2 minute read

Annexure 5: Fabricators FGD questionnaire

FEDERAL OF MINISTRY AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGRICULTURAL TRANSFORMATION AGENDA SUPPORT PROGRAM PHASE-1 (ATASP-1)

Survey Questionnaire for the Assessment of Adoption of Improved Technologies amongst ATASP -1 Beneficiaries in Nigeria Survey checklists for the assessment of the adoption of improved technologies amongst Fabricators under ATASP -1

Advertisement

Focus Group Discussion

FABRICATORS QUESTIONNAIRE:

(A) Background Information i. Questionnaire number…………………………………………………….. ii. Name of Group………………………………………. iii. Name of fabricator…………………………………………………………………………………………….. Phone number of ………………………………………………………….. iv. Name of the Enumerator …………………………………………………………………………………. Phone number of Enumerator………………………………………………………….. v. SCPZ:……………………………………………. State……………………………………………. LGA………………………………………. Community………………………………….. Cluster:………………………………… vi. Interview date: ................................................….../__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/ (ddmmyyyy) vii. GPS Coordinate: Latitude:………………………………………………………… Longitude:………………………………………………………

(B) DEMOGRAPHIC DATA 2.1) Gender Male Female

2.2) Household Size (Number) Male members = ; Female members = ;Total =

2.3) Age of Beneficiary/Farmer (Years)

2.4) Highest Education Attained: (0) No school at all (1) Primary (2) Secondary/TC II (3)Tertiary education (4) Non-Formal education (5)Quoranic

Below 30yrs Between 31-59yrs Above 60yrs

CHECKLISTS FOR FABRICATORS

1. Fabricated equipment extended by ATASP -1

S/N

List of Technologies

Sorghum: Mechanized 1 thresher 2 Stover crusher 3 Stover chopper Rice:

Mechanized 4

weeder 5 Hand planter 6 Rice parboiler Cassava: 7 Cassava presser 8 Cassava sifter

9

10 Cassava roasting tray Cassava burr grinder Cassava

11

combine dryer 12 Cassava grater 13 Cassava peeler

14 Cassava cabinet dryer Participation in training (Tick)

1

Source of Training How long have you been in the system Production (Yes = 1, No = 0) Number produced Number sold

1Source: ATASP – 1 =1, ADP = 2, NGOs = 3, Other Processors = 4, 5 = Others (Specify)

Other Trainers:

2. Have you received any other support from ATASP -1? [ ] 1 = Yes [ ] 0 = No

3. How useful is the support received under ATAP -1? …………… Code: Very useful = 3, Useful = 2, Not Useful = 1

4. Patronage and Income from Fabrication Enterprise: i. Did you experience increase in patronage due to ATASP -1 intervention? [ ] 1 = Yes [ ] 0 = No

i. What was the number of customers per season before ATASP -1 intervention?………………..

ii. What is number of customers per season during ATASP -1 intervention? ……………….

iii. What was your average income per season before ATASP -1 intervention? ……………….

iv. What is your average income per season during ATASP -1 intervention? …………………….

1. Has ATASP -1 training improved the quality of your fabrication operation ……………… (1) Excellent (2) Very Good (3) Good (4) Fair (5) Poor

2. What are the constraints to the production of ATASP -1 fabricated equipment?

This article is from: