2016 April Biomass Magazine

April 2016

MOBILIZING, GLOBALIZING Bioenergy Industry Sizes Up World Resources, Markets

READ:

Why California Biodiesel Imports are Rising PAGE 62

AND: Domestic Biogas Tech Providers On Competition Abroad PAGE 52

Upsides, Challenges of Pellet CommodiďŹ cation PAGE 34

PLUS:

Foreign, Stateside Projects Make Headway in Q2 Biomass Construction Update PAGE 14

www.biomassmagazine.com

ASTEC

: 2 2 ' 3 ( / / ( 7 3 / $ 1 7 6

+D]OHKXUVW *HRUJLD 86$

0RGXODU GHVLJQ ZLWK UHSOLFDWHG 73+ UDWHG ³OLQHV´ 2QH VRXUFH IRU HTXLSPHQW DQG FRQVWUXFWLRQ 1R DGG RQ HTXLSPHQW QHHGHG WR UHGXFH 92& HPLVVLRQV 4XLFN VHWXS DQG VWDUWXS ZLWK JXDUDQWHHG SURGXFWLRQ VXSSRUW SDUWV DQG VHUYLFH $Q\ KDUG ZRRG RU VRIW ZRRG VSHFLHV

$ WHF $V WHF WH F ,QF QF LV LVV D PHP HPEH EHHU U RII WKHH $VWHF VWHHFF ,QG VW GXV XVWU WULH LHV LH HV V ,QF Q IDP D LOL \ \ RII FRP RPS SDDQL Q HV HV D EL ELOOOOOLR RQ GR ROOOODU DU SHU HU \HD H U U FR FRUS US SRU RUDW D LR DW LRQ Q KHHDG Q D TX XDU D WHHUHHG G LQ Q &KD KDWW DWWWDQ QRR R J JDD 71 71 1 86 8 $ $

INSIDE ¦ APRIL 2016 | VOLUME 10 | ISSUE 4

ON THE COVER:

Coillte, Ireland's semistate forestry organization, harvests material that will be hauled to and processed at one of its biomass hubs.

PHOTO: COILLTE

06 EDITOR’S NOTE A Delicate Balance

By Tim Portz

08 BUSINESS BRIEFS 14 BIOMASS CONSTRUCTION UPDATE

24 POWER

24 NEWS

25 COLUMN Biomass Power’s Momentum in Maine

By Bob Cleaves

26 FEATURE Staving Off a Sunset Low natural gas prices, expiration of power purchase agreements (PPA) and price guarantees of continuing PPA, are a few of the factors weighing heavily on California’s biomass power industry.

By Bruce Dorminey

PELLETS

Subscriptions Biomass Magazine is free of charge to everyone with the exception of a shipping and handling charge of $49.95 for anyone outside the United States. To subscribe, visit www.BiomassMagazine.com or you can send your mailing address and payment (checks made out to BBI International) to Biomass Magazine Subscriptions, 308 Second Ave. N., Suite 304, Grand Forks, ND 58203. You can also fax a subscription form to 701-746-5367. Back Issues & Reprints Select back issues are available for $3.95 each, plus shipping. Article reprints are also available for a fee. For more information, contact us at 701-746-8385 or service@bbiinternational. com. Advertising Biomass Magazine provides a specific topic delivered to a highly targeted audience. We are committed to editorial excellence and high-quality print production. To find out more about Biomass Magazine advertising opportunities, please contact us at 701-746-8385 or service@ bbiinternational.com. Letters to the Editor We welcome letters to the editor.

Send to Biomass Magazine Letters to the Managing Editor, 308 2nd Ave. N., Suite 304, Grand Forks, ND 58203 or email to asimet@bbiinternational. com. Please include your name, address and phone number. Letters may be edited for clarity and/or space.

32 NEWS

33 COLUMN Roadmap For Pellet Stoves During Cheap Oil, Gas

By John Ackerly

34 FEATURE The Upside of Commodity Status While trade volumes of wood pellets pale in comparison to corn, wheat or coal, there are clear benefits in trade instruments common in larger commodity markets.

By Tim Portz

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 3

FUEL YOUR SUCCESS WITH VERMEER. Vermeer has the products and expertise to assist you throughout the entire biomass supply chain n from field to facility. And it’s all backed by service and support from your local Vermeer dealer.

VISIT VERMEER.COM TO LEARN MORE.

VISIT US AT THE INTERNATIONAL BIOMASS CONFERENCE, BOOTH #719 Vermeer, the Vermeer logo and Equipped to Do More are trademarks of Vermeer Manufacturing Company in the U.S. and/or other countries. © 2016 Vermeer Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

INSIDE ¦

ADVERTISER INDEX¦ 2016 National Advanced Biofuels Conference & Expo

63

Advanced Cyclone Systems

21

AGCO Corporation

10

American Pulverizer Co.

18

Andritz Feed & Biofuel A/S

66

ASGCO

7

ASTEC Bulk Handling Solutions

65

Astec, Inc.

APRIL 2016 | VOLUME 10 | ISSUE 4

THERMAL

42 NEWS

2

Biotec Energy

28

Biotec Energy

36

BRUKS Rockwood

47

Columbia Specialty Company, Inc

29

CPM Global Biomass Group

49

CPM Wolverine Proctor, LLC

54

Detroit Stoker Company

56

EBM Manufacturing

64

Elliott Group

13

GRYPHON Environmental, LLC

45

Hermann Sewerin GmbH

58

Hurst Boiler & Welding Co. Inc

48

IEP Technologies

30-31

International Bioenergy Conference & Exhibition Society

11

Iowa Economic Development Authority

22

Iowa Northern Railway Co.

37

Julio Berkes

19

KEITH Manufacturing Company

57

Laidig Systems, Inc

17

MonitorTech Corporation

70

Morbank, Inc

23

Orthman Conveying Systems

16

PHG Energy

72

ProcessBarron

8

Rawlings Waste Wood Recovery Systems

42

Scientific Dust Collectors

24

Sigma Thermal, Inc

38

SUMA America, Inc

50

SWANA Solid Waste Association of North America

67

Swedish Exergy AB

68

TerraSource Global (Jeffrey Rader)

9

Tramco, Inc

20

United Sorghum Checkoff Program

39

Uzelac Industries

15

Varco Pruden Buildings

60

Vecoplan LLC

32

Vermeer Corporation

4

West Salem Machinery Co.

55

Williams Crusher

12

Yargus Manufacturing, Inc.

69

43 COLUMN Stay of Clean Power Plan: Opportunity for Biomass Industry?

By Joel Stronberg

44 CONTRIBUTION Woody Biomass in the Inland Northwest Forest restoration projects in the Inland Northwest region could become a major supply of woody biomass for bioenergy, but economically only with the right support and incentives.

By David Jackson

46 CONTRIBUTION Delivering Renewable Energy From Irish Forests Ireland’s well-established forest industry has much to offer to the country’s emerging bioenergy market.

By Des O’Toole

BIOGAS

50 NEWS

51 COLUMN Future Remains Bright for Biogas Energy

By Amanda Bilek

52 FEATURE Growing the Local Home Base Stateside biogas technology suppliers are seeing success in the U.S., despite the experience their European counterparts possess.

By Katie Fletcher

ADVANCED BIOFUELS & CHEMICALS

60 NEWS

61 COLUMN Leveling the Playing Field For US Biodiesel Producers

By Anne Steckel

62 FEATURE Importing to Meet California Demand

COPYRIGHT © 2016 by BBI International

Several factors are leading to a substantial uptick in imports of advanced biofuels into California—specifically biomass-based diesel.

By Ron Kotrba

Biomass Magazine: (USPS No. 5336) April 2016, Vol. 10, Issue 4. Biomass Magazine is published monthly by BBI International. Principal Office: 308 Second Ave. N., Suite 304, Grand Forks, ND 58203. Periodicals Postage Paid at Grand Forks, North Dakota and additional mailing offices.

POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Biomass Magazine/Subscriptions, 308 Second Ave. N., Suite 304, Grand Forks, North Dakota 58203.

Please recycle this magazine and remove inserts or samples before recycling TM

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 5

¦EDITOR’S NOTE

A Delicate Balance

EDITORIAL PRESIDENT & EDITOR IN CHIEF Tom Bryan tbryan@bbiinternational.com VICE PRESIDENT OF CONTENT & EXECUTIVE EDITOR Tim Portz tportz@bbiinternational.com

At press time, registrants from 25 countries were signed up for this year’s International Biomass Conference & Expo. Last year, recognizing that as the companion issue for the event, our coverage in the April issue of Biomass Magazine TIM PORTZ VICE PRESIDENT OF CONTENT should examine the global nature of the industry, & EXECUTIVE EDITOR tportz@bbiinternational.com so we fixed our editorial gaze on import and export stories. This year, we returned to that same theme, and have found that the biomass market is very much global, both in the nature of its opportunities and its participants.

This quarter’s Biomass Construction Update, on page 14, is a rich illustration of the global nature of this business. A careful examination of the 22 projects featured in the update make it clear that foreign marketplaces ultimately lead to installed production capacity stateside. Projects not generating energy products for foreign markets still leverage a global knowledge base, deploying technologies developed outside of the U.S. The impact of a growing industrial wood pellet market is easy to see in projects like Colombo Energy in South Carolina, Blue Sky Biomass in Georgia, and Highland Pellets in Arkansas. In other projects, technologies and expertise are tapped instead of markets. A German engineering and construction has been hired to build a biomass power plant in Hawaii. An Italian firm is the technology provider and constructor for two North American biogas plants, a relationship that Katie Fletcher highlights in her page-52 biogas feature “Growing the Local Home Base.”

Underpinning, and often complicating, all of this is policy. This issue’s stories make it clear that while foreign policies, as well as state policies such as those explored in Senior Editor Ron Kotrba’s page-62 story, “Importing to Meet California Demand,” successfully generate real opportunities for domestic producers, they also bring increased foreign interest and competition. Kotrba’s story makes it clear that California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard has led to a dramatic increase in the state’s biodiesel consumption. In just four years, it has grown 20-fold, and the state’s inclusion rate, once nominal, now rivals Minnesota and Illinois at just less than 10 percent. Still, biodiesel producers in the U.S. often find themselves outside of this rapidly-growing marketplace, watching foreign producers from Argentina and Singapore capture a sizeable portion of that state’s market.

The dynamics Kotrba outlines in his story are playing out across this industry in every segment. Meanwhile, governments continue to wrestle with policies that deliver the environmental benefits for which they were devised, while also keeping an eye on domestic economic development and maintaining a favorable trade balance.

6 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

MANAGING EDITOR Anna Simet asimet@bbiinternational.com SENIOR EDITOR Ron Kotrba rkotrba@bbiinternational.com NEWS EDITOR Erin Voegele evoegele@bbiinternational.com ASSOCIATE EDITOR Katie Fletcher kfletcher@bbiinternational.com COPY EDITOR Jan Tellmann jtellmann@bbiinternational.com

ART ART DIRECTOR Jaci Satterlund jsatterlund@bbiinternational.com GRAPHIC DESIGNER Raquel Boushee rboushee@bbiinternational.com

PUBLISHING & SALES CHAIRMAN Mike Bryan mbryan@bbiinternational.com CEO Joe Bryan jbryan@bbiinternational.com VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS Matthew Spoor mspoor@bbiinternational.com SALES & MARKETING DIRECTOR John Nelson jnelson@bbiinternational.com BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Howard Brockhouse hbrockhouse@bbiinternational.com SENIOR ACCOUNT MANAGER Chip Shereck cshereck@bbiinternational.com ACCOUNT MANAGER Jeff Hogan jhogan@bbiinternational.com CIRCULATION MANAGER Jessica Beaudry jbeaudry@bbiinternational.com MARKETING & ADVERTISING MANAGER Marla DeFoe mdefoe@bbiinternational.com

EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS Stacy Cook, Koda Energy Ben Anderson, University of Iowa Justin Price, Evergreen Engineering Adam Sherman, Biomass Energy Resource Center

INDUSTRY EVENTS¦ International Fuel Ethanol Workshop & Expo JUNE 20-23, 2016

Wisconsin Center Milwaukee, Wisconsin This 6th annual national event, produced by BBI International, will feature the world of advanced biofuels and biobased chemicals––technology scaleup, project finance, policy, national markets and more––with a core focus on the industrial, petroleum and agribusiness alliances defining the national advanced biofuels industry, plus a networking junction for all biomass industries.

866-746-8385 | www.fuelethanolworkshop.com

National Advanced Biofuels Conference & Expo JUNE 20-23, 2016

Wisconsin Center Milwaukee, Wisconsin The 6th annual National Advanced Biofuels Conference & Expo will take place June 20-23, 2016, at the Wisconsin Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Produced by BBI International, this national event will feature the world of advanced biofuels and biobased chemicals—technology scale-up, project finance, policy, national markets and more—with a core focus on the industrial, petroleum and agribusiness alliances defining the national advanced biofuels industry and networking junction for all biomass industries.

866-746-8385 | www.advancedbiofuelsconference. com

International Biomass Conference & Expo APRIL 10-12, 2017

Minneapolis Convention Center Minneapolis, Minnesota Organized by BBI International and produced by Biomass Magazine, this event brings current and future producers of bioenergy and biobased products together with waste generators, energy crop growers, municipal leaders, utility executives, technology providers, equipment manufacturers, project developers, investors and policy makers. It’s a true one-stop shop––the world’s premier educational and networking junction for all biomass industries.

866-746-8385 | www.biomassconference.com

Biomass Magazine Webinar Series: Best Practices in Biomass

Facility Dust Explosion Prevention and Protection

APRIL 7, 2016

Sponsored by IEP Technologies Dust explosions can present serious risk within a biomass facility. Ignition of a dust cloud in process equipment can destroy the primary vessel, propagate to interconnected equipment and the plant, causing secondary explosions with devastating results. Fortunately, there are proven ways to address this threat. This webinar, a follow-up to IEP’s information-packed effort from last year features three new experts. This free webinar is a can’t-miss offering for operations teams looking to keep abreast of the latest advancements in these vital aspects of safe plant operations.

866-746-83835 | www.biomassmagazine.com/pages/ webinar

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 7

Business Briefs PEOPLE, PRODUCTS & PARTNERSHIPS

Clariant honored for its sunliquid technology Clariant was honored for its innovative sunliquid technology for the production of cellulosic ethanol from agricultural residues as part of the 2015 German Innovation Prize for Climate and Environment. The biotechnological process was awarded first place in the process innovations category.

Velocys appoints CEO Velocys plc has appointed David Pummell as CEO. Pummell has more than 30 years of energy and oil industry experience. Prior to joining Velocys, he served as CEO of ACAL Energy Ltd. Pummell also previously served as CEO of MAPS Technology Ltd., where he successfully commercialized the technology prior to its acquisition by GE. He also served as CEO of Ceres Power Group plc, a developer of fuel cell micro combined-heat-and-power

(CHP) products for the domestic stationary Hawaii. Ecoverse has worked alongside power sector.

Doppstadt in the North American market for more than 13 years and has strong experience with Doppstadt products and their application across the market. In addition to supplying new machines, Ecoverse will also provide service, parts and full after-market support for all new and existing Doppstadt customHamer, Fischbein Americas to merge ers, including technician and field training operations to support the complete Doppstadt product Hamer and Fischbein Americas have range. announced plans to merge operations. The Hamer-Fischbein union combines almost 200 RusForest begins operations at years of industrial bag closing and automated Russian pellet mill packaging experience. The company will conRusForestAB has announced the first tinue to focus on its core businesses, including sales from its 30,000-ton-per-year pellet mill in bag filling, bag closing, automated bagging and Magistralny, Russia. Following successful test robotic palletizing. runs in November, the company commenced Doppstadt appoints Ecoverse exclusive distributor Doppstadt has appointed Ecoverse Industries exclusive distributor for all Doppstadt sales and rentals in California, Oregon, Washington, Arizona, Idaho, Montana and

production and delivery of wood pellets to its European trading partner in December.

Stora Enso to add pellet production capacity at Sweden site Stora Enso has announced plans to invest â‚Ź16 million ($14.13 million) to integrate pellet

Come see us at Booth #1121

BIOMASS to ENERGY ProcessBarron is there every step of the way.

FUEL | AIR | GAS | ASH processbarron.com/biomass 205-663-5330

BUSINESS BRIEFSÂŚ

production at its Ala Sawmill in Sweden. The investment will also allow the company to update its boiler at the site. Pellet production is expected to begin during the second quarter of next year.

NDC Technologies delivers equipment to Zilkha NDC Technologies has delivered an inprocess Near-Infrared (NIR) moisture monitoring system to Zilkha Biomass Energy. The system solution includes the installation of multiple NDC CM710e NIR moisture gauges with HMIs and operator workstations to better control the quality of the company’s Zilkha Black Pellet product and to improve process performance.

Gevo adds board member Gevo Inc. has appointed William H. Baum to its board of directors. Baum has worked in the chemical and biobased products and technology industries during his career, with a focus on business development and strategic alliances. He has been employed in renewable fuels

and chemicals the past 18 years with Verenium Corp., Diversa Corp. and Genomatica Inc. Baum currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Genomatica and previously served as executive chairman of the board of Genomatica.

Covanta acquires Chief Industrial Services Covanta has announced that its subsidiary, Covanta Environmental Solutions, has acquired Chief Industrial Services, a privatelyheld environmental services company located in Wisconsin. The acquisition will expand and complement Covanta’s existing capabilities in the Midwest. Chief specializes in tailored nonhazardous waste management and industrial cleaning services for industrial and commercial customers in the Midwest.

Air Products receives certification for biogas separation products Air Products’ PRISM Membranes division in St. Louis, Missouri, has received pressure equipment directive certification for two new sizes of membrane separators for biogas upgrading applications. This certification, from DNV GL Business Assurance Italia S.r.l., confirms that Air Products’ biogas separation products meet the European standards for design, manufacture, and safe operation of pressurized equipment.

Solegear adds team member Solegear Bioplastic Technologies Inc. has added Brent Ostrowski as director of business development to support the company’s 2016 office products growth initiatives. He has more than 15 years of experience in sourcing and producing exclusive branded products and packaging for major retailers Target and Best Buy.

3URYHQ 6ROXWLRQV IRU \RXU %LRPDVV $SSOLFDWLRQV

3QHXPDWLF 0HFKDQLFDO %RLOHU )HHGV

%LRPDVV 0DWHULDO +DQGOLQJ

6WRUDJH 5HFODLP (TXLSPHQW

&UXVKHUV )HHGHUV 6L]HUV

8QPDWFKHG 3DUWV DQG 6HUYLFH

6WRUH UHFODLP FRQYH\ DQG IHHG ELRPDVV DQG DOWHUQDWLYH IXHOV GLUHFWO\ LQWR ERLOHUV DQG NLOQV

6XSSRUW IRU ELRPDVV HQHUJ\ JHQHUDWLRQ IURP WUXFN UDLO UHFHLYLQJ WKURXJK PHWHUHG LQIHHG LQWR WKH ERLOHU

2SHQ DLU RU HQFORVHG VWRUDJH ZLWK FLUFXODU RU OLQHDU GHVLJQ VROXWLRQV WR ÀW \RXU DSSOLFDWLRQ

3ULPDU\ DQG VHFRQGDU\ FUXVKLQJ DV ZHOO DV PXOWLSOH IHHGHU RSWLRQV WR SURFHVV FRDO DQG ELRPDVV

5HSODFHPHQW SDUWV 2(0 UHEXLOGV UHWURĂ€WV LQVWDOODWLRQ VWDUW XS WUDLQLQJ DQG UHSDLU

7ROO )UHH

ƒ (PDLO LQIR#WHUUDVRXUFH FRP ƒ :HE ZZZ WHUUDVRXUFH FRP EP

%,20$66 ,17(51$7,21$/

& 2 1 ) ( 5 ( 1 & ( ( ; 3 2

BOOTH 1131

PDUNHW OHDGLQJ EUDQGV UHFRJQL]HG DQG WUXVWHG WKURXJKRXW WKH ZRUOG

7KH EUDQGV FRPSULVLQJ 7HUUD6RXUFH *OREDO *XQGODFK &UXVKHUV -HIIUH\ 5DGHU DQG 3HQQV\OYDQLD &UXVKHU DUH ZKROO\ RZQHG VXEVLGLDULHV RI +LOOHQEUDQG ,QF 1<6( +,

Â&#x2039; 7HUUD6RXUFH *OREDO $OO 5LJKWV 5HVHUYHG

+DQGOLQJ D :RUOG RI 0DWHULDOV

Business Briefs PEOPLE, PRODUCTS & PARTNERSHIPS

Rentech appoints CFO Rentech Inc. has appointed Jeffrey R. Spain chief financial officer (CFO) of Rentech and the general partner of Rentech Nitrogen PartSpain ners L.P. Spain will be responsible for overseeing the finance and accounting functions for both companies. He replaces Dan J. Cohrs. Before being appointed CFO, Spain served as senior vice president of finance, accounting and administration for Rentechâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s wood fibre group. He has held various senior financial and accounting roles at Rentech since 2011, and most recently played a critical role in the financial turnaround of Fulghum Fibres. Spainâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s experience spans over 20 years and includes investment banking and operations management and chief financial officer roles. His past employers include Credit Suisse First Boston, LeadPoint Inc., eNutrition Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Corp.

Director of LBNL appointed The University of California Board of Regents has approved Michael Witherell, vice chancellor for research at UC Santa Barbara, as direcWitherell tor of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Witherell is a leading physicist with a highly distinguished career in teaching, research and managing complex organizations. He has received numerous honors and recognitions for his scientific contributions and achievements.

He is the former director of the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in northern Illinois and currently holds the presidential chair in Physics at UC Santa Barbara.

BioAmber earns certifications for Sarnia plant BioAmber Inc. has announced that its Sarnia, Ontario, production plant, jointly owned with Mitsui & Co., has received ISO 9001, ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001 and FSSC

22000 certifications. These certifications were granted by accredited certification bodies following audits of the Sarnia plant during the fourth quarter of 2015. By achieving these certifications, BioAmber has demonstrated its commitment to enhancing customer satisfaction through the implementation of an integrated management system. BioAmber has put in place processes that ensure continual improvement and conformity to customer, statutory and regulatory requirements.

Metabolix relocates headquarters Metabolix Inc. has signed a 10.5-year lease agreement for 30,000 square feet of state-of-the-art laboratory and office space in Woburn, Massachusetts. Metabolix expects to take occupancy of the space as its corporate headquarters in June as it exits space in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Metabolix also plans to exit office space it currently occupies in Lowell, Massachusetts, in May 2017 and to consolidate its biopolymers sales, marketing and administrative offices and biopolymers research and development laboratories in the Woburn facility. The new laboratory facilities will include a

microbial fermentation lab and an expanded biopolymers applications development lab.

Pending the spinout of its Yield10 crop science program, Metabolix will also relocate its Massachusetts-based crop science laboratory and personnel to the facility in Woburn.

Dale honored for work in biological engineering The American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering has announced the induction of Bruce Dale, Michigan Dale State University professor of chemical engineering and materials science, to its College of Fellows. Dale was nominated, reviewed and elected by peers and members of the College of Fellows for outstanding contributions in the biological engineering of transforming plant biomass to food and fuel to achieve a sustainable bioeconomy. The College of Fellows is composed of the top 2 percent of medical and biological engineers in the country.

AIMBE’s mission is to recognize excellence in,

and advocate for, the fields of medical and bio- will use the award to support two years of powlogical engineering in order to advance society. er-generation research in remote parts of China and Ethiopia. The Fulbright Global Flex ScholSBP appoints CEO ars Award is funded by the U.S. Department of The Sustainable Biomass Partnership has ap- State. It helps U.S. academic and professional pointed Carsten Huljus as CEO. Huljus is ex- experts engage in regional or transregional reperienced in forest management and chain of search and teaching through visits to multiple custody certification schemes. As CEO, he will countries. Engeda is an expert in turbomachinbe responsible for the leadership and manage- ery, including power plant cooling, experimenment of SBP, including engagement with its tal thermofluids, turbomachinery flow analysis many stakeholders, such as biomass supply and design, gas turbine and biogas. He is a felchain actors, policy makers and environmental low of the American Society of Mechanical NGOs. The current executive director, Peter Engineers and a recipient of the ASME Fluid Wilson, will take up the new post of standards Machinery Award. director with Simon Armstrong continuing as Floreat Group launches company technical director. specializing in biomass Biogas expert Floreat Group has committed $50 million recognized to the U.K. biomass sector and launched FCM Abraham Engeda, a Bioenergy Ltd., trading as Vesta, an energy professor of mechanical supply company specializing in providing lowengineering at Michigan cost, long-term green energy contracts using State University, is one biomass to the manufacturing, agriculture and of 10 professors worldcare home sectors. The venture will be funded wide to earn the Fulbright through a mixture of equity and debt, all fundEngeda Global Flex Award. He ed privately by the group.

15 - 17 JUNE 2016 PRINCE GEORGE, BC, CANADA

PARTNERSHIPS FOR INNOVATION DRIVING SUCCESS IN BIOENERGY

REGISTER NOW

bioenergyconference.org

Join us in Prince George, Canada for the 7th International Bioenergy Conference and Exhibition.

Over the three days of the conference, held at the centre of one of the largest biomass fibre baskets in the world, there will be many opportunities to learn more about the industry in British Columbia as well as the latest global trends in fibre supply, sustainability, products, technology, policies and other drivers of the future bioeconomy.

Contact us for more information: Event Manager, Cam McAlpine • cam#bioenergyconference.org • +1.250.961.6611

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 11

<RXU 6LQJOH 6RXUFH 6\VWHP 3URYLGHU Biomass Handling Equipment Complete Engineered Systems

We offer complete systems for grinding and/or drying a wide variety of biomass materials including wood chips, algae, switchgrass, & kenaf.

Primary Hogs Secondary Hammer Mills Apron Pan Feeders Mass Loading Feeders Disc Screens Screw Conveyors Pneumatic Conveying Silos 2701 North Broadway, St. Louis, Missouri 63102 USA Phone: (314) 621-3348 Fax: (314) 436-2639 Email: sales@williamscrusher.com

ZZZ ZLOOLDPVFUXVKHU FRP

Q

Customer:

Q

Challenge:

Q

Result:

Palm oil plantation, Southeast Asia.

Operate a critical stand-alone CHP system in a remote location.

A ruggged Elliott steam turbine generator package delivers reliable, cost-effective electricity and process steam.

They turned to Elliott

for leadership and proven expertise.

The customer turned to Elliott for more than 80 years of steam turbine experience.

Tens of thousands of rugged, easy to maintain Elliott YR steam turbines are installed and operating throughout the world. Who will you turn to?

C O M P R E S S O R S

Q

T U R B I N E S

Q

G L O B A L

S E R V I C E

The world turns to Elliott. www.elliott-turbo.com

Biomass CONSTRUCTION UPDATE Hello Spring, Adios El Niño

By Anna Simet In the U.S., unusual weather wreaked havoc on several plants under construction through the winter. While the El Niño has brought mild conditions to much of the country, it has and continues to bring above-average rainfall and flooding to many locations, and consequently has slowed progress a bit at some facilities.

A handful of plants aiming for startup earlier in the year have seen slight delays, but many are now readying to do so, with a fair number of plants already achieving operational status. For example, in Charlotte, North Carolina, and Johnston, Rhode Island, Blue Sphere is readying to turn on its combined-heatand-power biogas plants, after battling record rainfall and muddy site conditions.

Chip Energy’s pellet manufacturing plant in Goodfield, Illinois, reported a windy Old Man Winter that was unkind to construction workers needing to work 80 feet in the air. Setbacks are being gained upon, however, and a July startup is planned.

Also planning a July startup is Veolia North America and Fengate Capital Management’s 40-MW Fort St. James Green Energy Project in British

Columbia, with its twin in Merritt following shortly thereafter. Projects graduating to completion in this quarter’s Biomass Construction Update include the district heating plant at University of Maine, Farmington, which is now providing the campus with thermal energy, and Green Energy Team’s power plant in Kauai, Hawaii, which, after experiencing some technical issues with the facility’s turbine, has been fired up and is expected to be sending power to the grid by April.

Many are bidding an enthusiastic adios to El Niño, which is weakening and expected to diminish by late spring or early summer. Its end could make way for an interesting fall/winter construction season, however, as researchers believe there is a good chance that La Niña—El Niño’s opposite, usually characterized above-average precipitation and below-average temperatures to Canada, the U.S. Midwest and Pacific Northwest regions, as well a strong hurricane season in the Atlantic region—willl pay a visit to North America.

If you have a project you would like profiled in the Biomass Construction Update, email asimet@bbiinternational.com.

FORT ST. JAMES GREEN ENERGY PROJECT

TEMPLEBOROUGH BIOMASS PLANT

PHOTO: FENGATE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

PHOTO: TEMPLEBOROUGH BIOMASS PLANT

Fort St. James Green Energy LP

Templeborough Biomass Plant

Location

Fort St. James, British Columbia, Canada

Location

Rotherham, South Yorkshire, England.

Engineer/builder

Dalkia

Engineer/builder

Interserve Construction Ltd., Babcock & Wilcox Vølund

Primary fuel

Forest and sawmill waste, pine beetle kill

Primary fuel

Commercial and municipal wood waste

Boiler type

Double drum FSE Energy boiler

Boiler type

Babcock & Wilcox Vølund multifuel boiler

Nameplate capacity

40 MW

Nameplate capacity

41 MW

Combined heat and power

No

Combined heat and power

Yes

Government incentives

None

Government incentives

None

IPP or utility

IPP

IPP or utility

IPP

Groundbreaking date

2013

Groundbreaking date

Q2 2015

Start-up date

2016

Start-up date

August 2017

Toward the end of February, Fort St. James was is roughly 75 percent complete and on track to become operational by July.

14 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

The plant is rising above ground level as the power plant equipment, boiler, turbine, generator and gas wood fuel store are built. Power will be sold to GDF Suez Energy UK via a 15-year power purchase agreement. The facility is on course for an opening in late summer 2017.

Biomass Power

Pellets

Biogas

Thermal

CONSTRUCTION UPDATEÂŚ

Advanced Biofuel

Green Energy Team LLC Location

Koloa, Kauai, Hawaii

Engineer/builder

Standardkessel Baumgarte Group (SKG)

Primary fuel

Eucalyptus and albizia

Boiler type

Pusher-type grate with natural circulation steam generator

Nameplate capacity

7.5 MW

Combined heat and power

Yes

Government incentives

N/A

IPP or utility

IPP

Groundbreaking date

January 2013

Start-up date

Q4 2015

After completing an unforseen turbine repair, the boiler was lit and steam is being produced. The plant is on track to be sending power to the grid by April.

DUBLIN WASTE-TO-ENERGY LTD PHOTO: P.J. HEGARTY & SONS

Constellation Energy, Albany Green Energy Location

Albany, Georgia

Engineer/builder

DCO Energy LLC

Primary fuel

Forest residue, pecan shells, peanut hulls

Boiler type

Valmet circulating fluidized bed boiler

Nameplate capacity

50 MW

Combined heat and power

Dublin Waste-to-Energy Ltd. Location

Poolbeg, Dublin, Ireland

Engineer/builder

Covanta Energy Corp.

Primary fuel

Municipal solid waste

Boiler type

NA

Yes

Nameplate capacity

58 MW

Government incentives

$250 million in bonds issued by Albany Dougherty Payroll Development Authority

Combined heat and power

No

Government incentives

Irelandâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s renewable feed-in tariff

IPP or utility

Utility

IPP or utility

IPP

Groundbreaking date

2014

Groundbreaking date

Q4 2014

Start-up date

June 2017

Start-up date

2017

Boiler building steel erection continues and reached its highest elevation in February. Major equipment deliveries have commenced including the boiler steam drum and truck tippers. Fuel handling system construction also commenced in February.

Uzelac Industries 6901 Industrial Loop, Greendale, WI USA 53129

p: 414-529-0240 | f: 414-529-0362

The project is over 50 percent complete and on schedule to begin start-up operations in early 2017.

About 60 percent of the plant's waste capacity has been contracted. Covanta is in the process of staffing the facility.

The Right Choice In Drying for over

30

Years.

Uzelac Industries is a leading manufacturer of Rotary Drying Systems, with systems operating internationally. Our systems are employed to convert many different products into marketable by-products in many different industries.

Biomass Wood Pellets Wood Chips Wood Shavings Agricultural

Biosolids Municipal Sludge Industrial Sludge DAF Solids Poultry Manure

Meat Processing Cattle & Hog Blood Meat and Bone Feather Meal Egg Shells

Fertilizer Ammonium Sulfate Sulfate of Potassium Salts Potash

Our systems convert these products into: FUEL, FEED SUPPLEMENTS AND FERTILIZER Uzelac Industries Systems are Engineered for Efficiency - Designed for Longevity

www.uzelacind.com APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 15

Biomass Power

Pellets

Biogas

Thermal

Advanced Biofuel

Merritt Green Energy Project Location

Merritt, British Columbia, Canada

Engineer/builder

Dalkia

Primary fuel

Forest and sawmill waste, pine beetle kill

Boiler type

Double drum FSE Energy boiler

Nameplate capacity

40 MW

Combined heat and power

No

Government incentives

None

IPP or utility

N/A

Groundbreaking date

2014

Start-up date

2016

Toward the end of February, the plant was roughly 80 percent complete. Construction around the boiler is ongoing, conveyors are nearing finish, the steam turbine building is complete. Equipment is on-site and piping and electrical connections are soon to be made.

BLUE SKY BIOMASS GEORGIA LLC PHOTO: BLUE SKY BIOMASS

Colombo Energy Inc.-Greenwood Location

Greenwood County, South Carolina

Design/builder

Portucel

Export port

N/A

Export location

Europe

Pellet grade

Industrial premium pellets

Annual capacity

460,000 metric tons

Feedstock

Forest waste

Groundbreaking date

March 2015

Start-up date

Summer 2016

Blue Sky Biomass Georgia LLC

As part of its responsibilities in the project, Prodesa will supply the complete milling, pelleting and cooling lines, including five hammer mills, 15 pellet mills, and five vertical coolers.

Location

Adel, Georgia

Design/builder

Blue Sky Biomass

Export port

TBD

Export location

Europe

Pellet grade

Industrial premium pellets

Annual capacity

540,000 metric tons

Feedstock

Sawmill residuals

Groundbreaking date

2014

Start-up date

2016

Four presses are installed with remaining eight presses to arrive in April. The plant is four to five months from completion.

Orthman Conveying Systems is experienced in handling all of your bulk materials.

We specialize in heavy duty construction as a standard to reduce maintenance and extend the life of all equipment. Orthman will design and manufacture complete systems using either standard or special parts to meet the customerâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s exact needs.

877-664-2687 | Lexington, NE 573-443-2144 | Columbia, MO w w w. o r t h m a n . c o m 16 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

CONSTRUCTION UPDATEÂŚ

Canfor Corp., Chetwynd Sawmill Location

Chetwynd, British Columbia

Design/builder

Canfor/Pacific Bioenergy Corp

Export port

Port of Vancouver

Export location

Confidential

Pellet grade

Industrial premium pellets

Annual capacity

100,000 metric tons

Feedstock

Softwood

Groundbreaking date

2014

Start-up date

Early 2016

Project Complete

The Chetwynd plant manufacturing is operational on a 24/7 basis, and in February, commissioning work started on the associated power generation equipment on-site.

CHIP ENERGY INC. PHOTO: CHIP ENERGY INC.

Chip Energy Inc.

Highland Pellets Location

Pine Bluff, Arkansas

Engineer/builder

Astec Inc.

Export port

Port of South Louisiana

Location

Goodfield, Illinois

Export location

Europe

Design/builder

Chip Energy

Feedstock

Tree stem and waste wood

Export port

N/A

Pellet grade

Industrial premium

Export location

N/A

Annual capacity

500,000 metric tons

Pellet grade

Pellets, briquettes and logs

Groundbreaking date

January 2016

Capacity

36,500 metric tons

Start-up date

2017

Feedstock

Waste wood, energy crops, agricultural residue

Groundbreaking date

2013

Behind original schedule, dirt work is complete and construction of the plant has begun. It will last an estimated 20 months.

Start-up date

TBD

After a few setbacks during installation of the fabric roofing, piping was ordered and scheduled for installation in mid-March. Coupled with a tough winter, start-up has been pushed to midsummer, with production expected in July, and full operations in Q3.

(;3(576 ,1 %,20$66 0$7(5,$/ +$1'/,1* 62/87,216 )8//< $8720$7(' 7851.(< 6<67(06

/DLGLJ¡V WXUQNH\ VWRUDJH DQG UHFODLP V\VWHPV RIIHU VXSHULRU PDWHULDO KDQGOLQJ SHUIRUPDQFH DQG GHSHQGDELOLW\ LQ WKH KDUVKHVW HQYLURQPHQWV /DLGLJ¡V V\VWHPV DUH HQJLQHHUHG WR SURYLGH FRPSOHWHO\ DXWRPDWHG QHDU WRWDO FOHDQ RXW ZKLOH PDLQWDLQLQJ Ă&#x20AC;UVW LQ Ă&#x20AC;UVW RXW ),)2 PDWHULDO GLVWULEXWLRQ

Â&#x2021; VDOHV#ODLGLJ FRP 'UDJRRQ 7UDLO Â&#x2021; 0LVKDZDND Â&#x2021; ,1 86$

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 17

Biomass Power

Pellets

Biogas

Thermal

Advanced Biofuel

BLUE SPHERE - CHARLOTTE

BLUE SPHERE - JOHNSTON

PHOTO: AERO PHOTOS

PHOTO: CREATIVE CHICA PHOTOGRAPHY

Blue Sphere - Waste To Energy Power Plant Charlotte Location

Charlotte, North Carolina

Engineer/builder

AUSTEP/T. Ortega Gaines

Substrate(s)

Organic/food waste

Digester type

Conical tank utilizing AUSTEP's Cruise Control System

Gas cleaning technology

AUSTEP biogas washing system/wet scrubber

Biogas production capacity

N/A

Biogas end use

Electricity

Power capacity

5.2 MW

Groundbreaking date

March 2015

Start-up date

Spring 2016

After minor weather-related setbacks, the plant will begin operations in early spring. Power is being sold to Duke Energy via a 15-year PPA.

Blue Sphere - Waste To Energy Power Plant Johnston Location

Johnston, Rhode Island

Engineer/builder

AUSTEP/T. Ortega Gaines

Substrate(s)

Organic/food waste

Digester type

Conical tank utilizing AUSTEP's Cruise Control System

Gas cleaning technology

AUSTEP biogas washing system/wet scrubber

Biogas production capacity

N/A

Biogas end use

Electricity

Power capacity

3.2 MW

Groundbreaking date

March 2015

Start-up date

Spring 2016

The facility is on schedule for an early spring startup. Power will be sold to National Grid via a 15-year PPA.

CONSTRUCTION UPDATE¦

Roeslein Alternative Energy of Missouri LLC

Surrey Organic Biofuel Facility, Greenlane Biogas

Location

Northern Missouri

Location

Surrey, British Columbia

Engineer/builder

Roeslein Alternative Energy LLC

Engineer/builder

Orgaworld Canada

Substrate(s)

Hog manure

Substrate(s)

115,000 metric tons of organic waste annually

Digester type/technology

Lagoon style, floating impermeable cover

Digester type/technology

Orgaworld’s Biocel, dry AD

Gas cleaning technology

Molecular sieve/PSA

Gas cleaning technology

Greenlane water scrubbing biogas upgrading technology

Biogas production capacity

2 million-plus Btu/year

Biogas production capacity

N/A

Biogas end use

CNG and LNG

Biogas end use

RNG, heat

Power capacity

N/A

Power capacity

N/A

Groundbreaking date

May 2014

Groundbreaking date

Q1 2015

Start-up date

First pipeline injections in June 2016

Start-up date

Early 2017

Phase II construction started in November and is ongoing. Commissioning and startup are scheduled for May.

LA Sanitation, Hyperion Treatment Plant Cogeneration Project Location

Playa del Rey, California

Engineer/builder

Constellation Energy Resources LLC

Substrate(s)

Municipal sewage

Digester type/technology

Egg-shaped

Gas cleaning technology

Moisture Rx and Regenerative Mixed-Bed Media

Biogas production capacity

Electricity and steam

Biogas end use

N/A

Power capacity

25 MW

Groundbreaking date

November 2015

Start-up date

2016

Design is 100 percent complete. Major equipment deliveries are in progress and construction is progressing toward a mechanical completion date midsummer 2016.

The facility is under construction and will process organic waste from the city’s curbside collection program, and commercial waste from the region. Biogas will be upgraded to produce renewable natural gas that will fuel the city’s fleet of natural gas waste collection and operations service vehicle, as well as fuel the city-owned district energy system to heat and cool public and privately owned buildings.

Skærbæk Power Station, Dong Energy Location

Fredericia, Denmark

Engineer/builder

B&W Vollund

Primary fuel

Wood chips

Boiler type

B&W Vollund fluidized bed

Nameplate thermal capacity

280 MWth

Heat enduse

District heat and electricity

Government incentives/grants

N/A

Groundbreaking date

September 2014

Start-up date

Early 2017

At press time, approximately 150 workers were on-site. That number will increase to nearly 500 this quarter.

Energy solutions Industrial application and Power plants

• Biomass, industrial residues and wastes solutions • 40 years of experience with Gasification • Tailor-made solutions • Turnkey projects 10-100 MWth with world class partners

Weyerhaeuser, Tacuarembo CHP Plant, 90 t/h, 80 barg, 480 ºC Biomass Gasification

www.berkes.com.uy APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 19

Biomass Power

Pellets

Biogas

Thermal

Advanced Biofuel

University of Maine at Farmington, Biomass Heat Plant Location

Farmington, Maine

Engineer/builder

Trane U.S. Inc.

Primary fuel

Wood chips

Boiler type

Messersmith

Nameplate thermal capacity

35,400 MMBtu

Heat enduse

District heat

Government incentives/grants

N/A

Groundbreaking date

May 2015

Start-up date

January 2016

Project Complete

The plant is now supplying heat to the campus. A public ribbon-cutting ceremony was planned March 13.

DOE'S SAVANNAH RIVER SITE PHOTO: DOE, SAVANNAH RIVER SITE

East Kansas Agri-Energy LLC - Renewable Diesel Facility

Location

Garnett, Kansas

DOE's Savannah River Site Biomass Heating Plant

Design/builder

WB Services

Location

Aiken, South Carolina

Process technology

Capable of both enzymatic and chemical processing

Engineer/builder

Ameresco Inc.

Biofuel/biochemical product(s)

Renewable diesel

Primary fuel

Forest residue

Feedstock

Distillers corn oil

Boiler type

Fluidized bed

Production capacity

3 MMgy

Nameplate thermal capacity

N/A

Type of RINs

N/A

Heat enduse

District heat

Coproducts

Naphtha

Government incentives/grants

N/A

Groundbreaking date

2014

Groundbreaking date

May 2015

Start-up date

N/A

Start-up date

Spring 2016

The relocated package boiler is online, and the new biomass boiler will be online late spring.

The Worldâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Most Complete Line e of Mill Duty Conveyors

316.264.4604 tramcoinc.com

20 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

1020 E. 19th St. Wichita, KS 67214 USA

CONSTRUCTION UPDATEÂŚ

CENTRAL MN RENEWABLES LLC

ENVIA

PHOTO: GREEN BIOLOGICS

PHOTO: VELOCYS INC.

Central MN Renewables LLC

ENVIA Energy Oklahoma City LLC

Location

Little Falls, Minnesota

Location

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Design/builder

Weitz

Design/builder

Ventech Engineers International LLC

Process technology

Advanced fermentation process

Process technology

Velocys Fischer-Tropsch reactor

Biofuel/biochemical product(s)

n-butanol, acetone

Biofuel/biochemical product(s)

Diesel, synthetic waxes and naphtha

Feedstock

Corn

Feedstock

Landfill gas and natural gas

Production capacity

21 MMgy

Production capacity

TBA

Type of RINs

N/A

Type of RINs

D7, D3

Coproducts

N/A

Coproducts

TBA

Groundbreaking date

Q4 2015

Groundbreaking date

May 2015

Start-up date

Q3 2016

Start-up date

Mid-2016

The former ethanol plant requires some additional equipment and building infrastructure, including slightly different distillation equipment, but is utilizing some existing assets. Construction is in full swing and the plant is on track to become operational during the third quarter this year.

Manufacture of the FT reactors and initial catalyst charge for the plant is complete. Fabrication of the modular process units is essentially complete and the first modules are being prepared for delivery to the site.

WHEN WE SEE A DISCOVERY, WE SHARE IT. :\YL ^L»YL PU]LZ[PUN PU [OL QVIZ VM [VTVYYV^ >L Q\Z[ ^HU[ [OLT [VKH` ;OH[»Z ^O` ^L»]L ILLU ^VYRPUN ZV JSVZLS` ^P[O K`UHTPJ [LJOUVSVN` JVTWHUPLZ [V IYPUN [OLT [V 0V^H 6\Y YLZLHYJO PUZ[P[\[PVUZ ZOHYL KPZJV]LYPLZ ^P[O SVJHS IPVZJPLUJL JVTWHUPLZ ÄSSPUN [OLPY WPWLSPULZ ^P[O IYLHR[OYV\NO WYVK\J[Z 0V^H IYPUNZ [VNL[OLY I\ZPULZZ SLHKLYZ [V IVVZ[ PUUV]H[PVU HUK WVZP[PVU \Z MVY Z\JJLZZ PU [OL NSVIHS LJVUVT` =PZP[ PV^HLJVUVTPJKL]LSVWTLU[ JVT (UK ÄUK V\[ ^O` PUUV]H[PVU ZLLZ 0V^H HZ [OL SHUK VM VWWVY[\UP[`

CHIP STRONG. MORBARK® STRONG!

Track Options

Cab & Loader Option

MicroChipper Configuration Option

Morbark Strong. It’s more than a slogan; it’s a way of life for us. It’s our commitment to you that our heavy-duty equipment is built to withstand the rigors of even your toughest jobs.

All Morbark equipment is aggressive, productive and engineered to give you the power and features you need to maximize output, minimize downtime and enhance your profitability.

Range of Sizes Available

Visit us at the International Biomass Conference and Expo, Booth #1112

We custom-build your whole tree drum chipper to meet your exact specifications. Our dealers will partner with you to determine your needs — for now and in the future.

Our commitment to you extends beyond the sale with our ever-expanding dealer network, unmatched service and support teams, as well as expertise in helping you recognize and capitalize on potential business opportunities.

In short, our commitment to you is Morbark Strong!

Find your local authorized Morbark dealer at www.morbark.com/find-a-dealer

PowerNews 312 MW of biomass capacity added in 2015

New generation in service 2015 No. of units

2014

Installed capacity (MW)

No. of units

Installed capacity (MW)

The Federal Energy Regulatory CommisCoal 1 3 3 166 sion Office of Energy Projects recently released Natural gas 51 5,952 82 9,162 its energy infrastructure update for December, reporting the U.S. added 312 MW of biomass Oil 11 19 19 96 capacity last year, up from 270 MW in 2014.

Water 22 154 19 237 The number of biomass units, however, deWind 71 8,186 71 5,319 creased from 92 in 2014 to 30 in 2015.

Biomass 30 312 92 270 According to the report, 487 new generation units were placed in service across the U.S. Geothermal steam 2 48 7 36 last year, with a combined capacity of 17,272 Solar 282 2,598 426 3,776 MW. In 2014, the 741 new generation units Waste heat 0 0 4 75 were placed into service, with a combined caOther 17 0 8 22 pacity of 19,425 MW. Of the renewable energy technologies, Total 487 17,272 741 19,425 wind led with 71 units with a combined capacity SOURCE: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION of 8,186 MW, followed by 282 solar units with a combined capacity of 2,598 MW. The U.S. also added 22 hydro units last year with a combined categorized as “other” were added, with a com- proximately 1.43 percent of total U.S. capacity.

Of the nonhydro renewables, only wind had a capacity of 154 MW, 2 geothermal steam units bined capacity of less than 1 MW. As of the close of 2015, the U.S. had 16.68 higher percentage of capacity. with a combined capacity of 48 MW. No waste heat units were added last year, but 17 units GW of biomass capacity, accounting for ap-

The Real Dirt on Dust Scientific Dust Collectors offers a FREE second edition publication on dust collection titled “A Scientific Review of Dust Collection – Second Edition”.

This second edition, 120 page manual, contains new sections on explosion vents and system design and reviews the history, theory and application of all types of dust collection equipment.

Request your FREE copy at

www.scientificdustcollectors.com or call 708-597-7090

24 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

Supreme Court delays enforcement of EPA’s Clean Power Plan In February, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a request to delay enforcement of the U.S. EPA’s Clean Power Plan until legal challenges are resolved.

More than two dozen states and a variety of industry groups have filed legal challenges against the program. Oral arguments are currently scheduled to be held June 2 with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Colombia.

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest issued a statement on the Supreme Court’s decision Feb. 9. “We disagree with the Supreme Court’s decision to stay the Clean Power Plan while litigation proceeds,” he said in the statement.

“Even while the litigation proceeds, EPA has indicated it will work with states that choose to continue plan development and will prepare the tools those states will need,” he continued. “At the same time, the administration will continue to take aggressive steps to make forward progress to reduce carbon emissions.”

The U.S. EPA plans to hold a workshop on the role of biomass in the Clean Power Plan April 7.

POWER¦

Biomass Power’s Momentum in Maine

BY BOB CLEAVES

In the first few months of 2016, Maine lawmakers and the media have shown that when the (wood) chips are down, they will rally to do everything in their power to keep plants open. Biomass currently provides 25 percent of Maine’s total power, not just renewable electricity, and it is encouraging to see that many Mainers want to keep it that way.

On Jan. 1, Massachusetts put into effect new regulations that require any biomass facility selling power on the New England grid to meet an arbitrary 50 percent efficiency standard to qualify for Massachusetts renewable energy credits (RECs). This disqualifies any standalone biomass facility without a steam host, a category into which falls the entire New England biomass fleet operating today. As a result, two Maine facilities have announced impending closure by the end of March, if the policy is not reversed.

The hope is that Massachusetts will reconsider its requirement, allowing the Maine facilities to remain online. This will not happen overnight, however. In the meantime, Maine lawmakers are looking at creative measures to help fill in the gaps—supporting not only biomass, but also the loggers and other rural workers who benefit from the existence of a strong biomass market.

Maine media and lawmakers have been fully supportive of biomass, going on the record for an unambiguous defense of our industry and its many benefits.

Maine Gov. Paul LePage, in this year’s State of the State letter, recognized the economic role of biomass in Maine, and later held a briefing with Maine loggers and biomass power providers to hear about the current challenges and pledge the continued help of his staff in finding a solution Some of the media stories of the past month have included: • A Portland Press Herald story that explored the link between biomass and the state’s forestry economy, with several quotes from loggers and sawmill executives on the important role biomass plays for their businesses.

• Several Maine newspapers ran lengthy editorials on the need to reconsider state policies that are endangering Maine biomass. On the need to prevent potential job loss, the editorial said, “To help avoid that outcome, Maine should pursue policies favorable to biomass, even if that means marginally pushing up energy rates with above-market contracts. Any rate increase would be more than offset by the economic benefits of a homegrown energy supply that also means so much to forest products industry.

• Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, interviewed me for a nearly 15-minute segment on WGAN’s “Inside Maine,” during which we discussed the biomass industry and the policy solutions that could help keep plants open.

• A Portland Press Herald op-ed by Patrick Strauch further drove home the environmental benefits of biomass, and the adverse effects of state policies that make it more difficult to use biomass as a fuel for generating power. He also recognized King and Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, for their carbon neutrality amendment to the Senate energy bill.

It’s not yet clear what policy solutions will result from this wave of strong biomass support being vocalized in Maine. But we know that many Maine legislators are aware of the issue and are working to find a solution. The biomass industry is highly appreciative of these efforts.

Author: Bob Cleaves President, Biomass Power Association bob@usabiomass.org www.usabiomass.org

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 25

STAYING ALIVE: Rio Bravo Fresno is one of only a couple dozen biomass power plants that are still operating in California, which at its peak hosted more than 60 facilities.

PHOTO: RICK SPURLOCK

26 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

POWER¦

Staving

Off a Sunset While California’s biomass power industry continues its struggle for survival, fuel suppliers are left without a home for mounting materials.

BY BRUCE DORMINEY

F

rom its very inception, California has fostered the entrepreneurial spirit—from the 1849 Gold Rush right through to present-day Silicon Valley. The Golden State has traditionally been a hotbed of innovation, and that remains true today, particularly when it comes to renewable energy generation.

But three decades after California led the country in creating one of the world’s most viable biomass industries, the state’s sector is literally fighting for its long-term survival. A confluence of low natural gas prices, expiring power purchase agreements (PPAs), expiration of price guarantees on continuing PPAs, and cheap and plentiful solar alternatives have deeply cut into the state’s biomass-to-energy production.

In many ways, during his second term ending in 1983, current California Gov. Jerry Brown was the architect and inspiration behind the state’s once-burgeoning biomass industry. At one time, the state saw more than 60 plants incorporating a mix of ag waste, forest product waste and residues, as well as urban construction and demolition (C&D) waste.

Today, Brown is under pressure from both biomass plant operators and fuel sup-

pliers who are increasingly looking to leadership from Sacramento for a way out of what may shape up to be biomass’s worst year ever in California.

Past Biomass Glory

At its peak in the early 1990s, the California biomass energy industry produced almost 4.5 billion kilowatt-hours (KWh) per year of electricity, according to the national renewable energy laboratory. “There are currently 23 California biomass plants operating with a collective capacity of 550 MW,” says Gregg Morris, a Berkeley-based bioenergy consultant. “Seven or eight plants are idle but refurbishable.”

Thus, he says, there is probably 150 MW of capacity that could come back online if the facilities were to secure PPAs. Six biomass plants have shut down in the past two years. Covanta’s Mendota biomass plant is just the latest casualty, closing in December. Morris says two or three are facing closure if they don’t get a new contract this year. He expects another half dozen to close next year.

Long-term PPAs are expiring at the same time that we are seeing historically low natural gas prices, says Carrie Annand,

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 27

FOGGY FUTURE: Rio Bravo Fresno, a 25-MW plant operating in central California, normally has all of its annual fuel supply contracted at this time of year, but that’s not the case right now, as the near-term fate of the facility is unclear.

PHOTO: RICK SPURLOCK

vice president of external affairs at the Biomass Power Association in Washington, D.C. She says that is causing uncertainty for all California biomass producers.

Biomass currently only provides California with less than six percent of its renewable energy; compared to an all-time high of more than 15 percent. The industry uses some five to six million tons total per year of biomass total.

“In a normal year, we would have 100 percent of our fuel supply already contract-

28 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

ed,” says Rick Spurlock, plant manager of Rio Bravo Fresno, a 25-MW plant owned

by IHI Power Services Corp. “But we don’t have an energy price agreement past July 31.” Thus, Spurlock says they are not going to contract fuel without an energy price agreement in place, a decision that boils down to economics. “If the biomass plants go off the fixed rate, that means the price per KWh will drop by five to six cents,” says Lynch. “They can buy wind and solar for five to six cents.”

Thus, it’s no surprise that Covanta’s five California biomass plants have all been shut down. Current power purchase prices are not sufficient to cover operations and fuel and the company has been unable to secure PPAs to continue operations, says James Regan, spokesman for Covanta in Morristown, New Jersey. “We will continue to evaluate their future, but [only] getting a PPA at the right price will enable us to operate,” Regan says.

POWER¦

Clock is Ticking

The California legislature can appropriate greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction funds, says Kelly Covello, president of the Almond Hullers & Processors Association in Ripon. But the utilities still need to sign contracts, the California Public Utility Commission needs to approve them and a mechanism to get the funds passed through to the utility needs to be created, she says.

Finally, to benefit ag and almond growers, the contracts and funds need to flow

to the plants that are located in or near the valley to take ag biomass material, Covello says. The AHPA has developed a coalition of biomass producers, forestry professionals, urban waste collectors, agricultural entities and city sanitation district advocates to develop a strategy to address the immediate crisis and build a model for a sustainable biomass industry, according to Covello, but chipping rates have already increased from $350 per acre to over $1200 per acre. “Ultimately, we will not know until the governor signs the state budget in June if PPAs will be signed and what the details will be,” she says.

Unfortunately, that may be too late for many operators. “If we are unable to reach agreement on an extension to our fixed energy price, the plant would most likely shutdown this summer,” says Spurlock. “Current SRAC (short-run avoided cost) pricing would not even cover the cost of the plant’s fuel.”

That means this summer, prices Spurlock would be offered for the plant’s power could drop to as low as 3 cents per KWh. “If that happens, we would no longer be able to supply wood to the Rio Bravo plant at the equivalent of 3 cents per KWh,” says Harley Phillips, tipping manager with Wilson Ag in California’s Central Valley.

Phillips says the only alternative would be to raise the price for taking out orchard residues to the point where it would not be economically feasible for the growers. “If all of this happens, we’re going to have to develop something else to do with this

wood,” he says. “We’re trying to see how much can be incorporated back into the ground in the orchard where it came from.”

Disposal of Mounting Biomass

Further north in Chico, Tim Lynch of Agra Marketing Group, an ag waste fuel supplier, also says if nothing changes soon, his company will be in dire straits this summer. If these biomass plants can’t get fair, 5- to 10-year terms on price per KWh, Lynch says, it could result in an environmental disaster. “There’s so many millions of tons of this material, it’s got no place to go,” says Lynch.

Does this mean that the growers will go back to open burning? South of Sacramento, in the San Joaquin Valley, one of the worst air districts in the U.S., burning permits are again being issued. “When they start this open burning again, the farmers are going to get blamed,” says Lynch.

The effects of California’s four-year drought and subsequent bark beetle infestation on much of the state’s forests, could provide a helpful reprieve from such low rates. The U.S. Forest Service estimates that more than 22 million trees have already died. And as Gov. Jerry Brown has noted, state and federal agencies are actively surveying the most hazardous forest zones in California as a target of removing such dead wood.

Biomass fuel suppliers and biomass plant operators are pinning their hopes on passage of draft resolution E-4770 put forth by the California Public Utility Com-

DISTRIBUTOR AND FABRICATOR OF CARBON, STAINLESS AND ALLOY PIPING MATERIALS SPECIALIZING CIALIZING C CIAL ALIZING ALIZ A IZ ZING IN NG N G IN WELDING AND MACHINING MAC MA AC A ACHINING CH ING G OF O HIGH HIG HIG MPERATURE ERATURE CORROSION E ORROSION RESISTANT R RESISTANT STANT T NT ALLOYS. ALLOYS AL ALLO L OYS TEMPERATURE,

CUSTOM MANUFACTURING

CALL US TODAY, TOD TO ODAY, WE W WILL HELP HELP P YOU YOU TURN YOUR IDEAS INTO FINISHED PRODUCTS

(562) 62) 2) 634-6425 | WWW.COLUMBIASPECIALTY.COM WWW.COLUMBIAS WWW.CO WWW.COLUMBIASPECIALTY.CO W WWW W.COLUMBIAS APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 29

TRAGEDY TO TRIUMPH: The effects of California’s four-year drought and subsequent bark beetle infestation on much of the state’s forests, coupled with the government’s focus on removing the material and getting it to bioenergy facilities could prove helpful to the industry.

PHOTO: CAL FIRE

HOW DO YOU STOP AN INDUSTRIAL EXPLOSION IN ITS TRACKS?

POWER¦ mission. The PUC failed to initially pass a resolution that would require three of these utilities to get some 80 percent of their biomass fuel from forest residues under threat from drought and bark beetle infestation.

These new, short-term emergency PPAs would only be contracted for five years.

Although there may be some changes in its final wording, at press time, Morris felt confident that the PUC would pass some version of its existing resolution on March 17. In part, the PUC resolution orders the utilities to hold a solicitation to contract 50 MW worth of biomass power. He says San Diego Gas and Electric will get 5 to 10 MW, and Pacific Gas and Electric and Southern California Edison will split the rest of that that allotment.

Morris says the overarching goal is to keep the biomass industry operating. That means taking as much material out of those dead trees as the forest service, Cal Fire and any private landowners can produce. As Kim Carr, an assistant deputy director of the California department of forestry and fire protection (Cal Fire) explains, Cal Fire and the state’s office of emergency services have been designated by the governor to create a task force of stakeholders to co-

ordinate emergency protective actions and monitor ongoing conditions on this epidemic.

As part of the CPUC resolution, Carr says, the utilities are to offer auctions that allow for higher power prices for existing and new facilities that use biomass from areas designated for purposes of the emergency proclamation, as high hazard zones.

Rio Bravo Fresno in Fresno County is ideally located to receive fuel from three of the six county areas affected by southern Sierra tree mortality, Spurlock says. He notes that major highways run east from the city of Fresno into the mountainous areas of Madera, Fresno and Tulare County, adding that Rio Bravo Fresno is also negotiating a short-term contract with a southern Sierra biomass fuel supplier.

Biomass’s Future in California

The endgame for the current crisis remains murky, but Annand hopes to eventually see federal support in the form of tax credits for at least some of these biomass facilities. But, she says it’s unlikely to come until well after this fall’s presidential elections. Congress and state lawmakers will need to be reminded that biomass provides

much in the way of waste disposal, she adds, and that’s not something that wind and solar can offer.

Unfortunately, biomass is not the cheapest renewable out there, Morris points out. So the question remains: How can the biomass industry best be compensated for these extra services?

In the end, if California’s biomass industry is to continue, it will need the hallmarks of the state’s well-earned reputation for innovation to make it so. Exactly what form such innovation will ultimately take is anyone’s guess. But, in the long-term, it may take new more efficient technology to lower plant operating costs.

In the short-term, survival will likely come in the form of state and federal tax credits and incentives. If California can weather the current storm, what it learns would likely have follow-on benefits that will ripple across the U.S. biomass industry as a whole.

Author: Bruce Dorminey Science journalist/author brucedorminey@gmail.com Twitter:@bdorminey

It depends on a number of critical factors.

How explosible is the material you are processing? Are your process vessels indoors? How are the upstream and downstream processes configured? What ignition sources could be present? Our engineers start by understanding your process, reviewing your DHA and testing process materials if necessary. Then we apply the right solution including a combination of suppression, isolation and venting systems.

Why risk an industrial explosion that could threaten your workers or shut down valuable processes. Count on IEP Technologies to provide the right solution. Just like we have done successfully for hundreds of industrial companies around the world.

Let’s develop a solution for you

Call the IEP engineering experts with the most experience in explosion protection at 1-855-793-8407 or visit IEPTechnologies.com.

PROTECTING THE WORLD’S PROCESSES AGAINST EXPLOSION

PelletNews US South continues to ramp up pellet exports

The North American Wood Fiber Review has reported North American pellet exports increased for the second consecutive three-month period during the third quarter of last year, increasing 15 percent when compared to the second quarter and reaching a record high of more than 1.6 million tons. Growth is poised to continue as the U.S. South continues to be in expansion mode, with additional capacity being added last fall.

According to the review, newly operating pellet plants in the Gulf Coast reDJH LVODQG & gion made their first shipments to Europe during the third quarter. German Pellets facility in Louisiana, Drax Biomass’s two

new plants in Louisiana and Mississippi, and Zilkha Biomass Energy in Alabama all continued their ramp-up of operations. Primarily due to these new facilities, North American Wood Fiber Review reported exports from the Gulf ports rose by 54 percent from the previous quarter to reach over 550,000 tons in the third quarter of 2015.

In comparison, quarterly shipments of pellets from Canada remained practically unchanged during the first three quarters of the year.

%LRPDVV 3URFHVVLQJ 6\VWHPV

5HFHLYLQJ 6L]LQJ &RQYH\LQJ 6FUHHQLQJ 6HSDUDWLQJ 6WRUDJH &DOO IRU D IUHH EURFKXUH

32 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

Q3 2015 North American exports reached a record 1.6 million tons

3HOOHWL]LQJ &+3 &HOOXORVLF (WKDQRO

YHFRSODQOOF FRP

Canadian exports to Japan and South Korea nearly doubled from Q2 to Q3 2015

Q3 2015 pellet exports from Gulf ports increased 54%

Proposed pellet project awarded tax incentives Vermont-based Kingdom Pellet plans to build a pellet mill at the site of a former paper mill in the state’s Northeast Kingdom. The project was recently approved for tax incentives through the Vermont Employment Growth Incentive program, a job stimulus program run by the Vermont Economic Progress Council.

The company is leasing space at the site of the former Gilman paper mill and will make use of some existing assets, according to project partner Tabitha Bowling.

Bowling described the size of the plant as “community scale. We will pull in material at sustainable levels,” she said.

“The plan is for a 30,000-ton, super premium-grade softwood pellet mill.”

A construction date has not yet been set, as the company is in the midst of financing the project. Vermont Wood Pellet Co., a 16,000-ton-per-year mill in North Clarendon, Vermont, is a partner in the proposed project.

PELLET¦

Roadmap For Pellet Stoves During Cheap Oil, Gas

BY JOHN ACKERLY

From April 6-8, scores of state, federal, academic and industry representatives will gather at the U.S. DOE’s Brookhaven National Lab for the Pellet Stove Design Challenge. This competition seeks to identify and spread affordable strategies for making pellet stoves cleaner and more efficient. But, the competition also serves as a high-level gathering of experts to talk about the future of pellet stoves.

The future of residential pellet heating is in flux, not only because of rock bottom oil and gas prices, but also because more affordable heat pumps and other technologies are entering the market. However, we think the residential pellet stove market can withstand this downturn and come out even stronger. Here’s why: First, an increasing number of incentives and change out programs are giving larger rebates for pellet stoves than for wood stoves. This trend will create baseline sales to stabilize the industry. It’s becoming common knowledge that a pellet stove tested at 2.5 grams per hour will burn far cleaner during its lifetime than a wood stove tested at 2.5 grams per hour.

Second, pellet stoves are often used to heat just the core of a house. They offer homeowners substantial savings over an oil or propane boiler designed to heat the whole house.

Third, the price point of many pellet stoves is within reach of millions of Americans. One of the bestselling pellet stoves is a Virginia-made Englander stove that costs $1,200 and is occasionally marked down to under $1,000. It’s below average in efficiency, but for the price, it would take a decade for a higher-efficiency, $4,000 stove to achieve the same savings.

Fourth, more families are buying pellet stoves not based solely on cost savings, but because of the growing trend toward renewable technology and the notion that supporting multinational oil and gas companies is not beneficial for the planet, and it simply feels good to cut the cord with them.

Heat local. Eat local. Keep the profits and jobs local.

These four factors will help the pellet stove industry weather low gas and oil prices, but stronger and long-term growth of the residential pellet stove industry will take more deliberate action on the part of the industry. It will require stove manufacturers and their trade associations to be more assertive, transparent and consumer friendly.

The industry has already taken the crucial step of establishing a pellet certification program that helps consumers identify consistently good quality pellets, and increasingly more pellet producers are signing up.

Many stove manufacturers still have a long way to go in improving the efficiency of their technologies. The legacy of pellet stoves being exempted from U.S. EPA standards

through high air-to-fuel ratios left a stain on the industry.

Moreover, the average pellet stove today has an efficiency of about 70 percent, and some are still in the 50 percent range.

We need to see more stoves with efficiencies in the high 70s to build a renewable energy sector that can hold its own with heat pumps, solar thermal and geothermal.

The biggest environmental advantage of pellet stoves is that they can be consistently far cleaner than wood stoves in the hands of consumers. Each gram of particulate matter in a neighborhood’s air is important, and pellet stove manufacturers should start meeting the 2020 EPA standard of 2 grams per hour as soon as possible. Regulators should start devising incentives to be under 1 gram per hour.

All stove manufacturers should play by the same rules, disclosing actual efficiency and Btu output numbers to consumers. Some companies still grossly exaggerate efficiency and Btu output data, which may result in consumers purchasing a substandard product on the basis of false promises. And companies could be legally liable for misleading consumers through false promises, as has happened with some automobile and other appliances manufacturers.

Stove quality and durability are paramount. Too many consumers have had stoves break down and experienced trouble getting professional and affordable repairs. Some brands like Harman have excellent reputations for durability, but the tradeoff is higher cost. Buying a brand that has an experienced dealer and service capacity nearby is very important for pellet stoves because they need repairs and professional annual cleanings, somewhat like cars. However, unlike cars, many pellet stove brands don’t have the service network to support these maintenance needs, and this can result in a loss of consumer confidence.

All of these issues will be on the table at the Pellet Stove Design Challenge to be held at Brookhaven National Lab in April. We hope state and federal regulators attending will walk away with increased confidence in this sector and recognize the potential of pellet stoves to affordably reduce fossil fuels in millions of U.S. households. The solar juggernaut is building steam every year, and technologies like pellet stoves and boilers that have huge promise could get pushed to the sidelines. It’s up to us to ensure that doesn’t happen. When oil and gas prices rise again, pellet stoves have potential to become a more mainstream technology in the U.S., just as they are in Europe.

Author: John Ackerly President, Alliance for Green Heat jackerly@forgreenheat.org 301-204-9562

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 33

34 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

The Upside of

COMMODITY STATUS As the global wood pellet market grows, so does the need for marketplace efficiencies enjoyed by the worldâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s largest commodities.

BY TIM PORTZ

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 35

¦PELLETS

A

ccording to United Nations trade data, in 2015, 4.5 million tons of wood pellets were exported from the U.S., while Canada exported 1.6 million tons. In the same year, the U.S. exported nearly 73 million tons of coal, while Canada exported over 30 million. Collectively, coal exports from North America outstrip pellet exports by a factor of 17. While not surprising, this disparity helps shed some light on the inherent differences and challenges the wood pellet industry faces as it works to mature and drive the kind of trade efficiencies commonly enjoyed by larger commodities, such as coal, into its own marketplace.

By the simplest of definitions, a commodity is a fungible good. Put even more simply, one unit of a given commodity can be exchanged for another unit of the same commodity. This concept underpins and supports the movement of commodities of all types around the world, including corn, wheat, wood pulp, coal, oil, natural gas, cotton and a multitude of other goods vital to the global economy. Buyers requiring these commodities can be assured that when they need them, ample supply will be available, provided they are willing to pay the market price. And producers, whether they be growers, miners or manufacturers, can invest capital and deploy resources with confidence that their materials and goods

36 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

will find a waiting market. Whether or not wood pellets have achieved commodity status is a matter of ongoing debate, as are the characteristics that analysts point to when making that determination. Additionally, industry experts differ on the necessity of the marketplace practices commonly associated with larger commodities, including brokerage houses and traders, or financial instruments like futures contracts.

“When people are talk about the commoditization of wood pellets, their intent is clearly to make the market more liquid so that pellets may be traded more freely,” says Gordon Murray, executive director of the Wood Pellet Association of Canada. “I think that is the ultimate objective.”

This liquidity, from Murray’s perspective, is hampered by the existence of varying grades of wood pellets commonly manufactured. “For something to be a commodity, you need to be able to substitute one batch for another, and they should be indistinguishable, provided they meet some basic requirements,” he says. Murray points to industrial and residential wood pellets, and even the varying grades and classes within those two categories.

For Todd Bush, a partner at CM Biomass, a pellet trading firm, this distinction is too simplistic. “Wood pellets are fungible,” he says. “They are fungible just like oil is. There are different grades of oil that

are traded. In fact, there are even different grades of light, crude oil traded. Some refineries might not be able to take one subgrade of light sweet crude, but they may be able to take another.”

Bush says commodities of all types have this kind of quality stratification inherent in their product class. “No commodity market is purely and completely 100 percent fungible,” he says. “That doesn’t mean you can’t exchange one unit for another with discounts driven by certain parameters.”

The Argument for Commodity Status

The seasonality of pellet markets have always challenged the industry, certainly for producers playing in the residential heat market, the sector that gave rise to the industry in the first place. In the heating market, consumers only need pellets during the fall and winter months, and as a result, buying activity peaks in the months leading up to the heating season, plateaus during the season—unless there is an unexpected and prolonged cold snap—and in the months immediately following, it shuts down altogether. On-again, off-again markets bring with them on-again, off-again cash flow realities that challenge producers. Without steady cash flows, producers struggle to run plants efficiently, staff their operations and secure financing for plant improvements and expansion. Further, for the industry to

PELLETS¦

U.S. Export Volumes and Values of Common Commodities (2015) Commodity Exports in Metric Tons Trade Value (US$) Soybeans

48,231,077

$18,963,406,489

Corn

44,654,593

$8,699,738,118

-

$5,880,723,593

Coal

72,761,756

$5,671,655,193

Wheat

21,047,679

$5,577,498,970

Pork

1,506,778

$4,019,415,369

Beef

310,043

$2,652,291,637

Wood pellets

4,575,696

$682,667,592

Iron ore

8,157,231

$653,667,592

87,652

$40,630,045

Cotton

Wood pulp Source: UN Comtrade database

meet demand once the heating market does ramp up, they must find a way to sustain operations for year-round production.

Commodity traders, Bush says, go a long way in eliminating these challenges.

“You can’t have the handful of consumers out there buying up all of the summer product and storing it until they need it,” he says. “They can’t afford that kind of storage.” Instead, traders like CM Biomass become a proxy of sorts, buying volumes from producers when others won’t, and then reselling those volumes when retailers and distributors need them. Whether or not those traders make a profit hinges on

their ability to earn enough of a mark-up to cover their storage, capital and overhead costs. Therefore, generating a profit is not a guarantee. Traders, unlike brokers, actually take physical and financial possession of the products they trade, whereas brokers serve only as intermediaries. This distinction requires traders to have a very strong cash position, and significantly increases their overall risk. Traders introduce yearround demand into the market when, if end user demand were the only demand in the marketplace, it simply wouldn’t exist. This liquidity serves both buyers and sellers in that it enables producers to more efficiently

build supply, and allows buyers to more accurately predict available supplies. In most cases, liquidity contributes to more stable, predictable commodity prices.

Difference and Challenges

There are aspects of the wood pellet market that contribute to making true commodity status elusive. Many inside the industry point to the ongoing struggle to unify and harmonize the sustainability requirements to which pellet producers must comply as the largest impediment to greater marketplace efficiency. In nearly all instances, the buyers of industrial-grade wood pellets are doing so as a means of complying with a renewable energy or lowcarbon mandate, and the regulators and citizens they report to want assurances that users of the funds being used to subsidize use of pellets are accomplishing sustainability goals. The result is a patchwork of certification schemes that have fragmented the global market into a number of much smaller markets, and created a situation in which a shipload of pellets cannot be traded freely between buyers. “There are such varying requirements globally, even in Europe, and until there is some consensus there, this will continue to be a barrier for the efficient trading of wood pellets,” says Murray. “This is what the Sustainable Biomass Partnership was set up for, but so far

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 37

ÂŚPELLETS

the European regulators have been slow to come on board.â&#x20AC;?

The Sustainable Biomass Partnership, formed by seven large heat and power utilities in Europe, was established in an effort to drive out the inefficiencies that multiple and disparate country-specific sustainability requirements introduce into the market.

European utilities that are planning on, or already engaged in the cofiring of wood pellets, recognized that multiple sustainability programs would introduce added expenses for producers, as well as limit available supplies, ultimately leading to constrained supply, supply interruptions and highly variable prices. The SBP was developed to mitigate each of these, while also providing utilities a means of demonstrating that the widespread replacement of coal inputs with wood pellets delivered the environmental benefits for which it was intended.

In a recent Biomass Magazine webinar about the SBP and process by which producers become SBP certified, Simon Armstrong, technical director at the SBP

said, â&#x20AC;&#x153;Another objective of the SBP is to make wood pellets more fungible to ease the trade of pellets between market players, particularly when the ultimate end user is not known.â&#x20AC;? The success of the SBP and the promises of increased marketplace efficiencies all hinges on the regulatory bodies in pellet countries recognizing SBP certification and aligning their requirements with the program. If this is accomplished, producers and traders will be able to more freely capture opportunities in the spot market.

Also during the webinar, Armstrong reported progress on recognition of the SBP program in key pellet-buying markets in Europe. In early 2015, Denmark recognized the SBP in their energy agreement, and later in the year, the United Kingdom found that SBP approved pellets complied with U.K. legislation.

For other major pellet destinations in Europe, there is work left to do. â&#x20AC;&#x153;We are working with the Belgian regulators to make sure the SBP meets their requirements and are now piloting SBP with the Belgians

to give them confidence in the program,â&#x20AC;?

Armstrong said, continuing by touching on progress with the Dutch government, a market producers throughout the world are eager to see reemerge, including Murray. â&#x20AC;&#x153;The Netherlands is just a mess right now,â&#x20AC;?

Murray says. â&#x20AC;&#x153;The previous subsidy system and the contracts associated with that expired over about a three-year period and for now, cofiring in the Netherlands is all but dead. I donâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t think there was even one pellet cofired in the past two years.â&#x20AC;?

Most analysts agree that once the Dutch can agree on the sustainability requirements, theyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;ll generate 3.5 million tons of new demand. That said, producers will have to engage in an altogether new certification program to sell into this market, and more stratification will occur within the supply chain. Conversely, if the Dutch and the Belgians both agree to recognize the SBP certification process, pellets that are SBP certified can then move freely between each of those countries, increasing overall market liquidity.

_ LQIR#VLJPDWKHUPDO FRP

%LRPDVV )LUHG (QHUJ\ 6\VWHPV 3DUWV 6HUYLFH 5HWURË&#x2039;WV

(QJLQHHUHG :RRG 3ODQWV

26% 0') 3% DQG /9/

;PTL [V YLWSHJL `V\Y L_PZ[PUN LX\PWTLU[& 5LLK PTWYV]LK WYVJLZZ LMĂ&#x201E;JPLUJ`&

Consider retrofitting your existing system with modifications or equipment upgr ades to increase your process efficiency and to take advantage of improved energy savings.

9L[YVĂ&#x201E;[ 9L[Y ,TPZZPVU ,T <WNY <W N HKLZ )VPSLY )VPS LY 4(* ( ; *VTW *V TWSPSPHU HUJJL +L[HPSLK ,ULYN` :`Z[L [LT T (\KP[

:``Z[LT 4VKPĂ&#x201E; Ă&#x201E;JH[PVUZ

9LWSHJLT TLU[ ,,X\PPWTLU[ 7 7HYY[Z

,SLJJ[YPJJ (\[[VTH[PVU * *VU[YVS

â&#x20AC;˘ Fuel Storage and Reclaim

â&#x20AC;˘ Electrical/ Functional Safety Engin.

â&#x20AC;˘ Biomass Hydr drau aulic System

â&#x20AC;˘ Fuel Feed Conveying Equipment â&#x20AC;˘ Fans

â&#x20AC;˘ Combustion Control Systems

â&#x20AC;˘ Fuel Feeders and Metering Bins â&#x20AC;˘ Dampers

â&#x20AC;˘ Basic Process Control Systems (BPCS)

â&#x20AC;˘ Air-cooled Fuel Feeders â&#x20AC;˘ Air-cooled Thermal Fluid Heat Dumps

â&#x20AC;˘ Thermal Oil Radiant Heaters

â&#x20AC;˘ Multi-Clones

â&#x20AC;˘ Expansion Joints

â&#x20AC;˘ Thermal Oil Convection Heaters â&#x20AC;˘ Thermal Fluid Heat Dumps â&#x20AC;˘ Ash Conveyors

â&#x20AC;˘ Thermal Fluid Pumps

â&#x20AC;˘ Grate Bars

â&#x20AC;˘ Controls and Control Devices

â&#x20AC;˘ Safety Instrumented Systems â&#x20AC;˘ Field Support-Programming and Training

PELLETS¦

While Bush shares Murray’s and the industry’s concerns about the number of certification schemes out there, he differs with their conclusions, and suggests that while they do introduce challenges, and that measures should be taken to harmonize them when possible, the number of programs is less problematic than the overall volumes and number of buyers looking for pellets certified inside of each of these programs.

“I still say that underlying all of these challenges is the volume,” Bush says. “If the market were 10 times larger, you’d have 10 times more volume in each category. But right now, it is still a fragmented market, mostly because there are so many specifications and certifications out there that each end user requires. It’s really just a volume issue; a volume of trades issue, not volume in tonnage.”

For now, the vast majority of pellets made by Murray’s producers never even enter the spot market. Murray tells Biomass Magazine that it’s probable 90 percent of the volume that Canada exports is sold un-

der long-term contracts. Pellet volumes produced in the American Southeast are also largely sold to customers under long-term contracts, and while the value of the U.S. dollar and two consecutive warm winters in Europe has all but eliminated opportunities for U.S. producers within the sport market, those looking to move some discretionary volume are hungry for greater liquidity.

While opinions on the way to get there vary, all participants in the wood pellet market, in any market, want the same thing: options. Options offer all parties leverage.

More buyers and the freedom to sell product to those buyers, unencumbered by varying sustainability requirements, gives producers options. In the same way, a healthy marketplace with adequate, uniform supply allows buyers to distribute their inbound purchases across many different suppliers, and hedge against price fluctuations or supply interruptions caused by an unforeseen production outage at a single manufacturer, or weather interruptions.

For the world’s biggest commodities, these conditions are taken for granted. A buyer suddenly in need of a 25,000 tons of corn would have no trouble securing it, and without question, would entertain offers from innumerable sellers. In some ways, this is a function of the size of the global market, but pellets must also answer questions different than those of corn customers.

For this reason, there are additional layers of complexity introduced to the equation.

The work to streamline these challenges is well underway, but for now, producers find themselves managing a fragmented market, and traders like Bush work to smooth out the rough edges.

For Bush, the end game is clear. “Our perfect pellet,” he adds, “is one that we can buy and then sell into any market.”

Author: Tim Portz Executive Editor, Biomass Magazine tportz@bbiinternational.com 701-738-4969

Making efficiency our first priority to get us to profitability. Discovering better ways to run continuously at full capacity. Seeing the potential of a feedstock that can also produce a high-value livestock feed. That’s what fuels me.

Learn how sorghum can fuel your ethanol operation at

sorghumcheckoff.com/ethanolvideo

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 39 BioMass Magazine

Due to the pub:

3-7-16

A view from across Phillip's Pond, a privately owned, 150-acre lake near Cuthbert, Georgia, shows a robust forestry plantation.

Assessing Advantage in Randolph County Georgia’s Randolph County has much to offer a pellet mill or renewable fuel plant developer.

BY D. F. WALLIS

S

temming back several years, the Economic Development Authority in southwest Georgia’s Randolph County has striven to identify the economic strengths of the area and industries that could take advantage of them. Given the county’s rich history of farming and timber harvesting, these activities have been the focus of the EDA’s efforts. Armed with a good understanding of the large timber basket and an excellent undeveloped site, the EDA has been working to attract companies engaged in producing wood fuel pellets and liquid transportation fuels.

The benefits to the community could be significant, in both added tax base and additional employment. Total direct investment has potential to reach $400 million to $500 million, and the manufacturing facilities would each employ 60 to 80 people. However, the greatest

benefit to the region would be logging crews reaching into the hundreds, with thousands of direct and indirect jobs created. Added to all of this is expansion of the business community, supporting both the manufacturing operations and expanded population.

Opportunity here is great. And perhaps the most pressing question—how much excess growth is available of the region’s most abundant natural resource (trees), is available—has already been answered, via a study completed by the Georgia Forestry Commission.

Gauging Resources

In 2012, The Georgia Forestry Commission completed a study, the results of which were very encouraging, showing the annual timberland growth over removal is 4.7 million tons. From a landowner perspective, this

means that timber prices are down. However, from the emerging biomass-to-energy industry perspective, it represents a very large raw material base that can be used to produce wood fuel pellets and liquid transportation fuels such as gasoline and diesel.

The EDA has an undeveloped site that appears ideal for both a pellet mill and a renewable fuels facility. The property is located just north of Cuthbert on the east side of U.S. Highway 27 where the railroad crosses the highway. The site and area infrastructure (railroad, highways, wastewater treatment plant, and high-pressure natural gas pipeline) can meet or be modified as needed to support any large-scale manufacturing operation that utilizes trees and other biomass as raw material.

Based on the very positive results of the Forestry Commission study and the availability

CONTRIBUTION: The claims and statements made in this article belong exclusively to the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Biomass Magazine or its advertisers. All questions pertaining to this article should be directed to the author(s).

40 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

PELLET¦ of an excellent undeveloped industrial site, the EDA has been working to engage the interest of companies in the biomass conversion business.

Community leadership has been working to understand what is needed to manage the impacted community infrastructure required to support these types of companies. A number of preliminary engineering studies have been done to assess the cost of providing natural gas, water for fire suppression, additional land, and roadway expansion to handle the large number of logging trucks that would deliver raw material daily. Because of this work, it’s now possible to show the companies that not only are infrastructure and raw material available, but that the community is proactive and supportive of industrial growth in the area.

The Georgia Forestry Commission study, “Forest Resource Analysis for Cuthbert, Georgia,” substantiated the viability of providing wood as a raw material on a large scale.

As aforementioned, it showed that excess of timber growth over removals is estimated at 4.7 million tons annually. This excess is large enough to support the raw material needs of both a pellet mill and a renewable fuels refinery, still leaving in excess of 2 million tons available annually. There is a good supply of softwood and hardwood within an economic radius of 60 miles for harvesting and delivering to the manufacturing site. Of the 4.7 million tons, 3.1 million is softwood and 1.6 million is hardwood.

It is also significant that over 95 percent of the timberland is privately owned, which ensures numerous timber purchasing sources. It was noted in the study that there is a good balance in age class for the pine, which would provide a balanced harvest profile in the future. Almost all of the pine growth is located on pine plantations, which is particularly important because European market demand for wood fuel pellets requires sourcing of wood from timberland meeting certain criteria, including tree plantations.

Site and Infrastructure

The EDA currently owns 240 acres on five tracts of land on the east side of U.S. Highway 27 and south of the railroad track and right-ofway. This property was used many years ago as a wood yard. It has a driveway access onto U.S. Highway 27 with a median cut allowing for both north and south travel. U.S. Highway 82 is located three miles south of the property. Timber harvesting will occur from all directions,

and having these two highways available greatly facilitates truck deliveries. The site also has a well, a serviceable building and level terrain.

Fortunately, the land surrounding the property is undeveloped timberland, and should the need arise, additional land may be available.

The Genesse and Wyoming Railroad owns the track and right-of-way serving the site, and has an extensive track and rail switching capabilities on the west side of U.S. Highway 27. This is certainly one of the most valuable infrastructure advantages available, especially to facilities that ship large tonnages of products. The railroad has the ability to ship material anywhere, but is especially competitive in moving product to the Gulf Coast. This will become very important once the port at Port St. Joe, Florida, is reopened, providing a viable export point for wood fuel pellets serving the European market.

Southern Gas Co. has a high-pressure natural gas main line that runs through Randolph County from north to south and is three miles from the manufacturing site. Natural gas would be needed by either a pellet mill or renewable fuels refinery. The demand will vary significantly, but a 4 inch pipeline from the high-pressure main to the site would be adequate. The city of Cuthbert, which receives its gas from Southern Gas, has a gas and water department that provides operation and maintenance services for the city’s gas distribution system. Discussions with the mayor have indicated that they could serve a similar role for the pipeline that will serve the site. Preliminary engineering work has been done to develop a scope of work necessary to route a 4 inch pipeline from the highpressure main line to the manufacturing site.

A sufficient supply of water for an extensive fire suppression system will be the most important and most expensive part of meeting the water demand at the manufacturing site.

Fire suppression will be needed for the timber receiving and processing areas and the processing equipment areas. Because of the large area involved, a fire would require a large instantaneous flow of water. The city of Cuthbert’s current water distribution system can serve an important part of meeting this demand and a number of options have been evaluated. At this point, the scope of demand is not developed well enough to do an engineering evaluation.

However, there is a design basis to build on since an engineering analysis was done to assess firewater needs if only a pellet mill was being built.

Focusing On Pellets

Georgia has greatly benefited from the European market demand for wood fuel pellets.

Currently, there are a number of pellet mills operating and being built to meet this demand.

The success of the pellet mill business is not only dependent upon a large, readily available raw material supply, but the cost of moving the product from point of manufacture to customer. To be competitive with other U.S. companies selling wood fuel pellets into the European market, the cost of the rail shipment to a port is an important factor.

While the supply of raw material is more than adequate, the distance from Randolph County to an operating port is long. Currently, Savannah is viewed as the most viable port for exporting pellets from Randolph County to Europe. This has been a sticking point in moving forward with building a pellet mill to date.

However, the potential exists for the reopening of the port at Port St. Joe, Florida, which is 100 miles closer to Randolph County than Savannah. With this change, the logistics costs of serving Europe could be competitive with an export point on the east coast of Georgia.

Two notable project risks are the cost of the products sold and strength of market demand. As discussed, rail shipment costs to the port are a major factor in siting a pellet mill.

Unfortunately, the location of Randolph County is unfavorable in this regard, but it is expected that opening Port St. Joe will mitigate this cost concern.

The other market risk is European companies’ demand for pellets as a renewable energy source to replace fossil fuels such as coal. The European Union passed a renewable fuel initiative that calls for 20 percent of the energy used to be from renewable fuel sources by 2020. The U.S. is well-positioned to meet this demand, especially the Southeast, but a negative impact of changing the legislation for fuel mix in Europe could mitigate pellet demand.

Risks are a part of any project, however, and they must be identified early on and monitored to ensure success. In the case of Randolph County and its potential to host a pellet mill or biofuel plant, much of that has already been done.

Author: D.F. Wallis Chamber Board Member Randolph County Economic Development Authority 855-782-6312 rcchamber@hotmail.com

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 41

ThermalNews Reports evaluate RHI programs Reports recently published by the U.K. Department of Energy and Climate Change demonstrate more than 80 percent of applicants to the renewable heat incentive (RHI) are satisfied with their new systems. These government financial incentives promote the use of renewable heat through technologies, such as biomass boilers, both for domestic and non-domestic uses. The government-collected data shows the RHI has had a positive influence in the renewable heat technology market, helping the U.K. decarbonize heat, while reducing costs.

Between May 2014 and April 2015, 25,568 successful applications were received

Great Britain domestic RHI statistics (April 2014 to December 2015) Applications

Accreditations

Number

% of total

Number

% of total

21,659

45%

19,921

64%

6,954

14%

6,522

14%

11,832

24%

11,223

25%

Air source heat pump Ground source heat pump Biomass systems Solar thermal Total

8,160

17%

7,445

17%

48,605

100%

45,111

100%

SOURCE: U.K. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY & CLIMATE CHANGE

by the domestic RHI scheme from owner-occupiers, 33 percent of those were new applications. Applicants were asked what triggered their decision to install a new heating system

and the most common reason was the availability of a grant or other funding, with 52 percent of applicants who installed biomass systems indicating this was important.

Hurst commissions poultry litter-fueled boiler

Biomass Recovery Systems • Biomass and CoGeneration • Pulp, Paper, and Pellet Plants • Compost and Mulch Operations • Waste to Energy Plants • Sawmills • Vertical & Horizontal Models Available

Custom Biomass Recovery Systems - Sales - Parts - Service Toll Free 1-866-ROCWEAR (762-9327) WWW.WASTEWOODHOGS.COM 42 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

Hurst Boiler Inc. announced the commissioning of its third poultry litter-fueled boiler in January.

“While we have been carefully evaluating the potential to use litter in our boilers in the U.S. market, one of our solid fuel boilers in Guatemala began running almost 3 years ago on 100 percent litter simply because it was the most costeffective and reliable fuel. Since then, two more systems have been installed and are providing steam to poultry facilities using only chicken litter,” said Tommy Hurst of Hurst Boiler.

Litter has posed a challenge for many boiler systems due to its high ash content and ash characteristics. According to Charlie Coffee, solid fuel boiler sales for Hurst Boiler, “We are well aware of the many challenges and problems of litter as a fuel, which is why we spent an inordinate amount of time and resources making sure that we had measures in place to ensure success in the U.S. market.”

Prestage AgEnergy of Clinton, North Carolina, is completing a 1600 HP Hurst boiler installation. From fuel receiving through emissions, the 1600 HP is the first Hurst Boiler system in the U.S. designed and engineered specifically to be fueled by poultry litter. This cogeneration facility is scheduled to be commissioned midyear and will support Prestage Farm’s turkey operations.

THERMAL¦

Stay of Clean Power Plan: Opportunity for Biomass Industry?

BY JOEL STRONBERG

The recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to stay the implementation of the U.S. EPA’s Clean Power Plan caught nearly everyone off guard. The decision was unprecedented, in that it was the first time that the high court overruled a decision of a lower court to stay a regulation.

The legal challenge to the CPP was brought by 27 states, the coal industry and a number of utilities. Eighteen states submitted briefs in support of the CPP, and five chose to remain on the sidelines. The one-page ruling is not a decision on the constitutionality of the plan, but on the authority of the EPA to go forward with its implementation, before a decision of the case by the lower court. The lower court decision is expected in June. That decision—whether supporting or striking the CPP—will undoubtedly be appealed by the losing side. Once the lower court and the appeals courts make their rulings, the case will most probably find its way back to the Supreme Court for a final decision on the merits.

In this case, it is unlikely that justice will be swift, as it may well take several years before a final ruling is issued by the high court. Why SCOTUS chose to take the unprecedented action it did is a matter of speculation. It is logical to assume that the majority felt the challenge to the regulation has a fair chance of ultimately succeeding, however, and that implementation of the CPP by EPA in advance of a final legal decision would cause irreparable harm to the plaintiff coal companies, utilities and states. In this instance, the harm is that if the EPA is permitted to go forward with implementation, it would be nearly impossible to undo the action.

According to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Commissioner Tony Clark, “…the court was trying to avoid a situation like the one it faced with the mercury rule—by the time the court ruled, the rule had been in effect for years.”

SCOTUS’ decision to scrap the near-term implementation of the CPP strikes at the heart of the President Obama’s efforts to make climate activism a significant part of his legacy. It does not, however, serve as a death knell for clean energy alternatives. According to a ClimateWire poll, 20 states are pressing on with discussions about how to meet carbon emissions limits for power plans, 18 have stopped planning and nine are weighing whether to stop or slow down planning.

For the biomass industry, it may offer an opportunity otherwise lost, had the EPA been allowed to go forward with its implementation efforts.

Despite the economic, environmental, and societal benefits that would accompany increased deployment of sustainable biomass technologies, neither state nor federal decision makers have accorded our technologies the respect and attention they deserve. The decision to stay the CPP as written affords the biomass industry—both heat and power—additional time to demonstrate to state and federal decision makers, as well as key stakeholders, the value proposition of supporting the deployment of sustainable biomass resources.

The states and the federal government must come to understand that diversity of technologies is the preferred path to a cleaner environment. Diversity is key to a healthy ecosystem. Too great a reliance on solar and wind limits the opportunities that come with the support of multiple technological approaches to a healthy environment and economy. Biomass offers benefits not otherwise available from reliance upon solar and wind.

Sustainable biomass provides opportunities for sustained rural economic development, reduces the occurrence and severity of forest fires, lends itself equally to distributed generation, and does not suffer from the problem of intermittency and the need for expensive storage technologies.

Well-managed forests are carbon beneficial.

Although the burning of coal is the biggest culprit when it comes to carbon emissions, the fact is that coal will continued to be burned here and abroad for some time to come. When cofired with sustainable biomass, it emits less carbon than if it were burned alone.

As Shakespeare wrote, “The problem is not in our stars, but in ourselves.” If biomass is to garner the support it deserves in state energy plans, then it is up to the industry— both heat and power—to use the time afforded by the recent SCOTUS decision to double, triple and quadruple its efforts to engage local decision makers and key stakeholders in a dialogue that lays out the path to an expanded market for sustainable biomass.

Author: Joel Stronberg Consultant, renewable energy and climate change thejbsgroup78@gmail.com 703.485.7301

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 43

PHOTO: NATIONAL AGRICULTURE IMAGERY PROGRAM

Woody Biomass, Forest Operations in the Inland Northwest

BY DAVID JACKSON AND PATRICK WILSON

F

or well over 100 years, relatively dry forests on national forest lands in Idaho and Montana have undergone pronounced change. Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa var scopulorum Engelm) and western larch (Larix occidentalis), dependent on frequent, low- to moderate-intensity surface fire, have been replaced gradually by more shade-tolerant tree species such as grand fir (Abies grandis) and western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla). Physiologic stresses triggered by one set of species preempting another have created forest conditions favored by insects and disease. Widespread outbreaks have impaired forest health, leaving 2.3 million hectares of national forest land in Idaho and Montana in need of forest restoration, according to the USDA. Managing invasive insects and disease requires prevention and suppression, but a onesize-fits-all strategy is misguided. Instead, what may have potential is an option tailored to individual forest types and site conditions, whereby a single action is used to achieve multiple objectives: specifically, active forest management to improve ecosystem functionality, lower fire

risks, and generate woody biomass for innovative purposes.

Active forest management is a silvicultural approach used to reduce stand densities, increase tree diameters and improve forestsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; resistance to drought and fire. Particularly useful in dry forests such as those of the Inland Northwest, active forest management can help reestablish forest composition, old forest structures and critical habitat. In so doing, large amounts of woody biomass are often created but underutilized. Organized to address this issue was the Bioenergy Alliance Network of the Rockies, which is funded with a USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture grant.

Launched in 2013, BANR is one of seven coordinated agricultural projects funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture. The NIFA Bioeconomy-Bioenergy-Bioproduct Program sponsors research and development on national energy security, and encourages private investment in the emerging bioeconomy sectors of biofuels, biopower and other biobased products. NIFA pursues its vision through partner-

ships with federal agencies, private industry and academia.

BANR is a multidisciplinary research consortium represented by the U.S. Forest Service, the renewable fuels industry, and land-grant universities in the Inland Northwest region. Its objectives are to investigate the social, economic, and environmental implications of using woody biomass to produce renewable biofuels and other biobased products, and provide the scientific underpinnings necessary to support a regional bioenergy industry.

Because down and dead woody biomass is vital to most biotic processes in forest ecosystems, the scientific community is divided on using it to produce bioenergy. Only in recent decades have the ecologic contributions of woody biomass to wildlife habitat, nutrient cycling and carbon storage become better understood. Biomass supplies are plentiful, but concerns are that a thriving bioenergy market could result in overuse detrimental to soil nutrients and site productivity, especially in the arid, Inland Northwest where biomass reduction occurs endemically.

CONTRIBUTION: The claims and statements made in this article belong exclusively to the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Biomass Magazine or its advertisers. All questions pertaining to this article should be directed to the author(s).

44 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

THERMAL¦

Proponents claim that using woody biomass as a bioenergy feedstock will reduce dependence on fossil fuels, the effects of climate change and wildfire. Skeptics dismiss the notion as unreliable and outdated. Social opposition to biomass utilization has complicated forest management in the western U.S., where federal landownership is high. However, use of the material to produce thermal energy at relatively small scales has gained popularity among educational institutions.

In 1993, the University of Idaho converted its heating system from natural gas to steam.

Wood chips and hog fuel sourced within a 30mile radius of the Moscow, Idaho, campus are used to feed a biomass-fired boiler that heats more than 60 campus buildings, saving the university $1.5 million per year compared to natural gas. However, as scale increases, so do costs, especially those involving transportation.

An operation in Wisconsin that converted from coal to woody biomass in 2008 recently closed due to a combination of decreased value of renewable energy and increasing transportation costs. Biomass sources in the Inland Northwest are often located far from facilities that convert wood into energy. Increased bioenergy demand could dilute transportation cost per unit volume; if not, change is unexpected.

This does not mean woody biomass cannot be produced cost-effectively by forest operations. The U.S. Forest Service identified 5.7 million hectares of national forest land in 12 western states as capable of “paying for themselves.” Over two-thirds of these lands are in California, Idaho and Montana, and more than 50 percent of the woody biomass harvested would come from trees equal to or greater than 7 inches in diameter at chest height.

In 2012, the Mountain Pine Beetle Response Project on the Black Hills National Forest in western South Dakota and northeastern Wyoming began demonstrating woody biomass can be harvested at or above its breakeven price across large landscapes. Utilizing active forest management techniques, 50,000 hectares will be thinned to reduce stand densities and improve forests’ resilience to insect infestations, primarily the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) linked to forest mortality on 9.3 million hectares of national forest land since 2000. Supporting the PBR Project are several million dollars provided by state and county governments and nongovernmental organizations.

1

Many scientists agree bioenergy derived from woody biomass can be produced sustainably without risking our existing energy system. Improvements in manufacturing technologies could further strengthen woody biomass’s market competitiveness, helping it establish a niche among other forms of raw material used for renewable energy. However, biomass supplies, typically disaggregated an uncertain, must be guaranteed if businesses are to invest. Forest restoration projects on national forest lands in Idaho and Montana are capable of yielding enormous volumes of woody biomass, but it is unclear in a climate of shrinking federal budgets whether the financial and human resources needed to undertake such projects will be available.

Any new form of energy production system that lacks the elaborate networks of its predecessor will operate initially at a disadvantage. Before the new system can become competitive, disadvantages must be overcome and duplicate infrastructure created. Successful development of bioenergy from woody biomass will not be an exception as 20 years or longer will be required to recover capital costs alone.

According to the U.S. DOE, 2 percent of energy consumed in 2010 supplied by wood and wood-derived fuels will have risen to 9 percent by 2030, more than quadrupling wood fuels usage. On the other hand, the U.S. EIA estimates the country has recoverable reserves of at least 36 billion barrels of petroleum, 338 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, and enough coal to last for centuries. Given the current ready availability and price of fossil fuels, largescale expansion of bioenergy from woody biomass is infeasible economically.

If forest restoration projects in the Inland Northwest region were to become major suppliers of woody biomass for bioenergy, government subsidies in the form of tax credits, loan guarantees or other types of financial aid will be essential. Otherwise, the cost to harvest, collect, and transport the material could make its recovery from forest operations more expensive than the resulting bioenergy benefit.

2

3

Authors: David Jackson PhD, University of Idaho College of Natural Resources djackson@uidaho.edu Patrick Impero Wilson PhD, University of Idaho College of Natural Resources pwilson@uidaho.edu

1

USDA Forest Service. 2013. Western bark beetle mitigation: FY 2012 accomplishment report. Washington, D.C. 10 p.

2 Nicholls, D.L., R.A. Monserud, and D.P. Dykstra. 2008. A synthesis of biomass utilization for bioenergy production in the western United States. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-753, 48 p.

3 Ibid

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 45

SECURE SUPPLY: Coillte has a biomass processing hub in Drumkeen, County Donegal, Ireland. Pictured is the level of log storage required to ensure sufficient volumes of dry chip are available year-round to supply the local heat market.

PHOTOS: COILLTE

Delivering Renewable Energy From Irish Forests Ireland’s forestry sector, a major economic driver in the country, is poised for growth along with the bioenergy industry.

BY DES O'TOOLE

T

he Irish forestry sector annually contributes €2.3 billion ($2.5 billion) to the country’s gross domestic product, and supports approximately 12,000 jobs, mainly in rural locations, according to the Irish Forestry and Forest Products Association. Annual production of wood from Irish forests is estimated at 2.95 million cubic meters, with Coillte, the semi-state forestry organization, producing 2.43 million cubic meters, and the balance coming from the emerging private sector forestry resource, and a small amount of imports. This annual production volume can be categorized into large saw log (1.81 million cubic meters), fencing (0.15 million cubic meters) and small-diameter pulpwood (0.99 million cubic meters).

The markets for these products are the construction sector, packaging, fencing, wood-

based panel board production, and most recently, the emerging biomass energy market.

Today, supply and demand are largely in equilibrium, but it is expected that as the requirement for biomass energy increases, a new market dynamic will be created. Demand for biomass for cofiring, biomass power generation and both industrial heat and combined heat and power (CHP) are all expected to increase. This demand will be met by local sawmill residues, pulpwood from our forest estate, and potentially, biomass imports.

Today, pulpwood is primarily consumed

by Ireland’s wood-based panel board manufacturing sector, which produces in excess of 773,000 cubic meters of board products annually. Medium density fibreboard (MDF) is produced by Medite, oriented strand board (OSB) is produced by Smartply, and Masonite produc-

es door skin panels. Of all wood-based panel board products, 86 percent is produced products produced in ireland, 86 percent are exported. Medite and Smartply are both Coillteowned, and recently, Coillte commenced a €59 million reinvestment in SmartPly’s facility in Belview, County Waterford. The investment will secure the plant as one of the region’s most important export industries, and support a number of high-skilled research and development positions. The plant uses pulp harvested mainly in the southern part of the country, to manufacture innovative and sustainable wood panel products used by building companies in flooring, building frames, roofing, and many other applications.

Overall, the forest products sector is buoyant and optimistic about the future growth of the market.

CONTRIBUTION: The claims and statements made in this article belong exclusively to the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Biomass Magazine or its advertisers. All questions pertaining to this article should be directed to the author(s).

46 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

THERMALÂŚ

CHIP SHAPE: Biomass wood chips are produced at Coillteâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s biomass processing hub in Cahersiveen, County Kerry, in Ireland.

Irelandâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Bioenergy Sector

Large-scale electricity generation in Ireland is dominated by natural gas, accounting for 45 percent of total primary input, followed by coal, accounting for 22 percent of the fuel mix. In addition, Ireland has three peatpowered generation plants, one of which, Edenderry Power Ltd., has commenced cofiring with biomass. Local landowners have now started to show an interest in growing energy crops (e.g., willow) to supply the plant, but uptake has been slow.

The Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland reports that fossil fuels account for 90 percent of all energy used in the country, and there remains an opportunity for local biomass to displace imports. Oil is the dominant fuel used for thermal applications, but in recent years, renewable heat as an alternative has faced significant challenges. For large thermal energy users, the project economics associated with new, capital-intensive biomass installations has made investment decisions challenging. Notwithstanding, there were a number of early adopters who now represent the pinnacle of high-quality biomass installations throughout the country. These industrial-scale biomass installations now reduce Irelandâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s reliance on fossil fuel imports and reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, thereby improving domestic fuel security. In addition, they support many jobs across the local bioenergy supply chain.

Despite these recent success stories, uptake has been slow, and with fossil fuel prices now at an all-time low, new projects are unlikely to proceed in the current environment.

The Irish government white paper on energy policy set a target of 12 percent of thermal energy to come from renewable energy sources by 2020. The renewable heat sector remains

largely undeveloped, however, having grown slowly to 6.5 percent in 2014, mainly as a result of wood waste utilization in the timber processing sector. Based on its current heat from renewable energy sources (RES-H) trajectory, Irelandâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s 2020 target will not be achieved (Figure 1), and Ireland now faces potential EU fines. The Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland has estimated the cost to Ireland may be up to â&#x201A;Ź150 million for each percentage point Ireland falls short of its overall combined RES target of 16 percent.

Ireland's dominant species is Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis), a fastgrowing conifer and a native of the Pacific coast of North America.

The species was introduced to Europe in 1831 and was first planted in Ireland (Co. Wicklow) shortly afterwards. There are a limited number of hardwoods available and these feed smaller specialist industries such as furniture and joinery production.

Under the EU Tracking Roadmap prepared for the European Commission in 2014, it was noted that Ireland had no programs for the development of certain technologies such as biomass or high-efficiency CHP. One of the recommendations from that report was to introduce a reliable RES-H strategy with appropriate support schemes. It stated that Ireland was deploying less biomass than planned and that previous support programs had expired.

7KHUHČ&#x2021;V D VD\LQJ WKDW JHWV WRVVHG DURXQG D ORW KHUH Č&#x160;Î&#x2013;W MXVW UXQV Č&#x2039; 2XU KDPPHUPLOOV DQG SHOOHW PLOOV DUHQČ&#x2021;W WKH SUHWWLHVW %XW WKH\Č&#x2021;UH URFN VROLG $QG WKH\ UXQČ&#x192;\HDU DIWHU \HDU DIWHU \HDU %XW Č&#x160;Î&#x2013;W MXVW UXQVČ&#x2039; LVQČ&#x2021;W MXVW DERXW RXU SURGXFWV Î&#x2013;WČ&#x2021;V DERXW RXU FRPSDQ\ ZKLFK OLWHUDOO\ VSDQV FHQWXULHV $QG LWČ&#x2021;V DERXW RXU RQJRLQJ UHODWLRQVKLSV ZLWK RXU FXVWRPHUVČ&#x192;KRZ ZHČ&#x2021;OO DOZD\V EH WKHUH IRU \RX *LYH XV D FDOO DQG Č´QG RXW MXVW KRZ &30 FDQ UXQ IRU \RX

*/2%$/ %,20$66 *5283 Your Partner in Productivity &30 %LRPDVV *URXS Č? ZZZ FSP QHW &30 (XURSH %9

Č? ZZZ FSPHXURSH QO

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 47 &OLHQW &30 %LRPDVV 3XEOLFDWLRQ %LRPDVV 0DJD]LQH 2UGHU /LQH

Figure 1: Ireland’s progress in obtaining thermal energy from renewable energy sources (RES-H) during the period 1990 to 2013

;@A;C=F LMJC=Q AF<MKLJA=K 55,000 tons of turkey litter a year to produce the equivalent of 95 million kilowatt hours of electricity The utilization of litter as a boiler fuel offers many potential benefits on investment and returns that can be shared economically with the local community and poultry farmers alike.

At this time, more litter is being produced than the industry is

able to utilize effectively. Currently, the primary use of poultry litter in the US is as fertilizer for pasture, hay, small grains, and corn‐producing fields.

Hurst is currently installing and manufacturing several investment projects where Co-generation of steam and eletricity is being applied. The bulk of the steam energy will be suppling turbine driven generators producing electricity and sold on the local grid. The excess steam will be directed to any plant processing or contract leased to nearby outside facilities.

48 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

In response, the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources published a draft bioenergy plan in October 2014, whereby it acknowledged a gap in meeting Ireland’s 2020 RES-H target of up to 200 kilotonnes of oil equivalent, and announced the intention to introduce a renewable heat incentive (RHI) in 2016.

This demand-led incentive should provide the much-needed catalyst to stimulate new investment in the bioenergy sector. Investor confidence is critical to shift investments toward renewable technologies, and any renewable heat policy should aim to accelerate market growth by removing the economic barriers currently preventing major capital projects from proceeding.

Reducing Ireland’s reliance on fossil fuel imports, reducing national greenhouse gas emissions and improving domestic fuel security are key pillars for developing a green economy. The bioenergy sector stimulates rural development and local job creation through the many jobs required in the processing and logistics of biomass and in the design, installation and maintenance of boiler technology. It provides an outlet for the country’s growing private timber resource, and a channel to market for growers of energy crops.

Stimulating increased demand with the RHI will mobilize our forest resource, and allow the establishment of local grower groups that will be able to supply biomass energy to local industry with the economic benefits shared locally.

Ireland forestry cover currently stands at 11 percent or 750,000 hectares. These forests are diverse, ranging from commercial plantations to native woodlands and from amenity to urban forests. Private planting increased significantly in the 1990s, mostly by farmers, but also by some individuals and investment companies. Presently, approximately 59 percent of forests are owned by the state, and 41 percent by private individuals and companies.

The Biomass Supply Chain

Coillte, the state forestry company, is already at the forefront of mobilizing the bioenergy sector here in Ireland. Coillte now underpins the future sustainable energy supply of a range of industrial-scale clients through its regional biomass supply hubs. These long-term biomass supply contracts displace several thousand liters of imported fossil fuel per week by providing more competitive energy costs for the businesses

THERMAL¦

Ireland sources electricity primarily from dispatchable fossil-fuel based power plants with most electricity coming from coal, oil, gas and peat generation plants.

Gas is the dominant fuel in Ireland, with about 60 percent of the nation’s electricity generated from imported natural gas. Wind is the dominant renewable, with biomass currently being deployed at only one of the peat-burning power stations for cofiring.

tent samples are gathered in preapproved aluminium sampling trays for testing by the oven-dry method using preapproved and calibrated moisture testing devices. Particle size is controlled during the chipping process by the provision of the correct size screens on the chipper feed. Regular testing is undertaken to assess the percentage of fines.

The wood chip delivery vehicle fleet is comprised of a range of vehicles, from large walking floor trailers (carrying 20- to 24-metricton loads) to smaller tipping vehicles with side blowers (8- to 16-metric-ton loads) depending on a specific client’s fuel handling and on-site

storage infrastructure. The biomass loads that are delivered are checked for compliance with moisture content, particle size and percentage criteria. Each client is then invoiced per gigajoule of energy delivered.

Author: Des O’Toole Business Development Manager, Biomass Coillte Des.otoole@coillte.ie +353-1-8628491

concerned, thereby helping maintain competiveness and securing local jobs. Coillte plan to establish new hubs as new demand for wood chip arises. Through these regional hubs, wood chips are supplied to clients in the pharmaceutical, textile, industrial and hotel sectors and include companies such as Glaxosmithkline, Astellas and Radisson SAS. Each regional biomass fuel supply hub operated by Coillte is typically comprised of a secure, 8-hectare log storage yard and covered wood chip fuel storage sheds. In addition, a weighbridge and a quality testing laboratory are vital for operation. Each hub has a range of specialist chipping machinery and equipment capable of producing wood chip and access to a range of delivery vehicles for haulage.

Coillte is committed to a strategy that matches renewable energy requirements with local biomass supply. Small-diameter pulpwood is sourced through a local Coillte forestry team from both state and private sector sources within a region. These logs are sourced and delivered on a preplanned basis, several months in advance. Logs are systematically stacked for open-air drying to the required moisture contents specific to each customer’s boiler requirements. The key to ensuring good quality wood chips at the correct moisture content at each hub is management of stock rotation and replenishment, as well as ensuring suitable air flow through the stacks, which are covered during the winter months. Each supply hub has its own specific characteristics, and seasonal variations in log moisture need to be anticipated and controlled with great care. This can only be achieved through experience and by having a strong partnership with supply contractors.

All wood chips are produced strictly in accordance with quality specifications set out in I.S. CEN/TS 14961:2005. Moisture conAPRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 49

BiogasNews EBA publishes updated biogas statistics The European Biogas Association published a statistical report on the European anaerobic digestion industry and markets, reporting record-high growth in the number of plants and production in Europe.

The report states that there were 17,240 biogas plants, with a total installed capacity of 8,293 MW, in Europe at the end of 2014. “This is a remarkable number, especially when realizing that it represents 18 percent growth,” said Jan Štambaský, EBA president. In the case of certain countries, growth has soared. The U.K. doubled the number of its biogas plants in one year. The

17,240 biogas plants reported at the end of 2014 is up from 10,433 reported in 2010.

The total amount of electricity produced from biogas is estimated at 63.3 terawatt-hours, which corresponds to the annual consumption of 14.6 million European households.

Biogas upgrading is also growing, with 87 new biogas upgrading units commissioned in Europe in 2014, bringing the total to 367. On a combined basis, these upgrading units can process an estimated 310,000 cubic meters of raw biogas per hour.

Top European countries for biogas production Country

No. of plants

Germany

10,786

Italy

1,491

U.K.

813

France

736

Switzerland

633

Czech Republic

554

Austria

436

Sweden

279

Poland

277

Netherlands

252

SOURCE: EUROPEAN BIOGAS ASSOCIATION

Clean Energy Fuels doubles sales of RNG Clean Energy Fuels Corp. recently announced that sales of its renewable natural gas (RNG), known as Redeem, more than doubled in 2015, reaching 50 million gasoline gallon equivalents (GGEs), up from 20 million GGEs in 2014.

Redeem sales have expanded from clean energy public-access stations in California, to become the contracted fuel choice of customers like UPS, Republic Services, the City of Santa Monica’s Big Blue Bus, the University of California San Diego and others. Sales of Redeem also have recently expanded into Oregon and Texas.

The University of California, San Diego became the first university transit fleet to fuel with 100 percent RNG, fueling its fleet of 52 vehicles, including 19 transit buses with Redeem. UPS, already the largest user of Redeem, currently fuels close to 400 vehicles in California, and has announced plans to take delivery for portions of its delivery vehicle fleet in Texas.

50 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

BIOGAS¦

Future Remains Bright for Biogas Energy

BY AMANDA BILEK

This is my last biogas column for Biomass Magazine.

I am still committed to helping move biogas projects and policy forward, but I’ll do so from a slightly different role in the future. I was recently promoted at the Great Plains Institute to government affairs and communications director. In this position, I will be developing, directing and implementing state government affairs for GPI projects that have a state policy and regulatory component, and also directing GPI’s communications strategy and operation. I will be working across GPI’s seven programmatic areas: energy efficiency, energy infrastructure, fossil energy, international collaboration, renewable energy and fuels, sustainable communities and transportation. Biogas energy development touches several aspects of GPI’s seven program areas and will remain a thread of my work as I transition into my new position.

I began writing a biogas column for Biomass Magazine three years ago this month. The title of my first column, “Bright Future for Biogas Energy Systems,” is just as true today as it was back then. When I look back over the past three years, it is remarkable to reflect on the growth in the biogas sector.

The evidence of this growth is prevalent in the transportation sector. When the renewable fuel standard (RFS) was expanded in 2007, biogas used as a transportation fuel qualified as an advanced biofuel. It wasn’t until 2013 that we saw the first notable amounts of biogasbased gallons reported for RFS compliance. Biogas projects across the U.S. produced 26 million gallons of biogas-based transportation fuel in 2013. The amount of biogas-based fuel doubled in 2014, and in 2015, over 126 million gallons of biogas fuel credits were produced.

Partway through 2014, the U.S. EPA allowed biogas fuel to generate cellulosic fuel credits in addition to advanced fuel credits, and the biogas market hasn’t looked back. Biogas transportation fuel projects can now receive an attractive market premium through the RFS for the sale of their fuel, and the economic case becomes even more attractive when stacked with credit values under California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard. The RFS is in effect until 2022 and the LCFS until 2020, ensuring continued market growth and access for the next several years.

The scale and scope of biogas projects have also increased in the past three years. For several decades, we mostly saw biogas projects developed at livestock operations, landfills or wastewater treatment facilities. Development is still occurring in those foundational sectors, while recent project development has expanded the number of feedstocks (food waste, fats, oils, greases, crop residues) processed in partnership with local units of government or private businesses. We are looking more holistically at waste management ranging from individual residents to food manufacturers, and everything in between, to identify the opportunities to transform organic waste into a clean energy resource.

The potential for biogas energy systems to help supply a reliable and consistent form of clean energy has also resulted in an unprecedented cooperation among federal agencies. The Biogas Opportunities Roadmap coordinated and supported by the EPA, U.S. DOE and USDA provides a solid framework for addressing nearand long-term policy and project barriers to increase biogas development.

State and local governments have also devoted time and attention to determine how biogas energy systems can fit into clean energy development and address waste management challenges. Several jurisdictions have implemented policy or custom programs to divert organic material from landfill disposal and instead turn those organics into a higher-value product while capturing the nutrient value.

At no other time in my career has the future for biogas energy development looked so bright and held so much promise. I look forward to continuing to help move biogas projects and policy forward, even if you won’t be hearing from me regularly in my bimonthly column. It has been a pleasure to contribute to the biogas dialogue, and I express my sincere gratitude to Biomass Magazine for giving the forum to do so.

Authors: Amanda Bilek Government Affairs and Communications Director, Great Plains Institute 612-278-7118 abilek@gpisd.net

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 51

ÂŚBIOGAS

IMPROVING INFRASTRUCTURE: Ohio-based quasar energy group entered into a long-term contract with the city of Wooster to retrofit, operate and monitor existing anaerobic digesters located at the Wooster Water Pollution Control Plant.

PHOTO: QUASAR ENERGY GROUP

52 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

GROWING THE LOCAL HOME BASE Even though Europe is home to tried-and-true biogas technology, North American plant developers don’t necessarily look abroad.

BY KATIE FLETCHER

A

t the end of 2014, the European Biogas Association reported Europe had 17,240 biogas plants, with a total installed capacity of 8,293 MW, in its 2015 statistical report on the European anaerobic digestion (AD) industry and markets. The number of biogas plants represented an 18 percent growth over 2013, and certain European countries boasted rocketing growth rates, such as the U.K., where the number of biogas plants doubled to 813 in just one year. The report quantifies the total amount of electricity produced from biogas at 63.3 terawatt-hours, which corresponds to the annual consumption of 14.6 million European households. These stats alone demonstrate the European biogas industry is mature.

Near the end of 2014, the USDA, U.S. EPA and U.S. DOE reported the U.S. had more than 2,000 sites producing biogas in the 2014 Biogas Opportunities Roadmap. The roadmap found that more than 11,000 additional biogas systems could be deployed in the U.S., producing enough energy to power more than 3 million American homes and reduce methane emissions equivalent to 4 to 54 mil-

lion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) in 2030. The U.S. biogas industry is young, but has the potential to mature to Europe’s industry standard with the right support.

Will the U.S. work to reach its potential by sourcing technology providers and contractors here, with their boots already on the ground, or look toward their European counterparts who, due to the right market conditions, have successfully brought the biogas industry to where it is today?

Resourceful Competitor

European biogas expertise and technology have made their presence known in North America. Projects like Blue Sphere Corp.’s under-construction AD projects in Charlotte, Virginia, and Johnston, Rhode Island, utilize the Italian company Austep S.p.A. as the project’s technology provider and engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contractor. Southern California-based CR&R, a recycling and waste collection company, decided to implement German-based Eisenmann’s biogas technology for its multiphase biogas-to-fuel project in Perris, California. Project developers and technology providers in the U.S.

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 53

&RQYH\RU 'U\HU IRU WKH %LRPDVV ,QGXVWU\ U Unrivaled end-product uniformity U Low drying temperatures U Environmentally friendly with low dust emissions U Lower operating costs U Energy efficient U Rugged construction that minimizes cleaning and reduces maintenance costs

Wood Chips | Sawdust | Microchips Straw and Grass | Anaerobic Digestates Organic Waste | Forest Waste | Pellets Bark | Sewer Sludge Extrudiates &30 :ROYHULQH 3URFWRU //& *LEUDOWDU 5RDG +RUVKDP 3$ U.S. 215-443-5200 lawc@cpmwolverineproctor.com ]]] =UR\KXOTK6XUIZUX IUS &30 :ROYHULQH 3URFWRU /7' /DQJODQGV $YH .HOYLQ 6RXWK %XVLQHVV 3DUN (DVW .LOEULGH *ODVJRZ 8. * <* U.K. 44 (0) 1355-575350 mclark@wolverineproctor.co.uk

54 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

NIAGARA COUNTY: The U.S. anaerobic digestion technology operated and designed by quasar in Buffalo, New York, produces up to 768 kilowatts of renewable electricity per hour, which is then sold to New York State Electric and Gas. PHOTO: QUASAR ENERGY GROUP

believe there is a place for companies both foreign- and domestic-based North America, and as the industry matures, opportunity for the local biogas home base to grow will become great. â&#x20AC;&#x153;There are more opportunities to do projects in the biogas space than can ever be exhausted in our lifetime or our childrenâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s lifetimes,â&#x20AC;? says Caroline Henry, vice president of marketing with quasar energy group. â&#x20AC;&#x153;While we do compete with both U.S. and European digester technologies to secure new projects, there are more than enough opportunities for everyone to be successful.â&#x20AC;?

Based in Cleveland, Ohio, quasar is a renewable energy and organics management firm that specializes in the deployment of sustainable technology solutions in agricultural, municipal and industrial applications. According to Henry, quasar has designed, engineered and constructed 14 AD facilities across four statesâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;Ohio, New York, Massachusetts and Maineâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;with a combined capacity to annually process over 800,000 wet tons of organic material and generate 80,000 megawatt hours (MWh) of electricity per year. â&#x20AC;&#x153;As technology providers operating in a new frontier, we need to see each other as resources rather than competitors,â&#x20AC;? Henry says. â&#x20AC;&#x153;The American Biogas Council has taken on the role of uniting the biogas industry under a central banner and mission. Under its leadership, competitors collaborate to advocate for the collective benefit of the industry.â&#x20AC;?

Tried-and-True, Too

Wisconsin-based DVO Inc. has a patented digester design that was first deployed in 2001. Since then, Melissa VanOrnum, marketing manager with DVO, says the company has installed over 100 digesters at over 80 sites in 17 states, and has a handful of others outside the U.S. including Siberia, China, Chile and Canada.

The company has about 10 other projects currently under construction and a contract for a project in Korea. DVO specializes in industrial and agricultural digesters, which collectively produce over 75 MW of renewable power. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Our technology is tried-and-true,â&#x20AC;? VanOrnum says. â&#x20AC;&#x153;We actually find we compete very well with European systems, on a cost basis, on an OEM basis and on a production basis.â&#x20AC;? The company trademarked the two-stage, mixed plug-flow digestion system design.

According to DVO, traditional European above-ground digesters have three primary drawbacks. The first is no guaranteed retention time, because sometimes not all the waste is in the digester long enough for complete digestion to occur, leaving both energy and pathogens in the waste. Another drawback DVO identifies with above-ground, upright tank solutions is difficulty in maintaining consistent temperatures. In a mixed digester, since the digester is exposed to extreme heat and cold through the year, from both internal waste inputs and weather conditions, itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s hard to operate at peak efficiency. The last drawback DVO identifies is the amount of parasitic loading required to

SOURCE SEPARATION: CleanWorld’s project focus has been on processing food waste in California. The company’s technology can accept high-solids materials (up to 50 percent) with high levels of contamination.

PHOTO: CLEANWORLD

move the machinery in a mixed digester, so there is less power to export or sell.

VanOrnum adds that the markets are completely different in Europe. “We have people who we work with who won’t look at European systems, because they were developed in a very different market, and in a lot of cases, they weren’t developed to handle the heavy-strength waste that we have here in the U.S. on large farms,” she says. “There are a lot of digesters in Europe, but that doesn’t mean that only good digesters come out of Europe.”

CleanWorld joins the other U.S.-based biogas companies like DVO and quasar that provide technology to the market. So far, CleanWorld is solely working in California, with three commercial digesters in Davis, Natomas and Sacramento, but according to Ethan Hanohano, who works on feedstock procurement and business development for the company, they are looking to expand soon, when the appropriate project becomes available. “CleanWorld initially licensed the technology from Professor Ruihong Zhang of University of California, Davis,” Hanohano says. “The goal was to create commercial-size anaerobic digesters. While anaerobic digestion has been relevant in Europe for a long time, CleanWorld's initial goal was to become the first high-solids anaerobic digestion technology company in the U.S.” The company’s technology is a three-stage proprietary digestion process, which allows digesters to accept feedstock with up to 50 per-

cent solids content. Hanohano says although he believes there is quite a bit of technology in the market created outside of the U.S., being based in the states has its advantages. “Being U.S.-based and using multiple U.S.-based pieces of equipment allows CleanWorld to build digesters in record time,” he says. “This also means we have very quick turnaround on replaceable parts.”

Overall, many stateside biogas technology providers pride themselves on sourcing domestically. “We maintain our dedication to sourcing components in the U.S.,” Henry says.

“We continue to refine and enhance our systems as we learn and grow.”

Whereas quasar’s and DVO’s technology has a core presence in the agricultural sector, CleanWorld focuses on food waste. “There seems to be quite a bit of competition for farm-based or dairy manure digesters,” Hanohano says. “Food waste digesters, like the ones CleanWorld owns and operates, are rare. This is most likely due to the difficulty in locking down food waste contracts.”

North American renewable energy project developer Harvest Power, has also tapped into the food waste arena, and Ashwani Kumar, who helps oversee project development and engineering for Harvest Power, believes the AD technology itself is not a problem for the North American biogas sector, it is other project hurdles that have to be overcome.

“The challenge has always been preprocessing, which is fairly unique to every situation, it’s APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 55

FOOD WASTE POTENTIAL: Harvest Powerâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s energy garden in Orlando is unique in that the digestion technology handles food waste from the Disney property as well as biosolids from a wastewater treatment plant.

The company sources a majority of its project components domestically.

PHOTO: HARVEST POWER

&DOO 7ROO )UHH 672.(5 VDOHV#GHWURLWVWRNHU FRP ZZZ GHWURLWVWRNHU FRP 56 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

also digestate management, how you handle the gas, how you meet local regulations,â&#x20AC;? he says. â&#x20AC;&#x153;A lot of local expertise is neededâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;local engineering, local project development expertiseâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;so the limitation is not the technology. I think the limitation is the understanding and having the right project development skills, which is a big hindrance in the U.S. market.â&#x20AC;?

According to Kumar, today, the U.S. spends $218 billionâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;1.3 percent of gross domestic productâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;on growing, processing, transporting and disposing of food that is never eaten, most of which goes to a landfill. This is why Harvest Power began working toward a solution. The company has developed three â&#x20AC;&#x153;energy gardensâ&#x20AC;? in Richmond, British Columbia; London, Ontario; and Orlando, Florida, as well as a pipeline projects in California that will handle food waste scraps coming from northern part of the state. Kumar says Harvest Power is involved in technology evaluation for its projects, but selects an experienced general contractor who is responsible for its construction and making sure the system delivers the performance.

The high-solids AD technology provider for the Richmond energy garden is German-based GICON. Other contractors theyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;ve worked with have included foreign technology partners Global Water & Engineering based in Belgium and Entech Renewable Energy Solutions out of Australia.

Kumar says they mainly partner with North American construction and engineering companies on their projects, and a majority of the components associated with their development are sourced domestically. An example Kumar provided is the companyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s project in California. He highlighted four key components to the project including preprocessing, the digester, digestate handling and gas handling.

He said that of those four components, only the digester came from Germany and, even within the digester technology, much of the hardware was sourced from North America. â&#x20AC;&#x153;I would say as North America has has adapted these technologies, the European content has reduced a lot,â&#x20AC;? Kumar says. â&#x20AC;&#x153;There is no core competence that cannot be replicated in North America.â&#x20AC;?

Roadmap to Realization

It’s evident foreign-based biogas companies have found success in the North American biogas sector, and many abroad see further market opportunity here. “European technology providers see America as a virgin market,” Kumar says. “What they don’t understand is the challenges—the policy challenges, permitting challenges, the project financing challenges—that the U.S. faces, they are very different than the European ones.”

The biggest challenge Kumar perceives with food-based AD project development in the states is the project financing risk. “What the financing community needs is inherently missing in these kinds of projects,” he says. “They don’t have long-term feedstock and off-take contracts, the technology risk is high, as these are not repeatable and kind of unique in each case, and there is no infrastructure to support these projects.” Kumar adds, “These are challenges that do not exist in Europe because there is a lot of organic support that has mushroomed up around these projects. The government provides long-term power purchase agreement, and feedstock support for some of these projects to be financially viable.”

Another difference Kumar references between European biogas project development and North American is digestate handling. Kumar believes digestate waste fertilizer should be listed under the USDA National Organic Program in order to receive organic certification.

“It’s a nutrient, but right now it’s not handled right, and digestate is a big challenge in North America, but it’s not a concern in Europe.

Nearly every digester applies it on the land there, and here you have to treat it.”

Although Europe has support mechanisms that allowed the biogas market there to grow, the U.S. has made strides in the past few years to help move the industry forward. In June 2013, President Obama directed the administration to develop a strategy to reduce methane emissions and ultimately grow the biogas energy industry through his Climate Action Plan. Since then, the Biogas Opportunities Roadmap

5(&(,9( 6725( 0(7(5

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 57

¦BIOGAS was created to build on progress made to date. It outlines voluntary actions that can be taken to reduce methane emissions through the use of biogas systems and outlines strategies to overcome barriers limiting further expansion and development of a robust biogas industry in the U.S. The EPA’s AgSTAR helps promote the use of biogas recovery systems at livestock operations, and the EPA’s Landfill Methane Outreach Program helps reduce methane emissions from landfills by encouraging the recovery and beneficial use of landfill gas as a renewable energy source. Starting in 2012, EPA Region 9 convened a state, federal and local working group to facilitate the proliferation of dairy digesters in California, which is the nation’s largest dairy producer. DVO’s VanOrnum says she thinks it’s initiatives like this in certain areas of the country that will lead the way. “New York City has their landfill diversion ban, we have states like California that are putting in really good incentives for anaerobic digesters, so I think there are going to be certain parts of the U.S. that are going to take off faster than others, and I believe they’ll end up leading the way for the country,” she says.

Biogas not only manages waste, but can also improve profitability for operations through energy production, coproduct sales, nutrient recovery and avoided energy costs. Opportunities like those highlighted in the roadmap leave those in the space hopeful for what the future could bring. “I absolutely believe anaerobic digestion is here to stay,” Hanohano says. “New bills are being passed that have forced businesses to find a solution for their food waste. An infrastructure of AD facilities will need to be built in order to capture all of that waste.”

VanOrnum foresees not only DVO’s U.S.-based projects picking up, but more work for the company abroad and in markets beyond agriculture, like municipalities, landfill diversion and food processing waste.

“At the end of the day, digesters make sense,” she says. “They make economic sense. They make environmental sense. They make societal sense. I think as more and more people learn about them and the benefits they provide that demand will increase.”

Support is needed to drive development within the biogas sector ahead. Kumar with Harvest Power points out that the U.S.’s three prominent sectors for AD technology require different kinds of support.

Those that are farm-based will require government subsidy support, biosolid AD technology is paid by the taxpayer at locations like municipal wastewater treatment plants, and the third segment—which Kumar sees the most potential for—is merchant plants, like Harvest, that independently develop ways to divert organics. “I definitely see a strong will in having the right foundations here to move forward,” Kumar says. “I wouldn’t be surprised if 10 years from now the U.S. would lead that market more than any other European technology or European country.”

Henry at quasar acknowledges that the digester industry in the U.S. is still relatively new compared to the developed industry the in Europe, where Germany alone has more than 6,800 systems in operation.

But to her, failure is not an option. “Every project that puts a shovel in the ground needs to be well-planned, skillfully designed, responsibly financed and expertly operated,” she says. “When projects fail, the reputation of anaerobic digesters and the potential for the industry is brought into question.”

Author: Katie Fletcher Associate Editor, Biomass Magazine 701-738-4920 kfletcher@bbiinternational.com

58 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

6DYH ZLWK (DUO\ %LUG 5DWHV 'HDGOLQH 0D\

5HJLVWHU DW $GYDQFHG%LRIXHOV&RQIHUQHFH FRP

6$9( 5(*,67(5

)XOO &RQIHUHQFH 5HJLVWUDWLRQ

-XQH :LVFRQVLQ &HQWHU 0LOZDXNHH :,

Ă / /ŶƚĞƌŶĂƟŽŶĂů ĞǀĞŶƚ

6321625 72'$<

6SRQVRUVKLSV 'ULYH 5HFRJQLWLRQ 5HWXUQ RQ ,QYHVWPHQW *DLQ ([FOXVLYH ([SRVXUH %RRN <RXU 6SRQVRUVKLS 7RGD\ IRU

$V D VSRQVRU RI WKH 1DWLRQDO $GYDQFHG %LRIXHOV &RQIHUHQFH ([SR \RX ZLOO KDYH DQ RSSRUWXQLW\ WR SRVLWLRQ \RXU RUJDQL]DWLRQ DV D OHDGHU DQG VXSSRUWHU RI WKH UHQHZDEOH IXHOV LQGXVWU\ LQ LPSRUWDQW LQWHUQDWLRQDO PDUNHWV )RU SULFLQJ DQG DGGLWLRQDO LQIRUPDWLRQ SOHDVH FRQWDFW \RXU %%, ,QWHUQDWLRQDO $FFRXQW ([HFXWLYH DW RU VHUYLFH#EELLQWHUQDWLRQDO FRP

1(7:25. :,7+ 352'8&(56

7:2 )5((

3URGXFHU 3DVVHV 3HU %LRIXHOV )DFLOLW\

(WKDQRO _ %LRGLHVHO _ $GYDQFHG %LRIXHOV _ &HOOXORVLF

ZZZ $GYDQFHG%LRIXHOV&RQIHUHQFH FRP

AdvancedBiofuelsNews EPA publishes 2015 RIN data U.S. EPA renewable identification number (RIN) data published in January shows nearly 17.89 billion RINs were generated last year.

A net total of 127.39 million D3 cellulosic RINs were generated last year. Approximately 2.18 million D3 RINs were generated for cellulosic ethanol, with 72.77 million generated for renewable compressed natural gas and 53.16 million generated for renewable liquefied natural gas.

Approximately 146.84 million D5 advanced biofuel RINs were generated last year on a net basis, 23.99 million generated for naphtha, 847,149 generated for heating oil, and 5,022 generated for renewable compressed natural gas.

2015 RIN data (in millions) RIN Type D3 D4 D5 D6 D7

139.91 2,794.00 146.84 14,825.71 0.25

SOURCE: U.S. EPA

The net total for D6 renewable fuel RIN a net total of 2.78 billion D4 biomass-based generation was 14.82 billion last year, with 14.38 diesel RINs were generated last year, with 2.26 billion of that volume generated for biodiesel. billion of that volume generated for ethanol.

A net total of 247,785 D7 cellulosic diesel RINs were generated in 2015, all of which were generated for cellulosic heating oil. In addition,

CUSTOM SIZED STEEL FRAME BUILDINGS FOR INDUSTRIAL MILLS FROM VARCO PRUDEN Why settle for a standard sized building?

Whether you need a tasting room, barrel storage building, or beverage processing facility, Varco Pruden builders can provide a quality building at an affordable price. And it doesn’t have to be too big or too small. Every year, Varco Pruden provides steel-framed buildings for wineries and agricultural use in custom designs and dimensions.

Options include: • Custom sizes to 1/16th”, from 20’ to 250’ Wide and 30’ to 750’ Long • Wide selection of colors with long-life warranties.

• Delivery as soon as 4-6 weeks, depending on complexity.

• Professional installation available through VP’s nationwide network of Authorized Builders.

For free information, go to: www.vp.com/ad/PMM l 8CTEQ 2TWFGP $WKNFKPIU KU C FKXKUKQP QH $NWG5EQRG $WKNFKPIU 0QTVJ #OGTKEC 60 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

Net RIN generation

CARB approves Trestle Energy coproduct pathway The California Air Resources Board has approved a fuel pathway developed by Trestle Energy LLC that could shave 18 points off an ethanol plant’s carbon intensity (CI) rating.

According to James Rhodes, cofounder and president of Trestle Energy, the new approach creates a new coproduct credit from using corn stover for electric generation, either at an ethanol plant with biomass boilers or at a partnering utility cofiring biomass with coal. “By being very careful about the way we structure those supply chains and working with producers to integrate those supply chains, we’re able to engineer the integrated production of solid coproducts from the stover and liquid biofuels from the grain.”

Data for the life-cycle analysis of the pathway was collected in a demonstration project conducted in 2012 and 2013 with Iowa-based Golden Grain Energy and a local utility. The utility, Rhodes explained, has been evaluating the possible use of biomass in one of its coal-fired boilers for several years.

The life-cycle analysis used for the CARB CI score took into consideration the additional use of farm equipment for stover removal, additional inputs to offset nutrients removed and feedstock transportation, among other factors. The biggest CI reduction was the result of avoided emissions from using the crop residues.

ADVANCED BIOFUELS AND CHEMICALS¦

Leveling the Playing Field For US Advanced Biofuel Producers

BY ANNE STECKEL

Last year saw record markets for advanced biofuels in the U.S., where expansion is continuing, thanks in large part to the stabilization of the renewable fuel standard. But a troubling trend is emerging: growing imports of foreign fuels that undercut our U.S. industries.

The 2015 year-end figures demonstrate biodiesel’s rising popularity and its continued success as America’s first and only U.S. EPA-designated advanced biofuel to reach commercial-scale production nationwide. The U.S. biodiesel market reached nearly 2.1 billion gallons, or more than 5 percent of the 30 billion gallon on-road diesel market. With room to grow, our domestic production capacity currently sits at more than 3.2 billion gallons.

But the trend over the past several years has been exponential growth of foreign imports of biodiesel and renewable diesel. Noticeable volumes of foreign imports of biomass-based diesel into the U.S. began in 2011, with just under 50 million gallons, and have grown to over 670 million gallons.

Many of these gallons receive government support from programs in their home countries before departing for our shores, where they then double dip into our domestic programs like the biodiesel blender’s tax incentive.

This has had a major impact on our domestic market conditions, as our producers are not only competing with historically low petroleum prices, but also now against already subsidized, foreign-produced biodiesel and renewable diesel.

One of the National Biodiesel Board’s top priorities this year is to reform the $1-per-gallon biodiesel tax incentive from a blender’s credit to a production credit.

This is a change that would focus U.S. tax dollars on U.S. economic activity. The change would also save taxpayers an estimated $90 million annually, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation. This simple change would go a long way toward relieving the current imbalance of costcompetitiveness among domestic and imported fuels, while saving U.S. taxpayers significantly.

The effort to move to a production credit has been in the works for several years. The cause gained significant momentum last year when Sens. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and Maria Cantwell, D-Washington, and Reps.

Kristi Noem, R-South Dakota, and Bill Pascrell, D-New Jersey, introduced legislation in Congress. The bill gained significant support, but didn’t pass after Congress let tax issues slip late into the year and passed a straight-line renewal of expired tax provisions. This included extending the biodiesel tax incentive as a blender’s credit retroactively for 2015, and forward through 2016. Restoring the tax incentive supports jobs and economic activity at biodiesel plants across the country, but the impact won’t be as strong as it could be, because the extension continues to allow foreign biodiesel to qualify for the incentive.

We are already seeing a shrinking legislative calendar this year, as the politics of a heated election season takes center stage. But with strong industry champions in both the House and Senate from both sides of the aisle, and with a commonsense reform as our goal, our industry is in a good position.

The U.S. biodiesel industry needs an equal playing field in the market, and the change to a producer’s tax credit will restore market balance. NBB and biodiesel supporters will continue to advocate for the change, as the industry has proved that it can successfully increase biodiesel volumes year to year.

The biodiesel industry has been tremendously successful in reducing emissions and diversifying our fuel supply. This simple change to the structure of how the tax credit is administered will ensure that the success continues and that we don’t miss an opportunity to lead that growth from right here at home by supporting our own American industry.

Author: Anne Steckel Vice President of Federal Affairs, National Biodiesel Board asteckel@biodiesel.org www.nbb.org l www.biodiesel.org

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 61

62 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

ADVANCED BIOFUELS AND CHEMICALS¦

Importing to meet

CALIFORNIA DEMAND

Increased reductions of greenhouse gas emissions from transportation fuels required by California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard are driving up carbon credit prices, demand for advanced biofuels and imports.

BY RON KOTRBA

T

he U.S. imported a record volume of biomass-based diesel in 2015.

Imports of biodiesel and renewable diesel soared to an estimated 670 million gallons in 2015, up from 510 million gallons in 2014, according to U.S. EPA data. This increase in imports is particularly interesting because 2015 was a year with no forward-looking $1-per-gallon blender’s tax credit, and, for 11 months of the year, no RFS targets were in play. In 2013, however, an increased RFS mandate over 2012 coupled with a forward-looking tax credit made for another record year of imports. Nearly 350 million gallons biodiesel entered the U.S. in 2013, and more than 200 million gallons of renewable diesel from Neste Corp.’s Singapore production facility alone entered U.S. ports. That’s according to Susan Olson, who leads the ag and biofuels division at Genscape Inc., which hosted a webinar March 3 titled “Impacts of International Trade on the U.S. Biofuels Market.” U.S. production in 2015 remained flat at about 1.42 billion gallons, compared with around 1.47 billion gallons in 2014 and 1.50 billion gallons in 2013.

Olson says biodiesel imports to the U.S. have been much more substantial since

2013. “The core factors influencing this are RFS increases, California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard, foreign exchange rates and the existence—or nonexistence—of the blender’s tax credit,” she says. In 2013, imports saw a big jump, from less than 50 million gallons in 2012 to nearly 350 million in 2013. The makeup of countries exporting biodiesel to the U.S. has changed since 2013, too. Argentina and Canada have increased their flows while the EU is not exporting much to the U.S. at all now, Olson says.

U.S. imports are expected to grow even more this year over 2015’s record volumes, Olson says, primarily because of the forwardlooking tax credit that is in effect through the end of this year, and the additional 170 million gallons of biomass-based diesel growth in RFS volume obligations. Olson adds that diesel prices continue to be too low for exports from Argentina to North Africa to be economical, and entrants into the CARBIO survey program—an EPA-approved alternative feedstock tracking mechanism for RFS registration to generate RINs—have implemented the program over the past year.

Imports from Argentina are expected to increase by 20 to 25 percent in 2016, totaling APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 63

¦ADVANCED BIOFUELS AND CHEMICALS

upwards of 240 million gallons this year, Olson says. She adds, however, that Argentina’s recent increase in export taxes is worth watching, as it could affect projected volume increases.

Olson Matthew Stone, managing director of Prima Markets, provides some perspective to the Argentinian export tax hike. He says the Argentinian government caused a lot of confusion by mistakenly publishing a tenfold hike in the biodiesel export tax in its official journal following the Oct. 25 election. “In actual fact,” Stone says, “biodiesel export taxes were actually reduced to zero through November and December from 3.31 percent in October, rising to 1.69 percent in January and 3.89 percent in February.” At press time, Argentina raised export taxes yet again, from 3.89 to 6.4 percent through March. As to why Argentina did this, Stone says, “They are balancing their ambition to turbocharge Argentina’s agriculture-based exports against the need to keep cash rolling into the treasury coffers.”

He says so far this uptick in export taxes from 1.69 percent in January to 6.4 percent through March has increased costs by $35 a ton, or nearly 12 cents a gallon.

64 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

Of 2015’s 670 million gallons of imports, a majority of those specific biodiesel volumes entered the U.S. through the Gulf Coast, followed by the East Coast, then into California and on through the Midwest via Canada.

The California Market

Stone

The carbon market developing in California as a result of AB 32 (The Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006) and LCFS is a pioneering achievement, one only rivaled

by Germany, Stone says. “The transition toward carbon savings is the main justification for biofuel’s existence,” says Stone, who gave a presentation at the 2016 National Biodiesel Conference & Expo in Tampa, Florida, titled, “Global Biodiesel: Preparing to Cut Carbon.” Stone highlighted California and Germany as two unilateral carbon pioneers, and he said carbon will be the main driving force of this industry moving forward.

The LCFS was readopted in 2015, and legacy pathway and carbon intensity (CI) values associated with the various feedstocks for biodiesel and renewable diesel will expire Dec. 31, according to Shelby Neal, director

of state governmental affairs for the National Biodiesel Board. “California Air Resources Board is doing things differently now,” Neal says. “Before, it had default pathways, but now Neal every producer goes in and enters their own numbers, and each fuel has its own CI.” This new approach takes more variables into account, such as individual processing techniques and transportation, to name a few. “Having said that,” Neal says, “they do have reference values because people want an idea of what it is, but these are generally worst-case scenarios.”

Soy, canola and distillers corn oil biodiesels were the most affected by the changes; soy and canola CI reference values improved compared to their previous CIs—moving from 83.25 to 51.83 and 62.99 to 50.23, respectively—while distillers corn oil increased significantly from a CI of 4 to 28.68. Tallow also improved from 40.18 to 32.83. Used cooking oil increased slightly from 18.44 to 19.87.

“California is the only market in the U.S. at the moment that allows producers to differentiate pricing based on the carbon credentials of their product, and this has already

ADVANCED BIOFUELS AND CHEMICALS¦

had a tangible effect on import flows,” Stone says. “This is something that’s going to develop this year, and we can take away lessons as to how to develop and gain insight into wider U.S. and overseas markets as policy develops to carbon savings. This is a trend producers are well-advised to get ahead of.”

Biomass Magazine caught up with Stone and Prima Markets’ analyst Heather Zhang after the NBC in Tampa, Florida, to further discuss the California market, which Stone calls “red hot” right now.

Though biodiesel and renewable diesel imports to California in 2015 are rather anticlimactic compared to overall U.S. imports, Zhang says they are on the rise and expected to grow in coming years. Zhang says biodiesel imports in 2015 topped out at 44.6 million gallons, 4.6 million of which were from Argentina. According to Stone, California imported slightly more than 32 million gallons of biodiesel in 2014.

“Argentina is not really relevant as a supply source to the LCFS biofuel economy at present because none of the pathways registered under CARB is from Argentina, to the best of my knowledge,” Zhang says. “That means Argentine biodiesel consumed in California can’t be counted toward LCFS offsets.” Stone says unless Argentinian biodiesel producers successfully register under CARB,

IMPORT UPTICK: Imports of Brazilian sugarcane ethanol, an advanced biofuel, rose significantly in the second half of 2015, which coincided with a sharp rise in LCFS credit prices.

SOURCE: GENSCAPE INC.

he doesn’t expect the volume to go up. “Inflows will be restricted to just occasional shipments, perhaps to plug some shorts or because of other logistical issues,” he says.

Of the 40 million gallons of biodiesel that can generate LCFS credits, Zhang says 20.4 million gallons came from Korea, 18 million from Canada and 1.5 million from Taiwan. “These volumes represent material declared customs cleared at California ports,”

Zhang says. “So the figures don’t necessarily mean these volumes have actually been sold for consumption within California, especially the Argentina portion. We estimate, however, that most of the biodiesel imported into California ends up being consumed in-state excluding Argentina biodiesel.”

The import volumes to California provided by Genscape via Olson are more robust than Zhang’s and Stone’s. “Our in-

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 65

8NTQ FKNA@K DPTHOLDMS RTOOKHDQ ENQ SGD AHNL@RR HMCTRSQX

SOURCE: THE NATIONAL BIODIESEL BOARD

-#1(39 HR NMD NE SGD VNQKC R KD@CHMF RTOOKHDQR NE SDBGMN KNFHDR RXRSDLR @MC RDQUHBDR QDK@SHMF SN DPTHOLDMS ENQ SGD AHN L@RR ODKKDSHMF H MCTRSQX 6D NEEDQ RHMFKD L@BGHMDR ENQ SGD OQNCTBSHNM NE RNKHC @MC KHPTHC AHNETDK @MC V@RSD ODKKDSR 6D G@UD SGD @AHKHSX SN L@MT E@BSTQD @MC RTOOKX D@BG @MC DUDQX JDX OQNBDRRHMF L@BGHMD HM SGD ODKKDS OQN

CTBSHNM KHMD

-#1(39 %DDC !HNETDK 2 $TQNOD RH@ @MC 2NTSG LDQHB@ @MCQHSY EA @MCQHSY BNL 42 @MC "@M@C@ @MCQHSY EA TR @MCQHSY BNL

VVV @MCQHSY ROQNTS BNL !,, 66 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

dependent access to customs records and proprietary ship tracking indicate 56 million gallons of biodiesel imported to California,â&#x20AC;?

Olson says. â&#x20AC;&#x153;These shipments came from Zhang Canada, South Korea and Argentina.â&#x20AC;? The conversion factor used is 300.8 gallons per metric ton. â&#x20AC;&#x153;For biodiesel, the things to watch are additional shipments from South Korea and potential movement of biodiesel into California from Argentina,â&#x20AC;? Olson says. In addition, she points out that a new, RFSqualified biodiesel producer in Hong Kong just registered in February. The company is ASB Bio-Diesel Hong Kong, and it carries a 30 MMgy production capacity. â&#x20AC;&#x153;New producers registering for LCFS is a trend we are tracking,â&#x20AC;? Olson adds.

California imported nearly 126 million gallons of renewable diesel in 2015, up from about 107 million gallons in 2014, Stone says. Again, Genscapeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s figures on renewable diesel imports in 2015 are higher than Primaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s, as Olson says 164 million gallons entered California ports last year. â&#x20AC;&#x153;These shipments all came from Nesteâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Singapore facility,â&#x20AC;? Olson says, adding that the conversion factor used for renewable diesel is

339.3 gallons per metric ton. â&#x20AC;&#x153;The majority of renewable diesel product we get into the U.S. is from Nesteâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Singapore plant.

Seventy-nine percent of renewable diesel imports from Singapore enter California ports. Neste is definitely taking advantage of the LCFS credit, as well as RINs and the blenderâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s tax credit.â&#x20AC;? She says if additional waste feedstock or new qualified feedstock streams become available for renewable diesel production in Singapore, there would be an increased potential for qualified LCFS deliveries to California in 2016. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Weâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;re continuing to monitor deliveries on a weekly basis as the year continues,â&#x20AC;? Olson says.

Neste is currently the only source of renewable diesel imports to the U.S., and its financial reporting indicates the renewable diesel production capacity utilization rate at its three facilities (two in Europe and one in Singapore) is 94 percent, meaning thereâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s not a lot of room for production supply increases. However, as Olson points out, the companyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s 2015 split for product sales was 31 percent to North America and 69 percent to Europe, with a 4 percent shift toward North America from 2014 to 2015. With the forward-looking federal blenderâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s credit, increased RFS volume obligations and higher LCFS GHG reduction requirements pushing up carbon credit prices, Olson says the economics could shift more product to the

U.S. When Neste was asked whether the company will shift shipments from Europe to North America to take advantage of the favorable economics currently in play, Osmo Kammonen, Case senior vice president of communications and brand marketing for Neste, responded, “Our first priority is take care of our customer commitments. With the rest of the volumes, we look for the best market at any given time. Therefore, it is difficult to predict the shifts between markets.”

Consumption of both biodiesel and renewable diesel in California topped out at an estimated 285 million gallons, according to Neal, who adds that CARB’s final numbers on this aren’t out yet. “California is really kind of a microcosm of the national picture,” he says. “From a volume standpoint, it’s been a really positive, impressive picture. California consumption has gone from 14 million gallons in 2011 to 285 million gallons in 2015.

Do the math on that and we’ve gone from a decimal point to 8 or 9 percent of diesel fuel in California, which is probably the thirdhighest blend rate in the country behind Illinois and Minnesota.”

In-state production of biomass-based diesel in California last year topped off at around 33 million gallons, or just 12 percent of demand. “We are enjoying the environmental benefits of the LCFS, but the vast majority of the economic benefit is being enjoyed by South America, Asia and other parts of the United States,” says Jennifer Case, president of San Diego-based New Leaf Biofuel and chair of the California Biodiesel Alliance.

Brazilian Sugarcane Ethanol

The discussion on imports of advanced biofuels into California would not be complete without highlighting the importance of Brazilian sugarcane ethanol to meeting the LCFS mandate. According to Will Martin, lead ethanol analyst at Genscape, CARB plans on a lot of Brazilian ethanol hitting the ports. “It’s how they plan on meeting the

1$:7(& THE LEADING CONFERENCE ON MUNICIPAL WASTE-TO-ENERGY

THE NORTH AMERICAN WASTE-TO-ENERGY CONFERENCE May 23 - 25, 2016 PGA National Resort

West Palm Beach, Florida 1$:7(& RUJ 1$:7(& B BYHUWLFDO LQGG

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 67 30

¦ADVANCED BIOFUELS AND CHEMICALS

SOURCE: THE NATIONAL BIODIESEL BOARD

68 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

mandate initially,” he says. Overall, ethanol imports into the U.S. are relatively small at less than of 1 percent of consumption, Martin says.

According to Martin, California received a considerable amount of Brazilian ethanol in the latter part of 2015, which coincides with a dramatic increase in LCFS credit prices. “We’ve seen them jump from $40 to $120 already,” Martin says. “So there’s the potential for a lot more imports into California.

That’ll be one of the major factors looking toward 2016—are those LCFS credit prices going to keep encouraging imports into California? Right now, it’s unclear whether that arbitrage window is still open, just based on how much more expensive Brazilian ethanol is at the moment. And who knows where LCFS credit prices are going?”

Stone says last July the price was about $50, after spiking from the $20s in June. “The readoption of the LCFS scheme confirmed the need for obligated parties to secure tickets against their carbon offset requirements over the next few years,” Stone says. “The compliance scheme is set to get steadily tougher, stoking a scramble for short covering against pending offset obligations. Given the ticket scheme is currently price-capped at $200, some participants were scrambling to secure tickets at lower prices to offset their obligation given fears that the price spiral would soon send ticket prices toward the cap.”

From Q2 through Q4 2015, three California ports—Los Angeles, San Francisco and Carquinez Straight—imported a total of more than 40.6 million gallons of Brazilian ethanol, according to Martin. “A major player in this is the LCFS market and the price of those credits,” Martin says. Stone adds that the Brazilian domestic ethanol price is high compared with low U.S. domestic prices.

“The price relationship between the U.S. and Brazilian markets might start to change when the new Brazilian sugar crop harvest gets into full swing from April, and supply starts to reemerge,” Stone explains, adding that most of the LCFS market is expecting ticket prices to continue rising. “California has suf-

ADVANCED BIOFUELS AND CHEMICALS¦

ficient sources of supply to cover immediate requirements, but the market is not likely to become oversupplied because it is faced with sharp rises in yearly compliance,” he says.

Foreseen Growth

The new LCFS implementation schedule is less linear and more like a hockey stick, so demand for advanced biofuels will pick up increasingly through 2020. In 2015, a 1 percent reduction in GHGs from transportation fuels was required; in 2016, this is doubled to 2 percent; in 2017, it moves to 3.5 percent; in 2018, the reduction requirement is 5 percent; in 2019, the target is 7.5 percent; and finally, in 2020, a 10 percent reduction in GHGs from transportation fuels must be met. According to Neal, CARB laid out what it calls “illustrative scenarios” on what sort of biodiesel and renewable diesel demand this stepped increase in GHG reductions might provide. CARB’s illustrative scenario is 379 million gallons for 2016; 460 million gallons for 2017; and 785 million gallons for 2023.

“Five years ago, in-state production was just 3 million gallons a year,” Neal says.

“Then, last year, it was above 30 million gallons. On a percentage basis, that’s a tenfold increase in five years. In-state capacity is now 75 MMgy.” He says the LCFS never really took off like people thought. “People made investments and they thought it would be smooth, but it got stuck in neutral for a few years. This had a significant effect on our members. Now, implementation is going well, the lawsuits have been dealt with and the future is more certain. But we’re facing an onslaught of imports. The dollar is strong, there’s weak demand in China and India for diesel, we have robust RIN and LCFS prices, and the blender’s tax credit.

Add all those up and it makes sense why California is swamped with foreign product.”

Neal says restructuring the federal biodiesel and renewable diesel blender’s tax credit to a producer’s credit “would go a long way in straightening out this issue.” Domestic product still has the advantage, he says, and there is a lot of growth to be had in California.

“The LCFS scheme should start altering feedstock pricing patterns in the U.S. to reflect the advantage that low carbon waste fuels in particular enjoy under the LCFS program relative to the feedstock-undifferentiated RFS program,” Stone says. “To an EU observer used to higher prices for waste fuels than those for agriculture-based fuels, it makes little sense to see low carbon waste feedstock such as corn oil price at a discount

to soybean oil, although this is quite natural given the format of the RFS program. The uptake of LCFS-style schemes in neighboring states and Canadian provinces will accelerate this trend.”

Author: Ron Kotrba Senior Editor, Biomass Magazine 218-745-8347 rkotrba@bbiinternational.com

APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 69

Biomass Magazine Marketplace

Atlanta - Boston - California - North Carolina

AREAS OF FOCUS • Renewable/ Alternative • Efficiency • Agriculture • Water

SKILLS • Engineers • Sales • Industry Experts • Operational Support

Additional areas of focus/skills/searches at

HTPROFgroup.com/H.T.PROF-Clean-Tech Recruiting ‘KEY’ individuals since 1997

Contact - Todd Porter CleanTech@HTPROF.com 844-448-7763

Media Blasting Services

Adhesive compounds withstand: •

Acids • Bases • Organic Solvents

main@masterbond.com.com ∙ +1.201.343.8983 70 BIOMASS MAGAZINE | APRIL 2016

Regardless of the surface, Mole•Master has a media blasting solution for you.

From Dry Ice to Walnut Shells, Mole•Master does Abrasive Blasting safely and efficiently.

Toll Free: 800.322.6653 • Fax: 740.374.5908 info@molemaster.com

www.molemaster.com

MARKETPLACEÂŚ Biomass Magazine Marketplace From the feedstock handling to the final emission controls, let us utilize our expertise and 46+ years of experience to engineer solutions for your specific needs.

%,20$66(1(5*</$% &20

Experience & Innovation Working for You

Adhesive compounds withstand: â&#x20AC;˘

501-321-2276 mseco.com

Acids â&#x20AC;˘ Bases â&#x20AC;˘ Organic Solvents

CONTACT US TODAY main@masterbond.com.com â&#x2C6;&#x2122; +1.201.343.8983

30

The Right Choice In Drying for over

7,0%(5 352'8&76 ,163(&7,21

Years.

Uzelac Industries 6901 Industrial Loop, Greendale, WI USA 53129

BIOMASS GRINDING & CUBING SYSTEMS

Bale D-Stringing/Grinding Equip. for - Process Ready Fiber - Densified Fuel Needs

Ä?Ä?Ć&#x152;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161;Ĺ?Ć&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161; Ä?Ç&#x2021; Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; ĹľÄ&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ĺ?Ä?Ä&#x201A;Ĺś >ƾžÄ?Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152; ^Ć&#x161;Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x161; ŽžžĹ?ĆŠÄ&#x17E;Ä&#x17E; Ä&#x201A;Ć? Ä&#x201A; dÄ&#x17E;Ć?Ć&#x;ĹśĹ? >Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ĺ˝Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x161;Ĺ˝Ć&#x152;Ç&#x2021; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ä&#x201A;Ĺś ĆľÄ&#x161;Ĺ?Ć&#x;ĹśĹ? Ĺ?Ä&#x17E;ĹśÄ?Ç&#x2021; ĨŽĆ&#x152; Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; WÄ&#x17E;ĹŻĹŻÄ&#x17E;Ć&#x161; &ĆľÄ&#x17E;ĹŻĆ? /ĹśĆ?Ć&#x;Ć&#x161;ĆľĆ&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Í&#x203A;Ć? Ä&#x17E;ĹśĆ?Ĺ?ÄŽÄ&#x17E;Ä&#x161; Ĺ?ŽžÄ&#x201A;Ć?Ć? &ĆľÄ&#x17E;ĹŻ ^Ć&#x161;Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x161;Ć? WĆ&#x152;Ĺ˝Ĺ?Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;ĹľÍ&#x2DC;

EĆ&#x2030;ĹŻĆľĆ?

/ĹśĆ?Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x17E;Ä?Ć&#x;ŽŜĆ?Í&#x2022; ŽŜĆ?ƾůĆ&#x;ĹśĹ? Î&#x2DC; dÄ&#x17E;Ć?Ć&#x;ĹśĹ?

6,*0$1 52$' &21<(56 *$

cleaning| BROWSE CATEGORIES

FIND BROWSE COMPANIES

p: 414-529-0240 | f: 414-529-0362

www.uzelacind.com

39950 Road 108, Dinuba, CA 93618 USA Tel: 559-591-6790 Email: info@warrenbaerg.com Website: www.warrenbaerg.com Booth #912

',67,//(56 0$; ' 0 $ ; / / & F R P

(92/9( <285 3/$17 ' 0$; '(/,9(56

_+,*+(5 <,(/'6 _5,1V _*5($7(5 352),7

$W HWKDQRO SODQWV DFURVV WKH FRXQWU\ WKHUH¡V DQ HYROXWLRQ JRLQJ RQ 3URGXFHUV DUH GHPDQGLQJ PRUH WKDQ MXVW VWDQGDUG HWKDQRO SURGXFWLRQ IURP WKHLU IDFLOLWLHV 7KH\¡UH GHPDQGLQJ ´EROW RQ¾ WHFKQRORJLHV WKDW DUH HDVLO\ DGGHG DQG VXLWDEOH IRU WKHLU SODQW ' 0$; GHOLYHUV WKDW FXWWLQJ HGJH WHFKQRORJ\ E\ FRQYHUWLQJ FRUQ ILEHU DQG UHVLGXDO VWDUFK LQ GLVWLOOHUV JUDLQV WR FHOOXORVLF HWKDQRO 7KLV LV D ELOOLRQ JDOORQ SHU \HDU PDUNHW DQG ZLWK ' 0$; HWKDQRO SURGXFHUV FDQ PD[LPL]H WKHLU \LHOG DQG SURILWV

/($51 025( $7 ' 0$;//& FRP &217$&7 86 $7 RU P\DQFH\#G PD[OOF FRP APRIL 2016 | BIOMASS MAGAZINE 71

Cleanly Convert Waste To Renewable Energy Community-scale disposal solution for wood waste, tires and sludge Delivers clean-burning fuel gas for electrical generation or thermal use Extends landfill life and reduces carbon footprint Proven Gasification systems with over 50,000 commercial operating hours

=PZP[ V\Y >LIZP[L -PUK V\[ TVYL HIV\[ OV^ ^L ZVS]L LU]PYVUTLU[HS HUK LULYN` WYVISLTZ HUK OV^ ^L OH]L ^VYRLK ^P[O IV[O T\UPJPWHSP[PLZ HUK PUK\Z[Y` *VU[HJ[ \Z MVY HU PUP[PHS ILULMP[ HUHS`ZPZ HUK [V KPZJ\ZZ LULYN` HWWSPJH[PVUZ HUK MLLKZ[VJR VW[PVUZ

615.471.9299

www.phgenergy.com