The proof of the claim that necessary existance is the real existence

1 THE PROOF OF THE CLAIM THAT NECESSARY EXISTANCE IS THE REAL EXISTENCE:= Maulana Qasim Nanatavi was one of the Greatest theologians of the World. Unfortunately He did not write the number of Books which a person of such Eminent should have written. But what so ever he has written can be explained in several ways. The following Proof that Necessary Existence is Real Existence may be proved from different fragments of his different works when they are arranged in a systemic way.

A number of Atheists argue that Necessary Existence is not a Real Existence. They say that Necessary Existence is one thing and Real Existence is an other thing. It is incorrect to consider that Necessary Existence is Real Existence.

So it is tried to Prove that Necessary Existence is Real Existence.

TERMS:= 1] Possible 2] Impossible 3] Contingent 4] Existence 5] Incontingent.

6] Real 7]Not

AXIOMS:= 1] If an Existence Existeth then it is Real Existence.

2] If an Existence Existeth Not then it is Not Real Existence.

3] If an Existence is not Real Existence it Existeth Not. 4] If an Existence is Real Existence then It Existeth.

5] If an Existence is Real it is Not Necessary Necessary Existence.

6] If an Existence Existeth and is Possible not to Exist then it is a Contingent Existence.

1

2 7] If an Existence Existeth not and is Possible to Exist then it is a Contingent Existence. [ If an Existence Existeth and is Possible Not to Exist or an Existence Existeth Not and is Possible to Existence then it is Contingent Existence] 8] If an Existence is Impossible to Exist then it is an Impossible Existence.

9] If an Existence is Not Impossible Existence then it is Possible Existence.

10] A Possible Existence is Either Necessary Existence or Contingent Existence.

11] An Impossible Existence [Absurd Existence] is Neither Necessary Existence nor Contingent Existence.

12] An Incontingent Existence is either Necessary Existence or Impossible Existence.

13] A Not Necessary Existence is Either Contingent Existence or Impossible Existence.

[Not all of them are used in the Proof] Claim 1: Necessary Existence is Real Existence.

Proof:= Either Necessary Existence is Real Existence or Necessary Existence is Not Real Existence.

The Middle /Medium is Excluded and its Inclusion is Impossible.

Let it be Supposed that Necessary Existence is not Real Existence.

If a Existence is Not Real Existence then it Existeth Not. If an Existence Existeth Not then it is not Real Existence.

If it is not Real Existence then either it is Possible to Exist or it is Impossible to Exist.

If it is Impossible to Exist then it is Impossible Existence.

Since: If An Existence is Impossible to Exist then it is Impossible to be Real Existence..

If An Existence is impossible to Exist then it is Impossible Existence.

Let it be Supposed that It is Impossible Existence If it is impossible Existence then It Neither Existeth nor is Real Existence.

Since one that is Impossible to Existeth Existeth Not. If it Existeth Not it is not a Real Existence.

2

3 If Necessary Existence Existeth Not then it is an Impossible Existence.

If it is an Impossible Existence then is is not a Necessary Existence.

This implieth Necessary Existence is Not Necessary Existence.

This is a Contradicton This Implieth Necessay Existence if Not Real Existence and and Impossible Existence then this Implieth a Contradiction.

Let it be Supposed that It is possible Existence.

If it is Possible Existence then it Either Existeth or Existeth Not. As the case It Existeth is Excluded , It Existeth Not. If Existeth Not and is Possible to Exist then it Neither Existheth Nor Real Existence.

Since one that is PossibleTo Exist and Existeth Not is Not Real Existence.

If Necessary Existence Existeth Not and is Possible to Exist then it is a Possible Existence.

If a Possible Existence then not a Necessary Existence.

This Implieth Necessary Existence is not Necessaray Existence.

This is a Contradiction.

This implies that if Necessary Existence is not a Real Existence then it implieth a Contradiction. [ As there are only two Mutually Exclusive and Mutually Exhaustive Cases in the case Necessary Existence is not a Real Existence and each one of the two implieth a contradiction.]

In Strict Sentences If Necessary Existence is Not Real Existence then it Per Se Implieth a Contradiction.

If Necessary Existence is not a Real Existence then it is not Necessary EXISTENCE. (This Implieth it is false that Necessary Existence is Not a Real Existence.)

This implieth Necessary Existence is Real Existence.

If Necessary Existence is Real Existence then Either It is Possible Not to Exist or it is Not Possible to Exist.

3

4

This Implieth Necessary Existence is not Necessaray ..

If it is Possible to Not Exist then it is a Contingent Existence.

If it is a Real Existence and it is Possible not to Exist then it is a Contingent Existence.

If Necessary Existence is a Contingent Existence Then then it Implieth a Contradiction.

Since a Contingent Existent is Not a Necessary Existence.

This implieth Necessary Existence is Not Necessary Existence.

This implieth that if Necessary Existence is a Real Existence and not a Contingent Existence then it is a Real Existence and It is Impossible to Not Exist.

If Necessary Existence is Real Existence and it is Impossible for It Not to Exist then Necessary Existence is Real Existence.

Note: If there is a Necessary Existence then this implieth a Necessary Existent.

Since if Necessary Existent Exists then it is an Existent..

If it is Per Se Subsistent then it is a Necessary Per Se Subsistent Essence and Necessary Existent.

Since an Essence is a Per Se Subsistent Individual.

If it is not a Per Se Subsistent then there is a Per Se Subsistent Essence to Which it is Necessarily Associated. This Essence is Necessary Existent.

4