SEC URIT Y F E AT URE
Nation’s thin fluoro line between chaos and order By Anthony Bergin
On November 13, 2015, three suicide bombers attacked the national sports stadium, Stade de France, where the French president and almost 80,000 people were attending an international soccer game. One suicide bomber was stopped from entering the stadium by a private security guard who noticed the attacker’s hurried behaviour and attempt to enter the stadium without a ticket. About the Author: Anthony Bergin is a senior analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute and ANU’s National Security College. He is the coauthor of Safety in Numbers: Australia’s private security guard force and counter terrorism
The attacker quickly fled capture but detonated the vest seconds later, killing himself and a bystander. It’s believed that the bomber intended to detonate the vest inside the stadium, triggering patrons to flee in a panic into the street, where two other suicide bombers were lying in wait. In the Manchester terrorist ¬attack at a concert arena in May last year, the denial of entry of the bomber to the auditorium by private security personnel reduced the number of fatalities because of panic and crowd crush. Security guards also provided lifesaving first aid after the bomb exploded in the foyer. The role and contribution of private security services in preventing and responding to terrorism has been a neglected issue in Australia’s national security planning. The security guard force sector observes and reports suspicious activity. Security guards most often are the first people on the spot after a terrorist attack. Security personnel are responsible for implementing appropriate facility-level security plans, emergency response plans, crisis management and business continuity plans. The security industry is vital to the continuous operation of Australia’s economy. Without security officers there would be no screening at airports. Hospitals, shopping centres and sports stadiums would be easy targets. Cash deliveries and the restocking of ATMs would cease. Licensed venues would be forced to close. There would be no monitoring of security alarm systems. Most major providers of security guarding services, such as MSS Security, Wilson Security and Securecorp, are owned by overseas interests. Protection for major Australian airports and defence facilities has been provided by overseas-owned companies for many years. The primary concern relating to foreign ownership in the
18 S EC U R I T Y I N S I D ER | DEC/ JA N 201 9
sector is potential access to sensitive information and equipment. If foreign ownership is considered a concern at specific sites, the owner can employ an in-house guard force. It’s estimated that there are more than 120,000 licensed security guards and crowd controllers in Australia, of whom 54,753 were recorded as full-time workers in the 2016 census. By comparison, Australia has about 56,000 police and 58,000 permanent military personnel. The security workforce has a significant casual element, estimated at about 47 per cent. Because the private security industry lacks clearly defined career pathways, it has been a challenge to attract high-quality candidates to the industry. Security officers are among the lowest paid people at most sites. From July this year, the base rate for a permanent full-time level 1 security officer is $21.26 an hour. For some, low wages are offset by the available work hours, which may support their study or primary employment elsewhere. Because of Australia’s mutual recognition arrangements, a person with a licence in one jurisdiction can transfer it to another. This has resulted in “licence shopping”. The issue was put before the Council of Australian Governments in July 2008. COAG agreed to adopt a nationally consistent approach to the regulation of the guarding sector to improve the probity and skills of security personnel and the mobility of security industry licences across jurisdictions. But in the decade since
