The Environmental Footprint of Essential Oils and Synthetic Chemicals

Page 1

Paper presented at the IFEAT International Conference in Barcelona, 6 - 10 November 2011 ‘Spain: Bridging Continents and Cultures’ Pages 155-169 in the printed Conference Proceedings.

THE ENVIRONMENTAL FOOTPRINT OF ESSENTIAL OILS AND SYNTHETIC CHEMICALS (AND CONSEQUENCES FOR THE ESSENTIAL OIL INDUSTRY) Jim Gobert Telmont Essentials Pty Ltd 1 The Crescent Vaucluse NSW 2030, Australia jim_gobert@seventhwave.ws BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW In addition to the aesthetic enrichment of our lives by natural flavour and fragrance materials, humankind has traditionally drawn, from nature, the active ingredients to improve living conditions. Traditional Chinese medicine has its origins from the eras of the Three Emperors (Fu-hsi, Shen-nung and Huang-ti from 2852 – 2597 BCE) and in India from the Vedic age (1700 – 11 BCE). Traditional medicine was generally an amalgam of pharmaceutical actives which would show dose-response curves (e.g. ephedra), sympathetic magic and materials that were believed to interact with life forces such as “qi”. Natural materials were also used to control nature - in Mesopotamia around 2500 BCE, sulphur was used to control fungal diseases in plants; Egyptian fisherman burnt castor oil in lamps to repel mosquitoes from around 500 BCE and leguminous plants (such as Lonchocarpus nicou - a source of rotenone) were used by South American natives around 1600 CE to catch fish. Around 1700 CE tobacco extracts (as a source of the insecticide l-nicotine) were used to control cereal pests in Europe. Even animals employ natural materials as active ingredients to improve their living standards primates (such as wedge-capped capuchins) have been observed rubbing themselves with millipedes at times of high insect activity to apparently repel various feeding insects. From the mid-20th century, toxic heavy metal complexes of arsenic and a diverse range of synthetic chemicals, derived mainly from fossil fuels, were employed to control plant pests and human diseases and softer, less noxious, natural chemicals were made relatively obsolete. Climate change, and means to limit its consequences, is causing us to assess the atmospheric consequences of synthetic, fossil fuel derived materials in general. Concurrently, a range of other issues – such the development of pest resistance to synthetic chemicals, the depletion of natural resources used in production of synthetics (such as phosphate rock – used to produce a diverse range of pesticides) and concerns about toxic residues in food, waterways and farm workers – is driving new research into natural and naturally derived, efficacious ingredients. The presentation consists of three major components, which can be summarised as follows: A. Our world is changing: - plants supply diverse natural chemicals; - there is new demand for functional natural chemicals; - improved safety, low carbon footprint & reduced residues stimulating this demand. B. Nature has the solution: - plants supply us with functional ingredients (for example fungicides, insect repellents, herbicides, insecticides) – three examples will be presented; - additional new application areas will increase new demand for a range of natural chemicals.

155


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
The Environmental Footprint of Essential Oils and Synthetic Chemicals by American College of Healthcare Sciences - Issuu