CX 2020 LIVE Stats

CX 2020 LIVE LIVESTREAM & ON DEMAND

SUCCESS IN NUMBERS Aortic Consensus

Peripheral Arterial Consensus

Venous & Lymphatic Consensus

Acute Stroke Consensus

Vascular Access Consensus

w w w. c x s y m p o s i u m . c o m

Success in numbers CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 6,290 registrants from 123 countries.

The 10 CME-accredited sessions saw significant engagement through real-time audience participation, polling and social media.

6,290

registrations

Physicians Specialties

Physicians vs. industry

Vascular surgeon

67.59%

Other 8.97% Interventional radiologist

8.89%

Interventional cardiologist

4.07%

Research/education 3.46% Cardiothoracic surgeon

2.51%

Vascular physician

1.76%

Angiologist 1.74% Transplant surgeon

0.53%

Nephrologist 0.38% Diabetologist 0.08% Physicians 79% Industry 21%

2000

Years practising

2000

Top 10 countries

1500

20+ 16.09%

1 5 0 0 1000

500

3-5

Spain 255 India 221

6-10 11-20 20+

Germany 215

03-05 13.80%

Saudi Arabia

06-10 12.89%

S e s s i o n 111-20 20.99% 20+ 16.09%

Session 2

S e s s i o2 n 4 Session 5

743

Mexico 283

01-02 14.71%

S1 e s-s2i o n 3 3 - 5

United Kingdom

Italy 321

03-05 13.80%

06-10 12.89%

1-2

753

Brazil 478

11-20 20.99%

1000

500

01-02 14.71%

United States

1080

Session 1

173

Egypt 152

757

6 - 1 0 1 1 - 2 0 27 03 6+

Session 2

Session 4

544 803

768

Session 3

Session 5

553

CX 2020 LIVE Statistics

597

2000

Session attendance

1500

1000

CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 0 6,660 Live views from5 0107 countries.

1-2

3-5

Live session views

attendees

Session 1

1080

Session 5

Session 5

803

Session 7

1079

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 6,183 On Demand views from 109 countries.

1262

Session 1 Session 2

757

1079

Session 7

418 391

Session 9

319

400

263 316

Session 10

418 600

800

1000

1200

CX 2020 LIVE Statistics

attendees

638

Session 8

489

3,248

597

Session 6

435

300

553

Session 5

803

0

768

Session 4

544

316

977

Session 3

736

263

On Demand views

OnDemand session views 1080

391

6,183

As of the 03.07.2020

0 11-20 20+

418

Session 10

418 0

Session 7

Session 9

319

Session 10

638

Session 8

489

Session 9

597

Session 6

435

Session 8

553

Session 4

544

Session 6

768

Session 3

736

Session 4

Session 1 Session 2

757

Session 3

Live views

2,829

6-10 11-20 20+

Session 2

6,660

0

300

600

900

1200

1500

3

600

900

Session 1: Paclitaxel-coated Device CX Consensus Update Tuesday 26 May

1,079

Live views

1,262

On Demand views

CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 1,079 Live views from 84 countries.

Live views

As of the 03.07.2020

On Demand views

CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 1,262 On Demand views from 86 countries.

Average viewing time

Physicians vs. industry

829

Physicians live views

250

Industry live views

1,061

Physicians On Demand

Top 10 countries 246

United Kingdom

198

Brazil 130 Spain 112 Italy 94 Mexico 92 92

Germany 54 Poland 44 Austraila 42

4

54min

24min

Live views

On Demand

Audience participation

United States

Saudi Arabia

201

Industry On Demand

This session received questions from 18 countries.

A few presentations seem to suggest that paclitaxel is safe and even beneficial for critical limb ischaemia patients. However, do we need to be more careful when we treat claudicants?

Joy Roy, Stockholm, Sweden Is there any situation in which you reinforce VBX with a bare metal stent?

Bruno Canto, Recife, Brazil

Polling results Do you consider paclitaxel dose level to be crucial?

Yes 53% No 47% Does the VIVA IPD settle this once and for all?

Yes 37% No 63%

CX 2020 LIVE Statistics

Session 2: Durability of EVAR, Sac Diameter and NICE Guidelines CX Consensus Update Thursday 28 May

757

Live views

977

On Demand views

CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 757 Live views from 77 countries.

Live views

On Demand views

As of the 03.07.2020

CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 977 On Demand views from 84 countries.

Average viewing time

Physicians vs. industry

613

Physicians live views

144

Industry live views

849

Physicians On Demand

Top 10 countries

53min Live views

38min On Demand

Audience participation

United Kingdom

241

United States

121

Brazil 122 Mexico 77 Italy 75 Spain 61 Saudi Arabia

129

Industry On Demand

51

Germany 43

This session received questions from 20 countries.

How important is selective embolisation of contributing branches?

Tilo Kรถlbel, Hamburg, Germany Do the infrarenal fixation hooks interfere with endoanchor placement?

Glenn Tan, Singapore

Polling results Are you happy with the final NICE aortic guidelines?

Yes 61% No 39%

Argentina 32

Do you regard type II endoleak without sac expansion as harmless?

Egypt 31

Yes 68% No 32%

CX 2020 LIVE Statistics

5

Session 3: Superficial Venous Disease CX Consensus Update Tuesday 2 June

736

Live views

768

On Demand views

CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 736 Live views from 81 countries.

Live views

On Demand views

As of the 03.07.2020

CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 768 On Demand views from 85 countries.

Average viewing time

Physicians vs. industry

659

Physicians live views

77

Industry live views

703

Physicians On Demand

65

Industry On Demand

43min

32min

Live views

On Demand

Top 10 countries United Kingdom

199

Brazil 107 United States

93

Mexico 86 Spain 49 Saudi Arabia

42

Italy 35 Poland 35 India 32

Audience participation This session received questions from 34 countries.

Considering the importance of autologous vein for bypass and arterial reconstruction, do the guidelines consider saphenous vein-sparing procedures?

Alberto MuĂąoz, Bogota, Colombia Would you treat with anticoagulation after ablating/closing the vein after an episode of superficial vein thrombosis? For how long?

Raghu Kolluri, Columbus, United States

Polling results Are you a fan of cyanoacrylate glue?

Yes 39% No 61%

Germany 43

6

CX 2020 LIVE Statistics

Session 4: Aortic Arch and Stroke from Thoracic Endovascular Procedures (STEP) CX Consensus Update Thursday 4 June

544

Live views

553

On Demand views

CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 544 Live views from 70 countries.

Live views

On Demand views

As of the 03.07.2020

CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 553 On Demand views from 70 countries.

Average viewing time

Physicians vs. industry

429

Physicians live views

115

Industry live views

478

Physicians On Demand

Top 10 countries

75

Industry On Demand

56min Live views

37min On Demand

Audience participation

Unted Kingdom

132

This session received questions from 19 countries.

United States

104

How often do you see false lumen rupture in chronic uncomplicated type B dissections?

Waquar Yusuf, Brighton, United Kingdom

Brazil 68 Italy 63 Mexicao 52 Spain 45 Saudi Arbia

30

What is your spinal drainage protocol for doing TEVAR on dissections?

Edgar Tuazon, Manila, Philippines

Polling results Do you alter reconstruction methods in the arch according to underlying pathology?

Germany 29

Yes 85% No 15%

Argentia 24

Open repair is best for aortic arch aneurysms.

Canada 20

CX 2020 LIVE Statistics

Yes 38% No 62%

7

Session 5: CX Peripheral ArterialPodium 1st Tuesday 9 June

803

Live views

597

On Demand views

CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 803 Live views from 77 countries.

Live views

On Demand views

As of the 03.07.2020

CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 597 On Demand views from 73 countries.

Average viewing time

Physicians vs. industry

475

Physicians live views

122

Industry live views

558

Physicians On Demand

245

Industry On Demand

33min

Live views

On Demand

Audience participation

Top 10 countries United Kingdom

151

United States

118

India 76 Spain 63 Mexico 60

This session received questions from 18 countries.

Do you perform routine antibacterial prophylaxis during the implantation of stent grafts for iliac occlusive disease?

Dumitru Casian, Chisinau, Moldova Are there any data in relation to late events after sirolimus peripheral balloon angioplasty or stent? Is there a sirolimus stent with same elution nanotechnology?

George Dangas, New York, United States

Brazil 55 Saudi Arabia

51min

43

Polling results I like relining.

Italy 42

Yes 81% No 19%

Germany 36

I will use rivaroxaban in PAD lower extremity revascularisation.

Poland 25

8

Yes 75% No 25%

CX 2020 LIVE Statistics

Session 6: Vascular Access CX Consensus Update Tuesday 11 June

435

Live views

638

On Demand views

CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 435 Live views from 61 countries.

Live views

On Demand views

As of the 03.07.2020

CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 638 On Demand views from 83 countries.

Average viewing time

Physicians vs. industry

342

Physicians live views

93

Industry live views

542

Physicians On Demand

96

Industry On Demand

44min Live views

27min On Demand

Top 10 countries United Kingdom United States

142 88

Brazil 67 Mexico 50 Saudi Arabia

32

Spain 30 Italy 29 South Africa

25

Austraila 17

Audience participation This session received questions from 18 countries.

How many radial and how many ulnar endoAVF did you perform? How do you select patients?

Tobias Steinke, Duesseldorf, Germany What proportion of endoAVF patients require angioplasty to aid maturation in the first three months.

Narayan Karunanithy, London, United Kingdom

Polling results Endovascular creation of fistulas is the way forward?

Yes 46% No 54%

Egypt 17

CX 2020 LIVE Statistics

9

Session 7: Deep Venous Disease CX Consensus Update Tuesday 16 June

Live views

1079

CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 1079 Live views from 84 countries.

Live views

418

On Demand views

On Demand views

As of the 03.07.2020

CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 418 On Demand views from 70 countries.

Average viewing time

Physicians vs. industry

829

Physicians live views

250

Industry live views

352

Physicians On Demand

66

Industry On Demand

55min

37min

Live views

On Demand

Top 10 countries United Kingdom

184

Audience participation

United States

166

This session received questions from 24 countries.

Spain 79 Brazil 77 Italy 74 Mexico 56 Saudi Arabia

56

Which stent out of stents available on the market at the moment is the closest to the ‘ideal venous stent’?

JMartin Maresch, Manama, Bahrain Do you really need a dedicated venous stent for non-thrombotic iliac vein lesion?

Lowell Kabnick, Bernardsville, United States

Polling results

Germany 39

I am in favour of the use of venous stents as described.

Egypt 28

Yes 91% No 9%

South Africa

10

26

CX 2020 LIVE Statistics

Session 8: CX Aortic Podium 1st Thursday 18 June

489

Live views

391

On Demand views

CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 489 Live views from 63 countries.

Live views

As of the 03.07.2020

On Demand views

CX 2020 OnDemand enjoyed a huge global response with over 391 On Demand views from 64 countries.

Average viewing time

Physicians vs. industry

353

Physicians live views

136

Industry live views

316

Physicians On Demand

75

Industry On Demand

56min Live views

26min On Demand

Top 10 countries United Kingdom United States

109 90

Italy 42 Brazil 41 Spain 34 Netherlands 31 Germany 27

Audience participation This session received questions from 16 countries.

Great presentation! I can confirm that FORS works very nicely also in peripheral procedures.

Joost van Herwaarden, Utrecht, The Netherlands Would you consider correcting the position of the graft more proximally after partial deployment, or would you be concerned about retrograde Type A Dissection?

Nikos Tsilimparis, Munich, Germany

Polling results

Mexico 27

Fibre optic technology is the way forward in complex aortic repair.

Saudi Arabia

21

Yes 84% No 16%

South Africa

20

CX 2020 LIVE Statistics

11

Session 9: Acute Stroke CX Consensus Update Thursday 23 June

319

Live views

262

On Demand views

CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 319 Live views from 60 countries.

Live views

On Demand views

As of the 03.07.2020

CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 262 On Demand views from 54 countries.

Average viewing time

Physicians vs. industry

288

Physicians live views

31

Industry live views

253

Physicians On Demand

Top 10 countries United Kingdom

101

33

Mexico 23 Germany 21 Saudi Arabia

21

Italy 20 South Africa

46min

26min

Live views

On Demand

Audience participation

Brazil 38 United States

9

Industry On Demand

14

This session received questions from 16 countries.

Would it be truer to say that the variation is led by %GDP spent in health systems, rather than reimbursement?

Alison Halliday, Oxford, United Kingdom In some patients the external carotid artery can serve as a collateral supplying the ICA when the common carotid is clamped, thus increasing the risk of distal embolism. Has anyone looked at it in TCAR studies?

Pavel Kurianov, St Petersburg, Russian Federation

Polling results

Argentina 13

I agree that when operating on a carotid artery in a patient undergoing CABG, the two procedures should be done simultaneously.

Chile 13

Yes 47% No 53%

12

CX 2020 LIVE Statistics

Session 10: Juxtarenal Aneurysm CX Consensus Update Thursday 25 June

418

Live views

316

On Demand views

CX 2020 LIVE sessions enjoyed a huge global response with over 418 Live views from 59 countries.

Live views

On Demand views

As of the 03.07.2020

CX 2020 LIVE enjoyed a huge global response with over 316 On Demand views from 68 countries.

Average viewing time

Physicians vs. industry

332

Physicians live views

86

Industry live views

263

Physicians On Demand

53

Industry On Demand

46min Live views

28min On Demand

Top 10 countries United Kingdom United States

106 67

Brazil 39 Italy 37 Germany 36 Mexico 34 Saudi Arabia

21

Spain 21 South Africa

20

Audience participation This session received questions from 13 countries.

How would you compare in situ FEVAR with surgeon-modified FEVAR? Nuno Dias, MalmÜ, Sweden We know Chimneys have gutters [‌] How do you explain your excellent results? Any tips?

Marcelo Ferreira, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil

Polling results I like the idea of using inner branches.

Yes 79% No 21%

Argentina 16

CX 2020 LIVE Statistics

13

AORTIC VIENNA CLASSICAL OPEN AND ENDOVASCULAR SOLUTIONS

CARDIOVASCULAR

AORTIC ADVANCES

LIVE VIRTUAL

CONFERENCE

8–11 SEPTEMBER 2020 Founding Chair: Roger Greenhalgh

Registration open

www.cxaortic.com