CX 2020 LIVE LIVESTREAM & ON DEMAND
SUCCESS IN NUMBERS Aortic Consensus
Peripheral Arterial Consensus
Venous & Lymphatic Consensus
Acute Stroke Consensus
Vascular Access Consensus
w w w. c x s y m p o s i u m . c o m
Success in numbers CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 6,290 registrants from 123 countries. The 10 CME-accredited sessions saw significant engagement through real-time audience participation, polling and social media.
6,290
registrations
Physicians Specialties
Physicians vs. industry
Vascular surgeon
67.59%
Other 8.97% Interventional radiologist
8.89%
Interventional cardiologist
4.07%
Research/education 3.46% Cardiothoracic surgeon
2.51%
Vascular physician
1.76%
Angiologist 1.74% Transplant surgeon
0.53%
Nephrologist 0.38% Diabetologist 0.08% Physicians 79% Industry 21%
2000
Years practising
2000
Top 10 countries
1500
20+ 16.09%
1 5 0 0 1000
500
3-5
Spain 255 India 221
6-10 11-20 20+
Germany 215
03-05 13.80%
Saudi Arabia
06-10 12.89%
S e s s i o n 111-20 20.99% 20+ 16.09%
Session 2
S e s s i o2 n 4 Session 5
743
Mexico 283
01-02 14.71%
S1 e s-s2i o n 3 3 - 5
United Kingdom
Italy 321
03-05 13.80%
06-10 12.89%
1-2
753
Brazil 478
11-20 20.99%
1000
500
01-02 14.71%
United States
1080
Session 1
173
Egypt 152
757
6 - 1 0 1 1 - 2 0 27 03 6+
Session 2
Session 4
544 803
768
Session 3
Session 5
553
CX 2020 LIVE Statistics
597
2000
Session attendance
1500
1000
CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 0 6,660 Live views from5 0107 countries. 1-2
3-5
Live session views
attendees
Session 1
1080
Session 5
Session 5
803
Session 7
1079
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 6,183 On Demand views from 109 countries.
1262
Session 1 Session 2
757
1079
Session 7
418 391
Session 9
319
400
263 316
Session 10
418 600
800
1000
1200
CX 2020 LIVE Statistics
attendees
638
Session 8
489
3,248
597
Session 6
435
300
553
Session 5
803
0
768
Session 4
544
316
977
Session 3
736
263
On Demand views
OnDemand session views 1080
391
6,183
As of the 03.07.2020
0 11-20 20+
418
Session 10
418 0
Session 7
Session 9
319
Session 10
638
Session 8
489
Session 9
597
Session 6
435
Session 8
553
Session 4
544
Session 6
768
Session 3
736
Session 4
Session 1 Session 2
757
Session 3
Live views
2,829
6-10 11-20 20+
Session 2
6,660
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
3
600
900
Session 1: Paclitaxel-coated Device CX Consensus Update Tuesday 26 May
1,079
Live views
1,262
On Demand views
CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 1,079 Live views from 84 countries.
Live views
As of the 03.07.2020
On Demand views
CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 1,262 On Demand views from 86 countries.
Average viewing time
Physicians vs. industry
829
Physicians live views
250
Industry live views
1,061
Physicians On Demand
Top 10 countries 246
United Kingdom
198
Brazil 130 Spain 112 Italy 94 Mexico 92 92
Germany 54 Poland 44 Austraila 42
4
54min
24min
Live views
On Demand
Audience participation
United States
Saudi Arabia
201
Industry On Demand
This session received questions from 18 countries. A few presentations seem to suggest that paclitaxel is safe and even beneficial for critical limb ischaemia patients. However, do we need to be more careful when we treat claudicants? Joy Roy, Stockholm, Sweden Is there any situation in which you reinforce VBX with a bare metal stent? Bruno Canto, Recife, Brazil
Polling results Do you consider paclitaxel dose level to be crucial?
Yes 53% No 47% Does the VIVA IPD settle this once and for all?
Yes 37% No 63%
CX 2020 LIVE Statistics
Session 2: Durability of EVAR, Sac Diameter and NICE Guidelines CX Consensus Update Thursday 28 May
757
Live views
977
On Demand views
CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 757 Live views from 77 countries.
Live views
On Demand views
As of the 03.07.2020
CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 977 On Demand views from 84 countries.
Average viewing time
Physicians vs. industry
613
Physicians live views
144
Industry live views
849
Physicians On Demand
Top 10 countries
53min Live views
38min On Demand
Audience participation
United Kingdom
241
United States
121
Brazil 122 Mexico 77 Italy 75 Spain 61 Saudi Arabia
129
Industry On Demand
51
Germany 43
This session received questions from 20 countries. How important is selective embolisation of contributing branches? Tilo Kรถlbel, Hamburg, Germany Do the infrarenal fixation hooks interfere with endoanchor placement? Glenn Tan, Singapore
Polling results Are you happy with the final NICE aortic guidelines?
Yes 61% No 39%
Argentina 32
Do you regard type II endoleak without sac expansion as harmless?
Egypt 31
Yes 68% No 32%
CX 2020 LIVE Statistics
5
Session 3: Superficial Venous Disease CX Consensus Update Tuesday 2 June
736
Live views
768
On Demand views
CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 736 Live views from 81 countries.
Live views
On Demand views
As of the 03.07.2020
CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 768 On Demand views from 85 countries.
Average viewing time
Physicians vs. industry
659
Physicians live views
77
Industry live views
703
Physicians On Demand
65
Industry On Demand
43min
32min
Live views
On Demand
Top 10 countries United Kingdom
199
Brazil 107 United States
93
Mexico 86 Spain 49 Saudi Arabia
42
Italy 35 Poland 35 India 32
Audience participation This session received questions from 34 countries. Considering the importance of autologous vein for bypass and arterial reconstruction, do the guidelines consider saphenous vein-sparing procedures? Alberto MuĂąoz, Bogota, Colombia Would you treat with anticoagulation after ablating/closing the vein after an episode of superficial vein thrombosis? For how long? Raghu Kolluri, Columbus, United States
Polling results Are you a fan of cyanoacrylate glue?
Yes 39% No 61%
Germany 43
6
CX 2020 LIVE Statistics
Session 4: Aortic Arch and Stroke from Thoracic Endovascular Procedures (STEP) CX Consensus Update Thursday 4 June
544
Live views
553
On Demand views
CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 544 Live views from 70 countries.
Live views
On Demand views
As of the 03.07.2020
CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 553 On Demand views from 70 countries.
Average viewing time
Physicians vs. industry
429
Physicians live views
115
Industry live views
478
Physicians On Demand
Top 10 countries
75
Industry On Demand
56min Live views
37min On Demand
Audience participation
Unted Kingdom
132
This session received questions from 19 countries.
United States
104
How often do you see false lumen rupture in chronic uncomplicated type B dissections? Waquar Yusuf, Brighton, United Kingdom
Brazil 68 Italy 63 Mexicao 52 Spain 45 Saudi Arbia
30
What is your spinal drainage protocol for doing TEVAR on dissections? Edgar Tuazon, Manila, Philippines
Polling results Do you alter reconstruction methods in the arch according to underlying pathology?
Germany 29
Yes 85% No 15%
Argentia 24
Open repair is best for aortic arch aneurysms.
Canada 20
CX 2020 LIVE Statistics
Yes 38% No 62%
7
Session 5: CX Peripheral ArterialPodium 1st Tuesday 9 June
803
Live views
597
On Demand views
CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 803 Live views from 77 countries.
Live views
On Demand views
As of the 03.07.2020
CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 597 On Demand views from 73 countries.
Average viewing time
Physicians vs. industry
475
Physicians live views
122
Industry live views
558
Physicians On Demand
245
Industry On Demand
33min
Live views
On Demand
Audience participation
Top 10 countries United Kingdom
151
United States
118
India 76 Spain 63 Mexico 60
This session received questions from 18 countries. Do you perform routine antibacterial prophylaxis during the implantation of stent grafts for iliac occlusive disease? Dumitru Casian, Chisinau, Moldova Are there any data in relation to late events after sirolimus peripheral balloon angioplasty or stent? Is there a sirolimus stent with same elution nanotechnology? George Dangas, New York, United States
Brazil 55 Saudi Arabia
51min
43
Polling results I like relining.
Italy 42
Yes 81% No 19%
Germany 36
I will use rivaroxaban in PAD lower extremity revascularisation.
Poland 25
8
Yes 75% No 25%
CX 2020 LIVE Statistics
Session 6: Vascular Access CX Consensus Update Tuesday 11 June
435
Live views
638
On Demand views
CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 435 Live views from 61 countries.
Live views
On Demand views
As of the 03.07.2020
CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 638 On Demand views from 83 countries.
Average viewing time
Physicians vs. industry
342
Physicians live views
93
Industry live views
542
Physicians On Demand
96
Industry On Demand
44min Live views
27min On Demand
Top 10 countries United Kingdom United States
142 88
Brazil 67 Mexico 50 Saudi Arabia
32
Spain 30 Italy 29 South Africa
25
Austraila 17
Audience participation This session received questions from 18 countries. How many radial and how many ulnar endoAVF did you perform? How do you select patients? Tobias Steinke, Duesseldorf, Germany What proportion of endoAVF patients require angioplasty to aid maturation in the first three months. Narayan Karunanithy, London, United Kingdom
Polling results Endovascular creation of fistulas is the way forward?
Yes 46% No 54%
Egypt 17
CX 2020 LIVE Statistics
9
Session 7: Deep Venous Disease CX Consensus Update Tuesday 16 June
Live views
1079
CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 1079 Live views from 84 countries.
Live views
418
On Demand views
On Demand views
As of the 03.07.2020
CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 418 On Demand views from 70 countries.
Average viewing time
Physicians vs. industry
829
Physicians live views
250
Industry live views
352
Physicians On Demand
66
Industry On Demand
55min
37min
Live views
On Demand
Top 10 countries United Kingdom
184
Audience participation
United States
166
This session received questions from 24 countries.
Spain 79 Brazil 77 Italy 74 Mexico 56 Saudi Arabia
56
Which stent out of stents available on the market at the moment is the closest to the ‘ideal venous stent’? JMartin Maresch, Manama, Bahrain Do you really need a dedicated venous stent for non-thrombotic iliac vein lesion? Lowell Kabnick, Bernardsville, United States
Polling results
Germany 39
I am in favour of the use of venous stents as described.
Egypt 28
Yes 91% No 9%
South Africa
10
26
CX 2020 LIVE Statistics
Session 8: CX Aortic Podium 1st Thursday 18 June
489
Live views
391
On Demand views
CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 489 Live views from 63 countries.
Live views
As of the 03.07.2020
On Demand views
CX 2020 OnDemand enjoyed a huge global response with over 391 On Demand views from 64 countries.
Average viewing time
Physicians vs. industry
353
Physicians live views
136
Industry live views
316
Physicians On Demand
75
Industry On Demand
56min Live views
26min On Demand
Top 10 countries United Kingdom United States
109 90
Italy 42 Brazil 41 Spain 34 Netherlands 31 Germany 27
Audience participation This session received questions from 16 countries. Great presentation! I can confirm that FORS works very nicely also in peripheral procedures. Joost van Herwaarden, Utrecht, The Netherlands Would you consider correcting the position of the graft more proximally after partial deployment, or would you be concerned about retrograde Type A Dissection? Nikos Tsilimparis, Munich, Germany
Polling results
Mexico 27
Fibre optic technology is the way forward in complex aortic repair.
Saudi Arabia
21
Yes 84% No 16%
South Africa
20
CX 2020 LIVE Statistics
11
Session 9: Acute Stroke CX Consensus Update Thursday 23 June
319
Live views
262
On Demand views
CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 319 Live views from 60 countries.
Live views
On Demand views
As of the 03.07.2020
CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 262 On Demand views from 54 countries.
Average viewing time
Physicians vs. industry
288
Physicians live views
31
Industry live views
253
Physicians On Demand
Top 10 countries United Kingdom
101
33
Mexico 23 Germany 21 Saudi Arabia
21
Italy 20 South Africa
46min
26min
Live views
On Demand
Audience participation
Brazil 38 United States
9
Industry On Demand
14
This session received questions from 16 countries. Would it be truer to say that the variation is led by %GDP spent in health systems, rather than reimbursement? Alison Halliday, Oxford, United Kingdom In some patients the external carotid artery can serve as a collateral supplying the ICA when the common carotid is clamped, thus increasing the risk of distal embolism. Has anyone looked at it in TCAR studies? Pavel Kurianov, St Petersburg, Russian Federation
Polling results
Argentina 13
I agree that when operating on a carotid artery in a patient undergoing CABG, the two procedures should be done simultaneously.
Chile 13
Yes 47% No 53%
12
CX 2020 LIVE Statistics
Session 10: Juxtarenal Aneurysm CX Consensus Update Thursday 25 June
418
Live views
316
On Demand views
CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 418 Live views from 59 countries.
Live views
On Demand views
As of the 03.07.2020
CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 316 On Demand views from 68 countries.
Average viewing time
Physicians vs. industry
332
Physicians live views
86
Industry live views
263
Physicians On Demand
53
Industry On Demand
46min Live views
28min On Demand
Top 10 countries United Kingdom United States
106 67
Brazil 39 Italy 37 Germany 36 Mexico 34 Saudi Arabia
21
Spain 21 South Africa
20
Audience participation This session received questions from 13 countries. How would you compare in situ FEVAR with surgeon-modified FEVAR? Nuno Dias, MalmÜ, Sweden We know Chimneys have gutters [‌] How do you explain your excellent results? Any tips? Marcelo Ferreira, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
Polling results I like the idea of using inner branches.
Yes 79% No 21%
Argentina 16
CX 2020 LIVE Statistics
13
AORTIC VIENNA CLASSICAL OPEN AND ENDOVASCULAR SOLUTIONS
CARDIOVASCULAR
AORTIC ADVANCES
LIVE VIRTUAL
CONFERENCE
8–11 SEPTEMBER 2020 Founding Chair: Roger Greenhalgh
Registration open
www.cxaortic.com