firms in your region? DV: Not within the law firm itself. However, we have experienced a small number of clients who have expressed a desire to be represented by male lawyers. This is thankfully rare, but it does happen. Do you think effective networking is an integral skill for female lawyers? TS: Absolutely; networking is a critical skill for all lawyers. Here in Asia, for cultural and other reasons, women may face more challenges when networking than in other places. However, there are challenges everywhere and we just have to learn to work around them. How about mentoring? Is that something you place importance on? DV: Mentoring is very important; at this firm, it is one of the first priorities. We provide that to all lawyers whether they are male or female. TS: Mentoring is an important aspect for any firm. For the growth and continuance of the firm, we have to make sure that it’s part of the culture. Of course, some people are better at mentoring than others, but everyone is encouraged to do their best and we do have a system in place to acknowledge senior associates and partners who contribute in mentoring our more junior lawyers. Do you have any advice for up-and-coming female lawyers? DV: Work hard, have patience, learn new things and make a commitment to keep learning, even as you progress further in your career. Always be interested in learning more and more, because new legal and business developments are always happening, and you have to keep up with the changes. TS: Work hard and practice in areas that are of interest to you and that you enjoy. I believe that if you enjoy the work that you do, you’re more likely to be successful and to find personal fulfillment in your career. That’s the most important thing. Have a goal and work towards it with the support of those around you.
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
Blazing a trail in India Zia Mody, premier corporate attorney a n d w e l l- k n o w n trailblazer, moved back to Bombay in the mid 1980s to start her own litigation practice. From there, her ascent has been dizzying; h e r f ir m, A ZB & Partners, is now a top tier corporate law firm that has succeeded hand in hand with India’s global rise to power. Looking back however, it clearly wasn’t the easiest of paths to tread. “I had come back from America, where there was a very different environment, and when I started practicing law in India, the first thing I did was actually litigation,” says Mody. “So really, I was exposed from day one to the cour t and there you found very few women, if any at all.” Despite the intimidating profile of the other litigators, Mody stuck to her father ’s advice, which urged her to be well-prepared and work harder than anyone else if she wanted to see results. Fast forward thirty years, and her firm, AZB & Partners, one of India’s largest, most prestigious law firms has a sizable chunk of female lawyers in its ranks. However, despite the business environment having changed so rapidly for women, hurdles inevitably remain. Mody says: “For women, it is really a struggle to maintain a work-life balance issue; nothing else. It’s just the guilt that continues non-stop. Do you sacrifice a children’s party because a client has a crisis, even though you have committed to that party? Do you not watch a movie over the weekend because
something has come up, but your daughter has bought the tickets? It is the guilt that prevents many women from really going the whole nine yards. The problem is, as with most other professions, the legal profession is completely exacting and demanding.” She does not see that changing in the future; pointing out that top lawyers are in demand constantly, whether it is from their clients, from people within the firm itself, or familial and community responsibilities. “I am a very committed Baha’i by religion, and I really feel that I have not given that part of my life and that passion enough of its due. There is never enough in your 24 hours!” Mody traces back her drive and ambition to her childhood. As the eldest of four children and the only daughter, she credits her mother for instilling the notion of equality in the family. “She believed that as the eldest, I should be afforded all the opportunities. So I ended up being the only child that went for an undergraduate education abroad. My three brothers stayed at home.” Now, her family network also plays a crucial part in her success as a female lawyer. “I have personally looked for a lot of support from my immediate family, from my in-laws, and a lot of real s up p o r t f r o m my husband in terms of being ver y secure of himself.” The environment clearly has evolved throughout her career, and she identifies a clear positive trend when she says: “Women are being recruited almost in the ratio of 50/50. It is a function of how they just do so much better in school, they work that much harder, are so much more committed. The sticking point is what happens to these women five or six years down the line; that is when it gets upsetting. When the pressures of maintaining a work-life balance becomes too much for many of us.” What is her advice to these young women? “What is most important is for her to stay the course, for her to understand that other people have the same problems,” says Mody, “The good news is that she is not alone in her stress. That other people have done it! She should look forward to that as well.”
WOMEN IN LAW
15
All-star dealmaker Akiko Mikumo, head of Weil, Gotshal & Manges’ Hong Kong office, managing partner for Asia and a member of the firm’s management committee, has clearly scaled many towering heights in her 30 years as a practicing corporate lawyer. However, when she first started out, the world was a very different place for women. “There were fewer women in the profession; it was very male- dominated,“ recalls Mikumo, “We are one of the firms that are way ahead in terms of making opportunities available. We had two or three women partners back then.” She continues, relating how stories would float around about how pregnant women could not appear before a judge. “Despite how shocking that may sound now, of course that was a different world back then. Women did not wear pants; we all had to wear suits and little bow ties. Thirty years is a short time, but (it is) a long time when it comes to social changes. So the world has changed for the better.” Mikumo asserts that although the business environment has become hospitable for women, the challenges that remain have become personal, not external. “It’s very difficult to still have a family, unless you live in Asia where there is affordable child care, especially when you are a young attorney.” What about when it comes to actually chasing that career? Has it become easier for women? “I work all the time,” affirms Mikumo, “Doesn’t matter what sex you are; if you want to succeed or if you want to achieve certain positions, you need to have passion, you need to have ambition, and you need to work hard.” She has seen professions and employers gradually become more understanding of female professionals. “Now, it’s not seen as an accommodation, but seen as something that you need to do in order to keep the talent; it’s more of an economic decision. If you want talent, you need to adjust your work
16
WOMEN IN LAW
environment. It is very tough to have children in this profession, but it’s more doable now, certainly.” Mikumo deals with an elite echelon of corporate law practitioners, but has this traditionally male field posed any problems? “M&A tends to be dominated by men as is the banking world,” she says, “But you certainly see a lot more women in high positions in banking and law, so I don’t find that to be a hurdle. The world in general is still male-dominated but it can’t be that bad if I’m doing this!” Mentoring is one of the methods she singles out as an integral part of any lawyer’s progression, male or female. It just shows you the path forward, she says. It makes you want to work harder, it gives you more confidence, and you are happier at the workplace if you have older people who are going to take you under their arm. “I have had some very key mentors at the firm from the minute I joined; people who really showed me things, and that contributes to the lawyer I am right now.” Any other advice for up-and-coming female lawyers? “Just make sure you really like what you are doing,” says Mikumo, “The legal profession, is it the greatest job on earth? No, it’s just like any other job. But you have got to like what you are doing; you have got to find something that really excites you. There are so many things that you can do with the law, becoming a lawyer at a private firm, go in-house, go to a bank, public interest law, etc. That is definitely the key to any success. You are not going to be good at it otherwise. It’s just going to become a job.”
An icon in Indonesia Melli Darsa, senior partner and founder of Melli Darsa & Co, is acclaimed for her high-profile securities, corporate f inance and M&A practice, and is frequently at the table for most of Indonesia’s multimillion dollar deals.
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS JULY 2012
“Sometimes, there is inherent pressure not to be so successful in Indonesia. There is a culture of not standing out, and women who are ambitious are not exactly the most admired people in this country.” MELLI DARSA
She struck out to establish the firm in 2002, but has always had ambitious goals. “Not working was never an option,” she says, “I had to work to basically fulfill the needs of a family. Nowadays, women do need to work even if their husbands work, and that was the situation that I faced when I first started this career.” Rising to the top in Indonesia has not been easy, given the somewhat conservative societal pressure. “In terms of ability, I find so many talented women, but the same numbers are not actually reaching the top ranks,” says Darsa, “It is also their own mindset; they sort of slow themselves down. Sometimes, there is inherent pressure not to be so successful in Indonesia. There is a culture of not standing out, and women who are ambitious are not exactly the most admired people in this country.” She emphasises that women who successfully scale the ladder are those that leave traditional firms to start their own ventures, those with a keen sense of entrepreneurial spirit. “What I have seen are women like myself getting out of a firm, setting up on my own, and then showing what we can really do because we have our own platform. That is still a challenge because at the moment, women are not able to reach the top by actually going through the normal motions.” Apart from structural problems, other roadblocks remain - long hours, demanding clients, and the elusive work-life balance. “Unfortunately, this is a service industry and the client is king,” says Darsa, “…and when transactions are under deadline, you have to fulfill them by working late. It’s not possible to demand that the profession changes, but the work environment and law schools have to change the way that they are training people and managing the firms.” The biggest issue is that of keeping women motivated, Darsa says, identifying a trend of a large proportion of females going into law
school, but within the third or fourth year of practice, dropping out due to the challenges of balancing their personal and professional needs. “They are trying to be a young mother and a young wife, and that is when they start saying ‘maybe this is way too tough’,” she says. “They basically get out of the rat race and do not fulfill their true potential, which could have been to become a very strong long-term lawyer. You need policies that are more sensitive and more supportive to women who are raising children.” At her firm, such policies include part-time nannies at the office, and flexible working hours. Mentoring is another key aspect. “It’s not just supervision, but really trying to find out what their potential is and helping them through the complexity of a career that is not as clear-cut for women as it is for men,” she says. Looking back, Darsa points out that many female professionals initially tried to undermine their femininity, and hid the fact that they are mothers. But given the change in the working environment, “mentoring has become more important than ever in order to encourage women to stay on if they do have the talent, the potential, the willingness, and the commitment.” “My life has not been perfect,” she says, “I divorced six years ago, I am a single mom, so of course there are pressures of a career. But what I share with young female lawyers is that basically you do have to focus on your relationships with your family and your spouse.” She continues, saying there are costs to success, “but some say that balance is about being the perfect mom and the perfect wife and the perfect lawyer. That may be, and some people are very fortunate to have achieved that, but that is not happiness to everybody. You need to know what is important to you, and I always say that it helps to love the profession because if not, they will be very easily discouraged.”
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
Commanding capital markets Teresa Ko is a founding par tner of Freshfields’ equit y capital markets practice and th e f ir m ’s China chairman. Based in Hong Kong and having practiced corporate law for over 25 years, she has a keen insight into the life of a powerful and successful female lawyer. Having started her career in the City of London at a firm which did have a number of female partners, she recalls that she did not come across any particular obstacles in the beginning of her career. Was she encouraged to be a working professional from a young age? “Not at all, though I was told by dad that being a fashion designer is not exactly a serious enough profession,” says Ko, “He didn’t steer me in any other way, but I liked the fact that a law degree is intellectually stimulating and it is a career that I know my father would approve of.” Much like any other high-powered professional, Ko also places priority on work-life balance: “It is not always easy to find, but multitasking and being hugely efficient certainly helps. I do try to find some balance in my life. These days, I enjoy visiting arts exhibitions and galleries, cooking at home with my children, and finding new shops as I still love fashion.” She affirms that “doing high-quality work for our clients and helping to develop and shape the market”, is a professional achievement she is proud of, while “personally, having a successful career with a very supportive husband and two teenage children who still want to talk to, and hang out with their mother, is my biggest achievement”. Long hours are another struggle, which realistically, is not going to change in the future. “Top tier lawyers are well known for working long hours because a prerequisite for being a good lawyer is to show commitment and hard work, “ says Ko, “But with modern technology, a commitment to teamwork, and accommodating firm policies, top lawyers
should also have a life outside work.” What does she think are some of the main hurdles facing female professionals today? “The main challenges are managing work and family responsibilities, the lack of role models in the workplace, and the effects of unconscious bias/ stereotyping,” she says taking from a research survey commissioned by Freshfields. Much like many other interviewees, she is
WOMEN IN LAW
17
fully committed to mentoring, believing that good mentoring gives mentees a trusted sounding board for support, advice, and guidance. Mentors can offer so much from their own experience and this is an important part of the nurturing of our talent, she says. As for advice for the next generation, she says: “Follow your dreams. Be yourself. Continue to learn. And remember, don’t give up!”
ALB Singapore Women in Law Forum In late May this year, ALB held its first ever Women in Law Forum event, bringing together over 60 in- house counsel and private practice lawyers to discuss the hot button topics of the day. The panel consisted of Deirdre Stanley, EVP and general counsel of Thomson Reuters; Maija Burtmanis, associate general counsel Alcon Asia, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; Rachel Eng, managing partner, WongPartnership; Lee Suet Fern, senior partner, Stamford Law Corporation; and moderator Tara Joseph, producer, Reuters Insider. One of the topics discussed was the importance of mentoring and support, a refrain that comes up over and over again when it comes to overcoming obstacles in the work place. Maija Burtmanis recalled that: “I look back and I am very conscious
that as I was growing as a lawyer, so many women gave me an opportunity. (And) that is not women within the law firm, just women within the banking sector. So many women are out there working, and when somebody stuck their neck out to give me that piece of work when I was young and was not very established, it was a big piece of work and it really meant something. She was a voice in the community who said, ‘Give it to her, she can do it.’ You cannot underestimate the importance of that support.” Other issues discussed included overcoming the challenges that are particular to women in the workplace, including work-life balance, external and internal obstacles, and the importance of hard work and networking. The panel discussion is part of an ongoing series of Women in Law events that will take place throughout Asia and the Middle East.
18
OP-ED
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS JULY 2012
WOMEN IN THE LEGAL JOB MARKET: IS IT A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD? ALMOST HALF OF ALL LAWYERS IN HONG KONG ARE FEMALE AND THE NUMBERS ARE CONTINUING TO RISE. ROB GREEN AND CLARA CHEUNG EXPLORE WHAT IS DRIVING THE INFLUX.
I
n a city where everyone is fighting for success, and law firms in particular are battling for the best talent and the leading position in the market, female lawyers are certainly at the forefront of this battle. Over the past 10 years, Hong Kong’s legal profession has seen a remarkable increase in the number of female lawyers. Where there were once only a handful of women in any position at all within law firms, female lawyers now constitute almost 50 percent of Hong Kong’s 10,000 lawyers, and in fact, 24 per cent of local law firm partners are women, according to the Law Society of Hong Kong. The supposed reasons behind the influx of female lawyers vary greatly, yet, whatever the reason, the resounding truth is that female lawyers are no longer a small minority in Hong Kong’s legal market, and the already significant number is on the increase. Many of the most well-respected firms in Hong Kong, whether local, U.S. or UK-based, are led by women; women who most likely started out as associates and have moved their way up through the ranks due to their sheer passion to succeed in the city’s competitive workplace. Stefania Lucchetti, partner at Howse Williams Bowers in Hong Kong, comments on the reasons why top level roles have traditionally been held by men as opposed to women, even though the majority of junior and midlevel roles tend to be successfully covered by women. “This sudden drop in numbers at top levels is not due to a lack of skill or ambition,” says Lucchetti. “But is often a consequence of
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
the fact that – at least based on my personal experience and perception – the last leg of the journey to partnership often happens when professionals are in the early to mid thirties, and, therefore, it coincides with a time when many individuals are also building families and having children. For obvious reasons, this often leaves women behind, as the biological and emotional change of pace required during pregnancy and in the first months of taking care of a newborn will rarely be physically and logistically compatible with a bid for partnership.” However, as time progresses, competition becomes greater and the fight for leadership goes on. Attitudes towards career progression are also changing, meaning women are rapidly seeking, and indeed succeeding in senior roles. “This is due in part to women becoming smarter about managing their career and not giving up their options,” says Lucchetti. “ Also the higher flexibility in office face hours, enabled by technology, helps take care of some of the logistical issues. I, therefore, believe that in a short period of time, we will see a levelling in gender diversity in partnership roles.” With increased competition inevitably comes an increase in opportunities for women in the legal job market. Female lawyers succeeding in senior roles create hope for other women, who will continue to work towards partnership, knowing it can be achieved. Christine Chang, joint managing partner at Maples and Calder, reaffirms this positivity, as she has personally seen the change in female leadership in Hong Kong. “For quite a few years from when I started at Maples, I was the only female lawyer in the Hong Kong office,” she states. “Nowadays, we are almost at 50:50. I am also pleased to see that many of my female peers from the early days are now in senior positions in their respective firms.” Chang believes that given the disproportionately high percentage of women graduating from law schools, the trend of women moving into senior positions in the legal job market will inevitably continue. “I understand that around 70 percent of Hong Kong law school graduates these days are women. This can only result, I hope, in the ratio of female to male partners in law firms increasing across the board. For one thing, at my firm we are certainly focusing more attention on women, as part of our overall diversity programme,” she says. The obvious question is, aside from firms
appearing to be more in favour of diversity, what effect does having more women in senior positions have on the legal market? It is important to note that the number of women professionals has increased across the board, not just in law firms but also in financial services. Anne-Marie Godfrey, a partner at Bingham McCutchen, thinks that “law firms in Asia are relatively meritocratic when it comes to promoting women. We find that many of the general counsel and chief operating officers at hedge funds with whom we work are female... and across our firm, we have a higher proportion of female partners than our peers.” This suggests that as many of the law firms’ clients are women, it may make it easier to understand one another and work well together if the senior roles at law firms are also filled by women. Godfrey goes on to say that she believes the reason for the increase in women in senior
OP-ED
19
is still predominantly a man’s world,” says Swartz. “For the most part, I don’t think that these mandates are necessary as the world’s view of women in business appears to be naturally evolving. In Hong Kong, we are witnessing an increasing presence of women in the corporate sphere, in senior managerial positions, serving on the board of directors and being appointed as CEOs.” “Over recent years, the legal profession has seen a steady increase in the number of female partners, so it is to be expected we are now witnessing them reach senior legal positions,” she continues. “As the first woman ever to manage a Blank Rome office in the 65-year history of the firm, I must say that I hope to be the first of many more to come.” Luccheti agrees with this view, but also notes that a temporary regulation that would promote a higher degree of diversity in boards of directors for the benefit of good
“I understand that around 70 percent of Hong Kong law school graduates these days are women. This can only result, I hope, in the ratio of female to male partners in law firms increasing across the board.” Christine Chang, Maples and Calder positions is due in part to the ease and lower cost of childcare in Asia: “It is true that gender balance at a senior management level in law firms should be more even, but I feel that the imbalance has arisen to a degree as a result of women exercising personal choices.” At Bingham, she comments there are a “number of firmwide initiatives to facilitate female partners and senior associates who have children, for example, by providing access to a life coach both before and after maternity leave”. It is undeniable that the world in general has recently been pushed towards an increased awareness about gender and racial equality in the workplace. However, Kristi Swartz, the managing partner at Blank Rome’s Hong Kong office, argues that this shift in the gender dynamics of managerial structures, both in law firms and the corporate world, was a phenomenon waiting to happen. “With many governments worldwide currently debating the relevance of introducing mandates for women in the boardroom, it seems undeniable that the corporate world
corporate governance, such as what has been implemented in several European countries, could help create more opportunities and accelerate the process. “I am in any event optimistic that an increasing number of excellent women professionals will take on senior leadership roles in the near future,” concludes the successful HWB partner. It is apparent, therefore, that times are changing in Hong Kong’s legal market, meaning that in comparison to 20 or even 10 years ago, women are adapting their career goals and are being given the opportunity to succeed in higher level positions. The demand for talent is ever-increasing, as it will across all professions in this fast-paced city, and women, quite rightly, are capitalising on these demands, giving themselves now-attainable targets and creating the hope of more opportunities for today’s female lawyers; a hope that can only continue to grow. This article was contributed by CML Recruitment
20
INDIA COUNTRY REPORT
INDIA’S
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS JULY 2012
HOUR
“THERE IS NO POINT BLAMING THE GREEKS OR THE SPANIARDS FOR INDIA’S ECONOMIC WOES. NOR ARE THE USUAL SUSPECTS, THE RAIN GODS, AT FAULT THIS TIME. GROWTH SLOWDOWN IS ESSENTIALLY HOME-MADE.” THE ECONOMIC TIMES
INDIA COUNTRY REPORT
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
21
OF DOUBT IT IS HARD TO IMAGINE THAT INDIA WAS, UNTIL A MERE COUPLE OF YEARS AGO, ONE OF THE MOST ATTRACTIVE OF THE WORLD’S NEW ECONOMIES. THE LUSTRE HAS NOTICEABLY FADED IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS, WITH GROWTH SLOWING, THE DEFICIT GAP WIDENING, AND THE RUPEE FALLING THROUGH THE FLOOR AS A RESULT OF STALLED REFORM, GOVERNMENT PARALYSIS, AND A VARIETY OF OTHER FACTORS THAT HAVE MADE INVESTORS CIRCUMSPECT. THERE IS NO QUESTION THAT THE FUNDAMENTALS OF INDIA ARE JUST AS STRONG AS THEY WERE HALF A DECADE AGO, AND THE COUNTRY IS EXPECTED TO TURN THINGS AROUND IN THE NEAR FUTURE. BUT THE NEXT FEW MONTHS COULD BE CRUCIAL, FINDS RANAJIT DAM
REUTERS/Arko Datta
T
he recent statement from Leif Lybecker Eskesen, HSBC’s chief economist for India, describing the country as "a gasping elephant" would have been unthinkable a few years ago, as would have been the comment from Jim O'Neill, former chief economist at Goldman Sachs and the man who coined the famous "BRIC" moniker - that India was the "biggest disappointment" of the BRIC nations. An interplanetary traveler visiting Earth in the 2009, shortly after India had weathered the global financial crisis with a sense of relative calm, and then returning sometime in the first half of 2012 would be encountering a completely different country, particularly if the newspaper headlines were to be believed. Much of the negativity, however, has been justified. India's GDP grew a mere 5.3 percent in the quarter compared to a year earlier, its slowest quarterly pace since early 2003 and below economists' forecasts of 6.1 percent. For those used to the 8 percent the country had registered in recent years, it certainly felt like the growth party was over. This was the hangover setting in. As of the time of writing, the rupee had breached the mark of 56 to the dollar, and did not look like it was headed the right way anytime soon. India’s trade deficit in April amounted to $13.48 billion, with oil imports which account for the single largest chunk of India’s import bill, standing at $13.9 billion. When you combine all these with stifling red tape, a lumbering bureaucracy, and some distinctly investor-unfriendly moves by the Congress-led coalition government of Manmohan Singh, the picture begins to look grim indeed. The government has attributed much of the slowdown to the falling growth seen elsewhere around the globe. But India’s current situation owes much to problems at home, and has been on the horizon for a while now. "There is no point blaming the Greeks or the Spaniards for
22
INDIA COUNTRY REPORT
India's economic woes. Nor are the usual suspects, the rain gods, at fault this time," noted The Economic Times, possibly the most influential business newspaper in India. "Growth slowdown is essentially home-made." New Delhi has been spending massively on welfare programmes, which, while politically popular, have widened the budget deficit and exacerbated inflation. Oil imports (as stated above) have widened the trade deficit, weakening the rupee and pushing up the cost of imported goods. To rein in inflation, the Reserve Bank of India doubled benchmark interest rates over a period of two years – from 4.25 percent in January 2010 to 8.5 percent in January 2012 – and this has led to a drop in the pace of investments in the infrastructure and manufacturing sectors. In April, Standard & Poor's downgraded India’s rating from stable to negative, citing “lower GDP growth prospects and the risk that its external liquidity and fiscal flexibility may erode”. Clearly, the alarm bells have begun ringing. Much of the blame is laid at the feet of the current government. “Certainly six months back, if not earlier, there was realisation of the eurozone crisis and (the) weakening of the Indian economy (deficit and inflation included) would have an impact on India,” says Jyoti Sagar, founder partner at J. Sagar Associates. “However, since November
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS JULY 2012
2011, the acts of commission and omission in governance, or the lack of it, have clearly and disproportionately impacted India.” The Indian authorities have been accused of paying scant respect to Indian firms, while displaying a condescending attitude towards investors. Additionally, it has made no moves toward reforms of any variety as corruption and red tape have run unchecked. Examples like the scandal surrounding the sale of 2G licences and the Vodafone case, which has led to a Finance Bill containing extraordinary retrospective provisions that go back 50 years, have not helped either. “From purely a lawyer’s perspective, the casualty has been the belief that we are a country governed by the rule of law,” says Sagar. LEGAL WORK IMPACTED According to Sagar, the gloom pervading the
INDIA COUNTRY REPORT
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
23
“Certainly six months back, if not earlier, there was realisation of the eurozone crisis and (the) weakening of the Indian economy (deficit and inflation included) would have an impact on India. However, since November 2011, the acts of commission and omission in governance, or the lack of it, have clearly and disproportionately impacted India.”
REUTERS/Rupak De Chowdhuri
JYOTI SAGAR, J. Sagar Associates
Indian economy has led to market sentiment being definitely bearish, especially when compared to the bullish waves of the recent past. Another outcome has been a fall in foreign investments, both financial as well as strategic. “This is characterised by lower (and perhaps more realistic) valuations in the M&A and private equity space, as contrasted by the more bloated valuations one would witness up until four or five years ago,” he says. “While mid market M&A activity is still prevalent, it is the transactions having a larger ticket size which are only few and far between and less forthcoming.” Sagar adds that there has not been any significant capital markets activity. Rabindra Jhunjhunwala, partner at Khaitan & Co, agrees with regard to the capital markets work. “With the economy being what it is, there has definitely been a dent,” he says. “Investor confidence is low, which has resulted in IPOs being stalled, and hence the volume has dropped significantly, even though clients are still interested in listings.” According to Ashwin Ramanathan, partner at AZB & Partners, part of the reason for the slowdown in capital markets work is that IPO promoters have very little incentive to go through with them. “Companies are currently waiting for markets to turn,” he says. Jhunjhunwala adds that a lot of the firm’s capital markets lawyers are now helping out on the M&A side, which seems to be awash with work. “There is so much buying happening, and it is pretty much across all
sectors,” he says. “We honestly do not know how to handle all this work.” Arun Balasubramanian, a Singapore-based partner with Linklaters’ India practice, notes that his firm has seen a fall in plain vanilla transactions, and an increase in more complex structured deals like IL&FS Transportation Networks Ltd (ITNL), which through its Singapore-based subsidiary, is looking to raise money by issuing yuan-denominated bonds. He adds that an interesting trend has been the appetite of Indian companies to acquire assets overseas, despite the prevailing global economic conditions, and cites the example of auto parts maker Motherson Sumi’s acquisitions in Europe. “Also, there is a great deal of potential for M&A activity in the healthcare and pharma sectors,” he adds. Ramanathan also says that in a way, the larger law firms are hedged against market turbulence since they can provide a wider range of services. “As the capital markets work reduces, our litigation side is positively booming,” he says. “What is different now from other financial crises is that clients have much less patience when it comes to initiating litigation. They are willing to pull the trigger much earlier.” Sagar says that his firm is seeing continuing activity in the dispute resolution sphere, apart from the regulatory and infrastructure space, “given the uncertainty in the regulatory climate and contractual defaults”. RETAIL TO THE RESCUE? Lawyers agree that one of the brightest spots in India’s road to recovery is the introduction of foreign direct investment into the country’s massive retail sector [See box on p.24] - something the government has been unable to carry out in full in the face of fierce opposition from across the political spectrum and from traders' unions. The annual sales of the sector amount to an estimated $450 billion, with nearly 90 percent of the market being controlled by tiny family-run shops. The country recently allowed 100 percent FDI in single-brand retail subject to certain sourcing restrictions, but no ownership in multibrand retail. “The opening up of the insurance and retail sector to foreign
24
INDIA COUNTRY REPORT
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS JULY 2012
KEY FACTS: INDIA’S RETAIL
LOCAL COMPANIES
Supermarket chains are looking for funding in a tough business environment, with foreign partners closed off for now after last year's indefinite suspension of a move to open the $450 billion retail market to giants such as Wal-Mart.
• Pantaloon Retail, India's largest listed retailer
The government had hoped the major reform would boost investment in Asia's third-biggest economy, but it quickly backtracked when it came up against fierce opposition from across the political spectrum and from traders' unions. Following are some facts on India's retail sector:
• The retail sector in the nation of 1.2 billion
people is estimated to have annual sales of $450 billion, with nearly 90 percent of the market controlled by tiny family-run shops.
• Organised retail, or large chains, makes up
about 10 percent of the market, but is expanding at 20 percent a year. This is driven by the emergence of shopping centres and malls, and a middle class of close to 300 million people that is growing at nearly 2 percent a year.
•
India also allows 100 percent FDI in cashand-carry, or wholesale, ventures. Restrictions on foreign investment in front-end retail exist because of opposition from millions of small shopkeepers, who are valuable vote banks during elections.
• India has recently allowed 100 percent FDI in
single-brand retail subject to certain sourcing restrictions, but no ownership in multibrand retail.
and part of the Future Group, runs apparel and electronics stores under its lifestyle brands Central, E-Zone, and Hometown. Future also operates the Big Bazaar hypermarket chain and supermarket brand Food Bazaar. The group has over 1,300 stores across formats, and occupies a total retail space of 16.5 million square feet in India. Future has, for long, been linked to France's Carrefour for a partnership in hypermarkets. It recently sold controlling stake in its flagship clothing brand Pantaloon to bring down its high debt.
•
Second ranked Reliance Retail is part of Reliance Industries, India's largest listed group headed by Mukesh Ambani, India's richest man. Reliance Retail operates 1,300 stores across neighbourhood stores, supermarkets, hypermarkets, and lifestyle stores. It has said it does not plan to partner with any global retailer.
• Shoppers Stop, part of the K Raheja Group which operates in real estate, has about 265 stores across brands and formats including 12 Hypercity hypermarkets. It operates 4.58 million square feet of retail space, and its loss-making Hypercity is open to partnerships with foreign groups. • Trent, part of the sprawling Tata Group, operates 106 stores across formats and runs the Westside range of apparel stores, in addition to hypermarkets under Star Bazaar. It signed a
investors will certainly augur well for the industry and investor sentiment alike,” says Sagar. Jhunjhunwala agrees. “Liberalisation is key, and I expect it to happen in a number of sectors, including retail and insurance,” he says. “These are hard decisions that the government has to take.” He adds that just a “few small things” in the near future would be enough to turn around India’s fortunes. “We need clarity on the telecom issue, and we need clarity on the issue of tax,” he says. “(And) all these will happen; I am positive.” Another positive for him is the fact that many countries around the world are experiencing slowdowns as well. “The West is presently having a hard time too,” he says. “This is clearly a time of opportunity.” According to Balasubramanian at Linklaters, one trend he is seeing is more foreign investors entering into JVs with Indian counterparts instead of going for outright acquisitions. “This tends to benefit both parties,” he says. “The Indian partner gets the knowledge and the knowhow, while the foreign partner reduces its risk.” He expects to see liberalisation in sectors like retail, and “sensible regulations” in areas like transportation and aviation. “However, you need to keep in mind that this is a sentiment-driven market,” says Balasubramaniaun. “That needs to change.”
franchisee agreement with Tesco under which Star Bazaar shops use the British firm's supply chains and infrastructure.
• Aditya Birla Retail is the unlisted retail arm of
India's telecoms-to-cement conglomerate Aditya Birla Group, headed by Kumar Mangalam Birla, ranked the seventh-richest Indian by Forbes in March 2012. T h e co m p a n y o p e r a t e s a r o u n d 5 0 0 supermarket and hypermarket stores under the More brand. It has said it will evaluate partnerships with global firms. MAJOR FOREIGN COMPANIES
• Wal-Mart has a cash-and-carry operation with Indian partner Bharti Enterprises, the parent company of leading mobile provider Bharti Airtel, and will add 12 to 15 new cash-and-carry stores this year to its 17 existing stores.
• Tesco, Britain's largest retailer, has a tie-up with
Trent's Star Bazaar hypermarket chain. Tesco is also looking to enter the wholesale market through the tie-up.
• Germany's Metro AG operates 11 wholesale stores in India. The company plans to open five cash-and-carry stores every year.
• Carrefour has two cash-and-carry stores in India. The world's number two retailer has been seeking a local partner to enter the hyper or supermarket sectors.
For Ramanathan at AZB, one of the biggest pluses about the current situations is that assets have become cheaper. “Currently, as capital is hard to come by and debt is very expensive, valuations have become more realistic,” he says. “These present great opportunities for investors.” From a law firm’s perspective, he says that one of the strongest areas of growth has turned out to be the competition law practice, apart from the spike in litigation. However, he cautions that much will need to happen for India to come out of the woods. “All the problems that are being discussed need to be resolved,” he says. “A lot needs to be done. Investors are not convinced that this is the best time.” THE BRAND REMAINS STRONG It is worth noting that despite all the headlines, not all the news coming out of India has been depressing. In March, India attracted
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
INDIA COUNTRY REPORT
25
REUTERS/Sivaram V
“THERE’S SO MUCH BUYING HAPPENING, AND IT’S PRETTY MUCH ACROSS ALL SECTORS. WE HONESTLY DON’T KNOW HOW TO HANDLE ALL THIS WORK.” RABINDRA JHUNJHUNWALA, Khaitan & Co FDI of $ 8.1 billion, the highest monthly inflow ever recorded, even though much of it was due to the $ 7.2 billion Reliance IndustriesBritish Petroleum (BP) deal announced in February 2011, which saw BP picking up a 30 percent stake in Reliance Industries' 21 oilfields. According to Sagar, despite its recent troubles, the fundamentals of India “as of now are still sound, be it the demography and be it also democracy. Both (of) these are long term positives. Foreign investors should see that side of the coin too. Bold and positive moves by the government would provide the credibility and the spark that we need urgently to put to work our inherent strengths as a country.” Jhunjhunwala at Khaitan concurs, but says that while the last few months might not have heralded the end of the road for “India Shining”, it has clearly had an impact on the way the India brand in perceived among investors, particularly in the aftermath of the Vodafone tax case. “The announcement of the retroactive General Anti Avoidance Rule (GAAR), slated to come into force in 2013, had
a lot of people asking: ‘What exactly did the Finance Minister have in mind?’,” he says. “Is this the way things happen in a democracy, in a rule of law?” Nevertheless, he sees some positive trends in the next year or so. One is the growing number of outbound transactions, as cashrich Indian companies take advantage of cheap assets overseas, particularly in natural resources. Another trend is that of PE funds selling to other PE funds. “Since exits are currently difficult as IPOs have stalled and funds that have raised money looking for assets to purchase, I see a lot of acquisitions of PE assets by other PE funds,” he says. Jhunjhunwala also sees competition law as a growing practice area for firms as awareness increases, and M&As continuing to be their biggest revenue generator. Another promising area, he notes, is infrastructure, where India has penciled in an investment of about $1 trillion. The country plans to award 9,500 kms of road projects, and commission three new airports in the fiscal year to March end in 2013. Balasubramanian sees a lot of opportunities for India emerging from the so-called “South-South trade”. “I expect to see a lot of trading of resources located in Africa and in Southeast Asian countries,” he says. “There is a great deal of value to be had there.” Additionally, a lot of the larger companies will be looking to grab bigger assets overseas, he says, citing the attempt by Tatas to acquire Cable & Wireless as an example. Sagar, however, has words of caution. “We have to avoid the temptation (and the arrogance) that we will be an attractive investment destination irrespective of what we do or do not do,” he says. “Unfortunately, the world increasingly sees us in negative light. The perception is that we have red tape and not a red carpet for foreign investment. Add to that, we are not considered a business-friendly country… (and also) it was demoralising to see that India ranked 182 out of 183 countries in terms of enforceability of contracts. Now the recent threat that India’s rating could be pegged below investment grade does not really help.”
26
Equity Capital Markets
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012
Turning the
screws
Economic uncertainty has translated into a marked slowdown of IPO activity in global markets. Facebook’s botched listing in May this year did little to restore market confidence. In Hong Kong, investors finally have a reason to smile, following the Security and Futures Commission’s proposals to toughen rules for IPO sponsors, including making them criminally liable for listing prospectuses. Kanishk Verghese reports
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
T
he world waited in excitement on May 18 for Facebook to launch its highly publicised initial public offering (IPO). But eager anticipation turned into alarm as the social media giant’s share price plunged from $38 to $27 over the next 10 trading sessions, wiping out roughly $30 billion of its market capitalisation. A few weeks later, Graff Diamonds, a British high-end jeweller, abandoned its $1 billion listing in Hong Kong because of economic uncertainty. Dubious equity markets have resulted in Asian IPOs worth nearly $8 billion being pulled this year. Most recently, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) in Hong Kong fined and stripped Mega Capital (Asia) of its licence for its sub-par underwriting of Hontex International Holdings, which was investigated for financial fraud in 2009. A series of fraud scandals last year surrounding Chinese companies that went public in Hong Kong has spurred the SFC to take action. In a consultation paper released on May 9, the SFC proposed, among other recommendations, that IPO sponsors be made both civilly and criminally liable for faulty listings. The proposals, which will give investors some much-needed reassurance, have received staunch resistance, not surprisingly, from IPO sponsors – banks or smaller corporate finance houses that are responsible for preparing IPO documents and ensuring compliance with listing rules. Faced with such rules, the larger investment banks may shy away from some IPOs, which
Equity Capital Markets
27
REUTERS/Bobby Yip
could potentially create more opportunities for the smaller players. Another related worry for the big banks could be class action lawsuits for investors seeking damages, which has been recommended by the Hong Kong Law Reform Commission. Guiding sponsors The SFC’s two-part consultation paper, which is open for comment until July 6, not only requires IPO sponsors to tighten their due diligence of target companies, but also holds the sponsors liable for the contents of listing prospectuses. The proposals, which look holistically at a sponsor’s role in the IPO process, mark one of the first major initiatives spearheaded by the SFC since its new chief executive officer, Ashley Alder, took charge in October 2011. “I believe the SFC is trying to indicate to sponsors what they should ideally be doing when they are guiding a company through the IPO process. A good due diligence process leads to confidence in the information that is provided to the market from the IPO,” says Jill Wong, a counsel at King & Wood Mallesons in Hong Kong. Regulators stand as the only enforcement mechanism for faulty IPOs since there is at present no meaningful civil litigation in Hong Kong, say lawyers. “As a result, the SFC wants sponsors to act as gatekeepers to make sure listing applicants are doing the right thing,” states Steven Winegar, a Hong Kong-based partner at Paul Hastings.
28
Equity Capital Markets
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012
“Indeed, there will be a niche created where the up-and-coming banks will try and find their way into the market by taking on more risky roles. This is very natural in terms of business development. By moving in this direction of tighter regulation on sponsors, there will definitely be an opportunity for them.” Jeckle Chiu, Mayer Brown JSM
Wong agrees: “One important thing that comes out of the proposals is that the sponsors are ultimately responsible for due diligence. The SFC recognises that although many other professionals have input, sponsors should not blindly rely – reasonable reliance is acceptable – on them.” For their part, sponsors believe they are already shouldering more responsibility. Many of the companies listing in Hong Kong are from mainland China, and regulators find it difficult to take action against such companies when a faulty offering is uncovered. A series of scandals The SFC is determined to see new regulations enacted. Fierce opposition from financial institutions had shot down similar proposals in 2005. But a lot has happened since then. The Hong Kong IPO market, which raised $97.9 billion between 2009 and 2011, was the world’s largest for two of the last three years, according to Reuters. Despite these mammoth numbers, the city’s stock exchange in recent years has been rocked by scandals surrounding companies that went public, only to be scrutinised for fraud soon after their listing. An SFC inspection of 17 sponsors, conducted in March 2011, found a host of deficiencies in their IPO-related work, including inadequate due diligence and questionable disclosures in listing applications to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. In the infamous case of Hontex International Holdings, a Chinese textiles manufacturer, Mega Capital (Asia) lost its licence and was slapped with a fine of HK$42 million ($5.4 million). The SFC cited Mega Capital’s sub-standard due diligence work and failure to act independently and impartially as the motivator. According to Reuters, Chien Hung-Wen, chairman of Mega Capital’s parent company, Mega Securities, has said that the company would not appeal the regulator’s decision. Hontex had its shares suspended by the SFC just three months after it went public on the grounds that it had overstated its financial position. The commission has since frozen the $128 million that Hontex raised from its listing, and a court settlement reached on June 20 confirmed that investors will be able to get most of their money back. Under an agreement reached between the SFC and Hontex at the High Court, the textiles maker will repurchase shares held by minority stakeholders at HK$2.06 a share, the last price traded before the stock was suspended. Market segmentation The SFC’s proposals have sparked fierce opposition from the wellestablished investment banks, which are likely to lobby aggressively, in particular against prospectus liability, asserting that sophisticated fraud is near impossible to detect. However, many legal experts
believe that the banks will not be able to prevent tougher rules this time around. A strengthening of rules could cause some larger investment banks to pull back from the market, causing IPO sponsor work to trickle down to less experienced financial institutions. “Indeed, there will be a niche created where the up-and-coming banks will try and find their way into the market by taking on more risky roles,” says Jeckle Chiu, a partner at Mayer Brown JSM in Hong Kong. “This is very natural in terms of business development. By moving in this direction of tighter regulation on sponsors, there will definitely be an opportunity for them.” Even so, some lawyers feel that smaller players will have to reflect on their own due diligence practices if they want to become bigger. “Sponsors should be looking hard at their due diligence process, bring it up to scratch if they think there are inadequacies, and make sure they can meet the expectations of the SFC going forward. Those that do will continue to prosper,” says Wong of King & Wood Mallesons. Regardless of size, sponsors are likely to be more discriminating about the IPO work they take on, lawyers note, even though the Hong Kong market is currently sluggish. “Many sponsors are already selective as to who they work with, but I think you might see that caution increasing if the proposed amendments are effected,” says Matt Emsley, a partner at Herbert Smith. His colleague, Tim Mak, also a partner, opines that sponsors will have to consider their risk-reward framework very carefully: “This is where the rule changes come in. If sponsors risk facing additional regulatory and legal liability, particularly any potential criminal liability, that might well change the risk equation.” The risks are surely piling up. Besides the proposals, recent incidents this year have jolted sponsors. In March, accounting firm Deloitte resigned as the auditor of Daqing
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
Dairy Holdings and Boshiwa International Holdings, two mainland Chinese companies. Both are now being investigated for possible financial irregularities. These are not isolated cases. There are others, including Ausnutria Dairy and Ports Design Ltd, who had their shares suspended after they missed deadlines for annual report filing because their auditors wanted more time. Weighing the costs With greater risks may come greater rewards — but at a cost. The heightened level of due diligence required of IPO sponsors may make deals more expensive, which will cut profit margins and potentially drive some banks out of the IPO market. It may also lead to some law firms being squeezed out. “It will introduce costs because the banks will have to put in place more intense procedures, and a lot of that will fall on the lawyers to help implement. Certainly, the cost of providing those services is going up, but whether fees go up as a result is a different story,” says a Hong Kong-based lawyer, who asked to remain anonymous. He adds that the SFC’s measures will hopefully introduce more responsibility, and lead to more experienced people working on the deals. Several of the SFC’s proposals can be found in regulations in other jurisdictions. For example, the requirement to publish early drafts of prospectuses, as well as the liability of sponsors and underwriters are already present in the U.S. However, lawyers agree that the consultation paper explores features that are unique to Hong Kong. “Hong Kong regulators will usually consider what regulators are doing overseas. But regulators elsewhere will probably also be looking at Hong Kong quite closely to see how things develop here, because of the particular characteristics of the Hong Kong market,” says Emsley of Herbert Smith. Class action? Meanwhile, just two weeks after the SFC disseminated its consultation paper, Hong Kong’s banking and financial institutions had another reason to worry. The territory’s Law Reform Commission recommended legisla-
Equity Capital Markets
29
tion to allow class action lawsuits to help investors seek damages as a single representative. The proposed system would only apply to consumer fraud and product liability cases, but not investments such as securities. “Right now, the incentive for an investor to sue is low. The amount you spend on litigation could easily outstrip any loss you have on your investment,” says Winegar of Paul Hastings. But the introduction of class action could possibly see Hong Kong’s financial houses face a rise in lawsuits, as ordinary retail investors band together with renewed impetus. Banks will have some time to prepare,
A monitor shows a welcoming message for Facebook’s listing on the NASDAQ Marketsite prior to the opening bell in New York. REUTERS/Keith Bedford
however, as lawyers agree that such action may take several years to implement. “I think it would be a seismic event in the market, and for that reason, a class action regime will take years to work through the system. There are no assurances that this will get done,” says Winegar. The SFC’s proposals however, are tipped to see the light of day soon. IPO sponsors will need to carefully monitor their risk profiles and brace themselves for more stringent due diligence procedures and increased scrutiny from regulators. “The SFC is serious about wanting to improve quality and to change behaviour. They said the proposals were influenced by deficiencies they have seen in sponsor work in recent years; now is as good a time as any to do it,” says Wong. Mak agrees: “There is no doubt the regulators mean business, and there is a strong will to tighten regulation. I think the devil is going to be in the detail.”
30
Equity Capital Markets
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012
Hong Kong IPO Pipeline - June 25 Debut date
Company
Shares (Mln)
Price (HK$/Share)
Managers
Proceeds (US$ Mln)
June 28
Huadian Fuxin Energy Corp
1,500
1.65
BAML, Citic Securities, UBS
319
June 29
China Nonferrous Metal Mining (Group) Co Ltd
870
2.10 – 2.80
ABC Int’l, CICC, JP Morgan, UBS
313
July 6
China Aluminum International Engineering Corp. Ltd (Chalieco)
363
3.93 - 4.73
CICC, Guangfa Securities
200
July/Aug
China Everbright Bank
4,000
N.A.
BNP Paribas, BOC Int’l, CICC, Everbright Securities, HSBC, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Shenyin Wanguo, UBS
2,500
2012 Q2
Sany Heavy Industry Co
N.A.
N.A.
BAML, Citigroup, Citic Securities, ICBC Int’l, Morgan Stanley
2,000
2012 H1
China National Biotec Group (CNB)
N.A.
N.A.
CICC, Morgan Stanley, UBS
1,315 - 1,578
2012 Q3
China Railway Materials Co Ltd (HK & Shanghai dual listing)
N.A.
N.A.
CICC, Citic Securities, 1,000 - 1,500 Citibank, Credit Suisse, HSBC, UBS
2012 Q3
Hong Kong Airlines
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
644.7
2012 H2
En+ Group (parent of UC Rusal)
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
2012
Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical
476
N.A.
CICC, Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan, UBS
700 - 800
2012
Guangfa Bank
N.A.
N.A.
BAML, Citigroup, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs
5,500
2012
Graff Diamonds (Pulled)
N.A.
N.A.
Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley
1,000
2012
People’s Insurance Company of China Group
N.A.
N.A.
CICC, Credit Suisse, HSBC
6,000
2012
China Shouguang Agricultural Product Logistic Park
N.A.
N.A.
BOC Int’l, JPMorgan, UBS
800 - 1,000
2012
COFCO’s property business unit
N.A.
N.A.v
N.A.
N.A.
Equity Capital Markets
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
31
Hong Kong IPO Pipeline - June 25 Debut date
Company
Shares (Mln)
Price (HK$/Share)
Managers
Proceeds (US$ Mln)
2012
Jianhua Concrete Pile Group
N.A.
N.A.
Citic Securities, Deutsche Bank, Morgan Stanley
500 - 600
2012
Sunshine 100 Real Estate Group
N.A.
N.A.
Morgan Stanley, UBS
1,000
2012
EuroSibEnergo (Postponed)
N.A.
N.A.
BAML, Credit Suisse, RBS, RenCap, Sberbank
1,100 - 1,500
2012/2013
Lukoil
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
1,000
2012/2014
Taikang Life Insurance
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
1,000
2013 Q1
ErdenesTavan Tolgoi coal mine
N.A.
N.A.
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, Macquarie
3,000
2014/2016
Legend Holdings (parent of Lenovo Group)
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
Zhengzhou Coal Mining Machinery N.A. Group Co Ltd
N.A.
Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan, UBS
1,000
N.A.
Centrobuv
N.A.
N.A.
Morgan Stanley, BOCI, Renaissance Capital, VTB Capital
800
N.A.
Bluestar Adisseo Nutrition Group (Postponed)
N.A.
N.A.
BOC Int'l, CCB Int'l, Citigroup, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley
1,500
N.A.
XCMG Construction Machinery Co Ltd (Postponed)
516
N.A.
BNP Paribas, CICC, Credit Suisse, HSBC, Macquarie, Morgan Stanley
1,200
N.A.
China Xintiandi Co Ltd
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
Altain Khuder
N.A.
N.A.
BAML
300
N.A.
Inner Mongolia Yitai Coal Co Ltd
N.A.
N.A.
BNP Paribas, BOC Int’l, CICC, UBS
800 - 1,000
The following are some of the major companies planning initial public offerings on the Hong Kong stock exchange. ^ Information based on local media reports (Source: Reuters)
32
Macau report
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012
Beyond the gaming The gaming industry may be the core driver of Macau’s economy, but there is a lot more happening in the territory apart from the casinos. Construction extends to landmark infrastructure projects, public housing, and various residential and commercial developments. However, the continued boom times are exacerbating a problem that has been plaguing the former Portuguese colony for several years now: a severe labour shortage. Candice Mak explores the other aspects of Macau.
REUTERS/Paul Yeung
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
T
hink Macau; think the hottest gaming spot this side of the Pacific – and the most profitable one in the world. Flush with massive money from the mainland and an unparalleled expansion trajectory, the tiny former Portuguese colony off China’s southern coast is bursting with opportunities. Despite reports of a growth slowdown in May, there are absolutely no signs of anything remotely slowing down. Casino kingpins continue to trip over each other, vying to construct their next projects on the Cotai strip, the newest, flashiest stretch of the gaming capital. Joining the Venetian, the City of Dreams and the Galaxy, resort company Las Vegas Sands opened its new $4.4 billion casino on the strip in April this year. Luxury resort Wynn Macau, meanwhile, received approval from the government to develop a 51-acre resort in May, with casino operators MGM and SJM Holdings still awaiting their green lights to build their Cotai casinos. While the gaming industry is the main driver and focus of Macau’s economy, there is much more happening behind the glittering scenes of the casinos. For instance, the government has spurred on infrastructure construction and development to facilitate transportation for locals and the millions of tourists it welcomes each year to support the region’s ambitions. According to data from the Macau Government Tourist Office, there were nearly 2.34 million visitors in April, an increase of 6.3 percent from the year before. There were 28 million visitors in 2011, up 12.2 percent from 2010, with people from mainland China accounting for up to 25 million of all arrivals. Combine these figures with the local Macanese population of about 500,000, and the need for efficient, modern infrastructure is conspicuously evident. CONSTRUCTION Infrastructure Construction of the Delta Bridge – which will connect Hong Kong, Macau and Zhuhai - has been underway from the mainland China side since the end of 2009, and the complete project is expected to be completed in 2016. The Y-shaped bridge will be the longest cross sea bridge in the world at almost 50 kms in length, with 35 kms built over the sea. It will be a six-lane expressway and is estimated to cost more than $10 billion, a sum which will be shared by authorities on the mainland, Hong Kong, and Macau. Upon completion, travel time from Macau or Zhuhai to Hong Kong is expected to get reduced to half an hour compared to the current three hours. Macau-based lawyers tell ALB that from the Macau side, the project is proceeding smoothly and the reclamation area the bridge is due to land on will likely be completed ahead of schedule. Although there were delays last year in the bridge’s construction on the Hong Kong side due to a legal challenge that was brought on by an elderly Hong Kong resident regarding the structure’s environmental impact, the building of the bridge is officially slated to begin in the coming months. On June 6, French construction company Bouygues announced it had been awarded a EUR1.25 billion ($15.6 billion) contract to build the first section of the bridge in a joint venture with Chinese construction company China Harbour. The joint venture will build a 9.4 km section of the bridge from Lantau island in Hong Kong to the boundary of Hong Kong’s territorial waters. According to Bouygues, the deal is the largest ever design-build contract in Hong Kong. Within Macau, the most important project is that of the Light Rail Transit (LRT) system. At present, most tourists rely on taxis and hotel and casino shuttles to get around Macau. With more and more visitors
Macau report
33
expected each year to the area, a mass transit system is necessary to meet the crushing transportation demand. The LRT is destined to become Macau’s main mass transportation system, and reduce commuting time by 63 percent. An added bonus would be that the use of private vehicles would drop, leading to less greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption. The foundation work for the first phase of the mass transit system finally began on Taipa island in February this year with the LRTS now aiming for a first phase launch by 2015. The project was first approved in 2007, and was initially expected to be operational by 2011. However, due to numerous delays, the launch date kept getting postponed. A Macau Daily Times (MDT) article from March 2012 said that the construction work for the initial LRT route in downtown Taipa should be ready by May
“Even if it’s not 20 or 30 percent, growth is still very good in Macau. Every year, analysts say the market will crash, and each year the growth statistics keep breaking all the records.” Bruno Nunes, BN Lawyers
2015. This route will be two kms long and will cover five stations. The MDT quoted Union Gaming Research analysts as saying that most casino customers have “an ingrained preference for rail travel, as well as a tolerance for longer journeys in exchange for saving money on transportation costs”. The Transportation Infrastructure Office (GIT) commissioned a study this year that found that the LRT system would boost Macau’s economy and raise the population’s GDP from MOP 15.8 billion ($1.98 billion) to MOP 16.4 billion ($2.05 billion) in its first decade of operation alone. Gonçalo Mendes da Maia, a partner at MdME Lawyers, confirms that civil work tenders for the LRT are underway, and that Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is the rolling stock and system supplier. Tenders to build several interchange stations are slated
34
Macau report
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012
for launch later this year. Mendes da Maia says that one of the most important tenders that many overseas companies are waiting for is that of the operation and maintenance of the LRT, which various sources have hinted will occur in early 2013. Other projects that are ongoing or scheduled to start shortly include the airport’s expansion, a new ferry terminal in Taipa, and several water and waste treatment facilities. Macauhub.com.mo is a good source for investors or companies looking to participate in tenders occurring in Macau – of which there are new ones announced every week. “There are so many direct opportunities in the market open to any investor with the capabilities and qualifications to bid for a particular project,” says Mendes da Maia. Public housing Alongside the breakneck pace of casino and high-end real estate construction is another type of construction that is spiking ahead and reshaping Macau’s landscape: that of social housing. Largely ignored by foreign media, the scope and development of these public housing projects is a big deal for local residents, the government, and Greater China-based construction companies and developers. Public housing in Macau refers to two kinds: social and economic. Bruno Nunes, the founding partner of BN Lawyers, explains that “social housing is leased to people who cannot afford to buy homes and have very low incomes, while economic housing is sold at a slightly higher price by the government to residents who have more income”. The need for public housing has been spurred on by the locals’ discontent over rocketing property prices, out-of-reach rents, and inflation. According to the MDT, the government launched a public consultation in May this year on possible strategies for developing public housing. The consultation includes a recommendation for reserving newly-reclaimed lands for public houses that will be smaller to suit the needs of a declining number of family members and an aging population. The consultation additionally recommends the establishment of a public housing development fund to finance the construction, repair, and maintenance of public houses. The Macau Housing Bureau estimates that in the next five years, about 45,000 new public and private flats will become available and
“It (social housing) can be very profitable because the government pays for all the variations, all the changes, and all the extra costs that are required to complete these projects in a timely fashion,” Carlos Duque Simoes, DSL Lawyers
that a new round of applications for economical houses might open next year, with social housing applications taking up to a maximum of four years to get processed. Nineteen thousand units are scheduled to be finished by the end of this year, and the Housing Bureau has said that it has secured land for 6,300 new units of which 3,850 flats are already in the planning stages of development. The construction of these 3,850 units will be tendered at the end of this year, and are expected to begin early next year. At the moment, part of the Ilha Verde zone public housing project is under construction. This is “Area Three”, which comprises 770 apartments and is scheduled to be completed by the end of this year. Areas One and Two will contain 2,356 apartments, and are close to being planned. The tenders for the constructions of these areas are likely to be launched in the third quarter of this year, according to MDT reports.
Macau report
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
REUTERS/Bobby Yip
A 32-storey public housing building with 346 units called the Mong Ha Social House, which will be located along the Rua de Francisco Xavier Pereira, is expected to be completed by the fall of this year. Unlike in China, where affordable housing construction is shunned by private construction companies and developers due to low profit margins, the tenders for the construction of public housing in Macau are highly competitive. The projects are fully financed by the government – which always has a budget surplus – and are often lucrative for players involved in their construction. “It can be very profitable because the government pays for all the variations, all the changes, and all the extra costs that are required to complete these projects in a timely fashion,” says Carlos Duques Simoes, a partner at DSL Lawyers. “I suspect the contractors handling these projects are making very good money as the government does not have a very tight budget. What is important to the government is completing the housing on time.” Nunes agrees that not only can construction companies benefit money-wise, but also that the public housing tenders create opportunities for local and smaller players. “The big companies are all involved in either one of the big public tenders, so they are very busy. This opens up possibilities for small- and medium-sized construction companies to work on these projects, and it is profitable for them.” Mendes da Maia, however, is slightly more skeptical about profitability and feels that doing this type of work cannot compare to private proj-
Main Practice Areas
DSL Lawyers is a law firm established in Macau that provides highly qualified legal services in an extensive range of areas to local and international corporations. Its core practice areas are Corporate Law, Property, Construction and Infrastructure Projects, IP & TMT, Banking & Finance, Litigation and Dispute Resolution, covering also Employment, Tax and Employment. DSL has a team of experienced partners, associate lawyers and multi-lingual staff with a wide range of experience in the region, international qualifications and industry knowledge. Its Client base is diverse across many industries and worldwide geographic areas.
35
Property One of DSL’s core areas, its practice and experience extending to different types of Clients, covering individuals, corporations, institutional banks and private equity funds. To all sorts of concerns DSL provides sound legal advice and leads timely completion of transactions. DSL assists on residential, commercial and office acquisitions including property due diligences, construction issues, drafting and review of sale and purchase agreements, leases, addressing and liaising with related Government departments and assisting on the financing. Construction DSL provides advice on construction contracts and all other legal aspects of construction projects. DSL advises developers, owners, contractors and subcontractors in major construction projects, from conception to completion.
The firm provides expert guidance on risk management and dispute avoidance. But its comprehensive experience in judicial and arbitration disputes enables it to deliver the best support for Client if a dispute does arise. Infrastructure Projects DSL has extensive experience in assisting various clients in major infrastructure projects, such as the light rail project, wastewater treatment plants, and incineration plants, among others. The infrastructure practice includes services from the bidding stage to completions, such as tender preparation and strategy, advice on consortium and joint ventures arrangements, post adjudication contracting and subcontractting arrangements, drafting of project documentation and arbitration, mediation, dispute and claims resolution. -----------------------------OFFICE: Av. da Praia Grande 409, China Law Building 16/F, Macau Tel: +853 2822 3355 / Fax: +853 2872 5588 Email: mail@dsl-lawyers.com Web: http://www.dsl-lawyers.com
36
Macau report
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012
“There are so many direct opportunities in the market open to any investor with the capabilities and qualifications to bid for a particular project.” Gonçalo Mendes da Maia, MdME Lawyers
ect construction or casino building. Despite this, he agrees to the fact that he works with clients who have won public housing tenders and confirms that it is extremely competitive. “On construction works, we are talking about 18 to 20 companies bidding per tender and very close pricing,” he says. Real estate In particular, all the lawyers ALB spoke to mentioned that the real estate sector was currently very hot, and that it was so in a good way. For instance, there are land parcels up for auction at the moment, and all around the region, commercial and residential building sales are moving with various projects being built. Mendes da Maia points out that there are opportunities for mid market retailers and for shopping mall developers that cater to mid class or high mid class brands. “Here, we see only luxury malls or low-end street shops; there is not much retail in between,” says Mendes da Maia. He additionally notes there is a gap in the hospitality market, as everything is luxury five stars or on the low end of three, four stars. “There are opportunities for mid-level retail, hospitality and there is a huge need for grade A office buildings,” he says. EMPLOYMENT A crucial concern for Macau that is directly impacting all industries, including its $34 billion gaming industry, is that of labour shortage because it keeps getting worse. The
unemployment rate is hovering around 2.6 percent, which indicates nearly full employment for those wanting to be employed, and there is no indication from the government that it will relax its tough labour importation rules. Although the gaming industry has only mildly been affected, other sectors have not been so lucky. Small- and mediumsized businesses are struggling the most, owing to competition with the casinos for labour resources. Casinos are cash-rich, and offer their employees wages other businesses cannot compete with. Fung Kwan, the head of the economics department at the University of Macau, told the MDT in May that: “Labour shortage has been an ongoing problem for Macau. The recent casino developments have exacerbated the problem, and we’ve seen the casinos nabbing labour from other sectors. Labour costs for the whole of Macau are rising.” Macau-based managing director of the Union Gaming Group, Grant Govertsen, supports Kwan’s assertions in the MDT: “The shortage of labour will be exacerbated when the new resorts come online, particularly with respect to positions that can only be filled by Macau residents. This will put further upward pressure on wages.” According to Nunes, current labour laws dictate that the ratio of local to non-local workers should be one to one. Previously, it used to be two locals for every overseas worker. All the lawyers ALB spoke to expressed frustration with the importation and application guidelines for overseas employees. “It’s impossible to find enough people. You submit an application for 1000 non-locals because you have 1000
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
Macau report
37
REUTERS/Bobby Yip
locals, but then the government simply approves 300 or 500 and you do not understand why,” says Nunes. “It does not seem to be uniform criteria or it does not make sense.” Simoes says: “The government is managing the approvals process on a case by case basis, project by project and often, by profession, which is why there are so many problems and complaints.” For anyone imported to Macau, advance approval must be given based on his or her function – and the function cannot change. For example, if someone has been authorised to serve a gaming table, he or she cannot be moved to assume kitchen duties at some point. “Investors don’t want to go through this timeconsuming process, they just want to have the ability to bring over several thousand workers and decide for themselves where to employ them and when,” says Simoes. “The government is not flexible to the point it will allow this to happen.” He notes that even if a few thousand workers are approved for a certain project, the approvals will take six to nine months in all likelihood, and one by one, each worker will be scrutinised to ensure they are not breaking local laws or encroaching on local professions that need to be protected. “This is the struggle. The government has these procedures which are outdated, but it doesn’t want to relinquish full oversight because this is the way it maintains control over the employment market and satisfies locals.” Frustration with application approvals stems from the opaque decision-making process of government officials. The guidelines for applying are straightforward enough, but the results are subjectively based on the whims of the approving official. “The labour approvals are somewhat discretionary,” says Mendes da Maia. “If you apply, it
will go to a department head who basically makes the decision and there are some who are more flexible and others who are less so. It’s difficult for companies to plan their investments when there seems to be no established human resources policy among the authorities.” Nunes agrees: “You cannot understand the criteria; it keeps changing. You can have two identical clients with the same application applying, and one will get approved but the other gets rejected. You can’t work with that type of subjectivity.” Partner Julia Brockman of DSL Lawyers says that “in practice, the government has internally set ratios for certain sectors, and decides approvals on a case-by-case basis.” Three months before the Venetian opened up in 2007, it lacked more than 5,000 workers. The government realised it needed to issue a lot of last minute work permits, and jumped into action. In 2006, when “everyone was allowed to build” – Wynn and SJM were developing projects in Macau, and the Venetian and the Galaxy were under construction in Cotai – everything collapsed, says Nunes. However,
38
Macau report
now the government has changed its policy of granting approvals to projects to accommodate the labour issue. “Now they are approving one by one, “he says.“ For example, since the Galaxy finished construction last year, now they have granted approval to Wynn to build in Cotai. Wynn will begin construction in June, and the government will take its time to analyse everything before approving the next project, which is likely the MGM project in Cotai, then SJM’s project in Cotai. It will not allow for several concessionaires to build full scale and open at the same time in Macau. That is the new method. It has learnt how to cope with it.” Nunes is optimistic that the government will have no choice in the future but to grant more importation approvals. However, he says that employers will likely “have to submit
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012
to even stricter conditions” from the government. “One scenario it (government) could package the approvals is to allow the employment of foreign workers for a specific role, but then stipulate that they must train locals,” says Nunes. What about enforcement though? That, says Nunes, is a key point. The government has fallen victim to labour shortages as well, so the likelihood of it having enough resources to enforce conditions is very low. Another issue affecting employment in Macau is its “loose and relaxed” labour regime that allows a local worker to leave any company, without liability, within two weeks. “With the current labour laws, employees are basically free to jump from company to company without any adverse consequences. This creates an enormous instability in the market,” says Mendes da Maia. At the end of last year, it was reported in the local media that numerous amendments would be made to the current imported labour law due for an update sometime this year. The timeline for the new legislation and its implementation were not made clear. Employers’ and workers’ representatives met on Dec. 30, 2012 in a closed door meeting of the standing committee for the coordination of social affairs. One of the major changes expected is
Macau report
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
REUTERS/Stringer .
that non-local workers would be free to find a new job in another sector immediately after their contracts expire without needing to leave Macau for six months – as the current law dictates. Both parties also decided that if the employer terminates the contract with just case, then the worker would have to leave Macau for six months, and only after that could he or she be granted a new work permit. The same would occur if the worker ends the contract without just cause. The current law, which was enacted in 2009, states that if a worker is fired by an employer, he or she could look for a new job without needing to leave Macau and with no legal constraints. The issue was raised by a number of employers in various sectors that some employees were purposely trying to be terminated, without just cause, in order to gain compensation, and be free to look for a new job without facing the six-month ban. STEADY GROWTH Media reports and analysts have been relentlessly pessimistic about Macau’s growth figures. Despite a dip in numbers however, the lawyers ALB interviewed are much more confident about the growth they see
on their doorsteps. “Even if it’s not 20 or 30 percent, growth is still very good in Macau,” affirms Nunes. “Every year, analysts say the market will crash, and each year the growth statistics keep breaking all the records.” Reuters reported on June 1 that with China’s economic expansion slowing down and high rollers from the mainland becoming more cautious, Macau saw a 7.3 percent growth in its May gambling revenue - the slowest expansion rate recorded since July 2009. A total revenue of 26.08 billion patacas recorded for May is the second-highest for a single month, but a far cry from the 70 to 90 percent monthly growth rates seen in 2010, or even the 22 percent growth in April. “To assume that Macau gaming revenues will continue to grow at a double-digit pace, is to assume that the epic pace of property appreciation in China continues,” said Mike Turner, an analyst at Washington-based brokerage Compass Point to Reuters. Other analysts, however, remain upbeat on Macau’s future, citing a deeply unpenetrated market that will see further infrastructure development. Analysts have been expecting growth to ease since last year, and said May’s figure was within expectations. Most remain confident that a financial collapse for the tiny territory is not on the cards. Revenue is likely to remain steady due to rising demand from China’s expanding middle class and critical infrastructure developments. Gabriel Chan, an analyst at Credit Suisse in Hong Kong, said May marked the start of a tough yearon-year comparison due to the opening of Galaxy Entertainment’s new casino on the Cotai strip in 2011. “It is not the time to get in yet; we need to wait for better entry points. I think that will happen likely in August,” said Chan. He is not yet revising down a forecast of the 24.6 percent annual gambling revenue growth due to stronger than expected growth in the mass market segment. “I was always a bit reluctant to accept this unrestricted optimism in Macau that everything will grow indefinitely. But the truth is that everywhere you look, there are new opportunities,” says Mendes da Maia. “Real estate developments everywhere in the city, the Cotai developments, the reclaimed land projects, the light rail…I just don’t see one single sign that it’s going to slow down. Prices are going up, everything is getting more expensive, and still new foreign investors are flooding the market. Money is pouring in every day from everywhere; nothing is slowing down.”
39
40
Macau report
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012
REUTERS/Bobby Yip
The La Scala dilemma
O
n May 25, Reuters reported that Joseph Lau, the chairman of Hong Kong-based developer Chinese Estates, would face prosecution over bribery and money laundering charges in Macau. The prosecutor in Macau has alleged in court that Lau and another high-profile tycoon, Steven Lo, chairman of the South China Football Club and movie-and-music entertainment group BMA Investment, offered a HK$20 million ($2.6 million) bribe to a former Macau government official. The prosecutor alleged they did so to assure the purchase of five plots of land next to the Macau International Airport and near the Cotai Strip. Lau, who owns 75 percent of Chinese Estates, is currently awaiting trial in Macau along with Lo. The former official alleged to have been bribed, Ao Man-long, was Macau’s secre-
tary for transport and public works and the most senior government figure ever arrested by Macau’s anti-graft agency. He is already serving 28 and a half years in jail for accepting bribes to speed the approval of projects. The claims that Lau paid a bribe surfaced in a new trial, with Ao facing six fresh charges of bribery and three of money laundering. Lau has denied any wrongdoing. He was called as a witness in Ao’s new trial but did not appear, while Lo testified that he did not pay a bribe. Prosecutors say they found a cheque for HK$20 million that Lau signed with his brother, Thomas Lau. Chinese Estates is building a multitower luxury development on the site, naming it La Scala after the Milan opera house. Lo sold the company Full Moon, which owns the 78,000 square metres of land, to Chinese Estates. Property brokerage Jones
Lang LaSalle, which put in the winning bid for Full Moon, told Reuters it was assisting with the investigation. On June 12, the Macau government said it had initiated procedures to review the sale of the land plot that was sold to China Estates to build La Scala. The government had warned on June 4 that it could declare the sale of five plots of land to Chinese Estates invalid, after a court ruled that the transfer of the land next to the Macau International Airport involved illegal activity. Chinese Estates said in a filing to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange late on June 4 that it would have 30 days to appeal against any such decision. The company said it has presold 304 apartments at La Scala, generating sales of HK$3.8 billion ($490 million), and deposits of HK$384 million.
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
Macau report
41
Point of view What should the Macau What are the possible government’s next damages to investors steps be? who have bought La Scala flats through presale already? Julia Brockman, DSL Lawyers: I think it would be a very good decision of the government to halt the whole thing. It’s fair the government doesn’t want to reverse the whole situation and take the land plots back before the courts decide that there was corruption in the land grants. It’s reasonable because if it did so, it would get into more trouble.
Carlos duque Simoes, DSL Lawyers: The government should be more assertive because La Scala is still in the early stages of construction. There could be implications to what is being constructed as a consequence of these corruption charges. So, the government should take action at once instead of letting the matter sit still, and then by the time it decides to do something, it will be much more complicated and affect the interests of many other private parties. The government has to do what it has done in other circumstances, namely it has to react quickly and take clear and assertive measures now. It should stop the construction and unit sales of La Scala. In reality, if the government already knows or if it’s already public that there is clear evidence of corruption, at least it should suspend sales. I don’t think it should move now in terms of reversing the leasehold or cancelling the leasehold. But because there is a possibility that it may take more than a few months for the matter to be resolved, the government should not let more individual buyers get involved in the problem. It should notify China Estates to stop the sales of plans, and leave it on hold until the matter is decided in court. This will be a much more reasonable measure.
Carlos duque Simoes, DSL Lawyers: I don’t think there’s going to be much harm to buyers because if anything happens to the leasehold, they have a statutory provision that protects them in cases like this. They are most likely entitled to what is called “double compensation” that is to be refunded on the down payment. This is the equivalent amount as a penalty from the developer. China Estates is a very large listed company, so in all likelihood, it will face its liabilities in Macau.
Carlos Duque Simoes, DSL Lawyers
Julia Brockman, DSL Lawyers
42
Managing partner interview
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012
ONEOF A KIND
Stuart Fuller
When Australian market leader Mallesons Stephen Jaques and Chinese powerhouse King & Wood officially merged on March 1, the new combined firm became a game changer. With 21 offices and 390 partners worldwide, King & Wood Mallesons is the first and only firm with its international network headquartered in Asia, a true “combination of equals” offering Australian, UK, Hong Kong and PRC law advice. Global managing partner Stuart Fuller and China managing partner Wang Ling sat down with Candice Mak to discuss the integration of the firms’ cultures, why the King & Wood Mallesons model cannot be replicated, which elements are crucial for success, and the challenges they tackle as leaders.
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
Managing partner interview
43
Wang Ling
ALB: What is unique about the King & Wood Mallesons offering in the market? SF: King & Wood Mallesons is the first of its type, combining a Chinese and Western law firm. The true difference with us is that we are the only law firm that can practise Hong Kong law, English law, Australian law and PRC law. In essence, that is the key differentiation. It is also about our footprint in those markets. One of the key challenges for any business with the rise of China and with the shift in economic power is that you really need to know the markets you are operating in to do well. We know the market better than anyone else. We get China. We can best advise on China, help people navigate the complex environment, and that is a very unique thing in one coordinated brand. WL: If we look at the whole legal market and the combination based on the Asia-Pacific area, we are unique. I think what we have accomplished reflects the developments in
this market and our clients’ ambitions. ALB: How would you describe the King & Wood Mallesons culture? SF: It is all about being the best you can be, a culture of excellence and quality, and a culture of client-focus. We do better work for clients, help clients in their business, and we have a very strong focus on our people. How do we train and develop them, how do we bring our partners with us on this journey, and how can we constantly influence everybody in the firm. (And) we do have a lot of fun as the partners genuinely get along. ALB: What was the genesis of the firm? SF: We first met in November 2010. We did not know each other all that well; we did not have a long track record of referring work to each other or acting as co-counsel. But we had connections at the top. We had a meeting in Beijing – I remember that it was an extremely cold day! Within an hour, it was very clear that we had a common vision about where we wanted to take the respective firms. We were Australia’s leading firm and China’s leading firm, but we had greater aspirations for clients and our people to create a new firm that would be a genuine combination of equals, which is a strong driver for the King & Wood Mallesons combination. It is a combination of equals, and people got on board.
44
Managing partner interview
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012
“It is all about being the best you can be, a culture of excellence and quality, and a culture of client-focus. We do better work for clients, help clients in their business, and we have a very strong focus on our people.” stuart fuller, King & Wood Mallesons
WL: We had a very good feeling after meeting with Mallesons, and we wanted to continue the discussions in more detail. The result of those discussions came true, so that is very exciting. SF: These discussions took place over a year. In addition to doing the deal, we spent a significant amount of time talking to the partners about why this would work. We wanted to get very strong support from them. In the end, more than 95 percent of partners voted in favour of the deal. That was a very clear affirmation that it was the right choice, and that we were the right firms combining at the right time – some have even called it audacious! ALB: How do you define the firm’s strategies that you have set during your tenures? SF: In the short term, integration. We have started in Hong Kong where we have fully merged our respective firms to create King & Wood Mallesons. It is now the 4th largest firm in Hong Kong with close to 350 people. Common management is key. The management team speaks regularly on issues across the whole firm. We have a very clear plan about integration for the practice teams, clients, people and systems. That really focuses on strengthening the core of the network over the longer term. We will be focused on broadening our capabilities. We will also do this on the basis of what best suits the clients and our people over time. ALB: What were some of the post-integration merger issues you have had to address? WL: We put a lot of effort into looking closely at the business opportunities that existed as a result of the combination. On the practice side, it is quite exciting. The lawyers on both sides have been working together, managing transactions, or doing joint pitches. The combined team ultimately provides stronger and higher quality services to our clients. For operations, systems, IT, business development
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
and marketing, at each level, we are moving forward swiftly with integration. SF: For the firmwide things that we needed to do for March 1, we hit the targets perfectly: The launch of the brand, the client launch campaign across the network and the brand campaign, particularly in Australia, and the international advertising campaign. We were very focused on launching the brand in a very fresh and different way, reflecting the fact that our combination was the first of its type, and we wanted to make sure we had market impact. We have a client business development stream which is very strong, and part of our challenge has been controlling and harnessing the energy of our partners and lawyers to work together, which is a perfect problem for managing partners to have. The desire of partners to look for business opportunities and to go and get more work, particularly work we would not have seen had we stayed separate firms, is a real test of the success of our combination. We had to deal with a lot of internal stuff, so conflicts and alignments, pricing, and retainer terms, all of which we put into place by March 1. We are constantly looking at those to make them more efficient and effective. In Hong Kong, we have a new IT system, new phone system, and we are meshing partners together into a new single profit pool. That was a huge effort. There are some inevitable teething issues around that, mostly around IT, and we have put a lot of effort into getting it right. These are very personal issues because everyone relies so heavily on IT these days. We have recently physically integrated the practice teams, so that the corporate, banking and litigation groups in Hong Kong are sitting together. It is a very tangible sign of integrating people, and in hindsight, I am very glad we did not try to do this for March 1. The initial plan was to launch the firm and physically integrate by March 1. But putting a couple of months between it to let all the pieces settle down was absolutely the right call. We will be doing more of this over the next 18 to 24 months, as we continue to integrate a lot of back office functions. ALB: The King & Wood Mallesons combination is the first of its kind. Do you foresee more tie-ups of a similar nature happening in the future between competitors? WL: What is notable about our case is that both firms were the top in their jurisdictions. If we look at other Chinese firms, some have
Managing partner interview
also set up alliances or partnerships using different structures or opened up offices in other countries. It seems that a number of Chinese firms are exploring what the best way is for them to develop their business. The combination between King & Wood Mallesons received a lot of attention from the market and colleagues in the market. They are quite interested in knowing how the Verein structure, which we use, works. I think we are the first Chinese firm to use the Verein structure. I think the other Chinese firms are quite interested to see if maybe this could be a model they could use, or at least something to look at, or at least pay more attention to. SF: For many of our competitors, if you want to be a leading global law firm, you must have exposure to the largest economy on the globe. So the challenge for the industry, whether a law firm or a business, is how to get that exposure and how to service your clients in that market Chinese clients wanting to do work in the China market, Chinese clients wanting to invest outward, which looks to be a significant business activity over the next 10 to 20 years, and international companies going into China. If you want to be a significant global player, you need to have a significant presence in what will be the world’s largest economy, and you have to do that at the top tier. We have done that. On one level, the King & Wood Mallesons combination cannot be copied because each is the leading firm in each jurisdiction. Our competitors may follow over time, but they will not be at that brand or quality point. ALB: How is the Verein structure crucial to your success? WL: I think the basis for the combination structure was when during discussions, we realised that the structures of both firms were quite similar. Both firms had quite similar strategic goals, cultures, values and visions. On the King & Wood side, we had a modified lockstep system, but our structures were quite similar. So there was quite a solid basis to set up this structure. Most Chinese firms do not have this structure. SF: Vereins should be better understood than they are, because there are a number of accounting firms and global law firms that use it, so it is not an unknown structure. One of the reasons we chose it was that we believe it is the structure of the future. It gives you the benefits of a common approach to brand, management, clients and people development. Then you overlay on that common approach a degree of flexibility, where you can run the firm and have sufficient regard for the different markets, the economics of markets, and the volatility of markets and exchange rates. Also how you can be flexible about bringing in new members into the Verein as you want to expand your footprint. The Verein gives you much more flexibility than a single profit pool, one lockstep model. Plus, and I think this is becoming apparent to some other firms, there is an inherent limitation on how big a firm can get when it is a single profit pool, single lockstep, because markets perform differently, exchange rates fluctuate, pricing is different, productivity is different, and trying to put that into one uniform model across x number of countries is a hard task. It is a fulltime management job in itself. We can create all the benefits from a client and people perspective with a structure that gives you more flexibility, which is what the Verein gives. ALB: What are the key challenges of running a firm like King & Wood Mallesons? SF: We have a very focused business development plan as a combined
45
46
Managing partner interview firm around the areas where we think we can add better value to our clients than our competitors. In the first six weeks, we let that evolve and there was what I ended up calling “creative chaos”. We had so much connection between the partners in that period about client opportunities, joint pitches, etc. We started to work on five to six matters in that period of time, and we have now closed five of those. We have done over 50 pitches together as a combined firm in either China or Australia or Hong Kong, all in just 80 days. So part of our challenge was actually controlling the energy of the partners to get on a plane, see each other, and pitch to clients. It is a good problem to have. The thing we are both adjusting to is running a firm that is now over 21 offices and with three languages, Mandarin, Cantonese and English, and making sure that however we do things, it works across the whole network. How we communicate, how we manage, and how we make decisions. WL: The challenges are the firm locations if we are looking at the market, the target clients, and also that the backgrounds of the firms are quite different. If we look at the Australian part, Mallesons is more than 180 years old, but King & Wood is still a young firm – though it has grown very stable and quickly. Also, if we look at the markets, Australia is a first world nation, while China is still an emerging market. If we look at our client bases, some Chinese clients have become very experienced and some lack experience. When we integrate together, we need to fill in those detailed issues. So one part of the integration is to consider the background of our specialties. We are not only concerned with the business of deals, but also in the operational management of the combined firm. SF: This is all just a question of scale, I suspect. Whether it is across three jurisdictions or 23, you have the same broad issues of aligning people with the systems. The true thing about us, or the different part about our combination, is that it is a combination of equals. It is not a takeover or merger. If you have a dominant firm taking over a less dominant firm, that is easier to run by just saying “do it my way”. However with us, the combination of equals is a strong part of the DNA. It is a matter of saying “let’s look at the way we want to do it together”. There is not one dominating the other or creating opposition, but rather we are both saying “we really want to do this”, which means that communication is key. Making decisions on a joint basis is
“Although we have so many different offices, you see the same structures of the same practice areas, and we are always sharing market observations and information. Even though partners are in different offices, they have been getting to know each other and are working together to provide support to one another.” Wang Ling, King & Wood Mallesons
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012
much more powerful, and you get a lot more engagement when people work out things together instead of just being told what to do. ALB: How do you ensure best practices are upheld across all offices? WL: Although we have so many different offices, you see the same structures of the same practice areas, and we are always sharing market observations and information. Even though partners are in different offices, they have been getting to know each other and are working together to provide support to one another. SF: We have an executive team of four and we speak and e-mail regularly. There is Wang Ling as China managing partner, Australia managing partner Tony O’Malley, myself as the global managing partner and Hong Kong chief, and Rupert Li, who is the China international managing partner. The four of us have a particular time every week where we get together and talk about broader points across the firm. The international management committee has eight core members, four from each legacy firm with several Hong Kong observers. It meets every two months and looks at the overall firm, how we are going along in our business plan, integration plan, strategy, and any policy issues. The committee’s function is to primarily set standards and policies in the firm. So that is one way of achieving consistency at that level. Also, markets are different and the aim is to be the best in the market. You want to have that in whatever you do, in whatever market, and be accommodating of that market. So having an absolutely vanilla product across every market does not recognise the local nuances. As long as you are the best in the market and the client experience is very similar, that is the thing to aim for. That is a challenge for global law firms. WL: On both sides, we had practice heads. So we now have co-heads of the practice on each side. They help to coordinate any matter(s) that involves the lawyers and partners. If an issue arises, they know how to quickly involve the right person at the right time. SF: We have started with the firms’ top 30 clients with co-relationship partners and common client teams. With these clients, we are saying “here’s our team, what’s driving your business? And how can we help you? Here’s a team that can do that across all the practice areas that would be relevant to the client”. Client feedback and client engagement is crucial. It does not matter what we
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
say about how good we are; it is actually the voice of the client that is the key thing. The reaction from clients and the market was even more positive than I had personally hoped for. ALB: What ingredients are vital to the success of the firm over the next few years? SF: Clients and people. We are making sure that we are a very client-focused firm, which is what we are. To be honest, the King & Wood culture is incredibly client focused, so it is something out of the combination that we, Mallesons, will relearn. Mallesons is very client-focused as well. But being older and a dominant brand in the Australian market, we really want to edge up the client experience in the Australian market. But how we do execute our client strategy - the proof of concept? Are we getting more work from our existing clients and are we getting better deals from more clients? Deals we would not have won had we stayed as two separate firms? (And) then there is the people experience: how we are developing and training our people, giving them career opportunities, and improving their quality and their careers. ALB: What personally makes you believe in the success of King & Wood Mallesons?
Managing partner interview
SF: You have to be passionate and energetic about it as leaders of the firm, because you have to convey that you genuinely believe in what we have done, which I do. The combination of firms, the change in the global economic and political environment, the brand of the firm, the quality of the firm, and the clients and the market and the people connections - these are very strong across both firms. Being 81 days in, the signs are good because the people are gelling. We are dealing with each thing we need to deal with on a daily basis. We are talking regularly, and the client and market reaction is strong. Both firms are client driven firms, and if you get that reaction from the market, that incentivises the firm to continue on. It is our job to give partners and lawyers all the assistance they need, the platform they need to go into the market and get that work. WL: What I can add is that when you find the opportunity, you seize it for the firm’s development. When you have a very good basis, like from the management to the people to the structure of the firm, and you have no reason to cap the opportunities, then the opportunities can become true. Owning opportunities and taking them; that is really important to the next stage of the firm. When I look back on the development of King & Wood, many people have asked the same question: How did King & Wood build up so quickly? It developed quickly, not just in size or headcount, but I believe because people recognised the stable development and mature qualities of the firm, though it was still very young. I think one of the reasons for the growth in the past was that King & Wood tried to do something different from the other colleagues in the China market. We tried to catch the opportunities provided, or potentially provided, by the market or by the economic developments in the Chinese market. That is very important for the
47
48
Managing partner interview firm, and I think that is the main reason why we needed to do the combination. ALB: What have you learnt from the management style and the culture of the other’s firm? WL: There are many things we learnt from Mallesons. As a young firm, we were quite impressed by the efficiency of Mallesons’ management and its systems, each with a function that supported the firm’s development and created efficiency. The next stage for us on the King & Wood side is how we can adapt to the system. If we look at the legal practice, particularly in some sectors, Mallesons has a very good reputation and is highly recognised in the market in areas such as mining and energy. Knowing we can bring these into qualities into the combined firm is, I believe, really fantastic. SF: Mallesons is a very strong client focused firm, but the King & Wood client focus is incredibly strong with its depth of connection in the market. One thing I have realised from King & Wood, which is dominant in its market, is that it is the client connection and market connection that you have through your partners, being constantly in the market, and constantly focused on the clients - that makes a big difference. The singular focus is on what clients want, how do we get the deal, and how our connection to the market - through clients and people - mean we can provide better and broader service to clients. That is making a big difference with any client that we deal with. The other thing I have noticed is the communication style of the King & Wood lawyers. It is far more conversational. Mallesons, again, is 180 years old. We have very slick administrative services, and we probably do more by e-mail and by short, sharp communications. But the way, we do it in the Chinese firm; how I have seen Wang Ling and her partners do it is they have very significant conversations about decisions. So it is a group decision. That is the way you make a better decision, you talk it through, understand where each is coming from, and then move on. Now, as a whole firm, we are making sure we have conversations together so it is less of an e-mail culture. ALB: In the next five years, what do you predict the Asian legal market landscape will look like? WL: It will definitely be more competitive, and perhaps there will be more consolidation. In these next two years, we will likely see more and more Chinese firms trying to learn more from the experience of foreign firms and getting more involved in international matters. Also, I think one of the approaches for them would be to set up some type of relationship with the foreign firms. So I think that may result in more consolidation. On the other hand, it will not just be between Chinese firms and foreign firms. If we look at the other Asian firms, they might also be looking to set up relationships with Western firms. SF: It is a challenge because with the many countries in Asia, the laws vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Any strategy for a law firm has to be a client-led strategy, not a firm-led strategy. So you have to do things that will allow you to do more for your clients, and where they are taking their business. The big challenge for law firms, whether in five or ten years is that, in the current structure, law firms are not set up to do that. They do not cover enough jurisdictions; they cannot offer same brand or same experience to clients over enough of the jurisdictions where the clients are doing business. Compare accounting firms to law firms, and they are very different models. The accounting firms have the benefit of international accounting standards, so there is some similarity. But they drive brand and consistency of service across more jurisdictions in which their clients operate. (And) that is a
**The Chinese translation of this story was prepared by Synmax Translation**
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012
challenge for many law firms with a client-led strategy: How do you help your client across more jurisdictions through one brand and organisation? That is where I think there will be an evolution - in the way firms approach their structures, headcount, and their footprints. The markets are moving very quickly and the rate of change of what is happening
“In these next two years, we will likely see more and more Chinese firms trying to learn more from the experience of foreign firms and getting more involved in international matters. Also, I think one of the approaches for them would be to set up some type of relationship with the foreign firms.” Wang Ling, King & Wood Mallesons
in the U.S., European and Asian markets is quite significant at the moment. ALB: Have your work and personal lives changed since the launch of the new firm? SF: I have moved! So the biggest change for me was that I was made the chief executive of Mallesons and then became the global managing partner of King & Wood Mallesons in Hong Kong, and I moved here from Australia. My family does not move until the end of the year, so I go back to Sydney every weekend to see the family if I am not elsewhere. The firm changed, my job changed, and my place of residence changed, but it is terrific. I am meeting people all the time, dealing with clients and new market opportunities, and putting the firms together. It has been great fun. WL: Compared to Stuart, I am lucky. My travel is not so frequent. We appreciate Stuart traveling so much, particularly in the first year and around the time of integration. For me, travel did increase compared with before, but I think dealing with it has been fine. On the other hand, the working focus, my work has transferred into looking after the integration matters of the combined firm.
SPONSORED PROFILE
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
49
Li & Partners
IPO Lawyers Beware – Enhanced IPO Sponsor Regulatory Regime in Hong Kong
O
Hugo Ngaw, Senior Associate
Li & Partners (offices in Hong Kong, Shanghai, Beijing) A: 22/F, World-Wide House, Central, Hong Kong T: +852 2501 0088 F: +852 2501 0028 E: hugongaw@ li-partners.com W: www.li-partners.com
n 22 April 2012, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (“SFC”) revoked Mega Capital (Asia) Company Limited’s licence to advise on corporate finance and fined it HK$42 million for failing to discharge its duties as a sponsor in the listing of Hontex International Holdings Company Limited.
regime, sponsors should have already completed the vast majority of due diligence and resolved key issues concerning the operation, governance and structure of the company. A proposed big change is that first draft (A1 Proof) of the prospectus must be published on the website of The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited.
From 9 May to 6 July 2012, the public is invited to submit their comments to the SFC on the proposed enhanced regulation of initial public offerings (“IPO”) under a regime containing both civil and criminal penalties. IPO Lawyers particularly those acting for the sponsors should keep an eye on the proposed reform, selected highlights of which as follows:
Information in Prospectus Sponsors should also be reasonably satisfied through due diligence on the company that information in the prospectus is accurate and complete; and be able to demonstrate that it is reasonable to rely on accountants, valuers and other experts’ reports in the prospectus. Proper due diligence does not envision repeating the work done by experts and it does involve testing the information provided in the reports to ensure that the totality of disclosure in the prospectus is credible and coherent. Sponsors must also be closely involved in the preparation of the “Management Discussion & Analysis” section of a prospectus to ensure that sufficient qualitative information explaining the company’s track record is communicated clearly to potential investors.
Due Diligence The proposed regulations require sponsors to gain a thorough understanding of a company and adopt an open and questioning approach and not accept statements at face value. Listing Application Upon submitting a listing application under the new
www.step.org/asia2012
STEP ASIA CONFERENCE, 15-17 OCTOBER 2012, GRAND HYATT HOTEl, HONG KONG
WEALTH MANAGEMENT IN ASIA – The Future is Now Conference programme focus
Keynote Speakers
•
International tax developments - the macro view
•
Meeting the challenge of growing complexity in trust administration services
•
Doing business with the PRC, the compliance challenge and practical solutions
• Regulation of trustees in Asia-Pacific - a comparative analysis •
•
You, ethics and the criminal law
Working with families in Asia - an exercise in mediation
• Why fiduciary and governance skills matter... fiduciaries in the firing line •
Tips for handling contentious trust matters
Clive Grossman QC, Parkside Chambers, Hong Kong The Honourable Mr Justice Pagone Supreme Court of Victoria, Australia Plus... Panel sessions including: • Hunting the rich • 2017 vision
Accredited for 11.5 hours CPD, STEP, SRA, ILEX, The Law Society of Hong Kong Gold Sponsors
Silver Sponsor
Conference language: English Bronze Sponsors
Official International Business Newspaper
50
NEXT GENERATION CITIES
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS JULY 2012
ALB’S NEXT-GENERATION CITIES IDENTIFIES THE BEST FULL-SERVICE LAW FIRMS IN EMERGING COMMERCIAL CENTRES ACROSS ASIA. AS OSAKA, GUANGZHOU, BANGALORE AND PENANG BECOME INCREASINGLY IMPORTANT TO THE GLOBAL ECONOMY, THE MARKET DEMANDS A CORRESPONDING GROWTH IN SUPERIOR AND SOPHISTICATED LEGAL SERVICES. ALB HAS IDENTIFIED AND PROFILED THE TOP FULL-SERVICE LAW FIRMS IN THESE NEXT-GENERATION CITIES. BY SEHER HUSSAIN AND KANISHK VERGHESE
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
NEXT GENERATION CITIES
51
OSAKA
Despite the earthquake and tsunami that hit Japan’s economy in March last year, the world’s third-largest economy is bouncing back, buoyed by robust consumer spending and rebuilding in the disaster-struck areas. In fact, the Japanese economy grew a revised 1.2 percent in the first quarter of 2012, compared to the last three months of 2011. This was a welcome figure above the preliminary expectation of 1 percent growth, signalling that domestic demand is fuelling economic recovery. The revised annual growth figure stands at 4.7 percent, compared to the preliminary forecast of 4.1 percent. Osaka, historically the commercial centre of Japan, stands to benefit from the country’s rebound in the market. Practitioners note an increase in outbound M&A transactions by expanding Japanese companies, spurred on by an appreciating yen. Interestingly, some economists have suggested that domestic companies may consider shifting operations to Osaka in light of last year’s earthquake. Several business executives have asserted that production hubs in Japan should be moved to the west of the country – away from Tokyo – to minimise disruptions to the nation’s supply chain in case of future unforeseen events. A rise in businesses setting up shop in Osaka is certainly going to present lucrative opportunities for lawyers in the city.
REUTERS/Eriko Sugita
(Firms are arranged in alphabetical order)
CHUO SOGO LAW OFFICE A market leader in Osaka, Chuo Sogo Law Office has worked with clients for more than four decades on M&A, intellectual property, and local and cross border litigation, among others. The firm has a distinct prowess in financial matters, assisting banks and financial institutions on cross MASAHIRO border M&A. The pracNAKATSUKASA tice’s 15 partners and 41 lawyers work closely with foreign enterprises, and leading Japanese companies including Panasonic, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp, Mizuho Bank, and Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co.
52
NEXT GENERATION CITIES
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS JULY 2012
work, advising a range of corporations on banking and finance, trading, manufacturing, construction and IT. In 2010, Dojima Law office became a limited liability partnership, and opened an office in Tokyo. The recent expansion of operations has been a boon to the firm, whose clients are benefiting from the team’s ability to act quickly on cases that take place across Japan.
OH-EBASHI LPC & PARTNERS Established in 1981 in Osaka, Oh-Ebashi LPC & Partners is growing its reputation across Japan. The outfit offers a full range of services to its clients, from corporate law and finance, to environmental law and litigation. The Osaka office alone boasts a team of 25 partners and over 40 lawyers, underscoring the large volume of work being done in the city. Oh-Ebashi also has an office in Tokyo, and had opened a branch in Shanghai in 1995 which specialises in litigation and arbitration matters. “Oh-Ebashi is a very good law firm in Osaka,” comments a peer, who adds that “the quality of their lawyers is very impressive”. Another peer singles out partner Seigo Takehira for his expertise in corporate and M&A work.
OSAKA INTERNATIONAL LAW OFFICES
Passers-by walk under advertisements in the Dotonbori shopping and amusement district in Osaka. REUTERS/Issei Kato
Chuo Sogo expanded into Tokyo in 2003, and opened an office in Kyoto in 2009, strengthening its presence on the ground in Japan. Serving as a further boost, Shigeru Morimoto, a former professor at Kyoto University and an expert on corporation law in Japan, joined the firm in October 2011. Corporate partner Masahiro Nakatsukasa has been praised by both lawyers and clients. “His deep legal expertise, and his capability to understand our business needs makes him invaluable to us,” says one approving client. Nakatsukasa led the team that advised Sanyo Special Steel on establishing a joint venture company with Mahindra Ugine Steel to manufacture special steel in India. The group advised Sanyo on several cross border aspects of the transaction, assisted with its negotiation with Mahindra, and drafted agreements. “Chuo Sogo is one of the most renowned firms in Osaka,” comments a client. “The of-
fice has a fleet of highly qualified lawyers, including labour relations specialists, corporate law specialists, and international experts. All in all, we hold them in high regard,” he explains.
DOJIMA LAW OFFICE Dojima Law Office commands a strong presence in Osaka. Established in 1965 as Kimura & Matoba Joint Law Office, the firm was renamed to Dojima Law Office three years later in 1968. The firm operates with more than 20 capable lawyers, including the highly experienced Yuki Matoba and Toshio Kawamura. Key areas of focus for the firm include corporate restructuring and bankruptcy, environmental law, labour law, intellectual property, and criminal law. The team is also well known for its corporate law
Founded in 1994 by Koshi Yamaguchi, Osaka International Law Offices has grown steadily, and now includes, in addition to Yamaguchi, partner Nobuaki Matsuoka, five associates, and a resident foreign legal consultant. Yamaguchi, who a peer describes as “knowledgeable and very well known in the market”, helms the firm that offers a variety of services including M&A, real estate and construction, intellectual property, employment law, and international purchase agreements. Moreover, the firm has a wealth of experience in litigation. The team represents foreign enterprises in Japanese courts, and supports Japanese companies entangled in litigation proceedings abroad. Other notable firms in the city include H. Okada International Law Office, Kitahama Partners, Midosuji Legal Profession Corporation, and Yodoyabashi & Yamagami. As this issue went to press, Nishimura & Asahi, one of Japan’s Big Four law firms, announced plans to open offices in Osaka and Nagoya. The Osaka office will have two partners and up to four associates.
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
NEXT GENERATION CITIES
53
As China grows rapidly, Guangzhou – the capital of Guangdong province in southern China – is emerging as a significant economic powerhouse in the country. An economic report forecast that the city’s GDP is poised to catch up with that of Hong Kong and Singapore by 2015, and Taiwan by 2024. In fact, Guangzhou’s economic growth of 11 percent is in stark contrast to the sub-four percent figure seen in the other three jurisdictions. Guangzhou’s economy is fast developing as an important industrial base in China. The industrial output value of the three main industries – automobile manufacturing, electronic communications, and petrochemicals – accounts for about a third of the city’s output value. Other sectors are heating up too, say lawyers, who observe intellectual property, joint ventures, and M&A as some areas of growth. Guangzhou’s rise as an epicentre of activity has led to numerous foreign enterprises seeking to do business in the southern city. This has sparked several foreign law firms to set up shop, and spurred domestic law firms to bolster their existing practices in the region. (Firms are arranged in alphabetical order)
DACHENG LAW OFFICES
GUANGZHOU
One of the largest law firms in China, Dacheng Law Offices commands an impressive presence, sporting 35 offices on the mainland. In addition, the firm has seven overseas offices spanning the U.S. (New York, Los Angeles, Chicago), Paris, Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan. The outfit’s specialties include corporate M&A, capital markets, foreign direct investment, energy and mining, real estate, intellectual property, criminal law, and litigation and arbitration. The Guangzhou team consists of seven lawyers, and profits from the experience of senior partner Bin Jiang who focuses primarily on financial securities, real estate, corporate law, and criminal matters. Dacheng Law Offices joined the World Services Group (WSG) in 2009 as its only China member. The WSG is a leading profes-
54
NEXT GENERATION CITIES
sional service organisation encompassing members from law firms, accounting firms, and financial and investment companies.
GUANGDA LAW FIRM One of China’s prominent full-service law firms, Guangda Law Firm wields a team of more than 250 legal professionals who operate out of key cities including Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Guangzhou. The firm has capabilities in capital markets, banking and finance, real estate and construction, and intellectual property, with a specialisation in corporate and securities, cross border investment, and dispute resolution. The firm’s Guangzhou office has benefited from an array of work over the last year, including advising on several cable, radio and television network reorganisations for Guangdong province, negotiating on behalf of Opple Lighting with Apple on a global trademark registration of the mark Opple, and acting as legal adviser to CITIC Bank International and the Guangdong branch of the Agricultural Bank of China. The team also advised Brightoil Petroleum on its HK$1.5 billion ($193 million) stock acquisition from another petroleum company. Guangda is also a founding member of the Sino-Global Legal Alliance (SGLA), which includes Hogan Lovells and eight other leading PRC law firms.
HJM ASIA LAW & CO A foreign law firm with a presence in Singapore and Guangzhou, HJM Asia Law & Co boasts over 15 years of experience in the region. The outfit offers a gamut of specialties including corporate M&A work, employment law, litigation and arbitration, and compliance. But its prowess lies in assisting CAROLINE BERUBE foreign companies with establishing operations in China, and intellectual property matters. Managing partner Caroline Berube has been steadily growing the firm’s practice in Guangzhou, which now comprises eight lawyers. The recent arrival of foreign attorney Brad Alexander has served as a further boost to the team. Berube recently advised a German company on the setup of a wholly-owned for-
eign enterprise in Shanghai to expand its manufacturing in China. The team drafted required incorporation documents, resolved issues relating to the manufacturing facility, and liaised with authorities regarding the company’s activities. On the IP side, Berube advised a U.S. manufacturer on refiling its patent application in China, after the initial application and appeal – filed by the client’s previous legal adviser – was rejected by the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO). An amended application was drafted, and ultimately approved by SIPO.
MAYER BROWN JSM Commanding a strong legal presence globally, Mayer Brown JSM has also tapped into the Guangzhou market. The firm has had a busy year working with blue chip clients on real estate, construction, and engineering matters. The team is involved in real estate transactions that total over 11 million square feet in gross floor area in cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou. Advice is also given to numerous foreign companies building manufacturing facilities in China, particularly on issues including procurement models, drafting of contracts, and consultancy agreements for the projects. On the contentious side, the firm is acting for several developers and institutions on cross-border matters involving legal and arbitration proceedings in Hong Kong and China. Mayer Brown’s team has also advised several MNC clients on environmental law in China, including carbon credits, carbon emissions trading, and implementation models.
WRAGGE & CO UK firm Wragge & Co’s Guangzhou office, which opened in 2008, comprises eight legal professionals, headed by the experienced Tom Carver. Founded initially with a focus on intellectual property, the firm’s office has grown substantially in the last few years to encompass corporate, employment, real estate, finance, and dispute resolution among others via its international network. The consistent quality of the firm’s offering in Guangzhou has led it to acquire and retain clients including Aston Martin, Dyson, Triumph Motorcycles, Zaha Hadid, and several top UK and U.S. universities. The Guangzhou of fice was fur ther
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS JULY 2012
WRAGGE & CO
strengthened by the arrival of Daniela Shaw in February 2012. A Chinese qualified lawyer and trademark attorney, Shaw has a wealth of experience on intellectual property strategy and IPR transactions. The firm is assisting Aston Martin on its Chinese employment contracts, and advising the car maker on PRC intellectual property issues. The team also acted for Dyson in its successful civil action against Chinese home electrical appliances manufacturer Ninghai Wansheng. The issue surrounded the alleged design patent infringement by Ninghai of Dyson’s bladeless fan, in which the latter was awarded 500,000 yuan ($78,000) in damages. Besides intellectual property work, the firm has had a busy year advising clients on international arbitrations, joint ventures, and general corporate M&A matters.
ZHONG LUN LAW FIRM Headquartered in Beijing, Zhong Lun Law Firm also has offices in Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Wuhan, Chengdu, Hong Kong, Tokyo and London. The Guangzhou office covers a range of practice areas including, but not limited to, real estate and construction, corporate M&A, capital markets, foreign direct investment, and dispute resolution. The Guangzhou office alone boasts 14 partners, including real estate specialist Jianqing Ding, underlining the scope of the firm’s operations in Guangdong province’s capital city. The size of the team, coupled with its reputation in the market, has led many blue chip companies to seek out Zhong Lun Law Firm for its expertise. ING Real Estate, Sun Hung Kai Properties, HSBC, General Electric, Sony China, and American Oil Company are just a few of its clients on an extensive list. Other notable firms in the city include GFE Law Office, Guangxin Lawyers, Jun He Law Offices, King & Wood Mallesons, Trust Law, and Yingke Law Firm.
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
NEXT GENERATION CITIES
55
BANGALORE
Bangalore stole the spotlight earlier this year when lawyers clashed with journalists on the steps of the city’s civil court over allegations that they had been unjustly portrayed in the media. But leaving aside political confrontations, the outlook for the legal marketplace in Bangalore holds steadily positive. Sources report that despite a general slowdown, given the national economy, there is increasing activity in certain industries such as e-commerce and real estate. Venture capital and private equity funds are also continuing to take a closer look, and propelling deal activity in the region. Well known as an IT hub, lawyers have seen a continuous entry of software and internet companies into the city, with a heavy weighting towards international clients over domestic ones. There is also a distinct shift towards mid-level foreign companies who are now looking at Bangalore, as opposed to previous years in which only the larger Fortune 500 corporations staked a presence. More generally however, the market continues to evolve as national firms pour into Bangalore, setting up meaningful offices, as opposed to mere outposts. Smaller firms also persist in spinning off from larger national or Bangalore-headquartered firms, creating a deeper market for clients.
REUTERS/Jagadeesh N.V
(Firms are arranged in alphabetical order)
AMARCHAND & MANGALDAS & SURESH A. SHROFF & CO A force when it comes to corporate matters, this national firm has a renowned team in Bangalore that handles big-ticket restructurings, M&A, private equity, and capital markets transactions. The group also advises on real estate and litigation matters, focusing on corporate financing REEBA CHACKO and property acquisitions. Highlight work from the last year includes advising Doosan Heavy Industries &
56
NEXT GENERATION CITIES
Constructions in their $27 million acquisition of AE&E Chennai Works, and representing DSP Merrill Lynch in relation to the $2.1 billion sale by Petronas of 14.9 percent of Cairn India on the Bombay Stock Exchange and the National Stock Exchange of India. Other notable representations include advising the Kotak Alternate Opportunities (India) Fund in relation to the structuring of its investment in Century Real Estate Holdings. Notable clients include GMR, Landmark/ Lifestyle, Sequoia Capital, OnMobile, Premji Investments, Mantri Developers, Indiabulls, and BAMIL. Peers hail the firm for being “very active in the market”, and key contacts in Bangalore include partners Reeba Chacko and Nivedita Rao.
INDUS LAW A Bangalore-headquartered firm, Indus Law has a strong track record of representing clients in complex corporate, real estate, and dispute resolution matters. The team is especially sought after for its strength in capital markets, private equity, fund formation, and M&A work.
KHAITAN & CO This distinguished five-partner practice earns accolades for its expertise in corporate and commercial, real estate, litigation, and banking and finance mat te r s . T h e tea m frequently undertakes M&A, private equity, venture capital, securitisation, intellectual property, debt recovery RAJIV KHAITAN and licensing matters. Key work includes advising Vilmorin & Cie on the acquisition of shares in Bisco Bio Sciences with the objective of forming a joint venture company with the promoters; representing Happiest GANESH PRASAD Minds Technologies in a $45 million Series A Investments led by Canaan Partners and Intel Capital; and handling InMobi Technologies’s acquisition of certain assets worth $ 8.5 million from Sprout Inc. One client revealed that the team is “responsive, focused and easy to deal with”, while another pointed out that they are “excellent value for money”. O.P. Agarwal and Rajiv Khaitan helm the team in Bangalore, while other key contacts in the city include Ganesh Prasad.
KRISHNAMURTHY AND CO / K LAW
INDUS LAW
Recent key work includes representing Oak India Investments in its investment into Ybrant, advising Walden Investments on its $6 million investment into Bankbazar.com, and handling ASM Technologies in its 100 percent acquisition of U.S.-based Abacus Corporation. Key clients include Orbimed, Helion Venture Partner, Just Dial, and Elevar. Clients affirm that “we only have good things to say about Indus Law”, while peers reveal that the firm has “strong solid lawyers, and is a significant player”. Kartik Ganapathy, Srinivas Katta and Suneeth Katarki are the main partners in Bangalore.
Established in Bangalore in 1999, this fourpartner team is adept at handling corporate/ commercial and intellectual property matters. The firm is active in various industries, and represents software, pharmaceutical and hospitality companies as well as banking and finance clients. NIKHIL In the last year, the KRISHNAMURTHY team advised Captronic Systems in a $2.6 million investment by Forum Synergies India Trust and IMI Investments One Limited, represented IndoUS Venture Partners II in a $2.8 million investment in Simplilearn Solutions, and handled the Muthoot Group in the $8 million purchase of property in Bangalore.
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS JULY 2012
Clients compliment the firm for ITS “knowledge, experience, ease of working as a team and good accessibility”. Sources further note that “they deliver excellent legal advice and support and understand our needs”. Primary contacts include managing partner Naina Krishnamurthy and head of the Bangalore practice, Nikhil Krishnamurthy.
NARASAPPA, DORASWAMY & RAJA This talented team is headquartered in Bangalore, and is known for handling complex matters with a focus on corporate M&A, private equity and banking work. The firm also has a wellrespected litigation and arbitration practice. The team consists of three partners and 14 POORNIMA HATTI lawyers. Notable work from the last year includes advising Actoserba, a B angalor e -bas e d online lingerie store regarding a Series A funding from a venture capital firm, representing Aureos South SIDDHARTH RAJA Asia Fund in its $7 million investment in Sai Security Printers, and handling Inventus Capital Partners’ $2 million investment into LemonLearn eservices. Sources praise the team as “thoroughly professional, very helpful, and accommodative of tough time lines when required”. Harish Narasappa is the primary contact in Bangalore, and clients affirm he is “articulate and in control of his work”. Partners Siddharth Raja and Poornima Hatti are also well-recognised in the market.
SINGHANIA & PARTNERS Having established its Bangalore office in 1999, this firm maintains a significant profile in the market, advising on a wide range of dispute resolution matters as well as handling corporate and commercial deals. The team has particular expertise in representing both domestic and international IT clients, particularly software and internet companies. Key work from the last year includes defending the National Highways Authority of India in
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
NEXT GENERATION CITIES
57
REUTERS/Bazuki Muhammad
the High Court of Karnataka regarding a question of right of access to the national highway, as well as representing management and technology consulting firm BearingPoint in the acquisition of an Indian company. The team also advised the Union of India before the High Court of Karnataka chalSHILPA SHAH lenging the order passed by a judge regarding an acquisition by the government of India. Source praise the team for its “large variety and volume of work”. Key contacts include partner Shilpa Shah in Bangalore.
TRILEGAL Going from strength to strength, this fourpartner practice has an established reputation for a wide range of corporate transactions, particularly for technology clients, including M&As, venture capital and private equity matters. The team also frequently undertakes telecom and media transactions. Recent notable work includes representing SAIF Partners and MakeMyTrip in a $17.8 million acquisition of a majority stake in iXigo.com, advising Synopsys on its $11 mil-
TRILEGAL
lion acquisition of nSys Design Systems, and handling Varkey Group’s acquisition of 32.60 percent shareholding in Everonn Education. Key clients include Telenor, Norwest Venture Partners, and Unitech Wireless. Market sources praise the team for its “high level of activity” while partner Rahul Matthan is valued for his “unparalleled negotiation skills, both strategically and tactically, and profound knowledge of the telecom industry”. Other notable law firms in Bangalore include J. Sagar Associates, Wadia Ghandy & Co, Luthra & Luthra, and AZB & Partners.
PENANG
A clear next-generation region for legal services, Penang continues its dynamic growth hand in hand with Malaysia’s economic boom. A recent report by the chief minister of Penang noted that the state made the largest contribution to Malaysia’s foreign direct investments in 2011 with RM17.7 billion, or 28 percent of the country’s total FDI total - an undeniably strong advantage in continuing to attract more multi-nationals to its shores. To date, the economy has shown no sign of slowing down as manufacturing investment also continues to pour in, having topped out at RM9.1billion in 2011. Practitioners have clearly seen a knock-on effect, given the flurry of commercial activity. A notable trend is the robust growth in real estate work, as both commercial and residential projects keep lawyers busy. General corporate work has also been on the upswing, as joint ventures with foreign partners become increasingly common. Lastly, commercial banking transactions continue to hold steady, according to market sources. As the demand for these services grows, many predict a corresponding expansion of the legal market in the months and years to come.
58
NEXT GENERATION CITIES
(Firms are arranged in alphabetical order)
GHAZI & LIM A renowned national firm, Ghazi & Lim has a well-established Penang office that undertakes a mix of corporate, commercial, banking, real estate and dispute resolution matters. The team frequently handles a wide range of civil and criminal litigation, and is also sought out for its experience in labour relations, employment law, and immigration matters. Clients include multinationals from the electrical, electronics and manufacturing industries, as well as several international trading enterprises. Market sources praise them as “worthy opponents and a reputable firm”. Notable lawyers include Dato' Ghazi Ishak who focuses on litigation and often handles criminal, banking, construction, and constitutional disputes. Other areas of expertise include corporate transactions, in particular joint ventures with foreign partners. Tai Lee
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS JULY 2012
Sim is another key contact who is sought out for her banking, corporate, and commercial expertise.
LEE HISHAMMUDDIN ALLEN & GLEDHILL This large national law firm has two resident partners at its Penang office, and is renowned for its broad experience in disputes, intellectual property, and corporate matters. In the last year, the firm has undertaken a significant amount of real estate work as well. Last year, the team counselled Malayan CHIA LOONG THYE Banking Berhad, the largest bank in Malaysia, regarding the recovery of sums worth RM20 million due and owing under banking facilities granted to Tong Giap (the borrower) against its guarantors.
Key partners include Saravana Kumar who focuses on tax planning, audits, double taxation, stamp duty and transfer pricing matters, and Chia Loong Thye who handles arbitration, corporate, and real estate issues. Thye has particular expertise in land transactions and housing development legal matters.
PRESGRAVE & MATTHEWS With over 100 years of history, Presgrave & Matthews is one of Penang’s oldest law firms. This ten-partner team is well reputed for its disputes and corporate and commercial expertise. Within disputes, the group has a particular focus on building and construction law, arbitration, insurance, and taxation. Its corporate and commercial experience covers banking, shipping and employment transactions as well as offshore, personal and Islamic banking. There is also a dedicated intellectual property practice that handles both trademark and copyright issues. Senior partner Karin Lim Ai Ching specialises in corporate and commercial litigation, frequently undertaking wills, probate, banking and land law disputes. Head of the corporate and commercial department, Peter Moey Boon On, is experienced in property conveyancing, as well as personal and corporate banking matters.
ZAID IBRAHIM & CO This two-partner team is highly regarded for its real estate, litigation, and corporate and commercial expertise. Recent highlights include representing Maybank Investment Bank Berhad and Danajamin Nasional Berhad, Malaysia’s first financial guarantee insurer in the Ranhill Power Sukuk Musharakah worth $264 million. Other notable representations include advising Khazanah Nasional Berhad in its disposal by way of a private tender of its 32.21 percent strategic stake in Pos Malaysia Berhad, Malaysia’s national postal services corporation. Key clients include CIMB Group Holdings Berhad and AmInvestment Bank Berhad. The main contact is Ang Siak Keng, who focuses on corporate commercial, capital markets, real estate, and banking matters. He is sought out for his expertise in advising foreign investors in setting up operations in the states of Penang and Kedah. REUTERS/Zainal Abd Halim
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
SPONSORED PROFILE
59
SYCIP SALAZAR HERNANDEZ & GATMAITAN
SYCIP SALAZAR HERNANDEZ & GATMAITAN
Rafael A. Morales, Managing Partner
Overview SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan (SyCipLaw) is the largest law firm in the Philippines. Although its work centers on business activity, the firm has offered a broad and integrated range of legal services that cover such areas as family relations, constitutional issues, and other matters of law unrelated to commerce since its founding in 1945. Areas of practice SyCipLaw’s practice is diversified, as reflected in its seven principal departments: banking, finance and securities; corporate services; intellectual property; labor; litigation; special projects; and tax. Within this structure, some of the firm’s lawyers are involved in additional fields of specialization, such as immigration, shipping, and maritime law. We represent enterprises in many fields, including construction, energy, manufacturing, mining, insurance, banking and other financial services, transportation and communications, and real estate. In addition to domestic, foreign and multinational business corporations, the firm represents individuals, non-profit institutions, governmental agencies, and multilateral organizations. Network SyCipLaw has a wide and varied international law practice in the Philippines. It maintains links with established and leading firms in major cities in Asia, Europe, Canada, the US, Central and South America, Australia, and New Zealand. We are a member of various exclusive international lawyers’ associations, such as the Pacific Rim Advisory Council (PRAC), the World Law Group (WLG), and the Multinational Association of Law Firms (Multilaw). Recognitions and Awards “SyCip is the largest law firm in the Philippines, and one of the few with an international reputation. Clients particularly appreciate the firm’s emphasis on integrity.” — Asialaw Profiles (2012) “SyCip has a good grasp of relevant issues and understands completely the clients’ business concerns, not just the legal.” — Chambers and Partners, Chambers Asia Pacific (2011) “SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan possesses ‘great strength in its numbers, being the largest law firm in the country in terms of head count, as well as in the quality of professionals at its disposal,’ says a rival.” — IFLR 1000 (2011)
A: SyCipLaw Center, 105 Paseo de Roxas, Makati City 1226 The Philippines T: (632) 982 3500; 982 3600; 982 3700 F: (632) 817 3145; 817 3896; 818 7562 E: sshg@syciplaw.com W: www.syciplaw.com
SyCipLaw has consistently received professional recognitions and accolades, including: • National Law Firm of the Year for the Philippines, International Financial Law Review Asia Awards 2012 • Philippine Law Firm of the Year, Chambers Asia Awards for Excellence 2012
• Philippine Deal Firm of the Year, Asian Legal Business Southeast Asia Law Awards 2012 • Philippine Law Firm of the Year, Who’s Who Legal Awards 2012 • Most Responsive Philippine Firm of the Year, ASIANMENA COUNSEL Community Awards 2011 • Best Firm in the Philippines, Asia Women in Business Law Awards 2011 • Project Finance Deal of the Year, International Financial Law Review Asia Awards 2011 Managing Partner Rafael A. Morales Partners Andres B. Sta. Maria, Jr.; Vicente B. Amador; Mia G. Gentugaya; Emmanuel C. Paras; Lozano A. Tan; Emmanuel M. Lombos; Rolando V. Medalla, Jr.; Domingo G. Castillo; Marilyn A. Victorio-Aquino; Luisito V. Liban; Marievic G. Ramos-Añonuevo; Simeon Ken R. Ferrer; Rocky Alejandro L. Reyes; Jose F. Justiniano; Dante T. Pamintuan; Jose Ma. G. Hofileña; Imelda A. Manguiat; Rose Marie M. King-Dominguez; Ricardo Ma. P.G. Ongkiko; Enrique T. Manuel; Hector M. De Leon, Jr.; Leslie C. Dy; Carlos Roberto Z. Lopez; Ramon G. Songco; Angel M. Salita, Jr.; Rafael L. Encarnacion; Carina C. Laforteza; Maria Teresa D. Mercado-Ferrer; Vicente D. Gerochi IV; Anthony W. Dee; Amer Hussein N. Mambuay; Vida M. Panganiban-Alindogan; Alan C. Fontanosa; Dominador Maphilindo O. Carrillo; Thaddeus R. Alvizo; Rodelle B. Bolante; Philbert E. Varona; Marianne M. Miguel; Benedicto P. Panigbatan; Franco Noel A. Manaig Senior Counsel Florentino P. Feliciano; Andres G. Gatmaitan; Llewellyn L. Llanillo Of Counsel Juan C. Reyes, Jr.; Danilo V. Ortiz; Rene Y. Soriano; Roberto C. San Juan; Nelson T. Antolin Special Counsel Emmanuel L. Peña, Jr.; Marietta A. Tibayan; Cecile M.E. Caro-Selvaggio
60
AWARDS
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS JULY 2012
BEST Asian Legal Business (ALB) is delighted to announce the official list of winners of the Marina Bay Financial Centre ALB SE Asia Law Awards 2012, held on May 11 at the Shangri-la Hotel Singapore. The eighth annual event was attended by the guest of honour, Deirdre Stanley, EVP and general counsel Thomson Reuters Corporation visiting from the U.S. She joined more than 300 investment bankers, solicitors, in-house counsel, and CEOs from across SE Asia who assembled to celebrate with the winners as they accepted their awards on stage Awards in a total of 33 categories were presented to firms, companies, and individuals. Allen & Gledhill claimed 10 awards including the construction, real estate and tax and trusts law firm of the year awards, as well as the coveted Singapore Deal Firm of the Year award. In addition to recognising the collective talents of law firms and in-house legal teams, the Marina Bay Financial Centre ALB SE Asia Law Awards also singled out SE Asia’s leading individual talents. Lee Eng Beng SC of Rajah & Tann took home the Managing Partner of the Year award, while Sok-Theng Cheng of Morgan Stanley was named the Singapore In-House Lawyer of the Year. International law firm Latham & Watkins and regional heavyweight WongPartnership each took home four awards on the evening. Baker & McKenzie was one of the big winners for its work on the PT Natrindo Telepon Seluler Murabaha Facilities deal (the winning deal of the Islamic Finance Deal of the Year), as well as the recognition of its foreign offices. Wong & Partners was awarded with the Malaysia Deal Firm of the Year, and Hadiputranto, Hadinoto & Partners was named the Indonesia Deal Firm of the Year.
OF THE
BEST
DEAL AWARDS CATEGORIES
FIRM AWARDS CATEGORIES
Award
Winner
Award
Winner
Asset & Corporate Finance Deal of the Year
Boeing Aircraft Order from Lion Air
Commercial Litigation Law Firm of the Year
Drew & Napier
Islamic Finance Deal of the Year
PT Natrindo Telepon Seluler Murabaha Facilities
Construction Law Firm of the Year
Allen & Gledhill
Project Finance Deal of the Year
Jurong Aromatics Petrochemical Plant Project
Energy & Resources Law Firm of the Year
Linklaters
IP Law Firm of the Year
ATMD Bird & Bird
Debt Market Deal of the Year
Wilmar International Limited Guaranteed Medium Term Note Programme
International Arbitration Law Firm of the Year
Herbert Smith
Hutchison Port Holdings Trust Listing on the SGX-ST
Offshore Law Firm of the Year
Maples and Calder
Equity Market Deal of the Year
Temasek Holdings (Private) - Khazanah Nasional Berhad Joint Development
Marina Bay Financial Centre Award Real Estate Law Firm of the Year
Allen & Gledhill
SE Asia M&A Deal of the Year
NestlĂŠ S.A. Acquisition of 60% stake in Hsu Fu Chi International
SE Asia Shipping Law Firm of the Year
Ince & Co
IPP Financial Advisers Pte Ltd Award Singapore M&A Deal of the Year
Singapore Shipping Law Firm of the Year
Rajah & Tann
SE Asia Deal of the Year
Boeing Aircraft Order from Lion Air
Tax & Trusts Law Firm of the Year
Allen & Gledhill
Singapore Deal of the Year
Jurong Aromatics Petrochemical Plant Project
India Deal Firm of the Year
Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A. Shroff & Co.
Indonesia Deal Firm of the Year
Hadiputranto, Hadinoto & Partners
Malaysia Deal Firm of the Year
Wong & Partners
Philippines Deal Firm of the Year
Romulo Mabanta Buenaventura Sayoc & De los Angeles; SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan
Thailand Deal Firm of the Year
Linklaters
Vietnam Deal Firm of the Year
VILAF
International Deal Firm of the Year
Latham & Watkins
Singapore Deal Firm of the Year
Allen & Gledhill
Marina Bay Financial Centre Award Managing Partner of the Year
Rajah & Tann - Lee Eng Beng SC
IN-HOUSE AWARDS CATEGORIES Award
Winner
Investment Bank In-House Team of the Year
Morgan Stanley
Real Estate & Construction In-House Team of the Year
CapitaLand
Shipping In-House Team of the Year
Sembcorp Marine
Singapore In-House Lawyer of the Year
Morgan Stanley Sok-Theng Cheng
The Singapore Corporate Counsel Association Award Singapore In-House Team of the Year
CapitaLand
AWARDS
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
61
DEAL AWARDS CATEGORIES Asset & Corporate Finance Deal of the Year
(L-R) Paul Ng, Stephenson Harwood; Andrew Marshall, ESPN Star Sports
WINNER Boeing Aircraft Order from Lion Air Firm: Stephenson Harwood FINALISTS • Abbot Point X50 Coal Terminal Acquisition Financing • Aircel Mobile Telecommunications Project • Asia Mobile Holdings Dual Currency Term and Revolving Credit Facilities • Asia Square Tower 1 Refinancing • Festival Walk Acquisition Financing • JG Summit disposed of Digitel Telecommunications Philippines in favor of PLDT • Murabaha Finance Parties Secured Sharia Loan Transaction Launched by PT Natrindo Telepon Selular • Olam International Term Loan Facilities • Pertamina Bond Offering • Sahaviriya Acquisition of Teesside Cast Products • Singapore Airlines Lease Facility • SingTel Group Treasury Revolving Credit Facility • United Overseas Bank Debt Programme Agreement • Vietnam Airlines Aircraft Purchasing
Mochtar Karuwin Komar; Norton Rose; White & Case Banks: Deutsche Bank; HSBC; The Saudi British Bank FINALISTS • Government of Malaysia Dual Tranche Sukukal-Wakala Transaction • Gulf International Bank Ringgit Islamic MTN • Gulf Investment Corporation Sukuk Issuance • Projek Lebuhraya Usahasama Berhad Sukuk Musharakah • Republic of Indonesia Sukuk Issuance • Senai-Desaru Expressway Berhad Islamic Medium Term Notes Issuance • TNB Janamanjung Sukuk Ijarah Programme
Banks: BNP Paribas; ICON Capital Corp; ING Bank; Royal Bank of Scotland FINALISTS • • • • • • • •
Aircel Mobile Telecommunications Project Hai Duong BOT Thermal Coal-Fired Power Project Hindalco Industries Financing Indiabulls Power Plant Financing KSK Mahanadi Power Company Senior & Sub Debt Financing Mong Duong 2 Thermal Coal Fired Power Project Sasan Power Limited International Debt Tie-up Taganito Project
Debt Market Deal of the Year
Project Finance Deal of the Year Islamic Finance Deal of the Year
(L-R) Andrew Meagher, Thomson Reuters; Ellis Tang, Allen & Gledhill; Dean Lockhart, Linklaters
(L-R) Abi Sekimitsu, Thomson Reuters; Edmund Leow, Baker & McKenzie.Wong & Leow; Rambun Tjajo, Hadiputranto Hadinoto & Partners; Johannes Juette, Clifford Chance
WINNER PT Natrindo Telepon Seluler Murabaha Facilities Firms: Baker & Mckenzie; Clifford Chance; Hadiputranto, Hadinoto & Partners; MAQS;
(L-R) Stephen McWilliams, Latham & Watkins; Chen Lee Won, Allen & Gledhill; Dorothy Marie Ng, WongPartnership; Eric Pereira, Sweet & Maxwell Asia
WINNER Jurong Aromatics Petrochemical Plant Project Firms: Allen & Gledhill; Allen & Overy; Latham & Watkins; Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy; WongPartnership
WINNER Wilmar International Limited Guaranteed Medium Term Note Programme Firms: Allen & Gledhill; Haiwen & Partners; Linklaters; Linklaters Allen & Gledhill Accountant: Ernst & Young FINALISTS • Government of Malaysia Dual Tranche Sukukal-Wakala Transaction
62
AWARDS
• Jaguar Land Rover High Yield Bond Offering • Malayan Banking Berhad Multicurrency Medium Term Note Programme • Pertamina Bond Offering • Projek Lebuhraya Usahasama Berhad Sukuk Musharakah • PT PLN Persero GMTN Program • Senai-Desaru Expressway Berhad Islamic Medium Term Notes Issuance • TNB Janamanjung Sukuk Ijarah Programme • Transurban Finance Company Secured Euro Medium Term Note Programme • Vedanta Resources Bond Issuance
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS JULY 2012
FINALISTS • • • • • • • • • •
Bank Mandiri Rights Offering Bumi Armada IPO Cairn India Sale of Equity Shares on BSE & NSE Lonza Group Secondary Listing on the SGX-ST Ma Kuang Healthcare Listing on the OTC of the GTSM in Taiwan Mapletree Commercial Trust IPO MSM Malaysia Listing on the Malaysian Stock Exchange Perennial China Retail Trust Listing on the SGX-ST Power Finance Corporation Limited Further Public Offering Tata Steel Follow on Public Offer of Equity Shares
EQUITY MARKET Deal of the Year
SE ASIA M&A Deal of the Year
(L-R) Akash Mohapatra, Deutsche Bank AG; Ivy Yong, JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A; Yuen Ping Foong, Allen & Gledhill; Stephen Revell, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer; Sok-Theng Cheng, Morgan Stanley; Pin Yit Howe, UBS; Dharmendra Yadav, CIMB Securities (Singapore) Pte Ltd; Dayan Candappa, Thomson Reuters
(L-R) Putri Norlisa Mohd Najib, Kadir Andri & Partners; Lee Kee Yeng, Allen & Gledhill; Nachum Kaplan, IFR Asia; Raymond Yong, Rahmat Lim & Partners; Dorothy Marie Ng, WongPartnership
WINNER Hutchison Port Holdings Trust Listing on the SGX-ST Firms: Allen & Gledhill; Allen & Overy; Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer; Jun He; King & Wood Mallesons Banks: Bank of Nova Scotia Asia; Barclays Bank; CIMB; Daiwa Capital Markets; DBS Bank; Deutsche Bank; Ernst & Young Corporate Finance; Goldman Sachs; JP Morgan; Mizuho Securities; Morgan Stanley; Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation; UBS; United Overseas Bank Accountants: Ernst & Young; PwC
WINNER Temasek Holdings (Private) Khazanah Nasional Berhad Joint Development Firms: Allen & Gledhill; Kadir Andri & Partners; Rahmat Lim & Partners; Rodyk & Davidson; Shearn Delamore & Co.; WongPartnership; Zaid Ibrahim & Co FINALISTS • Aabar Stake Acquisition of RHB Capital • Abraaj Capital Divestment of 50% stake in Turkish hospital chain Acibadem Saglik Yatirimlari Holding • AXA SA Acquisition of the Asian Insurance Businesses Previously Held by AXA Asia Pacific Holdings • BP - Reliance Joint Venture
• Chareon Pokphand Food Acquisition of a 74% stake in its Hong Kong affiliate CP Pokphand Company • China Huaneng Acquisition of InterGen N.V. • GuocoLand - Employees Provident Fund of Malaysia Joint Venture • iGate Acquisition of Patni Computer Systems • Level 3 Acquisition of Global Crossing • Malayan Banking - Kim Eng Securities Acquisition • SapuraCrest and Kencana Merger of Equals • Siemens Open Offer under the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) • Vedanta Resources Acquisition of Cairn India
IPP Financial Advisers Pte Ltd Award Singapore M&A Deal of the Year
(L-R) Christopher Koh, Allen & Gledhill; Lee Hill, Latham & Watkins; Sok-Theng Cheng, Morgan Stanley; Joy Ling Wong, Loo & Partners; David Collins, Walkers; Ian Pryor, IPP Financial Advisers Pte Ltd
WINNER Nestlé S.A. Acquisition of 60% stake in Hsu Fu Chi International Firms: Allen & Gledhill; Conyers Dill & Pearman; King & Wood Mallesons; Latham & Watkins; Loo & Partners; Maples and Calder; Reed Smith; Shook Lin & Bok; Walkers; White & Case; WongPartnership Bank: Morgan Stanley FINALISTS • • • •
Advantest Corporation - Verigy Merge Chater Capital Acquisition of a subsidiary of CapitaLand SingTel NetLink Trust Creation Western Digital Corporation Acquisition of Viviti Technologies
AWARDS
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
63
IN-HOUSE AWARDS CATEGORIES SE ASIA Deal of the Year
Investment Bank In-House Team of the Year
Singapore In-House Lawyer of the Year
(L-R) Deirdre Stanley, Thomson Reuters Corporation; Sok-Theng Cheng, Morgan Stanley
(L-R) Paul Ng, Stephenson Harwood; Andrew Goldner, ALB
WINNER Boeing Aircraft Order from Lion Air Firm: Stephenson Harwood FINALISTS • PT Natrindo Telepon Seluler Murabaha Facilities • Temasek Holdings (Private) - Khazanah Nasional Berhad Joint Development
WINNER Morgan Stanley
(L-R) Rachel Eng, WongPartnership; Sok-Theng Cheng, Morgan Stanley; Deirdre Stanley, Thomson Reuters Corporation
FINALISTS • Barclays • CIMB • Credit Suisse
• Goldman Sachs • JP Morgan • UBS
Real Estate & Construction In-House Team of the Year
WINNER Morgan Stanley - Sok-Theng Cheng FINALISTS • • • • • •
CapitaLand - Low Sai-Choy Jurong International - Kash Quddus Macquarie - Deborah Ong Marina Bay Sands - Calvin Pereira Nomura - Kew Yong Koh Religare Capital Markets - Chris Holland
SINGAPORE Deal of the Year The Singapore Corporate Counsel Association Award Singapore In-House Team of the Year
(L-R) Lee Suet Fern, Stamford Law Corporation; Low Sai Choy, CapitaLand
WINNER CapitaLand FINALISTS (L-R) Christopher Koh, Allen & Gledhill; Owain Davies, Latham & Watkins; Kenneth Leong, WongPartnership; Ian Pryor, IPP Financial Advisers Pte Ltd
• Aboitiz Equity Ventures • City Developments
• Far East Organisation • Keppel Land
Shipping In-House Team of the Year WINNER Jurong Aromatics Petrochemical Plant Project Firms: Allen & Gledhill; Allen & Overy; Latham & Watkins; Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy; WongPartnership Banks: BNP Paribas; ICON Capital Corp; ING Bank; Royal Bank of Scotland
WINNER CapitaLand FINALISTS
FINALISTS • Hutchison Port Holdings Trust Listing on the SGX-ST • Nestlé S.A. Acquisition of 60% stake in Hsu Fu Chi International • Wilmar International Limited Guaranteed Medium Term Note Programme
(L-R) Low Sai Choy, CapitaLand; Eric Pereira, Singapore Corporate Counsel Association
(L-R) Andrew Tan, Sembcorp Marine; Chris Lowe, Watson, Farley & Williams Asia Practice
WINNER Sembcorp Marine FINALISTS • Neptune Orient Lines
• Pacific Carriers • PSA International
• • • • • • • • • •
CIMB Citi ESPN STAR Sports HSBC Maxis Morgan Stanley Resorts World at Sentosa Sembcorp Marine Standard Chartered Bank United Industrial Corporation / Singapore Land
64
AWARDS
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS JULY 2012
FIRM AWARDS CATEGORIES Commercial Litigation Law Firm of the Year
(L-R) Sok-Theng Cheng, Morgan Stanley; Jimmy Yim, SC, Drew & Napier
WINNER Drew & Napier
• Allen & Gledhill • Baker & McKenzie • Rajah & Tann
(L-R) May Wong, ALB; Leong Kah Wah, Rajah & Tann (L-R) Cynthia Wong, Raffles Quay Asset Management; Tan Boon Wah, Allen & Gledhill
WINNER Allen & Gledhill
FINALISTS • Shook Lin & Bok • Stamford Law Corporation • WongPartnership
Construction Law Firm of the Year
Singapore Shipping Law Firm of the Year
Marina Bay Financial Centre Award Real Estate Law Firm of the Year
FINALISTS • • • • • •
Lee & Lee Rajah & Tann Rodyk & Davidson Stamford Law Corporation Shook Lin & Bok WongPartnership
WINNER Rajah & Tann FINALISTS • Allen & Gledhill • Oon & Bazul • WongPartnership
Energy & Resources Law Firm of the Year
SE Asia Shipping Law Firm of the Year
(L-R) Low Sai Choy, CapitaLand; Chen Lee Won, Allen & Gledhill
(L-R) Jeffrey Wong, Religare Capital Markets; Arun Balasubramanian, Linklaters
WINNER Allen & Gledhill
WINNER Linklaters
FINALISTS • • • •
Drew & Napier INCA LAW Pinsent Masons MPillay WongPartnership
Offshore Law Firm of the Year
FINALISTS Reza Ispahani, Ince & Co, in alliance with Incisive Law LLC
WINNER Ince & Co FINALISTS
WINNER Maples and Calder FINALISTS • • • •
Appleby Cains Conyers Dill & Pearman Walkers
• • • • • •
Hanafiah Ponggawa & Partners Norton Rose Soewito Suhardiman Eddymurthy Kardono (SSEK) Stephenson Harwood Watson, Farley & Williams Wikborg Rein
• • • • • • • • •
Allen & Gledhill Clifford Chance Hadiputranto, Hadinoto & Partners Herbert Smith in association with Hiswara Bunjamin & Tandjung Latham & Watkins Soewito Suhardiman Eddymurthy Kardono (SSEK) Watson, Farley & Williams White & Case WongPartnership
On top in Asia and on your side Having rocketed up in the latest survey by Thomson Reuters’s Asian Legal Business, Rajah & Tann is now officially the largest law firm in Singapore and South East Asia. Naturally, we’re pleased to be No 1 in our own backyard. But, far from being content with local leadership, we’re forging ahead with our strategy of expanding our reach throughout the region, by adding new offices to our network. Our aim: to ensure that Rajah & Tann’s outstandingly responsive service and exceptional breadth and depth of expertise are easily accessible to clients wherever they do business in Asia. Widening our horizons still further, Rajah & Tann is increasingly a presence on the global stage, too. For example, we’ve recently been ranked among the world’s top 30 arbitration practices for the fourth consecutive year; while, in 2011, our highly rated Corporate team handled M&A deals with an impressive aggregate deal value of more than US$6.5 billion. In short, for a winning combination of local know-how, regional coverage, and world class legal thinking... look no further.
Rajah & Tann LLP Singapore | China | Malaysia* | Lao PDR Vietnam | Thailand | Indonesia* | Cambodia* * associate firm
www.rajahtann.com
66
AWARDS
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS JULY 2012
IP Law Firm of the Year
International Arbitration Law Firm of the Year
India Deal Firm of the Year
(L-R) Heidi Hui, Thomson Reuters; Chia Ling Koh, ATMD Bird & Bird
(L-R) Deirdre Stanley, Thomson Reuters Corporation; Alastair Henderson and Philip Lee, Herbert Smith
(L-R) Ranajit Dam, ALB; Cyril Shroff, Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A. Shroff & Co
WINNER ATMD Bird & Bird
WINNER Herbert Smith
FINALISTS
FINALISTS
• • • • •
Allen & Gledhill Baker & McKenzie Drew & Napier Rajah & Tann WongPartnership
• • • • • • • • • •
Allen & Gledhill Clifford Chance Drew & Napier K&L Gates O’Melveny & Myers Rajah & Tann Shook Lin & Bok Watson, Farley & Williams White & Case WongPartnership
WINNER Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A. Shroff & Co. FINALISTS • • • • • • • • • • •
August Legal Davis Polk & Wardwell Juris Corp Khaitan & Co Lex Counsel Luthra & Luthra Majmudar & Partners Rajani Associates Seth Dua & Associates Talwar, Thakore & Associates V.S. LAW OFFICE
Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A. Shroff & Co. (AMSS) Shardul S. Shroff, Managing Partner A: Amarchand Towers 216, Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase III, New Delhi - 110020 T: (91) 11 41590700 F: (91) 11 26924900 E: shardul.shroff@amarchand.com Cyril S. Shroff, Managing Partner A: V Floor, Peninsula Chamber, Peninsula Corporate Park, G. K.Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai - 400013 T: +91 22 66604455 F: +91 22 24963666 E: cyril.shroff@amarchand.com
~Only Law Firm from India awarded, receives ALB Indian Firm of the Year 2012~ Amarchand Mangaldas adds ALB SE Asia Award to its outstanding performance Scaling greater heights with a spectacular performance in the Indian legal landscape, Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A. Shroff & Co. (AMSS), India’s leading and largest law firm, has been adjudged the ALB Indian Deal Firm of the Year 2012. AMSS became the only Indian law firm to receive an award, at Marina Bay Financial Centre Asian Legal Business (ALB) SE Asia Law Awards 2012. With some of the biggest and most complicated transactions such as Vedanta Resources bond issuance, the firm was well placed in the nominations for the award. The firm has witnessed a remarkable 2012 with several recognitions in the first quarter by almost all prestigious legal, financial, sectoral, national & international researchers at various publication houses, league tables and industry bodies, for its exceptional performance. Ranked No.1 legal advisor by Bloomberg, Mergermarket and Venture Intelligence for Q1, the firm secured a
promising start to the year. AMSS has also been adjudged Indian Law Firm of the Year for 7 years consistently by Who’s Who Legal, 2012; Client Choice Award 2011 & 2012 by International Law Office (ILO), India Law Firm of the Year in 12 practice areas by IBLJ and the National Law Firm of the Year, 2012 by IFLR Asialaw 2012. These accolades reinforce the self-confidence about future opportunities and the quality of the firm’s internal bench strength in its focused journey towards achieving the key objective of becoming a 1000 lawyer firm by its 100th anniversary in 2017. Currently, the firm has over 550 lawyers including Partnership strength of 69 Partners. In line with its strategic plan (Amarchand Version 3.0), the firm recently announced its initial promotions and growth of the partnership with the addition of 13 new Partners across its various practice areas, at its various offices. Founded in 1917, the firm is renowned in the business community for its ability to develop successful strategies for business transactions through legal skills and careful consideration of commercial concerns.
LOOKING FOR A CHANGE?
Post your CV online and let your new life come to you
AWARDS
68
Indonesia Deal Firm of the Year
Rambun Tjajo, Hadiputranto, Hadinoto & Partners
WINNER Hadiputranto, Hadinoto & Partners FINALISTS • • • • • •
Ali Budiardjo, Nugroho, Reksodiputro Hiswara Bunjamin & Tandjung Makes & Partners Roosdiono & Partners Soewito Suhardiman Eddymurthy Kardono (SSEK) Tumbuan & Partners
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS JULY 2012
INTERNATIONAL Deal Firm of the Year
PHILIPPINES Deal Firm of the Year
(L-R) Rafael Morales, SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan; Joyce Fong, Tiger Airways Holdings; Eileen Rosario Batac, SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan
DUAL WINNERS Romulo Mabanta Buenaventura Sayoc & De los Angeles; SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan FINALIST • Quisumbing Torres
THAILAND Deal Firm of the Year
Malaysia Deal Firm of the Year
(L-R) John MacKay, Latham & Watkins; May Wong, ALB
WINNER Latham & Watkins FINALISTS • • • • •
Clifford Chance Davis Polk & Wardwell Herbert Smith Linklaters Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy • O’Melveny & Myers • Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom • Watson, Farley & Williams
Singapore Deal Firm of the Year
(L-R) Nathan Dodd, Linklaters; Andrew Smart, ALB
WINNER Linklaters (L-R) Andrew Meagher, Thomson Reuters; Wong Kien Keong, Baker & McKenzie.Wong & Leow
WINNER Wong & Partners FINALISTS
FINALISTS • Chandler & Thong-ek
• Clifford Chance • Watson, Farley & Williams (Thailand) (L-R) Dinesh Dillon, Allen & Gledhill; Ivy Yong, JP Morgan
Tax & Trusts Law Firm of the Year
• Albar & Partners • Shook Lin & Bok • ZUL RAFIQUE & partners
FINALISTS • Rajah & Tann • Stamford Law Corporation • WongPartnership
VIETNAM Deal Firm of the Year WINNER VILAF FINALISTS • • • •
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LCT Lawyers VISION & ASSOCIATES YKVN
WINNER Allen & Gledhill
(L-R) Lee Kee Yeng, Allen & Gledhill; Stephen Vallely, Macquarie Capital Securities (Singapore)
WINNER Allen & Gledhill FINALISTS • Baker & McKenzie
• KhattarWong • Rajah & Tann • WongPartnership
AWARDS
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
Marina Bay Financial Centre Award Managing Partner of the Year
(L-R) Warren Bishop, Raffles Quay Asset Management; Lee Eng Beng SC, Rajah & Tann
WINNER Rajah & Tann - Lee Eng Beng SC FINALISTS • • • • • • • •
Davis Polk & Wardwell - William Barron Duane Morris & Selvam - Arfat Selvam Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer - Tony Foster Latham & Watkins - Stephen McWiliams Luthra & Luthra - Rajiv K Luthra Majmudar & Partners - Akil Hirani S. S. Rana & Co - Vikrant Rana Soewito Suhardiman Eddymurthy Kardono (SSEK) Rusmaini Lenggogeni • Stephenson Harwood - Martin Green • Watson, Farley & Williams - Christopher Lowe • WongPartnership - Rachel Eng
WE ARE ALWAYS AHEAD OF THE PACK Challenging conventional norms. Doing right by our clients. Employing the best to be the best. Building relationships. These core values have led to our unprecedented growth into a leading law firm with over 270 lawyers within 20 years. We look forward to sharing our success with you for many years to come.
wongpartnership.com Singapore | China | Middle East WongPartnership LLP (UEN: T08LL0003B) is a limited liability law partnership registered in Singapore under the Limited Liability Partnerships Act (Chapter 163A).
69
70
AWARDS
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS JULY 2012
Amarchand Mangaldas adds ALB SE Asia Award to its outstanding performance Scaling greater heights with a spectacular performance in the Indian legal landscape, Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A. Shroff & Co. (AMSS), India’s leading and largest law firm, has been adjudged the ALB Indian Deal Firm of the Year 2012. AMSS became the only Indian law firm to receive an award, at Marina Bay Financial Centre Asian Legal Business (ALB) SE Asia Law Awards 2012. With some of the biggest and most complicated transactions such as Vedanta Resources bond issuance, the firm was well placed in the nominations for the award. The firm has witnessed a remarkable 2012 with several recognitions in the first quarter by almost all prestigious legal, financial, sectoral, national & international researchers at various publication houses, league tables and industry bodies, for its exceptional performance. Ranked No.1 legal advisor by Bloomberg, Mergermarket and Venture Intelligence for Q1, the firm secured a promising start to the year. AMSS has also been adjudged Indian Law Firm of the Year for 7 years consistently by Who’s Who Legal, 2012; Client Choice Award 2011 & 2012 by International Law Office (ILO), India Law Firm of the Year in 12 practice areas by IBLJ and the National Law Firm of the Year, 2012 by IFLR Asialaw 2012. These accolades reinforce the self-confidence about future opportunities and the quality of the firm’s internal bench strength in its focused journey towards achieving the key objective of becoming a 1000 lawyer firm by its 100th anniversary in 2017. Currently, the firm has over 550 lawyers including Partnership strength of 69 Partners. In line with its strategic plan (Amarchand Version 3.0), the firm recently announced its initial promotions and growth of the partnership with the addition of 13 new Partners across its various practice areas, at its various offices. Founded in 1917, the firm is renowned in the business community for its ability to develop successful strategies for business transactions through legal skills and careful consideration of commercial concerns.
AWARDS
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
71
AWARD SPONSORS Event Partner
AWARD SPONSOR IPP FINANCIAL ADVISERS PTE LTD Founded in 1983, IPP Financial Advisers Pte Ltd is Singapore’s oldest and most established, with a reputation for impartial advice and high levels of ongoing service rather than just simple product implementation. All consultants are trained to the highest standards, are all on the MAS Register of Representatives, and offer clients the full range of services from life insurance and medical cover, to savings plans and wealth management, right through to legacy planning and will writing. Based in Singapore, IPP has a specialist division, the Expat Advisory Group, servicing professional expats and international HNWIs around the region. With client Assets Under Advice of circa S$ 2.3 Billion, IPP is proud to be Singapore’s premier independently owned financial advisory.
MARINA BAY FINANCIAL CENTRE Marina Bay Financial Centre (MBFC) sits on a prime 3.55 hectare waterfront site at the heart of Singapore’s new downtown. The tenant-centric design of this purpose-built financial centre combines the best in form and function, making it a key draw for businesses and befitting Singapore’s position as a global financial hub. Developed over two phases, MBFC offers a breathtaking blend of three distinguished office towers with nearly 3 million sq ft of prime Grade A office space, two residential towers comprising 649 luxury apartments and penthouses as well as approximately 176,000 sq ft of retail space to meet the daily convenience of our business community and residents. MBFC Phase 1 comprising office Towers 1 & 2 and Marina Bay Link Mall is jointly owned by Hongkong Land, K-REIT Asia and Suntec REIT, while MBFC office Tower 3 and the two residential towers are jointly developed and owned by Cheung Kong (Holdings), Hongkong Land and Keppel Land. Contact details: Marina Bay Financial Centre Tel: (65) 6654 1388 Email: commercial@rqam.com.sg
Contact details: IPP Financial Advisers Pte Ltd Tel: (65) 6309 0138 Fax: (65) 6511 8806 Email: eag@ippfa.com Website: www.ippfa.com/eag Contact person: Ian Pryor
AWARD PATRON
Supporting Organisations
Corporate SCCA Singapore Counsel Association
IPBA 2012 New Delhi - India
Proudly presented by
72
Sponsored REGIONAL UPDATES
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012
SPONSORED UPDATE: CHINA Tailoring Merger Filings: A Review of Conditional Clearance on Google’s Acquisition of Motorola
CHINA
PHILIPPINES
Malaysia
SINGAPORE
On May 19, 2012, the Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (“MOFCOM”) conditionally cleared the acquisition of Motorola’s mobile business by Google (the “Transaction”). In doing so, MOFCOM imposed four conditions on Google: 1. continue to license Android in a free and open source manner; 2. treat all original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) in a non- discriminatory manner; 3. abide by Motorola’s existing fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory obligations with respect to patents; and 4. appoint an independent trustee to supervise the implementation of these conditions. Conditions 1, 2 and 4 apply for five years, however Google may request MOFCOM to amend or repeal conditions 1 and 2 upon any change in market conditions. In MOFCOM’s decision, the relevant markets were identified as (a) smart mobile devices and (b) their operating systems. With respect to the smart mobile device market, MOFCOM concluded that it is a highly decentralized market with intense competition both within China and globally. Motorola therefore does not gain any notable advantage in this arena, as Google is not a player. However, in the smart mobile device operation system market, Google is a de facto manipulator through Android, which occupies 73.99% market share in China. Given the high threshold to enter this market, Google is expected to maintain its dominant position in the foreseeable future.
SPONSORED REGIONAL UPDATES
Accordingly, MOFCOM’s major concern underlying the conditional clearance derived from an analysis of the separate but interactive markets of smart mobile devices and their operating systems. This is due to the overall position of Chinese OEMs in the global market. While leaders in the smart mobile device market, such as Samsung and HTC, have the ability to manufacture products on multi-operating platforms, Chinese OEMs rely heavily on Android to develop
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
and produce Android-compatible devices. If Motorola gains favorable or even exclusive access to Android, Chinese OEMs may be at a competitive disadvantage. The conditional clearance on the Transaction underscores the importance of identifying Chinese market characteristics in merger review filings. In sharp contrast, both antitrust authorities in the United States and the European Union approved the Transaction unconditionally, only expressing concerns on future use of Motorola’s patent portfolio by Google. Given the unique characteristics of the Chinese market, care should be given and special strategies should be formulated when coordinating multijurisdictional filings in any M&A transactions.
Written by Jeanette Chan, Partner Sue Yang, Associate Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison Hong Kong Club Building, 12th Floor 3A Chater Road, Central Hong Kong E: jchan@paulweiss.com T: +852 2846 0300
Sponsored REGIONAL UPDATES
SPONSORED UPDATE: SINGAPORE
Perpetual Bonds: A Permanent Feature of the Singapore Debt Market? The issuance of corporate perpetual bonds (“perpetuals”) in Singapore market has taken off since 2011. According to Thomson Reuters, there were more perpetuals issued in Singapore in the first three months of 2012 with the estimated values of S$3.1 billion (US$2.5 billion), than in the previous 15 years, spanning diversified sectors such as property, gaming, water treatment, postal and commodity. In contrast, the issuances of perpetuals in the Europe and North America have been abated significantly since the global financial crisis. The key drivers for the increasing demands of perpetuals are low interest rates and volatile stock market environment as investors look for higher yield and fixed rate of returns. Companies can issue perpetuals to take advantage of surging risk appetite among wealthy clients of private banks in Asia, particularly Singapore. Perpetuals can be structured as equity rather than debt on issuers’ balance sheets without causing equity dilution and affecting the financial gearings. Unlike plan vanilla bonds, in which both principal and coupon are paid to investors according to fixed schedule, perpetuals allow the issuers to defer coupon payments under certain circumstances. Perpetuals, with no fixed maturity date, leave the repayment of principal at the issuers’ discretion. There are many different features that the perpetuals can be structured in terms of coupon resets, change of control coupon step up, equity credit, the period of call protection, seniority, deferrals, look-back periods, etc. Like other corporate bonds, perpetuals can be sold to retail investors with lower size of the minimum subscription. Higher level of disclosures for retail offering is required by the issuers in the offer information memorandum to disclose the risks and features of the offerings clearly to investors. Such additional requirements increase preparation time and distribution costs. The increase in the popularity of perpetuals, however has recently raised concerns amongst the regulators in Asia. It has been reported that the development of the perpetual market has received the attention of Monetary
73
Authority of Singapore (MAS) since Genting Singapore’s offering of S$500 million retail tranche of perpetuals in April this year, which allowed the retail investors to subscribe via the automated telling machines. Unlike other investment products sold over the counter, the retail investors may have limited access to advisory services to highlight risks. There is also no guarantee in practical terms that they will read the offer information memorandum. No indication so far from MAS in holding back the perpetual issuance or making recommendations to increase protection to the investors. However, it is expected that the MAS would continue to monitor the development of perpetuals. Despite the above, more Singapore and foreign issuers are still exploring perpetuals to raise capital. Even the lower credit rating issuers are also gradually testing the waters. Investors may become wary and likely to scrutinise how stable the business model of the issuers. It makes more sense for companies that have predictable and stable cash flows to use more risky structure such as perpetuals. Written by Mr Nicholas Chang Ms Wu Yanjuan Mr Nicholas Chang Senior Corporate Finance Executive Tel: (65) 6322 2236 Fax: (65) 6534 0833 E-mail: nicholaschang@loopartners. com.sg Ms Wu Yanjuan Foreign Counsel Senior Legal Associate (Corporate Practice) Tel: (65) 6322 2232 Fax: (65) 6534 0833 E-mail: wuyanjuan@loopartners. com.sg Loo & Partners LLP 16 Gemmill Lane Singapore 069254 www.loopartners.com.sg
74
Sponsored REGIONAL UPDATES
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012
MEMBER FIRM OF BAKER & MCKENZIE INTERNATIONAL
SPONSORED UPDATE: MALAYSIA
THE MALAYSIAN MINIMUM RETIREMENT AGE BILL 2012
There is no legally-prescribed retirement age for private sector employees in Malaysia. This is determined through contract or in the absence of an agreed age, by reference to the employer’s practice. The prevalent age is 55 as the individual may access their Statemanaged Employees Provident Fund (“EPF”) contributions for retirement. In mid-June 2012, the Minimum Retirement Age Bill 2012 (“Bill”) was tabled in Parliament and as expected, the Bill seeks to implement a minimum retirement age of 60 for the private sector. The HR Minister may prescribe a higher age. As was the case for the public sector, the statutory age could gradually progress upwards. The mandated retirement age (“Mandated Age”) applies regardless of any agreement seeking to implement an age lower than the Mandated Age, although the employee may elect to retire upon attaining the optional retirement age under contract, if any. The Bill defines “retirement” to be the termination of the employment contract on the ground of age, and stipulates a penalty of up to RM10,000 fine for prematurely retiring an employee. The categories of employees who are excluded from the Bill include: • • • •
non-Malaysian citizens; part-timers; persons under a fixed term of employment of a maximum of 24 months including extensions; and persons who, prior to the coming into force of the Act, retired at 55 or more but was subsequently re-employed.
The Bill establishes a process where the wronged individual may initiate a Director General of Labour (“DGL”) inquiry for premature retirement. Unlike recent employment-related laws involving matters which could also be the subject matter of an unfair dismissal claim such as the new sexual harassment-related provisions of the Employment Act, the Bill provides that where the DGL complaint is made, the individual will not be able to pursue an unfair dismissal claim until the DGL complaint is resolved. Where an unfair dismissal claim has already been made,
the DGL shall not conduct the inquiry. The HR Minister has already indicated that the Bill will require fine-tuning, and it is for now uncertain whether the minimum EPF withdrawal age will be extended to 60. This is somewhat expected, given that Malaysia has not had any private sector retirement age legislation before, and the only viable remedy for premature retirement is an unfair dismissal claim. Employers who are long accustomed to the contractual age model will need to come up to speed on the various requirements which the Bill seeks to introduce. Optional retirement clauses are generally uncommon among private sector employers, but this is expected to change as a result. This article is for information purposes only. The contents do not constitute legal advice and should not be regarded as a substitute for detailed advice in individual cases. No decision to act or not to act in a particular way should be taken merely on the basis of this article, and detailed legal advice should always be sought at the earliest possible moment. Written by Woo Wei Kwang Woo Wei Kwang Partner E-mail: wei.kwang.woo@ wongpartners.com Wong & Partners Level 21, The Gardens South Tower Mid Valley City, Lingkaran Syed Putra 59200 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Tel: (603) 2298 7898 Fax: (603) 2282 2669
SPONSORED UPDATE: PHILIPPINES PHILIPPINE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE REVOKES THE BINDING EFFECT OF RULINGS ISSUED BY THE BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE PRIOR TO JANUARY 1, 1998 The Philippine Department of Finance, upon recommendation by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR), issued Revenue Regulations No. 5-2012 (RR5-2012) establishing the BIR’s policy not to recognize the binding effect of all BIR rulings issued prior to January 1, 1998, which marks the effectivity of Republic Act No. 8424 (the Tax Reform Act of 1997 or the Tax Code). Consequently, such BIR rulings cannot be invoked as basis for current business transactions or for securing BIR opinions or rulings on tax-related legal matters. In including even BIR rulings interpreting provisions of earlier laws incorporated into the Tax Code without any amendment, RR5-2012 seems inconsistent with the principle that “the reenactment of a statute is persuasive indication of the adoption by the legislative body of a prior executive construction,” which would support reliance upon such BIR rulings. Further, if used to justify any change in the BIR’s interpretation of well-settled tax provisions upon which foreign investors have relied, RR5-2012 may raise concerns regarding the Philippine government’s compliance
Sponsored REGIONAL UPDATES
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business
with its obligation to give fair and equitable treatment to foreign investors by protecting their legitimate expectations (arising from consistent administrative interpretation) and by ensuring stability, predictability and consistency of the Philippine legal framework.
75
CHINA
Written by Arlene M. Maneja SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan 7/F SyCipLaw Center 105 Paseo de Roxas, Legaspi Village 1226 Makati City, Metro Manila Philippines Tel: (632) 982-3500 or (632) 982-3600 (local 742) Fax: (632) 817-3896 http://www.syciplaw.com
PHILIPPINES Malaysia
SINGAPORE
Asian Legal Business is Asia’s leading legal magazine. Published from three regional centres, each issue is packed with news, hard hitting analysis and investigative journalism. Regional editors provide up to the minute legal and regulatory updates, while a team of dedicated journalists provide in depth analysis of all the issues facing lawyers and in-house counsel throughout the region.
PLEASE START MY SUBSCRIPTION TO ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS IMMEDIATELY Fill out the form below and fax to Thomsom Reuters at +65 6333 0900 ALB North Asia - HK ALB South East Asia - SG ALB The Brief - UAE For 1x edition: USD$49.99 per year (12 issues) For 2x editions: USD$69.99 per year (24 issues) For 3x editions: USD$89.99 per year (36 issues)
name company job title address
Please note for overseas deliveries ie. you do not reside in the origin country of the magazine selected, an additional US$29.99 postage and handling will be added to the final invoice All local taxes will be applicable.
tel
fax
All subscriptions will only be fulfilled once the subscription fee is paid in full.
For further information please contact Rozi: rozidah.jambari@thomsonreuters.com Published by Thomson Reuters 18 Science Park Drive Singapore 118229
76
SPONSORED UPDATES
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012
SPONSORED UPDATE
SPONSORED UPDATE
EMERGING MARKETS
international tax
US Parents try to force Facebook to yield up son’s digital estate
STREAMLINED PROCEDURE FOR VIETNAM STATE COMMERCIAL BANKS TO OBTAIN FOREIGN LOANS
A
P
rior to Circular No. 18/2011/TT-NHNN (“Circular 18”) issued by the State Bank of Vietnam (“SBV”) on 23 August 2011, State commercial banks (“Banks”) had to comply with and were restricted by various regulations in taking out medium and long term foreign loans (“Foreign Loans”). From the effective date of 15 October 2011, however, the Banks can comply with regulations based on consolidated legislation whenever they take out Foreign Loans. The purview of Circular 18, though, is only restricted to the principles, sequence and procedures for the assessment and implementation of Foreign Loans without any government guarantees. Loans with government guarantees are still regulated by current regulations on the provision and management of Vietnamese government guarantees.
AzureTax Ltd
Under Circular 18, a borrowing Bank must submit an application to obtain prior written approval from the SBV, before entering into an agreement to obtain a Foreign Loan. The SBV will consider and approve the Foreign Loan based on, inter alia, the Bank’s compliance with current regulations on prudential ratios and whether the total value of the Foreign Loan falls within the national limit on foreign debt approved annually by the Prime Minister. Upon the Bank’s submission of a valid application, the SBV is given 15 working days to respond by approving or rejecting the Foreign Loan. If the Foreign Loan is rejected, then the SBV must provide a written explanation to clarify its grounds for rejection. If the Bank must incur any expenses or pay any fees for the Foreign Loan before signing the relevant loan agreement, then prior approval must likewise be obtained from the SBV.
Suite 1010 10/F 89 Queensway
金鐘道89號力寶中心2座10樓1010室
Within 30 days from the signing of the relevant loan agreement and before the first drawdown, the Bank must register the signed loan agreement with the SBV for its certification. The SBV has a period of 5 working days (counted from the date of receipt of a complete application) within which to accept the registration of a Foreign Loan. Without such certification by the SBV, the Bank is prohibited from making any drawdown or any repayment of the principal and interest in respect of the Foreign Loan.
Lippo Centre Hong Kong
If there is any amendment to the loan agreement which is not contrary to current laws and/or which retains or reduces the loan facility, then the Bank must sign an amendment agreement and register such amendment with the SBV in accordance with the procedures stipulated by Circular No. 09/2004/TT-NHNN. The said circular, issued by the SBV on 21 December 2004, governs the management and repayment of foreign loans taken out by enterprises. However, if the amendment seeks to increase the registered loan facility, then fresh approval must be sought from the SBV before the borrowing Bank can proceed to make such amendment, and after which the amendment should be registered with the SBV. Tower Two
The workings and ambit of Circular 18 are expected to become clearer in the course of the year as more Banks apply to take out Foreign Loans in the remainder of 2012. HUYNH BA THUONG Kelvin Chia Partnership, Ho Chi Minh City T: +848 3822 4986 E: thuong.huynh@kcpartnership.com.vn
US couple from Wisconsin has obtained a US court order requiring Facebook to give them access to the accounts and online assets of their late son. But the social-media company has so far refused to comply.
Benjamin Stassen committed suicide in late 2010 without leaving a note. As with most young people, most of his personal communications had been done through the internet, so his parents, Jay and Helen, tried to search his accounts for an explanation of his suicide. However, Facebook and Google, which held most of Benjamin’s records, refused to reveal them, citing client confidentiality, even though the Stassens are clearly the heirs to their son’s estate. Eventually the Stassens (one of whom is a lawyer) resorted to legal action. They obtained a court order ordering Google to hand over all of Benjamin’s email records, and Google complied. They also now have an order from a local court directing Facebook to give them access to their son’s account, along with any digital assets or records, but at the time of writing, Facebook was still considering how to react. Its policy is not to allow survivors access to a deceased person’s account. A court order releases the company from its client confidentiality obligations, but it could still appeal to a higher state court or even a federal court. Privacy law in the US is a confusing complex of different statutes. Because of this, internet social media companies are usually cautious about granting access to a deceased user’s account. There have apparently been cases where an evil-doer falsely claimed that a living individual had died, so as to take control of their accounts. Moreover, there can be legitimate disagreement about whether a (genuinely) deceased person really wanted their family to be able to read their private emails or other records. There are almost no binding legal precedents on the matter as yet. Some states (Connecticut, Rhode Island, Oklahoma, Indiana and Idaho) have incorporated digital assets into their estate laws, but they do not agree with one another, some referring only to email while others also deal with social networking and blogging.
10
TH ANNIVERSARY Debbie Annells, CTA (Fellow) Managing Director A: AzureTax Ltd – Suite 1010, 10/F Lippo Centre, Tower Two, 89 Queensway, Hong Kong T: +852 2123 9339 (direct line), +852 2123 9370 (main line) F: +852 2122 9209 W: www.azuretax.com, a member of AzureTax Group
Supervised by the UK Chartered Institute of Taxation for purposes of anti money laundering legislation.
TV
YOUR CONTENT ON THE ALL-NEW ALB TV RAISE YOUR PROFILE Increase the visibility of your organization or an individual, through your own programming.
DEMONSTRATE YOUR EXPERTISE Distinguish your organization’s capabilities through multimedia programming.
OPTIMIZE REACH Leverage our tagging functionality to ensure your programs are found by the right people at the most relevant time.
PROMOTE YOUR BRAND Brand your video content with a descriptive overlay.
Quickly and easily engage with the legal community in a compelling and direct way. Reach new and existing clients with differentiated insights and analysis, unlike ever before. By joining the ALB TV network, you can distribute your own video content directly to the desktops of private practice attorneys and corporate counsel. If you don’t yet have your own video capabilities, our multimedia solutions can help you create webcasts, webinars and online video presentations to increase the reach, engagement and measurability of your communications programs across marketing, business development, and public relations.
ENGAGE YOUR AUDIENCE Supplement your video with additional elements such as PDFs, firm profiles, partner bios, podcasts and hyperlinks back to your website.
Technical Requirements - ALB TV supports the following import formats: AUDIO CODECS • PCM, MP3, DTS • AAC, AMC, AMR-NB • WM Audio, RealAudio
MEDIA CONTAINERS • HDV • MXF (including D-10/IMX) • MPEG-2 PS, MPEG-2 TS • GXF, LXF, QuickTime • WMV, ASF, AVI, VOB • 3GPP, 3G2 • WMA, WAV, Broadcast WAV
SYSTEMS • Leitch VR, Nexio • Grass Valley Profile, K2 • Omneon Spectrum • Quantel sQ • Avid Editing Systems • Apple Final Cut Pro • Adobe Premiere Pro • Grass Valley Edius
INDEX
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012
REUTERS/Robert Galbraith
78
REUTERS/Wolfgang Rattay
GET CONNECTED
HONG KONG 2012 IN-HOUSE LEGAL SUMMIT HONG KONG – 26 SEPTEMBER
A special platform for the frank exchange of views, sharing of best practices and formulation of strategies to deal with opportunities in 2012 and beyond. Topics include Private Antitrust Litigation in Hong Kong, PRC Employment Law, M&A updates and much more. Interact with some of the most active and influential lawyers from around Asia. For more information, please contact Tracy at +852 3762 3262 or email tracy.li@thomsonreuters.com WWW.ASIANLEGALBUSINESSEVENTS.COM WORKSHOP SPONSORS
SUPPORTING ORGANISATION
VIP NETWORKING LUNCHEON SPONSOR
ALB SUPPORTS
SPONSORS
PROUDLY PRESENTED BY
STAY UP-TO-DATE
HKIHLS 2012HP ad.indd 1
55 Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A. Shroff & Co 15, 23, 24, 57 AZB & Partners 76 Azure Tax 4 Baker & McKenzie 19 Bingham & McCutchen 19 Blank Rome 33, 36, 37, 38, 39 BN Lawyers 11 Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft 51 Chuo Sogo Law Office 4 Commerce & Finance Conyers Dill & Pearman 4 Cooley 11 53 Dacheng Law Offices 4 Davis, Polk & Wardwell 11 Dechert Dojima Law Office 52 DSL Lawyers 1, 34, 35, 37, 40 4 Fangda Partners 4 Fenwick & West 4 Freehills 4, 17 Freshfields Bruckhuas Deringer GFE Law Office 54 Ghazi & Lim 58 54 Guangda Law Firm 54 Guangxin Lawyers 52 H. Okada International Law Office Herbert Smith 5, 28, 29
25/6/12 9:31 AM
54 18, 19 56 22, 25, 57 4, 11 1 54 76 23, 24, 25, 26 1, 4, 11, 27, 28, 42, 54 52 Kitahama Partners 56 Krishnamurthy and Co/ K Law 58 Lee Hishammuddin Allen & Gledhill Linklaters 4, 23, 24, 25 Loo & Partners 73 57 Luthra & Luthra Maples and Calder 4, 19 28, 54 Mayer Brown JSM MdME Lawyers 33, 35, 36, 38, 39 16 Melli Darsa & Co 52 Midosuji Legal Profession Corporation Morgan Lewis 11 4 Munger Tolles & Olson Narasappa, Doraswamy & Raja 56 Nishimura & Asahi 52 52 Oh-Ebashi LPC & Partners HJM Asia Law & Co Howse Williams Bowers Indus Law J. Sagar Associates Jingtian & Gongcheng Jones Day Jun He Law Offices Kelvin Chia Partnership Khaitan & Co King & Wood Mallesons
11 Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe 52 Osaka International Law Offices 5, 27 Paul Hastings 11, 72 Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison 58 Presgrave & Matthews 4 SFME Advogados Singhania & Partners 56 Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom 4 6 Starwood Hotels and Resorts 11 Stephenson Harwood SyCip Salazar Hernandez & 74 Gatmaitan Tilleke & Gibbins 13, 14 57 Trilegal 54 Trust Law 4 Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz 57 Wadia & Ghandy & Co Walkers 4 Weil, Gotshal & Manges 4, 15 4 White & Case 54 Wragge & Co 54 Yingke Law Firm 52 Yodoyabashi & Yamagami Zaid Ibrahim & Co 58 Zhong Lun Law Firm 54
SPONSORS
WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business Country / Regional editors
The Country / Regional Updates section of ALB is sponsored by the following firms:
China
Malaysia
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP is a globally oriented, full-service law firm employing over 700 lawyers worldwide. Paul, Weiss is headquartered in New York and has offices in Tokyo, Washington, D.C., Wilmington, Beijing, Hong Kong, Toronto and London.
Wong & Partners is a Malaysian law firm dedicated to providing a quality and solution-oriented legal services to its clients. Wong & Partners has grown steadily with international standards of quality and experience and the Firm has a solid commitment to training its lawyers, and invests in training, professional development and quality management programs with the aim of producing lawyers of global standard.
The Philippines
Singapore
Established in 1945, SyCipLaw is the largest law firm in the Philippines, with its principal office in Makati City, the country’s financial and business center, and branches in Cebu, Davao and Subic Bay. SyCipLaw combines its tradition of professional integrity and excellence with a time-tested ability to break new ground. The broad range of the firm’s expertise is reflected in its client base, which includes top corporations, international organizations and governments.
Loo & Partners was founded in 1985 as a niche practice, handling mainly banking, corporate, securities and commercial work. With the support of a comprehensive network of correspondent law firms, the firm serves its clients in their regional needs. Loo & Partners has been regularly noted for its IPO, M&A and general corporate work.
Vietnam
Shanghai
Indochine Counsel is a commercial law firm focusing on business law practice in the Indochina region. Our areas of practice include: Foreign Investment, Corporate & Commercial, M&A, Securities & Capital Markets, Banking & Finance, Property & Construction, Taxation, Intellectual Property, Information Technology & Internet, International Trade, Outward Investment & Offshore Incorporation, and Dispute Resolution.
Victory Legal is a boutique legal practice in Shanghai, focusing on general corporate, corporate finance and capital markets matters. Its clients include governmental authorities, State-linked enterprises, banking and financial institutions, MNCs, SMEs and foreign law firms. The firm has extensive network across the region. It serves clients’ domestic and regional needs.
fUIJIAN Sphere Logic Partners is a mid-sized business law firm known for its offering of value, sophisticated legal solutions in a leaner approach across a range of practice areas, critical to the success of clients. We maintain an established global network with numerous law firms and relevant service providers. Our seasoned and cultureready professionals assist clients in cross-border investment, M&A and financing, governance and daily operations, identification of business opportunities and solving of complex legal disputes.
PRACTICE AREA AND INDUSTRY EDITORS
tHE iNDUSTRY uPDATES section of ALB is sponsored by the following firms:
Emerging Markets Kelvin Chia Partnership is a commercial law firm headquartered in Singapore with strong regional capabilities. With offices in Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, Yangon, Bangkok and Phnom Penh, and extensive experience all throughout Asia, we provide localized legal solutions consistent with international standards in emerging markets in Asia.
Intellectual property / Energy & Resources / Employment ATMD Bird & Bird is a dynamic and progressive firm with an established IP, corporate & commercial, competition and dispute resolution practice. The firm also has extensive regional experience advising both domestic and foreign clients on cross-border transactions. ATMD Bird & Bird has been voted Singapore’s Intellectual Property Firm of the Year at the 2005 and 2006 ALB Awards and the 2005 AsiaLaw (IP) Awards.
International tax AzureTax Ltd provides transparent strategic and ethical tax advice. Through our professional corporate and International, tax advisory and trustee services your tax plan is comprehensively implemented. Our advice provides you with independent innovative and rigorous solutions which deliver results and long-term accountability. We are qualified UK, U.S., Hong Kong and PRC tax advisors and complete tax filings for UK, U.S. and Hong Kong tax returns.
Alliances
ALB enjoys alliances with the following organisations:
ACCJ
CCCJ
Established in 1948 by representatives of 40 American firms, the ACCJ, a fully independent chamber of commerce, has grown into one of the most influential business organizations in Japan, with more than 2,700 members representing more than forty countries and 1,000 companies.
Promoting the development of commerce between Canada and Japan since 1975, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce in Japan (CCCJ) is a private sector, not-for-profit business organization serving its members through communications, networking and advocacy. Representing some 33 business sectors, the CCCJ is a member-driven, member-focused organization and is the longest serving Canadian Chamber in Asia with over 300 members.
JICN
HKCCA
The Japan In-house Counsel Network (JICN) is a professional association for in-house counsel working in, or having other affiliations with, Japan. JICN offers a forum for communication between members, social and networking opportunities, legal seminars, roundtable member discussions and other activities, as well as events with other lawyer and in-house groups. Visit www.jicn.jp for more details.
The Hong Kong Corporate Counsel Association is the pioneer association run for in-house counsel by in-house counsel in Hong Kong. It provides an efficient and effective range of benefits and services for its members’ professional development, including continuing legal education, a platform for networking and the exchange of ideas, information and experiences that are unique to the in-house role.
ssca The Singapore Corporate Counsel Association or SCCA was set up in 2002. It is the pioneer association representing in-house lawyers in Singapore. http://www.scca.org.sg
Corporate SCCA Singapore Counsel Association
IPBA 2012 New Delhi - India
79
80
SUNDRIES
ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS july 2012
30 MONTHS Prison sentence handed by an Indonesian court to Alexander Aan for denying the existence of God on his Facebook page
Compiled by PAUL PIMENTEL
NO BEAUTIFYING THIS TRAFFIC VIOLATION A prominent plastic surgeon in Singapore was recently fined S$1,000 for attempting to cosmetically alter a traffic infraction by having an elderly employee take the rap for it. Woffles Wu – dubbed locally as the “plastic surgeon to the stars” – pleaded guilty to abetting the employee in providing misleading information to the police. Going forward, he also promised to keep his aesthetic practice strictly within the realm of medicine.
SOUTHEAST ASIA’S SUMMER OF GAGA Thailand Upon arrival, Lady Gaga tweets: “…ready for 50,000 screaming Thai monsters. I wanna get lost in a lady market and buy fake Rolex.” She later dons a traditional Thai headdress along with a skimpy outfit, and sits on a motorcycle with the Thai flag trailing her. She is slammed for undermining Thailand’s anti-piracy efforts and “hurt(ing) Thai peoples’ sentiment”.
Indonesia Local police refuse to issue a permit for the concert after Islamic groups object to her show, claiming it was too vulgar. “Devastated”, she cancels the show and tweets: “The Jakarta situation is two-fold: Indonesian authorities demand I censor the show, and religious extremist separately are threatening violence.”
The Philippines Christian groups in the Philippines accuse her of promoting immorality her fans are in danger of falling into the clutches of Satan. She sells out her first Manila concert, and gets the green light for a second. While some may argue the show violates celestial laws, the authorities found she breached no local laws.
QUOTE OF THE MONTH
“The market does not look too bright after that little bit of a problem with Facebook. So I think they are going to wait and see.” F1 chief Bernie Ecclestone on why the Singapore IPO was postponed
why, autocomplete, why? A Japanese man is suing Google after he found that the terms which come up when the search engine autocompletes his name link to pages related to criminal acts, and articles that defame him. Besides violating his privacy, the plaintiff claims that the search terms were a factor in his sudden loss of employment several years ago, and his subsequent inability to secure a new job. Perhaps Google should add the term “damages” to the autocorrect function when one plugs “Google” into the search engine.
CONRAD, HONG KONG – 7 SEPTEMBER
R E S E RV E YO U R TA B LE S A N D S E ATS
THE MOST HIGH-PROFILE LEGAL EVENT OF THE YEAR The eleventh annual The Macallan ALB Hong Kong Law Awards 2012 will be held in Hong Kong on Friday 7 September 2012 at 6:30pm. This well established and reputable event recognises the excellence and outstanding achievements of Hong Kong’s leading law firms and in-house legal teams as well as the top deals and dealmakers of the past year. Join this prestigious event as Hong Kong’s best legal practitioners assemble to celebrate with all the finalists and winners. Table and seat reservations are now open and welcomed. Includes: cocktail reception, four-course gourmet dinner, unlimited wine, beer and soft drinks, gala black tie award ceremony announcing the winners of each award
BOOK NOW! DON’T MISS THE MACALLAN ALB HONG KONG LAW AWARDS 2012 Conrad Hong Kong Yes! I want to attend The Macallan ALB Hong Kong Law Awards 2012 dinner and presentation ceremony at 6:30pm on 7 September. Please reserve table(s) US$3,500 per table (for 10 seats) Please reserve US$400 per seat
seat(s)
Pacific Place, 88 Queensway
Name:
Job Title:
Company:
Contact Person:
Address: Tel:
Fax:
Email:
Signature:
Cancellation Policy: Written notice of cancellation must be given to Thomson Reuters no less than 28 days before the event date. Funds will be repaid less US$150 administration and processing fee. If no such notice is received the fee will remain payable in full.
Please fax back to +852 2154 6425 For more information, please contact Tracy at +852 3762 3262 or email tracy.li@thomsonreuters.com If you do not wish your details to be used for ALB promotional purposes, please tick the box
www.albawards.com Event Partner
Award Sponsors
Supporting Organisation
Proudly presented by
CHINA INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC AND TRADE ARBITRATION COMMISSION
CHINA’S EXPERIENCE IN
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION INTERNATIONAL IMAGE OF
CHINESE ARBITRATION CHINA INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC AND TRADE ARBITRATION COMMISSION Announcement The China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) is a permanent international arbitration institution independently resolving economic and trade disputes that was set up in 1954 with the approval of the Government Administration Council of the Central People’s Government and under the organization of the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade/CCPIT (China Chamber of International Commerce/CCOIC). The CIETAC has sub-commissions. The CIETAC and its sub-commissions form an integrated arbitration commission that uses a uniform set of Arbitration Rules and Panel of Arbitrators. In order to better meet the needs of development, further standardize its business management and promote its efficiency so as to provide parties with high-quality arbitration service, the CIETAC revised its Arbitration Rules in January 2012 in accordance with China’s Arbitration Law and the principles laid down in the relevant State Council’s Reply of 1988. Approved by CCPIT/CCOIC in February 2012, the new Arbitration Rules will come into force on May 1, 2012. As from May 1, 2012, the CIETAC Arbitration Rules (2012) shall uniformly apply to the CIETAC and its sub-commissions. The new CIETAC Arbitration Rules (2012) have been released on the CIETAC’s official website www.cietac.org for reference. China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission
Address: 6/F, CCOIC Building, 2 Huapichang Hutong, Xicheng District, Beijing 100035, P.R.China Telephone: (86-10) 8221 7788 Fax: (86-10) 8221 7766 64643500