Thursday, July 30, 2020 • BAY STATE BANNER • 1
inside this week
BPS, developers present McCormack plans pg 11
INSIDE ARTS
special section
AN ART FAIR FOR EVERYONE pg 21
Black owned businesses pg 15
plus Mourning the loss of the ‘Roxbury Love’ mural pg 21 Modern Connections dance classes resume in person pg 22 Vol. 56 No. 1 • Thursday, July 30, 2020 • FREE • GREATER BOSTON’S URBAN NEWS SOURCE SINCE 1965
www.baystatebanner.com
FIOed: some face weekly police stops Activists say stops violate rights, do little to lower city’s crime rate By YAWU MILLER Like many young black men in Boston, Derrell “Slim” Weathers can’t tell you how many times he’s been stopped, questioned, frisked or searched by police. It started, he says, when he was 12 and has kept up into his 30s, as often as five times a week. “If it’s not me, it’s one of my friends,” Weathers said. “It’s almost every day.” Weathers works for a nonprofit that serves local youths and owns a clothing company. He’s never been arrested or charged with a crime by Boston police (he was once arrested in Maine), but he almost certainly features prominently in the department’s FIO database, which records the officers’ field interrogation observation reports that result from stops. Data the Boston Police Department shared with the Boston Globe showed that Blacks accounted for 69% of FIO entries in 2019, despite making up 22% of the city’s population. While police officials claim that they focus their attention on people who are criminally involved and that higher rates of crime account for the greater number of stops in predominantly black communities, Weathers and others say police routinely stop and question Black people with no criminal records. A police spokesman said he was unable to provide comment
for this story by the Banner’s press deadline. FIO entries include data garnered from police stops that do not result in arrests. Police claim the data help them better track criminal activity. Yet many question whether police are reliably capturing criminal activity in their entries or creating records of people they consider suspicious, regardless of whether there’s actual underlying criminal activity. Regardless of past offenses, police should respect people’s protection against illegal search and seizure provided by the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, said Rahsaan Hall, director of the Racial Justice Program of the ACLU of Massachusetts. “The problem with the practice of stopping and frisking people without probable cause is that it violates people’s rights,” he said. “It erodes trust between police and the community.” Police do not have the right to stop someone or question them against their will unless they can clearly articulate a reason they believe that person has committed a crime, is in the process of committing a crime or is about to do so. The “reasonable suspicion” standard was set by the 1968 Terry v. Ohio Supreme Court ruling. The threshold for searching a person’s pockets, bag or car are even higher: An officer must have probable cause to
See FIO, page 8
BANNER PHOTO
Noah Hicks leads the Ride for Black Lives on Centre Street in Jamaica Plain (see story on page 12)
Caucus members praise House police reform bill Legislature has until Friday to reconcile two bills By MORGAN C. MULLINGS The Massachusetts House of Representatives passed their version of a police reform bill early Saturday morning by a 93-66 vote, after three days of debate, marked by mounting concerns over qualified immunity, no-knock warrants and internal investigations. The House bill covers the Massachusetts Black and Latino Legislative Caucus’ four core priorities:
Creation of an independent body to investigate, certify and decertify police; limitations on excessive force; creation of a commission for comprehensive civil service review and establishment of a commission on structural racism. “In the end, it was a firm and united Massachusetts Black and Latino Legislative Caucus demand for change that led to this historical vote to pass this legislation,” said MBLLC chairman Carlos Gonzales in a statement.
The bill covers the main points of the Senate’s police reform bill, but with a few key differences. First, qualified immunity is limited in two different ways. Because both bills establish a process for police officers to become certified and decertified if they commit certain infractions, the House bill ties qualified immunity to decertification. Qualified immunity would no longer protect police from lawsuits
See POLICE REFORM, page 10
A push to extend eviction protections Activists say tide of 20k evictions looming By MORGAN C. MULLINGS
BANNER PHOTO
Derrell “Slim” Weathers says he’s been stopped by Boston police countless times, yet they’ve never charged him with a crime.
Governor Charlie Baker’s statewide eviction moratorium is now set to end on October 17, he announced last Tuesday. But while the ban prevents no-fault evictions from flooding the courts during the COVID-19 emergency, organizers say the state could see over 20,000 eviction cases immediately after it ends.
The day after the announcement, protesters from City Life/ Vida Urbana, Right to the City Boston, Dorchester’s Not for Sale, Lynn United for Change and more gathered in front of the State House to demonstrate their support for the COVID-19 Housing Stability Act, which aims to protect renters from no-fault evictions for a year after the state of emergency is lifted, and stabilize landlords as well.
Following their caravan demonstration through the city on July 18, City Life/Vida Urbana launched demonstrations in Lynn, Springfield and Jamaica Plain on Wednesday morning and the groups converged in Boston at the State House between 1:30 and 2:00 p.m. The State House steps were crowded, already occupied by Cosecha protesters in tents for over a week. “We’re standing in solidarity with the movement that is already
See EVICTIONS, page 2