Preparation of Development Plan for BAUDA ( Bharuch Ankleshwar) 2041

“Towards a catalytic development of the twin cities (Bharuch-Ankleshwar) as one under BAUDA “

PORTFOLIO

Development Plan Studio | Semester 2

Amrutha Balan PG190115 Master of Urban planning Faculty of Planning CEPT University

ABOUT THE STUDIO The 2nd semester studio focused on preparing a development plan 2041 of area under BAUDA (Bharuch-Ankaleshwar Urban development Authority) understanding and analysing the characteristics of the twin cities of Bharuch and Ankleshwar. The studio spanning over 3 months was divided into 3 exercises to understand the basics of DP and 4 iterations to analyse and propose the DP 2041

ABOUT THE SITE Existing scenario of the study area was analysed to formulate a the vision plan for 2041. boundary delineation was justified as per the requirement for 2041 and thus the concepts for the development plan was worked on under road network and zoning.

The study on BAUDA started by incorporating the take aways from the 3 exercises under micro level planning within 1 sq km,Ahmedabad , road network analysis of Bangalore city and finally the study on a similar industrial city of Detroit,Michigan. Various site visits and discussions with the Municipal,BAUDA,Industrial, GPCB authorities ad various developers and residents of the areas were conducted to understand the functioning and existing scenario of the twin cities of Bharuch and Ankleshwar under BAUDA.The development plan was worked on the basis of this understanding .

A premliminary study had to be conducted to the understand the process better.For this 3 exercises were conducted : 1.For understanding the micro level planning.

2.To understand the road network of a developed city within the country .

3.To understand the overall planning process and its implementation mechanism from a selected city in India or abroad.

Led the topic with major contribution to data and graphics

Shared work of 4

Shared work of 2

Individual Output

2

2.

3.

4.

1.

STRUCTURE

1. Understanding the micro level planning

1.Identifying issue within the 1 sq km area of precinct (Shahpur Dariyapur) 2.The proposals for the same Pages 4-5 Development Plan BAUDA

2. Understanding the existing road network of a city through a case study of Bangalore city and key learnings

3. Understanding the macro level planning

4 . Proposal Development Plan for BAUDA 2041

Case Study : Detroit, Strategic Framework Plan 2012-50

Bharuch Akaleshwar, Gujarat

Pages 6-7

Pages 8-9

Pages 11- 25

3

Shahpur Dariyapur Ahmedabad Gujarat Understanding the Micro level planning Exercise 1 Sq km Area of the precinct Shahpur-Dariyapur and development proposals Sabarmati Riverfront Development Development of new structures or recreational centres on the vacant land.

This will prevent the formation of slums.

Existing EWS housing The area underneath the metro could be developed into garden and off-street parking

Vacant lands to be developed to residential area.(Govt.Ownership-State)Slums to be relocated to EWS Housing

ed pos

tro Me

Pro

Sab

arm

ati

Riv

erf

ron t

Sab

arm

ati

Riv

er

nd

Ga

ge

rid

B hi

Lala Kaka Garden

Market place (Lala Kaka Market) re-arranged to minimise the Congestion during peak hours

Existing area with higher FSI

Proposed areas for an increase in FSI

4

Proposal 2 Redeveloping the vacant land as residential area.

EWS housing with recreational facilities (Govt ownership)

Pedestrian pathways provided and provision for off street parking and garden underneath the metro transit

Proposals

Proposal 3 Proposed Footpaths And Sustainable streetscape development

The MRT corridor is under construction .As the transit system develops the connectivity increases and this will change the economic and physical aspects of the precinct.

Biometric system on chota hati

To accomodate this there should be vertical development as the vacant land availability is less.

Heavy fines to be charged for dumping waste on open spaces

Proposal 1 Rearrangement of Market area Redirecting the roads for better transportation and less congestion.

Legends Proposed road Accessibility Development Plan BAUDA

Highlights 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

Mixed use corridor development TOD Zone Higher FSI near the riverfront area and the transit corridors Major economic centres- Retails and the Lala kaka Market, Scrap industries Walkable precinct Majority of the population is employed within the precinct area and around Served by autorickshaws,twowheelrs,AMTs and MRTS High traffic congestion due to narrow roads.

Narrow lanes within the core city.Vehicular accesibility is limited Second largest generator of waste in Ahmedabad High population density (Pop:65000)

5

Bangalore , Karnataka

Road Network Analysis

Road Network Analysis City Area : 709 Sq km

Population :

The network layout of Bangalore city

84.4 L akhs

Medium population density of :

11904 per sq km The distance between the rings increase as one move away from the city centre .

Inner rings: 3.32 Km

Outermost rings: 9.67 Km

6

Average Distance between Rings and Radials

The distance betweent the radials vary. There are 16 radials

RING

AVG KM

RADIAL

AVG KM

1-2

3.32

A-B

5.21

2-3

3.09

B-C

5.68

1-3

4.07

C-D

0.79

2-4

3.64

D-E

6.07

3-4

3.95

E-F

2.95

4-5

7.43

4-6

9.67

F-G

2.49

G-H

5.07

H-I

6.00

I-J

5.40

J-K

0.51

K-L

2.10

L-M

3.82

M-N

1.70

N-O

3.84

O-P

3.92

P-A

2.86

Distance between the rings increases as we move away from the city centre

The average block size increases towards outer rings as the ring distances increase

Average arterial block size BLOCK SIZE

AVG SQ KM

Inner Ring

8.54

Outer Ring

43.79

Block sizes increase towards the outer areas making it less walkable

Highlights 1. As we move from inner to outer city area the block sizes increase which reduce the walkability of the city .

2. The Rings are not continuous as it stops at some radials .This will obstruct

Bangalore city road network Development Plan BAUDA

the flow of traffic in outer city areas and as it terminates at the radials which connects the city core to outer areas , it will increase the traffic congestion at these junctions serving high speed traffic making the city highly traffic congested 3. Only 20% of road network has 4 lanes or more.

4. Majority of roads lack service lanes

7

Spatial Evolution

Detroit Case study

Strategic Framework Plan 2012-50 Industries as the major economy Large number of blight structures Area

Vacant Land

360 Sq Kms

52 Sq Km

Population

Population density

672794

1869 person/ Sq Km

Vision Aspirational where it should be and practical where it must be Respectful of city’s history,community efforts and new ideas Just and equitable in seeking to create benefits for all Transparent and Inclusive of all voices participating to improve our community

4 IMPLEMENTATION HORIZONS 2012-2017 STABILIZE 2017-2021 IMPROVE 2021-2030 SUSTAIN 2031-2050 TRANSFORM

Layers

City of Multiple employment district A city connecting people to opportunity

Strategic development plan 2050

A green city where landscapes contribute to health A city of distinct attractive neighborhoods 50 year land use vision

The industrial and economic crisis led to a huge decline in population leaving a large number of vacant structures.

8

Developed Non-Developable

Developable Detached Small Mixed Use houses Aaprtments The kind of predominant building structuresshows the character of the city Policies and regulations :Master plan of policies and city zoning ordinance Temporary

Food trucks

Trailers

Small retails

+

Highlights Active Public Participation

1. The city has a declining industrial

2.

3.

4.

-Public participation in urban planning is seen efficient.

-Quality of life of every detroiter will be improved -Dense walkable mixed use neighborhood -Vacant land and blight structures are being removed re-purposed .

-Clustering of commercial and sicial actvities in the neighborhood to help reinforce symbiotic uses and improved walkability Local Area Plan for Dwarka

5.

6.

7.

and commercial economy due to the decline of motor production sector and increased crime due to many vacant structures and blight structures which could be removed or refurbished to reuse.

The work has already started from 2012.

Repurposing of vacant land Bringing up the blue green infrastructure Developing the green neighborhoods Increasing green landscape and agriculture and effectively trying to reduce the industrial pollution Public participaion in the growth of the city highly encouraged and monitored Mixed use transit corridor development

9

Bharuch Ankaleshwar Gujarat

Regional Context

Developemt Plan for the Twin city GNFC Bharuch

HSRC

DMIC

GIDC Bharuch

DFC Economic , spatial a nd demograph ic growth under the influence of D Vilayat GID ahej Port and C.

Bharuch

Sardar Bridge

Bharuch

HSRC Station

Golden Bridge

Narmada River

1. Major Connectivity Inter City 2. Connectivity to Ports 3. Connectivity to Dedicated Spatial growth towards Jhagadia

Ankaleshwar

GIDC Ankaleshwar

Freight

GIDC Jhagadia

4. Corridors (DFCs) 5. Close proximity to economically developed cities-Ahmedabad and Mumbai.

6. A part of Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMIC)

6,42,769 Population( 2011)

13,96,933 Projected

Population(2032)

2,315,96 GIDC Panoli

Working

Population ( 2011)

BAUDA Area 635 sq.km

Existing Scenario

BAUDA in comparison with other major urban development areas of Gujarat..

TWIN CITIES 12.48 SQ.KM-Bharuch Municipality 50 -Villages 5 -Census Towns 18 SQ.KM -Ankleshwar Municipality 30 -Villages 5 -Census Towns

BAUDA 635 Sq Kms

DMIC

DFC

Vilayat GIDC

PCPIR HSRC Station

BAUDA Kharchi and Jhagadia GIDCs

Economic, spatial and demographic growth under the influence of Dahej Port and Vilayat GIDC. DMIC, DFC and HSRC are three linear corridor based developments running across BAUDA which greatly influence the rate of development and engagement with the habitat through land acquisition, resettlement and impact on local businesses.

AUDA 1866 Sq Kms

Issues

•

• Water logging in

•

• Poor quality of

•

• • • •

HSRC

SUDA 722 Sq Kms

Strengths •

Twin cities under BAUDA but functions as two different cities though the motive was to bring both the city under one administration.

Dahej Port

RUDA 686 Sq Kms

Location and regional connectivity Industries and employment Water supply and irrigation due to Narmada.

Dahej port is fueling port-led development.

Strategic location, Bharuch has high potential for economical development.

plains

• •

• •

land, GW and low natural fertility.

Nuisance points Inefficient public transport and intracity connectivity Industrial pollution Environmental degradation and depletion of natural resources

Opportunities

•

Development of ports and SEZs Backward and forward linkages emerging from rapid industrial and port development, provide huge scope for small and medium enterprises across activities.

HSRC Station Area development

Chemical Capital of India Ankleshwar : 1900 Industrial units Red : 1400 units (Highly Hazardous) Orange :350 units (Medium Hazardous) Green:150 units (Less Hazardous) Bharuch : 550 Industrial Units Red: 215 Units (Highly Hazardous) Orange :120 Units (Medium Hazardous) Green:165 Units (Less Hazardous)

GPCB

High pollution due to red and orange industries.

12

Boundary Delineation

81

Spatial Developemnt

22

Villages Retained

Villages Included

14,19,730 721.96 sq.km.

9

Villages Excluded

Decadal Growth Rate (%)

Total population

Main Male Non - Agricultural Workforce

Development Plan BAUDA

New planning Area

New Delineated Boundary

Impact Domain

Common Potential Impacts of DMIC, DFC, HSRC

Planning Response

Fauna, Flora and Biodiversity

Loss of habitat and wildlife; Land acquisition of private land and involuntary resettlement.

Buffer Zones along Water Bodies and Eco Sensitive Areas to conserve and promote their growth; Zones with restricted development to mitigate habitat loss effects.

Involuntary Resettlement

Land acquisition of private land and involuntary resettlement.

The rehabilitation programmes are issued by each of the authorities responsible for acquisition; However, Affordable Housing Policies enforced in DP to meet rising housing demands in the city.

Local Economy

- Affecting sources of income due to land acquisition and involuntary resettlement.

- Increasing local business opportunities due to construction activities

Promoting healthier employment conditions in industries while enabling a local Economic Shift with provisioning small and informal businesses models.

Disturbed accessibility to local social infrastructure such as Social religious places, water Infrastructure pipelines for domestic water supply and irrigation system.

While this cannot be resolved through a DP, an ad-hoc system will be in place to address the loss of access to basic services due to development activities

Development Guiding agents

Population density

New projected Population

13

Vision Statement and Planning Principles “To develop a well connected region focusing on economic stability, affordability of resources and environmental conservation thereby enabling inclusive urbanization” .

Initial Concept development (Individual)

Floating population of marginal workers and other staffs of industries could be provided with housing in this area as PCPIR provides housing facilities only to the higher end staffs.

Quality of Life Enhancing the quality of life of Residents and Migrants through:

Incentive areas could be demarkated for housing facilites for industrial workers and other affordable housing at subsidized rates.

Conservation

Of Human Habitat and Natural Environment from:

Economy

Consolidation of Local Economy Concept development (Group of 4)

14

Proposal for a robust network system (2041) DMIC

SH 228

Strengthening the Twin city Connectivity

DFC HSRC NH 48

SH 164

Identifying the missing links

SH 6

NH 48 NH 64

Connectivity to villages

SH 166 NH 90

Radially connecting the city centres to strengthen regional connectiviy

21% 31% 13%

35% Primary Road 60 m Wide (NH, Outer Ring Road) Primary Roads 30 m Wide(SH, Inner Ring road) Secondary Roads 24 m Wide (Radial Roads) Tertiary Roads 18 m Wide Local Roads 12 m Wide

Identifying the development potentials and current growth trends

64 Km 33 Km 112 Km 42 Km 68 Km

Proposed characteristics for the heirachy of roads

•

Various connectivity layers considered

Development Plan BAUDA

Dividing into smaller blocks with improved connectivity within the development area

• • •

12 m wide and 18 m wide-pedestrian pathways on either sides with general traffic carriageway.

24 m wide - separate lanes for NMT (pedestrian ,cycle track) .

30m wide - serve the traffic with separte lanes for NMT (pedestrian,cycle track) and mini bus lanes.

60 m wide - separate mini bus lane ,corridor serving freight traffic and separate service lane

15

Reference Images

Proposed flyovers

Phase wise distribution 39.4%

DFC

DMIC

DMIC SH 228

DFC

SH 228

HSRC

NH 48

HSRC

NH 48

Reference Images

60.5%

Reference Images NH 164

NH 164 SH 6

SH 6 NH 48

NH 48

NH 64

NH 64

The area beneath the flyovers could be developed as a publ recreational space with parks, cycle tracks and pathways.

SH 166

SH 166

NH 90

NH 90

Phase I: 2031 (10 years horizon period) Phase II: 2041 (20 years horizon period)

Service Corridor

Bus lane

Carriage way

The area beneath the flyovers could b recreational space with parks, cycle t

Proposed DMIC Flyovers

The area beneath the flyovers could be developed as a public recreational space with parks, The cyclearea tracksbeneath and pathways.

Flyovers proposed

60 m Wide Road section Carriage way

the flyovers could be developed as a public -Eco sensitive -DMIC,DFC,HSRC recreational space areas -PCPIR development parks, cycle tracks -Air,with water -Jhagadia industrialpollution and pathways. development Freight Pedestrian -Low lying Corridor -Cargo Airport land

Bus lane

Zoning Approach

Liberal Use Based

Eco sensitve zones

Recreational

Market Demand

Logistics Agriculture

• PCPIR development • Jhagadia industrial development

• Cargo Airport

Zoning Zoning Rationale Rationale

CC MU1 MU2 CMU IZ MU3 AZ Mixes of Uses Polluting Industries

Small scale industries

Predominant Zones to be considered

Mixed use along corridor

Few non permissible uses are identified under each zones

Environment

• Eco sensitive areas • Air, water pollution • Low ly`ing land Connectivity • DMIC,DFC,HSRC • The road network proposed

To control the hazhazard development and to FSI Based invite more developers to certain zones Control

16

Proposed Zoning (2041)

DMIC

2% 1%

GE)

ure (RAZ)

6%

12%

SH 228

4%

5%

DFC NH 48 HSRC

22%

4% NH 164

7% 2% 3% 1%

2%

SH 6

27%

NH 48

LEGEND DMIC HSRC DFC Railway NH SH Road Network Road extension outside BAUDA BAUDA New Boundary Waterbodies Gamtal (G) Gamtal Extention (GE) Restricted Agriculture (RAZ) City Core (CC) Industrial (I)

NH 64 Industrial Buffer (IB) MU1 MU2 Incentivized Zone (IZ) Logistics (L) MU3

SH 166 NH 90

CMU Agricultural Zone (AZ) Green Buffer (GB) Existing Recreational Proposed Recreational Safe havens

Industrial Buffer (IB) MU1 MU2 Incentivized Zone (IZ)

side BAUDA

dary

Total Developed Area 381.17 Km. sq.

Logistics (L) MU3 CMU Agricultural Zone (AZ) Green Buffer (GB) Existing Recreational Proposed Recreational Safe havens

Development Plan BAUDA

17

MU1

DMIC

MU2

DFC

DFC

DMIC SH 228

NH 48

SH 228 NH 48

HSRC

HSRC

NH 164

NH 164

SH 6

SH 6

NH 48

NH 48

NH 64

NH 64

SH 166

SH 166

NH 90

NH 90

‘The concept to allow a mixed use zone with a liberal approach providing a robust framework considering the market demand and to ensure optimum utilisation of the available land under this demarcated zone.’

The concept is to allow a mix of different uses within the marked zone in a liberal approach within the FSI limit proposed.

Zone Code

FSI Permissible

FSI Purchasable

FSI Max

Zone Code

FSI Permissible

FSI Purchasable

FSI Max

MU1

2.5

1.0

3.5

MU2

1.8

0.8

2.6

18

MU3

DMIC

CMU

DFC

SH 228

DMIC

DFC

SH 228

NH 48

NH 48

HSRC

HSRC

NH 164

NH 164

SH 6

SH 6

NH 48

NH 48

NH 64

NH 64

SH 166

SH 166

NH 90

NH 90

The concept is to allow a mix of different uses within the marked zone in a liberal approach within the FSI limit proposed.

Ideology to develop an existing trend of mixed use observed along the corridors .Highest FSI of 3.7 is set along this area. The Zone offset is 200 m on either sides of the corridor.

Zone Code

FSI Permissible

FSI Purchasable

FSI Max

Zone Code

FSI Permissible

FSI Purchasable

FSI Max

MU3

1.2

Nil

1.2

CMU

2.2

1.5

3.7

Development Plan BAUDA

19

Green Buffer DFC

DMIC SH 228

NH 48 HSRC

NH 164

SH 6 NH 48

NH 64

Cycle tracks along the waterbodies with 10 m wide green buffer

SH 166 NH 90

Industrial Buffer FSI :0.6

Heavy industries FSI 1.2

Zone Code

FSI Permissible

FSI Purchasable

FSI Max

Ind Buffer

0.6

Nil

0.6

Green buffer along the corridors

20

Special proposals-Transportation proposals Policies

Policy Proposal Prime carriers in the region Low Density Carriers

Consolidating their pick-up stations in a regulated network

Policy Proposal

To introduce mini buses as IPT and integrate the auto-rickshaws into the system with consolidation of their pick-up stations in a regulated network

To Provide first mile/ last mile connections between job centers and major transit routes.

Industries could partially fund the purchase of IPT carriers for primary routes.

Safety concerns of people using para transit to be addressed. The bicycle tracks and pedestrian pathways to be constructed on the major roads

Fares should be sufficient to secure the living for the rickshaw drivers

The road network with separate transit lanes for MT and NMT

Development Plan BAUDA

The green network along the transit corridors

The proposed transit corridor of 30 m road width

21

Transportation proposals

DMIC SH 228

Current scenario Bharuch: No PT Ridership

IPT to be introduced as main mode

Existing Transport mode within city: Private auto rickshaws, cars and bikes, Cycle carts, bicycle Bus requirement per 1000 population: 2031 -5 buses 2041 -2 buses Share auto requirement : 2031 -8 2041 -3 TARGETTED RIDERSHIP TARGETTED RIDERSHIP (Industry oriented) (Industry oriented)

NH 48

HSRC

Bus requirement per 1000 population: 2031 -5 buses 2041 -2 buses Share auto requirement : 2031 -8 2041 -3

Case studies -Indore (Pop : 19 lakhs) -Kuala Lumpur-1975 (minibuses)Pop:15 lakhs -Gauteng Province, South Africa-Kombi Buses

NH 164

SH 6

NH 48 NH 64

SH 166 NH 90

Bicycle Dock

GENERAL RIDERSHIP GENERAL RIDERSHIP

• 9 Routes identified.

• 198 Km long Bus route • 91 Km long Auto route

DFC

Existing Bus stops Proposed Minibus stops Proposed Share auto station

Bus Station under construction Mini Bus route + Bicycle tracks Shared auto Development in Phase 2

Non-motorised IPT

Motorised IPT

SPV should be setup franchising operations to private partners

Regulatory

ITS Device on vehicles Panic button and GPS

Technological interventions

NMT -Phase I development if successful could be taken to Phase II Separate Cycle tracks of 2.2 m to be provided along the corridors – Primary 30 m wide ,secondary 24 m wide roads

22

BAUDA

Compactibility with PCPIR Enhanced connectivity to PCPIR

1

Overall connectivity to DMIC,DFC,HSRC

2

Villayat 1

Connectivity of gamtals to arterial roads

3

Connectivity of overlay incentive zones to industries

4

Residential development towards PCPIR for the projected population 2041

5

PCPIR

1

4 Overlay Incentive Zone

3

2

5

Dahej Overlay Kharchi Incentive Zone 4

Jhagadia

Developments towards PCPIR Mixed Use 3 zone proposed towards PCPIR encouraging the development envisaging the future migrant population and residential outgrowth from the identified housing areas within Dahej –Villayat regions.

The Commercial mixed use is proposed along the transit corridors towards PCPIR as anticipated and taking into account the mixed use proposed along the corridors within PCPIR area.

DCRs FSI and Ground Coverage

Base FSI Purchasable FSI Base FSI utilization according to the plot coverage Road

Development Plan BAUDA

Zone

FSI

1.2 1.2 1.2 2.5 MU1 2.5 2.5 1.8 1.8 MU2 1.8 1.8 1.2 1.2 MU3 1.2 1.2 1.2 2.2 CMU 2.2 2.2 Logistics 1.0 2.0 2.0 IZ 2.0 (Overlay) 2.0 2.0 Industrial 1.2 Industrial buffer 0.6 1.5 Gamtal 1.5 1.5 City core

FSI Max

GC

1.2 1.2 1.2 3.5 3.5 3.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 3.7 3.7 3.7 1.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 1.2

50% 60% 70% 30% 40% 50% 30% 40% 50% 60% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 30% 40% 50% 50% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 50%

60% 0.6 1.5 50% 1.5 60% 1.5 70%

B.U.A No.of FSI floors permissible 1200 2 1200 2 1200 2 2500 8 2500 6 2500 5 1800 6 1800 4 1800 3 1800 3 1200 4 1200 3 1200 2 1200 2 1200 2 2200 7 2200 5 2200 4 1000 2 2000 6 2000 5 2000 4 2000 3 2000 3 1200 2

Area per floor 500 600 700 300 400 500 300 400 500 600 300 400 500 600 700 300 400 500 500 300 400 500 600 700 500

600

1

600

1500 1500 1500

3 3 2

500 600 700

B.U.A No.of Max floors FSI 2 1200 2 1200 2 1200 12 3500 9 3500 7 3500 9 2600 7 2600 5 2600 4 2600 4 1200 3 1200 2 1200 2 1200 2 1200 12 3700 9 3700 7 3700 2 1000 12 3700 9 3700 7 3700 6 3700 5 3700 2 1200 600 1500 1500 1500

1 3 3 2

23

Plot Size

Plot width abutting road

<=150

150-300

300-500

300-750

12 m

18 m

1000

1000

1000

194

=

Proposed TP Schemes

107 Bharuch

+

87 W Ankleshwar

>18 m

12-18 m

<12 m <6 m

6-12 m

24 m

30 m

60 m

Road Width

Relation of Setbacks with Plot Size and Abutting Width No. Of Floors ROW 12 m 12-18 m 24 m 30 m >30 m

MU1 1 2 All All All

MU2 1 2 All All All

MU3 1 2 All All All

CMU 2 3 All All All

Overlay 2 2 All All All

Plot Area Max. Permissible Commercial MU 3 Zone

12m

12-18m

24m

30m

>30m

Phase I Phase II

MU 1 and MU2

Proposed TP Scheme Boundaries 12m

12-18m

24m

30m

>30m

CMU Zone

Revenue Generated by Budget Grants 12m

Roads < 12m wide

12-18m

24m

30m

12m- 18m roads Roads 12-18 m 2424m m roads30 m30m roads <12 wide wide wide wide

>30m

> 30 m roads

60 m wide

Permissible Mercantile Uses according to the Road Width

Revenue Generation

Grants received (Centre/State): 68% Cost Recovered by Sale of Plots Revenue Generated by Municipal Govt. on annual and periodical basis.

Sale of Purchasable FSI

24

Summary 381.17 sq.km.

18,70,598 Population (2041)

Total Land Area Zoned 281.02 sq.km.

78.8 sq.km.

169.18 sq.km.

Area Zoned Area Zoned 59.40 sq.km.

109.40 sq.km.

Area Required Area Required Net Residential Land Industrial Land

MU2 Zone The outgrowth of MU1 .No further industries in this zone

MU1 Zone Developing the existing city areas vertically

194

MU3 Zone

Proposed TP Schemes

Horizontal and vertical developments to a restricted height.

More neighborhoods,detached houses,townships apartments encouraged Industrial Green buffers with developement of MSMEs.Green buffer along water bodies and transit corridors.Protection from natural and chemical disasters Safe Havens, Escape routes

Mixed use commercial corridor development FSI 3.7

FSI 3.5

FSI 0.3

FSI 1.2 FSI 0.6

FSI 3.7

FSI 1.2

Infrastructure-Water supply,Sewage treatment and Solid waste management -Proposals condsidering the future demand

FSI 0.15

Incentive zone for Industrial and Affordable Housing

FSI 2.6

FSI 1.5

FSI 1.0

FSI 1.5

IPT Introduced as public mode of transport with segragated traffic corridors

Local Area Plan for Dwarka

25

THANK YOU