Naqs [AN ANSWER TO AN ARGUMENT AGAINST IMKAN AL KIZB]

A number of People have asked that Kidh:b [Falsehood/Falsity] Upon 'ALL-H is Muh:a:l Bidh: Dh:a:t.

To there reponce it must be noted that: Either a Naqs: is Ghairullah or Not. If Not then it is Naqs: Upon 'ALL-H [Naqs: "Alall-H] Naqs: "Alall-h is Muh:a:l Bidh: Dh:a:t.

If it is Ghairullah then either it is Naqs: Upon Ghairullah Or It is Qa:'im Bi Nafsihi: [Per Se Subsistent].

In the first case it is Mumkin Bidh:Dh:a:t Since Naq: Upon Ghairullah is Mumkin Bidh: Dh:a:t.

In the Second case it is a Creation of Deity 'ALL-H such that Naqs: Of the Creation is Identical to the Essence of the Creation.

Now the Kidh:b in Cala:m 'Al Lafz:i: is NAQS: "Ala: Ghairillah, since Cala:m 'Al Lafz:i: is Ghairullah and H:a:dith: .

So this is the Self Possibility ['Al 'imka:n 'Adh: dh:a:ti:] is Upon Ghairullah and not Upon 'ALL-H. According to Real Ahlussunnah Naqs: Upon Divne Essential 'Attributes are Also Self Absurd [Muh:a:l Bidh: Dh:a:t].

What if it is claimed that 'Al Cala:m 'Al Lafz:i: Is Eternal.

In thios case a type second type of Cala:m 'Al Lafz:i: that is Ghairullah and is H:a:dith: is Self Possible and not Self Absurd.

So in this case at most the denouncers of the Self Possibility Of Kidh:b can not claim that this type of Cala:m 'Al Lafz:i: is Muh:a:l Bidh: Dh:a:t.

But there is no proof that if Cala:m 'Al Lafz:i: is Eternal [Qadi:m] then an other type of Cala:m 'Al Lafz:i: is Mumkin Bidh Dh:a:t. At most they can claim that such a Kala:m 'Al Lafz:i: is Muh:a:l Bil Ghair.

But this is Sufficient to shew that such a Cala:m 'Al Lafzi: if it doeth not Exist is Self Possible even if a Type of Cla:m 'Al Lafz:i: is Eternal.

If two Divine Cla:ms are Eternal one Eternal Nafsi: and One Eternal Lafz:i: then one is Non Eternal Lafz:i: is atleast Self Possible even if it doeth not exist.

Any how Naqs: like Kidh:b Upon Deity is Muh:a:l Bidh: Dh:a:t then not upon Non Eternal Cala:m 'Al Lafz:i: whether it existeth or not.