SECTION B-B
PUBLIC HEARING 2011 - 2010 בדלתיים פתוחות
EXPERIMENTAL URBAN BLOCK COMBINING THE LAW COURT SYSTEM IN TEL AVIV WITH HOUSING BLOCK ADIE LEVY TECHNION TUTORS : ARCH.GABY SCHWARTS , ARCH.SHMAYA SERFATY
The project offers an alternative, critical observation on the system of law courts, its future, and its role in Tel Aviv’s metropolitan area, and reexamines the future courthouse program and its integration in the spirit of the 21st century. Southern Tel Aviv currently appears as a “seam” in the metropolis, slowly shaking off its industrial character and turning into an alternative platform which hosts some independent systems; governmental and judicial networks right beside alternative culture and art activities. Thorough urban analysis identifies the remaining industrials ruins scattered in the area both as substrates for the general renovation of Southern Tel Aviv and as infrastructures for the integration of the different systems into a single environment. The project proposes a new heterotypic mix, which challenges the conventional iconography we have in mind about the modern court system.
IN THE 60’S
100% Industrial usage
DC BA “KIRYAT HAMELACHA” AS A CASE STUDY
מסודרים באזורים כ»כ שונים זה מזה עד שבלתי אפשרי, מושמים,) מתאר את ההטרוטופיה כמקום שבו הדברים מונחיםfoucault 1986,22 ( מישל פוקו... הנאבקים על השליטה במקום אחד, אלטרנטיביים, אלה עולמות מקבילים.«המאבק המתמשך בין חלקי הבניין השונים של היכל המשפט הוא טופוגרפי ואידיאולוגי כאחד מכונת קריאה, היכל הצדק בתל אביב, מקום המשפט,אביגדור פלדמן .» ההטרוטופיה היא מקום אמיתי של משבר המאחד מקומות השונים זה מזה ואף נוגדים זה את זה.למצוא לכולם מקום משותף אחד
INNER TYPICAL STRUCTURE
2010
Only 30% industrial usage
Recognition of two systems: the govermental vs. the social. these two systems exists right beside each other, but operate completely independently. the court system operate on the western border in front of local workshops, studios and art galleries and residential units inside old shops. distinct buffer zone between the two systems: what kind of formula can combine the two systems daily use and urban-local usage efficiently?what kind of functional mixture can exist,when a governmental function, such as court house is involved in it? which king of characteristic identification, should a court house need to have as a public building located at this specific urban context?
HOUSING
Experimental housing typologies in several sizes and sections. open halls distincs between the court system and the housing units, and serves as the highest exposure level inside the block.
BLOCK A
BLOCK B THE COURT SYSTEM
Bridging between the court halls of each judicial wing, in accordabce with the level of confidentiality needed. the facade’s hiding and exposing sequence reveals the function exists behind it.
BLOCK C ADMINISTRATION
Connection between halls which serve as public reception, and leading path for the specific court halls in thr upper levels.
ART GALLERY+SINGLE HOUSING UNIT
BLOCK D
Exhibition galleries, stores and local workshops serve as active faces in the new widthwise paths which are crossing the complex, thus combining each a single housing unit.
PUBLIC AREAS AND ENTRIES TO THE COURT INSTANCES
COMMERCE+OFFICES
In the perimeter of the site, pierced by the new urban passagways leading the visitors into the complex
/3
1
ALL 3 LAYERS PUBLIC+COURT+HOUSING
ADIE LEV Y PUBLIC HEARING TECHNION 2 011 T U T O R S : A R C H . G A B Y S C H WA R T Z A R C H S H M AYA S E R FAT Y
FRAGMENTAL SEQUENCE