RACHEL MAGEE

K R A P E C A L P

AN INVESTIGATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING

WITH NORTHSIDERS ENGAGED IN SUSTAINABLE TRANSFORMATION

The matrixparking constraints that drove this design ADA and Aging-inOff-street Off-street parking and ADA andfriendly ADA friendly houses houses are uncommon arewere uncommon in Northside. in Northside.

Place.

Focusing on constraints created ranch-style design, However, However, both of both these of these these constraints constraints fit within fit within the ademographics the demographics of thewhere of the everything wasifwell, accessible on theutilized. first with the neighborhood neighborhood well, properly if properly utilized.

Thefloor, exibility Thewhich exibility ofworked a double-wide of awell double-wide length of siteadvantageous 02. The for Shed Roof, crafted a and system of uniform cornerlong corner lot proved lot proved advantageous exploration for exploration of thefrom of ADA the ADA Garage and Garage trusses at varying was utilized to numerous create a variety ofschemes unique constraints. constraints.

Utilizing Utilizing the heights, matrix the matrix ideology, ideology, numerous massing massing schemes andevaluating exterior spaces.

This helped to relationship differentiate private were interior developed, were developed, evaluating the architectural the architectural relationship of a Garage ofthe a Garage areas of theagainst house from the open, communal areas. The and house and house against the amount the amount of more ADA of accessible ADA accessible programming. programming.

TheSuper The pushed theon Masonry to theand exterior designInsulation design from Round fromconstraint Round 01capitalizes 01capitalizes on the Garage the Garage as Fireplace a building as a building block block and which to usable frame a half-enclosed, covered patio.

Thisrequirements patio is an the Flat theRoof Flathelped as Roof usable as exterior exterior space.space.

Additionally, Additionally, ADA requirements ADA extension ofwith the cost kitchen, connecting space with the backyard. were considered were considered witheffectiveness cost effectiveness of interior two-stories. of two-stories.

CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION TYPE TYPE STREET ATTITUDE LOT

LOT

1627-1629

CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION TYPE TYPE CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION TYPE TYPE STREET ATTITUDE STREET ATTITUDE

SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS TYPE CONSTRUCTION LOT LOT LOT LOT COOPER

1631 COOPER COOPER 1627-1629

NEUTRAL

COOPER 16531631 COOPER 1627-1629

1657 1657 COOPER 1642 POWERS 1653COOPER COOPER MOST COMPATIBLE 1631 C COOPER

LOT

1627-1629 1627-1629

1627-1629

1631 COOPER1631 COOPER1653 COOPER1653 COOPER 1657 COOPER1657 C COOPER

1631 COOPER 1631 COOPER

1657 COOPER 1657 COOPER

1653 COOPER 1653 COOPER

PUBLIC

COOPER COOPER

1642 POWERS 1642 POWERS

1631 COOPER

COOPER

ATTITUDESYSTEMS SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS STREETSTREET ATTITUDE SUSTAINABLE ACCESSIBILITY ACCESSIBILITY STREET ATTITUDE

AGE-IN-PLACE

1657

LOT

1627-1629

SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS CONSTRUCTION TYPE ACCESSIBILITY COOPER STREET ATTITUDE

STREET ATTITUDE STREET ATTITUDE

1653 COOPER 1653 COOPER

LEAST COMPATIBLE 1627-1629

CONSTRUCTION TYPE ATTITUDE STREETSTREET ATTITUDE

SITE 01

CONSTRUCTION TYPE

1631 COOPER 1631 COOPER

COOPERCOOPER

1653 COOP

SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS COMPONENTS

SUSTAINABLE SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS SYSTEMS SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS ACCESSIBILITY ACCESSIBILITY

SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS COMPONENTS COMPONENTS ACCESSIBILITY ROOFLINE

FLAT

ACCESSIBILITY ACCESSIBILITY COMPONENTS

STICK

ACCESSIBILITY ACCESSIBILITY

COMPONENTS ACCESSIBILITY

COMPONENTS

ROOFLINE ROOFLINE

LOT

1627-1629

1627-1629

COMPONENTS COMPONENTS

COMPONENTS COMPONENTS

OCCUPANCY TYPE

LOT

COMPONENTS

CONSTRUCTION TYPE CONSTRUCTION TYPE ROOFLINE ROOFLINE

OCCUPANCY OCCUPANCY TYPE TYPE

SOLAR

COOPER

ROOFLINE

1631 COOPER COOPER

COOPER 16531631 COOPER

165 16

ROOFLINE ROOFLINE

ROOFLINE ROOFLINE STREET ATTITUDE STREET ATTITUDE OCCUPANCY TYPE

OCCUPANCY TYPE ROOFLINE LOT

LOT OCCUPANCY TYPE

GARAGE

1627-1629

CONSTRUCTION TYPE

1627-1629

CONSTRUCTION TYPE OCCUPANCY OCCUPANCY TYPE TYPE

ADA

SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS SUSTAINABLE OCCUPANCY TYPE OCCUPANCY TYPE SYSTEMS 1631 COOPER COOPER COOPER OCCUPANCY TYPE

STREET ATTITUDE ACCESSIBILITY

CO 16531631 COOPE

STREET ATTITUDE

ACCESSIBILITY

OUND 02

OUND 01

LEAST COMPATIBLE NEUTRAL SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS COMPONENTS

ACCESSIBILITY

COMPONENTS

MOST COMPATIBLE

ACCESSIBILITY

R ACHEL MAGEE

01

INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS ROOFLINE

ROOFLINE

GARAGE ACCESSIBLE BEDROOMS

+

+

+

living + kitchen bedrooms bathrooms garage

ROUND 1 MATRIX // MASSING

ACCESSIBILITY // LEVEL 1

pat io pat io

gar

den

io pat

ROUND 2 MATRIX // PROGRAM R ACHEL MAGEE 02 INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS

LEVEL 2 PLAN

LEVEL 1 PLAN

APPLE ST. ELEVATION

ER

P COO

ST.

COOPER ST. ELEVATION R ACHEL MAGEE 03 INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS

The scheme shifted in Round 02, employing the Shed Roof to avoid common water issues associated with a Flat Roof. Despite possible issues, the roof patios remained due to the added value of occupiable exterior space. Ultimately, exploring the prioritization of different constraints, such as Garage, Shed Roof, and ADA, resulted in a form that accomplishes more than the required program. The Garage placement initiated programming and massing decisions, leading to a house exploiting the given constraints to shape exterior areas unique within the neighborhood.

R ACHEL MAGEE 04 INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS