inside this week
David Evans, a half century at Harvard pg 7
INSIDE ARTS
business news
VIRTUAL PERFORMANCE SERIES HIGHLIGHTS LATINX VOICES pg 12
Black restaurateurs seek relief pg 11
plus The ‘poem vessels’ of enslaved potter, David Drake pg 12 MFA acquires works from 24 diverse artists pg 13 Vol. 55 No. 47 • Thursday, June 18, 2020 • FREE • GREATER BOSTON’S URBAN NEWS SOURCE SINCE 1965
www.baystatebanner.com
Council seeks curb on facial recognition Commissioner says police will not use technology in the near future By KENNEAL PATTERSON Boston city councilors are pushing to ban facial recognition, a surveillance software that disproportionately misidentifies people of color and may violate civil rights and basic privacies. “When it comes to facial recognition tech, it doesn’t work,” said Councilor Ricardo Arroyo during a hearing on June 9. “It’s not good. It’s been proven through the data to be less accurate for people with darker skin.” A recent MIT examination of facial analysis software revealed that the technology has an error rate of 0.8% for light-skinned men, but 34.7% for dark-skinned women. Cities nationwide have already banned facial recognition technology. San Francisco implemented the ban in May of 2019. In Massachusetts, Cambridge, Brookline, Northampton, Somerville and Springfield have since adopted similar bans. The computer hardware company IBM recently announced that it would no longer offer, develop or research facial-recognition technology. The company’s decision was motivated by protests against discriminatory police practices and the murder of George Floyd, a Minneapolis resident who was suffocated by a white police officer. In Boston, Councilor Michelle Wu originally scheduled the hearing a month ago, and noted the issue is only growing more urgent. “It just so happened that the
timing of it now has lined up with a moment of great national trauma,” she said. “And in this moment the responsibility is on each one of us to step up to truly address systemic racism and systemic oppression.” Councilor Julia Mejia agreed. “We’re in a time where our technology is outpacing our morals,” she said. “We’ve got a 2020 technology with a 1620 state of mind.” The Boston Police Department does not currently use facial recognition software. The ordinance would prevent city officials from using the technology in the future without community consent. It would prohibit mass surveillance of the millions of protestors that have taken to the streets since Floyd’s death. “The department, for the record, does not currently have the technology for facial recognition,” said Police Commissioner William G. Gross. “As technology advances, however, many vendors have and will continue to incorporate automated recognition abilities.” Gross said that the department would not use the technology until it becomes more accurate. He said that as technology advances and becomes more reliable, the police department would like to consider using it to respond to specific crimes and emergency situations. Although the BPD has no desire to generally surveil Boston’s residents, said Gross, the department notes a distinction
See SURVEILLANCE, page 10
BANNER PHOTO
A youth-led march estimated at 2,000 en route to City Hall last week to air demands for a 10% cut in the Boston Police Department budget.
Mayor, activists differ on call to cut police budget Activists seeking more funding for youth services By MORGAN C. MULLINGS AND YAWU MILLER The youth protestors who led a crowd of 2,000 to demonstrate in front of City Hall on Wednesday of last week made their demands clear: cut 10% of the $414 million police budget and invest the funding in youth development and violence prevention programs. Their calls were echoed by city councilors and criminal justice reform activists, many of whom
have long advocated for shifting funding from law enforcement to prevention. By Friday, Mayor Martin Walsh delivered his response: an executive order declaring racism a public health crisis in Boston and a more modest 2.8% cut to the Boston Police Department’s budget, with most, but not all of the funds channeled to programs outside the department’s purview. “Our goal is to recover from this pandemic in a more equitable
state than we entered it,” said Walsh, who declared racism in Boston a public health emergency during the same announcement. Monday, Walsh resubmitted the FY21 budget, which now reallocates $12 million from the BDP budget as follows: $4 million for the Boston Public Health Commission (BPHC), $2 million for community-based programs, $2 million for BEST Clinicians and
See POLICE BUDGET, page 8
Racial reckoning turns to symbols Local Lincoln statue among targets By BRIAN WRIGHT O’CONNOR
PHOTO: ERINT IMAGES
A Boston man is circulating a petition to remove a Park Square statue depicting Abraham Lincoln freeing a slave.
The racial reckoning sweeping across America has triggered a long-overdue shift in attitudes towards offensive cultural icons. Images and symbols long derided by people of color as racist, demeaning or outright treasonous, like Confederate flags and statues revering the traitorous generals of the South’s “Lost Cause,” are being furled or removed at a pace
unthinkable just a few years ago. The idea that the Stars and Bars — the supreme emblem of the slaveholders’ rebellion — will no longer snap in the breeze like a rebel yell at NASCAR rallies is no longer an aspiration but a fact, one prompted by the actions of the improbably named Bubba Wallace, the racing circuit’s lone African American driver. Protesters are taking ropes and sledgehammers to symbols of oppression, from equestrian
statues of Robert E. Lee to Christopher Columbus monuments, but elected and appointed officials are also whisking them away by decree, including a Lee monument in Richmond, Virginia, the former capital of the Confederacy. In Washington, D.C., the guardians of Statuary Hall on Capitol Hill are considering the removal of numerous marble monuments placed there by former Confederate states to honor leaders of the insurrection. This public soul-searching, not
See STATUES, page 10