Climate Path Analysis for Transport in 2030 FEBRUARY, 2019
Climate protection plan aims to reduce transport CO2 emissions by around 40%1
Transportation:
To slow global warming, Germany has set itself the goal of reducing greenhouse gases by 80 to 95 percent by 2050 (relative to 1990).
1612 Mt
Emissions have practically not sunk at all in the transportation sector, and based on initial 2016 estimates appear to have even risen higher than 1990 levels.2
69% Road passenger transport
28% Road freight transport
Starting in 2015, new measures were developed to further reduce emissions. 1. Vs. 1990 2. Pure CO2 emissions in 2015, relative to 163 Mt CO 2e in 1990 and 166 Mt CO2e in 2016; shares per 2015 Climate Paths study Source: BMU (https://www.bmu.de/fileadmin/Daten_BMU/Download_PDF/Klimaschutz/klimaschutz_in_zahlen_sektorenziele2030_bf.pdf)
3% Rail, ship, and air transport
1
Copyright Š 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
CO2
Specific sector goals defined for 2030 → Roughly 40% for transportation
2
Copyright © 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
Starting point: Cross-sector, cost-optimized paths for 80–95% reduction of greenhouse gases (GHG) by 2050
With current policy, Germany would achieve a 61% greenhouse gas reduction by 2050, for a gap of 19–34 percentage points from its climate goals 80% reduction of greenhouse gases is achievable with existing technologies and economically feasible 95% greenhouse gas reduction would test the limits of technical feasibility and acceptance and is conceivable only with the assumption of joint global efforts Required additional investments of ~€1.5–2.3 trillion by 2050 (~1.2–1.8% of GDP) and direct additional costs of ~€470–960B by 2050 (~€15–30B/a)
Starting point: Cross-sector, costoptimized paths for 80–95% reduction of greenhouse gases (GHG) by 2050
Successful relevant efforts open up new economic opportunities in globally growing "climate protection markets" (€1–2 trillion market volume by 2030)
But the upcoming transformation still holds considerable challenges for implementation: Mismanagement could incur significantly higher costs and risks The government must ensure integrated implementation by dovetailing climate and economic policy, securing critical infrastructure, incentivizing considerable investments, performing continuous monitoring, etc. 3
Copyright © 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
Efficient implementation would prevent macroeconomic losses ("breakeven")—an 80% reduction would not even require international synchronicity for this
Not even the 95% path would achieve goals for transport by 2030 Bubbles: Mt % change vs. 1990
1990 vs. 2030 Climate protection plan
2030 Reference
2030 80% climate path
2030 95% climate path
Energy
-61-62%
-48%
-53%
-64%
Industry
-49-51%
-44%
-50%
-51%
Transport
-40-42%
-13%
-22%
-26%
Buildings
-66-67%
-56%
-69%
-74%
Agricultural and other
Ag: -31-34% Other.: -87%
-54%
-62%
-61%
∑ 2030
543-562
-55-56%
694
-45%
600
-52%
535
-57%
1. Greenhouse gas (GHG) sector accounting in the climate protection plan and the climate paths (based on the greenhouse gas inventory of Germany's Federal Environmental Agency) is not identical and therefore not fully comparable. Examples: In the GHGs inventory, blast furnace gas conversion is situated in the energy sector, but in the climate protection plan, it is in 4 the industry sector. Emissions from industrial buildings are in the industrial accounting of the GHG inventory, but in the buildings accounting of the climate protection plan.
Copyright Š 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
CO2e
Basic approach: Climate paths optimized by abatement cost Average abatement costs compared to the current policies scenario (€/t CO 2e)
37
80% climate path
400 300 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19
34 35 20
21 22 23 24 25
38
39
40 41
36
33
26 32
200
28
27
29
31
30
100 0 40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
360
380
400
420
-100 Energy
Buildings
1 Shift in modes of transport (from road to rail, ship, and bus)
Transport
Agriculture
Add. GHG abatement in 2050 vs. current policies scenario (Mt CO2e)
15 Expansion and low-carbon conversion of district heating
29 "Methane pill" and other agricultural measures
16 New kilns and grinding plants for cement and lime production
30 Post-combustion CCS in refineries, blast furnace gas electr. generation
4 Expansion of solar thermal energy for industrial heat supply
17 Drive change in heavy commercial vehicles (OH lines, gas, FCV, BEV)
31 Post-combustion CCS in steel production
5 Expansion of solar thermal energy for space heat and warm water supply
18 Expansion of heat pumps
32 Post-combustion CCS in ammonia production
6 Other effects in the transport sector
19 Expansion of gas power plants
33 Appliances and processes in buildings: Efficiency, energy source switch
7 Plant modernization in methanol, ammonia, steam cracker
20 Agriculture (e.g., fermentation of manure in biogas plants)
34 Further expansion of heat pumps, district heating, and solar thermal
21 22 Ref. rate incr. to 1.7% p.a., KfW 40 level in new build as of 2030
35 Drive change in passenger road transport (BEV, PHEV, FC, gas)
10 Vehicle efficiency in road freight transport
23 Expansion of photovoltaics
36 Biogas and PtG in the industrial sector
11 Devices and processes: efficiency and energy source substitution
24 25 Drive change in LNF and cars (BEV, PHEV, gas, FCV)
37 1.9% refurbishment rate, near passive-house efficiency of new buildings
12 Steel: Efficiency in blast furnace-converter route, arc furnace optimiz.
26 Lower consumption in road vehicles
38 Synthetic fuels in transport (PtL, PtG)
13 Biomass in low- and medium-temperature heat (< 500°C)
27 Further expansion of wind power and photovoltaics
39 Further drive change in road freight transport (OH lines, gas, BEV, FCV)
14 Substitution of HFCs and PFCs, e.g., in cooling and air conditioning
28 Oxyfuel CCS in cement production
40 Synthetic fuels in space heating and warm water generation
2
8
3
9
Energy efficiency in electric motors/cross-sectional technologies
Expansion of wind onshore and wind offshore
41 Full decarbonization of gas power generation with PtG GHG abatement refers to emissions caused in 2050 and represents the deviation from GHG emissions in the Current Policies scenario 2050. Abatement costs show direct macroeconomic abatement costs. They result from cumulative GHG abatement between 2016 and 2050 and cumulative costs and savings between 2016 and 2050 and are discounted to 2015. Investments are annualized at a real interest rate of 2%. Electricity costs in all sectors were valuated with system costs, imports with border-crossing prices Source: BCG
5
Copyright © 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
Industry
GHG emissions in transport sector in Germany Mt CO2e
2015: 161 Mt. 150
100
50
0 1990
Reference Sector goal in climate protecttion plan: 40% GHG reduction by 2030
80% climate path 95% climate path
2000
2020
2030 2034 2036 2040
2050 6
Copyright Š 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
Climate paths achieve 40% greenhouse gas reduction in transport sector by 2034/36
200
Electricity-Scenario: 40% target requires use of all possible levers GHG savings in Mt of CO2 by lever4
+5% passenger transport +30% freight transport
2015
Development of transport volume
7 +35% passenger transport by rail and bus +60% freight transport by rail and ship
Change in mode of transportation
15 -20% real consumption of new cars, light commercial vehicles, and trucks
Efficiency
37
10M e-cars1 3M CNG vehicles 140K e-Trucks2 New drive systems
220 PJ biofuels 140 PJ e-fuels3 19
Carbonneutral fuels
-40%
97
2030
1. Passenger and light commercial vehicles 2. Overhead line hybrids, battery-powered trucks, and fuel cell trucks 3. In nationwide transport, plus 50 PJ in international aviation Abbreviations: CNG = compressed natural has, PJ = petajoule 4. Source accounting Source: Prognos; BCG
7
Copyright Š 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
161
15
Shifts in modes of transport
35% more passengers for rail and bus Passenger transport volume (in billion domestic transport pkm) 1.184 11 116 77
1,184 1,182 11 11 119 128 74 84
1,138 10 106 65
1,184 11 140 90 23 17
854
2000
956
2015
980
2030
Reference
978
956
2015
2020
2025
943
Rail transport
-16
2015
2030
2030 sector target
Domestic aviation Note: pkm = person kilometers Source: Prognos, BCG
961
10
Base year
6
2030
Reference
Motor coaches
Passenger vehicles
6 10 -16
2020
18 -35
2025
30
-53
2030
2030 sector target
Non-motorized transport 8
Copyright Š 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
1,015 10 89 62
1,138 10 106 65
Shifts in modes of transport (billion pkm; based on shares in 2015)
Shifts in modes of transport
60% more freight transport by rail and inland waterway Freight transport volume (in billion domestic transport volume tkm)
494 66 78
639 55 117
153
639 55 117
607 350
2000
467
467
703 61 133
777 72
161
836 82 189
36
509
544
565
Base year
-4
4
-5
1
4
19 5
10
-24 -46
2015
2030
Reference
2015
2020
2025
2030 sector target Domestic aviation
Note: tkm = ton kilometer Source: Prognos, BCG
2030
2015
2030 Reference
Inland waterways
Rail
2020
2025
2030
2030 sector target
Roads (trucks and light commercial vehicles) 9
Copyright Š 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
836 76
Shifts in modes of transport (billion tkm; based on shares in 2015)
Efficiency
17% to 22% lower real consumption by newly registered combustion engines
(Ø real consumption 2015 = 100%)
(Ø real consumption 2015 = 100%)
(Ø real consumption 2015 = 100%)
(Ø real consumption 2015 = 100%)
100
100
100
100
-22 %
80 2015
90
80 2020
2025
2030
2015
-20 %
90
80
80 2020
2025
2030
2015
-19 %
90
2020
2025
2030
2015
2020
2025
2030
Most important levers: Efficiency improvements in motors,1 lightweight construction and aerodynamics, long trucks, more efficient loading, EcoDriving, (semi-) autonomous driving, digital traffic control,2 truck platooning, … 1. 48 volt, electrical chargers, variable compression, HCCI, … 2. Vehicle-to-infrastructure, parking space management, networked logistics, traffic congestion prevention, … Source: Prognos scenario analysis
10
Copyright © 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
90
-17 %
30 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; 40% new drive systems needed across all vehicle classes New drive systems
30%
Passenger vehicles Nr. of vehicles in million 44.4 0.6
29.9
46.6 0.9
29.3
45.9 1.9 1.8
Light comercial vehicles
40%
2.2 0.1
6.9 2.0 3.7
2.6 0.1 0.2
2.6 0.3 0.1 0.2
26.3
Nr. of vehicles in thousand 2.6
2.0
2.3
712
737
0.9 0.2 0.2
20.3
30% Trucks
Nr. of vehicles in million 44.7
New drive systems
710
728
2.0
720 21 22 31
624
1.3
13.9
15.9
14.9
11.6
2015
2020
2025
2030
2015
2020
2025
2030
2015
2020
2025
45 18 56
38 39
493
2030
Hydrogen
Natural gas Diesel
Hydrogen
Plug-in hybrid
Gasoline
Battery
Battery
Natural gas
Diesel
Overhead line hybrid
Source: Prognos; BCG
690
Plug-in hybrid
11
Copyright Š 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
New drive systems
Passenger cars: Sharp increase in new registrations with alternative drives
44.4 0.6
29.9
46.6 0.9
29.3
45.9
44.7
1.8
6.9 2.0 3.7
… mean a sharp increase in new registrations 3.2
3.2 0.1 0.1
3.1
1.6
0.3 0.5
1.9
0.9
0.4
0.5
0.6 0.1 0.1
2025
2030
1.6
26.3 20.3 1.5
13.9
15.9
14.9
11.6
2015
2020
2025
2030
Hydrogen
Plug-in hybrid
Gasoline
Battery
Natural gas (CNG + LPG)
Diesel
Source: Prognos, BCG
2015
1.1 2020
3.1
0.9
12
Copyright © 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
Nine million (semi-) electrical vehicles …
Fuel-Scenario: Higher imports of carbon-neutral fuels GHG savings in Mt of CO2 by lever4
+5% passenger transport +30% freight transport
2015
Development of transport volume
+5 Mt
37
310 PJ biofuels 140 PJ e-fuels3
7 +35% passenger transport by rail or bus +60% freight transport by rail and ship
Change in mode of transportation
15 -20% real consumption of new cars, light commercial vehicles, and trucks
Efficiency
7M e-cars1 3M CNG vehicles 120K e-semis2 New drive systems
19
Carbonneutral fuels
-40%
97
2030
1. Passenger and light commercial vehicles 2. Overhead line hybrids, battery-powered trucks, and fuel cell trucks 3. In nationwide transport, plus 50 PJ in international aviation Abbreviations: CNG = compressed natural has, PJ = petajoule 4. Source accounting Source: Prognos; BCG
13
Copyright Š 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
161
15
-5 Mt
Carbon-neutral fuels
Four- to fivefold increase in addition of carbon-neutral fuels
2,580 26 106
2,446
2,669 40 112
2,513
10/19% 2,507 28 37 81
2,177 10 176 105 112 124
2020
x4
2,272 10 175
194 56
2025 scenario E
2030
143
404 10 42 85
1,695
2030 scenario F
Natural gas (synthetic)
Natural gas (fossil)
Gasoline/diesel/kerosine (synthetic)
Gasoline/diesel/kerosine (fossil)
Natural gas (biogenic) Gasoline/diesel/kerosine (biogenic) Note: Incl. sales for international aviation 1. For final energy consumption, respectively, excl. electricity and hydrogen Source: Prognos, BCG
48
x/y
2
521 10 42 84
31 79
2030 scenario E
Rates of addition1: biogenic/(biogenic + PtX) Nat. gas
50/55%
92/97%
Gasoline
7/16%
8/16%
Diesel
8/17%
10/18%
49 194
105
108 31 75 2015
15/23% x5
2,248 1,650
2015
Development in use of carbon-neutral fuels (in PJ)
38 102 2 2030 scenario F
2030 2030 scenario E scenario F
Rates of addition: x = biogenic and y = (biogenic + PtX) Pt nat. gas
Pt kerosine
Diesel (biogenic)
Pt gasoline
Nat. gas (biogenic)
Kerosine (biogenic)
Pt diesel
Gasoline (biogenic)
14
Copyright Š 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
Final energy consumption in the transport sector (PJ, excl. electricity/H2)
Carbon-neutral fuels
Deviation from climate paths: Shift of biomass to transport needed1 Use of biomass to generate energy by sector (in PJ) 1,078
1,077
108 110
505
Sewer gas, biogas
117
Liquid biogenic materials, biofuels
455
Solid biogenic materials, sewage sludge, biogenic share of waste, and landfill gas
2015
1. Shift of biomass from other sectors (e.g., industry) generally results in higher emissions there Source: AG Energiebilanzen e. V.; Prognos; BCG
337
523
2015
1,150 108
1,150
1,223
218
336
155
110
324
324
324
453
453
453
2030 95% path
2030 scenario E
2030 scenario K
265
Transport
Appliances and processes in buildings
Industry
Conversion
Additional imports may be necessary
15
Copyright Š 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
Composition of biomass currently used to generate energy (in PJ)
Digitization offensive to improve efficiency in all forms of transport, e.g., with the promotion of digital rail programs, truck platooning, intelligent traffic control systems, …
Specific incentives for shifting modes of transport to rail, bus, and inland waterways, and for strengthening regional public transportation (e.g., master plan for rail freight transport, Pro-Rail Alliance, 740m trains, rail-/waterway expansion, …)
Incentives for infrastructure investment (esp. intelligent charging infrastructure, approx. 2,500 km of overhead lines for trucks, H 2 filling stations), e.g., via construction law, funding, investment guarantees, regulated infrastructure, …
Controls on the addition of biogenic fuels whether upwards or downwards, to prevent disruptions due to (national, sector-specific) CO2 prices, e.g., with auctions, ratios/caps, CO2 fleet accounting, …
Promotion of the industrial scaling of e-fuels nationally and internationally, e.g., with auctions, funding, mandatory mix ratios, CO 2 fleet accounting, …
Additional CO2 price trigger
for fuels/sources of energy in transport, e.g., with cap-and-trade, carbon tax, CO2-based readjustment of taxes on energy sources, higher toll rates for trucks, … (up to €250/t in 2030)
Subsidies for carbon-neutral vehicles or fuels, such as with tax breaks, purchase incentives, … (with lower CO2 price trigger; shortterm up to €6,000 per vehicles, subsequently decreasing) Details on following pages
16
Copyright © 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
Seven political areas for action
Three Variations of CO2-Pricing until 2030 Carbon Price only rapid, progressive increase to € 250/t in 2030
161
1 Scenario
18
€ 250/t in 2030
Diesel1: + € 0,66/l Gasoline1: + € 0,58/l
5
6
-45 Mrd. Pkm -20 Mrd. Tkm
20
6
10
97 Additional measures e.g. buying incentives for EV’s
161
Scenario
€ 150/t in 2030
Diesel1: + € 0,40/l Gasoline1:+ € 0,35/l
Self-financing buying incentive 3
6
-30 Mrd. Pkm -15 Mrd. Tkm
14
6
0
4.000 19 97 '20-'24
Scenario
18
€ 100/t in 2030
Diesel1:
+ € 0,26/l Gasoline1:+ € 0,23/l
2
5
8
-22 Mrd. Pkm -10 Mrd. Tkm
2015
'25-'29
1.000 '30
Subsidised buying incentive
161
3
2.500
Existing Traffic measures reduction
Modal shift
Emobility
5
0
Efficiency Renewable fuels2
6.000 3.500
28 97 2030
1. Price increase for the end consumer including taxes; real price 2. Renewable fuels (biogen) without any incentive on the energy tax level will need a CO2-Pricing of €250/T; PtX will even need a higher incentive Source: Prognos
'20-'24
'25-'29
2.000
'30
17
Copyright © 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
2
18
Carbon price only
Self-financing
Subsidies
Carbon price as main control mechanism
Carbon price with "self-financing" purchase incentive3
Lower carbon prices, higher purchase incentives
Carbon price trigger1 (e.g., carbon tax)
Rapid, progressive increase to €250/t in 2030
Progressive increase to €150/t in 2030
Linear increase to €100/t in 2030
Purchase incentives2 (e.g., purchase bonuses)
None
Purchase incentive of €4,000/vehicle sinking €1,000 in 2030, financed by carbon proceeds
Purchase incentive of €6,000/vehicle, sinking to €2,000 in 2030; subsidization necessary
1. Carbon price trigger as control mechanism in addition to current fuel price, including existing energy taxes and VAT 2. Incentivization of carbon-neutral vehicles/fuels with purchase of new passenger and light commercial vehicles 3. Cost side only; self-financing only in medium term (2025 – 2030) due to low proceeds at start
18
Copyright © 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
Considerable financial incentives required—three variations
Assumption: Progressive carbon price, regressive subsidies Carbon price only 2.04 1.89 1.55 1.40 2020
1.82
2022 2024
1.81
2.01 1.65
1.55 1.40
2026 2028
2030
2020
1.75
1.55
2022
2024
Diesel
Purchase incentives for carbon-neutral new vehicles (in €/vehicle)
Subsidies
2026
2028
2030
1.50 1.35 2020
2022
1.69
1.57
1.61 1.46 2024
2026
2028
2030
Gasoline 6,000
4,000
None
3,500
2,500
2,000
1,000 '20-'24
'25-'29
'30
'20-'24
'25-'29
'30
'20-'24
1. Base price from BDI price paths for diesel and gasoline: €1.35 for diesel and €1.46 for gasoline in 2030 Notes: Variation 1—carbon price starting at €50/t with concave increase to € 250/t; variation 2—carbon price starting at €50/t in 2020 with concave increase to €150/t; variation 3—carbon price starting at €30/t in 2020 with linear increase to €100/t Source: Prognos, BCG
'25-'29
'30
19
Copyright © 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
Real price development for fuels, plus carbon price1 (in €/l)
Self-financing
~ €250B in added investments to achieve 2030 transport sector target Cumulative added investments, not discounted
Added investments in both scenarios, 2015 to 2030 (cumulative, in B€, real2015) 36 1
4 6
18 24 17 26
243
Synthetic fuels: Production plants for ~190 PJ synthetic fuels (incl. international transport)1
36
Efficiency of rail, air, and inland waterways: More efficient drive technology and operating processes 1
4
18
6 24 21 21
38 26
27 26
Shift of traffic in passenger transport: Transfer of 53B pkm transport service from road to rail, bus, and non-motorized transport Further electrification of the rail system Shift in means of transport, freight transport Transfer of 46B tkm transport service from the road to rail and inland waterways Automation/digitalization and further electrification of the rail system Truck overhead lines: Expansion of the overhead line infrastructure on 2,500 km of German freeway More efficient trucks and light commercial vehicles: Long trucks, platooning, more efficient motors, … New drive systems for trucks: ~200K low-emission trucks (overhead line hybrids, hydrogen, battery, nat. gas) New drive systems for trucks: 1.0 – 1.3M low-emission light comm. vehicles (esp. battery and natural gas)
60
59
Charging infrastructure for electric vehicles and grid expansion for 7 – 10M (semi-) electrical vehicles More efficient passenger vehicles: More efficient motors/drives, lightweight construction, aerodynamics …
Scenario E
Scenario K
New drive sys. for pass. vehicles: 6.5 – 9M (semi-) electrical veh., 3M (biogenic) nat. gas, up to 4M hybrids, …
1. Excl. investments in electricity generation; incl. ~€9B for PtX use in international aviation Note: Added investment in research and development included only indirectly, without restructuring costs. PJ = petajoule, pkm = person kilometer, tkm = ton kilometer Source: BCG
20
Copyright © 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
256
Added costs of between €115 –126B by 2030 to achieve sector target Direct costs only; macroeconomic perspective; investments annualized, not discounted
Annual added costs of scenarios (in B€, real2015)
Cumulative added costs of scenarios (in B€, real2015) 18
3
1
11 -2
6
-9
19
1 2015
Capital costs
3
2020
Energy source costs
11 -2
-9
136
Energy source costs
97
116
-121
-127
Scenario E
Scenario K
22
9
3
139
-25
21
Scenario K
Capital costs
7
2025
24 -26 2030
Savings on energy source costs
Savings on energy source costs
Note: Direct macroeconomic added costs after energy source savings; added investments with real economic interest rate of 2% annualized. Energy source savings and costs excl. taxes, subsidies, or customs; electricity valuated with electricity system costs and imports with border-crossing prices. Cumulative added costs include ~€16B for PtX use in international aviation (for facility investments and electricity costs) 21 Source: BCG
Copyright © 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
Scenario E
126
23
9
3
115
The 40% transport sector target for 2030 is extremely ambitious compared to other sectors
Target achievement is possible, but only with the use of all conceivable levers in addition to significant investments
Activating these levers would require clear political reversals and strong financial incentives
22
Copyright Š 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
Summary
The materials contained in this presentation are designed for the sole use by the board of directors or senior management of the Client and solely for the limited purposes described in the presentation. The materials shall not be copied or given to any person or entity other than the Client (â&#x20AC;&#x153;Third Partyâ&#x20AC;?) without the prior written consent of BCG. These materials serve only as the focus for discussion; they are incomplete without the accompanying oral commentary and may not be relied on as a stand-alone document. Further, Third Parties may not, and it is unreasonable for any Third Party to, rely on these materials for any purpose whatsoever. To the fullest extent permitted by law (and except to the extent otherwise agreed in a signed writing by BCG), BCG shall have no liability whatsoever to any Third Party, and any Third Party hereby waives any rights and claims it may have at any time against BCG with regard to the services, this presentation, or other materials, including the accuracy or completeness thereof. Receipt and review of this document shall be deemed agreement with and consideration for the foregoing. BCG does not provide fairness opinions or valuations of market transactions, and these materials should not be relied on or construed as such. Further, the financial evaluations, projected market and financial information, and conclusions contained in these materials are based upon standard valuation methodologies, are not definitive forecasts, and are not guaranteed by BCG. BCG has used public and/or confidential data and assumptions provided to BCG by the Client. BCG has not independently verified the data and assumptions used in these analyses. Changes in the underlying data or operating assumptions will clearly impact the analyses and conclusions.
23
Copyright Š 2019 by Boston Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
The services and materials provided by Boston Consulting Group (BCG) are subject to BCG's Standard Terms (a copy of which is available upon request) or such other agreement as may have been previously executed by BCG. BCG does not provide legal, accounting, or tax advice. The Client is responsible for obtaining independent advice concerning these matters. This advice may affect the guidance given by BCG. Further, BCG has made no undertaking to update these materials after the date hereof, notwithstanding that such information may become outdated or inaccurate.
bcg.com