Early Years Bulletin
Spring 2017 vol 4 no 3
Focus on Pre-K & K editors: Jennifer Baumgartner and Cynthia F. DiCarlo
Can Developmentally Appropriate Practice Support College/Career Readiness? One School’s Journey From Skepticism to Understanding By Lea Ann Christenson, Towson University, Maryland Jenny James, Director First Lutheran Preschool, Ellicott City, Maryland
Y
ou could almost hear the eyes rolling as news of integrating science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) into preschool classrooms started to make its way around the early childhood teacher training community. Many professionals saw college/ career readiness as a mandate that couldn’t possibly be developmentally appropriate for young children. Others knew that their curriculum already touched on STEM subjects, and saw this as just another way to package a program of study for success-driven parents. If we were already doing STEM in our preschool classrooms, what were trainers actually trying to say? Could it be that we somehow were missing the point? Could early childhood really be the time and place for college/career readiness pedagogy? What about kindergarten readiness? Wouldn’t STEM be more appropriate for K-8? These were the questions that the First Lutheran Preschool board of directors explored when considering this new directive. So much of the curriculum to this point had been centered on developing social skills. When the director reported what appeared to be a paradigm shift, the board saw the need to explore local resources so they could learn more about what STEM would look like in a developmentally appropriate preschool classroom. One of the board members was a professor at the local state university. Since the STEM push seemed to be coming from academia, the professor decided to explore the activities of the local university’s lab school. When the preschool’s director and staff visited the lab school,
they saw many of the same developmentally appropriate activities that they were already doing in their classrooms. The difference was that the projects were child-driven and teacher-supported. Instead of having a science experiment for the sake of having a science activity, scientific practice was used to study subjects that were interesting to the children. After this field trip, some of the teachers became excited about trying The Project Approach in their classroom. The experience broadened their idea of what STEM could be, and they saw how to implement STEM curriculum through observation, data collection, recording, and sharing information. Observing teachers in action was the seed needed to try a new approach to teaching STEM. The school’s community offered access to professionals versed in several of the STEM subjects. This allowed board members and teaching staff to find out what was trending in their fields of expertise.
Contents p. 3 - Focus on Infants & Toddlers p. 6 - Activities for the Classroom