Undergraduate portfolio by Abraham Gutierrez

ABRAHAM GUTIERREZ UNDERGRADUATE PORTFOLIO

ABRAHAM GUTIERREZ TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE

abraham.gutierrez08@gmail.com a.gutierrez@ttu.edu (432) 528 - 0714

TABLE OF CONTENTS PRECEDENT STUDIES (Structures Class) ....... pg.3-5 Rhino3D, Illustrator, Physical Modeling CHOP SHOP STUDIO ........................................... pg.6 - 8 AUTOCAD, Photoshop, SketchUp, Physical Modeling PERPENDICULAR & PARALLEL STUDIO ....... pg.9-12 Rhino3D, Illustrator, Physical Modeling “I KNOW THE PRICE OF SUCCESS: DEDICATION, HARD WORK AND AN UNREMITTING DEVOTION TO THE THINGS YOU WANT TO SEE HAPPEN.” FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT

ENVELOPE STUDIO ............................................... pg.13-18 Rhino3D, Illustrator, Photoshop, Physical Modeling BUILDING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ..... pg. 19-20 REVIT

glazing

suspended reflection panels

PRECEDENT STUDIES 3

tension cable

DTL_02

tension cable

DTL_01

hinge joint

DTL_03 structure for retail cabin

tile flooring concrete

metal decking DTL_03 JESUS nut

DTL_01

the JESUS nut, at the apex of roof towers, was found to be self - correcting mechanism, bracing all the components and producing an exactness of lines.

suspended ceiling

ventilation duct

maintenance room secondary support column

primary structural column maintenance stairwell base plate

concrete

NORMAN FOSTER

STUDIO / FA11 / NESBIT

stansted airport

ELEVATION & PLAN ANGLE IRON CONNECTION JOINT

ALUMINUM COVER

PRE-CAST CONCRETE WALL CONNECTION FOR WALL PANELS

GYPSUM BOARD

CURVED GLASS

COLLAPSABLE STUDY MODEL

MULION MEMBERS

INSULATION REINFORCING STEEL RODS PRE-CAST CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB

SANTIAGO CALATRAVA

WALL SECTION

CONSTRUCTION 2 / FA12 / RAAB

turning torso

section of building used for bay model

pre-oxidized copper laminated larch timber steel struts stone arches reinforcing steel rod

lateral load uplift load compression load

tertiary structure secondary structure primary structure

detail_01

RENZO PIANO

CONSTRUCTION 2 / FA12 / RAAB

padre pio church

CHOP SHOP

DESIGN STUDIO_01 / FA10 / JEFF NESBIT

for this studio we were asked to salvage and collect different auto parts that provided an essential function in the system of the car. after choosing an alternator we were to disassemble the machine to its individual parts to get a better understanding of what exatly goes on within the car part to make it work. there was an elegant conversation about part to whole relationships not only within the car, but within the alternator. the next step was to reassemble the machine digitally in the form of hybrid collages of lines and superimposed photographs. physical study models came after we studied our collages and conceptually created spaces and levels and planes. we then took section cuts of each study model and layered the 2D drawings of each and further developed conceptual spaces, only this time the spaces had certain functions: demonstration space, transition space, storage space, junkyard space, and reconstruction space. alternator elevations

hybrid collage_01

alternator disassembled

hybrid collage_02

MACHINE “reassembled” model A

1. an apparatus consisting of interrelatedparts with seperate functions, used in the performance of some kind of work. 2. mechanics. a. a device that transmits or modifies force or motion. b. also called simple machine. any of six or more elementary mechanisms, as the lever, wheel and axle, pulley, screw, wedge, and inclined plane. c. also called complex machine. a combination of simple machines. dtl_A1

dtl_A2

place space

transverse sections

“reassembled” model B

dtl_B1

dtl_B2

Diagram

path space

“reassembled” model C

dtl_C1

dtl_C2

transition space

8 longitudal section_01

cross section_01

cross section_02

cross section_03

demonstration space_02

reconstruction space demonstration space_01

storage space

junkyard space

entry space_01

perspective section

entry space_02

site plan

PROVOST

oriented as a perpendicular condition and major entry node into manhattan, a new toll booth station adjacent to the holland tunnel is to be proposed. objectives include structural systems, controling efficiency and flows, and activating site negotiations. for this project we were required to examine innovative design sequences, structural logics, transportation ‘nodes’ (in particular New York City systems), and building code analysis to advance design proposal strategies. the goal was to provide the new jersey port authority with a highly operational proposal that could accommodate for the intense requirements as well as controlling manipulations and design decisions within the dense site parameters. during the pre-design phase of the project we developed multiple iterations of ‘digital paintings’ or diagrams of the site along with a series of ventilated models. in the diagrams we addressed certain questions: how does a vehicle pass through? make quick lane decisions? how does an employee circulate? what innovative structural sequences can be adopted for such necessary spans? what contextual references can be tied or even extended? program for the toll booth proposal includes 2 administrative offices, a lounge room, a restroom(unisex), a storage/mechanical room, and circulation space, roof coverage for 9 lanes, 6 parking spaces for employee vehicles.

SECTION_01

St.

I - 78

12th St. AUTOMATED AUTOMATED TELLER OPERATED TELLER OPERATED

SECTION_02 NEWPORT PARKWAY

OFFICE PARKING

OFFICES

MARIN BLVD .

11th St.

origin

extrude

wrap around MALL Dr.

N 0 scale: (1” = 50’)

50’

site diagram_01

site diagram_03

16’

scale: (1/16” = 1’)

Industrial

Retail

tollbooth plan

1st floor

2nd floor lift and flatten

Retail

site diagram_02

site diagram_04

scale: (1/8” = 1’)

storage breakroom restroom elevator

office_01 office_02 elevator

flatten and anchor

the PERPENDICULAR & the PARALLEL holland tunnel toll stationDESIGN STUDIO_02 / FA11 / JEFF NESBIT

elevation section_01

DTL_03

DTL_01

elevation section_02

DTL_02

welded angle cleat

exploded axo

metal decking 1” bolt

office walls

DTL_01

reinforced concrete slabs

metal decking

1” bolt base plate

metal decking

concrete pad high strength concrete steel anchor bolts

steel truss system steel truss system

light gauge steel framing

DTL_02

4 x 4 column steal I-beam

welded angle cleat

steel columns

5/8” bolt

DTL_03

dtl_01

growing medium filter layer drainage layer protective layer concrete

wall section

dtl_02

elevation sections

11 vegetated roof

dtl_01

growing medium

wire

channel molding

filter layer drainage layer protective layer concrete

tempered glass panels

c-channel

gypsum board

dropped ceiling bracket gypsum board

aluminum mulian structure for glass panels

dtl_02 pre-engineered steel framing

tempered glass

aluminum mulian connection concrete slab

wood decking

aluminum mulian

wood decking verticle wood slats

wall section

concrete floor slab

exploded axo

reinforced concrete pillar re-bar inside concrete

conceptual translation series split

embed anchor

anchor

connect lift

split

lift connection to water

BROOKLYN BRIDGE PARK_ferry station STUDIO / FA11 / NESBIT

perspective

digital paintings

YN KL OO BR

WA TE R

ST .

MUS

IC B ARG E

GE ID BR

A _01

ST.

A _03

RM AN

section_01

BROOKLYN BRIDGE PARK

section_02

A _02

A _05

C _01

UL TO N

ST.

A _04

08 C _02 A _06

B _02

C _03

A _07

C _04

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

= = = = = = = = =

dock controller’s office security office women restroom men restroom ticket office / tourist kiosk kitchen open cafe area enclosed waiting area outdoor waiting area

A _08

B _01

06 C _05

05 C _06

04 03 02

C _07

01 C _08

primary axis

N 1’

C _08

6’ 2’

floor plan

10’

existing boundaries

the brooklyn bridge park ferry station proposal continues the push to de-centralize the city of new york and provides an important transportation node from brooklyn to other parts of the city along the waterway. located on pier one of the park, the ferry terminal design strategies were heavily influenced by extensions of edge conditions and existing roads from brooklyn. the existing bulkhead edge on the north side of the site was used to define where the edge of the proposal would be.the existing edge was not broken, but manipulated so that half of the proposal would be on a slightly lower elevation than the other. this was done to emphasize a connection from the city to the waterfront by forcing the circulation of the proposal down towards the water. this change in elevation was also used in deciding how to organize the program within the terminal. all waiting area (interior and exterior) are on the lower elevation and everything else was organized in the higher elevation. there are also two level landings in the design of the slope of wood decking that is used to circulate people down to the terminal. these landings are for the circulation of the ferry, the lower landing is a drop off point and the higher landing is a pick up point. once this was all decided, there was still a need for a better relationship to the site, so the existing vegetated ground of the park was pulled over the proposal and became a vegetated roof that also acted as the main connection of the city to the terminal.

FRONT ELEVATION

vertical construct EXPLODED AXO

LATERAL BRACING CLOSED

15 DEGREE ROTATION

15 DEGREE ROTATION 165 DEGREE ROTATION

165 DEGREE ROTATION

PANEL FRAME

PLAN VIEW

CLOSED

15 DEGREE ROTATION

15 DEGREE ROTATION 165 DEGREE ROTATION

165 DEGREE ROTATION

R - PANEL

CORNER CONDITIONS L - PANEL

RIVET

OPERABLE VERTICLE SUPPORT

CLOSED

OPEN BASE

STUDIO / SP12 / MCREYNOLDS

ENVELOPE STUDIO

the vertical construct was developed after a series of envelope and material precedent studies. several students had to analyze envelope systems being used in certain buildings while other students studied conceptual art installations using different types of materials. once these studies were complete teams were made. my team included colleagues who studied the CALTRANS DISTRICT 7 building designed by thom mayne. myself and other peers studied LIGHT LINES, an art intallation developed by jay atherton and cy keener. we were then asked to develope a system(vertical construct) that utilized the conceptual properties of the two precedent studies. the light lines installation uses a fabric material covered in plaster that still alows light to pass through it, so in our construct we used a thin blue fabric that allowed plenty of light through. the caltrans building uses an innovative system of operable metal panels to allow ventilation and sun light through. my team and i developed a system of metal panels which are attached to steel pipe columns that are able to rotate. we then used the blue fabric to attach the metal panels on each end that way the rotation of the panels was somewhat controlled and allowed for different variations of sunlight to pass through the construct.

FILTRATION OF LIGHT THROUGH ROTATION

upon finishing the VERTICAL CONSTRUCT project of the studio, we were then asked to research and produce a series of mapping studies of our next project’s site, in el paso texas. after regional and city analysis were complete, there was a better understanding of the natural and cultural relationship of the city of el paso and cuidad juarez of mexico. we were then asked to design a cultural station in the heart of el paso which further emphasized the cultural connection between the two cities. this cultrual center was to impliment and further develope the material and conceptual qualities of the VERTICAL CONSTRUCT.

15 13

CROSS SECTION

REGIONAL AND CITY MAP STUDIES

REGIONAL CIRCULATION

REGIONAL POPULATION

CATHOLIC CHURCHES REGIONAL CULTURAL CENTERS

FLOOD ZONES

SITE PLAN

CATHOLIC CHURCHES CITY CULTURAL CENTERS

LONGITUDINAL SECTION

80’

NORTH ELEVATION

WEST ELEVATION

PERSPECTIVE MODEL PICTURES

GROUND FLOOR

EVENT SPACE

2ND FLOOR

3RD FLOOR

OPEN TO BELOW

EVENT SPACE EVENT SPACE

OFFICE SPACE

LIBRARY

COMPUTER LAB

KITCHEN

22’

LIBRARY

CAFE SPACE

el paso, texas

RIO BASIN CULTURAL STATION

330

final model

300

study model photos

1 80

CLIMATE PROTECTED 2

240

120

CLIMATE CONTROLLED

210

150

SITE PLAN LOCATION : 31 44’ 10.17” N 106 27’ 42.93” W N

10’ 0

40’

20’

“accessibility is key in a region territorially divided.” as the third project in this building systems/envelope studio, we were to design a mobile pavilion which would travel back and fourth between el paso and cuidad juarez on a bi-monthly migration schedule. the pavilion is to provide communities, previously unable to reach the BASIN STATION, access to our cultural event. we were given a base footprint and a base frame in the form of a 45’ x 8‘ flatbed which our pavilion will be housed and transported. from this base frame we were to apply systems of folding, inflating and/or sliding to negotiate the envelope between a closed transportation state and an open deployed state. the objective was to provide a system of shading and climate moderaion for the rio grande basin. within the closed state of the pavilion we were to implement building materials and connections.

9 c a b

7 6

STUDIO / SP12 / MCREYNOLDS

RIO GRANDE MOBILE PAVILION

ELEVATION SECTION_01

1. eye bolts 2. fabric canopy 3. mullion system 4. mullion column w/support for platform 5. double pane glass 6. track system a - (c-channel) b - (i-beam) c - (bearing) 7. hinge joint 8. L-hinge joint 9. truss system

STEP_01

STEP_02

STEP_03

AXONOMETRIC UNFOLDING PROCESS

2ND LEVEL

STEP_04

STEP_05

STEP_06

CUT_02

CUT_01

STEP_07

STEP_08

STEP_09

1ST LEVEL

CUT_02

FLOOR PLANS CUT_01

3’ 1’

LONGITUDINAL SECTION

6’ 10’

BUILDING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 19

DESIGNS

3D View 2

Description CARTOON SET

Date 1-30-2013

GRIDS AND LEVELS FOOTINGS AND COLUMNS BEAMS, WALLS, DOORS

2-6-2013 2-13-2013 2-20-2013

WALL SECTIONS ROOF PLANS INTERIOR ELEVATIONS REFLECTED CEILING PLAN SITE PLAN TITLE SHEET

2-27-2013 3-6-2013 3-20-2013 3-27-2013 4-03-2013 4-14-2013

Project number Date

FINAL SET MAY 03, 2013 AG

TITLE SHEET

A0.0

5/3/2013 10:48:07 AM

No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

SARATOGA SPRINGS, UTAH

ABRAHAM GUTIERREZ

A0.0 TITLE SHEET A1.0 SITE PLAN A2.0 FLOOR PLAN A3.0 ROOF PLAN A4.0 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A5.0 ELEVATIONS A6.0 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A7.0 WALL SECTIONS A7.1 DETAILS A8.0 FRAMING PLAN A9.0 FOUNDATION PLAN A10.0 DOOR SCHEDULE

INTERMOUNTAIN SARATOGA SPINGS CLINIC

SHEET INDEX;

in the building information technology class we learned to use REVIT to construct a building and produce a full set of construction documents for the building.

9.1

8.9

DESIGNS

3’ - 9”

STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF SYSTEM

METAL ROOF

5.9

7.9

8.1

8.6

8.9

9.1

RIGID INSULATION

Level 4 23' - 9"

141' - 1 1/2" 25' - 3 3/4" 16' - 9 1/4"

26' - 4 3/8"

0' - 10 1/8"

19' - 10 7/8"

6' - 1 5/8"

13' - 7"

17' - 6 1/8"

0' - 9 1/4"

0' - 3 7/8"

Level 4 23' - 9"

METAL ROOF DECK 6” MTL STUD FRAMING

ROOF INSULATION

Level 4 23' - 9"

METAL ROOF DECK 6” MTL STUD FRAMING

GYP BOARD

14' - 8 3/8"

GYP BOARD

ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE

132

EXAM 138

130

EXAM 132

128

EXAM 130

126 120

122

EXAM 128

CALL CENTER 120

HSK 122

WAIT 101

150

VESTIBULE 100

3 A7.0 16' - 9 1/4"

26' - 4 3/8"

100A

0' - 10 1/8"

19' - 10 7/8"

6' - 1 5/8"

17' - 6 1/8"

13' - 7"

0' - 9 1/4"

0' - 3 7/8"

2 25' - 3 3/4" A7.0

141' - 1 1/2"

14' - 8 3/8"

Level 3 19' - 4"

Level 2 15' - 8"

Level 3 19' - 4"

A7.01 / 01 OPP A7.01 / 3 ROOF SYSTEM

11 - 5/8”

RIGID INSULATION ROOF JOISTS

Level 2 15' - 8"

3 COURSES OF BRICK IN ROWLOCK COURSING

B.O. WINDOW R.O.

Level 2 15' - 8"

SINGLE-PLY ROOF SYSTEM

INSULATED COMPOSITE METAL PANEL

1’ 3/8”

T.O. FRAMING/MASONRY 115’ - 4”

WOOD JOIST

FIREBLOCKING

RIGID INSULATION

GLAZED ALUMINUM WALL SYSTEM

4’ 3 - 5/8”

12” SOLDIER COURSE SET 3/4” IN FROM FACE OF BRICK

H J

GYPSUM BOARD ON UNDERSIDE OF ROOF STRUCTURE FACE BRICK WOOD SHEATHING DAMPPROOFING AIR BARRIER WOOD FRAMING

EXTEND GYP BOARD TO STRUCTURE AT EXTERIOR WALLS VAPOR RETARDER TO ROOF DECK

BATT INSULATION

1’ 3/8”

138

EXAM 140

108

PUBLIC TOILET 106 PUBLIC TOILET 108

A5.1

Level 3 19' - 4"

3 - 1/2”

Level 2 15' - 8"

K.6

12” HIGH HEADER STONE CLADDING FLUSH WITH BRICK

15’ 4”

106

1 A7.0 124

CORRIDOR 126

F G

SARATOGA SPRINGS, UTAH

11' - 7 1/2"

CORRIDOR 110

TREATMENT 124

ABRAHAM GUTIERREZ

0' - 2 1/4"

WAIT 102

A6.0

INSULATED COMPOSITE METAL PANEL

No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

M N

Description Date CARTOON SET 1-30-2013 GRIDS AND LEVELS 2-6-2013 FOOTINGS AND COLUMNS 2-13-2013 BEAMS, WALLS, DOORS 2-20-2013 WALL SECTIONS 2-27-2013 ROOF PLANS 3-6-2013 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS 3-20-2013 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN 3-27-2013 SITE PLAN 4-03-2013 TITLE SHEET 4-14-2013

LOOSE STEEL LINTEL

2 - 1/2” METAL STUD FRAMING ISULATED COMPOSTIE METAL PANEL

1/2” GYPSUM BOARD AT WINDOW HEAD

GLAZED ALUMINUM WALL SYSTEM

No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4’ 11” FRAME

INTERMOUNTAIN SARATOGA SPINGS CLINIC

10' - 6 3/8"

RECEPTION 116

10' - 3"

TREATMENT 1110

5' - 1"

ELEC 112

BUSINESS OFFICE 118

INSTACARE MA STATION 134

LAB 136

112

A6.0

146

140

CLINIC MANAGER 142

FORMED METAL SOFFIT PANELS

4” - 16 GA COLD FORMED METAL STUD FRAMING AT 16” O.C.

5’ ROUGH OPENING

152

PATIENT TOILET 190 FM MA STATION 192

1108

1110

5' - 10 1/2"

CORRIDOR 1108 190

EXAM PATIENT TOILET 148 146

142

OFFICE 152

MECH 114

1120

TREATMENT 188

148

114

WAIT 103

INTAKE 1116

5' - 1"

A6.0

104A

RADIOLOGY 1120

1118

DRAW 1112

B.95

5' - 8 7/8"

1114

EXAM 1106 1106

0' - 9 3/8"

PEDS MA STATION 170

CONTROL 1118

5' - 11 1/2" 0' - 9 1/4"

5' - 1"

196

SUPPLY 1114

10' - 4 1/2"

CORRIDOR 150

5' - 8 7/8"

0' - 9 1/4"

6' - 2 5/8"

EXAM 1104

CORRIDOR 194 1104

184

CORRIDOR 144 5' - 11 1/2"

10' - 4 1/2"

K K.6

EXAM 196

198

6' - 2 5/8"

174

EXAM 174

STAFF TOILET 154 154

0' - 9 3/8"

EXAM 184

1102

INSULATED COMPOSITE METAL PANEL

TREATMENT 1110

158

BREAK 158

EXAM 198

188

TYPICAL TOILET ROOM

F G

EXAM 182

EXAM 1102

CORRIDOR 186

5' - 1"

83' - 3 1/4"

A5.0

CORRIDOR 172 182

164

CORRIDOR 162 160

OFFICE 162

10' - 3"

EXAM 1100

CLERSTORY WEST

10' - 11 1/4" 10' - 6 3/8" 0' - 2 1/4"

OFFICE 164

176

EXAM 176

166

5' - 10 1/2"

180

EXAM 180

1100

FORMED METAL SOFFIT PANELS

OFFICE 166

11' - 7 1/2"

178

EXAM 178

168

B.95

160

OFFICE 168

ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE

3 5/8” STEEL STUD FRAMING

Level 4 23' - 9"

S/S FLASHING

5.9

7.9

8.1

8.6

8.9

9.1

10 STONE CLADDING

3’ 0”

2 A5.0

SARATOGA SPRINGS, UTAH

ABRAHAM GUTIERREZ

A5.1

INTERMOUNTAIN SARATOGA SPINGS CLINIC

DAMPPROOFING AIR BARRIER BATT INSULATION WOOD SHEATHING

Description CARTOON SET

Date 1-30-2013

GRIDS AND LEVELS FOOTINGS AND COLUMNS BEAMS, WALLS, DOORS

2-6-2013 2-13-2013 2-20-2013

WALL SECTIONS 2-27-2013 ROOF PLANS 3-6-2013 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS 3-20-2013 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN 3-27-2013 SITE PLAN 4-03-2013 TITLE SHEET 4-14-2013

VAPOR RETARDER WOOD FRAMING

BELOW SLAB ON GRADE VAPOR RETARDER

GYP BOARD

Project number Date

A7.01 / 2

FINAL SET MAY 02, 2013 AG

10” HIGH STARTER COURSE TYP

FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"

FLOOR LEVEL 0' - 0" Project number

C:\Users\abgutier\Desktop\Check Set.rvt

Date

5.9

7.9

8.1

8.6

141' - 1 1/2" 16' - 9 1/4"

0' - 10 1/8"

26' - 4 3/8"

Level 4 23' - 9"

19' - 10 7/8"

6' - 1 5/8"

17' - 6 1/8"

13' - 7"

8.9

0' - 9 1/4"

0' - 3 7/8"

A7.0 25' - 3 3/4"

9.1

14' - 8 3/8"

Level 4 23' - 9"

3 A7.0

Level 3 19' - 4"

Level 2 15' - 8"

FLOOR LEVEL 0' - 0"

3/4” FND CHAMFER

FLOOR LEVEL 0' - 0"

5/2/2013 12:20:57 PM

SECTION THROUGH GLAZED WALL 3/4" = 1'-0"

CLERESTORY EXTERIOR WALL 3/4" = 1'-0"

HIGH LOBBY CLERESTORY WALL 3/4" = 1'-0"

GLAZED ALUMINUM WALL SYSTEM

STAINLESS STEEL FLASHING

DESIGNS

TAPERED FLOOR

FLOOR LEVEL 0' - 0"

A7.0

CONCRETE FOUNDATION 2” FOUNDATION INSULATION

A2.0

FLOOR LEVEL 0' - 0"

2” FOUNDATION INSULATION

FINAL SET MAY 02, 2013

FLOOR LEVEL 0' - 0"

3 / 4” FND CHAMFER

AG DESIGNS

FLOOR LEVEL 0' - 0"

3/4” X 3/4” CHAMFER 3/4” TREATED PLYWOOD

5.9

7.9

8.6

8.1

8.9

9.1

SOUTH 1/8" = 1'-0"

8.6

8.1 2

0' - 3 7/8"

25' - 3 3/4"A7.0

7.9

5.9

141' - 1 1/2" 0' - 9 1/4"

13' - 7"

17' - 6 1/8"

6' - 1 5/8"

19' - 10 7/8"

26' - 4 3/8"

16' - 9 1/4"

0' - 10 1/8"

Level 4 23' - 9"

3 A7.0

Level 3 19' - 4"

Level 2 15' - 8"

0' - 9 3/8"

10' - 4 1/2"

5' - 8 7/8"

A7.0 5' - 1"

NORTH 1/8" = 1'-0"

9.1

8.6

8.1

7.9

5.9

B.95 C

5' - 1"

5' - 10 1/2"

3 COURSES OF BRICK IN ROWLOCK COURSING

11' - 7 1/2"

10' - 6 3/8"

10' - 11 1/4"

10' - 4 1/8"

0' - 2 1/4"

11' - 7 1/2"

5' - 10 1/2"

5' - 1"

K.6

12” SOLIDIER COURSE SET 3/4” IN FROM FACE

A7.0 10' - 3"

5' - 1"

0' - 9 1/4" 5' - 8 7/8" 5' - 11 1/2"

0' - 9 3/8" 6' - 2 5/8"

4' - 5"

Level 4 23' - 9"

Level 3 19' - 4"

Level 2 15' - 8"

SINGLE-PLY ROOF SYSTEM

BATT INSULATION

C:\Users\abgutier\Desktop\Check Set.rvt

FLOOR LEVEL 0' - 0"

K.6

C B.95

FLOOR LEVEL 0' - 0"

A WEST 1/8" = 1'-0"

B.95 C

K.6

GYPSUM BOARD

Project number

FINAL SET MAY 02, 2013 AG

A5.0

No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Description CARTOON SET

Date 1-30-2013

GRIDS AND LEVELS FOOTINGS AND COLUMNS BEAMS, WALLS, DOORS

2-6-2013 2-13-2013 2-20-2013

WALL SECTIONS 2-27-2013 3-6-2013 ROOF PLANS INTERIOR ELEVATIONS 3-20-2013 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN 3-27-2013 SITE PLAN 4-03-2013 TITLE SHEET 4-14-2013

Project number Date

GYPSUM BOARD

Date

RIGID INSULATION

WOOD DECK

FLOOR LEVEL 0' - 0"

5/2/2013 12:20:57 PM

FLOOR LEVEL 0' - 0"

EAST 1/8" = 1'-0"

9 GLAZED ALUMINUM WALL SYSTEM

CEMENT BOARD

22' - 11"

Level 4 23' - 9"

No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

PARAPET 3 3" = 1'-0"

SILL 3" = 1'-0"

WOOD FRAMING

83' - 3 1/4"

0' - 2 1/4" 10' - 3"

2” RIGID INSULATION CONT SEALANT

SEALANT AND BACKER ROD

C B.95

5' - 11 1/2"

Level 4 23' - 9"

8.9

83' - 3 1/4"

0' - 9 1/4"

6' - 2 5/8"

FOUNDATION

FLOOR LEVEL 0' - 0"

K.6

VAPOR BARRIER

1’ 3/8”

FLOOR LEVEL 0' - 0"

CONCRETE SLAB

FASTENERS @ 12” O.C.

11 - 5/8”

8.9

SARATOGA SPRINGS, UTAH

14' - 8 3/8"

ABRAHAM GUTIERREZ

9.1

Level 4 23' - 9"

FLAT HEAD STAINLESS STEEL SCREW

2 X 6 FRAMING

CONCRETE SLAB

SARATOGA SPRINGS, UTAH

ABRAHAM GUTIERREZ

INTERMOUNTAIN SARATOGA SPINGS CLINIC

SHEET METAL COPING

WINDOW AT CLERESTORY 1 3" = 1'-0"

FINAL SET MAY 02, 2013 AG

A7.1

I WOULD LIKE TO GIVE A SPECIAL THANKS TO ALL OF MY PROFESSORS, WHO IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER HELPED ME DURING MY TIME AS AN UNDERGRAD STUDENT.

ABRAHAM GUTIERREZ UNDERGRADUATE PORTFOLIO