...strangely, familiar Aesthetics of the Everyday
Alexander Jackson Master of Architecture Portfolio Stuart Weitzman School of Design University of Pennsylvania
Architecture and the Aesthetics of the Familiar
The familiar harkens towards an emotional response from an individual. The everydayness of one’s life operates upon routines and continuity, one could say that the familiar is something usually not thought of to be unique, or sublime, or really that exciting. This familiar is what lies beyond, seemingly difficult to explain. Here lies the vast majority of architecture and the built environment, or as R. Buckminster Fuller would say, “Ninety-nine percent of who you are is invisible and untouchable.” It is here within these Ninety-nine percents that I would posit as the familiar. The cul-de-sac in suburban developments, the pitched roof, the trimmed, green lawn, all seep into the familiar. Within this realm, (surely there is ninety-nine percent of it!) lies infinite possibility. This portfolio of works draws upon close readings of aesthetics of the familiar, to create novel forms of architecture that challenge one’s relationships to the everyday. Estrangement and defamiliarization produce novel forms that might seem... ...strangely, familiar.
contents
01 LIFE IN THE CIRCLE Mega-Block Redux IV 02 COMPANY HOUSE® Adaptive Reuse Live-Work Housing 03 ZEP-PORT Museum Archive Addition 04 INNATE EXPRESSIONS Urban Replica & Food Hybrids Market 05 DIPTYCH COPY Museum of Fake Realities 06 POETICS OF WASTE Precast Concrete Wall Assembly 07 THE URBAN CANOPY ULI Hines Student Competition
LIFE IN THE CIRCLE Adaptive Reuse Urban Housing
2019 Fall Architecture Urban Housing Studio - Mega-Block Redux IV Instructor: Kutan Ayata Site: The Round House, Moscow, Russia Building Area: 60,400 m2 Collective Studio Proposition With the implementation of 20th Century modernist urbanism, the typology of the urban mega block came to rise throughout the history of architectural development. The mega block is a sizable block composed of a series of regularly scaled urban blocks within a city, that came from social housing ambitions from the densification of city centers throughout the modernist era. These new utopian ideal attempted to replace the densely packed, existing urban fabric, with one that revealed openness and large format projects to define a new world of living conditions. While the effort had good initial intentions, the realization of these mega blocks would turn to be lackluster in density, character, segregated, and quite homogenous. As vestiges of the past, their footprints are imposing upon cities, and have become seemingly lifeless as their outputs have become stale in their aging. The question of tabula rasa, the very beginning of these projects, seems a waste of structure and one that would replace sameness with the same very indifference. With city centers globally shifting toward densification as populations grow, a radical re-approach toward urban housing is needed. While building taller and larger structures can be accomplished, these results have warranted lackluster responses, and have not shown meaningful impacts towards the cities that host them. These individuated projects do not participate within the larger context of the urban fabric. Perhaps no where more evident is this condition present, than Soviet Russia. The impetus of the project is the Round House, located in Moscow Russia, orginally created as a large housing development for the 1980s Olympics.
Collective Rendering
-8-
The studio collectively tackled the notion of the collective project to transform one of these Round House buildings. Each structure is characterized by the 9 stories of residential units containing 956 apartments in a circular plan, with a commercial floor residing at the base of the building. The studio’s ambitions were focused on near future realities considering new socio-economic adaptations, life-style shifts, and demographics and act as a documentation of the project not as new concept, but rather a documentation of a potential fictious reality. With the notion of tabula rasa out of the question, interventions needed to not only consider the existing building as site, but the reality of ‘neighbors’ and close by projects to project an urban strategy that each project had to grapple with. Assembling the Site Model
Collective Site Model
Each project began as a singular slice of the ‘Round House’ as the building capitalized on mass pre-fabrication systems. But, not relying upon these systems, projects began to deviate and transform the existing from performing surgical moves to the existing through a series of additions, subtractions, blending, growing, expanding and projecting. The strategy of the new building was one of collective decision, as the circle opened to the park adjacent to the site and arising the three towers to contextually relate toward the other modernist ‘towers in a park’. Projects began to define a varied program from research from shifting aging demographics (combined retirement + youth housing), to the adaptation of schools toward honed skills such as ballet, to the shifting population of incoming immigrants in temporary housing facilities.
-9-
- 10 -
- 11 -
COMPANY HOUSE®
Adaptive Reuse Live-Work Housing
2019 Fall Architecture Urban Housing Studio - Mega-Block Redux IV Instructor: Kutan Ayata Site: The Round House, Moscow, Russia Building Area: 4,650 m2 -a narrativeCompany House® bringing a new meaning to work – life balance. Have employees feeling the burden of work? Company House® offers a variety of services to help optimize your body to keep continual workflow! That pesky eye pestering you from writing code all day? Hands feeling weak from carpal tunnel syndrome? Company House® will replace it so you can keep working despite your bodily short-comings! Company House® provides amenities for all your living and working needs! Our common roof deck makes sure you never need to touch the ground again. Also part of your new home is cafes and shops, all supported by the Company House®. Your home is your office! We work, we live: Company House®
The project is an exploration in challenging the prototypical ‘unit’ based housing typologies, in which the unit drives an exterior form and shell. Instead of starting from typical unit layouts, traditional in housing typology, the project is imagined as an object. As a formal generator, the building takes the logical of the assemblege, and mis-contrues its reading. Beyond the kit-bash, the grouping of form generate a new formal reading through close proximities, slippages, and loose fits. Aperture patterning breaks this mass of assembleges, as the existing window pattern on the existing building, pushing through the facade to generate novel openning conditions. The play between the orthagonal grid logic and the radial organization of the Round House shear glazing, in which dichoic glass exposes the breaching of the existing exterior wall. Heavy stucco adorns the facade relating simultaneously to precast concrete pattern language on the existing, but permitting a great degree of material weathering and surface texture. Maintaining the common roof and green park on the roof, the project sits gently and hovers above the Round House. The cores act as connectors to and from the existing, which become extended into the project. Once the object of the building locates itself onto the roof, the existing building is renovated to create new balconies, gathering spaces, shops for residents, and theater spaces to watch the life within the circle.
Select Iterative Formal Generations Each formal generation seeks to defamiliarize the image of the unit through the aggregation. As new generations emerge, new figural profiles are explored as a device to connect and remove the ‘unit-ness’ of the massing. Each massing block occupies the roof of the existing Round House. Various engagements with this roof are explored to either join or separate the two systems.
- 14 -
Ground Level Tenant Floor Plan
- 15 -
Isometric ‘Choisy’ The underbelly of the project is revealed through the massing render above. With the boundary of the existing building shearing off the massing, the dichoic glazing reveals a network of figural patterning that appears on the facade. The panelization of the radial geometry below, regulates the glazing vertically on the mass. The existing windows puncture and push into the mass, creating shallow and deep pockets for apertures. Through these windows, the black glazing is reflected by the shiny black chrome in stark contrast to the stucco facade. The black reflects and highlights opennings, while the stucco falls back and is contextual.
- 16 -
Level 10 Showroom Floor Plan
- 17 -
Isometric Building ‘Chunk’
- 18 -
Level 11 Common Roof Plan
- 19 -
Isometric Building ‘Chunk’
- 20 -
Level 12 Unit Floor Plan
- 21 -
- 22 -
Unique Units The interior of the apartments showcase the blending of the living and working conditions. Benches of workstations are aligned within the common spaces inside. Shown above, this unit is an example of a dormitory style unit, housing both an electronics lab and common spaces for individuals. Perched Above Seen in this site model, the project sits atop the Round House, offering grand views from above, as well as functioning as a tall mass to relate more contextually toward the other tower projects nearby.
- 23 -
- 24 -
- 25 -
THE PODS, PORT, AND PARK Museum Archive Addition
2019 Fall Architecture Studio - Decolonizing the Archive Instructor: Eduardo Rega Site: Penn Museum, Philadelphia, PA Building Area: 52,000 SF -a manifestoMuseum archives are not to be stowed away from the public. Archived artifcats many times do not see the interaction with the public, to which these treasures once belonged. These artifacts should engage with the community and embed themselvces within their existing contexts. The role of the ethnographic museum is to showcase and engage the public domain to educate and explore those cultures of the ancient and present world. The archives are no longer shelves of closed, concealed space, locked up in a building. The artifacts are housed within zeppelins that liberate themselves from the dock at the museum, now a port of call. The Zep-port houses The Dock, The Factory, and the Park. The Dock houses and exhibits the archival zeppelins, the Factory manufactures these zeppelins lead by research faculty at the museum, and the Park that integrates onto the roof of the Zep-Port where projections of exhibitions are now showcased. The museum is a media machine.
IN H C R A CS I M E Y T I C A UR C OR E S IT N A J M
D
A N
A
N
E T IN R O IT
27 A
M
N
R
O
E
IT
S
E
R
E
C
N
A
D
J
A
A
J
2
4
.
ID
E
A
F
E
23
22 9
.
21
25
L
G R R O E U C P E E P N T T IO R N Y
O
A
D
20
AY A
G
ST
IN
24
D
O
K
19
15
13
12
16
N
1 e 1 w p ie A c c e q s u 2 i 0 s 1 i 7 t - io 2 0 n 1 8
3 14
M
C
F
O
IT
H
18
C
R
G
V
N E T IN R O IT
10
7
T
E
D
U
T
N
S
A
J
S
A
E
R
N
$
A
M
E
V
R
U
8
IS
E
1
L
F
R
O
T
IS
$
A
E
IN
IS
LEGEND
E
H
C
R
R
IT
E
C
N
A
R
A
E
S
E
2
56 4
N
A
J
R
17
F
9
R
E
11
3
PENN MU
EL E
4
1
Y R A IN R D O R T O SI I T $ V N E D R U O T T S SI I V $
ADMINISTRATIVE S
1
4
.
EXECUTIVE MARKETING DEPARTMENTS
C
A
F
E
SOCIO-SPATIAL MAP G IN T E H C R A E S TY E R UL Y C IT A F UR C OR E S IT N A J
R
O
IT
PENN MUSEUM N
A
J
A
T
N
E
M
E
S
SOCIO-
G
1
F
2
U
N
26
.
B
L
O
5
6
.
T
K
R
A
M
O
IL
E
B
B
E
S
A
mostly cations
LEGEND
U
S
T
N
E
M
T
R
O
IT
N
A
J
RESEARCH STAFF VISITING RESEARCH
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF
EXECUTIVE6. TO I MARKETING LET DEPARTMENTS
SOCIO-SPATIAL MAP
from
PENN MUSEUM
.
VISITING SCHOLARS RESEARCHERS ADULT RESEARCHER COLLECTIONS COORDINATO VISITING SCHOLARS
E
X
H
IB
IT
IO
N
H
A
L
L
H
S
A
C
Y
IT
R
U
C
E
S
R
O
ir ty B ar P
IT
N
A
l
w
ra
C t
u
O
$
LEGEND n
ig
h
ts
Etruscan Italy d Mexico & Central
m
e
r
merican Voices ast Galleries Exhibitions phinx)
C
o
n
ce
rt
S
u
m
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF EXECUTIVE MARKETING DEPARTMENTS
AREA
R PLACE .
3
R
IE
J
Japan in the Crossfire & Israel
NGLE
2
SOCIO-SPATIAL MAP
MONEY FLOW LEGEND
1
8
$$$$ (3.5M+) $$$
(2M-3.5M)
.
(1M-2M)
$
(0-1M)
1
2
.
G
IF T VISITING SCHOLARS RESEARCHERS S H O P ADULT RESEARCHER COLLECTIONS COORDINATORS VISITING SCHOLARS
C
O
U
R
O
IT
N
A
J
1
5
.
STUDENT RESEARC ACADEMIC STAFF NEW ACQUISITION PENN STUDENTS PROFESSORS OTHER STUDENTS LECTURERS
C O R A O T O M
R
T
Y
A
PENN MUSEUM
$$
RESEARCH STAFF VISITING RESEARCHER
R
D
$$$$ FACILITIES $$$
ADMINISTRATIVE
$$
ACADEMIC & RESEARCH
$
OTHER
LEGEND ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF EXECUTIVE MARKETING DEPARTMENTS
DISPLAY ARTIFACVT VISITING RESEARCHER RESEARCH STAFF VISITING SCHOLARS RESEARCHERS ADULT RESEARCHER COLLECTIONS COORDINATORS VISITING SCHOLARS
NEW ACQUISITION ACADEMIC STAFF STUDENT RESEARCHER PENN STUDENTS PROFESSORS OTHER STUDENTS LECTURERS
DISPLAY ARTIFACVTS RESEARCH STAFF
RESEARCHERS COLLECTIONS COORDINATORS VISITING SCHOLARS
STUDENT RESEARCHER ACADEMIC STAFF PENN STUDENTS PROFESSORS OTHER STUDENTS LECTURERS
- 28 -
DORMANT ACTIVE FACILITIES STAFF LEISURE VISITORS FAMILY GROUP BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUMMER CAMP HOUSEKEEPING MEMBERSHIP VISITORS TRAVEL VISITORS
DORMANT ACTIVE FACILITIES STAFF LEISURE VISITORS FAMILY GROUP BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUMMER CAMP HOUSEKEEPING MEMBERSHIP VISITORS TRAVEL VISITORS
STORAGE - ACTIVE
STUDENT VISITORS PENN STUDENTS OTHER STUDENTS
FINDINGS
O
J
A O CA F D F E IC M E IC
SP HI
N X
-SPATIAL MAP
.
U
T
H
C
R
R
O
IT
N
A
E
S
H C R A R E E S R E R TU R C O E L IT N A J
R
A
E
$
S
E
$
N
R
S C um a m m p e r
A
J
H
C
$
R
O
IT
$
USEUM
7
R
E
R
U
T
C
E
C a off k e e e e p w e it r h
E
R L
2
R
U
T
C
E
L
R
E
R
O
IT
N
A
J
.
3
.
1
1
M
U
L
T
I-
.
C
L
U
.
A
D
C
L
A
S
2
S
8
R
O
O
T
IO
S
R
R
1
3
.
H
C
C O L M A P B U
R
T
)
M
)
2
R
R
$ NEW ACQUISITION $ $ (
M
$
1
R L
+
M
3
A
$
(
1
0
R
E
R
H
O
R
E
R
U
T
C
E
L
P
T
R
O
IT
.
O
U
T
C
E
)
$
(
R
R
O
IT
N
A
J
L
A
N
A
urs
es
J
1
.
ry
ra
urs
ib
L
Co
ct
6
.
C
L
S
R
ia
O
ed
lM
cia
So
26
S
O
Re Ex se pe arc dit h io Pu n b M lic ag ati az on in s e
$
F
A
Ou tle ts
D
ig
it a
l
O
R
2
2
b je
E
era
SOCIO-SPATIAL MAP
A
5
B
Co
S U N H I C M D AR S E IC S M E D Y T A C RI A U C OR E S IT N A J B
E
)
M
2
-
M
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
E
S
2
-
M
1
$
(
S
S
E
IN
A
E
S
E
H
C
E
M
3
-
VISITING SCHOLARS ADULT RESEARCHER
R
O
IT
N
A
J
VISITING RESEARCHER
A
E
S
E
R
M
STAFF
27
C
R
E
M
O
V
A
O
O
C O L N A S B E
R
O
R
.
M
H
T
S
E
R
O
IT
N
A
J
C O L M A P B U
A
S
E
R
R E O S F E F A IC R E CH
N
1 4
.
A
E
S
7
H
C
R
R R U R C E TO I N
A
J
A
6
Y
IT
S
R
E
R
C
E
1
IV
C
A
H
C
R
A
E
S
E
R
N
S
E
H
C
IO
T
A
V
R
E
S
N
AR T
IF AC TS
H
C
R
A
E
S
E
R
L
HE AV Y
CH I
N ES E
QI L
IN
S IC M E G D A IN G C N N E A R A IC E L EM Y D IT A C R A U C OR E S IT N A J
M
PENN MUSEUM G
IN
T
B O US F IN F IC E E SS
E
K
R
A
M
R
H
4
C
R
A
E
S
E
F
R
O
IT
N
A
J
25 2
2
DISPLAY ARTIFACVTS LEGEND .
A
R
T
IF
A
24
C
STUDENT RESEARCHER
$ e P n
u
r
t
n
ve e
to p u ro
a
u
id
iv
d
L
B
IT
N
r
u
to
VISITING SCHOLARS ADULT RESEARCHER
PENN MUSEUM
y il
a
d s
$
ctu
L
se
e
m
il
re
n
o
o
rn
e ft
F
$
ig
d
ra
C
$
m
e
3
F H
1
9
y
F In es stu te tiv r a d na l fo e n tio r ts n a l
P
a d rth y
u
b
$
li
c
s
cla
rie
$
C
R
$ $ $
.
A
E
S
o
e m n ti io ry dit to e S xp e
h
T
r e d n e o c w an m rld r o fo W er p
$
$
$
ss ro
p
u
r
o it
ro
G
vis
J
$
E
R
A
R
O
IT
N
H
A
U
J
D
IT
NEW A
VISITING RESEARCHER
EXECUTIVE MARKETING DEPARTMENTS
R
O
A
l
$
R
E
R
U
T
C
E
A
SOCIO-SPATIAL MAP
In
g
R
A
E
S
E
R
L
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF
H
C
PENN STUDENTS OTHER STUDENTS
n
ORS
T
DORMANT ACTIVE
C
R
O
A
E
S
R
E
IU
R
M
14
R
O
IT
N
A
$
J
.
LEISURE VISITORS STAFF ADMINISTRATIVE FAMILY GROUP
L
EXECUTIVE SUMMER CAMP MARKETING MEMBERSHIP VISITORS DEPARTMENTS TRAVEL VISITORS
IB
R
A
R
Y
-SPATIAL MAP
USEUM
FE STAFF
F
TORS
T E K R A AL NT E IT PM IG O S D EL N IO M
V
5
.
S L S A P T O N G E IN Y R LD I IT U R B U C OR E S IT N A J
T
I IB TY I H R U R C E TO I N A X
E
S H
J
C
R
A
E
S
E
R
N
IA
R
A
R
IB
L
S
Y
IT
2
0
R
U
C
E
R
O
IT
N
A
J
.
G
E
R O VISITING SCHOLARS RESEARCHERS IT N A J ADULT RESEARCHER COLLECTIONS COORDINATORS VISITING SCHOLARS
G
E
A
1
RESEARCH STAFF VISITING RESEARCHER
IN
D
DISPLA
R
J C AN L I O T S O E R T
U
L
A
V
W
O
O
T
Y
V
O
L
“
A
E
H
E
IL
G
A
R
N
IO
F IB H O X O Y YE D R U A T OR S MP
IT
DORMANT 11 ACTIVE
STUDENT RESEARCHER NEW ACQUISITION 7
”
E
E
5
.
A
R
C
PENN STUDENTS OTHER STUDENTS
H
IV
E
T
2
F
T
E OU TANS
9
IR
LO A EP R
3
.
G
10
3 2
GREEK ARTIFACTS FOR CLASSICS CLASS
M O AR F K F E IC T E IN
12
O
IL
2
STORAGE - ACTIVE
T
A G
LEGEND
13 S
R
.
F
8
127
F O AC F I F L IC IT E IE
56 4
S
7
DISPLAY ARTIFACVTS VISITING RESEARCHER STUDENT VISITORS RESEARCH STAFF PENN STUDENTS VISITING SCHOLARS RESEARCHERS OTHER STUDENTS ADULT RESEARCHER COLLECTIONS COORDINATORS VISITING SCHOLARS
NEW ACQUISITION ACADEMIC STAFF STUDENT RESEARCHER PENN STUDENTS PROFESSORS OTHER STUDENTS LECTURERS
STORAGE - DORMANT
DORMANT ACTIVE LEISURE VISITORS FAMILY GROUP SUMMER CAMP MEMBERSHIP VISITORS TRAVEL VISITORS
1
F
5
F
26
4
F
STUDENT RESEARCHER ACADEMIC STAFF PENN STUDENTS PROFESSORS OTHER STUDENTS LECTURERS
DORMANT ACTIVE FACILITIES STAFF LEISURE VISITORS FAMILY GROUP BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUMMER CAMP HOUSEKEEPING MEMBERSHIP VISITORS TRAVEL VISITORS
- 29 -
STORAGE - ACTIVE
B
T
N
E
M
E
S
A
DISPLAY ARTIFACVTS
8
STORA
GREEK ART
25 24
STUDENT VISITORS PENN STUDENTS OTHER STUDENTS
3
A
M
E
S
T
N
E
STORA
Section perspective
Gallery Floor Plan
- 30 -
Site Axonometric
- 31 -
To po 18 f Lan 3’din 6” gP
ad
To po 17 f Cra 2’ne 0”
F
2
F’
E
2’
D
C
B
1
A
1’
Ro
of
Ga
M
rde 60 n ’-6 ”
ez
Ex
za nin 46 e ’-6 ”
hib
’
25
itio
nH a 28 ll ’-0 ”
Th
ird
Flo o 25 r ’-0 ”
’
20
’
15
25
’
Se
co
nd
Flo o 12 r ’-6 ”
20
’
’
10 15
’ 10
’ 5’ 5’
5’ ’
10 ’
15 ’
20 ’
25
Choisy Isometric Scale: 1/8” = 1’-0”
Isometric ‘Choisy’ Visual Studies I | DeLuna | Alexander Jackson
- 32 -
Fir
st
Flo or 0’0”
Urban Deployment Each zeppelin not only docks at the museum, but also engages with the city to bring and return artifacts back to the public domain. The zeppelins engage within the public realm through occupying vacant lots in underrepresented areas of the city, areas where the museum has little reach. The zeppelins project onto the facades of the surrounding buildings; acting as an attractor for the public parks within the city. This brings the message of the museum to areas that cannot be accessed. Finally, the zeppelins engage with the skyscrapers, which now become billboards not to their private owners, but now to the decolonialized message.
- 33 -
INNATE EXPRESSIONS
Urban Replica & Hybrid Foods Market
2019 Spring Architecture Studio - Miscellany Instructor: Andrew Lucia Site: Manayunk, Philadelphia, PA Building Area: 67,000 SF selected for publication in Pressing Matters 8 The project, Innate Expressions, is an exploration of the difference between that which lies beneath in its inherent and underlying data, and its outward expression or manifestation. This data adn its expression mixes and produces novel hybrids and new fusions. With digital scanning technologies, able to capture any object in three dimensions, one can begin to blend this raw data and produce new alalgamations. The proposal is for a market of purely hybridized produce and mixed architectural replicas. With reference to traditional canopy structures, the market manifests as a distribution of tents, each cluster created with the same texture mapping and meshes but become characterized differently as each program becomes unique. Underlying beneath these tents, the replication factory, genetics laboratories, and produce warehouse become revealed as the mesh-like flooring system begins to expose this innate data. The plazas between become new blends of each of the floor plans of each market folly. A distribution of artifacts crafts the landscape, all for purchase at the market. Replication processes and the role of hybrids brings a contemporary discourse to the question of an urban market, what is innate and what is expressed.
PHOTOGRAMMETRY STUDIES a catalog of fruits and vegetables Choose from the following fruits and vegetables to create new forms of produce.
ARTICHOKE Texture Mapping
ARTICHOKE
ARTICHOKE
AVOCADO Texture Mapping
ARTI-CADO
ARTI-ROT
Scanned Geometry
Artichoke & Artichoke
AVOCADO
AVO-CHOKE Avocado & Artichoke
Avocado & Avocado
CARROT
CAR-TICHOKE
CAR-VOCADO
GARLIC
GAR-TICHOKE
GAR-VOCADO Garlic & Avocado
Garlic & Carrot
GINGER
GING-CHOKE
GING-CADO
GING-ROT
NECTARINE
NECT-ICHOKE
NECT-CADO
NECT-ARROT
Scanned Geometry
Scanned Geometry
Scanned Geometry
Scanned Geometry
Scanned Geometry
ONION
Carrot & Artichoke
Garlic & Artichoke
Ginger & Artichoke
Artichoke & Avocado
CARROT
Texture Mapping
AVOCADO
Carrot & Avocado
Ginger & Avocado
Nectarine & Artichoke
Nectarine & Avocado
Artichoke & Carrot
AVO-ROT
Avocado & Carrot
CARROT
Carrot & Carrot
GAR-ROT
Ginger & Carrot
Nectarine & Carrot
GINGER
NECTARINE
ARTI-NGER
ARTI-CTARINE Artichoke & Nectarine
Artichoke & Onion
Texture Mapping
ARTI-LIC
Artichoke & Garlic
Artichoke & Ginger
AVO-LIC
Texture Mapping
ONION
BELL PEPPER
SWEET POTATO
ARTI-NION
BELL ARTI-PER
SWEET ARTI-TATO
BELL AVO-PER
SWEET AVO-TATO
Texture Mapping
AVO-TARINE
AVO-NION
CAR-LIC
CAR-INGER
CARRO-TARINE
CAR-NION
GARLIC
GAR-INGER
GAR-TARINE
GAR-NION
BELL GAR-PER
SWEET GAR-TATO
GINGER
GIN-TARINE
GING-NION
BELL GING-PER
SWEET GING-TATO
NECTARINE
NECT-NION
BELL NECT-PER
SWEET NECT-ATO
ONION
BELL ONIO-PER
SWEET ONI-TATO
Carrot & Garlic
Carrot & Ginger
Garlic & Garlic
Garlic & Ginger
GING-LIC
Avocado & Nectarine
Carrot & Nectarine
Garlic & Nectarine
Ginger & Garlic
Ginger & Ginger
NECT-LIC
NECT-INGER Nectarine & Ginger
Nectarine & Nectarine
Nectarine & Garlic
Ginger & Nectarine
Avocado & Onion
Carrot & Onion
Garlic & Onion
Ginger & Onion
Nectarine & Onion
ONI-CADO Onion & Avocado
Onion & Carrot
Onion & Garlic
ONI-LIC
ONI-INGER
ONI-TARINE Onion & Nectarine
Onion & Onion
BELL PEPPER
BELL PEP-OKE
BELL PEP-VOCADO
BELL PEP-ROT
BELL PEP-LIC
BELL PEP-INGER
BELL PEP-TARINE
BELL PEP-NION
SWEET POT-ICHOKE
SWEET PO-VOCADO
SWEET PO-ROT
SWEET PO-LIC
SWEET POT-INGER
SWEET PO-TARINE
SWEET PO-NION
SWEET POTATO Scanned Geometry
Sweet Potato & Artichoke
Sweet Potato & Avocado
Bell Pepper & Carrot
Sweet Potato & Carrot
Artichoke & Sweet Potato
AV-INGER
ONI-OKE
Bell Pepper & Avocado
Artichoke & Bell Pepper
Texture Mapping
Avocado & Ginger
Onion & Artichoke
Bell Pepper & Artichoke
Texture Mapping
Avocado & Garlic
Scanned Geometry
Scanned Geometry
ONI-ROT
GARLIC
Texture Mapping
Onion & Ginger
Bell Pepper & Garlic
Bell Pepper & Ginger
Sweet Potato & Garlic
Sweet Potato & Ginger
Bell Pepper & Nectarine
Sweet Potato & Nectarine
Bell Pepper & Onion
Sweet Potato & Onion
Avocado & Bell Pepper
BELL CAR-PER Carrot & Bell Pepper
Garlic & Bell Pepper
Ginger & Bell Pepper
Nectarine & Bell Pepper
Onion & Bell Pepper
BELL PEPPER
Bell Pepper & Bell Pepper
SWEET BELL PO-PER Sweet Potato & Bell Pepper
Photogrammetry Studies One primary study in the development of the market was the analysis of how 3D scanning technologies determine and generate three dimensional data. These texture mappings are generated from ‘rationalization’ outputs based on certain inputs. The technique of blending textures and cross pollination of this data was inspired by the cross mutations of fruits commonly found in contemporary markets. This technique was applied initially to fruits and vegetables, but become farther reaching in terms of building components, developing a catalog of site conditions unique to Manayunk and the market itself.
- 36 -
Avocado & Sweet Potato
SWEET CAR-TAT0 Carrot & Sweet Potato
Garlic & Sweet Potato
Ginger & Sweet Potato
Nectarine & Sweet Potato
Onion & Sweet Potato
SWEET BELL PEP-TATO Bell Pepper & Sweet Potato
SWEET POTATO
Sweet Potato & Sweet Potato
METRY
nts
mponents
ARCH
BAY WINDOW Texture Mapping
Texture Mapping
Texture Mapping
Texture Mapping
ARCH
BAY WINDOW ARCH
COLUMN ARCH
PILASTER ARCH
STAIRS ARCH
BAY WINDOW
COLUMN BAY WINDOW
PILASTER BAY WINDOW
STAIRS BAY WINDOW
Texture Mapping
Arch & Arch
ARCHED BAY WINDOW Arch & Bay Window
Bay Window & Arch
Bay Window & Bay Window
COLUMN
Column & Arch
Column & Bay Window
HITECTURAL ARTIFACT REPLICAS
ctions:
t from the sampling list of ectural artifacts. Bring this og to the replication factory he recreation will be created.
have time to wait in our y?
model is available for sale in ard of each folly. See a sales iate for further details.
ks for your visit!
- 37 -
PILASTER
Pilaster & Arch
Pilaster & Bay Window
STAIRS
Stairs & Arch
Stairs & Bay Window
Ground Floor Plan
Longitudinal Site Section
- 38 -
- 39 -
Section through warehouse showroom
Section through market
- 40 -
Revealing Sections The section reveals the spaces housed below the market. These spaces are derived from the same geometric metadata, but have beeen realized in a different formal operation. The triangulation and thus more rigid geometries of below represent the mesh logic as computational pattern making. The sails and fabric of the market utilize these meshes as tether points in which physics-based simulations were used to find funicular forms.
- 41 -
The Yard: A Well Littered Lawn The drawing reveals the relationship between the viaduct, the railroad, and the market site. Vehicular, rail, and pedestrian traffic all intersect at this junction, becoming a nexus of all transit. An ideal location for an urban market, connectivity toward the city was crucial. Littered across the site, the field of replicas act as both landscape and as market. The market follies begin to perform more than just as building, becoming benches, and landscaping islands for locating artifacts and replicas. The viaduct gives views throughout the market and well as connecting to Greater Philadelphia.
- 42 -
- 43 -
DIPTYCH COPY Museum of Fake Realities
2020 Spring Architecture Integrated Options Studio - Museum Hybrid Instructor: Miroslava Brooks Site: The Met Breuer, New York, NY Building Area: 85,700 SF in collaboration with Kevin He The Polemic & The Project Through centuries, architecture has operated between the worlds of science and the humanities with increasingly greater emphasis on the former. Historically, museums were places of authority where knowledge was collected by a few disciplinary experts, clearly categorized, and presented to the public. Such authority was often conveyed through a building’s façade via symmetry, monumentality, and historical (Western) references. Today, cultural institutions are rethinking their institutional identities to expand their audience through cross-disciplinary thinking and risk-taking programming. The project looks at the transformation and addition to the canonical Marcel Breuer building – an icon of sculptural modernist monumentality. Currently the building’s fate is uncertain as the Metropolitan Museum of Art will vacate its premises after a fiveyear lease from the Whitney Museum of American Art, and the Frick Collection will temporarily move in. We will take on the challenge and speculate on its future. As Paul Goldberger, the former New York Times architecture critic, articulated: “The Breuer building is resistant to all attempts to bring it into an urban dialogue along the street, but that alone should not be a reason not to build a work of architecture that attempts, gently and powerfully, to coax it into speaking.” A site of some of the most compelling esthetic battles in recent architecture history, the Breuer building is an epitome of modernism. Reflective of modernity’s divide between nature and culture, the hermetic, anti-contextual, anti-historical, tabula-rasa approach is clearly conveyed in its bold and severe form, entirely cut off from everything around it. The project is Strangely, familiar; the Museum of Fake Realities: an exploration of the replica through the near miss. We wanted to explore how the idea of fake realities could be explored through architecture by replicating the original Breuer on the opposite side of the site. We were interested in how elements of the Breuer can start to spin an entirely new system, like how one small piece of truth can spin many new tales of fiction. With the aperture of Breuer being the most iconic image of the project, we sought to re-present these through a spatial near miss. The apertures become large spatial voids and organizes exhibition spaces. The iconic figure of the Breuer is now radically transformed on the interior. Situated in parallel to the original Breuer, the elevational experience presents the addition on equal footing with the museum to the point where one may question which is the original.
ALIEN
ANTARCTIC NINGEN
BIGFOOT
BLOND HAIR GHOST
BODMIN BEAST
CADBOROSAURAUS
CHUPACABRA
DOGMAN
FOO FIGHTERS LIGHTS
HODAG
IGOPOGO
LOCH NESS MONSTER
MER PEOPLE
MOTHMAN
RUSSIAN YETI
SHADOW PEOPLE
SKUNK APE
TATZELWORM
THUNDERBIRD
TRUNKO
Nature’s Resolution Collection The collections represent a diptych of representations of nature. One the left, the collection is a series of cryptids. Cryptids are folk lore creatures whose representations throw into question what is actually there. The collection on the right are drawings of 16th century animals from the new world. Here, drawings are highly detailed representations of actual creatures that exist. The collection is a showcase of resolutions. The cryptids, fake creatures, rely on low resolution to become real. The drawings, utilize high resolution to replica a real creature, but through the drawing process, become not real. This idea is exemplified through these two emlarged images. The Loch Ness monster’s size, scale, and material, shape, is thrown into question through the low resolute picture. While, the walrus is drawn to such detail, even toenails that look like humanfeet, but becomes a fake creature.
- 46 -
Generative Collage We wanted to explore how the idea of fake realities could be explored through architecture by replicating the original Breuer on the opposite sideof the site with new modifications: first with fictionalized anamorphic features, then with architectural elements. We were interested in how just one element of the Breuer can start to spin off into an entirely new system, similar to how one small piece of truth can spin many new tales of fiction.
Diptych Elevation Rendering Situated in parallel to the original Breuer, the front elevational experience presents the addition on equal footing with the museum to the point where one mayquestion which is the original. As explored later in the interiors, the new addition houses parallel exhibits to the original Breuer with the original exhibiting certain factual events/findings. Borrowing elements from the original Breuer, the addition spins a new architecture based upon the exaggeration and reorientation of the original Breuer’s architectural elements such as the apertures and stepping that continue into the groundscape.
- 47 -
- 48 -
- 49 -
- 50 -
1.1
2.1
3
4.7 4.9
5.1
0.9
- 51 -
1
2
3
4
5
6 a
aa
bb
cc
dd
ee
ff
Basement Level Floor Plan 1
2
3
4
5
6 a
aa
Street Level Floor Plan
- 52 -
e3
e2
e1
e
d
c9
c
b
aa
b.1
Madison Avenue Section
- 53 -
a
1
2
3
4
5
6 a
aa 1.1
2.5
3.9
5.1
b
c
d
e
Second Level Floor Plan 1
2
3
4
5
6 a
aa 1.1
2.9
3.9
5.1
b
c
d
e2
Third Level Floor Plan
- 54 -
Isometric ‘Chunk’ Model The chunk model showcases the relationship between the public plaza at the street level, the basement theaters and classrooms, and the exhibition spaces above. The addition is of steel construction with a hung stone façade, to match the existing stone on the Breuer building. The Skylight is the terminus of the structure as it opens the interior up toward the sky.
- 55 -
2
1
3
4
5
6 a
aa 1.1
3.1
4.1
5.1
b
c
d
e
e3
Fourth Level Floor Plan
Compared to Breuer, these apertures now exist in all directions with skylight apertures on top and now basement apertures as structure on the bottom. Originally a faรงade element, the aperture has now taken over the Breuer on the interior to become the organization, structural cores front and back, room layouts while still existing similarly on the exterior faรงade. Both formally and programmatically, the authority & factuality of the museum is questioned through the dyptical relationship.
- 56 -
Public Garden Plaza The new public plaza plays games of resolution, the legs transforming in scale and color as they reach the ground, while the benches that erode from this new earth reveal bright mosaic patterning, the smallest scale of resolution.
- 57 -
- 58 -
- 59 -
POETICS OF WASTE Precast Concrete Wall Assembly
2019 Fall Technology Seminar Matter, Making, & Testing: Designing Next Generation Precast Concrete Instructor: Richard Garber, AIA Mockup Wall Area: 32 SF in collaboration with Northeast Precast & Lauren Hunter, YongKyu Hong With concrete manufacturing being a major contributor toward global climatic change, we sought to design a process that would help capitolize both on ‘leftovers’ from precast concrete pours and establishing a new aesthetic. We want to prioritize waste into a new tectonic expression of the prefabrication processes used to manufacture concrete wall panels. The most interesting expression we found at the plant was the casts of the leftover concrete deposits (pictured on the left). This stratification of the material is rendered in an almost haphazard way; a beautiful expression of the materiality of concrete. The proposal taxonomizes on the waste to create a new expression in wall panel surface treatment. The walls are assembled from any leftover concrete that is simply poured into the formwork until it is filled. Blends and mixes of the concrete become the new ornament of the panel, self-expressive of the process. These new panels take advantage of recycling processes and showcase the character and act as a billboard to expose the re-used nature of the wall. Each panel becomes a unique assemblage of mixes and transforms the seemingly banal into the beautiful. This seminar focused on precast concrete and specifically it’s history, materiality – how it is manufactured and the logistics of its assembly - and cultural affects through its uses within the urban environment. Through a strategic partnership with Northeast Precast (NEP), based in Millville, NJ, project teams gained access to places where precast concrete is made, formed, and put into action. Over two weekends, students were exposed to the fabrication process from material selection, to formwork production, to pour, and disassembly. Utilizing NEP’s facilities and their workforce, a group of professional engineers and concrete experts, students worked in teams to produce panel prototypes for wall assemblies that respond to structural, thermal, and water-proofing performance; and received feedback from NEP’s expert staff on the construction feasibility and applicability of student-proposed prototypes. Developed a delivery workflow utilizing digital tools to communicate with and transmit panel, assembly and formwork concepts to NEP staff, fostering a collaboration opportunity for students that is not regularly experienced in architecture school. This workflow allowed students to virtually study panelization schemas and jointing ahead of actual prototype preparation.
team trash
NOTES: Concrete panel to be treated with Basf Silane Sealer, MasterProtect H1000 sealant after curing. 4'-0"
RV1
2"
EH1
1
PLAN - TOP
4'-0"
HARDWARE SCHEDULE:
REVEAL DETAIL
8"
CL
1'-0"
3
EH1
1'-0"
CL
PL1
PL1
CL
3'-6" Top of Reveal
PL1 - (4) 4”x4”x3/8” Steel Angle PL2 - (2) 6”x6”x1/2” Steel Angle EH1 - (2) Erection Head Anchor (QL403SPG) CI1 - (2) Coil Insert (CI16124P) PSA - (4) 4 1/2” Slotted insert short studs (4535 PSA) RV1 - GOLD Poly-Comp Reveal (RVL-050-150-050X10’) AC1 - (16) 4” x1/2” HCA Anchor
8"
2'-8"
1'-0"
1. 1/2” Chamfer at corner 2. 1/2“ bolt to concrete slab 3. Epoxy rebar at front face
2 1/2" 1 1/2"
2"
3
SECTION - CHAMFER
°
135
45°
3'-6"
PSA
Top of Reveal
1/2"
1'-0"
135°
1 3/4"
Low RPM vibrator - less than 14,000 VPM under load for vibrating concrete.
1/
3/4"
3
Lauren Hunter Alex Jackson Yongkyu Hong Matt Hicks
CONCRETE: Strength - 5000 psi Volume - 25 cubic ft (25 x 150 = 3750 lbs. per panel)
8'-0"
RV1
REBAR: ASTM Grade 60 rebar
(8) 3’-6” #4 rebar (horizontal) (8) 3’-6” #4 rebar w/ epoxy coat
4'-6"
4'-6"
(5) 7’-6” #4 rebar (vertically) (5) 7’-6” #4 rebar w/ epoxy coat AC1 PL1 CL
PL2
1'-0"
PL2
CI1 10/24/2019
ELEVATION - FRONT
2
ELEVATION - BACK
team trash
A101
ELEVATION - SIDE
3
3
Lauren Hunter Alex Jackson Yongkyu Hong Matt Hicks
2
1
1
Architectural Precast Panel
NOTES: 1. Foam 2. HDO Plywood 3. HDO Plywood Siderail
2
PIECES: F1 - Foam 1 P1 - Plywood 1
4'-6"
3'- 7 1/4"
F1
ELEVATION - SIDE
1
1 1/2"
1/2"
3’ - 6 1/2"
6 1/4"
6 1/4"
4'-5"
F2 - Foam 2 P2 - Plywood 2
F2
1"
1" 4'-6"
3'- 6 3/4"
ELEVATION - SIDE - F1
ELEVATION - SIDE - F2
F1
4’
PLAN - TOP - F1
1/2"
1/2"
3'- 6 3/4"
PLAN - TOP - F2
F1 2
F2 3'- 6 1/2"
2
4’
4’
4'-5"
1
4’
1
4'-6"
F2
10/24/2019
PLAN - TOP - F1
P1
PLAN - TOP - F2
- 62 -
P2
F101
Formwork
- 63 -
FORM
Geometric Development
12 | Prototype Wall Assemblies
Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 13
20 | Prototype Wall Assemblies
Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 21
MATTER, MAKING & TESTING Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete Team A Amanda Gruen, Catherine Shih, Karen Toomasian
Team D Lauren Hunter, Alexander Jackson, Yongkyu Hong
The panel design originates from a studio project which involved an exploration of apertures and surface texture. At the scale of the panel, we are interested in the interplay of deep, cavernous pockets or impressions, juxtaposed against thin, sinuous, and sharp edges or seams. The pocketed openings of varying sizes give depth and variation to the panel, allowing light to dance over the surface in rhythms.
Poetics of Waste We want to prioritize waste into a new tectonic expression of the prefabrication processes used to manufacture concrete wall panels. The most interesting expression we found at the plant was the casts of the leftover concrete deposits. This stratification of the material is rendered in an almost haphazard way; a beautiful expression of the materiality of concrete.
The pockets have both sharp corners as well as more smooth curvilinear edges, creating both dramatic and soft shadow effects on the surface as the sun changes position throughout the day. The space between each of the disparate impressions create interstitial seams that read as a network of flat, sinuous, sharp edges. Overall, the collection of pockets creates an overall reading of a curvilinear form. The tension between the cavernous area of the panel and the flattened surface is heightened by the thin reveal that runs between the two.
UPENN PRECAST PIECE MARK
DETAILS
SHEET NO.
3 OF 7
Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 23
Concrete panel to be treated with Basf Silane Sealer, MasterProtect H1000 sealant after curing. 4'-0"
EH1
1
RV1
135°
1 3/4"
2"
PLAN - TOP
2 1/2" 1 1/2"
ITEM MARK
GR
LENGTH
#4BB01
60
#4 X 9’-3”
#4BB02
60
#4 X 6’-11”
12”
2”
SECTION VIEW - LOWER MAT
24”
1'-0"
1 QTY. UOM
B/F F
3,200 LBS
S/F = 32 L/F =
DATE
BY
10/23/19
7”
1’-2”
1’-6”
1’-0”
2’-0”
10"
PENNDESIGN
5-1/2"
3”
#40308
#40308
#40308
#40308
#40308
11”
#40708
ELEVATION - SIDE - F1
ELEVATION - SIDE - F2
F1 1
4'-6"
1
1/2"
1/2"
F2
3'- 6 3/4"
PLAN - TOP - F1
PLAN - TOP - F2
F1 4'-5"
(8) 3’-6” #4 rebar (horizontal) (8) 3’-6” #4 rebar w/ epoxy coat
PL2
2
F2 2
3'- 6 1/2"
CI1 10/24/2019
ELEVATION - BACK
2
ELEVATION - SIDE
A101
Architectural Precast Panel
10/24/2019
PLAN - TOP - F1
PLAN - TOP - F2
P1
P2
DETAILS
SHEET NO.
JOB NO.
2 OF 7
TEAM A
PIECE MARK
DETAILS
SHEET NO.
team trash
4 OF 7
NOTES: 1. 1/2” Diameter hole. 2. 3/8” Steel 3. 1/2” Steel
Lauren Hunter Alex Jackson Yongkyu Hong Matt Hicks
10”
#40708
1’-2”
1’-3”
#4BB01
PSA 4535
PSA 4535 NUT TYPE SLOTTED INSERT
2
3
#4 REBAR X 3’-8” LONG
11
6”
2
#4 REBAR X 7’-8” LONG
#40308
1
#40202
#4 REBAR X 2’-2” LONG
1
1
#4BB01
#4 BENT REBAR X 9’-3 LONG
1
2T LIFTING PIN 4 3/4” LENGTH
#4BB02
#4 BENT REBAR X 6’-11” LONG
1
1 1
#4 BENT REBAR X 6’-11” LONG
#4BB02
1
3”
MARK
QTY. UOM
CONCRETE MIX MIX
B/F F
2
COIL INSERT 3/4” CI5634412P #4 REBAR X 6’-8” LONG
#40708
PIECES REQ'D:
CY
4
PL3/8X8X8 W/ (4) 1/2” DIA X 5” LONG HCAs
CI5634412P #40608
QTY. UOM
CONCRETE MIX MIX NEP-15
2T LIFTING PIN 4 3/4” LENGTH
EP08
2 1 1
MARK
FORM VIEW - UPPER MAT
LPA2T434G
4
PL3/8X8X8 W/ (4) 1/2” DIA X 5” LONG HCAs COIL INSERT 3/4” CI5634412P #4 REBAR X 6’-8” LONG
#40708
6”
PSA 4535 NUT TYPE SLOTTED INSERT 2T LIFTING PIN 6 3/4” LENGTH
3 11
#4 BENT REBAR X 9’-3 LONG
EP08 CI5634412P
3”
PSA 4535 LPA2T634G
2
#4 REBAR X 7’-8” LONG #4 REBAR X 3’-8” LONG #4 REBAR X 2’-2” LONG
#4BB01
#40608
#40708
2
2T LIFTING PIN 6 3/4” LENGTH
10”
LPA2T634G LPA2T434G
#40308 #40202
#40608
CY
ISOMETRIC
PIECES REQ'D:
ISOMETRIC
B/F
WEIGHT:
WEIGHT:
3,200 LBS
3 LENGTH
#4 X 9’-3”
60
#4 X 6’-11”
5,000 PSI
f'c (SHIPPING)
12”
L/F =
PSI PC. FOUND ON E-DRAWING:
PSI
SECTION
10”
7”
5,000 PSI
f'c (SHIPPING)
f'ci (RELEASE)
PSI
REV.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
BY
10/23/19
FOR REVIEW
0
SECTION VIEW - UPPER MAT
REV.
DESCRIPTION
DATE
SECTION
BY
10/23/19
FOR REVIEW
0
TEAM A
1
2 43 "
2 43 "
CL CHECKED:
TEAM A
ENGR:
PLOTTED:
DRAWN:
TEAM A
CHECKED:
ENGR:
1
TEAM A
40”
DRAWN:
2
S/F =
f'c (28 DAYS)
L/F =
PSI
f'ci (RELEASE)
2”
10” 26”
19”
S/F = 32
f'c (28 DAYS)
DESCRIPTION
24”
CL CL
4"
GR
60
#4BB02
6"
ITEM MARK
#4BB01
BEND DIAMETER : 2”
PLOTTED:
4" 6"
SCALE 1/8” = 1’-0”
PLAN + ELEVATION
PLAN + ELEVATION
PL2
PL1
16 | Prototype Wall Assemblies
Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 17
UPENN PRECAST
Northeast Precast is a supplier of precast concrete and prefabricated steel located in southern New Jersey. After first opening up production in 2004 with a handful of employees, John and Lorie Ruga and their team have grown the business to be a regional leader across several construction markets. With over 300 acres of production and storage space the Northeast team has heavy involvement in industrial warehousing, residential construction, highway and marine infrastructure as well as other niche markets.
JOB NO.
PIECE MARK
DETAILS
SHEET NO.
PSA 4535
PSA 4535
PSA 4535 NUT TYPE SLOTTED INSERT
LPA2T634G
2
2T LIFTING PIN 6 3/4” LENGTH
LPA2T434G
EP08
2
#40608
2
2T LIFTING PIN 6 3/4” LENGTH
2
2T LIFTING PIN 4 3/4” LENGTH
4 2
COIL INSERT 3/4” CI5634412P
1 1 3
#4 REBAR X 3’-8” LONG
11
#4 REBAR X 2’-2” LONG
1 1
#4 BENT REBAR X 6’-11” LONG
#4BB02
1
PSA 4535 NUT TYPE SLOTTED INSERT
#4 BENT REBAR X 9’-3 LONG
#4BB01
1
7 OF 7
#4 REBAR X 7’-8” LONG
#40308 #40202
1
SHEET NO.
#4 REBAR X 6’-8” LONG
#40708
3 11
#4 BENT REBAR X 6’-11” LONG
MARK
DETAILS
PL3/8X8X8 W/ (4) 1/2” DIA X 5” LONG HCAs
CI5634412P
1 1
#4 REBAR X 7’-8” LONG #4 REBAR X 3’-8” LONG #4 REBAR X 2’-2” LONG #4 BENT REBAR X 9’-3 LONG
#4BB02
LPA2T434G
4
PL3/8X8X8 W/ (4) 1/2” DIA X 5” LONG HCAs COIL INSERT 3/4” CI5634412P #4 REBAR X 6’-8” LONG
#40708
#4BB01
LPA2T634G
2
2T LIFTING PIN 4 3/4” LENGTH
EP08 CI5634412P #40608 #40308 #40202
PIECE MARK
TEAM A
5 OF 7
1
MARK
QTY. UOM
QTY. UOM
CONCRETE MIX
CONCRETE MIX MIX
CY
PIECES REQ'D:
MIX
B/F
CY
PIECES REQ'D:
B/F WEIGHT:
WEIGHT:
5,000 PSI
L/F =
PSI
DESCRIPTION
DATE
SANDBLASTED FINISH
BY
10/23/19
FOR REVIEW
PLYWOOD TEMPLATE PIECE 2
PLYWOOD TEMPLATE PIECES COMBINED
PLYWOOD TEMPLATE OVER THE CAST PANEL
TEAM A
S/F =
f'c (28 DAYS)
5,000 PSI
f'c (SHIPPING)
f'ci (RELEASE)
PC. FOUND ON E-DRAWING:
PSI
REV. 0
PLYWOOD TEMPLATE PIECE 1
S/F =
f'c (28 DAYS)
f'c (SHIPPING)
f'ci (RELEASE)
REV. 0
L/F =
PSI PC. FOUND ON E-DRAWING:
PSI
DESCRIPTION
DATE 10/23/19
FOR REVIEW
BY TEAM A
PLYWOOD TEMPLATE
DRAWN:
DRAWN:
TEAM A
ISO VIEW - REBAR
CHECKED:
ENGR:
TEAM A
PLOTTED:
CHECKED:
ENGR:
PLOTTED:
FINISH DIAGRAM
TOP VIEW - REBAR
PENNDESIGN PROJECT:
UPENN PRECAST
JOB NO.
PIECE MARK
DETAILS
TEAM A
While construction has advanced tremendously over the past 200 years John Ruga and his team realize that future advancements will come in new ways. As the construction environment adapts to current world challenges the mindset at Northeast Precast remains the same; combine the current trades in construction with the efficiencies and quality of manufacturing, led by industrious and engaged employees, and they’ll continue to move towards being the standard in this fast growing industry.
PSA 4535 LPA2T634G LPA2T434G EP08
SHEET NO.
6 OF 7
PSA 4535 NUT TYPE SLOTTED INSERT
2
2T LIFTING PIN 6 3/4” LENGTH
2
2T LIFTING PIN 4 3/4” LENGTH
4
PL3/8X8X8 W/ (4) 1/2” DIA X 5” LONG HCAs
CI5634412P #40608
1 1
#4 REBAR X 7’-8” LONG
3
#4 REBAR X 3’-8” LONG
11
#4 REBAR X 2’-2” LONG
1
#4 BENT REBAR X 9’-3 LONG
#4BB01
1
#4 BENT REBAR X 6’-11” LONG
#4BB02
1
MARK
QTY. UOM
CONCRETE MIX MIX
CY
NEP-15
PIECES REQ'D:
B/F F
WEIGHT:
3,200 LBS
S/F = 32
f'c (28 DAYS)
5,000 PSI
f'c (SHIPPING)
f'ci (RELEASE)
0
DRAWN:
L/F =
PSI PSI
DESCRIPTION
DATE 10/23/19
FOR REVIEW
TEAM A
ISO VIEW
Finished residual concrete panel
2
COIL INSERT 3/4” CI5634412P #4 REBAR X 6’-8” LONG
#40708 #40308 #40202
REV.
CHECKED:
ENGR:
BY TEAM A
PLOTTED:
TOP VIEW SCALE 1/8” = 1’-0”
Utilization of residual concrete pours from other prototypes
18 | Prototype Wall Assemblies
Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 19
Formwork test fit
Final completed wall panel
Rebar installation
- 64 -
Steel Fabrication
Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 25
PROJECT:
UPENN PRECAST
TEAM A
24 | Prototype Wall Assemblies
PENNDESIGN
PROJECT:
Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 11
10/24/2019
S101
PENNDESIGN
10 | Introduction
Formwork
UPENN PRECAST
PIECE MARK
JOB NO.
Throughout the years the team at Northeast Precast has remained focused on combining hard work and ingenuity with the best technology and equipment available. In order to always provide a product and service that’s at the leading edge, the company has continued to reinvest its resources back into its employees and equipment.
F101
PROJECT:
UPENN PRECAST
TEAM A
#40308
1" 3'- 6 3/4"
PENNDESIGN
PROJECT:
JOB NO.
#40308
F2 - Foam 2 P2 - Plywood 2
3’ - 6 1/2"
4'-6"
CONCRETE:
PLOTTED:
ELEVATION - FRONT
5-1/2”
3'-6"
PL1
PL2
1'-0" ENGR:
SCALE 1/8” = 1’-0”
SCALE 1/8” = 1’-0”
F1 - Foam 1 P1 - Plywood 1
1/2"
REBAR: ASTM Grade 60 rebar
AC1
TEAM A
CL CHECKED:
TEAM A
PIECES:
F2
1/2"
1"
(5) 7’-6” #4 rebar (vertically) (5) 7’-6” #4 rebar w/ epoxy coat
DESCRIPTION FOR REVIEW
0
DRAWN:
NOTES: 1. Foam 2. HDO Plywood 3. HDO Plywood Siderail
2
3'- 7 1/4"
1
1
Strength - 5000 psi Volume - 25 cubic ft (25 x 150 = 3750 lbs. per panel)
RV1
WEIGHT:
PSI
REV.
40”
BEND DIAMETER : 2”
PL1
PSA
PSI
10”
BY TEAM A
PLOTTED:
PL1
CL
PIECES REQ'D:
CY
5,000 PSI
f'c (SHIPPING)
f'ci (RELEASE)
10” 26”
ENGR:
#4 BENT REBAR X 6’-11” LONG
CONCRETE MIX MIX
f'c (28 DAYS)
DESCRIPTION
56”
DATE 10/23/19
CHECKED:
MARK
NEP-15
S/F = 32
DESCRIPTION FOR REVIEW
0
TEAM A
#4BB02
3,200 LBS
L/F =
PSI
REV.
DRAWN:
1
WEIGHT:
PSI
f'ci (RELEASE)
LPA2T634G
1
1
F1
4'-5"
4’
B/F F
f'c (SHIPPING)
PSA 4535
3 11
#4 BENT REBAR X 9’-3 LONG
FORM VIEW - LOWER MAT
PIECES REQ'D:
CY
5,000 PSI
LPA2T434G
1
#4 REBAR X 7’-8” LONG #4 REBAR X 2’-2” LONG
#4BB01
3
EH1
PL1 - (4) 4”x4”x3/8” Steel Angle PL2 - (2) 6”x6”x1/2” Steel Angle EH1 - (2) Erection Head Anchor (QL403SPG) CI1 - (2) Coil Insert (CI16124P) PSA - (4) 4 1/2” Slotted insert short studs (4535 PSA) RV1 - GOLD Poly-Comp Reveal (RVL-050-150-050X10’) AC1 - (16) 4” x1/2” HCA Anchor
4’
QTY. UOM
CONCRETE MIX MIX NEP-15
f'c (28 DAYS)
CI5634412P
#40708
1'-0"
Top of Reveal
1
MARK
PSA 4535 (TIF)
LPA2T434G
SECTION VIEW
1
#4 REBAR X 6’-8” LONG #4 REBAR X 3’-8” LONG
#40202
#40308
CL
8'-0"
#4 BENT REBAR X 6’-11” LONG
#4BB02
FORM VIEW
EP08
NOTES: 1. ALL REBAR IS TO BE 1 1/2” CLR. UNO 2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO CENTERLINE UNO SYMBOLS: SIF= SIDE IN FORM TIF= TOP IN FORM BIF= BOTTOM IN FORM
2
COIL INSERT 3/4” CI5634412P
#40608
#4BB02
8"
2'-8"
CL
4'-6"
1
9”
1
4
PL3/8X8X8 W/ (4) 1/2” DIA X 5” LONG HCAs
CI5634412P
#40202
3 11
2
2T LIFTING PIN 4 3/4” LENGTH
EP08
2 1 1
#4 REBAR X 7’-8” LONG #4 REBAR X 3’-8” LONG #4 REBAR X 2’-2” LONG #4 BENT REBAR X 9’-3 LONG
2
2T LIFTING PIN 6 3/4” LENGTH
LPA2T434G
4
PL3/8X8X8 W/ (4) 1/2” DIA X 5” LONG HCAs COIL INSERT 3/4” CI5634412P #4 REBAR X 6’-8” LONG
#40708
LPA2T634G
2
2T LIFTING PIN 4 3/4” LENGTH
EP08 CI5634412P
#4BB01
8" 1'-0"
PSA 4535 NUT TYPE SLOTTED INSERT
3'-6" Top of Reveal
2T LIFTING PIN 6 3/4” LENGTH
LPA2T434G
#40608
#40202
#40308
4'-0"
PSA 4535
3
1
2
4'-6"
ELEVATION - SIDE
HARDWARE SCHEDULE:
REVEAL DETAIL
4'-6"
2’-8”
1’-4” 2’-0”
1’-4”
11"
LPA2T634G (SIF)
EP08 (TIF)
2
8-1/2”
10"
LPA2T634G
8-7/8”
3’ 3-1/2”
PSA 4535 NUT TYPE SLOTTED INSERT
3
Lauren Hunter Alex Jackson Yongkyu Hong Matt Hicks
Low RPM vibrator - less than 14,000 VPM under load for vibrating concrete. 1. 1/2” Chamfer at corner 2. 1/2“ bolt to concrete slab 3. Epoxy rebar at front face
135°
45°
3
SECTION - CHAMFER
PSA 4535
team trash
NOTES:
3/4"
#40308
6 1/4"
PSA 4535 (TIF)
#40308
Lauren Hunter Alex Jackson Yongkyu Hong Matt Hicks
PROJECT:
TEAM A #40308
6 1/4"
PENNDESIGN
5-1/2"
JOB NO.
#40308
1’-0”
Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 9
4’-3”
1 OF 7
3”
8 | Introduction
1’-9”
SHEET NO.
DETAILS
EP08 (TIF)
56”
3. Developed a delivery workflow utilizing digital tools to communicate with and transmit panel, assembly and formwork concepts to NEP staff, fostering a collaboration opportunity for students that is not regularly experienced in architecture school. This workflow allowed students to virtually study panelization schemas and jointing ahead of actual prototype preparation.
PIECE MARK
1/2"
UPENN PRECAST
TEAM A
LPA2T634G (SIF)
1. Over two weekends, attended two six-hour sessions to learn about the precast concrete manufacturing process. Students were exposed to the fabrication process from material selection, to formwork production, to pour, and disassembly. 2. Utilized NEP’s facilities and their workforce, a group of professional engineers and concrete experts. Students worked in teams to produce panel prototypes for wall assemblies that respond to structural, thermal, and water-proofing performance; and received feedback from NEP’s expert staff on the construction feasibility and applicability of studentproposed prototypes.
1’ 6-1/2”
PROJECT:
1'-0"
LPA2T434G (TIF)
PENNDESIGN JOB NO.
3
CI5634412P
7”
CI5634412P (TIF)
LPA2T634G
3’-1/2"
1/2"
CI5634412P
LPA27434G
EPO8
LPA2T634G
PSA 4535 8-7/8”
10"
1’-4”
11”
LPA2T434G (TIF)
22 | Prototype Wall Assemblies team trash
20"
5”
This seminar focused on precast concrete and specifically it’s history, materiality – how it is manufactured and the logistics of its assembly - and cultural affects through both its traditional uses within the urban environment as well as new approaches to building typologies such as housing. Through a strategic partnership with Northeast Precast (NEP), based in Millville, NJ, students gained access to places where precast concrete is made, formed, and put into action. The class was organized as a seminar, with a group of 18 students. In addition to readings and case studies via traditional seminar delivery, students had access to Northeast Precast’s state-of-the-art facility where they:
2’-0”
The Premise
PSA 4535 EP08
20"
4’
Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 15
10" 10"
4’
14 | Prototype Wall Assemblies
7”
Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 7
19”
6 | Introduction
The proposal taxonomizes on the waste to create a new expression in wall panel surface treatment. The walls are assembled from any leftover concrete that is simply poured into the formwork until it is filled. Blends and mixes of the concrete become the new ornament of the panel, selfexpressive of the process. These new panels take advantage of recycling processes and showcase the character and act as a billboard to expose the re-used nature of the wall. Each panel becomes a unique assemblage of mixes and transforms the seemingly banal into the beautiful.
26 | Prototype Wall Assemblies
34 | Prototype Wall Assemblies
Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 27
Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 35
Team E Ian Lai, Quan Hao Huynh, David Forero
Team F Abdullah Alsahafi, Huadong Lin, Xiaoyi Peng
Topologically Optimized Concrete Structural Tee
We see the panel as a screen rather than a solid wall. The openings create visual continuity between the two sides. Ample light can pass through, while shadows are cast at different angles due to the openings’ slanted side walls. The design creates a structural challenge since there is no continuous line in the Y axis. Therefore, steel reinforcements must loop around the openings to transfer forces. As an aggregate, we imagine the panel to a horizontal long yet vertically short façade.
Precast concrete has benefits of much lighter weight construction than typical steel frame building types and can withstand much higher building loads per weight of structure. Precast panels traditional have been limited to modular and rectilinear units for ease of fabrication, while the standard single and double Ts have been used for long span efficiency parking garages. These T units are already optimized in their industrial form for quick production and low cost of fabrication, but have not been structurally optimized for even higher structural optimization from minimizing material use.
24.00"
24.00" 24.00"
In the current age where buildings, either from embodied energy or cost of transportation due to weight are the greatest contributor to greenhouse gases, calls for not only a cost effective standard modular unit for precast building systems, but also material efficient units. Our choice was to focus on the single T as a point of departure for structural optimization and fabrication assessment. Following would be our examination into the execution of the structural member.
6.00"
6.00" 6.00"2.00" 6.00"2.00" 2.00"
2.00"
12.00" 12.00"
12.00" 12.00"
24.00" 24.00"
24.00" 24.00"
3.00" 24.00" 24.00"
24.00" 24.00"
12.00"
12.00" 12.00"
12.00"
24.00"
24.00" 24.00"
24.00"
3.00" 24.00"
3.00" 3.00"
3.00" 3.00"
96.00"
3.00"
96.00" 96.00"
AXON AXON AXON AXON
3.00"
96.00" 96.00" 48.00"
48.00" 48.00"
96.00" 96.00"
48.00"
12.00"
24.00"
3.00"
Learning Through Making Students visited Northeast Precast’s state-of-the-art facility to manufacture their prototype walls. Groups learned how to mix concrete, assemble and create formwork, and cast the prototypes.
CNC CNC CNC CNC NEGATIVE NEGATIVE MOULD MOULD NEGATIVE NEGATIVE MOULD MOULD 3/16" 3/16" Layers Layers 3/16" 3/16" Layers Layers (whole) (whole) (whole) (whole)
PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL
24.00"
3.00"
24.00"
3.00"
12.00"
24.00"
Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 41
96.00"
PLAN PLAN PLAN PLAN
6.00" 6.00"2.00" 2.00" 6.00" 6.00"2.00" 2.00"
40 | Learning Through Making
3.00"
24.00"
48.00" 48.00"
AXON AXON AXON AXON
12.00"
12.00"
48.00" 48.00" 24.00"
24.00"
PLAN PLAN PLAN PLAN 24.00" 24.00"
24.00"
CNC CNC CNC CNC NEGATIVE MOULD NEGATIVE MOULD 3/16" Layers 3/16" Layers MOULD NEGATIVE MOULD 3/16" Layers 3/16" LayersNEGATIVE (whole) (whole) (whole) (whole)
PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL 6.00"
3.00" 3.00"
6.00"
12.00" 12.00"
96.00"
96.00" 96.00"
2.00"
96.00"
2.00"
24.00"
3.00"
24.00"
3.00"
12.00"
6.00"
6.00"
2.00"
24.00" 24.00"
2.00"
AXON AXON
48.00"
CNC CNC 3/16" Layers 3/16" Layers
PANEL PANEL
PLAN PLAN 48.00"
12.00" 24.00"
NEGATIVE MOULD NEGATIVE MOULD (whole) (whole)
24.00"
96.00" 96.00"
AXON AXON 28 | Prototype Wall Assemblies
0.98
1x
1x
1.18
0.18
0.98
1.03
1x
1.04
0.18
1x 1x
1.18
0.18
0.36
0.24
1.03
0.18
0.14
4x
0.90
0.98
0.36
8x 0.33
0.21
4x
8x
0.90 0.21
0.84 0.19
0.33
0.42
1.18
0.18
0.36
1.04
0.18
0.36
0.42
0.84 0.19
0.33
PANEL PANEL
PLAN PLAN
96.00"
36 | Prototype Wall Assemblies2.00"
2.00"
17.40
4x
0.90
3.00
0.33
0.21
0.38 0.19
0.48
0.42
0.33 0.48
6.00"
2.00"
2'-8 21"
AXON AXON
0'-1 21" 0'-3 21"
0'-3"
1x
1x
1.04 0.18
0.36
1.18 0.18
1x
1.03
PLAN PLAN
12.00"
AXON
PANEL PANEL 3.00"
0.36
1.16 0.98
1x
1.18 0.18
1x
1.04 0.18
0.36
1.18 0.18
1x
1.03
0.84 0.19
10'-3 21"
4x
0.90
0.38 0.19
0.38
0.48
0.42
0.84 0.19
0.33
0.42
0.33
0.42
0.14
8x
0.33 0.19
4x
0.90
0.33
0.21
0.38 0.19
0.48
0.42
0.33 0.48
96”
96.00"
17.66 17.66
1x
6.00"
1.18 0.18
1x
1.03
1.04 0.18
10.70
0.38 0.42
0.33 0.48
0.98
1.18
1x
1.03
1.04 0.18
16.71
0.36
0.24
1.16
3.00
0.33 0.38 0.19
0.42
0.33 0.48
48.00"
5'-2 21"
SLAB RCP
SLAB ELEVATION
PLAN
ROTATED AXONOMETRIC
1x1x 1x1x 17.60
3.00
PLAN
WEITZMAN SCHOOL OF DESIGN AT THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA IN COLLABORATION WITH NORTH EAST PRECAST PROJECT MANAGER: SHEA JONES
Taylor Wigglesworth | Team Members: Abdullah Alsahafi, Huadong Lin, Xiaoyi Peng
Team
14.40
7.60
Project Manager: Taylor Wigglesworth Project | TeamManager: Members:Taylor Abdullah Alsahafi, Huadong Lin, XiaoyiAbdullah Peng Alsahafi, Wigglesworth | Team Abdullah Members: Huadong XiaoyiPeng Peng Taylor Wigglesworth | Team Members: Alsahafi, Huadong Lin,Lin, Xiaoyi
3.19
19.77
3.19
19.77
1.18 0.18
1x
1x
1.04 0.18
1.18 0.18
0.36
1x
5.81
1.03
7.20
1.04 0.18
0.38 0.42
0.48
6.50
0.33 0.38 0.19
0.42
0.33 0.48
2.40
2.40 2.40
3.60
1.18 0.18
1x
1.03
1.04 0.18
0.36
0.24
1.16
0.84
4x
0.90
0.33
0.21
0.19
0.38 0.19
0.42
3.60
14.40 15.40 14.40 15.40
1x
1.03
0.36
7.17
PLAN SHOWING FIRST LAYER OF REBAR
3.19
0.42
4x
0.90
0.38 0.19
0.42
1.18 0.18
1x
0.18
3.19
3.19
7.20
1x 1x
7.20
17.60
0.36
7.20
1.16 0.98
1x
1.18 0.18
1x
1.03
1.04 0.18
1.16
4x
0.90
0.38 0.19
0.33
0.42
0.48
0.84 0.19
4x4x 4x4x 1x1x
0.42
0.14
8x
4x
0.90
0.33
0.21
0.38 0.19
0.42
0.33 0.48
3.00
6.50
0.33
0.21
20.17 5.60
8x 8x
4.06 6.12
5.79
6.50 3.00
6.50
7.17
7.17 8.20 7.17
8.20
7.17 8.20 20.17 5.60 5.60
17.40 4.06
1x 17.66
1x
17.66
4.06
6.12
4x4x
4.06
8.20
20.17 19.77
1x 2.00
5.60
16.71 3.00
18.40
10.70
17.60
1.00
3.19
10.70
19.60
7.17 20.10
8x 8x
6.12 6.12
14.40
6.50
14.40 15.40
15.40
8x
3.19
4.06
3.19
Project Manager: Taylor Wigglesworth Project | TeamManager: Members:Taylor Abdullah Alsahafi, Huadong Lin, XiaoyiAbdullah Peng Alsahafi, Wigglesworth | Team Abdullah Members: Huadong XiaoyiPeng Peng Taylor Wigglesworth | Team Members: Alsahafi, Huadong Lin,Lin, Xiaoyi
3.19
3.19
19.77 19.77
8x8x
5.60 5.60
5.79
5.60
2.40 3.60
8.20
10.70 7.60
20.10
8.20
8x 8.20
19.60
20.10 7.60
5.81 1.00
8x
5.79 19.60
14.40
20.10
5.79
15.40 2.40 3.60 3.19
20.10
19.60
20.10
14.40
15.40
5.81
Team
F
F
Team Team F
5.81 3.19 7.20
5.79
6.50
7.17
8.20
4x
5.60
3.19 6.50
7.17
8.20 7.20 5.60
4x
5.60
15.40 5.60
10.70
5.81
*GENERAL NOTE: ALL REBAR USED ISALL #3 REBAR USED IS #3 *GENERAL NOTE: 3.19
7.20
6.50
7.17
5.60
15.40
18.40
7.60
1.00
5.79 7.20
4x 4x
2.40
10.70
3.60
7.60
19.60
8x
18.40 17.40 10.70 2.00
17.40
1.00
5.81
19.77
2.40
3.60
1.00
4.06
2.00
17.40
4x
6.50 7.20
5.60
7.17
5.81 5.79
19.77 6.12
4.06
2.40
3.60 17.66
3.60
19.60
17.66
10.70
10.70
2.40
17.66 17.60
14.40
15.40
18.40 4.06
1x
16.71 3.00
17.60
14.40
8x 8x4x 4x 6.12
17.40
16.71
8x8x
15.40
3.19
7.60
1.00
5.79
5.79
18.40
4x
10.70
7.20
2.00
17.40
19.77
5.60 5.60
7.60
17.66
20.10
5.81
17.40
3.60
14.40
14.40
3.19 3.19
17.60
20.10
1.00
3.60 2.40
10.70
19.60
19.60
5.81
18.40 2.40
10.70
8x 8x
20.17
3.00
17.40
19.77
2.00
17.40
10.70
20.17
3.00
16.71
17.40
5.60
5.60
3.00
1x1x
2.00
17.40
5.60
16.71
6.12
6.50
5.60
4x 4x
8.20
3.00
5.60 5.60
18.40
7.60
17.66
6.50
7.17 8.20 8.20
20.17 5.60 5.60
3.00
17.60
7.20
0.36
0.24
0.42
0.84 0.19
3.00
0.33 0.48
0.24
0.14
3.00 6.50 6.50
7.17 7.17 8.20
16.71
3.19
0.33
0.21
1.04
3.00
5.60
3.19
1.16
0.84 0.19
1x
F
Team Team F 6.12
19.77
3.19 3.19
1.04 0.18
0.24
0.14
8x
8x
5.79 5.79
7.20
15.40 5.60
3.19 1.18 0.18
4x 4x 4x 4x 1x 1x 15.40
14.40
0.33 0.48
0.98
1x
2.40
3.60
14.40
0.42
0.14
3.60
8x8x 8x8x
0.98
1x
8x
0.98
1.03
7.20 7.20
10.70
10.70
F
Team
1.00 7.60
17.40
4x
0.90 0.21
18.40
10.70
10.70
17.60
0.42
0.84 0.19
0.33
17.40
2.00
17.40
17.66
0.36
0.14
8x 0.33
0.19
1x 1x
1.16
0.42
4x
0.90 0.21
20.10
5.81
3.00 17.60
0.24
1.16
0.84
2.00
17.40
16.71
19.60 20.10
5.81 5.81
0.98
1.03
0.24
0.14
0.19
20.17
3.00
20.10
*GENERAL NOTE: ALL REBAR USED #3 REBAR USED IS #3 *GENERAL NOTE:ISALL
3.19
4x 4x
20.17
1.00 19.60 20.10
5.79 0.98
1x
8x
17.40
5.79
3.00
16.71
1.00 1.00
19.60
19.60
3.19 3.19
19.77 19.77
8x8x 8x8x
3.19 3.19
20.10
5.81
5.79 5.79 3.00
7.60
15.40 1.00
3.19
4.06
5.81 5.81
5.79
7.60 7.60
14.40 15.40 15.40
6.12
4.06
F
5.81
1x 1x
3.60
14.40 14.40 15.40
19.60 20.10 20.10
10.70
2.40
3.60 3.60
17.66
6.12 6.12
4.06
2.40 2.40
3.60
17.66
8x 8x 8x 8x
17.66
17.60
6.12
4.06
ARCH 732-005: MATTER, MAKING, AND TESTING: DESIGNING WITH NEXT GENERATION PRECAST CONCRETE F19 PROFESSOR: RICHARD GARBER STUDENTS: DAVID FORERO, IAN LAI, QUAN HAO HUYNH (TEAM E)
2.40
17.66
17.60
17.60
PLAN
10.70 16.71
3.00
3.00
Hanger
SPECULATIVE SECTION
10.70
16.71 16.71
0.42
4x
0.90 0.21
1.00
19.60 19.60 20.10
18.40
10.70
10.70
0.33 0.19
0.18
0.84 0.19
7.60
1.00 1.00
19.60
18.40
18.40 10.70
Mini V
Anchor
4x
0.90 0.21
0.14
10.70
7.60 7.60
1.00
18.40 17.40
10.70
19.77
8x 8x 8x 8x
2.00
17.40
17.40
19.77 19.77
0.36
0.42
0.84 0.19
1x
8x
0'-10 21"
7.60
17.40
2.00 2.00
17.40
19.77
1.16
0.14
8x
AXON AXON
0'-5 21"
17.40
6.12
4.06
20.17
0.24
2.00"
0'-10 21"
10.70 10.70
17.66
17.40
4.06 4.06
20.17 20.17
18.40
16.71
6.12 6.12
4x4x 4x4x 2.00
4.06 20.17
18.40 18.40
10.70
3.00
17.66 17.60
6.12
3.00
1x1x 1x1x
24.00"
0.98
STEM PLAN & ELEVATION
Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 43
2.00
17.40 18.40
10.70 10.70
10.70
16.71 16.71
3.00 3.00
17.60 17.60
3.00
3.00 Rebar
1'-7 21"
2.00 2.00
17.40 17.40
17.40
20.17
10.70
16.71
3.00
0.33
0.21
0.42
4x
0.90
0.21
20.17 20.17
17.40
0.36
1.16 0.42
0.14
8x 0.33 0.48
0.84
0.19
20.17
3.00
1.04 0.18
0.24 1.16
0.38 0.42
0.14
8x
17.60
0.98
1.03
0.24
0.42
0.33 0.19
2.00
PLAN SHOWING SECOND LAYER OF REBAR
PANEL
48.00"
24”
0'-3 21"
1.04 0.18
0.24 1.16
1x
4x
0.90 0.21
42 | Learning Through Making
17.40
3.00
4x 4x 4x 4x CNC 3/16" Layers NEGATIVE MOULD (whole) CNC NEGATIVE MOULD 3/16" MOULD 3/16"Layers Layers NEGATIVE PANEL PLAN 3/16" Layers NEGATIVE MOULD (whole) (whole) (whole) 1x 1x 1x 1x
12”
0.98
1.03
0.24
0.84 0.19
24.00"
CNC PLAN CNC
3”
24”
AXON 24.00"
0.98
1x
1.18
0.18
0.14
8x
10'-3 21"
0'-4 21"
48.00" 48.00"
3.00 3.00
1x 1x 1x 1x
48.00"
0'-3"
17.40 17.40
0.42
0.14
8x 0.38
0.33 0.48
1.03
1.16
0.42
0.33
0.38 0.19 0.42
1x
0.24
1.16
4x
0.90 0.33
0.21
0.19
0.48
6.00" 0.98
1x
1.04
0.18
0.42
0.14
0.84 0.19
0.38 0.19
1.03
0.24
1.16
0.42
0.84 0.19
1x
1.04
1.18 0.18
0.24
1.16
0.14
CNC CNC NEGATIVE MOULD MOULD 3/16" 3/16" Layers LayersNEGATIVE (whole) (whole) Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 37
96.00"
48.00"
6.00"
Designing with Next Generation Concrete | 29 6.00" Precast 2.00" 8x
48.00"
6.50 5.60 7.17
8.20
5.60
3.19 3.19
5.60
3.19 3.19
7.20 7.20
4x4x 30 | Prototype Wall Assemblies
Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 31
Formwork
38 | Prototype Wall Assemblies
6.50 6.50 7.17
8.20 7.17
8.20
5.60 5.60
Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 39
5.60 5.60
Rebar detail with spacers
Finishing the voids
Assembling the voids
First precast assembly
Comparison of void elements to cup of coffee
Final pour of concrete mixture
32 | Prototype Wall Assemblies
Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 33
Final precast assembly
Final precast assembly
- 65 -
48 | Learning Through Making
Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 49
50 | Learning Through Making
Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 51