2 minute read
Annexure 5: Fabricators FGD questionnaire
from Crop Productivity, Yield and Technology Adoption Survey of ATASP-1 Small Holder Farmers in Nigeria
FEDERAL OF MINISTRY AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGRICULTURAL TRANSFORMATION AGENDA SUPPORT PROGRAM PHASE-1 (ATASP-1)
Survey Questionnaire for the Assessment of Adoption of Improved Technologies amongst ATASP -1 Beneficiaries in Nigeria Survey checklists for the assessment of the adoption of improved technologies amongst Fabricators under ATASP -1
Advertisement
Focus Group Discussion
FABRICATORS QUESTIONNAIRE:
(A) Background Information i. Questionnaire number…………………………………………………….. ii. Name of Group………………………………………. iii. Name of fabricator…………………………………………………………………………………………….. Phone number of ………………………………………………………….. iv. Name of the Enumerator …………………………………………………………………………………. Phone number of Enumerator………………………………………………………….. v. SCPZ:……………………………………………. State……………………………………………. LGA………………………………………. Community………………………………….. Cluster:………………………………… vi. Interview date: ................................................….../__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/ (ddmmyyyy) vii. GPS Coordinate: Latitude:………………………………………………………… Longitude:………………………………………………………
(B) DEMOGRAPHIC DATA 2.1) Gender Male Female
2.2) Household Size (Number) Male members = ; Female members = ;Total =
2.3) Age of Beneficiary/Farmer (Years)
2.4) Highest Education Attained: (0) No school at all (1) Primary (2) Secondary/TC II (3)Tertiary education (4) Non-Formal education (5)Quoranic
Below 30yrs Between 31-59yrs Above 60yrs
CHECKLISTS FOR FABRICATORS
1. Fabricated equipment extended by ATASP -1
S/N
List of Technologies
Sorghum: Mechanized 1 thresher 2 Stover crusher 3 Stover chopper Rice:
Mechanized 4
weeder 5 Hand planter 6 Rice parboiler Cassava: 7 Cassava presser 8 Cassava sifter
9
10 Cassava roasting tray Cassava burr grinder Cassava
11
combine dryer 12 Cassava grater 13 Cassava peeler
14 Cassava cabinet dryer Participation in training (Tick)
1
Source of Training How long have you been in the system Production (Yes = 1, No = 0) Number produced Number sold
1Source: ATASP – 1 =1, ADP = 2, NGOs = 3, Other Processors = 4, 5 = Others (Specify)
Other Trainers:
2. Have you received any other support from ATASP -1? [ ] 1 = Yes [ ] 0 = No
3. How useful is the support received under ATAP -1? …………… Code: Very useful = 3, Useful = 2, Not Useful = 1
4. Patronage and Income from Fabrication Enterprise: i. Did you experience increase in patronage due to ATASP -1 intervention? [ ] 1 = Yes [ ] 0 = No
i. What was the number of customers per season before ATASP -1 intervention?………………..
ii. What is number of customers per season during ATASP -1 intervention? ……………….
iii. What was your average income per season before ATASP -1 intervention? ……………….
iv. What is your average income per season during ATASP -1 intervention? …………………….
1. Has ATASP -1 training improved the quality of your fabrication operation ……………… (1) Excellent (2) Very Good (3) Good (4) Fair (5) Poor
2. What are the constraints to the production of ATASP -1 fabricated equipment?