OWT_Green_PNPM_QR_1_2010

KECAM MATAN DE EVELOPMENT PROG GRAM AND D ENVIRON NMENT (G GREEN PNP PM) IN SULAWESI S I Componeent 3: Awarreness Raisiing and Traaining PROV VINCE: SO OUTH EAST T SULAWE ESI

QUARTE ERLY REP PORT Reportin ng Period: [1 [ January – 30 April 2010] 2 For THE E WORLD BANK - IN NDONESIA A

Preepared by:

Operration Waallacea Trrust (OWT T) 10 May, M 2010

I.

Executive Summary

1.

Background: The Green-Kecamatan Development Program/G-KDP is a pilot program within the Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM) - Rural aimed to develop and integrate sustainable natural resources management (NRM) strategy into the PNPM-Rural. The objective of the Green KDP is: for villagers in rural Sulawesi to benefit from improved local governance and equitable access to, and sustainable use of, natural resources. The Operation Wallacea Trust (OWT) is a Civil Service Organization (CSO) subcontracted by the World Bank (Bank) to conduct environmental awareness and training to local community and Green-PNPM actors at village and kecamatan level and mainstreaming sustainable development at districts and province level in the Pilot GreenPNPM in South East Sulawesi Province.

2.

Project Management: During this quarter, we moved the post of several old staff and also recruited new staff to response the challenge of environmental facilitation program of each district. Since March 2010, we recruited Andi Muh Sainuddin, S.Si, M.Si as Assistant Training and Awareness Coordinator of Kolaka District; he replaced Abdul Hadedi (Dedi). The latter becomes Assistant Coordinator of Buton District to replace Muhammad Erwin who had new post as OWT’s Data Base Manager. We recruited Gusti Suganda to replace Arman as Awareness Coordinator for Ladongi Sub-District. We raised the role of Pak Made Tinggal Karyasa, key Champion of Gunung Sari Village, to assist us to train farmer groups on organic farming in Watubangga Sub-District. We used Pak Made garden as organic farming learning center. On mid February 2010, our financial administration during year 2009 (1 January – 31 December 2010) was audited by registed public accountant Drs. Salam Rauf and Partners during. The opinion and statement of Receipts and Payments have been submitted to the World Bank of March 30, 2010. On April 5, 2010, we have submitted letter to the PNPM-Support Facility (PSF, Mr. John Victor Bottini Task Team Leader of Green-PNPM) to propose No-Cost Extension until October 31, 2011.

3.

Mainstreaming NRM issues to non-Green PNPM facilitators/actors at province and national and global level: We believe that one of key success indicators of Green-PNPM will be materialized when the NRM issues bring by the program can be ‘infected’ to or ‘accommodated’ by local community, facilitators and actors of regular PNPM. As such, during this quarter, we have started to socialize the outputs, achievements, strategies, approaches and lessons learned of our temporary results to wider audience, especially to non Green-PNPM actors, such as PNPM facilitators and government officials from nonGreen-PNPM pilot areas in SE Sulawesi Province. It was conducted in the form of: (a) One-day workshop, raising a topic ‘Towards Sustainable and Energy Self-Sufficiency Villages’ (Menuju Desa Lestari Mandiri Energi) in Kendari, it was organized together with PMD as part of regular PNPM coordination meeting at province level. The training workshop was attended by 59 participants, 30 persons were PNPM facilitators while 20 persons were government officials at district and province levels. The impact of this activities were: (i) PMD of SE Sulawesi Province has adopted Home Biogas as smart practice, this will be replicated by the Government; (ii) Our targeted villages facilitation

1

Edi Purwanto

(Gunung Jaya/Ladongi, Gunung Sari/Watubangga) are selected by PMD province as pilot example villages; (b) Participated Coordination Meeting for Green PNPM Evaluation. In this meeting, we presented our facilitation strategies and outputs to key government officials at province and district level; (c) Organized Green-PNPM exhibition in Kendari: Together with PMD Province, we promoted Green-PNPM activities on the annual exhibition event organized by SE Sulawesi Province Government. Based on guest book, our stand was at least visited by 700 visitors; (d) Hosted Radio Talk-Show to promote Green-PNPM at National Level. Together with PSF and KBR68H (private networking radio with 700 members all over Indonesia), we organize the first Green-PNPM Radio Talk-Show which lively broadcasted at national level; (e) Since March 2010, we published a new website www.wallaceatrustindonesia.org, we made use this to publish our Green-PNPM facilitations globally. We use two languages Indonesian and English, we continuously update the website with the developed awareness, training materials and our strategies to mainstream NRM at village level.

4.

Mainstreaming Smart Practices of NRM at village and sub-district level: To make tangible outputs of environmental awareness, we facilitated the development of NRM smart practices demonstration pilots (demplots/models). Those have been successfully inspired local community to replicate the initiatives by proposing the activities to be funded by Green-PNPM fund (BLM). Those were the cases for Home Biogas in Ladongi, Baula and Watubangga, cashew processing in Pasarwajo and Tongkuno, mangrove planting in Mawasangka and Napabalano, making energy saving stoves in Sampolawa, making biopores and recharge wells in Pasarwajo, planting Pala (Myristica Fragan) in Pasarwajo, planting Sengon (Albizia falcataria) in Sampolawa, planting Mahoni (Swietenia mahagony) in Pasarwajo etc.

During this quarter, we developed several new demplots: (a) Home biogas installation in Ladongi, Baula, Watubangga and Pasarwajo; (b) Honeybee culture in Ladongi, Baula, Napabalano and Lawa; (c) VCO development in Mawasangka and Pasarwajo; (d) Seaweed farming (Sampolawa); (e) Fattening Mangrove Crab in Mawasangka; (f) Janthropa Stove in Mawasangka; (g) Organic farming in Watubangga, Sampolawa, Pasarwajo and Mawasangka; (h) Water purification in Ladongi; (i) Learning house on Waste separation and processing in Bau-Bau. We also raised awareness on the need to define and conserve ‘Village Protection Areas’ (Kawasan Perlindungan Desa) in Pasarwajo, waste separation in Mawasangka, Pasarwajo, Sampolawa and Lawa.

5.

Publish and installed awareness materials/campaign: (a) Published three factsheets on bio-gas, bee-culture and Village Nursery; (b) Three films about the making of biogas, charcoal bricked and documentation of National Radio Talk-Show; (c) Installed six campaign iron (metal) boards displaying environmental campaign in Buton District; (d) Installed 16 Wooden Campaign Boards in Buton District; (e) Installed awareness materials at UPK Offices in Buton; (f) Put sticker for villagers who use Janthropa stove in Mawasangka, Solar Voltage in Sampolawa; (g) Installed Wooden frame environmental awareness posters in Buton, Muna and Kolaka; (h) Published awareness materials and socialization of NRM smart-practices initiative at two Community Radios, i.e. Radio Gunung Sari (Watubangga) and Green-Trust (Ladongi).

2 Edi Purwanto

6.

Institutional Capacity building: Facilitated the development and strengthen of; (a) 12 women groups of Coconut Shell Charcoal Bricked (CCB) makers group in Watubangga; (b) Nentu Handcraft makers in Sampolawa; (c) Broadcasting organization structure of Radio Gunung Sari and Green Trust Community Radios; (d) Crap fattening fishers in Mawasangka; (e) Orange farmers group in Pasarwajo; (f) Bee culture farmers group in Ladongi, Lawa, Napabalano and Lawa; (g) VCO makers in Pasarwajo and Mawasangka; (h) Seaweed farmers in Sampolawa.

7.

Lessons Learned: We faced 8 challenges which are valuable as lesson learned for future development of Green-PNPM, those are: (a) Kecamatan policy to evently distributed block-grant to all villages; (b) Many RABs are defined by FKL; (c) Training repetition using different fund sources; (d) Unsustainbale trees nursery demplots; (e) Conflicts between TPK and project beneficiary; (f) Inconsistency between planting proposal and its implementation; (g) Catchment Area rehabilitation using commercial species; (h) The fate of UPK Institution after PNPM.

8.

Concluding remarks: The challenges for Green are bigger than non-green activities.

Much need to be done to present the spirit of community development on environmental improvement in this program. Big efforts are required to change government, local community and facilitator from project oriented culture into the ‘mandiri’ (self-help spirit). The recruitment of Green facilitator should be conducted in selective manner; they should receive realistic jobs, reasonable remuneration with strict punishments.

Awareness and training are highly required for this, but this should be accompanied by adaptive guideline and strong monitoring and evaluation.

3 Edi Purwanto

II.

Project Background

The Green-Kecamatan Development Program/G-KDP is a pilot program within the Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM) - Rural aimed to develop and integrate sustainable natural resources management (NRM) strategy into the PNPM-Rural. The objective of the Green PNPM is: for villagers in rural Sulawesi to benefit from improved local governance and equitable access to, and sustainable use of, natural resources. The Operation Wallacea Trust (OWT) is a Civil Service Organization (CSO) subcontracted by the World Bank (Bank) to conduct environmental awareness and training to local community and Green-PNPM actors at village and kecamatan level and mainstreaming sustainable development at districts and province level in the Pilot Green-PNPM in South East Sulawesi Province.

Green-PNPM Pilot in SE Sulawesi Province is implemented in three districts, i.e. Buton, Muna and Kolaka. Three kecamatans (Sub-Districts) were selected for each district, Pasarwajo, Sampolawa and Mawasangka for Buton, Tongkuno, Lawa and Napabalano for Muna, and Ladongi, Baula and Watubangga for Kolaka. The total project budget for Component 3 (Awareness Raising and Training) is USD 764.650,00. The life of the project is three years, starting November 7, 2007 and ended October 31, 2010. Understanding that the remaining fund is sufficient to run the project for another year, and there are still many uncompleted tasks, on April 5, 2010, we submitted letter to the PNPM-Support Facility to propose No-Cost Extension until October 31, 2011.

The project has two main components, i.e. environmental training and awareness. Both activities are inserted to the existing PNPM system to mainstreaming NRM at village, (sub) district and province level. To make tangible outputs of environmental awareness, the activity has been supported by facilitating local community to develop community based NRM models. The objective is to provide life examples of community based NRM which are applicable and affordable to rural community. Those have been successfully inspired local community to replicate the initiatives by proposing the activities to be funded by Green-PNPM fund (BLM).

During this quarter, we developed several new demplots: (a) Home biogas installation in Ladongi, Baula, Watubangga and Pasarwajo; (b) Honeybee culture in Ladongi, Baula, Napabalano and Lawa; (c) VCO development in Mawasangka and Pasarwajo; (d) Seaweed farming (Sampolawa); (e) Fattening Mangrove Crab in Mawasangka; (f) Janthropa Stove in Mawasangka; (g) Organic farming in Watubangga, Sampolawa, Pasarwajo and Mawasangka; (h) Water purification in Ladongi; (i) Learning house on Waste separation and processing in BauBau. We also raised awareness on the need to define and conserve ‘Village Protection Areas’ (Kawasan Perlindungan Desa) in Pasarwajo, waste separation in Mawasangka, Pasarwajo, Sampolawa and Lawa.

Environmental training is targeted to: (a) local community at village and kecamatan level; (b) government officials at district and province level; (c) Green-PNPM actors (FKL, Faskap, PJOK etc.) at kecamatan, district and province level. Training delivery for local community is mainly aimed at improving skills on NRM. Training delivery for government officials is aimed at nurturing problem solving dialogue and cross-fertilization among decision makers on NRM. Training delivery is organized in collaboration with government agencies to reduce training cost, ease technical arrangement and to deliver the training to considerable numbers of intended

4

Edi Purwanto

participants (key decison makers) efficiently. Training delivery for PNPM actors is aimed at mainstreaming visions on site specific environmental problems and associated solutions to stimulate the implementation of ‘green window’ to the existing PNPM. Training delivery is organized in collaboration with PMD and other Green-PNPM actors at district and province level. The principles taken as a basis on training design are as follow: (a) it is not aimed at raising skills but mainstreaming visions on sustainable development decisions; (b) its duration not longer than 8 hours (one-day), as key decisions makers have no time to engage more than one-day training, Table1. Process in designing environmental training and awareness No. 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Phase Identification

Mapping Natural resources

of

Mapping KCVs as key conservation agents at village level Develop grand design of environmental development strategy in every kecamatan Develop relevant training and awareness materials

Item Natural resources Environmental problems Sources of threats and pressures Knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP)

Spatial data collection at village level

Develop networking with KCVs

Methodology Reconnaissance survey at kecamatan level

Socio-economic data collection supported with interviews of selected respondents Data collection using GPS, supported with GIS/Remote sensing

Focus Group discussions (FGD) on village environmental problems

Visions and facilitations actions plan

Vegetative restoration Physical restoration Application of appropriate technology which can save renewable energy.

Outputs Overview of environmental problems at kecamatan (see Chapter 3 of Inception Report) KAP report

Maps of natural resources and environmental problems of each kecamatan ‘Environmental Profile’ (baseline env. survey) of each kecamatan List of KCVs on GreenPNPM facilitation village.

Environmental training and awareness strategy on every village/kecamatan

Emphasis on practical exercise or learning by doing principle

Well-trained and informed local community, GreenPNPM actors, government officials and relevant stakeholders

The report outlines progress, outputs and achievements during the first four months of 2010, i.e.

1 January – 30 April 2010.

5 Edi Purwanto

III. Progress Made Over the Reporting Period A.

Project Management

During this quarter, we moved the post of several old staff and also recruited new staff to response the challenges of environmental facilitation program of each district. Since March 2010, we recruited Andi Muh Sainuddin, S.Si, M.Si as Assistant Training and Awareness Coordinator of Kolaka District; he replaced Abdul Hadedi (Dedi). The latter becomes Assistant Coordinator of Buton District to replace Muhammad Erwin who had new post as OWT’s Data Base Manager. We recruited Gusti Suganda to replace Arman as Awareness Coordinator for Ladongi Sub-District. We raised the role of Pak Made Tinggal Karyasa, key Champion of Gunung Sari Village, to assist us to train farmer groups on organic farming in Watubangga SubDistrict. We used Pak Made garden as organic farming learning center. On mid February 2010, our financial administration during year 2009 (1 January – 31 December 2010) was audited by registed public accountant Drs. Salam Rauf and Partners during. The opinion and statement of Receipts and Payments have been submitted to the World Bank of March 30, 2010. On April 5, 2010, we submitted letter to the PNPM-Support Facility (PSF, Mr. John Victor Bottini Task Team Leader of Green-PNPM) to propose No-Cost Extension until October 31, 2011.

B.

Environmental Awareness

Since the beginning 2010, we started promoting the developed smart practices models to district and province level as ways to mainstream environmental issues and prepare exit strategy to areas within and beyond Green PNPM.

B.1. Environmental Awareness and Training at Province and National Level B.1.1. On-going development of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ environmental management practices: Learning of the World Bank Book outlines ‘good’ and ‘bad’ environmental management practices, since July 2009, we have collected photos related to example of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ environmental practices with special reference to Indonesian environmental condition. We will develop a book, a discussion on ‘pros’ and ‘cons’ of each practice will be discussed. The lists of intended photos are presented on Table 1. The book is planned to be completed on July 2010.

6 Edi Purwanto

Table2. Good and Bad Environmental Management Typology

Upland

Lowland

Coastal

Near

(Sub)Topic of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ management Ecosystem or practices Forest Natural Forest: Intact vs degraded forest. A closer look on: surface and morphoerosion1 Manmade Forest: well management with good canopy cover and undergrowth vs forest with good canopy cover but poor undergrowth and poor canopy and poor undergrowth. A closer look on overland flow and accelerated erosion.

Rainfed Agroforestry: intercropping trees with annual crop vs annual crop agriculture (without tree crop). A closer look on surface erosion and land productivity.

Intercropping vs monoculture. Example: intercropping rice, maize and cassava vs monoculture cassava. A closer look on accelerated erosion2 and land productivity.

Upland agriculture with and without soil conservation. A closer look on accelerated erosion and land productivity.

Bench terrace with and without terrace riser protection. A closer look on accelerated (rill) erosion and land productivity.

Cocoa Plantation with and without pest management. A closer look on quality and quantity of fruit production.

Steep sloping land along the roads with and without slope stabilization.

A closer look on mass wasting.

Irrigated Sawah with and without ‘ngaguguntur’ (slope retreatment). A closer agriculture look on river suspended and bed load (total river sediment load).

Settlement area Settlement area with and without recharge well and water harvesting system. A closer look on surface water pounding and depth of ground water level.

Domestic waste Domestic waste management with and without sorting and processing management River Erodible meandering river bank with and without slope stabilization using gabion and vegetative protection. A closer look on riverbank erosion.

Mangrove Coastal area with and without mangrove: A closer look on coastal line forest retreatment (abrasion).

Brackish water Brackish water pond with and without mangrove trees (Silvo-fishery): pond A closer look on bank stability and pond productivity.

Sandy beach Sandy beach with and without Casuarinas’ trees: A closer look on coastal line retreatment.

Coral reef Near shore marine with good and degraded coral reef: A closer look on reef fish abundance and diversity

1

Morphoerosion is the wearing away of soil and rock by mass wasting (e.g. gully erosion, landslide etc.).

2

Accelerated erosion/man-made erosion is erosion influenced by man.

7 Edi Purwanto

shore

Fish stock

marine/

Seaweed farming

Fishery

Near shore fishery with and without environmentally sound fishing gears Near shore marine with and without seaweed farming: A closer look on illegal logging and coral reef degradation.

B.1.2. Published and installed 3 information sheets: During the reporting period, we developed three information sheets (factsheets), so in total we have already developed seven factsheets and one faith base environmental campaign (DL). Each material was printed for 1,000 copies. The factsheet were printed on mat paper 150 gram, size 21 x 30 cm, four pages and full color. The first factsheet entitled ‘Develop low-cost biogas installation: Toward energy self-sufficiency village. This factsheet discusses: (a) why do we need and what the benefits of biogas; (c) principle of animal (caws and pigs) dung biogas; (d) procedure to develop low-cost biogas reactor (using polyethylene). The second factsheet entitled: ‘Benefits and knowhow of bee-culture’. The factsheet discusses: (a) bee culture and forest conservation; (b) economic benefit of bee culture; (c) types of bees; (d) knowhow in beeculture. The third factsheet entitled: ‘Developing Village Nursery’. The factsheet discusses: (a) why do we need to develop village nursery; (b) materials; (c) several methods of planting materials development.

B.1.3. In-service training for OWT staff on Film Making (Kendari, 10-11 January 2010): Film is considered the most communicative and effective media for environmental awareness.

Good film can deliver message in attractive and interesting manner to the targeted audience. As awareness aids, film can raise the quality of message delivery and make the job of environmental awareness facilitators easier. Understanding this, realizing the need to document and promote smart practices to other areas using film, while our field staff capacity on film making was still lacking, then we decided to organize in-service training on film making. The training was held in OWT branch office in Kendari for two days and involved all OWT field staff (14 persons). The trainer was Pak Arief Nurmawan from NGO Kanopi, Yogyakarta. Two main topics were given, first was shooting techniques and secondly is film editing. Knowledge and skill taken from this training were directly practiced to document the process of biogas installation in Gunung Jaya Village, Kecamatan Ladongi, Kolaka. The film had been completed almost the same time with the completion of the biogas training. The film has become our milestone on film making by our own resource. Before, we had produced many films, but we always asked film maker to do the job.

8 Edi Purwanto

B.1.4. Development of three Green-PNPM films: During this reporting period we developed three films: (a) the process of Home Biogas installation; (b) the making of Coconut charcoal bricked; (c) Documentation of National Radio Talk-Show on Green-PNPM. B.1.5. In-service training for OWT staff for home biogas installation (Ladongi, 12 -14 January 2010): We learned biogas application from WCS-IP whom facilitated this technique earlier in North Sulawesi. Knowing that WCS-IP learned such practice from Kanopi (Yogyakarta based NGO), thereby we contacted the NGO to assist us. Since November 2009, we have already asked Kanopi for training, however due to their tight schedule, the training was not conducted until beginning of January. We planned to introduce this to community which raises cattle such as in Kolaka District (Kecamatan Ladongi, Baula and Watubangga). Munanese and Butonese do raise cattle as well but most of them do not cage their cattle, as such the fresh dung collection as the main requirement of this technology application was unmet. Efforts are needed to lock in their cattle (at least at model scale) in Muna and Buton before introducing the technology. Based on the background, we started to apply the installation in Kolaka. We selected Gunung Jaya Village in Kolaka, the village is dominated by Balinese whom most of villagers raise pigs in cage. The trainer was Pak Arief Nurmawan. The training was conducted for two days, in which all the process was filmed. The training was attended by 39 persons whom included all OWT field staff from three districts (14 people) plus key villagers of Gunung Jaya (20 persons), Putemata (2 persons), and Atula (3 persons) Villages. Those three villages are potentials for biogas installation. The participants were very enthusiastic and curious following the training. They were actively involved having step by step the installation technique. As such, apart from inservice training, also gave benefits to local community, ‘killing two birds with one stone’. See also Section C.3.1. Two weeks after the training, about 20 villagers from those villages bought plastic polyethylene from Bali to install biogas at their house; however they have to wait until harvest season to be able to work for their personal home installation.

Box 1: Home biogas: a SMART-PRACTICE to save economy and environment Biogas is the flammable gas produced from fermented organic materials by anaerobic bacteria.

The gas can be use as the source of home energy for cooking and fuel source of generator. The main requirement for home biogas installation is the cattle have already been caged for efficient collection of fresh dung. Home biogas installation (using plastic Poly-ethyl Propylene/PP digestor) with the dung source of two cows or 6 pigs or 500 chickens can produce 2 m3. 1 m3 of biogas is equal to 0.46 kg LPG or 0.6 liter kerosene or 3.5 kg fuel-wood. This is amount of 9 Edi Purwanto

gas is well-matched with the cooking fuel demand of one household. To start-up the production of biogas, about 5,000 liter of cattle dung solution (cattle dung mixed with water with ratio of 1 to 2) should be stored in the digestor. It takes about 8 days to produce biogas after the first input; the daily input is about 5 liter cattle dung or 10% of the digester volume. The waste of the fermented organic materials can be used as organic fertilizer. The average installation cost is Rp. 1,750,000; this will last about 7 years, the daily installation cost is Rp. 650. Suppose the labor cost for fresh dung collection is Rp. 1,000/day, this brings the total cost of Rp. 1,650/day.

The produced gas is able to cook for at least two hours/1 day; this is equal to use kerosene of 1.2 liter or equal to Rp. 8000. In comparison to kerosene, the use of biogas gives benefit of Rp. 6,350. No transport required to bring kerosene home and free of scarce access. In addition, the waste of biogas can be used as organic fertilizer. The use of biogas will stop trees cutting and forest for fuel-woods source. Clearly that biogas installation is considered as SMARTPRACTICE, apart from providing ecological benefits, improve clean environment (using organic waste); the biogas installation is also accessible (no transport cost) and gives significant economic benefit compared to kerosene, fuel wood and LPG. B.1.6. Training Workshop for PNPM Actors at Province level (Kendari, Aden Hotel, 23 February 2010): While environmental awareness activities had already started since 2008, its implementation had only been effective since January 2009, after all components (Green-facilitators, grant etc.) have been in-place. During 2009, many environmental initiatives have been facilitated by OWT, Green-PNPM facilitators and actors. As results, many Green-Projects (natural resource management/NRM) have been implemented by local community in pilot areas. Considering the first two (out of three) objectives of Green PNPM3, we socialize the outputs, achievements, strategies, approaches and lessons learned to PNPM facilitators and government in SE Sulawesi Province as a way to mainstream NRM and Green-PNPM to non Green-PNPM actors. We believe that one of key success indicators of Green-PNPM will be materialized when the NRM issues bring by the program can be ‘infected’ to or ‘accommodated’ by local community participating on regular PNPM. The socialization was designed in the form of one-day training workshop which was organized together with PMD as part of regular PNPM coordination meeting at province level. The training workshop was attended by 59 participants, 30 persons were PNPM facilitators while 20 persons were government officials at district and province levels. The workshop was officially opened by the Head of PMD at province level (Drs. H. Tony Herbiansyah). The implemented agenda of the one-day workshop was the following agenda: (a) 3

The objective is achieved through (a) mainstreaming NRM issues in the community-driven development planning process, (b) increasing environmental awareness and related management capacity of communities and government stakeholders, and (c) the disbursement of block grants to fund environmentally supportive ‘green’ projects at the sub-district (kecamatan) and district (kabupaten) level.

10 Edi Purwanto

Presenting film ‘The Giant Sponge of Indonesia’ (Karet Busa Raksasa Indonesia); (b) Presentation on ‘Watershed Management’ (Dr. Edi Purwanto); (c) Discussion about GreenPNPM and Watershed Management; (d) Presentation the implementation of environmental awareness and training in SE Sulawesi: ‘Towards Sustainable and Energy Self-Sufficiency Villages’ (Menuju Desa Lestari Mandiri Energi). The presentation outlined; (i) OWT strategies on environmental awareness and training; (ii) establishment of demonstration pilots (demplots) on smart-practices technologies applications for the efficient use of natural resource and energy self-sufficiency; (iii) OWT future planning to mainstream environmental issues to non GreenPNPM sites; (e) Films presentation on the technical procedures to establish (i) home biogas; (ii) coconut charcoal bricked; (iii) honey-bee culture; (iv) the making of organic fertilizer; (f) Working Group Discussion and Presentation: participants were grouped on the basis of their District origin, they were asked to assess the smart-practices technologies suitable for their areas and its associated reasons. Workshop evaluation: participants were asked to fill out the workshop evaluation form. The workshop then officially closed by PJO SE Sulawesi Province (Pak Trias). We provided participants with information sheets, posters, booklets and CD film.

All workshop participants considered the workshop were very inspiring, useful and wellorganized. The impact of workshop were: (i) PMD of SE Sulawesi Province has adopted Home Biogas as smart practice, this will be replicated by the Government; (ii) Our targeted villages facilitation (Gunung Jaya/Ladongi, Gunung Sari/Watubangga) are selected by PMD province as pilot example villages;

B.1.7. Participated CSO Coordination Meeting (Yogyakarta, Grand Aquila Hotel, 23 – 25 February 2010): Coordination meeting among CSO (WCS, CARE and OWT) and World Bank staff is regularly conducted every three months and facilitated by CSO. In this occasion, the host was WCS and the meeting held in Grand Aquila Hotel, Yogyakarta with field excursion in Sleman District.

Two OWT persons attended the meeting (Edi Purwanto and Abdul Rahman). During the first day of the meeting: OWT outlined the progress of environmental awareness and training, while during the second day, we jointed field excursion organized by WCS and Kanopi Indonesia. The first excursion site was Sukunan Hamlet, Banyuraden Village, Gamping, Sleman. In this hamlet, we observed excellent example of community based waste management. The second excursion site was home biogas installation in rural areas surrounding Mount Merapi. The meeting was continued during the third day, in this occasion, we presented our planning during the coming three months and proposed to have ‘No-Cost Extension’ for one year (until October 2011). The reasons for having no-cost extension were: (a) Delayed effective start of the project: The project

11

Edi Purwanto

was expected to run on January 2008, due to the slower than anticipated mobilization of Green PNPM community facilitators and delayed disbursements of block grant, the project was only effectively run since January 2009. In fact, our facilitations had immediately started after the sign of the Agreement, however during 2008, many activities were not properly implemented (and thereby had to be repeated during 2009) due to inexistence of community facilitators and unclear fate of block grant disbursement; (b) Incomplete facilitation activities: The long delay has led the burden poles of 2008 move to 2009. Two years (inter) kecamatan block grants (2008 and 2009) were implemented during 2009. As results, we focused all of our resources to support Green PNPM implementation at village and kecamatan level, especially to: (a) facilitate environmental awareness and training; (b) facilitate the process and advocate the proper use and allocation of block grant; (c) develop various NRM smart practices models at village and kecamatan level.

The implication was, little had been done to mainstream environmental issues at district and province level. Recently, we have just started promoting the developed smart practices models to district and province level as ways to mainstream environmental issues and prepare exit strategy to areas within and beyond Green PNPM. We will continue to do that during the rest of 2010 and 2011. Given the remaining grant is still possible to support full project activities until one year ahead, in addition, there is also a need to give full facilitation of 2010 block grant until mid 2011.

B.1.8. Participated Coordination Meeting for Green PNPM Evaluation (Kendari, Horizon Hotel, 9 March 2010): Coordination meeting to evaluate last year project implementation (2009) performance was annually conducted in the beginning of the following year (2010), it is organized by PMD in collaboration with NMC. There are two types of coordination meetings, first at province level; it was conducted on each province capital (Kendari, Makassar and Manado), this was done during March 2010, and the whole Sulawesi Province (four provinces), it was conducted at the Quality Hotel, Makassar (15 April 2010). We participated the evaluation meeting on SE Sulawesi Province level, but not for Sulawesi. The underlined reason, we considered the coverage and participants of Sulawesi meeting was too big to enable to draw the truth evaluation as expected by meeting, while at the same date we organized Green-PNPM Talk-show in collaboration with PSF and KBR68H. The SE Sulawesi Province coordination meeting was attended by 56 participants (PMD, NMC, facilitators, province and districts governments and OWT). Five OWT persons attended the meeting (Edi Purwanto, Winardi, Yamin, La Aji and Erwin). On the morning session, three Askab/Green District facilitator of Buton, Muna and Kolaka presented the progress of activities, outputs and achievements during 2009 and followed by discussion. While in the afternoon session, we presented progress, outputs and achievements during 2009 to reach 12 Edi Purwanto

our mission: ‘Towards Sustainable and Energy Self-Sufficiency Villages’. This presentation consisted of: (a) OWT strategies on environmental awareness and training; (b) establishment of smart-practices technologies applications for the efficient use of natural resource and energy selfsufficiency; (c) Evaluation of current problems and constraints for environmental awareness; (d) Lessons learned during two years project implementation. The meeting was concluded by PMD presentation (Pak Ivan Rangkuty) on future development and opportunities of Green-PNPM in Indonesia. In this meeting, we distributed information sheets, posters, booklets and CD film to all participants.

B.1.9. Radio Talk-Show to promote Green-PNPM at National Level (Bau-Bau, 14 April 2010): We were selected by Communication Division of the PNPM Support Facility (PSF) in collaboration with KBR68H (private networking radio with 700 members all over Indonesia) to host the first Green-PNPM Radio Talk-Show. The talk-show was held form 10.00 – 11.00 am at the OWT Office, Jl. La Balawo No. 25, Bau-Bau. The talk-show was designed to match with KBR68H regular broadcasting program in the morning so called ‘Daerah Bicara’/Voice of Rural Areas. It composed of four discussion session; the duration of each session was 12 minutes. The theme of the discussion was ‘Towards Sustainable and Energy Self-Sufficiency Villages’. There were four resource persons: (a) Drs. Tasman (PMD Province, contacted via telephone); (b) Drs. Asnawi Hasan (PJO Buton District); (c) I Made Tinggal Karyasa (representative of local community beneficiary); (d) Edi Purwanto (Director Operation Wallacea Trust). The Talk-show was facilitated by mBak Fia (KBR68H presenter/reporter) and attended by 32 participants, including Pak Bowo amd mBak Citra (World Bank) and three Head of Sub-districts (Camat) from Sampolawa, Pasarwajo and Mawasangka. As part of campaign strategy, we gave T-Shirt to all participants, promoting our new motto: ‘Towards Sustainable and Energy Self-Sufficiency Villages’.

B.1.10. Evaluation the effectiveness of awareness activities at village level: Until the beginning of 2010, the effective implementation of Green-PNPM has already been about half-way, suppose the effective implementations start on mid 2008 and will be ended mid 2011. During half-way implementation, many awareness campaigns have been organized using various approaches and methods. As such, it was the time to gain feed-back from project beneficiaries. The obtained information will be an important basis to adjust and improve the awareness approaches during the remaining half of the project implementation period. The information was collected in Warinta Village (representation of upland village), which was one

13

Edi Purwanto

of 2008’s KAP survey site. The information was obtained during the facilitation process of Ibu Vivi Rambe4’preliminary research by observing the answer of respondents in response to questionnaires developed by Ibu Vivi Rambe. Similar efforts were also conducted in Baula SubDistrict, Kolaka. See also Section B.4.4.

B.1.11. Developed website to publish Green-PNPM facilitations: Since March 2010, we published a new website www.wallaceatrustindonesia.org, we made use this to publish our Green-PNPM facilitations globally. We use two languages Indonesian and English, we continuously update the website with the developed awareness, training materials and our strategies to mainstream NRM at village level.

B.1.12. Green-PNPM exhibition in Kendari (23 – 27 April 2010): Together with BPMD SE Sulawesi we promoted Green-PNPM activities on the annual exhibition event organized by SE Sulawesi Province Government. The exhibition, which was entitled ‘Hallo Sultra’, was aimed at promoting development of various sectors, promotion of industrial products and ecotourism. In this event, we promoted: (a) sustainable livelihoods, such as wickerwork (Nentu) from Todombulu Village (Sampolawa, Buton), VCO from Oengkolaki Village (Mawasangka, Buton), honey-bees from Gunung Jaya Village (Ladongi, Kolaka); (b) renewable energy such as coconut charcoal bricked from Gunung Sari Village (Watubangga, Kolaka), saving stove energy from Sampolawa (Buton); (c) Organic fertilizer from Warinta Village (Pasarwajo, Buton); (d) awareness materials; (e) OWT publication on environmental management; (f) ecotourism in Lambusango Forest; (g) environmental (Green-PNPM) film show. Based on guest book, our stand was at least visited by 700 visitors.

4

Former Team leader of Green-PNPM, PhD student of Murdock University, her research PhD is dealing with evaluation of the effectiveness of Pilot Green-PNPM in Buton District.

14 Edi Purwanto

B.2. Buton District B.2.1. Garbage separation campaign in Pasarwajo, Mawasangka and Sampolawa Towns: Most of local communities have not practiced waste separation (between organic and nonorganic/metal, paper) and associated reuse and recycle of the garbage. Understanding the situation, since June 2009, we have started to campaign waste separation (Gemes/Gerakan Memilah Sampah) on in the capital of sub-districts town. We conducted this through simulation of garbage separation to Key Village Champions (KVCs), Women Groups (PKK) and students at elementary and secondary schools. We also installed 5 garbage separation beans in every capital of sub-districts. This was aimed as models to inspire local communities, the garbage beans is composed of two metal containers with indication of garbage types on each container.

B.2.2. Coordination meeting to initiate the development of Waste Management Unit (WMU) in Buton (Bau-Bau, 12 February 2010): The main objective of the meeting was to involve and synergize efforts of government agencies on waste separation and processing campaign. The meeting was attended by the Head of Pasarwajo Sub-District (Camat), Head of Sanitary Agency, Head of Environment Agency, District’s PJOK and 3 KVCs who already practiced waste separation in their houses. Action plan of the meeting: (a) Camat Pasarwajo supported by relevant agencies in Buton District will develop demonstration plot for garbage separation and processing at Pasarwajo Village. The pilot will involve the roles of Women Groups (PKK) as motivator on waste separation; (b) Establish environmental Learning house.

B.2.3. Established learning house on garbage separation and processing in Bau-Bau: Since mid February 2010, we developed our Center office in Bau-Bau as learning center of domestic waste processing, this includes waste separation and composting. We also develop organic fertilizer (Bokashi) as a basis to grow organic vegetable such as chili, capsicum, onion, garlic etc. We made use the house as learning house for Green-PNPM actors (facilitators) who visits and have a meeting in this office. We plan to develop a women group surrounding the office to develop craftsmanship from waste of plastic packets/boxes such as the packets of Coffee Mix, detergent etc.

B.2.4. Waste separation campaign in Pasarwajo and Kambula-Mbulana Villages (15 April 2010): The positions of those villages are in the Pasarwajo Town (capital of Buton District). The awareness campaign involved government officials of two villages, Camat (head of Sub-District) and staff and women groups of two villages. We provided 5 garbage separation beans on each village. The campaign was attended by 45 persons (28 male, 17 female).

B.2.5. Awareness rising on the need to identify and define ‘Village Protection Areas’ (January and February 2010): Tropical ecosystem is rich but highly vulnerable, as such the fragile areas (steep slope, stoniness areas, thin soils, coastal areas etc.) should be managed with extra care. Our ancestor had been so wise; they had defined natural forest in the fragile areas as protected forest, such as forest 15 Edi Purwanto

surrounding spring water, forest in steep slope areas etc. Those areas, based on customary law, were strictly prohibited to cut. Unfortunately, many customary laws have been neglected by Village Government, the capacity of village government to protect their natural resource have been so weak, while the District Government has been mostly failed to enforce National Law on forest and environmental protection. As results many valuable villages’ natural resources have been highly exploited. Butonese own ‘Kaombo Forest’ or village protection forest. The forest is managed through selective logging; villagers are not allowed to cut forest without the approval of the Parabela (traditional leader), those who break these laws will receive social sanctions.

Unfortunately the ‘Kaombo Forest’ has been mostly neglected, many customary forest have been logged and trade under the scheme of community forest (Hutan Rakyat). To protect the remaining village forest and fragile areas (areas along side the river, steep slope, stoniness areas, thin soils, coastal areas etc.), efforts were made to revitalize ‘Village Protection Areas’ (Kawasan Perlindungan Desa/KPD) Box 2: Wakaokili Village and ‘Kaombo’ Forest Wakaokili Village is located about 3 to 4 km from the boundary of Lambusango Forest; however, the village is very valuable for conservation, the main reasons are: (a) this is the only village surrounding Lambusango Forest which still manages ‘Kaombo’ Forest, traditional sustainable managed areas of forest (named Bonea-Bonea, Wabanca, Lasole and Kundee Panda, total area is 80 ha). The forest is managed through selective logging; villagers are not allowed to cut forest without the approval of the Parabela (traditional leader), those who break these traditional laws will be isolated from social life and fined a minimum of IDR 100.000; (b) the village is still governed by the old traditions (customary regulation) which manifests itself in the clean environment, tidy (traditional) houses and strong social capital. The village is not much influenced by consumerism life style as other Butonese villages; (c) the village has diversity of agriculture products including coffee, candle fruit, kolang-kaling (jelly food made of arenga fruits), banana, corn and arenga sugar.

Understanding the problem, since January 12, 2010 OWT has conducted intensive awareness rising and facilitate the identification of KPD in 4 villages (Wakaokili, Waangu-Wangu, Lapodi and Kancinaa). The awareness is composed of the following activities: (a) Selection of KVCs having great concern for KPD protection (Conservation Cadre/Kader Pelestari Lingkungan/KPL); (b) OWT together with KPL organized awareness rising activities at hamlet (sub-village) level. The awareness activities were designed in the form of FGD involving 20-25 households’ representatives. The FGD was opened by presenting film made by A. Seymour entitled "Karet Busa Raksasa Indonesia" (‘The Giant Sponge of Indonesia’), then continued by discussing the roles of KPD by calling local community memory, on the different conditions during the period when customary forest were still exist and after depletion. We recorded the differences on table and made rough quantification on economic benefit to local community; (c) Mapping KPD together with KPL. Awareness rising was also conducted to all village heads and officials, Camat (Head of kecamatan), Danramil (Army Head at kecamatan level), and Kapolsek (Police Head at kecamatan level). It was good that all village heads and high officials raised great concerns to the proposed facilitation activities.

16 Edi Purwanto

B.2.6. Building inter-villages partnership for KPD Mapping and Protection in Kecamatan Pasarwajo (18 February 2010): After conducted serial awareness on 4 villages, the time was then considered to be ripe to build inter-village commitment to protect KPD at kecamatan level. The main objective of the meeting is to mainstream KPD issues from selected villages to kecamatan level. The meeting was held at the Auditorium of Wasaga Village, Pasarwajo Town, attended by Muspika (Camat, Danramil, and Kapolsek), Head of Forestry District, Head Law Section of the Secretary District, Head of Spatial Planning, village heads and BPD of Pasarwajo Sub-District plus OWT staff (76 persons, 61 male, 15 female). The meeting was directly led by Pak Camat (Azis Zima). During the first session, Village Head of four Villages presented the criteria of KPD and the process of KPD identification and mapping. On the second session, OWT and the Head of Environment Agency present KPD criteria on the basis on Precedential Decree No. 32/1990 on Protected Areas. At the end of the day ‘the agreement of inter-village actions to protect KPD was signed by Muspika, OWT Director, FKL, village heads and KVCs of 20 villages. The principle agreement is the following: (a) All remaining natural forest (outside state forest) should be defined as KPD; (b) The natural forest can be managed as Village Forest (Hutan Desa) according to Ministerial Regulation No. 49/2008; (c) Non-forested land which are fragile (steep slope, areas alongside the river etc.) should be defined as KPD; (d) All village will map their KPD; (e) Every village will develop Perdes (village regulation) for KPD protection and management.

B.2.7. Celebrating Earth Day in Warinta Village (22 April 2010): We use the Earth-Day Celebration as a medium to reconcile among parties in this village which had been polarized during the selection of Village Head. Why did we need to reconcile? It was to raise its social capital to make it conducive for environmental campaign program. We celebrated the day by making cooking competition among hamlet (sub-village). Why did we choose cooking competition? Because cooking competition is known as the most favorite event which can attract many KCVs to come together. The gathering was quite successful; it was attended by Camat (Head of Pasarwajo Sub-District) and his wife, Village head, hamlet heads, KCVs, women group. It was attended by 219 persons (112 male, 107 female). The Camat appreciated us who successfully organized such interesting event to reconcile villagers. Everybody was happy and shakes hand to each other. We deliver awareness that 22 April 2010 is known as the Earth Day and we asked to all villagers to hand-in-hand to safe the environment of Warinta Village and the surrounding areas. At this event, we also socialize that we will facilitate the establishment of ‘Warung Lingkungan’ (Environment Stall) at this village. We will sell organic fertilizer, honey, VCO, Nentu handicraft (see Section B.2.9). All products are developed by villagers participating on Green-PNPM. B.2.8. Installed Iron Campaign Boards on Main Roads Six campaign iron (metal) boards (plank) displaying environmental campaign boards have been erected on two sites along the main roads across the sub-district. Each of campaign board contains two messages, one message on each side of the board. Campaign board 1: One side: ‘Do not let the coastal fortress gone. Mangrove forest is coastal fortress, site for fish breeding.

Destroy mangrove forest is destroying coastal life. REHABILITATE and PROTECT mangrove forest through: (1) Define mangrove areas as Village Protection Areas (KPD); (2) Do not cut and damage mangrove; (3) Do not convert mangrove to brackish water pond; (4) Do not use 17 Edi Purwanto

mangrove trees as fuel-wood; (5) Conduct planting campaign and mangrove maintenance’.

Other side: Save the Earth through: (1) Use energy saving stove; (2) Convert fossil fuel to biogas; (3) Switch off the lamp if not needed; (4) Save clean water; (5) Trees planting movement.

Campaign board 2/One side: Save Village Conservation Areas (KPD). Forest, River, Spring Water and Coastal Area are life supporting systems which have to be protected. Save KPD through: (1) Trees planting campaign; (2) Develop Village Regulation to conserve KPD; (3) Save KPD from illegal logging; (4) Do not contaminate KPD with rubbish and poisoned waste.

Other side: Managing domestic waster through: (1) Waste separation between organic and non-organic; (2) Minimize the use of an-organic matter (plastic, paper, metal etc.); (3) Convert organic waste into compost; (4) Recycle and reuse an-organic waste; (5) Develop domestic waste processing unit. It is hoped that the messages will act as environmental education for the younger generation, whilst also acting as a ‘psychological deterrent’ for environmental destruction.

B.2.9. Institutional Capacity Building of Nentu Handcraft Makers (Todombulu, Sampolawa, Buton): Nentu is a grass which creeps on the ground, the plant often becomes a weed to agriculture crop.

Villagers in Todombulu (Sampolawa, Buton) use the plant as wickerwork, such as hat, baskets, bags etc. There are 10 villagers who have side-job on this. We consider this as sustainable livelihood. Since beginning of February 2010, we facilitated the establishment of Nentu craftsmanship maker group and supported small-scale capital to procure some equipment and machine, selling the products to foreigners who visited Lambusango Forest (Labundo-Bundo Village, Buton District) and Hoga and Kaledupa Islands (Wakatobi District).

B.2.10. Installed Wooden Campaign Boards Apart from installing metal campaign boards, we also installed 15 wooden campaign boards in three sub-districts. The environmental campaign boards were installed at public area such as side the road, school, village-hall, sub-district office, the house of Conservation Cadre (KPL) etc.

Here is the example text of the installed campaign board: “Short garbage and put them in proper site”, “Garbage will bring money if we treat it properly”, “Save forest for our future life” etc.

B.2.11. Installed Wooden frame environmental awareness poster So far, 80 environmental posters have been put in wooden frames and installed in strategic public areas such as schools, mosques, restaurants, village halls, sub-districts and UPK offices, police offices, hospitals, hotels, banks etc in Mawasangka, Sampolawa and Pasarwajo Sub-Districts.

B.2.12. Installed awareness materials at UPK Offices To socialize environmental awareness and training, smart-practices facilitation documents and other Green-activities to non-Green-PNPM actors/facilitators and government officials, we have displayed those materials at UPK (‘Wahana Informasi’) and Kecamatan office. To do so, we install display-board and cupboard at UPK Office in Mawasangka, Sampolawa and Pasarwajo Sub-Districts.

18 Edi Purwanto

B.3. Muna District B.3.1. Participated Verification of inter-sub districts proposals (16-17 January 2010): We participated verification on two sub-districts: (a) Tongkuno Sub-District, rehabilitation of Lakambulu Catchment Areas where the rehabilitation areas located on Danagoa Village (Tongkuno Sub-District) with Oelongko Village (Bone Sub-District); (b) Napabalano Subdistrict, rehabilitation of Lambiku Catchment Areas and Langkumapo Spring Water where the rehabilitation areas located on Lambiku Village (Napabalano Sub-District) and Langkumapo Village (Lasalepa Sub-District). Lawa Sub-District did not submit inter-sub districts proposal.

Two major aspects were verified: (a) Legal documents verification such as proposal feasibility and completeness of legal documentation of Green-PNPM cycle; (b) Field verification, feasibility of field area and associated beneficiaries. The member of Verification Team was Charles, S.Hut (District Forestry Agency); Drs. Muh.Arfa (District Development Planning Agency/Bappeda), Drs. La Tando (BPMD), Afiaddin, SE. M.Si (District Environmental Agency/Bappedalda), La Ode Muhammad Rabiali (OWT).

B.3.2. Garbage separation campaign in Latugho (18 January 2010) and Lalemba Village (19 January 2010), Lawa Sub-District: Most of local communities have not practiced waste separation (between organic and nonorganic/metal, paper) and associated reuse and recycle of the garbage. Understanding the situation on 18 and 19 January we campaign waste separation (Gemes/Gerakan Memilah Sampah) on those two villages. We conducted this through simulation of garbage separation to Key Village Champions (KVCs) and Women Groups (PKK). We also installed 2 garbage separation beans on each village. The campaign in Latugho involved 103 persons (85 male and 17 female), while in Lalemba involved 82 persons (58 male, 24 female).

B.3.3. Participated District Meeting to rank inter-sub districts proposals (SMK Raha Hotel, 23 January 2010): The objective of the meeting was to rank and define funded inter-sub districts proposals. The meeting was attended by 33 persons (28 male and 4 female), i.e. BKAD, representatives of district agencies (PMD, Forestry, Bappeda, Bappedalda) Head of sub-districts, PJOK, (Green) PNPM facilitators and Verification Team. We made use the meeting to deliver awareness on: (a) general and specific physical and socio-economic problems of proposed rehabilitation areas; (b) the need to put priority on areas having the most severe conditions and urgent areas for rehabilitation; (c) the tree species for catchment rehabilitation should not be teak (Tectona grandis), as the tree has high economic values so those will be cut after several years; (d) the need to develop Village Regulations (Perdes) on areas under protection. As there were only two inter-sub districts proposals, so the two proposals were funded with IDR 500 millions. The meeting was arranged by Askab/District Green-PNPM facilitator, rather than UPK of three subdistricts as defined by the Green-PNPM Guideline (PTO) for inter-sub districts activities.

19 Edi Purwanto

B.3.4. facilitated awareness meeting on mangrove forest protection (Napalakura Village, 20 February 2010): We found some activities which tend to degrade mangrove forest in three villages (Napalakura, Langkumapo and Latawe) in Napabalano Sub-District. Some people conducted clear-cutting of mangrove forest and convert into brackish water ponds (tambak), while there was also issue on the coming of investor to build shrimp brackish water pond (300 ha) at the expense of mangrove forest. The objectives of the awareness meeting: (a) Inspire KCVs on the importance and benefits of mangrove forest; (b) To revitalize the roles of customary institution to impose sanctions to mangrove violators; (c) Introduce Silvo-pasture (agroforestry) which combine mangrove forest and brackish water pond; (d) Building Village dignity and sovereignty (kedaulatan desa) against investor who exploit village natural resource. We presented film ‘The Guardian of Archipelago’ (Menjaga Pagar Nusantara), facilitated the development of ‘Mangrove Guardians Group’ (Kelompok Pelestari Bakau), The meeting was attended by 45 participants (29 male, 16 female) whom also involved KCVs from Langkumapo and Latawe Villages. The meeting started at 9 am and ended at 4 pm.

B.3.5. Facilitated awareness meeting on the need to develop Natural resource Management Village Regulation/NRM Perdes (Danagoa Village, 16 March 2010): The objectives of the awareness meeting: (a) Inspire KCVs on the urgency of NRM Perdes development; (b) To revitalize the roles of customary institution to impose sanctions to environmental violators. In this meeting, we also reviewed the list of NRM facilitations we have facilitated since 2008, presenting film ‘The Giant Sponge of Indonesia’ (Karet Busa Raksasa Indonesia). The meeting was attended by 40 participants (31 male, 9 female). The meeting started at 9 am and ended at 3 pm.

B.3.6. Participated PNPM coordination meeting (Auditorium PMD, 7 April 2010): The objective of the meeting was to evaluate the progress of community development facilitated by (Green) PNPM. We expressed three points in the meeting: (a) we will provide training and technical assistances on RPJM Desa (Village Development Planning Document); (b) we asked PMD and PNPM facilitators to identify villages which need training and technical assistances on RPJM Desa; (c) synchronization between regular PNPM and Green PNPM still need to be strengthened. In this meeting, Faskab asked OWT to present smart environmental practices to inspire PNPM actors/facilitators on Green proposals during the coming coordination meeting (beginning of May 2010). The meeting was attended by 70 participants (65 male, 5 female).

B.3.7. Facilitated Clean Environment Campaign, Napalakura Village, Napabalano (13-15 April 2010): We facilitated to clean village environment as a preparation for clean village competition (Lomba Kebersihan Lingkungan Desa) at district level. It was composed of the following activities: (a) cleaning drainage/water sanitation; (b) eradicate mosquito habitat; (c) clean environment surrounding settlement areas; (d) develop and maintain house garden; (e) painting house fences; (e) waste separation campaign. This activity involved 300 persons (230 male, 70 female).

20 Edi Purwanto

B.3.8. Installed Wooden frame environmental awareness poster So far, 83 environmental posters have been put in wooden frames and installed in strategic public areas such as schools, mosques, restaurants, village halls, sub-districts and UPK offices, police offices, hospitals, hotels, banks etc in Raha, Tongkuno, Lawa and Napabalano.

B.4. Kolaka District B.4.1. Awareness rising on the application of Coconut-shell Charcoal Bricked (CCB) to Watubangga Community: Coconut product is the most important plantation crop in Kecamatan Watubangga after cacao and cashews. They usually use as copra and sell to middlemen, while the husk and shell are used to be a fuel to fumigate copra or to burn earthenware handy-craft. Understanding the abundant of coco-shell, OWT facilitated training on Coco shell charcoal bricked (Briket arang tempurung kelapa) on April 30, 2009. Since the time, we continuously conduct awareness rising and facilitation the establishment of CCB makers group in Gunung Sari Village. As results, there have been 12 women groups on this. Each of women group has received coconut charcoal grinding (Rp. 3 million) from Green-BLM 2008. With this machine, all groups have actively produced CCB for their own household use and for sales. We consider the activity as SMARTPRACTICES! The cost of 1 kg coconut shell charcoal is Rp. 2,000; the cost for grinding of 1 kg coconut shell charcoal is Rp. 1,000, the cost for tapioca glue to mould 1 kg grinded coconut shell charcoal is Rp. 500; the drying coast is Rp. 1,000/kg. The total production cost is Rp. 4,500/kg, while they can sell it Rp. 7,000/kg or creating 30% added value per kg of coconut charcoal! CCB is an efficient fuel compared to kerosene; 1 kg CCB is composed of 20 pieces, 5 pieces can be used to cook for 1 day, so total fuel cost for 4 days cooking is Rp. 7,000, while if we use kerosene, say 1 day we need 1 liter (Rp. 6,000) or Rp. 24,000 in four days. Using CCB can reduce fuel cost until 25% compared to kerosene! The benefit will rise significantly when they produce coconut charcoal by themselves. See Box 3.

Box 3: The making of Coconut Shell Charcoal The coconut shell in Watubangga Sub-District is used extensively for coconut shell charcoal.

The average production one of village producing shell-charcoal, such as Lamundre village is about 12 tons per month. Making charcoal has become important side job for the coconut farmers since there is no alternative market demand for the shell except for charcoal. The charcoal processing is mostly conducted on the same site where the dehusking and deshelling of coconut has occurred. The manufacture of charcoal is a relatively simple process. It consists essentially of burning fully mature and empty coconut shells with a limited supply of air so that they are carbonized but not yet burned to ash. The tricky part of the operation is to get the right conditions so that the coconut shells are carbonized to the correct degree. The kiln in which the shells are burned varies from a simple open pit in the ground (covered pit method), to a drum method and also a brick kiln method. The first and second methods are commonly practiced in Lamundre Villages. The coconut charcoal is normally of low quality due to overcooking with 21 Edi Purwanto

high water content (i.e. 5%) and fragile with a dull shine that can easily crumble is dropped.

The normal output of charcoal in Lamundre Village is just under 20 percent of the weight of the original shells.

B.4.2. Awareness rising on the application of home Biogas in Baula and Watubangga Community: Realizing the abundance of livestock in this district, in January 2009 we made awareness the benefits to utilize the dung as the source of bio-gas through installation of low-cost home biogas.

The message has been socialized in three sub-districts which then manifested on the appearance of BLM’s biogas proposals on several villages during 2008. During January 2010, together with Kanopi Indonesia, we demonstrated the biogas installation in Gunung Jaya Village (Ladongi Sub-District), Pewutaa Village (Baula Sub-District) and Gunung Sari Village (Watubangga SubDistrict). We have provided intensive technical assistances after installation phase, in several areas; the biogas was not successfully produced due to insufficient input of cattle dung and also problem related to the gas-stove. So far, we have already had 3 pilots biogas in Ladongi, 3 in Baula and 5 in Watubangga. There have been at least 20 persons in each kecamatan who have been skillful to install biogas. We have continuously socialized this smart-practice to local community. The temporary results, there have been 5 households in Ladongi (Atula Village) and 1 household in Watubangga (Gunung Sari Village) who built home biogas by their own efforts.

On April 17, 2010, the pilots were visited by the Kolaka District Head (Bupati Kolaka) whom he was accompanied with the Head of Agriculture Agency and the Head of Mining. There are 50 households in Watubangga whom they are ready to install biogas using their own money; however they need our assistances to purchase the plastics. It is not available in SE Sulawesi and so far we used to buy them in Java.

B.4.3. Socialization of Sustainable Village and Renewable Energy at Radio Gunung Sari and Green Trust Radio: Since January 2010, we developed new program in both radios which were broadcasted every Sunday and Friday afternoon, the title of the program is ‘Towards Sustainable Village and Renewable Energy’. In this program, we promoted our SMART PRACTICES which have been developed in several villages in three districts. We interviewed Operation Wallacea Trust’s facilitators and the testimony of local community whom they received our facilitation.

B.4.4. Awareness roles of Green-PNPM facilitators to local community: During mid February 2010, we organized a semi structural survey by interviewing local community on 5 villages in Kecamatan Baula. The objective of the survey was to understand the response of local community to Green-PNPM. We have noted several problems stated such as lack of knowledge regarding the program, conflict occurred among village key actors and village elites; no involvement of TPK in RAB designing, FKL handled procurement for tree seedlings and lack of transparency on Green Project implementation. Lack of knowledge of the actor is reasonably the impact of insufficient socialization of the program in which during 2009 was not conducted by FKL, while OWT at each meeting mostly discussed environmental issues rather 22 Edi Purwanto

than the program. Lack of transparency of RAB to villagers and key actors lead to suspicions of the villagers and key village actors to TPK as the budget was only known by FKL and TPK. We also received complaint from the villagers and project benefiaries related budget transparency.

One of our findings was that many people often misunderstood with the truth roles of FKL. Many villagers thought that FKL is representative of donor agency who hold authority in directing project implementation at field level. To clarify this, we made awareness of the role of each actors in the PNPM-LMP. See also Lesson Learned No. 12/2010.

B.4.5. Installed Wooden frame environmental awareness poster So far, 80 environmental posters have been put in wooden frames and installed in strategic public areas such as schools, mosques, restaurants, village halls, sub-districts and UPK offices, police offices, hospitals, hotels, banks etc in Mawasangka, Sampolawa and Pasarwajo Sub-Districts.

C.

Environmental Training

Environmental training is targeted to: (a) local community at village and kecamatan level; (b) government officials at district and province level; (c) PNPM actors at kecamatan, district and province level.

C.1. Buton District C.1.1. Training on Seaweed Farming (Tira Village, Sampolawa, 1 March 2010): Seaweed (Eucheuma sp, Gracilaria sp) has short production cycle; from planting to harvesting is about 40 days. After harvesting, farmers have to dry the seaweed for about 5 days, the ratio between wet and dry seaweed is 8 to 1, 8 kg wet seaweed become 1 kg dry seaweed with 20 percent water content. The average total production is about 320 kg dry seaweed per farmer every harvest. The price of dried-seaweed at the farmer’s gate is Rp. 6,000/kg; as such every harvest farmer will obtain Rp 1.920.000. On average farmers are able to harvest four times a year. Assuming the price is stable; farmers will receive Rp 7.680.000 (USD 835) per year or Rp 15.360.000 (USD 1,700) over two years. As such, the Return of Investment (ROI) is 4.8 (income/investment). This figure is considerably high, meaning that farmers will capable of returning the initial investment in less than one year. Tira Village received 2009 Green PNPM Block-Grant to establish seaweed farming; that is why we provided training to make them ready to develop seaweed farming in properly. In facts, many seaweed farmers in this area were unsuccessful because of their poor skill. Tira is a village located at the tip of Sampolawa Gulf.

The Gulf is sheltered and experiences only gentle waves, there is little freshwater discharge, these factors combine to make the area ideal for seaweed farming for almost 12 months of the year. Coastal is the only source of livelihoods due to its thin soil and stoniness landscape. The training was attended by all the Block-Grant beneficiary candidates, i.e. 16 male and 2 female.

23 Edi Purwanto

Box.4. Seaweed Farming and Illegal logging: Smart-Practice from in Wagari Village, Buton Wagari is a poor village located at the tip of Lawele Gulf (Buton Island), it is about 100 km away from Tira Village. OWT within the Lambusango Forest Conservation Program (LFCP) facilitated the development of seaweed farming in this area. During the time, only one villager, named La Peo (Pak La Peo) was involved in cultivating seaweed in the Gulf. Pak La Peo had tried to encourage his fellow villagers into seaweed farming, but had failed as most of them had no capital or where making sufficient money from illegal logging. The hope is that by providing the means for villagers to start farming seaweed they will stop illegal logging and move into this more sustainable industry. As of October 2007, Wagari Village received facilitation to develop Village Economic Unit/VEU (Cooperative) and capital investment to develop seaweed farming. At the beginning, VEU had 15 members; each member received an in-kind capital loan of Rp. 1,600,000 (USD 175), mostly in the form of 50 plastic ropes (each rope has 75 m length), 10 plastic bottles (for floats) and seaweed seedlings. The equipment should last on average around two years. VEU defined an interest rate of 1 percent, and pay-back period of 10 months. The development of seaweed business in Wagari village has been most satisfying.

Just one year from the start of the initiative, average farmer income has increased by around 200 %. Some of the farmers have even been able to buy new motorbikes, parabolic antennas and other luxury goods which were unaffordable before. The situation has been helped enormously by a consistent rise in the price of seaweed; it was until USD 1.65 per kg. After the success of the development of the seaweed industry in Wagari Village, in April 2008, OWT started efforts to replicate the business in surrounding areas of Kakenauwe and Waleona Villages. OWT has successfully expanded seaweed farming (without start-up funding!) from Wagari Village to surrounding villages in Lawele Gulf, i.e. Kakenauwe, Waleona, Lawele and Suandala. In fact, this is the most rapid alternative livelihood development in this area. More importantly, this activity has completely stopped the transportation of illegal timbers from natural state forest surrounding Lawele Gulf to areas outside of Buton (Wakatobi and Flores).

Boats cannot reach the gulf as the area is full of seaweed farming, while most of those who used to rely on illegal logging have changed their livelihoods over to seaweed farming.

C.1.2. Training and facilitation to develop Virgin Coconut Oil community-based enterprise (Wasaga, Pasarwajo 10 April 2010 and Napa Village, Mawasangka, 17 April 2010): Since March 2008, we have been in contacted with Pak Lasamira, a Key Village Champion of xxxxx Village, Mawasangka Sub-District. Since 2007 he has been well-known as Virgin Coconut Oil (VCO) producer. He used one room of his house as VCO production unit. His VCO products were marketed to his neighbors, but gradually enlarge to surrounding villages. In October 2008, with his own effort, he successfully received VCO certification from Badan POM (National Food and Medicines Supervision Agency). Since then we assisted Pak Lasamira to improve the packaging of his products, from using ex-mineral water bottle to sterile bottle, we also gave labeling on his product. Since 2010, his VCO products have been recognized by Mawasangka communities. We are in the process to link his product to market and VCO industries in Kendari, Makassar and Surabaya. We also offered him as trainer and facilitator to assist community in rich coconut resource areas to develop VCO home industry. He agreed with

24

Edi Purwanto

this, as he has to raise the production capacity, and this will be effectively conducted by the assistances of other home industry in his surrounding areas. As such, his assistances is not only training but also developing economic business unit. VCO home industries provided significant added value which provide good opportunities for income generation. From one old coconut can produce 130 ml VCO. The local price of one old coconut is Rp.500, while the price of 130 ml VCO is Rp. 25,000. Many people have cut their coconut trees due to the low economic income, as such the downstream approach through raising income earnings from the coconut based business is expected to become a strong incentive for the local community to maintain and replant the existing coconut plantations. With this in mind, we started to select community having rich coconut resource and good working ethic, i.e. diligent, hard-working with a relatively high educational background. Why this is important? One of the basic enterprise (industrial) attributes (including VCO making) is a culture that includes principles and values of discipline and honesty, while the major weakness of community-based enterprises is generally a lack of discipline and honesty. There are many social activities at the village or inter-village level which often distract people from their enterprises, such as wedding parties or traditional (family) gatherings. People are not used to a strict commitment to standard operating procedures (SOPs).

Due to a relaxed mood or laziness, short cuts in work procedures may occur which negatively impact to the end quality of VCO product. Realizing this, one of the key empowerment aspects of the community is to develop working ethic from individual agriculture activity to industrybased communities. This may take longer time than introducing the VCO processing technologies. Realizing this, apart from technical training, we also provide motivation to training participants to have industrial character in developing VCO home industry. The first training was conducted in Wasaga Village, Pasarwajo Sub-District. The training was conducted on 10 April 2010 and attended with 24 persons (18 female and 6 male). The second training took place in Napa Village, Mawasangka Sub-District. The training was conducted on 17 April 2010 and attended with 20 persons all were female. We continuously encourage women to develop income generation from VCO making and link the product with Pak Lasamira home industry as a Center Production Unit.

Box 5. Virgin Coconut Oil (VCO) VCO is the latest value addition to the coconut which is catching up fast in the domestic and export markets. VCO is a high priced premium grade coconut oil produced under low heat or no heat process and has wider applications in the infant foods, functional foods, pharmaceuticals and cosmoceuticals. VCO is known for its medium chain triglycerides (MCT) and high content of lauric acids (more than 48.6%) which are having properties of developing immunity. VCO greatly differ from traditional Coconut Oil (CNO) which has to undergo chemical refining, bleaching and deodorization prices to make suitable for human consumption. So far, VCO is primarily produced as a small-scale industry as well as cottage industry by farmers, farmwomen and processors.

25 Edi Purwanto

C.1.3. Training the use of Janthropa stove (Wakabangura Village, Mawasangka, (8 April 2010): In 2006, there was Government program to plant unproductive land with Janthropa as raw material for bio-fuel industries. The plant has largely been grown in this village, but has no market facilitation from the government. Some people have cut the plant and replace with other cash crop. Understanding the problem, we inspired villagers on the use of Janthropa seeds as domestic fuel. To burn the seeds, they need to have Janthropa stove, this was demonstrated during Pegas. Villagers were interested and proposed stove procurement for the 2009 Green Block-Grant. In short, they procured 132 stoves, each household in this village receive one stove.

Realizing that most of beneficiaries have no skill to use the stove then we deliver training on this.

The training was attended by 40 participants (all female). The Janthropa is just like ordinary stove; the Janthropa seeds must be air-dried about 12 hours (to release the resin) before opening the shell, 200 gram seeds can be used for 2 hours cooking with equal to 1 liter kerosene (Rp. 6,000/liter). Understanding that Janthropa can grow everywhere, we consider this as SMARTPRACTICES (economically and environmentally sounds) for poor family in upland areas. For the sake of awareness campaign, we put sticker for each family who use Janthropa stove. We plan to train villagers on the making of the stove on the near future.

C.1.4. Training on home biogas installation (Wining, 21 March 2010): This is the first biogas training outside Kolaka District. The major constraints to implement this technology in Muna and Buton Districts, despite many people raise cattle; none of them cage their cattle. It is different with Kolaka, most of Balinese and Javanese put their cattle in cage.

We realized that it is not easy to change culture. However, for the sake of demonstration, we approached Head of Wining Village (Pak Rustam) to cage their cattle. The training was attended by all sub-village heads (5) and 20 KVCs. The training process was conducted for one day; this was shorter than the previous training in Kolaka, thanks to the presence of piping specialist whom he can set the pipe installation quicker. After two weeks, the biogas installation in this village has been in function (it takes about two weeks for dung fermentation process). It is hope that the model will attract people to cage their cattle and apply the technology.

C.1.5. Training the making of Bokashi (Banga, Mawasangka, 24 March 2010; Warinta, Pasarwajo 9 March 2010, Wawoangi, 19 April 2010): Buton is dominated by thin soil and poor organic matter; it is understood that during the past time Butonese farmes practiced shifting cultivation. Nowadays, due to lack of land resource, shifting cultivation is not possible to practice. While for permanent cultivation, farmers have to use extra agriculture inputs to maintain soil fertility. Understanding the situation, we stimulated Butonese farmers to develop simple organic fertilized using effective microorganism (EM-4, Lactobacillus, Actinomycetes), the resulted organic fertilizer s known as Bokhasi (Bahan Organik Kaya Akan Sumber Hayati, Organic matter rich of bio resources). It is organic fertilizer 26 Edi Purwanto

made of biomass (rice straw/jerami, organic waste), dung which is fermented with EM-4. The latter is also useful to improve soil fertility, to prevent the growth of pathogen microbes and improve the crop on the efficient use of organic matter. Bokhasi can be prepared between 4 to 7 days, the cost is cheap (the price of 1 bottle of EM-4 is Rp. 18,000, it can be used to develop 1 ton Bokhasi), while the process in simple.

C.1.6. Training on mangrove crab fattening in Banga Village, Mawasangka (27 March 2010): Livelihood development is considered to be the most effective way to stronghold vulnerable ecosystem, such as mangrove forest. The absence of sustainable economic benefits has dictated the cutting of mangrove forest for fuel wood. So far local community has collected mangrove crab; however there are no efforts to cultivate them. We initiated the fattening process of mangrove crab in sea-cage (karamba), by doing this local fishers can raise the crab weight significantly within relatively short-time. During one month, on average the crabs can gain the weight of about 5 – 7 times, from 200 - 300 gram to become 1.5 - 2 kilogram. The size of the sea-cage is 2 x 1 x 1 meters and made of bamboo. Fishers fed the crab with small fishes. Since mid February 2010, we have developed demonstration pilots in Banga Village which has a good mangrove forest. The pilot is composed of 6 sea-cages; each sea-cage is composed of 60 - 70 crabs (15 - 25 kg). We also facilitated the development of fishers group; so far the group has 15 members and has conducted two harvests. To socialize the demplot to wider audience, on March 27, 2010, we conducted training on fattening mangrove crabs. The trainer (Pak Lanuri) discussed the technical as well as the business aspects of mangrove crab and the way to link the business with the bank. The training was attended by 35 persons (28 male and 7 female) who come from surrounding village. This training has inspired participants to put the idea in the BLM proposal.

Box 6. Mangrove Crab Mangrove crab is one of coastal fishery commodity which has important economic value.

Formerly, mangrove crab was considered as pest for brackish water farmers, as it caused leakage of the pond. After having significant domestic and foreign market demand, fishers then started collecting the crab. During the last five years, mangrove crab farming has been growing in many coastal areas. The quality and price of mangrove crab depend on its fatness. To fatten mangrove crab it only takes 20 – 30 days, where the price could raises until 500%. The favorable sea-cage sites are the following: (a) substrate is sandy loam; (b) free from flood and influence by tides; (c) easy to control; (d) it is the area of crab fishing ground.

C.1.7. Training and Facilitation on RPJM-Desa in Warinta Village (22 April 2010): This training and facilitation was conducted one day after celebration of Earth-Day in this village (see Section B.2.7). The facilitation was conducted after we facilitated the reconciliation among parties in this village. The facilitation was attended by Headman, Head of Hamlets and KCVs. It was attended by 27 persons (21 male, 6 female).

27 Edi Purwanto

C.2. Muna District C.2.1. Coached Inter-Sub District Verification Team (Jeneberang Hotel, Raha, 14 January 2010): The coaching held for one day (5 hours), we made use this occasion to socialize the objective of LMP, introduce OWT activities and progress made on NRM smart-practices facilitation at village level. The team was composed of 4 persons, representatives of Forestry (Charles, S.Hut), Bappeda (Drs. Muh. Arfa), PMD (Drs. Latando), Environmental (Afiaddin, SE, M.Si). On this opportunity, we asked Verification Team to support and maintain the introduced smart-practices.

In this coaching session, we discussed the principal of catchment areas, upstream and downstream relationships and principal of activities which would be funded by inter-sub district fund. As usual we presented the film ‘The Giant Sponge of Indonesia’ (Karet Busa Raksasa Indonesia). We presented the general physical and socio-economic conditions of Lakambulu Catchment Areas (Tongkuno Sub-District) and Lambiku Catchment Areas (Napabalano SubDistrict).

C.2.2. Training the Development of NRM Village Regulation (Napabalano, 15 January 2010): The training participants were BPD and Village Heads of all villages in Napabalano Sub-District.

The objectives of the training were: (a) Techniques and mechanism of Perdes development and its legal aspect arrangement at district level; (b) Position of Perdes within Indonesian law and regulations; (c) Identification of environmental strength and problems (Rona Lingkungan) as a basis to develop RPJM Desa (Village Development Planning Document). The total training participants were 30 persons (26 male, 4 female). The training was officially opened and closed

by Napabalano Sub-District Head (Camat), the meeting was also attended by PJOK Napabalano.

C.2.3. Training and facilitation of Cashews nursery demplot (Lalemba Village, Lawa, 15–16 January 2010): The age of cashew plantation in Muna has been about 30-35 years. The plantation was developed during regreening project in 1970, the effective production ages of cashews range from 10 – 20 years old; as such most of the existing plantation has been too old leading to low production plantation capacity, apart from the planting space is too close. Understanding the situation, we facilitated the development of ‘cashews plus’ nursery as the source of planting materials to replace the existing plantation. We inspired local community to replace their old cashew with young high quality planting materials; such rehabilitation should be conducted gradually to avoid sharp declining of cashews production. To develop ‘cashews plus’ nursery, we facilitated local community to collect cashew seeds from mother trees (Pohon Induk), which produced lot good quality cashews. We conducted training and facilitated the development of 6,000 seedlings from selected mother trees. We improve the skills of farmers on the selection and protection of cashew mother trees, collections of seeds and development of nursery. The training involved 18 KCVs (10 male, 8 female). The demonstration plot was located on the land of ‘Bukit Harapan’ Nursery Group.

28 Edi Purwanto

C.2.4. Training and facilitation of honeybee culture demplot (Lalemba Village, Lawa, 20 March 2010, Napalakura, 6 April 2010): Honeybee culture is one of sustainable livelihood suitable for rural community; it is conducive for forest conservation, as honeybee culture need plentiful vegetation. We have already facilitated the development of honeybee culture demplots in Kolaka District, so we replicated such initiative in Lalemba and Napalakura Villages. Before training, we facilitated the establishment of honeybee culture farmer groups; the member of each group is 15 persons. The name of the group is ‘Al-Bainah’ for Lalemba Village and ‘Madu-Jaya’ for Napalakura. For each farmer group, we provided 10 honeybee’s colonies which have been developed in wooden boxes. Those were made as starter for honeybee culture development.

C.2.5. Participated Refresher training for KPMD in three pilot Sub-Districts (Tongkuno, 21 February 2010, Napabalano, 9 March 2010, Lawa 22 April 2010): We support this training as part of Green-PNPM process and funded by DOK. The objective of the training were; (a) to refresh the knowledge and skill of KPMD on recent application of environmentally friendly appropriate technologies, especially those which have been already introduced/facilitated by OWT; (b) Revitalized KPMD roles: So far, KPMD is only active during Pegas, after those events they are mostly silent, while as villages’ facilitators, they should be active on the overall cycle of the Green-PNPM; (c) Strengthen the role of KPMD, refresh the roles and responsibilities of each actors within Green-PNPM; (d) Discuss challenge faces during the development of Village Regulation on RPJM Desa. We always make the meeting to stimulate KPMD to be ‘mandiri’, not rely much on the existing temporary assistances. The refresher training in Tongkuno was attended by 38 persons (19 male, 19 female), Napabalano was 28 persons (14 male, 14 female); Lawa was 30 person (15 male, 15 female). The training was used to start 9.15 am to 5.30 pm.

C.2.6. Participated Refresher training for Proposal Development Team (Napabalano, 8 March 2010): We support this training as part of Green-PNPM process and funded by DOK. In fact, many Proposal Development Teams often do not know what to write exactly on every sub-chapter, such as background, objectives, project beneficiaries etc. They often copy from other proposals.

They are not clear on how to prepare the required Appendices of the proposal. We supported the training by discussing step-by-step process on proposal development. The training was attended by 35 persons (20 male, 15 female).

C.3. Kolaka District C.3.1. Supported Training on home biogas installation funded by BLM in Pewutaa/Baula, 1415 January, 2010 and Gunung Sari/Watubangga 15-16 January 2010: The first training of biogas was conducted in Gunung Jaya Village in collaboration with Kanopi Indonesia (section B.1.4). To maximize benefit the presence of Kanopi trainer, biogas training 29 Edi Purwanto

was also organized on Baula (Puulemo Village) and Watubangga (Gunung Sari Village) Subdistricts. The training on Pewutaa was organized together with FKL and supported with BLM funding, it was conducted for one day, attended by 36 persons (28 male, 8 female). The training in Gunung Sari was also organized together with FKL and supported with BLM funding, it was conducted for one day, attended by 42 persons (38 male, 6 female). All training was conducted through learning by doing principle. After ceremonial opening and short introduction the principle of biogas, participants together with trainer designed the lay-out of biogas installation, i.e. position of plastic digester, flow of pipes etc. Based on our experience, to smooth-out the building process, it was good if the participants have skill as brickwork (tukang batu) and plumber (tukang pipa). Training in Pewutaa Village: Due to lack of maintenance, the biogas demplot in Pewutaa did not work, and that is why we made a new plot in Puubenua Village on March 2010. The material for the gas in Pewutaa was from chicken feces. Compared with cow and pig dung, chicken feces was the quickest in producing gas. As just after two days the digestor plastic has already been fully gas-filled. Somehow, due to lack of maintenance of the owner, biogas was not worked. Training in Watubangga Village: Biogas training in Watubangga was also carried out for two days. The training was broadcasted through RGS Radio. Two weeks after, there were 5 groups of households who to develop 5 home-biogas funded by Green-PNPM block-grant (BLM); 2 groups in Gunung Sari Hamlet, 1 group in Ranoote Hamlet, 1 group in Lembah Mukti Hamlet and 1 group in Karang Tengah Hamlet. All those installations have been work well.

C.3.2. Training on home biogas installation in Puubenua Village/Baula (21 March 2010), Peoho Village (16 -17 April 2010) and Kukutio Village (26-27 April 2010)/Watubangga: Training on Puubenua Village: The selection of Puubenua Village was reasonably that the village with more potential compared with Puuroda, Pewutaa, Baula and Puubunga village. The selection of demplot site was purposively under the condition that the beneficiaries are able to responsible on the maintenance. The participants of the training were also very enthusiastic and those who raise livestock were keen to install home biogas. Training on Peoho Village: The Village was established in 1982 when the area occupied by transmigration. The village consists of 4 hamlets (Taman Bali, Pondok Banyu, Arjo Winangun and Arjo Sari). It is dominated by Balinese ethnic (70 percent), followed by Javanese and Lomboknese. The origin ethnic in the area is Moronene. Considering pig and cow dung abound in the village, we decided to build biogas demplot in the village. The development of biogas training in Peoho village was carried out in two days attended by villagers (16 male, 3 female) PNPM actor and the village government as well the targeted participant. We also explain the general environmental problem in the area. Training on Kukutio: Kukutio village consist of four hamlets (Taniha, Laloata, Anggalo Meure, and Tawonta). The majority of the inhabitants are Javanese, Balinese, Moronene, Bugisnese, Tolaki and Lomboknese. The community mostly works as farmer planting soya bean, rice field, vegetables. Agriculture commodities are cocoa, cashew nut. Since 2006 the lands belong to the community 1500 hectare leased to oil palm plantation company PT DJL. Since 2006, Oil palm Company has been the source of cash; the company has employed more or less 30 percent of the villagers paid IDR 30.000 per day. The development of biogas training in Peoho village was carried out in two days attended by villagers (15 male, 5 female) PNPM actor and the village government as well the targeted participant. We also explain the general environmental problem in the area.

30 Edi Purwanto

C.3.3. Training on Integrated Organic farming in Gunung Jaya Village (14 January 2010), Puulemo Village (16 January 2010) and Gunung Sari Village (18 January 2010): Among the three targeted districts (Kolaka, Buton, Muna), Kolaka is the district, due to its deep and fertile soil and abundance resource of water irrigation, is the most suitable for intensive agriculture. Organic farming is agriculture practices without using synthetic (non-organic) agriculture inputs. What we meant as Integrated Organic Farming is farming activities with totally use non-synthetic inputs, in terms of fertilizer, pesticide and rodenticide (to eradicate mouse raids). To deliver the training to key farmers, we invited Pak Sulistiono (agronomist) from Yogyakarta and assisted by Pak Made (farmer from Gunung Sari Village, Watubangga).

By combining two trainers, there will be a blended of knowledge between general and local, theory and real practices. In addition, Pak Made will in charge to follow-up the training with real actions on the field and provide long-term technical assistance (at least till the end of GreenPNPM). The participants of the training were the head of Gapoktan (farmer group union at village level) and Agriculture Extension Workers. The training in Gunung Jaya was attended by 25 key farmers (all male), in Puulemo was attended by 18 key farmers (15 male, 3 female) and in Gunung Sari was attended by 45 key farmers (32 male, 13 female). The following skill was delivered during the training: (a) Principle of organic farming; (b) procedure the making of liquid organic fertilizer from livestock (cow) urine; (c) procedure the making of Bokhasi; (d) procedure the making of organic pesticide; (e) procedure the making of rodenticide. The training was very inspiring to all key farmers; however they need further facilitation to transfer the knowledge into practices. To do this: (a) We assign Pak Made as our technical staff which special task to mainstream organic farming in Kolaka; (b) We use and build their house and surrounding land as learning house for organic farming; (c) we will use organic farming as away to mainstream Green-PNPM in Kolaka District.

C.2.1. Coached Inter-Sub District Verification Team (PMD Office, Kolaka, 15 January 2010): The coaching held for 3 hours (10.00 – 13.00), we made use this occasion to socialize the objective of LMP, introduce OWT activities and progress made on NRM smart-practices facilitation at village level. The team was composed of 5 persons, representatives of Forestry, Bappeda, Agriculture and Environmental agencies. As, we did in Muna, we also asked Verification Team to support and maintain the introduced smart-practices. In this coaching session, we discussed the principal of catchment areas, upstream and downstream relationships and principal of activities which would be funded by inter-sub district fund. As usual we presented the film ‘The Giant Sponge of Indonesia’ (Karet Busa Raksasa Indonesia). We reviewed the general physical and socio-economic conditions of Ladongi and Polipolia SubDistricts, Baula and Pomaala Sub-District.

C.3.5. Training on Water Purification in Pembeyoha Village, Ladongi (31 March 2010): Pembeyoha and Wungguloko Villages received 2008’s Green-PNPM funding (BLM) to develop water purification installation. Those villages share boundaries with Rawa Aopa National Park.

Since those villages located on swampy land, the water color is reddish and not potable; this 31 Edi Purwanto

situation underlined the reason why local community required water purification. Each village received BLM of IDR 45,971,900. We assisted FKL to link with specialist trainer from BPPT (Jakarta), however due to uncertainty of training schedule the trainer was unable to come to project site. We then found specialist trainer from Kendari, however we were then informed by FKL that they did not need trainer anymore, as local community can do by themselves using Zeolith stones. Both villages have bought 15 tons (1 container) of Zeolith stones from West Java, in which the cost per kg was IDR 5,000. The beneficiaries for the established water purification were 10 household groups (Rukun Tetangga) for each village. Unfortunately, the water purifications installations were failed functions and local community were disappointed as they had spent much money to buy Zeolith stones. In response to the situation, we developed a simple technology for water purification (without using Zeolith stone) and proved to work well. On March 31, 2010, we organized training to introduce simple water purification at Wungguloko Village; the training was attended by 25 KCVs from both villages. The objective of the training is to demonstrate people on simple, workable and low-cost water purification using local materials (sands and charcoal/active carbon). It seems to be that the above problems was rooted down on lack of transparency and community participation on budget planning (RAB) development. The dominant roles of FKL on project planning and implementation has distracted local community participation and wasted precious resources. See lesson learned No. 12/2010.

32 Edi Purwanto

IV. Challenges Faced, Lessons Learned

Remedial

Actions

Taken,

and

We faced 8 challenges which are valuable as lesson learned for future development of GreenPNPM.

A. Kecamatan policy to evently distributed block-grant to all villages (lesson learned No. 11/2010): Challenges faced: Some PNPM actors consider the Green block grant as the source of village funding rather than incentive to improve environmental condition and natural resource management. Kecamatan Watubangga (Kolaka District) is composed of 12 villages, understanding that the Green-PNPM pilot last for three years. The MAD-1 in 2009 resulted a gentlemen agrement to evently distributed the grant to all villages. In fact, this has been a common practice for PNPM program in this kecamatan. Each year, there would be four villages receiving Green block grant. As results, villages receiving 2008’s block-grant did not have any interest to participate Green-PNPM process on the following years as there would be no opportunities to receive Green block-grant. For example, Lamundre, a village located at Watubangga coast, had received 2008 block-grant. Early 2009, we conducted awareness on the need to rehabilitate their coast by planting mangrove. They decided not to use Green block-grant to plant mangrove as they were afraid that the plant could not grow in their coast. Later, after seeing the mangrove demonstration plot (developed by OWT) have grown well, they are interested in planting mangrove. Unfortunately, they are no opportunities to receive Green blockgrant. Similar conditions occured with inter-sub districts funding, there are three years funding (2005-2010), each year for each pilot district is IDR 500 millions, to average funding allocation on three sub-district beneficiary, there was also policy on particular district to give 2008 funding to Sub-district A, 2009 to Sub-District B, and 2010 to Sub-District C. Such practice is annoyed the spirit of Green-PNPM, environmental problem cannot be averaged, the villages/sub-district which have no or have not yet realized (discovered) their environmental problem during the time when they have opportunity to receive block-grant will use the grant for irrelevant activities.

Those tend to waste precious resources.

Remedial actions taken: On January 2010, during biogas training, we told that the existing practices are not conducive for environmental program.

B.

Many RABs are developed by FKL (lesson learned No. 12/2010):

Challenges faced: RAB in many villages are often developed by FKL and not TPK. At the beginning, such practice was driven with the emergency condition, it was done to meet the deadline of fund disbusrment. If FKL relied on TPK, the RAB development would take longger.

The situation underlined the reason why FKL doing thing beyond their job. The problem rooted down on one year late start of the Green-PNPM project, where the 2008’s Green Block Grant 33 Edi Purwanto

(BLM) was disbursed in 2009, similarly with 2009’s BLM which is disbursed in 2010. To meet the disbursment dealine of last year BLM, FKL had to speed up the Green-PNPM process and forced to make several short-cuts by ignoring the main principles of the PNPM program, transparency, participation and self-help (mandiri). In fact, the overall situation have shifted the main tasks of FKL, from community facilitator to BLM disbursment facilitator. This led the position of FKL on RAB development and project implementation are central while no one hardly control their job, including CSO, Faskab and project beneficiaries. With the absence of price standard of goods and services of Green-PNPM, this led to moral hazard and to a certain extent waste precious resource. In many cases RAB and the associated financial administration document (RPD/LPD[1]) are treated as secret documents to project benefiaries. The lack of transparency and participation in defining RAB have driven to serious conflicts during project implementation which deteriorate the spirit of ownership and local community empowerment.

Remedial actions taken: the problem is beyond of our job, what we can do is to provide awareness to local community about the truth roles and responsibilities of FKL and stimulate the spirit of ‘mandiri’ of local community.

C.

Training repetition using different fund sources (lesson learned No. 13/2010):

Challenges faced: On 26-29 June 2009, we organized training of trainers on cashew processing at Saragi Village (Pasarwajo, Buton) which involved KCVs of cashews farmers producing villages, i.e. Lapodi, Pasarwajo and Dongala. The training aimed at providing skills to KCVs on opening cashews shell (cashews processing), when those villages (Lapodi, Pasarwajo, Dongala) receive Green-Block Grant (BLM), they can use the fund to purchase cashew nut cutters (pisau kacip), so they can produce cashews kernels rather than gelondongan (shell-on cashews), they may also use the BLM to improve packaging etc. During 2010, each of those villages (Lapodi, Pasarwajo and Dongala) received 2009’s Green Block Grant (IDR 17,760,000 each), however they did not use the fund to follow-up the 2009 training into actions, but they spend the fund for training again. When they use the fund (IDR 18 millions) to buy cashew nut cutters, each villager may have their own equipment. While if they spend for training much money is spending-up for participant meals and transport, it was only about 40 cashew nut cutter bought by each village.

Remedial actions taken: We repeatedly advise local community to propose training activities to CSO instead of using the BLM; however they prefer to organize training rather than real actions.

D.

Unsustainbale seedling trees nursery (lesson learned No. 14/2010):

Challenges faced: Some of seedling trees nursery pilots facilitations such as in Waangu-Wangu Village (Pasarwajo, Buton), Kancinaa Village (Pasarwajo, Buton), Gunung Sejuk (Sampolawa, Buton), Lalemba (Lawa, Muna) and Rara (Ladongi, Kolaka) are not sustainable. The development of planting materials activities stoped after the seedlings have been sold out to [1]

Rencana Penggunaan Dana (Fund expenditure plan), LPD (Laporan Penggunaan Dana/Fund expenditure report)

34

Edi Purwanto

Green-PNPM, some nursery stop operation due to unclear ownership of the developed planting materials.

Remedial actions taken: Developing new nursery groups are not simple; many are interested in joining the group for short-term financial reasons (they can sell their planting materials to GreenPNPM), little who has spirits to rely on nursery as alternative income generation. In response to this, we have changed our strategy, instead of developing new nursery group; we made use the existing small-scale tree breeder. We provide training and small-capital and use their experience and site as community learning center.

E.

Conflicts between TPK and project beneficiary (lesson learned No. 15/2010):

Longori Village (Baula Sub-District) and Huko-Huko Village (Pomaala Sub-District) was selected as catchment areas rehabilitation sites (80 ha) funded by inter-sub district 2009’s GreenPNPM. Pak Benyamin (67 years) is the head of TPK for inter-sub district of Longori Village, while Pak Bahrun (66 years) is villager of Longori Village who was mad to find his land was planted by the project. During MDST meeting, Pak Benyamin was attached by Pak Bahrun using sickle (parang), Pak Benyamin was safe due to protected by others. It was the second attach, the first attach done by the same person on April 12, 2010. Pak Benyamin felt restless and unsecured; while no ones from Green-PNPM facilitators assisted them to resettle the conflict.

Since the beginning of May, we looked over the root of the problem and resettle the conflicts.

Proposed Remedial actions: The conflict is driven by serious social jealousy due to lack of transparency and possibly unequal distribution of ‘benefits’ among project beneficiaries. For planting project, it is imperative for facilitator to check and recheck that proposed rehabilitation areas are ‘clean and clear’. FKL should facilitate the development of written agreement among project beneficiaries on benefit sharing mechanisms to avoid social conflicts. These aspects seemed to be lacking as FKL in reality is more project administrator rather than community facilitator. Immature communication, ‘hit and run’ facilitation and lack of transparency have led to social conflicts which destroy social capital, ‘cure is really worst than the disease’.

F. Inconsistency between planting proposal and its implementation (lesson learned No. 16/2010): Most of planting proposals take the planting space of 2 x 3 m2. Taking assumptions that they plan an open (clear) land. While in reality, most the planting activities are conducted in the form of enrichment planting. Consequently: (a) the numbers of planted seedlings is possibly much lower that the proposed plantings; (b) low survival of planted seedlings, as many trees seedlings such as teak (Tectona grandis), white teak (Gmellina arborea), Kayu Kuku/ (Pericopsis mooniana), Sengon (Albizia falcataria) are light demanding (tollerant) species.

Proposed Remedial actions: We really need rethinking the suitability of planting proposals whithin Green-PNPM, there are so many source of ’manipulation’, such as: (a) the difference 35 Edi Purwanto

between proposed planting materials with real planted planting materials; (b) the difficulty to check how large (the size area) they had really planted; (c) the high variation of planting materials price from site to site. In many cases, the price of planting materials are simply defined

by FKL, they are often involved on the procurement process; (d) the low seedlings survival on enrichment planting etc. Planting proposals is only reasonable if it is conducted on open land with clearly known the exact size area (m2), so it will be easy to check. Development of community based nursery is considered to be wiser (better) than planting proposal !

G. Catchment Area rehabilitation using commercial species (lesson learned No. 17/2010): So far, there are six sub-districts received inter-sub districts fundings in South-east Sulawesi province, i.e. Sampolawa/Buton (solar voltage installation), Mawasangka (Fish Aggregating Devices installation). While for Muna and Kolaka Districts, the inter-sub district activities are related with catchment areas rehabilitation. The selected species for Muna district, either Tongkuno or Napabalano is teak/Jati. It is highly commercial species, in such away that after 15 – 20 years, if the planting were successful, all the planted trees might be disappeared as they will be logged for its timber. The selected species fo Baula Sub-District (Kolaka) are white teak (Gmellina arborea), Kayu Kuku (Pericopsis mooniana) and Biti (Vitex cofasus). All of them are also highly commercial species. The selected species for Ladongi Sub-District are white teak and Durian (Durio cibetinus). The latter is the only species which is part of multi-purposes trees species (MPTS), which may not cut for its timber.

Proposed Remedial actions: Tree species selection for catchment areas rehabilitation should be taken with care, the best species is Ficus sp. The reasons: (a) it is non-commercial timber, it does not attract people to log; (b) it is very good to restore water and biodiversity, especially to attract birds diversity which may a good opportunity for tourism. How Ficus trees can attract birds?

First, Ficus trees tend to produce large fruit crop, and the fruit ripen quickly. Furthermore, Ficus fruit production does not follow seasonal pattern and tend to be available throughout the year.

Because of this, they become critical resources when other fruits are scare. Finally, the ripe fruits are sugar-rich and easily digested. They are also a good source of calcium, necessary for bone growth and the development of egg shells (Kinnaird, 1995). Ficus trees can provide abundant fruit for birds and other great variety of animals, so as to not only water which can be restored but also the biodiversity of the production forest; (c) Most Indonesian people are reluctance to cut Ficus. MPTS is also good for catchment rehabilitation such as Durian and Nutmeg/Pala (Myristica fragan).

H.

The fate of UPK Institution after PNPM (lesson learned No. 16/2010):

Challenges faced: So far, UPK is PNPM institution which administers project funding at kecamatan level. How will be the fate of UPK during post PNPM program? Understanding that PNPM will be ended in 2012 (2015), it could be worth during the remaining time of the program, efforts could be given to establish legal aspect of UPK as community based empowerment agency at kecamatan level.

36 Edi Purwanto

V.

Concluding Remarks

The challenges for Green are bigger than non-green activities. Much need to be done to present the spirit of community development on environmental improvement in this program. Big efforts are required to change government, local community and facilitator from project oriented culture into the ‘mandiri’. The recruitment of Green facilitator should be conducted in selective manner; they should receive realistic jobs, reasonable remuneration with strict punishments. Awareness and training are highly required for this, but this should be accompanied by adaptive guideline and strong monitoring and evaluation.

VI. Planned Activities, Deliverables, Milestones for next Reporting Period Table3. Planned activities and deliverable Activities and/or Milestones

Actual Progress to Date (This Reporting Period)

Planned Progress (Next Reporting Period)

Conduct serial environmental awareness to rehabilitate all mangrove forest in the Green PNPM pilots (Kec. Pasarwajo, Kec. Mawasangka, Kec. Napabalano and Kec. Watubangga)

Awareness campaign has successfully stimulated Kec. Mawasangka, Pasarwajo and Napabalano to rehabilitee their mangrove forest using BLM 2008.

We will intensify environmental awareness in Kec. Sampolawa and Kec. Watubangga in such away that they put priority on mangrove rehabilitation on the coming proposals.

Comments

Deliverable: Documentation (film and photos) before and after mangrove rehabilitation.

Green proposals of Kec. Sampolawa and or Watubangga for BLM 2009.

Conduct serial environmental awareness on the whole steps of GreenPNPM Cycle for fiscal year 2008 and 2009 at kecamatan and at village level

Until the end of May 2009, serial environmental awareness for fiscal year 2008 has been completed.

Based on lesson learned obtained during 2008 and first half of 2009, we will improve the quality of environmental awareness to ensure that all village proposals for 2009 will be completely green and feasible to be implemented using local resources.

Some adjustments are required to improve the current PTO.

37 Edi Purwanto

Deliverable: Feasible and local specific Green village proposals.

Provide technical assistances on the implementation of vegetative and physical restorations funded by BLM 2008 at village level

Based on monitoring and technical assistances on the implementation of BLM 2008, we found that the bidding procedure laid out in the current PTO is not well-fit with the spirit of Green-PNPM.

We will approach all GreenPNPM actors to maximize the use of local resources, rather than relying on companies, especially for planting materials procurement.

Facilitate the development of Perdes and inter-villages partnership/collaboration to maintain vegetative and physical restorations funded using 2008’s BLM.

So far we have done inter-village partnership to save mangrove in Kecamatan Mawasangka, and riparian area restoration in Kecamatan Sampolawa we will elaborate such initiatives to other kecamatans.

We will facilitate the development of Perdes and inter-villages partnership to save natural resources and maintain restoration introduced by Green-PNPM

The first draft of the document has been completed and waiting review from several reviewers (Moslem scholars).

We will organize workshop to socialize the materials at district and province level.

MoU with Kendari Pos has been established.

OWT will publish success story of mangrove rehabilitation from Kecamatan Mawasangka in Kendari Pos.

Develop faith base environmental campaign for Muslim Preachers

Develop ‘Sisipan’ (inserted environmental campaign news) in Kendari Pos

Some adjustments are required to improve the current PTO.

Deliverable: Perdes and inter-villages Collaborative Management.

Deliverable: Friday Preach Book on environmental campaign.

Deliverable: Publication in Kendari Pos

Conduct on the job training on GPS operation for TPK and FKL at village and kecamatan level

So far we have conducted GPS training for FKL, we will provide refresher training for FKL and train for TPK

All FKL and TPK are enabled to operate GPS, they will able to map NR and the restored areas.

Deliverable: Numbers of trained participants

Develop environmental awareness film/video

So far, we have developed three films

We will produce at least 3 new documentary films Deliverable: Documentary films

38 Edi Purwanto

Develop environmental awareness posters and stickers

So far, we have developed three posters

We will produce at least 2 new posters and 10 stickers

Deliverable: New posters and stickers Conduct training workshop for Green PNPM actors to evaluate the implementation of Green-PNPM 2008 at district level

Together with NMC (Pak Warintoko), we have provided technical assistances to all FKL in Muna and Buton District during end of May 2009

We will facilitate workshop involving all Green-PNPM actors on each district, i.e.

Buton, Muna and Kolaka.

Deliverable: reports

Conduct training workshop for Green PNPM actors and relevant stakeholders on the importance use of GIS and RS as a basis for NRM at province level

So far, we have not yet organized the training workshop at province level, since during January-April 2009; all the energy was invested to speed-up the facilitation process of BLM’s 2008 disbursement.

Workshop

We will organize workshop at province level. This will be conducted in association with regular coordination meeting at province level as organized by Satker Province.

Deliverable: reports

Prepare environmental training modules which covered all aspects of NRM

Prepare Green-Menu

So far, we have produced 6 training modules which mostly directed to FKL and government officials (educated persons)

Workshop

We will develop practical training modules (working manuals) applicable for local communities Deliverable: modules for communities.

Training local

So far, we have verified 15 We will finalize the green menu together with other GGreen Menu KDP actors at province and national level Deliverable: Verified Green Menu

Annex A. Environmental Awareness Raising Activities

Awareness Title

1

Brief Description of Awareness/type of Participants

Date

2

Location

3

4

Number of male Particip ants 5

#of Female Particip ants 6

Buton District

39 Edi Purwanto

1. Garbage campaign

separation

2. Coordination meeting to initiate the development of Waste Management Unit (WMU) 3.

Established learning house on garbage separation and processing in Bau-Bau

4.

Awareness rising on the need to identify and define ‘Village Protection Areas’

5.

Building inter-villages partnership for KPD Mapping and Protection in Kecamatan Pasarwajo Installed Iron Campaign Boards on Main Roads

6.

7.

8.

Institutional Capacity Building of Nentu Handcraft Installed Wooden Campaign Boards

9. Installed Wooden frame environmental awareness poster 10.

Installed materials Offices

awareness at UPK

1. Verification of inter-sub districts proposals

2.

Garbage campaign

separation

We conducted this through simulation of garbage separation to Key Village Champions (KVCs), Women Groups (PKK) and students at elementary and secondary schools The main objective of the meeting was to involve and synergize efforts of government agencies on waste separation and processing campaign We developed our center office in Bau-Bau as learning center of domestic waste processing; this includes waste separation and composting.

To protect the remaining village forest and fragile areas.

June 2009

Pasarwajo, Mawasangka Sampolawa

112

203

12 February 2010

Bau-Bau

22

13

Since February 2010 to date

Bau-Bau

14

January and February 2010

Wakaokili, WaanguWangu, Lapodi and Kancinaa Pasarwajo

203

78

61

15

To provide long-lived March environmental campaign, 2 metal 2010 campaign board for each subdistrict To facilitate the development of Since economic organization, capacity February to building and market link date Apart from installing metal March campaign boards, we also 2010 installed 15 wooden campaign boards in three sub-districts So far, 80 environmental posters January to have been put in wooden frames March and installed in strategic public 2010 areas To socialize environmental January to awareness and training, smart- March practices facilitation documents 2010 and other Green-activities to nonGreen-PNPM actors/facilitators and government officials.

Muna District We participated verification 16-17 process of two sub-districts January proposals 2010

Pasarwajo, Sampolawa and Mawasangka Todombulu, Sampolawa

-

-

20

35

Pasarwajo, Sampolawa and Mawasangka Pasarwajo, Sampolawa and Mawasangka Pasarwajo, Sampolawa and Mawasangka

-

-

-

-

-

-

Tongkuno and Napabalano sub districts

25

15

We conducted this through simulation of garbage separation

Latugho Lalemba

143

41

To mainstream KPD issues from selected villages to kecamatan level

18 February 2010

18 and 19 January

and

40 Edi Purwanto

3.

Participated District Meeting to rank inter-sub districts proposals 4. Facilitated awareness meeting on mangrove forest protection

5. Facilitated awareness meeting NRM Perdes

to Key Village Champions (KVCs) and Women Groups (PKK).

Selected inter-sub districts proposals.

2010

Villages, Lawa Sub-District

23 January 2010

Raha

28

4

To stop clear-cutting of mangrove forest for brackish water ponds (tambak).

20 February 2010

Napalakura Village, Napabalano Sub-District

19

16

Danagoa Village, 16 March 2010

31

9

Raha

65

5

Napalakura, Napabalano sub-Distric

230

70

The objectives of the awareness 16 March meeting: (a) Inspire KCVs on the 2010 urgency of NRM Perdes development; (b) To revitalize the roles of customary institution to impose sanctions to environmental violators.

Participated PNPM The objective of the meeting was 7 April coordination meeting to evaluate the progress of 2010 community development facilitated by (Green) PNPM. Facilitated Clean We facilitated to clean village 13 -15 Environment Campaign, environment as a preparation for April 2010 Napalakura Village, clean village competition (Lomba Napabalan: Kebersihan Lingkungan Desa) at district level.

Kolaka District Participated on half day training We made use the training to deliver 14 for inter sub districts presentation about the philosophy January verification team. of PNPM-LMP, objectives and 2010 organization (NGO) in charge. We also explained inter sub district project proposal, technique of filling the form and field verification process. As the team was representative of government at district level, we also presented the progress of OWT activities for coordination and to inspire the participant.

Participant: , Kehutanan, BAPEDA,Astal Assisted verification in Baula After trained the verifiacation team, 14-15 and Ladongi to make sure that the team January implemented verification 2010 procedure, We assisted the team during field verification.

Participants:BPMD, Kehutanan, BAPPEDA, Astal, FK-L Ladongi, FK-L Baula, PL OWT.

BPMD, Longori village

5

0

Raara and Kec PoliPolia

5

0

41 Edi Purwanto

Talked about the progress of LMP with PjOKab.

Accompanied Nano (radio technician) to mend radio trouble in Ladongi.

Participated training

in

UPS/TPS

Participated in KPMD training

Coordination headman.

meeting

with

Coordination meeting Lalowosula village

with

Coordination meeting Sekdes and TPK

with

Due to the absence of PJoKab Kolaka at the Workshop on Renewable Energy Conducted by OWT and PMD, PjOkab invited OWT Kolaka to talk about the workshop. OWT talked about the result of the workshop related to renewable energy that possible to be conducted in Kolaka. We also give one copy of OWT annual report to PjOkab.

Participant: PjoKab, Astal Community Radio “Green Trust� on air through fm channel 95.1. The radio established on December 2009 and has been used to broadcast environment and the progress LMP. Due to the trouble, it has to stop for three weeks. On the 20th of Feb we solved the problem and started the environmental broadcasting program.

UPK,FK-L, RGS announcer We made use of the training to give a talk about several reasons why should we concern about environment. The talk was aimed at raising awareness of TPK not to be project oriented, but to be fully aware that running the project based on the reason that some problems need to solved and activities which may lead to environmental destruction need to be prevented.

We made use the KPMD training to develop water purifying installation.

Participant: KPMD, FK, UPK, PjOK. We talked about village potential and made action plan to develop honey bee culture and biogas demonstration plot Participants: Headmen We talked about potential and action plan to develop biogas.

Participant: Tahu tempe businessman, headmen, UEP team Sabar Subur, PL MP. We visited the project funded by BLM to make an evaluation the

1 March 2010

PMD Kolaka

2

0

20-21 January2 010

Green Trust Radio UPK Ladongi

6

1

26 February 2010

UPK office.Lad onig

28

4

5-6 March 2010

Ladongi

13

13

4 March 2010

Ladongi

2

1

7 March 2010

Ladongi

4

2

8 March 2010

Ladongi

2

0

42 Edi Purwanto

Observe biogas demplot at Gunung Jaya Village

KPMD meeting annual meeting

Participated in Idea project proposal collection

Meet with Headmen of Wungguloko village to decide beneficiary of water purifier installation

Meet with the beneficiaries of water purifier demo plot

Visit the inter sub district project implementation

Visit biogas demo plot

Meet with the honey bee culture group

efficiency of the implementation.

Participant: Sekdes, Head of TPK We visited demonstration plot of Gunung Jaya village and talked about development of biogas in the village.

Participant: TPK, KPMD We participated in KPMD annual meeting to talk about the evaluation result meeting at Horizon hotel Kendari and improvement of faciliatation and project implementation.

Participant: KPMD, PjoK, FK-MP, FK-L, PL, UPK. We participated and made action plan to develop demonstration plot.

Participants: Head of hamlet, KPMD, Head of adat, Wungguloko village is one of the villages in Ladongi which receive project fund on water purifier installation.

Somehow, the implementation was not effective according to beneficiary. Gusti, the sub district staff of OWT in Kecamatan Ladongi identified the problem and decided to demonstrate the other simple model of water purifier.

Participant: Headmen,BPD,Female KPMD We discussed with the beneficiaries to follow the training and build commitment for the maintencance of the plot Participants: Sekdes,BPD,KPMD, Beneficiaries Talked with TPK Raraa village related to implementation progress.

Participant: TPK, PL LMP,Kades Poli-Polia Observe the use of biogas and the maintenance as well talked about the problem encountered using biogas.

Participant: TPK, Beneficiaries Observe the activities at the plot and problem encountered with honey bee culture.

Participant: Segara madu group, male KPMD

9 March 2010

11 March 2010

Demonstr ation Plot of Biogas Desa Gunung Jaya Ladongi

3

1

13

13

13 March 2010

Balai Banjar.

Ladongi

47

0

21 March 2010

Wunggulo ko village

2

1

22 March 2010

Wunggulo ko village

6

4

23 March 2010

Poli-Polia village, Lambandi a subdistrict Gunung Jaya village

4

1

2

0

Atula village

16

0

24 March 2010

25 March 2010

43 Edi Purwanto

Check the preparation of water purifier training

Participated in Pegas

Participated in Pegas

Visit penetasan telur itik

Perdes Facilitation

Coordination Kolaka

Meeting

in

Meeting with radio crew and management

Assisted PSF visit to the radio

Final discuss ranking villages project’s proposal

Check the tools and equipment for the training.

Participant: TPK, Female KPMD Watch the implementation process of Pegas, and facilitate the participant to collect idea for project proposal environmentally friendly.

Participant: BKAD, KPMD, Head of the hamlet, PL MP.FT MP Introduce the environmental friendly activities that may be proposed to the project, reinforce Wallacea Trust responsibility to the project,introduce wallacea trust activities in KDP in order to give choice.

Participant: Kades,Sekdes,KPMD,PL

30 March 2010

Wunggulo ko village

2

1

1 April 2010

Hamlet II Putemata village

31

14

2 April 2010

Hamlet I, Lalowosul a village

29

5

Observe the technique of hatching the eggs in order to have inspiration to be able to socialize and give more option for project proposal of LMP. Participants: Headmen ,Village traditional head, TPK and KPMD Talked with the village government about the progress of Perdes.

Participants: PJOK , Headmen, BPD, Tokoh Masyarakat,PL Talked about the progress and problem encountered Participants: Pak Yamin , Bu Salmi

5 April 2010

Raara Village

6

1

7 April 2010

Anggaloo si village

7

0

11 April 2010

OWT office Kolaka

2

1

We have evaluation meeting with the radio crew related to broadcasting material.

Participant: Radio crew Talked with Ibu Citra Lestari related to the basic principle of community radio.

Participants: Pak Bowo, Ibu Citra Lestari Radio crew, FK, FT MP,FKL,PL UPK

12 S/d 13 April 2010

UPK Office.La dongi

6

2

15 April 2010

UPK office,Lad ongi

9

3

8 January 2010

Sub district meeting hall.Ladon

6

3

We gave some input and recommendation to the verification team to put forward villages with

44 Edi Purwanto

Participated in second, third inter village and socialization for 2010 meeting.

significant environmental problem in ranking project proposal.

Participants: BPPT, Sub district officer, UPK, FK, Sub district Forestry officer.

We participated in the meeting to make sure the rank of project proposal and fund allocation is defined as well to give a talk raising awareness on environment.

Participant: FK, KPMD, TPK, TPU, Head of sub district, Verification team, Head of the village.

gi

21 January 2010

Sub district meeting hall

27

25

Participated in TPK Training

We made use the meeting to improve knowledge related to LMP. Explain the objectives and responsibility of TPK. Participant: Astal, FK-L (Baula, Ladongi and Watubangga), TPK.

27 February 2010

Sub district meeting hall

16

14

Coordination Meeting Head of Sub district.

with

3 Mar ch 2010

Sub district Office

2

0

Participated in Pertanggung Jawaban

MD

OWT talked with new sub district head about LMP. Introduce the program, OWT and its responsibilities.

Participant : Head of Sub district, PjOK We participated in MD Pertanggung Jawaban to observe how the level of understanding and participation of community to the program We evaluated the understanding of headman and all village actor of PNPM-LMP about the program and how they functions and participated.

Participant :FK-L, Head of the Village, KPMD, PL, Head of the hamlet, Beneficiary, TPK. We interviewed the female KPMD Watalara village, Headman, TPK and female KPMD Pewutaa Village, Male and Female KPMD, Headmen, TPK of Puubunga village, TPK Puuroda, Male KPMD Baula, Headmen of Longori village to measure knowledge of the project as well explaining their job description.

Brainstorming knowledge on the potential and environmental problem as well designing awareness program and

4 March20 10

Village office Puulemo

12

4

6-7 March 2010

Each person’s resident

3

2

8-11 March 2010

Each person resident

9

3

Interviewed with Headman, Village, TPK,KPMD,TPU

Interviewed KPMD and Watalara

Longori

45 Edi Purwanto

Meet with headmen and KPMD desa Puubenua

Biogas beneficiary house hold survey

Participated training

in

in

KPMD

Meet the headmen, handed the notification letter for biogas training

Installing Poster

Installing poster

Installing poster

Visited intersubdistrict implementation progress

training with OWT. Participant: Head of the villages and PNPM actors at village level (TPK,KPMD) Introducing biogas with headmen and KPMD about biogas and preparation for the upcoming training.

Puubneua village

1

2

21 March 2010

Puubenua village

2

3

22 March 2010

Subdistric t office Baula

12

9

Participants: Headmen,KPMD Visit the beneficiary house for biogas demo plot.

Participants: 3 house hold Based on the survey result that we need to re explain PNPM LMP, inter sub district and the responsible of OWT We handed the letter, Announced the house for biogas demo plot as well explain the reason of the selection Participants: Headmen, PNPM village actors • Rumah Makan Wirlan • Terminal Kolaka • Warung Coto • Pelabuhan Ferry Kolaka • RumahMakan Minasa Tenne • Warung Bakso • Rumah makan Tatik • Dinas perikanan dan Kelautan • Kabag Umum • Kabag Hukum • Kabag Bencana Alam • Kabag SDA • Kabag Humas • Kabag Kesra • Kabag Ekonomi District agriculture agency District forestry

22 March 2010

Puubenua village

4

3

30 March 2010

Kota Kolaka

3

2

1 April 2010

Kota Kolaka

7 April 2010

4

1

We visited intersubdistrict project implementation progress.

8 April 2010

Desa HukoHuko Huko Huko village

4

1

Puubenua

2

2

Participants: Astal, FKL Beneficiaries

Visited biogas demo plot

20 March 2010

Ketua

TPK,

Visited demo plot to make sure

10 April

46 Edi Purwanto

there is nothing wrong with the installation

Modifying stove

Awareness raising of Cocoa farmer group

Participated in Earth day on green campaign

Socialized bio pores on “RGS weekly environmental Program”

Biogas as an alternative Energy.

Discuss the RAB for biogas training

Radio Broadcast of Biogas

Participants: Beneficiaries, KPMD We bring the stove to the garage asked them to modify. The person was firstly doubt as it may danger to be used. We explained that the stove will be used for biogas not LPG. We made use the training to explain PNPM LMP and environmental problem; we explained our responsibility in the program.

Participants: Cocoa farmer group With Environmental Care community distribute sapling and environmental friendly greeting card Participants: Senior high school student Kolaka district RGS has been quite successful broadcasting music and information to audience. Particularly at prime time, there are always responses to the broadcasting material. We have used the radio at particular time three times a week broadcasting environment such as biogas, domestic waste disposal management and also bio pores.

Bio pores is also become significant material for broadcasting as in several villages has problem with flood during the rainy season. OWT and the head of sub district has now planed to do an environmental action by developing recharging areas.

Socialization through RGS the installation of biogas.

To check the preparation of biogas training in Gunung Sari village.

•

Introduce Renewable energy biogas in to village that has resource and potential Gunung Sari village

2010

village

10 April 2010

Desa Puubenua

1

1

16 April 2010

Desa Puulemo

6

12

22 April 2010

Kolaka

20

9

1 January 2010

RGS Studio, Watubang ga

50

70

6 January 2010

RGS Studio, Watubang ga Gunung Sahari, Watubang ga Watubang ga

20

5

3

0

18

4

8 January 2010 16-17 January 2010

47 Edi Purwanto

•

Training on organic farm

Participated in KPMD Training

Out bond KPMD

Coordination with FK, PjOK and UPK.

Charcoal bricked training in Watubangga village

Discuss with key person about Biogas

Discussion the plan to develop demo plot of organic farming in Tandebura village.

Discussion to develop demo plot of honey bee cultures at

Introduce home scale biogas digester • Introduce organic farming • Introduce how to make compose, pesticide KPMD training was filled with material on the technique of facilitation and introducing the progress of PNPM LMP and its possible extension to 2012. OWT made use this training to deliver world and local issues of environment. OWT encouraged the participant to be a real hero for environment for themselves and to the society.

Out bond KPMD is part of KPMD training. This out bond was conducted aims to build solidarity among KPMD. In order the out bond relate do environment, OWT suggest to facilitator that this kind of out bond might also be used to do environmental action to inspire the community.

Participant: FK,KPMD,UPK The coordination was to announce the new position given to Ediana as well to talk about progress made by consultant and discuss the work plan of OWT to campaign environment.

Participant: UPK,FK,PjoK We participated in the training to remind the beneficiaries of the program on the environmental issues regarding to renewable energies as well planning the marketing bricked charcoal.

Participant: Beneficiaries, UPK, FK We discussed about the flame of the stove. As the installation has fully conducted but the flame is still low.

We then decided to modify to stove, now the flame is already resemble elpiji.

Participant: Pak Made, KPMD Gunung Sari.

We talked about the phases of organic farming and it’s relation to protect environment Participant: Pak Made, Pak Kasman.

Honey bee culture is one of the potential can be developed in

17 January2 010 22 February 2010

Watubang ga

18

4

Watubang ga

11

11

23 February 2010

Watubang ga

13

11

2 March 2010

UPK office

5

0

3 March 2010

Village meeting hall.

Watubang ga

20

50

5 March 2010

Head of biogas group house

2

1

6 March 2010

Pak Kasman’s house

2

0

7 March 2010

Meeting hall,

5

2

48 Edi Purwanto

Gunung Sari.

Discussion to develop demo plot of biogas at Peoho village.

Participated in KPMD training

Talked about bio pores with KPMD Watubangga

Discussed with KPMD Kukutio village

Discussed with Longgosipi village

KPMD

Coordination meeting with the headmen of Peoho village and PJOK Watubangga sub district to decide the beneficiary of biogas demo plot.

Survey of location for Biogas demo plot

Coordination meeting with male KPMD head of TPK in Kukutio village to decide biogas demo plot

Participated in TPU training

Visited

Biogas in

dusun 02

Watubangga.

Participants: Pak Made, TPK, KPMD We visited Peoho village to talk about the progress of the program, potential on biogas development.

We participated in the training to remind the potential and environmental problem in the village as well designing action plan develop demo plot.

Participants: KPMD We talked with KPMD to talk about the solution to overcome the flood problem in Watubangga village.

Participants: KPMD, headmen We talked with KPMD in Kukutio to talk about potential and environmental problem Participants: KPMD, Headmen We talked with KPMD in Kukutio to talk about potential and environmental problem Participants: KPMD, Headmen We talked with PJoK and Peoho village headmen in order to decide the potential location for demo plot as well to involve PjOK and village elite to have their participation and their control.

Participant: PJOK, Headmen of Peoho, Male KPMD. Discussed with the beneficiary related to the technical implementation of biogas training and maintenance demo plot.

Participant :Sekdes, male KPMD, beneficiaries Discussed with male KPMD and head of TPK of Kukutio village related to implementation technique biogas installation Participant: Head of TPK, male KPMD Clarifying the environmental impact of village idea for project proposal and announce demo plot of OWT. Participants: PJOK,FK MP, FK LMP,UPK, TPK Observe the progress of biogas,

9 March 2010 10 March 2010

Gunung Sari village Head of the village house UPK’s office

2

2

11

9

12 March 2010

KPMD’s house

2

1

13 March 2010

KPMD’s house

2

2

14 March 2010

KPMD’s house

3

1

04 April 2010

Sub district office

5 April 2010

Peoho village

6 April 2010

Kukutio village

8 April 2010

Kecamata n Watubang ga.

10 April

Desa

5

1

49 Edi Purwanto

Ranoote Trubus

Kelompok

Biogas

Evaluasi Kegiatan Kelompok Arang Briket di Desa Gunung Sari

Prepare the radio for PSF visit ( RGS) FM 91,20 Mhz.

Assisted the PSF to RGS of community radio

Visited the beneficiaries for biogas demo plot

Talked with the headmen of Gunung Sari village, head of PKK and Pak Imam.

Internal meeting consultant

Meet pak Syaiful

give technical assistance and maintenance.

Participant: KPMD,TPK, Beneficiaries Melihat Perkembangan Kegiatan Kelompok Arang Briket di Desa Gunung Sari serta menjelaskan manfaat program yang telah diterima secara langsung oleh Masyarakat.

Participants: Head of the hamlet, 1, female KPMD, member of the group Clean the studio and do evaluation meeting Participants: Radio crew

Talked with ibu Citra related to the basic principle of community radio, management and broadcasting material.

Participants: Pak Bowo, Ibu Citra Lestari Pak Dedi , Askab LMP,FK LMP , Radio crew Meninjau sekaligus menyampaikan Rencana Pembuatan Degester Biogas Di Tempat Bapak Coge serta Peserta yang diharapkan hadir dalam rangka pelatihan dimaksud diatas, Participants: Sekdes, ,PKK and hamlet head, Talked about PNPM and its progress, community participation and action plan. Participants: Pak Imam, Headmen of Gunung Sari, Head of PKK PROVINCE LEVEL Internal meeting of consultant was conducted in OWT office Kendari.

The meeting was an evaluation to the progress and problem encountered.

Participant: T.A, ASTAL, MIS, FK We used the time in Kendari to looking for some expert for trainer in sub district. Pak Syaiful is a key person who has been experienced conducted some training.

Participant: Pak Syaiful and his wife, OWT and

2010

11 April 2010

Gunung Sari Dusun 02 Ranoote Desa Gunung Sari Dusun 01 Karang Tengah

29

5

Studio RGS Kecamata n Watubang ga.

Studio RGS Kecamata n Watubang ga.

4

2

6

3

19 March 2010

Rumah Pak Coge.

3

3

21 March 2010

Rumah Kepala Desa Gunung Sari

4

1

25 January 2010

OWT office KEndari

14

1

26 January 2010

Pak Syaiful’s house

3

1

12-13 April 2010

14 April 2010

50 Edi Purwanto

Coordination PMD

meeting

with

Visit RRI

Participated in Round Table Discussion “ Forest Conversion to Palm Oil in Konawe Utara District�

Participated in Evaluation Meeting held by consultant

We had a meeting with PMD and province coordinator of PNPM at Hotel Aden. In the meeting we talked about the progress of LMP and what we have done related to our responsibility in term of environmental campaign. Related to this campaign and socialization of LMP to all the facilitator of PNPM, we agreed with PMD to conduct training and environmental campaign at the next coordination meeting on February.

Participant: PMD, Province coordinator of PNPM. We visited RRI to talk about the program that we potentially be able to do in collaboration with RRI related to environmental campaign.

We were told that RRI Kendari has a program one hour a week every Wednesday called green Radio. We agreed to give some environmental broadcasting material for RRI and we will provide time for Wednesday to talk about progress of LMP. Participant: Kepala seksi Penyiaran RRI. We participated in the round table discussion to socialize LMP at stakeholders and NGO at province level also to learn from its problem to share with the community at the pilot area. We remind the participants of the discussion that the problem might also happen to one of the pilot area of LMP Watubangga sub district. We also distribute some posters to the participant of discussion.

Participant: Jauh Sultra, WWF Sultra, CO Lokal Walhi, BLH Prov Sultra, Unhalu Students, Focil Indonesia, Kendari Pos, Media Sultra, Bappedalda Konawe Utara, Dinas Kehutanan Prov Sultra, Dinas Kehutanan Konawe Utara, KPI Sultra, Yascita, YPSHK, Kendari TV, SP Kendari, Medikara Sultra, Antropolog Unhalu The meeting was an evaluation to improve the implementation of the program. We made use the meeting to present OWT progress and problems met.

Participants: Facilitator,

27 January 2010

Aden Hotel

4

0

28/01/2 010

RRI office Kendari

1

2

28/01/2 010

Meeting Hall Province Forestry agency

20

10

09 March 2010

Horizon Hotel Kendari

51 Edi Purwanto

52 Edi Purwanto

Annex B. Training Activities Training Title

Brief Description of Training/type of Participants

Date

Location

#of Male Participa nts

1

2

3

4

5

Training on Seaweed Farming

Training and facilitation to develop Virgin Coconut Oil community-based enterprise

Training the use of Janthropa stove

Training on installation

home

biogas

Training the making of Bokashi

Training on mangrove crab fattening

Training for Inter-Sub District Verification Team

Buton District Tira Village received 2009 Green PNPM Block-Grant to establish seaweed farming; that is why we provided training to make them ready to develop seaweed farming in properly VCO is a high priced premium grade coconut oil produced under low heat or no heat process and has wider applications in the infant foods, functional foods, pharmaceuticals and cosmoceuticals.

We inspired villagers on the use of Janthropa seeds as domestic fuel. To burn the seeds, they need to have Janthropa stove, this was demonstrated during Pegas This is the first biogas training outside Kolaka District. The major constraints to implement this technology in Muna and Buton Districts Bokhasi (Bahan Organik Kaya Akan Sumber Hayati, Organic matter rich of bio resources). It is organic fertilizer made of biomass (rice straw/jerami, organic waste), dung which is fermented with EM4.

Mangrove crab is one of coastal fishery commodity which has important economic value.

Formerly, mangrove crab was considered as pest for brackish water farmers, as it caused leakage of the pond Muna District The training was held for one day and made use the training to socialize the objective of LMP, introduce OWT activities and progress made on NRM smartpractices facilitation at village level to inspire local community to

#of Female Participa nts 6

1 March 2010

Tira Village, Sampola wa,

16

12

10 April 2010, 17 April 2010

Wasaga, Pasarwaj o and Napa Village, Mawasan gka, Wakaban gura Village, Mawasan gka Winning village, Pasar Wajo

6

38

-

40

23

2

8 April 2010

21 March 2010

24 March 2010; 9 March 2010, 19 April 2010 27 March 2010

14 January 2010

Banga, Mawasan gka, Warinta, Pasarwaj o Wawoan gi Banga Village, Mawasan gka

25

28

7

Raha

4

-

53 Edi Purwanto

Training the Development of NRM Village Regulation Training and facilitation of Cashews nursery demplot

Training and facilitation of bee culture demplot

Participated Refresher training for KPMD in three pilot

Participated Refresher training for Proposal Development Team Training on biogas

Training on organic farming

Develop water purifying demo plot

Training on Biogas

Training on Organic farming

Pelatihan KPMD

submit Green proposals.

The training participants were BPD and Village Heads of all villages in Napabalano Sub-District.

We facilitated the development of ‘cashews plus’ nursery as the source of planting materials to replace the existing plantation. We inspired local community to replace their old cashew with young high quality planting materials; such rehabilitation should be conducted gradually to avoid sharp declining of cashews production Honey bee culture is one of sustainable livelihood suitable for rural community; it is conducive for forest conservation, as bee culture need plentiful vegetation We support this training as part of Green-PNPM process and funded

by DOK

We support this training as part of Green-PNPM process and funded

by DOK. Kolaka District Objectives: Develop installation of biogas for home using, develop demonstration plot.

Objectives: Introduce and build demonstration plot of organic farming.

We developed water purifying demo plot using sand and charcoal. As the result of the training we produced four unit water purifyier.

Participants: Headmen , Participants Objectives: Develop installation of biogas for home using, develop demonstration plot Objectives: Introduce and build demonstration plot of organic farming

15 January 2010 15–16 January 2010

Napabala no

26

4

Lalemba Village, Lawa

10

8

20 March 2010, 6 April 2010 21 Februar y 2010, 9 March 2010, 22 April 2010 8 March 2010

Lalemba Village, Lawa, Napalaku ra SubDistricts Tongkun o, Napabala no, Lawa Napabala no

8

7

38

38

20

15

12-13 January 2010

Gunung Jaya village

38

3

15 january 2010 31 March 2010

Gunung Jaya village Wunggu loko village

15

2

26

1

14-15 January 2010 16 January 2010

Pewutaa village

21

19

Puulem o village Kantor Camat Baula

9

3

12

9

22-23 March 2010

54 Edi Purwanto

Pelatihan Biogas

Training on Biogas

Training on organic farm

Training and developed demo plot of biogas

Training on film making

Peserta Sangat Antusias dan bersemangat Mengikuti Jalannya Kegiatan,karena Merupakan hal Baru bagi mereka,dimana selama ini kotoran ternak yang hanya terbuang begitu saja kini dapat di manfaatkan bahan bakar,dan juga dapat di jadikan Pupuk Kompos.

Objectives: Introduce technique of biogas installation for home use made of Poly Ethylene plastic.

Participant: Project beneficiary, KPMD, FK Objectives: Introduce technique of making organic fertilizer botanic pesticide.

Participant: FK, KPMD, BKAD. We developed demo plot for biogas in Peoho village Watubangga sub district aimed at inspiring the community on using animal feces.

Participants: Headmen , Headmen secretary ,TPK, participant PROVINCE LEVEL Teach technique of video taking, editing, and narrating Participant: OWT district coordinator, Province coordinator, Sub district staff, UPK Ladongi, Radio Technician.

24-25 March2 010

Desa Puuben ua

13

2

16-17 January 2010

Gunung Sari village

18

4

17 January 2010

Gunung Sari village

18

4

16-17/ 04 2010

Desa Peoho

16

3

10-11 January 2010

OWT Office Kendari

12

1

55 Edi Purwanto

Annex C. IEC and Training materials Green PNPM_Jan-Mar 2010 Types of IEC & training materials Documentary film/video

Radio Program

Title of IEC/training materials

Produced by

No of IEC materials produced

Disseminated in what province(s)

1.

Biogas installation for home - documentary and tutorial

OWT

150 pieces of CD

Southeast Sulawesi

2.

Practice on making briquette of coconut shell charcoal – documentary

OWT

150 pieces of CD

Southeast Sulawesi

3.

How to make briquette of coconut shell charcoal – tutorial

OWT

150 pieces of CD

Southeast Sulawesi

4.

The PNPM-LMP profile at Sub District Level documentary

OWT

150 pieces of CD

Southeast Sulawesi

5.

Pagar Nusantara - movie

OWT

150 pieces of CD

Southeast Sulawesi

6.

Karet Busa Raksasa Indonesia – movie

OWT

150 pieces of CD

Southeast Sulawesi

7.

The best practice of Lambusango forest conservation – movie

FKTI dan OWT

150 pieces of CD

Southeast Sulawesi

8.

Technical sorting for household’s waste tutorial

Copyright Paguyuban pemilah sampah Jogja dan Walhi

20 pieces of CD

Southeast Sulawesi

9.

Desa Lestari Mandiri Energi - talk show documentary

OWT

10 pieces of CD

Southeast Sulawesi

1.

Info Lingkungan

Radio Gunung Sari 92,8 FM

12 times

Southeast Sulawesi

2.

Jingle PNPMLMP

Radio Gunung Sari 92,8 FM

Every day

Southeast Sulawesi

3.

Talk show

Radio Gunung Sari 92,8 FM

3 times

Southeast Sulawesi

4.

“PNPM” radio program,

Radio Green Trust Ladongi

Every day

Southeast Sulawesi

5.

“ Lingkungan’ radio program

Radio Green Trust Ladongi

Every day

Southeast Sulawesi

56 Edi Purwanto

Posters

Fact sheet

Banner

6.

Keep Muna green

Radio Wuna Swara

7.

Kawasan Perlindungan Radio GSB 106,mi5 MHZ Desa (KPD) socialization

1.

Drought disaster could only be prevented by avoiding deforestation

2.

Save ‘Jompi’ Forest as the water tower of Raha Town

3.

Stop Deforestation: Cutting forest means inviting flood disaster.

4.

Save water movement through build millions of absorption area

5.

Let’s sort domestic waste: Dislocating waste without sorting and processing is equal to moving problems

6.

Utilizing cow-dung as a new source of sustainable fuel

7.

Non-organic waste treatment

8.

Organic Waste treatment

1.

Tentative

Southeast Sulawesi

Actual news

Southeast Sulawesi

OWT

1000 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

OWT

1000 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

OWT

1000 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

OWT

1000 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

OWT

1000 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

OWT

1000 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

OWT

40 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

OWT

40 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

Bee livestock : tip and benefit

OWT

1000 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

2.

Village self-supporting energy through biogas for villagers movement

OWT

1000 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

3.

Developing Nursery

Village

OWT

1000 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

1. Healthy, clean and efficient with charcoal briquettes

OWT

5 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

57 Edi Purwanto

Plang/ himbauan

Stiker

2. Green and sustainable for the country

OWT

5 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

3. Keep the village green with energy-efficient stoves

OWT

5 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

4. The Maintain soil of fertility with Bokashi

OWT

4 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

5. The bee livestock for getting honey

OWT

4 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

6. Recovering coastal fort

OWT

4 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

7. Getting money from the coastal fort

OWT

4 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

8. The Turn of livestock manure into biogas

OWT

4 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

1. Conservation Village Areas

OWT

3 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

2. Do not let the coastal fortress gone

OWT

3 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

3. Managing domestic waster through 5M activity

OWT

3 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

4. Save the Earth

OWT

3 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

5. Lets join us to protect and preserve forest

OWT

2 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

6. Save the forest as a water tower

OWT

2 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

8. Environmental conservationists groups throw garbage into place after the disaggregated

OWT

3 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

9. Environmental conservationists groups: the nentu handcrafts

OWT

1 piece

Southeast Sulawesi

10. Environmental conservationists groups : springs preserve

OWT

3 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

11. Environmental conservationists groups: mud crab fattening

OWT

1 piece

Southeast Sulawesi

1. the community of jarak stoves user

OWT

30 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

58 Edi Purwanto

2. The community of solar cell power user

Of OWT

3. Green- PNPM : Towards OWT

350 pieces

1000 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

Southeast Sulawesi

Sustainable and Energy Self – Sufficiency Villages

Training materials (printed)

4. The beneficiaries of planting program on PNPMLMP

OWT

5000 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

1. Module: Crab fattening in mangrove area

Fisheries government agent (BP5K) and OWT

40 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

2. Module: Seaweed farming

Fisheries government office (BP5K) and OWT

30 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

OWT

40 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

FEATI , BPP and OWT

30 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

5. Module: Bokasi

OWT

20 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

6. Module: Biogas

Canopy and OWT

40 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

Forestry government agent and OWT

50 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

Cultivation government agent and OWT

40 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

Canopy and OWT

70 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

Paguyuban Sukunan and promoted by OWT

40 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

Water OWT , PDAM dan PNPM

50 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

OWT

300 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

village

OWT and law biro of district government

50 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

16. Patterns in order to village regulations

OWT and law biro of district government

50 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

3. Module: Coconut Charcoals Briquette 4. Module: Virgin Coconut Oil

7. Module : Bee culture 8. Modules: cashew seedlings 9. Module: Organic agriculture 10. Module : Community base system on waste treatment 12.

Module: purification

13 Reading Material GreenPNPM : Towards Sustainable and Energy Self – Sufficiency Villages 14.

Concept of regulations

59 Edi Purwanto

17. Participative regulation in manner

village gender

OWT and law biro of district government

50 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

The village regulation position among others laws regulation

OWT and law biro of district government

50 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

19. RPJMDes for developing environment and livelihood

OWT

50 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

20.

OWT

150 pieces

Southeast Sulawesi

18.

Reading material : Conservation location Villages and Groups environment Conservations

60 Edi Purwanto

Annex D. Photo Gallery 1. Province Level

Siaran langsung nasional radio talkshow

Sultra Expo ( Halo Sultra )dalam rangkan

PNPM-LMP Sulawesi Tenggara di Kota Bau

Ulang tahun Sultra Pameran pembangunan

Bau

2. ButonDistrict

Budidaya Agar – agar di Desa Tira Kec.

Budidaya Agar – agar di Desa Tira Kec.

Sampolawa

Sampolawa

61 Edi Purwanto

3. Muna District

Pembuatan Demplot Persemaian Jambu Mete

Pelatihan Pembuatan Perdes, Desa Latugho,

Desa Lalemba, Kec. Lawa, kerjasama CSO

Kecam

Operation Wallacea Trust dan Masyarakat

atan Lawa

4. Kolaka District

Pelatihan

pembuatan

Kecamatan Watubangga

arang

briket

di

Pelatihan bersama FO (Field Officer) CSO Dan PNPMLMP (SPL) Dalam Pelatihan Pembuatan Biogas Skala Rumah Tangga di Kecamatan Ladongi

62 Edi Purwanto

63 Edi Purwanto